{ "original_study": { "claim": { "hypothesis": "Post-secular individuals are less likely than modern individuals to believe humans evolved from earlier species.", "hypothesis_location": "The descriptive comparison appears in the Results section (Table 2) where evolution beliefs are summarized for each latent perspective group.", "statement": "The study reports that only 3% of post-secular individuals agree that humans evolved from earlier species, indicating substantially lower acceptance of human evolution among post-secular respondents.", "statement_location": "Results section, Table 2.", "study_type": "Observational" }, "data": { "source": "General Social Survey (GSS).", "wave_or_subset": "2006, 2008, and 2010 waves", "sample_size": "2,901 cases (1,563 from 2006; 988 from 2008; and 350 from 2010).", "unit_of_analysis": "Individual adult survey respondent.", "access_details": "not stated", "notes": "Belief in human evolution is measured by agreement with the statement that humans evolved from earlier species. Respondents are classified into three latent perspectives—traditional, modern, and post-secular—based on latent class analysis using religion and science belief indicators." }, "method": { "description": "The authors used latent class analysis to identify three worldview groups—traditional, modern, and post-secular—and then descriptively compared the percentage in each group agreeing that humans evolved from earlier species.", "steps": [ "Identify indicators of scientific and religious beliefs in the GSS dataset.", "Estimate a latent class model to classify respondents into traditional, modern, and post-secular perspectives.", "Extract predicted class membership for respondents.", "Calculate descriptive percentages of agreement with the statement that humans evolved from earlier species for each latent class.", "Compare evolution-belief percentages between post-secular and modern perspectives." ], "models": "Latent class analysis used for group classification; the evolution comparison itself is descriptive and not based on regression modeling.", "outcome_variable": "Agreement that humans evolved from earlier species (percentage agreeing).", "independent_variables": "Latent perspective membership (post-secular vs. modern).", "control_variables": "not stated (no regression model is used for this descriptive comparison).", "tools_software": "not stated" }, "results": { "summary": "Post-secular individuals show substantially lower acceptance of human evolution than modern individuals, with only 3% agreeing that humans evolved from earlier species.", "numerical_results": [ { "outcome_name": "Agreement that humans evolved from earlier species", "value": 3, "unit": "percentage of respondents agreeing.", "effect_size": "difference in proportions", "confidence_interval": { "lower": "not stated", "upper": "not stated", "level": "not stated" }, "p_value": "not stated.", "statistical_significance": 1, "direction": "negative" } ] }, "metadata": { "original_paper_id": "10.1177/0003122414558919", "original_paper_title": "Traditional, Modern, and Post-Secular Perspectives on Science and Religion in the United States.", "original_paper_code": "not stated", "original_paper_data": "not stated" } } }