The People's Procuratorate in a certain area charges: On the evening of June 20, 2014, around 8 PM, the defendant Yu, while using the internet at the "Lushan Internet Cafe" in a certain town in the city, had a dispute and scuffle with Gao, a resident of a village in this town. Feeling discontent, Yu then gathered the defendant Song to teach Gao a lesson. On the evening of June 24, 2014, around 9 PM, Song and Yu went together to the "Lushan Internet Cafe" and assaulted Gao, injuring Gao's nose. According to an assessment, Gao sustained a comminuted nasal fracture, classified as a minor injury of the second degree. On July 4, 2014, Song, Yu, and Gao reached a civil settlement agreement.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charges that on October 1, 2015, at around 12:00, the defendant Lu had a dispute with Yang and others near the Second Bridge of Qingshuzui Town in that county due to a traffic accident. Feeling aggrieved and outnumbered, defendant Lu called his friend Wang and others for help. After arriving at the scene with a knife, defendant Wang injured Yang's left hand. According to forensic identification, Yang's injuries constituted minor injuries of the second degree. After the incident, defendants Lu and Wang compensated the victim, Yang, for a total of 80,000 yuan in losses and obtained Yang’s understanding and forgiveness. Defendants Lu and Wang voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities on October 13 and December 15, 2015, respectively, and truthfully confessed to their criminal acts. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Lu and Wang during the court trial, and are corroborated by the statements of arrival, the criminal reconciliation document, receipts, household registration records; testimonies of witnesses Zeng, Yang, Zhang, Li, Ding; statements from victim Yang; confessions and defenses from defendants Lu and Wang; forensic opinions; and identification records, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution alleges that defendants Ran and Jiang were co-renting with victims Wei and Bian at Room 1002, Unit 1, Building 17, Datong New Village, Xinqi Street, a district in a certain city. On the afternoon of April 16, 2015, defendants Ran and Jiang pried open the door to enter the temporary residence of victims Wei and Bian, stealing a Lenovo laptop (valued at 1,760 RMB) and an ASUS laptop (valued at 4,428 RMB). After the incident, the stolen goods were recovered and returned to the victims, and the two defendants obtained the victims’ forgiveness. The above facts, to which defendants Ran and Jiang raised no objections during the court hearing, are substantiated by the statements of victims Wei and Bian, the price appraisal report issued by the price certification center of the district, on-site inspection records and photographs, identification records and photographs, police statements of the arrest process, letters of forgiveness, identity information, and other evidence, sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain region accused that the defendant Zhang is one of the actual operators of Huanghua Runlong Petroleum Products Co., Ltd. In May 2019, Zhang arranged for workers to clean the waste oil sludge in the company's oil tanks and bagged the sludge for storage at the company. In order to avoid inspection by the ecological environment department, Zhang contacted the defendant Wang to take the company's waste oil sludge away for dumping. Wang arranged for the defendant Zhao to drive a red front-end dump truck with a license plate of a certain region J××××× (a fake license plate). On July 4, 2019, from about 5 p.m. to 10 p.m., Zhao transported a total of 16.54 tons of the aforementioned waste oil sludge out of the factory in three trips and illegally dumped it into an earth pit without any anti-leakage measures, approximately 500 meters east of the Tianhe Used Vehicle Trading Market in the same city, causing environmental pollution. According to the appraisal by the Cangzhou Science and Technology Affairs Judicial Appraisal Center, the substances dumped by Zhang and others east of the Tianhe Used Vehicle Trading Market were identified as hazardous waste, possessing toxicity and flammability. To substantiate the aforementioned accusation, the prosecution read out and presented at the court the confessions of defendants Zhang, Wang, and Zhao; testimonies of witnesses Zhou, Tian, and Cui Xin; documentary evidence including the contract for hazardous waste harmless disposal projects signed by Huanghua Runlong Petroleum Products Co., Ltd. and Huanghua Xinzhi Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd., and the "Emergency Treatment Soil Pollution Condition Investigation Report and Attachments of Huanghua Runlong Petroleum Products Co., Ltd." provided by Hebei Huakan Zihuan Surveying Co., Ltd.; on-site inspection records, site diagrams, and related photos, identification records, judicial appraisal engagement letter and appraisal opinions; surveillance videos, and other evidence.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Hulunbuir City charged that at about 22:00 on June 29, 2014, in front of a barbecue restaurant in a certain district, the defendant Jiao engaged in a dispute with the victim Ma over trivial matters and they started fighting. The co-defendant Xu assisted Jiao in beating Ma, resulting in the victim sustaining an injury to the left shoulder. On July 14, 2014, a forensic examination by the Public Security Bureau of the district determined Ma's left shoulder injury as a minor injury category II. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Jiao and Xu during the trial, and were sufficiently corroborated by evidence including the case registration form, the process of the case, the forensic appraisal certificate for human bodily injury severity, the transcript of the interview with the victim Ma, testimonies of witnesses Bao and Liu, basic information on permanent residents, the criminal reconciliation agreement, the letter of understanding, two interrogation CDs of Jiao and Xu, and the confessions of the defendants Jiao and Xu.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged: At around 4 a.m. on July 5, 2014, the defendants Ma and Yuan went to a certain town's Surpass Internet Cafe in a certain city. While the victim, Chen Yi, was asleep, defendant Yuan kept watch, and defendant Ma stole a black Oppo phone worth 2,100 yuan from the victim's pants pocket. After the crime, the stolen goods were recovered and returned to the victim. On July 7, 2014, defendant Yuan assisted the public security organs in apprehending defendant Ma. To prove the above charges, the prosecution provided the court with evidence including the confessions and defenses of defendants Ma and Yuan, the statement of the victim Chen Yi, the testimony of witness Chen Jia, the seizure decision, the seizure list and photos, the return list, the identification records and photos, the notification and list of evidence extraction, surveillance videos, the arrest process, basic information on permanent residents, and the price appraisal conclusion. It is believed that defendants Ma and Yuan committed the crime of theft of others’ property with the intent of illegal possession and should be held accountable for the crime of x, which constitutes joint crime. Defendant Yuan showed meritorious performance and may be given a mitigated punishment according to the law. The court is requested to punish defendants Ma and Yuan separately according to the provisions of Articles x, x, and x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China. Defendants Ma and Yuan have no objections to the facts and charges brought by the prosecution. After trial and evidence verification, the evidence submitted by the prosecution was found to be true. This court confirms the facts of the crime of x charged by the prosecution against defendants Ma and Yuan.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Guizhou Province charges: On June 11, 2014, at around 10 a.m., the defendant Zhou and the victims, Xing and his son Xing, had a conflict regarding the transportation of sand and gravel at a construction site on the extension section of the educational city in Sajin Village, a certain city. Xing threw a stone and injured a worker, Wang, at the site. Subsequently, defendant Zhou, along with defendant Wang, gathered several workers from the construction site intending to teach Xing a lesson, but to no avail. Later, they had a verbal dispute with Xing. During the dispute, Zhou, Wang, and the workers present physically assaulted Xing, causing injuries to his right elbow, both lower limbs, and waist. According to the assessment, the injuries to Xing's right elbow and lower limbs were classified as minor injuries, while the injury causing transverse fractures to the first and second lumbar vertebrae on the left was classified as a secondary minor injury. After the incident, defendants Zhou and Wang and others compensated the victim Xing with 33,955 yuan for medical and other expenses and received Xing's understanding. The above charges were not disputed by defendants Zhou and Wang during the trial process. The evidence includes: the arrest report from the local police station of a certain Public Security Bureau, household registration certificates of defendants Zhou and Wang, the mediation agreement, the letter of understanding; testimonies from witnesses Xing, He, Li, Yang, Xing, Xia, Wang, Wang A, Wang B, and Tao; the victim Xing's statement; the forensic identification report (2014) No. 247; the notice of identification opinion; the on-site identification record and photos of the criminal case; the confessions of defendants Zhou and Wang, among others, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


Upon trial, it was found that in the early morning of January 17, 2014, in the eastern open area of Chandu Heat Treatment Plant, Chengxi Industrial Park, Shangcun, Hutang Town, Wujin District, a certain city, Defendant Xu took advantage of his position at Jiangsu Chang Dafeng Electric Power Engineering Co., Ltd., where he was assigned to watch over the company’s construction cables at night. He colluded with Defendant Zhang and Niu (who is being handled in a separate case), using hydraulic pliers and other means to steal 24 meters of Baoan brand YJV22-8.7/10KV-3*400 type cable belonging to the company, valued at 14,952 RMB. After the incident, Defendant Zhang and Niu returned the proceeds from the stolen goods, which were then returned to the victimized company. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by Defendants Xu and Zhang during the trial, and they were corroborated by the testimony record of the victimized company's witness, Yu, the testimony records of other witnesses such as Niu and Song, documentary evidence such as the labor contract and payroll provided by the victimized company, the incident and capture process, identification records, and photos produced by Wujin District Public Security Bureau of a certain city, as well as the price authentication conclusion of the items involved from the Price Certification Center of Wujin District, a certain city.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges that on July 24, 2018, at approximately 5 p.m., the defendants Xia and Jiang went to a certain district in a certain city to demand a debt from the victim Li. Subsequently, Xia, Jiang, and others drove a white SUV with the license plate number Yun D×××××, taking Li to an abandoned mining site near the Songmao Reservoir in the district to demand the debt, and unlawfully restricted his personal freedom for about 3 hours. During this process, Xia and Jiang assaulted Li, and Xia used a knife to intimidate and threaten Li.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that at around 16:00 on March 20, 2020, a certain company was conducting production operations inside coal shed No. 6 in the coal storage area of the Tumed Right Banner Coal Industry Park. Defendant Wang was operating a loader to push the unloaded coal onto a large coal pile. While reversing, the front right wheel of the loader knocked down and ran over Yang, a coal unloading worker employed by defendant Ma, resulting in Yang's death. After the incident, defendant Ma reported it to the police. According to the forensic examination, the victim Yang died from traumatic hemorrhagic shock caused by the compression of the chest and abdomen by a large blunt object. On March 22, 2020, Inner Mongolia Xindeli Fuel Co., Ltd. reached a compensation agreement with the victim Yang's family and obtained the family's forgiveness. On August 9 and 11, 2020, defendants Ma and Wang respectively surrendered to the authorities. The People's Procuratorate of a certain place submitted the following evidence materials to this court to charge defendants Ma and Wang with the crime of X: 1. Labor contracts, safety management agreements, power of attorney, business licenses, compensation agreements, letters of forgiveness, training materials, power of attorney, explanations of arrest circumstances, household registration information, etc.; 2. Testimonies from witnesses Li, Jin, Bai, Yan, Li, Li, He, and Yang; 3. Confessions and defenses of defendants Ma and Wa


The People's Procuratorate in a certain place accused the defendants Luo and Jiang of arranging to use methamphetamine together through WeChat with Xiao Ling (phonetic). On December 25, 2014, Luo purchased a small amount of methamphetamine crystals and tablets. Subsequently, Luo discussed with the defendant Jiang about using drugs together, agreeing that Jiang would be responsible for the room fee. Around 6 PM on that day, Luo and Jiang came to Liyuan Hotel with the methamphetamine. Luo and Jiang registered room 428 under Luo's name, and Jiang paid 200 yuan on the spot for the room fee and deposit. At about 9 PM, Lu (phonetic) arrived at the room with friends Lin (phonetic) and Tiha (phonetic). Subsequently, the defendants Luo and Jiang, together with Lu and the other three, consumed methamphetamine crystals. Around 10 PM, the public security organ apprehended Luo, Jiang, and the other five people in the hotel room on the spot and seized the unfinished drugs and drug-taking tools. The urine samples of Luo, Jiang, Lu, and the other five were tested with methamphetamine test reagents, resulting in positive results for all five. The defendants Luo and Jiang did not object to the above facts during the trial, which are corroborated by the following evidence: 1. Information on permanent residents, statement of arrest situation, detailed phone call logs, list of seized items, guest accommodation registration form from Liyuan Hotel; 2. Testimonies from witnesses Lu, Lin (phonetic), Tiha (phonetic), and Yu; 3. On-site inspection record; 4. Identification record and photos; 5. Audiovisual materials; 6. On-site testing report from Yugan County Public Security Bureau. All the evidence was subjected to cross-examination during the trial, and defendants Luo and Jiang did not object. The sources of evidence are legitimate, objective, truthful, and form an evidence chain sufficient to establish the criminal facts charged by the prosecution that Luo and Jiang allowed others to use drugs.


The People's Procuratorate of Gulou District in a certain city charges that, between September 2017 and July 2018, the defendants Zhang and Gong, in order to seek illegal benefits, jointly used WeChat and QQ to impersonate staff members of "Nanjing XuanYing Network Technology Co., Ltd." They falsely claimed that they could assist in registering micro-businesses and provide goods for sale on registered malls, thereby defrauding unspecified individuals of a total of 14,380 RMB. The specific facts are as follows: 1. In November 2017, the defendants Zhang and Gong, in pursuit of illegal benefits, defrauded the victim Rong of 4,500 RMB over the internet by claiming to boost orders for Rong’s micro-store. 2. In May 2018, the defendants Zhang and Gong, in pursuit of illegal benefits, defrauded Liu of 9,880 RMB by claiming to provide goods for sale on a registered mall located in a certain city. On September 13, 2018, both defendants were apprehended by the public security organs, and after arriving at the case, they truthfully confessed the above facts. After the incident, the families of the defendants Zhang and Gong have compensated the victims for all economic losses, receiving their understanding. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Zhang and Gong during the trial and are substantiated by documentary evidence, including the basic information of the permanent population for defendants Zhang and Gong, case registration form, decision to file a case, case-solving procedures, details of their arrival at the case, seizure decision, business license, micro-store page, logistics information, Alipay, WeChat ID, QQ ID, transaction records, chat records, situation explanation, receipts, the letter of understanding, statements from victims Liu and Rong, confessions and defenses of the defendants Zhang and Gong, as well as on-site inspection records, examination records, identification records, and investigation experiment records, which are sufficient to establish these facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain area accuses: On April 6, 2015, at around 22:00, the defendant Cao was playing mahjong in the mahjong room operated by his mother, Xiao, at No. 25, Door 1, Street 104, Metallurgy Street, Qingshan District, Wuhan City. He saw the victim Xiong, in an argument with others at another table and accused Xiong of causing trouble in his family's mahjong parlor, leading to a dispute. The defendants Cao and Wang used glass cups, stools, and other tools to injure Xiong before leaving the scene. Subsequently, defendant Cao instructed Wang to continue gathering people to seek revenge against Xiong. Defendant Wang invited defendants Zhang and Jiang and others to drive to the Wuhan Steel General Hospital. In the hospital's emergency room, they found Xiong's companion Yu, and used sticks to assault the victim Yu, causing severe disruption to the emergency room's order. According to the assessment, Xiong's injuries were classified as minor injuries of the second degree, while Yu's injuries were classified as mild injuries. After the incident, defendants Cao, Wang, Zhang, and Jiang actively compensated the victims Xiong and Yu for their economic losses, totaling 120,000 RMB, and obtained the understanding of the victims. The defendants Cao, Wang, Zhang, and Jiang had no objections to the aforementioned facts during the trial process, and the evidence such as the case investigation and arrest process by the public security agency, identity materials and criminal records, statements from the victims Xiong and Yu, testimonies from witnesses Qiu, Sun, and Xiao, and expert opinions are sufficient to confirm the facts. Regarding the defense opinion of defendant Cao's defense counsel that "the victim is at fault in this case," after investigation, it was found that defendant Cao, due to trivial matters, along with defendant Wang, randomly assaulted others and instructed defendant Wang to gather people to cause trouble in public places. The victim in this case had no fault, and the defense opinion is inconsistent with the established facts. Therefore, this point of opinion is not supported by the court.


The prosecution charges: 1. At around 3 a.m. one day in early October 2015, the defendants Liang and Sun carried tools to a villa under renovation by Jiang next to the Longtouling Land Bureau in a certain county, stealing electrical wires and two copper pipes from the air conditioning unit. 2. Between 3 and 4 a.m. on October 25, 2015, the defendants Liang and Sun went to the stationery store operated by Shi opposite the kindergarten in the Wutongshu Residential Community in a certain county. Defendant Liang pried open the anti-theft net, while defendant Sun acted as a lookout. Defendant Liang entered the store and stole a white VIVO phone, a "Tianwang" brand watch, a digital camera, and over 200 yuan in cash. According to the appraisal, the stolen phone was valued at 525 yuan, and the watch at 577 yuan. 3. One night at the end of October 2015, the defendants Liang and Sun carried tools to a villa under renovation by Wu next to the Longtouling Land Bureau in a certain county, stealing electrical wires. 4. At around 9 p.m. one night in June 2015, defendant Liang went to Liu's machinery factory at the former Duxiu Cement Plant in a certain county, stealing more than thirty meters of copper core cable. 5. At around 8 p.m. one night in November 2014, defendant Liang went to Wutongshu Hospital in Longtouling, a certain county, stealing two copper pipes from the hospital's hyperbaric oxygen chamber.


The prosecution charges: 1. In the early morning of September 5, 2015, the defendant Xiao went to the entrance of Jie Net Internet Cafe in Baijia Town, Henghe Street, Qingcheng District, a certain city, and stole a red unlicensed women's scooter parked there by the victim, Yang. 2. In the early morning of September 6, 2015, the defendant Xiao went to the entrance of Vigor Internet Cafe in Baijia Town, Henghe Street, Qingcheng District, a certain city, and stole a black women's motorcycle with the license plate Yue RNS4** parked there by the victim, Chen. According to the appraisal, the motorcycle was valued at 3,313 yuan. 3. In the early morning of October 2, 2015, the defendants Xiao, Li, and Wen went to the area below Hengfu Residence, Xiaoshi, Qingcheng District, a certain city, and stole a blue men's motorcycle with the license plate Yue RGG2** parked there by the victim, Huang. According to the appraisal, the motorcycle was valued at 2,048 yuan. After the case was solved, the public security authorities recovered the stolen motorcycles and returned them to the victims. 4. One day in September 2015, in the early morning, the defendant Li went to the area below Bichui Garden, Zone 7, Xiaoshi, Qingcheng District, a certain city, and stole a red men's knife-style motorcycle with the license plate Yue RD45** parked there by the victim, He Y. According to the appraisal, the motorcycle was valued at 1,467 yuan. The criminal facts mentioned above were not objected to by the defendants Xiao, Li, and Wen during the trial, and they were confirmed by the statements of the victims Yang, Chen, Huang, and He Y, the confessions and defenses of the defendants Xiao, Li, and Wen, testimony from witnesses such as He A and Kong Mouyun, physical evidence, documentary evidence, appraisal opinions, records of inspection, examination, and identification, household registration information, details of the arrests, audio and video materials, and other evidence, which are sufficient to make a determination. The defendant Wen argued that the public security authorities used coercive interrogation on the day I was captured at the police station.


Upon trial, it was found that around 3:00 am on June 12, 2014, the defendants Wang and Su, along with "A" and "Xiao" (handled in a separate case), were driving past the "Bailian" supermarket in a certain town of a certain county, where they had a dispute with Yang, who was passing by with a kitchen knife. The defendants Wang and Su, along with others, got out of the car and took the kitchen knife from Yang's hand, then punched and kicked Yang, causing him to fall to the ground. The defendants Wang and Su, along with others, continued to beat him by kicking, dragging by his legs, and other means, resulting in injuries to Yang. According to the forensic examination, Yang sustained localized soft tissue contusions to the head, localized soft tissue contusions to the torso accompanied by a linear fracture of the right 5th anterior rib, and right 9th to 12th posterior ribs, and a fracture of the left transverse process of L1. The overall assessment of his injuries was minor injury grade two. After the incident, the defendant Wang advised the defendant Su to surrender, and they both turned themselves in at the public security bureau of a certain county on August 6, 2014. During the trial in this court, the parties reached a settlement agreement. The relatives of the defendants Wang and Su compensated the victim Yang for his economic losses in the amount of 30,000 RMB, and Yang expressed his understanding of the defendants Wang and Su's criminal acts. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Wang and Su during the trial and were substantiated by statements from the victim Yang, a forensic medical assessment of the degree of bodily injury, video footage from the scene, prior records, a mediation agreement, a letter of understanding, population information, and records of the apprehension, all of which are sufficient for recognition.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that in January 2016, the defendant Gu, in order to settle project payments from Zhenjiang Water Conservancy Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Water Conservancy Construction Company), without actual business dealings, had 41 ordinary VAT invoices of a certain province falsely issued for himself through Wang Jia and Wang Yi (both handled in separate cases), with a total face value of 4.0016 million yuan, which he later provided to the Water Conservancy Construction Company to settle project payments. In January 2016, the defendant Gu, to settle project payments from the Water Conservancy Construction Company, without actual business dealings, had the defendant Luo contact others to falsely issue material cost invoices for him. Later, Luo, through the defendant Chen, falsely issued five ordinary VAT invoices of a certain province for Gu, with a total face value of 2.5 million yuan, which the defendant Gu provided to the Water Conservancy Construction Company for settling project payments. After the case came to light, the defendants Gu, Luo, and Chen voluntarily reported to the public security authorities upon notification and truthfully confessed all the aforementioned criminal facts. Accordingly,


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: On the afternoon of August 22, 2014, the defendants Shen and Shi, after premeditation, had Shen rent a Toyota Reiz car with the license plate Zhejiang B××××× from Cixi Jiafu Investment Consulting Co., Ltd. Subsequently, the two defendants had someone create a driving license and registration certificate falsely bearing the name Chen. On the evening of the 27th of the same month, around 7 o'clock, Shen and Shi, introduced by Pan at a hair salon near Huan Chi Community, Gutang Street, Cixi, used the forged documents to impersonate Chen and mortgaged the vehicle to Hu, fraudulently obtaining 70,500 RMB. On the 29th of the same month, Cixi Jiafu Investment Consulting Co., Ltd. discovered the vehicle missing, retrieved it after a search, and drove it away. Hu was unable to contact Shen and Shi. After their arrest, Shen and Shi truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts. After the incident, Shen and Shi compensated the victim for economic losses amounting to 80,000 RMB and obtained the victim's understanding. Shen and Shi raised no objections to the aforementioned facts during the trial and the prosecution’s claims were corroborated by Hu's victim statement, the testimonies of witnesses Pan, Ji, and Xu, identification records and photos, call detail records, inventories of seized items, rental contracts, copies of forged documents, electronic bank real-time transfer receipts, vehicle sale agreements, receipts, criminal understanding documents, records of the case's procedural handling, and identifications of the defendants Shen and Shi, among other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the charge.


The prosecution alleges: From July 2011 to May 2012, a certain county's urban area expanded southward, requisitioning part of the land in a certain village of a certain town and paying compensation for the attached objects on the land. In the first half of 2013, the defendants Liu and Song, without approval, unlawfully dug ponds for fish farming and planted saplings in the aforementioned requisitioned land at the location of a certain villa area. In May 2016, victims Li and Wang partnered to undertake the earthwork leveling project of the villa area and subsequently entered the site for construction. On May 23 of the same year, the county's Land and Resources Bureau sent a letter to Liu, requiring him to rectify the unauthorized occupation of construction land and clear aquatic products and other equipment from the fish pond within seven days from the date of the letter. Liu and Song did not rectify the situation within the deadline. On June 5, 2016, Liu and Song went to the construction site, demanded the machinery to stop working, and sought compensation related to the fish pond. On June 10, 2016, Liu returned to the construction site and again obstructed the work, claiming that compensation for the fish pond was yet to be paid. After Li called the police, officers took Liu to a certain police station, where Liu issued a written guarantee before leaving. Shortly thereafter, Liu contacted Wang requesting compensation for the fish pond and related facilities. Worried about Liu and others continuing to obstruct the construction, Wang was forced to agree to compensate him with 25,000 yuan, with 10,000 yuan paid on the same day. When the earthwork project was nearing completion, Li paid Liu the remaining 15,000 yuan. Liu and Song received 15,000 yuan and 10,000 yuan, respectively. In July 2019, Liu and Song were brought to justice after being notified by the police via phone. After the incident, Liu obtained forgiveness from victim Li. To support the charges, the prosecution provided documentary evidence such as the case registration form, the decision to file the case, the transaction confirmation for state-owned construction land use rights, receipts, a letter notification, record of the case intake process, population information forms; testimonies from witnesses Wang, Han, Zhu, and Jiao; statements from victims Li and Wang, and the confessions and defenses of defendants Liu and Song.


The prosecution alleged that at around 1:00 am on September 19, 2013, the defendants Qin and Guo stole a red Honda DAX Giraffe motorcycle belonging to Zhang Mou Yi in front of the Xin Bai Wang supermarket in Beixinzhuang Village, Nanshi District, a certain city. The motorcycle was valued at 3,672 RMB. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Qin and Guo during the trial, and were corroborated by the case report, Price Appraisal Conclusion No. (2013) 069 by the Southern Price Appraisal, the victim Zhang Mou Yi's statement, witness Zhang Mou Yi's testimony, the list of seized and returned items and the photographs of the stolen motorcycle, the list of evidence obtained from surveillance footage, identification transcripts and photos, Criminal Judgment No. (2007) Nan Xing Chu Zi 299 and release certificate stub, Criminal Judgment No. (1996) Qing Xing Chu Zi 59, and the household registration certificates of the defendants Qin and Guo, among other evidence, sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of the Third District of a Certain City charges that on December 11, 2013, at about 2:00 PM, the defendants Liang and Wang went to Good Luck Lodge at No. 15-11 Baoshi Road, Jiaoyitang Community, Tangxia Town, in a certain city to commit burglary. Liang used a wrench and a homemade key to pry open the door of Room 502 on the fifth floor of the building, and then Liang and Wang stole a Coolpad model 7020 mobile phone (worth 208 yuan) belonging to the victim Yang inside the room. Subsequently, Liang and Wang went to the second floor of the building, where Wang acted as a lookout while Liang pried open the door of Room 205 and entered to steal a Hasee model A460-T35 laptop computer (worth 1035 yuan) belonging to the victim Wu. The defendants Liang and Wang were apprehended while fleeing the scene, and the stolen goods were recovered and returned to the victims. The prosecution authority provided evidence including an on-site inspection record, site diagrams and photographs, physical evidence such as the Hasee laptop and Coolpad phone, documents regarding the case resolution, household registration proof, seizure list, appraisal of the value of the involved property, explanatory materials, testimonies from witnesses Huang, Zhao Jia, and Zhao Yi, statements from the victims Wu and Yang, and confessions, identifications, and recognitions recordings from the defendants Liang and Wang. Based on this, the prosecution believes that the defendants Liang and Wang have committed the crime of x. Considering their truthful confessions and the fact that the crime was not completed, it is recommended that the court sentence them to imprisonment for a term ranging from six months to one year and six months and impose a fine. The defendants Liang and Wang have no objections to the facts, charges, and sentencing recommendations of the prosecution and have not presented any defense arguments. After examination, it is confirmed that the facts of the crime x charged by the prosecution against the defendants Liang and Wang are clear, and the evidence is credible and sufficient; therefore, the court acknowledges it.


The prosecution alleges that in early March 2015, on a certain day, defendant Xu, through defendant Shuai, purchased a batch of "methamphetamine" from another person for 3,500 RMB for personal use. At approximately 0:00 on March 13, 2015, defendant Xu brought the remaining methamphetamine and, along with defendant Shuai, traveled in vehicle Yue Y××××× to Guohui Hotel in Chancheng District, a certain city. During the ride, Xu handed over 12.34 grams of methamphetamine to Shuai for safekeeping, while keeping 4.68 grams for himself. As they arrived at the Guohui Hotel parking lot, the police caught them red-handed. According to the evaluation, the seized 17.02 grams of "methamphetamine" all tested positive for methamphetamine composition. Defendant Xu and Shuai raised no objections to these facts during the trial, supported by witness Feng's testimony and identification records, arrest process, search record, list of seized items, explanation statement, forensic laboratory test report, household registration proof, and the confessions and identification records made by defendants Xu and Shuai during the investigation stage, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution alleges that on March 1, 2015, and March 2, 2015, the defendants Chen and Lu allowed others to use methamphetamine twice in their home at 508 Tongyue Jiayuan, Building 17, Xinghua City. The details are as follows: 1. On March 1, 2015, the defendants Chen and Lu allowed Zhu to use methamphetamine once in a room in their home at 508 Tongyue Jiayuan, Building 17, Xinghua City. 2. On March 2, 2015, the defendants Chen and Lu allowed Zhu to use methamphetamine once in the living room of their home at 508 Tongyue Jiayuan, Building 17, Xinghua City. After the incident, the defendants Chen and Lu truthfully confessed their crimes. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Chen and Lu during the trial and are substantiated by the testimonies of witnesses such as Zhu and Zhang; documentary evidence including: the permanent resident registration form and case registration form extracted by the Xinghua City Public Security Bureau, a statement of the incident, the on-site inspection report produced by the Xinghua City Public Security Bureau, inspection records, and identification records, among other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts. Additional evidence proving the facts of the case includes: the criminal judgment No. 474 of the (2011) Taixing Criminal Preliminary of the People’s Court of Xinghua City, Jiangsu Province, the administrative penalty decision, and release registration form.


The People's Procuratorate of a Certain District in Wuhan City charges: At around 9 a.m. on June 2, 2013, the defendants Wang and Liu, after premeditation, went to the vicinity of a residential area in a certain district of the city. They impersonated police officers and attempted to defraud Zhang Mouyi of 4,000 yuan on the pretext that Zhang Mouyi needed to pay a "fine" for soliciting prostitution. Later, when the defendants Wang and Liu accompanied the victim Zhang Mouyi to a China Construction Bank branch to withdraw money, the victim's son-in-law, Hu Moumou, discovered and saw through the scam. Defendant Wang was captured by Hu Moumou and others and handed over to the public security authorities. Defendant Liu took the opportunity to escape. Subsequently, after an investigation, the public security authorities apprehended defendant Liu and brought him to justice on June 25, 2013. The aforementioned facts are uncontested during the trial by defendants Wang and Liu and are supported by evidence including the victim Zhang Moubing's report, statements, and identification records; materials from the public security authorities regarding the arrest and case resolution process; bank withdrawal records; testimonies from witnesses Hu Mou, Huang Mou, and Zhang Moujia; the Decision on Re-education Through Labor (No. 1458 [2003]) from the Wuhan Municipal Labor Re-education Administration Committee; and the confessions and defenses of defendants Wang and Liu made to the public security authorities, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: Defendant Zhu had multiple disputes with the construction unit due to issues of land ownership. On the morning of March 16, 2014, Zhu drove to the construction site and saw that the project department was working. He then called the defendant Wang and asked him to use a bulldozer to push over the steel pipe scaffolding at the site. Wang subsequently drove the bulldozer to the site and damaged the steel pipe scaffolding outside the 11th building under construction. According to the appraisal, the value of the damaged items amounted to 7,783 RMB.


After trial, it was found that on October 23, 2014, at around 3 PM, the defendants Yang, Wang, and Shen, along with the victim Zhang, were involved in a physical altercation over a trivial matter in front of No. 63, Siqian, Lujia Village, Development Zone, in this city. During the conflict, the defendants Yang, Wang, and Shen used their fists and feet, as well as a log, to beat the victim Zhang, resulting in a comminuted fracture of the distal right radius for the victim Zhang, which was classified as a minor injury level 1. After the incident, Gan and the defendants' families reached a settlement agreement with the victim Zhang, who received compensation of 194,000 RMB and expressed forgiveness. The aforementioned facts were acknowledged by the defendants Yang, Wang, and Shen during the trial without objection, and were further corroborated by evidence such as the case registration form, household registration certificates, personal information, injury photographs, list of retrieved evidence, medical records, medical condition evaluation form, notification of evaluation opinions, application, settlement agreement, receipt; testimonies of witnesses Gan, Wu, and Gao; the account provided by investigators from the public security organ; victim Zhang's statement; forensic medical report No. Wu A Wu Jian (Fa) Zi (2016) 504 on the degree of human injury; a record of identification, site inspection record and crime scene photography; as well as the confessions and defenses of the defendants Yang, Wang, and Shen, which are all sufficient for the conviction.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that at around 18:00 on May 20, 2016, the defendant Liang, on his way to work, discovered a blue TailG electric scooter with the license plate Nanning 973** at the entrance of a restaurant named Original Taste Coconut Chicken located next to the south gate of 303 Jiangbei Avenue, Nanning. The key was not removed from the scooter, so he took the key and later gave it to the defendant Su, instructing Su to steal the scooter. Subsequently, the defendant Su stole the scooter. According to an appraisal, the stolen electric scooter was valued at 2,726 yuan at the time of the incident. Further investigation revealed that after the incident, the public security organ seized an electric scooter from the defendant Su, which has been returned to the victim, Deng. The aforementioned facts were not contested by the defendants Liang and Su during the court trial, and they did not submit any evidence to the court. The case is supported by various pieces of evidence including the case registration form, household registration certificates, arrest records, administrative penalty decisions, compulsory detoxification decisions, invoices for the stolen items, surveillance video screenshots, extraction records, seizure records, a list of seized items, a list of returned items, the testimony of witness Fu, the statement of victim Deng, the confessions of the defendants Liang and Su, price appraisal reports, identification transcripts, on-site identification transcripts, and photographs, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution alleges that from early April 2019 to April 25, defendant Zhao, without a tobacco retail license, purchased vaping cartridges from a Russian entering a certain city and sold 1,110 cartridges to defendant Tang and 40 cartridges to Song at a price of 165 RMB each. After the incident, 422 cartridges were seized in a garage rented by Zhao. Zhao's illegal business amount was 234,060 RMB, with an illegal profit of 1,700 RMB. From early April 2019 to April 25, defendant Tang, also without a tobacco retail license, sold 200 cartridges to Liu from Mudanjiang and, together with Yan Dong (handled in a separate case), sold 800 cartridges in a certain area, with each cartridge priced at 165 RMB. On April 25, 2019, the public security authorities arrested defendants Zhao and Tang, who were about to trade cartridges, in garage number 48 of a residential area in a certain city. 810 cartridges that Zhao intended to sell were seized on site, and 132,800 RMB that Tang intended to use to purchase cartridges was confiscated, along with 200 cartridges found in the black Magotan car Tang was driving. Tang's illegal business amount was 190,000 RMB, with an additional 133,650 RMB being attempted, and an illegal profit of 5,000 RMB. To substantiate the above charges, the prosecution presented and read out in court evidence including photos of seized cartridges; documentary evidence of case origin, apprehension process, residence registration and current behavior certification, labor contract, search warrant, seizure list, cash deposit slip, inventory of property seized by a province, discharge and diagnostic medical records, evidence retrieval notice, explanation for tobacco retail administrative license handling, notice for assisting in property inquiry, China Agricultural Bank transaction slips, etc.; testimonies of witnesses Song, Yan Dong, Liu, Wang, Zhu1, Zhu2; confessions and defenses of the defendants Zhao and Tang; appraisal and inspection report from a provincial tobacco quality supervision and testing station; electronic data inspection records, search records, and identification records from a city's public security bureau cyber security brigade, and other evidence.


After examination, it has been found that on March 28, 2015, the defendant Wang leased the store at No. 287, East District of Mingfa Commercial Plaza, Siming District, in a certain city. In late May 2015, knowing that others intended to operate a casino, the defendant Wang still provided the venue to "A Jun" (handled in a separate case) for casino operation, with an agreed venue fee of 1,000 RMB per day. The casino provided playing cards for others to gamble in the "San Gong" style and profited by taking a rake-off. On May 24, 2015, the defendant Xiao was employed by the casino to act as a lookout. At around 22:00 on May 28, 2015, the police arrested defendants Wang, Xiao, and gamblers Wan, Xiang, and others at the above location. They seized a deck of playing cards used in the crime, a rake-off box, a TCOM brand walkie-talkie (black, model TK-668), illegal proceeds of 74,800 RMB in rake-offs, and 43,240 RMB in gambling funds. By the time the case was uncovered, defendant Wang had received a total of 2,000 RMB in illegal venue fees, which was returned on January 15, 2016, by a family member to this court. The above facts were confessed by defendants Wang and Xiao after they were brought to justice and throughout the trial. In addition, witness testimonies from Long, Xiang, Wan, Tang, Zeng, and Zhong, along with the seized playing cards, rake-off box, walkie-talkie, illegal proceeds in rake-offs, gambling funds, and scene photos, identification records, extraction records, site inspection records, seizure list, seizure warrant, receipt for returned illegal proceeds, rental contract, inquiry explanation of illegal activities and criminal records, fugitive registration information, defendants’ household registration information, and the police report on the case and explanation of circumstances constitute evidence in the case sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charges: 1. On August 9, 2016, at about 4 PM, Liu (already sentenced) organized and gathered defendants Cao, Li, Dou, Gao, Sun, and others. They drove to the construction site of Xin'ao Mingshun Gas Co., Ltd. in a certain village of a certain town in a certain county, carrying shovels, hand saws, cement, and other items. They sawed open the gas pipeline and poured cement and inserted bricks into it, damaging the pipeline. The damaged pipeline was appraised to be worth 9,222 yuan. 2. On August 13, 2016, at about 10 AM, Liu and Sun (both already sentenced) organized and gathered defendants Dou, Gao, and others. They drove to the construction site of Xin'ao Mingshun Gas Co., Ltd. in a certain village of a certain town in a certain county, carrying electric drills. They drilled holes into the company's gas pipeline, causing damage. The damaged pipeline was appraised to be worth 43,467 yuan. 3. One night in mid-August 2016, defendant Cao conspired with Liu and Sun. They drove to the construction site of Xin'ao Mingshun Gas Co., Ltd. in a certain village of a certain district in a certain county, carrying electric drills. They drilled holes into the company's gas pipeline and poured soybeans into it, causing damage. The damaged pipeline was appraised to be worth 10,700 yuan. Later, defendant Cao, with Liu and Sun, drove to the construction site of Xin'ao Mingshun Gas Co., Ltd. in a certain village of a certain district in a certain county. They


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges: In the early morning of June 27, 2015, defendant Hou and defendant Ma were near the Binhu Mingzhu Community in a certain district of a certain city. Hou entered the community and stole victim Yao's "Xunying" brand electric bicycle from the entrance of Building 1, Unit 1. After riding it out of the community, he handed it over to Ma. Ma purchased the two electric bicycles, including this one, for 1,100 yuan. According to the appraisal, the bicycle was valued at 1,907 yuan. In the early morning of August 24, 2015, defendants Hou and Ma went to the vicinity of Huijie Garden, Binhu Century City, in a certain district of a certain city. Hou entered the community and stole victim Zhang's "Royalstar" brand electric bicycle from the hallway entrance of Building 1, Unit 2. Ma purchased the two electric bicycles, including this one, for 1,400 yuan. According to the appraisal, the bicycle was valued at 2,021 yuan. Accordingly,


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city of Hunan Province charges:

1. At around 9 a.m. on July 16, 2014, the defendant Jiang, wearing a police uniform, impersonated a police officer at the entrance of Ai Shang · Lanshan Chinese and Western Restaurant on Tianxing Road in a certain district of a certain city. He deceived the victim, Zhang, by claiming that Zhang had to go to the police station for processing due to soliciting prostitution. This was used to trick Zhang into getting into the blue Great Wall vehicle with license plate N××××× driven by the defendant Luo. They then pretended to drive to the Xinyuan Police Station of the Hecheng Sub-bureau of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city. During the journey, they defrauded 2,400 yuan in cash from the victim, Zhang, by falsely claiming it was a "fine" for soliciting prostitution. The defendant Jiang received 2,400 yuan as his share of the stolen money, while the defendant Luo received 1,300 yuan.

2. At around 12 p.m. on July 18, 2014, the defendant Jiang, again wearing a police uniform, used the same method near the Sanjiaoping distillery in a certain district of a certain city to deceive the victim, Zheng, into getting into the blue Great Wall vehicle with license plate N××××× driven by the defendant Luo. They intended to "fine" 10,000 yuan from Zheng for soliciting prostitution. However, as the defendants Jiang and Luo drove to a location near the Liu Lin Group Company on Hongxing Road in a certai


The prosecution charges that around 2:50 AM on June 4, 2013, defendants Kuang and Liu, along with Zuo (handled in a separate case), went to Room 612 of XX Building, Spring, Southern Bonded Area, entered through an unlocked door, and while victims Li, Xiong, and He were asleep, stole an Asus laptop (valued at 2,387 RMB), an Acer laptop (valued at 2,430 RMB), and a white savings jar containing over 100 RMB. After the incident, the co-defendant Zuo compensated the victims for their losses, totaling 5,000 RMB. The defendants Kuang and Liu did not dispute these facts during the court proceedings. The facts are corroborated by the statements of the victims Li, Xiong, and He, the testimony of witness Zuo, identification records and photographs, valuation reports, police statements on the course of events and escorting record, administrative penalty decisions, receipts, and residential information, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


A People's Procuratorate in a certain place charged: In late June 2012, defendant Zhou, knowing it was a stolen vehicle, purchased a red Suzuki 125 two-wheeled motorcycle from someone near a certain city for 1,000 yuan. On the 30th of the same month, defendant Huang, knowing it was a stolen vehicle, purchased the motorcycle from defendant Zhou for 1,200 yuan. Investigation revealed that the vehicle was stolen from Chen, who was from a certain village in Lanshan District of a certain city, on September 27, 2011, in a bay of that city, with an appraised value of 4,400 yuan. Regarding the aforementioned facts charged, the prosecution read aloud and presented the following evidence in court: documentary evidence such as household registration information; appraisal opinions; victim Chen's statement; confessions of defendants Zhou and Huang.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county in a certain district of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region alleged that at around 2 a.m. on March 23, 2015, the defendant Liang entrusted the defendant Zhou to help him purchase drugs for consumption at a club. Subsequently, Zhou bought a package of the drug MDMA (commonly known as "milk tea") from "Ya Niu" (a nickname, dealt with in a separate case) for 250 RMB and handed it to Liang. Liang then took the purchased MDMA to a private club in Hekou Village, Tengzhou Town, a certain county, for entertainment. At around 3 a.m. the same day, police officers from the county public security bureau conducted a raid on the club, arresting Liang and Zhou at the scene and seizing 30.3 grams of suspected MDMA. The Wuzhou Public Security Bureau's forensic identification institute later confirmed that the substance contained MDMA components. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Liang and Zhou during the court hearing. These facts are also substantiated by documentary evidence including the case registration form, household registration certificates, arrest records, evidence preservation list, the Wuzhou Public Security Bureau forensic report (Wu Gong [Criminal] Identification [Chemistry] No. 092 [2015]), inspection reports from the county public security bureau, transcripts of investigations, identification records, identification photos and explanations, on-site inspection transcripts, on-site photos, identification photos, as well as the confessions and defenses of defendants Liang and Zhou, which are sufficient for conviction.


The prosecution alleges that, starting in May 2015, defendants Zhao and Mao were hired at a nameless gambling machine room located about 100 meters west of the intersection of Yaohai West Road and Longmenling Road in a district of a certain city, on the south side of the road. Defendant Zhao was responsible for managing operations inside the establishment, while defendant Mao was in charge of lookout duties and machine maintenance outside. On October 16, 2015, police officers raided the gambling machine room and seized eight "Six Lions Dynasty Link-Up" gambling machines and one "Fishing Machine," totaling 14 operation units, along with gambling funds amounting to 5,530 RMB. Testing revealed that these gambling machines were equipped with functions for crediting, deducting, adding points on the screen, setting odds, and small stakes for big wins.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: In early September 2015, Guo (handled in a separate case) learned through QQ chat with the defendants Liu and Xie that Lao Cheng High School in Mengjin County would start on September 4, 2015, and agreed to meet at the entrance of Mengjin County People's Court on the opening day. On the afternoon of September 4, Xie, Liu, and Lü, as usual, gathered at the entrance of Mengjin County People's Court to go to school together. Guo brought the defendants Liang and Pan (escaped) to the entrance of Mengjin County People's Court. Guo and Liang had previously conspired to commit robbery against the students at Lao Cheng High School in Mengjin County, and upon meeting, informed Liu of their plan, asking Liu to provide assistance. Subsequently, Guo and Liang bought a fruit knife from a general store opposite Mengjin County People's Court. Knowing that Liang and others were going to the school to commit a crime, Liu still put the fruit knife into his school bag. Later, Guo gave Liang 40 yuan for travel expenses to go to Lao Cheng High School in Mengjin County, but Guo did not go. On the way, Xie and Lü knew about going to the school to steal money, and Liang, fearing he was too old to enter the school, discussed using Xie’s school bag to disguise as a student to enter the school, while Liu carried the school bag containing the fruit knife into the school. That afternoon, after Liang and Pan entered the school with the help of Liu and Xie, Xie a


Upon examination, it was found that from February 15 to March 6, 2014, defendant Lin A (handled in another case) organized more than 30 gambling events in a simple shed at No. 5, Ge Xi, Gaosu Village, Bailongshan Street, a county (defendant Lin's home). He recruited and attracted more than 20 people, including Ye A, Chen, Qiu, to participate in gambling, making a profit of more than 17,000 RMB from it. During this period, defendant Lin A arranged for defendants Zhong, Jiang, Wu, and Lin B (handled in another case) to help at the casino and paid them wages. Defendant Lin knowingly provided the venue for Lin A and others to operate the casino and occasionally helped with the skim, making a profit of about 1,100 RMB; Defendant Zhong acted as security for the casino and helped with the skimming in over 30 gambling events, making a profit of over 1,800 RMB; Defendant Jiang acted as a lookout for more than 20 gambling events, making a profit of about 800 RMB, during which the casino skimmed profits totaling over 14,000 RMB; Defendant Wu was responsible for managing the gambling apparatus and skim funds in more than 30 events and occasionally helped with skimming, making a profit of over 1,000 RMB. After the incident, defendant Wu voluntarily surrendered to the county public security bureau on April 2, 2014, and truthfully confessed his criminal acts. During the trial, defendants Lin, Zhong, Jiang, and Wu each respectively handed over their illegal proceeds to the court: 1,100 RMB, 1,800 RMB, 800 RMB, and 1,000 RMB. The aforementioned facts were undisputed and confessed by defendants Lin A, Lin, Zhong, Jiang, and Wu during the court trial, and were confirmed by confessions and defenses from defendants Lin A, Lin, Zhong, Jiang, Wu, and Lin B, testimonies of witnesses Qiu, Chen, and Ye among 30 other people, the process of being brought to justice, the process of capture, criminal judgment, administrative penalty decision, population information forms, recognition records, and photos among other evidence, sufficient to be established.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city accused that Zhou Jia (already sentenced) had sporadic conflicts with the victim Zhang Bing due to setting up stalls and other life incidents. Zhou Jia instructed the defendant Zhou and Zhou Yi (already sentenced) to gather the defendant Guan as well as Li Jia, Li Yi, and Liu Jia (all three already sentenced), along with Zhu (to be handled in a separate case), and on August 12, 2015, at around 11 p.m., at the "Barbecue Inn" opposite the east gate of the Jinxiu Huacheng Community in a certain city, they used means such as punching, kicking, and striking with sticks to beat Zhang Bing, resulting in injuries. According to the assessment, Zhang Bing's injury on the right mastoid region was classified as minor injury level one, the injury on the left scapular region was classified as minor injury level two, and the surface abrasions, contusions on the right shoulder and right elbow were classified as slight injuries.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges: On the afternoon of June 13, 2015, the defendants Yuan and Ma went to the AB4 passage of the frozen market at the agricultural and sideline products logistics center located in Liangzhu Street, a certain district of a certain city. They entered the vehicle with license plate AXXXXX, parked there by the victim Zhuang, by opening the car door, and stole one box each of frozen beef, frozen pork ribs, and frozen cooked shrimp, with the stolen goods totaling a value of 1,635 RMB. In the early morning of June 30, the defendants Yuan and Ma went to the east gate of Lianghui Frozen Goods Store at the aquatic market of the agricultural and sideline products logistics center in Liangzhu Street, a certain district of a certain city. They entered the van with license plate AXXXXX, parked there by the victim Zhu, by opening the car door, and stole one box of frozen pork bones, one box of frozen pig feet, one box of frozen pork ribs, two boxes of frozen pork shank bones, 20 pounds of pork head meat, 30 pounds of cooked intestines, four pig livers, four pig stomachs, and four pairs of pig kidneys, with the stolen goods totaling a value of 1,585 RMB. At noon on July 2, the defendants Yuan and Ma went to the eighth row of the parking lot at the west gate of the frozen market of the agricultural and sideline products logistics center in Liangzhu Street, a certain district of a certain city. They entered the van with license plate AXXXXX, parked there by the victim Wang, by opening the car door, and stole two boxes of frozen squid and one box of frozen bones, with the stolen goods totaling a value of 1,313 RMB.


After the trial, it was found that on November 27, 2012, at around 11 PM, the defendants Yin, Wei, Zhang, and others went to the town of Chengguan in Linquan County to sing at Vitesse KTV. In the lobby, due to a dispute over a bill, Li had an altercation with the cashier. Yin and the others tried to intervene and got into a dispute with Li. Subsequently, Yin, Wei, Zhang, and others assaulted Li, resulting in fractures of the left third to eleventh ribs and left transverse processes of T12, L1, and L2 vertebrae for Li. According to the forensic medical examination by Linquan County Public Security Bureau, the injuries Li sustained were considered minor injuries. Furthermore, after the incident, each of the defendants Yin, Wei, and Zhang compensated the victim Li for various economic losses in the amount of 25,000 yuan, obtaining forgiveness. Defendant Wei voluntarily surrendered to the Linquan County Public Security Bureau on April 25, 2013, and defendant Zhang did so on September 11, 2013. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants during the trial. These facts are confirmed by evidence such as material evidence shown and identified in court, documents verified through court investigation procedures, including the registration form of case acceptance, the notice of case filing, household registration certificates, records of surrender, statements, hospital records, mediation agreements, letters of forgiveness, receipts, testimonies from witnesses such as Li and Liu, statements by the victim Li, inspection and identification records, and appraisal opinions, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution accuses the defendants Tang, Deng, and Fan of conspiring to extort money from others by staging fake traffic accidents, known as "pengci." On May 24 and 29, 2015, the defendant Deng drove his white Toyota Reiz car, with the license plate "S×××××," accompanied by defendants Tang and Fan from a certain city to the Dongchangling Village section in Lingui District on National Highway 321, and to a section in a certain town and village in Longsheng Various Nationalities Autonomous County at 733KM on National Highway 321. They extorted 2,000 RMB from the victim Liang and 3,000 RMB from the victim Long using "pengci" tactics.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Bayan Nur City charges that in 2017, defendants Gao, Si, and Zhang1, after inspecting certain locations and the "Zhai Yi Shou Company," jointly invested in and established Yishun Information Technology Co., Ltd. on July 6, 2017. Gao served as the legal representative of the company, while Si and Zhang1 were shareholders. After its establishment, the company neither put up a sign with its name nor operated within the scope of business recorded in its business license. Instead, it put up a sign for "Zhai Yi Shou Company" to undertake and carry out illegal debt collection activities. During this period, a relatively fixed criminal syndicate was formed, with Gao and Si as the main leaders, and Liu1, He, Xu, Ren, Yang, Zhang1, Yun, Li1, Luo, Liu2, Huang, Feng, Liu6, and Wan (all of whom have been sentenced) as other members. The criminal syndicate, during its criminal activities, involved Zhang1 and the "Zhai Yi Shou Company" business personnel in soliciting debt collection services, signing commission collection agreements and power of attorney documents with creditors. After Gao reviewed the relevant documents, Gao or Si would assign "orders" to Liu1, He, Xu, Ren, Yang, and other collection personnel. The assigned personnel, along with other debt collectors from "Zhai Yi Shou Company" or temporarily gathered idle individuals from the community, would use methods such as harassment, causing disturbances, abuse, pestering, intimidation, threats, gathering crowds to create momentum, etc., to pursue debtors for payments. The syndicate committed wrongdoing, oppressed the people, seriously disrupted economic and social life order, caused a bad social impact, inflicted immense psychological coercion on the victims, led to public misunderstanding of the societal law and order situation, and caused some negative impacts on the work of judicial organs. The specific criminal acts


After the trial, it was found that on the evening of May 18, 2019, the defendants Wang, Li, Shi, and others went to a KTV in a certain alley in Meiguang, a town in Qianqi, to drink. Around midnight on May 19, 2019, the defendants Wang, Li, Shi, and Liu had finished drinking and were chatting in front of the KTV when they encountered the victim Sun and his friends coming out of the Jinbawan KTV. At this time, defendant Wang inexplicably insulted the victim Sun and his friends. The victim Sun and defendant Wang insulted each other, after which defendants Wang, Li, and Shi assaulted the victim Sun. After the assault, the three defendants attempted to take a taxi to flee the scene but were stopped by the victim Sun. The three defendants then fled on foot, and the victim Sun called the police. After the incident, it was determined by the Bayannur City Jinqiao Forensic Identification Institute that the victim Sun's injury constituted minor injury of the second degree. Defendants Wang, Li, and Shi compensated the victim Sun 15,000 RMB and obtained the victim Sun's understanding. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Wang, Li, and Shi during the trial. There are also materials such as the victim Sun's report and statement, the acceptance registration form made by Qianqi Public Security Bureau, the case filing decision, the course of arrival, site inspection record, site map and photos, identification record and photos, evidence collection notice, evidence collection list, the victim Sun's inpatient medical records and diagnosis certificate from the Qianqi People's Hospital, administrative penalty decision, release from detention proof, compulsory isolation detoxification decisions for defendants Wang and Li, engagement letter with Bayannur City Jinqiao Forensic Identification Institute, forensic identification opinion letter, identification opinion notice, testimonies from witnesses Huang, Liu, Luo, Song, Liu, mediation agreement, understanding letter, defendants Wang, Li, Shi's confession, and household registration verification among other evidence that can fully confirm the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charges: From early November 2017 to mid-December of the same year, defendants Cheng, Liu, and Xu colluded at a storefront located at the west gate of Sunshine Apartments, Lizhou Street in the city, placing two eight-station fishing video game machines to provide a gambling environment for others. From mid-December to December 28 of the same year, defendants Cheng, Liu, and Xu moved the aforementioned two video game machines to a bungalow located at Mingshan 28-1, Mingwei Village, Lizhou Street in the city to provide a gambling environment for Wan, Huang, Shen, and others. The aforementioned two gambling machines generated illegal profits totaling over 33,000 RMB during the aforementioned placement period. According to the identification by Yuyao City Public Security Bureau, the two aforementioned eight-station fishing video game machines both have functions allowing for coin entry and withdrawal, gambling on small stakes for larger returns. On December 28, 2017, defendants Cheng, Liu, and Xu were apprehended by police officers. To prove the aforementioned facts, the prosecution provided corresponding evidence to the court.


Upon examination, it was found that on April 21, 2015, at approximately 21:00, the defendants Liu and Xiao together entered the "MINISO" store in the underground mall of Zhongmin Baihui in Siming District, a certain city. Taking advantage of the victim Huang's unpreparedness, they stole an "Apple" iPhone 5S worth 2,766 RMB from the pocket of his jacket. On May 1, 2015, Liu and Xiao were apprehended outside Robinson Square in Siming District of a certain city. After being brought to justice, both defendants truthfully confessed to the aforementioned facts, yet the stolen phone has not been recovered. During the court proceedings, both defendants Liu and Xiao did not object to the above facts, and these facts are corroborated by the victim Huang’s statement, the evidence retrieval notice, evidence list, surveillance video, and screenshots, the price appraisal conclusion from the municipal price appraisal center, the appraisal opinion notice, the pre-trial confessions and defenses of the two defendants, relevant identification records, photos, the account of the case provided by the public security organ, explanation of circumstances, household registration proofs, criminal record materials, and legal documents on coercive measures, sufficient to be established.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged that on the evening of March 18, 2014, the defendants Dai and Zhang, with the intent of making a profit, gathered Lu, Chen, Gao, and Zhao (all handled in separate cases) among others, to gamble using mahjong tiles in the form of "Niuniu" at Room 203, Building 4, Victory New Village, a certain town in the city. They gained a total of 7,600 RMB in profits through taking a cut. After being apprehended, defendant Dai truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts. Following the incident, 7,600 RMB in illicit profits were seized and are currently held by the local Public Security Bureau; 40 mahjong tiles and 2 dice were seized and are currently held by this court. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Dai and Zhang during the trial and were corroborated by witness testimonies from Chen, Zhao, Song, Gao, Sun, Feng, Lu, Wu, Jiang, Huang, Jiang, Zhuo, Cheng, Zhou A, Zhou B, Zhu, Wang, Ji, along with phone records of reports, inspection transcripts, evidence preservation lists, photos, seizure transcripts, seizure lists, restitution lists, attached evidence and item transfer lists, administrative penalty decisions, confiscated item lists, case investigation records, arrest records, confessions from defendants Dai and Zhang, basic information of permanent residents, administrative penalty decisions, and decisions on forced isolation for drug rehabilitation, all of which are sufficient to confirm the facts, as acknowledged by this court.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a city charges: On February 14, 2012, at around 18:00, Chen B (already sentenced) was invited to meet with the victim, Gao, at the May Red Hotel on Nanyuan Street, within a certain district of a city, to discuss their economic dispute. Chen B, fearing he might be at a disadvantage if a fight broke out during the negotiation, gathered the defendants Chen, Feng, and Ling (already sentenced), among others, to go along to the May Red Hotel. Upon arriving at the hotel entrance, defendant Chen followed Chen B into the hotel lobby to negotiate with the victim, Gao, while defendant Feng and others waited in the car. The negotiation failed, leading to a scuffle. Defendant Chen then notified defendant Feng and others that a fight had broken out inside. Defendant Feng, together with Ling, each armed with a piece of rebar, rushed into the hotel lobby. Defendant Feng then used the rebar to strike victim Gao, who was grappling with defendant Chen, resulting in injuries to Gao. Forensic examination determined that victim Gao sustained fractures to the left 8th and 9th ribs due to trauma, with the injuries classified as minor. After the incident, the relatives of defendants Chen and Feng compensated the victim Gao for economic losses, gaining Gao's understanding. On August 1, 2012, defendants Chen and Feng voluntarily turned themselves in at the Nanyuan Police Station of a district’s Public Security Bureau, truthfully confessing the criminal facts. The evidence for the prosecution includes: victim Chen A; witness testimonies; forensic medical injury assessment report; surveillance footage; household registration proof, police administrative penalty decision, explanatory note, identification records; defendants' confessions and statements in defense, etc.


The public prosecution charges that the defendants Hou and Sun sold drugs to others, and their actions violated Article x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, and they should be held criminally responsible for crime x. To substantiate the above charges, the prosecution submitted evidence such as the defendants' confessions and defenses, witness testimonies, identification records, and household registration certificates. The defendants Hou and Sun do not object to the facts and charges put forth by the prosecution. The defense for defendant Sun argued that Sun had shown meritorious behavior; he voluntarily confessed to drug trafficking facts that the judicial authorities were not yet aware of, constituting a voluntary surrender, and he pleaded guilty in court, being a first-time and occasional offender, and suggested leniency in punishment. Upon examination, it was found that at about 10 a.m. on March 25, 2015, defendant Hou sold 0.2 grams of methamphetamine (ice) to Sun at the price of 500 yuan in the corridor on the first floor of Building XX, Unit X, District II, a certain city. Later, defendant Sun sold the above-mentioned methamphetamine to Wang for 1000 yuan in Room XXX of a certain securities training center at a certain town in the same city. At noon that day, the police officers from the Police Station of a city's Public Security Bureau, based on a report from others, apprehended Wang suspected of drug use in the lobby of the same securities training center and subsequently arrested Sun in Room XXX of the center. Wang confessed to purchasing methamphetamine from Sun, and later Sun confessed to selling methamphetamine to Wang. On March 26, Sun assisted police officers in arresting Hou at Household XXX, Unit X, Building XX, District II, a certain city. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Hou and Sun during the court trial, and were corroborated by evidence, including the case registration form, the case development and solving records, arrest proofs, testimonies from witnesses Wang and Dai, on-site testing reports, identification records and photos, evidence preservation, and seizure lists, administrative penalty decision, household registration certificates. The evidence was verified and testified to be sufficient in court to establish the conviction of crime x for the two defendants. During the trial, the prosecution, considering the criminal facts and sentencing circumstances of the two defendants, suggested lenient punishment as both confessed their crimes truthfully and had no prior criminal records.


After trial, it was found that on the evening of March 22, 2016, the defendants Mei and others encountered Wang at the flagship skating rink in the Shuguang Trade City of this district. Defendant Mei, on the grounds that Wang caused Wang M. to become pregnant, demanded compensation. Subsequently, defendant Tao, upon invitation from defendant Mei, arrived, and they together took Wang to borrow money, which was unsuccessful. Mei and Tao used verbal threats to force Wang to transfer money via Alipay and pay a total of 7,000 yuan in cash. On May 11, 2016, the public security authorities arrested defendants Mei and Tao. After the case, the relatives of the two defendants compensated the victim for the economic loss of 9,000 yuan and received forgiveness. The aforementioned facts were not contested by Mei and Tao during the trial. The facts are substantiated by verified evidence, including records of arrest and case resolution, the victim Wang's report materials, statements, and identification records, testimony and identification records from witnesses Chen and Wang M., testimony from witnesses Zheng, Zeng, and Yu, outpatient records from a provincial medical institution, IOUs, Alipay transfer and cash withdrawal transaction details, letters of forgiveness and receipts, and the interrogation records and identity information of defendants Tao and Mei, which are sufficient for a conviction.


Upon trial, it was found that in the early morning of June 3, 2014, the defendants Chen and Zhang, after prior discussion, drove a scooter to a city to look for a target to rob. At around 4 a.m., the two drove past the public restroom in the Gaokantou community of Gucheng Street, saw the victim Hou walking alone, and developed malicious intent. They approached Hou, pushed him to the ground, and despite Hou's resistance, they beat and threatened him, stealing a handbag and a white Gionee phone from him before fleeing the scene by vehicle. Later, they found 30 yuan in cash in the stolen handbag and discarded the bag. On June 11, 2014, the defendant Chen was captured by the police in Hengfeng Street, Wenling City; on the night of June 13, 2014, the defendant Zhang was captured by the police in a district of a city. After apprehension, both defendants truthfully confessed their crimes. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Chen and Zhang during the court trial and were corroborated by evidence such as the victim Hou's testimony, search records and photos, lists and photos of seized and returned items, on-site inspection records and photos, identification records, the process of apprehension, and household registration certificates. The facts of this case are clear and sufficient to be established.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district of a certain city charges that between April and May 2016, the defendants Tu, Du, and Ji conspired and organized gambling gatherings approximately 10 times in locations such as Room 801, Unit 2, Building 30, Fudi Youyicheng Community, Qiao Street, a nameless card room in the same community, and Qiao Hotel card room, all situated in a certain district of a certain city. The gatherings involved playing cards in the form of "Little Nine" for cash, from which they drew a profit of over 73,000 RMB. During this period, the defendant Huang was responsible for collecting the rake at the gambling venues, participated in 5 gambling sessions, and was involved in rake profits amounting to over 41,000 RMB. The evidence used for the accusation includes witness testimonies; documentary evidence such as household registration certificates and explanatory notes; identification records; and the confessions and defenses of the defendants.


Upon examination, it was found that on the night of May 12, 2013, the defendants Yang and Li Nan, Li Wei, Sun Kai, Gao, and Wang (all five have been sentenced) had a dispute over the phone and agreed to meet for a fight at the crossroads of a certain village in a certain county. Yang then gathered the defendant Li and, along with Zhou, Kou Zhuang, and Lü A (all three have been sentenced), engaged in an armed fight with Li Nan, Li Wei, Sun Kai, Gao, Wang, and others at the western end of the crossroads in the west village of a certain township. The fight resulted in minor injuries to Yang and slight injuries to Kou Zhuang, Li Wei, and Li Nan. On October 25, 2013, both parties reached a compensation agreement. These criminal facts were undisputed by the defendants Yang and Li during the trial and were corroborated by evidence including household registration certificates, a report from the county police department, the process of apprehension by the Shangqiu City Public Security Bureau, site photographs, a statement from the county police department, witness testimony from Wang, a forensic medical assessment report on bodily injuries, confessions and defenses from co-defendants Li Nan, Li Wei, Sun Kai, Kou Zhuang, Zhou, Gao, Wang A, Lü B, Feng Kai, and agreement documents and receipts, which are sufficient for the conviction.


The People’s Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges: On October 8, 2013, at around 12 p.m., defendants Zhou and Wu, at the entrance of the north gate of the Fukang grocery hall on Hanzhong Street in a certain district of this city, committed theft by having defendant Zhou drive an electric scooter as backup while defendant Wu executed the theft. Taking advantage of the victim Gao’s unguarded moment, they stole a black plastic bag placed on the footrest of the scooter. The plastic bag contained 10 packs of Huang cigarettes and 2 packs of Su cigarettes. The stolen goods have been sold off, and the proceeds squandered. After receiving the report, the public security bureau investigated and arrested the two defendants on October 12, 2013. Appraisal and evaluation determined the cigarettes were valued at 2,100 RMB. During the investigation, the relatives of the two defendants voluntarily compensated the victim for all economic losses. The above-mentioned facts are uncontested by defendants Zhou and Wu during the trial, supported by the victim's testimony; materials from the public security bureau outlining the process of arrest and case resolution; criminal forensic photographs showing the defendants identifying the theft scene; invoices and receipts for the cigarettes provided by the victim; a price appraisal opinion issued by the Price Verification Branch of the District Bureau of Commodity Pricing of a certain district in a certain city; the criminal judgment document from the People’s Court of a certain district in a certain province (2008) ×× Criminal First Instance No. ××; as well as the confessions and defenses provided by defendants Zhou and Wu. This evidence is sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged: From 2011 to December 2012, the defendants Han, Zhu, Gu, and Yin jointly invested to establish the "Yi River Sand Field." After obtaining approval from the city's Bureau of Land and Resources and the river management department, they carried out sand mining activities within the Yi River riverbed between the Caoqiao Town 323 Provincial Road Yi River Bridge and the highway bridge. The mining license for the sand field expired on December 22, 2012. From January to November 2013, without a mining license, the defendants Han, Zhu, Gu, and Yin continued to instruct sand ship owners such as Hao to conduct sand mining activities within this river channel. According to an appraisal by the Jiangsu Institute of Geological Survey, the volume of the sand piles on site was 5,162.2 cubic meters. According to an appraisal by a certain city's Price Certification Center, the value of the sand on site was RMB 193,261. Defendants Han, Zhu, and Gu were respectively criminally detained by the city's Public Security Bureau on February 24, 2014, released on bail on March 18, 2014, criminally detained again on April 23, 2014, arrested with the approval of the city's People's Procuratorate on May 15, 2014, and arrested by the city’s Public Security Bureau the next day. Defendant Yin voluntarily surrendered to the city’s Public Security Bureau on March 11, 2014, was released on bail on the same day, criminally detained on April 23, 2014, and arrested with the approval of the city's People’s Procuratorate on May 15, 2014, and arrested by the city's Public Security Bureau the next day. The above facts were not disputed by the four defendants during the trial and were confirmed by evidence such as the documentation provided by the city's Public Security Bureau regarding the case breakthrough and the defendants coming to the case, household registration certificates, appraisal reports by the Jiangsu Provincial Department of Land and Resources, and the Jiangsu Institute of Geological Survey, sufficient for recognition.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges: On the evening of April 25, 2013, defendants Li and Zhang went to the southern section of Jianshe Road in a certain city, in front of the "Yajumingdenghui" lighting store, south of the "Galaxy Gas Station," and stole a King brand electric tricycle that victim Zhao had parked unlocked in front of the store. According to the appraisal, the stolen electric tricycle was valued at 2,590 yuan. The evidence supporting the above facts includes the confessions and defenses of the defendants, the statements of the victim, the appraisal opinion, documentary evidence, etc. The actions of Li and Zhang should be pursued for criminal responsibility as crime X, and both are identified as principal offenders, both with mitigating circumstances of voluntary surrender, and it is requested to impose a sentence according to law. It has also been found: During the period of compulsory drug rehabilitation, defendants Li and Zhang truthfully confessed facts about theft crimes that the judicial authorities had not yet known. The above facts were also undisputed by defendants Li and Zhang during the court trial, and were corroborated by evidence such as the statement of victim Zhao, the electric vehicle sales receipt, the price appraisal opinion letter, the appraisal opinion notification, records of police reports, basic population information inquiry, the process of being brought to justice, report materials, proof of inquiry into previous offenses, and the criminal judgment, which are sufficient for establishment.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain region charges that on September 24, 2015, at around 16:30, the defendant Liang, along with Wang, near the Jinshangcheng area of a certain city, under the guise of card swiping for cash, took advantage of the victim's moment of withdrawing money to cancel the POS machine transaction, thereby defrauding 18,800 yuan. On the same day, around 19:30, the defendant Liang, together with Wang, using the same method near the Minsheng Square in the Dongsheng District of a certain city, defrauded victim Zhang of 38,690 yuan in cash. In summary, the defendant Liang, in collaboration with Wang, committed two frauds totaling 57,490 yuan. The prosecution has submitted evidence to confirm this, including residence registration proof, resident population information, a list of evidence received, identification records and photos, UnionPay business transaction vouchers, the criminal judgment No. 149 (2016) Chudi 0302 Criminal First, the criminal ruling No. 234 (2016) Chudi 03 Criminal Final, receipts and letters of understanding, investigation reports, statements from the victims, reporting materials, the defendants' confessions and defenses, as well as synchronized audio and video recordings.


The prosecution charged: At around 1 a.m. on June 13, 2014, defendants Li and Fan, along with friends, arrived at a hotel in a certain district of this city with the intention of checking in. The hotel receptionist, Guang, stated that an ID card was necessary to process the check-in. Dissatisfied with Guang's response, Li picked up items from the hotel's front desk, such as the telephone, money counter, and computer monitor, and threw them at Guang. Li also attempted to climb over the front desk to assault Guang, but was restrained by Fan and friends. Subsequently, they left the hotel, and Guang called the police. Upon receiving the report, the police arrived at the hotel and found Li and Fan nearby. The police identified themselves and asked the two to cooperate for an investigation at the police station, but they refused. At the hotel entrance, inside the police car, and at the police station, Li kicked law enforcement officers Dai and Gu and attempted to strangle officer Yang with his arm. Fan struck officer Gao on the face and ear with his hand and bag, and hit officer Gu on the head with a phone. Thereafter, defendants Li and Fan were apprehended by the police. After being taken into custody, both defendants truthfully confessed to the aforementioned facts. Following the incident, defendants Li and Fan compensated the hotel for related economic losses, and the hotel issued a written statement of understanding, expressing forgiveness for their actions. The facts mentioned above were not contested by the two defendants during the trial. The evidence is supported by testimonies from witnesses Hu, Guang, Gao, Gu, Cao, Dai, Liu, Yu, Hu, Ding A, and Ding B; the case registration form; identification records; Li's previous conviction materials; the comprehensive information sheet for released prisoners; the medical records of Guang, Gao, and Tao; copies of police officer certificates; receipts and a letter of understanding issued by the Ared Hotel; the defendants' recorded identifications of the crime scene; photos; site location maps; video materials; and evidence provided by the police on the process of apprehension, inquiry proof, and household registration information. This is sufficient to establish the case.


The prosecution alleges that from around 2:00 AM to 8:00 AM on December 5, 2019, the defendants Yang and Ding were together at Haidilao Hot Pot, where they ate and drank alcohol. Despite knowing that Yang had consumed alcohol, Ding still handed over his car, a small sedan with the license plate number Su C×××××, to Yang to drive, while Ding sat in the passenger seat. Later, as Yang drove the car on the road around the city from west to east, reaching the intersection of Fuxing North Road and the Ring Road, he was stopped by on-duty police officers. According to the evidence appraisal by the Traffic Police Brigade of Xuzhou Public Security Bureau, ethanol was detected in the venous blood of defendant Yang, with a concentration of 124.0 mg/100 ml of blood. After the incident, defendant Yang was apprehended by the public security authorities. Defendant Ding was summoned orally by the public security authorities and truthfully confessed the criminal facts. The defendants Yang and Ding did not object to the aforementioned facts during the trial, backed by the testimonies of witnesses Zhang and Liang; the driver’s breath alcohol content test record and result sheet; blood sample extraction registration form, blood sample photos, and the examination report issued by the evidence appraisal room of the Traffic Police Brigade of the Xuzhou Public Security Bureau; photocopies of the motor vehicle driving license and vehicle registration certificate as well as related query result sheets; dining receipts; audiovisual materials of the scene of apprehension, blood sample collection, and the defendants’ dining and drinking at Haidilao; case registration form, circumstances of apprehension, case solution report, explanation, and household registration certificate, etc. These pieces of evidence are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charged that on the afternoon of June 22, 2016, defendants He and Yang, after prior consultation, took advantage of a moment when no one was present to steal 3,000 yuan in cash from a suitcase belonging to Liu, who shared the same dormitory at "Shaoxing Zhentuo Textile Co., Ltd." in the Binhai Industrial Zone of a certain district in a certain city. After the incident, defendants He and Yang returned the 3,000 yuan in cash to Liu. Further investigation revealed that after being brought to justice, defendants He and Yang truthfully confessed to the aforementioned facts. The facts mentioned above were not disputed by defendants He and Yang during the court trial. The facts are corroborated by evidence, including photos of the stolen money, lists of seized and returned items, records of the capture process, testimony from Yang A, statements from Liu, and identification records from He and Yang, which are sufficient for confirmation.


The prosecution agency charges that at approximately 9 PM on August 7, 2016, defendants Yang and Long conspired and went to a construction site near "Guojing Mingpin Furniture City" on Lanjiang Street in this city. They entered the construction site using methods such as climbing over walls and staircases, and reached the sixth floor pipeline well of the site, where they cut two cables. Then, they proceeded to the twelfth floor pipeline well, cut the same two cables, and extracted the copper wires, stealing a total of 40 meters of cable valued at RMB 5343.2. On August 15, 2016, defendants Yang and Long were apprehended by the city police officers. After the crime, Long's family compensated the victim, Han, for economic losses amounting to RMB 9300 and obtained Han's understanding. During the trial, defendants Yang and Long did not object to the above facts. The evidence, including documentary photographs, "arrest process" documents, personal information, criminal reconciliation agreement, receipts, victim Han's statements, price appraisal report, recognition transcript and photographs, sufficiently corroborates the facts.


After trial, it was found that defendant Zhang, on June 23, 2017, and August 7, 2017, respectively, used his WeChat account named "An" to create two WeChat groups: "High-Quality Players of Play Two Circles Official" and "New 200-Year Good Friends." He organized individuals in these two groups to gamble using the "Play Two Circles" mobile Mahjong software, collecting a rake of 5 yuan and 10 yuan per game from the two groups respectively. As of November 20, 2017, the total rake amounted to 180,885 yuan. Starting from September 13, 2017, because defendant Zhang was interviewed by his supervisor, the management of the aforementioned WeChat gambling groups was taken over by defendant Jiang, while defendant Zhang assisted in maintaining group order, enlivening the atmosphere, and occasionally collecting room fees. As of November 20, 2017, the total rake amounted to 91,150 yuan. After the incident, defendants Zhang and Jiang truthfully confessed and returned the entire illegal income of 180,885 yuan. These facts were not contested by defendants Zhang and Jiang during the trial, and are corroborated by witness testimonies from Zhang, Han, and others; basic population information, case registration forms, seizure records, extraction records, statement descriptions extracted by the Xinghua Municipal Public Security Bureau; photographic electronic data by the Xinghua Municipal Public Security Bureau, and other documentary evidence, which are sufficient to establish these facts.


The People’s Procuratorate of a High-Tech Industrial Development Zone in a certain region charged: On January 12, 2015, at around 17:00, defendants Ci and Li went to the basement storage room of 9 households in Shenghua Garden Community, located in the High-Tech Industrial Development Zone of a certain region in a certain province. Using technical means to pry open the door, they stole 24 bottles of 53-degree Moutai liquor, 12 bottles of 43-degree and 38-degree Moutai liquor, 6 bottles of 52-degree Wuliangye liquor, 12 bottles of 39-degree Wuliangye liquor, and two police uniform shirts from victim Xu. The stolen liquor was appraised to be worth RMB 48,006. For the above charges, the prosecution suggested conviction and punishment based on the relevant article of the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China. It was also found that after the incident, the family of defendant Li compensated the victim for economic losses totaling RMB 30,000, and the victim expressed that he would no longer pursue compensation responsibility from defendant Li and requested leniency in punishment for him. Further investigation revealed that on July 10, 2011, defendant Ci was subjected to 15 days of administrative detention by the Weicheng Branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city for theft; and on September 23, 2013, defendant Ci was subjected to 15 days of administrative detention by the Kuiwen Branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city for theft and fined RMB 500. The above facts were undisputed by defendants Ci and Li during the court trial, and are substantiated by evidence such as a motorcycle, screwdriver, T-shaped cone, and police uniform shirt photos, documentary evidence of the arrest process, investigation and case-solving process, crime scene screenshots, search warrant, seizure decision book, seizure list, basic information of permanent residents, phone inquiry records, public security administrative penalty decision book, case handling explanations, letter of understanding, statement of victim Xu, witness testimony, appraisal opinion on the value of the involved items, on-site inspection records, search records, seizure records, identification records, and confessions of defendants Ci and Li, which are sufficient to establish the charges.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges: From April 11, 2014, to May 1, 2014, the defendant Zhang operated a casino using "Tongbao" for gambling purposes in the back mountain of a new village in a certain city. The defendant Zhang invested 5,000 yuan to host and gamble with participants. During the casino's operation, the defendant Zhang hired the defendant Guan and Liao Moujia (separately processed) to transport customers to the mountain casino. The defendant Zhang gained a profit of 5,300 yuan during the casino's operation, and the defendant Guan gained 2,200 yuan from the casino. After the incident, the defendants Zhang and Guan voluntarily turned themselves in to the public security authorities on August 29, 2014, and May 25, 2014, respectively. The public security authorities lawfully seized illicit money of 5,300 yuan from the defendant Zhang and 2,200 yuan from the defendant Guan, which was not transferred with the case. The aforementioned facts are acknowledged by defendants Zhang and Guan during the trial process, and are confirmed by the following evidence provided by the public prosecution agency and verified by the court for legality, authenticity, and relevance, which this court confirms: 1. Testimonies from witnesses Song, Liu, Feng, Xu, Fan, Ye, Deng, Pan, and others; 2. Documentary evidence such as basic information of personnel, the process of bringing into custody, statements, and inquiry forms on the history of illegal activities and crimes; 3. Inspection records, seizure decision, seizure records, evidence preservation decision, inventory of seized items, and administrative penalty decision; 4. Identification records, identification scene records, and photographs; 5. Testimony of Liao Moujia, an accomplice in the same case; 6. Confessions of defendants Zhang and Guan. The facts of this case are clear, and the evidence is indeed sufficient to reach a verdict.