--- dataset_info: features: - name: name dtype: string - name: seq dtype: string - name: tertiary sequence: sequence: float64 - name: valid_mask sequence: bool - name: metadata struct: - name: contact_density dtype: float64 - name: has_valid_structure dtype: bool - name: invalid_residues dtype: int64 - name: long_range_contacts dtype: int64 - name: medium_range_contacts dtype: int64 - name: seq_length dtype: int64 - name: short_range_contacts dtype: int64 - name: token_count dtype: int64 - name: tokenization_ratio dtype: float64 - name: total_contacts dtype: int64 - name: valid_residues dtype: int64 splits: - name: train num_bytes: 169570266 num_examples: 25299 - name: validation num_bytes: 1350998 num_examples: 224 - name: test num_bytes: 356465 num_examples: 40 download_size: 96822838 dataset_size: 171277729 configs: - config_name: default data_files: - split: train path: data/train-* - split: validation path: data/validation-* - split: test path: data/test-* --- ## Background ### What is Protein Contact Prediction? Protein contact prediction is a fundamental task in computational biology that aims to predict which amino acid residues in a protein sequence are in close spatial proximity (typically within 8Å) in the protein's 3D structure. This information is crucial for: - **Protein structure prediction** - **Understanding protein folding mechanisms** - **Drug discovery and design** - **Evolutionary analysis** ### Linear Probing for Protein Language Models Linear probing is a technique used to evaluate the quality of learned representations from pre-trained language models. In the context of protein language models (PLMs): 1. **Freeze** the pre-trained model parameters 2. **Train** only a simple linear classifier on top of the frozen embeddings 3. **Evaluate** how well the linear classifier performs on downstream tasks This approach helps assess the quality of protein representations learned by different PLMs without the confounding effects of fine-tuning the entire model. ## Task Definition ### Contact Map Generation | Parameter | Value | Description | |-----------|--------|-------------| | **Distance Threshold** | 8.0 Å | Distance between Cα atoms | | **Sequence Separation** | ≥ 6 residues | Minimum separation (\|i-j\| ≥ 6) | | **Valid Contacts** | Required | Only consider residues with valid 3D coordinates | ### Evaluation Metrics The evaluation follows standard contact prediction protocols with precision at different coverage levels: #### Range Categories | Range | Separation | Description | |-------|------------|-------------| | **Short Range** | 6 ≤ \|i-j\| ≤ 11 | Local contacts | | **Medium Range** | 12 ≤ \|i-j\| ≤ 23 | Medium-distance contacts | | **Long Range** | \|i-j\| ≥ 24 | Long-distance contacts | #### Precision Metrics - **P@L**: Precision at top L contacts (L = sequence length) - **P@L/2**: Precision at top L/2 contacts - **P@L/5**: Precision at top L/5 contacts Each metric is calculated separately for each range category, resulting in **9 total metrics** per evaluation. ### Dataset Format The system uses HuggingFace datasets with entries containing: ```json { "seq": "MKTFFVLVLLPLVSSQCVNLTTRTQLPPAYTNSFTRGVYYPDKVFRSSVLHSTQDLFL", "tertiary": [[x1,y1,z1], [x2,y2,z2], ...], "valid_mask": [true, true, false, ...] } ``` **Default Dataset**: `fredzzp/contact_data` (automatically downloaded from HuggingFace Hub)