The People's Procuratorate of a certain city accused: Between the night of April 13, 2016, and the early hours of the next day, the defendants Tang and Wei (handled in a separate case) drove a three-wheeled vehicle to the roadside of the village center in Tielu Village, Feiyun Subdistrict, a certain city. Using tools such as a socket, jack, and steel pipe, they stole two Cheng Shin-brand tires and two Cheng Shin-brand steel rims from the rear of a heavy dump truck with the license plate number ×××××, owned by the victim Wang. According to appraisal, the two tires and rims were valued at 5,120 RMB. In the early hours of April 15, 2016, the defendants Tang, Yang, and Wei (handled in a separate case), after prior conspiracy, drove a three-wheeled vehicle and an electric bike respectively, to the roadside at the entrance of a certain village on the new Provincial Highway 56 in Yunzhou, Feiyun Subdistrict, a certain city. Defendants Tang and Wei used sockets, jacks, and steel pipes to remove the tires, while defendant Yang stood by as a lookout, stealing two Shen Tong-brand tires and two Cheng Shin-brand steel rims from the rear of the construction vehicle with the license plate number ×××××, owned by the victim Cai. According to appraisal, the two tires and rims were valued at 3,515 RMB. On April 16 and 18, 2016, defendants Yang and Tang were respectively apprehended by public security organs. Subsequently, defendants Tang and Yang each returned illegal proceeds of 3,000 RMB and 1,000 RMB, and returned 2,000 RMB each to victims Wang and Cai. During the trial phase at this court, defendant Yang returned illegal proceeds of 1,515 RMB. These facts were not disputed by defendants Tang and Yang during the trial process, and were corroborated by the statements of victims Wang and Cai, price appraisal certificates, seizure lists, return lists, photographs, call records, statements, the process of apprehension, household registration certificates, and other evidence, sufficient to be established.


The prosecution agency charges that on the afternoon of November 6, 2012, defendants Luo and Nie conspired to break into Room 204, No. 48, Building 14, South Gardens Third Community, Haizhou Street, Haining City. Using lock-picking techniques, they stole one Lenovo IBM-X60 laptop, one iPad tablet, twelve packs of cigarettes, and one foreign currency commemorative album from the victim Wang Wen. The total value of the stolen goods was 4,585 yuan. After the crime, the mentioned stolen goods were recovered by the public security authorities and returned to the victim. The defendants Luo and Nie raised no objections to these facts during the trial, and these facts were corroborated by the victim Wang's statement, the search warrant, search records and photos, a temporary item storage list and photos, a list of seized items, the price appraisal report, investigation records and photos, identification records and photos, surveillance video, arrest details, and household registration evidence, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that at around 6 a.m. on May 21, 2015, defendants Dang and Xu went to the Jinrun Internet Cafe in Yanta District of this city to look for someone but were unsuccessful. Dang noticed that the victim Liu, who was asleep while online, had a wallet in the left pocket of his pants, and suggested to Xu that they steal the wallet. The two of them repeatedly attempted several times in turns and eventually succeeded in stealing the victim's wallet. After dividing up the more than 1,000 yuan in cash from the wallet, they discarded the wallet (which contained four bank cards and an ID card). On June 2 of the same year, Dang and Xu were arrested by the public security authorities. After the incident, Dang and Xu compensated the victim for his losses and obtained his understanding. The above facts were undisputed by defendants Dang and Xu during the court trial and were sufficiently confirmed by evidence such as the report materials, details of the arrest, household registration certificates, surveillance video screenshots, letter of understanding, receipts, the victim Liu's statement, the confessions of defendants Dang and Xu, identification records and photos, and surveillance video. The defenders of both defendants had no objections to the facts charged in the indictment and provided a defense argument highlighting the defendants' good attitude in admitting guilt, compensating the victim for economic losses, and obtaining understanding, recommending the court to impose lenient punishment on the two defendants.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain location charges: Defendants Tian, Zhang, Niu, and Liu were all service staff at the Yin Hai Entertainment Club in the Agricultural and Sideline Products Logistics Center, Liangzhu Street, Yuhang District, Hangzhou. On the evening of June 30, 2013, the victim, Li, and a friend were singing in Room 511 of the club. At around 11 PM, when the victim Li and others were settling the bill, they refused to pay a tip, leading to a dispute with defendant Niu in the club's lobby. Defendant Yang, who was singing at the club at the time, heard the commotion and approached to punch and kick the victim Li. Yang also instructed defendants Tian, Zhang, Niu, and Liu to successively use baseball bats to beat the victim Li. Among them, defendant Zhang struck the victim Li in the face with a baseball bat. On September 16 of the same year, a forensic evaluation by the Yuhang District Public Security Bureau in Hangzhou determined that the victim Li sustained bilateral nasal bone fractures and a nasal septum fracture due to the trauma, which constituted minor injuries. After the incident, defendants Yang, Tian, Zhang, Niu, and Liu subsequently reached a settlement agreement with the victim Li, collectively compensating him with 100,000 RMB, and obtained Li's understanding. The evidence for these charges includes the victim's statement, witness testimonies, documentary evidence, identification records, audio-visual materials (CD), a forensic report on the degree of huma


Upon trial, it was found that from the end of July 2015 to September 9, 2015, the defendant Li, in collaboration with others, set up a casino on a street near the Shapo Wei market in a certain town of a certain city, using buttons as gambling tools. During this period, on September 6 and September 9, 2015, the defendants Li and Wei jointly invested in acting as the bank at this casino. After receiving a report, police officers arrested both defendants and seized gambling funds amounting to 326 RMB and 300 buttons used as gambling tools at the scene. The aforementioned facts were not contested by the defendants Li and Wei during the court hearing. They were substantiated by documentary evidence such as the case registration form, the circumstances of the arrest, household registration certificates, a list of confiscated items, and by witness testimonies from Chen, Gan, Rong, and Li A, as well as the confessions of the defendants Li and Wei. Additionally, evidence was supported by on-site investigation records, diagrams, photos, extraction records, and identification records, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


After trial, it was found that between April and October 2018, the defendants Liang and Wei, who were tinning workers at Changzhou Xinen Metal Products Co., Ltd., took advantage of their positions to embezzle 643 kilograms of production raw material tin ingots from the company's workshop, with a total value of more than 80,000 RMB, by carrying them out personally on multiple occasions. It was also found that after the incident, defendant Liang voluntarily returned 12,906.25 RMB of his salary and compensated the victim unit with 50,000 RMB. Defendant Wei also compensated the victim unit with 50,000 RMB, and both obtained the victim unit's understanding. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Liang and Wei during the trial, and they are substantiated by documentary evidence including bank transaction lists, transfer records, attendance sheets, invoices, and letters of understanding. Additionally, the testimony records of witnesses, such as Chen and Ma, as well as police documentation of the incident, arrests, identification records, photos, confiscation, and search records, weighing records, and a price assessment conclusion issued by the Wujin District Price Certification Center in Changzhou, all provide sufficient confirmation.


After the trial was conducted, it was established that from January 2015 to May 28, 2015, the defendants Xu and Hong knowingly purchased counterfeit branded sportswear from places such as the Sijiqing Clothing Market in Hangzhou. They set up a Taobao online store in a certain residential area of a city where they temporarily resided, selling these counterfeit goods to the outside world, with total sales amounting to over 270,000 RMB. On May 28, 2015, the public security authorities seized 121 pieces of counterfeit branded sportswear along with 100 packaging bags, valued at nearly 5,000 RMB, from the defendants' temporary residence. Additionally, they confiscated one computer tower, one Lenovo all-in-one machine, account books, express delivery slips, seals, purchase receipts, and a USB drive used for the crime. Following the incident, the families of Xu and Hong returned illegal proceeds of 90,000 RMB on their behalf. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Xu and Hong or their defense during the court proceedings, and were substantiated by evidence such as search records, a list and photos of items seized, a list of evidence collected, a CD of Alipay transaction data, statements explaining the appraisal situation, and testimonies from the defendants Xu and Hong, which were sufficient for the determination.


The prosecution alleges: From early 2005 to October 24, 2013, defendants Jin and Wang, without following the required application procedures, illegally tapped into the water pipeline of Wenling City Water Supply Co., Ltd. to supply water for their own use and offered it to others for a fee. They stole approximately 2,243 tons of water, valued at about 6,737 RMB. On April 11, 2014, after negotiating with Wenling City Water Supply Co., Ltd., defendants Jin and Wang each paid 11,995.20 RMB to the company. On November 13, 2013, defendant Jin voluntarily went to the Chengdong Police Station of Wenling Public Security Bureau to surrender and truthfully confessed his involvement in the crime. On December 4, 2013, defendant Wang, after being summoned, went to the Chengdong Police Station of Wenling Public Security Bureau to surrender and truthfully confessed his involvement in the crime. These facts were undisputed by defendants Jin and Wang during the court proceedings and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Ding, Qu, He, and Liu; photographs of the water meters; water pricing charts and explanations of the water recovery situation; water measurement tables; leasing contracts; water bills; explanation of the voluntary surrender; basic information on residents; and the process of bringing the defendants to justice; all of which are sufficient for determination.


The prosecution alleges that since 2017, a crime syndicate headed by Chen (handled in a separate case) and involving the defendants Liang and Wang, as well as others, operated the business of the Zhongqi Financial Services Company Certain Mountain Branch in a certain city's Guangsha Business Building on the mid-section of Jianshe Road. The branch later moved to Room 607 of the Jitai Building on Zhongxing Road in the same city for its operations. After investigation, it was found that during the operation of the Zhongqi Financial Services Company's Certain Mountain Branch, the company deceived numerous victims in urgent need of loans by claiming that loans required no collateral or credit checks. Victims were led to sign falsely inflated loan contracts with amounts not matching the actual loan amounts and were defrauded through demands for deposits, management fees, home visit fees, and through the imposition of interest rates far exceeding the legal limit and high penalty fees, causing


A certain local People's Procuratorate charges that, starting in June 2016, the defendants Guo and Wen were successively employed by a co-defendant "Lao Huo" (whose case is handled separately) to engage in crowd gambling using poker cards to play "San Gong" in an unlicensed shack next to the Zhongtong Express in the Sixth Team of Xiejiazhuang, Taihe Town, Baiyun District, in this city. At approximately 2 a.m. on January 5, 2017, Guo, Wen, and several gamblers were apprehended at the aforementioned location by the public security personnel. A deck of playing cards used as a tool for the crime and gambling funds totaling RMB 9,710 were seized on-site. Based on the aforementioned facts,


The prosecution alleges that the defendant Huang is the head of Huining County Hongsheng Automobile Trading Co., Ltd. From August 2018 to July 2019, in order to increase car sales, Huang and the defendant Wu (an employee of the company) discussed using fake motor vehicle driver's licenses to handle vehicle mortgage procedures for customers. Wu collected relevant information from four customers and collected 960 yuan, which was given to Huang. Huang sent the relevant information via WeChat to the maker of the fake driver's licenses and transferred 500 yuan. Once the fake motor vehicle driver's licenses were made, Wu delivered them to the four buyers of the fake licenses. During this period, Huang individually arranged for two fake motor vehicle driver's licenses for others.


After trial, it was found that on February 13, 2018, the defendant Wo purchased a semi-automatic rifle (7.62 mm caliber, gunpowder powered) from Wu Moumou (at large) in a room of a certain hotel in a certain district of a certain city. One day in April 2018, the defendant Wo delivered the semi-automatic rifle to defendant Wang for safekeeping at a certain hotel in a certain town of a certain banner in a certain city. Defendant Wang, on that day, delivered the rifle to defendant He for safekeeping at a certain bungalow in the same town, and He stored the rifle under the bed in the bedroom of his home. According to the identification by the Forensic Evidence Center of the Ministry of Public Security, the semi-automatic rifle was legally recognized as a firearm. After being brought to justice, defendants Wo, He, and Wang truthfully confessed to the criminal facts and voluntarily signed a plea of guilty and punishment agreement. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Wo, He, and Wang during the trial, and were substantiated by evidence such as the seizure record, seizure list and photographs, the police response document, the acceptance and filing documents, jurisdiction designation letter, compulsory measure documentation, case explanation, inquiry of criminal records, report materials, supplementary investigation statement, the testimony of witness Xue, the identification report from the Forensic Evidence Center of the Ministry of Public Security (Forensic [2018] No. 3068), and the on-site inspection record and photographs from the Manzhouli City Public Security Bureau, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.


The prosecution alleges that from June 10, 2018, to September 3, 2018, the defendants Yu and You placed orders for fine lungs and pig blood tofu. When defendant Yu went to Huabao Company to pick up the goods, defendant You replaced them with high-priced pig products of the same total weight, such as pig stomachs, pig half tails, crescent bones, and large intestine heads. During this period, the two used a total of 3,945 kilograms of fine lungs and 920 kilograms of pig blood tofu to place orders, thus misappropriating a total of 4,865 kilograms of high-priced pig products including pig stomachs, pig half tails, crescent bones, and large intestine heads. After accounting, from June 10, 2018, to September 3, 2018, the price of fine lungs fluctuated between 0.7 to 2.3 yuan per kilogram, and the price of pig blood tofu was 3 yuan per kilogram. Among the five types of products including pig stomachs, pig half tails, crescent bones, large intestine heads, and pig trotters, the lowest price was that of pig trotters, at 26.4 yuan per kilogram. Calculating based on the highest price of fine lungs at 2.3 yuan per kilogram, the highest price of pig blood tofu at 3 yuan per kilogram, and the lowest price of the five products (pig stomachs, pig half tails, crescent bones, large intestine heads, pig trotters) at 26.4 yuan per kilogram, the defendants Yu and You misappropriated a total of 116,602.5 yuan from Huabao Company through these means.


The defendants Yang and Gao had no objections to the criminal facts charged by the prosecution and expressed their willingness to plead guilty. The defender of defendant Yang agreed that the behavior of defendant Yang constituted the crime of x but stated that: 1. The organization of gambling by the defendant was brief, with few sessions, a small number of participants, limited gambling funds, and low profit from taking a cut; therefore, the criminal circumstances were ordinary, with minor subjective malice and low social harm. 2. Defendant Yang showed a good attitude towards admitting guilt, expressed remorse, was a first-time and occasional offender, and could be given a lenient punishment. In summary, it is suggested that defendant Yang be sentenced to a prison term of 6 months to 1 year with probation. The facts of the case ascertained by this court are consistent with the prosecution's charges. The evidence proving the aforementioned facts includes: 1. Documentary evidence such as arrest procedure, population information, administrative penalty decisions, criminal records, and explanatory statements; 2. Testimonials from witnesses Yu and Li, among others; 3. Confessions and defenses by defendants Yang and Gao; 4. Identification records; 5. On-site photographs. The facts of this case are clear, and the evidence is reliable and sufficient to support the findings.


Upon trial, it was found that one evening in November 2013, the defendant Jia contacted the defendant Bai to deliver approximately 4 grams of drugs to a drug user named Li living in a certain county. They agreed on a transaction price of 2,000 yuan. Li paid this amount to Jia through Bai in two installments, and Bai took a cut of 250 yuan. One evening in December 2013, the defendant Jia contacted the defendant Bai to deliver approximately 1 gram of drugs to a man at the Luliang District Committee family compound. Bai, knowing the transaction was for drug trafficking, still followed Jia's instructions and delivered the drugs. He forwarded the transaction amount of 400 yuan to Jia and took a cut of 50 yuan. One evening in January 2014, the defendant Jia sold approximately 0.5 grams of drugs for 500 yuan to a drug user named Xue in a taxi driven by Li with license plate Jin J×××××, near the Sunshine Coast Hotel in Xiya Di, Lishi District. On the evening of January 20, 2014, public security officers from Lishi District found a package containing 0.48 grams of suspected drug material with skin, an electronic scale, and 50 small plastic bags in a bag carried by the defendant Jia. After identification, methamphetamine was detected in the suspected drug material carried. The above facts were basically undisputed by defendant Jia during the trial, and similarly undisputed by defendant Bai, supported by the confessions of defendants Jia and Bai; witness testimonies from Li, Xue, and Li; recognition records, identification documents, lists of items seized and returned, photo descriptions, situation explanations, case explanations, household registration information and other evidence. This is sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of Kuiwen District in a certain city charged: In the early morning of March 26, 2014, the defendant Zhang instigated defendants Pang and Ma to drive from a certain city to the urban area to find the victim, Xu Moujia, to demand repayment of a debt. At around 9 a.m. the next day, after finding the victim, Xu Moujia, at the Qixing Hotel in Kuiwen District, the defendants illegally detained him at the Home Inn in Weicheng District until around 2:30 p.m. on the same day. During this period, defendants Zhang, Ma, and Pang used thumb cuffs, electric batons, and their fists and feet to torture the victim, Xu Moujia, and forced him to write a repayment plan. The beating resulted in multiple contusions on the victim Xu Moujia's hands, swelling of both thumbs, a fracture of the right transverse process of the second lumbar vertebra, and a herniated disc. According to forensic identification, the victim Xu Moujia's injuries were assessed as minor injuries of the second degree. In response to the accusations, the prosecuting authority read and produced evidence such as the confessions and defenses of the defendants, documentary evidence, witness testimonies, the victim's statement, identification records, appraisal opinions, and audio-visual materials.


A certain Procuratorate in a certain region accuses: On July 5, 2013, the defendants Dong and Chang, together with Yun from a certain town (dealt with in a separate case), signed a "Real Estate Cooperative Development Agreement." It was agreed that the three would invest in shares, and that a certain city's Tianyi Real Estate Development Co., Ltd. would build and develop the Ruyi Jiayuan residential community (later renamed Tianyi International City) in Sanjianfang Village, a town in a certain region. The agreement stipulated that after it took effect, a Ruyi Jiayuan Development Project Department would be established, with defendant Dong serving as general manager, and defendants Chang and Yun serving as deputy general managers. Subsequently, defendants Dong, Chang, and Yun divided responsibilities and, in the name of the company, signed and executed a "Land Acquisition, Replacement, and Transfer Agreement" with the villagers of Sanjianfang Village, obtaining land. The Ruyi Jiayuan development project covered a total of 12.4258 hectares. Without the approval of the land management department, the land use was changed for the construction of residential buildings and for ground hardening. Later, experts organized by a certain city's Land and Resources Bureau appraised that the construction of the residential buildings and the ground hardening severely damaged the farming conditions of 67.9395 mu of arable land. On November 14, 2019, defendant Chang surrendered to the Jingshan Police Station of the local Public Security Bureau. The Land and Resources Bureau in the certain region issued administrative penalties to Tianyi Real Estate Development Co., Ltd. on August 6, 2014, and December 5, 2018. The company paid fines of 666,670 yuan on October 22 and 24, 2014; a total of 812,970 yuan for farmland reclamation fees on March 29, 2018; and a fine of 1.7 million yuan on December 5, 2018. In response to the above charges, the prosecution presents corresponding evidence to the court: documentary evidence, witness testimony, defendant confessions, and expert opinions.


The prosecution authorities charge: In June 2015, the defendants Wang and Kuang rented the basement of a self-built house at No. 1, Qing Tian Fifth Alley, Shuimogou District in this city. Wang was responsible for paying the rent, while Kuang purchased a fishing machine that could simultaneously accommodate 8 players (identified as 8 gambling game machines), and another fishing machine for 10 players (identified as 10 gambling game machines), and was also responsible for managing petty cash and settling turnover. Wang and Kuang employed Li to manage customer credits and clean the premises. On October 9, 2015, at around 11 PM, police officers inspected the basement of the self-built house at No. 1, Qing Tian Fifth Alley, Shuimogou District and caught the defendant Kuang, arcade attendant Li, and gamblers Xu and Zhao on the spot. They seized a fishing machine for 8 players, a fishing machine for 10 players, gambling petty cash totaling 1,500 yuan, and five account books. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Wang and Kuang during the court hearing, and are supported by the testimonies of witnesses Li, Xu, Qin, and Zhao, search records, on-site photos, identification records, seizure lists, IOUs, account books, the opinion on the gambling nature of the game, arrest process, and the identification documents of the defendants Wang and Kuang, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charged that on October 19, 2014, at around 21:00, defendants Wu, Yang, and Pan took advantage of the absence of the victim, Chen, to jointly steal the victim's Benling-brand electric bicycle within the Ronghe Shanshui Green City residential area on East Mingxiu Road, in a certain district of a certain city. According to the appraisal, the involved Benling-brand electric bicycle was valued at 2,772 RMB. It was further found that on October 20, 2014, the public security authorities apprehended defendants Pan and Wu, and the next day apprehended defendant Yang. After the incident, the public security authorities seized the stolen electric bicycle from defendant Pan and legally returned it to the victim, Chen. During the court hearing, the three defendants also confessed to the above criminal facts without objection, and the allegations were substantiated by the victim's statement, identification records and photos, the confessions and defenses of the three defendants, the price appraisal opinion, the list of seized and returned items, and related documentary evidence, which were sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charged: In June 2013, the victim Zhou defaulted on two months' wages owed to the defendants Zhao, Kang, and You (handled in a separate case) and subsequently absconded. Later, the defendants Zhao, Kang, and You filed a complaint with the Jinhua City Human Resources and Social Security Bureau, falsely claiming that Zhou owed them each three months' wages, totaling more than 30,000 RMB. During the police questioning, they still falsely claimed that Zhou owed each of them three months' wages. On December 5 of the same year, the police took criminal detention measures against Zhou to pursue and apprehend him. On September 21, 2015, Zhou was captured and detained at the Jinhua City Detention Center, but after the facts were clarified, he was released on September 25. To substantiate the facts of the charges mentioned above, the prosecution provided corresponding evidence.


The prosecution agency alleges that on May 18, 2013, at around 23:00, the defendant Xiao, in the parking lot of Yayipark, Chancheng District, in a certain city, smashed the window glass of a JAC Refine seven-seater van parked there by the victim Jian and stole a black and white backpack from inside the vehicle. The backpack contained a Lenovo Zhaoyang V31 series laptop worth 320 RMB, a white Coolpad mobile phone worth 519.87 RMB, and 150 RMB in cash. On the night of May 26, at around 21:00, the defendants Xiao and Du, along with "Zhu" and "Diao" (both handled in separate cases), in a parking lot near the roadside of Wenhua Park in Chancheng District of the same city, smashed the window glass of a car parked there by the victim Chen and stole 8,000 RMB in cash, a Samsung mobile phone worth 80 RMB, a counterfeit Sony Ericsson mobile phone worth 80 RMB, a counterfeit LV leather bag valued at 227 RMB, and a handbag with the brand SAICHI and other items. On May 28, 2013, at around 19:00, the police apprehended the defendants Xiao and Du at a pavilion near the parking lot of Wenhua Park in Chancheng District (some of the stolen items were recovered and returned to the two victims). The facts mentioned above were not disputed by the defendants Xiao and Du during the trial and are corroborated by the statements of the victims Chen and Jian, the list of seized and returned items, on-site investigation records, search records, a price appraisal certificate, fingerprint identification certificate, arrest process document, household registration proof, the defendants' statements during the investigation phase, and the identification records, which are sufficient to verify the claims.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charges: 1. On August 17, 2016, defendant Han, together with defendant Guo, went to the vicinity of a certain hot spring bath on a certain road in a town of a certain county. Using marbles and other instruments, they broke the glass of the front passenger door of a white Kaiyi brand car (license plate: Yu G×××××) owned by the victim Chang, which was parked by the roadside. They stole a black Samsung tablet and 100 yuan in cash from the car. According to an appraisal by the price appraisal center of the county, the stolen tablet was valued at 1125 yuan. The tablet and the 100 yuan in cash have been returned to the victim. 2. On August 17, 2016, defendant Han, together with defendant Guo, went to the front of a certain auto parts store near a certain bridge in a county, and, using marbles and other instruments, broke the left rear door glass of a white GAC Trumpchi SUV (license plate: Yu A×××××) owned by the victim Zheng, which was parked by the roadside. They stole a black leather bag placed on the seat behind the driver. According to the appraisal by the county's price appraisal center, the stolen bag was valued at 1200 yuan. The bag has been returned to the victim. 3. On the evening of August 10, 2016, defendant Guo went to a small town on a certain road in a township of a certain county in a certain province, and, using marbles and other tools, broke the glass of a Cadillac SUV owned by the victim Qi, parked by the roadside. He stole a leather bag, mobile phone, cigarettes, and other items from the car. According to the appraisal by the county's price appraisal center, the total value of the stolen items was 12711 yuan. In summary, defendant Guo stole items, cash, etc., totaling 15136 yuan, and defendant Han stole items, cash, etc., totaling 2425 yuan. Regarding the above charges, the prosecution submitted evidence including the judgment, list of seized items, testimonies from witnesses Fu and Geng, statements from the victims Chang, Zheng, and Qi, confessions and defenses from defendants Guo and Han, appraisal opinion from the Yanjin Price Certification Center, and a CD, among other evidence.


After examination, it was found that: On January 29, 2014, at around 8 p.m., the defendants Li and Cui confronted Gui outside the game room on Zhenxing Road, Sanzhang Town, Nanxun Town, Nanxun District of this city to demand repayment of a debt. Gui refused to repay and had a poor attitude, leading to a scuffle between Li and Gui. During the altercation, Gui picked up a roadside stone intending to hit Li. Seeing this, defendant Cui stepped in to help, and together with Li, they beat Gui, resulting in injuries to Gui's leg. Forensic examination determined that the fracture in Gui's right lower limb constituted a level-one minor injury. After the incident, defendants Li and Cui voluntarily turned themselves in and truthfully confessed their crimes. They reached a compensation agreement with the victim Gui and paid the agreed compensation. The facts above were not contested by defendants Li and Cui during the trial, and were supported by evidence such as personal information, administrative penalty decision, criminal judgment, medical records, agreements, letter of understanding, receipts, witness testimony of Hu, the arrest process, Gui's statements, and forensic assessment of bodily injuries, all sufficient for verification.


The prosecution alleges that the defendant Jin, together with Xu, used an air gun to illegally hunt on five occasions in a certain town of a certain city in January 2020. Among these, on January 2, 2020, they illegally hunted a wild animal by the roadside of a certain village in the same town. According to the appraisal, the air gun used for illegal hunting qualifies as a firearm. To substantiate the above allegations, the prosecution read aloud and presented relevant documentary evidence, witness testimonies, and the confessions and defenses of the defendants Jin and Xu in court.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charged that on May 18, 2014, at noon, the defendants Li and Zhang went to the garage of the house of Zhou in Building 2, Phase 4 of the University City in Huanghua City. Li then entered through the back door of the garage to commit theft, while Zhang was on lookout outside. During this theft, they stole a power hammer, a circular saw, and an angle grinder, with a total value of 1085 yuan. On May 20, at around 8 a.m., defendants Li and Zhang again went to the garage of Zhou's house in the same location to commit theft. Li opened the back door of the garage and stole two welding machines stored inside, handing them over to Zhang. Zhang hid the two welding machines in the utility meter boxes on the fifth and seventh floors of the building. Li was caught on the spot when he was about to enter the garage for another theft, and Zhang was subsequently also apprehended. The two welding machines were valued at 2200 yuan. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Li and Zhang during the trial. Their statements, along with testimonies from Zhou, Zhang Jia, Shi, Zhang Yi, identification records, photos, lists of seized and returned items, and value appraisal reports, serve as evidence sufficient to establish these facts.


The prosecution alleges that between August 13 and August 23, 2016, the defendants Bian and Guo, on three separate occasions, conspired to go to the alleyway in front of ** Electrical Appliance Factory in Nanxinan Village, Xiao Cao'e Town, Yuyao City. They used methods such as transporting with a battery-powered tricycle to steal over 1000 kilograms of scrap iron, worth a total of 1000 RMB, which belonged to the victim Wang. On August 24 of the same year, the defendants Bian and Guo were apprehended by local police officers. After the incident, they returned the stolen funds amounting to 1000 RMB. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Bian and Guo during the court proceedings and are supported by documentary evidence, including the "Arrest Record" from the Yuyao Municipal Public Security Bureau, photographic evidence, population information, witness testimony from Zhang, the victim Wang's statement, identification records and photos, a price assessment report, and surveillance video discs, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.


Based on the trial findings: From 2016 to March 30, 2017, the defendant Li, either alone or in conjunction with the defendant Zhu, committed theft in the "Lanke Internet Cafe" operated by Tang on a street in a certain town of a certain county on two occasions, stealing items such as computer hosts and mice, with a total value of 2314.2 yuan. Defendant Li was involved in two theft cases, stealing items such as computer hosts and mice, with a total value of 2314.2 yuan; Defendant Zhu was involved in one theft case, stealing items such as a computer host and iced tea, with a total value of 2284.2 yuan. Detailed as follows: 1. In 2016, defendant Li stole two mice and one mouse pad in the "Lanke Internet Cafe" operated by Tang on a street in a certain town of a certain county. After the case occurred, all the stolen items were recovered by the public security authorities and returned to the victim Tang. According to the appraisal, the total value of the stolen items was 30 yuan. 2. On March 30, 2017, defendants Li and Zhu stole one host number 47 and two bottles of iced tea in the "Lanke Internet Cafe" operated by Tang on a street in a certain town. According to the appraisal, the total value of the stolen items was 2284.2 yuan. After the case occurred, all the stolen items were recovered by the public security authorities and returned to the victim Tang. Additionally, it was found that after being brought to justice, defendants Li and Zhu truthfully confessed the criminal facts of themselves and their co-offenders. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by defendants Li and Zhu during the trial, and are corroborated by the statement of the victim Tang, the testimony of the non-appearing witness Mo, site inspection records and photos, identification records and crime scene photos, search records and photos, seizure decisions, seizure and return inventories, price appraisal opinion, surveillance video, criminal judgment, parole proof, case investigation progress, apprehension progress, household registration information, and related documentary evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


Upon examination, it was found that at around 8 PM on July 19, 2014, defendant Wang collided and engaged in an argument with victim Qian while playing football on a road at the city's beach Phase III. Following this, Wang intended to retaliate. At about 10 PM the same day, defendant Wang, together with defendant Fan who arrived at the scene later, injured victim Qian in the head and face with punches at the toll gate of the city's beach Phase III. A forensic appraisal determined that victim Qian suffered blunt force trauma to the nose, resulting in bilateral nasal bone fractures and a nasal septum fracture, with the injuries classified as minor injuries of second degree. Defendant Wang surrendered to law enforcement on August 6, 2014. Defendant Fan was apprehended by the police on August 22, 2014. It was further established that after the incident, defendants Wang and Fan reached a mediation agreement with victim Qian regarding civil compensation, where Wang and Fan jointly compensated Qian for economic losses totaling 30,000 RMB. Victim Qian expressed understanding towards defendants Wang and Fan and waived their right to file an ancillary civil lawsuit. The defendants raised no objections to these facts during the court proceedings, and the facts were substantiated by material evidence photos; documentation of apprehension and case-solving by the police, situational explanations, the criminal judgment, mediation agreement, receipts, statement of understanding, and witness testimonies from Zhang, Deng, and Zhong; the statement from victim Qian; the forensic appraisal report, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges that: From the end of February 2014 to April of the same year, defendants Zhao, Li, and Deng, after prior conspiracy, set up gambling dens in various locations such as a rented house on Zhongxing South Street in a certain village of a certain town, another rented house behind the Haoting Hotel in a certain town, and above a small shop in a certain village of a certain town. They organized gambling activities and extracted profits amounting to 30,000 RMB. During the trial of the case, defendants Zhao, Li, and Deng returned the illegal income of 30,000 RMB. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhao, Li, and Deng during the court hearing, and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Wu, Chen, Lu, and Lin, as well as by the public security administrative punishment decision, the process of arrest, and basic population information. These pieces of evidence are sufficient to confirm the charges.


The prosecution agency charges: Between November and December 2012, the defendant Zhang, knowing that the items were stolen, still purchased 30 grams of gold jewelry including rings, a gold bracelet, a platinum ring, and a gold peanut from Yu (already convicted) and others at the Jiner Gold Shop in Hengjie, Yinzhou District, a city in a certain province. According to the appraisal, the total value of the aforementioned items is RMB 24,535. Between November and December 2012, the defendant Huang, knowing that the items were stolen, repeatedly purchased one Lenovo Y460, Acer AS2420, Lenovo E40, HP FP632PA, and Hasee laptop from Yu and others at the "Huang's Second-hand Goods Store" in a certain district of a city in a certain province. According to the appraisal, the total value of the aforementioned laptops is RMB 10,740. After the case was uncovered, some of the stolen items were recovered and returned to the victims. The defendant Zhang refunded stolen money totaling RMB 16,100, and the defendant Huang refunded stolen money totaling RMB 5,480. The aforementioned facts were not contested by the defendants Zhang and Huang during the court proceedings and are supported by the statements of the victims Zhu, Xu, Lu, Luo, He, and Wang, the testimonies of witnesses Yu, Sun, and others, the explanation of the case's resolution, identification records, lists of seized and returned items, receipts, the appraisal conclusion report by the Xinchang County Pricing Certification Center, the criminal judgment No. 373 of 2013 of this court, as well as the basic information of the permanent population, all of which are sufficient to substantiate the charges.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charges that between March and May 2015, the defendant Yang distributed printed solicitation cards to rooms in hotels such as Huijin Business Hotel in the district. After negotiating the prostitution fee with Yang via the solicitation phone number on these cards, Yang and Kuang arranged for prostitutes like Liu to come to the hotel rooms for prostitution, and subsequently took a certain percentage of the proceeds as an introduction fee. At around 1 a.m. on May 15, 2015, defendants Yang and Kuang, using the aforementioned method, introduced prostitute Liu to Room 6602 of Huijin Business Hotel in the district for prostitution with client Zou. On June 9, 2015, defendant Yang was apprehended by public security personnel on a C××××× vehicle near a rented room at No. 5 Fangsheng Pond, Songtai Street in the district; defendant Kuang was apprehended on the same day inside the aforementioned rented room. During the trial, the defendants had no objection to the aforementioned facts, corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Zou and Liu, photographs of condoms, mobile phones as tools of the crime, business cards, lists of seized items, lists of returned items, decisions of administrative penalties, lists of received evidence materials, hotel registration information, images, call records, lists of confiscated items, electronic evidence examination reports, search record transcripts, identification transcripts, surveillance videos, arrest process details, and population information, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of Jiang'an District, a certain city, charged: During May 2013, defendants Xiong and Chen conspired to illegally appropriate No. 0 diesel fuel belonging to the company by taking advantage of Xiong's position as the dormitory administrator of the Hong Kong Road staff dormitory of Kanglong Taizi Wine House Limited Liability Company garden hotel in a certain city. In the early hours of May 3, May 19, and May 23, 2013, defendant Chen invited Li (handled separately) to drive a certain area's A××××× Mustang small car (with 23 fifty-pound oil barrels inside) from a certain city in a certain province to the staff dormitory of Kanglong Taizi Wine House Limited Liability Company garden hotel on Hong Kong Road in a certain city. Defendants Xiong and Chen filled the 23 pre-brought fifty-pound oil barrels with No. 0 diesel stored in the dormitory boiler room. Defendant Chen transported them back to a certain city in a certain province for personal use and paid defendant Xiong 3,000 yuan in illegal proceeds on three occasions. Around 3 a.m. on May 23, 2013, defendant Chen was stopped by police at a checkpoint while transporting the 23 fifty-pound barrels of No. 0 diesel weighing a total of 1,150 pounds and valued at 4,428 yuan; on the same day, the public security authorities arrested defendants Xiong and Chen. In summary, defendants Xiong and Chen misappropriated a total of 3,450 pounds of No. 0 diesel fuel valued at 13,284 yuan from Kanglong Taizi Wine House Limited Liability Company garden hotel in a certain city on three occasions. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Xiong and Chen during the trial and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Wang and Li; records of seizure, identification transcripts, seizure lists, return lists, photos, delivery notes, and other documentary evidence; price authentication opinions; arrest and case-solving processes, situation explanations; and the confessions of defendants Xiong and Chen, which were sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of Xixiangtang District in a certain city charged: 1. On February 14, 2017, the defendants Cai and Li jointly stole a Boleia brand electric scooter (license plate: **096, frame number: 201508000001352), which belonged to the victim Luo and was parked by the roadside at No. 38 Lupan Road, Xixiangtang District, in a certain city. According to the appraisal, the value of the scooter at the time of the crime was 2,376 RMB. 2. On March 12, 2017, the defendants Cai and Li jointly stole a Hongqi brand electric scooter (license plate: **867, frame number: 783221604434454), which belonged to the victim Zhu and was parked at the parking area in front of Gate 6, Huaxi Commercial City, No. 38 Huaxi Road, Xixiangtang District, in a certain city. According to the appraisal, the value of the scooter at the time of the crime was 2,142 RMB. The prosecution provided evidence such as the case registration form, details of the arrest, basic information forms of the individuals, the list of seized and returned items, the list of accepted evidential materials, the electric scooter information registration form, invoices, explanation of the situation, statements of the victims Luo and Zhu, confessions and defenses of the defendants Cai and Li, price appraisal conclusion, identification records, on-site identification records and photos, on-site surveillance videos, etc. It was considered that the defendants Cai and Li, with the purpose of illegal possession, secretly stole other people's property, with a total value of 4,518 RMB, which constitutes a large amount. The actions of both defendants have violated Article x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China. The criminal facts are clear, and the evidence is indeed sufficient, and both defendants should be held criminally responsible for x crime. The court is requested to sentence according to law. During the trial, defendants Cai and Li had no objections to the facts and charges contained in the indictment and voluntarily pleaded guilty. Upon examination, it was found that the facts that the prosecution charged defendants Cai and Li with x crime were clear, and the evidence was sufficient, and substantial enough to establish the charges.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accuses: At around 3 a.m. on February 18, 2014, defendants Huang and Hong, after premeditation, carried tools such as wrenches and screwdrivers, and went to the "Good Butler" supermarket at 529 Xihong Road, Gulou District, Fuzhou City. They entered the supermarket by breaking walls and stole cash totaling 3,000 yuan, mobile and China Unicom phone recharge cards valued at 2,400 yuan, 16 packs of Soft Zhonghua brand cigarettes valued at 5,938 yuan, one carton of Three Five brand cigarettes, 5 bottles of Yanghe Blue Classic liquor, and 3 bottles of Castel red wine, among other items, and then fled the scene. On February 21, 2014, defendants Huang and Hong were arrested by the police. A total of 7,900 yuan, 16 packs of Soft Zhonghua cigarettes, one carton of "555" brand cigarettes, five bottles of Yanghe Blue Classic liquor, and three bottles of red wine have been recovered and returned to the victim, Liu.


Upon examination, it was found that on the morning of February 25, 2012, defendant Zou purchased 16 boxes of "Gong Capsule" from an unknown street vendor at Qingping Market, Liwan District, Guangzhou, at a price of 1.5 yuan per box, for the purpose of resale. On the afternoon of March 1, 2012, defendant Zou brought these 16 boxes of "Gong Capsule" to Wanyingtang Pharmacy in Jida, Xiangzhou District, Zhuhai City for promotion. The person in charge of Wanyingtang Pharmacy, defendant Ning, without verifying the legal source of the medicine, purchased all 16 boxes at a price of 3 yuan each and placed them on the shelves for sale at 6 yuan each. On March 28, 2012, staff from the Zhuhai Municipal Food and Drug Administration conducted a random inspection of the aforementioned "Gong Capsule" at Wanyingtang Pharmacy. According to the appraisal, the 16 boxes of "Gong Capsule" sold at Wanyingtang Pharmacy were identified as counterfeit drugs. On March 5, 2013, defendants Zou and Ning turned themselves in to the Gongbei Public Security Administration Brigade for investigation. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Ning and Zou during the trial, and were substantiated by the testimony and identification records of witness Zhang, along with business licenses, drug operation permits, sales slips, official replies, sales instructions, on-site inspection records, notices of seizure, investigation records, statements upon arrival, explanatory notes, household registration information, drug appraisal conclusion reports, drug quality announcements, as well as photos of the scene and physical evidence, which are sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Jiangsu Province charged that defendants Zhu and Xu, after prior conspiracy, from September 2 to September 10, 2015, gathered gamblers in a room at a certain number in the Chengdong Street of the city to gamble using mahjong tiles in the form of "Niu Niu," operating the casino for more than 10 sessions and extracting profits of over 10,000 yuan. Among them, defendant Zhu was responsible for collecting the house fee, while defendant Xu provided the venue. Furthermore, it was found that on September 10, 2015, police officers from the city's public security bureau, after receiving a report from the public, arrested defendants Zhu and Xu, who were operating the casino, along with other gamblers Xue, Ma, Jiang, Zhou, Zhang, Chen, and more than 20 others, in a room at a certain number in Chengdong Street of the city. They seized 40 sets of mahjong tiles from defendant Zhu and confiscated 3,100 yuan (which has been submitted to the state treasury). The aforementioned facts have been repeatedly confessed by defendants Zhu and Xu in the records, and they raised no objections during the court proceedings. Additionally, there are decisions on evidence preservation, lists, confiscation lists, a general payment receipt for the confiscated income by the city, witness testimonies from Xue, Ma, Gu, Jiang, Zhou, Zhang, Chen, Du, Miao, Luo, Li, and others, on-site records and photos, the investigation process of the criminal case, and the criminal record and misconduct history of defendants Zhu and Xu, which are sufficient for determination.


The People's Procuratorate in a certain area charged: In July 2013, Jiang utilized the premises of the "Queyou Club" located at 24 Yong'an Garden, Huashan District, Ma'anshan City, to set up six gaming machines with gambling functions, providing a venue for others to gamble and thereby obtaining illegal profits. Jiang employed Lai and Han to manage the daily operations of the gaming machine room. On the evening of July 30, 2013, law enforcement officers apprehended Han on-site at the "Queyou Club" and seized six gambling machines, accounting books, and other items, along with gambling funds amounting to 28,830 yuan. On August 8, 2013, Jiang and Lai voluntarily surrendered to the Yangjiashan Police Station and truthfully confessed their criminal activities. Jiang, Han, and Lai raised no objections to the aforementioned facts during the trial proceedings. Additionally, evidence such as household registration certificates, accounting books, seizure lists, gambling machines, and testimonies from witnesses Liu, Yong, Ruan, and Yu, provided by the prosecution and verified during the trial, sufficiently confirm the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges that in the afternoon in late August 2013, defendants Bao and Chen stole 2 pieces of electrolytic copper plates, valued at 3,250 RMB, from the workshop of Linkun Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. in the Penglang Street area of the development zone of a certain city. On the night of September 3 of the same year, defendants Bao, Chen, and Xia stole 9 pieces of electrolytic copper plates from the same location, valued at 10,400 RMB. The defendants Bao, Chen, and Xia voluntarily turned themselves in and truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. Additionally, this court has found that the public security authorities seized 4,200 RMB of stolen money from defendant Bao, 4,500 RMB from defendant Chen, and 3,300 RMB from defendant Xia. The seized stolen money has been returned to the victimized unit by the public security authorities. During the trial process, close relatives of defendants Bao, Chen, and Xia compensated 1,650 RMB in stolen money on their behalf, which is currently held by this court. The above facts are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Shi, Yuan, Luo, Fan, Xu, and others, as well as by identification records, weighing records, price appraisal conclusions, search records, lists of seized and returned items, invoices, arrest details, identity documents, and other evidence. The defendants Bao, Chen, and Xia have confessed without objection, and their confessions are consistent with the facts proven by the aforementioned evidence. The evidence is confirmed to have probative value by this court.


The prosecution alleges that in the early hours of March 21, 2019, defendants Liu and Zhang climbed over the fence into the premises of Hongying Clothing Co., Ltd. in a certain city. After disabling the video surveillance, they entered the first-floor warehouse and stole 5 computer units, 2 computer monitors valued at 2,550 yuan, and 3 Hisense LCD TVs valued at over 3,000 yuan.


The prosecution charges that in October 2012, the defendant Chen met the victim Li at a certain location. In April 2013, Chen paid Li 75,000 yuan in cash, requesting Li to help him purchase a laser perspective device. At the end of April 2013, Li delivered a laser perspective device to Chen. In September 2013, Chen negotiated with Li again and requested Li to help him buy a better laser perspective device at a price of 230,000 yuan, subsequently paying Li a total of 250,000 yuan, but Li was never able to deliver the device. On June 25, 2015, after learning that Li was at a certain location, defendant Chen invited defendant He to join him in Guangzhou Baiyun Airport. In the early morning of June 26, they captured Li at Baiyun Airport, detained him at a hotel in a certain state, and demanded that Li repay the money for the goods. In the early morning of June 27, they rented a car to take Li back to a certain place and detained him in room 412 of the "Fumilai" Hotel there. Around 12 pm on June 28, Chen called in defendant Huang to join him and He in guarding Li, forbidding Li from leaving alone, and requiring accompaniment for meals or shopping. On June 30, around 8 am, after receiving a report, the Yong'an Police Station came to the scene and rescued Li. In response to the above charges, the prosecution read and presented relevant documentary evidence, the statements of the victim Li, and the testimonies of witnesses Cao and Li (from Ezhou), as well as those of the three defendants.


The prosecution alleges that at around 10 a.m. on June 29, 2016, the defendant Yuan, in retaliation for nearly colliding with the victim Luo, invited the defendant Zhu and four other young men from society. Under the pretense of discussing an advertising business, the defendant Yuan and others lured Luo to the entrance of the Paris Night Fashion Restaurant on Dongfeng Road in a certain city. Once Luo was tricked into getting in the car, they forcibly controlled Luo and took him to a farm road next to the old village committee in the Jinshan Street area of an economic and technological development zone in a certain place. The defendants Yuan and Zhu used pre-prepared wooden sticks to beat Luo, causing multiple injuries to Luo's body. Subsequently, Luo escaped from the scene. According to the appraisal by the Qiushe Judicial Appraisal Center in a certain place, the injury to Luo's right shoulder was classified as minor injury level two. The defendant Yuan was arrested on December 19, 2016. The defendant Zhu surrendered himself to the public security authorities on May 23, 2017. After the incident, the defendant Yuan compensated the victim Luo 50,000 RMB for various economic losses, and the victim Luo expressed understanding towards the actions of the defendants Yuan and Zhu. During the trial, this court commissioned the community correction office of a certain city to conduct a social investigation on the defendants Yuan and Zhu. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants Yuan and Zhu during the court trial, and are supported by household registration certificates, the process of turning themselves in, outpatient medical records, proof documents, letters of understanding, and other documentary evidence; the victim Luo's statement; the confessions and defenses of the defendants Yuan and Zhu; site inspection records, identification transcripts and photos; an audiovisual material disc, and other evidence.


The prosecution alleged that around 7 PM on March 29, 2013, the defendant Wu, in order to collect a debt from Chen, collaborated with defendants Sun, Song, and others to forcibly take Chen in front of the grain and oil market at Yuelong Street in a certain county, into a Mazda car with the license plate Zhe B×××××. They then took Chen to a village in a certain town in the county, the large flower bed at the West Gate of Yuelong Street, and other places for detention. During this time, defendant Sun and others used physical assault to coerce Chen into repaying the debt. Around 11 PM on the same day, after Chen issued an IOU to defendant Wu, Wu, Sun, Song, and others returned Chen to Bashi Alley on Yuelong Street. According to forensic identification, Chen had a contusion to the left eye, constituting a minor injury. On April 11, April 24, 2013, and April 3, 2014, defendants Wu, Sun, and Song were captured and brought to justice by the police. After the incident, all three defendants obtained the pardon of the victim Chen. During the court hearing, defendants Wu, Sun, and Song raised no objections to the aforementioned facts, and there was corroborative evidence from the victim Chen's statement, the testimonies of witnesses Jiang, Zhu, Sun A, identification records, photographs, forensic injury assessment, explanatory notes, letter of pardon, release registration form, case details explanation, arrest process details, and population information form, which is sufficient for conviction.


Upon trial, it was found that at around 20:00 on May 29, 2019, the defendant Peng contacted drug buyer Yan via phone and agreed to sell 1 packet of drugs to Yan for RMB 1000. At around 21:00 that evening, Peng drove car *** with Yan to a rental house in a certain district of a certain city where defendant Luo lived to purchase drugs. At around 21:50, Yan transferred RMB 1000 to Peng's WeChat, but due to Luo telling Peng that there were no drugs available, Peng and Yan then left in car *** (owned by Peng A). At the same time, Peng refunded the RMB 1000 to Yan via WeChat. At around 22:55 that evening, while Peng was driving with Yan near Yanghai Avenue, Peng received a call from Luo stating that drugs were available, and they agreed on a price of RMB 800 for 1 small packet of drugs. Peng then collected RMB 800 from Yan and transferred the amount to Luo via WeChat. At around 23:00, Luo drove car *** (owned by Luo) near a certain district of a certain city and sold the small packet of drugs to Peng. Afterwards, near the Tianze Supermarket on Maiying Road in Qiongshan District, Peng sold the drugs to Yan. After the transaction, both were apprehended by police, who seized one black OPPO phone, RMB 1900 in cash, and car *** (returned to the owner) from Peng; and 1 small packet of drugs from Yan. After weighing and identification, the seized drugs were found to contain methamphetamine, with a net weight of 0.38 grams. At around 2:00 on May 30, 2019, the defendant Peng assisted the police in arresting the defendant Luo. Police seized 2 phones, car *** (owned by Luo), and 1 watch from Luo. The aforementioned facts did not face any objections from defendant Luo and Peng during the trial process, and were supported by evidence such as seizure orders, seizure lists, witness testimony from Yan, processes and explanations of coming to court, recognition records and identification photos, seizure records, weighing records and photos, sampling records, on-site investigation records, site diagrams, WeChat screenshots, call records, drug test reports, criminal judgment, release certificate, motor vehicle information, explanatory notes, personnel electronic files, and plea agreement documents, all sufficient to establish the case.


Shanghai District People's Procuratorate charges: On January 5, 2014, at approximately 15:45, defendants Wang and Zhou, in a Hyundai car near a certain road in a district of this city, sold 1.94 grams of methamphetamine to Chen for 800 RMB and were caught on the scene by the police officers from Baoshan Branch of Shanghai Public Security Bureau. After being brought to justice, both defendants Wang and Zhou truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts. After being brought to justice, defendant Zhou assisted the public security agency in cracking the drug trafficking case involving Wang A, Chi, and Xu. The defendants Wang and Zhou raised no objections to the aforementioned facts during the trial, and the evidence, including the testimonies and identification records of witnesses Chen and Feng, the seizure list and related photos provided by the Baoshan Branch of Shanghai Public Security Bureau, the inspection report from the Shanghai Drug Inspection Center, the special receipt for confiscated drugs issued by the Shanghai Public Security Bureau Anti-drug Department, the work situation, case filing decision, and prosecution recommendation issued by the Dajang Police Station of Baoshan Branch of Shanghai Public Security Bureau, and the criminal records of defendants Wang and Zhou, are sufficient to confirm the facts.


After trial, it was found that at about 13:00 on May 9, 2014, defendants Yu and Zhang, along with Yue and Zhao (both handled in separate cases), met with the victim, Jia, at the entrance of the China Construction Bank in Junchuang Plaza, Xinhua District, Shijiazhuang City. Yue got into a quarrel and fight with Jia for some reason. Defendants Yu and Zhang successively held Jia down, while Yue and Zhao assaulted Jia, causing Jia to suffer from comminuted fractures of both nasal bones, as well as the frontal process of the left maxilla, and a nasal septum fracture. According to the assessment, this injury constitutes a minor injury of the second degree. Furthermore, it was found that after the incident, the co-defendant Yue voluntarily reached an agreement with the victim Jia and compensated Jia a total of 45,000 RMB for various economic losses as agreed. Subsequently, Jia issued a "Reconciliation Agreement" expressing forgiveness for the actions of Zhang and Yu. The judicial authorities at the place of residence of Zhang and Yu provided an opinion of investigation and assessment agreeing to include the two in community correction management. The aforementioned facts were also undisputed by defendants Zhang and Yu during the trial process, supported by their confessions at the public security agency, confessions of co-defendants Yue and Zhao, the statement of victim Jia, testimonies of witnesses An and Guo, the forensic injury assessment report by the Hebei Province Shijiazhuang Public Security Bureau Physical Evidence Assessment Institute (No. 748 [2014]), examination photos, video materials from the crime scene, the reconciliation agreement, details of the arrest, household registration certificates, proof of current behavior, and this court's criminal judgment No. 354 of the New Criminal First Instance (2014). The above evidence has legitimate sources, objective content, and was all cross-examined in court. This court has legally confirmed its validity.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that: Starting in 2015, the defendant Ge purchased raw materials for manufacturing Anna Coffee in a certain district's Riyuexuan community where he manufactured liquid Anna Coffee and solid Anna Coffee. During this period, the defendant Xi assisted in manufacturing Anna Coffee. Subsequently, the two brought the manufactured Anna Coffee to their jointly operated "Fruit Orchard Convenience Store Chain" to sell. In June 2018, Li bought 10 bottles of Kangshifu bottled suspected liquid Anna Coffee at the defendants' store for 500 yuan. The identification showed that benzoic acid and caffeine were detected in all of them. On August 2, 2018, police searched the "Fruit Orchard Convenience Store Chain ×× District residence" jointly operated by the two defendants, and lawfully seized 109 bottles of suspected liquid Anna Coffee, suspected liquid Anna Coffee in an iron drum, 4 bags of sodium benzoate, 8 pieces of suspected solid Anna Coffee, poppy shells, and 7 bags of white powder. Identification revealed that the poppy shells contained codeine, morphine, thebaine, papaverine, and noscapine. The bottled suspected liquid Anna Coffee, the suspected liquid Anna Coffee in the iron drum, and the suspected solid Anna Coffee were all found to contain benzoic acid and caffeine.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charges: On February 18, 2014, at around 22:00, defendants Liu and Zhou conspired together at the intersection of Jiefang Road and Dacheng Road in Wuchang District of this city. Defendant Zhou cooperated by obstructing the view of bystanders, while defendant Liu stole a white VIVO brand mobile phone from the pocket of pedestrian Wang. The two defendants were apprehended near the post office on Pengliuyang Road in this district during a police patrol inspection. The stolen phone has been recovered and returned to the owner, and it has been appraised to be worth 1,100 RMB. In the trial process, both defendants Liu and Zhou expressed no objections to the aforementioned facts. Furthermore, these facts are corroborated by the prosecution's evidence, including the arrest procedure proof provided by the public security agency, the list of seized and returned items, photos, valuation appraisal, testimonies of witnesses Tang and Lin, the victim Wang's report and statement, confessions of defendants Liu and Zhou, and Zhou's compulsory drug rehabilitation decision. The evidence is consistent and, after being presented and cross-examined in court, has been confirmed and is sufficient to establish the facts.


A certain city's People's Procuratorate charges: On March 7, April 11, April 14, and April 15, 2014, the defendants Shui, Xian repeatedly allowed Li, Tian, Tang, Zhang, and others to use methamphetamine by "ice pipe" smoking in their rented apartment located at No. xxx, xx Lane, Longshan East Road, Anyang Street, a certain city. Around 2 a.m. on April 17, 2014, the defendants Shui, Xian, and others were caught in this rented apartment, and a simple ice pipe was seized on site. The defendants Shui, Xian raised no objections during the trial, and the facts are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Li, Tian, Tang, Lin, the inspection records, evidence preservation list, administrative penalty decision, the arrest process, household registration proof, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution charges that on March 5 and March 10, 2018, defendants Xu and Hou respectively violated immigration management regulations by avoiding border checkpoints and evading inspection to illegally cross the border to a certain location in a certain place. On March 27 of the same year, defendants Hou and Xu used the same method to illegally cross the border together back to a certain country. On April 6, 2018, defendants Xu and Hou violated immigration management regulations by avoiding border checkpoints and evading inspection to illegally cross the border together to a certain location in a certain place. On April 18 of the same year, defendants Xu and Hou used the same method to illegally cross the border together back to a certain country. On September 5, 2018, defendants Xu and Hou, along with Li, a villager from a village in a certain town in a certain county (handled in a separate case), and Jiang, a villager from a village in a certain town in a certain county (handled in a separate case), violated immigration management regulations by avoiding border checkpoints and evading inspection to illegally cross the border together to a certain location in a certain place. On September 24 of the same year, defendants Xu and Hou used the same method to illegally cross the border together back to a certain country. On November 15 and December 17, 2018, defendants Xu and Hou respectively violated immigration management regulations by avoiding border checkpoints and evading inspection to illegally cross the border to a certain location in a certain place and Bangkang. On December 28 of the same year, defendants Xu and Hou used the same method to illegally cross the border together back to a certain country. After being apprehended, defendant Xu truthfully confessed his criminal activities; after the incident, defendant Hou voluntarily surrendered and truthfully confessed his criminal activities.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges that: 1. On June 8, 2014, the defendants Zhang and Fan, riding a blue two-wheeled motorcycle, snatched a handbag from the victim, Yang, 100 meters south of the intersection of Xinguang West Road and Fengying Road in a certain district of a certain city. The bag contained 3,400 yuan in cash, a gold necklace (with a gold pendant), and a white Huawei mobile phone. According to the appraisal by the Price Authentication Center of a certain district in a certain city, the value of the gold necklace (with the gold pendant) was 4,704 yuan, and the value of the white Huawei mobile phone was 1,408 yuan. 2. On the morning of June 19, 2014, at around 9 o'clock, the defendants Zhang and Fan, riding a blue two-wheeled motorcycle, snatched a handbag from the front of the Jiutian Music Plaza opposite a certain location on Shaoxian Road, a certain district in a certain city. The handbag, which was on the front passenger seat of a car, belonged to the victim, Li, and contained 900 yuan in cash, a black Apple 5 mobile phone, and a black Apple 3 mobile phone. According to the appraisal by the Price Authentication Center of a certain district in a certain city, the value of the black Apple 5 mobile phone was 2,774 yuan, and the value of the black Apple 3 mobile phone was 580 yuan. After the incident, the black Apple 5 mobile phone and the black Apple 3 mobile phone were seized from the defendant Zhang and have been returned to the victim. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by the defendants Zhang and Fan during the court trial. Additionally, they were confirmed by evidence such as the report materials and victim's statements, the price appraisal certificate and situation explanation, on-site detection report, the arrest process, the list of seized and returned items, basic information of permanent residents, situation explanation, and the confessions of the two defendants, which are sufficient to establish these facts.


The People's Procuratorate of Wuzhong District, a certain city, charges: Defendants Shao and Cai, after premeditation, climbed over a wall to enter Yaxin Electronics Factory in Guoxiang Street, Wuzhong District, a certain city, in the early morning of March 3, 2016. They then cut and stole a 223.1-meter cable worth RMB 2153, belonging to a certain city's branch of China Tower Company, which was in use on the rooftop of the factory. It was further discovered that the two defendants stripped the insulation from the cable, obtaining 35 kilograms of pure copper, which they sold to Zhang, obtaining illegal proceeds of RMB 1050. The above-mentioned facts were not disputed by defendants Shao and Cai during the trial. The evidence includes the statements of the victimized unit's staff members Ye and Cai A, the testimony of witness Zhang, records of identification and recognition, on-site inspection records and photos, investigation experiment records, forensic DNA identification report, appraisal report, case-solving and apprehension account, household registration certificate, and administrative penalty decision, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


A People's Procuratorate in a certain location charged: On a day in June or July 2014, Xu XX and another individual (both handled in separate cases) summoned Nie A, Shen Jia (nickname Wai XX), Shen Yi (nickname Xiao XX), Tao, Zhu (nickname Zhu A), and others for gambling using the "Pai Jiu" method at Room 1001, Unit 2, Building 68, Oulong Community, Niushan Street, Donghai County, profiting more than 7,000 yuan from the stakes. Despite knowing that Xu XX and the other individual organized gambling for others, defendants Liu and Xu provided financial assistance to the participants through the two organizers, by lending 10,000 yuan and benefiting 400 yuan. Specifically, through Xu, they provided 10,000 yuan to Zhu and 15,000 yuan to Shen Yi; through the other organizer, they provided 30,000 yuan to Shen Jia. After the case was uncovered, defendant Xu voluntarily turned himself in and truthfully confessed his criminal acts; defendant Liu also truthfully confessed his criminal acts upon being apprehended. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Liu and Xu during the trial and are substantiated by the criminal record registration form, administrative penalty decision; testimonies of witnesses Nie, Shen Jia, Dai, Shen Yi, Zhu, Tao, Yao, Wang, Zhang, Wang A; the confessions and defenses of defendants Liu, Xu, and co-defendants Xu XX and the other individual; identification records; household registration certificates; and evidence of case discovery and apprehension processes, which are sufficient for conviction.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accused that in early March 2018, the defendant Xu conspired with Luo, the captain of the accident handling team of Liangzhou District Public Security Bureau Traffic Police Brigade (handled in another case), to defraud insurance claims by fabricating a false traffic accident, with Xu creating the false traffic insurance accident scene. After discussing with defendant Li, Li agreed. Xu then discussed with defendant Liang, Wang2, Ma1, and others the specific process of fabricating the false traffic accident, deciding on the personnel and vehicles involved in the incident, and Xu and Wang2 carried out a preliminary inspection of the accident site. On the night of March 26, as prearranged, defendant Liang drove his pickup and Ma1 drove an electric scooter to create a false rear-end collision scene on the Talwan section of Liangzhou District. After Liang filed the insurance claim, Yong'an Property Insurance Co., Ltd. Wuwei Center Sub-branch assigned Xu, who was on duty that night, to examine the scene. Xu contacted Luo, and they arrived at the accident scene one after another and took photographs. Luo then fabricated the traffic accident identification, forensic autopsy opinion, mediation letter, household registration certificate, and other false insurance claim documents using other case materials and "Photoshop" technology, which were given to Xu. After being incrementally reported and approved by Li, Yong'an Insurance transferred insurance compensation amounts to Liang totaling 610,900 yuan. Xu then received 90,000 yuan, Luo and Li each received 200,000 yuan, Liang received 100,900 yuan, and Wang2 and Ma1 each received 20,000 yuan. After the incident was discovered, defendants Xu, Li, and Liang successively surrendered to the Gulang County Supervision Committee and returned the stolen money of 410,900 yuan to Yong'an Property Insurance Co., Ltd. Wuwei Center Sub-branch. Regarding the aforementioned accusation, the prosecution presented business licenses, labor contracts, traffic accident liability identification, autopsy reports, bank transaction certificates, and other documentary evidence, testimonies from witnesses such as Wang2 and Ma1, as well as the confessions and defenses of defendants Xu, Li, and Liang.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges that on the evening of October 30, 2014, defendants Shen and Wang, after prior planning, went to the workshop of "Cifu Chemical Fiber Co., Ltd." located in the Binhai district of a certain city and district. They stole a total of 74 circuit boards of various models from the winder machines in the workshop and were subsequently caught on the spot. An appraisal determined that the stolen goods were valued at a total of 137,637.15 yuan. During the court trial, defendants Shen and Wang raised no objection to the above facts. The case is substantiated by evidence, including the tools used in the crime, photos of the stolen goods, arrest reports, seizure and return lists, invoices, and quotations provided by the police officers from the public security bureau of a certain city and district, as well as testimonies from Han B and Han A, recognition records, inventory records, and the price appraisal report, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution alleges: On January 20, 2015, the defendants Xu and Shi drove a tricycle to the western woods by the Sibao Gate in a certain county's economic development zone and illegally hunted 110 wild spotted doves by setting up sticky nets on trees. According to the appraisal by the Criminal Evidence Identification Center for Wildlife under the State Forestry Bureau's Forest Public Security Bureau, the aforementioned doves are classified as "three haves" animals protected by the state. The defendants did not dispute these facts during the court hearing, and the prosecution presented and verified evidence of the arrest process, household registration certificates of defendants Xu and Shi, the seizure list from the Public Security Bureau of the county, the testimony of the witness Zhang, the appraisal opinion of the Criminal Evidence Identification Center for Wildlife under the State Forestry Bureau, and the confessions of defendants Xu and Shi, all of which were sufficient to establish the facts. During the trial, the prosecutor stated that after coming to light, defendants Xu and Shi honestly confessed their criminal acts, qualifying as voluntary confessions, which is a statutory mitigating circumstance. Upon verification, this sentencing circumstance was found to be true and is hereby confirmed by this court.


Upon trial, it was found that: On December 13, 2013, around 7 p.m., six law enforcement officers from the Ren Shou County Urban Management Enforcement Bureau, including He, were conducting a crackdown on illegal operations of tricycles near the "Spring Pouring to the World" residential area. Liu Yi was stopped while carrying passengers on an electric tricycle. The urban management officers confiscated Liu's tricycle, after which Liu Yi lay down on the ground. Subsequently, Liu Yi's son Liu Jia and daughter-in-law Lai received a message that Liu Yi had been beaten by urban management personnel. Lai, along with the defendant Li, went to the "Spring Pouring to the World" residential area. Li called the defendant Wang, who arrived with others. Liu Jia, who was in Jingyan, also called for help. Due to these factors, a crowd gathered around where Liu Yi was lying. After the "120" ambulance took Liu Yi away, someone suggested going to the Urban Management Bureau to demand an explanation. Therefore, more than a dozen people drove to the courtyard of the Ren Shou County Urban Management Enforcement Bureau. Finding no one at the bureau, the two defendants used an iron rod from the courtyard to smash the windows, doors, and lights of three vans marked "Comprehensive Enforcement," with the license plates Chuan Z469**, Chuan Z785**, and Chuan ZBB4**. The damage to the vehicles was appraised at a value of 10,338.80 yuan. On December 23, 2013, Li turned himself in to the Ren Shou County Public Security Bureau. On January 7, 2014, Lai paid the compensation for the vehicle damages to the urban management unit. The aforementioned facts are clearly and sufficiently supported by evidence, including the on-site inspection records, site photos, price appraisal report, testimonies from 14 witnesses such as Liu Jia, Fan, Luo, Lai, and He, confessions from the defendants Wang and Li, a receipt from the Ren Shou County Urban Management Enforcement Bureau, an explanation of circumstances, and the process of bringing the case to justice. These facts are clear and the evidence is sufficient for recognition.


Upon trial, it was ascertained that Jiangsu Diyiyi Group Co., Ltd. legally owns the No. 1980275 "graphic" registered trademark, which was recognized as a well-known trademark by the Trademark Office of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce on September 4, 2014. In early July 2016, the defendant Zhang, without authorization from Jiangsu Diyiyi Group Co., Ltd., gave defendant Leng a piece of cable produced by the company as a sample, indicating that he should produce a batch of cables counterfeiting the company's trademark according to the sample, and paid defendant Leng 2,000 yuan as compensation. On July 16, 2016, defendant Leng, using printing wheels and other tools commissioned to others at Yangzhou Yongcheng Electrical Cable Co., Ltd., where he worked, produced a batch of cables in various models with the wording "Jiangsu Diyiyi Group Co., Ltd." and the same logo as the No. 1980275 registered trademark, totaling 55 pieces and more than 50,000 meters. On the morning of July 17, 2016, the batch of counterfeit cables was seized by public security organs when it was handed over to a logistics company in preparation for shipment to a certain city. According to the certification by Jiangsu Diyiyi Group Co., Ltd., the market sales price of genuine cables identical to this batch of counterfeit cables is more than 120,000 yuan. After the incident, defendants Zhang and Leng voluntarily went to the public security organs and truthfully confessed their criminal activities. Defendant Leng has handed over the illegal income of 2,000 yuan. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhang and Leng during the court trial, and they are corroborated by their interrogation transcripts at the investigation agency, testimonies of witnesses Han, Ding, Yin, Xu A, Xu B, Yang, and others, the order notice, the goods waybill, the trademark registration certificate, the approval recognizing the well-known trademark, the business license, the price certification, the appraisal certification, the search warrant, on-site photos, basic permanent resident information, case registration form, and other evidence, sufficient to confirm.


Upon trial, it was found that on the evening of June 15, 2013, defendants Fang and Xu, after planning, drove to the old forest farm in Lishanbai, Qiandaohu Town, Chun'an County, and stole 50.94 square meters of granite belonging to the victim Jiang, valued at over 14,200 yuan. After the incident, all stolen granite was recovered and returned to the victim. Additionally, during the prosecution review period, victim Jiang submitted a written statement expressing forgiveness for defendant Fang and requested a lenient sentence for him. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Fang and Xu during the trial and were corroborated by the statements of victim Jiang, testimonies from witnesses Xu A and Tang, the apprehension and case-breaking process, the list of seized and returned items, granite measurement statistics, the criminal judgment, the letter of forgiveness, household registration certificates, price appraisal opinion and appraisal notification, search records, identification records, and photographic explanations, which are sufficient for determination.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges: On January 19, 2015, at around 22:00, the defendants Wu and Liu got into an argument and a fight with the victim Li and others over trivial matters while dining at Brother's BBQ in a certain district of a certain city. The defendants Wu and Liu injured the victim Li. According to the forensic evaluation by the Forensic Judicial Appraisal Institute of the Central Hospital of the said city, the victim Li suffered a nasal bone fracture and a fracture of the fifth metacarpal bone in the right hand, both classified as minor injuries of the second degree.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that on May 8, 2014, at approximately 1 a.m., at the Sesame Open Private Kitchen Restaurant on Prosperity East Road in Zhucheng City, Zang (already sentenced) had an altercation with Han. Subsequently, Zang called Wang, Zhang, Yu, along with Sun, Wang Jia, and Zhang Jia (all already sentenced), who damaged the Chevrolet Cruze and QQ cars that Han, Geng, and others were in, using beer bottles and floor tiles as the cars were about to leave. The damage to the car was appraised at a total of 2160 yuan. Further investigation by this court revealed that on August 28, 2014, the defendant Yu turned himself in to the Zhucheng City Public Security Bureau. The facts as mentioned above were not disputed by the three defendants during the trial, and are substantiated by evidence including written records of the police report, arrest procedures, fugitive registration forms, a letter of apology, household registration certification, criminal judgment documents, testimonies from witnesses such as An and Wang Yi, statements from the victims Han and Geng, confessions from co-defendants Zang, Sun, Wang Jia, and Zhang Jia, and the appraisal (certification) report of the value of items involved in the case from a certain provincial authority, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged that around October 2012, Wang, the legal representative of Yantai Ruida Chemical Co., Ltd., agreed with Guo, who did not have a hazardous waste operation permit, to have Guo help Wang dispose of hazardous waste produced by Yantai Ruida Chemical Co., Ltd. Wang paid a certain fee to Guo for this. From around October 2012 to January 2013, Wang, Guo, and Li (handled in a separate case) did not fill out the hazardous waste transfer form according to national regulations and did not apply to the Yantai City Environmental Protection Bureau for the transfer. They hired vehicles multiple times to transport a total of 741 barrels of hazardous waste from Yantai Ruida Chemical Co., Ltd. and stored them in a village in a certain town of a certain city and a village in the Yantou Subdistrict Office. Around September 2013, due to a hazardous waste leakage, Li transferred the 741 barrels of hazardous waste to a mountain north of a village under the Yantou Subdistrict Office for storage. On July 3, 2015, Wang voluntarily appeared at the case following a telephone summons by the public security authorities. For the aforementioned charges, the prosecution provided evidence such as the defendant's confessions, witness testimonies, documentary evidence, and expert opinions.


The People's Procuratorate of Yufeng District, a certain city in a certain district of Guangxi, charged: On May 14, 2014, at approximately 4 a.m., the defendants Fang and Lin, after premeditation, went to the front of a hospital on a certain road in a certain city. Taking advantage of the absence of people, they used tools prepared in advance to pry open the main lock and the handlebar lock of a "Xinlei" brand electric bicycle, valued at 1,880 RMB, which belonged to the victim, Deng. They then stole the bicycle. The stolen bicycle has been sold off, and the proceeds have been squandered and cannot be recovered. On November 24, 2014, at approximately 4 a.m., the defendants Fang and Lin were apprehended by the police on suspicion due to their suspicious behavior near a market on a particular road in a certain district of a certain city. They subsequently truthfully confessed to the aforementioned theft acts, which were not yet known to the police. The defendants Fang and Lin raised no objections during the court hearing regarding the above facts, which are corroborated by the following evidence, verified and confirmed during the trial: the case registration form; the decision to file the case; the statement of the victim, Deng, and the purchase receipt of the stolen electric bicycle provided by him; the confessions of the defendants Fang and Lin, along with the identification and photo recognition records; the seizure decision and list, and photographs of the seized items; the price assessment report; the forensic opinion notice; the explanation of the case circumstances; and the household registration certificates of the defendants Fang and Lin, etc. The facts of this case are clear, and the evidence is concrete and sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charged that at around 6 a.m. on May 3, 2013, the defendants Zhao and Li, at their home, knowingly purchased three motorcycles worth 11,400 yuan, which had an improper origin, from Wang Jia, Wang Yi, and Wang Bing (the latter three have already been sentenced), for a price of 3,300 yuan. They then resold the motorcycles. Defendant Li turned himself in to the criminal investigation team of the mining area public security bureau on November 22, 2013. The prosecution submitted corresponding evidence to the court to prove the above facts.


The prosecution charges that at around 2 a.m. on November 7, 2016, the defendants Su and Chen, after conspiring to commit theft, carried tools such as hydraulic pliers, scissors, and screwdrivers to No. 2, Alley 16, Chongdefang Street, in a certain town of this district. By using these tools to pick the lock, they stole a Yuehao brand 48CC women's motorcycle (engine number: 160924024, valued at 3,136 RMB) belonging to the victim Guan parked at that location. After committing the crime, defendants Su and Chen were caught in the act with the stolen goods while fleeing the scene by patrolling personnel.


A certain local People's Procuratorate accuses that on the evening of May 2, 2014, defendants Zhou and Lu went to a place in the Jiangbei Street area of this city to the Bai Le Bar to demand repayment of gambling debts from the victim Dai (referred to as Dai [B]) without success. A quarrel ensued between the two parties, during which defendants Zhou and Lu assaulted Dai [B], causing him to suffer fractured ribs. Subsequently, defendants Zhou and Lu forcibly took the victim Dai [B] to a section near the green belt in front of the Sanyou Yinglun Hotel in the Jiangbei Street area of this city, continuing to demand the repayment of the gambling debt. The victim Dai [B] contacted Dai [A] by phone to request money. Later, Dai [A], Wang, Ju, and Luo arrived at the scene and a fight broke out between them and defendants Zhou and Lu. Dai [A], Ju, and Wang chased defendant Lu, who, while fleeing, picked up a roadside no-parking plastic sign and struck it at the victim Wang. After both fell to the ground, defendant Lu further assaulted Wang with his fists, resulting in Wang suffering multiple skull and facial fractures. Subsequently, defendant Lu, wielding a watermelon knife and dustpan, and defendant Zhou, holding a watermelon knife, caught up with Dai [B] and others in front of the Jiangbei area's Haoyouduo Supermarket. Defendant Lu struck Dai [B] on the head with the dustpan, and after the dustpan broke apart, he used the dustpan handle to continue striking Dai [B]'s head, resulting in a scalp laceration for Dai [B]. According to the identification by the forensic evidence appraisal office of Dongyang City Public Security Bureau, the injuries of victim Dai [B] were classified as minor injuries, level two; the injuries of victim Wang were classified as minor injuries, level one. In order to substantiate the above accusations, the prosecution presented evidence in court, including the victim's statements, witness testimonies, documentary evidence, forensic medical injury assessment reports, video materials, and the defendants' confessions. Based on the above facts and evidence,


According to the trial investigation, on May 24, 2018, defendants Bai and Du conspired, with defendant Du finding Zhang, who was willing to repay their credit card debts for them, via the internet. They lied to Zhang on WeChat, claiming that they needed him to help repay a debt of 18,000 yuan and would give him a 180 yuan service fee. That night, the two defendants gave Zhang Bai’s China Minsheng Bank credit card number, which was ×××, along with the password. On May 25, 2018, the victim Zhang used a phone transfer method to repay 10,800 yuan to that card at the Zhonglian Steel Building, 103 Liberation Road, Xinghualing District, in a certain city. Defendant Du promptly transferred the 10,800 yuan via mobile banking to another China Minsheng Bank card owned by Bai, and Bai notified the bank to freeze the credit card. After the fraud, defendant Bai transferred 5,020 yuan to Du, and the stolen money was entirely squandered. On December 10, 2018, defendant Du and Bai’s relatives compensated victim Zhang 10,800 yuan, and Zhang issued a letter of understanding expressing forgiveness for the actions of the two defendants. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Bai and Du during the court trial and were supported by evidence such as the investigation report and arrest process; the statement of the victim Zhang; the identification records; screenshots of WeChat chat logs; transaction records of Bai’s China Minsheng Bank card; the letter of understanding; the confessions of defendants Bai and Du; and household registration certificates, which are sufficient to confirm the facts.


After hearing and verifying the case, it was established that on July 26, 2015, the defendant Wei accompanied her husband Li in a Wuling Sunshine minivan, along with the defendant Chen and her husband Cheng, to a city to inspect breakfast restaurants. Around noon, the group arrived at the "Authentic Beef Noodle" restaurant owned by Li's daughter, Li. Cheng intended to buy some items for Li, so he walked north along Jianshe Street. When passing Xin Hua Computer, he noticed a wallet inside the basket of a parked electric bicycle. Later, during lunch, Cheng mentioned the incident, which was overheard by Chen and Wei. The two took advantage of a restroom break to go to the front of Xin Hua Computer store. Wei stood to the left of Chen, assisting in concealing her actions while Chen opened the electric bicycle basket lid and took the wallet. They then fled the scene. On their way back, Chen divided the stolen 3,900 yuan cash with Wei, keeping 3,900 yuan for herself. The wallet and bank cards were discarded. After the crime, the defendants' families returned all the stolen money to the police, which has since been returned to the victim. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Chen and Wei during the trial, and were supported by the following evidence: the police case registration form, acceptance registration form, decision to file a case; victim Wang's statement; confessions by defendants Chen and Wei; witness testimonies from Cheng, Li, Wang, and Li; recognition transcripts; situation report from the Criminal Investigation Team of Guangzhou Railway Public Security Bureau Huizhou Branch; transfer documents and detention certificates issued by the detention center of Guangzhou Railway Public Security Bureau Huizhou Branch; certificates and criminal records from Zilu Police Station of Luoshan County Public Security Bureau; evidence material acceptance list from the municipal public security bureau and receipt issued by Wang; as well as the defendants' household registration certificates, audiovisual material, etc., are sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges that on the afternoon of October 25, 2013, the defendant Pan, due to his girlfriend Wang breaking up with him and moving into housing arranged by Zhou, conceived the idea of setting fire to Zhou's home in retaliation. That afternoon, the defendant Pan colluded with the defendant Yu and Lu (handled in a separate case), brought gasoline, and used gasoline to ignite the residence of Zhou in a village under the jurisdiction of Longshan Subdistrict Office in a certain city, resulting in the destruction of Zhou's house and household appliances. According to the appraisal by the city's price certification center, the value of the damaged items was 6,415 yuan. Defendants Yu and Pan were apprehended and brought to justice on May 30 and July 16, 2014, respectively.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Jiangsu Province charges: On the evening of April 24, 2019, the defendants Huang and Hu, after premeditation, rode an electric tricycle and brought a crowbar to the old house of Zhou in a town in a certain city. Taking advantage of the absence of people, they used means such as prying with a crowbar to steal seven aluminum alloy doors and two aluminum alloy windows from the house, later selling the stolen goods for 665 RMB. According to the appraisal, the stolen property was valued at a total of 2,528 RMB. After the incident, the defendants Huang and Hu compensated the victim for the economic loss of 2,528 RMB. After being brought to justice, the defendants Huang and Hu truthfully confessed to the above criminal facts and voluntarily pleaded guilty and accepted punishment. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants Huang and Hu during the court trial and were substantiated by Zhou's statement as the victim, receipts, testimony of the witness Wei, identification records, photos, on-site inspection records, audiovisual material description, surveillance video, price verification appraisal, case development process, capture process, confessions of the defendants Huang and Hu, demographic information, and other evidence, which are sufficient to confirm, as this court acknowledges.