Datasets:
File size: 4,347 Bytes
64fe538 e822a68 61c7bba e822a68 61c7bba e822a68 61c7bba e822a68 61c7bba 64fe538 e822a68 be26b40 e822a68 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 | ---
license: apache-2.0
task_categories:
- text-generation
language:
- en
tags:
- comedy
- stand-up
- humor
- dpo
- sft
- funny
size_categories:
- 10K<n<100K
dataset_info:
features:
- name: text
dtype: string
- name: source
dtype: string
splits:
- name: train
num_bytes: 64671620
num_examples: 369940
- name: test
num_bytes: 1321826
num_examples: 7550
download_size: 37816655
dataset_size: 65993446
configs:
- config_name: default
data_files:
- split: train
path: data/train-*
- split: test
path: data/test-*
---
# FunnyBench: Stand-Up Comedy Dataset for LLM Training
LLMs aren't funny. This initiative tries to solve that. A curated dataset of **24,438 stand-up comedy transcripts** with engagement metrics, designed for teaching LLMs to generate funny content. Shout out to Shofo (https://www.shofo.ai/) for providing the dataset for free for public use!
## Dataset Splits
### SFT (Supervised Fine-Tuning)
- **23,216 train** / **1,222 test** examples
- Chat format with quality-tier conditioning
- Fields: `messages`, `tier`, `engagement_rate`, `like_count`, `play_count`, `duration_seconds`, `video_id`, `author`
```python
from datasets import load_dataset
ds = load_dataset("fchaubard/funny_bench", "sft")
```
### DPO (Direct Preference Optimization)
- **11,607 train** / **611 test** preference pairs
- Pairs matched by duration bucket
- "Chosen" = higher engagement rate, "Rejected" = lower engagement rate
- Fields: `prompt`, `chosen`, `rejected`, `chosen_engagement`, `rejected_engagement`
```python
from datasets import load_dataset
ds = load_dataset("fchaubard/funny_bench", "dpo")
```
## Source Data
- **29,729 TikTok stand-up comedy clips** (pre-filtered: 10,000+ likes, English, standup hashtags)
- Transcribed using NVIDIA Canary-Qwen 2.5B
- Speaker diarization via NVIDIA NeMo MSDD
- Labels: `[COMEDIAN]`, `[AUDIENCE]`, `[LAUGHTER]`
## Cleaning Pipeline
| Filter | Threshold | Dropped |
|--------|-----------|---------|
| Transcript length | 80-12,000 chars | 1,163 |
| Duration | 15-300 seconds | 2,098 |
| Word repetition score | <= 0.55 | 1,954 |
| Unique word count | >= 15 | 54 |
| ASR garbage detection | trigram loops | 22 |
| **Total removed** | | **5,291 (17.8%)** |
| **Clean dataset** | | **24,438 (82.2%)** |
## Quality Tiers (SFT)
Each SFT example has a quality tier based on engagement rate (likes/views):
| Tier | Percentile | Engagement Rate | Count |
|------|-----------|----------------|-------|
| `[LEGENDARY]` | Top 5% | > 21.8% | 1,222 |
| `[KILLER]` | 75-95th | 14.7-21.8% | 4,888 |
| `[SOLID]` | 50-75th | 10.8-14.7% | 6,109 |
| `[WARMING_UP]` | Bottom 50% | < 10.8% | 12,219 |
At inference, prompt with `[LEGENDARY]` to generate top-tier comedy.
## Why Engagement Rate?
Raw like counts are dominated by virality and follower counts. The engagement rate (likes/views) better captures per-viewer funniness. A clip with 1M views and 200K likes (20%) is funnier per-viewer than one with 100M views and 5M likes (5%).
## SFT Format
```json
{
"messages": [
{"role": "system", "content": "You are a stand-up comedian performing a live set..."},
{"role": "user", "content": "[LEGENDARY] Perform a stand-up comedy bit."},
{"role": "assistant", "content": "[COMEDIAN]: So where are you from?\n[AUDIENCE]: Texas!\n[COMEDIAN]: Texas? Oh man...\n[LAUGHTER]"}
],
"tier": "LEGENDARY",
"engagement_rate": 0.22,
"like_count": 500000,
"play_count": 2200000
}
```
## DPO Format
```json
{
"prompt": [
{"role": "system", "content": "You are a stand-up comedian..."},
{"role": "user", "content": "Perform a stand-up comedy bit."}
],
"chosen": [{"role": "assistant", "content": "...funnier transcript..."}],
"rejected": [{"role": "assistant", "content": "...less funny transcript..."}],
"chosen_engagement": 0.18,
"rejected_engagement": 0.05
}
```
## Limitations
- ASR artifacts from NVIDIA Canary-Qwen 2.5B transcription
- Comedy depends heavily on delivery and timing that text can't capture
- TikTok bias toward short-form, punchy comedy
- Engagement != funny (controversy and relatability also drive engagement)
## Citation
If you use this dataset, please cite:
```
@misc{funnybench2026,
title={FunnyBench: Teaching LLMs Stand-Up Comedy with Engagement-Based Preference Learning},
year={2026}
}
```
|