Update README.md

README.md

@@ -25,7 +25,6 @@ The questions can be split half-half in 2 possible ways:
 * coding
 * trick questions
 
-
 # Results
 
 ![benchmark-results.png](https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/65a681d3da9f6df1410562e9/GGTY_m0DJIf15c8UvCvyr.png)
@@ -41,11 +40,35 @@ Has a tendency to use lists when replying. Has difficulty following instructions
 [Undi95/Miqu-70B-Alpaca-DPO-GGUF](https://huggingface.co/Undi95/Miqu-70B-Alpaca-DPO-GGUF)\
 Actually more censored than the original! Has more difficulties following instructions. The ability to stay consistent within a long answer, and the quality of the generated text have also decreased.
 
-
 # Questions type
 
-I will not provide the exact questions are used for various reasons, but I can provide some general ideas about which areas they cover:
-
+I will not provide the exact text of the questions, for various reasons, but I can provide some general ideas about which areas they cover:
+* evaluation of different writing styles
+* writing quality of narration
+* grammatical and syntaxic tests
+* multi-turn conversation and ability to recall information
+* job interview practice
+* gastronomy
+* geography
+* planning
+* step by step instructions
+* mechanics through ability to engineer flow of complex physical interactions
+* understanding and summarisation of long texts
+* anatomy
+* medical knowledge
+* censorship 
+
+# Scoring system
+
+Each response is scored from 0 to 6. Some questions have a double score, as separate criterias are evaluated.
+The score are attributed as follow:\
+0 = technical failure\
+1 = bad answer\
+2 = too many flaws or mistakes\
+3 = fullfills all requests in an adequate way\
+4 = great answer\
+5 = outstanding\
+6 = exceptional answer worthy of an oscar, grammy award, or nobel prize (so far only 1/720 replies obtained it)
 
 # Other interesting benchmarks