Add files using upload-large-folder tool

flat/objects/03/02/0302704f-ccbd-416a-aabe-1d34b8dad5bc.json

@@ -0,0 +1,208 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "PwP-Bench/Claude-Sonnet-4.0/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "Carnegie Mellon University",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "text",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "Claude-Sonnet-4.0",
+    "name": "Claude-Sonnet-4.0",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "PwP-Bench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "PwP-Bench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2502.18525"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Performance of computer-use agents with File/Bash APIs on specialized programming tasks like ethical hacking (CTF) and interactive theorem proving (MiniCTX).",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Domain-Specific Code Generation (%) - CUA with APIs",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Performance on Domain-Specific Code Generation Tasks (CUA with APIs)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "performance_on_domain_specific_code_generation_tasks_cua_with_apis",
+        "metric_name": "Performance on Domain-Specific Code Generation Tasks (CUA with APIs)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 43.3
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "PwP-Bench/Claude-Sonnet-4.0/1771591481.616601#pwp_bench#performance_on_domain_specific_code_generation_tasks_cua_with_apis"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "PwP-Bench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "PwP-Bench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2502.18525"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Performance of computer-use agents with File/Bash APIs on general software engineering tasks beyond code generation, such as IDE configuration, performance profiling, and debugging.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "General SWE Tasks (%) - CUA with APIs",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Performance on General SWE Tasks (CUA with APIs)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "performance_on_general_swe_tasks_cua_with_apis",
+        "metric_name": "Performance on General SWE Tasks (CUA with APIs)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 37.5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "PwP-Bench/Claude-Sonnet-4.0/1771591481.616601#pwp_bench#performance_on_general_swe_tasks_cua_with_apis"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "PwP-Bench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "PwP-Bench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2502.18525"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Performance of computer-use agents with File/Bash APIs on tasks related to code generation and editing. This category includes tasks from datasets like HumanEval and SWE-Bench.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Code Generation & Editing (%) - CUA with APIs",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Performance on Code Generation & Editing Tasks (CUA with APIs)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "performance_on_code_generation_editing_tasks_cua_with_apis",
+        "metric_name": "Performance on Code Generation & Editing Tasks (CUA with APIs)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 53.4
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "PwP-Bench/Claude-Sonnet-4.0/1771591481.616601#pwp_bench#performance_on_code_generation_editing_tasks_cua_with_apis"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "PwP-Bench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "PwP-Bench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2502.18525"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Performance of computer-use agents with File/Bash APIs on tasks requiring code creation from visual inputs, such as images or charts. This category includes tasks from Design2Code and Chart2Mimic.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Multimodal Code Generation (%) - CUA with APIs",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Performance on Multimodal Code Generation Tasks (CUA with APIs)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "performance_on_multimodal_code_generation_tasks_cua_with_apis",
+        "metric_name": "Performance on Multimodal Code Generation Tasks (CUA with APIs)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 58.6
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "PwP-Bench/Claude-Sonnet-4.0/1771591481.616601#pwp_bench#performance_on_multimodal_code_generation_tasks_cua_with_apis"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "PwP-Bench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "PwP-Bench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2502.18525"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Overall average performance of computer-use agents augmented with File/Bash APIs on the PwP-Bench-Lite benchmark. This setup allows agents to directly edit files and run shell commands, significantly boosting performance compared to purely visual agents. The score is the macro average of all task-specific metrics.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Overall Avg (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Overall Average Performance on PwP-Bench-Lite - CUA with APIs"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "overall_average_performance_on_pwp_bench_lite_cua_with_apis",
+        "metric_name": "Overall Average Performance on PwP-Bench-Lite - CUA with APIs",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 50.7
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "PwP-Bench/Claude-Sonnet-4.0/1771591481.616601#pwp_bench#overall_average_performance_on_pwp_bench_lite_cua_with_apis"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "PwP-Bench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "PwP-Bench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2502.18525"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Overall average performance of pure computer-use agents on the PwP-Bench-Lite benchmark. These agents interact with the IDE solely through visual inputs (screenshots) and primitive actions (keyboard/mouse), without access to file or bash APIs. The score is the macro average of task-specific metrics.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Overall Avg (%) - Pure CUA",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Overall Average Performance on PwP-Bench-Lite - Pure Computer-Use Agents"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "overall_average_performance_on_pwp_bench_lite_pure_computer_use_agents",
+        "metric_name": "Overall Average Performance on PwP-Bench-Lite - Pure Computer-Use Agents",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 22.9
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "PwP-Bench/Claude-Sonnet-4.0/1771591481.616601#pwp_bench#overall_average_performance_on_pwp_bench_lite_pure_computer_use_agents"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/03/0b/030b16ab-f0fe-4854-8dc1-beeb7fa41232.json

@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "EffiBench/CodeLlama-13b-hf/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "University of Waterloo",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "text",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "CodeLlama-13b-hf",
+    "name": "CodeLlama-13b-hf",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "EffiBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "EffiBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://huggingface.co/spaces/EffiBench/effibench-leaderboard"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": true,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Normalized Execution Time (NET) measures the execution time of generated code relative to a human-written canonical solution. A value > 1 means the generated code is slower; < 1 means faster. This metric is a primary indicator of code speed efficiency on the EffiBench dataset, which contains 1000 efficiency-critical problems from LeetCode. Lower is better.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Normalized Execution Time (NET)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Overall Code Efficiency on EffiBench: Normalized Execution Time"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "overall_code_efficiency_on_effibench_normalized_execution_time",
+        "metric_name": "Overall Code Efficiency on EffiBench: Normalized Execution Time",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 2.71
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "EffiBench/CodeLlama-13b-hf/1771591481.616601#effibench#overall_code_efficiency_on_effibench_normalized_execution_time"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "EffiBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "EffiBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://huggingface.co/spaces/EffiBench/effibench-leaderboard"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": true,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Normalized Max Memory Usage (NMU) measures the peak memory consumption of generated code relative to a human-written canonical solution. A value > 1 means the generated code uses more peak memory. This metric assesses the spatial efficiency of the generated algorithms. Lower is better.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Normalized Max Memory Usage (NMU)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Overall Code Efficiency on EffiBench: Normalized Max Memory Usage"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "overall_code_efficiency_on_effibench_normalized_max_memory_usage",
+        "metric_name": "Overall Code Efficiency on EffiBench: Normalized Max Memory Usage",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 1.85
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "EffiBench/CodeLlama-13b-hf/1771591481.616601#effibench#overall_code_efficiency_on_effibench_normalized_max_memory_usage"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "EffiBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "EffiBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://huggingface.co/spaces/EffiBench/effibench-leaderboard"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": true,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Normalized Total Memory Usage (NTMU) compares the dynamic memory efficiency (area under the memory usage curve) of generated code to a canonical solution. A value > 1 means the code is less efficient in its overall memory management. This metric captures both magnitude and duration of memory use. Lower is better.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Normalized Total Memory Usage (NTMU)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Overall Code Efficiency on EffiBench: Normalized Total Memory Usage"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "overall_code_efficiency_on_effibench_normalized_total_memory_usage",
+        "metric_name": "Overall Code Efficiency on EffiBench: Normalized Total Memory Usage",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 5.32
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "EffiBench/CodeLlama-13b-hf/1771591481.616601#effibench#overall_code_efficiency_on_effibench_normalized_total_memory_usage"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "EffiBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "EffiBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://huggingface.co/spaces/EffiBench/effibench-leaderboard"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Pass@1 measures the percentage of problems for which a model generates a functionally correct solution on the first attempt. Only code that passes this correctness check is evaluated for efficiency. Higher is better.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Pass@1 (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Overall Code Correctness on EffiBench (Pass@1)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "overall_code_correctness_on_effibench_pass_1",
+        "metric_name": "Overall Code Correctness on EffiBench (Pass@1)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 1.1
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "EffiBench/CodeLlama-13b-hf/1771591481.616601#effibench#overall_code_correctness_on_effibench_pass_1"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/03/0b/030b8c6e-e3f5-403d-8382-db08ad060c75.json

@@ -0,0 +1,328 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "MedBench-IT/Qwen 2.5 14B/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "University of Graz",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "text",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "Qwen 2.5 14B",
+    "name": "Qwen 2.5 14B",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MedBench-IT",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MedBench-IT",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2509.07135"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the overall percentage of correctly answered questions from the MedBench-IT benchmark using a standard, direct-answering prompt. This is the primary metric for evaluating model performance on the Italian medical entrance examination questions.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Overall Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Overall Accuracy on MedBench-IT (Standard Prompt)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "overall_accuracy_on_medbench_it_standard_prompt",
+        "metric_name": "Overall Accuracy on MedBench-IT (Standard Prompt)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 72.6
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "MedBench-IT/Qwen 2.5 14B/1771591481.616601#medbench_it#overall_accuracy_on_medbench_it_standard_prompt"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MedBench-IT",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MedBench-IT",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2509.07135"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures accuracy on the Chemistry subset of MedBench-IT using a standard prompt. This is a knowledge-intensive subject where most models performed well.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%) - Chemistry (Std.)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Accuracy on Chemistry Questions (Standard Prompt)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "accuracy_on_chemistry_questions_standard_prompt",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy on Chemistry Questions (Standard Prompt)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 73.5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "MedBench-IT/Qwen 2.5 14B/1771591481.616601#medbench_it#accuracy_on_chemistry_questions_standard_prompt"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MedBench-IT",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MedBench-IT",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2509.07135"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures accuracy on the General Culture subset of MedBench-IT using a standard prompt.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%) - General Culture (Std.)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Accuracy on General Culture Questions (Standard Prompt)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "accuracy_on_general_culture_questions_standard_prompt",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy on General Culture Questions (Standard Prompt)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 76.6
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "MedBench-IT/Qwen 2.5 14B/1771591481.616601#medbench_it#accuracy_on_general_culture_questions_standard_prompt"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MedBench-IT",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MedBench-IT",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2509.07135"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures accuracy on the Logic subset of MedBench-IT using a reasoning-eliciting prompt. This subject was identified as particularly challenging for most models.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%) - Logic (Reas.)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Accuracy on Logic Questions (Reasoning Prompt)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "accuracy_on_logic_questions_reasoning_prompt",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy on Logic Questions (Reasoning Prompt)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 62.1
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "MedBench-IT/Qwen 2.5 14B/1771591481.616601#medbench_it#accuracy_on_logic_questions_reasoning_prompt"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MedBench-IT",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MedBench-IT",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2509.07135"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures accuracy on the Logic subset of MedBench-IT using a standard prompt. This subject was identified as particularly challenging for most models, testing abstract and multi-step reasoning.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%) - Logic (Std.)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Accuracy on Logic Questions (Standard Prompt)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "accuracy_on_logic_questions_standard_prompt",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy on Logic Questions (Standard Prompt)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 56.3
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "MedBench-IT/Qwen 2.5 14B/1771591481.616601#medbench_it#accuracy_on_logic_questions_standard_prompt"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MedBench-IT",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MedBench-IT",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2509.07135"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures accuracy on the Biology subset of MedBench-IT using a standard prompt. This is a knowledge-intensive subject where most models performed well.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%) - Biology (Std.)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Accuracy on Biology Questions (Standard Prompt)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "accuracy_on_biology_questions_standard_prompt",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy on Biology Questions (Standard Prompt)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 81.2
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "MedBench-IT/Qwen 2.5 14B/1771591481.616601#medbench_it#accuracy_on_biology_questions_standard_prompt"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MedBench-IT",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MedBench-IT",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2509.07135"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures accuracy on the Mathematics subset of MedBench-IT using a standard prompt. This subject was identified as particularly challenging for most models, testing quantitative reasoning.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%) - Mathematics (Std.)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Accuracy on Mathematics Questions (Standard Prompt)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "accuracy_on_mathematics_questions_standard_prompt",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy on Mathematics Questions (Standard Prompt)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 69.5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "MedBench-IT/Qwen 2.5 14B/1771591481.616601#medbench_it#accuracy_on_mathematics_questions_standard_prompt"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MedBench-IT",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MedBench-IT",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2509.07135"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures accuracy on the Physics subset of MedBench-IT using a standard prompt.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%) - Physics (Std.)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Accuracy on Physics Questions (Standard Prompt)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "accuracy_on_physics_questions_standard_prompt",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy on Physics Questions (Standard Prompt)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 72.8
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "MedBench-IT/Qwen 2.5 14B/1771591481.616601#medbench_it#accuracy_on_physics_questions_standard_prompt"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MedBench-IT",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MedBench-IT",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2509.07135"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the overall percentage of correctly answered questions from the MedBench-IT benchmark using a reasoning-eliciting (Chain-of-Thought style) prompt. This evaluates the impact of explicit reasoning on model accuracy.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Overall Accuracy (%) - Reasoning Prompt",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Overall Accuracy on MedBench-IT (Reasoning-Eliciting Prompt)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "overall_accuracy_on_medbench_it_reasoning_eliciting_prompt",
+        "metric_name": "Overall Accuracy on MedBench-IT (Reasoning-Eliciting Prompt)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 76.9
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "MedBench-IT/Qwen 2.5 14B/1771591481.616601#medbench_it#overall_accuracy_on_medbench_it_reasoning_eliciting_prompt"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MedBench-IT",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MedBench-IT",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2509.07135"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures accuracy on the Mathematics subset of MedBench-IT using a reasoning-eliciting prompt. This subject was identified as particularly challenging for most models.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%) - Mathematics (Reas.)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Accuracy on Mathematics Questions (Reasoning Prompt)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "accuracy_on_mathematics_questions_reasoning_prompt",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy on Mathematics Questions (Reasoning Prompt)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 71.7
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "MedBench-IT/Qwen 2.5 14B/1771591481.616601#medbench_it#accuracy_on_mathematics_questions_reasoning_prompt"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/03/0b/030bb1a7-28d6-43d9-add5-f1eeb3380dab.json

@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "VIVA+/GPT-4o-mini (w/ Consequence)/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "The Hong Kong Polytechnic University",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "image",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "GPT-4o-mini (w/ Consequence)",
+    "name": "GPT-4o-mini (w/ Consequence)",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "VIVA+",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "VIVA+",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2509.23698"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "An ablation study evaluating the impact of multi-step reasoning strategies (Consequence Prediction and Chain-of-Thought) on Social Role-Based Action Selection (Q3). Performance is compared to a baseline for GPT-4o-mini and Qwen2.5-VL-7B.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%) - Q3 Multi-Step Reasoning",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "VIVA+ Multi-Step Reasoning: Social Role-Based Action (Q3)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "viva_multi_step_reasoning_social_role_based_action_q3",
+        "metric_name": "VIVA+ Multi-Step Reasoning: Social Role-Based Action (Q3)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 75.3
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "VIVA+/GPT-4o-mini (w/ Consequence)/1771591481.616601#viva#viva_multi_step_reasoning_social_role_based_action_q3"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "VIVA+",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "VIVA+",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2509.23698"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "An ablation study evaluating the impact of multi-step reasoning strategies (Consequence Prediction and Chain-of-Thought) on Environment-Constrained Action Selection (Q4). Performance is compared to a baseline for GPT-4o-mini and Qwen2.5-VL-7B.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%) - Q4 Multi-Step Reasoning",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "VIVA+ Multi-Step Reasoning: Environment-Constrained Action (Q4)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "viva_multi_step_reasoning_environment_constrained_action_q4",
+        "metric_name": "VIVA+ Multi-Step Reasoning: Environment-Constrained Action (Q4)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 79.61
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "VIVA+/GPT-4o-mini (w/ Consequence)/1771591481.616601#viva#viva_multi_step_reasoning_environment_constrained_action_q4"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/03/0c/030c24dc-a020-4e44-8e10-c7c6982cb43c.json

@@ -0,0 +1,208 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "TransBench/OS-Atlas/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "Beihang University",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "image",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "OS-Atlas",
+    "name": "OS-Atlas",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "TransBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "TransBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2505.17629"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "This table shows the overall accuracy of different models on the TransBench dataset, measuring the percentage of correctly identified screen elements based on natural language instructions.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Overall Accuracy on TransBench Dataset"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "overall_accuracy_on_transbench_dataset",
+        "metric_name": "Overall Accuracy on TransBench Dataset",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 81.37
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "TransBench/OS-Atlas/1771591481.616601#transbench#overall_accuracy_on_transbench_dataset"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "TransBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "TransBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2505.17629"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Model performance on the 'Android New' subset of the TransBench dataset, evaluating the ability to handle UI changes in updated applications.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Accuracy on Android (New Version)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "accuracy_on_android_new_version",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy on Android (New Version)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 84.6
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "TransBench/OS-Atlas/1771591481.616601#transbench#accuracy_on_android_new_version"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "TransBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "TransBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2505.17629"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Model performance on the 'Android Old' subset of the TransBench dataset, serving as a baseline for version-to-version transfer learning.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Accuracy on Android (Old Version)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "accuracy_on_android_old_version",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy on Android (Old Version)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 84.52
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "TransBench/OS-Atlas/1771591481.616601#transbench#accuracy_on_android_old_version"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "TransBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "TransBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2505.17629"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Model performance on the iOS subset of the TransBench dataset, evaluating cross-platform transferability.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Accuracy on iOS"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "accuracy_on_ios",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy on iOS",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 79.64
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "TransBench/OS-Atlas/1771591481.616601#transbench#accuracy_on_ios"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "TransBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "TransBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2505.17629"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": true,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "This table presents the average distance error of various models on the TransBench dataset. The error is the Euclidean distance between the predicted click position and the center of the ground truth bounding box, normalized to a 0-100 scale.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Average Distance Error",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Overall Average Distance Error on TransBench Dataset"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "overall_average_distance_error_on_transbench_dataset",
+        "metric_name": "Overall Average Distance Error on TransBench Dataset",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 8.36
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "TransBench/OS-Atlas/1771591481.616601#transbench#overall_average_distance_error_on_transbench_dataset"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "TransBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "TransBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2505.17629"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Model performance on the Web subset of the TransBench dataset, evaluating cross-platform transferability.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Accuracy on Web"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "accuracy_on_web",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy on Web",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 74.76
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "TransBench/OS-Atlas/1771591481.616601#transbench#accuracy_on_web"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/03/11/03116601-2283-44fb-a722-5b7dee328057.json

@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "Cityscapes-3D/SDC-Depth/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST)",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "image",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "SDC-Depth",
+    "name": "SDC-Depth",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "Cityscapes-3D",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "Cityscapes-3D",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2304.00971"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": true,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Evaluation of monocular depth estimation on the Cityscapes-3D dataset, measured by Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE). A lower RMSE indicates a more accurate prediction of depth from a single 2D image. The paper's TaskPrompter model sets a new state-of-the-art for this task.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "RMSE",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Monocular Depth Estimation (RMSE) on Cityscapes-3D"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "monocular_depth_estimation_rmse_on_cityscapes_3d",
+        "metric_name": "Monocular Depth Estimation (RMSE) on Cityscapes-3D",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 6.92
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "Cityscapes-3D/SDC-Depth/1771591481.616601#cityscapes_3d#monocular_depth_estimation_rmse_on_cityscapes_3d"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/03/16/03164b5b-c557-4a32-bbed-99d8b0e1555c.json

@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "SEED-Bench-2-Plus/NExt-GPT/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "Tencent AI Lab",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "image",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "NExt-GPT",
+    "name": "NExt-GPT",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "SEED-Bench-2-Plus",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "SEED-Bench-2-Plus",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2404.16790"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Overall average accuracy across all three text-rich data categories (Charts, Maps, and Webs) in the SEED-Bench-2-Plus benchmark. This metric represents the general text-rich visual comprehension capability of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs).",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Overall Performance on SEED-Bench-2-Plus"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "overall_performance_on_seed_bench_2_plus",
+        "metric_name": "Overall Performance on SEED-Bench-2-Plus",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 26.2
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "SEED-Bench-2-Plus/NExt-GPT/1771591481.616601#seed_bench_2_plus#overall_performance_on_seed_bench_2_plus"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "SEED-Bench-2-Plus",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "SEED-Bench-2-Plus",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2404.16790"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) on the 'Charts' category of the SEED-Bench-2-Plus benchmark. This category tests the ability to understand various chart types like flow charts, organizational charts, and Gantt charts.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%) - Charts",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Performance on Charts (SEED-Bench-2-Plus)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "performance_on_charts_seed_bench_2_plus",
+        "metric_name": "Performance on Charts (SEED-Bench-2-Plus)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 26.3
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "SEED-Bench-2-Plus/NExt-GPT/1771591481.616601#seed_bench_2_plus#performance_on_charts_seed_bench_2_plus"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "SEED-Bench-2-Plus",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "SEED-Bench-2-Plus",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2404.16790"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) on the 'Maps' category of the SEED-Bench-2-Plus benchmark. This category, identified as particularly challenging, evaluates the understanding of various map types like road maps, weather maps, and historical maps.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%) - Maps",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Performance on Maps (SEED-Bench-2-Plus)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "performance_on_maps_seed_bench_2_plus",
+        "metric_name": "Performance on Maps (SEED-Bench-2-Plus)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 26.6
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "SEED-Bench-2-Plus/NExt-GPT/1771591481.616601#seed_bench_2_plus#performance_on_maps_seed_bench_2_plus"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "SEED-Bench-2-Plus",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "SEED-Bench-2-Plus",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2404.16790"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) on the 'Webs' category of the SEED-Bench-2-Plus benchmark. This task assesses the model's ability to act as a 'website agent' by comprehending screenshots from various websites like Amazon, GitHub, and Wikipedia.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%) - Webs",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Performance on Web Screenshots (SEED-Bench-2-Plus)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "performance_on_web_screenshots_seed_bench_2_plus",
+        "metric_name": "Performance on Web Screenshots (SEED-Bench-2-Plus)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 25.7
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "SEED-Bench-2-Plus/NExt-GPT/1771591481.616601#seed_bench_2_plus#performance_on_web_screenshots_seed_bench_2_plus"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/03/19/03195b16-2ad3-41ea-8dcd-9013e1e8bc6e.json

@@ -0,0 +1,238 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "HLCE/chatgpt-4o-latest/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "City University of Hong Kong",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "text",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "chatgpt-4o-latest",
+    "name": "chatgpt-4o-latest",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "HLCE",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "HLCE",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2506.12713"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average pass@5 score on the Humanity’s Last Code Exam (HLCE) benchmark, combining results from both ICPC World Finals and IOI problem sets. Pass@5 measures the percentage of problems for which at least one correct solution is generated within five attempts. This metric indicates a model's overall capability on extremely difficult coding challenges when allowed multiple tries.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Average pass@5 (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "HLCE Code Generation: Average Performance (pass@5)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "hlce_code_generation_average_performance_pass_5",
+        "metric_name": "HLCE Code Generation: Average Performance (pass@5)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 2.37
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "HLCE/chatgpt-4o-latest/1771591481.616601#hlce#hlce_code_generation_average_performance_pass_5"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "HLCE",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "HLCE",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2506.12713"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Pass@1 score on the ICPC World Finals subset of the HLCE benchmark. These problems involve standard input/output. Pass@1 measures the percentage of problems solved in a single attempt, testing first-shot accuracy on complex algorithmic tasks.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "ICPC World Finals pass@1 (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "HLCE Code Generation: ICPC World Finals (pass@1)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "hlce_code_generation_icpc_world_finals_pass_1",
+        "metric_name": "HLCE Code Generation: ICPC World Finals (pass@1)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 1.91
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "HLCE/chatgpt-4o-latest/1771591481.616601#hlce#hlce_code_generation_icpc_world_finals_pass_1"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "HLCE",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "HLCE",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2506.12713"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average pass@1 score on the Humanity’s Last Code Exam (HLCE) benchmark, combining results from both ICPC World Finals and IOI problem sets. Pass@1 measures the percentage of problems for which a correct solution is generated in a single attempt. This metric reflects a model's first-shot accuracy on extremely difficult competitive programming tasks.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Average pass@1 (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "HLCE Code Generation: Average Performance (pass@1)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "hlce_code_generation_average_performance_pass_1",
+        "metric_name": "HLCE Code Generation: Average Performance (pass@1)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 1.18
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "HLCE/chatgpt-4o-latest/1771591481.616601#hlce#hlce_code_generation_average_performance_pass_1"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "HLCE",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "HLCE",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2506.12713"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Pass@1 score on the International Olympiad in Informatics (IOI) subset of the HLCE benchmark. These problems are often interactive, requiring dynamic program behavior. Pass@1 measures the percentage of problems solved in a single attempt, testing performance on a less common but crucial type of programming challenge.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "IOI pass@1 (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "HLCE Code Generation: IOI (pass@1)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "hlce_code_generation_ioi_pass_1",
+        "metric_name": "HLCE Code Generation: IOI (pass@1)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.45
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "HLCE/chatgpt-4o-latest/1771591481.616601#hlce#hlce_code_generation_ioi_pass_1"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "HLCE",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "HLCE",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2506.12713"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Pass@5 score on the International Olympiad in Informatics (IOI) subset of the HLCE benchmark. These problems are often interactive. Pass@5 measures the percentage of problems where at least one correct solution is found within five attempts, showing capability on interactive coding tasks.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "IOI pass@5 (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "HLCE Code Generation: IOI (pass@5)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "hlce_code_generation_ioi_pass_5",
+        "metric_name": "HLCE Code Generation: IOI (pass@5)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 1.12
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "HLCE/chatgpt-4o-latest/1771591481.616601#hlce#hlce_code_generation_ioi_pass_5"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "HLCE",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "HLCE",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2506.12713"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Area Under the Curve (AUC) score for the self-recognition task in the HLCE benchmark. This task evaluates an LLM's ability to correctly determine whether its own generated code solution is correct or incorrect. A higher AUC (max 1.0) indicates better metacognitive or self-evaluation ability.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "AUC Score",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "HLCE Self-Recognition Performance (AUC)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "hlce_self_recognition_performance_auc",
+        "metric_name": "HLCE Self-Recognition Performance (AUC)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.84
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "HLCE/chatgpt-4o-latest/1771591481.616601#hlce#hlce_self_recognition_performance_auc"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "HLCE",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "HLCE",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2506.12713"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Pass@5 score on the ICPC World Finals subset of the HLCE benchmark. These problems involve standard input/output. Pass@5 measures the percentage of problems where at least one correct solution is found within five attempts.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "ICPC World Finals pass@5 (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "HLCE Code Generation: ICPC World Finals (pass@5)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "hlce_code_generation_icpc_world_finals_pass_5",
+        "metric_name": "HLCE Code Generation: ICPC World Finals (pass@5)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 3.61
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "HLCE/chatgpt-4o-latest/1771591481.616601#hlce#hlce_code_generation_icpc_world_finals_pass_5"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/03/19/0319e596-ea86-4492-bea3-9c85c00c60f4.json

@@ -0,0 +1,268 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "StructBench/Qwen-Image/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "National University of Singapore",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "image",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "Qwen-Image",
+    "name": "Qwen-Image",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "StructBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "StructBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2510.05091"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Performance on the Chart domain of the StructT2IBench benchmark for structured image generation. The metric is StructScore (reported as Accuracy %).",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "StructScore (%) - Chart (Generation)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Chart Performance on StructT2IBench (Image Generation)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "chart_performance_on_structt2ibench_image_generation",
+        "metric_name": "Chart Performance on StructT2IBench (Image Generation)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 32.23
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "StructBench/Qwen-Image/1771591481.616601#structbench#chart_performance_on_structt2ibench_image_generation"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "StructBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "StructBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2510.05091"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Performance on the Graph domain of the StructT2IBench benchmark for structured image generation. The metric is StructScore (reported as Accuracy %).",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "StructScore (%) - Graph (Generation)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Graph Performance on StructT2IBench (Image Generation)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "graph_performance_on_structt2ibench_image_generation",
+        "metric_name": "Graph Performance on StructT2IBench (Image Generation)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 48.05
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "StructBench/Qwen-Image/1771591481.616601#structbench#graph_performance_on_structt2ibench_image_generation"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "StructBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "StructBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2510.05091"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Performance on the Math domain of the StructT2IBench benchmark for structured image generation. The metric is StructScore (reported as Accuracy %).",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "StructScore (%) - Math (Generation)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Math Performance on StructT2IBench (Image Generation)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "math_performance_on_structt2ibench_image_generation",
+        "metric_name": "Math Performance on StructT2IBench (Image Generation)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 46.98
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "StructBench/Qwen-Image/1771591481.616601#structbench#math_performance_on_structt2ibench_image_generation"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "StructBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "StructBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2510.05091"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Overall performance on the StructT2IBench benchmark for structured text-to-image generation. The metric is StructScore (reported as Accuracy %), a VLM-based evaluation that measures factual correctness by averaging scores from fine-grained question-answer pairs. Higher is better.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "StructScore (%) - Overall Generation",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Overall Performance on StructT2IBench (Structured Image Generation)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "overall_performance_on_structt2ibench_structured_image_generation",
+        "metric_name": "Overall Performance on StructT2IBench (Structured Image Generation)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 41.03
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "StructBench/Qwen-Image/1771591481.616601#structbench#overall_performance_on_structt2ibench_structured_image_generation"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "StructBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "StructBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2510.05091"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Performance on the Puzzle domain of the StructT2IBench benchmark for structured image generation. The metric is StructScore (reported as Accuracy %).",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "StructScore (%) - Puzzle (Generation)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Puzzle Performance on StructT2IBench (Image Generation)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "puzzle_performance_on_structt2ibench_image_generation",
+        "metric_name": "Puzzle Performance on StructT2IBench (Image Generation)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 48.9
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "StructBench/Qwen-Image/1771591481.616601#structbench#puzzle_performance_on_structt2ibench_image_generation"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "StructBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "StructBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2510.05091"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Performance on the Science domain of the StructT2IBench benchmark for structured image generation. The metric is StructScore (reported as Accuracy %).",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "StructScore (%) - Science (Generation)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Science Performance on StructT2IBench (Image Generation)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "science_performance_on_structt2ibench_image_generation",
+        "metric_name": "Science Performance on StructT2IBench (Image Generation)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 53.51
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "StructBench/Qwen-Image/1771591481.616601#structbench#science_performance_on_structt2ibench_image_generation"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "StructBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "StructBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2510.05091"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Overall performance on the ImgEdit-Full benchmark, a general-purpose image editing benchmark. This evaluation was performed to show that specializing on structured visuals did not degrade general editing capabilities. Higher is better.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "ImgEdit Score",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Overall Performance on ImgEdit-Full (General Editing)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "overall_performance_on_imgedit_full_general_editing",
+        "metric_name": "Overall Performance on ImgEdit-Full (General Editing)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 4.27
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "StructBench/Qwen-Image/1771591481.616601#structbench#overall_performance_on_imgedit_full_general_editing"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "StructBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "StructBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2510.05091"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Performance on the Table domain of the StructT2IBench benchmark for structured image generation. The metric is StructScore (reported as Accuracy %).",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "StructScore (%) - Table (Generation)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Table Performance on StructT2IBench (Image Generation)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "table_performance_on_structt2ibench_image_generation",
+        "metric_name": "Table Performance on StructT2IBench (Image Generation)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 73.65
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "StructBench/Qwen-Image/1771591481.616601#structbench#table_performance_on_structt2ibench_image_generation"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/03/1b/031b3333-f8b6-4f59-a0fc-3fb00c0c907d.json

@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "multi-swe-bench/typescript/anthropic_Claude-3.5-Sonnet_Oct_/20250329_MopenHands_Claude-3.5-Sonnet_Oct_/1776704403.994647",
+  "evaluation_timestamp": "2025-03-29",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1776704403.994647",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "Multi-SWE-Bench Leaderboard",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "ByteDance-Seed",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://github.com/multi-swe-bench/experiments",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party"
+  },
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "multi-swe-bench",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "name": "Claude-3.5-Sonnet(Oct)",
+    "id": "anthropic/Claude-3.5-Sonnet(Oct)",
+    "developer": "anthropic",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "submission_name": "MopenHands + Claude-3.5-Sonnet(Oct)",
+      "language": "typescript",
+      "oss": "True",
+      "site": "https://github.com/multi-swe-bench/MopenHands",
+      "verified": "True",
+      "submission_dir": "20250329_MopenHands_Claude-3.5-Sonnet(Oct)",
+      "agent": "MopenHands"
+    }
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "Multi-SWE-Bench (typescript)",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "Multi-SWE-bench (typescript)",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://huggingface.co/datasets/ByteDance-Seed/Multi-SWE-bench"
+        ]
+      },
+      "evaluation_timestamp": "2025-03-29",
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Fraction of typescript GitHub issues resolved (0.0–1.0)",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "multi_swe_bench_leaderboard.score",
+        "metric_name": "Score",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.11607142857142858,
+        "details": {
+          "resolved_count": "26",
+          "total_instances": "224",
+          "submitted_instances": "216",
+          "completed_instances": "216",
+          "unresolved_instances": "190",
+          "empty_error_patch_instances": "8"
+        }
+      },
+      "generation_config": {
+        "generation_args": {
+          "agentic_eval_config": {
+            "available_tools": [
+              {
+                "name": "bash"
+              }
+            ]
+          },
+          "max_attempts": 1
+        }
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "multi-swe-bench/typescript/anthropic_Claude-3.5-Sonnet_Oct_/20250329_MopenHands_Claude-3.5-Sonnet_Oct_/1776704403.994647#multi_swe_bench_typescript#multi_swe_bench_leaderboard_score"
+    }
+  ]
+}

flat/objects/03/1b/031b77c2-34a7-43a0-bb8b-d08644d35f62.json

@@ -0,0 +1,328 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "KILT/BERT + DPR/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "University of Amsterdam",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "text",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "BERT + DPR",
+    "name": "BERT + DPR",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "KILT",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "KILT",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://huggingface.co/datasets?search=kilt"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures KILT Exact Match on the Natural Questions (NQ) task. This metric only awards points for a correct answer if the model also provides correct provenance (R-Precision = 1), jointly evaluating accuracy and explainability.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "KILT Exact Match (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "KILT Score on Natural Questions (Open Domain QA)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "kilt_score_on_natural_questions_open_domain_qa",
+        "metric_name": "KILT Score on Natural Questions (Open Domain QA)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 31.99
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "KILT/BERT + DPR/1771591481.616601#kilt#kilt_score_on_natural_questions_open_domain_qa"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "KILT",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "KILT",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://huggingface.co/datasets?search=kilt"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures classification accuracy on the FEVER fact-checking task from the KILT benchmark. Models are evaluated on their ability to classify claims as 'Supported' or 'Refuted' based on evidence from a Wikipedia snapshot.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Downstream Performance on FEVER (Fact Checking)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "downstream_performance_on_fever_fact_checking",
+        "metric_name": "Downstream Performance on FEVER (Fact Checking)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 69.68
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "KILT/BERT + DPR/1771591481.616601#kilt#downstream_performance_on_fever_fact_checking"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "KILT",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "KILT",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://huggingface.co/datasets?search=kilt"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures KILT Accuracy on the FEVER fact-checking task. This metric only awards points for a correct classification if the model also provides correct provenance (R-Precision = 1), jointly evaluating accuracy and explainability.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "KILT Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "KILT Score on FEVER (Fact Checking)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "kilt_score_on_fever_fact_checking",
+        "metric_name": "KILT Score on FEVER (Fact Checking)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 58.58
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "KILT/BERT + DPR/1771591481.616601#kilt#kilt_score_on_fever_fact_checking"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "KILT",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "KILT",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://huggingface.co/datasets?search=kilt"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures Exact Match (EM) score on the HotpotQA (HoPo) task from the KILT benchmark. This is a multi-hop open-domain QA task requiring reasoning over multiple documents.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Exact Match (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Downstream Performance on HotpotQA (Open Domain QA)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "downstream_performance_on_hotpotqa_open_domain_qa",
+        "metric_name": "Downstream Performance on HotpotQA (Open Domain QA)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 11.29
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "KILT/BERT + DPR/1771591481.616601#kilt#downstream_performance_on_hotpotqa_open_domain_qa"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "KILT",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "KILT",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://huggingface.co/datasets?search=kilt"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures KILT Exact Match on the multi-hop HotpotQA (HoPo) task. This metric only awards points for a correct answer if the model also provides correct provenance (R-Precision = 1).",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "KILT Exact Match (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "KILT Score on HotpotQA (Open Domain QA)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "kilt_score_on_hotpotqa_open_domain_qa",
+        "metric_name": "KILT Score on HotpotQA (Open Domain QA)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.74
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "KILT/BERT + DPR/1771591481.616601#kilt#kilt_score_on_hotpotqa_open_domain_qa"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "KILT",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "KILT",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://huggingface.co/datasets?search=kilt"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures Exact Match (EM) score on the Natural Questions (NQ) task from the KILT benchmark, an open-domain extractive question answering task.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Exact Match (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Downstream Performance on Natural Questions (Open Domain QA)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "downstream_performance_on_natural_questions_open_domain_qa",
+        "metric_name": "Downstream Performance on Natural Questions (Open Domain QA)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 38.64
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "KILT/BERT + DPR/1771591481.616601#kilt#downstream_performance_on_natural_questions_open_domain_qa"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "KILT",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "KILT",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://huggingface.co/datasets?search=kilt"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures Exact Match (EM) score on the TriviaQA (TQA) task from the KILT benchmark, an open-domain extractive question answering task with a large number of answer aliases.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Exact Match (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Downstream Performance on TriviaQA (Open Domain QA)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "downstream_performance_on_triviaqa_open_domain_qa",
+        "metric_name": "Downstream Performance on TriviaQA (Open Domain QA)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 70.38
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "KILT/BERT + DPR/1771591481.616601#kilt#downstream_performance_on_triviaqa_open_domain_qa"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "KILT",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "KILT",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://huggingface.co/datasets?search=kilt"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures KILT Exact Match on the TriviaQA (TQA) task. This metric only awards points for a correct answer if the model also provides correct provenance (R-Precision = 1).",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "KILT Exact Match (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "KILT Score on TriviaQA (Open Domain QA)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "kilt_score_on_triviaqa_open_domain_qa",
+        "metric_name": "KILT Score on TriviaQA (Open Domain QA)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 34.48
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "KILT/BERT + DPR/1771591481.616601#kilt#kilt_score_on_triviaqa_open_domain_qa"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "KILT",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "KILT",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://huggingface.co/datasets?search=kilt"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures accuracy on the Zero Shot RE (zsRE) slot filling task from the KILT benchmark. This task evaluates generalization to unseen relations.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Downstream Performance on Zero Shot RE (Slot Filling)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "downstream_performance_on_zero_shot_re_slot_filling",
+        "metric_name": "Downstream Performance on Zero Shot RE (Slot Filling)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 6.93
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "KILT/BERT + DPR/1771591481.616601#kilt#downstream_performance_on_zero_shot_re_slot_filling"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "KILT",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "KILT",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://huggingface.co/datasets?search=kilt"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures KILT Accuracy on the Zero Shot RE (zsRE) slot filling task. This metric only awards points for a correct prediction if the model also provides correct provenance (R-Precision = 1).",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "KILT Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "KILT Score on Zero Shot RE (Slot Filling)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "kilt_score_on_zero_shot_re_slot_filling",
+        "metric_name": "KILT Score on Zero Shot RE (Slot Filling)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 4.47
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "KILT/BERT + DPR/1771591481.616601#kilt#kilt_score_on_zero_shot_re_slot_filling"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/03/1f/031f0ea2-6c95-460f-bf25-bcfafad2a1f0.json

@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "mmlu-pro/unknown_hunyuanturbos/self-reported/1777613486.918081",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1777613486.918081",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "MMLU-Pro Leaderboard",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "TIGER-Lab",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://tiger-ai-lab.github.io",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "leaderboard_space_url": "https://huggingface.co/spaces/TIGER-Lab/MMLU-Pro",
+      "results_csv_url": "https://huggingface.co/datasets/TIGER-Lab/mmlu_pro_leaderboard_submission/resolve/main/results.csv",
+      "paper_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.01574",
+      "github_url": "https://github.com/TIGER-AI-Lab/MMLU-Pro",
+      "leaderboard_data_source": "Self-Reported"
+    }
+  },
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "MMLU-Pro leaderboard (TIGER-Lab)",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "name": "HunyuanTurboS",
+    "id": "unknown/hunyuanturbos",
+    "developer": "unknown",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "raw_model_name": "HunyuanTurboS",
+      "size_billions_parameters": "560.0",
+      "leaderboard_data_source": "Self-Reported"
+    }
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_result_id": "mmlu_pro/overall",
+      "evaluation_name": "MMLU-Pro (overall)",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MMLU-Pro leaderboard submissions (TIGER-Lab)",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "TIGER-Lab/mmlu_pro_leaderboard_submission",
+        "hf_split": "train",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "results_csv_url": "https://huggingface.co/datasets/TIGER-Lab/mmlu_pro_leaderboard_submission/resolve/main/results.csv",
+          "leaderboard_space_url": "https://huggingface.co/spaces/TIGER-Lab/MMLU-Pro",
+          "benchmark_hf_repo": "TIGER-Lab/MMLU-Pro",
+          "paper_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.01574",
+          "github_url": "https://github.com/TIGER-AI-Lab/MMLU-Pro",
+          "dataset_total_questions": "12000",
+          "prompt_style": "5-shot CoT"
+        }
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Overall accuracy across the ~12,000-question MMLU-Pro benchmark, evaluated 5-shot with chain-of-thought.",
+        "metric_id": "mmlu_pro/overall",
+        "metric_name": "MMLU-Pro (overall)",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "additional_details": {
+          "aggregation": "accuracy_over_subset",
+          "prompt_style": "5-shot CoT"
+        }
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.79
+      }
+    }
+  ]
+}

flat/objects/03/20/0320af4e-e67a-4c01-9b60-81ce9564d6bb.json

@@ -0,0 +1,298 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "NumGLUE/GPT-3 (Few-shot, Task-specific)/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "Microsoft",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "text",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "GPT-3 (Few-shot, Task-specific)",
+    "name": "GPT-3 (Few-shot, Task-specific)",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "NumGLUE",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "NumGLUE",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2204.05660"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "The unweighted average of F1 scores across all eight NumGLUE tasks. This score serves as an aggregate measure of a model's numerical reasoning capabilities, with higher scores indicating better overall performance. The significant gap between the best model and human performance highlights the benchmark's difficulty.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "NumGLUE Score (Avg. F1)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Overall Performance on NumGLUE Benchmark"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "overall_performance_on_numglue_benchmark",
+        "metric_name": "Overall Performance on NumGLUE Benchmark",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 37.4
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "NumGLUE/GPT-3 (Few-shot, Task-specific)/1771591481.616601#numglue#overall_performance_on_numglue_benchmark"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "NumGLUE",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "NumGLUE",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2204.05660"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "F1 performance on solving arithmetic problems that require domain-specific knowledge (e.g., chemistry, physics principles) not provided in the problem.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "F1 Score (%) - Task 2: Domain Specific + Arithmetic",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "NumGLUE Task 2: Domain Specific + Arithmetic Reasoning"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "numglue_task_2_domain_specific_arithmetic_reasoning",
+        "metric_name": "NumGLUE Task 2: Domain Specific + Arithmetic Reasoning",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 42
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "NumGLUE/GPT-3 (Few-shot, Task-specific)/1771591481.616601#numglue#numglue_task_2_domain_specific_arithmetic_reasoning"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "NumGLUE",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "NumGLUE",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2204.05660"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "F1 performance on answering quantitative comparison questions that require commonsense knowledge and numerical comparison, often in a multiple-choice setting.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "F1 Score (%) - Task 3: Commonsense + Quantitative Comparison",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "NumGLUE Task 3: Commonsense + Quantitative Comparison"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "numglue_task_3_commonsense_quantitative_comparison",
+        "metric_name": "NumGLUE Task 3: Commonsense + Quantitative Comparison",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 46
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "NumGLUE/GPT-3 (Few-shot, Task-specific)/1771591481.616601#numglue#numglue_task_3_commonsense_quantitative_comparison"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "NumGLUE",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "NumGLUE",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2204.05660"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "F1 performance on solving arithmetic word problems presented in a fill-in-the-blanks format, testing for model robustness to stylistic variations.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "F1 Score (%) - Task 4: Fill-in-the-blanks",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "NumGLUE Task 4: Fill-in-the-blanks Format"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "numglue_task_4_fill_in_the_blanks_format",
+        "metric_name": "NumGLUE Task 4: Fill-in-the-blanks Format",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 40
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "NumGLUE/GPT-3 (Few-shot, Task-specific)/1771591481.616601#numglue#numglue_task_4_fill_in_the_blanks_format"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "NumGLUE",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "NumGLUE",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2204.05660"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "F1 performance on solving arithmetic problems that require numerical commonsense facts not explicitly stated in the problem (e.g., a die has six faces).",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "F1 Score (%) - Task 1: Commonsense + Arithmetic",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "NumGLUE Task 1: Commonsense + Arithmetic Reasoning"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "numglue_task_1_commonsense_arithmetic_reasoning",
+        "metric_name": "NumGLUE Task 1: Commonsense + Arithmetic Reasoning",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 44
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "NumGLUE/GPT-3 (Few-shot, Task-specific)/1771591481.616601#numglue#numglue_task_1_commonsense_arithmetic_reasoning"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "NumGLUE",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "NumGLUE",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2204.05660"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "F1 performance on a reading comprehension task where the final answer is an entity (e.g., a name), but arriving at it requires implicit numerical reasoning such as comparison.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "F1 Score (%) - Task 6: RC + Implicit Numerical Reasoning",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "NumGLUE Task 6: RC + Implicit Numerical Reasoning"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "numglue_task_6_rc_implicit_numerical_reasoning",
+        "metric_name": "NumGLUE Task 6: RC + Implicit Numerical Reasoning",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 42
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "NumGLUE/GPT-3 (Few-shot, Task-specific)/1771591481.616601#numglue#numglue_task_6_rc_implicit_numerical_reasoning"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "NumGLUE",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "NumGLUE",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2204.05660"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "F1 performance on classifying the relationship (Entailment, Contradiction, or Neutral) between a premise and a hypothesis, which often requires simple arithmetic calculations.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "F1 Score (%) - Task 7: Quantitative NLI",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "NumGLUE Task 7: Quantitative Natural Language Inference"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "numglue_task_7_quantitative_natural_language_inference",
+        "metric_name": "NumGLUE Task 7: Quantitative Natural Language Inference",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 35
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "NumGLUE/GPT-3 (Few-shot, Task-specific)/1771591481.616601#numglue#numglue_task_7_quantitative_natural_language_inference"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "NumGLUE",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "NumGLUE",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2204.05660"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "F1 performance on solving traditional arithmetic word problems, representing a foundational type of numerical reasoning.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "F1 Score (%) - Task 8: Arithmetic Word Problems",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "NumGLUE Task 8: Arithmetic Word Problems"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "numglue_task_8_arithmetic_word_problems",
+        "metric_name": "NumGLUE Task 8: Arithmetic Word Problems",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 40
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "NumGLUE/GPT-3 (Few-shot, Task-specific)/1771591481.616601#numglue#numglue_task_8_arithmetic_word_problems"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "NumGLUE",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "NumGLUE",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2204.05660"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "F1 performance on a reading comprehension task where the required answer is an explicit number that must be found or computed from the provided text passage.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "F1 Score (%) - Task 5: RC + Explicit Numerical Reasoning",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "NumGLUE Task 5: RC + Explicit Numerical Reasoning"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "numglue_task_5_rc_explicit_numerical_reasoning",
+        "metric_name": "NumGLUE Task 5: RC + Explicit Numerical Reasoning",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 10
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "NumGLUE/GPT-3 (Few-shot, Task-specific)/1771591481.616601#numglue#numglue_task_5_rc_explicit_numerical_reasoning"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/03/21/03212383-1857-474e-8596-4579dac30414.json

@@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "hfopenllm_v2/Minami-su_test-v2-7B-00/1773936498.240187",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1773936498.240187",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "HF Open LLM v2",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "Hugging Face",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party"
+  },
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "lm-evaluation-harness",
+    "version": "0.4.0",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "fork": "https://github.com/huggingface/lm-evaluation-harness/tree/adding_all_changess"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "name": "test-v2-7B-00",
+    "id": "Minami-su/test-v2-7B-00",
+    "developer": "Minami-su",
+    "inference_platform": "unknown",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "precision": "bfloat16",
+      "architecture": "Qwen2ForCausalLM",
+      "params_billions": "7.616"
+    }
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IFEval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IFEval",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "google/IFEval"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on IFEval",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.6747
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/Minami-su_test-v2-7B-00/1773936498.240187#ifeval#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "BBH",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "BBH",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "SaylorTwift/bbh"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on BBH",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.4416
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/Minami-su_test-v2-7B-00/1773936498.240187#bbh#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MATH Level 5",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MATH Level 5",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "DigitalLearningGmbH/MATH-lighteval"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Exact Match on MATH Level 5",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "exact_match",
+        "metric_name": "Exact Match",
+        "metric_kind": "exact_match",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.4418
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/Minami-su_test-v2-7B-00/1773936498.240187#math_level_5#exact_match"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "GPQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "GPQA",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "Idavidrein/gpqa"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on GPQA",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.2919
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/Minami-su_test-v2-7B-00/1773936498.240187#gpqa#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MUSR",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MUSR",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "TAUR-Lab/MuSR"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on MUSR",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.4154
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/Minami-su_test-v2-7B-00/1773936498.240187#musr#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MMLU-PRO",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MMLU-PRO",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "TIGER-Lab/MMLU-Pro"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on MMLU-PRO",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.3472
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/Minami-su_test-v2-7B-00/1773936498.240187#mmlu_pro#accuracy"
+    }
+  ]
+}

flat/objects/03/21/03219a6e-cc5b-4664-8769-bbec0f3b2cb5.json

@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "DocMath-Eval/DeepSeek-Coder-V2/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "New York University",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "document",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "DeepSeek-Coder-V2",
+    "name": "DeepSeek-Coder-V2",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "DocMath-Eval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "DocMath-Eval",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2311.09805"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average accuracy across all four subsets (DM_SimpShort, DM_CompShort, DM_SimpLong, DM_CompLong) of the DocMath-Eval test set, using Program-of-Thought (PoT) prompting. PoT requires the model to generate an executable Python program to derive the answer, which is often more robust for numerical reasoning. Results are from the official leaderboard.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Average Accuracy (%) - PoT",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "DocMath-Eval (Test Set): Average Accuracy with Program-of-Thought (PoT)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "docmath_eval_test_set_average_accuracy_with_program_of_thought_pot",
+        "metric_name": "DocMath-Eval (Test Set): Average Accuracy with Program-of-Thought (PoT)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 61.9
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "DocMath-Eval/DeepSeek-Coder-V2/1771591481.616601#docmath_eval#docmath_eval_test_set_average_accuracy_with_program_of_thought_pot"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "DocMath-Eval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "DocMath-Eval",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2311.09805"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average accuracy across all four subsets of the DocMath-Eval test set, using Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting. CoT involves generating step-by-step natural language reasoning to reach the final answer. Results are from the official leaderboard.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Average Accuracy (%) - CoT",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "DocMath-Eval (Test Set): Average Accuracy with Chain-of-Thought (CoT)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "docmath_eval_test_set_average_accuracy_with_chain_of_thought_cot",
+        "metric_name": "DocMath-Eval (Test Set): Average Accuracy with Chain-of-Thought (CoT)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 55.7
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "DocMath-Eval/DeepSeek-Coder-V2/1771591481.616601#docmath_eval#docmath_eval_test_set_average_accuracy_with_chain_of_thought_cot"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "DocMath-Eval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "DocMath-Eval",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2311.09805"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average accuracy across all four subsets (DM_SimpShort, DM_CompShort, DM_SimpLong, DM_CompLong) of the DocMath-Eval testmini (development) set, using Program-of-Thought (PoT) prompting. PoT requires the model to generate an executable Python program to derive the answer. Results are from the official leaderboard.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Average Accuracy (%) - PoT",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "DocMath-Eval (Testmini Set): Average Accuracy with Program-of-Thought (PoT)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "docmath_eval_testmini_set_average_accuracy_with_program_of_thought_pot",
+        "metric_name": "DocMath-Eval (Testmini Set): Average Accuracy with Program-of-Thought (PoT)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 63.1
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "DocMath-Eval/DeepSeek-Coder-V2/1771591481.616601#docmath_eval#docmath_eval_testmini_set_average_accuracy_with_program_of_thought_pot"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "DocMath-Eval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "DocMath-Eval",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2311.09805"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on the most challenging subset, DM_CompLong, which involves complex reasoning over extremely long financial documents with multiple tables. Results are from the DocMath-Eval test set using Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting. Results are from the official leaderboard.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "DM_CompLong Accuracy (%) - CoT",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "DocMath-Eval (Test Set): Accuracy on DM_CompLong with Chain-of-Thought (CoT)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "docmath_eval_test_set_accuracy_on_dm_complong_with_chain_of_thought_cot",
+        "metric_name": "DocMath-Eval (Test Set): Accuracy on DM_CompLong with Chain-of-Thought (CoT)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 31.5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "DocMath-Eval/DeepSeek-Coder-V2/1771591481.616601#docmath_eval#docmath_eval_test_set_accuracy_on_dm_complong_with_chain_of_thought_cot"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "DocMath-Eval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "DocMath-Eval",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2311.09805"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on the most challenging subset, DM_CompLong, which involves complex reasoning over extremely long financial documents with multiple tables. Results are from the DocMath-Eval test set using Program-of-Thought (PoT) prompting. Results are from the official leaderboard.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "DM_CompLong Accuracy (%) - PoT",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "DocMath-Eval (Test Set): Accuracy on DM_CompLong with Program-of-Thought (PoT)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "docmath_eval_test_set_accuracy_on_dm_complong_with_program_of_thought_pot",
+        "metric_name": "DocMath-Eval (Test Set): Accuracy on DM_CompLong with Program-of-Thought (PoT)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 37.5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "DocMath-Eval/DeepSeek-Coder-V2/1771591481.616601#docmath_eval#docmath_eval_test_set_accuracy_on_dm_complong_with_program_of_thought_pot"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/03/22/032213d0-942a-4f61-a615-427a3bf31eea.json

@@ -0,0 +1,328 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "CodeEditorBench/CodeLlama-7B-Instruct-hf/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "University of Waterloo",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "text",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "CodeLlama-7B-Instruct-hf",
+    "name": "CodeLlama-7B-Instruct-hf",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "CodeEditorBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "CodeEditorBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2404.03543"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Overall model performance on the CodeEditorBench_Plus dataset, aggregated across all four code editing tasks (Debug, Translate, Switch, Polish) using a few-shot prompting strategy. The Win Rate is calculated as 1 - (rank - 1) / num_models for each category and then averaged, providing a single metric for model comparison. CodeEditorBench_Plus is filtered to mitigate data contamination.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Win Rate",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Overall Win Rate on CodeEditorBench_Plus (Few-shot)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "overall_win_rate_on_codeeditorbench_plus_few_shot",
+        "metric_name": "Overall Win Rate on CodeEditorBench_Plus (Few-shot)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.211
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "CodeEditorBench/CodeLlama-7B-Instruct-hf/1771591481.616601#codeeditorbench#overall_win_rate_on_codeeditorbench_plus_few_shot"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "CodeEditorBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "CodeEditorBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2404.03543"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the percentage of tasks (Pass@1) where the LLM's first generated solution correctly fixes bugs and passes all test cases on the CodeEditorBench_Plus dataset. This evaluation uses a zero-shot prompting strategy.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Pass@1",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Code Debug Performance on CodeEditorBench_Plus (Zero-shot)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "code_debug_performance_on_codeeditorbench_plus_zero_shot",
+        "metric_name": "Code Debug Performance on CodeEditorBench_Plus (Zero-shot)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.155
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "CodeEditorBench/CodeLlama-7B-Instruct-hf/1771591481.616601#codeeditorbench#code_debug_performance_on_codeeditorbench_plus_zero_shot"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "CodeEditorBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "CodeEditorBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2404.03543"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the average optimization score (Mean OptScore) for code polishing tasks. The score reflects the improvement in time or memory efficiency for generated solutions that correctly pass all functional test cases. A higher score indicates better optimization. Results are from the CodeEditorBench_Plus dataset using a few-shot prompting strategy.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Mean OptScore (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Code Polishing Performance on CodeEditorBench_Plus (Few-shot)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "code_polishing_performance_on_codeeditorbench_plus_few_shot",
+        "metric_name": "Code Polishing Performance on CodeEditorBench_Plus (Few-shot)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 1
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "CodeEditorBench/CodeLlama-7B-Instruct-hf/1771591481.616601#codeeditorbench#code_polishing_performance_on_codeeditorbench_plus_few_shot"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "CodeEditorBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "CodeEditorBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2404.03543"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the average optimization score (Mean OptScore) for code polishing tasks. The score reflects the improvement in time or memory efficiency for generated solutions that correctly pass all functional test cases. A higher score indicates better optimization. Results are from the CodeEditorBench_Plus dataset using a zero-shot prompting strategy.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Mean OptScore (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Code Polishing Performance on CodeEditorBench_Plus (Zero-shot)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "code_polishing_performance_on_codeeditorbench_plus_zero_shot",
+        "metric_name": "Code Polishing Performance on CodeEditorBench_Plus (Zero-shot)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 1.47
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "CodeEditorBench/CodeLlama-7B-Instruct-hf/1771591481.616601#codeeditorbench#code_polishing_performance_on_codeeditorbench_plus_zero_shot"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "CodeEditorBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "CodeEditorBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2404.03543"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the percentage of tasks (Pass@1) where the LLM's first generated solution correctly adapts existing code to new or modified functional requirements. This is considered the most challenging task in the benchmark. Results are from the CodeEditorBench_Plus dataset using a few-shot prompting strategy.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Pass@1",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Code Requirement Switch Performance on CodeEditorBench_Plus (Few-shot)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "code_requirement_switch_performance_on_codeeditorbench_plus_few_shot",
+        "metric_name": "Code Requirement Switch Performance on CodeEditorBench_Plus (Few-shot)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.028
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "CodeEditorBench/CodeLlama-7B-Instruct-hf/1771591481.616601#codeeditorbench#code_requirement_switch_performance_on_codeeditorbench_plus_few_shot"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "CodeEditorBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "CodeEditorBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2404.03543"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the percentage of tasks (Pass@1) where the LLM's first generated solution correctly adapts existing code to new or modified functional requirements. This is considered the most challenging task in the benchmark. Results are from the CodeEditorBench_Plus dataset using a zero-shot prompting strategy.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Pass@1",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Code Requirement Switch Performance on CodeEditorBench_Plus (Zero-shot)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "code_requirement_switch_performance_on_codeeditorbench_plus_zero_shot",
+        "metric_name": "Code Requirement Switch Performance on CodeEditorBench_Plus (Zero-shot)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.017
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "CodeEditorBench/CodeLlama-7B-Instruct-hf/1771591481.616601#codeeditorbench#code_requirement_switch_performance_on_codeeditorbench_plus_zero_shot"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "CodeEditorBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "CodeEditorBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2404.03543"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the percentage of tasks (Pass@1) where the LLM's first generated solution correctly translates code from a source to a target language while passing all test cases. Results are from the CodeEditorBench_Plus dataset using a few-shot prompting strategy.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Pass@1",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Code Translation Performance on CodeEditorBench_Plus (Few-shot)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "code_translation_performance_on_codeeditorbench_plus_few_shot",
+        "metric_name": "Code Translation Performance on CodeEditorBench_Plus (Few-shot)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.271
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "CodeEditorBench/CodeLlama-7B-Instruct-hf/1771591481.616601#codeeditorbench#code_translation_performance_on_codeeditorbench_plus_few_shot"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "CodeEditorBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "CodeEditorBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2404.03543"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the percentage of tasks (Pass@1) where the LLM's first generated solution correctly translates code from a source to a target language while passing all test cases. Results are from the CodeEditorBench_Plus dataset using a zero-shot prompting strategy.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Pass@1",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Code Translation Performance on CodeEditorBench_Plus (Zero-shot)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "code_translation_performance_on_codeeditorbench_plus_zero_shot",
+        "metric_name": "Code Translation Performance on CodeEditorBench_Plus (Zero-shot)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.289
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "CodeEditorBench/CodeLlama-7B-Instruct-hf/1771591481.616601#codeeditorbench#code_translation_performance_on_codeeditorbench_plus_zero_shot"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "CodeEditorBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "CodeEditorBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2404.03543"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the percentage of tasks (Pass@1) where the LLM's first generated solution correctly fixes bugs and passes all test cases on the CodeEditorBench_Plus dataset. This evaluation uses a few-shot prompting strategy.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Pass@1",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Code Debug Performance on CodeEditorBench_Plus (Few-shot)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "code_debug_performance_on_codeeditorbench_plus_few_shot",
+        "metric_name": "Code Debug Performance on CodeEditorBench_Plus (Few-shot)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.167
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "CodeEditorBench/CodeLlama-7B-Instruct-hf/1771591481.616601#codeeditorbench#code_debug_performance_on_codeeditorbench_plus_few_shot"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "CodeEditorBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "CodeEditorBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2404.03543"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Overall model performance on the CodeEditorBench_Plus dataset, aggregated across all four code editing tasks (Debug, Translate, Switch, Polish) using a zero-shot prompting strategy. The Win Rate is calculated as 1 - (rank - 1) / num_models for each category and then averaged. CodeEditorBench_Plus is filtered to mitigate data contamination.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Win Rate",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Overall Win Rate on CodeEditorBench_Plus (Zero-shot)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "overall_win_rate_on_codeeditorbench_plus_zero_shot",
+        "metric_name": "Overall Win Rate on CodeEditorBench_Plus (Zero-shot)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.289
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "CodeEditorBench/CodeLlama-7B-Instruct-hf/1771591481.616601#codeeditorbench#overall_win_rate_on_codeeditorbench_plus_zero_shot"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/03/28/03281d76-2fe1-4f1c-9954-7128f3ae8557.json

@@ -0,0 +1,268 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "M3STR/MiniCPM-V V2.0-2.8B/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "Tianjin University",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "image",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "MiniCPM-V V2.0-2.8B",
+    "name": "MiniCPM-V V2.0-2.8B",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "M3STR",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "M3STR",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2506.01293"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "The overall score on the M3STR benchmark, calculated as the average accuracy across all 7 subtasks: Entity Count, Relation Count, Entity Detection, Relation Detection, Mix Detection, Entity Completion, and Relation Completion. This metric provides a comprehensive measure of a model's ability for abstractive visual understanding of structured knowledge.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Overall Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "M3STR: Overall Performance"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "m3str_overall_performance",
+        "metric_name": "M3STR: Overall Performance",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 55.94
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "M3STR/MiniCPM-V V2.0-2.8B/1771591481.616601#m3str#m3str_overall_performance"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "M3STR",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "M3STR",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2506.01293"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on the Entity Count subtask of M3STR. Models are asked to count the number of distinct entities (nodes) in a given multi-modal knowledge graph image. This task evaluates coarse-grained object recognition and superficial understanding.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Entity Count Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "M3STR Task 1: Entity Count"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "m3str_task_1_entity_count",
+        "metric_name": "M3STR Task 1: Entity Count",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 28.53
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "M3STR/MiniCPM-V V2.0-2.8B/1771591481.616601#m3str#m3str_task_1_entity_count"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "M3STR",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "M3STR",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2506.01293"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on the Relation Count subtask of M3STR. Models are asked to count the number of distinct relations (edges) in a given multi-modal knowledge graph image. This task evaluates coarse-grained object recognition and superficial understanding.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Relation Count Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "M3STR Task 1: Relation Count"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "m3str_task_1_relation_count",
+        "metric_name": "M3STR Task 1: Relation Count",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 17.22
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "M3STR/MiniCPM-V V2.0-2.8B/1771591481.616601#m3str#m3str_task_1_relation_count"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "M3STR",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "M3STR",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2506.01293"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on the Entity Detection subtask of M3STR. Models must detect whether a factual anomaly or inconsistency exists related to an entity in the given subgraph of the multi-modal knowledge graph. This requires higher-level judgment and commonsense reasoning.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Entity Anomaly Detection Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "M3STR Task 2: Entity Anomaly Detection"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "m3str_task_2_entity_anomaly_detection",
+        "metric_name": "M3STR Task 2: Entity Anomaly Detection",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 66.64
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "M3STR/MiniCPM-V V2.0-2.8B/1771591481.616601#m3str#m3str_task_2_entity_anomaly_detection"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "M3STR",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "M3STR",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2506.01293"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on the Mixed Detection subtask of M3STR. Models must detect arbitrary anomalies (entity or relation) within the multi-modal knowledge graph without any scope constraints, making it a more generalized and challenging anomaly detection task.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Mixed Anomaly Detection Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "M3STR Task 2: Mixed Anomaly Detection"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "m3str_task_2_mixed_anomaly_detection",
+        "metric_name": "M3STR Task 2: Mixed Anomaly Detection",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 50.15
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "M3STR/MiniCPM-V V2.0-2.8B/1771591481.616601#m3str#m3str_task_2_mixed_anomaly_detection"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "M3STR",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "M3STR",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2506.01293"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on the Relation Detection subtask of M3STR. Models must detect whether a factual anomaly or inconsistency exists related to a relation in the given subgraph of the multi-modal knowledge graph. This requires higher-level judgment and commonsense reasoning.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Relation Anomaly Detection Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "M3STR Task 2: Relation Anomaly Detection"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "m3str_task_2_relation_anomaly_detection",
+        "metric_name": "M3STR Task 2: Relation Anomaly Detection",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 83.51
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "M3STR/MiniCPM-V V2.0-2.8B/1771591481.616601#m3str#m3str_task_2_relation_anomaly_detection"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "M3STR",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "M3STR",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2506.01293"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on the Entity Completion subtask of M3STR. Models must predict a missing entity (node) in the multi-modal knowledge graph from a set of multiple-choice options. This task evaluates inferential reasoning based on structured knowledge.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Entity Completion Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "M3STR Task 3: Entity Completion"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "m3str_task_3_entity_completion",
+        "metric_name": "M3STR Task 3: Entity Completion",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 66.47
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "M3STR/MiniCPM-V V2.0-2.8B/1771591481.616601#m3str#m3str_task_3_entity_completion"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "M3STR",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "M3STR",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2506.01293"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on the Relation Completion subtask of M3STR. Models must predict a missing relation (edge) in the multi-modal knowledge graph from a set of multiple-choice options. This task evaluates inferential reasoning based on structured knowledge.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Relation Completion Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "M3STR Task 3: Relation Completion"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "m3str_task_3_relation_completion",
+        "metric_name": "M3STR Task 3: Relation Completion",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 79.05
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "M3STR/MiniCPM-V V2.0-2.8B/1771591481.616601#m3str#m3str_task_3_relation_completion"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/03/28/03288721-9eaa-413e-9b54-a5185b923cfd.json

@@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "hfopenllm_v2/Lil-R_2_PRYMMAL-ECE-7B-SLERP-V3/1773936498.240187",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1773936498.240187",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "HF Open LLM v2",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "Hugging Face",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party"
+  },
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "lm-evaluation-harness",
+    "version": "0.4.0",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "fork": "https://github.com/huggingface/lm-evaluation-harness/tree/adding_all_changess"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "name": "2_PRYMMAL-ECE-7B-SLERP-V3",
+    "id": "Lil-R/2_PRYMMAL-ECE-7B-SLERP-V3",
+    "developer": "Lil-R",
+    "inference_platform": "unknown",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "precision": "bfloat16",
+      "architecture": "Qwen2ForCausalLM",
+      "params_billions": "7.616"
+    }
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IFEval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IFEval",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "google/IFEval"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on IFEval",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.2235
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/Lil-R_2_PRYMMAL-ECE-7B-SLERP-V3/1773936498.240187#ifeval#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "BBH",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "BBH",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "SaylorTwift/bbh"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on BBH",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.3578
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/Lil-R_2_PRYMMAL-ECE-7B-SLERP-V3/1773936498.240187#bbh#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MATH Level 5",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MATH Level 5",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "DigitalLearningGmbH/MATH-lighteval"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Exact Match on MATH Level 5",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "exact_match",
+        "metric_name": "Exact Match",
+        "metric_kind": "exact_match",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.006
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/Lil-R_2_PRYMMAL-ECE-7B-SLERP-V3/1773936498.240187#math_level_5#exact_match"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "GPQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "GPQA",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "Idavidrein/gpqa"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on GPQA",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.2567
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/Lil-R_2_PRYMMAL-ECE-7B-SLERP-V3/1773936498.240187#gpqa#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MUSR",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MUSR",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "TAUR-Lab/MuSR"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on MUSR",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.4107
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/Lil-R_2_PRYMMAL-ECE-7B-SLERP-V3/1773936498.240187#musr#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MMLU-PRO",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MMLU-PRO",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "TIGER-Lab/MMLU-Pro"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on MMLU-PRO",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.1817
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/Lil-R_2_PRYMMAL-ECE-7B-SLERP-V3/1773936498.240187#mmlu_pro#accuracy"
+    }
+  ]
+}

flat/objects/03/28/03289397-c487-4641-aed1-77a16ced2097.json

@@ -0,0 +1,388 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "HaystackCraft/Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "National University of Singapore",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "text",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct",
+    "name": "Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "HaystackCraft",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "HaystackCraft",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2510.07414"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "F1 score on the HaystackCraft static NIAH task with a 128K token context. Haystacks were constructed using BM25+PPR, but documents were presented in a random order to diagnose positional bias. This is averaged over three random permutations.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Static F1 @ 128K (BM25+PPR, Random Order)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "HaystackCraft: Static NIAH Performance (BM25+PPR, Random Order, 128K Tokens)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "haystackcraft_static_niah_performance_bm25_ppr_random_order_128k_tokens",
+        "metric_name": "HaystackCraft: Static NIAH Performance (BM25+PPR, Random Order, 128K Tokens)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 33.53
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "HaystackCraft/Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct/1771591481.616601#haystackcraft#haystackcraft_static_niah_performance_bm25_ppr_random_order_128k_tokens"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "HaystackCraft",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "HaystackCraft",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2510.07414"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "F1 score on the HaystackCraft static 'needle-in-a-haystack' (NIAH) task with a 128K token context. Haystacks were constructed using the BM25 retriever, with documents reranked by Personalized PageRank (PPR) to leverage graph structure. This method consistently improved performance across models by mitigating harmful distractors.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Static F1 @ 128K (BM25+PPR)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "HaystackCraft: Static NIAH Performance (BM25+PPR Retriever, 128K Tokens)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "haystackcraft_static_niah_performance_bm25_ppr_retriever_128k_tokens",
+        "metric_name": "HaystackCraft: Static NIAH Performance (BM25+PPR Retriever, 128K Tokens)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 37.08
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "HaystackCraft/Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct/1771591481.616601#haystackcraft#haystackcraft_static_niah_performance_bm25_ppr_retriever_128k_tokens"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "HaystackCraft",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "HaystackCraft",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2510.07414"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "F1 score on the HaystackCraft static 'needle-in-a-haystack' (NIAH) task with a 128K token context. Haystacks were constructed using the sparse BM25 retriever, but documents were presented in a random order to diagnose positional bias. This is averaged over three random permutations.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Static F1 @ 128K (BM25, Random Order)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "HaystackCraft: Static NIAH Performance (BM25, Random Order, 128K Tokens)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "haystackcraft_static_niah_performance_bm25_random_order_128k_tokens",
+        "metric_name": "HaystackCraft: Static NIAH Performance (BM25, Random Order, 128K Tokens)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 30.58
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "HaystackCraft/Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct/1771591481.616601#haystackcraft#haystackcraft_static_niah_performance_bm25_random_order_128k_tokens"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "HaystackCraft",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "HaystackCraft",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2510.07414"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "F1 score on the HaystackCraft static 'needle-in-a-haystack' (NIAH) task with a 128K token context. Haystacks were constructed using the sparse BM25 retriever, and documents were ordered by retrieval rank, simulating a realistic RAG scenario. Higher scores are better.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Static F1 @ 128K (BM25)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "HaystackCraft: Static NIAH Performance (BM25 Retriever, 128K Tokens)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "haystackcraft_static_niah_performance_bm25_retriever_128k_tokens",
+        "metric_name": "HaystackCraft: Static NIAH Performance (BM25 Retriever, 128K Tokens)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 30.71
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "HaystackCraft/Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct/1771591481.616601#haystackcraft#haystackcraft_static_niah_performance_bm25_retriever_128k_tokens"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "HaystackCraft",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "HaystackCraft",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2510.07414"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "F1 score on the HaystackCraft static NIAH task with a 128K token context. Haystacks were constructed using Hybrid+PPR, but documents were presented in a random order to diagnose positional bias. This is averaged over three random permutations.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Static F1 @ 128K (Hybrid+PPR, Random Order)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "HaystackCraft: Static NIAH Performance (Hybrid+PPR, Random Order, 128K Tokens)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "haystackcraft_static_niah_performance_hybrid_ppr_random_order_128k_tokens",
+        "metric_name": "HaystackCraft: Static NIAH Performance (Hybrid+PPR, Random Order, 128K Tokens)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 33.16
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "HaystackCraft/Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct/1771591481.616601#haystackcraft#haystackcraft_static_niah_performance_hybrid_ppr_random_order_128k_tokens"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "HaystackCraft",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "HaystackCraft",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2510.07414"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "F1 score on the HaystackCraft static 'needle-in-a-haystack' (NIAH) task with a 128K token context. Haystacks were constructed using a hybrid retriever, with documents reranked by Personalized PageRank (PPR). Higher scores are better.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Static F1 @ 128K (Hybrid+PPR)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "HaystackCraft: Static NIAH Performance (Hybrid+PPR Retriever, 128K Tokens)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "haystackcraft_static_niah_performance_hybrid_ppr_retriever_128k_tokens",
+        "metric_name": "HaystackCraft: Static NIAH Performance (Hybrid+PPR Retriever, 128K Tokens)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 36.22
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "HaystackCraft/Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct/1771591481.616601#haystackcraft#haystackcraft_static_niah_performance_hybrid_ppr_retriever_128k_tokens"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "HaystackCraft",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "HaystackCraft",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2510.07414"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "F1 score on the HaystackCraft static NIAH task with a 128K token context. Haystacks were constructed using the hybrid retriever, but documents were presented in a random order to diagnose positional bias. This is averaged over three random permutations.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Static F1 @ 128K (Hybrid, Random Order)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "HaystackCraft: Static NIAH Performance (Hybrid, Random Order, 128K Tokens)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "haystackcraft_static_niah_performance_hybrid_random_order_128k_tokens",
+        "metric_name": "HaystackCraft: Static NIAH Performance (Hybrid, Random Order, 128K Tokens)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 28.82
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "HaystackCraft/Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct/1771591481.616601#haystackcraft#haystackcraft_static_niah_performance_hybrid_random_order_128k_tokens"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "HaystackCraft",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "HaystackCraft",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2510.07414"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "F1 score on the HaystackCraft static 'needle-in-a-haystack' (NIAH) task with a 128K token context. Haystacks were constructed using a hybrid of BM25 and Qwen3-0.6B retrievers. Documents were ordered by retrieval rank. Higher scores are better.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Static F1 @ 128K (Hybrid)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "HaystackCraft: Static NIAH Performance (Hybrid Retriever, 128K Tokens)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "haystackcraft_static_niah_performance_hybrid_retriever_128k_tokens",
+        "metric_name": "HaystackCraft: Static NIAH Performance (Hybrid Retriever, 128K Tokens)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 25.11
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "HaystackCraft/Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct/1771591481.616601#haystackcraft#haystackcraft_static_niah_performance_hybrid_retriever_128k_tokens"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "HaystackCraft",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "HaystackCraft",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2510.07414"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "F1 score on the HaystackCraft static NIAH task with a 128K token context. Haystacks were constructed using Qwen3-0.6B+PPR, but documents were presented in a random order to diagnose positional bias. This is averaged over three random permutations.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Static F1 @ 128K (Qwen3-0.6B+PPR, Random Order)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "HaystackCraft: Static NIAH Performance (Qwen3-0.6B+PPR, Random Order, 128K Tokens)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "haystackcraft_static_niah_performance_qwen3_0_6b_ppr_random_order_128k_tokens",
+        "metric_name": "HaystackCraft: Static NIAH Performance (Qwen3-0.6B+PPR, Random Order, 128K Tokens)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 33.35
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "HaystackCraft/Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct/1771591481.616601#haystackcraft#haystackcraft_static_niah_performance_qwen3_0_6b_ppr_random_order_128k_tokens"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "HaystackCraft",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "HaystackCraft",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2510.07414"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "F1 score on the HaystackCraft static 'needle-in-a-haystack' (NIAH) task with a 128K token context. Haystacks were constructed using the dense Qwen3-0.6B retriever, with documents reranked by Personalized PageRank (PPR). Higher scores are better.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Static F1 @ 128K (Qwen3-0.6B+PPR)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "HaystackCraft: Static NIAH Performance (Qwen3-0.6B+PPR Retriever, 128K Tokens)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "haystackcraft_static_niah_performance_qwen3_0_6b_ppr_retriever_128k_tokens",
+        "metric_name": "HaystackCraft: Static NIAH Performance (Qwen3-0.6B+PPR Retriever, 128K Tokens)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 33.42
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "HaystackCraft/Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct/1771591481.616601#haystackcraft#haystackcraft_static_niah_performance_qwen3_0_6b_ppr_retriever_128k_tokens"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "HaystackCraft",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "HaystackCraft",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2510.07414"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "F1 score on the HaystackCraft static NIAH task with a 128K token context. Haystacks were constructed using the dense Qwen3-0.6B retriever, but documents were presented in a random order to diagnose positional bias. This is averaged over three random permutations.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Static F1 @ 128K (Qwen3-0.6B, Random Order)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "HaystackCraft: Static NIAH Performance (Qwen3-0.6B, Random Order, 128K Tokens)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "haystackcraft_static_niah_performance_qwen3_0_6b_random_order_128k_tokens",
+        "metric_name": "HaystackCraft: Static NIAH Performance (Qwen3-0.6B, Random Order, 128K Tokens)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 26.49
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "HaystackCraft/Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct/1771591481.616601#haystackcraft#haystackcraft_static_niah_performance_qwen3_0_6b_random_order_128k_tokens"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "HaystackCraft",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "HaystackCraft",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2510.07414"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "F1 score on the HaystackCraft static 'needle-in-a-haystack' (NIAH) task with a 128K token context. Haystacks were constructed using the dense Qwen3-0.6B retriever, which introduces semantically similar but irrelevant distractors. Documents were ordered by retrieval rank. Higher scores are better.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Static F1 @ 128K (Qwen3-0.6B)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "HaystackCraft: Static NIAH Performance (Qwen3-0.6B Retriever, 128K Tokens)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "haystackcraft_static_niah_performance_qwen3_0_6b_retriever_128k_tokens",
+        "metric_name": "HaystackCraft: Static NIAH Performance (Qwen3-0.6B Retriever, 128K Tokens)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 25.85
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "HaystackCraft/Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct/1771591481.616601#haystackcraft#haystackcraft_static_niah_performance_qwen3_0_6b_retriever_128k_tokens"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/03/29/03296296-3987-4f75-a33a-89bd30191b67.json

@@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "hfopenllm_v2/paloalma_ECE-TW3-JRGL-V2/1773936498.240187",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1773936498.240187",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "HF Open LLM v2",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "Hugging Face",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party"
+  },
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "lm-evaluation-harness",
+    "version": "0.4.0",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "fork": "https://github.com/huggingface/lm-evaluation-harness/tree/adding_all_changess"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "name": "ECE-TW3-JRGL-V2",
+    "id": "paloalma/ECE-TW3-JRGL-V2",
+    "developer": "paloalma",
+    "inference_platform": "unknown",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "precision": "bfloat16",
+      "architecture": "Qwen2ForCausalLM",
+      "params_billions": "72.288"
+    }
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IFEval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IFEval",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "google/IFEval"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on IFEval",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.2255
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/paloalma_ECE-TW3-JRGL-V2/1773936498.240187#ifeval#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "BBH",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "BBH",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "SaylorTwift/bbh"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on BBH",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.6031
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/paloalma_ECE-TW3-JRGL-V2/1773936498.240187#bbh#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MATH Level 5",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MATH Level 5",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "DigitalLearningGmbH/MATH-lighteval"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Exact Match on MATH Level 5",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "exact_match",
+        "metric_name": "Exact Match",
+        "metric_kind": "exact_match",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.185
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/paloalma_ECE-TW3-JRGL-V2/1773936498.240187#math_level_5#exact_match"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "GPQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "GPQA",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "Idavidrein/gpqa"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on GPQA",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.3314
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/paloalma_ECE-TW3-JRGL-V2/1773936498.240187#gpqa#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MUSR",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MUSR",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "TAUR-Lab/MuSR"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on MUSR",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.4793
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/paloalma_ECE-TW3-JRGL-V2/1773936498.240187#musr#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MMLU-PRO",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MMLU-PRO",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "TIGER-Lab/MMLU-Pro"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on MMLU-PRO",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.4588
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/paloalma_ECE-TW3-JRGL-V2/1773936498.240187#mmlu_pro#accuracy"
+    }
+  ]
+}

flat/objects/03/2d/032d6068-e6a5-4174-9321-13c185f7378e.json

@@ -0,0 +1,508 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "CORAL/Qwen2.5-0.5B-SFT/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "text",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "Qwen2.5-0.5B-SFT",
+    "name": "Qwen2.5-0.5B-SFT",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "CORAL",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "CORAL",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2410.23090"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Citation Precision for citation labeling on CORAL using the 'LLM Summarization' strategy. This metric measures the proportion of generated citations that are correct after condensing the conversation history. This metric is highlighted as a key finding, showing that context compression can improve citation accuracy.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Citation Precision (LLM Summarization)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Citation Labeling (Precision) with Summarized Context"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "citation_labeling_precision_with_summarized_context",
+        "metric_name": "Citation Labeling (Precision) with Summarized Context",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 17.4
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "CORAL/Qwen2.5-0.5B-SFT/1771591481.616601#coral#citation_labeling_precision_with_summarized_context"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "CORAL",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "CORAL",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2410.23090"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "BLEU-1 score for response generation on CORAL using the 'LLM Summarization' strategy, where the conversation history is summarized by an LLM to create a condensed context. Higher is better.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "BLEU-1 (LLM Summarization)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Response Generation (BLEU-1) with Summarized Context"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "response_generation_bleu_1_with_summarized_context",
+        "metric_name": "Response Generation (BLEU-1) with Summarized Context",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 21.4
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "CORAL/Qwen2.5-0.5B-SFT/1771591481.616601#coral#response_generation_bleu_1_with_summarized_context"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "CORAL",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "CORAL",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2410.23090"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "BLEU-1 score for response generation on CORAL using the 'Raw Context' strategy, where the full conversation history is provided as input. BLEU-1 measures unigram overlap between the generated and reference responses. Higher is better.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "BLEU-1 (Raw Context)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Response Generation (BLEU-1) with Raw Context"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "response_generation_bleu_1_with_raw_context",
+        "metric_name": "Response Generation (BLEU-1) with Raw Context",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 13
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "CORAL/Qwen2.5-0.5B-SFT/1771591481.616601#coral#response_generation_bleu_1_with_raw_context"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "CORAL",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "CORAL",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2410.23090"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "BLEU-1 score for response generation on CORAL using the 'Rewrite' strategy, where the conversational query is rewritten into a standalone question before being passed to the model. Higher is better.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "BLEU-1 (Rewrite)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Response Generation (BLEU-1) with Rewritten Query"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "response_generation_bleu_1_with_rewritten_query",
+        "metric_name": "Response Generation (BLEU-1) with Rewritten Query",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 21.4
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "CORAL/Qwen2.5-0.5B-SFT/1771591481.616601#coral#response_generation_bleu_1_with_rewritten_query"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "CORAL",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "CORAL",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2410.23090"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Citation Precision for citation labeling on CORAL using the 'Last Response' strategy. Higher is better.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Citation Precision (Last Response)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Citation Labeling (Precision) with Last Response Context"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "citation_labeling_precision_with_last_response_context",
+        "metric_name": "Citation Labeling (Precision) with Last Response Context",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 18
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "CORAL/Qwen2.5-0.5B-SFT/1771591481.616601#coral#citation_labeling_precision_with_last_response_context"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "CORAL",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "CORAL",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2410.23090"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Citation Precision for citation labeling on CORAL using the 'Raw Context' strategy. This metric measures the proportion of generated citations that are actually relevant and correct. Higher is better.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Citation Precision (Raw Context)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Citation Labeling (Precision) with Raw Context"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "citation_labeling_precision_with_raw_context",
+        "metric_name": "Citation Labeling (Precision) with Raw Context",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 10.2
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "CORAL/Qwen2.5-0.5B-SFT/1771591481.616601#coral#citation_labeling_precision_with_raw_context"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "CORAL",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "CORAL",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2410.23090"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Citation Precision for citation labeling on CORAL using the 'Rewrite' strategy. Higher is better.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Citation Precision (Rewrite)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Citation Labeling (Precision) with Rewritten Query"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "citation_labeling_precision_with_rewritten_query",
+        "metric_name": "Citation Labeling (Precision) with Rewritten Query",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 16.5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "CORAL/Qwen2.5-0.5B-SFT/1771591481.616601#coral#citation_labeling_precision_with_rewritten_query"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "CORAL",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "CORAL",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2410.23090"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Citation Recall for citation labeling on CORAL using the 'Last Response' strategy. Higher is better.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Citation Recall (Last Response)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Citation Labeling (Recall) with Last Response Context"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "citation_labeling_recall_with_last_response_context",
+        "metric_name": "Citation Labeling (Recall) with Last Response Context",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 6.5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "CORAL/Qwen2.5-0.5B-SFT/1771591481.616601#coral#citation_labeling_recall_with_last_response_context"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "CORAL",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "CORAL",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2410.23090"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Citation Recall for citation labeling on CORAL using the 'LLM Summarization' strategy. This metric measures the proportion of ground-truth citations correctly included in the response after condensing the conversation history. Higher is better.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Citation Recall (LLM Summarization)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Citation Labeling (Recall) with Summarized Context"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "citation_labeling_recall_with_summarized_context",
+        "metric_name": "Citation Labeling (Recall) with Summarized Context",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 6.5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "CORAL/Qwen2.5-0.5B-SFT/1771591481.616601#coral#citation_labeling_recall_with_summarized_context"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "CORAL",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "CORAL",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2410.23090"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Citation Recall for citation labeling on CORAL using the 'Raw Context' strategy. This metric measures the proportion of ground-truth citations that are correctly included in the generated response. Higher is better.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Citation Recall (Raw Context)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Citation Labeling (Recall) with Raw Context"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "citation_labeling_recall_with_raw_context",
+        "metric_name": "Citation Labeling (Recall) with Raw Context",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 3.5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "CORAL/Qwen2.5-0.5B-SFT/1771591481.616601#coral#citation_labeling_recall_with_raw_context"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "CORAL",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "CORAL",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2410.23090"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Citation Recall for citation labeling on CORAL using the 'Rewrite' strategy. Higher is better.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Citation Recall (Rewrite)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Citation Labeling (Recall) with Rewritten Query"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "citation_labeling_recall_with_rewritten_query",
+        "metric_name": "Citation Labeling (Recall) with Rewritten Query",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 6.5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "CORAL/Qwen2.5-0.5B-SFT/1771591481.616601#coral#citation_labeling_recall_with_rewritten_query"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "CORAL",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "CORAL",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2410.23090"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "ROUGE-L score for response generation on CORAL using the 'Last Response' strategy, where only the previous turn's response is provided as context. Higher is better.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "ROUGE-L (Last Response)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Response Generation (ROUGE-L) with Last Response Context"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "response_generation_rouge_l_with_last_response_context",
+        "metric_name": "Response Generation (ROUGE-L) with Last Response Context",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 15.5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "CORAL/Qwen2.5-0.5B-SFT/1771591481.616601#coral#response_generation_rouge_l_with_last_response_context"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "CORAL",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "CORAL",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2410.23090"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "ROUGE-L score for response generation on CORAL using the 'LLM Summarization' strategy, where the conversation history is summarized by an LLM to create a condensed context. Higher is better.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "ROUGE-L (LLM Summarization)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Response Generation (ROUGE-L) with Summarized Context"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "response_generation_rouge_l_with_summarized_context",
+        "metric_name": "Response Generation (ROUGE-L) with Summarized Context",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 14.6
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "CORAL/Qwen2.5-0.5B-SFT/1771591481.616601#coral#response_generation_rouge_l_with_summarized_context"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "CORAL",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "CORAL",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2410.23090"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "ROUGE-L score for response generation on CORAL using the 'Raw Context' strategy, where the full conversation history is provided as input. ROUGE-L is based on the longest common subsequence between generated and reference responses. Higher is better.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "ROUGE-L (Raw Context)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Response Generation (ROUGE-L) with Raw Context"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "response_generation_rouge_l_with_raw_context",
+        "metric_name": "Response Generation (ROUGE-L) with Raw Context",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 15.5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "CORAL/Qwen2.5-0.5B-SFT/1771591481.616601#coral#response_generation_rouge_l_with_raw_context"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "CORAL",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "CORAL",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2410.23090"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "BLEU-1 score for response generation on CORAL using the 'Last Response' strategy, where only the previous turn's response is provided as context. Higher is better.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "BLEU-1 (Last Response)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Response Generation (BLEU-1) with Last Response Context"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "response_generation_bleu_1_with_last_response_context",
+        "metric_name": "Response Generation (BLEU-1) with Last Response Context",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 19.8
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "CORAL/Qwen2.5-0.5B-SFT/1771591481.616601#coral#response_generation_bleu_1_with_last_response_context"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "CORAL",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "CORAL",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2410.23090"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "ROUGE-L score for response generation on CORAL using the 'Rewrite' strategy, where the conversational query is rewritten into a standalone question before being passed to the model. Higher is better.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "ROUGE-L (Rewrite)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Response Generation (ROUGE-L) with Rewritten Query"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "response_generation_rouge_l_with_rewritten_query",
+        "metric_name": "Response Generation (ROUGE-L) with Rewritten Query",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 16.1
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "CORAL/Qwen2.5-0.5B-SFT/1771591481.616601#coral#response_generation_rouge_l_with_rewritten_query"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/03/2d/032d626d-f283-425c-9227-fd78de3bf0cf.json

@@ -0,0 +1,268 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "L0-Bench/Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "NVIDIA",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "text",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct",
+    "name": "Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "L0-Bench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "L0-Bench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2503.22832"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "This metric measures the percentage of generated program execution traces that exactly match the ground truth. The score is determined by taking the majority vote from 31 independent generation attempts for each test program. This aggregated metric, averaged across four data splits of varying difficulty, provides a robust measure of a model's procedural reasoning capability, mitigating the randomness of single-shot generation.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Trace Accuracy (%) (majvote@31)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "L0-Bench: Overall Procedural Correctness with Majority Voting"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "l0_bench_overall_procedural_correctness_with_majority_voting",
+        "metric_name": "L0-Bench: Overall Procedural Correctness with Majority Voting",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 32.4
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "L0-Bench/Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct/1771591481.616601#l0_bench#l0_bench_overall_procedural_correctness_with_majority_voting"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "L0-Bench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "L0-Bench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2503.22832"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Single-attempt whole-trace accuracy on the 'Extra Long' data split of L0-Bench, the most challenging set with an average of ~246 execution steps. Performance on this split reveals the limits of current models in maintaining step-by-step correctness over very long procedures.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Trace Accuracy (%) (Single Attempt) - Extra Long Traces",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "L0-Bench: Performance on Extra Long Traces (~246 steps)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "l0_bench_performance_on_extra_long_traces_246_steps",
+        "metric_name": "L0-Bench: Performance on Extra Long Traces (~246 steps)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 10.2
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "L0-Bench/Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct/1771591481.616601#l0_bench#l0_bench_performance_on_extra_long_traces_246_steps"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "L0-Bench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "L0-Bench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2503.22832"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Single-attempt whole-trace accuracy on the 'Long' data split of L0-Bench. This split contains programs requiring an average of ~164 execution steps. This level of difficulty tests the model's ability to maintain procedural correctness over extended sequences.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Trace Accuracy (%) (Single Attempt) - Long Traces",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "L0-Bench: Performance on Long Traces (~164 steps)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "l0_bench_performance_on_long_traces_164_steps",
+        "metric_name": "L0-Bench: Performance on Long Traces (~164 steps)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 13.29
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "L0-Bench/Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct/1771591481.616601#l0_bench#l0_bench_performance_on_long_traces_164_steps"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "L0-Bench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "L0-Bench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2503.22832"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Single-attempt whole-trace accuracy on the 'Medium' data split of L0-Bench. This split contains programs requiring an average of ~80 execution steps, representing a significant increase in procedural complexity compared to the short split.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Trace Accuracy (%) (Single Attempt) - Medium Traces",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "L0-Bench: Performance on Medium Traces (~80 steps)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "l0_bench_performance_on_medium_traces_80_steps",
+        "metric_name": "L0-Bench: Performance on Medium Traces (~80 steps)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 16.74
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "L0-Bench/Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct/1771591481.616601#l0_bench#l0_bench_performance_on_medium_traces_80_steps"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "L0-Bench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "L0-Bench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2503.22832"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "This metric (pass@31) calculates the probability that at least one of 31 independently generated program execution traces is perfectly correct. It serves as a soft upper-bound on performance, indicating the model's capability to produce a correct solution, even if not consistently. The large gap between this metric and single-attempt accuracy highlights significant room for improving model reliability.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Trace Accuracy (%) (pass@31)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "L0-Bench: Upper-Bound Procedural Correctness (pass@31)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "l0_bench_upper_bound_procedural_correctness_pass_31",
+        "metric_name": "L0-Bench: Upper-Bound Procedural Correctness (pass@31)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 62.5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "L0-Bench/Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct/1771591481.616601#l0_bench#l0_bench_upper_bound_procedural_correctness_pass_31"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "L0-Bench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "L0-Bench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2503.22832"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Single-attempt whole-trace accuracy on the 'Short' data split of L0-Bench. This split contains programs requiring an average of ~13 execution steps. It evaluates baseline procedural correctness on the simplest tasks.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Trace Accuracy (%) (Single Attempt) - Short Traces",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "L0-Bench: Performance on Short Traces (~13 steps)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "l0_bench_performance_on_short_traces_13_steps",
+        "metric_name": "L0-Bench: Performance on Short Traces (~13 steps)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 28
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "L0-Bench/Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct/1771591481.616601#l0_bench#l0_bench_performance_on_short_traces_13_steps"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "L0-Bench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "L0-Bench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2503.22832"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": true,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "This metric quantifies partial procedural correctness by counting the average number of correct steps a model generates before the first error occurs. Scores are based on single generation attempts, averaged across 31 runs and four data splits. A higher value indicates the model can maintain correctness for longer procedural sequences.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Steps to Error (Single Attempt)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "L0-Bench: Partial Correctness (Steps to First Error)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "l0_bench_partial_correctness_steps_to_first_error",
+        "metric_name": "L0-Bench: Partial Correctness (Steps to First Error)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 52.3
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "L0-Bench/Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct/1771591481.616601#l0_bench#l0_bench_partial_correctness_steps_to_first_error"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "L0-Bench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "L0-Bench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2503.22832"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "This metric measures the average percentage of perfectly correct program execution traces generated in a single attempt, without aggregation methods like majority voting. The score is averaged over 31 independent runs (each with different few-shot examples) and across four data splits of increasing difficulty. It represents a model's baseline reliability for procedural reasoning.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Trace Accuracy (%) (Single Attempt)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "L0-Bench: Overall Procedural Correctness in a Single Attempt"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "l0_bench_overall_procedural_correctness_in_a_single_attempt",
+        "metric_name": "L0-Bench: Overall Procedural Correctness in a Single Attempt",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 17.1
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "L0-Bench/Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct/1771591481.616601#l0_bench#l0_bench_overall_procedural_correctness_in_a_single_attempt"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/03/2e/032e68a1-76c5-4dea-abae-a0ac3637a4af.json

@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "NT-VOT211/TATrack-L/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "image",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "TATrack-L",
+    "name": "TATrack-L",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "NT-VOT211",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "NT-VOT211",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2410.20421"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the overall tracking success on the NT-VOT211 night-time visual object tracking benchmark. It is derived from a success plot showing the percentage of successfully tracked frames at different overlap thresholds (Intersection over Union). Higher AUC scores indicate better performance. Results are from Table 2 of the paper.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "AUC",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Area Under the Curve (AUC) on the NT-VOT211 Benchmark"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "area_under_the_curve_auc_on_the_nt_vot211_benchmark",
+        "metric_name": "Area Under the Curve (AUC) on the NT-VOT211 Benchmark",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 39.29
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "NT-VOT211/TATrack-L/1771591481.616601#nt_vot211#area_under_the_curve_auc_on_the_nt_vot211_benchmark"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "NT-VOT211",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "NT-VOT211",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2410.20421"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "A variation of the precision metric on the NT-VOT211 benchmark that normalizes the center location error by the target's bounding box size. This makes the metric more robust to scale variations across different video sequences. Higher scores indicate better performance. Results are from Table 2 of the paper.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Normalized Precision",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Normalized Precision on the NT-VOT211 Benchmark"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "normalized_precision_on_the_nt_vot211_benchmark",
+        "metric_name": "Normalized Precision on the NT-VOT211 Benchmark",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 84.84
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "NT-VOT211/TATrack-L/1771591481.616601#nt_vot211#normalized_precision_on_the_nt_vot211_benchmark"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "NT-VOT211",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "NT-VOT211",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2410.20421"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the percentage of frames where the Intersection over Union (IoU) between the predicted bounding box and the ground truth bounding box is greater than 0.5 on the NT-VOT211 benchmark. Higher scores are better. Results are from Table 2 of the paper.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Overlap Precision 50 (OP50)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Overlap Precision 50 (OP50) on the NT-VOT211 Benchmark"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "overlap_precision_50_op50_on_the_nt_vot211_benchmark",
+        "metric_name": "Overlap Precision 50 (OP50) on the NT-VOT211 Benchmark",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 51.77
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "NT-VOT211/TATrack-L/1771591481.616601#nt_vot211#overlap_precision_50_op50_on_the_nt_vot211_benchmark"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "NT-VOT211",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "NT-VOT211",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2410.20421"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the percentage of frames where the Intersection over Union (IoU) between the predicted bounding box and the ground truth bounding box is greater than 0.75 on the NT-VOT211 benchmark. This is a stricter metric than OP50. Higher scores are better. Results are from Table 2 of the paper.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Overlap Precision 75 (OP75)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Overlap Precision 75 (OP75) on the NT-VOT211 Benchmark"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "overlap_precision_75_op75_on_the_nt_vot211_benchmark",
+        "metric_name": "Overlap Precision 75 (OP75) on the NT-VOT211 Benchmark",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 14.21
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "NT-VOT211/TATrack-L/1771591481.616601#nt_vot211#overlap_precision_75_op75_on_the_nt_vot211_benchmark"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "NT-VOT211",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "NT-VOT211",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2410.20421"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the tracking precision on the NT-VOT211 benchmark, based on the average center location error (CLE) over all frames. The score represents the percentage of frames where the CLE is below a certain threshold. Higher precision scores are better. Results are from Table 2 of the paper.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Precision",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Precision on the NT-VOT211 Benchmark"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "precision_on_the_nt_vot211_benchmark",
+        "metric_name": "Precision on the NT-VOT211 Benchmark",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 53.94
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "NT-VOT211/TATrack-L/1771591481.616601#nt_vot211#precision_on_the_nt_vot211_benchmark"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/03/2f/032f918a-f952-435c-8e80-678e6f911f31.json

@@ -0,0 +1,328 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "TRIG-Bench/OminiControl/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "The Chinese University of Hong Kong",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "image",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "OminiControl",
+    "name": "OminiControl",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "TRIG-Bench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "TRIG-Bench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2507.22100"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Evaluation of model performance on the 'Aesthetics' dimension for the Subject-driven Generation task. Aesthetics measures the visual appeal of the generated images. Scores are calculated using TRIGScore. Higher scores indicate better performance.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "TRIGScore - Aesthetics (Subject-driven)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "TRIG-Bench: Aesthetics in Subject-driven Generation"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "trig_bench_aesthetics_in_subject_driven_generation",
+        "metric_name": "TRIG-Bench: Aesthetics in Subject-driven Generation",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.7
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "TRIG-Bench/OminiControl/1771591481.616601#trig_bench#trig_bench_aesthetics_in_subject_driven_generation"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "TRIG-Bench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "TRIG-Bench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2507.22100"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Evaluation of model performance on the 'Ambiguity' dimension for the Subject-driven Generation task. Ambiguity measures the ability to generate diverse images based on ambiguous or abstract prompts. Scores are calculated using TRIGScore. Higher scores indicate better performance.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "TRIGScore - Ambiguity (Subject-driven)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "TRIG-Bench: Ambiguity Diversity in Subject-driven Generation"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "trig_bench_ambiguity_diversity_in_subject_driven_generation",
+        "metric_name": "TRIG-Bench: Ambiguity Diversity in Subject-driven Generation",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "TRIG-Bench/OminiControl/1771591481.616601#trig_bench#trig_bench_ambiguity_diversity_in_subject_driven_generation"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "TRIG-Bench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "TRIG-Bench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2507.22100"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": true,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Evaluation of model performance on the 'Bias' dimension for the Subject-driven Generation task. Bias measures the extent to which generated images exhibit biases. Scores are calculated using TRIGScore. Higher scores indicate less biased content.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "TRIGScore - Bias (Subject-driven)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "TRIG-Bench: Bias Robustness in Subject-driven Generation"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "trig_bench_bias_robustness_in_subject_driven_generation",
+        "metric_name": "TRIG-Bench: Bias Robustness in Subject-driven Generation",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.91
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "TRIG-Bench/OminiControl/1771591481.616601#trig_bench#trig_bench_bias_robustness_in_subject_driven_generation"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "TRIG-Bench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "TRIG-Bench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2507.22100"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Evaluation of model performance on the 'Content' dimension for the Subject-driven Generation task. Content measures the alignment of the image’s main objects and scenes with those specified in the prompt. Scores are calculated using TRIGScore. Higher scores indicate better performance.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "TRIGScore - Content (Subject-driven)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "TRIG-Bench: Content Alignment in Subject-driven Generation"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "trig_bench_content_alignment_in_subject_driven_generation",
+        "metric_name": "TRIG-Bench: Content Alignment in Subject-driven Generation",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.64
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "TRIG-Bench/OminiControl/1771591481.616601#trig_bench#trig_bench_content_alignment_in_subject_driven_generation"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "TRIG-Bench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "TRIG-Bench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2507.22100"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Evaluation of model performance on the 'Knowledge' dimension for the Subject-driven Generation task. Knowledge measures the ability to generate images with complex or specialized knowledge. Scores are calculated using TRIGScore. Higher scores indicate better performance.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "TRIGScore - Knowledge (Subject-driven)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "TRIG-Bench: Knowledge Diversity in Subject-driven Generation"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "trig_bench_knowledge_diversity_in_subject_driven_generation",
+        "metric_name": "TRIG-Bench: Knowledge Diversity in Subject-driven Generation",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.55
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "TRIG-Bench/OminiControl/1771591481.616601#trig_bench#trig_bench_knowledge_diversity_in_subject_driven_generation"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "TRIG-Bench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "TRIG-Bench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2507.22100"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Evaluation of model performance on the 'Originality' dimension for the Subject-driven Generation task. Originality measures the novelty and uniqueness in the generated images. Scores are calculated using TRIGScore. Higher scores indicate better performance.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "TRIGScore - Originality (Subject-driven)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "TRIG-Bench: Originality in Subject-driven Generation"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "trig_bench_originality_in_subject_driven_generation",
+        "metric_name": "TRIG-Bench: Originality in Subject-driven Generation",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.67
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "TRIG-Bench/OminiControl/1771591481.616601#trig_bench#trig_bench_originality_in_subject_driven_generation"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "TRIG-Bench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "TRIG-Bench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2507.22100"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Evaluation of model performance on the 'Realism' dimension for the Subject-driven Generation task. Realism measures the similarity between the generated images and those in the real world. Scores are calculated using TRIGScore. Higher scores indicate better performance.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "TRIGScore - Realism (Subject-driven)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "TRIG-Bench: Realism in Subject-driven Generation"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "trig_bench_realism_in_subject_driven_generation",
+        "metric_name": "TRIG-Bench: Realism in Subject-driven Generation",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.65
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "TRIG-Bench/OminiControl/1771591481.616601#trig_bench#trig_bench_realism_in_subject_driven_generation"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "TRIG-Bench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "TRIG-Bench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2507.22100"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Evaluation of model performance on the 'Relation' dimension for the Subject-driven Generation task. Relation measures the alignment of spatial and semantic logical relationships between elements in the image with the prompt. Scores are calculated using TRIGScore. Higher scores indicate better performance.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "TRIGScore - Relation (Subject-driven)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "TRIG-Bench: Relational Alignment in Subject-driven Generation"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "trig_bench_relational_alignment_in_subject_driven_generation",
+        "metric_name": "TRIG-Bench: Relational Alignment in Subject-driven Generation",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.6
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "TRIG-Bench/OminiControl/1771591481.616601#trig_bench#trig_bench_relational_alignment_in_subject_driven_generation"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "TRIG-Bench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "TRIG-Bench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2507.22100"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Evaluation of model performance on the 'Style' dimension for the Subject-driven Generation task. Style measures the alignment of the image’s aesthetic and scheme with that specified in the prompt. Scores are calculated using TRIGScore. Higher scores indicate better performance.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "TRIGScore - Style (Subject-driven)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "TRIG-Bench: Style Alignment in Subject-driven Generation"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "trig_bench_style_alignment_in_subject_driven_generation",
+        "metric_name": "TRIG-Bench: Style Alignment in Subject-driven Generation",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.58
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "TRIG-Bench/OminiControl/1771591481.616601#trig_bench#trig_bench_style_alignment_in_subject_driven_generation"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "TRIG-Bench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "TRIG-Bench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2507.22100"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Evaluation of model performance on the 'Toxicity' dimension for the Subject-driven Generation task. Toxicity measures the extent to which generated images contain harmful or offensive content. Scores are calculated using TRIGScore. Higher scores indicate less toxic content.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "TRIGScore - Toxicity (Subject-driven)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "TRIG-Bench: Toxicity Robustness in Subject-driven Generation"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "trig_bench_toxicity_robustness_in_subject_driven_generation",
+        "metric_name": "TRIG-Bench: Toxicity Robustness in Subject-driven Generation",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.52
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "TRIG-Bench/OminiControl/1771591481.616601#trig_bench#trig_bench_toxicity_robustness_in_subject_driven_generation"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/03/30/03307425-0836-46a2-aec2-40a9bfcc1f8f.json

@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "CHURRO-DS/Skywork R1V3 (38B)/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "Stanford University",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "document",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "Skywork R1V3 (38B)",
+    "name": "Skywork R1V3 (38B)",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "CHURRO-DS",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "CHURRO-DS",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2509.19768"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average normalized Levenshtein similarity scores of models on the handwritten subset of the CHURRO-DS test set. This metric measures the character-level accuracy of transcribing historical handwritten documents. Scores range from 0 to 100, where higher is better. All models were evaluated in a zero-shot setting, except for the paper's model, CHURRO, which was fine-tuned on the dataset.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Avg. Normalized Levenshtein Similarity (Handwritten)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Historical Text Recognition Accuracy on Handwritten Documents (CHURRO-DS)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "historical_text_recognition_accuracy_on_handwritten_documents_churro_ds",
+        "metric_name": "Historical Text Recognition Accuracy on Handwritten Documents (CHURRO-DS)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 25.6
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "CHURRO-DS/Skywork R1V3 (38B)/1771591481.616601#churro_ds#historical_text_recognition_accuracy_on_handwritten_documents_churro_ds"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "CHURRO-DS",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "CHURRO-DS",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2509.19768"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average normalized Levenshtein similarity scores of models on the printed subset of the CHURRO-DS test set. This metric measures the character-level accuracy of transcribing historical printed documents. Scores range from 0 to 100, where higher is better. All models were evaluated in a zero-shot setting, except for the paper's model, CHURRO, which was fine-tuned on the dataset.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Avg. Normalized Levenshtein Similarity (Printed)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Historical Text Recognition Accuracy on Printed Documents (CHURRO-DS)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "historical_text_recognition_accuracy_on_printed_documents_churro_ds",
+        "metric_name": "Historical Text Recognition Accuracy on Printed Documents (CHURRO-DS)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 42.4
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "CHURRO-DS/Skywork R1V3 (38B)/1771591481.616601#churro_ds#historical_text_recognition_accuracy_on_printed_documents_churro_ds"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/03/31/03317d0e-9a25-4c0f-8d41-5505f40b1a12.json

@@ -0,0 +1,508 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "SR-Eval/QW3-30/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "Sichuan University",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "text",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "QW3-30",
+    "name": "QW3-30",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "SR-Eval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "SR-Eval",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2509.18808"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average per-turn accuracy on Python function-level tasks in the SR-Eval benchmark. The 'Basic Setting' (BS) is the most realistic scenario, where the model's own generated code from previous turns is used as context, allowing errors to accumulate.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Avg Acc (Python, Function, BS)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Average Accuracy on SR-Eval Python Function-Level Tasks (Basic Setting)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "average_accuracy_on_sr_eval_python_function_level_tasks_basic_setting",
+        "metric_name": "Average Accuracy on SR-Eval Python Function-Level Tasks (Basic Setting)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.3869
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "SR-Eval/QW3-30/1771591481.616601#sr_eval#average_accuracy_on_sr_eval_python_function_level_tasks_basic_setting"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "SR-Eval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "SR-Eval",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2509.18808"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average per-turn accuracy on Java function-level tasks in the SR-Eval benchmark. The 'Golden Setting' (GS) provides the ground-truth reference code from previous turns as context, representing an upper-bound performance.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Avg Acc (Java, Function, GS)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Average Accuracy on SR-Eval Java Function-Level Tasks (Golden Setting)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "average_accuracy_on_sr_eval_java_function_level_tasks_golden_setting",
+        "metric_name": "Average Accuracy on SR-Eval Java Function-Level Tasks (Golden Setting)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.555
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "SR-Eval/QW3-30/1771591481.616601#sr_eval#average_accuracy_on_sr_eval_java_function_level_tasks_golden_setting"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "SR-Eval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "SR-Eval",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2509.18808"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average per-turn accuracy on Java repository-level tasks. The 'Basic Setting' (BS) reveals the significant difficulty models face with iterative development in complex, statically-typed codebases like Java repositories.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Avg Acc (Java, Repo, BS)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Average Accuracy on SR-Eval Java Repository-Level Tasks (Basic Setting)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "average_accuracy_on_sr_eval_java_repository_level_tasks_basic_setting",
+        "metric_name": "Average Accuracy on SR-Eval Java Repository-Level Tasks (Basic Setting)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.1973
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "SR-Eval/QW3-30/1771591481.616601#sr_eval#average_accuracy_on_sr_eval_java_repository_level_tasks_basic_setting"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "SR-Eval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "SR-Eval",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2509.18808"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average per-turn accuracy on Java repository-level tasks in the 'Golden Setting' (GS). This shows the upper-bound performance on these complex, multi-file tasks when error accumulation is prevented.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Avg Acc (Java, Repo, GS)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Average Accuracy on SR-Eval Java Repository-Level Tasks (Golden Setting)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "average_accuracy_on_sr_eval_java_repository_level_tasks_golden_setting",
+        "metric_name": "Average Accuracy on SR-Eval Java Repository-Level Tasks (Golden Setting)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.5762
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "SR-Eval/QW3-30/1771591481.616601#sr_eval#average_accuracy_on_sr_eval_java_repository_level_tasks_golden_setting"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "SR-Eval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "SR-Eval",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2509.18808"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average per-turn accuracy on Python function-level tasks in the SR-Eval benchmark. The 'Golden Setting' (GS) provides the ground-truth reference code from previous turns as context, representing an upper-bound performance where errors do not accumulate.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Avg Acc (Python, Function, GS)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Average Accuracy on SR-Eval Python Function-Level Tasks (Golden Setting)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "average_accuracy_on_sr_eval_python_function_level_tasks_golden_setting",
+        "metric_name": "Average Accuracy on SR-Eval Python Function-Level Tasks (Golden Setting)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.5803
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "SR-Eval/QW3-30/1771591481.616601#sr_eval#average_accuracy_on_sr_eval_python_function_level_tasks_golden_setting"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "SR-Eval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "SR-Eval",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2509.18808"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average per-turn accuracy on Python repository-level tasks, which are more complex than function-level tasks. The 'Basic Setting' (BS) uses the model's own prior output as context, simulating a realistic development workflow.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Avg Acc (Python, Repo, BS)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Average Accuracy on SR-Eval Python Repository-Level Tasks (Basic Setting)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "average_accuracy_on_sr_eval_python_repository_level_tasks_basic_setting",
+        "metric_name": "Average Accuracy on SR-Eval Python Repository-Level Tasks (Basic Setting)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.2669
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "SR-Eval/QW3-30/1771591481.616601#sr_eval#average_accuracy_on_sr_eval_python_repository_level_tasks_basic_setting"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "SR-Eval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "SR-Eval",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2509.18808"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average per-turn accuracy on Python repository-level tasks in the 'Golden Setting' (GS). Using ground-truth context shows the upper-bound performance on these complex, multi-file tasks.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Avg Acc (Python, Repo, GS)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Average Accuracy on SR-Eval Python Repository-Level Tasks (Golden Setting)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "average_accuracy_on_sr_eval_python_repository_level_tasks_golden_setting",
+        "metric_name": "Average Accuracy on SR-Eval Python Repository-Level Tasks (Golden Setting)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.3751
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "SR-Eval/QW3-30/1771591481.616601#sr_eval#average_accuracy_on_sr_eval_python_repository_level_tasks_golden_setting"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "SR-Eval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "SR-Eval",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2509.18808"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Completion Rate (CR) on Java function-level tasks in the SR-Eval benchmark. This metric measures the proportion of tasks where the model successfully passes all tests in every turn. The 'Basic Setting' (BS) is the most realistic scenario.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "CR (Java, Function, BS)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Completion Rate on SR-Eval Java Function-Level Tasks (Basic Setting)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "completion_rate_on_sr_eval_java_function_level_tasks_basic_setting",
+        "metric_name": "Completion Rate on SR-Eval Java Function-Level Tasks (Basic Setting)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.0581
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "SR-Eval/QW3-30/1771591481.616601#sr_eval#completion_rate_on_sr_eval_java_function_level_tasks_basic_setting"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "SR-Eval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "SR-Eval",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2509.18808"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Completion Rate (CR) on Java function-level tasks in the SR-Eval benchmark. The 'Golden Setting' (GS) provides the ground-truth reference code from previous turns, representing an upper-bound scenario for completing all turns of a task successfully.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "CR (Java, Function, GS)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Completion Rate on SR-Eval Java Function-Level Tasks (Golden Setting)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "completion_rate_on_sr_eval_java_function_level_tasks_golden_setting",
+        "metric_name": "Completion Rate on SR-Eval Java Function-Level Tasks (Golden Setting)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.0872
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "SR-Eval/QW3-30/1771591481.616601#sr_eval#completion_rate_on_sr_eval_java_function_level_tasks_golden_setting"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "SR-Eval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "SR-Eval",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2509.18808"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Completion Rate (CR) on complex Java repository-level tasks in the 'Basic Setting' (BS). This metric measures the proportion of tasks where the model successfully completes all turns from start to finish.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "CR (Java, Repo, BS)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Completion Rate on SR-Eval Java Repository-Level Tasks (Basic Setting)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "completion_rate_on_sr_eval_java_repository_level_tasks_basic_setting",
+        "metric_name": "Completion Rate on SR-Eval Java Repository-Level Tasks (Basic Setting)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.125
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "SR-Eval/QW3-30/1771591481.616601#sr_eval#completion_rate_on_sr_eval_java_repository_level_tasks_basic_setting"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "SR-Eval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "SR-Eval",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2509.18808"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Completion Rate (CR) on Java repository-level tasks in the 'Golden Setting' (GS). The scores highlight that even with perfect context, successfully completing all turns of a complex, iterative Java repository task is very difficult for current LLMs.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "CR (Java, Repo, GS)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Completion Rate on SR-Eval Java Repository-Level Tasks (Golden Setting)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "completion_rate_on_sr_eval_java_repository_level_tasks_golden_setting",
+        "metric_name": "Completion Rate on SR-Eval Java Repository-Level Tasks (Golden Setting)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.15
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "SR-Eval/QW3-30/1771591481.616601#sr_eval#completion_rate_on_sr_eval_java_repository_level_tasks_golden_setting"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "SR-Eval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "SR-Eval",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2509.18808"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Completion Rate (CR) on Python function-level tasks in the SR-Eval benchmark. This metric measures the proportion of tasks where the model successfully passes all tests in every turn. The 'Basic Setting' (BS) is the most realistic scenario, where the model's own generated code from previous turns is used as context.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "CR (Python, Function, BS)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Completion Rate on SR-Eval Python Function-Level Tasks (Basic Setting)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "completion_rate_on_sr_eval_python_function_level_tasks_basic_setting",
+        "metric_name": "Completion Rate on SR-Eval Python Function-Level Tasks (Basic Setting)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.0845
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "SR-Eval/QW3-30/1771591481.616601#sr_eval#completion_rate_on_sr_eval_python_function_level_tasks_basic_setting"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "SR-Eval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "SR-Eval",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2509.18808"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Completion Rate (CR) on Python function-level tasks in the SR-Eval benchmark. The 'Golden Setting' (GS) provides the ground-truth reference code from previous turns, representing an upper-bound scenario for completing all turns of a task successfully.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "CR (Python, Function, GS)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Completion Rate on SR-Eval Python Function-Level Tasks (Golden Setting)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "completion_rate_on_sr_eval_python_function_level_tasks_golden_setting",
+        "metric_name": "Completion Rate on SR-Eval Python Function-Level Tasks (Golden Setting)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.1056
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "SR-Eval/QW3-30/1771591481.616601#sr_eval#completion_rate_on_sr_eval_python_function_level_tasks_golden_setting"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "SR-Eval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "SR-Eval",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2509.18808"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Completion Rate (CR) on complex Python repository-level tasks in the 'Basic Setting' (BS). This measures the proportion of tasks where the model successfully completes all turns, highlighting the difficulty of long-term consistency in larger codebases.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "CR (Python, Repo, BS)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Completion Rate on SR-Eval Python Repository-Level Tasks (Basic Setting)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "completion_rate_on_sr_eval_python_repository_level_tasks_basic_setting",
+        "metric_name": "Completion Rate on SR-Eval Python Repository-Level Tasks (Basic Setting)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.0225
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "SR-Eval/QW3-30/1771591481.616601#sr_eval#completion_rate_on_sr_eval_python_repository_level_tasks_basic_setting"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "SR-Eval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "SR-Eval",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2509.18808"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average per-turn accuracy on Java function-level tasks in the SR-Eval benchmark. The 'Basic Setting' (BS) is the most realistic scenario, where the model's own generated code from previous turns is used as context, allowing errors to accumulate.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Avg Acc (Java, Function, BS)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Average Accuracy on SR-Eval Java Function-Level Tasks (Basic Setting)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "average_accuracy_on_sr_eval_java_function_level_tasks_basic_setting",
+        "metric_name": "Average Accuracy on SR-Eval Java Function-Level Tasks (Basic Setting)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.4053
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "SR-Eval/QW3-30/1771591481.616601#sr_eval#average_accuracy_on_sr_eval_java_function_level_tasks_basic_setting"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "SR-Eval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "SR-Eval",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2509.18808"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Completion Rate (CR) on Python repository-level tasks in the 'Golden Setting' (GS). Even with perfect historical context, completing all turns of a repository-level task remains extremely challenging for LLMs.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "CR (Python, Repo, GS)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Completion Rate on SR-Eval Python Repository-Level Tasks (Golden Setting)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "completion_rate_on_sr_eval_python_repository_level_tasks_golden_setting",
+        "metric_name": "Completion Rate on SR-Eval Python Repository-Level Tasks (Golden Setting)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.0449
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "SR-Eval/QW3-30/1771591481.616601#sr_eval#completion_rate_on_sr_eval_python_repository_level_tasks_golden_setting"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/03/31/0331ce52-e200-4acc-acea-18369b0da5ab.json

@@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "hfopenllm_v2/spow12_ChatWaifu_v2.0_22B/1773936498.240187",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1773936498.240187",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "HF Open LLM v2",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "Hugging Face",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party"
+  },
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "lm-evaluation-harness",
+    "version": "0.4.0",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "fork": "https://github.com/huggingface/lm-evaluation-harness/tree/adding_all_changess"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "name": "ChatWaifu_v2.0_22B",
+    "id": "spow12/ChatWaifu_v2.0_22B",
+    "developer": "spow12",
+    "inference_platform": "unknown",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "precision": "bfloat16",
+      "architecture": "MistralForCausalLM",
+      "params_billions": "22.247"
+    }
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IFEval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IFEval",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "google/IFEval"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on IFEval",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.6517
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/spow12_ChatWaifu_v2.0_22B/1773936498.240187#ifeval#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "BBH",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "BBH",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "SaylorTwift/bbh"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on BBH",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.5908
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/spow12_ChatWaifu_v2.0_22B/1773936498.240187#bbh#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MATH Level 5",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MATH Level 5",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "DigitalLearningGmbH/MATH-lighteval"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Exact Match on MATH Level 5",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "exact_match",
+        "metric_name": "Exact Match",
+        "metric_kind": "exact_match",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.2032
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/spow12_ChatWaifu_v2.0_22B/1773936498.240187#math_level_5#exact_match"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "GPQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "GPQA",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "Idavidrein/gpqa"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on GPQA",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.3238
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/spow12_ChatWaifu_v2.0_22B/1773936498.240187#gpqa#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MUSR",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MUSR",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "TAUR-Lab/MuSR"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on MUSR",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.3842
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/spow12_ChatWaifu_v2.0_22B/1773936498.240187#musr#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MMLU-PRO",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MMLU-PRO",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "TIGER-Lab/MMLU-Pro"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on MMLU-PRO",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.3812
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/spow12_ChatWaifu_v2.0_22B/1773936498.240187#mmlu_pro#accuracy"
+    }
+  ]
+}

flat/objects/03/33/0333211e-390c-441f-aafa-8b304eef5cf3.json

@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "fibble2_arena/openai/o4-mini/1773248706",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1773248706",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "Fibble2 Arena (2 lies)",
+    "source_type": "evaluation_run",
+    "source_organization_name": "Dr. Chang Liu's Lab",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://drchangliu.github.io/WordleArenas/",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "first_party"
+  },
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "wordle_arena",
+    "version": "1.0.0",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "arena_type": "fibble2",
+      "num_lies": "2",
+      "max_guesses": "8"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "name": "o4 Mini",
+    "id": "openai/o4-mini",
+    "developer": "OpenAI",
+    "inference_platform": "openai"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "fibble2_arena",
+      "evaluation_result_id": "fibble2_arena/openai/o4-mini/1773248706#fibble2_arena#fibble2_arena_win_rate",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "Fibble2 Arena (2 lies) Word Set",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://drchangliu.github.io/WordleArenas/"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Win rate on Fibble2 Arena (2 lies) puzzles (2 lies, 8 max guesses)",
+        "metric_id": "fibble2_arena.win_rate",
+        "metric_name": "Win Rate",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "additional_details": {
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "fibble2_arena_win_rate"
+        },
+        "metric_kind": "win_rate"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.0,
+        "uncertainty": {
+          "num_samples": 30
+        },
+        "details": {
+          "games_played": "30",
+          "games_won": "0"
+        }
+      }
+    }
+  ],
+  "detailed_evaluation_results": {
+    "format": "jsonl",
+    "file_path": "0333211e-390c-441f-aafa-8b304eef5cf3_samples.jsonl",
+    "total_rows": 30
+  }
+}

flat/objects/03/35/03353542-aae9-41ee-905c-7d8514e4087d.json

@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "MMDocBench/InternVL2-8B/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "National University of Singapore",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "document",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "InternVL2-8B",
+    "name": "InternVL2-8B",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MMDocBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MMDocBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2410.21311"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the overall F1 score for answer prediction across all 15 main tasks and 48 sub-tasks of the MMDocBench. This metric balances precision and recall, evaluating a model's ability to generate accurate textual answers to questions about document images. Data is from the official project leaderboard.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "F1 Score (%) - Overall",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Overall F1 Score on MMDocBench"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "overall_f1_score_on_mmdocbench",
+        "metric_name": "Overall F1 Score on MMDocBench",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 46.22
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "MMDocBench/InternVL2-8B/1771591481.616601#mmdocbench#overall_f1_score_on_mmdocbench"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MMDocBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MMDocBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2410.21311"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the overall Average Normalized Levenshtein Similarity (ANLS) for answer prediction on MMDocBench. This metric provides a robust score for text similarity, capturing correctness even with minor character-level differences. Data is from the official project leaderboard.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "ANLS (%) - Overall",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Overall Average Normalized Levenshtein Similarity (ANLS) on MMDocBench"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "overall_average_normalized_levenshtein_similarity_anls_on_mmdocbench",
+        "metric_name": "Overall Average Normalized Levenshtein Similarity (ANLS) on MMDocBench",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 35.12
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "MMDocBench/InternVL2-8B/1771591481.616601#mmdocbench#overall_average_normalized_levenshtein_similarity_anls_on_mmdocbench"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MMDocBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MMDocBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2410.21311"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the percentage of predictions that exactly match the ground truth answer across all MMDocBench tasks. This is a strict metric for answer accuracy. Data is from the official project leaderboard.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Exact Match (%) - Overall",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Overall Exact Match (EM) Score on MMDocBench"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "overall_exact_match_em_score_on_mmdocbench",
+        "metric_name": "Overall Exact Match (EM) Score on MMDocBench",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 43.22
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "MMDocBench/InternVL2-8B/1771591481.616601#mmdocbench#overall_exact_match_em_score_on_mmdocbench"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MMDocBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MMDocBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2410.21311"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the percentage of region predictions with an Intersection over Union (IOU) score of 0.5 or higher. This metric indicates how often a model's predicted supporting region has a substantial overlap with the ground truth region. Data is from the official project leaderboard.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "IOU@0.5 (%) - Overall",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Overall IOU@0.5 Score for Region Prediction on MMDocBench"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "overall_iou_0_5_score_for_region_prediction_on_mmdocbench",
+        "metric_name": "Overall IOU@0.5 Score for Region Prediction on MMDocBench",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.33
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "MMDocBench/InternVL2-8B/1771591481.616601#mmdocbench#overall_iou_0_5_score_for_region_prediction_on_mmdocbench"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MMDocBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MMDocBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2410.21311"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the overall Intersection over Union (IOU) for region prediction across all MMDocBench tasks. This metric evaluates the model's ability to visually ground its answers by accurately localizing the supporting regions in the document image. Data is from the official project leaderboard.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Intersection over Union (IOU) (%) - Overall",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Overall IOU Score for Region Prediction on MMDocBench"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "overall_iou_score_for_region_prediction_on_mmdocbench",
+        "metric_name": "Overall IOU Score for Region Prediction on MMDocBench",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 1.27
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "MMDocBench/InternVL2-8B/1771591481.616601#mmdocbench#overall_iou_score_for_region_prediction_on_mmdocbench"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/03/35/0335df57-f8a0-4076-8ccf-8b298d24e3bf.json

@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "BertaQA/Latxa 7B/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "text",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "Latxa 7B",
+    "name": "Latxa 7B",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "BertaQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "BertaQA",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2406.07302"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the accuracy of models on multiple-choice questions about Basque culture, presented in English. This eval is part of the BERTAQA benchmark and highlights the challenge models face with culturally specific, local knowledge compared to global knowledge.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%) on Local Questions (English)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "BERTAQA: Accuracy on Local Basque Culture Questions (English)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "bertaqa_accuracy_on_local_basque_culture_questions_english",
+        "metric_name": "BERTAQA: Accuracy on Local Basque Culture Questions (English)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 47.72
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "BertaQA/Latxa 7B/1771591481.616601#bertaqa#bertaqa_accuracy_on_local_basque_culture_questions_english"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "BertaQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "BertaQA",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2406.07302"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the accuracy of models on multiple-choice questions about general world knowledge, presented in the Basque language. This eval tests models' ability to process a low-resource language for topics they are generally familiar with.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%) on Global Questions (Basque)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "BERTAQA: Accuracy on Global Knowledge Questions (Basque)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "bertaqa_accuracy_on_global_knowledge_questions_basque",
+        "metric_name": "BERTAQA: Accuracy on Global Knowledge Questions (Basque)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 50.79
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "BertaQA/Latxa 7B/1771591481.616601#bertaqa#bertaqa_accuracy_on_global_knowledge_questions_basque"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "BertaQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "BertaQA",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2406.07302"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the accuracy of models on multiple-choice questions about general world knowledge, presented in English. This eval serves as a baseline within the BERTAQA benchmark to contrast with performance on local cultural questions.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%) on Global Questions (English)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "BERTAQA: Accuracy on Global Knowledge Questions (English)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "bertaqa_accuracy_on_global_knowledge_questions_english",
+        "metric_name": "BERTAQA: Accuracy on Global Knowledge Questions (English)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 53.26
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "BertaQA/Latxa 7B/1771591481.616601#bertaqa#bertaqa_accuracy_on_global_knowledge_questions_english"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "BertaQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "BertaQA",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2406.07302"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the accuracy of models on multiple-choice questions about Basque culture, presented in the original Basque language. This eval assesses both cultural knowledge and native language proficiency, highlighting the performance of models continually pretrained on Basque (Latxa models).",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%) on Local Questions (Basque)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "BERTAQA: Accuracy on Local Basque Culture Questions (Basque)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "bertaqa_accuracy_on_local_basque_culture_questions_basque",
+        "metric_name": "BERTAQA: Accuracy on Local Basque Culture Questions (Basque)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 49.45
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "BertaQA/Latxa 7B/1771591481.616601#bertaqa#bertaqa_accuracy_on_local_basque_culture_questions_basque"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/03/37/033749a5-172b-4778-be39-e1da233f086c.json

@@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "hfopenllm_v2/speakleash_Bielik-11B-v2.3-Instruct/1773936498.240187",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1773936498.240187",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "HF Open LLM v2",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "Hugging Face",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party"
+  },
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "lm-evaluation-harness",
+    "version": "0.4.0",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "fork": "https://github.com/huggingface/lm-evaluation-harness/tree/adding_all_changess"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "name": "Bielik-11B-v2.3-Instruct",
+    "id": "speakleash/Bielik-11B-v2.3-Instruct",
+    "developer": "speakleash",
+    "inference_platform": "unknown",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "precision": "float16",
+      "architecture": "MistralForCausalLM",
+      "params_billions": "11.169"
+    }
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IFEval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IFEval",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "google/IFEval"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on IFEval",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.5583
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/speakleash_Bielik-11B-v2.3-Instruct/1773936498.240187#ifeval#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "BBH",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "BBH",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "SaylorTwift/bbh"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on BBH",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.5663
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/speakleash_Bielik-11B-v2.3-Instruct/1773936498.240187#bbh#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MATH Level 5",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MATH Level 5",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "DigitalLearningGmbH/MATH-lighteval"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Exact Match on MATH Level 5",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "exact_match",
+        "metric_name": "Exact Match",
+        "metric_kind": "exact_match",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.2085
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/speakleash_Bielik-11B-v2.3-Instruct/1773936498.240187#math_level_5#exact_match"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "GPQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "GPQA",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "Idavidrein/gpqa"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on GPQA",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.3406
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/speakleash_Bielik-11B-v2.3-Instruct/1773936498.240187#gpqa#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MUSR",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MUSR",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "TAUR-Lab/MuSR"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on MUSR",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.4518
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/speakleash_Bielik-11B-v2.3-Instruct/1773936498.240187#musr#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MMLU-PRO",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MMLU-PRO",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "TIGER-Lab/MMLU-Pro"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on MMLU-PRO",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.3444
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/speakleash_Bielik-11B-v2.3-Instruct/1773936498.240187#mmlu_pro#accuracy"
+    }
+  ]
+}

flat/objects/03/37/03376628-21b7-4a2b-a24d-a42dbb062d14.json

@@ -0,0 +1,208 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "SpatialBench/Bunny-Phi2-3B-RGBD/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "BAAI",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "image",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "Bunny-Phi2-3B-RGBD",
+    "name": "Bunny-Phi2-3B-RGBD",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "SpatialBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "SpatialBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2406.13642"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "This metric assesses a model's ability to accurately determine the metric depth of specific points or objects from either RGB (Monocular Depth Estimation) or RGB-D images. A higher score indicates better performance.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "SpatialBench Depth Understanding"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "spatialbench_depth_understanding",
+        "metric_name": "SpatialBench Depth Understanding",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 85.8
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "SpatialBench/Bunny-Phi2-3B-RGBD/1771591481.616601#spatialbench#spatialbench_depth_understanding"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "SpatialBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "SpatialBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2406.13642"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Tests the model's ability to count objects based on visual and spatial attributes from images. Higher scores are better.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "SpatialBench Counting & Enumeration"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "spatialbench_counting_enumeration",
+        "metric_name": "SpatialBench Counting & Enumeration",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 90.4
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "SpatialBench/Bunny-Phi2-3B-RGBD/1771591481.616601#spatialbench#spatialbench_counting_enumeration"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "SpatialBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "SpatialBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2406.13642"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Determines if a model can correctly identify the presence or absence of specified objects or conditions in the scene. Higher scores are better.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "SpatialBench Object Existence"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "spatialbench_object_existence",
+        "metric_name": "SpatialBench Object Existence",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 75
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "SpatialBench/Bunny-Phi2-3B-RGBD/1771591481.616601#spatialbench#spatialbench_object_existence"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "SpatialBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "SpatialBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2406.13642"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Evaluates the understanding of relative object positions (e.g., left/right, above/below) and proximity relationships (which object is closer/further). Higher scores are better.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "SpatialBench Positional Reasoning"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "spatialbench_positional_reasoning",
+        "metric_name": "SpatialBench Positional Reasoning",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 50
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "SpatialBench/Bunny-Phi2-3B-RGBD/1771591481.616601#spatialbench#spatialbench_positional_reasoning"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "SpatialBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "SpatialBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2406.13642"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Assesses whether a model can determine if one object has physically contacted or reached another, requiring precise metric depth understanding. Higher scores are better.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "SpatialBench Reaching/Touching"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "spatialbench_reaching_touching",
+        "metric_name": "SpatialBench Reaching/Touching",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 43.3
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "SpatialBench/Bunny-Phi2-3B-RGBD/1771591481.616601#spatialbench#spatialbench_reaching_touching"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "SpatialBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "SpatialBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2406.13642"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Evaluates the model's capacity to compare the sizes of objects in a scene, which can be influenced by depth information to account for perspective. Higher scores are better.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "SpatialBench Size Comparison"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "spatialbench_size_comparison",
+        "metric_name": "SpatialBench Size Comparison",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 28.3
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "SpatialBench/Bunny-Phi2-3B-RGBD/1771591481.616601#spatialbench#spatialbench_size_comparison"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/03/38/0338283e-d589-4549-814b-4592af0a1f8e.json

@@ -0,0 +1,1108 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "IMAGINE-E/Stable Diffusion 3/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "Shanghai AI Laboratory",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "image",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "Stable Diffusion 3",
+    "name": "Stable Diffusion 3",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.13920"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human evaluation scores for Text-to-Image models on the Json2Image task, where models generate images based on JSON-formatted descriptions of objects, attributes, and relations. The score is calculated based on aesthetic appeal, realism, safety, and text alignment, with a maximum of 10.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Human Score (out of 10)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on JSON-to-Image Generation"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_json_to_image_generation",
+        "metric_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on JSON-to-Image Generation",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 6.25
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IMAGINE-E/Stable Diffusion 3/1771591481.616601#imagine_e#imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_json_to_image_generation"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.13920"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human evaluation scores for Text-to-Image models on the Autonomous Driving task, evaluating the ability to generate road scenes under challenging weather conditions. The score is calculated based on aesthetic appeal, realism, safety, and text alignment, with a maximum of 10.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Human Score (out of 10)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Autonomous Driving Scene Generation"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_autonomous_driving_scene_generation",
+        "metric_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Autonomous Driving Scene Generation",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 7.5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IMAGINE-E/Stable Diffusion 3/1771591481.616601#imagine_e#imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_autonomous_driving_scene_generation"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.13920"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human evaluation scores for Text-to-Image models on the Biology task, evaluating the ability to generate detailed biological images (e.g., plant or animal cells). The score is calculated based on aesthetic appeal, realism, safety, and text alignment, with a maximum of 10.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Human Score (out of 10)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Biology Image Generation"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_biology_image_generation",
+        "metric_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Biology Image Generation",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 5.84
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IMAGINE-E/Stable Diffusion 3/1771591481.616601#imagine_e#imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_biology_image_generation"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.13920"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human evaluation scores for Text-to-Image models on the Chemistry task, evaluating the ability to generate scientifically accurate chemical structures. The score is calculated based on aesthetic appeal, realism, safety, and text alignment, with a maximum of 10.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Human Score (out of 10)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Chemistry Image Generation"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_chemistry_image_generation",
+        "metric_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Chemistry Image Generation",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IMAGINE-E/Stable Diffusion 3/1771591481.616601#imagine_e#imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_chemistry_image_generation"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.13920"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human evaluation scores for Text-to-Image models on the Code2Chart task, where models generate charts from Matplotlib code. The score is calculated based on aesthetic appeal, realism, safety, and text alignment, with a maximum of 10.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Human Score (out of 10)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Code-to-Chart Generation"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_code_to_chart_generation",
+        "metric_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Code-to-Chart Generation",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IMAGINE-E/Stable Diffusion 3/1771591481.616601#imagine_e#imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_code_to_chart_generation"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.13920"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human evaluation scores for Text-to-Image models on the Code2Table task, where models are prompted with Markdown or LaTeX code to generate tables. The score is calculated based on aesthetic appeal, realism, safety, and text alignment, with a maximum of 10.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Human Score (out of 10)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Code-to-Table Generation"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_code_to_table_generation",
+        "metric_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Code-to-Table Generation",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 4.72
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IMAGINE-E/Stable Diffusion 3/1771591481.616601#imagine_e#imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_code_to_table_generation"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.13920"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human evaluation scores for Text-to-Image models on the Code Generation task, assessing the ability to generate images of Python code, C programs, barcodes, or QR codes. The score is calculated based on aesthetic appeal, realism, safety, and text alignment, with a maximum of 10.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Human Score (out of 10)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Code Generation"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_code_generation",
+        "metric_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Code Generation",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 2.5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IMAGINE-E/Stable Diffusion 3/1771591481.616601#imagine_e#imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_code_generation"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.13920"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human evaluation scores for Text-to-Image models on the Dense OCR task, evaluating the ability to generate images containing dense and accurate text (e.g., posters). The score is calculated based on aesthetic appeal, realism, safety, and text alignment, with a maximum of 10.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Human Score (out of 10)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Dense OCR Generation"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_dense_ocr_generation",
+        "metric_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Dense OCR Generation",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 5.83
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IMAGINE-E/Stable Diffusion 3/1771591481.616601#imagine_e#imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_dense_ocr_generation"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.13920"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human evaluation scores for Text-to-Image models on the Emoji task, assessing the ability to interpret and generate images from combinations of emojis. The score is calculated based on aesthetic appeal, realism, safety, and text alignment, with a maximum of 10.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Human Score (out of 10)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Emoji Prompt Interpretation"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_emoji_prompt_interpretation",
+        "metric_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Emoji Prompt Interpretation",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 5.83
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IMAGINE-E/Stable Diffusion 3/1771591481.616601#imagine_e#imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_emoji_prompt_interpretation"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.13920"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human evaluation scores for Text-to-Image models on the Equation Generation task, assessing the ability to generate mathematical equations from text prompts. The score is calculated based on aesthetic appeal, realism, safety, and text alignment, with a maximum of 10.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Human Score (out of 10)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Equation Generation"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_equation_generation",
+        "metric_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Equation Generation",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 3.89
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IMAGINE-E/Stable Diffusion 3/1771591481.616601#imagine_e#imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_equation_generation"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.13920"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human evaluation scores for Text-to-Image models on the Fractal task, assessing the ability to generate images with complex recursive patterns like Mandelbrot sets. The score is calculated based on aesthetic appeal, realism, safety, and text alignment, with a maximum of 10.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Human Score (out of 10)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Fractal Image Generation"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_fractal_image_generation",
+        "metric_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Fractal Image Generation",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 2.5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IMAGINE-E/Stable Diffusion 3/1771591481.616601#imagine_e#imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_fractal_image_generation"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.13920"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human evaluation scores for Text-to-Image models on the Human Body task, focusing on generating accurate human anatomy, particularly hands, feet, and poses. The score is calculated based on aesthetic appeal, realism, safety, and text alignment, with a maximum of 10.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Human Score (out of 10)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Human Body Generation"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_human_body_generation",
+        "metric_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Human Body Generation",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 6.46
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IMAGINE-E/Stable Diffusion 3/1771591481.616601#imagine_e#imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_human_body_generation"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.13920"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human evaluation scores for Text-to-Image models on the Image with Mark task, assessing the ability to generate images with objects highlighted by bounding boxes. The score is calculated based on aesthetic appeal, realism, safety, and text alignment, with a maximum of 10.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Human Score (out of 10)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Image with Bounding Box"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_image_with_bounding_box",
+        "metric_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Image with Bounding Box",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 7.5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IMAGINE-E/Stable Diffusion 3/1771591481.616601#imagine_e#imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_image_with_bounding_box"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.13920"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human evaluation scores for Text-to-Image models on the Irrational Scene Generation task, evaluating the ability to generate anomalous or surreal scenes. The score is calculated based on aesthetic appeal, realism, safety, and text alignment, with a maximum of 10.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Human Score (out of 10)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Irrational Scene Generation"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_irrational_scene_generation",
+        "metric_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Irrational Scene Generation",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 6.94
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IMAGINE-E/Stable Diffusion 3/1771591481.616601#imagine_e#imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_irrational_scene_generation"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.13920"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human evaluation scores for Text-to-Image models on the Language2Chart task, where models generate charts from natural language descriptions. The score is calculated based on aesthetic appeal, realism, safety, and text alignment, with a maximum of 10.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Human Score (out of 10)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Language-to-Chart Generation"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_language_to_chart_generation",
+        "metric_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Language-to-Chart Generation",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 4.58
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IMAGINE-E/Stable Diffusion 3/1771591481.616601#imagine_e#imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_language_to_chart_generation"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.13920"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human evaluation scores for Text-to-Image models on the Language2Newspaper task, where models generate newspaper layouts and content from natural language descriptions. The score is calculated based on aesthetic appeal, realism, safety, and text alignment, with a maximum of 10.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Human Score (out of 10)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Newspaper Generation"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_newspaper_generation",
+        "metric_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Newspaper Generation",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 6.25
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IMAGINE-E/Stable Diffusion 3/1771591481.616601#imagine_e#imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_newspaper_generation"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.13920"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human evaluation scores for Text-to-Image models on the Language2Paper task, assessing the ability to generate academic paper layouts from natural language descriptions. The score is calculated based on aesthetic appeal, realism, safety, and text alignment, with a maximum of 10.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Human Score (out of 10)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Academic Paper Generation"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_academic_paper_generation",
+        "metric_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Academic Paper Generation",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 5.42
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IMAGINE-E/Stable Diffusion 3/1771591481.616601#imagine_e#imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_academic_paper_generation"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.13920"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human evaluation scores for Text-to-Image models on the Language2Table task, where models are prompted with natural language descriptions to generate tables. The score is calculated based on aesthetic appeal, realism, safety, and text alignment, with a maximum of 10.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Human Score (out of 10)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Language-to-Table Generation"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_language_to_table_generation",
+        "metric_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Language-to-Table Generation",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 5.28
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IMAGINE-E/Stable Diffusion 3/1771591481.616601#imagine_e#imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_language_to_table_generation"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.13920"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human evaluation scores for Text-to-Image models on the LLM QA task, assessing the ability to understand questions and generate visual representations of the answers. The score is calculated based on aesthetic appeal, realism, safety, and text alignment, with a maximum of 10.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Human Score (out of 10)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Visual Question Answering"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_visual_question_answering",
+        "metric_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Visual Question Answering",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 2.92
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IMAGINE-E/Stable Diffusion 3/1771591481.616601#imagine_e#imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_visual_question_answering"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.13920"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human evaluation scores for Text-to-Image models on the Low Quality task, investigating the ability to generate images with specific low-quality attributes (e.g., low resolution, distorted colors). The score is calculated based on aesthetic appeal, realism, safety, and text alignment, with a maximum of 10.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Human Score (out of 10)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Low-Quality Image Generation"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_low_quality_image_generation",
+        "metric_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Low-Quality Image Generation",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 8.98
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IMAGINE-E/Stable Diffusion 3/1771591481.616601#imagine_e#imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_low_quality_image_generation"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.13920"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human evaluation scores for Text-to-Image models on the Math task, evaluating the ability to generate images reflecting geometrical concepts. The score is calculated based on aesthetic appeal, realism, safety, and text alignment, with a maximum of 10.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Human Score (out of 10)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Math Image Generation"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_math_image_generation",
+        "metric_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Math Image Generation",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 3.33
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IMAGINE-E/Stable Diffusion 3/1771591481.616601#imagine_e#imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_math_image_generation"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.13920"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human evaluation scores for Text-to-Image models on the Medical task, evaluating the ability to generate scientifically accurate medical images like X-rays or CT scans. The score is calculated based on aesthetic appeal, realism, safety, and text alignment, with a maximum of 10.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Human Score (out of 10)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Medical Image Generation"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_medical_image_generation",
+        "metric_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Medical Image Generation",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 6.66
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IMAGINE-E/Stable Diffusion 3/1771591481.616601#imagine_e#imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_medical_image_generation"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.13920"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human evaluation scores for Text-to-Image models on the Multi-image task, evaluating the ability to generate grids of multiple sub-images with logical and stylistic consistency. The score is calculated based on aesthetic appeal, realism, safety, and text alignment, with a maximum of 10.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Human Score (out of 10)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Multi-Image Grid Generation"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_multi_image_grid_generation",
+        "metric_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Multi-Image Grid Generation",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 8.24
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IMAGINE-E/Stable Diffusion 3/1771591481.616601#imagine_e#imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_multi_image_grid_generation"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.13920"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human evaluation scores for Text-to-Image models on the Multilingual task, assessing the ability to process and generate images from prompts in various languages. The score is calculated based on aesthetic appeal, realism, safety, and text alignment, with a maximum of 10.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Human Score (out of 10)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Multilingual Prompt Understanding"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_multilingual_prompt_understanding",
+        "metric_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Multilingual Prompt Understanding",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 8.33
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IMAGINE-E/Stable Diffusion 3/1771591481.616601#imagine_e#imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_multilingual_prompt_understanding"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.13920"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human evaluation scores for Text-to-Image models on the Multi-Person task, evaluating the ability to generate realistic scenes with multiple human figures. The score is calculated based on aesthetic appeal, realism, safety, and text alignment, with a maximum of 10.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Human Score (out of 10)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Multi-Person Scene Generation"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_multi_person_scene_generation",
+        "metric_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Multi-Person Scene Generation",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 7.08
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IMAGINE-E/Stable Diffusion 3/1771591481.616601#imagine_e#imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_multi_person_scene_generation"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.13920"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human evaluation scores for Text-to-Image models on the Multi-style Creation Task, evaluating the ability to generate images in over 30 distinct artistic styles. The score is calculated based on aesthetic appeal, realism, safety, and text alignment, with a maximum of 10.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Human Score (out of 10)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Multi-Style Creation"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_multi_style_creation",
+        "metric_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Multi-Style Creation",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 8.68
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IMAGINE-E/Stable Diffusion 3/1771591481.616601#imagine_e#imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_multi_style_creation"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.13920"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human evaluation scores for Text-to-Image models on the Perspective Relation task, evaluating the ability to generate images that correctly interpret and apply perspective. The score is calculated based on aesthetic appeal, realism, safety, and text alignment, with a maximum of 10.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Human Score (out of 10)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Perspective Relation"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_perspective_relation",
+        "metric_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Perspective Relation",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 7.5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IMAGINE-E/Stable Diffusion 3/1771591481.616601#imagine_e#imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_perspective_relation"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.13920"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human evaluation scores for Text-to-Image models on the Photographic Image Generation task, assessing understanding of photographic terminology (e.g., bokeh, long exposure). The score is calculated based on aesthetic appeal, realism, safety, and text alignment, with a maximum of 10.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Human Score (out of 10)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Photographic Image Generation"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_photographic_image_generation",
+        "metric_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Photographic Image Generation",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 6.87
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IMAGINE-E/Stable Diffusion 3/1771591481.616601#imagine_e#imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_photographic_image_generation"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.13920"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human evaluation scores for Text-to-Image models on the Physical Understanding task, assessing the ability to generate images conforming to real-world physical laws. The score is calculated based on aesthetic appeal, realism, safety, and text alignment, with a maximum of 10.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Human Score (out of 10)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Physical Understanding"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_physical_understanding",
+        "metric_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Physical Understanding",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IMAGINE-E/Stable Diffusion 3/1771591481.616601#imagine_e#imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_physical_understanding"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.13920"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human evaluation scores for Text-to-Image models on the 3D Point Cloud task, assessing the ability to generate images of objects rendered as point clouds. The score is calculated based on aesthetic appeal, realism, safety, and text alignment, with a maximum of 10.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Human Score (out of 10)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on 3D Point Cloud Generation"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_3d_point_cloud_generation",
+        "metric_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on 3D Point Cloud Generation",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 7.08
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IMAGINE-E/Stable Diffusion 3/1771591481.616601#imagine_e#imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_3d_point_cloud_generation"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.13920"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human evaluation scores for Text-to-Image models on the Robotics and Simulation Tasks, evaluating the ability to generate images for tool-usage grounding (bounding boxes) and simulation environments. The score is calculated based on aesthetic appeal, realism, safety, and text alignment, with a maximum of 10.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Human Score (out of 10)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Robotics and Simulation"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_robotics_and_simulation",
+        "metric_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Robotics and Simulation",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 6.04
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IMAGINE-E/Stable Diffusion 3/1771591481.616601#imagine_e#imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_robotics_and_simulation"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.13920"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human evaluation scores for Text-to-Image models on the Set of Mark task, evaluating the ability to generate images with multiple objects marked by labeled bounding boxes. The score is calculated based on aesthetic appeal, realism, safety, and text alignment, with a maximum of 10.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Human Score (out of 10)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Image with Labeled Bounding Boxes"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_image_with_labeled_bounding_boxes",
+        "metric_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Image with Labeled Bounding Boxes",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 7.22
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IMAGINE-E/Stable Diffusion 3/1771591481.616601#imagine_e#imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_image_with_labeled_bounding_boxes"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.13920"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human evaluation scores for Text-to-Image models on the Text Writing task, evaluating the ability to generate images containing accurate and legible text. The score is calculated based on aesthetic appeal, realism, safety, and text alignment, with a maximum of 10.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Human Score (out of 10)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on In-Image Text Writing"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_in_image_text_writing",
+        "metric_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on In-Image Text Writing",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 3.33
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IMAGINE-E/Stable Diffusion 3/1771591481.616601#imagine_e#imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_in_image_text_writing"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.13920"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human evaluation scores for Text-to-Image models on the UI Design task, assessing the ability to create user interfaces from HTML code or natural language. The score is calculated based on aesthetic appeal, realism, safety, and text alignment, with a maximum of 10.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Human Score (out of 10)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on UI Design Generation"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_ui_design_generation",
+        "metric_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on UI Design Generation",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IMAGINE-E/Stable Diffusion 3/1771591481.616601#imagine_e#imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_ui_design_generation"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.13920"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human evaluation scores for Text-to-Image models on the 3D Mesh task, evaluating the ability to generate images of objects rendered as 3D meshes. The score is calculated based on aesthetic appeal, realism, safety, and text alignment, with a maximum of 10.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Human Score (out of 10)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on 3D Mesh Generation"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_3d_mesh_generation",
+        "metric_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on 3D Mesh Generation",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 7.92
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IMAGINE-E/Stable Diffusion 3/1771591481.616601#imagine_e#imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_3d_mesh_generation"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IMAGINE-E",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2501.13920"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Human evaluation scores for Text-to-Image models on the Watermark task, evaluating the ability to correctly generate images with watermarks in specified locations. The score is calculated based on aesthetic appeal, realism, safety, and text alignment, with a maximum of 10.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Human Score (out of 10)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Watermark Generation"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_watermark_generation",
+        "metric_name": "IMAGINE-E: Human Evaluation on Watermark Generation",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 8.33
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "IMAGINE-E/Stable Diffusion 3/1771591481.616601#imagine_e#imagine_e_human_evaluation_on_watermark_generation"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/03/39/033952ec-d81c-4ae7-97a2-01e462910ebb.json

@@ -0,0 +1,238 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "VisualPuzzles/Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "Carnegie Mellon University",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "image",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct",
+    "name": "Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "VisualPuzzles",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "VisualPuzzles",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2504.10342"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Overall accuracy of various Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) on the VISUALPUZZLES benchmark using Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting. VISUALPUZZLES is designed to evaluate multimodal reasoning while minimizing reliance on domain-specific knowledge. This metric represents the average performance across all five reasoning categories. Results are from Table 7 in the paper's appendix.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Overall Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Overall Performance on VISUALPUZZLES with Chain-of-Thought Prompting"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "overall_performance_on_visualpuzzles_with_chain_of_thought_prompting",
+        "metric_name": "Overall Performance on VISUALPUZZLES with Chain-of-Thought Prompting",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 34.9
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "VisualPuzzles/Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct/1771591481.616601#visualpuzzles#overall_performance_on_visualpuzzles_with_chain_of_thought_prompting"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "VisualPuzzles",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "VisualPuzzles",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2504.10342"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on the Analogical Reasoning subset of VISUALPUZZLES, which requires analyzing relationships between entities and applying them to new pairs. Models were evaluated using Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting. Results are from Table 7 in the paper's appendix.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Analogical Reasoning Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Analogical Reasoning on VISUALPUZZLES with CoT Prompting"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "analogical_reasoning_on_visualpuzzles_with_cot_prompting",
+        "metric_name": "Analogical Reasoning on VISUALPUZZLES with CoT Prompting",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 33.5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "VisualPuzzles/Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct/1771591481.616601#visualpuzzles#analogical_reasoning_on_visualpuzzles_with_cot_prompting"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "VisualPuzzles",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "VisualPuzzles",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2504.10342"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on the Deductive Reasoning subset of VISUALPUZZLES, which involves logically drawing specific conclusions from known premises. Models were evaluated using Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting. Results are from Table 7 in the paper's appendix.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Deductive Reasoning Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Deductive Reasoning on VISUALPUZZLES with CoT Prompting"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "deductive_reasoning_on_visualpuzzles_with_cot_prompting",
+        "metric_name": "Deductive Reasoning on VISUALPUZZLES with CoT Prompting",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 45.2
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "VisualPuzzles/Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct/1771591481.616601#visualpuzzles#deductive_reasoning_on_visualpuzzles_with_cot_prompting"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "VisualPuzzles",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "VisualPuzzles",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2504.10342"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on the Algorithmic Reasoning subset of VISUALPUZZLES, which involves reasoning over algorithmic rules or step-by-step procedures. Models were evaluated using Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting. Results are from Table 7 in the paper's appendix.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Algorithmic Reasoning Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Algorithmic Reasoning on VISUALPUZZLES with CoT Prompting"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "algorithmic_reasoning_on_visualpuzzles_with_cot_prompting",
+        "metric_name": "Algorithmic Reasoning on VISUALPUZZLES with CoT Prompting",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 39.9
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "VisualPuzzles/Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct/1771591481.616601#visualpuzzles#algorithmic_reasoning_on_visualpuzzles_with_cot_prompting"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "VisualPuzzles",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "VisualPuzzles",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2504.10342"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Overall accuracy of various MLLMs on the VISUALPUZZLES benchmark using direct multiple-choice prompting. This serves as a baseline to evaluate the impact of more complex reasoning strategies like Chain-of-Thought (CoT). Results are from Table 8 in the paper's appendix.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Overall Accuracy (%) - Direct Prompting",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Overall Performance on VISUALPUZZLES with Direct Prompting"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "overall_performance_on_visualpuzzles_with_direct_prompting",
+        "metric_name": "Overall Performance on VISUALPUZZLES with Direct Prompting",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 34.2
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "VisualPuzzles/Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct/1771591481.616601#visualpuzzles#overall_performance_on_visualpuzzles_with_direct_prompting"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "VisualPuzzles",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "VisualPuzzles",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2504.10342"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on the Spatial Reasoning subset of VISUALPUZZLES, which requires interpreting and manipulating spatial relationships, visualizing objects, and understanding orientations. Models were evaluated using Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting. Results are from Table 7 in the paper's appendix.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Spatial Reasoning Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Spatial Reasoning on VISUALPUZZLES with CoT Prompting"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "spatial_reasoning_on_visualpuzzles_with_cot_prompting",
+        "metric_name": "Spatial Reasoning on VISUALPUZZLES with CoT Prompting",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 32.4
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "VisualPuzzles/Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct/1771591481.616601#visualpuzzles#spatial_reasoning_on_visualpuzzles_with_cot_prompting"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "VisualPuzzles",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "VisualPuzzles",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2504.10342"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on the Inductive Reasoning subset of VISUALPUZZLES, which focuses on generalizing rules or patterns from observed instances. This was found to be a particularly challenging category for models. Models were evaluated using Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting. Results are from Table 7 in the paper's appendix.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Inductive Reasoning Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Inductive Reasoning on VISUALPUZZLES with CoT Prompting"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "inductive_reasoning_on_visualpuzzles_with_cot_prompting",
+        "metric_name": "Inductive Reasoning on VISUALPUZZLES with CoT Prompting",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 23.5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "VisualPuzzles/Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct/1771591481.616601#visualpuzzles#inductive_reasoning_on_visualpuzzles_with_cot_prompting"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/03/3a/033a82d9-4e2e-4bc8-8350-d0d1ab9ea0b2.json

@@ -0,0 +1,268 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "M4U/DeepSeek-VL/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "Chinese Academy of Sciences",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "image",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "DeepSeek-VL",
+    "name": "DeepSeek-VL",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "M4U",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "M4U",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2405.15638"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average zero-shot accuracy across Chinese, English, and German on the M4U benchmark. M4U is a challenging benchmark for evaluating multi-discipline multilingual multimodal understanding and reasoning in Large Multimodal Models (LMMs). This metric represents the main leaderboard and overall model performance. Results are sourced from the official project website's leaderboard, representing the most up-to-date figures.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Average Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "M4U Benchmark: Average Accuracy on Multilingual Multimodal Reasoning"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "m4u_benchmark_average_accuracy_on_multilingual_multimodal_reasoning",
+        "metric_name": "M4U Benchmark: Average Accuracy on Multilingual Multimodal Reasoning",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 31.3
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "M4U/DeepSeek-VL/1771591481.616601#m4u#m4u_benchmark_average_accuracy_on_multilingual_multimodal_reasoning"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "M4U",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "M4U",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2405.15638"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Zero-shot accuracy of models on the Chinese language subset of the M4U benchmark. This provides a language-specific breakdown of performance on multilingual multimodal reasoning tasks.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Chinese Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "M4U Benchmark: Chinese Language Performance"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "m4u_benchmark_chinese_language_performance",
+        "metric_name": "M4U Benchmark: Chinese Language Performance",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 30.4
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "M4U/DeepSeek-VL/1771591481.616601#m4u#m4u_benchmark_chinese_language_performance"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "M4U",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "M4U",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2405.15638"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average zero-shot accuracy on the cross-lingual subset of the M4U benchmark. This evaluation tests the models' ability to reason when key textual information within images is in one language (e.g., Chinese) while the question is posed in another (e.g., English or German), highlighting a significant challenge for current LMMs.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Average Cross-lingual Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "M4U Benchmark: Cross-Lingual Multimodal Reasoning"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "m4u_benchmark_cross_lingual_multimodal_reasoning",
+        "metric_name": "M4U Benchmark: Cross-Lingual Multimodal Reasoning",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 33.4
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "M4U/DeepSeek-VL/1771591481.616601#m4u#m4u_benchmark_cross_lingual_multimodal_reasoning"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "M4U",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "M4U",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2405.15638"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average zero-shot accuracy across Chinese, English, and German for questions in the Engineering domain from the M4U benchmark. This provides a subject-specific performance breakdown.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Engineering Average Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "M4U Benchmark: Performance on Engineering Domain"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "m4u_benchmark_performance_on_engineering_domain",
+        "metric_name": "M4U Benchmark: Performance on Engineering Domain",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 28.3
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "M4U/DeepSeek-VL/1771591481.616601#m4u#m4u_benchmark_performance_on_engineering_domain"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "M4U",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "M4U",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2405.15638"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Zero-shot accuracy of models on the English language subset of the M4U benchmark. This provides a language-specific breakdown of performance on multilingual multimodal reasoning tasks.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "English Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "M4U Benchmark: English Language Performance"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "m4u_benchmark_english_language_performance",
+        "metric_name": "M4U Benchmark: English Language Performance",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 32.8
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "M4U/DeepSeek-VL/1771591481.616601#m4u#m4u_benchmark_english_language_performance"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "M4U",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "M4U",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2405.15638"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Zero-shot accuracy of models on the German language subset of the M4U benchmark. This provides a language-specific breakdown of performance on multilingual multimodal reasoning tasks.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "German Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "M4U Benchmark: German Language Performance"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "m4u_benchmark_german_language_performance",
+        "metric_name": "M4U Benchmark: German Language Performance",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 30.8
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "M4U/DeepSeek-VL/1771591481.616601#m4u#m4u_benchmark_german_language_performance"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "M4U",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "M4U",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2405.15638"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average zero-shot accuracy across Chinese, English, and German for questions in the Health domain from the M4U benchmark. This provides a subject-specific performance breakdown.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Health Average Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "M4U Benchmark: Performance on Health Domain"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "m4u_benchmark_performance_on_health_domain",
+        "metric_name": "M4U Benchmark: Performance on Health Domain",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 37.77
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "M4U/DeepSeek-VL/1771591481.616601#m4u#m4u_benchmark_performance_on_health_domain"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "M4U",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "M4U",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2405.15638"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average zero-shot accuracy across Chinese, English, and German for questions in the Science domain from the M4U benchmark. This provides a subject-specific performance breakdown.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Science Average Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "M4U Benchmark: Performance on Science Domain"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "m4u_benchmark_performance_on_science_domain",
+        "metric_name": "M4U Benchmark: Performance on Science Domain",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 27.93
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "M4U/DeepSeek-VL/1771591481.616601#m4u#m4u_benchmark_performance_on_science_domain"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/03/3b/033b3adc-7276-49e4-a12c-303c7d61dee3.json

@@ -0,0 +1,208 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "SciFIBench/Google Multimodal Embedding/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "Google DeepMind",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "image",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "Google Multimodal Embedding",
+    "name": "Google Multimodal Embedding",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "SciFIBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "SciFIBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2405.08807"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the accuracy of models in selecting the correct caption for a given scientific figure from five options. This overall score is evaluated on the combined Computer Science (CS) and General subsets of the SciFIBench dataset.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%) - Overall Fig.→Cap.",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "SciFIBench: Overall Figure→Caption Accuracy"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "scifibench_overall_figure_caption_accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "SciFIBench: Overall Figure→Caption Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 37.9
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "SciFIBench/Google Multimodal Embedding/1771591481.616601#scifibench#scifibench_overall_figure_caption_accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "SciFIBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "SciFIBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2405.08807"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the accuracy of models in selecting the correct scientific figure for a given caption from five options, evaluated specifically on the Computer Science (CS) subset of the SciFIBench dataset.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%) - CS Cap.→Fig.",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "SciFIBench: Computer Science Caption→Figure Accuracy"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "scifibench_computer_science_caption_figure_accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "SciFIBench: Computer Science Caption→Figure Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 54.4
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "SciFIBench/Google Multimodal Embedding/1771591481.616601#scifibench#scifibench_computer_science_caption_figure_accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "SciFIBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "SciFIBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2405.08807"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the accuracy of models in selecting the correct caption for a given scientific figure from five options, evaluated specifically on the Computer Science (CS) subset of the SciFIBench dataset.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%) - CS Fig.→Cap.",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "SciFIBench: Computer Science Figure→Caption Accuracy"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "scifibench_computer_science_figure_caption_accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "SciFIBench: Computer Science Figure→Caption Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 47.6
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "SciFIBench/Google Multimodal Embedding/1771591481.616601#scifibench#scifibench_computer_science_figure_caption_accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "SciFIBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "SciFIBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2405.08807"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the accuracy of models in selecting the correct scientific figure for a given caption from five options, evaluated specifically on the General subset (non-Computer Science arXiv domains) of the SciFIBench dataset.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%) - General Cap.→Fig.",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "SciFIBench: General Science Caption→Figure Accuracy"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "scifibench_general_science_caption_figure_accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "SciFIBench: General Science Caption→Figure Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 28.4
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "SciFIBench/Google Multimodal Embedding/1771591481.616601#scifibench#scifibench_general_science_caption_figure_accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "SciFIBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "SciFIBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2405.08807"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the accuracy of models in selecting the correct caption for a given scientific figure from five options, evaluated specifically on the General subset (non-Computer Science arXiv domains) of the SciFIBench dataset.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%) - General Fig.→Cap.",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "SciFIBench: General Science Figure→Caption Accuracy"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "scifibench_general_science_figure_caption_accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "SciFIBench: General Science Figure→Caption Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 28.2
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "SciFIBench/Google Multimodal Embedding/1771591481.616601#scifibench#scifibench_general_science_figure_caption_accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "SciFIBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "SciFIBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2405.08807"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the accuracy of models in selecting the correct scientific figure for a given caption from five options. This overall score is evaluated on the combined Computer Science (CS) and General subsets of the SciFIBench dataset.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%) - Overall Cap.→Fig.",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "SciFIBench: Overall Caption→Figure Accuracy"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "scifibench_overall_caption_figure_accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "SciFIBench: Overall Caption→Figure Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 41.4
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "SciFIBench/Google Multimodal Embedding/1771591481.616601#scifibench#scifibench_overall_caption_figure_accuracy"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/03/3c/033c8a36-cda7-4405-914a-82809d34ab20.json

@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "VisualWebArena/CogVLM (Multimodal, SoM)/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "Carnegie Mellon University",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "image",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "CogVLM (Multimodal, SoM)",
+    "name": "CogVLM (Multimodal, SoM)",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "VisualWebArena",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "VisualWebArena",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2401.13649"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Overall success rate of various AI agents on the VisualWebArena benchmark, which evaluates performance on realistic, visually grounded web tasks across three environments: Classifieds, Reddit, and Shopping. Higher scores indicate better performance.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Success Rate (%) - Overall",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "VisualWebArena Overall Success Rate"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "visualwebarena_overall_success_rate",
+        "metric_name": "VisualWebArena Overall Success Rate",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.33
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "VisualWebArena/CogVLM (Multimodal, SoM)/1771591481.616601#visualwebarena#visualwebarena_overall_success_rate"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "VisualWebArena",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "VisualWebArena",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2401.13649"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Success rate of various AI agents on the Classifieds environment of the VisualWebArena benchmark. This environment involves tasks like posting, searching, and commenting on a marketplace website, which require visual understanding.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Success Rate (%) - Classifieds",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "VisualWebArena Success Rate on Classifieds Tasks"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "visualwebarena_success_rate_on_classifieds_tasks",
+        "metric_name": "VisualWebArena Success Rate on Classifieds Tasks",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "VisualWebArena/CogVLM (Multimodal, SoM)/1771591481.616601#visualwebarena#visualwebarena_success_rate_on_classifieds_tasks"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "VisualWebArena",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "VisualWebArena",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2401.13649"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Success rate of various AI agents on the Reddit environment of the VisualWebArena benchmark. Tasks in this environment are visually grounded and require interacting with a social media platform.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Success Rate (%) - Reddit",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "VisualWebArena Success Rate on Reddit Tasks"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "visualwebarena_success_rate_on_reddit_tasks",
+        "metric_name": "VisualWebArena Success Rate on Reddit Tasks",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.48
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "VisualWebArena/CogVLM (Multimodal, SoM)/1771591481.616601#visualwebarena#visualwebarena_success_rate_on_reddit_tasks"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "VisualWebArena",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "VisualWebArena",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2401.13649"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Success rate of various AI agents on the Shopping environment of the VisualWebArena benchmark. This environment tests agents on e-commerce tasks that depend on visual cues like product images and colors.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Success Rate (%) - Shopping",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "VisualWebArena Success Rate on Shopping Tasks"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "visualwebarena_success_rate_on_shopping_tasks",
+        "metric_name": "VisualWebArena Success Rate on Shopping Tasks",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.43
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "VisualWebArena/CogVLM (Multimodal, SoM)/1771591481.616601#visualwebarena#visualwebarena_success_rate_on_shopping_tasks"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/03/3d/033db36f-2faa-41be-8520-f3a18ab1b6d8.json

@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "C-Eval/玉言/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "Shanghai Jiao Tong University",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "text",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "玉言",
+    "name": "玉言",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "C-Eval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "C-Eval",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2305.08322"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Overall average accuracy on the C-Eval benchmark, which evaluates the Chinese language capabilities of Large Language Models across a wide range of academic and general knowledge subjects. This is the main ranking metric from the official C-Eval leaderboard, which aggregates performance across all 52 subjects. The leaderboard includes results from models with both open and limited access. Models marked with '*' were evaluated by the C-Eval team.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "C-Eval Leaderboard: Overall Average Accuracy"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "c_eval_leaderboard_overall_average_accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "C-Eval Leaderboard: Overall Average Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 44.3
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "C-Eval/玉言/1771591481.616601#c_eval#c_eval_leaderboard_overall_average_accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "C-Eval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "C-Eval",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2305.08322"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average accuracy on the C-EVAL HARD subset, which is composed of particularly challenging subjects requiring advanced reasoning (e.g., advanced mathematics, college physics). This metric from the official leaderboard is designed to differentiate the reasoning capabilities of the most powerful models. The leaderboard includes results from models with both open and limited access. Models marked with '*' were evaluated by the C-Eval team.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "C-Eval Leaderboard: Average Accuracy (Hard Subjects)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "c_eval_leaderboard_average_accuracy_hard_subjects",
+        "metric_name": "C-Eval Leaderboard: Average Accuracy (Hard Subjects)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 30.6
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "C-Eval/玉言/1771591481.616601#c_eval#c_eval_leaderboard_average_accuracy_hard_subjects"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/03/42/03420115-7b3e-4eac-8bf4-8ae8cca46fe4.json

@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "ChineseSimpleVQA/InterVL2.5-8B/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "Alibaba Group",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "image",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "InterVL2.5-8B",
+    "name": "InterVL2.5-8B",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "ChineseSimpleVQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "ChineseSimpleVQA",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://huggingface.co/datasets/OpenStellarTeam/Chinese-SimpleVQA"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "F-score on the final multi-hop questions (Merged Q&A) in the ChineseSimpleVQA benchmark. This task requires both correct visual object recognition and subsequent factual knowledge retrieval. F-score is the harmonic mean of Correctness (CO) and Correctness among Given Attempted (CGA).",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "F-score (%) - Merged Q&A",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "ChineseSimpleVQA: F-score on Merged (Multi-hop) Questions"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "chinesesimplevqa_f_score_on_merged_multi_hop_questions",
+        "metric_name": "ChineseSimpleVQA: F-score on Merged (Multi-hop) Questions",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 30
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "ChineseSimpleVQA/InterVL2.5-8B/1771591481.616601#chinesesimplevqa#chinesesimplevqa_f_score_on_merged_multi_hop_questions"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "ChineseSimpleVQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "ChineseSimpleVQA",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://huggingface.co/datasets/OpenStellarTeam/Chinese-SimpleVQA"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Correctness (CO) score on the final multi-hop questions (Merged Q&A) in the ChineseSimpleVQA benchmark. This metric measures the percentage of predicted answers that fully encompass the reference answer without contradictions.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Correctness (%) - Merged Q&A",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "ChineseSimpleVQA: Correctness on Merged (Multi-hop) Questions"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "chinesesimplevqa_correctness_on_merged_multi_hop_questions",
+        "metric_name": "ChineseSimpleVQA: Correctness on Merged (Multi-hop) Questions",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 28.4
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "ChineseSimpleVQA/InterVL2.5-8B/1771591481.616601#chinesesimplevqa#chinesesimplevqa_correctness_on_merged_multi_hop_questions"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "ChineseSimpleVQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "ChineseSimpleVQA",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://huggingface.co/datasets/OpenStellarTeam/Chinese-SimpleVQA"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Correctness (CO) score on the object recognition questions (Recognition Q&A) in the ChineseSimpleVQA benchmark. This metric measures the percentage of correctly identified objects from the images.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Correctness (%) - Recognition Q&A",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "ChineseSimpleVQA: Correctness on Recognition (Object ID) Questions"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "chinesesimplevqa_correctness_on_recognition_object_id_questions",
+        "metric_name": "ChineseSimpleVQA: Correctness on Recognition (Object ID) Questions",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 24.5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "ChineseSimpleVQA/InterVL2.5-8B/1771591481.616601#chinesesimplevqa#chinesesimplevqa_correctness_on_recognition_object_id_questions"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "ChineseSimpleVQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "ChineseSimpleVQA",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://huggingface.co/datasets/OpenStellarTeam/Chinese-SimpleVQA"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "F-score on the object recognition questions (Recognition Q&A) in the ChineseSimpleVQA benchmark. This task evaluates the model's fundamental visual perception and object identification capabilities, which is the first step in the multi-hop reasoning process.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "F-score (%) - Recognition Q&A",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "ChineseSimpleVQA: F-score on Recognition (Object ID) Questions"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "chinesesimplevqa_f_score_on_recognition_object_id_questions",
+        "metric_name": "ChineseSimpleVQA: F-score on Recognition (Object ID) Questions",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 26
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "ChineseSimpleVQA/InterVL2.5-8B/1771591481.616601#chinesesimplevqa#chinesesimplevqa_f_score_on_recognition_object_id_questions"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/03/46/0346acab-b5cb-4cdd-ae0b-d71b7e0daf93.json

@@ -0,0 +1,208 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "SciFIBench/Qwen-VL-Chat/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "Google DeepMind",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "image",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "Qwen-VL-Chat",
+    "name": "Qwen-VL-Chat",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "SciFIBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "SciFIBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2405.08807"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the accuracy of models in selecting the correct caption for a given scientific figure from five options. This overall score is evaluated on the combined Computer Science (CS) and General subsets of the SciFIBench dataset.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%) - Overall Fig.→Cap.",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "SciFIBench: Overall Figure→Caption Accuracy"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "scifibench_overall_figure_caption_accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "SciFIBench: Overall Figure→Caption Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 22.5
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "SciFIBench/Qwen-VL-Chat/1771591481.616601#scifibench#scifibench_overall_figure_caption_accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "SciFIBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "SciFIBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2405.08807"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the accuracy of models in selecting the correct scientific figure for a given caption from five options, evaluated specifically on the Computer Science (CS) subset of the SciFIBench dataset.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%) - CS Cap.→Fig.",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "SciFIBench: Computer Science Caption→Figure Accuracy"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "scifibench_computer_science_caption_figure_accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "SciFIBench: Computer Science Caption→Figure Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 16
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "SciFIBench/Qwen-VL-Chat/1771591481.616601#scifibench#scifibench_computer_science_caption_figure_accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "SciFIBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "SciFIBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2405.08807"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the accuracy of models in selecting the correct caption for a given scientific figure from five options, evaluated specifically on the Computer Science (CS) subset of the SciFIBench dataset.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%) - CS Fig.→Cap.",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "SciFIBench: Computer Science Figure→Caption Accuracy"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "scifibench_computer_science_figure_caption_accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "SciFIBench: Computer Science Figure→Caption Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 28
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "SciFIBench/Qwen-VL-Chat/1771591481.616601#scifibench#scifibench_computer_science_figure_caption_accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "SciFIBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "SciFIBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2405.08807"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the accuracy of models in selecting the correct scientific figure for a given caption from five options, evaluated specifically on the General subset (non-Computer Science arXiv domains) of the SciFIBench dataset.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%) - General Cap.→Fig.",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "SciFIBench: General Science Caption→Figure Accuracy"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "scifibench_general_science_caption_figure_accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "SciFIBench: General Science Caption→Figure Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 19.2
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "SciFIBench/Qwen-VL-Chat/1771591481.616601#scifibench#scifibench_general_science_caption_figure_accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "SciFIBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "SciFIBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2405.08807"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the accuracy of models in selecting the correct caption for a given scientific figure from five options, evaluated specifically on the General subset (non-Computer Science arXiv domains) of the SciFIBench dataset.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%) - General Fig.→Cap.",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "SciFIBench: General Science Figure→Caption Accuracy"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "scifibench_general_science_figure_caption_accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "SciFIBench: General Science Figure→Caption Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 17
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "SciFIBench/Qwen-VL-Chat/1771591481.616601#scifibench#scifibench_general_science_figure_caption_accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "SciFIBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "SciFIBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2405.08807"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the accuracy of models in selecting the correct scientific figure for a given caption from five options. This overall score is evaluated on the combined Computer Science (CS) and General subsets of the SciFIBench dataset.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%) - Overall Cap.→Fig.",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "SciFIBench: Overall Caption→Figure Accuracy"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "scifibench_overall_caption_figure_accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "SciFIBench: Overall Caption→Figure Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 17.6
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "SciFIBench/Qwen-VL-Chat/1771591481.616601#scifibench#scifibench_overall_caption_figure_accuracy"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/03/48/03484c1a-1ab0-4b87-9f0f-281319d90095.json

@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "BigCodeBench/Mistral Large/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "text",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "Mistral Large",
+    "name": "Mistral Large",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "BigCodeBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "BigCodeBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2406.15877"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the functional correctness (Pass@1) of code generated on the BigCodeBench-Instruct dataset (1,140 tasks). Unlike the 'Complete' version, 'Instruct' uses condensed, natural language prompts, testing a model's ability to infer requirements from less verbose human instructions. The score is calibrated to correct for 'model laziness' (e.g., missing imports).",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Calibrated Pass@1",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "BigCodeBench (Full-Instruct) Calibrated Pass@1"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "bigcodebench_full_instruct_calibrated_pass_1",
+        "metric_name": "BigCodeBench (Full-Instruct) Calibrated Pass@1",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.3
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "BigCodeBench/Mistral Large/1771591481.616601#bigcodebench#bigcodebench_full_instruct_calibrated_pass_1"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "BigCodeBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "BigCodeBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2406.15877"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the functional correctness (Pass@5) on the BigCodeBench-Complete dataset (1,140 tasks with structured docstrings). This metric is computed by generating N=5 samples with a temperature of 0.8 and top-p of 0.95, and assessing if at least one of the samples passes all test cases. It indicates a model's potential when allowed multiple attempts.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Pass@5",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "BigCodeBench (Full-Complete) Pass@5"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "bigcodebench_full_complete_pass_5",
+        "metric_name": "BigCodeBench (Full-Complete) Pass@5",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.539
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "BigCodeBench/Mistral Large/1771591481.616601#bigcodebench#bigcodebench_full_complete_pass_5"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/03/48/0348fb88-5221-4c4c-8168-f9f766519dda.json

@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "LiveCodeBench/CodeGemma-7b-Base/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "UC Berkeley",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "text",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "CodeGemma-7b-Base",
+    "name": "CodeGemma-7b-Base",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "LiveCodeBench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "LiveCodeBench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2403.07974"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Overall Pass@1 scores for the code generation task, as reported in the original paper. This evaluation uses a contamination-free subset of problems released after September 2023. The task assesses an LLM's ability to translate natural language descriptions into functional Python code.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Pass@1 (%) - Code Generation (Paper)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "LiveCodeBench: Code Generation Performance (Paper Results)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "livecodebench_code_generation_performance_paper_results",
+        "metric_name": "LiveCodeBench: Code Generation Performance (Paper Results)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 12.8
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "LiveCodeBench/CodeGemma-7b-Base/1771591481.616601#livecodebench#livecodebench_code_generation_performance_paper_results"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/03/4c/034c656c-80a3-4aa8-b2ee-baf9308596e3.json

@@ -0,0 +1,257 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "llm-stats/first_party/xai_grok-4.1-2025-11-17/1777108064.422824",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1777108064.422824",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "LLM Stats API: first_party scores",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "LLM Stats",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://llm-stats.com/",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "first_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "models_endpoint": "https://api.llm-stats.com/v1/models",
+      "benchmarks_endpoint": "https://api.llm-stats.com/leaderboard/benchmarks",
+      "scores_endpoint": "https://api.llm-stats.com/v1/scores",
+      "scores_endpoint_fallback": "https://api.llm-stats.com/leaderboard/benchmarks/{benchmark_id}",
+      "developer_page_url": "https://llm-stats.com/developer",
+      "attribution_url": "https://llm-stats.com/",
+      "attribution_required": "true",
+      "source_role": "aggregator"
+    }
+  },
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "LLM Stats",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "name": "Grok-4.1",
+    "id": "xai/grok-4.1-2025-11-17",
+    "developer": "xai",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "raw_id": "grok-4.1-2025-11-17",
+      "raw_name": "Grok-4.1",
+      "raw_model_id": "grok-4.1-2025-11-17",
+      "raw_model_name": "Grok-4.1",
+      "raw_organization_id": "xai",
+      "raw_organization_name": "xAI",
+      "raw_context_window": "256000",
+      "raw_input_cost_per_million": "3.0",
+      "raw_output_cost_per_million": "15.0",
+      "raw_release_date": "2025-11-17",
+      "raw_announcement_date": "2025-11-17",
+      "raw_multimodal": "true",
+      "raw_provider_slug": "xai",
+      "raw_provider_name": "xAI"
+    }
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_result_id": "creative-writing-v3::creative-writing-v3-grok-4.1-2025-11-17",
+      "evaluation_name": "llm_stats.creative-writing-v3",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "Creative Writing v3",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://llm-stats.com/models/grok-4.1-2025-11-17",
+          "https://llm-stats.com/benchmarks/creative-writing-v3",
+          "https://api.llm-stats.com/leaderboard/benchmarks/creative-writing-v3"
+        ],
+        "additional_details": {
+          "raw_benchmark_id": "creative-writing-v3",
+          "raw_model_id": "grok-4.1-2025-11-17",
+          "source_role": "aggregator"
+        }
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "EQ-Bench Creative Writing v3 is an LLM-judged creative writing benchmark that evaluates models across 32 writing prompts with 3 iterations per prompt. Uses a hybrid scoring system combining rubric assessment and Elo ratings through pairwise comparisons. Challenges models in areas like humor, romance, spatial awareness, and unique perspectives to assess emotional intelligence and creative writing capabilities.",
+        "metric_id": "llm_stats.creative-writing-v3.score",
+        "metric_name": "Creative Writing v3 score",
+        "metric_kind": "benchmark_score",
+        "metric_unit": "points",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1708.6,
+        "additional_details": {
+          "raw_benchmark_id": "creative-writing-v3",
+          "raw_score_field": "score",
+          "bound_strategy": "observed_value",
+          "raw_name": "Creative Writing v3",
+          "raw_categories": "[\"writing\",\"creativity\"]",
+          "raw_modality": "text",
+          "raw_verified": "false",
+          "raw_model_count": "13"
+        }
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 1708.6,
+        "details": {
+          "raw_score": "1708.6",
+          "raw_score_field": "score",
+          "raw_model_id": "grok-4.1-2025-11-17",
+          "raw_benchmark_id": "creative-writing-v3",
+          "source_urls_json": "[\"https://llm-stats.com/models/grok-4.1-2025-11-17\",\"https://llm-stats.com/benchmarks/creative-writing-v3\",\"https://api.llm-stats.com/leaderboard/benchmarks/creative-writing-v3\"]",
+          "raw_score_id": "creative-writing-v3::grok-4.1-2025-11-17",
+          "raw_provenance_label": "unknown",
+          "raw_verified": "false"
+        }
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_result_id": "eq-bench::eq-bench-grok-4.1-2025-11-17",
+      "evaluation_name": "llm_stats.eq-bench",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "EQ-Bench",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://llm-stats.com/models/grok-4.1-2025-11-17",
+          "https://llm-stats.com/benchmarks/eq-bench",
+          "https://api.llm-stats.com/leaderboard/benchmarks/eq-bench"
+        ],
+        "additional_details": {
+          "raw_benchmark_id": "eq-bench",
+          "raw_model_id": "grok-4.1-2025-11-17",
+          "source_role": "aggregator"
+        }
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "EQ-Bench is an LLM-judged test evaluating active emotional intelligence abilities, understanding, insight, empathy, and interpersonal skills. The test set contains 45 challenging roleplay scenarios, most of which constitute pre-written prompts spanning 3 turns. The benchmark evaluates the performance of models by validating responses against several criteria and conducts pairwise comparisons to report a normalized Elo computation for each model.",
+        "metric_id": "llm_stats.eq-bench.score",
+        "metric_name": "EQ-Bench score",
+        "metric_kind": "benchmark_score",
+        "metric_unit": "points",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1585.0,
+        "additional_details": {
+          "raw_benchmark_id": "eq-bench",
+          "raw_score_field": "score",
+          "bound_strategy": "observed_value",
+          "raw_name": "EQ-Bench",
+          "raw_categories": "[\"writing\",\"creativity\",\"general\",\"reasoning\",\"roleplay\"]",
+          "raw_modality": "text",
+          "raw_verified": "false",
+          "raw_model_count": "2"
+        }
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 1585.0,
+        "details": {
+          "raw_score": "1585.0",
+          "raw_score_field": "score",
+          "raw_model_id": "grok-4.1-2025-11-17",
+          "raw_benchmark_id": "eq-bench",
+          "source_urls_json": "[\"https://llm-stats.com/models/grok-4.1-2025-11-17\",\"https://llm-stats.com/benchmarks/eq-bench\",\"https://api.llm-stats.com/leaderboard/benchmarks/eq-bench\"]",
+          "raw_score_id": "eq-bench::grok-4.1-2025-11-17",
+          "raw_provenance_label": "unknown",
+          "raw_verified": "false"
+        }
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_result_id": "factscore::factscore-grok-4.1-2025-11-17",
+      "evaluation_name": "llm_stats.factscore",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "FActScore",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://llm-stats.com/models/grok-4.1-2025-11-17",
+          "https://llm-stats.com/benchmarks/factscore",
+          "https://api.llm-stats.com/leaderboard/benchmarks/factscore"
+        ],
+        "additional_details": {
+          "raw_benchmark_id": "factscore",
+          "raw_model_id": "grok-4.1-2025-11-17",
+          "source_role": "aggregator"
+        }
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "A fine-grained atomic evaluation metric for factual precision in long-form text generation that breaks generated text into atomic facts and computes the percentage supported by reliable knowledge sources, with automated assessment using retrieval and language models",
+        "metric_id": "llm_stats.factscore.score",
+        "metric_name": "FActScore score",
+        "metric_kind": "benchmark_score",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "additional_details": {
+          "raw_benchmark_id": "factscore",
+          "raw_score_field": "score",
+          "bound_strategy": "inferred_proportion",
+          "raw_name": "FActScore",
+          "raw_categories": "[\"reasoning\"]",
+          "raw_modality": "text",
+          "raw_verified": "false",
+          "raw_model_count": "2"
+        }
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.9703,
+        "details": {
+          "raw_score": "0.9703",
+          "raw_score_field": "score",
+          "raw_model_id": "grok-4.1-2025-11-17",
+          "raw_benchmark_id": "factscore",
+          "source_urls_json": "[\"https://llm-stats.com/models/grok-4.1-2025-11-17\",\"https://llm-stats.com/benchmarks/factscore\",\"https://api.llm-stats.com/leaderboard/benchmarks/factscore\"]",
+          "raw_score_id": "factscore::grok-4.1-2025-11-17",
+          "raw_provenance_label": "unknown",
+          "raw_verified": "false"
+        }
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_result_id": "lmarena-text::lmarena-text-grok-4.1-2025-11-17",
+      "evaluation_name": "llm_stats.lmarena-text",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "LMArena Text Leaderboard",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://llm-stats.com/models/grok-4.1-2025-11-17",
+          "https://llm-stats.com/benchmarks/lmarena-text",
+          "https://api.llm-stats.com/leaderboard/benchmarks/lmarena-text"
+        ],
+        "additional_details": {
+          "raw_benchmark_id": "lmarena-text",
+          "raw_model_id": "grok-4.1-2025-11-17",
+          "source_role": "aggregator"
+        }
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "LMArena Text Leaderboard is a blind human preference evaluation benchmark that ranks models based on pairwise comparisons in real-world conversations. The leaderboard uses Elo ratings computed from user preferences in head-to-head model battles, providing a comprehensive measure of overall model capability and style.",
+        "metric_id": "llm_stats.lmarena-text.score",
+        "metric_name": "LMArena Text Leaderboard score",
+        "metric_kind": "benchmark_score",
+        "metric_unit": "points",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1465.0,
+        "additional_details": {
+          "raw_benchmark_id": "lmarena-text",
+          "raw_score_field": "score",
+          "bound_strategy": "observed_value",
+          "raw_name": "LMArena Text Leaderboard",
+          "raw_categories": "[\"general\",\"reasoning\"]",
+          "raw_modality": "text",
+          "raw_verified": "false",
+          "raw_model_count": "2"
+        }
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 1465.0,
+        "details": {
+          "raw_score": "1465.0",
+          "raw_score_field": "score",
+          "raw_model_id": "grok-4.1-2025-11-17",
+          "raw_benchmark_id": "lmarena-text",
+          "source_urls_json": "[\"https://llm-stats.com/models/grok-4.1-2025-11-17\",\"https://llm-stats.com/benchmarks/lmarena-text\",\"https://api.llm-stats.com/leaderboard/benchmarks/lmarena-text\"]",
+          "raw_score_id": "lmarena-text::grok-4.1-2025-11-17",
+          "raw_provenance_label": "unknown",
+          "raw_verified": "false"
+        }
+      }
+    }
+  ]
+}

flat/objects/03/4d/034da237-557b-49df-91f9-5ef0f9834fd6.json

@@ -0,0 +1,238 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "CHAMP/GPT-4/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "Boston University",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "text",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "GPT-4",
+    "name": "GPT-4",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "CHAMP",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "CHAMP",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2401.06961"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Final Answer Accuracy (FAA) on the CHAMP benchmark when models are provided with the problem statement, relevant mathematical concepts, and problem-specific hints. This setting represents the main evaluation scenario using the benchmark's unique annotations to assist model reasoning.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Final Answer Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "CHAMP: Final Answer Accuracy with Concepts and Hints"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "champ_final_answer_accuracy_with_concepts_and_hints",
+        "metric_name": "CHAMP: Final Answer Accuracy with Concepts and Hints",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 52.9
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "CHAMP/GPT-4/1771591481.616601#champ#champ_final_answer_accuracy_with_concepts_and_hints"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "CHAMP",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "CHAMP",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2401.06961"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Final Answer Accuracy (FAA) on the CHAMP benchmark where models are given the first one-third of the ground-truth solution as a starting point. This tests the model's ability to continue and complete a reasoning chain.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Final Answer Accuracy (%) - 1/3 Partial Solution",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "CHAMP: Final Answer Accuracy with 1/3 Partial Solution"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "champ_final_answer_accuracy_with_1_3_partial_solution",
+        "metric_name": "CHAMP: Final Answer Accuracy with 1/3 Partial Solution",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 57
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "CHAMP/GPT-4/1771591481.616601#champ#champ_final_answer_accuracy_with_1_3_partial_solution"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "CHAMP",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "CHAMP",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2401.06961"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Final Answer Accuracy (FAA) on the CHAMP benchmark where models are given the first two-thirds of the ground-truth solution as a starting point. This tests the model's ability to complete a nearly finished reasoning chain.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Final Answer Accuracy (%) - 2/3 Partial Solution",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "CHAMP: Final Answer Accuracy with 2/3 Partial Solution"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "champ_final_answer_accuracy_with_2_3_partial_solution",
+        "metric_name": "CHAMP: Final Answer Accuracy with 2/3 Partial Solution",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 58.9
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "CHAMP/GPT-4/1771591481.616601#champ#champ_final_answer_accuracy_with_2_3_partial_solution"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "CHAMP",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "CHAMP",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2401.06961"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Final Answer Accuracy (FAA) on the CHAMP benchmark in a 5-shot setting, where models are provided with five example problems and their solutions before being asked to solve the target problem.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Final Answer Accuracy (%) - 5-shot",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "CHAMP: Final Answer Accuracy (5-shot)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "champ_final_answer_accuracy_5_shot",
+        "metric_name": "CHAMP: Final Answer Accuracy (5-shot)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 55.6
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "CHAMP/GPT-4/1771591481.616601#champ#champ_final_answer_accuracy_5_shot"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "CHAMP",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "CHAMP",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2401.06961"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Final Answer Accuracy (FAA) on the CHAMP benchmark in a zero-shot setting where models are only given the problem statement without any additional concepts or hints. This serves as a baseline for raw problem-solving capability.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Final Answer Accuracy (%) - Problem Only",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "CHAMP: Final Answer Accuracy (Problem Only)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "champ_final_answer_accuracy_problem_only",
+        "metric_name": "CHAMP: Final Answer Accuracy (Problem Only)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 54.4
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "CHAMP/GPT-4/1771591481.616601#champ#champ_final_answer_accuracy_problem_only"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "CHAMP",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "CHAMP",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2401.06961"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Full Solution Accuracy (FSA) on a subset of the CHAMP benchmark, measuring the percentage of problems where the entire reasoning process is correct, not just the final answer. Models were provided with concepts and hints. This metric highlights the significant gap between getting the right answer and having the right reasoning.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Full Solution Accuracy (%) - Problem + C & H",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "CHAMP: Full Solution Accuracy with Concepts and Hints"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "champ_full_solution_accuracy_with_concepts_and_hints",
+        "metric_name": "CHAMP: Full Solution Accuracy with Concepts and Hints",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 33.8
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "CHAMP/GPT-4/1771591481.616601#champ#champ_full_solution_accuracy_with_concepts_and_hints"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "CHAMP",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "CHAMP",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2401.06961"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Measures the ability of models to correctly identify an error-free ground-truth solution as having 'No Mistake'. A high score indicates good specificity, but the paper notes that for some models, this is due to a general inability to identify any errors at all, rather than true verification skill. The low scores for powerful models like GPT-4 highlight a tendency to hallucinate errors.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Correct 'No-Mistake' Judgments (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "CHAMP: Verification Accuracy on Error-Free Solutions"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "champ_verification_accuracy_on_error_free_solutions",
+        "metric_name": "CHAMP: Verification Accuracy on Error-Free Solutions",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 29.3
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "CHAMP/GPT-4/1771591481.616601#champ#champ_verification_accuracy_on_error_free_solutions"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/03/52/035299db-d9a4-47cd-8e70-917470d4806b.json

@@ -0,0 +1,298 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "KG-FPQ/Llama2-13B-Chat/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "Beijing Jiaotong University",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "text",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "Llama2-13B-Chat",
+    "name": "Llama2-13B-Chat",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "KG-FPQ",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "KG-FPQ",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2407.05868"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average accuracy of models on the generative task for False Premise Questions (FPQs) in the Art domain. Models are presented with a WH-question containing a false premise and must provide a free-form text response that identifies and corrects the premise. Accuracy is determined by the FPQ-Judge, an automated evaluator. This score is the average across six different 'confusability' levels of FPQs.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Average Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "KG-FPQ: Generative Task Average Accuracy on Art Domain FPQs"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "kg_fpq_generative_task_average_accuracy_on_art_domain_fpqs",
+        "metric_name": "KG-FPQ: Generative Task Average Accuracy on Art Domain FPQs",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.907
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "KG-FPQ/Llama2-13B-Chat/1771591481.616601#kg_fpq#kg_fpq_generative_task_average_accuracy_on_art_domain_fpqs"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "KG-FPQ",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "KG-FPQ",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2407.05868"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on the discriminative task in the Art domain for the Neighbor-Different-Concept (NDC) confusability level.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "KG-FPQ: Accuracy on Art Dis-NDC"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "kg_fpq_accuracy_on_art_dis_ndc",
+        "metric_name": "KG-FPQ: Accuracy on Art Dis-NDC",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.95
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "KG-FPQ/Llama2-13B-Chat/1771591481.616601#kg_fpq#kg_fpq_accuracy_on_art_dis_ndc"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "KG-FPQ",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "KG-FPQ",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2407.05868"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on the discriminative task in the Art domain for the Neighbor-Same-Concept (NSC) confusability level.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "KG-FPQ: Accuracy on Art Dis-NSC"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "kg_fpq_accuracy_on_art_dis_nsc",
+        "metric_name": "KG-FPQ: Accuracy on Art Dis-NSC",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.876
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "KG-FPQ/Llama2-13B-Chat/1771591481.616601#kg_fpq#kg_fpq_accuracy_on_art_dis_nsc"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "KG-FPQ",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "KG-FPQ",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2407.05868"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on the generative task in the Art domain for the Neighbor-Different-Concept (NDC) confusability level.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "KG-FPQ: Accuracy on Art Gen-NDC"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "kg_fpq_accuracy_on_art_gen_ndc",
+        "metric_name": "KG-FPQ: Accuracy on Art Gen-NDC",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.867
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "KG-FPQ/Llama2-13B-Chat/1771591481.616601#kg_fpq#kg_fpq_accuracy_on_art_gen_ndc"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "KG-FPQ",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "KG-FPQ",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2407.05868"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on the generative task in the Art domain for the Neighbor-Same-Concept (NSC) confusability level.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "KG-FPQ: Accuracy on Art Gen-NSC"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "kg_fpq_accuracy_on_art_gen_nsc",
+        "metric_name": "KG-FPQ: Accuracy on Art Gen-NSC",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.879
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "KG-FPQ/Llama2-13B-Chat/1771591481.616601#kg_fpq#kg_fpq_accuracy_on_art_gen_nsc"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "KG-FPQ",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "KG-FPQ",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2407.05868"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Baseline accuracy of models on Yes-No format True Premise Questions (TPQs) in the Art domain. This measures the models' inherent knowledge of the facts before being tested with false premises. A correct answer is 'Yes'.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "KG-FPQ: Baseline Accuracy on True Premise Questions (Art)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "kg_fpq_baseline_accuracy_on_true_premise_questions_art",
+        "metric_name": "KG-FPQ: Baseline Accuracy on True Premise Questions (Art)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.191
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "KG-FPQ/Llama2-13B-Chat/1771591481.616601#kg_fpq#kg_fpq_baseline_accuracy_on_true_premise_questions_art"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "KG-FPQ",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "KG-FPQ",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2407.05868"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Baseline accuracy of models on Yes-No format True Premise Questions (TPQs) in the People domain. This measures the models' inherent knowledge of the facts before being tested with false premises. A correct answer is 'Yes'.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "KG-FPQ: Baseline Accuracy on True Premise Questions (People)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "kg_fpq_baseline_accuracy_on_true_premise_questions_people",
+        "metric_name": "KG-FPQ: Baseline Accuracy on True Premise Questions (People)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.395
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "KG-FPQ/Llama2-13B-Chat/1771591481.616601#kg_fpq#kg_fpq_baseline_accuracy_on_true_premise_questions_people"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "KG-FPQ",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "KG-FPQ",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2407.05868"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average accuracy of models on the discriminative task for False Premise Questions (FPQs) in the Art domain. Models are presented with a Yes-No question containing a false premise and must correctly respond 'No' to indicate they have identified the fallacy. This score is the average across six different 'confusability' levels of FPQs.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Average Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "KG-FPQ: Discriminative Task Average Accuracy on Art Domain FPQs"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "kg_fpq_discriminative_task_average_accuracy_on_art_domain_fpqs",
+        "metric_name": "KG-FPQ: Discriminative Task Average Accuracy on Art Domain FPQs",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.952
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "KG-FPQ/Llama2-13B-Chat/1771591481.616601#kg_fpq#kg_fpq_discriminative_task_average_accuracy_on_art_domain_fpqs"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "KG-FPQ",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "KG-FPQ",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2407.05868"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Baseline accuracy of models on Yes-No format True Premise Questions (TPQs) in the Place domain. This measures the models' inherent knowledge of the facts before being tested with false premises. A correct answer is 'Yes'.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "KG-FPQ: Baseline Accuracy on True Premise Questions (Place)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "kg_fpq_baseline_accuracy_on_true_premise_questions_place",
+        "metric_name": "KG-FPQ: Baseline Accuracy on True Premise Questions (Place)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.343
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "KG-FPQ/Llama2-13B-Chat/1771591481.616601#kg_fpq#kg_fpq_baseline_accuracy_on_true_premise_questions_place"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/03/54/0354ca51-a799-40d8-a146-c9d0f3fed946.json

@@ -0,0 +1,208 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "GridPuzzle/Claude-3-Opus/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "Arizona State University",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "text",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "Claude-3-Opus",
+    "name": "Claude-3-Opus",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "GridPuzzle",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "GridPuzzle",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2407.14790"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Evaluation of Large Language Models on the GridPuzzle benchmark using the PuzzleEval metric. PuzzleEval measures the average correctness of each step in an LLM's reasoning chain, offering a reference-free assessment of logical deduction quality. This metric provides a more nuanced view than final answer accuracy, capturing partial correctness in the reasoning process. Scores are averaged across all puzzle sizes.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "PuzzleEval (Avg. Correctness Score)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "True",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Average Correctness Score (ACS) on the GridPuzzle Benchmark"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "average_correctness_score_acs_on_the_gridpuzzle_benchmark",
+        "metric_name": "Average Correctness Score (ACS) on the GridPuzzle Benchmark",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.54
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "GridPuzzle/Claude-3-Opus/1771591481.616601#gridpuzzle#average_correctness_score_acs_on_the_gridpuzzle_benchmark"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "GridPuzzle",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "GridPuzzle",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2407.14790"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average Correctness Score (ACS) for models on the 3x4 grid size puzzles from the GridPuzzle benchmark. This metric evaluates the step-by-step reasoning quality on the simplest puzzle configuration.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "PuzzleEval (ACS) - 3x4 Grid",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "PuzzleEval ACS on GridPuzzle (3x4 Grid)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "puzzleeval_acs_on_gridpuzzle_3x4_grid",
+        "metric_name": "PuzzleEval ACS on GridPuzzle (3x4 Grid)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.6
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "GridPuzzle/Claude-3-Opus/1771591481.616601#gridpuzzle#puzzleeval_acs_on_gridpuzzle_3x4_grid"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "GridPuzzle",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "GridPuzzle",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2407.14790"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average Correctness Score (ACS) for models on the 3x5 grid size puzzles from the GridPuzzle benchmark, evaluating step-by-step reasoning quality.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "PuzzleEval (ACS) - 3x5 Grid",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "PuzzleEval ACS on GridPuzzle (3x5 Grid)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "puzzleeval_acs_on_gridpuzzle_3x5_grid",
+        "metric_name": "PuzzleEval ACS on GridPuzzle (3x5 Grid)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.56
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "GridPuzzle/Claude-3-Opus/1771591481.616601#gridpuzzle#puzzleeval_acs_on_gridpuzzle_3x5_grid"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "GridPuzzle",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "GridPuzzle",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2407.14790"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average Correctness Score (ACS) for models on the 4x5 grid size puzzles from the GridPuzzle benchmark, evaluating step-by-step reasoning quality.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "PuzzleEval (ACS) - 4x5 Grid",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "PuzzleEval ACS on GridPuzzle (4x5 Grid)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "puzzleeval_acs_on_gridpuzzle_4x5_grid",
+        "metric_name": "PuzzleEval ACS on GridPuzzle (4x5 Grid)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.55
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "GridPuzzle/Claude-3-Opus/1771591481.616601#gridpuzzle#puzzleeval_acs_on_gridpuzzle_4x5_grid"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "GridPuzzle",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "GridPuzzle",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2407.14790"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average Correctness Score (ACS) for models on the 4x6 grid size puzzles from the GridPuzzle benchmark. This metric evaluates the step-by-step reasoning quality on the most complex puzzle configuration.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "PuzzleEval (ACS) - 4x6 Grid",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "PuzzleEval ACS on GridPuzzle (4x6 Grid)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "puzzleeval_acs_on_gridpuzzle_4x6_grid",
+        "metric_name": "PuzzleEval ACS on GridPuzzle (4x6 Grid)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.46
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "GridPuzzle/Claude-3-Opus/1771591481.616601#gridpuzzle#puzzleeval_acs_on_gridpuzzle_4x6_grid"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "GridPuzzle",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "GridPuzzle",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2407.14790"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "Average Correctness Score (ACS) for models on the 4x4 grid size puzzles from the GridPuzzle benchmark, evaluating step-by-step reasoning quality.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "PuzzleEval (ACS) - 4x4 Grid",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "PuzzleEval ACS on GridPuzzle (4x4 Grid)"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "puzzleeval_acs_on_gridpuzzle_4x4_grid",
+        "metric_name": "PuzzleEval ACS on GridPuzzle (4x4 Grid)",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.52
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "GridPuzzle/Claude-3-Opus/1771591481.616601#gridpuzzle#puzzleeval_acs_on_gridpuzzle_4x4_grid"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/03/54/0354fd88-4825-4456-af3e-afaa3ef02b2b.json

@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "CodeXGLUE/UniXcoder-nine-MLP/1771591481.616601",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1771591481.616601",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "alphaXiv State of the Art",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "alphaXiv",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://alphaxiv.org",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_org": "Sun Yat-Sen University",
+      "alphaxiv_dataset_type": "text",
+      "scrape_source": "https://github.com/alphaXiv/feedback/issues/189"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "id": "UniXcoder-nine-MLP",
+    "name": "UniXcoder-nine-MLP",
+    "developer": "unknown"
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "CodeXGLUE",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "CodeXGLUE",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2102.04664"
+        ]
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "evaluation_description": "This task evaluates a model's ability to identify if a source code function contains defects (e.g., vulnerabilities). Performance is measured by classification accuracy on the Devign dataset. Higher accuracy indicates better performance.",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "alphaxiv_y_axis": "Accuracy (%)",
+          "alphaxiv_is_primary": "False",
+          "raw_evaluation_name": "Defect Detection Accuracy on Devign Dataset"
+        },
+        "metric_id": "defect_detection_accuracy_on_devign_dataset",
+        "metric_name": "Defect Detection Accuracy on Devign Dataset",
+        "metric_kind": "score",
+        "metric_unit": "points"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 69.29
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "CodeXGLUE/UniXcoder-nine-MLP/1771591481.616601#codexglue#defect_detection_accuracy_on_devign_dataset"
+    }
+  ],
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "alphaxiv",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  }
+}

flat/objects/03/5b/035b84ad-84c0-412e-81d2-22e77c5e2410.json

@@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "hfopenllm_v2/ontocord_ontocord_wide_7b-stacked-stage1/1773936498.240187",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1773936498.240187",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "HF Open LLM v2",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "Hugging Face",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party"
+  },
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "lm-evaluation-harness",
+    "version": "0.4.0",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "fork": "https://github.com/huggingface/lm-evaluation-harness/tree/adding_all_changess"
+    }
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "name": "ontocord_wide_7b-stacked-stage1",
+    "id": "ontocord/ontocord_wide_7b-stacked-stage1",
+    "developer": "ontocord",
+    "inference_platform": "unknown",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "precision": "float16",
+      "architecture": "Qwen2ForCausalLM",
+      "params_billions": "7.888"
+    }
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "IFEval",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "IFEval",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "google/IFEval"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on IFEval",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.1485
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/ontocord_ontocord_wide_7b-stacked-stage1/1773936498.240187#ifeval#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "BBH",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "BBH",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "SaylorTwift/bbh"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on BBH",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.2897
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/ontocord_ontocord_wide_7b-stacked-stage1/1773936498.240187#bbh#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MATH Level 5",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MATH Level 5",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "DigitalLearningGmbH/MATH-lighteval"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Exact Match on MATH Level 5",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "exact_match",
+        "metric_name": "Exact Match",
+        "metric_kind": "exact_match",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.0091
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/ontocord_ontocord_wide_7b-stacked-stage1/1773936498.240187#math_level_5#exact_match"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "GPQA",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "GPQA",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "Idavidrein/gpqa"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on GPQA",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.2534
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/ontocord_ontocord_wide_7b-stacked-stage1/1773936498.240187#gpqa#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MUSR",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MUSR",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "TAUR-Lab/MuSR"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on MUSR",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.3604
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/ontocord_ontocord_wide_7b-stacked-stage1/1773936498.240187#musr#accuracy"
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_name": "MMLU-PRO",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MMLU-PRO",
+        "source_type": "hf_dataset",
+        "hf_repo": "TIGER-Lab/MMLU-Pro"
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy on MMLU-PRO",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 1.0,
+        "metric_id": "accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "proportion"
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 0.1105
+      },
+      "evaluation_result_id": "hfopenllm_v2/ontocord_ontocord_wide_7b-stacked-stage1/1773936498.240187#mmlu_pro#accuracy"
+    }
+  ]
+}

flat/objects/03/5b/035bd326-b5c6-463c-9cd6-f504483eba9b.json

@@ -0,0 +1,222 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "vals-ai/mortgage_tax/alibaba_qwen3.5-flash/1777395187.3170502",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1777395187.3170502",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "Vals.ai Leaderboard - MortgageTax",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "Vals.ai",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://www.vals.ai",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "benchmark_slug": "mortgage_tax",
+      "benchmark_name": "MortgageTax",
+      "benchmark_updated": "2026-04-24",
+      "dataset_type": "private",
+      "industry": "finance",
+      "leaderboard_page_url": "https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/mortgage_tax",
+      "extraction_method": "static_astro_benchmark_view_props"
+    }
+  },
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "Vals.ai",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "name": "qwen3.5-flash",
+    "id": "alibaba/qwen3.5-flash",
+    "developer": "alibaba",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "vals_model_id": "alibaba/qwen3.5-flash",
+      "vals_provider": "Alibaba"
+    }
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_result_id": "mortgage_tax:numerical_extraction:alibaba/qwen3.5-flash:score",
+      "evaluation_name": "vals_ai.mortgage_tax.numerical_extraction",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MortgageTax - Numerical Extraction",
+        "source_type": "other",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "benchmark_slug": "mortgage_tax",
+          "task_key": "numerical_extraction",
+          "dataset_type": "private",
+          "leaderboard_page_url": "https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/mortgage_tax"
+        }
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy reported by Vals.ai for MortgageTax (Numerical Extraction).",
+        "metric_id": "vals_ai.mortgage_tax.numerical_extraction.accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "percent",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "additional_details": {
+          "score_scale": "percent_0_to_100",
+          "max_score_source": "fixed_percentage_bound",
+          "leaderboard_page_url": "https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/mortgage_tax"
+        }
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 74.96,
+        "details": {
+          "benchmark_slug": "mortgage_tax",
+          "benchmark_name": "MortgageTax",
+          "benchmark_updated": "2026-04-24",
+          "task_key": "numerical_extraction",
+          "task_name": "Numerical Extraction",
+          "dataset_type": "private",
+          "industry": "finance",
+          "raw_score": "74.96",
+          "raw_stderr": "1.222",
+          "latency": "48.322",
+          "cost_per_test": "0.002844",
+          "temperature": "1",
+          "max_output_tokens": "65536",
+          "provider": "Alibaba"
+        },
+        "uncertainty": {
+          "standard_error": {
+            "value": 1.222,
+            "method": "vals_reported"
+          }
+        }
+      },
+      "generation_config": {
+        "generation_args": {
+          "temperature": 1.0,
+          "max_tokens": 65536,
+          "max_attempts": 1
+        }
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_result_id": "mortgage_tax:overall:alibaba/qwen3.5-flash:score",
+      "evaluation_name": "vals_ai.mortgage_tax.overall",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MortgageTax - Overall",
+        "source_type": "other",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "benchmark_slug": "mortgage_tax",
+          "task_key": "overall",
+          "dataset_type": "private",
+          "leaderboard_page_url": "https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/mortgage_tax"
+        }
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy reported by Vals.ai for MortgageTax (Overall).",
+        "metric_id": "vals_ai.mortgage_tax.overall.accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "percent",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "additional_details": {
+          "score_scale": "percent_0_to_100",
+          "max_score_source": "fixed_percentage_bound",
+          "leaderboard_page_url": "https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/mortgage_tax"
+        }
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 67.368,
+        "details": {
+          "benchmark_slug": "mortgage_tax",
+          "benchmark_name": "MortgageTax",
+          "benchmark_updated": "2026-04-24",
+          "task_key": "overall",
+          "task_name": "Overall",
+          "dataset_type": "private",
+          "industry": "finance",
+          "raw_score": "67.368",
+          "raw_stderr": "0.922",
+          "latency": "36.822",
+          "cost_per_test": "0.002158",
+          "temperature": "1",
+          "max_output_tokens": "65536",
+          "provider": "Alibaba"
+        },
+        "uncertainty": {
+          "standard_error": {
+            "value": 0.922,
+            "method": "vals_reported"
+          }
+        }
+      },
+      "generation_config": {
+        "generation_args": {
+          "temperature": 1.0,
+          "max_tokens": 65536,
+          "max_attempts": 1
+        }
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_result_id": "mortgage_tax:semantic_extraction:alibaba/qwen3.5-flash:score",
+      "evaluation_name": "vals_ai.mortgage_tax.semantic_extraction",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "MortgageTax - Semantic Extraction",
+        "source_type": "other",
+        "additional_details": {
+          "benchmark_slug": "mortgage_tax",
+          "task_key": "semantic_extraction",
+          "dataset_type": "private",
+          "leaderboard_page_url": "https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/mortgage_tax"
+        }
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy reported by Vals.ai for MortgageTax (Semantic Extraction).",
+        "metric_id": "vals_ai.mortgage_tax.semantic_extraction.accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "percent",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "additional_details": {
+          "score_scale": "percent_0_to_100",
+          "max_score_source": "fixed_percentage_bound",
+          "leaderboard_page_url": "https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/mortgage_tax"
+        }
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 59.777,
+        "details": {
+          "benchmark_slug": "mortgage_tax",
+          "benchmark_name": "MortgageTax",
+          "benchmark_updated": "2026-04-24",
+          "task_key": "semantic_extraction",
+          "task_name": "Semantic Extraction",
+          "dataset_type": "private",
+          "industry": "finance",
+          "raw_score": "59.777",
+          "raw_stderr": "1.382",
+          "latency": "25.322",
+          "cost_per_test": "0.001473",
+          "temperature": "1",
+          "max_output_tokens": "65536",
+          "provider": "Alibaba"
+        },
+        "uncertainty": {
+          "standard_error": {
+            "value": 1.382,
+            "method": "vals_reported"
+          }
+        }
+      },
+      "generation_config": {
+        "generation_args": {
+          "temperature": 1.0,
+          "max_tokens": 65536,
+          "max_attempts": 1
+        }
+      }
+    }
+  ]
+}

flat/objects/03/5c/035c5ef9-bcb1-46f5-8d6c-5e3dda13312d.json

@@ -0,0 +1,225 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "0.2.2",
+  "evaluation_id": "vals-ai/aime/cohere_command-a-03-2025/1777395187.3170502",
+  "retrieved_timestamp": "1777395187.3170502",
+  "source_metadata": {
+    "source_name": "Vals.ai Leaderboard - AIME",
+    "source_type": "documentation",
+    "source_organization_name": "Vals.ai",
+    "source_organization_url": "https://www.vals.ai",
+    "evaluator_relationship": "third_party",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "benchmark_slug": "aime",
+      "benchmark_name": "AIME",
+      "benchmark_updated": "2026-04-16",
+      "dataset_type": "public",
+      "industry": "math",
+      "leaderboard_page_url": "https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/aime",
+      "extraction_method": "static_astro_benchmark_view_props"
+    }
+  },
+  "eval_library": {
+    "name": "Vals.ai",
+    "version": "unknown"
+  },
+  "model_info": {
+    "name": "command-a-03-2025",
+    "id": "cohere/command-a-03-2025",
+    "developer": "cohere",
+    "additional_details": {
+      "vals_model_id": "cohere/command-a-03-2025",
+      "vals_provider": "Cohere"
+    }
+  },
+  "evaluation_results": [
+    {
+      "evaluation_result_id": "aime:aime_2024:cohere/command-a-03-2025:score",
+      "evaluation_name": "vals_ai.aime.aime_2024",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "AIME - AIME 2024",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/aime"
+        ],
+        "additional_details": {
+          "benchmark_slug": "aime",
+          "task_key": "aime_2024",
+          "dataset_type": "public",
+          "leaderboard_page_url": "https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/aime"
+        }
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy reported by Vals.ai for AIME (AIME 2024).",
+        "metric_id": "vals_ai.aime.aime_2024.accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "percent",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "additional_details": {
+          "score_scale": "percent_0_to_100",
+          "max_score_source": "fixed_percentage_bound",
+          "leaderboard_page_url": "https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/aime"
+        }
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 15.0,
+        "details": {
+          "benchmark_slug": "aime",
+          "benchmark_name": "AIME",
+          "benchmark_updated": "2026-04-16",
+          "task_key": "aime_2024",
+          "task_name": "AIME 2024",
+          "dataset_type": "public",
+          "industry": "math",
+          "raw_score": "15",
+          "raw_stderr": "1.543",
+          "latency": "23.494",
+          "cost_per_test": "0.012986",
+          "temperature": "0.3",
+          "provider": "Cohere"
+        },
+        "uncertainty": {
+          "standard_error": {
+            "value": 1.543,
+            "method": "vals_reported"
+          }
+        }
+      },
+      "generation_config": {
+        "generation_args": {
+          "temperature": 0.3,
+          "max_attempts": 1
+        }
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_result_id": "aime:aime_2025:cohere/command-a-03-2025:score",
+      "evaluation_name": "vals_ai.aime.aime_2025",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "AIME - AIME 2025",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/aime"
+        ],
+        "additional_details": {
+          "benchmark_slug": "aime",
+          "task_key": "aime_2025",
+          "dataset_type": "public",
+          "leaderboard_page_url": "https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/aime"
+        }
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy reported by Vals.ai for AIME (AIME 2025).",
+        "metric_id": "vals_ai.aime.aime_2025.accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "percent",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "additional_details": {
+          "score_scale": "percent_0_to_100",
+          "max_score_source": "fixed_percentage_bound",
+          "leaderboard_page_url": "https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/aime"
+        }
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 11.667,
+        "details": {
+          "benchmark_slug": "aime",
+          "benchmark_name": "AIME",
+          "benchmark_updated": "2026-04-16",
+          "task_key": "aime_2025",
+          "task_name": "AIME 2025",
+          "dataset_type": "public",
+          "industry": "math",
+          "raw_score": "11.667",
+          "raw_stderr": "1.091",
+          "latency": "23.196",
+          "cost_per_test": "0.010479",
+          "temperature": "0.3",
+          "provider": "Cohere"
+        },
+        "uncertainty": {
+          "standard_error": {
+            "value": 1.091,
+            "method": "vals_reported"
+          }
+        }
+      },
+      "generation_config": {
+        "generation_args": {
+          "temperature": 0.3,
+          "max_attempts": 1
+        }
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "evaluation_result_id": "aime:overall:cohere/command-a-03-2025:score",
+      "evaluation_name": "vals_ai.aime.overall",
+      "source_data": {
+        "dataset_name": "AIME - Overall",
+        "source_type": "url",
+        "url": [
+          "https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/aime"
+        ],
+        "additional_details": {
+          "benchmark_slug": "aime",
+          "task_key": "overall",
+          "dataset_type": "public",
+          "leaderboard_page_url": "https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/aime"
+        }
+      },
+      "metric_config": {
+        "evaluation_description": "Accuracy reported by Vals.ai for AIME (Overall).",
+        "metric_id": "vals_ai.aime.overall.accuracy",
+        "metric_name": "Accuracy",
+        "metric_kind": "accuracy",
+        "metric_unit": "percent",
+        "lower_is_better": false,
+        "score_type": "continuous",
+        "min_score": 0.0,
+        "max_score": 100.0,
+        "additional_details": {
+          "score_scale": "percent_0_to_100",
+          "max_score_source": "fixed_percentage_bound",
+          "leaderboard_page_url": "https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/aime"
+        }
+      },
+      "score_details": {
+        "score": 13.333,
+        "details": {
+          "benchmark_slug": "aime",
+          "benchmark_name": "AIME",
+          "benchmark_updated": "2026-04-16",
+          "task_key": "overall",
+          "task_name": "Overall",
+          "dataset_type": "public",
+          "industry": "math",
+          "raw_score": "13.333",
+          "raw_stderr": "0.945",
+          "latency": "23.345",
+          "cost_per_test": "0.011732",
+          "temperature": "0.3",
+          "provider": "Cohere"
+        },
+        "uncertainty": {
+          "standard_error": {
+            "value": 0.945,
+            "method": "vals_reported"
+          }
+        }
+      },
+      "generation_config": {
+        "generation_args": {
+          "temperature": 0.3,
+          "max_attempts": 1
+        }
+      }
+    }
+  ]
+}