The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged that around February 2012, the defendants Gao and Huang obtained a lottery gambling setup from Fu (handled in a separate case) in a certain location. They then began accepting bets at their homes at No. 4 Shui Dui Tou East Road, Wuniu Street, and No. 33 Hengyu Street, respectively, in a certain county, and reported these bets back to Fu, earning a 1% rebate from the process. Upon investigation, it was found that defendants Gao and Huang held 85% and 15% of the shares, respectively. By the time they stopped accepting lottery bets in November 2012, defendants Gao and Huang had accepted a total of over 100,000 yuan in bets from others. After the incident, defendants Huang and Gao voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed their criminal acts. The above facts were not contested by defendants Gao and Huang during the court proceedings and are supported by Fu's testimony, bank transaction details, identification records, the account of how the case was solved, as well as population information forms of defendants Gao and Huang, sufficient to establish the charges.


The People's Procuratorate of a district in Hangzhou City accused: Between the end of May and early June 2014, defendants Xu and Liu, while gambling in the form of "Xiao Jiu" at a certain chess and card room at xxx Iron Street in the district, used a specially-made cell phone and specially-made playing cards to cheat the victim Xu Moumou out of more than thirty thousand yuan. After the fraudulent gambling was discovered, defendants Xu and Liu compensated the victim Xu Moumou with eighty thousand yuan and one gold necklace. On July 11 of the same year, defendant Xu was apprehended by police near Sandun Road in Xihu District; on July 17, defendant Liu went to the Public Security Bureau after being notified by a police phone call to accept processing. After the case, the police retrieved the involved specially-made cell phone and a set of specially-made playing cards from the victim Xu Moumou. The above facts were not contested by defendants Xu and Liu during the court trial, and are corroborated by the statements of the victim Xu Moumou, testimonies of witnesses Chai Mou, Wang Mou, Dai Mou, Zhou Moujia, Mao Xiangmou, Mao Mou, Yao Mou, identification records, testimonies of witnesses Yang Mou and Zhou Mouyi, evidence receipt list, photos of the items involved, evidence retrieval lists, criminal judgment, situation explanation, seizure process, household registration certificate, confessions, defenses, and identification records of defendants Xu and Liu, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts. The defense raised no objection to the charges and facts in the indictment, suggesting: Defendant Liu is a first-time offender, has no prior criminal record, possesses low subjective maliciousness, and poses little social harm; the defendants confessed, have fully compensated the victim; requesting for the defendants to be exempted from criminal punishment or given a suspended sentence.


The People's Procuratorate of Qiaoxi District in a certain city charges that: On the evening of April 12, 2014, around 9 PM, defendant Zhang was driving a Hebei A××××× Ford Focus car in a town of a certain county in a certain city when he had a traffic accident; the front of the car hit a tree and was severely damaged. Afterwards, Zhang called his cousin Liu, who worked as an insurance agent, to inform her of the incident. Defendant Liu instructed Zhang to purchase vehicle damage insurance and then claim compensation from the insurance company. On April 14, 2014, with Liu's assistance, Zhang took out a commercial insurance policy with People's Insurance Company of China, which included vehicle damage coverage. On the evening of April 18, around 10 PM, Zhang parked his accident vehicle at the original accident site and called the insurance company to report, falsely claiming that a traffic accident had just occurred. On May 12 of the same year, he submitted a compensation claim totaling 24,916 yuan to the city branch of People's Insurance Company of China. On May 16, 2014, the city branch of People's Insurance Company of China transferred the compensation amount of 24,916 yuan to Zhang's Agricultural Bank account.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accuses that the defendant Gao, during his job application process in a certain city, met with Qing and agreed that Gao would purchase bank cards at a low price from others to sell to Qing at a higher price. Since June 2020, Gao began purchasing bank cards from others. The purchased bank cards were configured with one Industrial and Commercial Bank of China card and one Agricultural Bank of China card, both bound to a single phone number and activated for mobile banking, allowing for transactions of 200,000 yuan per transaction and up to 1 million yuan per day. During this period, Gao sold his two bank cards to Qing for 750 yuan. He later contacted various individuals for the procurement of additional bank and phone cards, including Su, who handled one phone card and three bank cards; Yang, one phone card and two bank cards; Ge, one phone card and two bank cards; another Yang, one phone card and one bank card; Bai, one phone card and two bank cards; Wang A, one phone card and two bank cards; Zhao, one phone card and one bank card; Ruan, one phone card and two bank cards; another Bai, one phone card and two bank cards; Jian, one phone card and two bank cards; another Yang, one phone card and two bank cards; An, one phone card and two bank cards; another Zhang, one phone card and one bank card; another Wang, one phone card and two bank cards; Cao, one phone card and two bank cards; and Guo, one phone card and two bank cards. Notably, through defendant Guo's contacts, cards were acquired from Ge, Su, An, another Yang, Ruan, and another Bai. Defendant Gao sold all the aforementioned acquired bank and phone cards to Qing, earning a profit of about 8,000 yuan, which the two defendants used for daily expenses. The police, through the Ministry of Public Security's telecommunications fraud platform, discovered that the above-mentioned real-name bank cards purchased by Gao and Guo were used for telecommunications network criminal activities. In summary, defendant Gao illegally possessed 29 credit cards and 17 phone cards belonging to others; defendant Guo illegally possessed 12 credit cards and 6 phone cards belonging to others.


The People's Procuratorate of Dongchangfu District, Liaocheng City, a certain province, charges that the defendants Chen and Sun, after plotting to commit theft, at approximately 9 a.m. on January 11, 2013, proceeded with a crowbar to the third floor of Building 20 in the east campus of Liaocheng University. They unlocked Room 326 and stole a Lenovo laptop belonging to the victim Yang (valued at 2300 yuan) and a Golden Brand mobile phone belonging to Luo (valued at 600 yuan). Subsequently, the two defendants, also carrying a crowbar, went to the second floor of the same dormitory building and unlocked Room 226, stealing a Dell laptop (valued at 1200 yuan) and a Samsung laptop (valued at 900 yuan), both belonging to the victim Guo, as well as a Tsinghua Tongfang laptop (valued at 2800 yuan) belonging to Liang. The total value of the theft was 7800 yuan. After the incident, all the stolen items were recovered and returned to the victims. The defendants Chen and Sun had no objections to the above facts during the court trial. Additionally, the facts are corroborated by the statements of the victims Yang, Luo, Guo, and Liang; witness testimonies from Wu, Shao, and Ma; records of evidence collection and identification; an appraisal opinion document establishing the value of the items involved in the case provided by a certain province; physical evidence of the crowbar; documentary evidence including the public security agency's list of seized items, the account of the arrest, explanation of case handling procedures, receipts for returned items, and the residential information of the defendants Chen and Sun, all sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges: On the evening of July 25, 2012, defendants Zang and Pan had a quarrel over trivial matters while working at a construction site in the Chugezhuang area of the Dongcun Subdistrict Office in a certain city. At around 10 p.m. that day, Yu and Pan went to the village in the Fengcheng Subdistrict Office of the city to Zang's residence to confront defendant Zang about the incident. After learning about this, defendant Zang returned home along with defendant Xu. After the parties met, defendant Xu, armed with a machete, injured Yu. Then, defendant Zang continued to kick and stomp on Yu, resulting in injuries to Yu's left upper limb, right shoulder, and right upper arm. According to the forensic evaluation, Yu's injury to the left upper limb was classified as serious, while the injuries to the right shoulder and right upper arm were considered slight. Defendant Xu was arrested and brought to justice on December 12, 2015, and defendant Zang turned himself in to the criminal investigation team of the city's public security bureau on December 30, 2015.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges: From early December 2015 to January 17, 2016, defendants Zhang and Wang organized gambling sessions involving Li, Sun, and others in a rented house in a town in the city, by playing "Da Pai Jiu" more than fifteen times. Defendant Zhang was responsible for taking cuts, while Defendant Wang kept watch outside. A total profit of over 15,000 yuan was made by taking cuts through the "Baoxi Money" method. After the crime, defendants Zhang and Wang returned 10,000 yuan of illegal gains to the public security authorities. To prove the above charges, the prosecution has provided our court with the seizure decision, seizure list and restitution receipts, the arrest process, basic information on the permanent population, site photos, administrative penalty decision, detention center health checkup, and notification of temporary non-detention, testimonies from witnesses Li, Sun, Xie, Zhou, Li, and others, as well as the confessions and defenses of defendants Zhang and Wang. It believes that defendants Zhang and Wang, for the purpose of profit, gathered people for gambling, which constitutes the crime of x, and is a joint crime. The court is requested to punish defendants Zhang and Wang in accordance with the provisions of x and x articles of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China. Defendants Zhang and Wang have no objection to the facts and charges brought by the prosecution. After court examination and verification, the evidence submitted by the prosecution has been confirmed true. Our court confirms the facts of the crime of x charged against defendants Zhang and Wang by the prosecution. It is also found that after the crime, defendants Zhang and Wang each returned 5,000 yuan of illegal gains to our court. This fact is confirmed by the investigation agency and our court through legally collected and court-presented restitution receipts, which were read aloud, presented, and verified in court.


The prosecution alleges that on the morning of March 25, 2015, at around 9 am, defendants Chen, Jia, Hu, and more than ten other people gathered at the Huashui Police Station reception hall of the Dongyang Public Security Bureau to demand an explanation regarding the case involving their relative, Hu Moumou, who was injured in another public security case and receiving hospital treatment. Chief Fang, Deputy Chief Shentu, and other police officers tried to dissuade them without success. Defendant Hu and others used their mobile phones to record the situation despite repeated attempts by the police to stop them. When Shentu again tried to persuade defendant Hu and others to stop recording, defendant Hu used his hands to push Shentu to the ground, prompting the police to summon Hu in accordance with the law. To prevent the police from summoning defendant Hu, defendant Jia approached, pulling on the police officers and twisting their fingers, during which incident defendant Jia's hand struck the jaw area of an intern officer named Huang. Defendant Chen, taking advantage of Officer Zhang's inattention, approached and kicked Zhang's leg, and during the police summoning process, bit Shentu’s left hand, injuring it. A forensic assessment determined that the bite caused a skin break on Shentu’s left hand, classifying the injury as minor. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Chen, Jia, and Hu during the trial. The case also includes statements from victims Fang, Shen, Huang, Zhang, and Yu, testimony from witness Jiang, evidence materials provided by the police, copies of police officer identification cards, outpatient records, video surveillance, a forensic medical assessment report from the Dongyang Public Security Bureau's evidence identification office (Document No. [2015] 92), accounts of arrests provided by police officers, and household registration documents for defendants Chen, Jia, and Hu, all of which are sufficient to substantiate the charges.


After examination, it has been found that from around August 20, 2015, to September 4 of the same year, the defendant He set up a casino in the form of "pulling two cards" on the first floor of Building 19, Liao Yang West Garden, District, a certain city, and made profits through rake-off. From September 5, 2015, to September 21, 2015, the defendant He, together with Zhang and "Ha'er" (both handled in separate cases), set up a casino at the aforementioned location. The defendant Yuan was hired to collect rake-offs for this casino. During this period, the casino made a profit of over 7,500 RMB through rake-offs. From around August 20, 2015, to September 21, 2015, the casino made a total profit of over 10,000 RMB through rake-offs. On September 21, 2015, the defendants He and Yuan were arrested and brought to justice. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants He and Yuan during the court trial, and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Wang Jia, Wang Yi, Wang Bing, and Dan, the proceedings of their arrest, inspection records, identification records, the evidence preservation list, the re-education through labor decision, the criminal judgment, the certificate of release after serving the sentence, the situational explanation, and the household registration certificate. All these pieces of evidence were cross-examined during the trial, found to be true and lawful, and are mutually corroborative, sufficient for establishing the case.


The prosecution alleged and this court found that at approximately 5:00 p.m. on September 21, 2017, the defendant Liu got into a dispute with Zhang while playing at Jinhai'an KTV in a certain county. Zhang called his friend Xiong to discuss the matter with Liu and others at the entrance of Jinhai'an KTV and reported it to the police. At this time, the defendant Chen (Liu's wife) passed by Jinhai'an KTV, and upon seeing the situation, joined Liu in arguing with the other party. When Officer Wang and auxiliary police officer Guo from the Baota Police Station of the county public security bureau arrived at the scene to understand the situation, the defendant Liu punched Xiong. To prevent the situation from escalating, Officer Wang immobilized Liu on the ground with his bare hands. The defendant Liu did not cooperate and grabbed Officer Wang by the neck, while the defendant Chen, seeing this, tore at Officer Wang's clothing and continuously shoved and hit him. The defendant Liu then took the opportunity to hold Officer Wang and used his arm to strangle his neck in an attempt to break free, causing Officer Wang's police hat and police radio to fall to the ground. After Officer Wang and Guo managed to handcuff Liu, the defendant Chen continued to interfere and kicked Officer Wang's police hat aside in anger. Reinforcements later arrived and summoned the two defendants to the Baota Police Station. According to the assessment, Officer Wang sustained abrasions and contusions to the neck, which were classified as minor injuries. The defendant Liu and Chen did not object to the aforementioned facts during the court hearing, and the evidence, including testimonies from witnesses Xiong, Zhang, Wang, and Guo, identification records, surveillance video from Jinhai'an KTV, the forensic medical assessment of physical injury degree by Dean Zhenhui Forensic Institute, the 110 police alert information from the county public security bureau, work certificates regarding Wang and Guo, statements of the defendants being brought to justice, and resident information, is sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution alleges that from August 18, 2018, to June 5, 2019, the defendant entity, Jinmiao New Materials Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Jinmiao Company), without obtaining a hazardous chemicals operating license, purchased explosive-grade hazardous chemical silver nitrate from Lanzhou Jinchuan Technology Park Co., Ltd. and sold it at a markup to various places through logistics transportation. The total sales amount, including taxes, for silver nitrate was 161,301,831.9 RMB. Since October 12, 2018, the defendant entity, Shangyong New Materials Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Shangyong Company), after its hazardous chemicals operating license expired, purchased explosive-grade hazardous chemical silver nitrate from Lanzhou Jinchuan Technology Park Co., Ltd. and sold it at a markup to various places through logistics transportation. Between October 12, 2018, and August 31, 2019, Shangyong Company sold silver nitrate with a total sales amount, including taxes, of 79,009,797.81 RMB. Defendant Zhuang holds a 90% stake in the defendant entity Shangyong Company and a 65% stake in the defendant entity Jinmiao Company, responsible for the development direction and relevant approvals of both entities; Defendant Li holds a 10% stake in both defendant entities, responsible for their daily operations. It was also discovered that on September 25, 2019, Defendant Li voluntarily surrendered to the designated location after being notified by phone by the public security authorities and truthfully confessed the facts concerning himself and the entities.


The People's Procuratorate of Xihu District in a certain city charged that on the afternoon of July 18, 2015, at around 2 PM, the defendant Yang, along with "the kid" (handled in a separate case), were on Fusheng South Road in Xihu District of a certain city. "The kid" was driving a motorcycle, and Yang was seated on the back. Taking advantage of the victim Wang's unpreparedness, Yang snatched half of a gold necklace from Wang's neck (valued at RMB 5,700 according to appraisal). After the theft, the two quickly fled the scene by motorcycle and later sold the half gold necklace, splitting the proceeds. On the morning of September 8, 2015, around 9 AM, the defendants Wu and Yang were on Yingbin Avenue in a certain city, with Wu driving the motorcycle and Yang seated on the back. Near Yongsheng Modern Hotel and Vienna Hotel, taking advantage of the victims Yu and Zhou's unpreparedness, Yang snatched a gold necklace from Yu's neck (valued at RMB 8,735 according to appraisal) and another gold necklace from Zhou's neck (valued at RMB 10,897 according to appraisal). After the thefts, the two quickly fled the scene by motorcycle. Around noon on September 8, 2015, the police apprehended Yang and Wu near the Shenzhen Agricultural Products Wholesale Market in Qingyunpu District of a certain city, seizing two gold necklaces on the spot and returning them to Yu and Zhou. To support the above charges, the prosecution presented in court evidence such as written records of the arrest proceedings, documents of personal information, statements from victims like Wang, confessions and defenses by the defendants Yang and Wu, and appraisal reports of the involved items' value. Based on this,


The prosecution charges that in March 2016, defendants Pang and Xu operated a massage parlor and conspired to commit theft there. Between March and April 2016, the two committed theft together on three occasions, stealing 5,100 RMB. To prove the above facts, the prosecution read and presented in court the criminal judgment of a court in Weiyang District, Xi'an City, a certain province; testimonies of witnesses Zhang, Xia, and Wang; statements from victims Wei, Ma, and Feng; on-site investigation and inspection records, identification records, and inventory records produced by the Tongzhou District Public Security Bureau of Nantong City; and the confessions and defenses of the defendants Pang and Xu, among other evidence.


Upon trial, it was ascertained that on the morning of July 21, 2015, the defendants Cheng, Zhong conspired and rode a single motorcycle from a district of a certain city to a certain county in search of theft targets. At the ground floor of Building 3 on Rongchang Pedestrian Street in a town of that county, the two defendants discovered that the victim, Yuan's silver-grey Haojue brand scooter parked at that location was unlocked. Cheng acted as the lookout while Zhong stole the motorcycle, after which both rode separate motorcycles back to their district. The price evaluation department certified the stolen motorcycle's value at 5,804 RMB. On July 22, 2015, around 14:00, Cheng and Zhong were caught by the police at a motorcycle repair shop across from the old fiber factory in a district while refurbishing and modifying the stolen motorcycle. They were verbally summoned to the public security organ for investigation and were criminally detained the next day. During the investigation and prosecution phase, both defendants truthfully confessed to the facts of jointly committing theft. During the investigation, the police seized the stolen motorcycle and the motorcycle used by the defendants in the crime, each of which was confirmed to be stolen property belonging to a third party, Cheng Jia. The two motorcycles have been returned to the victim Yuan and the third party Cheng Jia respectively. The aforementioned facts were not contested by the two defendants during the trial and are corroborated by the victim Yuan’s statement, the testimonies of witnesses Cheng Yi, Fan, Zhang, Chen, Tao, and Cheng Jia, recognition records, photographic evidence of physical items, a price evaluation report, documentary evidence including the case acceptance form, filing decision document, call records, vehicle certificates, sales receipts, seizure decision documents, return lists, basic information on residents, the criminal judgment, and arrest facts, which are sufficient for confirmation.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county in Jiangsu Province indicts that the defendants Yan and Liu, after conspiring, in November 2015, placed the "Golden Rooster Laying Eggs" and "Golden Shark King" gaming machines in Yan's Yuxin Bathhouse located on the new street of Yucai Village in Datuo Agricultural Park in a certain county, agreeing to split the profits equally. Defendant Yan, at around 19:00 on March 26, 2016, accommodated minors Ding (born July 12, 2003) and Zhu (born October 1, 2005) to gamble using the "Golden Rooster Laying Eggs" gaming machine in the bathhouse when they were caught on the spot by the police. According to the identification by the county's Public Security Bureau, both the "Golden Rooster Laying Eggs" and "Golden Shark King" gaming machines have gambling functions. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Yan and Liu during the trial, and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Ding and Zhu, as well as the household registration certificates, case development records, on-site recognition, inspection transcripts, and seizure lists issued and produced by the county's Public Security Bureau, and the identification opinion issued by the Yancheng Public Security Bureau, providing sufficient evidence for conviction.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that on the evening of April 3, 2010, defendants Yan and Wang, together with Li and Wang A (at large), drove a small box truck to the Zhengxin Tire Sales Office in Yanzhou City. They then used crowbars to pry open the door and stole a total of 23 tires of different models from the store of victim Lin. According to the appraisal, the total value was 46,500 yuan. The evidence presented and read out by the public prosecution agency in court is as follows: 1. Documentary evidence: criminal case registration form, household registration certificate, DN laboratory database comparison explanation, the process of capture, criminal judgment, case handling notes, etc.; 2. Victim Lin's statement; 3. Appraisal opinion: price appraisal conclusion book for items involved in the case from a certain province; 4. The confessions and defenses of defendants Yan and Wang; 5. Identification record; 6. On-site investigation records, etc.


The prosecution alleges: On the early morning of September 9, 2014, Li (already convicted), together with the defendants Wang, Ban, and Zhang A (handled in a separate case), went to a tobacco and alcohol store on a certain street in a certain city to demand a debt from Tan and clashed with Tan and others, and then left separately. To take revenge on Tan and others, Li gathered the defendant Yang and, along with the defendants Wang, Ban, and others, returned to the entrance of the tobacco and alcohol store with machetes, baseball bats, and other tools. When they spotted the victim Liu driving a Toyota Reiz with the license plate SuB××××× preparing to leave, defendants Ban, Yang, Wang, and Li mistakenly believed Liu was associated with Tan's side and thus attacked the body of Liu's vehicle with machetes and baseball bats, causing damage valued at 7,556 RMB. Liu then drove away from the scene, and Li, Zhang A, and others mistakenly believed that the victim Liu (different person, hereinafter as Liu) on the scene was also part of the opposing group, and so they sprayed pepper spray at his face and chased him with machetes. Liu then fled the scene. Defendants Wang and Yang voluntarily turned themselves in at the police station on August 21, 2015, and truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal actions. To support the allegations of the aforementioned criminal actions, the prosecution has provided corresponding evidence.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Zibo City charges: 1. On the evening of January 21, 2015, defendants Miao, Jiang, Li, Cheng, and Ma poured 502 glue into the keyhole of Zhang's front door in a certain village of a certain district, causing the lock to be blocked. An appraisal determined the value of the lock's damage to be 120 RMB. 2. On the evening of February 4, 2015, defendants Miao, Jiang, Li, Cheng, and Ma smashed items such as the aluminum alloy door glass, aluminum alloy screen window, and Haier Crystal Prince BCD-216SDCX refrigerator door at Zhang's home in a certain village of a certain district using beer bottles. An appraisal determined the value of the damage to be 780 RMB. To substantiate these facts, the prosecution provided documentary evidence such as the incident report, the victim Zhang's statement, and the defendants Miao and others' confessions.


After trial, it was found that on April 27, 2015, defendants Ding and Chen, in the bathhouse they managed at 28 Sanyuan Road, Room 308, Chengdong, Nanhu District, a certain city, provided premises for prostitutes to engage in prostitution. Prostitute Pang engaged in prostitution once each with clients Guo and Liu and the defendants profited from these activities. Following the incident, the public security authorities seized 150 yuan from Ding. The above facts were not contested by defendants Ding and Chen during the trial, and were supported by witness testimonies from Pang, Guo, and Liu, as well as recognition records and photos, confessions from Ding and Chen during the investigation phase, investigation records, evidence preservation decisions, lists and photos of preserved evidence, business licenses for individual businesses, inquiries into criminal history, administrative penalty decisions, household registration certificates, and records of how they were brought to justice, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged that since December 2014, the defendant Yu set up a casino to make profits through "pat bingo" gambling at Unit A in Town A, County A, Unit B in Town A, County A, Unit C in Town A, County A, and Unit D in County A. In this casino, the defendant Yu was responsible for the daily management; the defendant Chen provided the Unit A in County A for the casino for four days, making an illegal profit of 2,400 RMB; the defendant Lin was employed to rake in profits at the casino for a daily salary of 300 RMB, and made a total illegal profit of 3,000 RMB; Chen Yi (handled in a separate case) was employed to rake profits and do cleaning at the casino for three days. On January 4, 2015, the casino was raided on the spot by the County Public Security Bureau, and gambling participants Zhang Jia, Ren, Zhang Yi, Wang, Yang, and others were arrested, with gambling funds of 86,200 RMB and a set of mahjong tile gambling tools confiscated. During the operation of the casino, the defendant Yu made a total illegal profit of 40,000 RMB. On September 11, 2015, the defendant Chen voluntarily surrendered to the County Public Security Bureau and truthfully confessed to his crimes. The aforementioned facts were not contested by the defendants Yu, Chen, and Lin during the court proceedings, and were confirmed by the testimonies of witnesses Zhang Jia, Ren, Zhang Yi, Wang, Yang, Zheng Jia, and others; the statements and defenses of co-defendants Chen Jia and Chen Yi; the seizure decision, administrative penalty decision; on-site inspection transcripts, on-site plans, on-site photos; household registration certificates, and the course of the case, among other evidence, sufficient to establish the facts.


The court found that in early April 2016, "Mr. Duan" (at large, identity unknown) set up a prostitution venue on the seventh floor of "Hongqi Furniture" on Huangpu Street in a district of this city, recruiting and organizing prostitutes to provide paid sexual services to the public. He hired the defendant Ma to handle marketing tasks such as attracting and arranging clients, the defendant Huang to take care of cash and bookkeeping, and the defendants Li and Nie to manage security. The defendant Zhang was hired around mid-April 2016 by the aforementioned prostitution venue, also responsible for attracting and arranging clients for marketing purposes. On April 22, 2016, around 11:00 p.m., police officers caught Zhang, Chi, Xiao, Liu, and others engaging in prostitution activities in rooms 8875 and 8882 at the venue. Meanwhile, Ma, Zhang, Huang, Li, and Nie were arrested at the location. These facts, as presented during the trial, were not disputed by the defendants Ma, Zhang, Huang, Li, and Nie. They were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Zhang, Chi, Xiao, Liu, Tan, Jia, and Deng; inspection records, search records; the seizure decision and inventory; "operational daily report", "order list", payment POS slip; physical evidence photos; identification record; criminal judgment, administrative penalty decision; and the documents provided by the public security authorities detailing the arrest, case solving process, explanatory notes, as well as the confessions and defenses of the defendants Ma, Zhang, Huang, Li, and Nie, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of Maojian District in a certain city accused: On September 8, 2013, at around 21:00, in a "Same Song" KTV private room, Zhu Moujia, Wang Mou, and other friends from a Momo group gathered to sing. During the event, Zhu Moujia had a conflict with others and then called the defendants Han, Chen, and He to come to drink and relieve stress. When the defendants Han, Chen, and He arrived, Zhu Moujia was in the bathroom. As Han, Chen, and He were about to enter the room, they were provoked by an unknown man who smashed a wine bottle in front of them. Upon returning to the room, the defendants Han, Chen, and He mistakenly believed Wang Mou to be the unknown man and assaulted him. According to the forensic evaluation by the city's public security bureau, victim Wang Mou sustained minor injuries.

On March 9, 2014, at around 22:00, victim Wang Mouyi had a verbal altercation with defendant Chen over his girlfriend Zhu Mouyi. Both parties agreed to meet at the "Haoji BBQ" restaurant on a certain street in the city for negotiation. Defendant Chen invited defendant He to accompany him. At around 23:00 in the "Haoji BBQ" restaurant, Chen and He had a verbal dispute with Wang Mouyi. Subsequently, Chen and He used machetes, which they had prepared in advance, to attack Wang Mouyi. According to the forensic evaluation by the city's public security bureau, victim Wang Mouyi sustained minor injuries, classified as second-degree.

The prosecution read out and presented documentar


The prosecution alleges: 1. On September 19, 2014, at around 11:00 PM, the defendants Li and Zhao, after prior consultation, stole a Qianjiake brand electric bicycle belonging to the victim Chen at the entrance of a small shop in Tong'er Village, Linpu Town, a certain district of a certain city. They used methods such as removing the front panel and connecting wires. The bicycle was valued at 1,378 RMB. 2. In the early hours of September 26, 2014, the defendants Li and Zhao, after prior consultation, stole a Lanbei brand electric bicycle belonging to the victim Pan from the parking shed behind the Zhongzheng Internet Cafe's bathhouse in Linpu Town, a certain district of a certain city. They used methods such as removing the front panel and connecting wires. The bicycle was valued at 882 RMB. 3. At around 3 or 4 AM on September 26, 2014, the defendants Li and Zhao, after prior consultation, stole a Jialiqi brand electric bicycle belonging to the victim Yao from the parking area beneath the Junma Internet Cafe in the Commerce and Trade City of Puyang Town, a certain district of a certain city. They used methods such as removing the front panel and connecting wires. The bicycle was valued at 1,452 RMB. They were caught on the spot by patrolling team members. In total, the property stolen by defendants Li and Zhao was valued at 3,712 RMB. After the incident, the stolen goods involved in sections 2 and 3 of this case were recovered and returned to the victims. After being brought to justice, defendants Li and Zhao confessed truthfully to their acts of theft. The above facts are undisputed by defendants Li and Zhao during the court trial and are corroborated by the statements of the victims Chen, Pan, and Yao, testimonials from witnesses Yan and Xie, identification records, on-site investigation records, the seizure decision document, the seizure inventory, the return inventory, the price appraisal conclusion, the account of the incident, the explanatory note, and residency certificates of the defendants Li and Zhao, which are sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charged: The defendant Huang is the legal representative of the defendant unit, Wenzhou Jiahe Pipe Fittings Co., Ltd. In March 2013, Huang decided to carry out stainless steel pipe drawing processing within Wenzhou Jiahe Pipe Fittings Co., Ltd. and hired others to be responsible for the pickling of stainless steel pipes. At the beginning of 2014, the pickling task was taken over by the company's employee, the defendant Liu. During the pickling process of the stainless steel pipes, Liu discharged the wastewater from the pickling directly into the ditches without any treatment, which then flowed into the soil outside the company. On March 21, 2014, the company was discovered by joint law enforcement of public security and environmental protection departments. Tests showed that the discharged wastewater had a pH value of 1.65, total chromium 8.09mg/l, and total nickel 4.91mg/l, with all three pollution factors exceeding national standards by more than three times. On the day of the incident, Huang voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities. The prosecution provided corresponding evidence for the above accusations.


After trial, it was found that on the afternoon of August 21, 2015, defendants Zhang and Liu went to No. 380, a village in a certain town, district, and city, kicked open the door of a temporary residence of the victim Zeng, entered the room and stole a black women's shoulder bag (containing more than 200 yuan in cash as well as an ID card, bank cards, etc.). On August 25, 2015, at noon, defendants Zhang and Liu went to No. 54-3, Zhu Jia, Hongzhou Village, a certain town, district, and city, sneaked into the temporary residence of victim Tian and stole a purple generic women's shoulder bag (containing 240 yuan in cash, an ID card, bank cards, household registration book, etc.) and an OPPO mobile phone (valued at 2,726.55 yuan). The stolen property was recovered and returned to the owners. On August 30, 2015, at noon, defendants Zhang and Liu went to a certain village in a street of a certain district and city, climbed through the window into the home of victim Jin, and stole four bottles of red wine and a piggy bank (containing coins totaling over 400 yuan). At around 19:00 on August 31, 2015, defendants Zhang and Liu were arrested by police in a temporary residence at No. 4-51-6, a certain village in a street of a certain district and city. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Zhang and Liu during the trial, and were corroborated by statements from victims Zeng, Tian, and Jin, identification records and photos, extraction records and photos, on-site inspection records and photos, the appraisal report issued by the price authentication center of a certain district and city, the list of seized and returned items, mobile phone photos, the criminal judgment numbered Jin A Criminal Initial No.1500 issued by the People's Court of Yiwu City, a certain province, in 2010, and the criminal judgment numbered Certain Criminal Initial No.1060 issued by this court in 2015, the release certificate, the arrest record, and the household registration certificates of the two defendants, which are sufficient for conviction.


After trial, it was found that defendant Wu, in order to monopolize the business of delivering sand to the China Railway Mixing Station, conspired with Li (already sentenced) to have Li recruit defendant Ge and others to intimidate and assault Tian. On July 24, 2014, at around 9 a.m., Wu lured Tian to a location near a cement factory in Jiekuang Yuanjia Village, under the pretense of discussing business. Li, Ge, and two other individuals assaulted Tian, resulting in a comminuted nasal bone fracture, which forensic appraisal classified as minor injury Level 2. On August 18, 2014, defendant Wu turned himself in to the public security authorities. It was also found that after the incident, Wu's family compensated the victim Tian with fifty thousand yuan for economic losses, and Tian expressed understanding towards the defendants involved. These facts were acknowledged by defendants Wu and Ge during the trial, and are corroborated by the victim's statement, confessions from co-defendants, documentary evidence, and expert opinions, all sufficient for confirmation.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Bengbu City charges: On February 5, 2016, at 15:00, the defendant Yu was driving a blue-gray large ordinary passenger bus with the license plate Wan C from the city long-distance bus central station to the Huaiyuan Changfen bus station. The defendant Yin was the owner and ticket seller of the vehicle. As the vehicle was traveling from east to west near the Hongqi Bridge on Huaishang Avenue in a certain district of this city, it was seized by the Fourth Brigade of the Traffic Police Detachment of the Bengbu Public Security Bureau, and the vehicle was taken to the Fourth Brigade of the Bengbu Public Security Bureau Traffic Police. Upon investigation, it was found that Yu was driving the blue-gray large ordinary passenger bus with the license plate Wan C with severe overloading. The vehicle was approved to carry 37 passengers but was actually carrying 65 people, including 61 adults and 4 children, resulting in an overload rate of 64.8%. The number of passengers exceeded the rated capacity by more than 50%.


Upon review, it was found that from March 2012 to October 2013, defendants Yang and Li, with the intent of illegal profit, repeatedly purchased invoices illegally produced, such as uniform machine-printed invoices from a certain province's local tax bureau, fixed-value invoices from a certain province's national tax bureau, general machine-printed invoices from a certain province's national tax bureau, and ordinary VAT invoices from a certain province. They hired others to distribute business cards containing content about issuing regular invoices and contact information. Through phone calls and text messages, they sold a total of 23 illegally manufactured invoices to individuals such as Jiang and Wu, with a total invoice amount exceeding 1.2 million RMB. After the incident, a total of over 4,900 forged invoices that had not yet been sold were confiscated from the two defendants. The specific criminal facts are listed as follows: 1. From January to October 2013, defendants Yang and Li sold 18 illegally manufactured invoices to Jiang, of which Jiang distributed 6 to Jiang and 4 to Zhao, with a total invoice amount of 692,168 RMB. 2. From June to October 2013, defendants Yang and Li sold 4 illegally manufactured invoices to Wu, with a total invoice amount of 317,640 RMB. 3. In September 2013, defendants Yang and Li sold 1 illegally manufactured invoice to Wang, with a total invoice amount of 196,000 RMB. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Yang and Li during the court trial, and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Jiang, Wu, Dong, Jiang, Sun, and others, the confessions of defendants Yang and Li, identification records, a list of seized items and evidence retrieval, proof materials issued by the Yantai Local Tax Bureau and Yantai Zhifu National Tax Bureau, appraisal appointment letters such as Yan [Employed Character] (2013) No. 00005, 00006, appraisal notice letters such as Yan [Economic] Appraisal Word (2014) No. 006, 101, 120, and evidence such as work situation and household registration certificates provided by the public security organs, all of which are sufficient to confirm the charges.


The public prosecution authority charges that between February 7 and March 30, 2016, defendants Li and Zhu repeatedly went to the dormitory parking lot of a certain college in this city and used pliers, lock cutters, and other means to steal a total of 19 bicycles of brands such as Giant and Merida. On March 20 of the same year, defendants Li and Zhu sold 8 of these bicycles to an individual named Xu for 6,100 yuan. Subsequently, Xu sold one of these bicycles, a Giant ATX660 model that he bought for 600 yuan, to another person, while the remaining 7 bicycles had not yet been sold. After the case was reported, the public security authorities recovered 11 bicycles from defendants Li and Zhu; additionally, 7 unsold bicycles were retrieved from Xu, and defendants Li and Zhu returned 5,500 yuan to Xu. In summary, the public security authorities recovered a total of 18 bicycles, 11 of which were returned to their respective victims. According to the appraisal, the 18 bicycles recovered were valued at a total of 24,050 yuan. During the trial of this case, defendants Li and Zhu returned the illegal proceeds of 600 yuan to the court. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Li and Zhu during the trial, and were substantiated by testimonies from victims Wu, Dai, Chen, among others, witness testimony from Xu, records from the scene examination conducted by the public security organs, site diagrams, site photos, search records, seizure decisions, seizure lists and photos, restitution lists, identification records, identification photos, lists of accepted evidence and transaction records, screenshots of Alipay transfer records, second-hand bicycle transfer vouchers, copies of sales slips, video surveillance footage, photos and notices of stolen bicycles, a price appraisal conclusion report from the city's price certification center, a letter of understanding from Xu, a police officer's account, the arrest process, and household registration certificates of defendants Li and Zhu. All these pieces of evidence are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution charges that at around 6 a.m. on June 27, 2017, the defendant Yu got into a fight with the victim Zhang at the Midea Lecheng construction site in Gulou District, Xuzhou City, over a trivial matter. Subsequently, defendants Wu and Quan, armed with steel pipes, and Ran Jia (already convicted) and Ran Yi (already convicted), armed with wrenches, joined defendant Yu in assaulting Zhang, resulting in a head injury to Zhang. According to a forensic assessment, the victim Zhang's injuries were classified as a level 2 serious injury. To substantiate the aforementioned facts, the prosecution presented evidence including the confessions of the defendants, statements of co-participants, the victim's statement, witness testimonies, medical records, expert opinion, and the criminal judgment.