Create README.md
Browse files
README.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
# KAMAC-Medical-MultiAgent Dataset
|
| 2 |
+
|
| 3 |
+
## Dataset Summary
|
| 4 |
+
|
| 5 |
+
KAMAC-Medical-MultiAgent is a curated dataset designed to support research on **knowledge-driven adaptive multi-agent collaboration** in medical decision-making. It is constructed to evaluate how large language models (LLMs) and multi-agent systems dynamically coordinate specialized expertise under complex clinical scenarios.
|
| 6 |
+
|
| 7 |
+
This dataset is developed alongside the **KAMAC (Knowledge-driven Adaptive Multi-Agent Collaboration)** framework and is intended for benchmarking:
|
| 8 |
+
|
| 9 |
+
* Multi-agent reasoning
|
| 10 |
+
* Dynamic expert recruitment
|
| 11 |
+
* Clinical question answering
|
| 12 |
+
* Medical decision support
|
| 13 |
+
|
| 14 |
+
The dataset includes structured medical questions, multimodal context (optional), and annotations suitable for simulating **multi-disciplinary team (MDT)** style reasoning.
|
| 15 |
+
|
| 16 |
+
---
|
| 17 |
+
|
| 18 |
+
## Supported Tasks
|
| 19 |
+
|
| 20 |
+
* Multi-agent collaboration
|
| 21 |
+
* Medical question answering (MedQA-style)
|
| 22 |
+
* Clinical reasoning
|
| 23 |
+
* Visual question answering (Prognostic / medical VQA)
|
| 24 |
+
* Tool-augmented LLM evaluation
|
| 25 |
+
* Adaptive agent planning
|
| 26 |
+
|
| 27 |
+
---
|
| 28 |
+
|
| 29 |
+
## Dataset Creation
|
| 30 |
+
|
| 31 |
+
### Source Data
|
| 32 |
+
|
| 33 |
+
The model is also tested under more datasets:
|
| 34 |
+
|
| 35 |
+
* Public medical QA benchmarks (e.g., MedQA)
|
| 36 |
+
* HEADNECK VQA datasets (e.g., Progn-VQA)
|
| 37 |
+
|
| 38 |
+
---
|
| 39 |
+
|
| 40 |
+
### Annotation Process
|
| 41 |
+
|
| 42 |
+
Annotations include:
|
| 43 |
+
|
| 44 |
+
* Ground-truth answers
|
| 45 |
+
* Medical specialty tags
|
| 46 |
+
|
| 47 |
+
---
|
| 48 |
+
|
| 49 |
+
### Motivation
|
| 50 |
+
|
| 51 |
+
Traditional multi-agent systems rely on **predefined expert roles**, which limits scalability and adaptability in complex domains such as medicine.
|
| 52 |
+
|
| 53 |
+
This dataset is designed to evaluate:
|
| 54 |
+
|
| 55 |
+
* Whether systems can **identify knowledge gaps**
|
| 56 |
+
* Whether they can **dynamically recruit appropriate expertise**
|
| 57 |
+
* Whether collaboration improves decision accuracy
|
| 58 |
+
|
| 59 |
+
---
|
| 60 |
+
|
| 61 |
+
## Evaluation
|
| 62 |
+
|
| 63 |
+
Typical evaluation metrics include:
|
| 64 |
+
|
| 65 |
+
* Accuracy
|
| 66 |
+
* Multi-agent improvement over single-agent baseline
|
| 67 |
+
* Reasoning quality (if traces are available)
|
| 68 |
+
* Efficiency (number of agents invoked)
|
| 69 |
+
|
| 70 |
+
---
|
| 71 |
+
|
| 72 |
+
## Limitations
|
| 73 |
+
|
| 74 |
+
* May inherit biases from source medical datasets
|
| 75 |
+
* Limited coverage of rare diseases
|
| 76 |
+
* Multimodal data availability may vary
|
| 77 |
+
* Not a substitute for professional medical advice
|
| 78 |
+
|
| 79 |
+
---
|
| 80 |
+
|
| 81 |
+
## Ethical Considerations
|
| 82 |
+
|
| 83 |
+
This dataset is intended **for research purposes only**.
|
| 84 |
+
|
| 85 |
+
* Not for clinical deployment
|
| 86 |
+
* Outputs should not be used for real medical decisions
|
| 87 |
+
* Researchers should evaluate fairness and bias
|
| 88 |
+
|
| 89 |
+
---
|
| 90 |
+
|
| 91 |
+
## Citation
|
| 92 |
+
|
| 93 |
+
If you use this dataset, please cite:
|
| 94 |
+
|
| 95 |
+
```bibtex
|
| 96 |
+
@misc{kamac2025,
|
| 97 |
+
title={KAMAC: Knowledge-driven Adaptive Multi-Agent Collaboration for Medical Decision Making},
|
| 98 |
+
author={Wu, Xiao and Huang, Ting-Zhu and Deng, Liang-Jian and Qiao, Yanyuan and Razzak, Imran and Xie, Yutong},
|
| 99 |
+
year={2025},
|
| 100 |
+
note={Dataset and code available at https://github.com/XiaoXiao-Woo/KAMAC}
|
| 101 |
+
}
|
| 102 |
+
|
| 103 |
+
@inproceedings{wu-etal-2025-knowledge,
|
| 104 |
+
title = "A Knowledge-driven Adaptive Collaboration of {LLM}s for Enhancing Medical Decision-making",
|
| 105 |
+
author={Wu, Xiao and Huang, Ting-Zhu and Deng, Liang-Jian and Qiao, Yanyuan and Razzak, Imran and Xie, Yutong},
|
| 106 |
+
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing",
|
| 107 |
+
year = "2025",
|
| 108 |
+
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
|
| 109 |
+
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2025.emnlp-main.1699/",
|
| 110 |
+
doi = "10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.1699",
|
| 111 |
+
pages = "33495--33512",
|
| 112 |
+
ISBN = "979-8-89176-332-6",
|
| 113 |
+
}
|
| 114 |
+
|
| 115 |
+
```
|
| 116 |
+
|
| 117 |
+
---
|
| 118 |
+
|
| 119 |
+
## Acknowledgements
|
| 120 |
+
|
| 121 |
+
This dataset is developed as part of research conducted on the **HANCOCK / NHR@FAU high-performance computing ecosystem**, which provides large-scale GPU infrastructure for AI and scientific computing.
|
| 122 |
+
|
| 123 |
+
---
|
| 124 |
+
|
| 125 |
+
## License
|
| 126 |
+
|
| 127 |
+
Specify your license here (e.g., MIT, CC BY 4.0, etc.)
|
| 128 |
+
|
| 129 |
+
---
|
| 130 |
+
|
| 131 |
+
## Contact
|
| 132 |
+
|
| 133 |
+
For questions, please open an issue on the GitHub repository:
|
| 134 |
+
|
| 135 |
+
https://github.com/XiaoXiao-Woo/KAMAC
|