Add files using upload-large-folder tool

flat/objects/07/03/0703d690-f2b6-4ba2-900d-eddcb5c08c7a.json

@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "AndroidWorld/GPT-4 Turbo/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "Google DeepMind",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "image",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "GPT-4 Turbo",
+    "name": "GPT-4 Turbo",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "AndroidWorld",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "AndroidWorld",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2405.14573"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Success Rate (SR) of the M3A-Simple agent on the ANDROIDWORLD benchmark. M3A-Simple is a simplified version of M3A with minimal prompting, serving as a baseline to evaluate the effectiveness of advanced prompting techniques. It uses the accessibility tree (a11y tree) as input.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Success Rate (%) - M3A-Simple Agent",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Agent Success Rate on ANDROIDWORLD - M3A-Simple"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "agent_success_rate_on_androidworld_m3a_simple",
+        "metric_name": "Agent Success Rate on ANDROIDWORLD - M3A-Simple",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 19.8
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "AndroidWorld/GPT-4 Turbo/1771591481.616601#androidworld#agent_success_rate_on_androidworld_m3a_simple"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "AndroidWorld",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "AndroidWorld",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2405.14573"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Success Rate (SR) of the SeeAct agent, originally designed for web navigation, adapted for the ANDROIDWORLD benchmark. SeeAct uses a Set-of-Mark (SoM) input combining screen pixels and the accessibility tree.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Success Rate (%) - SeeAct Agent",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Agent Success Rate on ANDROIDWORLD - SeeAct"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "agent_success_rate_on_androidworld_seeact",
+        "metric_name": "Agent Success Rate on ANDROIDWORLD - SeeAct",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 15.5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "AndroidWorld/GPT-4 Turbo/1771591481.616601#androidworld#agent_success_rate_on_androidworld_seeact"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "AndroidWorld",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "AndroidWorld",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2405.14573"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Success Rate (SR) of the M3A-Simple agent on the MobileMiniWoB++ benchmark. M3A-Simple is a simplified version of M3A with minimal prompting, serving as a baseline to evaluate the effectiveness of advanced prompting techniques on web tasks within a mobile environment.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Success Rate (%) on MobileMiniWoB++ - M3A-Simple Agent",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Agent Success Rate on MobileMiniWoB++ - M3A-Simple"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "agent_success_rate_on_mobileminiwob_m3a_simple",
+        "metric_name": "Agent Success Rate on MobileMiniWoB++ - M3A-Simple",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 67.7
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "AndroidWorld/GPT-4 Turbo/1771591481.616601#androidworld#agent_success_rate_on_mobileminiwob_m3a_simple"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "AndroidWorld",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "AndroidWorld",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2405.14573"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Success Rate (SR) of the SeeAct agent, originally designed for web navigation, on the MobileMiniWoB++ benchmark. SeeAct uses a Set-of-Mark (SoM) input combining screen pixels and the accessibility tree.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Success Rate (%) on MobileMiniWoB++ - SeeAct Agent",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Agent Success Rate on MobileMiniWoB++ - SeeAct"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "agent_success_rate_on_mobileminiwob_seeact",
+        "metric_name": "Agent Success Rate on MobileMiniWoB++ - SeeAct",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 66.1
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "AndroidWorld/GPT-4 Turbo/1771591481.616601#androidworld#agent_success_rate_on_mobileminiwob_seeact"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/07/04/07045ee0-101f-4f8f-a7ab-e4df9895e564.json

@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "AGIEval/Llama 3 8B/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "Microsoft",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "text",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "Llama 3 8B",
+    "name": "Llama 3 8B",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "AGIEval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "AGIEval",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2304.06364"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average accuracy of models on the English-centric multiple-choice question (MCQ) tasks from the AGIEval v1.1 benchmark under a few-shot setting. Tasks are derived from exams like the SAT, LSAT, and GRE.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Average Accuracy (%) - AGIEval-en (Few-shot)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "AGIEval-en (Few-shot) Performance on MCQ Tasks"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "agieval_en_few_shot_performance_on_mcq_tasks",
+        "metric_name": "AGIEval-en (Few-shot) Performance on MCQ Tasks",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 45.9
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "AGIEval/Llama 3 8B/1771591481.616601#agieval#agieval_en_few_shot_performance_on_mcq_tasks"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/07/0d/070dd19b-482d-4aca-8cd1-37dfca78875e.json

@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "CLEVR Mental Rotation Tests/2D FILM (Camera conditioning via FILM)/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "McGill University",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "image",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "2D FILM (Camera conditioning via FILM)",
+    "name": "2D FILM (Camera conditioning via FILM)",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "CLEVR Mental Rotation Tests",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "CLEVR Mental Rotation Tests",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2212.01639"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Performance of various Visual Question Answering (VQA) architectures on the CLEVR-MRT dataset. This benchmark tests a model's ability to answer questions about a 3D scene from a different viewpoint than the one shown in the input image. All models use a pre-trained ResNet-101 encoder. Higher accuracy is better.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Test Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "CLEVR-MRT: Visual Question Answering with Mental Rotation (ResNet-101 Encoder)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "clevr_mrt_visual_question_answering_with_mental_rotation_resnet_101_encoder",
+        "metric_name": "CLEVR-MRT: Visual Question Answering with Mental Rotation (ResNet-101 Encoder)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 83.68
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "CLEVR Mental Rotation Tests/2D FILM (Camera conditioning via FILM)/1771591481.616601#clevr_mental_rotation_tests#clevr_mrt_visual_question_answering_with_mental_rotation_resnet_101_encoder"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "CLEVR Mental Rotation Tests",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "CLEVR Mental Rotation Tests",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2212.01639"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Performance of select VQA architectures on the more challenging CLEVR-MRT-v2 dataset. This version adds complexity by including small objects (increasing occlusion) and varying camera elevations, further testing the robustness of 3D spatial reasoning. All models use a pre-trained ResNet-101 encoder. Higher accuracy is better.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Test Accuracy (%) on CLEVR-MRT-v2",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "CLEVR-MRT-v2: Visual Question Answering with Added Complexity"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "clevr_mrt_v2_visual_question_answering_with_added_complexity",
+        "metric_name": "CLEVR-MRT-v2: Visual Question Answering with Added Complexity",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 79.14
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "CLEVR Mental Rotation Tests/2D FILM (Camera conditioning via FILM)/1771591481.616601#clevr_mental_rotation_tests#clevr_mrt_v2_visual_question_answering_with_added_complexity"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/07/0e/070ed4e5-5fd6-4f86-bfc8-3a25c9684441.json

@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "vals-ai/proof_bench/google_gemini-3.1-pro-preview/1777395187.3170502",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1777395187.3170502",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "Vals.ai Leaderboard - ProofBench",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "Vals.ai",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://www.vals.ai",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "benchmark_slug": "proof_bench",
+      "benchmark_name": "ProofBench",
+      "benchmark_updated": "2026-04-22",
+      "dataset_type": "private",
+      "industry": "math",
+      "leaderboard_page_url": "https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/proof_bench",
+      "extraction_method": "static_astro_benchmark_view_props"
+    }
+  },
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "Vals.ai",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "name": "gemini-3.1-pro-preview",
+    "id": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview",
+    "developer": "google",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "vals_model_id": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview",
+      "vals_provider": "Google"
+    }
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_result_id": "proof_bench:overall:google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview:score",
+      "evaluation_name": "vals_ai.proof_bench.overall",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "ProofBench - Overall",
+        "source_type": "other",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "benchmark_slug": "proof_bench",
+          "task_key": "overall",
+          "dataset_type": "private",
+          "leaderboard_page_url": "https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/proof_bench"
+        }
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy reported by Vals.ai for ProofBench (Overall).",
+        "metric_id": "vals_ai.proof_bench.overall.accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "percent",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "additional_details": {
+          "score_scale": "percent_0_to_100",
+          "max_score_source": "fixed_percentage_bound",
+          "leaderboard_page_url": "https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/proof_bench"
+        }
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 26.0,
+        "details": {
+          "benchmark_slug": "proof_bench",
+          "benchmark_name": "ProofBench",
+          "benchmark_updated": "2026-04-22",
+          "task_key": "overall",
+          "task_name": "Overall",
+          "dataset_type": "private",
+          "industry": "math",
+          "raw_score": "26",
+          "raw_stderr": "4.408",
+          "latency": "2166.981",
+          "cost_per_test": "0.531265",
+          "temperature": "1",
+          "reasoning_effort": "high",
+          "provider": "Google"
+        },
+        "uncertainty": {
+          "standard_error": {
+            "value": 4.408,
+            "method": "vals_reported"
+          }
+        }
+      },
+      "generation_config": {
+        "generation_args": {
+          "temperature": 1.0,
+          "max_attempts": 1
+        },
+        "additional_details": {
+          "reasoning_effort": "high"
+        }
+      }
+    }
+  ]
+}

flat/objects/07/32/073237d3-b5e7-4564-bc6a-42a86536b077.json

@@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "hfopenllm_v2/MaziyarPanahi_calme-3.3-baguette-3b/1773936498.240187",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1773936498.240187",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "HF Open LLM v2",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "Hugging Face",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party"
+  },
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "lm-evaluation-harness",
+    "version": "0.4.0",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "fork": "https://github.com/huggingface/lm-evaluation-harness/tree/adding_all_changess"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "name": "calme-3.3-baguette-3b",
+    "id": "MaziyarPanahi/calme-3.3-baguette-3b",
+    "developer": "MaziyarPanahi",
+    "inference_platform": "unknown",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "precision": "bfloat16",
+      "architecture": "Qwen2ForCausalLM",
+      "params_billions": "3.086"
+    }
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IFEval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IFEval",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "google/IFEval"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on IFEval",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.636
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/MaziyarPanahi_calme-3.3-baguette-3b/1773936498.240187#ifeval#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "BBH",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "BBH",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "SaylorTwift/bbh"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on BBH",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.4678
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/MaziyarPanahi_calme-3.3-baguette-3b/1773936498.240187#bbh#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MATH Level 5",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MATH Level 5",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "DigitalLearningGmbH/MATH-lighteval"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Exact Match on MATH Level 5",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "exact_match",
+        "metric_name": "Exact Match",
+        "metric_kind": "exact_match",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.3807
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/MaziyarPanahi_calme-3.3-baguette-3b/1773936498.240187#math_level_5#exact_match"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "GPQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "GPQA",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "Idavidrein/gpqa"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on GPQA",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.2802
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/MaziyarPanahi_calme-3.3-baguette-3b/1773936498.240187#gpqa#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MUSR",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MUSR",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "TAUR-Lab/MuSR"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on MUSR",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.3928
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/MaziyarPanahi_calme-3.3-baguette-3b/1773936498.240187#musr#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MMLU-PRO",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MMLU-PRO",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "TIGER-Lab/MMLU-Pro"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on MMLU-PRO",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.3342
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/MaziyarPanahi_calme-3.3-baguette-3b/1773936498.240187#mmlu_pro#accuracy"
+    }
+  ]
+}

flat/objects/07/32/07324d3d-e602-4422-a289-3107757fdb44.json

@@ -0,0 +1,208 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "CAQA/Phi-3-small (7B)/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "Monash University",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "text",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "Phi-3-small (7B)",
+    "name": "Phi-3-small (7B)",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "CAQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "CAQA",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2401.14640"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "F1 score for classifying the 'Irrelevant' attribution category on the CAQA benchmark in a zero-shot setting. Performance is highly variable across models.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "F1 Score - Irrelevant (Zero-Shot)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "F1 Score for 'Irrelevant' Category on CAQA (Zero-Shot)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "f1_score_for_irrelevant_category_on_caqa_zero_shot",
+        "metric_name": "F1 Score for 'Irrelevant' Category on CAQA (Zero-Shot)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.569
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "CAQA/Phi-3-small (7B)/1771591481.616601#caqa#f1_score_for_irrelevant_category_on_caqa_zero_shot"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "CAQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "CAQA",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2401.14640"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "F1 score for classifying the 'Partially Supportive' attribution category on the CAQA benchmark in a zero-shot setting. This is the most challenging category for models, with scores being universally low without fine-tuning, as models tend to misclassify these cases as 'Supportive'.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "F1 Score - Partially Supportive (Zero-Shot)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "F1 Score for 'Partially Supportive' Category on CAQA (Zero-Shot)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "f1_score_for_partially_supportive_category_on_caqa_zero_shot",
+        "metric_name": "F1 Score for 'Partially Supportive' Category on CAQA (Zero-Shot)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.217
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "CAQA/Phi-3-small (7B)/1771591481.616601#caqa#f1_score_for_partially_supportive_category_on_caqa_zero_shot"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "CAQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "CAQA",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2401.14640"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "F1 score for classifying the 'Supportive' attribution category on the CAQA benchmark in a zero-shot setting. This is generally the highest-scoring category for most models.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "F1 Score - Supportive (Zero-Shot)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "F1 Score for 'Supportive' Category on CAQA (Zero-Shot)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "f1_score_for_supportive_category_on_caqa_zero_shot",
+        "metric_name": "F1 Score for 'Supportive' Category on CAQA (Zero-Shot)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.624
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "CAQA/Phi-3-small (7B)/1771591481.616601#caqa#f1_score_for_supportive_category_on_caqa_zero_shot"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "CAQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "CAQA",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2401.14640"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Overall Micro-F1 score on the CAQA benchmark for various language models in a few-shot setting, with one example provided for each attribution category. This evaluation tests the models' in-context learning capabilities. Larger models generally show improvement over zero-shot performance.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Overall Micro-F1 (Few-Shot)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Overall Performance on CAQA (Few-Shot)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "overall_performance_on_caqa_few_shot",
+        "metric_name": "Overall Performance on CAQA (Few-Shot)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.445
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "CAQA/Phi-3-small (7B)/1771591481.616601#caqa#overall_performance_on_caqa_few_shot"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "CAQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "CAQA",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2401.14640"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "F1 score for classifying the 'Contradictory' attribution category on the CAQA benchmark in a zero-shot setting. Performance varies significantly, with larger models showing much better capability.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "F1 Score - Contradictory (Zero-Shot)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "F1 Score for 'Contradictory' Category on CAQA (Zero-Shot)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "f1_score_for_contradictory_category_on_caqa_zero_shot",
+        "metric_name": "F1 Score for 'Contradictory' Category on CAQA (Zero-Shot)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.481
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "CAQA/Phi-3-small (7B)/1771591481.616601#caqa#f1_score_for_contradictory_category_on_caqa_zero_shot"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "CAQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "CAQA",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2401.14640"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Overall Micro-F1 score on the CAQA benchmark for various language models in a zero-shot setting, without any in-context examples. This evaluation measures the models' inherent ability to classify complex attributions. Performance is significantly lower than fine-tuned models, highlighting the difficulty of the task.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Overall Micro-F1 (Zero-Shot)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Overall Performance on CAQA (Zero-Shot)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "overall_performance_on_caqa_zero_shot",
+        "metric_name": "Overall Performance on CAQA (Zero-Shot)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.507
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "CAQA/Phi-3-small (7B)/1771591481.616601#caqa#overall_performance_on_caqa_zero_shot"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/07/34/0734a0ea-445d-4e9f-a203-94ad33f9ee2c.json

@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "Ineq-Comp/Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "Tsinghua University",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "text",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct",
+    "name": "Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "Ineq-Comp",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "Ineq-Comp",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2505.12680"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average pass rate on Type I problems where models are provided with the full formal proof of the corresponding seed problem via in-context learning (ICL). This experiment tests if seeing a solution to the base problem helps models generalize to its compositional variants. Results show that the compositional gap persists even with ICL. Results are at pass@128 for open models and pass@16 for proprietary models.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Average Pass Rate (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Average Pass Rate on Type I Compositional Problems with ICL"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "average_pass_rate_on_type_i_compositional_problems_with_icl",
+        "metric_name": "Average Pass Rate on Type I Compositional Problems with ICL",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 44
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "Ineq-Comp/Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct/1771591481.616601#ineq_comp#average_pass_rate_on_type_i_compositional_problems_with_icl"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/07/35/07352a6f-474b-412c-b611-4d2f70f6f989.json

@@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "hfopenllm_v2/NousResearch_Hermes-2-Theta-Llama-3-8B/1773936498.240187",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1773936498.240187",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "HF Open LLM v2",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "Hugging Face",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party"
+  },
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "lm-evaluation-harness",
+    "version": "0.4.0",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "fork": "https://github.com/huggingface/lm-evaluation-harness/tree/adding_all_changess"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "name": "Hermes-2-Theta-Llama-3-8B",
+    "id": "NousResearch/Hermes-2-Theta-Llama-3-8B",
+    "developer": "NousResearch",
+    "inference_platform": "unknown",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "precision": "bfloat16",
+      "architecture": "LlamaForCausalLM",
+      "params_billions": "8.03"
+    }
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IFEval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IFEval",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "google/IFEval"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on IFEval",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.6518
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/NousResearch_Hermes-2-Theta-Llama-3-8B/1773936498.240187#ifeval#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "BBH",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "BBH",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "SaylorTwift/bbh"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on BBH",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.5207
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/NousResearch_Hermes-2-Theta-Llama-3-8B/1773936498.240187#bbh#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MATH Level 5",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MATH Level 5",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "DigitalLearningGmbH/MATH-lighteval"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Exact Match on MATH Level 5",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "exact_match",
+        "metric_name": "Exact Match",
+        "metric_kind": "exact_match",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.0967
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/NousResearch_Hermes-2-Theta-Llama-3-8B/1773936498.240187#math_level_5#exact_match"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "GPQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "GPQA",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "Idavidrein/gpqa"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on GPQA",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.3037
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/NousResearch_Hermes-2-Theta-Llama-3-8B/1773936498.240187#gpqa#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MUSR",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MUSR",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "TAUR-Lab/MuSR"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on MUSR",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.3949
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/NousResearch_Hermes-2-Theta-Llama-3-8B/1773936498.240187#musr#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MMLU-PRO",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MMLU-PRO",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "TIGER-Lab/MMLU-Pro"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on MMLU-PRO",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.3369
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/NousResearch_Hermes-2-Theta-Llama-3-8B/1773936498.240187#mmlu_pro#accuracy"
+    }
+  ]
+}

flat/objects/07/35/0735500f-3296-4402-ad73-9d85f19fca15.json

@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "FRAMES-VQA/SPD/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "Georgia Institute of Technology",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "image",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "SPD",
+    "name": "SPD",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "FRAMES-VQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "FRAMES-VQA",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2505.21755"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Compares the VQA accuracy of robust fine-tuning methods on the GQA-OOD dataset, after being fine-tuned on GQA as the in-distribution dataset. This experiment, from the paper's supplementary material, validates findings on a different source domain.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Near OOD Accuracy (%) - GQA Tuned",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "VQA Accuracy on Near OOD Dataset GQA-OOD (Fine-tuned on GQA)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "vqa_accuracy_on_near_ood_dataset_gqa_ood_fine_tuned_on_gqa",
+        "metric_name": "VQA Accuracy on Near OOD Dataset GQA-OOD (Fine-tuned on GQA)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 54.04
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "FRAMES-VQA/SPD/1771591481.616601#frames_vqa#vqa_accuracy_on_near_ood_dataset_gqa_ood_fine_tuned_on_gqa"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "FRAMES-VQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "FRAMES-VQA",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2505.21755"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Compares the average VQA accuracy of robust fine-tuning methods on OOD datasets when applied to the LLaVA-7B model using LoRA. This experiment, from the paper's supplementary material, validates the main findings on a different model architecture.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "OOD Avg. Accuracy (%) - LLaVA-7B LoRA",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Average VQA Accuracy on OOD Datasets (LLaVA-7B LoRA)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "average_vqa_accuracy_on_ood_datasets_llava_7b_lora",
+        "metric_name": "Average VQA Accuracy on OOD Datasets (LLaVA-7B LoRA)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 51.31
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "FRAMES-VQA/SPD/1771591481.616601#frames_vqa#average_vqa_accuracy_on_ood_datasets_llava_7b_lora"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "FRAMES-VQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "FRAMES-VQA",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2505.21755"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Compares the average VQA accuracy of robust fine-tuning methods on OOD datasets when applied to the PaliGemma-3B model using full fine-tuning (not LoRA). This experiment, from the paper's supplementary material, validates the main findings with a different parameter-tuning strategy.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "OOD Avg. Accuracy (%) - PaliGemma-3B Full FT",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Average VQA Accuracy on OOD Datasets (PaliGemma-3B Full Fine-Tuning)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "average_vqa_accuracy_on_ood_datasets_paligemma_3b_full_fine_tuning",
+        "metric_name": "Average VQA Accuracy on OOD Datasets (PaliGemma-3B Full Fine-Tuning)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 53.43
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "FRAMES-VQA/SPD/1771591481.616601#frames_vqa#average_vqa_accuracy_on_ood_datasets_paligemma_3b_full_fine_tuning"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/07/3b/073b4a43-949a-44a1-8206-ca7350a07cd4.json

@@ -0,0 +1,238 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "COLD/Mistral-7B-v0.1/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IIT Kanpur)",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "text",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "Mistral-7B-v0.1",
+    "name": "Mistral-7B-v0.1",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "COLD",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "COLD",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2411.19500"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average success rate (accuracy) of language models on the COLD benchmark's causal query triplets, averaged across five daily activities (baking a cake, shopping, train, tree, bus). Models are evaluated using a prompt-based multi-choice question answering (MCQA) scheme. This metric represents the primary evaluation of LLMs' causal reasoning ability on standard tasks.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Average Success Rate (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Average Success Rate on COLD Causal Triplets"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "average_success_rate_on_cold_causal_triplets",
+        "metric_name": "Average Success Rate on COLD Causal Triplets",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 71.46
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "COLD/Mistral-7B-v0.1/1771591481.616601#cold#average_success_rate_on_cold_causal_triplets"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "COLD",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "COLD",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2411.19500"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average accuracy of models in predicting the correct causal relationship based on Average Treatment Effect (ATE) estimation. This baseline 'Temporal' scheme prompts the LLM to predict the temporal order ('before'/'after') between events. It serves as a comparison point for the more advanced 'Backdoor Adjustments' scheme. Results are averaged across five activities.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Avg. Accuracy (ATE with Temporal) (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Average Accuracy with ATE Estimation via Temporal Scheme"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "average_accuracy_with_ate_estimation_via_temporal_scheme",
+        "metric_name": "Average Accuracy with ATE Estimation via Temporal Scheme",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 58.52
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "COLD/Mistral-7B-v0.1/1771591481.616601#cold#average_accuracy_with_ate_estimation_via_temporal_scheme"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "COLD",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "COLD",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2411.19500"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average accuracy of models in predicting the correct causal relationship based on Average Treatment Effect (ATE) estimation. This scheme explicitly applies the backdoor criterion from causal theory, prompting the LLM to adjust for confounding events. This shows how performance improves when models are guided by formal causal principles. Results are averaged across five activities.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Avg. Accuracy (ATE with Backdoor) (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Average Accuracy with ATE Estimation via Backdoor Adjustments"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "average_accuracy_with_ate_estimation_via_backdoor_adjustments",
+        "metric_name": "Average Accuracy with ATE Estimation via Backdoor Adjustments",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 67.46
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "COLD/Mistral-7B-v0.1/1771591481.616601#cold#average_accuracy_with_ate_estimation_via_backdoor_adjustments"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "COLD",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "COLD",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2411.19500"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Success rate (accuracy) of language models on the COLD benchmark's causal query triplets for the 'Baking a Cake' daily activity. Models are evaluated using a prompt-based multi-choice question answering (MCQA) scheme.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Success Rate (Cake) (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Success Rate on COLD Causal Triplets (Baking a Cake)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "success_rate_on_cold_causal_triplets_baking_a_cake",
+        "metric_name": "Success Rate on COLD Causal Triplets (Baking a Cake)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 77.64
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "COLD/Mistral-7B-v0.1/1771591481.616601#cold#success_rate_on_cold_causal_triplets_baking_a_cake"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "COLD",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "COLD",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2411.19500"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Success rate (accuracy) of language models on the COLD benchmark's causal query triplets for the 'Going Grocery Shopping' daily activity. Models are evaluated using a prompt-based multi-choice question answering (MCQA) scheme.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Success Rate (Shopping) (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Success Rate on COLD Causal Triplets (Going Grocery Shopping)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "success_rate_on_cold_causal_triplets_going_grocery_shopping",
+        "metric_name": "Success Rate on COLD Causal Triplets (Going Grocery Shopping)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 69.38
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "COLD/Mistral-7B-v0.1/1771591481.616601#cold#success_rate_on_cold_causal_triplets_going_grocery_shopping"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "COLD",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "COLD",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2411.19500"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Success rate (accuracy) of language models on the COLD benchmark's causal query triplets for the 'Going on a Train' daily activity. Models are evaluated using a prompt-based multi-choice question answering (MCQA) scheme.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Success Rate (Train) (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Success Rate on COLD Causal Triplets (Going on a Train)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "success_rate_on_cold_causal_triplets_going_on_a_train",
+        "metric_name": "Success Rate on COLD Causal Triplets (Going on a Train)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 68.46
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "COLD/Mistral-7B-v0.1/1771591481.616601#cold#success_rate_on_cold_causal_triplets_going_on_a_train"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "COLD",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "COLD",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2411.19500"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average success rate on a more challenging version of the COLD benchmark where incorrect choices are temporally plausible but causally implausible. This setup is designed to diagnose if models conflate temporal precedence with causation. Results are averaged across five activities. A performance drop compared to standard triplets indicates a reliance on temporal cues.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Avg. Success Rate (Causally Hard) (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Average Success Rate on COLD Causally Hard Triplets"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "average_success_rate_on_cold_causally_hard_triplets",
+        "metric_name": "Average Success Rate on COLD Causally Hard Triplets",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 65.28
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "COLD/Mistral-7B-v0.1/1771591481.616601#cold#average_success_rate_on_cold_causally_hard_triplets"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/07/3d/073d637f-3fcc-4461-8a38-f958754a73d6.json

@@ -0,0 +1,478 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "PseudoEval/Llama3-8B/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "HKUST",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "text",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "Llama3-8B",
+    "name": "Llama3-8B",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "PseudoEval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "PseudoEval",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2502.19149"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the Pass@1 rate for generating correct Python code when provided with an intermediate pseudocode solution. This isolates the 'language-coding' capability of LLMs by removing the need for them to devise the algorithm from scratch. Scores are an average of performance on Easy, Medium, and Hard tasks from the PSEUDOEVAL benchmark.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Pass@1 (Overall) - Python (from Pseudocode)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Python Code Generation from Pseudocode"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "python_code_generation_from_pseudocode",
+        "metric_name": "Python Code Generation from Pseudocode",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.583
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "PseudoEval/Llama3-8B/1771591481.616601#pseudoeval#python_code_generation_from_pseudocode"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "PseudoEval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "PseudoEval",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2502.19149"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the Pass@10 rate of generating C++ code from human-annotated pseudocode on a subset of 55 LiveCodeBench tasks. This metric indicates the probability that at least one of ten generated samples is correct.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Pass@10 (C++ from Manual Pseudocode)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "C++ Generation from Manually Written Pseudocode (Pass@10)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "c_generation_from_manually_written_pseudocode_pass_10",
+        "metric_name": "C++ Generation from Manually Written Pseudocode (Pass@10)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.65
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "PseudoEval/Llama3-8B/1771591481.616601#pseudoeval#c_generation_from_manually_written_pseudocode_pass_10"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "PseudoEval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "PseudoEval",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2502.19149"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the Pass@1 rate of generating C++ code from pseudocode automatically generated by the DeepSeek-R1 model on a subset of 55 LiveCodeBench tasks. Results show this auto-generated pseudocode is often more effective than manual annotation.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Pass@1 (C++ from DeepSeek-R1 Pseudocode)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "C++ Generation from Auto-Generated (DeepSeek-R1) Pseudocode"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "c_generation_from_auto_generated_deepseek_r1_pseudocode",
+        "metric_name": "C++ Generation from Auto-Generated (DeepSeek-R1) Pseudocode",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.48
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "PseudoEval/Llama3-8B/1771591481.616601#pseudoeval#c_generation_from_auto_generated_deepseek_r1_pseudocode"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "PseudoEval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "PseudoEval",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2502.19149"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the Pass@1 rate of generating C++ code from human-annotated pseudocode on a subset of 55 LiveCodeBench tasks. This serves as a baseline to evaluate the quality of automatically generated pseudocode.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Pass@1 (C++ from Manual Pseudocode)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "C++ Generation from Manually Written Pseudocode"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "c_generation_from_manually_written_pseudocode",
+        "metric_name": "C++ Generation from Manually Written Pseudocode",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.47
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "PseudoEval/Llama3-8B/1771591481.616601#pseudoeval#c_generation_from_manually_written_pseudocode"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "PseudoEval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "PseudoEval",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2502.19149"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the Pass@1 rate for generating correct C++ code directly from a natural language problem description, evaluating combined problem-solving and language-coding skills. Scores are an average of performance on Easy, Medium, and Hard tasks from the PSEUDOEVAL benchmark.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Pass@1 (Overall) - C++ (from Problem)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "C++ Code Generation from Problem Description"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "c_code_generation_from_problem_description",
+        "metric_name": "C++ Code Generation from Problem Description",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.14
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "PseudoEval/Llama3-8B/1771591481.616601#pseudoeval#c_code_generation_from_problem_description"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "PseudoEval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "PseudoEval",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2502.19149"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the Pass@1 rate for generating correct C++ code when provided with an intermediate pseudocode solution. This isolates the 'language-coding' capability of LLMs for C++. Scores are an average of performance on Easy, Medium, and Hard tasks from the PSEUDOEVAL benchmark.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Pass@1 (Overall) - C++ (from Pseudocode)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "C++ Code Generation from Pseudocode"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "c_code_generation_from_pseudocode",
+        "metric_name": "C++ Code Generation from Pseudocode",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.47
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "PseudoEval/Llama3-8B/1771591481.616601#pseudoeval#c_code_generation_from_pseudocode"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "PseudoEval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "PseudoEval",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2502.19149"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Evaluates the Pass@1 rate for generating Python code from pseudocode that was originally derived from a C++ solution, testing the language-agnostic nature of the problem-solving logic.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Pass@1 (Python from C++ Pseudocode)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Cross-Language Transfer: C++ Pseudocode to Python Code"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "cross_language_transfer_c_pseudocode_to_python_code",
+        "metric_name": "Cross-Language Transfer: C++ Pseudocode to Python Code",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.65
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "PseudoEval/Llama3-8B/1771591481.616601#pseudoeval#cross_language_transfer_c_pseudocode_to_python_code"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "PseudoEval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "PseudoEval",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2502.19149"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the Pass@1 rate for generating correct Python code directly from a natural language problem description. This evaluates the end-to-end performance, encompassing both 'problem-solving' and 'language-coding' abilities. Scores are an average of performance on Easy, Medium, and Hard tasks from the PSEUDOEVAL benchmark.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Pass@1 (Overall) - Python (from Problem)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Python Code Generation from Problem Description"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "python_code_generation_from_problem_description",
+        "metric_name": "Python Code Generation from Problem Description",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.163
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "PseudoEval/Llama3-8B/1771591481.616601#pseudoeval#python_code_generation_from_problem_description"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "PseudoEval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "PseudoEval",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2502.19149"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Evaluates the Pass@1 rate for generating Python code from pseudocode that was originally derived from a Python solution. This serves as a baseline for cross-language transfer experiments.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Pass@1 (Python from Python Pseudocode)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Cross-Language Transfer: Python Pseudocode to Python Code"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "cross_language_transfer_python_pseudocode_to_python_code",
+        "metric_name": "Cross-Language Transfer: Python Pseudocode to Python Code",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.61
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "PseudoEval/Llama3-8B/1771591481.616601#pseudoeval#cross_language_transfer_python_pseudocode_to_python_code"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "PseudoEval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "PseudoEval",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2502.19149"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Evaluates the Pass@1 rate for generating Python code from pseudocode that was originally derived from a Rust solution, testing the language-agnostic nature of the problem-solving logic.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Pass@1 (Python from Rust Pseudocode)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Cross-Language Transfer: Rust Pseudocode to Python Code"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "cross_language_transfer_rust_pseudocode_to_python_code",
+        "metric_name": "Cross-Language Transfer: Rust Pseudocode to Python Code",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.6
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "PseudoEval/Llama3-8B/1771591481.616601#pseudoeval#cross_language_transfer_rust_pseudocode_to_python_code"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "PseudoEval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "PseudoEval",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2502.19149"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the Pass@1 rate for generating correct Rust code directly from a natural language problem description, evaluating combined problem-solving and language-coding skills. Scores are an average of performance on Easy, Medium, and Hard tasks from the PSEUDOEVAL benchmark.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Pass@1 (Overall) - Rust (from Problem)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Rust Code Generation from Problem Description"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "rust_code_generation_from_problem_description",
+        "metric_name": "Rust Code Generation from Problem Description",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.097
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "PseudoEval/Llama3-8B/1771591481.616601#pseudoeval#rust_code_generation_from_problem_description"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "PseudoEval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "PseudoEval",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2502.19149"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the Pass@1 rate for generating correct Rust code when provided with an intermediate pseudocode solution. This isolates the 'language-coding' capability of LLMs for Rust. Scores are an average of performance on Easy, Medium, and Hard tasks from the PSEUDOEVAL benchmark.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Pass@1 (Overall) - Rust (from Pseudocode)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Rust Code Generation from Pseudocode"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "rust_code_generation_from_pseudocode",
+        "metric_name": "Rust Code Generation from Pseudocode",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.29
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "PseudoEval/Llama3-8B/1771591481.616601#pseudoeval#rust_code_generation_from_pseudocode"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "PseudoEval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "PseudoEval",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2502.19149"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the Pass@5 rate of generating C++ code from pseudocode automatically generated by the DeepSeek-R1 model. This metric indicates the probability that at least one of five generated samples is correct.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Pass@5 (C++ from DeepSeek-R1 Pseudocode)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "C++ Generation from Auto-Generated (DeepSeek-R1) Pseudocode (Pass@5)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "c_generation_from_auto_generated_deepseek_r1_pseudocode_pass_5",
+        "metric_name": "C++ Generation from Auto-Generated (DeepSeek-R1) Pseudocode (Pass@5)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.59
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "PseudoEval/Llama3-8B/1771591481.616601#pseudoeval#c_generation_from_auto_generated_deepseek_r1_pseudocode_pass_5"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "PseudoEval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "PseudoEval",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2502.19149"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the Pass@10 rate of generating C++ code from pseudocode automatically generated by the DeepSeek-R1 model. This metric indicates the probability that at least one of ten generated samples is correct.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Pass@10 (C++ from DeepSeek-R1 Pseudocode)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "C++ Generation from Auto-Generated (DeepSeek-R1) Pseudocode (Pass@10)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "c_generation_from_auto_generated_deepseek_r1_pseudocode_pass_10",
+        "metric_name": "C++ Generation from Auto-Generated (DeepSeek-R1) Pseudocode (Pass@10)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.64
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "PseudoEval/Llama3-8B/1771591481.616601#pseudoeval#c_generation_from_auto_generated_deepseek_r1_pseudocode_pass_10"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "PseudoEval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "PseudoEval",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2502.19149"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the Pass@5 rate of generating C++ code from human-annotated pseudocode on a subset of 55 LiveCodeBench tasks. This metric indicates the probability that at least one of five generated samples is correct.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Pass@5 (C++ from Manual Pseudocode)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "C++ Generation from Manually Written Pseudocode (Pass@5)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "c_generation_from_manually_written_pseudocode_pass_5",
+        "metric_name": "C++ Generation from Manually Written Pseudocode (Pass@5)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.62
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "PseudoEval/Llama3-8B/1771591481.616601#pseudoeval#c_generation_from_manually_written_pseudocode_pass_5"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/07/50/07501cf2-516c-480c-ab94-e02bbe1a4611.json

@@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "hfopenllm_v2/netcat420_MFANN3bv0.22/1773936498.240187",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1773936498.240187",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "HF Open LLM v2",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "Hugging Face",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party"
+  },
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "lm-evaluation-harness",
+    "version": "0.4.0",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "fork": "https://github.com/huggingface/lm-evaluation-harness/tree/adding_all_changess"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "name": "MFANN3bv0.22",
+    "id": "netcat420/MFANN3bv0.22",
+    "developer": "netcat420",
+    "inference_platform": "unknown",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "precision": "float16",
+      "architecture": "PhiForCausalLM",
+      "params_billions": "2.78"
+    }
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IFEval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IFEval",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "google/IFEval"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on IFEval",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.1979
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/netcat420_MFANN3bv0.22/1773936498.240187#ifeval#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "BBH",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "BBH",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "SaylorTwift/bbh"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on BBH",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.4485
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/netcat420_MFANN3bv0.22/1773936498.240187#bbh#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MATH Level 5",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MATH Level 5",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "DigitalLearningGmbH/MATH-lighteval"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Exact Match on MATH Level 5",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "exact_match",
+        "metric_name": "Exact Match",
+        "metric_kind": "exact_match",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.0264
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/netcat420_MFANN3bv0.22/1773936498.240187#math_level_5#exact_match"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "GPQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "GPQA",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "Idavidrein/gpqa"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on GPQA",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.2617
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/netcat420_MFANN3bv0.22/1773936498.240187#gpqa#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MUSR",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MUSR",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "TAUR-Lab/MuSR"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on MUSR",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.3521
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/netcat420_MFANN3bv0.22/1773936498.240187#musr#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MMLU-PRO",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MMLU-PRO",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "TIGER-Lab/MMLU-Pro"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on MMLU-PRO",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.2517
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/netcat420_MFANN3bv0.22/1773936498.240187#mmlu_pro#accuracy"
+    }
+  ]
+}

flat/objects/07/50/07507eca-32ba-4a5a-bfe4-d666c715a84b.json

@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "KoLA/FLAN-UL2 (20B)/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "Tsinghua University",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "text",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "FLAN-UL2 (20B)",
+    "name": "FLAN-UL2 (20B)",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "KoLA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "KoLA",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2306.09296"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "This metric represents the overall performance of models on the KoLA benchmark (Season 2, September 2023). It is calculated as the average of the standardized Z-scores across all four cognitive ability levels: Knowledge Memorization (KM), Knowledge Understanding (KU), Knowledge Applying (KA), and Knowledge Creating (KC). This comprehensive score provides a holistic view of a model's world knowledge capabilities.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Overall Avg. Standardized Score",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "KoLA Benchmark: Overall Performance (Season 2)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "kola_benchmark_overall_performance_season_2",
+        "metric_name": "KoLA Benchmark: Overall Performance (Season 2)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.54
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "KoLA/FLAN-UL2 (20B)/1771591481.616601#kola#kola_benchmark_overall_performance_season_2"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "KoLA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "KoLA",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2306.09296"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "This metric reflects a model's ability to apply knowledge for complex reasoning and problem-solving. The score is the average of standardized scores from six multi-hop question-answering and reading comprehension tasks, which require reasoning over multiple documents or a combination of text and a knowledge base.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Knowledge Applying (KA) Score",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "KoLA Benchmark: Knowledge Applying (Season 2)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "kola_benchmark_knowledge_applying_season_2",
+        "metric_name": "KoLA Benchmark: Knowledge Applying (Season 2)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 47.4
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "KoLA/FLAN-UL2 (20B)/1771591481.616601#kola#kola_benchmark_knowledge_applying_season_2"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "KoLA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "KoLA",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2306.09296"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "This metric measures a model's ability to generate novel and factually coherent knowledge based on given events. The score is the average of standardized scores from two tasks: creating encyclopedic narratives from known events and creating narratives from evolving, unseen events. It utilizes a self-contrast metric to penalize hallucinations.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Knowledge Creating (KC) Score",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "KoLA Benchmark: Knowledge Creating (Season 2)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "kola_benchmark_knowledge_creating_season_2",
+        "metric_name": "KoLA Benchmark: Knowledge Creating (Season 2)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 23.65
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "KoLA/FLAN-UL2 (20B)/1771591481.616601#kola#kola_benchmark_knowledge_creating_season_2"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "KoLA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "KoLA",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2306.09296"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "This metric assesses a model's ability to recall facts from both known (Wikipedia) and evolving (recent news) sources. The score is the average of the standardized scores from three sub-tasks: probing high-frequency knowledge, low-frequency knowledge, and knowledge from recent articles. It measures the foundational ability of knowledge memorization.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Knowledge Memorization (KM) Score",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "KoLA Benchmark: Knowledge Memorization (Season 2)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "kola_benchmark_knowledge_memorization_season_2",
+        "metric_name": "KoLA Benchmark: Knowledge Memorization (Season 2)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 42.1
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "KoLA/FLAN-UL2 (20B)/1771591481.616601#kola#kola_benchmark_knowledge_memorization_season_2"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "KoLA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "KoLA",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2306.09296"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "This metric evaluates a model's ability to comprehend the underlying knowledge within texts. The score is the average of standardized scores from eight sub-tasks, including conceptual understanding, named entity recognition, relation extraction, and event detection, on both known and evolving data.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Knowledge Understanding (KU) Score",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "KoLA Benchmark: Knowledge Understanding (Season 2)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "kola_benchmark_knowledge_understanding_season_2",
+        "metric_name": "KoLA Benchmark: Knowledge Understanding (Season 2)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 36.04
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "KoLA/FLAN-UL2 (20B)/1771591481.616601#kola#kola_benchmark_knowledge_understanding_season_2"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/07/56/07569fc5-3792-429e-9dc1-f0cd962b605a.json

@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "AceMath-RewardBench/OpenMath2-Llama3.1-70B/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "NVIDIA",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "text",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "OpenMath2-Llama3.1-70B",
+    "name": "OpenMath2-Llama3.1-70B",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "AceMath-RewardBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "AceMath-RewardBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2412.15084"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the number of correctly answered problems out of 30 on the American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) 2024, a highly challenging pre-Olympiad math competition. This is a supplementary benchmark evaluating performance at the frontier of mathematical difficulty.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Correct Answers (out of 30)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Correct Answers on AIME 2024"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "correct_answers_on_aime_2024",
+        "metric_name": "Correct Answers on AIME 2024",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 4
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "AceMath-RewardBench/OpenMath2-Llama3.1-70B/1771591481.616601#acemath_rewardbench#correct_answers_on_aime_2024"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "AceMath-RewardBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "AceMath-RewardBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2412.15084"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the number of correctly answered problems out of 40 on the American Mathematics Competitions (AMC) 2023. This is a supplementary benchmark evaluating performance on competitive high-school level mathematics.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Correct Answers (out of 40)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Correct Answers on AMC 2023"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "correct_answers_on_amc_2023",
+        "metric_name": "Correct Answers on AMC 2023",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 20
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "AceMath-RewardBench/OpenMath2-Llama3.1-70B/1771591481.616601#acemath_rewardbench#correct_answers_on_amc_2023"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/07/58/07582ae2-9c6c-4c2f-9a8e-b72322899bd1.json

@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "KoLA/RedPajama-Instruct (7B)/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "Tsinghua University",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "text",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "RedPajama-Instruct (7B)",
+    "name": "RedPajama-Instruct (7B)",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "KoLA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "KoLA",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2306.09296"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "This metric represents the overall performance of models on the KoLA benchmark (Season 2, September 2023). It is calculated as the average of the standardized Z-scores across all four cognitive ability levels: Knowledge Memorization (KM), Knowledge Understanding (KU), Knowledge Applying (KA), and Knowledge Creating (KC). This comprehensive score provides a holistic view of a model's world knowledge capabilities.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Overall Avg. Standardized Score",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "KoLA Benchmark: Overall Performance (Season 2)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "kola_benchmark_overall_performance_season_2",
+        "metric_name": "KoLA Benchmark: Overall Performance (Season 2)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": -0.85
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "KoLA/RedPajama-Instruct (7B)/1771591481.616601#kola#kola_benchmark_overall_performance_season_2"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "KoLA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "KoLA",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2306.09296"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "This metric reflects a model's ability to apply knowledge for complex reasoning and problem-solving. The score is the average of standardized scores from six multi-hop question-answering and reading comprehension tasks, which require reasoning over multiple documents or a combination of text and a knowledge base.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Knowledge Applying (KA) Score",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "KoLA Benchmark: Knowledge Applying (Season 2)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "kola_benchmark_knowledge_applying_season_2",
+        "metric_name": "KoLA Benchmark: Knowledge Applying (Season 2)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 17.17
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "KoLA/RedPajama-Instruct (7B)/1771591481.616601#kola#kola_benchmark_knowledge_applying_season_2"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "KoLA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "KoLA",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2306.09296"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "This metric measures a model's ability to generate novel and factually coherent knowledge based on given events. The score is the average of standardized scores from two tasks: creating encyclopedic narratives from known events and creating narratives from evolving, unseen events. It utilizes a self-contrast metric to penalize hallucinations.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Knowledge Creating (KC) Score",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "KoLA Benchmark: Knowledge Creating (Season 2)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "kola_benchmark_knowledge_creating_season_2",
+        "metric_name": "KoLA Benchmark: Knowledge Creating (Season 2)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 13
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "KoLA/RedPajama-Instruct (7B)/1771591481.616601#kola#kola_benchmark_knowledge_creating_season_2"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "KoLA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "KoLA",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2306.09296"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "This metric assesses a model's ability to recall facts from both known (Wikipedia) and evolving (recent news) sources. The score is the average of the standardized scores from three sub-tasks: probing high-frequency knowledge, low-frequency knowledge, and knowledge from recent articles. It measures the foundational ability of knowledge memorization.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Knowledge Memorization (KM) Score",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "KoLA Benchmark: Knowledge Memorization (Season 2)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "kola_benchmark_knowledge_memorization_season_2",
+        "metric_name": "KoLA Benchmark: Knowledge Memorization (Season 2)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 19.8
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "KoLA/RedPajama-Instruct (7B)/1771591481.616601#kola#kola_benchmark_knowledge_memorization_season_2"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "KoLA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "KoLA",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2306.09296"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "This metric evaluates a model's ability to comprehend the underlying knowledge within texts. The score is the average of standardized scores from eight sub-tasks, including conceptual understanding, named entity recognition, relation extraction, and event detection, on both known and evolving data.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Knowledge Understanding (KU) Score",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "KoLA Benchmark: Knowledge Understanding (Season 2)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "kola_benchmark_knowledge_understanding_season_2",
+        "metric_name": "KoLA Benchmark: Knowledge Understanding (Season 2)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 23.06
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "KoLA/RedPajama-Instruct (7B)/1771591481.616601#kola#kola_benchmark_knowledge_understanding_season_2"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/07/60/07600cfa-806d-4033-9e8f-7d7efc894bf5.json

@@ -0,0 +1,238 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "OCR-Reasoning/Qwen2.5-VL-32B/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "South China University of Technology",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "image",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "Qwen2.5-VL-32B",
+    "name": "Qwen2.5-VL-32B",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "OCR-Reasoning",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "OCR-Reasoning",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2505.17163"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Overall accuracy of various Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) and LLMs with OCR on the OCR-Reasoning benchmark. This metric represents the average performance across all six reasoning categories and is the primary indicator of a model's ability to reason in complex text-rich image scenarios. Data is sourced from the official project leaderboard, which supersedes the paper's Table 2.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Overall Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Overall Accuracy on OCR-Reasoning Benchmark"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "overall_accuracy_on_ocr_reasoning_benchmark",
+        "metric_name": "Overall Accuracy on OCR-Reasoning Benchmark",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 36.2
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "OCR-Reasoning/Qwen2.5-VL-32B/1771591481.616601#ocr_reasoning#overall_accuracy_on_ocr_reasoning_benchmark"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "OCR-Reasoning",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "OCR-Reasoning",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2505.17163"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on tasks requiring critical thinking and drawing inferences from provided text-rich images to arrive at conclusions (e.g., Commonsense Reasoning, Game-theoretic Logic).",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Logical Reasoning Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Accuracy on Logical Reasoning Tasks"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "accuracy_on_logical_reasoning_tasks",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy on Logical Reasoning Tasks",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 34.7
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "OCR-Reasoning/Qwen2.5-VL-32B/1771591481.616601#ocr_reasoning#accuracy_on_logical_reasoning_tasks"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "OCR-Reasoning",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "OCR-Reasoning",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2505.17163"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on tasks entailing solving mathematical problems (e.g., functions, geometry, statistics) presented in text-rich images, including handwritten problems.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Mathematical Reasoning Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Accuracy on Mathematical Reasoning Tasks"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "accuracy_on_mathematical_reasoning_tasks",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy on Mathematical Reasoning Tasks",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 25.5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "OCR-Reasoning/Qwen2.5-VL-32B/1771591481.616601#ocr_reasoning#accuracy_on_mathematical_reasoning_tasks"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "OCR-Reasoning",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "OCR-Reasoning",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2505.17163"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on tasks involving applying cross-domain knowledge (e.g., physics, chemistry) to interpret text and visual elements in text-rich images.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Multidisciplinary Knowledge Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Accuracy on Multidisciplinary Knowledge Reasoning Tasks"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "accuracy_on_multidisciplinary_knowledge_reasoning_tasks",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy on Multidisciplinary Knowledge Reasoning Tasks",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 36.5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "OCR-Reasoning/Qwen2.5-VL-32B/1771591481.616601#ocr_reasoning#accuracy_on_multidisciplinary_knowledge_reasoning_tasks"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "OCR-Reasoning",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "OCR-Reasoning",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2505.17163"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on tasks involving calculations related to numerical variations in text-rich images (e.g., Financial Analysis, Schedule Analysis, Statistical Analysis).",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Numerical Analysis Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Accuracy on Numerical Analysis Reasoning Tasks"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "accuracy_on_numerical_analysis_reasoning_tasks",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy on Numerical Analysis Reasoning Tasks",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 38.7
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "OCR-Reasoning/Qwen2.5-VL-32B/1771591481.616601#ocr_reasoning#accuracy_on_numerical_analysis_reasoning_tasks"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "OCR-Reasoning",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "OCR-Reasoning",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2505.17163"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on tasks focusing on spatial relationships between text, visual elements, and layout within text-rich images (e.g., Route Reasoning, Layout Reasoning, Relation Extraction).",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Spatial Reasoning Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Accuracy on Spatial Reasoning Tasks"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "accuracy_on_spatial_reasoning_tasks",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy on Spatial Reasoning Tasks",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 21.1
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "OCR-Reasoning/Qwen2.5-VL-32B/1771591481.616601#ocr_reasoning#accuracy_on_spatial_reasoning_tasks"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "OCR-Reasoning",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "OCR-Reasoning",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2505.17163"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on tasks focusing on counting text and visual elements in text-rich images that satisfy specific query conditions (e.g., Text Counting, Conditional Counting). This category was noted as a relative strength for many models.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Enumerative Reasoning Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Accuracy on Enumerative Reasoning Tasks"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "accuracy_on_enumerative_reasoning_tasks",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy on Enumerative Reasoning Tasks",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 46.9
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "OCR-Reasoning/Qwen2.5-VL-32B/1771591481.616601#ocr_reasoning#accuracy_on_enumerative_reasoning_tasks"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/07/67/076717d0-0006-49b5-86aa-e91ab7fe11ee.json

@@ -0,0 +1,508 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "EditBench/Imagen Editor/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "Google Research",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "image",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "Imagen Editor",
+    "name": "Imagen Editor",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "EditBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "EditBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2212.06909"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human evaluation results on the EditBench benchmark for 'Mask-Rich' prompts, which contain detailed descriptions with multiple attributes for the masked object (e.g., 'a small, red, fluffy cat wearing a bow tie'). An image is judged as correct only if it includes every attribute and object specified, with correct binding, setting a very high bar for correctness. This metric is considered the most challenging.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Correct Image-Text Alignment (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "EditBench Human Evaluation: Image-Text Alignment for Complex 'Mask-Rich' Prompts"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "editbench_human_evaluation_image_text_alignment_for_complex_mask_rich_prompts",
+        "metric_name": "EditBench Human Evaluation: Image-Text Alignment for Complex 'Mask-Rich' Prompts",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 30
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "EditBench/Imagen Editor/1771591481.616601#editbench#editbench_human_evaluation_image_text_alignment_for_complex_mask_rich_prompts"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "EditBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "EditBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2212.06909"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human evaluation results for 'Mask-Simple' prompts on EditBench, focusing on the model's ability to correctly render the specified number of objects (e.g., 'three cats'). This is identified as one of the most challenging attributes for all models.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Correct Image-Text Alignment (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "EditBench Human Evaluation: Alignment for 'Count' Attribute"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "editbench_human_evaluation_alignment_for_count_attribute",
+        "metric_name": "EditBench Human Evaluation: Alignment for 'Count' Attribute",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 47
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "EditBench/Imagen Editor/1771591481.616601#editbench#editbench_human_evaluation_alignment_for_count_attribute"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "EditBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "EditBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2212.06909"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Supplementary human evaluation from the appendix, analyzing performance on 'Mask-Rich' prompts specifically for large mask sizes (>36.9% of image area).",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Correct Image-Text Alignment (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "EditBench Human Evaluation (Appendix): Alignment for 'Mask-Rich' Prompts with Large Masks"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "editbench_human_evaluation_appendix_alignment_for_mask_rich_prompts_with_large_masks",
+        "metric_name": "EditBench Human Evaluation (Appendix): Alignment for 'Mask-Rich' Prompts with Large Masks",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 30
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "EditBench/Imagen Editor/1771591481.616601#editbench#editbench_human_evaluation_appendix_alignment_for_mask_rich_prompts_with_large_masks"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "EditBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "EditBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2212.06909"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human evaluation results for 'Mask-Simple' prompts on EditBench, focusing on the model's ability to correctly render rare or unusual objects.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Correct Image-Text Alignment (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "EditBench Human Evaluation: Alignment for Rare Objects"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "editbench_human_evaluation_alignment_for_rare_objects",
+        "metric_name": "EditBench Human Evaluation: Alignment for Rare Objects",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 69
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "EditBench/Imagen Editor/1771591481.616601#editbench#editbench_human_evaluation_alignment_for_rare_objects"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "EditBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "EditBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2212.06909"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human evaluation results for 'Mask-Simple' prompts on EditBench, focusing on the model's ability to correctly render text as an object within the image. This is a known challenge for image generation models.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Correct Image-Text Alignment (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "EditBench Human Evaluation: Alignment for Text Rendering"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "editbench_human_evaluation_alignment_for_text_rendering",
+        "metric_name": "EditBench Human Evaluation: Alignment for Text Rendering",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 65
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "EditBench/Imagen Editor/1771591481.616601#editbench#editbench_human_evaluation_alignment_for_text_rendering"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "EditBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "EditBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2212.06909"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Automated evaluation using Text-to-Image (T2I) CLIPScore, which measures the cosine similarity between the CLIP embeddings of the text prompt and the generated image. Higher scores indicate better alignment between the text description and the visual content.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "CLIPScore (T2I)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "EditBench Automated Evaluation: Text-to-Image CLIPScore"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "editbench_automated_evaluation_text_to_image_clipscore",
+        "metric_name": "EditBench Automated Evaluation: Text-to-Image CLIPScore",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 31.5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "EditBench/Imagen Editor/1771591481.616601#editbench#editbench_automated_evaluation_text_to_image_clipscore"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "EditBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "EditBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2212.06909"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human evaluation results on the EditBench benchmark for 'Full' prompts, which describe the entire image scene. Annotators were asked 'Does the image match the caption?' to determine overall text-image alignment.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Correct Image-Text Alignment (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "EditBench Human Evaluation: Image-Text Alignment for 'Full' Prompts"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "editbench_human_evaluation_image_text_alignment_for_full_prompts",
+        "metric_name": "EditBench Human Evaluation: Image-Text Alignment for 'Full' Prompts",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 98
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "EditBench/Imagen Editor/1771591481.616601#editbench#editbench_human_evaluation_image_text_alignment_for_full_prompts"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "EditBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "EditBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2212.06909"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human evaluation results on the EditBench benchmark for 'Mask-Simple' prompts, which contain a basic description of the masked object (e.g., 'a metal cat'). An image is judged as correct only if the object rendering, attribute presence, and attribute binding are all correct.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Correct Image-Text Alignment (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "EditBench Human Evaluation: Image-Text Alignment for 'Mask-Simple' Prompts"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "editbench_human_evaluation_image_text_alignment_for_mask_simple_prompts",
+        "metric_name": "EditBench Human Evaluation: Image-Text Alignment for 'Mask-Simple' Prompts",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 74
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "EditBench/Imagen Editor/1771591481.616601#editbench#editbench_human_evaluation_image_text_alignment_for_mask_simple_prompts"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "EditBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "EditBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2212.06909"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Supplementary human evaluation from the appendix for 'Mask-Rich' prompts. This metric measures the percentage of images where all attributes (e.g., color, material) specified in the prompt were correctly rendered.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "All Attributes Correct (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "EditBench Human Evaluation (Appendix): All Attributes Correct for 'Mask-Rich' Prompts"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "editbench_human_evaluation_appendix_all_attributes_correct_for_mask_rich_prompts",
+        "metric_name": "EditBench Human Evaluation (Appendix): All Attributes Correct for 'Mask-Rich' Prompts",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 43
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "EditBench/Imagen Editor/1771591481.616601#editbench#editbench_human_evaluation_appendix_all_attributes_correct_for_mask_rich_prompts"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "EditBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "EditBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2212.06909"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Supplementary human evaluation from the appendix for 'Mask-Rich' prompts. This metric measures the percentage of images where all objects specified in the prompt were correctly rendered.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "All Objects Correct (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "EditBench Human Evaluation (Appendix): All Objects Correct for 'Mask-Rich' Prompts"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "editbench_human_evaluation_appendix_all_objects_correct_for_mask_rich_prompts",
+        "metric_name": "EditBench Human Evaluation (Appendix): All Objects Correct for 'Mask-Rich' Prompts",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 67
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "EditBench/Imagen Editor/1771591481.616601#editbench#editbench_human_evaluation_appendix_all_objects_correct_for_mask_rich_prompts"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "EditBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "EditBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2212.06909"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Automated evaluation using the NIMA (Neural Image Assessment) model, which predicts the perceptual quality and aesthetics of an image. Higher scores indicate better visual quality.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "NIMA Score",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "EditBench Automated Evaluation: NIMA Perceptual Quality Score"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "editbench_automated_evaluation_nima_perceptual_quality_score",
+        "metric_name": "EditBench Automated Evaluation: NIMA Perceptual Quality Score",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 4.63
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "EditBench/Imagen Editor/1771591481.616601#editbench#editbench_automated_evaluation_nima_perceptual_quality_score"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "EditBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "EditBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2212.06909"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Side-by-side human evaluation on EditBench 'Mask-Rich' prompts. This shows the percentage of times Imagen Editor was preferred over DALL-E 2 for Text-Image Alignment.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Preference Rate (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Side-by-Side Evaluation: Text-Image Alignment (Imagen Editor vs. DALL-E 2)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "side_by_side_evaluation_text_image_alignment_imagen_editor_vs_dall_e_2",
+        "metric_name": "Side-by-Side Evaluation: Text-Image Alignment (Imagen Editor vs. DALL-E 2)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 77
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "EditBench/Imagen Editor/1771591481.616601#editbench#side_by_side_evaluation_text_image_alignment_imagen_editor_vs_dall_e_2"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "EditBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "EditBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2212.06909"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Side-by-side human evaluation on EditBench 'Mask-Rich' prompts. This shows the percentage of times Imagen Editor was preferred over Stable Diffusion 1.5 for Text-Image Alignment.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Preference Rate (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Side-by-Side Evaluation: Text-Image Alignment (Imagen Editor vs. Stable Diffusion)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "side_by_side_evaluation_text_image_alignment_imagen_editor_vs_stable_diffusion",
+        "metric_name": "Side-by-Side Evaluation: Text-Image Alignment (Imagen Editor vs. Stable Diffusion)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 78
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "EditBench/Imagen Editor/1771591481.616601#editbench#side_by_side_evaluation_text_image_alignment_imagen_editor_vs_stable_diffusion"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "EditBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "EditBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2212.06909"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Side-by-side human evaluation on EditBench 'Mask-Rich' prompts. This shows the percentage of times Imagen Editor was preferred over DALL-E 2 for Image Realism.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Preference Rate (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Side-by-Side Evaluation: Image Realism (Imagen Editor vs. DALL-E 2)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "side_by_side_evaluation_image_realism_imagen_editor_vs_dall_e_2",
+        "metric_name": "Side-by-Side Evaluation: Image Realism (Imagen Editor vs. DALL-E 2)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 56
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "EditBench/Imagen Editor/1771591481.616601#editbench#side_by_side_evaluation_image_realism_imagen_editor_vs_dall_e_2"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "EditBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "EditBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2212.06909"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human evaluation results for 'Mask-Simple' prompts on EditBench, focusing on the model's ability to correctly render common objects.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Correct Image-Text Alignment (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "EditBench Human Evaluation: Alignment for Common Objects"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "editbench_human_evaluation_alignment_for_common_objects",
+        "metric_name": "EditBench Human Evaluation: Alignment for Common Objects",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 74
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "EditBench/Imagen Editor/1771591481.616601#editbench#editbench_human_evaluation_alignment_for_common_objects"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "EditBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "EditBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2212.06909"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Side-by-side human evaluation on EditBench 'Mask-Rich' prompts. This shows the percentage of times Imagen Editor was preferred over Stable Diffusion 1.5 for Image Realism.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Preference Rate (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Side-by-Side Evaluation: Image Realism (Imagen Editor vs. Stable Diffusion)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "side_by_side_evaluation_image_realism_imagen_editor_vs_stable_diffusion",
+        "metric_name": "Side-by-Side Evaluation: Image Realism (Imagen Editor vs. Stable Diffusion)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 51
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "EditBench/Imagen Editor/1771591481.616601#editbench#side_by_side_evaluation_image_realism_imagen_editor_vs_stable_diffusion"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/07/67/0767e5f7-68fd-445c-a94b-5a709de67237.json

@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "ViStoryBench/Gemini-2.0/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "ShanghaiTech University",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "image",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "Gemini-2.0",
+    "name": "Gemini-2.0",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "ViStoryBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "ViStoryBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://huggingface.co/datasets/ViStoryBench/ViStoryBench"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human ratings of the subjective aesthetic quality of generated images on the ViStoryBench-Lite dataset. 20 human annotators rated the images on a 5-point Likert scale (0-4), assessing overall artistic appeal and visual quality.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Subjective Aesthetics (Human Eval)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Human Evaluation of Subjective Aesthetics on ViStoryBench-Lite"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "human_evaluation_of_subjective_aesthetics_on_vistorybench_lite",
+        "metric_name": "Human Evaluation of Subjective Aesthetics on ViStoryBench-Lite",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 2.26
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "ViStoryBench/Gemini-2.0/1771591481.616601#vistorybench#human_evaluation_of_subjective_aesthetics_on_vistorybench_lite"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/07/69/0769627a-37e7-442a-96b5-117dbe5ac282.json

@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "Q-Bench+/MiniGPT-4 (Vicuna-13B)/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "Shanghai Jiao Tong University",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "image",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "MiniGPT-4 (Vicuna-13B)",
+    "name": "MiniGPT-4 (Vicuna-13B)",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "Q-Bench+",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "Q-Bench+",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2402.07116"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Evaluates the accuracy of Multi-modality Large Language Models (MLLMs) in answering open-ended questions about low-level visual features (e.g., clarity, lighting, distortions) of single images. The evaluation is conducted on the LLVisionQA+ dataset. Scores are from the official project leaderboard, with the latest update on July 18, 2024.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Overall Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Q-Bench+: Low-Level Visual Perception Accuracy on Single Images (A1)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "q_bench_low_level_visual_perception_accuracy_on_single_images_a1",
+        "metric_name": "Q-Bench+: Low-Level Visual Perception Accuracy on Single Images (A1)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 51.77
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "Q-Bench+/MiniGPT-4 (Vicuna-13B)/1771591481.616601#q_bench#q_bench_low_level_visual_perception_accuracy_on_single_images_a1"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "Q-Bench+",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "Q-Bench+",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2402.07116"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Evaluates MLLMs' zero-shot ability to provide quantifiable quality scores aligned with human-rated Mean Opinion Scores (MOS). The metric is the average Pearson Linear Correlation Coefficient (PLCC) across 7 standard Image Quality Assessment (IQA) datasets. Higher values indicate better linear correlation with human judgments.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Average PLCC",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Q-Bench+: Zero-Shot Image Quality Assessment (PLCC)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "q_bench_zero_shot_image_quality_assessment_plcc",
+        "metric_name": "Q-Bench+: Zero-Shot Image Quality Assessment (PLCC)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.3
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "Q-Bench+/MiniGPT-4 (Vicuna-13B)/1771591481.616601#q_bench#q_bench_zero_shot_image_quality_assessment_plcc"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "Q-Bench+",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "Q-Bench+",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2402.07116"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Evaluates MLLMs' zero-shot ability to provide quantifiable quality scores aligned with human-rated Mean Opinion Scores (MOS). The metric is the average Spearman Rank-Order Correlation Coefficient (SRCC) across 7 standard Image Quality Assessment (IQA) datasets. Higher values indicate better monotonic correlation with human judgments.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Average SRCC",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Q-Bench+: Zero-Shot Image Quality Assessment (SRCC)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "q_bench_zero_shot_image_quality_assessment_srcc",
+        "metric_name": "Q-Bench+: Zero-Shot Image Quality Assessment (SRCC)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.293
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "Q-Bench+/MiniGPT-4 (Vicuna-13B)/1771591481.616601#q_bench#q_bench_zero_shot_image_quality_assessment_srcc"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "Q-Bench+",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "Q-Bench+",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2402.07116"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Evaluates MLLMs' ability to generate natural language descriptions of low-level visual attributes for single images on the LLDescribe+ dataset. Performance is measured by a GPT-assisted evaluation scoring Completeness, Preciseness, and Relevance (each from 0-2), which are then summed.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Sum of Scores (out of 6)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Q-Bench+: Low-Level Description Quality for Single Images (A2)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "q_bench_low_level_description_quality_for_single_images_a2",
+        "metric_name": "Q-Bench+: Low-Level Description Quality for Single Images (A2)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 3.67
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "Q-Bench+/MiniGPT-4 (Vicuna-13B)/1771591481.616601#q_bench#q_bench_low_level_description_quality_for_single_images_a2"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/07/92/0792e5f8-dea3-48c8-81de-65b004cfea8f.json

@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "HATS/SWE-Rizzo/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "University of Pennsylvania",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "text",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "SWE-Rizzo",
+    "name": "SWE-Rizzo",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "HATS",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "HATS",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2507.13238"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Percentage of software engineering issues resolved by the SWE-Rizzo agent on the SWE-bench Verified benchmark, a human-filtered set of 500 real-world software issues.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "% Resolved - SWE-Rizzo",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "SWE-bench Verified: Performance of SWE-Rizzo Agent"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "swe_bench_verified_performance_of_swe_rizzo_agent",
+        "metric_name": "SWE-bench Verified: Performance of SWE-Rizzo Agent",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 56.6
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "HATS/SWE-Rizzo/1771591481.616601#hats#swe_bench_verified_performance_of_swe_rizzo_agent"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/07/94/0794a01f-242d-4a6d-9f7a-f108bb13fcd4.json

@@ -0,0 +1,208 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "LiveAoPSBench/DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "University of British Columbia",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "text",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B",
+    "name": "DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "LiveAoPSBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "LiveAoPSBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.14275"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average Pass@1 accuracy of Large Language Models on the LiveAoPSBench benchmark, which consists of 3107 recent, contamination-resistant Olympiad-level math problems. This metric reflects overall mathematical reasoning capability. Results are from the official project leaderboard.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Average Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "LiveAoPSBench: Average Accuracy on Olympiad-Level Math"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "liveaopsbench_average_accuracy_on_olympiad_level_math",
+        "metric_name": "LiveAoPSBench: Average Accuracy on Olympiad-Level Math",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 32.1
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "LiveAoPSBench/DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B/1771591481.616601#liveaopsbench#liveaopsbench_average_accuracy_on_olympiad_level_math"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "LiveAoPSBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "LiveAoPSBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.14275"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Pass@1 accuracy of LLMs on the subset of 425 College difficulty problems from the LiveAoPSBench benchmark. Results are from the official project leaderboard.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "College Level Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "LiveAoPSBench: Accuracy on College Level Problems"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "liveaopsbench_accuracy_on_college_level_problems",
+        "metric_name": "LiveAoPSBench: Accuracy on College Level Problems",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 27.8
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "LiveAoPSBench/DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B/1771591481.616601#liveaopsbench#liveaopsbench_accuracy_on_college_level_problems"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "LiveAoPSBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "LiveAoPSBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.14275"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Pass@1 accuracy of LLMs on the subset of 1046 High School difficulty problems from the LiveAoPSBench benchmark. Results are from the official project leaderboard.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "High School Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "LiveAoPSBench: Accuracy on High School Problems"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "liveaopsbench_accuracy_on_high_school_problems",
+        "metric_name": "LiveAoPSBench: Accuracy on High School Problems",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 37.7
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "LiveAoPSBench/DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B/1771591481.616601#liveaopsbench#liveaopsbench_accuracy_on_high_school_problems"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "LiveAoPSBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "LiveAoPSBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.14275"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Pass@1 accuracy of LLMs on the subset of 181 Middle School difficulty problems from the LiveAoPSBench benchmark. Results are from the official project leaderboard.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Middle School Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "LiveAoPSBench: Accuracy on Middle School Problems"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "liveaopsbench_accuracy_on_middle_school_problems",
+        "metric_name": "LiveAoPSBench: Accuracy on Middle School Problems",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 47.5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "LiveAoPSBench/DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B/1771591481.616601#liveaopsbench#liveaopsbench_accuracy_on_middle_school_problems"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "LiveAoPSBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "LiveAoPSBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.14275"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Pass@1 accuracy of LLMs on the subset of 1081 High School Olympiads difficulty problems from the LiveAoPSBench benchmark. This is the most challenging category. Results are from the official project leaderboard.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "High School Olympiads Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "LiveAoPSBench: Accuracy on High School Olympiads Problems"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "liveaopsbench_accuracy_on_high_school_olympiads_problems",
+        "metric_name": "LiveAoPSBench: Accuracy on High School Olympiads Problems",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 24.4
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "LiveAoPSBench/DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B/1771591481.616601#liveaopsbench#liveaopsbench_accuracy_on_high_school_olympiads_problems"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "LiveAoPSBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "LiveAoPSBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.14275"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Pass@1 accuracy of LLMs on the subset of 374 problems categorized as 'Others' from the LiveAoPSBench benchmark. Results are from the official project leaderboard.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Other Problems Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "LiveAoPSBench: Accuracy on Other Problems"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "liveaopsbench_accuracy_on_other_problems",
+        "metric_name": "LiveAoPSBench: Accuracy on Other Problems",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 35.8
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "LiveAoPSBench/DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B/1771591481.616601#liveaopsbench#liveaopsbench_accuracy_on_other_problems"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/07/94/0794f0ea-6234-417d-917f-e1fd477ea0e3.json

@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "EWoK/Phi-1/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "Harvard University",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "text",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "Phi-1",
+    "name": "Phi-1",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "EWoK",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "EWoK",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2405.09605"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Mean accuracy of open-weight LLMs on the EWOK-CORE-1.0 benchmark, evaluated using token-level log probabilities (LogProbs). The score is calculated based on whether the model correctly assigns higher probability to plausible context-target pairs compared to implausible ones. A score of 1.0 is awarded if both comparisons for an item are correct, 0.5 for one correct, and 0 for neither. The chance baseline is 50%. Results are averaged over 5 dataset versions.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Mean Accuracy (LogProbs)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "EWoK-Core-1.0 Performance (LogProbs Evaluation)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "ewok_core_1_0_performance_logprobs_evaluation",
+        "metric_name": "EWoK-Core-1.0 Performance (LogProbs Evaluation)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.522
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "EWoK/Phi-1/1771591481.616601#ewok#ewok_core_1_0_performance_logprobs_evaluation"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/07/9d/079db17a-7a2e-4f9c-849e-d9d252a4f843.json

@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "DA-2K/Depth Anything v1/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "HKU",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "image",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "Depth Anything v1",
+    "name": "Depth Anything v1",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "DA-2K",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "DA-2K",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2406.09414"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "This benchmark measures the accuracy of relative depth estimation on the DA-2K dataset, which includes 2000 challenging image pairs across eight diverse scenarios. Higher accuracy indicates better performance.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Performance on the DA-2K Benchmark"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "performance_on_the_da_2k_benchmark",
+        "metric_name": "Performance on the DA-2K Benchmark",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 88.5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "DA-2K/Depth Anything v1/1771591481.616601#da_2k#performance_on_the_da_2k_benchmark"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/07/a3/07a3c600-b040-47de-978f-92772c29f573.json

@@ -0,0 +1,208 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "TAO-Amodal/ViTDet-H/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "Carnegie Mellon University",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "image",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "ViTDet-H",
+    "name": "ViTDet-H",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "TAO-Amodal",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "TAO-Amodal",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2312.12433"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Track Average Precision (Track-AP) for tracks that are occluded (visibility <= 80%) for more than 5 seconds, evaluated on the TAO-Amodal validation set at an IoU threshold of 0.5. This metric is central to the benchmark's goal of evaluating occlusion reasoning in tracking. The evaluation is averaged across all categories, except for models marked as 'COCO eval'.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Tracking AP (Occluded Tracks)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Amodal Tracking of Occluded Objects on TAO-Amodal"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "amodal_tracking_of_occluded_objects_on_tao_amodal",
+        "metric_name": "Amodal Tracking of Occluded Objects on TAO-Amodal",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 5.63
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "TAO-Amodal/ViTDet-H/1771591481.616601#tao_amodal#amodal_tracking_of_occluded_objects_on_tao_amodal"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "TAO-Amodal",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "TAO-Amodal",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2312.12433"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average Precision (AP) for amodal object detection on the TAO-Amodal validation set, at an IoU threshold of 0.5. The evaluation is averaged across all 833 categories, except for models marked as 'COCO eval' which are evaluated only on objects within COCO categories. Models were fine-tuned on the TAO-Amodal training set.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Detection AP",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Overall Amodal Object Detection Performance on TAO-Amodal"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "overall_amodal_object_detection_performance_on_tao_amodal",
+        "metric_name": "Overall Amodal Object Detection Performance on TAO-Amodal",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 30.2
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "TAO-Amodal/ViTDet-H/1771591481.616601#tao_amodal#overall_amodal_object_detection_performance_on_tao_amodal"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "TAO-Amodal",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "TAO-Amodal",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2312.12433"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average Precision (AP) for detecting heavily occluded objects (visibility < 10%) on the TAO-Amodal validation set, at an IoU threshold of 0.5. The evaluation is averaged across all categories, except for models marked as 'COCO eval'. This metric specifically tests a model's ability to reason about objects with very little visible evidence.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Detection AP (Heavy Occlusion)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Amodal Detection of Heavily Occluded Objects on TAO-Amodal"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "amodal_detection_of_heavily_occluded_objects_on_tao_amodal",
+        "metric_name": "Amodal Detection of Heavily Occluded Objects on TAO-Amodal",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 1.13
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "TAO-Amodal/ViTDet-H/1771591481.616601#tao_amodal#amodal_detection_of_heavily_occluded_objects_on_tao_amodal"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "TAO-Amodal",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "TAO-Amodal",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2312.12433"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average Precision (AP) for detecting objects that are partially out-of-frame on the TAO-Amodal validation set, at an IoU threshold of 0.5. The evaluation is averaged across all categories, except for models marked as 'COCO eval'.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Detection AP (Out-of-Frame)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Amodal Detection of Out-of-Frame Objects on TAO-Amodal"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "amodal_detection_of_out_of_frame_objects_on_tao_amodal",
+        "metric_name": "Amodal Detection of Out-of-Frame Objects on TAO-Amodal",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 16.97
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "TAO-Amodal/ViTDet-H/1771591481.616601#tao_amodal#amodal_detection_of_out_of_frame_objects_on_tao_amodal"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "TAO-Amodal",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "TAO-Amodal",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2312.12433"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average Precision (AP) for detecting partially occluded objects (visibility between 10% and 80%) on the TAO-Amodal validation set, at an IoU threshold of 0.5. The evaluation is averaged across all categories, except for models marked as 'COCO eval'.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Detection AP (Partial Occlusion)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Amodal Detection of Partially Occluded Objects on TAO-Amodal"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "amodal_detection_of_partially_occluded_objects_on_tao_amodal",
+        "metric_name": "Amodal Detection of Partially Occluded Objects on TAO-Amodal",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 15.8
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "TAO-Amodal/ViTDet-H/1771591481.616601#tao_amodal#amodal_detection_of_partially_occluded_objects_on_tao_amodal"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "TAO-Amodal",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "TAO-Amodal",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2312.12433"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Track Average Precision (Track-AP) for amodal object tracking on the TAO-Amodal validation set, at an IoU threshold of 0.5. The evaluation is averaged across all categories, except for models marked as 'COCO eval'. Models were fine-tuned on the TAO-Amodal training set.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Tracking AP",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Overall Amodal Object Tracking Performance on TAO-Amodal"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "overall_amodal_object_tracking_performance_on_tao_amodal",
+        "metric_name": "Overall Amodal Object Tracking Performance on TAO-Amodal",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 9.72
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "TAO-Amodal/ViTDet-H/1771591481.616601#tao_amodal#overall_amodal_object_tracking_performance_on_tao_amodal"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/07/a3/07a3e69b-65e7-4c4e-a078-4067cf608398.json

@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "GitChameleon/Starcoder2 15B/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "Monash University",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "text",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "Starcoder2 15B",
+    "name": "Starcoder2 15B",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "GitChameleon",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "GitChameleon",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2411.05830"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the functional correctness of code generated by base (non-instruction-tuned) models on the GitChameleon benchmark. Pass@1 is the percentage of problems for which at least one generated solution passes all unit tests, sampled with a temperature of 0.3. This benchmark evaluates a model's ability to generate version-specific Python code.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Pass@1 (T=0.3)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "GitChameleon: Pass@1 Performance for Base Models"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "gitchameleon_pass_1_performance_for_base_models",
+        "metric_name": "GitChameleon: Pass@1 Performance for Base Models",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 13.7
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "GitChameleon/Starcoder2 15B/1771591481.616601#gitchameleon#gitchameleon_pass_1_performance_for_base_models"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "GitChameleon",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "GitChameleon",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2411.05830"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the functional correctness of code generated by base (non-instruction-tuned) models on the GitChameleon benchmark. Pass@10 is the percentage of problems for which at least one of the top 10 generated solutions passes all unit tests, based on 20 samples with a temperature of 0.8. This benchmark evaluates a model's ability to generate version-specific Python code.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Pass@10 (T=0.8)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "GitChameleon: Pass@10 Performance for Base Models"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "gitchameleon_pass_10_performance_for_base_models",
+        "metric_name": "GitChameleon: Pass@10 Performance for Base Models",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 27
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "GitChameleon/Starcoder2 15B/1771591481.616601#gitchameleon#gitchameleon_pass_10_performance_for_base_models"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/07/ab/07ab41bb-6dab-4c9a-84ad-0851dacf0330.json

@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "ViVerBench/SD-3-Medium/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "Tsinghua University",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "image",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "SD-3-Medium",
+    "name": "SD-3-Medium",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "ViVerBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "ViVerBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2510.13804"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Evaluates performance on GenEval++, a benchmark for complex compositional-based image generation. The table compares standard text-to-image models with models enhanced by a verifier agent (QwenVL-TTS or the proposed OmniVerifier-TTS) using either sequential or parallel refinement. Scores are overall accuracy; higher is better.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "GenEval++ Overall Score",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Compositional Generation on GenEval++"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "compositional_generation_on_geneval",
+        "metric_name": "Compositional Generation on GenEval++",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.296
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "ViVerBench/SD-3-Medium/1771591481.616601#viverbench#compositional_generation_on_geneval"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "ViVerBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "ViVerBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2510.13804"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Evaluates performance on T2I-ReasonBench, a benchmark for reasoning-based image generation. The table compares standard text-to-image models with models enhanced by a verifier agent (QwenVL-TTS or the proposed OmniVerifier-TTS) using either sequential or parallel refinement. Scores are overall accuracy; higher is better.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "T2I-ReasonBench Overall Score",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Reason-based Generation on T2I-ReasonBench"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "reason_based_generation_on_t2i_reasonbench",
+        "metric_name": "Reason-based Generation on T2I-ReasonBench",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 50.9
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "ViVerBench/SD-3-Medium/1771591481.616601#viverbench#reason_based_generation_on_t2i_reasonbench"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/07/ab/07ab5b61-298b-4035-adfc-ab7134445823.json

@@ -0,0 +1,508 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "IconQA/Human/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "UCLA",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "image",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "Human",
+    "name": "Human",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IconQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IconQA",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2110.13214"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the accuracy of models on the multi-image-choice sub-task of the IconQA benchmark. Given an abstract diagram and a question, the model must select the correct image from a list of visual candidates.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (Multi-image-choice)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IconQA: Multi-Image-Choice Accuracy"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "iconqa_multi_image_choice_accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "IconQA: Multi-Image-Choice Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 95.69
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IconQA/Human/1771591481.616601#iconqa#iconqa_multi_image_choice_accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IconQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IconQA",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2110.13214"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures model accuracy on questions from the IconQA test set that require applying external, commonsense knowledge.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (Commonsense)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IconQA Skill Breakdown: Commonsense"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "iconqa_skill_breakdown_commonsense",
+        "metric_name": "IconQA Skill Breakdown: Commonsense",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 97.06
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IconQA/Human/1771591481.616601#iconqa#iconqa_skill_breakdown_commonsense"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IconQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IconQA",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2110.13214"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures model accuracy on questions from the IconQA test set that require comparing object attributes.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (Comparing)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IconQA Skill Breakdown: Comparing"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "iconqa_skill_breakdown_comparing",
+        "metric_name": "IconQA Skill Breakdown: Comparing",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 94.41
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IconQA/Human/1771591481.616601#iconqa#iconqa_skill_breakdown_comparing"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IconQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IconQA",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2110.13214"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures model accuracy on questions from the IconQA test set that require counting objects or shapes.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (Counting)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IconQA Skill Breakdown: Counting"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "iconqa_skill_breakdown_counting",
+        "metric_name": "IconQA Skill Breakdown: Counting",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 97.63
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IconQA/Human/1771591481.616601#iconqa#iconqa_skill_breakdown_counting"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IconQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IconQA",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2110.13214"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures model accuracy on questions from the IconQA test set that require estimating lengths or large numbers.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (Estimation)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IconQA Skill Breakdown: Estimation"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "iconqa_skill_breakdown_estimation",
+        "metric_name": "IconQA Skill Breakdown: Estimation",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 87.51
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IconQA/Human/1771591481.616601#iconqa#iconqa_skill_breakdown_estimation"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IconQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IconQA",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2110.13214"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the accuracy of models on the filling-in-the-blank sub-task of the IconQA benchmark. Similar to conventional VQA, the model must provide a brief text answer to a question about an abstract diagram.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (Filling-in-the-blank)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IconQA: Filling-in-the-Blank Accuracy"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "iconqa_filling_in_the_blank_accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "IconQA: Filling-in-the-Blank Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 93.56
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IconQA/Human/1771591481.616601#iconqa#iconqa_filling_in_the_blank_accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IconQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IconQA",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2110.13214"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures model accuracy on questions from the IconQA test set that require performing fraction operations.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (Fraction)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IconQA Skill Breakdown: Fraction Operations"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "iconqa_skill_breakdown_fraction_operations",
+        "metric_name": "IconQA Skill Breakdown: Fraction Operations",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 97.45
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IconQA/Human/1771591481.616601#iconqa#iconqa_skill_breakdown_fraction_operations"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IconQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IconQA",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2110.13214"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures model accuracy on questions from the IconQA test set that require geometry reasoning skills, such as identifying shapes, symmetry, and transformations.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (Geometry)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IconQA Skill Breakdown: Geometry"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "iconqa_skill_breakdown_geometry",
+        "metric_name": "IconQA Skill Breakdown: Geometry",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 94.63
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IconQA/Human/1771591481.616601#iconqa#iconqa_skill_breakdown_geometry"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IconQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IconQA",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2110.13214"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures model accuracy on questions from the IconQA test set that require measuring widths, lengths, or heights.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (Measurement)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IconQA Skill Breakdown: Measurement"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "iconqa_skill_breakdown_measurement",
+        "metric_name": "IconQA Skill Breakdown: Measurement",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 86.55
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IconQA/Human/1771591481.616601#iconqa#iconqa_skill_breakdown_measurement"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IconQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IconQA",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2110.13214"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the accuracy of models on the multi-text-choice sub-task of the IconQA benchmark. Given an abstract diagram and a question, the model must choose the correct textual answer from 2-5 provided text choices.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (Multi-text-choice)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IconQA: Multi-Text-Choice Accuracy"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "iconqa_multi_text_choice_accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "IconQA: Multi-Text-Choice Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 93.91
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IconQA/Human/1771591481.616601#iconqa#iconqa_multi_text_choice_accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IconQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IconQA",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2110.13214"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures model accuracy on questions from the IconQA test set that require identifying next and different patterns.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (Pattern)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IconQA Skill Breakdown: Pattern Recognition"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "iconqa_skill_breakdown_pattern_recognition",
+        "metric_name": "IconQA Skill Breakdown: Pattern Recognition",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 95.66
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IconQA/Human/1771591481.616601#iconqa#iconqa_skill_breakdown_pattern_recognition"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IconQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IconQA",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2110.13214"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures model accuracy on questions from the IconQA test set that require performing probability and statistics operations.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (Probability)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IconQA Skill Breakdown: Probability"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "iconqa_skill_breakdown_probability",
+        "metric_name": "IconQA Skill Breakdown: Probability",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 85.67
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IconQA/Human/1771591481.616601#iconqa#iconqa_skill_breakdown_probability"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IconQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IconQA",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2110.13214"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures model accuracy on questions from the IconQA test set that require understanding abstract scenes.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (Scene)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IconQA Skill Breakdown: Scene Understanding"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "iconqa_skill_breakdown_scene_understanding",
+        "metric_name": "IconQA Skill Breakdown: Scene Understanding",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 92.73
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IconQA/Human/1771591481.616601#iconqa#iconqa_skill_breakdown_scene_understanding"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IconQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IconQA",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2110.13214"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures model accuracy on questions from the IconQA test set that require identifying spatial positions and relations.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (Spatial)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IconQA Skill Breakdown: Spatial Reasoning"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "iconqa_skill_breakdown_spatial_reasoning",
+        "metric_name": "IconQA Skill Breakdown: Spatial Reasoning",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 93.31
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IconQA/Human/1771591481.616601#iconqa#iconqa_skill_breakdown_spatial_reasoning"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IconQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IconQA",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2110.13214"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures model accuracy on questions from the IconQA test set that require performing algebraic operations.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (Algebra)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IconQA Skill Breakdown: Algebra"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "iconqa_skill_breakdown_algebra",
+        "metric_name": "IconQA Skill Breakdown: Algebra",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 96.29
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IconQA/Human/1771591481.616601#iconqa#iconqa_skill_breakdown_algebra"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IconQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IconQA",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2110.13214"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures model accuracy on questions from the IconQA test set that require identifying the time of clocks or events.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (Time)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IconQA Skill Breakdown: Time"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "iconqa_skill_breakdown_time",
+        "metric_name": "IconQA Skill Breakdown: Time",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 97.94
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IconQA/Human/1771591481.616601#iconqa#iconqa_skill_breakdown_time"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/07/ac/07ac07e2-2dc6-4c44-a588-061c650bf2f9.json

@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "Visual Commonsense Reasoning/MerlotReserve-Large/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "University of Washington",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "image",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "MerlotReserve-Large",
+    "name": "MerlotReserve-Large",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "Visual Commonsense Reasoning",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "Visual Commonsense Reasoning",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/1811.10830"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "The primary metric for the Visual Commonsense Reasoning (VCR) benchmark, measuring the holistic accuracy of both answering a question and providing the correct justification. A prediction is only correct if both the chosen answer and rationale are correct. Chance performance is 6.25%. Results are sourced from the official VCR leaderboard.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Q->AR Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "VCR: Holistic Answering and Justification (Q->AR) Accuracy"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "vcr_holistic_answering_and_justification_q_ar_accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "VCR: Holistic Answering and Justification (Q->AR) Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 71.5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "Visual Commonsense Reasoning/MerlotReserve-Large/1771591481.616601#visual_commonsense_reasoning#vcr_holistic_answering_and_justification_q_ar_accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "Visual Commonsense Reasoning",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "Visual Commonsense Reasoning",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/1811.10830"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the accuracy of models on the answer justification sub-task of the VCR benchmark. Given an image, a question, and the correct answer, the model must select the correct rationale from four multiple-choice options. Results are sourced from the official VCR leaderboard.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "QA->R Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "VCR: Answer Justification (QA->R) Accuracy"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "vcr_answer_justification_qa_r_accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "VCR: Answer Justification (QA->R) Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 84.9
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "Visual Commonsense Reasoning/MerlotReserve-Large/1771591481.616601#visual_commonsense_reasoning#vcr_answer_justification_qa_r_accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "Visual Commonsense Reasoning",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "Visual Commonsense Reasoning",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/1811.10830"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the accuracy of models on the question-answering sub-task of the VCR benchmark. Given an image and a question, the model must select the correct answer from four multiple-choice options. Results are sourced from the official VCR leaderboard.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Q->A Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "VCR: Question Answering (Q->A) Accuracy"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "vcr_question_answering_q_a_accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "VCR: Question Answering (Q->A) Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 84
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "Visual Commonsense Reasoning/MerlotReserve-Large/1771591481.616601#visual_commonsense_reasoning#vcr_question_answering_q_a_accuracy"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/07/ac/07acbf50-d87b-4915-bc35-56a3d2f93c19.json

@@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "hfopenllm_v2/sometimesanotion_lamarck-14b-reason-model_stock/1773936498.240187",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1773936498.240187",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "HF Open LLM v2",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "Hugging Face",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party"
+  },
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "lm-evaluation-harness",
+    "version": "0.4.0",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "fork": "https://github.com/huggingface/lm-evaluation-harness/tree/adding_all_changess"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "name": "lamarck-14b-reason-model_stock",
+    "id": "sometimesanotion/lamarck-14b-reason-model_stock",
+    "developer": "sometimesanotion",
+    "inference_platform": "unknown",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "precision": "bfloat16",
+      "architecture": "Qwen2ForCausalLM",
+      "params_billions": "14.766"
+    }
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IFEval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IFEval",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "google/IFEval"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on IFEval",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.4965
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/sometimesanotion_lamarck-14b-reason-model_stock/1773936498.240187#ifeval#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "BBH",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "BBH",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "SaylorTwift/bbh"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on BBH",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.6569
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/sometimesanotion_lamarck-14b-reason-model_stock/1773936498.240187#bbh#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MATH Level 5",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MATH Level 5",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "DigitalLearningGmbH/MATH-lighteval"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Exact Match on MATH Level 5",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "exact_match",
+        "metric_name": "Exact Match",
+        "metric_kind": "exact_match",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.358
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/sometimesanotion_lamarck-14b-reason-model_stock/1773936498.240187#math_level_5#exact_match"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "GPQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "GPQA",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "Idavidrein/gpqa"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on GPQA",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.3842
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/sometimesanotion_lamarck-14b-reason-model_stock/1773936498.240187#gpqa#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MUSR",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MUSR",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "TAUR-Lab/MuSR"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on MUSR",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.4741
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/sometimesanotion_lamarck-14b-reason-model_stock/1773936498.240187#musr#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MMLU-PRO",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MMLU-PRO",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "TIGER-Lab/MMLU-Pro"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on MMLU-PRO",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.5402
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/sometimesanotion_lamarck-14b-reason-model_stock/1773936498.240187#mmlu_pro#accuracy"
+    }
+  ]
+}

flat/objects/07/b3/07b3c6ab-3cbf-47e4-821e-2c4fa1904ebc.json

@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "InSpaceType/PixelFormer/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "UCLA",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "image",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "PixelFormer",
+    "name": "PixelFormer",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "InSpaceType",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "InSpaceType",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2309.13516"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": true,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) of various monocular depth estimation models on the InSpaceType evaluation set. This is a zero-shot cross-dataset evaluation where supervised models are trained on the NYUv2 dataset and then tested on InSpaceType. Lower values indicate better performance.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "RMSE",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Overall Performance on InSpaceType Benchmark (RMSE)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "overall_performance_on_inspacetype_benchmark_rmse",
+        "metric_name": "Overall Performance on InSpaceType Benchmark (RMSE)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.4392
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "InSpaceType/PixelFormer/1771591481.616601#inspacetype#overall_performance_on_inspacetype_benchmark_rmse"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "InSpaceType",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "InSpaceType",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2309.13516"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": true,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Absolute Relative Error (AbsRel) of various monocular depth estimation models on the InSpaceType evaluation set. This is a zero-shot cross-dataset evaluation where supervised models are trained on the NYUv2 dataset and then tested on InSpaceType. Lower values indicate better performance.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "AbsRel",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Overall Performance on InSpaceType Benchmark (AbsRel)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "overall_performance_on_inspacetype_benchmark_absrel",
+        "metric_name": "Overall Performance on InSpaceType Benchmark (AbsRel)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.1225
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "InSpaceType/PixelFormer/1771591481.616601#inspacetype#overall_performance_on_inspacetype_benchmark_absrel"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "InSpaceType",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "InSpaceType",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2309.13516"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "δ1 accuracy of various monocular depth estimation models on the InSpaceType evaluation set. This metric measures the percentage of pixels where the ratio between predicted and ground truth depth is less than 1.25. This is a zero-shot evaluation where models are trained on NYUv2. Higher values are better.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "δ1 Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Overall Performance on InSpaceType Benchmark (δ1 Accuracy)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "overall_performance_on_inspacetype_benchmark_1_accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Overall Performance on InSpaceType Benchmark (δ1 Accuracy)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 86.08
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "InSpaceType/PixelFormer/1771591481.616601#inspacetype#overall_performance_on_inspacetype_benchmark_1_accuracy"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/07/b4/07b49b7a-d704-479d-a766-50cf4175863d.json

@@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "hfopenllm_v2/OpenBuddy_openbuddy-llama3-70b-v21.2-32k/1773936498.240187",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1773936498.240187",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "HF Open LLM v2",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "Hugging Face",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party"
+  },
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "lm-evaluation-harness",
+    "version": "0.4.0",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "fork": "https://github.com/huggingface/lm-evaluation-harness/tree/adding_all_changess"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "name": "openbuddy-llama3-70b-v21.2-32k",
+    "id": "OpenBuddy/openbuddy-llama3-70b-v21.2-32k",
+    "developer": "OpenBuddy",
+    "inference_platform": "unknown",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "precision": "bfloat16",
+      "architecture": "LlamaForCausalLM",
+      "params_billions": "70.554"
+    }
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IFEval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IFEval",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "google/IFEval"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on IFEval",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.701
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/OpenBuddy_openbuddy-llama3-70b-v21.2-32k/1773936498.240187#ifeval#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "BBH",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "BBH",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "SaylorTwift/bbh"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on BBH",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.6507
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/OpenBuddy_openbuddy-llama3-70b-v21.2-32k/1773936498.240187#bbh#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MATH Level 5",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MATH Level 5",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "DigitalLearningGmbH/MATH-lighteval"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Exact Match on MATH Level 5",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "exact_match",
+        "metric_name": "Exact Match",
+        "metric_kind": "exact_match",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.2032
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/OpenBuddy_openbuddy-llama3-70b-v21.2-32k/1773936498.240187#math_level_5#exact_match"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "GPQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "GPQA",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "Idavidrein/gpqa"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on GPQA",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.3423
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/OpenBuddy_openbuddy-llama3-70b-v21.2-32k/1773936498.240187#gpqa#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MUSR",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MUSR",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "TAUR-Lab/MuSR"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on MUSR",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.458
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/OpenBuddy_openbuddy-llama3-70b-v21.2-32k/1773936498.240187#musr#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MMLU-PRO",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MMLU-PRO",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "TIGER-Lab/MMLU-Pro"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on MMLU-PRO",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.4832
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/OpenBuddy_openbuddy-llama3-70b-v21.2-32k/1773936498.240187#mmlu_pro#accuracy"
+    }
+  ]
+}

flat/objects/07/b4/07b4b9a4-f906-4245-b2ac-79d09f75aef7.json

@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "C-Eval/Taichu-70B/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "Shanghai Jiao Tong University",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "text",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "Taichu-70B",
+    "name": "Taichu-70B",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "C-Eval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "C-Eval",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2305.08322"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Overall average accuracy on the C-Eval benchmark, which evaluates the Chinese language capabilities of Large Language Models across a wide range of academic and general knowledge subjects. This is the main ranking metric from the official C-Eval leaderboard, which aggregates performance across all 52 subjects. The leaderboard includes results from models with both open and limited access. Models marked with '*' were evaluated by the C-Eval team.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "C-Eval Leaderboard: Overall Average Accuracy"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "c_eval_leaderboard_overall_average_accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "C-Eval Leaderboard: Overall Average Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 80.1
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "C-Eval/Taichu-70B/1771591481.616601#c_eval#c_eval_leaderboard_overall_average_accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "C-Eval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "C-Eval",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2305.08322"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average accuracy on the C-EVAL HARD subset, which is composed of particularly challenging subjects requiring advanced reasoning (e.g., advanced mathematics, college physics). This metric from the official leaderboard is designed to differentiate the reasoning capabilities of the most powerful models. The leaderboard includes results from models with both open and limited access. Models marked with '*' were evaluated by the C-Eval team.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "C-Eval Leaderboard: Average Accuracy (Hard Subjects)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "c_eval_leaderboard_average_accuracy_hard_subjects",
+        "metric_name": "C-Eval Leaderboard: Average Accuracy (Hard Subjects)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 59.8
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "C-Eval/Taichu-70B/1771591481.616601#c_eval#c_eval_leaderboard_average_accuracy_hard_subjects"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/07/b5/07b52234-27e3-462c-ae8c-ab01bf3878e8.json

@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "sciarena/deepseek/deepseek-r1/1775549757.5712588",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1775549757.5712588",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "SciArena leaderboard API",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "Ai2",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://sciarena.allen.ai",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "api_endpoint": "https://sciarena.allen.ai/api/leaderboard"
+    }
+  },
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "SciArena",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "name": "Deepseek-R1",
+    "id": "deepseek/deepseek-r1",
+    "developer": "deepseek",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "raw_model_id": "Deepseek-R1"
+    }
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_result_id": "sciarena/deepseek/deepseek-r1/1775549757.5712588#overall_elo#elo",
+      "evaluation_name": "overall_elo",
+      "source_data": {
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "dataset_name": "SciArena leaderboard API",
+        "url": [
+          "https://sciarena.allen.ai/api/leaderboard"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "metric_id": "elo",
+        "metric_name": "Elo rating",
+        "metric_type": "continuous",
+        "metric_kind": "elo",
+        "metric_unit": "points",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 829.7737302958208,
+        "max_score": 1151.3779287263492,
+        "additional_details": {
+          "raw_metric_field": "rating"
+        }
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 1006.8506439057406,
+        "details": {
+          "num_battles": "1814",
+          "rating_q025": "990.5091136747874",
+          "rating_q975": "1024.2239310594446",
+          "variance": "None"
+        }
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_result_id": "sciarena/deepseek/deepseek-r1/1775549757.5712588#overall_rank#rank",
+      "evaluation_name": "overall_rank",
+      "source_data": {
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "dataset_name": "SciArena leaderboard API",
+        "url": [
+          "https://sciarena.allen.ai/api/leaderboard"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "metric_id": "rank",
+        "metric_name": "Rank",
+        "metric_type": "continuous",
+        "metric_kind": "rank",
+        "metric_unit": "position",
+        "lower_is_better": true,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 1.0,
+        "max_score": 38.0
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 21.0
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_result_id": "sciarena/deepseek/deepseek-r1/1775549757.5712588#overall_cost_per_100_calls_usd#cost_per_100_calls_usd",
+      "evaluation_name": "overall_cost_per_100_calls_usd",
+      "source_data": {
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "dataset_name": "SciArena leaderboard API",
+        "url": [
+          "https://sciarena.allen.ai/api/leaderboard"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "metric_id": "cost_per_100_calls_usd",
+        "metric_name": "Cost per 100 calls",
+        "metric_type": "continuous",
+        "metric_kind": "cost",
+        "metric_unit": "usd",
+        "lower_is_better": true,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 28.648
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.744
+      }
+    }
+  ]
+}

flat/objects/07/be/07be0261-ad71-4bf2-bccd-3a9792f4e8b4.json

@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1777497427.2641459",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_type": "evaluation_run",
+    "source_organization_name": "Writer, Inc.",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "source_name": "wasp (Writer's Assessor of System Performance)",
+    "additional_details": {}
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "name": "moonshotai/Kimi-K2-Thinking",
+    "id": "moonshotai/Kimi-K2-Thinking",
+    "developer": "Moonshot AI",
+    "inference_platform": "sglang",
+    "inference_engine": {
+      "name": "sglang"
+    },
+    "additional_details": {
+      "wasp_model_name": "kimi-k2-thinking-sglang",
+      "served_model": "sglang/moonshotai/Kimi-K2-Thinking"
+    }
+  },
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "wasp",
+    "version": "0.3.0",
+    "additional_details": {}
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "GPQA Diamond",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "GPQA Diamond",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "reasoningMIA/gpqa_diamond",
+        "hf_split": "train",
+        "additional_details": {}
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on GPQA Diamond multiple-choice questions",
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion",
+        "metric_parameters": {},
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "additional_details": {}
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.8434343434343434,
+        "details": {}
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "gpqa-diamond/moonshotai_Kimi-K2-Thinking/1777497427.2641459#gpqa_diamond#accuracy",
+      "evaluation_timestamp": "2026-04-18T08:11:09Z",
+      "generation_config": {
+        "generation_args": {
+          "temperature": 1.0,
+          "top_p": 0.95
+        },
+        "additional_details": {}
+      }
+    }
+  ],
+  "evaluation_timestamp": "2026-04-18T08:11:09Z",
+  "detailed_evaluation_results": {
+    "format": "jsonl",
+    "file_path": "07be0261-ad71-4bf2-bccd-3a9792f4e8b4_samples.jsonl",
+    "total_rows": 198,
+    "additional_details": {}
+  },
+  "evaluation_id": "gpqa-diamond/moonshotai_Kimi-K2-Thinking/1777497427.2641459"
+}

flat/objects/07/be/07be0784-0a96-43c8-b853-701077c9a710.json

@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "MINTQA/Phi-3-small-8K/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "University of Manchester",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "text",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "Phi-3-small-8K",
+    "name": "Phi-3-small-8K",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MINTQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MINTQA",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2412.17032"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Evaluates the zero-shot accuracy of models' parametric knowledge on the MINTQA-POP dataset. This specific result is for questions where all knowledge required for the multi-hop reasoning chain is 'unpopular' (long-tail knowledge). This highlights the models' ability to answer questions about less common entities and relationships.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Zero-Shot Accuracy on MINTQA-POP (100% Unpopular Facts)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "zero_shot_accuracy_on_mintqa_pop_100_unpopular_facts",
+        "metric_name": "Zero-Shot Accuracy on MINTQA-POP (100% Unpopular Facts)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 9.93
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "MINTQA/Phi-3-small-8K/1771591481.616601#mintqa#zero_shot_accuracy_on_mintqa_pop_100_unpopular_facts"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MINTQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MINTQA",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2412.17032"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Evaluates the zero-shot accuracy of models' parametric knowledge on the MINTQA-TI dataset. This specific result is for questions where all knowledge required for the multi-hop reasoning chain is 'new' (not present in older knowledge bases). This highlights the models' ability to answer questions about recent information.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Zero-Shot Accuracy on MINTQA-TI (100% New Facts)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "zero_shot_accuracy_on_mintqa_ti_100_new_facts",
+        "metric_name": "Zero-Shot Accuracy on MINTQA-TI (100% New Facts)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 15.85
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "MINTQA/Phi-3-small-8K/1771591481.616601#mintqa#zero_shot_accuracy_on_mintqa_ti_100_new_facts"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/07/be/07bea865-83f1-4747-819c-bdf05b8be8c2.json

@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "MathBookEval/Math-PUMA-7B/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "Tsinghua University",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "image",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "Math-PUMA-7B",
+    "name": "Math-PUMA-7B",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MathBookEval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MathBookEval",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2508.10433"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy of various MLLMs on the MathVista benchmark, which evaluates mathematical reasoning in visual contexts. This is one of the external benchmarks used to validate the generalization capabilities of the models.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Performance on MathVista Benchmark"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "performance_on_mathvista_benchmark",
+        "metric_name": "Performance on MathVista Benchmark",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 47.9
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "MathBookEval/Math-PUMA-7B/1771591481.616601#mathbookeval#performance_on_mathvista_benchmark"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MathBookEval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MathBookEval",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2508.10433"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Strict score of various MLLMs on the We-Math benchmark. The strict score requires the complete solution, including all subproblems and steps, to be correct. This metric evaluates complex multi-step reasoning.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Strict Score (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Performance on We-Math Benchmark"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "performance_on_we_math_benchmark",
+        "metric_name": "Performance on We-Math Benchmark",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 19.2
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "MathBookEval/Math-PUMA-7B/1771591481.616601#mathbookeval#performance_on_we_math_benchmark"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/07/c6/07c68f67-81b8-42ba-91bc-e34a0c56c332.json

@@ -0,0 +1,238 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "Social Genome/GPT-4o/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "Carnegie Mellon University",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "image",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "GPT-4o",
+    "name": "GPT-4o",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "Social Genome",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "Social Genome",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2502.15109"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the model's ability to select the correct answer from four options for questions about social interactions in videos. This result is from the zero-shot (k=0) setting with 'Chain' prompting, where the model also generates a reasoning trace. A score of 1.0 represents perfect accuracy. Human accuracy is 0.853.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Social Inference Accuracy on SOCIAL GENOME (Zero-Shot)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "social_inference_accuracy_on_social_genome_zero_shot",
+        "metric_name": "Social Inference Accuracy on SOCIAL GENOME (Zero-Shot)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.71
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "Social Genome/GPT-4o/1771591481.616601#social_genome#social_inference_accuracy_on_social_genome_zero_shot"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "Social Genome",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "Social Genome",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2502.15109"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human annotator scores rating the comprehensiveness of model-generated reasoning traces on a scale of 1 to 5. A higher score indicates the trace provides a more complete and thorough explanation. Results are from the zero-shot (k=0) setting.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Comprehensiveness Score (1-5)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Human Evaluation of Reasoning Trace Comprehensiveness (Zero-Shot)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "human_evaluation_of_reasoning_trace_comprehensiveness_zero_shot",
+        "metric_name": "Human Evaluation of Reasoning Trace Comprehensiveness (Zero-Shot)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "Social Genome/GPT-4o/1771591481.616601#social_genome#human_evaluation_of_reasoning_trace_comprehensiveness_zero_shot"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "Social Genome",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "Social Genome",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2502.15109"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the fine-grained semantic similarity between individual steps in the model's reasoning trace and the human trace. For each model step, it finds the most similar human step and averages these maximum similarities. A higher score is better. This result is from the zero-shot (k=0) setting.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Similarity-Step Score",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Reasoning Trace Fine-Grained Semantic Similarity (S_step, Zero-Shot)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "reasoning_trace_fine_grained_semantic_similarity_s_step_zero_shot",
+        "metric_name": "Reasoning Trace Fine-Grained Semantic Similarity (S_step, Zero-Shot)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.4016
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "Social Genome/GPT-4o/1771591481.616601#social_genome#reasoning_trace_fine_grained_semantic_similarity_s_step_zero_shot"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "Social Genome",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "Social Genome",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2502.15109"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the number of reasoning steps where the model correctly references external knowledge (contextual norms, commonsense) in alignment with the human trace. This is a key metric for the benchmark's goal of evaluating grounded social reasoning. This result is from the zero-shot (k=0) setting.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "External Knowledge Steps Score",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "External Knowledge Grounding in Reasoning (Zero-Shot)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "external_knowledge_grounding_in_reasoning_zero_shot",
+        "metric_name": "External Knowledge Grounding in Reasoning (Zero-Shot)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.6199
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "Social Genome/GPT-4o/1771591481.616601#social_genome#external_knowledge_grounding_in_reasoning_zero_shot"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "Social Genome",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "Social Genome",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2502.15109"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the structural similarity between the sequence of modalities (visual, verbal, vocal) referenced in the model's and human's reasoning traces using an adapted Levenshtein distance. A higher score indicates better structural alignment. This result is from the zero-shot (k=0) setting.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "DifferenceSequence Score",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Reasoning Trace Structural Similarity (DifferenceSequence, Zero-Shot)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "reasoning_trace_structural_similarity_differencesequence_zero_shot",
+        "metric_name": "Reasoning Trace Structural Similarity (DifferenceSequence, Zero-Shot)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.4582
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "Social Genome/GPT-4o/1771591481.616601#social_genome#reasoning_trace_structural_similarity_differencesequence_zero_shot"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "Social Genome",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "Social Genome",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2502.15109"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the number of reasoning steps where the model correctly references visual evidence (e.g., gestures, facial expressions) in alignment with the human trace. This result is from the zero-shot (k=0) setting.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Visual Steps Score",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Visual Evidence Grounding in Reasoning (Zero-Shot)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "visual_evidence_grounding_in_reasoning_zero_shot",
+        "metric_name": "Visual Evidence Grounding in Reasoning (Zero-Shot)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 1.5894
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "Social Genome/GPT-4o/1771591481.616601#social_genome#visual_evidence_grounding_in_reasoning_zero_shot"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "Social Genome",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "Social Genome",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2502.15109"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the high-level semantic similarity between the aggregate embeddings of the model's reasoning trace and the human-generated trace. A higher score indicates better semantic alignment. This result is from the zero-shot (k=0) setting.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Similarity-Trace Score",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Reasoning Trace Semantic Similarity (S_trace, Zero-Shot)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "reasoning_trace_semantic_similarity_s_trace_zero_shot",
+        "metric_name": "Reasoning Trace Semantic Similarity (S_trace, Zero-Shot)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.4631
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "Social Genome/GPT-4o/1771591481.616601#social_genome#reasoning_trace_semantic_similarity_s_trace_zero_shot"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/07/c7/07c71667-89f5-4c5a-b536-0573fb472ceb.json

@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "OCRBench/TextMonkey/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "South China University of Technology",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "image",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "TextMonkey",
+    "name": "TextMonkey",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "OCRBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "OCRBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2305.07895"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "This leaderboard shows the average performance of Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) on English-language visual text localization and reasoning tasks from the OCRBench v2 benchmark. The score is a composite average across eight sub-tasks: Recognition, Referring, Spotting, Extraction, Parsing, Calculation, Understanding, and Reasoning. Results are from the private test set.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Average Score - English Tasks (OCRBench v2)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "OCRBench v2: Average Performance on English Tasks"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "ocrbench_v2_average_performance_on_english_tasks",
+        "metric_name": "OCRBench v2: Average Performance on English Tasks",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 23.4
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "OCRBench/TextMonkey/1771591481.616601#ocrbench#ocrbench_v2_average_performance_on_english_tasks"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "OCRBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "OCRBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2305.07895"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "This leaderboard shows the aggregated final score of various Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) on the original OCRBench benchmark (v1), as presented in the initial paper. The score is the total count of correctly answered questions across five task categories (Text Recognition, Scene Text-Centric VQA, Document-Oriented VQA, Key Information Extraction, and Handwritten Mathematical Expression Recognition), out of a total of 1000 questions.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Final Score (OCRBench v1)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "OCRBench v1: Final Aggregated Score Leaderboard"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "ocrbench_v1_final_aggregated_score_leaderboard",
+        "metric_name": "OCRBench v1: Final Aggregated Score Leaderboard",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 561
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "OCRBench/TextMonkey/1771591481.616601#ocrbench#ocrbench_v1_final_aggregated_score_leaderboard"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "OCRBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "OCRBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2305.07895"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "This leaderboard shows the average performance of Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) on Chinese-language visual text localization and reasoning tasks from the OCRBench v2 benchmark. The score is a composite average across five sub-tasks: Recognition, Extraction, Parsing, Understanding, and Reasoning. Results are from the private test set.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Average Score - Chinese Tasks (OCRBench v2)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "OCRBench v2: Average Performance on Chinese Tasks"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "ocrbench_v2_average_performance_on_chinese_tasks",
+        "metric_name": "OCRBench v2: Average Performance on Chinese Tasks",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 21.5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "OCRBench/TextMonkey/1771591481.616601#ocrbench#ocrbench_v2_average_performance_on_chinese_tasks"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/07/c8/07c87f15-33ba-4049-a385-8d3f40be83bf.json

@@ -0,0 +1,478 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "FinanceMATH/Phi-3-Mini/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "New York University",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "text",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "Phi-3-Mini",
+    "name": "Phi-3-Mini",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "FinanceMATH",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "FinanceMATH",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2311.09797"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average accuracy of models on the FinanceMATH test set using Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting. The benchmark evaluates knowledge-intensive mathematical reasoning in the finance domain. The paper ranks models based on this metric. Higher scores indicate better performance.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "FinanceMATH - Avg. Accuracy (CoT)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "FinanceMATH Benchmark: Average Accuracy (Chain-of-Thought)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "financemath_benchmark_average_accuracy_chain_of_thought",
+        "metric_name": "FinanceMATH Benchmark: Average Accuracy (Chain-of-Thought)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 24.4
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "FinanceMATH/Phi-3-Mini/1771591481.616601#financemath#financemath_benchmark_average_accuracy_chain_of_thought"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "FinanceMATH",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "FinanceMATH",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2311.09797"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy of models on the Accounting sub-domain of the FinanceMATH test set using Program-of-Thought (PoT) prompting. This sub-domain focuses on financial accounting problems. Higher scores indicate better performance.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "FinanceMATH - Accounting Accuracy (PoT)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "FinanceMATH Benchmark: Accounting Sub-domain Accuracy (PoT)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "financemath_benchmark_accounting_sub_domain_accuracy_pot",
+        "metric_name": "FinanceMATH Benchmark: Accounting Sub-domain Accuracy (PoT)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 28.3
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "FinanceMATH/Phi-3-Mini/1771591481.616601#financemath#financemath_benchmark_accounting_sub_domain_accuracy_pot"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "FinanceMATH",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "FinanceMATH",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2311.09797"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average accuracy of models on the FinanceMATH test set using Program-of-Thought (PoT) prompting. PoT requires the model to generate a Python program to solve the problem. The benchmark evaluates knowledge-intensive mathematical reasoning in the finance domain. Higher scores indicate better performance.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "FinanceMATH - Avg. Accuracy (PoT)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "FinanceMATH Benchmark: Average Accuracy (Program-of-Thought)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "financemath_benchmark_average_accuracy_program_of_thought",
+        "metric_name": "FinanceMATH Benchmark: Average Accuracy (Program-of-Thought)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 24.3
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "FinanceMATH/Phi-3-Mini/1771591481.616601#financemath#financemath_benchmark_average_accuracy_program_of_thought"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "FinanceMATH",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "FinanceMATH",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2311.09797"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy of models on the Corporate Finance sub-domain of the FinanceMATH test set using Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting. This sub-domain focuses on corporate finance problems. Higher scores indicate better performance.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "FinanceMATH - Corporate Accuracy (CoT)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "FinanceMATH Benchmark: Corporate Finance Accuracy (CoT)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "financemath_benchmark_corporate_finance_accuracy_cot",
+        "metric_name": "FinanceMATH Benchmark: Corporate Finance Accuracy (CoT)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 20.2
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "FinanceMATH/Phi-3-Mini/1771591481.616601#financemath#financemath_benchmark_corporate_finance_accuracy_cot"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "FinanceMATH",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "FinanceMATH",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2311.09797"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy of models on the Corporate Finance sub-domain of the FinanceMATH test set using Program-of-Thought (PoT) prompting. This sub-domain focuses on corporate finance problems. Higher scores indicate better performance.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "FinanceMATH - Corporate Accuracy (PoT)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "FinanceMATH Benchmark: Corporate Finance Accuracy (PoT)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "financemath_benchmark_corporate_finance_accuracy_pot",
+        "metric_name": "FinanceMATH Benchmark: Corporate Finance Accuracy (PoT)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 16.5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "FinanceMATH/Phi-3-Mini/1771591481.616601#financemath#financemath_benchmark_corporate_finance_accuracy_pot"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "FinanceMATH",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "FinanceMATH",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2311.09797"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy of models on the Derivatives sub-domain of the FinanceMATH test set using Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting. This sub-domain focuses on financial derivatives problems. Higher scores indicate better performance.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "FinanceMATH - Derivatives Accuracy (CoT)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "FinanceMATH Benchmark: Derivatives Sub-domain Accuracy (CoT)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "financemath_benchmark_derivatives_sub_domain_accuracy_cot",
+        "metric_name": "FinanceMATH Benchmark: Derivatives Sub-domain Accuracy (CoT)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 13.5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "FinanceMATH/Phi-3-Mini/1771591481.616601#financemath#financemath_benchmark_derivatives_sub_domain_accuracy_cot"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "FinanceMATH",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "FinanceMATH",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2311.09797"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy of models on the Derivatives sub-domain of the FinanceMATH test set using Program-of-Thought (PoT) prompting. This sub-domain focuses on financial derivatives problems. Higher scores indicate better performance.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "FinanceMATH - Derivatives Accuracy (PoT)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "FinanceMATH Benchmark: Derivatives Sub-domain Accuracy (PoT)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "financemath_benchmark_derivatives_sub_domain_accuracy_pot",
+        "metric_name": "FinanceMATH Benchmark: Derivatives Sub-domain Accuracy (PoT)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 12.9
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "FinanceMATH/Phi-3-Mini/1771591481.616601#financemath#financemath_benchmark_derivatives_sub_domain_accuracy_pot"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "FinanceMATH",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "FinanceMATH",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2311.09797"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy of models on the Economics sub-domain of the FinanceMATH test set using Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting. This sub-domain focuses on economics-related financial problems. Higher scores indicate better performance.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "FinanceMATH - Economics Accuracy (CoT)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "FinanceMATH Benchmark: Economics Sub-domain Accuracy (CoT)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "financemath_benchmark_economics_sub_domain_accuracy_cot",
+        "metric_name": "FinanceMATH Benchmark: Economics Sub-domain Accuracy (CoT)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 32.1
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "FinanceMATH/Phi-3-Mini/1771591481.616601#financemath#financemath_benchmark_economics_sub_domain_accuracy_cot"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "FinanceMATH",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "FinanceMATH",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2311.09797"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy of models on the Economics sub-domain of the FinanceMATH test set using Program-of-Thought (PoT) prompting. This sub-domain focuses on economics-related financial problems. Higher scores indicate better performance.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "FinanceMATH - Economics Accuracy (PoT)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "FinanceMATH Benchmark: Economics Sub-domain Accuracy (PoT)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "financemath_benchmark_economics_sub_domain_accuracy_pot",
+        "metric_name": "FinanceMATH Benchmark: Economics Sub-domain Accuracy (PoT)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 28.6
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "FinanceMATH/Phi-3-Mini/1771591481.616601#financemath#financemath_benchmark_economics_sub_domain_accuracy_pot"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "FinanceMATH",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "FinanceMATH",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2311.09797"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy of models on the Management sub-domain of the FinanceMATH test set using Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting. This sub-domain focuses on financial management problems. Higher scores indicate better performance.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "FinanceMATH - Management Accuracy (CoT)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "FinanceMATH Benchmark: Management Sub-domain Accuracy (CoT)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "financemath_benchmark_management_sub_domain_accuracy_cot",
+        "metric_name": "FinanceMATH Benchmark: Management Sub-domain Accuracy (CoT)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 35.1
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "FinanceMATH/Phi-3-Mini/1771591481.616601#financemath#financemath_benchmark_management_sub_domain_accuracy_cot"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "FinanceMATH",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "FinanceMATH",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2311.09797"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy of models on the Management sub-domain of the FinanceMATH test set using Program-of-Thought (PoT) prompting. This sub-domain focuses on financial management problems. Higher scores indicate better performance.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "FinanceMATH - Management Accuracy (PoT)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "FinanceMATH Benchmark: Management Sub-domain Accuracy (PoT)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "financemath_benchmark_management_sub_domain_accuracy_pot",
+        "metric_name": "FinanceMATH Benchmark: Management Sub-domain Accuracy (PoT)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 38
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "FinanceMATH/Phi-3-Mini/1771591481.616601#financemath#financemath_benchmark_management_sub_domain_accuracy_pot"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "FinanceMATH",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "FinanceMATH",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2311.09797"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy of models on the Portfolio sub-domain of the FinanceMATH test set using Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting. This sub-domain focuses on portfolio management problems. Higher scores indicate better performance.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "FinanceMATH - Portfolio Accuracy (CoT)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "FinanceMATH Benchmark: Portfolio Sub-domain Accuracy (CoT)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "financemath_benchmark_portfolio_sub_domain_accuracy_cot",
+        "metric_name": "FinanceMATH Benchmark: Portfolio Sub-domain Accuracy (CoT)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 19.4
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "FinanceMATH/Phi-3-Mini/1771591481.616601#financemath#financemath_benchmark_portfolio_sub_domain_accuracy_cot"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "FinanceMATH",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "FinanceMATH",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2311.09797"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy of models on the Quantitative sub-domain of the FinanceMATH test set using Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting. This sub-domain focuses on quantitative finance problems. Higher scores indicate better performance.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "FinanceMATH - Quantitative Accuracy (CoT)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "FinanceMATH Benchmark: Quantitative Sub-domain Accuracy (CoT)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "financemath_benchmark_quantitative_sub_domain_accuracy_cot",
+        "metric_name": "FinanceMATH Benchmark: Quantitative Sub-domain Accuracy (CoT)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 22.2
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "FinanceMATH/Phi-3-Mini/1771591481.616601#financemath#financemath_benchmark_quantitative_sub_domain_accuracy_cot"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "FinanceMATH",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "FinanceMATH",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2311.09797"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy of models on the Accounting sub-domain of the FinanceMATH test set using Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting. This sub-domain focuses on financial accounting problems. Higher scores indicate better performance.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "FinanceMATH - Accounting Accuracy (CoT)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "FinanceMATH Benchmark: Accounting Sub-domain Accuracy (CoT)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "financemath_benchmark_accounting_sub_domain_accuracy_cot",
+        "metric_name": "FinanceMATH Benchmark: Accounting Sub-domain Accuracy (CoT)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 31
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "FinanceMATH/Phi-3-Mini/1771591481.616601#financemath#financemath_benchmark_accounting_sub_domain_accuracy_cot"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "FinanceMATH",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "FinanceMATH",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2311.09797"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy of models on the Quantitative sub-domain of the FinanceMATH test set using Program-of-Thought (PoT) prompting. This sub-domain focuses on quantitative finance problems. Higher scores indicate better performance.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "FinanceMATH - Quantitative Accuracy (PoT)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "FinanceMATH Benchmark: Quantitative Sub-domain Accuracy (PoT)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "financemath_benchmark_quantitative_sub_domain_accuracy_pot",
+        "metric_name": "FinanceMATH Benchmark: Quantitative Sub-domain Accuracy (PoT)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 27.8
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "FinanceMATH/Phi-3-Mini/1771591481.616601#financemath#financemath_benchmark_quantitative_sub_domain_accuracy_pot"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/07/c8/07c87f2a-633c-4c7e-b2aa-2c76b270fb22.json

@@ -0,0 +1,448 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "Human-MME/GLM-4.5V/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "National University of Singapore",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "image",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "GLM-4.5V",
+    "name": "GLM-4.5V",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "Human-MME",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "Human-MME",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2509.26165"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "The overall average score across all eight evaluation dimensions of the Human-MME benchmark, providing a holistic measure of a model's performance in human-centric scene understanding. The dimensions include Face Understanding (FU), Body Understanding (BU), Human-Object Interaction (HU), Multi-Image Understanding (MIU), Multi-Person Reasoning (MPR), Intention Discrimination (ID), Causal Discrimination (CD), and Emotion Discrimination (ED).",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Overall Average Score",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Human-MME: Overall Average Score"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "human_mme_overall_average_score",
+        "metric_name": "Human-MME: Overall Average Score",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 76
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "Human-MME/GLM-4.5V/1771591481.616601#human_mme#human_mme_overall_average_score"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "Human-MME",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "Human-MME",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2509.26165"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average Intersection-over-Union (IoU) score across all question types that require a bounding box output. This metric specifically evaluates the model's spatial localization and fine-grained grounding capabilities.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Bounding Box (Avg. IoU)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Human-MME: Bounding Box Question Performance"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "human_mme_bounding_box_question_performance",
+        "metric_name": "Human-MME: Bounding Box Question Performance",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 66.3
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "Human-MME/GLM-4.5V/1771591481.616601#human_mme#human_mme_bounding_box_question_performance"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "Human-MME",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "Human-MME",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2509.26165"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the model's ability to analyze past causes and future consequences of a scene. Performance is evaluated using accuracy on Causal Choice questions, where both past and future selections must be correct.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Causal Discrimination Score",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Human-MME: Causal Discrimination (CD)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "human_mme_causal_discrimination_cd",
+        "metric_name": "Human-MME: Causal Discrimination (CD)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 85.4
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "Human-MME/GLM-4.5V/1771591481.616601#human_mme#human_mme_causal_discrimination_cd"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "Human-MME",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "Human-MME",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2509.26165"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average Accuracy score across all multiple-choice question types. This metric evaluates the model's discriminative understanding and reasoning abilities in selecting the correct option from a given set.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Choice (Avg. Accuracy)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Human-MME: Choice Question Performance"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "human_mme_choice_question_performance",
+        "metric_name": "Human-MME: Choice Question Performance",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 70.8
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "Human-MME/GLM-4.5V/1771591481.616601#human_mme#human_mme_choice_question_performance"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "Human-MME",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "Human-MME",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2509.26165"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the model's ability to interpret emotional states from visual information. Performance is evaluated based on accuracy in Emotion Analysis Choice questions.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Emotion Discrimination Score",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Human-MME: Emotion Discrimination (ED)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "human_mme_emotion_discrimination_ed",
+        "metric_name": "Human-MME: Emotion Discrimination (ED)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 66.6
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "Human-MME/GLM-4.5V/1771591481.616601#human_mme#human_mme_emotion_discrimination_ed"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "Human-MME",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "Human-MME",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2509.26165"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures model performance on understanding facial features and parts. The score is an average of performance on Face Grounding (measured by IoU) and Face Choice (measured by Accuracy) questions.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Face Understanding Score",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Human-MME: Face Understanding (FU)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "human_mme_face_understanding_fu",
+        "metric_name": "Human-MME: Face Understanding (FU)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 61.6
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "Human-MME/GLM-4.5V/1771591481.616601#human_mme#human_mme_face_understanding_fu"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "Human-MME",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "Human-MME",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2509.26165"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Assesses comprehension of interactions between humans and objects. The score is an average of performance on HOI Grounding (IoU), HOI Choice (Accuracy), and HOI Short-Answer (Composite Score) questions.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "HOI Understanding Score",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Human-MME: Human-Object Interaction Understanding (HU)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "human_mme_human_object_interaction_understanding_hu",
+        "metric_name": "Human-MME: Human-Object Interaction Understanding (HU)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 82.5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "Human-MME/GLM-4.5V/1771591481.616601#human_mme#human_mme_human_object_interaction_understanding_hu"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "Human-MME",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "Human-MME",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2509.26165"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the model's ability to infer a person's intentions from visual cues. Performance is evaluated based on accuracy in Intention Choice questions.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Intention Discrimination Score",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Human-MME: Intention Discrimination (ID)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "human_mme_intention_discrimination_id",
+        "metric_name": "Human-MME: Intention Discrimination (ID)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 83.9
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "Human-MME/GLM-4.5V/1771591481.616601#human_mme#human_mme_intention_discrimination_id"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "Human-MME",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "Human-MME",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2509.26165"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "The F1 score for the decision-making component of Judgment questions. This metric evaluates the model's ability to correctly choose whether to answer (if a target condition is met) or abstain (if it is not), balancing precision and recall to measure robustness against hallucination.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Judgment (F1 Score)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Human-MME: Judgment Question Performance"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "human_mme_judgment_question_performance",
+        "metric_name": "Human-MME: Judgment Question Performance",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 68.3
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "Human-MME/GLM-4.5V/1771591481.616601#human_mme#human_mme_judgment_question_performance"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "Human-MME",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "Human-MME",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2509.26165"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Requires cross-image reasoning. The score is an average of performance on Multi-Face (Kendall's Tau), Multi-Wearing (Kendall's Tau), and Multi-HOI (Accuracy) questions.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Multi-Image Understanding Score",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Human-MME: Multi-Image Understanding (MIU)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "human_mme_multi_image_understanding_miu",
+        "metric_name": "Human-MME: Multi-Image Understanding (MIU)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 79.2
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "Human-MME/GLM-4.5V/1771591481.616601#human_mme#human_mme_multi_image_understanding_miu"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "Human-MME",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "Human-MME",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2509.26165"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Involves understanding interactions and attributes across multiple individuals in an image. The score is an average of performance across a variety of complex question types including Identify, Judgment, and Common Choice.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Multi-Person Reasoning Score",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Human-MME: Multi-Person Reasoning (MPR)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "human_mme_multi_person_reasoning_mpr",
+        "metric_name": "Human-MME: Multi-Person Reasoning (MPR)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 71.5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "Human-MME/GLM-4.5V/1771591481.616601#human_mme#human_mme_multi_person_reasoning_mpr"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "Human-MME",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "Human-MME",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2509.26165"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average Kendall's Tau (τ) score for ranking tasks, such as Multi-Face and Multi-Wearing questions. This metric measures the correlation between the model's predicted ranking and the ground-truth ranking.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Ranking (Avg. Kendall's Tau)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Human-MME: Ranking Question Performance"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "human_mme_ranking_question_performance",
+        "metric_name": "Human-MME: Ranking Question Performance",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 86.2
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "Human-MME/GLM-4.5V/1771591481.616601#human_mme#human_mme_ranking_question_performance"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "Human-MME",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "Human-MME",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2509.26165"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures model performance on understanding body parts and attire. The score is an average of performance on Body Grounding (IoU), Wearing Choice (Accuracy), and Wearing Short-Answer (Composite Score) questions.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Body Understanding Score",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Human-MME: Body Understanding (BU)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "human_mme_body_understanding_bu",
+        "metric_name": "Human-MME: Body Understanding (BU)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 77.4
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "Human-MME/GLM-4.5V/1771591481.616601#human_mme#human_mme_body_understanding_bu"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "Human-MME",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "Human-MME",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2509.26165"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average Composite Score across all short-answer question types. The score combines semantic correctness measures, including BERT F1, Cosine Similarity, and Keyword Coverage, to evaluate the quality of generated text answers.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Short-Answer (Composite Score)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Human-MME: Short-Answer Question Performance"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "human_mme_short_answer_question_performance",
+        "metric_name": "Human-MME: Short-Answer Question Performance",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 83.5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "Human-MME/GLM-4.5V/1771591481.616601#human_mme#human_mme_short_answer_question_performance"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/07/c8/07c8ac52-4dc6-4b7d-852e-dccdab13215e.json

@@ -0,0 +1,298 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "MT-Video-Bench/InternVL3.5-4B (Think)/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "Fudan University",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "image",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "InternVL3.5-4B (Think)",
+    "name": "InternVL3.5-4B (Think)",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MT-Video-Bench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MT-Video-Bench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2510.17722"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Overall performance of Multimodal LLMs on the MT-Video-Bench, averaging accuracy across six core competencies: Object Reference, Memory Recall, Content Summary, Answer Refusal, Topic Shifting, and Proactive Interaction. This metric provides a holistic view of a model's ability to handle multi-turn video dialogues.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Overall Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Overall Accuracy on MT-Video-Bench"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "overall_accuracy_on_mt_video_bench",
+        "metric_name": "Overall Accuracy on MT-Video-Bench",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 52.25
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "MT-Video-Bench/InternVL3.5-4B (Think)/1771591481.616601#mt_video_bench#overall_accuracy_on_mt_video_bench"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MT-Video-Bench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MT-Video-Bench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2510.17722"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Assesses the model’s effectiveness in condensing conversational and video content into succinct yet comprehensive summaries, typically tested in the final round of a dialogue.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Content Summary (CS) Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Content Summary (CS) Accuracy on MT-Video-Bench"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "content_summary_cs_accuracy_on_mt_video_bench",
+        "metric_name": "Content Summary (CS) Accuracy on MT-Video-Bench",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 54.82
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "MT-Video-Bench/InternVL3.5-4B (Think)/1771591481.616601#mt_video_bench#content_summary_cs_accuracy_on_mt_video_bench"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MT-Video-Bench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MT-Video-Bench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2510.17722"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Evaluates the capacity of MLLMs to engage in coherent and adaptive dialogues. This score is an average of performance on Answer Refusal (AR), Topic Shifting (TS), and Proactive Interaction (PI) tasks.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Interactivity Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Interactivity Accuracy on MT-Video-Bench"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "interactivity_accuracy_on_mt_video_bench",
+        "metric_name": "Interactivity Accuracy on MT-Video-Bench",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 46.9
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "MT-Video-Bench/InternVL3.5-4B (Think)/1771591481.616601#mt_video_bench#interactivity_accuracy_on_mt_video_bench"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MT-Video-Bench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MT-Video-Bench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2510.17722"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the model’s capacity to retrieve, retain, and integrate relevant information from prior conversational turns or long-term history.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Memory Recall (MR) Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Memory Recall (MR) Accuracy on MT-Video-Bench"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "memory_recall_mr_accuracy_on_mt_video_bench",
+        "metric_name": "Memory Recall (MR) Accuracy on MT-Video-Bench",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 53.78
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "MT-Video-Bench/InternVL3.5-4B (Think)/1771591481.616601#mt_video_bench#memory_recall_mr_accuracy_on_mt_video_bench"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MT-Video-Bench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MT-Video-Bench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2510.17722"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Evaluates the model’s ability to resolve references and pronouns (e.g., 'it', 'them') in user input, correctly mapping them to objects or concepts within the video and dialogue context.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Object Reference (OR) Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Object Reference (OR) Accuracy on MT-Video-Bench"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "object_reference_or_accuracy_on_mt_video_bench",
+        "metric_name": "Object Reference (OR) Accuracy on MT-Video-Bench",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 67.5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "MT-Video-Bench/InternVL3.5-4B (Think)/1771591481.616601#mt_video_bench#object_reference_or_accuracy_on_mt_video_bench"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MT-Video-Bench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MT-Video-Bench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2510.17722"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the foundational ability of MLLMs to perceive and integrate information from video and dialogue context. This score is an average of performance on Object Reference (OR), Memory Recall (MR), and Content Summary (CS) tasks.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Perceptivity Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Perceptivity Accuracy on MT-Video-Bench"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "perceptivity_accuracy_on_mt_video_bench",
+        "metric_name": "Perceptivity Accuracy on MT-Video-Bench",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 58.7
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "MT-Video-Bench/InternVL3.5-4B (Think)/1771591481.616601#mt_video_bench#perceptivity_accuracy_on_mt_video_bench"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MT-Video-Bench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MT-Video-Bench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2510.17722"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Probes the model’s capacity to sustain engagement through clarifications, elaborations, or by asking novel, video-specific, open-ended questions.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Proactive Interaction (PI) Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Proactive Interaction (PI) Accuracy on MT-Video-Bench"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "proactive_interaction_pi_accuracy_on_mt_video_bench",
+        "metric_name": "Proactive Interaction (PI) Accuracy on MT-Video-Bench",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 44.89
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "MT-Video-Bench/InternVL3.5-4B (Think)/1771591481.616601#mt_video_bench#proactive_interaction_pi_accuracy_on_mt_video_bench"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MT-Video-Bench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MT-Video-Bench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2510.17722"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Tests the model’s ability to recognize and refuse to answer unanswerable queries based on available video evidence, preventing hallucination.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Answer Refusal (AR) Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Answer Refusal (AR) Accuracy on MT-Video-Bench"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "answer_refusal_ar_accuracy_on_mt_video_bench",
+        "metric_name": "Answer Refusal (AR) Accuracy on MT-Video-Bench",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 37.74
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "MT-Video-Bench/InternVL3.5-4B (Think)/1771591481.616601#mt_video_bench#answer_refusal_ar_accuracy_on_mt_video_bench"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MT-Video-Bench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MT-Video-Bench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2510.17722"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Evaluates how effectively the model can track and adapt to user-initiated changes in conversational focus or subject matter while maintaining coherence and relevance.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Topic Shifting (TS) Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Topic Shifting (TS) Accuracy on MT-Video-Bench"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "topic_shifting_ts_accuracy_on_mt_video_bench",
+        "metric_name": "Topic Shifting (TS) Accuracy on MT-Video-Bench",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 54.67
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "MT-Video-Bench/InternVL3.5-4B (Think)/1771591481.616601#mt_video_bench#topic_shifting_ts_accuracy_on_mt_video_bench"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/07/ca/07ca455f-0d26-4f30-9ffb-deb2179e1988.json

@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "UniQA-3D/GPT-4o/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "Princeton University",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "image",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "GPT-4o",
+    "name": "GPT-4o",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "UniQA-3D",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "UniQA-3D",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2410.10799"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy in estimating camera ego-motion between two geometrically perturbed (upside-down) views of a scene, testing robustness. The task is a two-way classification, with 50% as random chance. The dramatic drop in model performance highlights a key finding of the paper. Higher is better.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Camera Pose Accuracy (Upside-down) (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Relative Camera Pose Estimation Accuracy (Upside-down Images)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "relative_camera_pose_estimation_accuracy_upside_down_images",
+        "metric_name": "Relative Camera Pose Estimation Accuracy (Upside-down Images)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 31.5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "UniQA-3D/GPT-4o/1771591481.616601#uniqa_3d#relative_camera_pose_estimation_accuracy_upside_down_images"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "UniQA-3D",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "UniQA-3D",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2410.10799"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy in estimating the camera's ego-motion between two regular views of a scene from the DTU dataset. The task is a two-way classification, with 50% as random chance. Higher is better.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Camera Pose Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Relative Camera Pose Estimation Accuracy (Regular Images)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "relative_camera_pose_estimation_accuracy_regular_images",
+        "metric_name": "Relative Camera Pose Estimation Accuracy (Regular Images)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 48.6
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "UniQA-3D/GPT-4o/1771591481.616601#uniqa_3d#relative_camera_pose_estimation_accuracy_regular_images"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "UniQA-3D",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "UniQA-3D",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2410.10799"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy in determining which of two marked pixels is closer to the camera on regular, unperturbed images from the KITTI dataset. Higher is better.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Relative Depth Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Relative Depth Estimation Accuracy (Regular Images)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "relative_depth_estimation_accuracy_regular_images",
+        "metric_name": "Relative Depth Estimation Accuracy (Regular Images)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 67.9
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "UniQA-3D/GPT-4o/1771591481.616601#uniqa_3d#relative_depth_estimation_accuracy_regular_images"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "UniQA-3D",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "UniQA-3D",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2410.10799"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on Visual Question Answering (VQA) questions requiring spatial reasoning about object relationships from a subset of the CLEVR dataset. Higher is better.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Spatial Reasoning Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Spatial Reasoning Accuracy on UniQA-3D"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "spatial_reasoning_accuracy_on_uniqa_3d",
+        "metric_name": "Spatial Reasoning Accuracy on UniQA-3D",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 52.4
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "UniQA-3D/GPT-4o/1771591481.616601#uniqa_3d#spatial_reasoning_accuracy_on_uniqa_3d"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "UniQA-3D",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "UniQA-3D",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2410.10799"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy in determining which of two marked pixels is closer to the camera on geometrically perturbed (upside-down) images from the KITTI dataset, testing for model robustness. Higher is better.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Relative Depth Accuracy (Flipped) (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Relative Depth Estimation Accuracy (Flipped Images)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "relative_depth_estimation_accuracy_flipped_images",
+        "metric_name": "Relative Depth Estimation Accuracy (Flipped Images)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 53.5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "UniQA-3D/GPT-4o/1771591481.616601#uniqa_3d#relative_depth_estimation_accuracy_flipped_images"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/07/d7/07d75d4f-ed3c-4a74-918a-c41348def5ef.json

@@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "hfopenllm_v2/jaspionjader_Kosmos-EVAA-gamma-v15-8B/1773936498.240187",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1773936498.240187",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "HF Open LLM v2",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "Hugging Face",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party"
+  },
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "lm-evaluation-harness",
+    "version": "0.4.0",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "fork": "https://github.com/huggingface/lm-evaluation-harness/tree/adding_all_changess"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "name": "Kosmos-EVAA-gamma-v15-8B",
+    "id": "jaspionjader/Kosmos-EVAA-gamma-v15-8B",
+    "developer": "jaspionjader",
+    "inference_platform": "unknown",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "precision": "bfloat16",
+      "architecture": "LlamaForCausalLM",
+      "params_billions": "8.03"
+    }
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IFEval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IFEval",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "google/IFEval"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on IFEval",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.4654
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/jaspionjader_Kosmos-EVAA-gamma-v15-8B/1773936498.240187#ifeval#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "BBH",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "BBH",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "SaylorTwift/bbh"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on BBH",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.5343
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/jaspionjader_Kosmos-EVAA-gamma-v15-8B/1773936498.240187#bbh#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MATH Level 5",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MATH Level 5",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "DigitalLearningGmbH/MATH-lighteval"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Exact Match on MATH Level 5",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "exact_match",
+        "metric_name": "Exact Match",
+        "metric_kind": "exact_match",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.111
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/jaspionjader_Kosmos-EVAA-gamma-v15-8B/1773936498.240187#math_level_5#exact_match"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "GPQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "GPQA",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "Idavidrein/gpqa"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on GPQA",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.3112
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/jaspionjader_Kosmos-EVAA-gamma-v15-8B/1773936498.240187#gpqa#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MUSR",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MUSR",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "TAUR-Lab/MuSR"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on MUSR",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.4277
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/jaspionjader_Kosmos-EVAA-gamma-v15-8B/1773936498.240187#musr#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MMLU-PRO",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MMLU-PRO",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "TIGER-Lab/MMLU-Pro"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on MMLU-PRO",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.3941
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/jaspionjader_Kosmos-EVAA-gamma-v15-8B/1773936498.240187#mmlu_pro#accuracy"
+    }
+  ]
+}

flat/objects/07/d9/07d9fb9f-6690-4487-a310-500bbf9fac7c.json

@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "DSG-1k/Stable Diffusion v1.5/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "University of Washington",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "text",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "Stable Diffusion v1.5",
+    "name": "Stable Diffusion v1.5",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "DSG-1k",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "DSG-1k",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2310.18235"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average human evaluation scores on a 1-5 Likert scale for text-image consistency. This evaluation was conducted on the TIFA160 subset of prompts and serves as a ground-truth human ranking of T2I models.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Average Likert Score (1-5)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "T2I Model Human Preference Scores on TIFA160"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "t2i_model_human_preference_scores_on_tifa160",
+        "metric_name": "T2I Model Human Preference Scores on TIFA160",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 3.99
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "DSG-1k/Stable Diffusion v1.5/1771591481.616601#dsg_1k#t2i_model_human_preference_scores_on_tifa160"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/07/e2/07e2ccd0-d8ce-40ff-b717-8a66c24d7df6.json

@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "MEGA-Bench/NVLM-72B/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "University of Waterloo",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "image",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "NVLM-72B",
+    "name": "NVLM-72B",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MEGA-Bench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MEGA-Bench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2410.10563"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "The overall score on the MEGA-Bench, which is a weighted average of performance on the Core Set (440 rule-based tasks) and the Open-ended Set (65 GPT-4o judged tasks). This metric provides a comprehensive measure of a model's multimodal capabilities across 505 diverse, real-world tasks. The higher of the with/without Chain-of-Thought (CoT) scores is used for the Core set portion.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "% Score",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "MEGA-Bench Overall Performance"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "mega_bench_overall_performance",
+        "metric_name": "MEGA-Bench Overall Performance",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 25.57
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "MEGA-Bench/NVLM-72B/1771591481.616601#mega_bench#mega_bench_overall_performance"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MEGA-Bench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MEGA-Bench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2410.10563"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Performance on the Core Set of MEGA-Bench, which consists of 440 tasks evaluated with rule-based metrics. This score reflects the model's performance when prompted with Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "% Score (w/ CoT)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "MEGA-Bench Core Set Performance (with Chain-of-Thought)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "mega_bench_core_set_performance_with_chain_of_thought",
+        "metric_name": "MEGA-Bench Core Set Performance (with Chain-of-Thought)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 21.59
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "MEGA-Bench/NVLM-72B/1771591481.616601#mega_bench#mega_bench_core_set_performance_with_chain_of_thought"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MEGA-Bench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MEGA-Bench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2410.10563"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Performance on the Open-Ended Set of MEGA-Bench, which consists of 65 tasks that do not have a single ground-truth answer. Scores are determined by a GPT-4o-based evaluator.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "% Score",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "MEGA-Bench Open-ended Set Performance"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "mega_bench_open_ended_set_performance",
+        "metric_name": "MEGA-Bench Open-ended Set Performance",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 34.78
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "MEGA-Bench/NVLM-72B/1771591481.616601#mega_bench#mega_bench_open_ended_set_performance"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MEGA-Bench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MEGA-Bench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2410.10563"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "The overall score on the single-image subset of the MEGA-Bench, which consists of 273 Core SI tasks and 42 Open-ended SI tasks. Scores for proprietary models were derived from runs with in-context image demonstrations, while scores for open-source models were based on evaluations without the demonstration image for better performance.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "% Score",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "MEGA-Bench Performance on Single-Image (SI) Subset"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "mega_bench_performance_on_single_image_si_subset",
+        "metric_name": "MEGA-Bench Performance on Single-Image (SI) Subset",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 34.55
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "MEGA-Bench/NVLM-72B/1771591481.616601#mega_bench#mega_bench_performance_on_single_image_si_subset"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/07/e3/07e30a07-c538-4caf-aba6-6831c183c304.json

@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "BrowseComp-VL/Qwen-2.5-VL-72B/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "Alibaba Group",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "image",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "Qwen-2.5-VL-72B",
+    "name": "Qwen-2.5-VL-72B",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "BrowseComp-VL",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "BrowseComp-VL",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2508.05748"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average Pass@1 scores on the BrowseComp-VL benchmark, a novel vision-language dataset introduced in this paper for deep research tasks. It includes multi-hop questions with both explicit and obfuscated entities, requiring complex reasoning and tool use. Scores are averaged across Level 1 and Level 2 difficulty.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Pass@1 (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Performance on BrowseComp-VL Benchmark (Average)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "performance_on_browsecomp_vl_benchmark_average",
+        "metric_name": "Performance on BrowseComp-VL Benchmark (Average)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 7.1
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "BrowseComp-VL/Qwen-2.5-VL-72B/1771591481.616601#browsecomp_vl#performance_on_browsecomp_vl_benchmark_average"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "BrowseComp-VL",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "BrowseComp-VL",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2508.05748"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average Pass@1 scores on the Humanity’s Last Exam (HLE-VL) benchmark, which evaluates multimodal agents on 330 expert-written questions across diverse scientific and humanities domains. Scores are averaged across three inference runs.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Pass@1 (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Performance on Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) Benchmark (Average)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "performance_on_humanity_s_last_exam_hle_benchmark_average",
+        "metric_name": "Performance on Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) Benchmark (Average)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 4.9
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "BrowseComp-VL/Qwen-2.5-VL-72B/1771591481.616601#browsecomp_vl#performance_on_humanity_s_last_exam_hle_benchmark_average"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "BrowseComp-VL",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "BrowseComp-VL",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2508.05748"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Pass@1 scores on the LiveVQA benchmark, which evaluates a model's ability to answer questions about real-world, live-streamed visual content. This tests multi-hop visual question answering capabilities in dynamic scenarios.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Pass@1 (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Performance on LiveVQA Benchmark"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "performance_on_livevqa_benchmark",
+        "metric_name": "Performance on LiveVQA Benchmark",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 30.3
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "BrowseComp-VL/Qwen-2.5-VL-72B/1771591481.616601#browsecomp_vl#performance_on_livevqa_benchmark"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "BrowseComp-VL",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "BrowseComp-VL",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2508.05748"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Pass@1 scores on the visual subset of the MMSearch benchmark. This benchmark is designed to evaluate multimodal search capabilities, requiring models to understand and retrieve information based on complex visual queries.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Pass@1 (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Performance on MMSearch Benchmark (Visual Subset)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "performance_on_mmsearch_benchmark_visual_subset",
+        "metric_name": "Performance on MMSearch Benchmark (Visual Subset)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 11.7
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "BrowseComp-VL/Qwen-2.5-VL-72B/1771591481.616601#browsecomp_vl#performance_on_mmsearch_benchmark_visual_subset"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "BrowseComp-VL",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "BrowseComp-VL",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2508.05748"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Pass@1 scores on the SimpleVQA benchmark, which tests fundamental visual perception and reasoning abilities through straightforward visual questions. Strong performance indicates robust core visual understanding.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Pass@1 (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Performance on SimpleVQA Benchmark"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "performance_on_simplevqa_benchmark",
+        "metric_name": "Performance on SimpleVQA Benchmark",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 51.3
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "BrowseComp-VL/Qwen-2.5-VL-72B/1771591481.616601#browsecomp_vl#performance_on_simplevqa_benchmark"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/07/e4/07e42cf8-7991-4153-9f18-f12aba61fa9e.json

@@ -0,0 +1,268 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "TISE/CPGAN/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "VinAI Research",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "image",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "CPGAN",
+    "name": "CPGAN",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "TISE",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "TISE",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2112.01398"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "The Ranking Score (RS) is a composite metric proposed by the TISE benchmark to provide an overall performance ranking. It aggregates the ranks of models across six key evaluation aspects: Image Realism (IS*, FID), Text Relevance (RP), Object Accuracy (SOA-C, SOA-I), Object Fidelity (O-IS, O-FID), Counting Alignment (CA), and Positional Alignment (PA). This metric is designed to align with human judgment.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Ranking Score (RS)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Overall Ranking Score on MS-COCO Multi-Object Synthesis"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "overall_ranking_score_on_ms_coco_multi_object_synthesis",
+        "metric_name": "Overall Ranking Score on MS-COCO Multi-Object Synthesis",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 43
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "TISE/CPGAN/1771591481.616601#tise#overall_ranking_score_on_ms_coco_multi_object_synthesis"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "TISE",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "TISE",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2112.01398"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": true,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Fréchet Inception Distance (FID) measures the similarity between the distribution of generated images and real images in the feature space of an Inception-v3 network. It is a standard metric for assessing image quality and realism. This evaluation is on the multi-object MS-COCO dataset.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "FID",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Image Realism (FID) on MS-COCO"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "image_realism_fid_on_ms_coco",
+        "metric_name": "Image Realism (FID) on MS-COCO",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 50.68
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "TISE/CPGAN/1771591481.616601#tise#image_realism_fid_on_ms_coco"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "TISE",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "TISE",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2112.01398"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human evaluation score for multi-object synthesis on the MS-COCO dataset. Participants scored generated images from 50 test captions based on their plausibility and naturalness on a 1-5 scale. This evaluation serves to validate that the automated TISE metrics align with human perception.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Human Score",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Human Evaluation Score on MS-COCO"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "human_evaluation_score_on_ms_coco",
+        "metric_name": "Human Evaluation Score on MS-COCO",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 43.73
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "TISE/CPGAN/1771591481.616601#tise#human_evaluation_score_on_ms_coco"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "TISE",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "TISE",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2112.01398"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Improved Inception Score (IS*) measures image quality and diversity. It is a calibrated version of the standard Inception Score, corrected to mitigate miscalibration issues in the underlying classifier, providing a more reliable measure of image realism. This evaluation is on the multi-object MS-COCO dataset.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "IS*",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Image Realism (IS*) on MS-COCO"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "image_realism_is_on_ms_coco",
+        "metric_name": "Image Realism (IS*) on MS-COCO",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 59.64
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "TISE/CPGAN/1771591481.616601#tise#image_realism_is_on_ms_coco"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "TISE",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "TISE",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2112.01398"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Positional Alignment (PA) is a novel metric introduced by TISE to measure the correctness of relative object positions described by spatial prepositions (e.g., 'cat on top of a bench' vs. 'cat under a bench'). It is calculated as the retrieval success rate of matching captions against mismatched ones.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "PA (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Positional Alignment (PA) on MS-COCO"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "positional_alignment_pa_on_ms_coco",
+        "metric_name": "Positional Alignment (PA) on MS-COCO",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 43.28
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "TISE/CPGAN/1771591481.616601#tise#positional_alignment_pa_on_ms_coco"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "TISE",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "TISE",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2112.01398"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "R-precision (RP) evaluates text-image alignment. For a generated image, it measures the model's ability to retrieve the correct source text caption from a pool of 100 candidates. The TISE benchmark uses an improved RP based on the CLIP model to mitigate overfitting issues found in previous versions.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "RP",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Text Relevance (R-precision) on MS-COCO"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "text_relevance_r_precision_on_ms_coco",
+        "metric_name": "Text Relevance (R-precision) on MS-COCO",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 69.08
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "TISE/CPGAN/1771591481.616601#tise#text_relevance_r_precision_on_ms_coco"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "TISE",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "TISE",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2112.01398"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": true,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Counting Alignment (CA) is a novel metric introduced by TISE to evaluate a model's ability to generate the correct number of objects specified in the text (e.g., 'two cats'). It is measured as the Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) between the predicted and ground-truth object counts.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "CA (RMSE)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Counting Alignment (CA) on MS-COCO"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "counting_alignment_ca_on_ms_coco",
+        "metric_name": "Counting Alignment (CA) on MS-COCO",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 2.07
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "TISE/CPGAN/1771591481.616601#tise#counting_alignment_ca_on_ms_coco"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "TISE",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "TISE",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2112.01398"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Semantic Object Accuracy - Image (SOA-I) measures the average recall of objects mentioned in the text caption that are successfully detected in the generated image, averaged per image. TISE uses a robust version with Mask-RCNN to avoid overfitting. It evaluates if the model correctly generates the specified objects.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "SOA-I",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Object Accuracy (SOA-Image) on MS-COCO"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "object_accuracy_soa_image_on_ms_coco",
+        "metric_name": "Object Accuracy (SOA-Image) on MS-COCO",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 83.83
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "TISE/CPGAN/1771591481.616601#tise#object_accuracy_soa_image_on_ms_coco"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/07/e5/07e5a679-f9c0-4079-8c66-adb3502dfcfa.json

@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "vals-ai/vibe-code/anthropic_claude-opus-4-7/1777395187.3170502",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1777395187.3170502",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "Vals.ai Leaderboard - Vibe Code Bench",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "Vals.ai",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://www.vals.ai",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "benchmark_slug": "vibe-code",
+      "benchmark_name": "Vibe Code Bench",
+      "benchmark_updated": "2026-04-24",
+      "dataset_type": "private",
+      "industry": "coding",
+      "leaderboard_page_url": "https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vibe-code",
+      "extraction_method": "static_astro_benchmark_view_props"
+    }
+  },
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "Vals.ai",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "name": "claude-opus-4-7",
+    "id": "anthropic/claude-opus-4-7",
+    "developer": "anthropic",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "vals_model_id": "anthropic/claude-opus-4-7",
+      "vals_provider": "Anthropic"
+    }
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_result_id": "vibe-code:overall:anthropic/claude-opus-4-7:score",
+      "evaluation_name": "vals_ai.vibe-code.overall",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "Vibe Code Bench - Overall",
+        "source_type": "other",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "benchmark_slug": "vibe-code",
+          "task_key": "overall",
+          "dataset_type": "private",
+          "leaderboard_page_url": "https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vibe-code"
+        }
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy reported by Vals.ai for Vibe Code Bench (Overall).",
+        "metric_id": "vals_ai.vibe-code.overall.accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "percent",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "additional_details": {
+          "score_scale": "percent_0_to_100",
+          "max_score_source": "fixed_percentage_bound",
+          "leaderboard_page_url": "https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vibe-code"
+        }
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 71.003,
+        "details": {
+          "benchmark_slug": "vibe-code",
+          "benchmark_name": "Vibe Code Bench",
+          "benchmark_updated": "2026-04-24",
+          "task_key": "overall",
+          "task_name": "Overall",
+          "dataset_type": "private",
+          "industry": "coding",
+          "raw_score": "71.003",
+          "raw_stderr": "4.506",
+          "latency": "2141.902",
+          "cost_per_test": "21.407199",
+          "temperature": "1",
+          "provider": "Anthropic"
+        },
+        "uncertainty": {
+          "standard_error": {
+            "value": 4.506,
+            "method": "vals_reported"
+          }
+        }
+      },
+      "generation_config": {
+        "generation_args": {
+          "temperature": 1.0,
+          "max_attempts": 1
+        }
+      }
+    }
+  ]
+}

flat/objects/07/e5/07e5c53e-180d-4767-ace8-60bf8806b386.json

@@ -0,0 +1,298 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "OCRBench v2/Deepseek-VL2-Small/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "South China University of Technology",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "image",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "Deepseek-VL2-Small",
+    "name": "Deepseek-VL2-Small",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "OCRBench v2",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "OCRBench v2",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.00321"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average score across eight core OCR capabilities (Recognition, Referring, Spotting, Extraction, Parsing, Calculation, Understanding, and Reasoning) on the private English test set of OCRBench v2. This metric provides a holistic view of a model's ability to handle diverse text-centric visual tasks.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Average Score (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Overall Performance on OCRBench v2 (English, Private)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "overall_performance_on_ocrbench_v2_english_private",
+        "metric_name": "Overall Performance on OCRBench v2 (English, Private)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 41
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "OCRBench v2/Deepseek-VL2-Small/1771591481.616601#ocrbench_v2#overall_performance_on_ocrbench_v2_english_private"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "OCRBench v2",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "OCRBench v2",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.00321"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Performance on the Mathematical Calculation capability, which covers numerical reasoning tasks such as text counting (character/word counts) and solving math problems presented in images (Math QA). Scores are based on exact match or normalized L1 distance on the private English test set.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Mathematical Calculation Score (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Mathematical Calculation on OCRBench v2 (English, Private)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "mathematical_calculation_on_ocrbench_v2_english_private",
+        "metric_name": "Mathematical Calculation on OCRBench v2 (English, Private)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 30.6
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "OCRBench v2/Deepseek-VL2-Small/1771591481.616601#ocrbench_v2#mathematical_calculation_on_ocrbench_v2_english_private"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "OCRBench v2",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "OCRBench v2",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.00321"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Performance on the Relation Extraction capability, which involves extracting and mapping visual components from densely arranged text, such as key-value pairs from receipts or handwritten content. It is evaluated using an F1 score on the private English test set.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Relation Extraction Score (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Relation Extraction on OCRBench v2 (English, Private)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "relation_extraction_on_ocrbench_v2_english_private",
+        "metric_name": "Relation Extraction on OCRBench v2 (English, Private)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 86.4
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "OCRBench v2/Deepseek-VL2-Small/1771591481.616601#ocrbench_v2#relation_extraction_on_ocrbench_v2_english_private"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "OCRBench v2",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "OCRBench v2",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.00321"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Performance on the Element Parsing capability, assessing a model's ability to parse complex elements like tables, charts, and documents into structured formats (e.g., HTML, JSON). It is evaluated using metrics like Tree-Edit-Distance-based Similarity (TEDS) on the private English test set.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Element Parsing Score (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Element Parsing on OCRBench v2 (English, Private)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "element_parsing_on_ocrbench_v2_english_private",
+        "metric_name": "Element Parsing on OCRBench v2 (English, Private)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 18.9
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "OCRBench v2/Deepseek-VL2-Small/1771591481.616601#ocrbench_v2#element_parsing_on_ocrbench_v2_english_private"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "OCRBench v2",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "OCRBench v2",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.00321"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Performance on the Knowledge Reasoning capability, which requires complex inference and world knowledge. Tasks include Science QA, APP Agent interaction, ASCII art classification, and Reasoning VQA, evaluated on the private English test set.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Knowledge Reasoning Score (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Knowledge Reasoning on OCRBench v2 (English, Private)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "knowledge_reasoning_on_ocrbench_v2_english_private",
+        "metric_name": "Knowledge Reasoning on OCRBench v2 (English, Private)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 39.5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "OCRBench v2/Deepseek-VL2-Small/1771591481.616601#ocrbench_v2#knowledge_reasoning_on_ocrbench_v2_english_private"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "OCRBench v2",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "OCRBench v2",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.00321"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Performance on the Text Recognition capability, which assesses a model's ability to perceive and transcribe textual content from images. This includes tasks like recognizing regular, irregular, handwritten, and occluded text on the private English test set.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Text Recognition Score (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Text Recognition on OCRBench v2 (English, Private)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "text_recognition_on_ocrbench_v2_english_private",
+        "metric_name": "Text Recognition on OCRBench v2 (English, Private)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 56.6
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "OCRBench v2/Deepseek-VL2-Small/1771591481.616601#ocrbench_v2#text_recognition_on_ocrbench_v2_english_private"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "OCRBench v2",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "OCRBench v2",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.00321"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Performance on the Text Referring capability, which measures a model's ability to accurately determine the location of specified text within an image. This often involves outputting bounding box coordinates and is evaluated using metrics like Intersection over Union (IoU) on the private English test set.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Text Referring Score (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Text Referring on OCRBench v2 (English, Private)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "text_referring_on_ocrbench_v2_english_private",
+        "metric_name": "Text Referring on OCRBench v2 (English, Private)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 23.7
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "OCRBench v2/Deepseek-VL2-Small/1771591481.616601#ocrbench_v2#text_referring_on_ocrbench_v2_english_private"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "OCRBench v2",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "OCRBench v2",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.00321"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Performance on the Text Spotting capability, which requires models to both locate (output bounding box) and recognize (transcribe content) text simultaneously. It is a challenging task where most LMMs perform poorly, evaluated using an F1 score on the private English test set.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Text Spotting Score (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Text Spotting on OCRBench v2 (English, Private)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "text_spotting_on_ocrbench_v2_english_private",
+        "metric_name": "Text Spotting on OCRBench v2 (English, Private)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "OCRBench v2/Deepseek-VL2-Small/1771591481.616601#ocrbench_v2#text_spotting_on_ocrbench_v2_english_private"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "OCRBench v2",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "OCRBench v2",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.00321"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Performance on the Visual Text Understanding capability, which assesses a model's ability to comprehend the semantic information of text in an image. Tasks include document classification, diagram question answering, and cognition VQA, evaluated on the private English test set.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Visual Text Understanding Score (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Visual Text Understanding on OCRBench v2 (English, Private)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "visual_text_understanding_on_ocrbench_v2_english_private",
+        "metric_name": "Visual Text Understanding on OCRBench v2 (English, Private)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 72.2
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "OCRBench v2/Deepseek-VL2-Small/1771591481.616601#ocrbench_v2#visual_text_understanding_on_ocrbench_v2_english_private"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/07/ec/07ec0a29-1aa2-43d2-94ca-76eb9b27c11c.json

@@ -0,0 +1,388 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "USEbench/USEagent/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "National University of Singapore",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "text",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "USEagent",
+    "name": "USEagent",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "USEbench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "USEbench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2506.14683"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the percentage of tasks successfully resolved on the first attempt across the entire USEbench, which includes 1271 tasks spanning program repair, regression testing, code generation, and test generation. This is the main aggregate metric for agent efficacy.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "PASS@1 (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Overall Performance on USEbench (PASS@1)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "overall_performance_on_usebench_pass_1",
+        "metric_name": "Overall Performance on USEbench (PASS@1)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 33.3
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "USEbench/USEagent/1771591481.616601#usebench#overall_performance_on_usebench_pass_1"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "USEbench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "USEbench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2506.14683"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures success rate within 5 attempts on code generation tasks from REPOCOD-Lite. Success is determined by generating a method body from documentation that passes a test suite.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "PASS@5 (%) - REPOCOD",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Code Generation Performance on REPOCOD (PASS@5)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "code_generation_performance_on_repocod_pass_5",
+        "metric_name": "Code Generation Performance on REPOCOD (PASS@5)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 15.2
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "USEbench/USEagent/1771591481.616601#usebench#code_generation_performance_on_repocod_pass_5"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "USEbench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "USEbench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2506.14683"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures first-attempt success rate on 173 test generation tasks from REPOTEST-Lite. The task is to generate tests for a given method to achieve 100% code coverage.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "PASS@1 (%) - REPOTEST",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Test Generation Performance on REPOTEST (PASS@1)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "test_generation_performance_on_repotest_pass_1",
+        "metric_name": "Test Generation Performance on REPOTEST (PASS@1)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 31.8
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "USEbench/USEagent/1771591481.616601#usebench#test_generation_performance_on_repotest_pass_1"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "USEbench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "USEbench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2506.14683"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures success rate within 5 attempts on test generation tasks from REPOTEST-Lite. Success is defined by generating tests for a given method to achieve 100% code coverage.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "PASS@5 (%) - REPOTEST",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Test Generation Performance on REPOTEST (PASS@5)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "test_generation_performance_on_repotest_pass_5",
+        "metric_name": "Test Generation Performance on REPOTEST (PASS@5)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 42.5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "USEbench/USEagent/1771591481.616601#usebench#test_generation_performance_on_repotest_pass_5"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "USEbench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "USEbench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2506.14683"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures first-attempt success rate on 100 compound tasks involving test generation and program repair, where the agent must improve upon a previously failed but promising patch. Success is defined by passing the test suite.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "PASS@1 (%) - Partial Fix (SWETRY)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Compound Task Performance on Partial Fix (SWETRY) (PASS@1)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "compound_task_performance_on_partial_fix_swetry_pass_1",
+        "metric_name": "Compound Task Performance on Partial Fix (SWETRY) (PASS@1)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 8
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "USEbench/USEagent/1771591481.616601#usebench#compound_task_performance_on_partial_fix_swetry_pass_1"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "USEbench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "USEbench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2506.14683"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures success rate within 5 attempts on compound tasks involving improving a previously failed but promising patch. Success is defined by passing the test suite.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "PASS@5 (%) - Partial Fix (SWETRY)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Compound Task Performance on Partial Fix (SWETRY) (PASS@5)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "compound_task_performance_on_partial_fix_swetry_pass_5",
+        "metric_name": "Compound Task Performance on Partial Fix (SWETRY) (PASS@5)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 30.4
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "USEbench/USEagent/1771591481.616601#usebench#compound_task_performance_on_partial_fix_swetry_pass_5"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "USEbench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "USEbench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2506.14683"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures first-attempt success rate on 500 program repair tasks from the SWE-bench-verified dataset. Success is defined by the agent's generated patch passing the original test suite.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "PASS@1 (%) - SWE-bench-verified",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Program Repair Performance on SWE-bench-verified (PASS@1)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "program_repair_performance_on_swe_bench_verified_pass_1",
+        "metric_name": "Program Repair Performance on SWE-bench-verified (PASS@1)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 45.6
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "USEbench/USEagent/1771591481.616601#usebench#program_repair_performance_on_swe_bench_verified_pass_1"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "USEbench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "USEbench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2506.14683"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures success rate within 5 attempts on program repair tasks from the SWE-bench-verified dataset. Success is defined by the agent's generated patch passing the original test suite.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "PASS@5 (%) - SWE-bench-verified",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Program Repair Performance on SWE-bench-verified (PASS@5)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "program_repair_performance_on_swe_bench_verified_pass_5",
+        "metric_name": "Program Repair Performance on SWE-bench-verified (PASS@5)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 66.7
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "USEbench/USEagent/1771591481.616601#usebench#program_repair_performance_on_swe_bench_verified_pass_5"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "USEbench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "USEbench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2506.14683"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures first-attempt success rate on 298 regression testing tasks from SWT-bench. Success is defined by generating tests that cover all changed lines in a ground-truth developer-written patch.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "PASS@1 (%) - SWT-bench",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Regression Testing Performance on SWT-bench (PASS@1)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "regression_testing_performance_on_swt_bench_pass_1",
+        "metric_name": "Regression Testing Performance on SWT-bench (PASS@1)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 40.3
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "USEbench/USEagent/1771591481.616601#usebench#regression_testing_performance_on_swt_bench_pass_1"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "USEbench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "USEbench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2506.14683"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures success rate within 5 attempts on regression testing tasks from SWT-bench. Success is defined by generating tests that cover all changed lines in a ground-truth developer-written patch.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "PASS@5 (%) - SWT-bench",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Regression Testing Performance on SWT-bench (PASS@5)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "regression_testing_performance_on_swt_bench_pass_5",
+        "metric_name": "Regression Testing Performance on SWT-bench (PASS@5)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 53.6
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "USEbench/USEagent/1771591481.616601#usebench#regression_testing_performance_on_swt_bench_pass_5"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "USEbench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "USEbench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2506.14683"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures first-attempt success rate on 200 code generation tasks from REPOCOD-Lite. The task is to generate a method body from documentation, and success is determined by passing a test suite.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "PASS@1 (%) - REPOCOD",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Code Generation Performance on REPOCOD (PASS@1)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "code_generation_performance_on_repocod_pass_1",
+        "metric_name": "Code Generation Performance on REPOCOD (PASS@1)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 6
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "USEbench/USEagent/1771591481.616601#usebench#code_generation_performance_on_repocod_pass_1"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "USEbench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "USEbench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2506.14683"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the percentage of tasks successfully resolved within 5 attempts across a sampled subset of USEbench. This metric assesses the benefit of allowing for global retries, showing a significant increase in efficacy for both agents.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "PASS@5 (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Overall Performance on USEbench (PASS@5)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "overall_performance_on_usebench_pass_5",
+        "metric_name": "Overall Performance on USEbench (PASS@5)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 49.5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "USEbench/USEagent/1771591481.616601#usebench#overall_performance_on_usebench_pass_5"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}