opinion_id
int64
3.78k
9.89M
opinion
stringlengths
9
136k
opinion_source
stringclasses
5 values
opinion_word_count
int64
1
21.2k
opinion_date_created
stringlengths
22
29
opinion_type
stringclasses
7 values
opinion_extracted_by_ocr
stringclasses
2 values
opinion_per_curiam
stringclasses
2 values
cluster_id
int64
3.78k
9.41M
cluster_judges
stringlengths
2
140
cluster_nature_of_suit
stringclasses
7 values
cluster_source
stringclasses
12 values
cluster_blocked
stringclasses
2 values
cluster_precedential_status
stringclasses
3 values
cluster_citation_count
int64
0
2.27k
cluster_case_name
stringlengths
10
159
cluster_case_name_short
stringlengths
3
81
cluster_case_name_full
stringlengths
11
1.82k
cluster_summary
stringclasses
71 values
cluster_history
stringclasses
1 value
cluster_headmatter
stringlengths
171
17.7k
cluster_headnotes
stringclasses
56 values
cluster_posture
stringclasses
33 values
cluster_arguments
stringclasses
3 values
cluster_cross_reference
stringclasses
6 values
cluster_disposition
stringclasses
12 values
cluster_syllabus
stringclasses
8 values
docket_id
int64
5.88k
67.6M
docket_number
stringlengths
2
66
docket_view_count
int64
0
10
court_id
stringlengths
2
15
court_jurisdiction
stringclasses
11 values
court_in_use
stringclasses
2 values
court_short_name
stringlengths
9
59
court_full_name
stringlengths
18
64
4,200,405
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT EURICE McGILL, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D17-1492 [August 31, 2017] Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Paul L. Backman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 10-12523...
opinion_plain_text
83
2017-08-31 15:10:30.817226+00
010combined
f
f
4,423,152
null
null
C
f
Published
0
EURICE MCGILL v. STATE OF FLORIDA
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
6,146,166
17-1492
0
fladistctapp
SA
t
District Court of Appeal of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida
2,251,008
889 N.E.2d 809 (2005) 356 Ill. App.3d 1130 PEOPLE v. NEWSOME. No. 1-03-2985. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District. April 29, 2005. Affirmed.
opinion_html_with_citations
23
2013-10-30 08:51:32.80475+00
010combined
f
f
2,251,008
null
null
L
f
Published
0
People v. Newsome
Newsome
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
2,102,724
1-03-2985
0
illappct
SA
t
Appellate Court of Illinois
Appellate Court of Illinois
4,858,364
*234In re Cordes, Paul; Hurdlik, Paulette;—Plaintiff(s); Applying For Writ of Certio-rari and/or Review, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. E, No. 04-14706; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2009-CA-0976. Denied.
opinion_xml_harvard
33
2021-08-26 01:28:25.294915+00
020lead
t
f
5,044,497
null
null
U
f
Published
0
Cordes v. Board of Zoning Adjustments & Audubon, LLC
Cordes
Paul CORDES and Paulette Hurdlik v. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS AND AUDUBON, LLC
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
60,294,368
No. 2010-C-0584
0
la
S
t
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Supreme Court of Louisiana
2,790,710
Twersky v Incorporated Vil. of Great Neck ( 2015 NY Slip Op 02755 ) Twersky v Incorporated Vil. of Great Neck 2015 NY Slip Op 02755 Decided on April 1, 2015 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to...
opinion_html_with_citations
644
2015-04-01 19:05:17.073529+00
010combined
f
f
2,790,710
Austin, Barros, Cohen, Eng
null
CU
f
Published
0
Twersky v. Incorporated Village of Great Neck
Twersky
Sharon Twersky, Respondent, v. Incorporated Village of Great Neck Et Al., Defendants, and FHM Mortgage Corp. Et Al., Appellants
null
null
<parties id="AvU"> Sharon Twersky, Respondent, v Incorporated Village of Great Neck et al., Defendants, and FHM Mortgage Corp. et al., Appellants. </parties><citation id="AiFJ"> [7 NYS3d 309]— </citation>
null
null
null
null
null
null
2,646,175
2014-07552
0
nyappdiv
SA
t
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1,470,544
951 A.2d 180 (2008) Philip S. HORNER v. GOVERNOR, State of New Hampshire and another. No. 2007-668. Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Argued March 27, 2008. Opinion Issued: June 19, 2008. *181 Philip S. Horner, pro se, and Richard E. Samdperil, of Exeter (Mr. Horner on the brief, and Mr. Samdperil orally), for the plaint...
opinion_html_with_citations
1,472
2013-10-30 06:23:26.439857+00
010combined
f
f
1,470,544
Broderick, Dalianis, Duggan, Galway, Hicks
null
LU
f
Published
1
Horner v. Governor of New Hampshire
Horner
Philip S. Horner v. Governor, State of New Hampshire & A.
null
null
<p data-order="0" data-type="docketnumber" id="b440-9"> Merrimack </p><docketnumber data-order="1" data-type="docketnumber" id="A9E"> No. 2007-668 </docketnumber><br><parties data-order="2" data-type="parties" id="b440-10"> Philip S. Horner v. Governor, State of New Hampshire <em> &amp; a. ...
null
null
null
null
null
null
1,621,241
2007-668
0
nh
S
t
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1,083,484
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE FILED FEBRUARY, 1997 SESSION August 15, 1997 Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Court Clerk STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) ) Appellee, ) No. 01C01-9508-CR-00263 ) vs. ) Davidson County ) ANTONIO DEMONTE LYONS, ) Honorable Thomas H. Shriver, ) Judge ) Appellant. ) (Withdrawal o...
opinion_html_with_citations
8,411
2013-10-09 21:16:46.172414+00
010combined
f
f
1,083,484
null
null
C
t
Published
0
State v. Antonio Demonte Lyons
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
700,324
01C01-9508-CR-00263
0
tenncrimapp
SA
t
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee
2,193,107
905 A.2d 15 (2006) 279 Conn. 682 Kathleen DUFFY, Administratrix (Estate of Sage T. Warren), et al. v. Julie S. FLAGG et al. No. 17455. Supreme Court of Connecticut. Argued April 18, 2006. Decided August 29, 2006. *16 Charles W. Fleischmann, with whom were Madonna A. Sacco and, on the brief, Paul E. Pollock and David J....
opinion_html_with_citations
4,728
2013-10-30 08:34:19.499673+00
010combined
f
f
2,193,107
Borden, Norcott, Palmer, Sullivan, Vertefeuille
null
LU
f
Published
44
Duffy v. Flagg
Duffy
Kathleen Duffy, Administratrix (Estate of Sage T. Warren), Et Al. v. Julie S. Flagg Et Al.
null
null
<parties data-order="0" data-type="parties" id="b704-3"> KATHLEEN DUFFY, ADMINISTRATRIX (ESTATE OF SAGE T. WARREN), ET AL. <em> v. </em> JULIE S. FLAGG ET AL. </parties><br><docketnumber data-order="1" data-type="docketnumber" id="b704-5"> (SC 17455) </docketnumber><br><p data-order="2" d...
null
null
null
null
null
null
2,060,795
SC 17455
0
conn
S
t
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Supreme Court of Connecticut
3,516,995
* Corpus Juris-Cyc. References: Indictments and Informations, 31CJ, p. 821, n. 65; Intoxicating, 33CJ, p. 727, n. 22. This is an appeal by the state from a judgment sustaining a demurrer to an indictment. The indictment charged the appellee with the possession of a still "on the day of December, 1923." The ground of t...
opinion_html_with_citations
477
2016-07-05 22:28:24.402312+00
020lead
f
f
3,544,484
Smith
null
ZU
f
Published
10
State v. Clark
null
State v. Clark. [Fn]
null
null
<parties id="b221-6"> State <em> v. </em> Clark. <a class="footnote" href="#fn*" id="fn*_ref"> * </a> </parties><br><court id="b221-7"> (Division A. </court><decisiondate id="Aid"> Suggestion of Error Overruled Nov. 29, 1926.) </decisiondate><br><citation id="b221-8"> ...
null
APPEAL from circuit court of Lafayette county; HON. T.E. PEGRAM, Judge.
null
null
null
null
3,416,609
No. 25615.
0
miss
S
t
Mississippi Supreme Court
Mississippi Supreme Court
6,331,009
Case: 20-61182 Document: 00516278598 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/13/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 13, 2022 No. 20-61182 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Bolivar Chowa, Petitioner, versus Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, Responden...
opinion_html_with_citations
469
2022-04-13 18:00:21.24493+00
010combined
f
f
6,458,898
null
Immigration
C
t
Unpublished
0
Chowa v. Garland
Chowa
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
63,233,450
20-61182
0
ca5
F
t
Fifth Circuit
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
2,729,050
Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: MARIELENA DUERRING GREGORY F. ZOEL...
opinion_html_with_citations
4,405
2014-09-08 21:38:34.377891+00
010combined
f
f
2,729,050
null
null
C
f
Unpublished
0
Darrius Woods v. State of Indiana
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
1,202,177
20A03-1202-CR-90
0
indctapp
SA
t
Indiana Court of Appeals
Indiana Court of Appeals
6,237,262
Mr. Justice Mercur delivered the opinion of the court, November 20th 1882. Both parties claim title to this land under sheriff’s sale as the property of James Strouss. The defendant purchased at a sale made in December 1815, the plaintiff at one made in March 1880. The plaintiff seeks to impeach the validity of the fi...
opinion_xml_harvard
567
2022-02-17 20:35:32.092114+00
020lead
t
f
6,368,396
Gordon, Green, Mercur, Paxson, Sharswood, Sterrett, Trunkey
null
U
f
Published
0
Barton v. Hunter
Barton
Barton versus Hunter
<p>Error to the Court of Common Pleas No. 2 of Allegheny county: Of October Term 1882, No. 160.</p> <p>Ejectment, by E. L. Barton, against Annie E. S. Hunter, administratrix of Pev. Wm. Hunter deceased, and others, for a certain tract of land in B&aver and Allegheny counties containing about 142 acres. Both parties cla...
null
null
<p>1. If a purchaser at a sheriff’s sale has been guilty of some falsehood, trick or device before or at the time of the sale, by virtue of which he has obtained the property for less than it would otherwise have brought, he does not obtain a good title; and such a title may be defeated by a subsequent sale of the prop...
null
null
null
null
null
63,023,274
null
0
pa
S
t
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
27,344
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-20729 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOEL RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant. -------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-26-ALL -------------...
opinion_html_with_citations
336
2010-04-25 09:07:24+00
010combined
f
f
27,344
null
null
C
t
Unpublished
0
United States v. Ramirez
Ramirez
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
1,121,457
01-20729
0
ca5
F
t
Fifth Circuit
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
3,781
09-2727-ag Shkurti v. Holder BIA A095 150 206 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS CO...
opinion_html_with_citations
849
2010-04-24 19:33:45+00
010combined
f
f
3,781
Hall, Katzmann, Parker, Peter, Roberta
null
CU
t
Unpublished
0
Shkurti v. Holder
Shkurti
Ardian SHKURTI, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., United States Attorney General, Respondent
null
null
<parties id="b246-10"> Ardian SHKURTI, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., United States Attorney General, Respondent. </parties><br><docketnumber id="b246-12"> No. 09-2727-ag. </docketnumber><br><court id="b246-13"> United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. </court><br><decisiondate id="b246...
null
null
null
null
null
null
297,582
09-2727-ag
1
ca2
F
t
Second Circuit
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1,467,030
217 N.J. Super. 541 (1987) 526 A.2d 290 ALAN C. STAVER, PLAINTIFF, v. MARGARET STAVER, DEFENDANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division Bergen County, Family Part. March 11, 1987. *543 Donald L. Garber for plaintiff ( Donald L. Garber, attorney; Michael I. Lubin on the brief). John Fiorello for defendant ( Fe...
opinion_html_with_citations
1,592
2013-10-30 06:22:11.608755+00
010combined
f
f
1,467,030
Simon
null
L
t
Published
4
Staver v. Staver
Staver
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
1,032,763
null
0
njsuperctappdiv
SA
t
New Jersey Superior Court App Division
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
5,239,595
Howard, J.: By the'will of Byron S. Briggs, which was offered for probate in the Surrogate’s Court of Madison county, Harriet 0. Briggs, his wife, was appointed executrix. After the surrogate had overruled certain objections to the probate of the will and announced his conclusion that the will should be admitted to pr...
opinion_xml_harvard
1,248
2022-01-06 17:22:34.293877+00
020lead
t
f
5,402,447
Howard
null
U
f
Published
0
In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of Briggs
null
In the Matter of Proving the Last Will and Testament of Byron S. Briggs, Walter W. Briggs and Frank J. Cregg, as Special Guardian for Gladys Briggs Blanchard, Appellants Harriet C. Briggs, as etc., of Byron S. Briggs
<p>Appeal by the contestants, Walter W. Briggs and another, heirs at law and next of kin of the deceased, from a decree and order of the Surrogate’s Court in the county of Madison, entered in the office of said Surrogate’s Court on the 14th day of September, .1914, admitting an alleged will to probate and overruling th...
null
null
<p>Executors and administrators — objection to appointment of widow upon ground that she had deliberately murdered testator — duty of surrogate to inquire into objections.</p> <p>Where, in a proceeding for the probate of a will, written objections are filed by the son of the testator to the issuance of letters testamen...
null
null
null
null
null
61,750,824
null
0
nyappdiv
SA
t
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
6,198,051
Alfred M. Lama, J. In this case, the defendant was charged with the uninsured operation of a motor vehicle. The only evidence on this point was the officer’s testimony that the defendant operator failed to produce the insurance card when requested. In order to establish that a nonowner operator is guilty of uninsured ...
opinion_xml_harvard
315
2022-02-05 20:27:04.205189+00
020lead
t
f
6,329,497
Lama
null
U
f
Published
0
People v. Simmons
Simmons
The People of the State of New York v. Thomas Simmons
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
62,960,664
null
0
nydistctsuffolk
ST
f
Suffolk County District Court
Suffolk County District Court
1,587,382
709 F.Supp. 1374 (1989) Wayne R. GRIES, Plaintiff, v. ZIMMER, INC., Defendant. Michael J. MORAN, Plaintiff, v. ZIMMER, INC., Defendant. Nos. C-C-87-0576-P, C-C-87-0577-P. United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division. February 28, 1989. *1375 Louis L. Lesesne, Jr., Gillespie, Lesesne & Connette,...
opinion_html_with_citations
6,782
2013-10-30 06:51:51.693208+00
010combined
f
f
1,587,382
Robert D. Potter
null
LU
f
Published
5
Gries v. Zimmer, Inc.
Gries
Wayne R. GRIES, Plaintiff, v. ZIMMER, INC., Defendant; Michael J. MORAN, Plaintiff, v. ZIMMER, INC., Defendant
null
null
<parties id="b1454-11"> Wayne R. GRIES, Plaintiff, v. ZIMMER, INC., Defendant. Michael J. MORAN, Plaintiff, v. ZIMMER, INC., Defendant. </parties><br><docketnumber id="b1454-15"> Nos. C-C-87-0576-P, C-C-87-0577-P. </docketnumber><br><court id="b1454-16"> United States District Court, W.D. North Caroli...
null
null
null
null
null
null
1,649,434
C-C-87-0576-P, C-C-87-0577-P
0
ncwd
FD
t
W.D. North Carolina
District Court, W.D. North Carolina
8,388,881
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, Middle Division, denied.
opinion_xml_harvard
16
2022-10-24 21:17:56.871961+00
020lead
t
f
8,418,535
null
null
U
f
Published
0
Thomas v. Tennessee
Thomas
Calvin L. THOMAS v. TENNESSEE.
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
65,614,543
No. 13–10326.
0
scotus
F
t
Supreme Court
Supreme Court of the United States
7,979,774
Per Curiam. The court ordered defendant to pay plaintiff certain sums for attorney’s fees, suit money and support pendente lite of her divorce. Defendant appeals from the order. The reasonableness of each item awarded is conceded, but the contention is that the court was without authority to order defendant to pay any...
opinion_xml_harvard
359
2022-09-09 01:04:02.713727+00
020lead
t
f
8,024,130
null
null
U
f
Published
0
Wetter v. Wetter
Wetter
HULDA E. WETTER v. WILLIAM F. WETTER
<p>Action for divorce in the district court for Carver county. Plaintiff moved for an order directing defendant to pay her or her attorneys $'56 for fees of officers and witnesses, $500 for fees of her attorneys and $106 per month for support of plaintiff and her youngest child. Prom an order, Tifft, X, directing the p...
null
null
<p>Divorce —■ temporary alimony and attorney’s fee.</p> <p>Section 7119, G. S. 1913, does not authorize an award of temporary alimony, suit money and attorney’s fees, unless necessary for the wife’s support and for securing a proper presentation of her cause of action or defense to the court. The fact that the wife has...
null
null
null
Affirmed.
null
65,119,649
No. 21,698
0
minn
S
t
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Supreme Court of Minnesota
8,826,793
Mr. Justice Dever delivered the opinion of the court. 5. Trial, §, 295*—when propositions of Taw should he tendered. Propositions of law should be tendered before announcement of final judgment.
opinion_xml_harvard
30
2022-11-26 15:49:15.114057+00
020lead
t
f
8,841,607
Dever
null
U
f
Published
0
Thompson Bros. Feed Co. v. Neiman Bros.
null
Thompson Brothers Feed Company v. Neiman Brothers Company
<p>Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John A. Mahoney, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1916.</p>
null
null
<p>Abstract of the Decision.</p> <p>1. Account stated, § 25*—when evidence sufficient to show. Evidence held to support the finding of the court that the plaintiff’s claim arose on an account stated, in an action to recover for balance due after allowance of a disputed item.</p> <p>2. Cobpobations, § 354*—when hound hy...
null
null
null
Affirmed.
null
66,107,746
Gen. No. 22,596
0
illappct
SA
t
Appellate Court of Illinois
Appellate Court of Illinois
3,531,217
The purpose of this proceeding is twofold. First, to construe a will and, second, to partition the property in controversy. The will in question is that of C.C. Broyles and Margaret I., his wife. It is joint and bears date of April 11, 1889. C.C. Broyles died in 1896; Margaret I. Broyles died in 1924. The will was duly...
opinion_html_with_citations
2,524
2016-07-05 22:43:49.31555+00
020lead
f
f
3,554,949
Walker
null
ZU
f
Published
4
Bishop v. Broyles
Bishop
Columbus Bishop Et Al. v. James Broyles Et. Al.; Missouri Valley College and Bethel College, Interveners and Appellants
null
null
<parties id="b105-4"> Columbus Bishop et al. v. James Broyles et. al.; Missouri Valley College and Bethel College, Interveners and Appellants. </parties><citation id="AVVc"> 22 S. W. (2d) 790. </citation><br><court id="b105-5"> Division Two, </court><decisiondate id="As6"> December 11, 1929. ...
null
Appeal from Barton Circuit Court. &#8212; Hon. B.G. Thurman, Judge. REVERSED AND REMANDED ( with directions ).
null
null
null
null
3,427,074
null
0
mo
S
t
Supreme Court of Missouri
Supreme Court of Missouri
8,940,245
Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia. Certiorari granted.
opinion_xml_harvard
8
2022-11-27 07:52:52.309003+00
020lead
t
f
8,949,525
null
null
U
f
Published
0
National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Harrison
Harrison
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Harrison, Attorney General of Virginia
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
66,215,740
No. 689
0
scotus
F
t
Supreme Court
Supreme Court of the United States
4,364,341
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Feb 04 2019, 10:41 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court the defense of res judicata, collateral Court of Appeals and Tax Court estoppel,...
opinion_html_with_citations
1,274
2019-02-04 16:08:10.04735+00
010combined
f
f
4,587,088
null
null
C
f
Published
0
Sharon Louie v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
14,532,970
18A-CR-1856
0
indctapp
SA
t
Indiana Court of Appeals
Indiana Court of Appeals
9,627,650
JOHNSON, J., concurring. In the Penal Code, there are a number of offenses that differ only in the required mental state, and because of the required mental state, have different ranges of punishment. E.g., murder under section 19.02(b)(1) (intentionally and knowingly causes the death of an individual; 1st degree felo...
opinion_xml_harvard
807
2023-08-22 08:49:35.133972+00
030concurrence
f
f
1,427,807
Cochran, Hervey, Holcomb, Johnson, Keasler, Keller, Meyers, Price, Womack
null
LU
f
Published
56
Reed v. State
Reed
Anthony James REED, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas
null
null
<parties id="b280-3"> Anthony James REED, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas. </parties><br><docketnumber id="b280-6"> No. 1410-01. </docketnumber><br><court id="b280-7"> Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. </court><br><decisiondate id="b280-8"> May 14, 2003. </decisiondate><br><attorneys id="...
null
null
null
null
null
null
895,916
1410-01
0
texcrimapp
SA
t
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
8,566,522
RESOLUCIÓN Examinada la Moción Solicitando Reinstalación, se au-toriza la reinstalación del Sr. José A. De la Texera Barnes al ejercicio de la abogacía, por haber cumplido el término de la suspensión decretada. Notifíquese por telefax y por la vía ordinaria. Lo acordó el Tribunal y certifica la Secretaria del Tribunal...
opinion_xml_harvard
68
2022-11-23 13:07:33.68004+00
020lead
t
f
8,590,715
Acordó, Certifica, Denton, Fdo, Intervino, Supremo
null
U
f
Published
0
In re De la Texera Barnes
null
In re José A. De la Texera Barnes y José G. Marrero Luna
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
65,853,185
Número: CP-1995-15
0
prsupreme
TS
f
Supreme Court of Puerto Rico
Supreme Court of Puerto Rico
6,434,171
By the Court. This is a bill in equity seeking the disbarment of an attorney at law. It was begun by an ordinary writ of summons and attachment. Such a proceeding cannot be instituted or maintained in this way. Boston Bar Association v. Greenhood, 168 Mass. 169, 182. Boston Bar Association v. Casey, 211 Mass. 187; 227...
opinion_xml_harvard
73
2022-06-25 12:10:58.911948+00
020lead
t
f
6,560,422
null
null
U
f
Published
0
Philbrick v. Creed
Philbrick
Edward W. Philbrick v. Edward C. Creed & another
<p>Bill in equity, inserted in a common law writ dated February 9, 1917, against an attorney at law and the Bar Association of the City of Boston, praying that the defendant attorney be removed from his office and that the defendant association “ show cause, if any it has,” why this prayer should not be granted.</p> <p...
null
null
<p>Equity Jurisdiction, Disbarment proceedings. Attorney at law, Disbarment proceedings.</p> <p>A suit in equity, begun by a common law writ, cannot be maintained for the disbarment of an attorney at law.</p>
null
null
null
null
null
63,490,429
null
0
mass
S
t
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1,944,212
52 B.R. 960 (1985) In re CROUTHAMEL POTATO CHIP CO. Civ. A. No. 85-0048. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. July 23, 1985. *961 *962 Michael H. Reed, Barbara Sagar, Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz, Philadelphia, Pa., for trustee. Stewart Fishbein, Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the United St...
opinion_html_with_citations
6,259
2013-10-30 07:53:07.611012+00
010combined
f
f
1,944,212
Louis H. Pollak
null
LU
f
Published
10
In Re Crouthamel Potato Chip Co.
In Re Crouthamel Potato Chip Co.
In Re CROUTHAMEL POTATO CHIP CO.
null
null
<parties id="b1008-7"> In re CROUTHAMEL POTATO CHIP CO. </parties><br><docketnumber id="b1008-8"> Civ. A. No. 85-0048. </docketnumber><br><court id="b1008-9"> United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. </court><br><decisiondate id="b1008-11"> July 23, 1985. </decisiondate><br><attorney...
null
null
null
null
null
null
1,772,833
Civ. A. 85-0048
0
paed
FD
t
E.D. Pennsylvania
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
8,315,172
The Court (nem. con.) refused to strike out the plea, principally on the ground stated in the affidavit of Mr. Turner. There was a demurrer to the evidence, upon which this Court rendered judgment for the defendant at October term, 1822; which was affirmed by the Supreme Court of the United States. 11 Wheat. 309.
opinion_xml_harvard
55
2022-10-17 20:00:23.985908+00
020lead
t
f
8,346,574
null
null
U
f
Published
0
Wetzell v. Bussard
Wetzell
Wetzell v. Bussard
<p>Ti-ie plea of limitations was filed in this cause after the rule-day, and the issue was made up by the clerk.</p> <p>moved the Court to order the plea to be stricken out, because not filed before the expiration of the rule to plead ; and cited the case of Thompson v. Afflick, in this Court at June term, 1812, (ante,...
null
null
<p>If the defendant instruct his attorney to plead the statute of limitations, and he pleads it after the rule-day, the Court will refuse to order the plea to be stricken out if the attorney, having been recently admitted to practice, was ignorant of the rule which requires that such a plea should be filed strictly wit...
null
null
null
null
null
65,526,372
null
0
circtddc
F
f
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
4,090,781
[Cite as State v. Vaughn, 2016-Ohio-7384.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 27902 Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE JAMALL L. VAUGHN COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF SUMMIT, OHIO Appellant CASE Nos. CR 2013 04 1008(D) DL 13-04-06...
opinion_html_with_citations
3,066
2016-10-19 16:02:57.739007+00
010combined
f
f
4,313,520
Carr
null
C
t
Published
3
State v. Vaughn
Vaughn
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
4,480,406
27902
0
ohioctapp
SA
t
Ohio Court of Appeals
Ohio Court of Appeals
5,228,821
Judgment of conviction of the County Court of Hassau county affirmed. Ho opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Rich, JJ., concurred.
opinion_xml_harvard
23
2022-01-06 16:51:25.023767+00
020lead
t
f
5,392,146
null
null
U
f
Published
0
People v. Kocannck
Kocannck
The People of the State of New York v. Alex Kocannck
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
61,740,432
null
0
nyappdiv
SA
t
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
3,141,436
No. 2--03--0345 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT FRANK HEABLER, JR., ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of Kane County. Petitioner-Appellant, ) ) v. ) No. 03--MR--31 ) MUNICIPAL OFFICERS ELECTORAL ) BOARD OF THE VILLAGE OF ) LAKEMOOR and its Members ) ROBERT KOEHL, DONALD POGGENSEE, ) and LENORE LUKA...
opinion_html_with_citations
3,041
2015-10-22 17:54:00.83893+00
010combined
f
f
3,141,436
null
null
C
f
Published
0
Heabler v. Municipal Officers Electoral Board
Heabler
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
2,999,028
2-03-0345 Rel
0
illappct
SA
t
Appellate Court of Illinois
Appellate Court of Illinois
6,199,131
OPINION OF THE COURT Sidney Leviss, J. In this action brought pursuant to subdivision 12 of section 63 of the Executive Law and sections 476-a and 476-b of the Judiciary Law, plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction restraining defendants from the unauthorized practice of law. Plaintiff alleges that defendants give lega...
opinion_xml_harvard
1,131
2022-02-05 20:30:09.946087+00
020lead
t
f
6,330,577
Leviss
null
U
f
Published
0
People v. Divorce Associated & Publishing Ltd.
null
The People of the State of New York v. Divorce Associated and Publishing Ltd.
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
62,961,744
null
0
nysupct
ST
t
New York Supreme Court
New York Supreme Court
9,060,053
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
opinion_xml_harvard
6
2022-11-27 20:08:49.985309+00
020lead
t
f
9,066,386
null
null
U
f
Published
0
Akbar v. United States
Akbar
Akbar v. United States
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
66,332,637
No. 86-6079
0
scotus
F
t
Supreme Court
Supreme Court of the United States
9,493,494
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge, with whom Circuit Judges TROTT and KLEINFELD join, dissenting: The sweeping language and exalted tone of the court’s wide-ranging opinion make clear that it aspires to offer a definitive interpretation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). This might be less disturbing if this case ...
opinion_xml_harvard
1,172
2023-08-05 15:09:52.650214+00
040dissent
f
f
770,693
Fletcher, Gould, Hug, Kleinfeld, O'Scannlain, Pregerson, Schroeder, Tashima, Thomas, Trott
null
RU
f
Published
111
Robert Barnett v. U.S. Air, Inc.
null
Robert BARNETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. AIR, INC., Defendant-Appellee
null
null
<parties id="b1123-8"> Robert BARNETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. AIR, INC., Defendant-Appellee. </parties><docketnumber id="A6E"> No. 96-16669. </docketnumber><court id="Ak5"> United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. </court><otherdate id="AuWa"> Argued and Submitted June 22, 2000. ...
null
null
null
null
null
null
2,063,404
96-16669
0
ca9
F
t
Ninth Circuit
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1,355,714
112 Wash. 2d 303 (1989) 771 P.2d 350 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. KIMBERLY COLLINS, Petitioner. No. 55170-7. The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. April 13, 1989. Marc R. Lampson of Washington Appellate Defender Association, for petitioner. Seth R. Dawson, Prosecuting Attorney, and Seth Aaron Fine, Deput...
opinion_html_with_citations
3,821
2013-10-30 05:44:34.94933+00
010combined
f
f
1,355,714
Andersen, Brachtenbach, Callow, Dolliver, Dore, Durham, Pearson, Smith, Utter
null
LU
f
Published
28
State v. Collins
Collins
The State of Washington, Respondent, v. Kimberly Collins, Petitioner
null
null
<docketnumber id="b339-4"> [No. 55170-7. </docketnumber><court id="AIl"> En Banc. </court><decisiondate id="A1m"> April 13, 1989.] </decisiondate><br><parties id="b339-5"> The State of Washington, <em> Respondent, </em> v. Kimberly Collins, <em> Petitioner. </em> <...
null
null
null
null
null
null
85,790
55170-7
1
wash
S
t
Washington Supreme Court
Washington Supreme Court
4,996,099
DAVIDSON, P. J. Appellant was convicted of burglary. The indictment alleges that the offense was committed on the 19th day of April, “One Thousand Nine Hundred and -” and anterior to the presentment of this indictment. This instrument was filed in court on August SO, 1910. This shows clearly on the face of the pleadin...
opinion_xml_harvard
115
2021-09-30 14:22:11.915448+00
020lead
t
f
5,174,805
Davidson
null
U
f
Published
0
Bradford v. State
null
BRADFORD v. STATE
<p>Appeal from District Court, Denton County; Clem B. Porter, Judge.</p> <p>Delos Bradford was convicted of burglary, and he appeals.</p>
null
null
<p>Indictment and Information (§ 87*) — Allegation as to Time — Limitations.</p> <p>An indictment for burglary, alleging that the offense was committed on April 19, “One Thousand Nine Hundred and'-,” and anterior to the presentment of the indictment, which was filed August 30, 1910, showed on its face that the offense ...
null
null
null
Reversed and dismissed.
null
60,500,745
null
0
texcrimapp
SA
t
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
4,059,947
MANDATE THE STATE OF TEXAS TO THE 150TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY, GREETINGS: Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on November 20, 2013, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between IBS Asset Liquidations LLC f/k/a Icon Building Systems, LLC, Appellant V. Servi...
opinion_plain_text
431
2016-09-29 19:43:48.853208+00
010combined
f
f
4,282,686
null
null
C
f
Published
0
IBS Asset Liquidations LLC F/K/A Icon Building Systems, LLC v. Servicios Multiples Del Norte SA De CV
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
4,449,245
04-13-00273-CV
0
texapp
SA
t
Court of Appeals of Texas
Court of Appeals of Texas
8,143,875
Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
opinion_xml_harvard
17
2022-09-09 20:19:03.939807+00
020lead
t
f
8,181,956
null
null
U
f
Published
0
Rawls v. Penn Mutual Life Insurance
Rawls
Edna M. Rawls v. Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company of Philadelphia
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
65,279,563
No. 940
0
scotus
F
t
Supreme Court
Supreme Court of the United States
3,433,682
In 1928 the Southern Surety Company of Iowa sold to plaintiff certain Oklahoma improvement bonds, with a repurchasing agreement. In 1929 the Southern Surety Company of Iowa was taken over by the defendant, the Southern Surety Company of New York, which, in lieu of the repurchasing agreement of the Iowa corporation, exe...
opinion_html_with_citations
3,649
2016-07-05 20:02:41.294997+00
020lead
f
f
3,435,926
Albert, Anderson, Kindig, Kintzinger, Stevens
null
ZU
f
Published
2
Watts v. Southern Surety Co.
Watts
Clarence v. Watts, Appellee, v. Southern Surety Company of New York, Defendant; E. W. Clark, Receiver, Intervenor-Appellant
null
null
<parties id="b160-4"> Clarence V. Watts, Appellee, v. Southern Surety Company of New York, Defendant; E. W. Clark, Receiver, Intervenor-appellant. </parties><br><docketnumber id="b160-5"> No. 41633. </docketnumber><br><decisiondate id="b160-9"> May 9, 1933. </decisiondate><br><attorneys id="b160-11...
null
Appeal from Polk District Court. &#8212; O.S. FRANKLIN, Judge. Action against the defendant upon a surety bond aided by attachment and garnishment. E.W. Clark, receiver of defendant corporation intervened, filing a petition in intervention alleging his appointment under receivership proceedings, and asking abatement o...
null
null
null
null
3,308,051
No. 41633.
0
iowa
S
t
Supreme Court of Iowa
Supreme Court of Iowa
2,996,466
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Nos. 02-3624 & 02-8025 MARC LIVINGSTON, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. ASSOCIATES FINANCE, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellants. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 01 C 1659—David H....
opinion_html_with_citations
3,196
2015-09-24 19:29:00.182269+00
010combined
f
t
2,996,466
Per Curiam
civil
C
f
Published
0
Livingston, Marc v. Associates Finance
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
2,853,696
02-3624
0
ca7
F
t
Seventh Circuit
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
8,428,604
ORDER Maras Djokic has filed a petition for judicial review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), that summarily affirmed an immigration judge’s denial of Djokie’s fourth motion to reopen his deportation proceedings. The parties have waived oral argument, and the panel unanimously agrees that oral a...
opinion_xml_harvard
601
2022-11-04 04:46:36.750471+00
020lead
t
f
8,456,874
null
null
U
f
Published
0
Djokic v. Ashcroft
Djokic
Maras DJOKIC v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
65,679,860
No. 03-3393
0
ca6
F
t
Sixth Circuit
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
6,944,151
OPINION TROTT, Circuit Judge: This appeal arises from a suit brought by Michael Stefanow (“Stefanow”), a prisoner in the Arizona State Prison Complex, against the prison warden and other prison officials (collectively, the “prison officials”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. We must decide whether the prison officials’ c...
opinion_xml_harvard
4,533
2022-07-24 01:16:37.303786+00
020lead
t
f
7,041,108
Beezer, Roney, Trott
null
U
f
Published
0
Stefanow v. McFadden
Stefanow
Michael STEFANOW v. James McFADDEN, Warden Dr. McKinley Mike Shuller, Nurse, Special Management Unit Sgt. Manriquez Officer Brydon CSO Martinez CSO Simms CSO Granillo J. Polley Wes Mayhew, Administrative Assistant
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
64,029,442
No. 95-16134
0
ca9
F
t
Ninth Circuit
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
3,444,750
Reversing. Appellants owned 600 acres of land in Carter county. Appellees instituted an action in the county court to condemn a right of way 100 feet wide, 9,981 feet long, across the tract, containing 22.95 acres, for its high-power electric line, under section 1599b, Kentucky Statutes, which provides that the proceed...
opinion_html_with_citations
2,425
2016-07-05 20:17:10.309226+00
020lead
f
f
3,446,686
Hobson
null
ZU
f
Published
13
Saulsberry v. Kentucky & West Virginia Power Co.
Saulsberry
Saulsberry Et Al. v. Kentucky & West Virginia Power Company
null
null
<parties id="b89-3"> Saulsberry et al. v. Kentucky &amp; West Virginia Power Company. </parties><br><decisiondate id="b89-5"> (Decided September 25, 1928.) </decisiondate><br><otherdate id="b89-6"> (As Modified on Denial of Rehearing, November 27, 1928.) </otherdate><br><attorneys id="b90-9"> <span...
null
Appeal from Carter Circuit Court.
null
null
null
null
3,318,811
null
0
kyctapphigh
S
t
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
5,737,027
Motion by appellant for counsel fees and disbursements to prosecute her appeal, denied without prejudice to an application at Special Term for such counsel fees and disbursements, if appellant be so advised. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
opinion_xml_harvard
42
2022-01-12 16:35:28.359133+00
020lead
t
f
5,880,435
null
null
U
f
Published
0
Bruno v. Bruno
Bruno
Rose Bruno v. Peter Bruno
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
62,238,476
null
0
nyappdiv
SA
t
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
3,453,925
Affirming. J.C. Tracy, a resident of Corbin, Ky., during the year 1922, erected a large apartment building in the city of Corbin, and in the month of August placed an order with C.M. McClung Company, a wholesale dealer of Knoxville, Tenn., to furnish the heating and plumbing materials to be used in its construction. It...
opinion_html_with_citations
2,484
2016-07-05 20:23:37.233748+00
020lead
f
f
3,455,778
McCANDLESS
null
ZU
f
Published
2
Tracy v. C. M. McClung Company
Tracy
Tracy v. C. M. McClung & Company
null
null
<parties id="b646-7"> Tracy v. C. M. McClung &amp; Company. </parties><br><decisiondate id="b646-8"> (Decided June 8, 1926.) </decisiondate><br><attorneys id="b647-5"> <span citation-index="1" class="star-pagination" label="633"> *633 </span> JOHN -B. WALD and WILLIAM: LEWIS for appellant. ...
null
Appeal from Whitley Circuit Court.
null
null
null
null
3,327,903
null
0
kyctapphigh
S
t
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
5,063,669
WINTERSHEIMER, Justice. This appeal is from a decision of the Court of Appeals which affirmed the judgment of the circuit court holding that candidate Noble did not meet the required residency qualifications for the position of district judge in the Thirty-ninth Judicial District composed of Breathitt, Powell and Wolf...
opinion_xml_harvard
2,072
2021-10-01 09:37:38.567546+00
020lead
t
f
5,238,274
Aker, Gant, Leibson, Stephens, Stephenson, Vance, Wintersheimer
null
U
f
Published
0
Noble v. Meagher
Noble
James H. NOBLE, Movant/Appellant v. Virginia MEAGHER Hon. Ray Corns, Judge, Franklin Circuit Court Drexell R. Davis, Secretary of State Margaret McPherson, Clerk, Breathitt County Anna M. Baker, Clerk, Powell County S. Kenneth Lindon, Clerk, Wolfe County
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
60,568,597
null
0
ky
S
t
Kentucky Supreme Court
Kentucky Supreme Court
8,793,157
WARD, Circuit Judge. The complainant exploits the patents in *»uit by means of licenses and these suits are against dealers. A suit against manufacturers is soon to be reached for final hearing before Judge Hazel in the Northern district. In it a mass of new proofs have been already taken, which have been submitted to...
opinion_xml_harvard
108
2022-11-26 13:59:05.258538+00
020lead
t
f
8,808,841
Ward
null
U
f
Published
0
Kryptok Co. v. Harris
Harris
KRYPTOK CO. v. HARRIS SAME v. STRAUS
<p>In Equity. Suits by the Kryptok Company against Moses I. Harris and against Jesse I. Straus and others, trading as R. H. Macy & Co. On motions for preliminary injunctions.</p>
null
null
<p>Patents (§ 306*) — Suit fob Infringement — Preliminary Injunction.</p> <p>• Preliminary injunctions against infringement of patents granted, in suits against dealers only, subject to suspension pending decision in a suit against the manufacturer on the giving of security by defendants.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other ...
null
null
null
Granted.
null
66,074,960
null
0
nysd
FD
t
S.D. New York
District Court, S.D. New York
8,023,000
MB. JUSTICE COOPER delivered the opinion of the court. This is an aetion in replevin by a mortgagee to recover possession of personal property covered by two chattel mortgages, of the agreed value of $1,000, alleged to have been unlawfully seized and wrongfully detained by the defendants. To the complaint defendants f...
opinion_xml_harvard
948
2022-09-09 02:27:50.823228+00
020lead
t
f
8,065,104
Brantly, Cooper, Himself, Holloway, Hurly, Matthews, Takes
null
U
f
Published
0
Perkins & Co. v. Duluth Brewing & Malting Co.
null
PERKINS & CO. v. DULUTH BREWING & MALTING CO.
<p> Appeal from District Court, Bvchland County; C. C. Hurley, Judge. </p> <p>Action by W. L. Perkins & Co. against the Duluth Brewing & Malting Company and others. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant Jack Bennett, Sheriff, appeals.</p>
null
null
<p>Conversion — Action by Chattel Mortgagee — Allegation of Ownership—C omplaint—Insufficiency.</p> <p>Conversion—Action by Chattel Mortgagee—Allegation of Ownership— Complaint—Insufficiency.</p> <p>1. Seld, that the complaint in an action to recover possession of chattels, covered by mortgage, alleged to have been unl...
null
null
null
Beversed.
null
65,160,673
No. 4,230
0
mont
S
t
Montana Supreme Court
Montana Supreme Court
4,891,754
Ogden, J. Appellant brought this suit against the appellee to recover a certain mule alleged to have been unlawfully seized by the latter, and for damages for the wrongful detention of the same. The defense set up is that the animal was lawfully seized, under and by virtue of a writ of execution which issued from a ju...
opinion_xml_harvard
906
2021-09-02 23:51:09.676539+00
020lead
t
f
5,076,211
Ogden
null
U
f
Published
0
Allison v. Brookshire
Allison
William Allison v. W. S. Brookshire
<p>Appeal from Williamson. Tried below before the Hon. E. B. Turner.</p> <p>The facts appear in the opinion of the court.</p>
null
null
<p>The law exempting certain property from forced sale was intended to secure to each family a means of support; and, since in the exemption of two horses it was intended to protect to a family animals to use, it cannot be construed to exclude geldings, mares or mules, all being used for the same purpose.</p>
null
null
null
null
null
60,346,522
null
0
tex
S
t
Texas Supreme Court
Texas Supreme Court
4,896,497
HOBBY, Judge. Appellants Harcisso, Jesus, Harcisso A., and Trinidad Rodriguez, and Jesus Lafuente in their own behalf, and the last named as next friend for Simon, Delfina, Adela, and Micuela Lafuente, minors, brought this action of tresspass to try title, on the 23d day of. March, 1887, to recover the land described ...
opinion_xml_harvard
2,759
2021-09-02 23:58:45.773647+00
020lead
t
f
5,080,847
Hobby
null
U
f
Published
0
Rodriguez v. Haynes
Rodriguez
Narcisso Rodriguez v. John V. Haynes
<p>Appeal from Jackson. Tried below before Hon. W. H. Burkhart.</p>
null
null
<p>1. Erasures in Ancient Instrument.—On the production of an instrument, if it appears to have been altered, it is incumbent upon the party offering it in evidence to explain this appearance. If nothing appears to the contrary the alteration, it is said, will be presumed to be contemporaneous with the execution of the...
null
null
null
null
null
60,351,158
No. 2579
0
tex
S
t
Texas Supreme Court
Texas Supreme Court
794,528
449 F.3d 954 Albino PEREZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Terry ROSARIO, Respondent-Appellee. No. 04-15279. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted December 6, 2004. Submission Deferred December 8, 2005. Resubmitted May 22, 2006. Filed May 22, 2006. Kent A. Russell, Russell and Russell, San Franci...
opinion_html_with_citations
5,707
2012-04-19 03:16:36+00
010combined
f
f
794,528
Bea, Carlos, Cowen, Diarmuid, O'Scannlain, Robert
null
RU
f
Published
0
Albino Perez v. Terry Rosario
null
Albino PEREZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Terry ROSARIO, Respondent-Appellee
null
null
<parties id="b978-24"> Albino PEREZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Terry ROSARIO, Respondent-Appellee. </parties><docketnumber id="AyC"> No. 04-15279. </docketnumber><br><court id="b978-26"> United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. </court><br><otherdate id="b978-27"> Argued and Submitted Dec....
null
null
null
null
null
null
736,223
04-15279
0
ca9
F
t
Ninth Circuit
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
6,254,514
Opinion by Mr. Chief Justice Brown, The pole lines of the Erie County Electric Company and the Mutual Telephone Company are on the east side of Sassafras street, in the City of Erie. At a certain point on these lines the telephone company erected a pole, which passed between the wires of the electric company. It exten...
opinion_xml_harvard
778
2022-02-17 21:26:12.990807+00
020lead
t
f
6,385,378
Brown, Frazer, Kephart, Simpson, Walling
null
U
f
Published
2
Erie Comity Electric Co. v. Mutual Telephone Co.
null
Erie Comity Electric Co. v. Mutual Telephone Co.
<p>Appeal, No. 34, Jan. T., 1919, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. Erie Co., Sept. T., 1915, No. 263, refusing to take off nonsuit in case of Erie County Electric Company v. Mutual Telephone Company.</p> <p>Trespass to recover the amount of a judgment which plaintiff was compelled to pay. Before Criswell, P. J., speci...
null
null
null
null
null
null
Affirmed.
<p>Negligence — Electric companies — Telephone companies — Non-insulated wire — Indemnity—Record of former suit.</p> <p>Where a telephone company and an electric company maintain pole lines along the same side of a street, and the telephone company attaches a wire of the electric company by a bracket to one of its own ...
63,040,515
Appeal, No. 34
0
pa
S
t
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
7,638,249
Affirmed.
opinion_xml_harvard
1
2022-07-29 20:41:18.230386+00
020lead
t
f
7,702,809
null
null
U
f
Published
0
J.W. v. Dep't of Children & Families
J.W.
J.W., The Father v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and Guardian Ad Litem Program
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
64,706,502
No. 4D18-3316
0
fladistctapp
SA
t
District Court of Appeal of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida
6,815,344
Sims, J., after making the foregoing statement, delivered the following opinion of the court: The questions presented by the assignments of error-will, so far as necessary, be passed upon in their order as-stated below. The question upon which we feel constrained to reverse the case is as follows: 1. Did the court err...
opinion_xml_harvard
1,107
2022-07-23 19:00:08.670385+00
020lead
t
f
6,919,714
Sims
null
U
f
Published
0
Counts v. Commonwealth
Counts
Harless Counts v. Commonwealth
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
63,907,990
null
0
va
S
t
Supreme Court of Virginia
Supreme Court of Virginia
9,541,671
Kaplan, J. The New England Home for Little Wanderers (Home), which had had custody of the unmarried mothers child from about the time of its birth ten months previously, filed a petition in the Probate *632Court for Suffolk County on April 23, 1973, to dispense with the need for the mother’s consent to a subsequent ad...
opinion_xml_harvard
5,884
2023-08-07 16:27:38.296905+00
020lead
f
f
2,059,510
Hennessey, Kaplan, Quirico, Reardon, Tauro, Wilkins
null
LU
f
Published
65
Petition of the New England Home for Little Wanderers
null
Petition of the New England Home for Little Wanderers to Dispense With Consent to Adoption
null
null
<parties data-order="0" data-type="parties" id="b643-4"> Petition of the New England Home for Little Wanderers to Dispense with Consent to Adoption. </parties><br><court data-order="1" data-type="court" id="b643-5"> Suffolk. </court><otherdate data-order="2" data-type="otherdate" id="AUF"> January 6, ...
null
null
null
null
null
null
1,903,496
null
0
mass
S
t
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
4,490,887
This is an appeal from the determination of a deficiency in income tax for the .calendar year 1919 in the amount of $3,429.67, all of which is in controversy. The single issue involved is how much profit, if any, the taxpayer realized from the sale of the assets of T. C. Tanke, a business firm of which he was the sole...
opinion_xml_harvard
720
2020-01-17 22:02:35.36291+00
020lead
t
f
4,711,312
Lansdon, Sterniiagen, Ajrundell
null
U
f
Published
1
Tanke v. Commissioner
Tanke
APPEAL OF EUGENE TANKE.
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
16,724,757
Docket No. 2926.
0
bta
FS
t
Board of Tax Appeals
United States Board of Tax Appeals
340,983
546 F.2d 413 U. S. v. Savino No. 76-1021 United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit 10/20/76 1 D.Mass. AFFIRMED
opinion_html_with_citations
20
2011-08-23 09:01:44+00
010combined
f
f
340,983
null
null
R
f
Published
0
United States v. Savino
Savino
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
2,399,341
76-1021
0
ca1
F
t
First Circuit
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
8,743,403
FRANKLIN E. KENNAMER, District Judge. i On March 7, 1938, W. I. Southern, Inc., brought suit in the district court of Tulsa county, Okl., to recover the proceeds of a policy of insurance issued by the plaintiff herein upon the life of Wheaton I. Southern, who died after the policy was issued. The policy contained a cl...
opinion_xml_harvard
999
2022-11-26 10:57:49.761928+00
020lead
t
f
8,760,060
Kennamer
null
U
f
Published
0
Atlas Life Ins. v. W. I. Southern, Inc.
null
ATLAS LIFE INS. CO. v. W. I. SOUTHERN, Inc.
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
66,026,175
No. 1272
0
oknd
FD
t
N.D. Oklahoma
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
6,763,702
Douglas, J. R.C. 4117.07 addresses the filing with respondent of a petition for representation election and provides, in part: “(A) When a petition is filed, in accordance with rules prescribed by the state employment relations board: “(1) By any employee or group of employees, or any individual or employee organizati...
opinion_xml_harvard
491
2022-07-21 00:34:15.508252+00
020lead
t
f
6,871,496
Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
null
U
f
Published
0
State ex rel. Independence Local School District Board of Education v. State Employment Relations Board
null
[The State, ex rel.] Independence Local School District Board of Education v. State Employment Relations Board
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
63,853,428
No. 90-1403
0
ohio
S
t
Ohio Supreme Court
Ohio Supreme Court
9,532,578
NOURSE, P. J. Plaintiff sued on a common count for the reasonable value of legal services. The cause was tried before a jury and plaintiff had a verdict for $50,400. The defendants’ motion for a new trial was denied and they present this appeal from the judgment under the alternative method. The defendants were attorn...
opinion_xml_harvard
3,194
2023-08-07 04:22:44.818741+00
020lead
f
f
1,124,108
Nourse
null
LU
f
Published
9
Stuart v. Preston
Stuart
THEODORE M. STUART, Respondent, v. JOHN W. PRESTON Et Al., Appellants
null
null
<docketnumber id="b346-7"> [Civ. No. 9382. </docketnumber><court id="A7E"> First Appellate District, Division Two. </court><decisiondate id="Av7n"> November 20, 1934.] </decisiondate><br><parties id="b346-9"> THEODORE M. STUART, Respondent, v. JOHN W. PRESTON et al., Appellants. </parties><b...
null
null
null
null
null
null
418,535
Civ. 9382
1
calctapp
SA
t
California Court of Appeal
California Court of Appeal
3,654,791
The facts are fully stated in the opinion. His Honor sustained the demurrer, and plaintiff appealed. In section 1, chapter 70, of the acts of the General Assembly, passed at the session held in 1883, it was enacted: "That it shall be unlawful for any live stock (a word defined in section 10), to run at large in Lenoir ...
opinion_html_columbia
1,767
2016-07-06 06:08:18.243619+00
020lead
f
f
3,908,597
Smith
null
ZU
f
Published
5
Commissioners of Greene v. . Commissioners of Lenoir
null
Commissioners of Greene County v. Commissioners of Lenoir County.
<p>Civil ACTION tried before Shepherd, Judge, upon a demurrer to the complaint, at Spring Term, 1884, of LeNOIR county.</p> <p>The facts arc fully stated in the opinion.</p> <p>His Honor sustained the demurrer, and plaintiff appealed.</p>
<p>(Cain v. Commissioners, 86 N. C., 8; Newsom v. Earnheart, Ibid, 391; Shuford v. Commissioners, Ibid, 552, cited and approved).</p>
<parties id="b214-3"> COMMISSIONERS OF GREENE COUNTY v. COMMISSIONERS OF LENOIR COUNTY. </parties><br><headnotes id="b214-4"> <em> Local Assessments </em> — Fence <em> Lem </em> — Parties. </headnotes><br><headnotes id="b214-5"> 1. Special burdens imposed for local improvemen...
<p>Local Assessments — Fence Lem — Parties.</p> <p>1. Special burdens imposed for local improvements by the Legislature are not unconstitutional. They are considered not so much a burden, as a compensation for the enhanced value which the taxed property is supposed to derive from the work.</p> <p>2. The Legislature (La...
CIVIL ACTION tried before Shepherd, Judge , upon a demurrer to the complaint, at Spring Term, 1884, of LENOIR county.
null
null
null
null
3,780,739
null
0
nc
S
t
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Supreme Court of North Carolina
9,865,186
On Rehearimg. Zamp received a trustee’s deed September 2, 1926, and the same day notified the mortgagor, Lamon, to quit on September 6th. September 7th Zamp brought suit in unlawful detainer before justice of the peace. Defendant *91answered that September 4th, “plaintiff agreed, in consideration of the snm of $35, to...
opinion_xml_harvard
429
2023-09-25 16:26:38.485979+00
070rehearing
f
f
3,319,494
Denison, Zamp
null
ZU
f
Published
4
Lamon v. Zamp
Lamon
Lamon v. Zamp.
null
null
<docketnumber id="b106-4"> No. 11,751. </docketnumber><br><parties id="b106-5"> Lamon <em> v. </em> Zamp. </parties><br><decisiondate id="b106-6"> Decided February 21, 1927. </decisiondate><br><attorneys id="b106-15"> Mr. John D. Milliken, for plaintiff in error. </attorneys...
null
Action in unlawful detainer. Judgment for plaintiff. Reversed.Error to the County Court of the City and County of Denver, Hon. George W. Dunn, Judge.
null
null
null
null
3,191,615
No. 11,751.
0
colo
S
t
Supreme Court of Colorado
Supreme Court of Colorado
8,051,196
Johnson, J. This case involves a town tax abatement program designed to reimburse persons for money spent educating students in schools outside the local school system. The defendants in these consolidated cases, the Town of Epsom and its board of selectmen (collectively referred to as “the selectmen”), appeal the Sup...
opinion_xml_harvard
1,988
2022-09-09 04:12:04.76145+00
020lead
t
f
8,091,056
Johnson, Others, Thayer
null
U
f
Published
0
Barksdale v. Town of Epsom
Barksdale
Barbara Barksdale & a. v. Town of Epsom Epsom School Board & a. v. Town of Epsom Board of Selectmen
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
65,186,672
No. 91-420
0
nh
S
t
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
8,674,489
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Thomas Dean, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge iss...
opinion_xml_harvard
247
2022-11-25 01:21:38.553168+00
020lead
t
t
8,691,406
Davis, Motz, Wynn
null
U
f
Published
0
United States v. Dean
Dean
United States v. Thomas DEAN, Jr.
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
65,956,865
No. 12-7065
0
ca4
F
t
Fourth Circuit
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
8,427,011
*828 ORDER William Waters, a Tennessee state prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals a district court judgment dismissing his civil rights complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1988. Waters has filed a motion for a preliminary injunction. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of ...
opinion_xml_harvard
989
2022-11-04 03:15:15.132274+00
020lead
t
f
8,455,322
Clay, Gilman, Matia
null
U
f
Published
0
Waters v. Evans
Waters
William WATERS v. Carl EVANS, Captain, Corporal and Internal Affairs Investigator at TCIP Michael Roberts, Captain, Sergeant and Disciplinary Board Chairperson Oneida Hensin, Employee at TCIP James Flowers, Employee at TCIP Jack Morgan, Warden at TCIP Jeff Butler, Sergeant and Disciplinary Board Chairperson, Bryant Wil...
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
65,678,265
No. 03-6576
0
ca6
F
t
Sixth Circuit
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
3,315,369
DEFENDANT Buschman was convicted of the statutory crime of operating and knowingly having in his possession *Page 174 a still, used, designed and intended for the manufacture of intoxicating liquor. He brings error. The only errors assigned are that the verdict is contrary to the law and the evidence; that prejudicial,...
opinion_html_with_citations
343
2016-07-05 17:32:46.336824+00
020lead
f
f
3,320,220
Campbell
null
ZU
f
Published
0
Buschman v. People
Buschman
Buschman v. the People.
null
null
<docketnumber id="b189-4"> No. 11,671. </docketnumber><br><parties id="b189-5"> Buschman <em> v. </em> The People. </parties><br><decisiondate id="b189-6"> Decided October 4, 1926. </decisiondate><br><attorneys id="b189-19"> Mr. George H. Lerg, for plaintiff in error. </atto...
null
Plaintiff in error was convicted of having in his possession and operating a still for the manufacture of intoxicating liquor. Affirmed. On Application for Supersedeas.Error to the District Court of Grand County, Hon. Charles E. Herrick, Judge.
null
null
null
null
3,192,341
No. 11,671.
0
colo
S
t
Supreme Court of Colorado
Supreme Court of Colorado
7,190,871
Howell, J. A motion was made at the July term of 1873 to dismiss this appeal on two grounds, the first of which is because the transcript was not filed in time. The appeal was made returnable on the third Monday of July, 1872, which was the fifteenth day of said month. On the seventeenth day of the same month, on moti...
opinion_xml_harvard
213
2022-07-24 16:56:37.075701+00
020lead
t
f
7,275,087
Howell
null
U
f
Published
0
Cane v. Caldwell
Cane
M. D. C. Cane v. Caldwell & Kahn
<p>APPEAL from the Tenth Judicial District Court, parish of Caddo. Levisee, J.</p>
null
null
<p>An extension oí the return-day does not carry with it the “ days of grace ” added to the original return-day, and a second or subsequent application for an extension must be made on or before the day to which the extension is made. This has been repeatedly held.</p>
null
null
null
null
null
64,263,469
No. 475
0
la
S
t
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Supreme Court of Louisiana
5,179,262
OPINION STOKES, J. Defendant AMEC Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. (“AMEC”) has filed a motion to compel documents in the possession of non-party Golder Associates (“Golder”). The State of Delaware Department of Transportation (“the Department”) opposes the motion, arguing that 178 of the 181 the documents sought ...
opinion_xml_harvard
4,341
2022-01-06 02:26:34.443653+00
020lead
t
f
5,346,339
Stokes
null
U
f
Published
1
State, Department of Transportation v. Figg Bridge Engineers, Inc.
null
STATE of Delaware, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION v. FIGG BRIDGE ENGINEERS, INC. and AMEC Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., f/k/a AMEC E & I, Inc., f/k/a MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
61,694,067
C.A. No. S11C-01-031 RFS
0
delsuperct
SA
t
Superior Court of Delaware
Superior Court of Delaware
9,883,976
OPINION PAGE, Justice. This case presents the issue of whether a landowner whose immediate access to a state highway has been limited to one direction by the closure of a median crossover is entitled to compensation from the state for the resulting reduction in value of its property. The court of appeals reversed summ...
opinion_xml_harvard
1,873
2023-10-06 02:29:34.449387+00
020lead
f
f
1,809,741
Page
null
LU
f
Published
8
Dale Properties, LLC v. State
null
DALE PROPERTIES, LLC, Respondent, v. STATE of Minnesota, Petitioner, Appellant
null
null
<parties id="b827-12"> DALE PROPERTIES, LLC, Respondent, v. STATE of Minnesota, Petitioner, Appellant. </parties><br><docketnumber id="b827-16"> No. C3-00-837. </docketnumber><br><court id="b827-17"> Supreme Court of Minnesota. </court><br><decisiondate id="b827-18"> Feb. 7, 2002. </decision...
null
null
null
null
null
null
1,385,679
C3-00-837
0
minn
S
t
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Supreme Court of Minnesota
409,225
689 F.2d 396 Unempl.Ins.Rep. CCH 21,696 William SIPE, individually and on behalf of all other persons who are similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant in Nos. 81-2689, 81-3005 and Cross-Appellee, v. AMERADA HESS CORPORATION, Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant in Nos. 81-2690, 81-3006 and Cross-Appellee, v. STATE ...
opinion_html_with_citations
7,148
2011-08-23 09:26:06+00
010combined
f
f
409,225
null
null
R
f
Published
29
null
null
unempl.ins.rep. Cch 21,696 William Sipe, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Who Are Similarly Situated, in Nos. 81-2689, 81-3005 and Cross-Appellee v. Amerada Hess Corporation, Defendant-Third Party in Nos. 81-2690, 81-3006 and Cross-Appellee v. State of New Jersey, Department of Labor and Industry of the ...
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
293,268
81-2689
1
ca3
F
t
Third Circuit
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1,494,869
391 F. Supp. 186 (1975) Brian Mark BURKE et al. v. Edward H. LEVI et al. Civ. A. No. 629-72-R. United States District Court, E. D. Virginia, Richmond Division. March 14, 1975. *187 Brian Mark Burke and others, pro se. Raymond A. Carpenter, Asst. U. S. Atty., Richmond, Va., for defendants. MEMORANDUM MERHIGE, District J...
opinion_html_with_citations
3,302
2013-10-30 06:28:50.231085+00
010combined
f
f
1,494,869
Merhige
null
LU
f
Published
9
Burke v. Levi
Burke
Brian Mark BURKE Et Al. v. Edward H. LEVI Et Al.
null
null
<parties id="b244-3"> Brian Mark BURKE et al. v. Edward H. LEVI et al. </parties><docketnumber id="AiK"> Civ. A. No. 629-72-R. </docketnumber><br><court id="b244-5"> United States District Court, E. D. Virginia, Richmond Division. </court><decisiondate id="AaLp"> March 14, 1975. </decisionda...
null
null
null
null
null
null
982,363
Civ. A. 629-72-R
0
vaed
FD
t
E.D. Virginia
District Court, E.D. Virginia
8,228,083
Unpublished Decision. Citation to unpublished opinion of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania is governed by Section 65.37 of the Operating Procedure of the Superior Court, 210 Pa. Code § 65.37.Affirmed.
opinion_xml_harvard
30
2022-10-15 15:43:28.518181+00
020lead
t
f
8,262,770
null
null
U
f
Published
0
In re J.S.
In re J.S.
IN the INTEREST OF: J.S., a Minor
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
65,440,765
2004 EDA 2017
0
pasuperct
SA
t
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
7,190,227
Moe&an, J. The public administrator published an account of his, administiation. The aecouut was opposed by Perry, administrator of the succession of Bradley. Among other grounds of opposition, it was urged that the public administrator had not been legally appointed. To this opposition the administrator excepted on t...
opinion_xml_harvard
185
2022-07-24 16:56:06.557509+00
020lead
t
f
7,274,556
Moe
null
U
f
Published
0
Succession of Epperson
Succession of Epperson
Succession of R. P. Epperson
<p>APPEAL from the Parish Court, parish of Yermilion. Guegnon, J.</p>
null
null
<p>Among the several grounds of opposition to a public administrator’s account it was urged,, that said public administrator bad not been legally appointed. To this tbe Administrator excepted on tbe ground that it was an attempt to remove bim from office, wbicb be maintained, could only be done by direct action. Tbe ju...
null
null
null
null
null
64,262,938
No. 834
0
la
S
t
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Supreme Court of Louisiana
9,703,729
MR. JUSTICE MURPHY delivered the opinion of the court. This is an administrative review action in which the Circuit Court affirmed the revocation of plaintiff’s City of Chicago retail liquor license for premises at J/-721 N. Clifton Avenue, Chicago. On appeal, plaintiff contends that the judgment of the trial court is...
opinion_xml_harvard
1,209
2023-08-26 00:06:10.035085+00
020lead
f
f
1,976,127
Burman, Murphy
null
LU
f
Published
3
Legones v. License Appeal Commission
Legones
Marco Legones, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. License Appeal Commission of the City of Chicago, A. L. Cronin, Chairman, and Richard J. Daley, Local Liquor Control Commissioner of the City of Chicago, Defendants-Appellees
null
null
<parties data-order="0" data-type="parties" id="b410-5" pgmap="410"> Marco Legones, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. License Appeal Commission of the City of Chicago, A. L. Cronin, Chairman, and Richard J. Daley, Local Liquor Control Commissioner of the City of Chicago, Defendants-Appellees. </parties><br><docketnumber d...
null
null
null
null
null
null
1,804,461
Gen. 52,193
0
illappct
SA
t
Appellate Court of Illinois
Appellate Court of Illinois
4,443,545
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT PARKER WAICHMAN LLP, Appellant, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY and LINDA PURDO, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of THOMAS PURDO, Appellees. No. 4D18-3239 [October 2, 2019] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judici...
opinion_html_with_citations
2,484
2019-10-02 15:03:23.610222+00
010combined
f
f
4,666,292
null
null
C
f
Published
0
PARKER WAICHMAN LLP v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
16,280,853
18-3239
0
fladistctapp
SA
t
District Court of Appeal of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida
6,673,247
The opinion of the Court was delivered by Willard, A. J. The relators allege that the ordinance of the city of Columbia imposing upon them, as bankers, payment of a sum of money by way of a license is invalid, and they ask that the respondents be restrained from enforcing such ordinance by a writ of prohibition issued...
opinion_xml_harvard
3,137
2022-07-20 21:13:59.442071+00
020lead
t
f
6,788,920
Moses, Willard, Wright
null
U
f
Published
0
State v. Columbia
Columbia
State v. Columbia
<p>Beeoke COOKE, J., at Columbia, August, 1873.</p> <p>This was a suggestion by the Citizens’ Savings Bank and the South Carolina Bank and Trust Company, as relators, against the city of Columbia and Jesse E. Dent, Sheriff of Richland County, praying for a writ-of prohibition to restrain the enforcement of certain exec...
null
null
<p>An ordinanco of the city of Columbia imposing by way of license fees a tax on business and avocations, and discriminating as to the amounts to be paid for licenses by the different classes of persons subject to the tax: Held to be conformable to an Act of the Legislature authorizing the city to require all persons, ...
null
null
null
null
null
63,770,244
null
0
sc
S
t
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Supreme Court of South Carolina
5,047,382
STERNBERG, Justice. Ruth Harlow, widow of Carl Harlow, in her individual capacity and in her administrative capacity, attacks the validity of Carl’s last will and testament and also seeks to set aside a settlement of claim that she made with Clarence Harlow, her brother-in-law, on the grounds that it was induced by du...
opinion_xml_harvard
1,785
2021-10-01 07:30:00.64117+00
020lead
t
f
5,223,030
Sternberg
null
U
f
Published
0
Harlow v. Harlow
Harlow
Ruth HARLOW, widow of Carl Harlow v. Clarence HARLOW, Appellees Ruth HARLOW, widow of Carl Harlow v. Clarence HARLOW
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
60,553,346
null
0
ky
S
t
Kentucky Supreme Court
Kentucky Supreme Court
5,665,858
*644Opinion BANKE, J. I. Introduction Real party in interest Timothy H. Joyce has sued petitioner Life Technologies Corporation (LTC) for wrongful termination, claiming, among other things, that he was discriminated against on the basis of his age and retaliated against because he complained about such discrimination....
opinion_xml_harvard
5,107
2022-01-12 03:54:37.662758+00
020lead
t
f
5,810,420
Banke
null
U
f
Published
0
Life Technologies Corp. v. Superior Court
null
LIFE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN MATEO COUNTY, Respondent TIMOTHY H. JOYCE, Real Party in Interest
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
62,167,855
No. A131120
0
calctapp
SA
t
California Court of Appeal
California Court of Appeal
2,046,057
394 N.E.2d 935 (1979) William W. BUCK, Defendant-Appellant, v. P.J.T., Plaintiff-Appellee. No. 3-978A243. Court of Appeals of Indiana. September 10, 1979. Rehearing Denied January 14, 1980. *936 Anthony V. Luber, South Bend, for defendant-appellant. Bruce H. Stewart, Leibowitz & Stewart, South Bend, for plaintiff-appel...
opinion_html_with_citations
2,000
2013-10-30 08:10:02.001586+00
010combined
f
f
2,046,057
Garrard, Hoffman, Staton
null
LU
f
Published
8
Buck v. P. J. T.
Buck
William W. BUCK, Defendant-Appellant, v. P. J. T., Plaintiff-Appellee
null
null
<parties id="b973-9"> William W. BUCK, Defendant-Appellant, v. P. J. T., Plaintiff-Appellee. </parties><br><docketnumber id="b973-11"> No. 3-978A243. </docketnumber><br><court id="b973-12"> Court of Appeals of Indiana. </court><br><decisiondate id="b973-13"> Sept. 10, 1979. </decisiondate><b...
null
null
null
null
null
null
1,880,507
3-978A243
0
indctapp
SA
t
Indiana Court of Appeals
Indiana Court of Appeals
8,661,795
By JUDGE H. CALVIN SPAIN On December 22, 1989, a suppression hearing was held in the above-captioned matter. The Commonwealth presented the evidence of Officer Layton, an auxiliary Police Officer, with respect to the facts expected to be presented at trial. Thorough examination and cross-examination of the witness set...
opinion_xml_harvard
322
2022-11-24 21:46:21.143988+00
020lead
t
f
8,678,761
Spain
null
U
f
Published
0
Commonwealth v. West
Commonwealth
Commonwealth of Virginia v. Roosevelt West, Jr.
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
65,944,208
Case No. CR88-2789
0
vaccvabeach
ST
f
Virginia Beach County Circuit Court
Virginia Beach County Circuit Court
6,614,180
Re, Chief Judge: The question presented in this case pertains to the proper classification, for customs duty purposes, of certain dried, unground chili peppers imported from Mexico. The merchandise was described on the invoices as “Chili Seco Chilaca” peppers. The chili peppers were classified by the customs officials...
opinion_xml_harvard
5,481
2022-07-20 20:20:13.337223+00
020lead
t
f
6,732,513
Re
null
U
f
Published
0
Hutchinson Brokers, Inc. v. United States
null
Hutchinson Brokers, Inc., A/C Thos. P. Gonzalez Corp. v. United States
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
63,713,485
Court No. 79-8-01298
0
cit
FS
t
Court of International Trade
United States Court of International Trade
9,126,946
Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.
opinion_xml_harvard
6
2022-11-28 00:14:57.795503+00
020lead
t
f
9,132,347
null
null
U
f
Published
0
Ables v. Oklahoma
Ables
Ables v. Oklahoma
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
66,398,637
No. 92-7274
0
scotus
F
t
Supreme Court
Supreme Court of the United States
8,113,391
Rao, Judge: The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, were submitted for decision upon the following stipulation: *497IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that the items on the invoices covered by the reappraisement appeals listed in Schedule “A”, attached here...
opinion_xml_harvard
271
2022-09-09 14:42:39.551155+00
020lead
t
f
8,151,899
Rao
null
U
f
Published
0
F. W. Myers & Co. v. United States
null
F. W. Myers & Co., Inc. v. United States
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
65,247,914
Reap. Dec. 10642; Entry No. F-5636, etc.
0
cusc
FS
t
U.S. Customs Court
United States Customs Court
4,683,493
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-7792 DERRICK MICHAEL ALLEN, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BROOKS, PIERCE, MCLENDON, HUMPHREY AND LEONARD LLP; KEARNS DAVIS, Attorney, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina,...
opinion_html_with_citations
215
2021-05-03 19:00:56.163768+00
010combined
f
f
4,879,714
null
null
C
f
Unpublished
0
Derrick Allen, Sr. v. Brooks Pierce
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
59,876,626
20-7792
0
ca4
F
t
Fourth Circuit
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
5,004,522
JACKSON, Justice. The record discloses that in August, 1926, the appellant conveyed to appellee a certain' iot in the Lindsey addition to Amarillo, Tex., for a consideration of $5,000 paid, $750 in ■cash and the assumption of the sum of $1,900 owing to the Standard Savings & Loan Association and a note in the sum of $...
opinion_xml_harvard
2,167
2021-10-01 01:48:55.218437+00
020lead
t
f
5,182,584
Jackson
null
U
f
Published
1
Lindsey v. Dougherty
Lindsey
LINDSEY v. DOUGHERTY
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
60,512,586
No. 4001
0
texapp
SA
t
Court of Appeals of Texas
Court of Appeals of Texas
3,836,669
The parties herein are in the same relation as in the trial court, and will be referred to as plaintiff and defendant, respectively. Plaintiff commenced this action against defendant to recover upon two promissory notes. The petition was in the usual form, and defendant answered and alleged, in substance, that, on Nove...
opinion_html_with_citations
787
2016-07-06 08:05:39.042088+00
020lead
f
f
4,078,455
Andrews, Clark, Cullison, Keener, Lester, McNEILL, Riley, Swindall
null
ZU
f
Published
4
First State Bank v. Sharp
Sharp
First State Bank of Vian v. Sharp
null
null
<parties id="b221-6"> FIRST STATE BANK of VIAN v. SHARP. </parties><br><docketnumber id="b221-7"> No. 20245. </docketnumber><decisiondate id="AJ7"> Opinion Filed Sept. 22, 1931. </decisiondate><br><attorneys id="b221-15"> Frye &amp; Frye and Hughes &amp; Ellinghausen, for plaintiff in error. ...
null
Appeal from District Court, Sequoyah County; J.T. Parks. Judge. Action by the First State Bank of Vian against W.L. Sharp. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
null
null
null
null
3,950,597
20245
0
okla
S
t
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
8,641,995
DECISION ABRAMS, Chief Judge: Tried by special court-martial with members, the accused was convicted, contrary to his pleas, of disrespect toward his superior officer, failing to obey a lawful order, and drunk and disorderly in station, in violation of Articles 89, 92 and 134, respectively, Uniform Code of Military Ju...
opinion_xml_harvard
1,516
2022-11-24 20:15:35.783193+00
020lead
t
f
8,661,857
Abrams, Early, Foray, Military
null
U
f
Published
1
United States v. Daniels
Daniels
UNITED STATES v. Airman First Class Nathan E. DANIELS, FR 156-46-0858 Headquarters, 2d Combat Support Group Eighth Air Force (SAC)
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
65,927,301
ACM S24509
0
usafctmilrev
MA
f
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
3,037,507
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION  LOCAL 1309, AFL-CIO; SELMA No. 05-56567 SHACKLEFORD; GREGORY PASSMORE; RONALD G. DUNCAN; TIMOTHY D.C. No. THURMANN; SAMUEL J. FRANK; CV 05-1199 IEG ALEXANDER BRADLEY; MICHELE L. SD Cal. BOSWELL; JOHN A. TAYLOR; ORDER TERRE...
opinion_html_with_citations
5,035
2015-10-13 22:56:34.83656+00
010combined
f
f
3,037,507
null
Civil
C
f
Published
0
Amalgamated Transit Union v. Laidlaw Transit Services, Inc.
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
2,894,933
05-56567
0
ca9
F
t
Ninth Circuit
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
3,845,868
Plaintiff claims it had an exclusive contract with defendant for the sale in Fayette County of the articles which the latter distributes. The contract was terminable by either party on written notice. Plaintiff asserts that, while the contract was in force, defendant entered into an arrangement with West Penn Appliance...
opinion_html_with_citations
1,512
2016-07-06 08:19:27.148318+00
020lead
f
f
4,086,760
Barnes, Drew, Kephart, Linn, Maxey, Schaefer, Schaffer
null
ZU
f
Published
29
Dahath Electric Co. v. Suburban Electric Development Co.
null
Dahath Electric Company, Appellant, v. Suburban Electric Development Company
null
null
<parties id="b263-2"> Dahath Electric Company, Appellant, <em> v. </em> Suburban Electric Development Company. </parties><br><otherdate id="b263-8"> Argued October 5, 1938. </otherdate><judges id="A6m"> Before Kephart, C. J., Schaffer, Maxey, Drew, Linn and Barnes, JJ. </judges><br...
null
Appeal, No. 53, March T., 1938, from judgment of Allegheny Co., Oct. T., 1932, No. 1527, in case of Dahath Electric Company v. Suburban Electric Development Company. Judgment affirmed. Assumpsit. Before T. M. MARSHALL, J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. Compulsory nonsuit entered. Motion to take i...
null
null
null
null
3,958,902
Appeal, 53
0
pa
S
t
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1,854,151
191 B.R. 365 (1996) In re ABEPP ACQUISITION CORP., dba Abbott & Company, Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 95-32313. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division. January 11, 1996. William Schoenberg, Cleveland, Ohio, for Debtor. Mary Ann Whipple, Toledo, Ohio, for Unsecured Creditors' Committee. Yvonne Tertel, Tol...
opinion_html_with_citations
2,686
2013-10-30 07:37:47.122747+00
010combined
f
f
1,854,151
Walter J. Krasniewski
null
LU
f
Published
1
In Re ABEPP Acquisition Corp.
In Re ABEPP Acquisition Corp.
In Re ABEPP ACQUISITION CORP., Dba Abbott & Company, Debtor
null
null
<parties id="b421-10"> In re ABEPP ACQUISITION CORP., dba Abbott &amp; Company, Debtor. </parties><docketnumber id="AI1"> Bankruptcy No. 95-32313. </docketnumber><br><court id="b421-11"> United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division. </court><br><decisiondate id="b421-14"> Jan. 11...
null
null
null
null
null
null
1,735,986
19-10426
0
ohnb
FB
t
N.D. Ohio
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio
9,079,900
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
opinion_xml_harvard
6
2022-11-27 21:20:48.360396+00
020lead
t
f
9,085,816
null
null
U
f
Published
0
Valdez v. United States
Valdez
Valdez v. United States
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
66,352,073
No. 88-1375
0
scotus
F
t
Supreme Court
Supreme Court of the United States
9,560,674
Judge COZORT concurring by separate opinion. I concur with both ultimate conclusions reached by the majority: (1) that the case must be remanded to set support consistent with the applicable statutes; and (2) that the pendente lite alimony award is not immediately appealable. On the first issue, however, I cannot agre...
opinion_xml_harvard
238
2023-08-21 17:53:30.687592+00
030concurrence
f
f
1,202,425
Cozort, Greene, Parker
null
LU
t
Published
19
Browne v. Browne
Browne
Jo Perry Browne v. Joseph M. Browne, Jr.
null
null
<parties id="b645-5"> JO PERRY BROWNE v. JOSEPH M. BROWNE, JR. </parties><br><docketnumber id="b645-6"> No. 906DC750 </docketnumber><decisiondate id="AWH"> (Filed 19 February 1991) </decisiondate><br><attorneys id="b646-14"> <span citation-index="1" class="star-pagination" label="618"> *618 ...
null
null
null
null
null
null
261,077
906DC750
1
ncctapp
SA
t
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
7,597,152
PER CURIAM. We affirm appellant’s conviction but remand for sentencing correction. The written sentence must be corrected to reflect the trial court’s oral pronouncement that *1138appellant should be sentenced as a youthful offender. See Kelly v. State, 414 So.2d 1117 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and STONE a...
opinion_xml_harvard
52
2022-07-29 06:54:41.546728+00
020lead
t
f
7,662,951
Farmer, Glickstein, Stone
null
U
f
Published
0
Schlee v. State
Schlee
Jeremy SCHLEE v. STATE of Florida
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
64,664,023
No. 91-0230
0
fladistctapp
SA
t
District Court of Appeal of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida
7,275,037
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
opinion_xml_harvard
17
2022-07-25 08:01:22.754553+00
020lead
t
f
7,356,428
null
null
U
f
Published
0
Parsons v. United States
Parsons
Norman PARSONS v. UNITED STATES
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
64,344,926
No. 06-256
0
scotus
F
t
Supreme Court
Supreme Court of the United States
4,662,434
**************************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of this opinion is the date the opinion was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certificatio...
opinion_html_with_citations
5,659
2021-02-24 13:02:23.343672+00
010combined
f
f
4,858,655
null
null
C
t
Published
0
In re Miyuki M.
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
59,677,769
AC44186
0
connappct
SA
t
Connecticut Appellate Court
Connecticut Appellate Court
6,629,101
Opinion by Sullivan, J. It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of wooden beads similar to those the subject of Abstract 38617. The claim at 35 percent under paragraph 1503 was therefore sustained.
opinion_xml_harvard
33
2022-07-20 20:36:10.483927+00
020lead
t
f
6,747,009
Sullivan
null
U
f
Published
0
Protests 835152-G of Hollander Bead & Novelty Corp.
null
Protests 835152-G, etc., of Hollander Bead & Novelty Corp. (New York)
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
63,728,164
No. 40341
0
cusc
FS
t
U.S. Customs Court
United States Customs Court
2,279,347
21 Cal. App. 4th 203 (1993) 25 Cal. Rptr. 2d 804 AERO-CRETE, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, Respondent; DALE VILLAGE APARTMENT COMPANY et al., Real Parties in Interest. Docket No. D019450. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One. December 21, 1993. *205 COUNS...
opinion_html_with_citations
3,462
2013-10-30 08:58:00.843444+00
010combined
f
f
2,279,347
Wiener
null
LU
f
Published
9
Aero-Crete, Inc. v. Superior Court
null
AERO-CRETE, INC., Et Al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, Respondent; DALE VILLAGE APARTMENT COMPANY Et Al., Real Parties in Interest
null
null
<docketnumber id="b123-5"> [No. D019450. </docketnumber><court id="A7u"> Fourth Dist., Div. One. </court><decisiondate id="AeW"> Dec. 21, 1993.] </decisiondate><br><parties id="b123-6"> AERO-CRETE, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, Respondent; DALE VILLAGE AP...
null
null
null
null
null
null
2,166,154
D019450
0
calctapp
SA
t
California Court of Appeal
California Court of Appeal
5,759,944
In an action to declare the validity of a lease and for other relief, in which defendant interposed a counterclaim to declare the lease terminated, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered October 6, 1965, which denied its motion for findings inter alia that plaintiff and its presid...
opinion_xml_harvard
145
2022-01-12 17:12:48.60366+00
020lead
t
f
5,902,680
null
null
U
f
Published
0
South Bay Center, Inc. v. York Associates Inc.
null
South Bay Center, Inc. v. York Associates, Inc.
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
62,260,780
null
0
nyappdiv
SA
t
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
7,534,199
Writ denied. On the showing made, the exercise of this court’s supervisory jurisdiction is not warranted. The state’s application seeks review and reversal of a trial court ruling overruling the state’s objection to certain testimony being elicited from a defense witness in this criminal trial which is in progress. It...
opinion_xml_harvard
155
2022-07-29 05:15:44.149582+00
020lead
t
f
7,604,014
Hall, Price, Sexton
null
U
f
Published
0
State v. Hardey
Hardey
STATE of Louisiana v. Janet C. HARDEY
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
64,605,081
No. 16,565-KW
0
lactapp
SA
t
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Louisiana Court of Appeal
37,964
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D In the April 7, 2005 United States Court of Appeals Charles R. Fulbruge III for the Fifth Circuit Clerk m 04-30676 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, VERSUS BARRY C. GRIER, ALSO KNOWN AS BARRY CORNELIUS GRIER, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the Uni...
opinion_html_with_citations
1,807
2010-04-25 20:01:09+00
010combined
f
f
37,964
Dennis, Prado, Smith
null
CU
t
Unpublished
0
United States v. Grier
Grier
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Barry C. GRIER, Also Known as Barry Cornelius Grier, Defendant-Appellant
null
null
<parties id="b744-7"> UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Barry C. GRIER, Also Known as Barry Cornelius Grier, Defendant-Appellant. </parties><br><docketnumber id="b744-9"> No. 04-30676. </docketnumber><br><court id="b744-10"> United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. </court><br>...
null
null
null
null
null
null
1,316,544
04-30676
0
ca5
F
t
Fifth Circuit
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit