Datasets:
Commit ·
a9f8353
1
Parent(s): c736d77
Initial commit.
Browse files
README.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
---
|
| 2 |
+
license: mit
|
| 3 |
+
---
|
| 4 |
+
# Summary
|
| 5 |
+
`databricks-dolly-15k` is an open source dataset of instruction-following records generated by thousnads of Databricks empoyees in several
|
| 6 |
+
of the behavioral categories outlined in the InstructGPT paper, including brainstorming, classification, closed QA, generation, information
|
| 7 |
+
extraction, open QA, and summarization.
|
| 8 |
+
|
| 9 |
+
[LEGAL]
|
| 10 |
+
This dataset is licensed for commercial use ...
|
| 11 |
+
|
| 12 |
+
# Dataset Overview
|
| 13 |
+
Databricks employees were invited to create prompt / response pairs using Google Forms in each of eight different instruction categories, including the seven
|
| 14 |
+
outlined above as well as an open-ended free-form category. Employees were instructed to avoid using information from any source on the web with
|
| 15 |
+
the exception of Wikipedia, and explicitly instructed to avoid using generative AI in formulating instructions or responses. Examples of each behavior were
|
| 16 |
+
provided to motivate the types of questions and instructions appropriate to each category.
|
| 17 |
+
|
| 18 |
+
Halfway through the data generation process, participants were given the option of answering questions posed by other employees. They were
|
| 19 |
+
asked to rephrase the original question and only select questions they could be reasonably expected to answer correctly.
|
| 20 |
+
|
| 21 |
+
For questions in the XYZ categories employees were asked to provide a reference passage copied from Wikipedia. This text may contain bracketed
|
| 22 |
+
citations which we recommend users remove for downstream applications.
|
| 23 |
+
|
| 24 |
+
# Intended Uses
|
| 25 |
+
While immediately valuable for instruction fine tuning large language models, as a corpus of human-generated instruction prompts,
|
| 26 |
+
this dataset also presents a valuable opportunity for synthetic data generation in the methods outlined in the [Self-Instruct](https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.10560) paper.
|
| 27 |
+
For example, employee-generated prompts could be submitted as few-shot examples to a large open language model to generate a corpus of millions of examples of
|
| 28 |
+
instructions in each of the respective InstructGPT categories.
|
| 29 |
+
|
| 30 |
+
Likewise, both the instructions and responses present fertile ground for data augmentation. A paraphrasing model might be used to restate each prompt or short responses, with the
|
| 31 |
+
resulting text associated to the respective ground-truth sample. Such an approach might provide a form of regularization on the dataset that could allow for
|
| 32 |
+
more robust instruction-following behavior in models derived from these synthetic datasets.
|
| 33 |
+
|
| 34 |
+
# Dataset Limitations
|
| 35 |
+
[LEGAL]
|