ConstructTraining / docs /source /experimental-features /newton-physics-integration /solver-transitioning.rst
| Solver Transitioning | |
| ==================== | |
| Transitioning to the Newton physics engine introduces new physics solvers that handle simulation using different numerical approaches. | |
| While Newton supports several different solvers, our initial focus for Isaac Lab is on using the MuJoCo-Warp solver from Google DeepMind. | |
| The way the physics scene itself is defined does not change - we continue to use USD as the primary way to set basic parameters of objects and robots in the scene, | |
| and for current environments, the exact same USD files used for the PhysX-based Isaac Lab are used. | |
| In the future, that may change, as new USD schemas are under development that capture additional physics parameters. | |
| What does require change is the way that some solver-specific settings are configured. | |
| Tuning these parameters can have a significant impact on both simulation performance and behaviour. | |
| For now, we will show an example of setting these parameters to help provide a feel for these changes. | |
| Note that the :class:`~isaaclab.sim.NewtonCfg` replaces the :class:`~isaaclab.sim.PhysxCfg` and is used to set everything related to the physical simulation parameters except for the ``dt``: | |
| .. code-block:: python | |
| from isaaclab.sim._impl.newton_manager_cfg import NewtonCfg | |
| from isaaclab.sim._impl.solvers_cfg import MJWarpSolverCfg | |
| solver_cfg = MJWarpSolverCfg( | |
| nefc_per_env=35, | |
| ls_iterations=10, | |
| cone="pyramidal", | |
| ls_parallel=True, | |
| impratio=1, | |
| ) | |
| newton_cfg = NewtonCfg( | |
| solver_cfg=solver_cfg, | |
| num_substeps=1, | |
| debug_mode=False, | |
| ) | |
| sim: SimulationCfg = SimulationCfg(dt=1 / 120, render_interval=decimation, newton_cfg=newton_cfg) | |
| Here is a very brief explanation of some of the key parameters above: | |
| * ``nefc_per_env``: This is the size of the buffer constraints we want MuJoCo warp to | |
| pre-allocate for a given environment. A large value will slow down the simulation, | |
| while a too small value may lead to some contacts being missed. | |
| * ``ls_iterations``: The number of line searches performed by the MuJoCo Warp solver. | |
| Line searches are used to find an optimal step size, and for each solver step, | |
| at most ``ls_iterations`` line searches will be performed. Keeping this number low | |
| is important for performance. This number is also an upper bound when | |
| ``ls_parallel`` is not set. | |
| * ``cone``: This parameter provides a choice between pyramidal and elliptic | |
| approximations for the friction cone used in contact handling. Please see the | |
| MuJoCo documentation for additional information on contact: | |
| https://mujoco.readthedocs.io/en/stable/computation/index.html#contact | |
| * ``ls_parallel``: This switches line searches from iterative to parallel execution. | |
| Enabling ``ls_parallel`` provides a performance boost, but at the cost of some | |
| simulation stability. To ensure good simulation behaviour when enabled, a higher | |
| ``ls_iterations`` setting is required. Usually an increase of approximately 50% is | |
| best over the ``ls_iterations`` setting when ``ls_parallel`` is disabled. | |
| * ``impratio``: This is the frictional-to-normal constraint impedance ratio that | |
| enables finer-grained control of the significance of the tangential forces | |
| compared to the normal forces. Larger values signify more emphasis on harder | |
| frictional constraints to avoid slip. More on how to tune this parameter (and | |
| cone) can be found in the MuJoCo documentation here: | |
| https://mujoco.readthedocs.io/en/stable/XMLreference.html#option-impratio | |
| * ``num_substeps``: The number of substeps to perform when running the simulation. | |
| Setting this to a number larger than one allows to decimate the simulation | |
| without requiring Isaac Lab to process data between two substeps. This can be | |
| of value when using implicit actuators, for example. | |
| A more detailed transition guide covering the full set of available parameters and describing tuning approaches will follow in an upcoming release. | |