| { |
| "at": "2026-05-20T23:26:10.635184", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "input_path": "dataset/MTS-Dialog/Main-Dataset/MTS-Dialog-TestSet-1-MEDIQA-Chat-2023.csv", |
| "output_path": "logs/clean_testset_2/testset1-cleaned-2.csv", |
| "removed_path": "logs/clean_testset_2/testset1-cleaned-2.removed.csv", |
| "kimi_model": "moonshotai/Kimi-K2.6", |
| "config": { |
| "input_path": "dataset/MTS-Dialog/Main-Dataset/MTS-Dialog-TestSet-1-MEDIQA-Chat-2023.csv", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "output_path": "logs/clean_testset_2/testset1-cleaned-2.csv", |
| "removed_path": "logs/clean_testset_2/testset1-cleaned-2.removed.csv", |
| "report_path": "logs/clean_testset_2/testset1-report.json", |
| "facts_path": "", |
| "facts_output_path": "", |
| "checkpoint_path": "logs/clean_testset_2/kimi-ts1.json", |
| "min_turns": 3, |
| "min_patient_chars": 1, |
| "min_patient_turns": 1, |
| "dialogue_limit": 0, |
| "kimi_limit": 0 |
| }, |
| "summary": { |
| "in": 200, |
| "kept": 94, |
| "dropped": 106, |
| "reasons": { |
| "same": 23, |
| "no": 8, |
| "only": 24, |
| "non": 7, |
| "doctor": 42, |
| "starts": 5 |
| } |
| }, |
| "entries": [ |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:0", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 0, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "No doctor turn is entirely a non-standalone reaction to the immediately preceding patient turn. Turn 6 and 8 contain brief acknowledgments ('Yes, I see.', 'Yes, I do.') but each is followed by a separate standalone question or new medical information. Turn 10 is a substantive diagnostic explanation that conveys independent medical content. All other doctor turns are standalone questions or statements.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:1", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 1, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "The doctor turn 'Anything else?' is a generic, elliptical follow-up question that solicits additional family medical history. It is not tightly bound to the specific content of the previous patient answer ('stroke'); it would remain appropriate across various patient responses in this history-taking context, and it advances the dialogue rather than serving as a pure acknowledgment.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:2", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 2, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "same side twice at turn 5" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "same side twice at turn 5", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:3", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 3, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "Turn 2 is a standalone question that does not refer back to the previous patient answer; it makes sense on its own and is not an acknowledgment or comment entirely about the prior 'No'.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:4", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 4, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "Turn 2 ('Anything for anyone else?') is a follow-up question asking for additional family history rather than a purely backward-referential reaction. Although it is elliptical, it constitutes a standalone question requesting new information and does not fall into the category of entire utterances that are only about the previous patient answer (e.g., 'That's good', 'Yes, I do'). Per the instructions, doctor turns that contain a question should not be dropped.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:5", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 5, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "Turn 2 is a standalone question about medical and social history that does not refer back to or depend on the preceding patient answer ('I have been good.'); it makes sense on its own and is not an acknowledgment or purely referential utterance.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:6", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 6, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "no patient/guest patient turns" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "no patient/guest patient turns", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:7", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 7, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "All doctor turns are standalone questions that request new information rather than purely acknowledging or reacting to the preceding patient turn. Turn 2 ('How old are your brothers?') is a follow-up question but is not entirely dependent on the previous answer for intelligibility, and Turn 4 ('Any family history of diabetes?') introduces a new topic. There are no doctor turns consisting solely of backward-looking acknowledgments like 'That's good' or 'Yes'.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:8", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 8, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "same side twice at turn 2" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "same side twice at turn 2", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:9", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 9, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "only 2 turns (min 3)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "only 2 turns (min 3)", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:10", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 10, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "Every doctor turn either is a standalone question that makes sense without the preceding patient answer, or it briefly acknowledges the patient and then introduces a new standalone question/topic. No doctor turn consists entirely of a backward-referring utterance.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:11", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 11, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "non doctor/patient speakers: guest_family, guest_family_2" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "non doctor/patient speakers: guest_family, guest_family_2", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:12", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 12, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "Every doctor turn either introduces a new standalone question or a standalone statement; none consist entirely of a brief, context-dependent acknowledgment/reaction that would be meaningless without the preceding patient turn. Turn 2 is a follow-up question about support systems but is a self-contained query. Turn 4 opens a new topic. Turn 6 is a general standalone statement about smoking.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:13", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 13, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "Turn 2 is a standalone question that does not refer back to the prior patient answer. Turn 4 begins with a brief acknowledgment ('Good, good.') of the patient's prior statement, but the remainder is a new, standalone question about blood pressure, so the entire utterance is not about the previous patient answer. No doctor turn is wholly dependent on the immediately preceding patient turn.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:14", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 14, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "Every doctor turn that follows a patient turn contains a new standalone question or topic after any brief acknowledgment; no doctor utterance consists entirely of a response to the previous patient answer.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:15", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 15, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "Every doctor turn that follows a patient turn is a standalone question (e.g., 'Any headaches or breathlessness?', 'Any skin problems?', etc.) and does not consist entirely of a reaction to the immediately preceding patient answer. None of the doctor lines depend wholly on the prior patient utterance to make sense.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:16", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 16, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "All doctor turns that follow a patient turn contain standalone questions that do not depend on the previous patient answer; none consist entirely of a reference back to that answer.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:17", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 17, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "The doctor turn at index 2 ('Lucky you. No prior surgeries?') briefly acknowledges the patient's prior answer ('Lucky you') but then poses a standalone new question ('No prior surgeries?'). Because the entire utterance is not solely about the previous patient answer and contains an independent question, the dialogue should be kept.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:18", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 18, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "only 2 turns (min 3)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "only 2 turns (min 3)", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:19", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 19, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "Every doctor turn that follows a patient turn either introduces a new standalone question/topic or provides a substantive medical observation/explanation. No turn consists entirely of a brief, context-dependent backchannel or acknowledgment that would be meaningless on its own.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:20", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 20, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "Every doctor turn either introduces a new standalone question or a forward-looking action, even when referencing the prior patient turn. Turn 14 ('Okay. Let me look.') is responsive but not purely anaphoric or evaluative like the drop examples (e.g., 'Yes, I do.', 'That's good'); it functions as a transition to physical exam and can sensibly follow various patient complaints. No turn is entirely dependent on the specific previous patient answer to the point of being nonsensical on its own.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:21", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 21, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "Every doctor turn consists of a standalone question that introduces a new topic or inquiry; none consist entirely of an acknowledgment or reaction that depends on the previous patient answer to make sense.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:22", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 22, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "doctor refers to prior patient (kimi)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "Turn 2 ('Wow, that's remarkable.') is entirely an acknowledgment/reaction to the patient's immediately preceding answer about being married for forty-five years. It contains no standalone question or new topic and would not make sense on its own without that context.", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": true, |
| "reason": "Turn 2 ('Wow, that's remarkable.') is entirely an acknowledgment/reaction to the patient's immediately preceding answer about being married for forty-five years. It contains no standalone question or new topic and would not make sense on its own without that context.", |
| "offending_turns": [ |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 2, |
| "snippet": "Wow, that's remarkable." |
| } |
| ], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:23", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 23, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "non doctor/patient speakers: guest_clinician" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "non doctor/patient speakers: guest_clinician", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:24", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 24, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "doctor refers to prior patient (kimi)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "Turn 4 ('Because it is harmful for your current condition.') is entirely an answer to the patient's immediately preceding 'Why?' and cannot stand alone without that context; it contains no separate question or new topic.", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": true, |
| "reason": "Turn 4 ('Because it is harmful for your current condition.') is entirely an answer to the patient's immediately preceding 'Why?' and cannot stand alone without that context; it contains no separate question or new topic.", |
| "offending_turns": [ |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 4, |
| "snippet": "Because it is harmful for your current condition." |
| } |
| ], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:25", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 25, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "Every doctor turn that follows a patient turn contains a new, standalone question or topic in addition to any brief acknowledgment of the previous patient answer. Turn 2 acknowledges the family history but then asks a new question about childhood arthritis. Turn 4 comments on the patient's misconception but then asks a new question about psoriasis. Neither turn is entirely dependent on the previous patient answer.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:26", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 26, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "Turn 2 begins with a brief acknowledgment of the patient's question ('I do.') but then provides independent clinical information about scan results and asks a standalone symptom question. The entire utterance is not about the previous patient answer.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:27", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 27, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "doctor refers to prior patient (kimi)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "Turn 2 ('Okay.') is entirely an acknowledgment of the patient's immediately preceding answer. It contains no standalone question or new topic and would not make sense on its own without that prior context.", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": true, |
| "reason": "Turn 2 ('Okay.') is entirely an acknowledgment of the patient's immediately preceding answer. It contains no standalone question or new topic and would not make sense on its own without that prior context.", |
| "offending_turns": [ |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 2, |
| "snippet": "Okay." |
| } |
| ], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:28", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 28, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "no patient/guest patient turns" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "no patient/guest patient turns", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:29", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 29, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "Turn 2 ('Did it travel anywhere in your body?') introduces a new, standalone question about metastasis. Although it uses the pronoun 'it' to refer to the cancer mentioned in the previous patient turn, the utterance is not entirely a backward-reactive response; it seeks new information and contains a separate topic/question. No doctor turn in the dialogue consists solely of a non-standalone acknowledgment or reaction to a prior patient answer.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:30", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 30, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "The only doctor turn following a patient turn is turn 2, which provides a substantive, standalone list of example conditions. It is not a purely backward-looking acknowledgment or agreement (e.g., 'Yes, I do' or 'That's good') and makes sense as an explanatory utterance on its own.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:31", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 31, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "Every doctor turn either introduces a new standalone question/topic or contains a separate inquiry; none consist entirely of a reaction or acknowledgment to the immediately preceding patient answer.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:32", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 32, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "only 2 turns (min 3)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "only 2 turns (min 3)", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:33", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 33, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "doctor refers to prior patient (kimi)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "Doctor turns 2 and 6 are entirely reactions to the immediately preceding patient answers and lack any standalone question or new topic. Turn 2 ('Good, no one should.') only makes sense as a response to the patient denying smoking, and turn 6 ('Okay.') is a bare acknowledgment of the patient denying drinking.", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": true, |
| "reason": "Doctor turns 2 and 6 are entirely reactions to the immediately preceding patient answers and lack any standalone question or new topic. Turn 2 ('Good, no one should.') only makes sense as a response to the patient denying smoking, and turn 6 ('Okay.') is a bare acknowledgment of the patient denying drinking.", |
| "offending_turns": [ |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 2, |
| "snippet": "Good, no one should." |
| }, |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 6, |
| "snippet": "Okay." |
| } |
| ], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:34", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 34, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "Doctor turn 2 ('That's good. Do you have any other medical condition?') acknowledges the previous patient answer but also contains a separate, standalone new question. Per the instructions, lines that briefly acknowledge the patient then ask a standalone question should be kept, and the entire utterance is not solely about the previous patient answer.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:35", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 35, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "doctor refers to prior patient (kimi)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "Doctor turns 4 and 6 are brief acknowledgments/reactions ('I see.' and 'Interesting.') that are entirely about the immediately preceding patient answers and do not make sense as standalone utterances without that context.", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": true, |
| "reason": "Doctor turns 4 and 6 are brief acknowledgments/reactions ('I see.' and 'Interesting.') that are entirely about the immediately preceding patient answers and do not make sense as standalone utterances without that context.", |
| "offending_turns": [ |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 4, |
| "snippet": "I see." |
| }, |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 6, |
| "snippet": "Interesting." |
| } |
| ], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:36", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 36, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "No doctor turn is entirely a backward-looking reaction to the immediately preceding patient answer. Every doctor turn introduces a new standalone question or topic (e.g., asking for background information, asking what happened, asking when it happened, asking about other injuries) even if it includes a brief acknowledgment like 'Good' or 'Okay'.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:37", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 37, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "doctor refers to prior patient (kimi)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "Turn 2 ('Each day, is it?') is entirely a clarifying question about the immediately preceding patient answer ('Yes, I've been smoking around one pack.') and does not make sense on its own without that context; the pronoun 'it' requires the prior utterance for reference.", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": true, |
| "reason": "Turn 2 ('Each day, is it?') is entirely a clarifying question about the immediately preceding patient answer ('Yes, I've been smoking around one pack.') and does not make sense on its own without that context; the pronoun 'it' requires the prior utterance for reference.", |
| "offending_turns": [ |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 2, |
| "snippet": "Each day, is it?" |
| } |
| ], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:38", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 38, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "doctor refers to prior patient (kimi)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "Turn 16 ('Yes, that's not out all the way.') is entirely a reaction to the patient's immediately preceding answer and would not make sense on its own; it contains no separate question or new topic.", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": true, |
| "reason": "Turn 16 ('Yes, that's not out all the way.') is entirely a reaction to the patient's immediately preceding answer and would not make sense on its own; it contains no separate question or new topic.", |
| "offending_turns": [ |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 16, |
| "snippet": "Yes, that's not out all the way." |
| } |
| ], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:39", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 39, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "No doctor turn is entirely a response to the immediately preceding patient answer that would be meaningless on its own. Turn 2 is a standalone medical history question that makes sense independently.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:40", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 40, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "doctor refers to prior patient (kimi)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "Turn 4 ('Yeah.') is entirely a backchannel/acknowledgment that depends completely on the previous patient turn and lacks any standalone content or new topic.", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": true, |
| "reason": "Turn 4 ('Yeah.') is entirely a backchannel/acknowledgment that depends completely on the previous patient turn and lacks any standalone content or new topic.", |
| "offending_turns": [ |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 4, |
| "snippet": "Yeah." |
| } |
| ], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:41", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 41, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "Turn 2 ('Oh sorry to hear that. Let me see what we can do.') contains an acknowledgment of the patient's complaint, but it also includes a separate, forward-looking statement that does not depend entirely on the previous patient turn. Because the entire utterance is not solely about the previous patient answer, it does not meet the drop criterion.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:42", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 42, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "Every doctor turn that follows a patient turn either introduces a new standalone question or combines a brief acknowledgment with a new question; none consist entirely of a reaction to or restatement of the immediately preceding patient answer.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:43", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 43, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "no patient/guest patient turns" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "no patient/guest patient turns", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:44", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 44, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "No doctor turn consists entirely of a response to the immediately preceding patient turn. Turn 2 is a standalone new question. Turn 4 contains a brief acknowledgment ('Thank you') but also a separate standalone question ('anything else you can remember?'), so the entire utterance is not about the previous patient answer.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:45", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 45, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "Turn 2 ('And how do you feel after that?') is a new, standalone question about the patient's condition after the procedure. It is not an acknowledgment of or entirely about the preceding patient answer 'Yes.'; the line makes sense as an independent query and continues the clinical topic from turn 0.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:46", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 46, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "All doctor turns either introduce new standalone questions or topics, or combine a backward reference with a new standalone question (turn 6). None consist entirely of a backward-referential acknowledgment that would not make sense on its own without the immediately preceding patient turn.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:47", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 47, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "non doctor/patient speakers: guest_family" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "non doctor/patient speakers: guest_family", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:48", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 48, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "No doctor turn consists entirely of a reaction to the immediately preceding patient answer. Turn 2 ('Oh, no. When did it start?') and turn 4 ('I see. Do you smoke to relieve the stress?') each briefly acknowledge the patient but also contain a separate, standalone new question, so they are not wholly about the previous patient turn.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:49", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 49, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "doctor refers to prior patient (kimi)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "Turn 2 (\"Happy birthday!\") is entirely a reaction to the patient's immediately preceding statement about turning seventy-seven. It contains no standalone question or new topic and would not make sense without that prior patient turn.", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": true, |
| "reason": "Turn 2 (\"Happy birthday!\") is entirely a reaction to the patient's immediately preceding statement about turning seventy-seven. It contains no standalone question or new topic and would not make sense without that prior patient turn.", |
| "offending_turns": [ |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 2, |
| "snippet": "Happy birthday!" |
| } |
| ], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:50", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 50, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "Every doctor turn that follows a patient turn either asks a new standalone question, provides an explanation, or introduces a new topic/information. None consist entirely of a context-dependent reaction to the immediately preceding patient utterance. For example, turns 2, 4, 6, and 10 briefly acknowledge the patient but then pose new questions; turns 12 and 14 introduce new information or explanations; and turn 8 is a clarifying question that advances the dialogue rather than a pure backchannel.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:51", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 51, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "only 2 turns (min 3)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "only 2 turns (min 3)", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:52", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 52, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "doctor refers to prior patient (kimi)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "Turn 2 consists solely of 'Okay.', a brief acknowledgment that refers entirely back to the previous patient answer and does not make sense on its own without that context.", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": true, |
| "reason": "Turn 2 consists solely of 'Okay.', a brief acknowledgment that refers entirely back to the previous patient answer and does not make sense on its own without that context.", |
| "offending_turns": [ |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 2, |
| "snippet": "Okay." |
| } |
| ], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:53", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 53, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "All doctor turns are standalone questions that do not depend on the immediately preceding patient answer for their meaning; none consist entirely of a backward-looking acknowledgment or reaction.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:54", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 54, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "No doctor turn consists entirely of a response to the immediately preceding patient turn. Every doctor turn either introduces a new standalone question/topic (turns 4, 6, 8, 10, 12) or combines a brief acknowledgment with a separate standalone question or directive (turns 2, 10, 12).", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:55", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 55, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "All doctor turns are standalone questions that seek new information (e.g., onset, frequency, symptoms). While they refer to topics mentioned by the patient, none are purely backward-looking reactions or acknowledgments that would be nonsensical without the exact previous patient turn.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:56", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 56, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "doctor refers to prior patient (kimi)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "Turn 4 (\"So, no loss vision, right?\") is entirely a confirmation/summary of the patient's immediately preceding answer (\"Um, no.\") and would not make sense on its own without it; it contains no separate standalone question or new topic.", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": true, |
| "reason": "Turn 4 (\"So, no loss vision, right?\") is entirely a confirmation/summary of the patient's immediately preceding answer (\"Um, no.\") and would not make sense on its own without it; it contains no separate standalone question or new topic.", |
| "offending_turns": [ |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 4, |
| "snippet": "So, no loss vision, right?" |
| } |
| ], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:57", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 57, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "No doctor turn is entirely a non-standalone reaction to the immediately preceding patient answer. Turn 2 ('Strange, in what way?') briefly echoes the patient's wording but is fundamentally a clarifying question that advances the dialogue. Turn 4 contains an empathic acknowledgment, but the turn also includes a separate standalone question ('How long did you feel disoriented?'). Turns 6 and 8 are standalone history-taking and planning statements that do not wholly depend on the prior patient answer.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:58", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 58, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "No doctor turn is entirely a reaction to the immediately preceding patient answer. Turns 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 each introduce new standalone symptom questions. Turn 12 begins with a brief acknowledgment ('I see.') but the remainder is an independent plan for tests and imaging, so the utterance as a whole is not solely about the previous patient answer.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:59", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 59, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "doctor refers to prior patient (kimi)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "Turn 2 ('Okay.') is entirely a backchannel/acknowledgment of the patient's immediately preceding answer and does not make sense as a standalone utterance without that context.", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": true, |
| "reason": "Turn 2 ('Okay.') is entirely a backchannel/acknowledgment of the patient's immediately preceding answer and does not make sense as a standalone utterance without that context.", |
| "offending_turns": [ |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 2, |
| "snippet": "Okay." |
| } |
| ], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:60", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 60, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "same side twice at turn 3" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "same side twice at turn 3", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:61", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 61, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "only 2 turns (min 3)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "only 2 turns (min 3)", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:62", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 62, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "no patient/guest patient turns" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "no patient/guest patient turns", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:63", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 63, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "same side twice at turn 3" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "same side twice at turn 3", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:64", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 64, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "Every doctor turn either introduces a new standalone question/topic or combines a brief acknowledgment with a new inquiry; none consist entirely of a non-standalone response to the immediately preceding patient answer.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:65", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 65, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "Turn 2 begins with a backward reference ('That's good') but continues with a separate, standalone statement about treatment ('I gave you cycle seven...'). Because the entire doctor utterance is not solely about the previous patient answer and contains an independent new topic, the dialogue should be kept.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:66", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 66, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "No doctor turn consists entirely of a reaction to the immediately preceding patient answer. Every doctor utterance either introduces a new standalone question/topic or contains independent content beyond a brief acknowledgment, so none would be dropped under the given rule.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:67", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 67, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "No doctor turn is composed entirely of a backchannel or acknowledgment wholly dependent on the immediately preceding patient answer. Turn 14 asks follow-up questions about the injection, but these are substantive new questions rather than pure acknowledgments like 'Yes, I do' or 'That's good'. All other doctor turns introduce new standalone questions, exam instructions, or summaries not tied solely to the prior patient turn.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:68", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 68, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "All doctor turns are standalone questions that do not depend entirely on the immediately preceding patient answer; they introduce new topics and make sense on their own.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:69", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 69, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "same side twice at turn 3" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "same side twice at turn 3", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:70", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 70, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "No doctor turn is entirely a context-dependent reaction to the immediately preceding patient turn. Turn 2 ('Okay, let me take a look.') is a standalone action statement that makes sense on its own. Turn 4 begins with 'Yes' but the bulk of the utterance lists specific medications, constituting a separate topic/information, so the entire line is not about the previous patient answer.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:71", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 71, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "no patient/guest patient turns" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "no patient/guest patient turns", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:72", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 72, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "only 2 turns (min 3)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "only 2 turns (min 3)", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:73", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 73, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "same side twice at turn 9" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "same side twice at turn 9", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:74", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 74, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "Every doctor turn that follows a patient turn contains either a standalone question or new clinical information; none consist entirely of a back-reference to the immediately preceding patient answer.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:75", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 75, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "No doctor turn consists entirely of a backward-looking acknowledgment or reaction to the immediate previous patient answer. All doctor turns either introduce new standalone questions/topics or contain only brief acknowledgments alongside independent content (e.g., turn 8, 16). Turn 14 is a substantive follow-up inquiry that advances the conversation, not a pure evaluative response like the examples to drop.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:76", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 76, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "only 2 turns (min 3)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "only 2 turns (min 3)", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:77", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 77, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "doctor refers to prior patient (kimi)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "Turn 2 is entirely a reaction to the patient's immediately preceding answer about their diet. It contains no standalone questions or new topics; sentences like 'Keep doing whatever you're doing' and 'It's working for you' are anaphoric and only make sense in the context of that specific patient response. The whole turn functions as pure acknowledgment/feedback.", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": true, |
| "reason": "Turn 2 is entirely a reaction to the patient's immediately preceding answer about their diet. It contains no standalone questions or new topics; sentences like 'Keep doing whatever you're doing' and 'It's working for you' are anaphoric and only make sense in the context of that specific patient response. The whole turn functions as pure acknowledgment/feedback.", |
| "offending_turns": [ |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 2, |
| "snippet": "You look great! Keep doing whatever you're doing. It's working for you." |
| } |
| ], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:78", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 78, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "Every doctor turn that follows a patient turn contains a new standalone question or topic; none consist entirely of a backward-looking response to the previous patient answer.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:79", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 79, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "doctor refers to prior patient (kimi)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "Turn 2 ('Anything else?') is entirely anaphoric and depends on the immediately preceding patient answer to be understood; it is not a standalone question or new topic and would not make sense on its own.", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": true, |
| "reason": "Turn 2 ('Anything else?') is entirely anaphoric and depends on the immediately preceding patient answer to be understood; it is not a standalone question or new topic and would not make sense on its own.", |
| "offending_turns": [ |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 2, |
| "snippet": "Anything else?" |
| } |
| ], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:80", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 80, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "only 2 turns (min 3)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "only 2 turns (min 3)", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:81", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 81, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "doctor refers to prior patient (kimi)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "Turn 10 ('I am sorry to hear that.') is entirely a reaction to the patient's previous answer about being unemployed and would not make sense on its own without that context; it contains no standalone question or new topic.", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": true, |
| "reason": "Turn 10 ('I am sorry to hear that.') is entirely a reaction to the patient's previous answer about being unemployed and would not make sense on its own without that context; it contains no standalone question or new topic.", |
| "offending_turns": [ |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 10, |
| "snippet": "I am sorry to hear that." |
| } |
| ], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:82", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 82, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "The only doctor turn following a patient turn is turn 2 ('How about diabetes?'), which is a standalone question about a new topic/condition. It does not acknowledge or refer back to the previous patient answer as its entire content, and it makes sense on its own.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:83", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 83, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "same side twice at turn 3" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "same side twice at turn 3", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:84", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 84, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "The only doctor turn that follows a patient turn is turn 2 ('This was your first wasp sting, correct?'), which is a standalone question about sting history. It does not refer back to the preceding patient answer about redness/swelling improving, and it makes sense on its own.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:85", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 85, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "only 2 turns (min 3)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "only 2 turns (min 3)", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:86", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 86, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "Turn 2 follows the patient turn, but it does not consist entirely of a response to that previous answer. It briefly addresses the patient's clarification ('it could be anything like depression, or mood disorders') and then poses a separate, standalone question ('Does anything like that ring any bells?'). Per the instructions, dialogues are not dropped when the doctor turn also contains a new question or topic.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:87", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 87, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "same side twice at turn 7" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "same side twice at turn 7", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:88", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 88, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "No doctor turn is entirely about the immediately preceding patient answer. Turn 2 is a standalone clarification question; turn 4 contains procedural transition statements; turn 6 is a new standalone question; turn 8 briefly acknowledges ('Great.') but then asks a separate standalone question, which the instructions explicitly say to keep.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:89", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 89, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "No doctor turn consists entirely of a reaction to or comment on the immediately preceding patient answer; every doctor turn either introduces a standalone question/topic or pairs a brief acknowledgment with a new question.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:90", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 90, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "doctor refers to prior patient (kimi)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "Turn 2 (\"And when was this?\") is entirely about the immediately preceding patient answer and would not make sense on its own without that context.", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": true, |
| "reason": "Turn 2 (\"And when was this?\") is entirely about the immediately preceding patient answer and would not make sense on its own without that context.", |
| "offending_turns": [ |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 2, |
| "snippet": "And when was this?" |
| } |
| ], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:91", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 91, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "None of the doctor turns are entirely about the immediately preceding patient answer. Each doctor utterance introduces a new standalone question or topic (e.g., asking how symptoms started, inquiring about chest pain, cough, fainting, or duration), rather than consisting solely of a back-referential acknowledgment or response that would not make sense on its own.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:92", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 92, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "No doctor turn consists entirely of a reaction or acknowledgment that depends solely on the immediately preceding patient turn. Turn 2 is a standalone question; Turn 4 briefly acknowledges but then asks a new standalone question; Turn 6 is a substantive offer and explanation that is self-contained.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:93", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 93, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "No doctor turn consists entirely of a response to the immediately preceding patient answer. Turn 2 is a standalone new question about bleeding disorders. Turn 4 introduces a new topic (existing GI and urinary tract reports) and asks a standalone follow-up question; it makes sense independently and is not an acknowledgment of the patient's prior 'No.'", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:94", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 94, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "same side twice at turn 5" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "same side twice at turn 5", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:95", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 95, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "same side twice at turn 37" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "same side twice at turn 37", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:96", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 96, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "only 2 turns (min 3)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "only 2 turns (min 3)", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:97", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 97, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "doctor refers to prior patient (kimi)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "Turn 4 ('Would you say you drink occasionally then?') is entirely contingent on the patient's immediately preceding answer and would not make sense on its own without it. It contains no separate standalone question or new topic; it is purely a request for confirmation of an inference drawn from that specific patient utterance.", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": true, |
| "reason": "Turn 4 ('Would you say you drink occasionally then?') is entirely contingent on the patient's immediately preceding answer and would not make sense on its own without it. It contains no separate standalone question or new topic; it is purely a request for confirmation of an inference drawn from that specific patient utterance.", |
| "offending_turns": [ |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 4, |
| "snippet": "Would you say you drink occasionally then?" |
| } |
| ], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:98", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 98, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "No doctor turn consists entirely of a response to the immediately preceding patient turn. Turn 2 is a standalone question about family history, and Turn 4 introduces new information about bloodwork and follow-up planning. Both make sense independently.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:99", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 99, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "only 2 turns (min 3)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "only 2 turns (min 3)", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:100", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 100, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "non doctor/patient speakers: guest_family" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "non doctor/patient speakers: guest_family", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:101", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 101, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "only 2 turns (min 3)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "only 2 turns (min 3)", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:102", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 102, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "doctor refers to prior patient (kimi)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "Turn 2 ('Oops!') is entirely a reactive exclamation to the immediately preceding patient turn. It contains no standalone question, instruction, or new topic, and would not make sense on its own without that patient context.", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": true, |
| "reason": "Turn 2 ('Oops!') is entirely a reactive exclamation to the immediately preceding patient turn. It contains no standalone question, instruction, or new topic, and would not make sense on its own without that patient context.", |
| "offending_turns": [ |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 2, |
| "snippet": "Oops!" |
| } |
| ], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:103", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 103, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "No doctor turn consists solely of a backward-looking acknowledgment or reaction to the immediately preceding patient utterance. Every doctor turn either poses a new standalone question (e.g., turns 2, 4, 6, 10, 12) or combines a brief backward reference with a separate new question/topic (turn 8). Therefore, no turn meets the criterion for dropping the dialogue.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:104", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 104, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "Turn 2 includes the acknowledgment 'Good' referring to the patient's prior answer, but the remainder of the utterance is a new standalone question ('have you had any other surgeries on anywhere else?'). Because the entire doctor line is not solely about the previous patient answer, the dialogue should be kept.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:105", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 105, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "Turn 2 briefly acknowledges the patient's statement ('Great! You are absolutely right. Prevention is key.') but then introduces a separate, standalone question and topic ('Are your social history and medical conditions the same as last visit? Here, you can look at the chart.'). Because the doctor turn does not consist entirely of a response to the previous patient answer and makes sense as a new inquiry, the dialogue should be kept.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:106", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 106, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "only 2 turns (min 3)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "only 2 turns (min 3)", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:107", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 107, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "All doctor turns introduce new standalone questions or topics; none consist entirely of a backward-referring acknowledgment, agreement, or reaction to the immediately preceding patient answer.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:108", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 108, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "doctor refers to prior patient (kimi)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "Turn 2 ('Both ears?') is entirely a backward-looking clarification about the patient's immediately preceding mention of ear pain. The word 'both' has no referent without that prior turn, so the line does not make sense on its own and contains no separate standalone question or topic.", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": true, |
| "reason": "Turn 2 ('Both ears?') is entirely a backward-looking clarification about the patient's immediately preceding mention of ear pain. The word 'both' has no referent without that prior turn, so the line does not make sense on its own and contains no separate standalone question or topic.", |
| "offending_turns": [ |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 2, |
| "snippet": "Both ears?" |
| } |
| ], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:109", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 109, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "only 2 turns (min 3)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "only 2 turns (min 3)", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:110", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 110, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "doctor refers to prior patient (kimi)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "Turn 16 is entirely a synthesis of the patient's immediately preceding answer about episode duration ('thirty to forty seconds') and makes no sense as a standalone utterance without that prior context. It contains no new question or separate topic.", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": true, |
| "reason": "Turn 16 is entirely a synthesis of the patient's immediately preceding answer about episode duration ('thirty to forty seconds') and makes no sense as a standalone utterance without that prior context. It contains no new question or separate topic.", |
| "offending_turns": [ |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 16, |
| "snippet": "So, it is somewhere around thirty to forty seconds." |
| } |
| ], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:111", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 111, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "The only doctor turn following a patient turn is turn 2, which provides substantive, self-contained examples (ADHD, substance abuse, epilepsy) that make sense on their own and do not consist entirely of a back-referencing acknowledgment or response.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:112", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 112, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "same side twice at turn 4" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "same side twice at turn 4", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:113", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 113, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "No doctor turn consists entirely of a response to the immediately preceding patient answer that would be meaningless on its own. Turn 2 ('What happens when you take Sulfa drugs?') is a standalone question and does not depend on the prior 'Yes, ma'am.' to make sense.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:114", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 114, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "only 2 turns (min 3)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "only 2 turns (min 3)", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:115", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 115, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "The only doctor turn after a patient turn (turn 2) is a new follow-up question ('When did you first notice the pain?'). It asks for additional information rather than being a purely referential acknowledgment that cannot stand alone.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:116", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 116, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "doctor refers to prior patient (kimi)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "Turn 6 consists entirely of the acknowledgment 'Okay.', which only makes sense in reference to the patient's immediately preceding answer and cannot stand alone.", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": true, |
| "reason": "Turn 6 consists entirely of the acknowledgment 'Okay.', which only makes sense in reference to the patient's immediately preceding answer and cannot stand alone.", |
| "offending_turns": [ |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 6, |
| "snippet": "Okay." |
| } |
| ], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:117", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 117, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "only 2 turns (min 3)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "only 2 turns (min 3)", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:118", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 118, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "Turn 2 ('How about alcohol, do you drink?') is a standalone question about a new topic. It does not consist entirely of a backward-looking reaction to the patient's prior answer and makes sense on its own.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:119", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 119, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "doctor refers to prior patient (kimi)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "Turn 4 ('Wonderful.') and Turn 8 ('Gotcha.') are entire utterances that serve only as acknowledgments of the immediately preceding patient answers. They cannot stand alone without that context, matching the examples to drop (e.g., 'That's good', 'Lucky you').", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": true, |
| "reason": "Turn 4 ('Wonderful.') and Turn 8 ('Gotcha.') are entire utterances that serve only as acknowledgments of the immediately preceding patient answers. They cannot stand alone without that context, matching the examples to drop (e.g., 'That's good', 'Lucky you').", |
| "offending_turns": [ |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 4, |
| "snippet": "Wonderful." |
| }, |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 8, |
| "snippet": "Gotcha." |
| } |
| ], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:120", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 120, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "No doctor turn is composed entirely of a backward reference to the immediately preceding patient answer. Every doctor utterance is either a standalone question (turns 2, 4, 6, 8, 10) or combines a brief acknowledgment with a separate new topic/proposal (turn 12: 'I don't think so' responds to the arthritis question, but 'we can get a test done to confirm it if you want' introduces a new, forward-looking statement). Therefore, none of the doctor lines would be nonsensical in isolation solely because they depend entirely on the previous patient turn.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:121", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 121, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "only 2 turns (min 3)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "only 2 turns (min 3)", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:122", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 122, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "starts with guest_family, not doctor", |
| "same side twice at turn 9" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "starts with guest_family, not doctor; same side twice at turn 9", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:123", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 123, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "The only doctor turn following a patient turn (turn 2) is a standalone question ('Do you drink or smoke?') that does not refer back to the previous patient answer and makes sense on its own. No doctor turn is entirely about the immediately preceding patient answer.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:124", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 124, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "no patient/guest patient turns" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "no patient/guest patient turns", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:125", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 125, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "starts with patient, not doctor", |
| "same side twice at turn 11" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "starts with patient, not doctor; same side twice at turn 11", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:126", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 126, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "Every doctor turn either is a standalone question/statement or contains a standalone question/statement after a brief acknowledgment; no doctor turn consists entirely of a back-reference to the immediately preceding patient answer.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:127", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 127, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "same side twice at turn 4" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "same side twice at turn 4", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:128", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 128, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "doctor refers to prior patient (kimi)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "Turn 10 ('Yes, we are looking at that at this point.') is entirely a backward-looking response to the patient's prior statement about palliative radiation/comfort care. It contains no standalone question or new topic and would not make sense on its own without the immediately preceding patient turn.", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": true, |
| "reason": "Turn 10 ('Yes, we are looking at that at this point.') is entirely a backward-looking response to the patient's prior statement about palliative radiation/comfort care. It contains no standalone question or new topic and would not make sense on its own without the immediately preceding patient turn.", |
| "offending_turns": [ |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 10, |
| "snippet": "Yes, we are looking at that at this point." |
| } |
| ], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:129", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 129, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "No doctor turn is entirely about the immediately previous patient answer; every doctor turn introduces a new question, topic, or standalone statement and does not consist solely of a back-referring acknowledgment.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:130", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 130, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "only 2 turns (min 3)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "only 2 turns (min 3)", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:131", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 131, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "same side twice at turn 1" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "same side twice at turn 1", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:132", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 132, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "only 2 turns (min 3)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "only 2 turns (min 3)", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:133", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 133, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "doctor refers to prior patient (kimi)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "Turn 4 ('Excellent!') is entirely a backward-looking reaction to the patient's 'No!' and has no standalone meaning without that prior context. Turn 2 is acceptable because it contains a separate standalone question after a brief acknowledgment.", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": true, |
| "reason": "Turn 4 ('Excellent!') is entirely a backward-looking reaction to the patient's 'No!' and has no standalone meaning without that prior context. Turn 2 is acceptable because it contains a separate standalone question after a brief acknowledgment.", |
| "offending_turns": [ |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 4, |
| "snippet": "Excellent!" |
| } |
| ], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:134", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 134, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "doctor refers to prior patient (kimi)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "Turn 2 ('Yes, sir.') is a direct confirmation of the patient's clarifying question with no standalone content beyond that response. Turn 8 ('Okay great.') is a purely backward-looking acknowledgment of the patient's answer, functionally identical to the example 'That's good'. Both doctor turns consist entirely of material about the immediately preceding patient answer and would not make sense on their own.", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": true, |
| "reason": "Turn 2 ('Yes, sir.') is a direct confirmation of the patient's clarifying question with no standalone content beyond that response. Turn 8 ('Okay great.') is a purely backward-looking acknowledgment of the patient's answer, functionally identical to the example 'That's good'. Both doctor turns consist entirely of material about the immediately preceding patient answer and would not make sense on their own.", |
| "offending_turns": [ |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 2, |
| "snippet": "Yes, sir." |
| }, |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 8, |
| "snippet": "Okay great." |
| } |
| ], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:135", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 135, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "Every doctor turn that follows a patient turn either asks a new standalone question or includes an independent statement (e.g., 'welcome'), so no turn consists entirely of a reaction/acknowledgment to the immediately preceding patient answer.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:136", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 136, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "doctor refers to prior patient (kimi)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "Turn 2 ('What do they say?') is entirely anaphoric and depends on the immediately preceding patient turn mentioning reports; without that context the line is incomplete and would not make sense on its own. It contains no separate standalone question or new topic.", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": true, |
| "reason": "Turn 2 ('What do they say?') is entirely anaphoric and depends on the immediately preceding patient turn mentioning reports; without that context the line is incomplete and would not make sense on its own. It contains no separate standalone question or new topic.", |
| "offending_turns": [ |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 2, |
| "snippet": "What do they say?" |
| } |
| ], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:137", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 137, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "Every doctor turn that follows a patient turn contains a standalone question or new topic in addition to any brief acknowledgement, so no utterance is entirely dependent on the previous patient answer.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:138", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 138, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "None of the doctor turns are entirely anaphoric or context-dependent utterances that cannot stand alone. Turn 2 ('I am asking for the EHR.') is a self-contained explanation of purpose. Turn 4 ('Ok, let me update it here.') briefly acknowledges the patient but then introduces a new, standalone action. Turn 6 ('Thanks.') is a generic social formula that makes sense on its own.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:139", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 139, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "same side twice at turn 18" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "same side twice at turn 18", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:140", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 140, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "only 2 turns (min 3)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "only 2 turns (min 3)", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:141", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 141, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "starts with patient, not doctor", |
| "same side twice at turn 1" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "starts with patient, not doctor; same side twice at turn 1", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:142", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 142, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "doctor refers to prior patient (kimi)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "Turn 2 ('Oh I am so sorry.') is entirely a reaction to the immediately preceding patient answer and does not make sense on its own without that context; it contains no standalone question or new topic.", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": true, |
| "reason": "Turn 2 ('Oh I am so sorry.') is entirely a reaction to the immediately preceding patient answer and does not make sense on its own without that context; it contains no standalone question or new topic.", |
| "offending_turns": [ |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 2, |
| "snippet": "Oh I am so sorry." |
| } |
| ], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:143", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 143, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "Turn 2 ('I see. Does cancer run in your family?') follows a patient turn, but it is not entirely about the previous patient answer. While 'I see' acknowledges the patient, the rest of the turn introduces a new, standalone question that makes sense on its own.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:144", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 144, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "The only doctor turn following a patient turn (turn 2) is a standalone question about substance use that does not refer back to the preceding patient answer and makes sense on its own. No doctor turn consists entirely of a response to the immediately previous patient answer.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:145", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 145, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "same side twice at turn 3" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "same side twice at turn 3", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:146", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 146, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "doctor refers to prior patient (kimi)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "Turn 8 ('We'll have to, even though its early.') is entirely a response to the patient's preceding question and cannot stand alone. Turn 14 ('Yes, he won't feel a thing.') is entirely an answer to the immediately preceding yes/no question and is non-sensical without it. Both are fully dependent on the previous patient turn.", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": true, |
| "reason": "Turn 8 ('We'll have to, even though its early.') is entirely a response to the patient's preceding question and cannot stand alone. Turn 14 ('Yes, he won't feel a thing.') is entirely an answer to the immediately preceding yes/no question and is non-sensical without it. Both are fully dependent on the previous patient turn.", |
| "offending_turns": [ |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 8, |
| "snippet": "We'll have to, even though its early." |
| }, |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 14, |
| "snippet": "Yes, he won't feel a thing." |
| } |
| ], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:147", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 147, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "non doctor/patient speakers: guest_family" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "non doctor/patient speakers: guest_family", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:148", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 148, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "non doctor/patient speakers: guest_family" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "non doctor/patient speakers: guest_family", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:149", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 149, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "No doctor turn is entirely a non-standalone reaction to the immediately preceding patient answer. Turn 2 ('Do you smoke?') introduces a new topic after the family history. Turn 4 ('How much would you use to smoke before?') is a standalone follow-up question that makes sense on its own. Turn 6 ('What did you used to do for a living?') shifts to a new topic after the smoking quantity answer.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:150", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 150, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "starts with guest_family, not doctor" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "starts with guest_family, not doctor", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:151", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 151, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "The doctor turns following patient turns are both follow-up questions ('What was it about?', 'Anything else?') that elicit new information. They are not purely backward-looking acknowledgments, reactions, or evaluations (e.g., 'That's good', 'Yes, I do') that would make no sense on their own. Even though they contain anaphoric references, they move the dialogue forward rather than merely commenting on the previous answer.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:152", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 152, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "doctor refers to prior patient (kimi)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "Turn 10 ('Does this make the pain worse?') is entirely about the immediately preceding patient answer (playing instruments) and would not make sense on its own without it; the referent of 'this' is supplied only by the patient's hobby statement in turn 9.", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": true, |
| "reason": "Turn 10 ('Does this make the pain worse?') is entirely about the immediately preceding patient answer (playing instruments) and would not make sense on its own without it; the referent of 'this' is supplied only by the patient's hobby statement in turn 9.", |
| "offending_turns": [ |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 10, |
| "snippet": "Does this make the pain worse?" |
| } |
| ], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:153", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 153, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "doctor refers to prior patient (kimi)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "Turn 2 ('I am sorry.') is entirely a sympathetic reaction to the patient's statement that their father has passed away. It does not introduce a new question or topic and would not make sense on its own without the preceding patient answer.", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": true, |
| "reason": "Turn 2 ('I am sorry.') is entirely a sympathetic reaction to the patient's statement that their father has passed away. It does not introduce a new question or topic and would not make sense on its own without the preceding patient answer.", |
| "offending_turns": [ |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 2, |
| "snippet": "I am sorry." |
| } |
| ], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:154", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 154, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "starts with patient, not doctor" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "starts with patient, not doctor", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:155", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 155, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "No doctor turn is composed entirely of a back-referring acknowledgment or response to the immediately preceding patient answer. Turn 2 contains standalone questions that introduce new inquiries rather than solely commenting on the prior patient utterance.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:156", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 156, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "same side twice at turn 3" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "same side twice at turn 3", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:157", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 157, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "No doctor turn is entirely a backward-referring response that lacks standalone meaning. Turn 2 ('Who all is there in your family?') is an independent question, and Turn 4 ('Have you been in contact with anyone who is sick?') introduces a new standalone topic.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:158", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 158, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "doctor refers to prior patient (kimi)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "Turn 4 ('Yes, it is normal.') is entirely an answer to the patient's immediately preceding question ('Is that normal?') and would not make sense on its own without that context. This matches the examples to drop (e.g., 'Yes, I do.', 'Yes mostly').", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": true, |
| "reason": "Turn 4 ('Yes, it is normal.') is entirely an answer to the patient's immediately preceding question ('Is that normal?') and would not make sense on its own without that context. This matches the examples to drop (e.g., 'Yes, I do.', 'Yes mostly').", |
| "offending_turns": [ |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 4, |
| "snippet": "Yes, it is normal." |
| } |
| ], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:159", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 159, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "No doctor turn consists entirely of a backward-referring acknowledgment that lacks standalone meaning. Each doctor turn either introduces a new question/topic or provides new substantive information beyond a brief acknowledgment.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:160", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 160, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "only 2 turns (min 3)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "only 2 turns (min 3)", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:161", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 161, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "only 2 turns (min 3)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "only 2 turns (min 3)", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:162", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 162, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "No doctor turn is entirely about the immediately preceding patient answer. Each doctor turn either contains a standalone question, introduces a new topic/action, or provides independent examination findings, so none would qualify as a line that makes no sense on its own without the previous patient answer.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:163", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 163, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "No doctor turn is entirely dependent on the immediately preceding patient answer; each doctor turn either poses a standalone question or includes a new standalone question after a brief acknowledgement, so the line makes sense on its own.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:164", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 164, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "None of the doctor turns are purely reactive acknowledgments that depend entirely on the immediately preceding patient utterance. Turn 2 introduces a new clinical topic unrelated to the prior patient answer. Turns 4 and 6 are standalone questions that advance the dialogue; although they use the pronoun 'this', they are not mere back-references like 'Yes, I do' or 'That's good', and they each constitute a new question.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:165", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 165, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "The only doctor turn that follows a patient turn is turn 2, which provides examples and asks a standalone question ('Do any of those ring any bells?'). It is not a pure acknowledgment or referential utterance whose entire content depends on the previous patient answer; it makes sense on its own.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:166", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 166, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "no patient/guest patient turns" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "no patient/guest patient turns", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:167", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 167, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "doctor refers to prior patient (kimi)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "Turn 2 consists solely of the acknowledgment \"I see.\", which refers entirely to the patient's previous answer and does not introduce any standalone question or new topic. It would not make sense on its own without the prior patient turn.", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": true, |
| "reason": "Turn 2 consists solely of the acknowledgment \"I see.\", which refers entirely to the patient's previous answer and does not introduce any standalone question or new topic. It would not make sense on its own without the prior patient turn.", |
| "offending_turns": [ |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 2, |
| "snippet": "I see." |
| } |
| ], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:168", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 168, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "doctor refers to prior patient (manual review)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "Manually reviewed \u2014 drop per prior-patient criterion (doctor lines depend on earlier patient wording).", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": true, |
| "reason": "Doctor confirms patient's ultrasound guess (turn 18), references stopping medicine after patient report (turn 6), and names Macrobid before patient specified it (turn 2).", |
| "offending_turns": [ |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 2, |
| "snippet": "You were taking the Macrobid, correct?" |
| }, |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 6, |
| "snippet": "Since stopping the medicine, have these symptoms gone away?" |
| }, |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 18, |
| "snippet": "Basically, yes. There's nohydronephrosis..." |
| } |
| ], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:169", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 169, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "Each doctor turn that follows a patient turn contains substantive standalone content: turn 2 asks a new independent question after a brief acknowledgment; turn 4 and turn 6 provide specific medication names the doctor sees, which convey new information rather than consisting entirely of a dependent acknowledgment. Brief acknowledgments like 'Okay' or 'Yes' do not make the whole utterance purely about the previous answer.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:170", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 170, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "same side twice at turn 1" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "same side twice at turn 1", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:171", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 171, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "doctor refers to prior patient (kimi)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "Turn 14 ('Why aren't you still doing this?') and turn 18 ('What does this entail?') are entirely anaphoric follow-ups that refer back to the immediately preceding patient answers. Without those patient turns, the referent of 'this' is missing and the utterances do not make sense on their own.", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": true, |
| "reason": "Turn 14 ('Why aren't you still doing this?') and turn 18 ('What does this entail?') are entirely anaphoric follow-ups that refer back to the immediately preceding patient answers. Without those patient turns, the referent of 'this' is missing and the utterances do not make sense on their own.", |
| "offending_turns": [ |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 14, |
| "snippet": "Why aren't you still doing this?" |
| }, |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 18, |
| "snippet": "What does this entail?" |
| } |
| ], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:172", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 172, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "doctor refers to prior patient (kimi)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "Turn 4 ('That's great.') is entirely a back-reference to the patient's previous answer and does not make sense as a standalone utterance.", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": true, |
| "reason": "Turn 4 ('That's great.') is entirely a back-reference to the patient's previous answer and does not make sense as a standalone utterance.", |
| "offending_turns": [ |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 4, |
| "snippet": "That's great." |
| } |
| ], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:173", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 173, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "doctor refers to prior patient (kimi)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "Turn 6 ('Oh.') is entirely a backchannel acknowledgment of the patient's previous answer and does not make sense as a standalone utterance; it refers completely to the prior patient turn without introducing any new question or topic.", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": true, |
| "reason": "Turn 6 ('Oh.') is entirely a backchannel acknowledgment of the patient's previous answer and does not make sense as a standalone utterance; it refers completely to the prior patient turn without introducing any new question or topic.", |
| "offending_turns": [ |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 6, |
| "snippet": "Oh." |
| } |
| ], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:174", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 174, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "doctor refers to prior patient (kimi)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "Turn 2 ('Do you know what kind of cancer she passed from?') is entirely a follow-up about the mother's cancer mentioned in the immediately previous patient turn and does not make sense on its own without that context.", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": true, |
| "reason": "Turn 2 ('Do you know what kind of cancer she passed from?') is entirely a follow-up about the mother's cancer mentioned in the immediately previous patient turn and does not make sense on its own without that context.", |
| "offending_turns": [ |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 2, |
| "snippet": "Do you know what kind of cancer she passed from?" |
| } |
| ], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:175", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 175, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "same side twice at turn 2" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "same side twice at turn 2", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:176", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 176, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "doctor refers to prior patient (kimi)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "Turn 4 ('Never?') is entirely a backward-looking follow-up to the patient's immediately preceding answer ('No, I do not drink.') and does not make sense as a standalone utterance without that context.", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": true, |
| "reason": "Turn 4 ('Never?') is entirely a backward-looking follow-up to the patient's immediately preceding answer ('No, I do not drink.') and does not make sense as a standalone utterance without that context.", |
| "offending_turns": [ |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 4, |
| "snippet": "Never?" |
| } |
| ], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:177", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 177, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "No doctor turn is entirely a backward-referencing acknowledgment or dependent response. Every doctor turn either introduces a new standalone question/topic (e.g., 'Do you have any major medical conditions...', 'Has this problem been getting worse?', 'How about fever or chills?') or provides substantive standalone information (e.g., the urodynamics explanation). Brief acknowledgments like 'Okay, thank you' or 'Okay, and...' are followed by new questions or statements, so they do not qualify as entire utterances about the previous patient answer.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:178", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 178, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "only 2 turns (min 3)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "only 2 turns (min 3)", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:179", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 179, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "No doctor turn consists entirely of a backward-looking acknowledgment or reaction to the immediately previous patient utterance. Every doctor line either provides substantive medical information, asks a standalone or forward-looking medical question, or combines a brief acknowledgment with a new question/topic.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:180", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 180, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "The only doctor turn following a patient turn is index 2 ('So, there's no history of depression, high blood pressure, or anything like that?'). While it follows up on the patient's prior 'No,' it is a substantive clarification question that introduces specific conditions and can be understood on its own. It is not a pure acknowledgment or reaction (e.g., 'That's good,' 'Yes, I do') whose entire meaning depends on the previous patient answer.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:181", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 181, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "doctor refers to prior patient (kimi)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "Turn 10 is entirely a backchannel acknowledgment ('Okay.') that refers back to the immediately preceding patient turn and lacks standalone meaning without it. Turn 8 contains a backward-referring phrase but also includes a separate standalone question ('What about your brothers?'), so it does not qualify as an offending turn per the instructions.", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": true, |
| "reason": "Turn 10 is entirely a backchannel acknowledgment ('Okay.') that refers back to the immediately preceding patient turn and lacks standalone meaning without it. Turn 8 contains a backward-referring phrase but also includes a separate standalone question ('What about your brothers?'), so it does not qualify as an offending turn per the instructions.", |
| "offending_turns": [ |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 10, |
| "snippet": "Okay." |
| } |
| ], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:182", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 182, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "no patient/guest patient turns" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "no patient/guest patient turns", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:183", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 183, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "doctor refers to prior patient (kimi)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "Turn 2 ('Good, great.') is entirely an acknowledgment of the patient's previous confirmation and does not make sense on its own without that context.", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": true, |
| "reason": "Turn 2 ('Good, great.') is entirely an acknowledgment of the patient's previous confirmation and does not make sense on its own without that context.", |
| "offending_turns": [ |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 2, |
| "snippet": "Good, great." |
| } |
| ], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:184", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 184, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "No doctor turn is entirely a backward-referencing remark about the immediately preceding patient answer; each doctor line contains a standalone question that makes sense on its own.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:185", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 185, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "No doctor turn consists entirely of a backward-looking reaction or acknowledgment that lacks standalone meaning. Turn 2 ('What did your parents have?') and Turn 4 ('What about your mother?') are standalone questions seeking new information. Turn 6 ('I am sorry to hear that. Do you have any siblings?') combines a brief acknowledgment with a separate, standalone question, which the instructions explicitly say to keep.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:186", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 186, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "No doctor turn is entirely dependent on the immediately preceding patient answer. Turn 2 contains an independent statement about lab work followed by a standalone medication question, and Turn 4 is a standalone symptom screening question that does not refer back to the patient's prior answer.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:187", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 187, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "same side twice at turn 5" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "same side twice at turn 5", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:188", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 188, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "Every doctor turn that follows a patient turn contains a standalone question, standalone medical instruction/information, or a brief acknowledgment paired with a new question or topic. No doctor turn consists entirely of a back-reference or acknowledgment to the immediately preceding patient answer. Turns with single referring expressions (e.g., 'since', 'these', 'this') are protected because they also introduce separate questions or topics.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:189", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 189, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "Turn 2 begins with a brief back-reference ('I see.') but then poses a separate, standalone question about other medications ('And you're no longer taking Terazosin, Lisinopril, or Atenolol?'). Because the doctor turn contains a new question and is not entirely about the previous patient answer, it should be kept.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:190", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 190, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "same side twice at turn 9" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "same side twice at turn 9", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:191", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 191, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "Every doctor turn after a patient turn contains substantive new content (follow-up questions or new statements/topics) rather than being a pure backchannel/acknowledgment. Turn 2 asks new questions about the patient's history, turn 4 introduces a new topic (smoking), and turn 6 raises a new health point about chronic bronchitis. None are entirely dependent reactive utterances like 'That's good' or 'Yes, I do.'", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:192", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 192, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "non doctor/patient speakers: guest_family" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "non doctor/patient speakers: guest_family", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:193", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 193, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "Every doctor turn either introduces a new standalone question (turns 2, 4, 6) or a new meta-topic about the interview process (turn 8). None consist entirely of an acknowledgment or reaction to the immediately preceding patient answer that would be meaningless in isolation.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:194", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 194, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "Each doctor turn that follows a patient turn introduces a new standalone question ('Where do you work?', 'Do you smoke or drink?') rather than consisting entirely of a response to the immediately preceding patient answer.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:195", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 195, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "doctor refers to prior patient (kimi)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "Turn 12 ('Great.') is entirely a reaction to the patient's preceding answer ('Everything's well') and would not make sense on its own without that context. This matches the examples to drop (e.g., 'That's good' when it is the whole line).", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": true, |
| "reason": "Turn 12 ('Great.') is entirely a reaction to the patient's preceding answer ('Everything's well') and would not make sense on its own without that context. This matches the examples to drop (e.g., 'That's good' when it is the whole line).", |
| "offending_turns": [ |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 12, |
| "snippet": "Great." |
| } |
| ], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:196", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 196, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "The only doctor turn following a patient turn (turn 2) is a standalone question ('Um, any soreness in your throat?') that does not refer back to the previous patient answer and makes sense on its own.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:197", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 197, |
| "kept": true, |
| "drop_reasons": [], |
| "drop_justification": "", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": false, |
| "reason": "No doctor turn is entirely contingent on the immediately preceding patient turn. Turn 2 is a standalone new question. Turn 4 begins with an acknowledgment ('Good') but then poses a separate, standalone question about new symptoms. Turn 6 starts with a reaction ('That's pretty normal') but continues with additional information and a new question. Turn 8 answers a patient question and supplies new information about recovery. None of these consist solely of a back-reference that would be meaningless without the exact prior patient utterance.", |
| "offending_turns": [], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:198", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 198, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "doctor refers to prior patient (kimi)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "Turn 2 ('Well, anything from depression, to cancer.') is entirely a clarification/elaboration in direct response to the patient's request for explanation in turn 1. It would not make sense as a standalone utterance if the patient had answered the original question instead, violating the requirement that doctor lines be independent of the specific previous patient answer.", |
| "kimi_result": { |
| "drop_dialogue": true, |
| "reason": "Turn 2 ('Well, anything from depression, to cancer.') is entirely a clarification/elaboration in direct response to the patient's request for explanation in turn 1. It would not make sense as a standalone utterance if the patient had answered the original question instead, violating the requirement that doctor lines be independent of the specific previous patient answer.", |
| "offending_turns": [ |
| { |
| "turn_idx": 2, |
| "snippet": "Well, anything from depression, to cancer." |
| } |
| ], |
| "cached": false |
| } |
| }, |
| { |
| "dialogue_id": "1:199", |
| "testset_index": 1, |
| "dialogue_index": 199, |
| "kept": false, |
| "drop_reasons": [ |
| "only 2 turns (min 3)" |
| ], |
| "drop_justification": "only 2 turns (min 3)", |
| "kimi_result": null |
| } |
| ] |
| } |
