--- license: cc-by-4.0 language: - en task_categories: - text-generation - image-to-text tags: - newspapers - historical - ocr - glam - nineteenth-century size_categories: - 1M [!NOTE] > **Private working mirror**, not an original work. Source: **Jonno Bourne, *NCSE v2.0: A Dataset of OCR-Processed 19th Century English Newspapers*, UCL Research Data Repository, 2025.** [doi:10.5522/04/28381610.v1](https://doi.org/10.5522/04/28381610.v1) — **CC BY 4.0**. Mirrored here for analysis convenience (parquet-native loading, Dataset Viewer). All credit to the original author. The Nineteenth Century Serials Edition re-OCR'd with **Pixtral 12B**, reported at **1% median character error rate — 5× lower than the next best approach** ([paper](https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqaf151), [arXiv 2502.14901](https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.14901), [code](https://github.com/JonnoB/reading_the_unreadable)). **1,378,882 text segments** across six periodicals, **1806–1890**. | periodical | segments | |---|---| | Northern Star | 904,516 | | Leader | 271,082 | | Publishers' Circular | 98,674 | | Monthly Repository | 79,606 | | English Woman's Journal | 13,350 | | Tomahawk | 11,654 | ## Contents | path | what | |---|---| | `data/` | main OCR text, one parquet per periodical (**default config**) | | `ground_truth/` | 358 human ground-truth `.txt` files, one per text region | | `cropped_images/` | 378 region crops (`.png`) pairing with the ground truth by region id | | `bounding_boxes/` | per-region layout coordinates | | `classification/` | IPTC topic + text-type classifications per segment | | `silver_labels/` | silver IPTC / text-type label parquet | | `class_mappings/` | label id → name JSON (18 IPTC topics, 4 text types) | | `original_readme.txt` | the author's field descriptions, verbatim | **Main schema**: `issue_id · page_number · block · column · class · reading_order · content · segment_count · prompt_tokens · completion_tokens · total_tokens · box_page_id · page_id` ## ⚠️ Verified structure notes (checked 2026-08-05, not in the original docs) - **`ground_truth/` pairs with `cropped_images/`, NOT with `data/`.** All 358 GT files have a matching crop (`{issue}_page_{n}_{box}`; the GT filename adds a `_box_page_id_` infix). Together they are a **standalone OCR eval set**: run a model on the crop, score against the transcription. - **The GT does *not* join cleanly to the released text.** Only **107 of 358** GT region ids exist in `data/`, and region numbering diverges (e.g. `CLD-1852-04-24_page_6` jumps R7 → R10). **So the paper's 1% CER headline cannot be reproduced from this release** by comparing published OCR against published GT — the two were evidently produced from different segmentation runs. This is a documentation/alignment gap, *not* evidence that the OCR is poor. - GT text preserves original line breaks and end-of-line hyphenation (`perma-\nnent`); `data/` content is post-processed and de-hyphenated. Normalise before scoring. ## Why mirrored 1. **A rare high-quality historic-newspaper corpus** — most heritage OCR is far worse than 1% CER, so this is a useful *clean* reference point against noisy corpora. 2. **`ground_truth/` + `cropped_images/` form a real paired eval set** (image crop ↔ human transcription) for 19th-c English newsprint — scarce, and directly usable for calibrating OCR-quality metrics. 3. It was published only to a university repository with **zero Hub presence**, so it is invisible to the ML ecosystem despite being CC BY. **Original page images** are held by King's College London (Monthly Repository, Northern Star, Leader, English Woman's Journal, Tomahawk, Publishers' Circular) and are *not* included here. ## Citation ```bibtex @misc{bourne_ncse_v2, author = {Bourne, Jonno}, title = {{NCSE v2.0}: A Dataset of {OCR}-Processed 19th Century English Newspapers}, year = {2025}, publisher = {UCL Research Data Repository}, doi = {10.5522/04/28381610.v1} } ```