Upload 45 files

00c73f2a3515da4249d4416a544c09b2/vpd-lm.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+1. scene description
+the scene depicts a nighttime urban residential street with moderate lighting conditions. the ego vehicle is traveling on a two-way road flanked by multi-story apartment buildings on both sides. the street appears to be a quiet neighborhood with parked vehicles along both sides. there are several illuminated areas from streetlights and building lights creating a dimly lit environment. the road surface shows some wear with visible cracks. the surrounding area features trees, decorative lighting fixtures, and typical urban infrastructure including sidewalks and driveways. the overall atmosphere suggests a residential district at night with minimal traffic activity.
+
+2. critical objects
+object 1: this is a dark-colored suv/pickup truck parked on the right side of the road. based on the relative 3d coordinates[14.97, -16.58], it is positioned to the front-right of the ego vehicle.
+object 2: this appears to be another vehicle parked on the left side of the road, partially visible in the frame.
+object 3: this is a white pickup truck parked on the left side of the road, positioned ahead of the ego vehicle.
+object 4: this appears to be a pedestrian or small vehicle on the right side of the road, near the parked suv.
+object 5: this is a dark-colored sedan parked on the right side of the road, positioned further ahead than the suv.
+
+3. risk analysis
+in this scenario, the ego vehicle is traveling on a narrow urban street with parked vehicles on both sides. the most concerning factor is the presence of multiple parked vehicles that could potentially pull out unexpectedly. object 1 (the suv) is directly in the ego vehicle's path and appears to be moving forward. while the ego vehicle has sufficient space to continue straight ahead, the proximity of the suv creates a potential conflict situation if it suddenly moves into the roadway.
+
+the ego vehicle should maintain its current lane and follow the suv at a safe distance. the suv appears to be proceeding normally but may need to make a turn or change lanes. the ego vehicle should be prepared for sudden stops or lane changes from the suv. the presence of parked vehicles on both sides adds complexity as they could potentially pull out unpredictably.
+
+risk level: unsafe
+therefore, the unsafety score of this should be: 0.85

0c1bdcfac7be564a0c75d3bb4234e47d/vpd-lm.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+1. scene description
+the scene depicts a bright, sunny day with clear blue skies and scattered clouds. the ego vehicle is traveling on a two-lane road through what appears to be a residential neighborhood in an arid climate, evidenced by the palm trees lining both sides of the street. the environment features a mix of single-story houses with brick facades and metal roofs, some with balconies. there's a chain-link fence visible on the right side of the road, separating the roadway from a construction or vacant lot area. utility poles with overhead wires run along the left side of the street. the road surface shows some wear but is generally in good condition. the overall setting suggests a typical suburban area with moderate traffic density.
+
+2. critical objects
+object 2: this appears to be a white sedan positioned to the front-right of the ego vehicle. based on the relative 3d coordinates[14.69, -7.58], it's located ahead and slightly to the right of the ego vehicle.
+object 11: this is a dark-colored sedan parked on the right side of the road near the curb. based on the relative 3d coordinates[14.69, -7.58], it's positioned to the front-right of the ego vehicle.
+object 3: this appears to be a person standing behind the fence on the right side of the road. based on the relative 3d coordinates[14.69, -7.58], they are also positioned to the front-right of the ego vehicle.
+
+3. risk analysis
+in this scenario, the ego vehicle is approaching a white sedan (object 2) that is positioned to its front-right. the white sedan appears to be either parked or moving slowly in the same direction as the ego vehicle. given the spatial proximity indicated by the relative coordinates[14.69, -7.58], the ego vehicle would need to maintain a safe following distance while proceeding forward.
+
+there is no immediate conflict between the ego vehicle and the white sedan as they appear to be traveling in the same direction. however, if the white sedan were to suddenly accelerate or change lanes into the ego vehicle's path, it could create a dangerous situation. the ego vehicle has sufficient space to continue forward without needing to change lanes, but maintaining awareness of the white sedan's movements is crucial.
+
+risk level: unsafe
+therefore, the unsafety score of this should be: 0.85

0cdf4bedea5f52bfb54edea6cbdbb15e/vpd-lm.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+1. scene description
+the scene depicts a nighttime driving scenario through an urban underpass or tunnel. the ego vehicle is traveling on a two-lane road with a solid yellow center line dividing opposing traffic lanes. the environment is dimly lit by overhead streetlights, creating a dark and somewhat confined driving space. the tunnel has concrete walls on both sides with some visible wear and markings. there are height restriction signs indicating "14ft 7in" at various points along the tunnel ceiling. the road surface appears to be in fair condition with clear lane markings. at the far end of the tunnel, there are faint green lights visible, suggesting the approach to an exit or intersection beyond the tunnel.
+
+2. critical objects
+object 1: this appears to be a vehicle positioned ahead of the ego vehicle in the right lane. based on the relative 3d coordinates[16.58, -10.9], the vehicle is approximately 16.58 meters ahead and slightly to the right of the ego vehicle's path.
+
+3. risk analysis
+the situation presents minimal immediate risk for several reasons. first, the ego vehicle is traveling in what appears to be a single lane through the tunnel, with no vehicles directly in its path. the presence of object 1 (the vehicle in the right lane) does not create a direct conflict since it is traveling in a separate lane. the ego vehicle has sufficient space to continue forward without needing to change lanes. additionally, the road ahead appears clear with no visible obstacles or hazards that would require evasive action. the tunnel environment provides limited visibility beyond the immediate vicinity, but the ego vehicle can maintain a safe following distance from any vehicles ahead while navigating through this constrained space. the road surface conditions appear adequate for normal driving speeds, and there are no visible signs of congestion or traffic buildup that would necessitate caution.

0d94d2a36405c21b1fc19601c41e8d23/vpd-lm.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+1. scene description
+the scene depicts a clear daytime driving scenario on a two-lane road with a slight curve ahead. the weather is sunny with a bright blue sky and some wispy clouds. the ego vehicle is traveling on a residential street lined with single-story houses on both sides. the road surface appears to be asphalt with visible lane markings including a double yellow line dividing opposing lanes. there are several parked vehicles along both sides of the street, particularly on the right side where there's a row of trees and well-maintained landscaping. traffic appears light, with only a few vehicles visible ahead in the distance. the road curves slightly to the right, and there's a pedestrian crossing area visible at the intersection ahead. the environment suggests a suburban neighborhood with good visibility conditions.
+
+2. critical objects
+object 1: this is a silver hatchback parked on the left side of the road near the curb. based on the relative 3d coordinates[8.97, -14.65], it's positioned to the front-left of the ego vehicle.
+object 2: this appears to be a white sedan parked on the right side of the road, partially visible in the center-right portion of the frame.
+object 3: this is a parked vehicle on the right side of the road, positioned further ahead of the ego vehicle.
+object 4: this appears to be a parked vehicle on the right side of the road, positioned further ahead of the ego vehicle.
+
+3. risk analysis
+in this scenario, the ego vehicle is approaching an intersection with a curved road ahead. the most critical factor is the presence of parked vehicles on both sides of the road that could potentially pull out unexpectedly. object 1 (silver hatchback) is parked on the left side and would need to move if the ego vehicle were to change lanes. object 2 (white sedan) is parked on the right side and would also need to move if the ego vehicle were to change lanes. the risk level is elevated because these vehicles are parked close to the curb and may not be clearly visible to the ego vehicle until they begin to move. additionally, the curved nature of the road reduces the ego vehicle's visibility of any vehicles that might emerge from behind parked cars.
+
+risk level: unsafe
+therefore, the unsafety score of this should be: 0.85

0e871c9836cb94ce7adaf502567b2b35/vpd-lm.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+1. scene description
+the scene depicts an urban downtown area with tall office buildings flanking both sides of a multi-lane road. it appears to be daytime with overcast conditions. the ego vehicle is traveling on a two-way street with at least three lanes in each direction, separated by lane markings. there's a red bike lane visible on the left side of the road. the environment shows typical city infrastructure including parking meters, bollards, and pedestrian walkways. traffic is relatively light, with only a few vehicles visible ahead of the ego car. the right side of the road features scaffolding around a building under construction, while the left side has commercial buildings with large windows and entrances. the overall setting suggests a busy downtown business district with moderate traffic flow.
+
+2. critical objects
+object 1: this is a gray suv/crossover vehicle positioned to the front-right of the ego vehicle. based on the relative 3d coordinates[14.75, -16.9], this vehicle is slightly ahead and to the right of the ego vehicle.
+object 2: this appears to be a dark-colored vehicle positioned directly ahead of the ego vehicle in the same lane. based on the relative 3d coordinates[18.1, -16.9], this vehicle is slightly ahead and to the right of the ego vehicle.
+object 3: this is a white van or delivery truck parked along the left side of the road near the entrance of a building. based on the relative 3d coordinates[14.75, -16.9], this vehicle is positioned to the front-left of the ego vehicle.
+object 4: this appears to be a blue vehicle or sign partially visible on the left side of the frame, possibly parked or stopped near the building entrance.
+object 5: this is a black vehicle parked along the right side of the road, near the construction scaffolding.
+object 6: this appears to be a small vehicle or object partially visible on the right side of the frame, near the construction area.
+
+3. risk analysis
+in this scenario, the ego vehicle is traveling on a multi-lane urban road with moderate traffic density. the most critical factor is the presence of object 1 (gray suv) to the front-right of the ego vehicle. if this vehicle were to suddenly change lanes into the ego vehicle's path, it would create a direct conflict situation. the suv is positioned in the rightmost lane and appears to be moving in the same direction as the ego vehicle, but its trajectory could potentially intersect with the ego vehicle's path if it changes lanes.
+
+the ego vehicle has sufficient space to maintain its current lane and speed, but if object 1 decides to change lanes, it would require the ego vehicle to either slow down significantly or change lanes to avoid collision. the visibility is good, and there are no immediate obstacles that would prevent the suv from changing lanes if it chooses to do so.
+
+risk level: unsafe
+therefore, the unsafety score of this should be: 0.85

0ee52c24789d5aec6f730fd4287c4a12/vpd-lm.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+1. scene description
+the scene depicts a residential neighborhood during daytime with clear, sunny weather conditions. the ego vehicle is traveling on a two-lane street with moderate traffic. on both sides of the road are single-story houses with various architectural styles, including a prominent beige house with a porch visible on the left side. the right side features a large tree with bare branches and a gray house with blue trim. the street has a sidewalk running along both sides where several parked vehicles are visible. overhead power lines crisscross the sky, and there's a palm tree visible at the end of the street. the road appears to be a typical suburban residential area with no visible lane markings, though it's clearly a two-way street with moderate traffic density.
+
+2. critical objects
+object 1: this is a red pickup truck parked on the right side of the road. based on the relative 3d coordinates[14.78, -5.96], the truck is positioned to the front-right of the ego vehicle.
+object 2: this appears to be a white sedan parked on the left side of the road near the curb.
+object 3: this is another white vehicle parked on the right side of the road, slightly ahead of the red pickup truck.
+object 4: this appears to be a dark-colored vehicle parked further down the street on the right side.
+
+3. risk analysis
+in this scenario, the ego vehicle is traveling on a narrow residential street with moderate traffic density. the red pickup truck (object 1) is parked on the right side of the road and appears to be stationary. the white sedan (object 2) is parked on the left side of the road, also appearing to be stationary. the white vehicle (object 3) is parked further down the right side of the road.
+
+there is no immediate behavioral conflict between the ego vehicle and any of these parked vehicles. the ego vehicle would need to maintain its current lane while proceeding forward, which doesn't create any direct conflict with the parked vehicles. the vehicles are all properly parked along their respective sides of the road, not occupying the travel lanes.
+
+the only potential concern is if the ego vehicle were to make an unexpected lane change or sudden acceleration, but given the narrow nature of the residential street and the presence of parked vehicles, this would be highly risky. the vehicles are clearly marked as parked and not actively moving, so there's no need for the ego vehicle to change lanes around them.
+
+risk level: safe
+therefore, the unsafety score of this should be: 0.24

0f09faf7f1cd29a7478b2c034c9045d2/vpd-lm.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+1. scene description
+the scene depicts an urban environment under a large concrete overpass structure with a distinctive architectural design featuring exposed steel beams and a slanted roof. it appears to be daytime with clear weather conditions. the ego vehicle is traveling through what looks like a commercial area with various buildings visible on both sides of the road. there's a pedestrian crossing marked with white stripes in the center of the road. traffic signals can be seen at an intersection ahead, showing red lights. the road surface shows some wear with visible lane markings. several vehicles are parked along the sides of the street, including a white sedan visible in the rightmost frame. the overall setting suggests this is a downtown or commercial district with moderate activity but no immediate traffic congestion.
+
+2. critical objects
+object 5: this appears to be a bus or large vehicle positioned to the front-right of the ego vehicle. based on the relative 3d coordinates[14.78, -16.9], this object is located ahead and slightly to the right of the ego vehicle.
+object 3: this is a pedestrian standing near the curb on the right side of the road. based on the relative 3d coordinates[14.78, -16.9], this person is positioned to the front-right of the ego vehicle.
+object 4: another pedestrian standing further back on the right side of the road. based on the relative 3d coordinates[14.78, -16.9], this person is also positioned to the front-right of the ego vehicle.
+
+3. risk analysis
+in this scenario, the ego vehicle appears to be traveling through a commercial area under an overpass with moderate traffic conditions. the most critical factor is the presence of pedestrians (object 3 and object 4) who appear to be standing near the curb on the right side of the road. these pedestrians are positioned in the ego vehicle's path and could potentially step into the roadway unexpectedly.
+
+the ego vehicle has sufficient space to maneuver around these pedestrians if they decide to cross the street. however, the pedestrians are standing relatively close to the curb, which may limit their visibility to the ego vehicle. additionally, the ego vehicle would need to slow down significantly to safely pass by these pedestrians without creating a dangerous situation.
+
+risk level: unsafe
+therefore, the unsafety score of this should be: 0.85

0f71456c67c9eeff7b8cea4e979e0393/vpd-lm.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+1. scene description
+the scene depicts a residential street during daytime with clear, sunny weather conditions. the ego vehicle is traveling through a narrow two-way road flanked by multi-story apartment buildings on both sides. the street appears to be a private or gated community entrance, with several parked vehicles lining both sides of the road. trees line both sides of the street, creating a canopy effect overhead. the road surface shows some wear with visible cracks. there are commercial buildings visible at the end of the street, including what appears to be an esquire store. the environment suggests a quiet neighborhood with limited traffic flow.
+
+2. critical objects
+object 1: a dark-colored sedan parked on the left side of the road.
+object 2: a white suv parked on the right side of the road.
+object 4: another white suv parked on the right side of the road.
+object 5: a white sedan parked further ahead on the right side of the road.
+
+3. risk analysis
+in this scenario, the ego vehicle is approaching a narrow residential street with parked vehicles on both sides. the most concerning factor is the presence of multiple parked vehicles that could potentially pull out unexpectedly. object 1 (dark sedan) on the left side appears to be parked at an angle that might make it difficult for the ego vehicle to see clearly. object 2 (white suv) and object 4 (white suv) on the right side are parked parallel to the curb but may have limited visibility due to their positioning. object 5 (white sedan) is further ahead on the right side.
+
+the risk level is considered unsafe because:
+1. the narrow road width limits maneuvering space
+2. multiple parked vehicles create blind spots
+3. the potential for vehicles to suddenly pull out from parking spaces
+4. the ego vehicle has limited visibility of all parked vehicles
+5. the road appears to be a private or gated community entrance
+
+risk level: unsafe
+therefore, the unsafety score of this should be: 0.87

0f76f9048ab4644c00643b06e7649595/vpd-lm.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+1. scene description
+the scene depicts an urban street in what appears to be downtown san francisco during daytime with clear blue skies. the ego vehicle is traveling on a two-way road with moderate traffic. on both sides of the street are tall commercial buildings, including a distinctive building with columns on the left side. there are traffic signals visible ahead at an intersection, with a green light showing for the ego vehicle's direction. the road surface shows some wear with visible lane markings. several vehicles are visible in adjacent lanes, including a white sedan parked on the right side and a white pickup truck on the left. the environment features pedestrian walkways with crosswalks, traffic signs, and streetlights lining the roadway. the overall setting suggests a busy commercial district with moderate traffic flow.
+
+2. critical objects
+object 1: this is a white sedan positioned to the front-right of the ego vehicle. based on the relative 3d coordinates[14.58, -16.79], it appears to be traveling in the same direction as the ego vehicle but slightly ahead and to the right.
+object 2: this appears to be a dark-colored sedan positioned directly in front of the ego vehicle. based on the relative 3d coordinates[1.85, -11.58], it is traveling in the same lane as the ego vehicle.
+object 3: this is a white sedan positioned to the front-left of the ego vehicle. based on the relative 3d coordinates[1.85, -11.58], it is traveling in the same lane as the ego vehicle.
+object 4: this appears to be a dark-colored sedan positioned to the front-right of the ego vehicle. based on the relative 3d coordinates[14.58, -16.79], it is traveling in the same direction as the ego vehicle but slightly ahead and to the right.
+object 5: this is a white sedan parked on the left side of the road. based on the relative 3d coordinates[1.85, -11.58], it is positioned to the front-left of the ego vehicle.
+object 6: this is a traffic signal located at the intersection ahead. based on the relative 3d coordinates[1.85, -11.58], it is positioned directly in front of the ego vehicle.
+object 7: this appears to be another traffic signal at the intersection ahead. based on the relative 3d coordinates[1.85, -11.58], it is positioned directly in front of the ego vehicle.
+object 8: this is a no parking sign visible on the left side of the road. based on the relative 3d coordinates[1.85, -11.58], it is positioned to the front-left of the ego vehicle.
+object 9: this appears to be a crosswalk area with yellow markings visible on the road surface. based on the relative 3d coordinates[1.85, -11.58], it is positioned to the front-right of the ego vehicle.
+
+3. risk analysis
+in this scenario, the ego vehicle is approaching an intersection with traffic signals where all lights appear to be green. the white sedan (object 1) is positioned to the front-right of the ego vehicle and appears to be traveling in the same direction. the dark sedan (object 2) is directly in front of the ego vehicle in the same lane. the white sedan (object 3) is also positioned to the front-left of the ego vehicle in the same lane. the dark sedan (object 4) is to the front-right of the ego vehicle and appears to be traveling in the same direction as the ego vehicle.
+
+there is no immediate conflict between the ego vehicle and any other agent. the ego vehicle has a clear path forward through the intersection with green lights, and all surrounding vehicles appear to be maintaining their respective lanes without any indication of changing trajectories that would create a conflict. the traffic flow is orderly, and there are no obstacles or hazards that would require the ego vehicle to change its course.
+
+risk level: safe
+therefore, the unsafety score of this should be: 0.24