dirtycomputer/Wikipedia_Talk_Labels · Datasets at Hugging Face

rev_id int64 37.7k 700M	comment stringlengths 5 10k	year int64 2k 2.02k	logged_in bool 2 classes	ns stringclasses 2 values	sample stringclasses 2 values	split stringclasses 3 values	attack bool 2 classes
661,011,500	` Khamar. I would like to disambiguate Justin Herman from the other one on Wikipedia, and need help working out that nobody will know there is an ``M.`` in M. Justin Herman. Also, can you tell me what happened to my user page? I've been working on wikipedia sice 2005 and had been keeping track of the pages I started, and now I can't find the user page where I was keeping this info.`	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
661,011,768	` == M. Justin Herman == Khamar. I would like to disambiguate Justin Herman from the other one on Wikipedia, and need help working out the problem that nobody will know there is an ``M.`` in M. Justin Herman. Also, can you tell me what happened to my user page? I've been working on wikipedia sice 2005 and had been keeping track of the pages I started, and now I can't find the user page where I was keeping this info.`	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
661,018,299	` ::::Well the CBR source also provides the clarification on what Veronica actually is. Per the fact in that source: ``A satellite in low orbit is always around Banner and at a moment’s notice, Tony Stark can deploy the Hulkbuster armor, get into it and stop the Hulk in his tracks.`` Having this clarifies that Veronica is the name of the deployment system as well as possibly the containment unit that surrounds the Hulk. By just using the Marvel source, we would only be confirming the armor name, not really what Veronica is. - `	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
661,019,904	` :OK, i informed relevant wikiprojects. Will see what will people say. I think that it is important to say that legally it was not the assembly that proclaimed independence. `	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
661,023,067	: 1951-1994 was the period he was the Rebbe of the Lubavich movement. That is what sets this period apart, and therefore I think that is what should be in the header, rather than some activities like 'Outreach, spiritual and political campaigns'.	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
661,025,185	chickenshit vikie-addict. you are a liar about your service. you are not missed.	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	true
661,029,373	::::::::I'm not fucking arguing for inclusion stringently , I just said it was notable then I left it. Do you think your behaviour is WP:CIVIL? :::::::: - are you saying I'm for or against UKIP in your paranoid mind? I cannot believe you have the brass neck to post the link to my contributions and blatantly lie that they are 'all geared around the May elections'. I have created several pages not related to the election and the majority of my contributions are NOT election related.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	true
661,033,882	== Infobox == Should we keep the old infobox as less parties have seats here (ie Respect, UKIP, SDLP, SNP, Sinn Fein, DUP, Green etc) and keep the new infobox for the main UK election article?	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
661,034,522	'What makes you think I give a fuck about your political leanings?' - er, you questioned them by saying 'this user seems to be on a campaign trial on behalf of UKIP' Why is it non-notable trivia? Why did the media cover it then? Why is it a 'drive-by' to add sourced material to the article? Is this article yours? How does it having nothing to do with Brady when he himself made the comments? *Why couldn't you just be decent about it? Why all the swearing and accusations?	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	true
661,036,434	::Ironically, I know more about WP:CIVIL, WP:AGF and WP:BITE than many others. You guys don't really like new editors that much, do you? By the way, are you saying we wait three months for everything? 2011 England riots? September 11 attacks?	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
661,039,696	::::::What about the other, ruder, more aggressive editor?	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
661,048,357	== How much abuse? == How much abuse and foul language do I have to put up with, whilst administrators excuse and justify the other editors contact? Yet you criticise me for the most minor insult 'smart alec'	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	true
661,049,097	== Closure of case == Can I ask why you closed the case without action and without enforcing policies? The precedent is now clear.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
661,050,094	== Yet more problems with your edit summaries == Hi. You won't remember but you blocked me around twelve months ago for the (many many times fully earned) things I said about a certain editor. The only solution is for me to attract as much attention as possible. I'll keep doing it (the hopefully very insulting edit summaries) while 's behaviour is the way it is. So Please get ready to block me again.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
661,057,071	May 2015 (UTC) :::::Absolutely! Now if only this invertebrate could figure out which appendages to use the armholes for... 05:20, 6	2,015	true	user	random	test	false
661,058,420	Looks like I could use some backup on getting a macron into malāsana on the mālāsana page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:M%C4%81l%C4%81sana#Pronounciation_and_spelling	2,015	true	user	random	dev	false
661,059,855	` ::: He is now unblocked. I guess it was a better idea to AGF. • • Log) `	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
661,062,499	==Musaybeen is now under Mujahideen (The Opposition) control == The Syrian Army (Regime) defense line was collapsed. The Regime forces retreated to Ariha. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdyxE7P9p40&feature;=youtu.be Buthaina hill was captured by the Opposition: http://wikimapia.org/#lang=tr&lat;=35.830792&lon;=36.641250&z;=15&m;=b https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-SoGMHgiEoA&feature;=youtu.be After liberation of Buthaina hill: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bLPbrCFHnyc	2,015	false	article	blocked	test	false
661,070,716	`Hello, Romeo mikay, and welcome to Wikipedia! While efforts to improve Wikipedia are always welcome, unfortunately your contributions are not written in English that is good enough to be useful. You appear to be more familiar with Russian; did you know there is a Russian Wikipedia? You may prefer to contribute there instead. In any case, welcome to the project, and thank you for your efforts! Добро пожаловать! Здравствуйте, Romeo mikay! Добро пожаловать в Википедию! Хотя мы и приветствуем попытки улучшения Википедии, к сожалению, Ваши правки сделаны на английском, уровень которого недостаточен для действительно полезного вклада. Кажется, Вы лучше владеете русским; знаете ли Вы о существовании русской Википедии? Возможно, Вы предпочтёте вносить вклад в её развитие. В любом случае, добро пожаловать в проект и спасибо за усилия! `	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
661,072,831	: Hahaha. Thanks	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
661,073,411	::Thanks, after four or more years of this behaviour by this editor it seems my only defence is to make a fuss - which I am trying to do. Thanks,	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
661,082,800	===nick jonas=== we rock is also featured on joe jonas discography. on the soundtrack the are creditet as cast of camp rock. not as jonas brothers	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
661,085,926	` ::: Your idea that other encyclopedias ``cut her some slack`` is a risible reflection of your view of the world and little else. I'm confident that if Graeme Wood (journalist) chose to publish an autobiography under the name Graeme C.A. Wood and if he met other encyclopedia's criteria for inclusion then other encyclopedias would use his initials in his name to achieve encyclopedic register for their article title. Because Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion are lower than other encyclopedias (which is a good thing), we require that the name be commonly used in addition to being in an encyclopedic register. Encyclopedic register is a scholarly register that does not fall along the informal/formal spectrum for human names, and autobiographies carry huge weight in determining encyclopedic register due to their uniquely self-citing author/subject identity in library science. So, if Graeme Wood published an autobiography under the name Graeme C.A. Wood but that name did not achieve much common use (according to the tools we like to use), the requirement for encyclopedic register and common usage would conflict with each other, and we would most likely still stick with Graeme Wood as our title under current policy. If the man published an autobiography with his initials and if his name with his initials was also in common use, then we would (or at least should) use his encyclopedic autobiography-name as our article title even if the tools we like showed the result that this was the less commonly used name while still being a commonly used name. I appreciate your admission that you're not entirely sure what is meant by encyclopedic register, and I believe you. I hope you can find it within yourself to cut some slack to editors at Wikipedia who do understand it. Wikipedia's title name policy is overly simple in the sense that it lumps many requirements and ideas into the concept of encyclopedic register and trusts that editors will understand what that is and what it requires. If you want to prevent Wikipedia from being an encyclopedia, removing that phrase from that policy should be part of your plan. Removing ideas that you don't understand may be easier for you than trying to understand them. Instead of taking that course, I hope you have another look at the section below, reread my comments above about Mr. Wood's article's title, and keep trying to understand how all parts of the policy WP:COMMONNAME can be met by a Hillary Rodham Clinton article. `	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
661,098,177	== Map == Great map. But I would like to know why the ends of the abandoned portion are indicated with hatched color rather than solid. PurpleChez 5/6/15	2,015	false	article	random	dev	false
661,118,601	` ::I agree with User:The Magnificent Clean-keeper, no NPOV source has been presented for the ``controversial`` claim. SPLC tracks all hate groups in the USA, including Islamic ones, such as the Nation of Islam. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
661,122,214	== STOP PROPAGANDA == You should be ashamed of yourselves! The formal name is FYROM, as it is on UN charta!Stop propaganda and misrepresentation of history.	2,015	false	article	blocked	dev	false
661,127,393	It's been a week since the first proposed move. How much time does it generally take an administrator to change to the appropriate title?	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
661,140,979	` == A barnstar for you! == {\| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` \|rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` \| \|style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;`` \| The Special Barnstar \|- \|style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` \| The Special Barnstar is awarded to a user as a gesture of appreciation when there is no other barnstar which would be appropriate.A Leftist; a devoted Wikipedian; a sense of humour; knowledge and intelligence without arrogance…Well, you are simply an all-round good egg. \|}`	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
661,154,317	I am not a sock puppet!	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
661,158,020	Log back into my original account, this is my original account! Oh I just love this bit - User talk:GiantSnowman[edit source] From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Archives 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Contents [hide] 1 I'm surprised it's taken me this long to notice I'm surprised it's taken me this long to notice[edit source] but this editor is obviously this indefblocked editor. Apart from similarity of interests, their edit summary is unmistakable. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 8:02 pm, Today (UTC+1) Well very observant of you - you're unbelievable! Okay so there are similar interests shared between myself and User Pablo is that a crime, does that automatically give you an incentive to ahead and immediately block my account no! Right so one user isn't allowed to share interests of another user ... you are way in over your head because what happens if there are some twins that register an account on here ... if they share similarities between each other (music), writing style etc. and one becomes a problem user but the other is the complete opposite you are then telling me that you will block the GOOD twin (from a Wikipedia point of view to spite the vandal twin) - now you have done that you have alienated this user from Wikipedia, and the better twin not only resents Wikipedia but they have also lost all faith in the encyclopedia and will NOT be recommending its services to his / her friends! Another scenario could be that a friend or relative has seen how the account user writes and has decided to hack into their account and perform some very inappropriate edits under that person's username ... meanwhile the owner of the account is completely oblivious to this and only when they log in or just take a look at their user talk page find that they have been either issued a warning (s) or have been BLOCKED for something they did NOT do as a result of the nastiness caused by the vandal (hacker), the person that has USED their account to create problems with other users and to ultimately get them in a lot of trouble with the Wikipedia Community.	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
661,179,900	== Question == You really seem to want to keep all WP:FRINGE books about 'curing' and 'preventing' homosexuality, even very poor and non-notable books. Any particular reason?	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
661,183,195	::It is poor because it was written by a non-notable individual and seems to fail WP:NBOOK, WP:FRINGE, WP:UNDUE and WP:GNG.	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
661,197,399	especially your reversion of your unconstructive edit	2,015	true	user	random	test	false
661,198,172	:Like our Moon, Triton was a dwarf planet until it entered into orbit around Neptune. Moons are not currently accepted as planets.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
661,210,119	` UNPRODUCTIVE SUICIDE ATTEMPTS or why the word ``PRACTISED`` is not the case of Lubitz's earlier actions. Very often people who intend to commit suicide have had many interrupted attempts to do it when ``suicidal impulse`` is not strong enough to overcome ``natural fear`` and ``resistance of rational thought``. For example, people trying to commit suicide with a gun often put the weapon to their head and then they interrupt this action moments before they pull the trigger. Viewed from the side, those unsuccessful suicide attempts are like theatrical act but this is just an illusion because every such attempt has the potential to end tragically. In the case of Lubitz - in the situation in which he intended to carry out his suicide there are several circumstances that limit his freedom of choice to interrupt the suicidal attempt - such as ``returning of the Captain`` or ``what you are doing in the cabin?!``. These circumstances can force his unproductive suicide attempts to became productive one in any moment and he knows that after them he will have no choice to turn back. For this reason it is ``normal`` he to do first timid attempts - which were unsuccessful in the first flight ``Duesseldorf to Barcelona`` because time is not limited. On his return back ``Barcelona to Duesseldorf`` the end destination is forcing him. As I said he has not ``PRACTISED`` but was ``TRYING`` to commit suicide or in other words - he had unproductive suicide attempt. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
661,230,813	\| decline = Unblock requests that contain personal attacks are not considered.	2,015	true	user	random	test	false
661,250,845	:::::::::The overall tone of the article is a smear campaign against Walt. Per WP:BLP, the Satlof and Hitchens gratuitous insults should be removed.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
661,255,554	== Wikipedia becomes Hate-o-pedia == This article read more like a outlet for hate speech than an encyclopedia article. If you are going to include quotes of long rants from the leaders of hate groups, you should at least be including some views of non-hate groups as well to get some balance.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
661,285,152	:::Debatable. Dwarf planet Theia failed to clear Earth from its orbit.	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
661,306,411	::This must be the worst and most selective incident of selective and biased enforcement of all time.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
661,308,971	` == Suggest renaming == This article is (as currently written) really about the prospective effects of global warming on humans, not the general effects of climate change. An article as broadly titled as this on the ``effects of climate change`` would have to speak about climate changes generally. These would perforce include historic ``effects of climate change`` such as the Little Ice Age, the Roman Warming Period, Ice Ages, etc. We could include such historic climate effects here, but given the thrust of the article it would probably be best just to do a renaming. `	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
661,326,669	` ::::Look here - the admin closed as not abusive enough - what is it I did? 1.This user undid my edit, with an edit summary 'no I don't think so' which seems to breach WP:ESDONTS namely don't 'Make snide comments' or 'Be aggressive' 2.I tried to discuss at User talk:Cassianto but the user was again rather condescending and seemed to be ganging up on me with other users he already knows 3.When discussion began on at Talk:Moors murders, I simply put 'I think it is notable enough for a single line' - however, Cassianto replied 'Then you need to look up the definition of ``notable``, clearly.' (Ignoring WP:NNC) I believe this breaches WP:CIVIL - when I indicated the editor should read WP:CIVIL they replied 'I did once, and I vowed never to read it again' 4.It is breathtaking the way some editors feel policies don't apply to them. I was not rude to the editor, but I was treated in a condescending and arrogant manner over a very minor matter The user then preceded to launch a very abusive and malicious attack on me. He linked my 710 contributions [166] and entirely falsely wrote 'Not so ridiculous when you look at his contributions which seem to be all geared around the May elections. This user seems to be on a campaign trial on behalf of UKIP'. This is called blatantly misleading other editors, surely in violation of policies such as WP:AGF, WP:BITE, WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA. I have nothing to do with UKIP. I am not a member of any political party. I am not enrolled to vote in the United Kingdom. So these are ludicrous allegations. I have created 21 pages, 16 non-related to the elections. Articles I have created such as Endorsements in the United Kingdom general election, 2015 are very important and been widely edited and viewed. I have also created articles such as United Kingdom general election, 2015 (Wales) in accordance with precedent. I have worked hard on the project for good and in good faith. Examples: List of European Union member states by GDP growth and Mr Galloway Goes to Washington. I have successfully nominated dozens of articles for speedy deletion. As a new editor, I am deeply upset by how hard it is to edit this site without abuse and being treated like a moron (WP:BITE). It certainly is not encouraging for those wanting to make a difference in good faith. Nothing at WP:SPA points to me. 5.The editor has breached multiple policies. Editor still going. He has written now 'What makes you think I give a fuck about your political leanings?' (despite questioning them) and removed the ANI notification remarking 'what a waste of time'. What is the point of WP:CIVIL, WP:AGF, WP:NPA, WP:BITE? What did I say that was uncivil? Mellowed Fillmore said 'It is my view that AusLondonder is clearly not here to build an encyclopedia. He is likely to remain a problematic editor and I'm not sure that any more patience needs to be shown' - yet I have created 27 pages including Endorsements in the United Kingdom general election, 2015 and List of European Union member states by GDP growth. How can they possibly say that with your agreement? I will address each other point at the ANI if you wish. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
661,328,258	::So it's not abusive to say 'fucking', 'fuck', 'bullshit', accuse of WP:SPA accuse of breaching WP:SPA but what I did deserves a ban? Look here The admin said this abuse did not even deserve a warning - yet my conduct deserve a block this is utterly unbelievable.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	true
661,345,227	` == Double-voting in AfDs == An editor is firmly insistent that he also gets to vote in an AfD he submitted. (On the slight, I think, chance I'm actually wrong about this — I did it myself on one of my very first AfDs and was jumped on for doing it — I haven't argued the matter further there.) `	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
661,370,798	` :::It is known as Innate Intelligence. `	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
661,412,869	::::::::::: Or, indeed, why the Asian-ness of someone is of any interest. We're people, people. -	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
661,413,411	== Merci Beaucoup == A very kind thank you, Geraldine.	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
661,433,078	I will restore the refs and edit to emphasis AFP's role and de-emphasis Block's role per your comments. Please look at it and discuss before paragraph blanking and deleting reliable sources. That no federal prison time resulted from this episode is irrelevant; coverage in major news outlets means it is due weight here. Thank you again.	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
661,436,062	SUPPOSING I WANT TO CLEAN UP MY ACT AND VOW TO NEVER SWEAR NO MATTER HOW IDIOTIC THE SITUATION IS EVER AGAIN, CAN'T CAN I ACCOUNT CREATION BLOCKED ... WHY DON'T YOU BELIEVE IN A CHANGE OF FORTUNE!? GIVE PEACE A CHANCE!	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
661,436,460	== all allied pigdogs deserve death in Auschwitz == fuck entente	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	true
661,445,985	Steve Pound is a good MP. Two pages is what he deserves.	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
661,448,732	May 2015 (UTC) :Again vandalizing Giorgio Chiellini, please stop, this is your second warning. 18:34, 8	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
661,450,388	I am extremly sorry for vandalising Wikipedia. Please forgive me C.Fred and aGastya. I was only being fun with this but it turned out to be more than fun. I will now edit on wikipedia properly.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
661,451,136	===Footnote addded=== I added a footnote for historical analysis of Grant's controversial General Order No. 11. I included Smith analysis in the footnote...It is up to other editors if Smith's views should be included in the paragraph mentioning Grant's order...I believe any historical views should be in the footnote to be neutral rather then only have one historians view in the article narration.	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
661,464,823	== 093 SSN == Hello Thomas. W. Thank you for your edit on 093 SSN article. Please protect the page from RevolvingPeronalConduct. He always vandalize the page. I will also be more careful when I edit. Jon	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
661,483,561	` Another quote: ``...and their engines normally (!) drive a continuous track or tracks at the rear.```	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
661,483,689	Haha, seriously?! xD WHERE is there a personal attack in my last message?! WHERE? ) Hilaroius.	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
661,484,002	Pity you.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
661,484,299	The invented the Stereoscope (!!!) you stupid piece of shit. )	2,015	false	user	blocked	test	true
661,484,454	They never developed a stereo camera.	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
661,485,892	Ok, without personal attacks: They never developed stereo cameras, just stereoscopes. )	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
661,493,203	== How come you never block Judeophobes? Why do you only block Jews? == Are you a Muslim?	2,015	false	user	blocked	dev	false
661,522,825	` == Battle of Rajasthan == While I am pleased the article has been retained (since I !voted Keep), I'm curious about the ``No Consensus`` conclusion when the !vote was about 15 to Keep versus about a half-dozen to Delete (discounting the nom's second vote in the survey). From this noticeboard discussion, the canvassing appears to have been on the Delete side (which means that if his friends are discounted, the !vote is more like 15 to 2 or 1. — Unless there was some Keep-canvassing on the other wise that I don't know about, could you change the result to a clear Keep rather than no-con? (That way the delete-minded won't be able to make any ``It could barely hang on the last time!`` arguments in future AfDs.) `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
661,524,538	For God's sake, will someone with an elementary knowledge of arithmetic please fix that stupid majority of 8 nonsense? There are 650 seats. The Tories have 331. Therefore, everyone else has 650-331=319. Therefore, the Tories have a majority of 331-319=12, that's TWELVE. Please don't go into the issue of Sinn Fein not swearing allegiance (which makes the Tories' effective majority equal to 16). Let's try to get over this elementary hurdle first. While we're at it, Prime Ministers ARE NOT ELECTED in the Westminster system. Individual MPs are elected and as a result, The Prime Minister does or does not continue in office.	2,015	false	article	random	test	false
661,527,095	== Please... == You don't need to punish ME because YOU have severe insecurities...	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
661,527,311	` == The essence does not belong to the lead == The essence of Pigenhole principle is to obscure the basic trivial principle, ``maximum ≥ average``. Yet, this remark was removed from the intro with a note that it belongs to somewhere else. I do not understand why short and valuable simplification of the definition belongs somewhere else and, furthermore, doesn't Wikipedia prescribe to keep simple definitions for the general population with prefer add/rewirte over remove rule? Is there such rule? Why materials are always removed in the first place, even faithful and valuable ones? `	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
661,529,704	` Another random member who doesn't even edit any of the New York City Subway articles, nor knows nothing about the New York City Subway itself. Yeah, thanks for your ``unnecessarily hostile`` comment at that sockpuppet's page. Sit down and watch how I myself edit. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
661,556,067	*Support WP:CONCISE and unambiguous. (We could hatnote to the video game character, though that seems a fairly trivial usage.) It's not our place to police whether this guy chose a good screen name or not.	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
661,557,973	And I will add it back again as it is true	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
661,562,851	::You're pathetic.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	true
661,564,268	:http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi?sstr=9078;cad=1 is a main-belt asteroid and does not come anywhere near Earth.	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
661,565,096	2015 === Do we want any image of Nemesis, when Nemesis is not real? Depicting Nemesis as a generic star seems worthless to me. =	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
661,584,908	, and Far-right Yishai vows a vote for him helps PM. These are clearly references to Yishai and the party he founded	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
661,594,949	== InfoBox Image == Can we get another picture posted in the InfoBox because the one that's there now is just horrible. She looks like the poster child for death. I mean no offense but jeeze.	2,015	false	article	blocked	dev	false
661,613,140	You know what? Don't offend other users , you are a jerk! I know you are correct, but you don't have to get so angry about it.	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
661,613,227	\|San Mateo Public Library	2,015	false	user	blocked	test	false
661,613,405	You need to say sorry to all the fellow Wikipedians you offended!	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
661,613,649	You are very dumb because you offend other users you mother fucker!	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	true
661,635,861	==What happened to the parlay== So apparently both Napoleon and Louverture wanted to talk things over. But nothing is written about this	2,015	false	article	blocked	test	false
661,660,979	`*Comment: While BeastBoy has pushed the limit with four reverts in a 24hr period, I will defend him in noting that one of those was to rescind a vandalistic edit that another editor had restored. ( Please keep an eye on the clock, my fellow man!) `	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
661,664,112	` == Closing merger discussions at that troublesome article == At Talk:Rape jihad, could we get the ``Proposed merge`` and ``Proposed title`` threads ``blue-box`` closed (as the proposals are highly contentious, meaning no merge or move can proceed on the basis of !voting)? Their existence is enabling a couple of the still-unblocked disruptive editors to keep hatting the article with multiple-issue tag-pollution. Thanks in advance. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
661,665,657	` ::No sweat. I'll tab it and ping you tomorrow if you're still asleep come sundown. ) `	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
661,665,935	::If there's a redirect in the way you can use Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests. They're usually pretty quick about responding to requests there. Cheers. -	2,015	true	user	random	test	false
661,672,939	== Image == The image here is permissible to use . There is more than enough proof here to maintain that it is indeed Godane and portrays the person who it is intended to portray. As per the sources cited by , () the onus of proof is on anyone else to provide sources which discredit the POV held by the United States State Department, BBC, Reuters and CNN that the image is Godane. The fact that the image is featured on the Rewards for Justice website is already adequate enough proof, the U.S State Department being one of the most premier sources for counter-terrorism. This is no stab in the dark. It's not like this image has been randomly found on the internet with the caption 'Ahmed Abdi Godane' below it. Reputable sources state that the image is Godane, as per WP:V. If you challenge this assertion, either cite some sources which explicitly disprove this or deal with it. It is as simple as that.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
661,676,844	Hello Thank You for reply . Please check the article Govind Kumar Singh all important information content is removed from article by single user. If you check previous history of this article same user has changed this article so many time . This person have some person issue with this article . please guide me how to deal with it ?	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
661,681,962	== Blockbuster LLC- significant removal of information and damage to article == Hi, In this edit, you removed a significant amount of information relating to the Japanese and Peruvian operations. I'm assuming that this was a mistake on your part, but please take care when editing in future- this caused significant damage to the article that might not otherwise have been spotted if I hadn't been looking for something else at the time.	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
661,688,096	` == lord Shiva for Featured article == ==lord Shiva for Featured article == I just see many important features relating to the topic was missing, including a small description and link to Maha Shivaratri . I would like to give my points here.Undoubtedly lord Shiva is linked to all sections and regions of the Indian society.There are great works relating to lord Shiva in many languages. Remember he is pre vedic god, immensely popular among tribes later on included in the Vedas. If the page depicts what is in popular culture it will be a great source and the page should become ``Featured Article``. I feel there is discrimination of users writing from Tamil / Malayalam / Kannada even Hindi perspective. Sanskrit has its own credits, it is unique and as the name suggests it is ``well written``. I have written 4 articles on them. But it gets defamed by wrong promoters who make it mess up with other languages / claiming other linguistic works. My article was edited because i mentioned the name of the god in ``Tamil``?. Those who deleted them know whether Sanskrit and Tamil both used same script once before Sanskrit stuck to Devanagari script )? [User:Redtigerxyz\|Redtigerxyz]] Include Malayalam scripture works on ``Ayyappa`` please don't completely ignore them. I will give more details for my writings with explanations on sources later for your views. Shiva is linked deeply in Kannada, Maratha and Telugu traditions too, but very less representations in the page. And when it comes to lord shiva and muruga, you just cannot ignore Tamil if you have developed hat redness for the language. Include details what is popular among different peoples rather than quoting just Vedas. can you please give your views?`	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
661,688,856	` ==lord Shiva for Featured article == I just see many important features relating to the topic was missing, including a small description and link to Maha Shivaratri . I would like to give my points here.Undoubtedly lord Shiva is linked to all sections and regions of the Indian society.There are great works relating to lord Shiva in many languages. Remember he is pre vedic god, immensely popular among tribes later on included in the Vedas. If the page depicts what is in popular culture it will be a great source and the page should become ``Featured Article``. I feel there is discrimination of users writing from Tamil / Malayalam / Kannada even Hindi perspective. Sanskrit has its own credits, it is unique and as the name suggests it is ``well written``. I have written 4 articles on them. But it gets defamed by wrong promoters who make it mess up with other languages / claiming other linguistic works. My article was edited because i mentioned the name of the god in ``Tamil``?. Those who deleted them know whether Sanskrit and Tamil both used same script once before Sanskrit stuck to Devanagari script )? [User:Redtigerxyz\|Redtigerxyz]] Include Malayalam scripture works on ``Ayyappa`` please don't completely ignore them. I will give more details for my writings with explanations on sources later for your views. Shiva is linked deeply in Kannada, Maratha and Telugu traditions too, but very less representations in the page. And when it comes to lord shiva and muruga, you just cannot ignore Tamil if you have developed hat redness for the language. Include details what is popular among different peoples rather than quoting just Vedas. can you please give your views?`	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
661,689,350	== Request for review of editing history of Article Govind Kumar Singh == : Hello could you review of article Govind Kumar Singh revisions ? One single user has removed all references from article . Please check the revision history . User has edited article many times and its vandalism . Please do needful . Thank	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
661,744,905	Hi, I have seen and I know what I should do . I have added only facts with proper references . I just want to help article make more informative by adding these information . I request you don't remove anything from article . If feel any content need to remove please discuss at talk page . We will find out solution . I have seen this page editing history and seems you have personal issue with this article . You have removed all information and references . Please check Wikipedia editing guidelines for your reference .	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
661,748,588	:: You have removed this information He is listed in top 50 designers in India.http://www.jdinstitute.com/famous-fashion-designers-in-india.html which was given with reference . Do you think JD Institute put wrong information on their website ? and why they will put wrong information ? You simply removed and mentioned comment is revision history designer himself made this list . So funny . You are senior editor I appreciate if you avoid this kind of edits .	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
661,749,600	ERROR: type should be string, got " https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Govind_Kumar_Singh&diff;=next&oldid;=661667234 In this edit what citation do you need ?? Do you think all these links are wrong ? "	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
661,751,564	http://infobharti.com/indian-fashion-industry/govind-kumar-singh-indian-fashion-designer.php http://fashionfad.in/category/designer-biography/page/14/ http://www.99celebs.in/fashion-designers/govind-kumar-singh.html http://www.metromela.com/indian-fashion-designers/ Do you think these all websites has substantial content ?? For your kind information these all websites are reliable . You have removed all these sources from article my hard work . Why you want to remove all these information ?	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
661,752,286	:: Admin Please note this edit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Govind_Kumar_Singh&diff;=next&oldid;=661667842 NIFT annual report is there for reference but these information was removed ? why ? and how ? I am also giving you link for reference here - http://www.nift.ac.in/Downloads/annualreport_13_14.pdf	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
661,753,319	:: HE was appointed as coordinator for IFBM programme and this was there in article with reference link is here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Govind_Kumar_Singh&diff;=next&oldid;=661668418 he removed . here is reference http://www.nift.ac.in/Downloads/ce_brochure_29may.pdf this was impotent . Which was removed by him . I appreciate if you please discuss before removing anything . It is really tedious to find reliable sources to improve any article . It really hurts when people like you say editing or adding content is promotion of someone and their is some interest . For your kind information I am volunteer , but you seems bias when I look this article history . I request Admins to look on to this matter and do needful .	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
661,756,226	\|decline=I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or the block is no longer necessary because you :#understand what you have been blocked for, :#will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and :#will make useful contributions instead. Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. }}	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
661,760,014	Looks like a binge of support. Fine RFA!	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
661,762,410	What exactly was it promoting? It was informational and a start. A lot more was going to be added. Everyone calling me a local celeb is inaccurate and incorrect. Most of my traffic comes from different states as well as different countries. I don't understand why I'm being attacked there are way more things on Wikipedia that need removal. I am not using Wikipedia in a destructive way. I actually did not make the page nor did anyone I know. Someone from the Wikipedia community made it. How do you expect others to succeed when peers are constantly pulling one another down? Who can authorize this since everyone that has a hand in taking it down doesn't have the power to put it back?	2,015	true	user	random	test	false
661,781,036	:: I'm sorry but mistakes need to be pointed out in this matter, and we need to use official numbers here, and this is also relevant for other editors. We are all a little guilty, sorry if i made a to strong remark, thanks for your reply.	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
661,791,295	I re-wrote 2 of your AfDs because you were asking for numbered asteroid deletions when NASTRO makes it clear you should be asking for a re-directs when dealing with asteroids. As soon as you complained, I quit. Is is now you writing character assassinations of me. I will write it off to semantics. But supporters asking for a numbered asteroid to be deleted are not complying WP:NASTRO / WP:DWMP.	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false

661,011,500

` Khamar. I would like to disambiguate Justin Herman from the other one on Wikipedia, and need help working out that nobody will know there is an ``M.`` in M. Justin Herman. Also, can you tell me what happened to my user page? I've been working on wikipedia sice 2005 and had been keeping track of the pages I started, and now I can't find the user page where I was keeping this info.`

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

661,011,768

` == M. Justin Herman == Khamar. I would like to disambiguate Justin Herman from the other one on Wikipedia, and need help working out the problem that nobody will know there is an ``M.`` in M. Justin Herman. Also, can you tell me what happened to my user page? I've been working on wikipedia sice 2005 and had been keeping track of the pages I started, and now I can't find the user page where I was keeping this info.`

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

661,018,299

` ::::Well the CBR source also provides the clarification on what Veronica actually is. Per the fact in that source: ``A satellite in low orbit is always around Banner and at a moment’s notice, Tony Stark can deploy the Hulkbuster armor, get into it and stop the Hulk in his tracks.`` Having this clarifies that Veronica is the name of the deployment system as well as possibly the containment unit that surrounds the Hulk. By just using the Marvel source, we would only be confirming the armor name, not really what Veronica is. - `

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

661,019,904

` :OK, i informed relevant wikiprojects. Will see what will people say. I think that it is important to say that legally it was not the assembly that proclaimed independence. `

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

661,023,067

: 1951-1994 was the period he was the Rebbe of the Lubavich movement. That is what sets this period apart, and therefore I think that is what should be in the header, rather than some activities like 'Outreach, spiritual and political campaigns'.

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

661,025,185

chickenshit vikie-addict. you are a liar about your service. you are not missed.

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

true

661,029,373

::::::::I'm not *fucking* arguing for inclusion stringently , I just said it was notable then I left it. Do you think your behaviour is WP:CIVIL? :::::::: - are you saying I'm for or against UKIP in your paranoid mind? I cannot believe you have the brass neck to post the link to my contributions and blatantly lie that they are 'all geared around the May elections'. I have created several pages not related to the election and the majority of my contributions are NOT election related.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

true

661,033,882

== Infobox == Should we keep the old infobox as less parties have seats here (ie Respect, UKIP, SDLP, SNP, Sinn Fein, DUP, Green etc) and keep the new infobox for the main UK election article?

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

661,034,522

*'What makes you think I give a fuck about your political leanings?' - er, you questioned them by saying 'this user seems to be on a campaign trial on behalf of UKIP' *Why is it non-notable trivia? Why did the media cover it then? *Why is it a 'drive-by' to add sourced material to the article? Is this article yours? *How does it having nothing to do with Brady when he himself made the comments? *Why couldn't you just be decent about it? Why all the swearing and accusations?

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

true

661,036,434

::Ironically, I know more about WP:CIVIL, WP:AGF and WP:BITE than many others. You guys don't really like new editors that much, do you? By the way, are you saying we wait three months for everything? 2011 England riots? September 11 attacks?

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

661,039,696

::::::What about the other, ruder, more aggressive editor?

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

661,048,357

== How much abuse? == How much abuse and foul language do I have to put up with, whilst administrators excuse and justify the other editors contact? Yet you criticise me for the most minor insult 'smart alec'

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

true

661,049,097

== Closure of case == Can I ask why you closed the case without action and without enforcing policies? The precedent is now clear.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

661,050,094

== Yet more problems with your edit summaries == Hi. You won't remember but you blocked me around twelve months ago for the (many many times fully earned) things I said about a certain editor. The only solution is for me to attract as much attention as possible. I'll keep doing it (the hopefully very insulting edit summaries) while 's behaviour is the way it is. So Please get ready to block me again.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

661,057,071

May 2015 (UTC) :::::Absolutely! Now if only this invertebrate could figure out which appendages to use the armholes for... 05:20, 6

2,015

true

user

random

test

false

661,058,420

Looks like I could use some backup on getting a macron into malāsana on the mālāsana page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:M%C4%81l%C4%81sana#Pronounciation_and_spelling

2,015

true

user

random

dev

false

661,059,855

` ::: He is now unblocked. I guess it was a better idea to AGF. • • Log) `

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

661,062,499

==Musaybeen is now under Mujahideen (The Opposition) control == The Syrian Army (Regime) defense line was collapsed. The Regime forces retreated to Ariha. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdyxE7P9p40&feature;=youtu.be Buthaina hill was captured by the Opposition: http://wikimapia.org/#lang=tr&lat;=35.830792&lon;=36.641250&z;=15&m;=b https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-SoGMHgiEoA&feature;=youtu.be After liberation of Buthaina hill: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bLPbrCFHnyc

2,015

false

article

blocked

test

false

661,070,716

`Hello, Romeo mikay, and welcome to Wikipedia! While efforts to improve Wikipedia are always welcome, unfortunately your contributions are not written in English that is good enough to be useful. You appear to be more familiar with Russian; did you know there is a Russian Wikipedia? You may prefer to contribute there instead. In any case, welcome to the project, and thank you for your efforts! Добро пожаловать! Здравствуйте, Romeo mikay! Добро пожаловать в Википедию! Хотя мы и приветствуем попытки улучшения Википедии, к сожалению, Ваши правки сделаны на английском, уровень которого недостаточен для действительно полезного вклада. Кажется, Вы лучше владеете русским; знаете ли Вы о существовании русской Википедии? Возможно, Вы предпочтёте вносить вклад в её развитие. В любом случае, добро пожаловать в проект и спасибо за усилия! `

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

661,072,831

: Hahaha. Thanks

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

661,073,411

::Thanks, after four or more years of this behaviour by this editor it seems my only defence is to make a fuss - which I am trying to do. Thanks,

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

661,082,800

===nick jonas=== we rock is also featured on joe jonas discography. on the soundtrack the are creditet as cast of camp rock. not as jonas brothers

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

661,085,926

` ::: Your idea that other encyclopedias ``cut her some slack`` is a risible reflection of your view of the world and little else. I'm confident that if Graeme Wood (journalist) chose to publish an autobiography under the name Graeme C.A. Wood and if he met other encyclopedia's criteria for inclusion then other encyclopedias would use his initials in his name to achieve encyclopedic register for their article title. Because Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion are lower than other encyclopedias (which is a good thing), we require that the name be commonly used in addition to being in an encyclopedic register. Encyclopedic register is a scholarly register that does not fall along the informal/formal spectrum for human names, and autobiographies carry huge weight in determining encyclopedic register due to their uniquely self-citing author/subject identity in library science. So, if Graeme Wood published an autobiography under the name Graeme C.A. Wood but that name did not achieve much common use (according to the tools we like to use), the requirement for encyclopedic register and common usage would conflict with each other, and we would most likely still stick with Graeme Wood as our title under current policy. If the man published an autobiography with his initials and if his name with his initials was also in common use, then we would (or at least should) use his encyclopedic autobiography-name as our article title even if the tools we like showed the result that this was the less commonly used name while still being a commonly used name. I appreciate your admission that you're not entirely sure what is meant by encyclopedic register, and I believe you. I hope you can find it within yourself to cut some slack to editors at Wikipedia who do understand it. Wikipedia's title name policy is overly simple in the sense that it lumps many requirements and ideas into the concept of encyclopedic register and trusts that editors will understand what that is and what it requires. If you want to prevent Wikipedia from being an encyclopedia, removing that phrase from that policy should be part of your plan. Removing ideas that you don't understand may be easier for you than trying to understand them. Instead of taking that course, I hope you have another look at the section below, reread my comments above about Mr. Wood's article's title, and keep trying to understand how all parts of the policy WP:COMMONNAME can be met by a Hillary Rodham Clinton article. `

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

661,098,177

== Map == Great map. But I would like to know why the ends of the abandoned portion are indicated with hatched color rather than solid. PurpleChez 5/6/15

2,015

false

article

random

dev

false

661,118,601

` ::I agree with User:The Magnificent Clean-keeper, no NPOV source has been presented for the ``controversial`` claim. SPLC tracks all hate groups in the USA, including Islamic ones, such as the Nation of Islam. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

661,122,214

== STOP PROPAGANDA == You should be ashamed of yourselves! The formal name is FYROM, as it is on UN charta!Stop propaganda and misrepresentation of history.

2,015

false

article

blocked

dev

false

661,127,393

It's been a week since the first proposed move. How much time does it generally take an administrator to change to the appropriate title?

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

661,140,979

` == A barnstar for you! == {| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` |rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` | |style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;`` | The Special Barnstar |- |style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` | The Special Barnstar is awarded to a user as a gesture of appreciation when there is no other barnstar which would be appropriate.A Leftist; a devoted Wikipedian; a sense of humour; knowledge and intelligence without arrogance…Well, you are simply an all-round good egg. |}`

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

661,154,317

I am not a sock puppet!

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

661,158,020

Log back into my original account, this is my original account! Oh I just love this bit - User talk:GiantSnowman[edit source] From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Archives 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Contents [hide] 1 I'm surprised it's taken me this long to notice I'm surprised it's taken me this long to notice[edit source] but this editor is obviously this indefblocked editor. Apart from similarity of interests, their edit summary is unmistakable. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 8:02 pm, Today (UTC+1) Well very observant of you - you're unbelievable! Okay so there are similar interests shared between myself and User Pablo is that a crime, does that automatically give you an incentive to ahead and immediately block my account no! Right so one user isn't allowed to share interests of another user ... you are way in over your head because what happens if there are some twins that register an account on here ... if they share similarities between each other (music), writing style etc. and one becomes a problem user but the other is the complete opposite you are then telling me that you will block the GOOD twin (from a Wikipedia point of view to spite the vandal twin) - now you have done that you have alienated this user from Wikipedia, and the better twin not only resents Wikipedia but they have also lost all faith in the encyclopedia and will NOT be recommending its services to his / her friends! Another scenario could be that a friend or relative has seen how the account user writes and has decided to hack into their account and perform some very inappropriate edits under that person's username ... meanwhile the owner of the account is completely oblivious to this and only when they log in or just take a look at their user talk page find that they have been either issued a warning (s) or have been BLOCKED for something they did NOT do as a result of the nastiness caused by the vandal (hacker), the person that has USED their account to create problems with other users and to ultimately get them in a lot of trouble with the Wikipedia Community.

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

661,179,900

== Question == You really seem to want to keep all WP:FRINGE books about 'curing' and 'preventing' homosexuality, even very poor and non-notable books. Any particular reason?

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

661,183,195

::It is poor because it was written by a non-notable individual and seems to fail WP:NBOOK, WP:FRINGE, WP:UNDUE and WP:GNG.

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

661,197,399

especially your reversion of your unconstructive edit

2,015

true

user

random

test

false

661,198,172

:Like our Moon, Triton was a dwarf planet until it entered into orbit around Neptune. Moons are not currently accepted as planets.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

661,210,119

` UNPRODUCTIVE SUICIDE ATTEMPTS or why the word ``PRACTISED`` is not the case of Lubitz's earlier actions. Very often people who intend to commit suicide have had many interrupted attempts to do it when ``suicidal impulse`` is not strong enough to overcome ``natural fear`` and ``resistance of rational thought``. For example, people trying to commit suicide with a gun often put the weapon to their head and then they interrupt this action moments before they pull the trigger. Viewed from the side, those unsuccessful suicide attempts are like theatrical act but this is just an illusion because every such attempt has the potential to end tragically. In the case of Lubitz - in the situation in which he intended to carry out his suicide there are several circumstances that limit his freedom of choice to interrupt the suicidal attempt - such as ``returning of the Captain`` or ``what you are doing in the cabin?!``. These circumstances can force his unproductive suicide attempts to became productive one in any moment and he knows that after them he will have no choice to turn back. For this reason it is ``normal`` he to do first timid attempts - which were unsuccessful in the first flight ``Duesseldorf to Barcelona`` because time is not limited. On his return back ``Barcelona to Duesseldorf`` the end destination is forcing him. As I said he has not ``PRACTISED`` but was ``TRYING`` to commit suicide or in other words - he had unproductive suicide attempt. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

661,230,813

| decline = Unblock requests that contain personal attacks are not considered.

2,015

true

user

random

test

false

661,250,845

:::::::::The overall tone of the article is a smear campaign against Walt. Per WP:BLP, the Satlof and Hitchens gratuitous insults should be removed.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

661,255,554

== Wikipedia becomes Hate-o-pedia == This article read more like a outlet for hate speech than an encyclopedia article. If you are going to include quotes of long rants from the leaders of hate groups, you should at least be including some views of non-hate groups as well to get some balance.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

661,285,152

:::Debatable. Dwarf planet Theia failed to clear Earth from its orbit.

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

661,306,411

::This must be the worst and most selective incident of selective and biased enforcement of all time.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

661,308,971

` == Suggest renaming == This article is (as currently written) really about the prospective effects of global warming on humans, not the general effects of climate change. An article as broadly titled as this on the ``effects of climate change`` would have to speak about climate changes generally. These would perforce include historic ``effects of climate change`` such as the Little Ice Age, the Roman Warming Period, Ice Ages, etc. We could include such historic climate effects here, but given the thrust of the article it would probably be best just to do a renaming. `

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

661,326,669

` ::::Look here - the admin closed as not abusive enough - what is it I did? 1.This user undid my edit, with an edit summary 'no I don't think so' which seems to breach WP:ESDONTS namely don't 'Make snide comments' or 'Be aggressive' 2.I tried to discuss at User talk:Cassianto but the user was again rather condescending and seemed to be ganging up on me with other users he already knows 3.When discussion began on at Talk:Moors murders, I simply put 'I think it is notable enough for a single line' - however, Cassianto replied 'Then you need to look up the definition of ``notable``, clearly.' (Ignoring WP:NNC) I believe this breaches WP:CIVIL - when I indicated the editor should read WP:CIVIL they replied 'I did once, and I vowed never to read it again' 4.It is breathtaking the way some editors feel policies don't apply to them. I was not rude to the editor, but I was treated in a condescending and arrogant manner over a very minor matter The user then preceded to launch a very abusive and malicious attack on me. He linked my 710 contributions [166] and entirely falsely wrote 'Not so ridiculous when you look at his contributions which seem to be all geared around the May elections. This user seems to be on a campaign trial on behalf of UKIP'. This is called blatantly misleading other editors, surely in violation of policies such as WP:AGF, WP:BITE, WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA. I have nothing to do with UKIP. I am not a member of any political party. I am not enrolled to vote in the United Kingdom. So these are ludicrous allegations. I have created 21 pages, 16 non-related to the elections. Articles I have created such as Endorsements in the United Kingdom general election, 2015 are very important and been widely edited and viewed. I have also created articles such as United Kingdom general election, 2015 (Wales) in accordance with precedent. I have worked hard on the project for good and in good faith. Examples: List of European Union member states by GDP growth and Mr Galloway Goes to Washington. I have successfully nominated dozens of articles for speedy deletion. As a new editor, I am deeply upset by how hard it is to edit this site without abuse and being treated like a moron (WP:BITE). It certainly is not encouraging for those wanting to make a difference in good faith. Nothing at WP:SPA points to me. 5.The editor has breached multiple policies. Editor still going. He has written now 'What makes you think I give a fuck about your political leanings?' (despite questioning them) and removed the ANI notification remarking 'what a waste of time'. What is the point of WP:CIVIL, WP:AGF, WP:NPA, WP:BITE? What did I say that was uncivil? Mellowed Fillmore said 'It is my view that AusLondonder is clearly not here to build an encyclopedia. He is likely to remain a problematic editor and I'm not sure that any more patience needs to be shown' - yet I have created 27 pages including Endorsements in the United Kingdom general election, 2015 and List of European Union member states by GDP growth. How can they possibly say that with your agreement? I will address each other point at the ANI if you wish. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

661,328,258

::So it's not abusive to say 'fucking', 'fuck', 'bullshit', accuse of WP:SPA accuse of breaching WP:SPA but what I did deserves a ban? Look here The admin said this abuse did not even deserve a warning - yet my conduct deserve a block this is utterly unbelievable.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

true

661,345,227

` == Double-voting in AfDs == An editor is firmly insistent that he also gets to vote in an AfD he submitted. (On the slight, I think, chance I'm actually wrong about this — I did it myself on one of my very first AfDs and was jumped on for doing it — I haven't argued the matter further there.) `

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

661,370,798

` :::It is known as Innate Intelligence. `

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

661,412,869

::::::::::: Or, indeed, why the Asian-ness of someone is of any interest. We're people, people. -

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

661,413,411

== Merci Beaucoup == A very kind thank you, Geraldine.

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

661,433,078

I will restore the refs and edit to emphasis AFP's role and de-emphasis Block's role per your comments. Please look at it and discuss before paragraph blanking and deleting reliable sources. That no federal prison time resulted from this episode is irrelevant; coverage in major news outlets means it is due weight here. Thank you again.

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

661,436,062

SUPPOSING I WANT TO CLEAN UP MY ACT AND VOW TO NEVER SWEAR NO MATTER HOW IDIOTIC THE SITUATION IS EVER AGAIN, CAN'T CAN I ACCOUNT CREATION BLOCKED ... WHY DON'T YOU BELIEVE IN A CHANGE OF FORTUNE!? GIVE PEACE A CHANCE!

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

661,436,460

== all allied pigdogs deserve death in Auschwitz == fuck entente

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

true

661,445,985

Steve Pound is a good MP. Two pages is what he deserves.

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

661,448,732

May 2015 (UTC) :Again vandalizing Giorgio Chiellini, please stop, this is your second warning. 18:34, 8

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

661,450,388

I am extremly sorry for vandalising Wikipedia. Please forgive me C.Fred and aGastya. I was only being fun with this but it turned out to be more than fun. I will now edit on wikipedia properly.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

661,451,136

===Footnote addded=== I added a footnote for historical analysis of Grant's controversial General Order No. 11. I included Smith analysis in the footnote...It is up to other editors if Smith's views should be included in the paragraph mentioning Grant's order...I believe any historical views should be in the footnote to be neutral rather then only have one historians view in the article narration.

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

661,464,823

== 093 SSN == Hello Thomas. W. Thank you for your edit on 093 SSN article. Please protect the page from RevolvingPeronalConduct. He always vandalize the page. I will also be more careful when I edit. Jon

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

661,483,561

` Another quote: ``...and their engines normally (!) drive a continuous track or tracks at the rear.```

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

661,483,689

Haha, seriously?! xD WHERE is there a personal attack in my last message?! WHERE? ) Hilaroius.

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

661,484,002

Pity you.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

661,484,299

The invented the Stereoscope (!!!) you stupid piece of shit. )

2,015

false

user

blocked

test

true

661,484,454

They never developed a stereo camera.

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

661,485,892

Ok, without personal attacks: They never developed stereo cameras, just stereoscopes. )

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

661,493,203

== How come you never block Judeophobes? Why do you only block Jews? == Are you a Muslim?

2,015

false

user

blocked

dev

false

661,522,825

` == Battle of Rajasthan == While I am pleased the article has been retained (since I !voted Keep), I'm curious about the ``No Consensus`` conclusion when the !vote was about 15 to Keep versus about a half-dozen to Delete (discounting the nom's second vote in the survey). From this noticeboard discussion, the canvassing appears to have been on the Delete side (which means that if his friends are discounted, the !vote is more like 15 to 2 or 1. — Unless there was some Keep-canvassing on the other wise that I don't know about, could you change the result to a clear Keep rather than no-con? (That way the delete-minded won't be able to make any ``It could barely hang on the last time!`` arguments in future AfDs.) `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

661,524,538

For God's sake, will someone with an elementary knowledge of arithmetic please fix that stupid majority of 8 nonsense? There are 650 seats. The Tories have 331. Therefore, everyone else has 650-331=319. Therefore, the Tories have a majority of 331-319=12, that's TWELVE. Please don't go into the issue of Sinn Fein not swearing allegiance (which makes the Tories' effective majority equal to 16). Let's try to get over this elementary hurdle first. While we're at it, Prime Ministers ARE NOT ELECTED in the Westminster system. Individual MPs are elected and as a result, The Prime Minister does or does not continue in office.

2,015

false

article

random

test

false

661,527,095

== Please... == You don't need to punish ME because YOU have severe insecurities...

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

661,527,311

` == The essence does not belong to the lead == The essence of Pigenhole principle is to obscure the basic trivial principle, ``maximum ≥ average``. Yet, this remark was removed from the intro with a note that it belongs to somewhere else. I do not understand why short and valuable simplification of the definition belongs somewhere else and, furthermore, doesn't Wikipedia prescribe to keep simple definitions for the general population with prefer add/rewirte over remove rule? Is there such rule? Why materials are always removed in the first place, even faithful and valuable ones? `

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

661,529,704

` Another random member who doesn't even edit any of the New York City Subway articles, nor knows nothing about the New York City Subway itself. Yeah, thanks for your ``unnecessarily hostile`` comment at that sockpuppet's page. Sit down and watch how I myself edit. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

661,556,067

*Support WP:CONCISE and unambiguous. (We could hatnote to the video game character, though that seems a fairly trivial usage.) It's not our place to police whether this guy chose a good screen name or not.

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

661,557,973

And I will add it back again as it is true

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

661,562,851

::You're pathetic.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

true

661,564,268

:http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi?sstr=9078;cad=1 is a main-belt asteroid and does not come anywhere near Earth.

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

661,565,096

2015 === Do we want any image of Nemesis, when Nemesis is not real? Depicting Nemesis as a generic star seems worthless to me. =

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

661,584,908

, and Far-right Yishai vows a vote for him helps PM. These are clearly references to Yishai and the party he founded

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

661,594,949

== InfoBox Image == Can we get another picture posted in the InfoBox because the one that's there now is just horrible. She looks like the poster child for death. I mean no offense but jeeze.

2,015

false

article

blocked

dev

false

661,613,140

You know what? Don't offend other users , you are a jerk! I know you are correct, but you don't have to get so angry about it.

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

661,613,227

|San Mateo Public Library

2,015

false

user

blocked

test

false

661,613,405

You need to say sorry to all the fellow Wikipedians you offended!

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

661,613,649

You are very dumb because you offend other users you mother fucker!

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

true

661,635,861

==What happened to the parlay== So apparently both Napoleon and Louverture wanted to talk things over. But nothing is written about this

2,015

false

article

blocked

test

false

661,660,979

`*Comment: While BeastBoy has pushed the limit with four reverts in a 24hr period, I will defend him in noting that one of those was to rescind a vandalistic edit that another editor had restored. ( Please keep an eye on the clock, my fellow man!) `

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

661,664,112

` == Closing merger discussions at that troublesome article == At Talk:Rape jihad, could we get the ``Proposed merge`` and ``Proposed title`` threads ``blue-box`` closed (as the proposals are highly contentious, meaning no merge or move can proceed on the basis of !voting)? Their existence is enabling a couple of the still-unblocked disruptive editors to keep hatting the article with multiple-issue tag-pollution. Thanks in advance. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

661,665,657

` ::No sweat. I'll tab it and ping you tomorrow if you're still asleep come sundown. ) `

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

661,665,935

::If there's a redirect in the way you can use Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests. They're usually pretty quick about responding to requests there. Cheers. -

2,015

true

user

random

test

false

661,672,939

== Image == The image here is permissible to use . There is more than enough proof here to maintain that it is indeed Godane and portrays the person who it is intended to portray. As per the sources cited by , () the onus of proof is on anyone else to provide sources which discredit the POV held by the United States State Department, BBC, Reuters and CNN that the image is Godane. The fact that the image is featured on the Rewards for Justice website is already adequate enough proof, the U.S State Department being one of the most premier sources for counter-terrorism. This is no stab in the dark. It's not like this image has been randomly found on the internet with the caption 'Ahmed Abdi Godane' below it. Reputable sources state that the image is Godane, as per WP:V. If you challenge this assertion, either cite some sources which explicitly disprove this or deal with it. It is as simple as that.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

661,676,844

Hello Thank You for reply . Please check the article Govind Kumar Singh all important information content is removed from article by single user. If you check previous history of this article same user has changed this article so many time . This person have some person issue with this article . please guide me how to deal with it ?

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

661,681,962

== Blockbuster LLC- significant removal of information and damage to article == Hi, In this edit, you removed a significant amount of information relating to the Japanese and Peruvian operations. I'm assuming that this was a mistake on your part, but please take care when editing in future- this caused significant damage to the article that might not otherwise have been spotted if I hadn't been looking for something else at the time.

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

661,688,096

` == lord Shiva for Featured article == ==lord Shiva for Featured article == I just see many important features relating to the topic was missing, including a small description and link to Maha Shivaratri . I would like to give my points here.Undoubtedly lord Shiva is linked to all sections and regions of the Indian society.There are great works relating to lord Shiva in many languages. Remember he is pre vedic god, immensely popular among tribes later on included in the Vedas. If the page depicts what is in popular culture it will be a great source and the page should become ``Featured Article``. I feel there is discrimination of users writing from Tamil / Malayalam / Kannada even Hindi perspective. Sanskrit has its own credits, it is unique and as the name suggests it is ``well written``. I have written 4 articles on them. But it gets defamed by wrong promoters who make it mess up with other languages / claiming other linguistic works. My article was edited because i mentioned the name of the god in ``Tamil``?. Those who deleted them know whether Sanskrit and Tamil both used same script once before Sanskrit stuck to Devanagari script )? [User:Redtigerxyz|Redtigerxyz]] Include Malayalam scripture works on ``Ayyappa`` please don't completely ignore them. I will give more details for my writings with explanations on sources later for your views. Shiva is linked deeply in Kannada, Maratha and Telugu traditions too, but very less representations in the page. And when it comes to lord shiva and muruga, you just cannot ignore Tamil if you have developed hat redness for the language. Include details what is popular among different peoples rather than quoting just Vedas. can you please give your views?`

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

661,688,856

` ==lord Shiva for Featured article == I just see many important features relating to the topic was missing, including a small description and link to Maha Shivaratri . I would like to give my points here.Undoubtedly lord Shiva is linked to all sections and regions of the Indian society.There are great works relating to lord Shiva in many languages. Remember he is pre vedic god, immensely popular among tribes later on included in the Vedas. If the page depicts what is in popular culture it will be a great source and the page should become ``Featured Article``. I feel there is discrimination of users writing from Tamil / Malayalam / Kannada even Hindi perspective. Sanskrit has its own credits, it is unique and as the name suggests it is ``well written``. I have written 4 articles on them. But it gets defamed by wrong promoters who make it mess up with other languages / claiming other linguistic works. My article was edited because i mentioned the name of the god in ``Tamil``?. Those who deleted them know whether Sanskrit and Tamil both used same script once before Sanskrit stuck to Devanagari script )? [User:Redtigerxyz|Redtigerxyz]] Include Malayalam scripture works on ``Ayyappa`` please don't completely ignore them. I will give more details for my writings with explanations on sources later for your views. Shiva is linked deeply in Kannada, Maratha and Telugu traditions too, but very less representations in the page. And when it comes to lord shiva and muruga, you just cannot ignore Tamil if you have developed hat redness for the language. Include details what is popular among different peoples rather than quoting just Vedas. can you please give your views?`

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

661,689,350

== Request for review of editing history of Article Govind Kumar Singh == : Hello could you review of article Govind Kumar Singh revisions ? One single user has removed all references from article . Please check the revision history . User has edited article many times and its vandalism . Please do needful . Thank

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

661,744,905

Hi, I have seen and I know what I should do . I have added only facts with proper references . I just want to help article make more informative by adding these information . I request you don't remove anything from article . If feel any content need to remove please discuss at talk page . We will find out solution . I have seen this page editing history and seems you have personal issue with this article . You have removed all information and references . Please check Wikipedia editing guidelines for your reference .

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

661,748,588

:: You have removed this information He is listed in top 50 designers in India.http://www.jdinstitute.com/famous-fashion-designers-in-india.html which was given with reference . Do you think JD Institute put wrong information on their website ? and why they will put wrong information ? You simply removed and mentioned comment is revision history designer himself made this list . So funny . You are senior editor I appreciate if you avoid this kind of edits .

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

661,749,600

ERROR: type should be string, got " https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Govind_Kumar_Singh&diff;=next&oldid;=661667234 In this edit what citation do you need ?? Do you think all these links are wrong ? "

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

661,751,564

http://infobharti.com/indian-fashion-industry/govind-kumar-singh-indian-fashion-designer.php http://fashionfad.in/category/designer-biography/page/14/ http://www.99celebs.in/fashion-designers/govind-kumar-singh.html http://www.metromela.com/indian-fashion-designers/ Do you think these all websites has substantial content ?? For your kind information these all websites are reliable . You have removed all these sources from article my hard work . Why you want to remove all these information ?

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

661,752,286

:: Admin Please note this edit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Govind_Kumar_Singh&diff;=next&oldid;=661667842 NIFT annual report is there for reference but these information was removed ? why ? and how ? I am also giving you link for reference here - http://www.nift.ac.in/Downloads/annualreport_13_14.pdf

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

661,753,319

:: HE was appointed as coordinator for IFBM programme and this was there in article with reference link is here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Govind_Kumar_Singh&diff;=next&oldid;=661668418 he removed . here is reference http://www.nift.ac.in/Downloads/ce_brochure_29may.pdf this was impotent . Which was removed by him . I appreciate if you please discuss before removing anything . It is really tedious to find reliable sources to improve any article . It really hurts when people like you say editing or adding content is promotion of someone and their is some interest . For your kind information I am volunteer , but you seems bias when I look this article history . I request Admins to look on to this matter and do needful .

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

661,756,226

|decline=I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that *the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or *the block is no longer necessary because you :#understand what you have been blocked for, :#will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and :#will make useful contributions instead. Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. }}

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

661,760,014

Looks like a binge of support. Fine RFA!

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

661,762,410

What exactly was it promoting? It was informational and a start. A lot more was going to be added. Everyone calling me a local celeb is inaccurate and incorrect. Most of my traffic comes from different states as well as different countries. I don't understand why I'm being attacked there are way more things on Wikipedia that need removal. I am not using Wikipedia in a destructive way. I actually did not make the page nor did anyone I know. Someone from the Wikipedia community made it. How do you expect others to succeed when peers are constantly pulling one another down? Who can authorize this since everyone that has a hand in taking it down doesn't have the power to put it back?

2,015

true

user

random

test

false

661,781,036

:: I'm sorry but mistakes need to be pointed out in this matter, and we need to use official numbers here, and this is also relevant for other editors. We are all a little guilty, sorry if i made a to strong remark, thanks for your reply.

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

661,791,295

I re-wrote 2 of your AfDs because you were asking for numbered asteroid deletions when NASTRO makes it clear you should be asking for a re-directs when dealing with asteroids. As soon as you complained, I quit. Is is now you writing character assassinations of me. I will write it off to semantics. But supporters asking for a numbered asteroid to be deleted are not complying WP:NASTRO / WP:DWMP.

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false