Datasets:
Create README.md
Browse files
README.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
---
|
| 2 |
+
task_categories:
|
| 3 |
+
- text-classification
|
| 4 |
+
language:
|
| 5 |
+
- en
|
| 6 |
+
tags:
|
| 7 |
+
- legal
|
| 8 |
+
size_categories:
|
| 9 |
+
- 10K<n<100K
|
| 10 |
+
---
|
| 11 |
+
|
| 12 |
+
This is the **ECHR dataset**, a collection of 11.5K court cases extracted from the public database
|
| 13 |
+
of the European Court of Human Rights and further annotated by human experts. The dataset was
|
| 14 |
+
published along with [this paper](https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P19-1424/) (pleae cite it
|
| 15 |
+
accordingly!) and can be donwloaded in its original form from [this website](https://archive.org/details/ECHR-ACL2019).
|
| 16 |
+
|
| 17 |
+
Each instance in this dataset is a court case. Each court case is annotated with the following properties (the columns of the dataframe):
|
| 18 |
+
|
| 19 |
+
* `partition`: a label indicating dataset partition this court case belongs to ("train", "dev", or "test")
|
| 20 |
+
* `itemid`: a code which uniquely identifies this court case
|
| 21 |
+
* `languageisocode`: an [ISO code](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ISO_3166_country_codes) describing the language in which the case is reported
|
| 22 |
+
* `respondent`: the ISO code of the party being sued or tried (respondents are nation states)
|
| 23 |
+
* `branch`: the branch of the Court dealing with the case, indicating at which stage of the trial a judgement was made (it can be one out of "ADMISSIBILITY", "CHAMBER", "GRANDCHAMBER", "COMMITTEE")
|
| 24 |
+
* `date`: the date of the judgement
|
| 25 |
+
* `docname`: the title of the court case (for example, "ERIKSON v. ITALY")
|
| 26 |
+
* `importance`: an "importance score" from 1 (key case) to 4 (unimportant), denoting a case's contribution in the development of case-law
|
| 27 |
+
* `conclusion`: a short summary of the case conclusion (for example, "Inadmissible" or "Violation of Art. 6-1; No violation of Art. 10"
|
| 28 |
+
* `judges`: the name of the judges
|
| 29 |
+
* `text`: the facts brought to the attention of the Court
|
| 30 |
+
* `binary_judgement`: a binary label indicating whether an article or protocol was (1) or wasn't (0) violated
|