The People's Procuratorate of Keqiao District in a certain city charged that from March 2015 to May 4, 2016, the defendants Wang and Li, after prior discussion, placed a Fire Butterfly brand gaming machine in a small shop operated by Wang next to the "Yongjin Church" in Keyan Street, Keqiao District, a certain city, to attract people for gambling. By the time it was discovered by the public security authorities on May 4, 2016, they had gained illegal profits totaling over 6,400 yuan, and the gaming machine involved in the case was seized. According to the appraisal, the gaming machine involved in the case was a gambling machine. It was also found that when the public security authorities uncovered the case, they additionally seized 400 yuan of illegal gains on the spot. After the incident, Wang and Li each returned 3,000 yuan in cash to the public security authorities. After being arrested, both defendants truthfully confessed to the above facts. During the court proceedings, the defendants Wang and Li did not dispute the aforementioned facts, which were further substantiated by evidence, including photos of the gaming machine involved, the seizure decision, seizure list, cash payment slips, accounts of the arrest process by police officers from the former Keqiao District Public Security Bureau and Yuecheng District Branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city, as well as the testimonies and identification records of Chen and Tang, and the identification opinion of electronic gaming facilities and equipment, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


Upon review, it was found: On the evening of July 29, 2013, at around 9 PM, defendant Zhu and others were dining with the victim Zheng and others at Junhai Barbecue Restaurant, located on the south side of Peace Hotel in Dianbu Town, a certain county. During their meal, due to a trivial matter, defendant Zhu developed a dislike for Zheng and called Liu, requesting him to bring others to teach Zheng a lesson. Subsequently, defendant Liu and others arrived at Zhao's barbecue stall and assaulted Zheng and others who were eating. On August 2, 2013, the victim Zheng was diagnosed with traumatic spleen rupture at Hefei Second People's Hospital and later underwent surgery to have the spleen removed. According to the forensic assessment from a certain county, Zheng's injuries were classified as second-degree serious injury. It was further found that on March 31, 2014, Liu voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed his criminal acts. After the incident, both defendants compensated the victim with 230,000 yuan for economic losses and obtained the victim's forgiveness. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants during the trial proceedings. Additionally, the victim's statement, witness testimonies, forensic assessment of the degree of human injuries, the process of bringing the defendants to justice, the compensation and forgiveness agreement, and household registration certificates serve as evidence, sufficient to establish the facts.


Upon trial, it was established that starting from July 22, 2015, defendants Qiao and Ruan, under the instruction of Zhang, the manager of Lihui Tiantong Company (handled in another case), demanded repayment of debts from victim Li Mouyi by following him closely for 24 hours and moved into Li Mouyi's residence at Room 705, Building B18, Yahuju, Kaiyin Xincheng, Torch Development Zone, a certain city. On the evening of September 6 of the same year, due to Li Mouyi's prolonged failure to repay, Qiao informed Li Mouyi he was not allowed to leave for three days and proceeded to assault him, confiscating his cellphone and keys. During this period, Ruan was present with Qiao and Li Mouyi in the aforementioned Room 705. Subsequently, Li Mouyi secretly threw several SOS notes from his room's window downstairs. On the morning of September 8, taking advantage of Qiao and Ruan being asleep, Li Mouyi managed to escape and requested assistance from the community security to call the police. Shortly afterward, the police apprehended Qiao and Ruan in the said Room 705. The aforementioned facts were uncontested by defendants Qiao and Ruan during the trial, and corroborated by confessions and identification records from Qiao and Ruan, statements and identification records from victim Li Mouyi, witness testimonies and identification records from Zhang, Hu, Mo, Li Moujia, Wang Moujia, Wei, Xie Moujia, Hao, Wang Mouyi, Xie Mouyi, and Chen, site inspection records and photographs, arrest process, evidence acceptance lists, notes, WeChat chat screenshots, repayment receipts, inventory of seized items, and agreements, injury photos, call and message records, bank statements, household registration information, administrative penalty decision (Shangong Xingfa Juezi [2013] No. 10487), letter of understanding, case handling explanation, and mobile phone recordings, providing ample evidence for conviction.


The prosecution alleges that Liang and Yu repeatedly stole others' mountain bikes from the second-floor parking area at a certain location on Pingshan Street, Pingshan New District: 1. One day in May 2013, Liang and Yu stole a "SUMMA" brand mountain bike belonging to Liang, which was parked there. The mountain bike involved in the case was appraised at a value of 810 RMB. 2. One day in August 2013, Liang and Yu stole a "ONOX" brand mountain bike and a white mountain bike belonging to Liu Taoli, which were parked there. The "ONOX" brand mountain bike involved in the case was appraised at a value of 630 RMB. 3. On February 21, 2014, Liang and Yu stole a "OSIMA" brand mountain bike belonging to Yang Cai, and a red and white framed mountain bike belonging to Chen Mei, which were parked there. The "OSIMA" brand mountain bike involved in the case was appraised at a value of 680 RMB. On March 24, 2014, Yu voluntarily confessed to the crime of stealing others' bicycles with Liang when being questioned due to suspicious behavior. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Liang and Yu during the court hearing and are confirmed by physical evidence, documentary evidence, witness testimony, victim statements, defendant confessions and defenses, appraisal opinions, investigation, inspection, identification, and investigation experiment records, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


In September 2015, the People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that the defendant, Tian, harbored resentment upon hearing that the victim, Hu, had reported violations regarding his contracted project and thus planned revenge. He called and instructed the defendant, Liu, to vandalize the silver-gray Range Rover with the license plate number starting with "E" driven by Hu. In the early hours of September 21 of the same year, at 1 a.m., Liu spotted the vehicle in front of the "Asia Hotel" in a town in the county. He then rode a motorcycle and led "Ha'er" (a nickname, identity unknown) to smash multiple parts of Hu's Range Rover with a machete, including the two front headlights and the windshield. According to the local pricing department's appraisal, the car sustained damages worth 39,460 yuan. On January 12, 2016, the defendant, Tian, voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities. The prosecution presented evidence to the court in the form of eight physical evidence photos, documentary evidence of compensation for the victim's losses, the household registration information of the two defendants, a description of their arrest, an on-site inspection report, a pricing appraisal opinion, audiovisual material on a disc, witness testimony from a witness named Huang, a statement from the victim, Hu, and the confessions and defenses of the defendants, Liu and Tian.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: In the early morning of May 28, 2014, Shi, because his girlfriend Xiao did not return while singing at Candy Tree KTV on Dongfeng Road, Daye City, with Hou Jia, Hou Wu, Hou Ding, and others, asked defendants Liu and Feng and others to rush to the location to find his girlfriend. Shi argued with the others on the grounds that Hou Ding, Hou Wu, and others made his girlfriend sing too late, which led to a quarrel and eventually a mutual fight. Defendant Feng punched and kicked Hou Ding and Hou Wu, while defendant Liu injured Hou Wu and Hou Ding with a machete. According to the forensic appraisal, Hou Ding suffered a Grade 1 minor injury, and Hou Wu suffered a Grade 2 minor injury. After the incident, defendant Liu voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed his criminal acts; defendants Liu and Feng jointly compensated the victim Hou Ding for economic losses of 128,000 yuan, and defendant Feng compensated Hou Wu for economic losses of 20,000 yuan, obtaining the victims' understanding.


The prosecution alleges: At around 19:00 on May 12, 2014, defendants Mo and Peng went to the entrance of the China Merchants Bank on Wenxin Five Road in the Coastal City area of Nanshan District, a certain city. Seeing that a Simplon-brand mountain bike belonging to the victim, Ma, was parked there, Peng served as a lookout and support while Mo went forward and used pliers to cut the bike lock to steal the bike. The two were captured as they were preparing to flee the scene on the bicycle. The aforementioned bicycle and the tools used in the crime were seized on the spot. According to an appraisal, the stolen bicycle was valued at 5,855 RMB. The prosecution submitted Sentencing Recommendation No. 1188 (2014) from the Shenzhen Southern Procuratorate to the court, suggesting that defendant Peng, classified as a repeat offender, be sentenced to nine months to one year in prison and fined; for defendant Mo, a sentence of less than eleven months in prison or detention was suggested, along with a fine. The facts of the crime alleged by the prosecution were not refuted by defendants Mo and Peng during the court hearing, and were supported by the statements of the victim Ma; testimonies of witnesses Wen and Huang; photos of the bicycle and pliers involved, the seizure order, inventory of seized items, return receipt, arrest proceedings, recovery of stolen goods, explanation of prior offenses, defendants' identification information, criminal judgment, and proof of release after serving a sentence; price appraisal opinion; site investigation records and photographs; identification records involving Wen X, Huang A, Mo, and Peng; and the confessions and defenses of defendants Mo and Peng, all of which were verified as true evidence, sufficient to establish guilt.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charged that at approximately 11:00 PM on September 1, 2013, defendants Wang and Qiu, along with Cheng and Zheng (both of whom have been sentenced) and others, after drinking alcohol, caused disturbances without reason to Zhao and Shen near the east gate of Mengshan Shopping Mall in Jiaxiang County. They were later driven away by patrolling police officers. After the police left, defendants Wang and Qiu, under the rallying of Cheng A, returned and assaulted Zhao and Shen. During the assault, Zheng injured Zhao's head with a brick. Forensic examination determined that Zhao's epidural hematoma on the left occipital region was categorized as minor injury level one, and the skull fracture as minor injury level two. After the incident, defendants Wang and Qiu compensated the victim Zhao for economic losses. These facts were undisputed by defendants Wang and Qiu during the trial and were substantiated by documentary evidence such as settlement agr


The prosecution alleges that at around 8:00 PM on September 1, 2014, defendants Tan and Luo went to the entrance of China Minsheng Bank at No. 1 Anji Avenue, Xixiangtang District, in a certain city, and sold a small package of K powder (net weight 0.4 grams) to Lin for 300 yuan, where they were caught on the spot by public security personnel. Upon assessment, the said drug was confirmed to be ketamine. The prosecution has provided corresponding evidence to support this accusation, and believes that defendants Tan and Luo sold 0.4 grams of ketamine, and their actions have violated article x, clause four of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China. The criminal facts are clear, the evidence is sufficient, and both defendants should be held criminally responsible for x crime. Defendants Tan and Luo have no objections to the criminal facts and charges in the indictment. The defense argues that defendant Luo has a good attitude towards admitting guilt, sold a small amount of drugs, is a minor participant, and poses minimal social harm, recommending a lenient sentence. Upon examination, it was found that at around 8:00 PM on September 1, 2014, defendants Tan and Luo went to the entrance of China Minsheng Bank at No. 1 Anji Avenue, Xixiangtang District, in a certain city, and sold a small package of ketamine (commonly known as "K powder"), with a net weight of 0.4 grams, to Lin for 300 yuan. After the transaction was completed, the three of them were caught on the spot by public security personnel. The police seized 300 yuan of drug money from Tan and a small package of ketamine (net weight 0.4 grams) from Lin. These facts, which defendants Tan and Luo also do not dispute during the court hearing, along with the criminal case registry, details of arrest, household registration proof, list of seized items, testimony from witness Lin, confessions and defenses of defendants Tan and Luo, drug testing and identification report, photos of drug weighing, site identification record and photos, extraction record, and other evidence, are sufficient to ascertain.


Upon trial, it was found that on April 3, 2015, Zheng was lured by "Xiao Wu" (handled in a separate case) under the pretense of job introduction to a pyramid scheme den located in Room D601, Building A, Jinxia Huayuan, a town in Nan'an City. Zheng was unlawfully detained there, with defendants Zhou, Qiu, Yang, and Li responsible for guarding him until the police uncovered the den on April 19, 2015, and rescued Zheng. Among the defendants, Lu acted as the caretaker, responsible for arranging meals and accommodation within the pyramid scheme den, keeping keys and mobile phones, and monitoring communications. Zhou, arranged by "Director Li" (handled in a separate case), was assigned as Zheng's mentor, fully responsible for his custody. Defendants Qiu, Yang, and Li were responsible for guarding Zheng in Zhou's absence. After the incident, the police lawfully seized a key from defendant Lu. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Lu, Zhou, Qiu, Yang, and Li during the court hearing and were confirmed by the statements of victim Zheng, witness testimonies from Yu, Pan, Wu, and Zhang, identification records and photos, seizure lists, household registration certificates, and the account of the apprehension, all constituting sufficient evidence for conviction.


According to the prosecution, at approximately 11 p.m. on October 30, 2014, the defendants Lan and He, along with Chen, were apprehended on the spot by the public security authorities while conducting a drug transaction in room 203 of the Gongxiao Hotel, Yulin City. The prosecution has provided corresponding evidence to prove the criminal facts charged in the indictment.


The prosecution alleges: 1. At around 3 a.m. on September 19, 2014, the defendant Yu, in collaboration with others, stole a white Kymco brand Fengli 110 scooter belonging to the victim, Liu Jia, from the entrance of Causeway Bay KTV on Huaihai Road in a certain city. The stolen scooter was appraised at a value of 4,070 RMB. 2. On November 14, 2014, the defendant Yu, along with the defendant Yao, went to the entrance of the Hengyue Hotel on Dama Road in a certain city. Using means of having the defendant Yao act as a lookout, the defendant Yu executed the theft and stole a white Yamaha ZY125T-6 scooter belonging to the victim, Liu Yi. The stolen scooter was appraised at a value of 7,020 RMB. On November 14, 2014, the defendants Yu and Yao were apprehended by the police and brought to justice.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: In May 2013, the defendants Li, Wang, Wu, Zheng, and others, without the knowledge of the village committee and villagers of a certain village in a certain town of Xichuan County, sold 1.9 acres of land intended for the construction of the village office to developer Wang for 530,000 yuan to build houses. On January 25, 2016, the defendants Li, Wang, Wu, Zheng, and others turned themselves in to the public security authorities. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Li, Wang, Wu, Zheng during the court trial, and were corroborated by testimonies from witnesses Fan, Wang, and others, as well as documentary evidence such as the land transfer agreement, account of surrender, and household registration certificates, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution charges: 1. In the early morning of December 12, 2013, the defendants Wu and Wang went to a village in a certain town of a certain city and stole a silver-white Supaiqi electric tricycle belonging to the victim Yu. Subsequently, defendant Wu sold it to Chen for 1,450 yuan. According to a price appraisal, the value of the electric tricycle at the time of theft was 2,660 yuan. 2. In the early morning of December 18, 2013, the defendants Wu and Wang went to a village in a certain town of a certain city and stole four electric vehicles belonging to the victim Liang, namely one Daan brand electric tricycle, one Xiaoniao brand electric bicycle, one Huaxun brand electric bicycle, and one Xinri brand electric bicycle. According to a price appraisal, the value of the four electric vehicles at the time of theft was 5,864 yuan. For the criminal facts charged above, the prosecution has provided evidence such as a list of seized items returned, recognition records, price appraisal opinions, household registration certificates, apprehension process explanations, case handling descriptions, witness testimonies, victim statements, and defendant confessions.


The People's Procuratorate in a certain area charges that, at approximately 22:00 on August 23, 2013, the defendants Xu and Du, after conferring, carried out a plan where defendant Xu invited Xu Moumou and his wife, Guo, to dinner. Meanwhile, defendant Du took the opportunity to commit theft at Xu Moumou's home in a certain village of a town in Funing County, stealing 10,600 RMB. After the incident, defendants Xu and Du voluntarily surrendered to the Funing County Public Security Bureau on August 28, 2013, and truthfully confessed their criminal conduct. Defendants Xu and Du have returned the stolen 10,600 RMB. The aforementioned facts are not contested by defendants Xu and Du during the court hearing, and they are corroborated by evidence such as the victim Guo's statement, household registration certificates issued by the Funing County Public Security Bureau, inspection records, receipts, and letters of understanding, which are sufficient to establish the case.


The prosecution agency charges: In the early morning of March 15, 2016, defendants Han and Huang, after prior consultation, took a van driven by defendant Han (bearing a fake license plate) to a construction site at Jingrui Wangfu in a certain town of a certain district in a certain city. They climbed the fence to enter the site and used tools they had brought to saw off the cables placed on the site. They stole 35 meters of cable with a specification of 70 square millimeters, 120 meters of cable with a specification of 35 square millimeters, and 20 meters of cable with a specification of 4 square millimeters. The two defendants also broke the wall panels of a temporary warehouse on site and stole 1 welding machine, 1 cutting machine, and 5 electric hammers from the warehouse (all the aforementioned stolen items are valued at 11,330.5 yuan). Afterwards, they loaded the items and fled the scene. The next day, the two defendants stripped the stolen cables and sold them near Century Avenue in Jiangdong District of a certain city to a person named He, obtaining more than 8,000 yuan in illicit gains. On April 24 of the same year, defendant Han was arrested by the police at a temporary residence located at No. 8 Lao Xia's house in a certain village of a certain town in a certain district in a certain city. On the same day, defendant Huang was arrested by the police at a temporary residence in a certain village of a certain town in a certain district in a certain city. The stolen welding machine and cutting machine have been recovered and returned to the victim. The two defendants additionally compensated the victim 12,000 yuan. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Han and Huang during the court trial, and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses He and Ming, identification records and photos, cable invoices, delivery lists, extraction records and photos, seizure orders and lists, site identification records and photos, return lists, receipts, surveillance checkpoint platform photos, on-site inspection records, price appraisal report, arrest process, the defendants’ household registration certificates, and other evidence, which are sufficient to confirm these facts.


The prosecution alleges: Between September and November 17, 2014, the defendants Liu and Yang, in their shared rented apartment at No. 175, Room 20, Building 1, Xinghe Garden Community, Development Zone of a certain city, accommodated Ma on three occasions to use methamphetamine. In early November 2014, the defendant Liu, at his temporary residence at No. 175, Room 20, Building 1, Xinghe Garden Community, Development Zone of a certain city, allowed Ma and others to use methamphetamine. On November 19, 2014, the defendant Liu was arrested by the police at No. 175, Room 20, Building 1, Xinghe Garden Community. On the same day, the defendant Yang was arrested by the police at the Yuxiang Internet Cafe in the Development Zone of the same city. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Liu and Yang during the trial process, and are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Ma, Chen, and Lai, inspection and identification records, the rental agreement, administrative penalty decision, on-site test report opinion, and the record of the case, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


Upon examination of the facts, it was found that:

1. In late March 2014, defendant Li used the identity card of "Yang" to check into room 8203 at the Long An Ju Hotel in a certain district of a city, allowing defendant Fan to consume methamphetamine.

2. In the early hours of April 13, 2014, defendant Li used the identity card of "Li A" to check into the De'er Hotel in Wuyi County, allowing defendant Fan to consume methamphetamine.

3. On the evening of April 13, 2014, defendant Li used the identity card of "Li A" to check into the New Tianhe Grand Hotel in a certain city, had defendant Fan purchase methamphetamine worth 200 yuan, and allowed defendants Fan and Qiu B to consume methamphetamine.

4. In late March and early April 2014, defendant Fan twice parked the Toyota Corolla car with plate number ga0958, which he rented, on the south side of Binjiang Road in a certain district of the city near the city's Eighth Middle School, and allowed defendant Li to consume methamphetamine inside the car.

On April 14, 2014, the public security authorities apprehended defendant Li in room 8309 of the New Tianhe Grand Hotel in a certain district of the city; on the same day, defendant Fan was apprehended in room 302 of the Ruby Hotel in a certain district of the city.

Fresh urine samples from Li, Fan, and Qiu B were collected and tested for drug content, all showing positive for methamphetamine.

These facts are undisputed by defendants Li and Fan during the court hearing, and are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Qiu B, Zhu, Liao, Zhou, Qiu A, Wang, Zhang, and Li A; the on-site test reports and photos; inspection records and photos; identification records and photos; a CD; transcript of administrative coercive measures notifications; decisions and lists of evidence preservation; photos of seized items; receipts and return lists; notifications for retrieving evidence; lists and accommodation registration forms; a car rental contract; a copy of the motor vehicle driver's license; the criminal judgment; release registration forms; administrative penalty decisions; compulsory isolation detoxification decisions; the account of the case; residency information, and other evidence, sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district of a certain city charged that on June 16, 2015, at around 12:00, the defendants Liu and Chen, along with Yang, Chen, and Liu A (all dealt with in separate cases), drove to a certain village on a certain road in a certain district of a certain city. Under the pretense of buying a car and the payment of the guarantee money not being settled, they successively brought Zhang Yi, Wang, Zhang Jia, and Zhang Yi, Wang's van to the vicinity of Beiyuan Community in a certain district. They took the three individuals to a room on the fifteenth floor of an office building and detained them there. During this period, the defendants Liu, Chen, and others repeatedly beat Zhang Yi, Wang, and Zhang Jia, forcing them to repay the debt and the penalty for breach of contract. After Wang paid 20,000 yuan in cash, he was released at 19:00 on the same day. Zhang Jia was released after paying 1,500 yuan at around 23:00 the same day. Zhang Yi was released at around 1:00 the following morning. The injuries of Zhang Jia, Zhang Yi, and Wang were all classified as minor injuries.


The prosecution agency charges that: 1. One early morning in early March 2014, the defendant Yan sneaked into Liu's "Yi Zhi Mei" beauty salon located at No. 10, Four South Ring Road, Bathou Village, Chengdong Street, of a certain city, and stole 275 RMB in cash and 7 packs of Yuan Su brand Yuan Peptide Repair Masks. According to the appraisal by the Price Verification Center of the city, the masks were valued at 154 RMB. 2. In the early morning of March 11, 2014, defendants Yan and He again entered the "Yi Zhi Mei" beauty salon by climbing through a window, and stole 7 packs of Yuan Su brand Yuan Peptide Repair Masks, 2 boxes of Meisu eye cream, 2 boxes of ecological water, 1 box of Ai Si Jiu cleansing foam, and 1 box of Ou Zi Mei Ya Eye Care Babysitter Eye Patches. According to the city’s Price Verification Center, these items were valued at 1167 RMB. 3. In the early morning of March 17, 2014, defendants Yan and He conspired to steal an iPhone 5S from Liu's house. They climbed through a window into Liu's "Yi Zhi Mei" beauty salon. Subsequently, He entered the second-floor bedroom and stole an iPhone 5S and an iPhone 5 from Liu's bedside table, along with two handbags. Finding no valuable items in the bags, they returned them to their original place. The next day, attempting to dispose of the stolen goods, Yan and He tried to reset the iPhone 5S but were unable to do so without the ID password. Defendant He even contacted Liu via text message to try to obtain the ID password. After the incident, the two stolen phones were recovered and returned to the victim, Liu. According to the city’s Price Verification Center, the phones were valued at 5925 RMB. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Yan and He during the trial. The case is corroborated by the victim Liu's statement, residence certificate, list and photos of seized items, list of returned items, photos of text messages, query form from the Vast Information Investigation and Analysis System, capture records, explanatory notes, price appraisal reports, identification records, and site investigation records, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: Between 2016 and 2017, defendants Zhu and Wang, while serving as the investment promotion manager and investment director of the Investment Promotion Department at Jiakai City Group Commercial Asset Management Co., Ltd. in the Tangqi and Pingyao branches, colluded to use their positions, which involved facilitating project investments, for personal gain. They solicited or accepted kickbacks from several shop owners in the projects they managed by promising reduced rent, extending rent-free periods, and other benefits. Among them, defendant Zhu accepted bribes totaling 142,000 RMB from businesses such as "Shangbailao Malatang," "Tianyuan Xiaomaolv," and "Creative Baby." Defendant Wang accepted bribes totaling 130,000 RMB from businesses such as "Xiaozui Le You" and "Han Fu Gong." The evidence supporting these charges includes: witness testimonies; documentary evidence like household registration certificates; and the confessions and defenses of the defendants.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charges that on January 2 and January 4, 2016, the defendants Wang and Zhao committed theft three times in locations such as the back road of the county town and Zhenzhong Street, with the stolen items valued at a total of 13,156 yuan. The details are as follows: 1. On January 2, 2016, at about 18:00, the defendants Wang and Zhao went to the county People's Hospital and stole a beige Edison brand electric tricycle belonging to Li. 2. On January 4, 2016, at about 18:00, the defendants Wang and Zhao went to the Su Yuan Shopping Center on the back road of Zhenzhong Street in the county and stole a yellow Yadea brand electric bicycle belonging to Guo. 3. On January 4, 2016, at about 19:00, the defendants Wang and Zhao went to the entrance of the Lv Ling Fast Food Restaurant on Zhenzhong Street in the county and stole a red Shenghao brand electric tricycle belonging to Zhang. On May 24, 2018, the defendant Zhao compensated the victims Li, Guo, and Zhang with 5,000 yuan, 2,000 yuan, and 5,000 yuan respectively, obtaining their forgiveness. Regarding the above charges, the prosecution has submitted relevant documentary evidence, appraisal opinions, witness testimonies, on-site inspection records, identification records, and the statements and defenses of the defendants.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charges that from February 2010 until the case was uncovered, defendant Yang operated a typing and photocopying shop near the east courtyard of a certain town government. During this period, defendant Yang forged 62 seals from state organs and enterprises, among which were 23 seals of insurance company underwriting business used for forging insurance policies; 12 dedicated seals for road transport management documents and 23 dedicated seals for road transport inspection, used for forging the "People's Republic of China Road Transport Permit"; and 4 seals for state organ business, including the "Shandong Jining Public Security Bureau Traffic Police Detachment Vehicle Management Business Seal (14)," "Dedicated Seal for Vehicle Maintenance Industry Management Office of a County's Transport Bureau," "Yuncheng County Local Taxation Bureau Tax Collection Seal 05," and "Tax Collection Seal 05 of a County's Local Taxation Bureau." In January 2018, the certain freight service company operated by defendant Wu and the Liangshan freight service company were found to have significant transport safety hazards, leading the Transport Management Office of a county's Transport Bureau to revoke their "Road Transport Operation Permit," and the vehicles' "Road Transport Certificate" under the company were also revoked. Between February 28 and June 6, 2018, defendant Wu commissioned defendant Yang to forge 27 "Road Transport Operation Permits" at a price of 80 yuan each for use by the transport vehicles of the aforementioned companies. Defendant Yang made a profit of 1980 yuan from this. On June 8, 2018, defendant Yang was arrested by the police at a certain typing and photocopying shop in a town in a certain county; on September 3 of the same year, defendant Wu was arrested at a logistics park in a town in a certain county. In support of the aforementioned charges, the public prosecution has submitted the following evidence: 1. Documentary evidence: household registration certificates, etc.; 2. Witness testimonies: testimonies from witnesses such as Wu; 3. Defendants' confessions and defenses: confessions and defenses of defendants Yang and Wu; 4. Identification records: identification records of defendant Yang; 5. Audiovisual materials: search recordings, etc.


The prosecution alleges the following criminal acts committed by the defendants Yang and Li:

1. Theft by Yang and Li: From mid to late June to mid-July 2020, the defendants Yang and Li entered the premises of the non-operational Gaokeng Power Plant, located in a certain town within a certain district of a certain city, on three separate nights. They stole approximately 750 pounds of pre-cut scrap iron blocks, which had been prepared by workers of Jiangxi Metal Recycling Co., Ltd., using an electric tricycle to transport the stolen goods out of the premises and then sold them. The proceeds from the sale were used by both defendants to purchase drugs for consumption. The stolen scrap iron blocks were appraised at a value of 675 yuan.

2. Yang's act of providing a location for others to use drugs: From early July to September 2, 2020, defendant Yang provided his rented accommodation in a certain district of a certain city for others to use drugs on seven different occasions, allowing an individual named Tang to use drugs and, on one occasion, facilitated and used heroin together with Tang and the defendant Li.

The prosecution has submitted various evidence to support these allegations, including: the case registration form, the decision to file the case, testimonies from witnesses Tang, Cheng, and Zhang, statements from the victims Wu and Tu, identification records and photos, on-site identification records and photos, the seizure decision book, the seizure list and photos of seized items, the return list (another person's electric tricycle), the conclusion of the price assessment by Ping of the certain city and district Price Authentication Center, number [2020] 101, extraction records and photos, housing notification slip, administrative penalty decisions (related to Tang and Cheng), an explanation of the case, the permanent resident registration form, and the confessions and defenses of the defendants Yang and Li.


Upon examination, it has been found that on September 10, September 14, and October 13 of 2014, the defendants Yin and Lin consecutively allowed drug users, including He Mosheng, to gather at Room 303 of an apartment building behind the Minghua Supermarket in a village in a certain town of a certain city, to consume the drug methamphetamine by "boiling pork." It has also been found that after coercive measures were taken against the defendant Yin, he proactively confessed to criminal facts not yet known to the judicial authorities, thus regarded as turning himself in, and assisted the public security organs in arresting other criminal suspects, demonstrating meritorious behavior. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Yin and Lin during the court trial and are substantiated by evidence including confessions from defendants Lin and Yin, as well as their identification of the crime scene photos provided by the prosecution and verified in court, testimonies from witnesses Xiong and He, on-site investigation records, diagrams and photos, identification records and photos of defendants Yin and Lin by witnesses Xiong and He, mutual identification records and photos of defendants Yin and Lin, crime scene photos identified by witness He, on-site test reports, site inspection records, administrative penalty decisions, statements, case-solving reports, receipts, arrest details, and the defendants' household registration documents, which are sufficient to confirm the facts.


The people's procuratorate of a certain county charged: At around 21:00 on August 7, 2019, Wu and Xiao were having dinner and drinking alcohol at a farmhouse restaurant in a certain village in Liu Hu Di Town, a certain county. At around midnight the following day, car owner Xiao stated that he had poor vision for night driving, so he instructed Wu, who had been drinking, to drive the small ordinary passenger vehicle with license plate number Xin ACM9** carrying Xiao and Li, another person who had been drinking, out of the farmhouse restaurant. They drove westward along Liu Hu Di Town and were intercepted by patrolling police officers at the entrance road segment of Liu Hu Di Town Post Office. According to the appraisal, the alcohol content in Wu's blood was 194mg/100ml, and the alcohol content in Xiao's blood was 187mg/100ml.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city accuses: 1. One evening in late December 2014, "Heihei" (identity unknown) purchased 5 pills of methamphetamine (commonly known as crystal meth) from the defendant Chen and agreed to trade drugs near Overseas Chinese Community area in a certain town of the city. Later, defendant Chen contacted defendant Lin via phone to purchase 5 pills of methamphetamine for resale, and both parties agreed on a transaction price of 90 RMB per pill. That evening, defendant Lin drove a car to deliver defendant Chen to the area near Overseas Chinese Community in the town. Subsequently, defendant Chen sold the 5 pills totaling approximately 2.6 grams of methamphetamine to "Heihei" for 500 RMB, and returned 450 RMB to defendant Lin. 2. On an evening around January 10, 2015, "Heihei" purchased 5 pills of methamphetamine from defendant Chen, agreeing to trade drugs near Baidu Billiards Hall in Andu Market in a certain town of the city. Later, defendant Chen contacted defendant Lin via phone to purchase 5 pills of methamphetamine for resale, and both parties agreed on a transaction price of 90 RMB per pill. That evening, defendant Lin drove a car to deliver defendant Chen to the area near Baidu Billiards Hall in Andu Market of the town. Subsequently, defendant Chen sold the 5 pills totaling approximately 2.6 grams of methamphetamine to "Heihei". However, defendant Lin and defendant Chen have yet to receive payment for this transaction.


Through the trial, it was ascertained that defendant Xue and defendant Li cohabited together. Starting in 2010, defendant Xue rented a building from the County Government Community Residents' Committee on County Government Street in a town in a certain city to operate a hotel named "Sister Fang Hostel." Defendants Xue and Li jointly managed this hotel. Since running and managing "Sister Fang Hostel," defendants Xue and Li, while knowing that women were engaging in prostitution in the hotel rooms, still allowed prostitutes to conduct prostitution activities in the hotel and charged each man who came for prostitution a "door fee" of 2 yuan. On June 5, 2014, knowing that women such as Huang Hong, Zhou Ping, Qin Xia, and Liao Li were engaging in prostitution in the hotel, defendants Xue and Li still opened rooms for these individuals to carry out prostitution activities. They charged men such as Gan Song, He Jia, Huang Lun, and Yao Lie who came for prostitution a "door fee" of 2 yuan each, allowing the aforementioned individuals to engage in prostitution activities in the hotel. On that day, the police apprehended the individuals involved. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Xue, Li, and their defense during the trial. There are also documentary evidence such as the registration form for accepting the case, household registration certificates, records of the arrest process, transcripts of evidence collection, confiscation lists, accommodation registration cards, business licenses, testimonies from witnesses such as Huang Hong, Zhou Ping, Qin Xia, Liao Li, Qin Lian, Wei Liu, Fu Xiu, Wu Yong, Gan Song, He Jia, Huang Lun, Yao Lie, and Yang, confessions from defendants Xue and Li, site survey records, identification transcripts, photos, and other evidence sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged: Between August 2012 and January 2014, during their tenure at a sub-station of the Animal Epidemic Prevention and Supervision Center under the Veterinary and Aquatic Product Management Bureau of a certain county, defendants Gao, Zhang, Li, and Pu failed to diligently perform their duties of supervision and management. They did not conduct synchronized full-process quarantine and necessary laboratory disease testing on the pig slaughtering process at a certain pig slaughtering point. This negligence allowed individuals like Sun and Wang at the slaughtering point to inject large quantities of toxic and harmful fluids into the pigs during the slaughtering process and then sell the meat, resulting in the sale of toxic and harmful pork valued at over 4.2 million yuan, severely endangering public health. During the trial, defendants Gao, Zhang, Li, and Pu did not dispute the charges brought by the public prosecutor. Defendant Gao's defense counsel agreed with the facts of the crime charged by the public prosecutor, argued that the criminal act was less severe, did not result in serious consequences, and that Gao pled guilty, suggesting that a lenient or reduced punishment could be applied. Defendant Zhang's defense counsel argued that Zhang's dereliction of duty did not cause serious harm, and that Sun should bear full responsibility for the water injection incident at the slaughterhouse. The defense counsel for defendants Pu and Li argued that both were granted leave by their superiors, and after leaving their positions, could no longer fulfill quarantine duties. They asserted that the incident primarily occurred after defendants Pu and Li had left, and thus there was no causal relationship between their actions and the harm caused by negligence, indicating they were not guilty of a crime.

After hearing, it was ascertained that between August 2012 and January 2014, during their tenure at a sub-station of the Animal Epidemic Prevention and Supervision Center under the Veterinary and Aquatic Product Management Bureau of a certain county, defendants Gao, Zhang, Li, and Pu, failed to diligently perform their supervisory and management duties and did not strictly adhere to the relevant laws, regulations, and procedures concerning quarantine work during the pig slaughtering process at a certain pig slaughtering point. This led to individuals like Sun and Wang injecting large quantities of toxic and harmful fluids into pigs during the slaught


The prosecution charged: On July 1, 2014, defendants Zhu and Xie conspired to steal elevator motherboards. They drove a Hebei XXX1** Volkswagen Lavida car to the 7th floor machine room of a construction site at the Fusheng Huaou Hotel on East Chongming Island Road, Huangdao District, a certain city, and stole 12 Mitsubishi elevator motherboards from the machine room. According to the appraisal, the value of the 12 stolen elevator motherboards was 24,052 RMB.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: At approximately 3:00 a.m. on November 14, 2013, Liu contacted defendant Wang to purchase methamphetamine. Defendant Wang then called defendant Ye, asking Ye to provide drugs for the transaction. Defendant Ye agreed to sell Wang a package of methamphetamine and a package of Magu for 200 RMB, with an additional 150 RMB for transportation expenses. At approximately 6:10 a.m. that day, defendant Ye brought the drugs to the agreed transaction location at the Jinhuhotel on Wenjin Road in the Luohu District of this city. He sold the methamphetamine and Magu to Liu downstairs and collected 500 RMB in drug money. After the transaction was completed, the police ambushed the defendants, apprehending defendant Wang at the scene with drugs and 500 RMB in drug money, and also arrested defendant Ye downstairs at the Jinhuhotel. According to the identification, the involved methamphetamine weighed 2.3 grams and contained methamphetamine components; the involved Magu weighed 0.13 grams and contained methamphetamine and caffeine components. To prove the above facts, the prosecution submitted the following evidence: 1. Physical evidence: the involved drugs and drug money; 2. Documentary evidence: case registration form, case filing decision, seizure decision, seizure list, receipt for suspected drugs, explanation of drug money, arrest reports, identity information of defendants Ye and Wang, fingerprint cards, call records. 3. Witness testimony: testimony of witness Liu; 4. Statements and defenses of the defendants: statements and defenses of defendants Ye and Wang; 5. Expert opinion: drug identification documents; 6. Inspection, examination, and identification records: scene inspection records and photographs.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accused the defendants Cheng and Jiang, stating that from August 2014, Cheng and Jiang were hired by Zhang and Wang (both have been sentenced) to keep watch below the Xinnanya Hotel in this district to avoid inspection for Zhang and Wang and others' activities of accommodating prostitution. The period lasted until December 18 and November 27 of the same year respectively. During this time, Zhang and Wang and others accommodated prostitute Fan on September 7 for prostitution once, accommodated prostitute Yao on October 4 for prostitution once, and accommodated Zhao on September 12 and December 11 for prostitution once each. After the case was exposed, defendant Cheng and Jiang were apprehended and brought to justice on September 11, 2015, and December 15, 2015, respectively. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Cheng and Jiang during the trial, and were verified by evidence such as cash, condoms, lubricants, site photos, WeChat records, SMS records, call records, accommodation records, administrative penalty decisions, criminal attached civil judgment, criminal judgment, criminal files, population information, testimonies of witnesses including Zhang, Wang, Liu, Fan, Huang, Zhu, Zhang, Yao, Wang, Zhu, Ye, Hu, Huang, Jin, Zhao, Lin, Cai, and Wang, circumstances of apprehension, search transcripts, identification transcripts, and inspection transcripts, which are sufficient to confirm the charges. Regarding the issue of whether defendant Cheng constitutes a confession, after investigation, defendant Cheng stated during the fourth interrogation in the investigation stage that he started working at Zhang's place in August 2014, keeping watch at Xinnanya Hotel, and during the trial, he did not dispute the criminal facts charged in the indictment, thus it can be recognized that defendant Cheng has the circumstances of a confession.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accused that on the evening of April 19, 2013, at around 7 p.m., the defendant Yang, at the request of Chen, purchased drugs worth 2,000 yuan from the defendant Liu. Subsequently, the defendant Liu bought methamphetamine worth 1,500 yuan from "Duck" (identity unknown) and handed it over to Yang. When the defendant Yang delivered the methamphetamine to Chen near the Old West Station in the Shuixin Street area of a certain district in a certain city, Yang was caught on the spot by public security officers. A package of suspected drugs was seized on site, containing a package of suspected methamphetamine and a suspected magu pill. After examination, the seized methamphetamine weighed 3.67 grams and tested positive for methamphetamine components, while the suspected magu weighed 0.09 grams and tested positive for methamphetamine and caffeine components. According to a forensic psychiatric evaluation, the defendant Yang had limited capacity for criminal responsibility at the time of the incident.


Upon examination, it was found that in July 2014, the defendant Yin rented a storefront in a certain town for 6,000 yuan per year. Later, defendant Yin and defendant Chen conspired to use a Longxiang Tianxia gaming machine (which can be operated independently by seven people simultaneously) in the storefront to set up a casino for others to gamble. Subsequently, the two defendants hired Huang, Shi, and Zhang to work as casino attendants, responsible for managing the casino, collecting money, and adding or deducting credits. The illegal proceeds were transferred by the attendants into defendant Yin's account at the Rural Commercial Bank. On August 20, 2014, officers from the Liangping County Public Security Bureau sealed the storefront. During this period, defendants Yin and Chen made a total profit of 28,690 yuan. It was determined that the Longxiang Tianxia gaming machine had gambling functions. On August 25, 2014, defendants Yin and Chen voluntarily surrendered to the Public Security Management Brigade of the Liangping County Public Security Bureau. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Yin and Chen during the court proceedings, and were substantiated by the household registration certificates, confessions, and defenses of defendants Yin and Chen; the testimonies of witnesses Huang, Shi, Zhang, and others; an opinion statement; case registration form, payment vouchers, and a savings account statement from the Chongqing Rural Commercial Bank, which were sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution alleges that the defendants Zhang and Fang, as the director and deputy director responsible for safety production at the calcium carbide plant of Shuangxin Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. in a certain city, knowingly allowed the No. 4 calcium carbide furnace in Workshop No. 2 of the plant to operate with malfunctioning equipment. The safety production facilities did not meet national standards, and the hydrogen gas analyzer and furnace pressure gauge displayed inaccurate data. Despite being aware of these issues, they failed to fulfill their respective safety responsibilities and did not eliminate the hazards in a timely manner. As a result, on April 5, 2012, at approximately 14:15, an explosion occurred in the No. 4 furnace in Workshop No. 2 of the plant, causing a serious accident that resulted in 1 death and injuries of varying degrees to 16 people. In support of the above facts, the prosecution provided evidence including the report materials, witness testimonies, documentary evidence, on-site inspection records, appraisal documents, and the confessions and defenses of the defendants.


The prosecution charges that from March 2015 to June 26, 2015, defendants Li and Ma, in partnership (each holding half of the shares), operated a casino on the second floor of No. 38 Kaiyuan Road, Taizhou Economic Development Zone, in a game room, organizing gambling in the form of "Baerzhan" (a type of card game) and profiting from rake-offs. During this period, they employed defendant Lin to keep watch for the casino. During the operation of the casino, they illegally profited more than 20,000 RMB from rake-offs, while Lin profited over 600 RMB and some cigarettes. On June 26, 2015, the casino was raided by public security officers, and defendants Li, Ma, and Lin were all apprehended. It was also found that defendants Li and Ma returned illegal proceeds amounting to 21,000 RMB, and defendant Lin returned illegal proceeds amounting to 600 RMB during the trial. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Li, Ma, and Lin during the court trial, and were corroborated by evidence such as household registration certificates, population information, administrative penalty decisions, evidence preservation decisions, inventories, seizure decisions, testimonies of witnesses Huang, He, Zhao, and others, records of arrest, details of the case, inspection records, identification records, and other evidences, which are sufficient to establish the charges.


Upon trial and verification: At approximately 1 a.m. on April 9, 2013, defendants Sun and Chang, among others, were consuming at the Gucci room on the fourth floor of a certain KTV in the Lubei District of a city when defendant Sun, failing to find a certain waitress and out of frustration, smashed a BBSU-5000DM microphone in the room (valued at RMB 475). While settling the bill, defendant Sun also smashed a TCL telephone on the fourth-floor bar counter (valued at RMB 80). Subsequently, defendant Sun punched the KTV manager, victim Kong (乙), on the left side of the face when he came to mediate. The injury to the victim Kong (乙) was assessed as minor. Defendant Chang, also out of frustration, kicked and broke the door to the bathroom in a certain KTV room (valued at RMB 2945) for no reason. On May 23, 2013, defendant Chang voluntarily surrendered to the Qiaotun Police Station of the Lubei District Branch of the city's Public Security Bureau. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by defendants Sun and Chang during the court trial process and are corroborated by victim Kong (乙)'s statement, testimonies from witnesses Kong (甲), Yuan, He, Chen, Wang, and others; assessment opinions; audio-visual materials; household registration information; prior record materials; documentary evidence, among other evidence.


Upon trial, it was found that: At around 11 PM on October 19, 2015, the defendant Li and friends, including Qiu (currently at large), were drinking at the Leman Bar in Yiyang. After the bar's resident singer left, they began to sing inside the bar. A dispute arose with Guo Molong, Ding Moujie, and others at the neighboring table over the order of singers, which was later mediated by the bar owner, Zou. Around midnight, the defendant Li and others again confronted Guo Molong, Ding Moujie, and others who were resting on a long bench outside the bar. The defendant Li first slapped Ding Moujie. The defendant Tang, along with Qiu, Chen (called by Li over the phone, currently at large), and several others present at the time, then proceeded to beat Ding Moujie and subsequently Guo Molong, who came out later, resulting in injuries to both Guo Molong and Ding Moujie. A forensic examination determined that the injuries to both Guo Molong and Ding Moujie were minor. Following the incident, the defendant Li voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed to the crime. The defendant Tang was apprehended. The defendant Li reached a settlement agreement with the two victims and obtained their forgiveness. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Li and Tang during the trial proceedings, and they are corroborated by the statements of the victims Guo Molong and Ding Moujie, testimonies from witnesses Xia, Hu Xiqian, and Zou, the police dispatch report, call records, the on-site inspection record, the appraisal report, identification transcripts, receipts, the letter of forgiveness, prior conviction records of the defendant Tang, and documentation of the arrest and identification details of defendants Li and Tang. This evidence is sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution charges that in early February 2019, the defendants Yang and Li discussed and agreed to jointly establish a gaming arcade for gambling in the basement of a residential area on a certain street in a certain district of a certain city. It was agreed that defendant Li would invest 14,000 yuan, while defendant Yang would be responsible for the remaining investment, purchasing the gambling machines, sourcing clients, and managing operations. Li would hold a 30% share, while Yang would hold a 70% share. Defendant Yang purchased a fishing game machine (for eight simultaneous users) and a "Missing One" game machine (for eight simultaneous users) to conduct gambling operations by providing credits and cashing out coins, exclusively for others to gamble. They hired Hu as a cashier with a monthly salary of 5,000 yuan. The arcade operated from February 25, 2019, to March 30, 2019, accumulating illegal profits totaling 69,600 yuan. Defendant Yang distributed over 10,000 yuan in gambling dividends to defendant Li, paid Hu a salary of 5,000 yuan, and retained the remaining gambling funds. On March 30, 2019, at around 2 AM, Ning, Kang, and Yang were caught by the police while gambling at the arcade. The police seized the fishing game machine (for eight simultaneous users) and the "Missing One" game machine (for eight simultaneous users). An appraisal confirmed both machines had gambling properties. Defendant Yang was apprehended at the scene, and defendant Li was captured by officers from the Xinxing Street Police Station on April 5, 2019. The police seized two mobile phones (OPPO R15, OPPO R17), a construction bank card, and a portable POS machine related to the case.


The prosecution alleges that at around midnight on February 18, 2019, the defendants Gu and Dong, together with Li, Zeng, and Wang (the latter three not prosecuted), after premeditation, had Zeng reach an agreement with the victim Liu via the online chat software "Momo" to meet at Room 435 in the Shangkeyou Hotel on Sifanghe Road, in a certain district of a certain city, to engage in sexual relations with Liu. Later, as per the agreement, Zeng performed oral sex with Liu. Subsequently, Gu, Li, Dong, and Wang entered the room and extorted Liu for 5,300 yuan by threatening to report to the public security authorities that Zeng was a minor. To substantiate the above accusation, the prosecution read and presented evidence in court, including records of the arrest, household registration information, a letter of understanding, the statement of the victim Liu, as well as confessions from defendants Gu, Dong, and co-defendants Li, Zeng, Wang, identification records, site identification transcripts, and photos.


A certain People's Procuratorate charged: One day in the 11th or 12th month of the lunar calendar in 2009, the defendant Jia purchased a stolen silver-gray Wuling Light minivan from Jia Jia (another person with the same surname) for 4,000 yuan on the road east of his village. The vehicle was originally valued at 22,226 yuan. After the crime, the stolen vehicle was returned to the owner. One day in May 2010, the defendant Shi purchased a stolen silver-gray Wuling Hongtu minivan from Jia Jia for 5,300 yuan on the same road. This vehicle was valued at 49,900 yuan. After the crime, the stolen vehicle was returned to the owner. The evidence submitted by the public prosecution includes: the statements of the victims (Guo and He), the list of seized and returned items from the Daming County Public Security Bureau, the price assessment conclusions, and the confessions and defenses of the defendants Jia and Shi.


The People's Procuratorate of Wuzhong District of a certain city charges: Defendant Yu, in collaboration with others, after premeditation, set up a casino from mid-June to July 1, 2014, in a certain place near the import and export processing area on Guoxiang Street, Wuzhong District of a certain city, on a civilian ship and in a residence in a certain village in a certain town. They arranged for fixed personnel to engage in shuffling, skimming, and overseeing the venue, and they illegally profited RMB 100,000. Defendant Wang, knowing that defendant Yu and others were operating a casino, still provided gambling funds to participants Li and Gu for profit, amounting to a total of RMB 95,000. The prosecution presented corresponding evidence to prove the above facts.


The prosecution alleges that: 1. At around midnight on February 9, 2020, defendants Zhang and Zhang went to the residence of the victim Qiu in a certain district of a certain city. They pushed the door open and entered, stealing an Asus laptop from the secondary bedroom. According to the appraisal, the laptop involved in the case was valued at 2,600 RMB. 2. At around 11 PM on February 14, 2020, defendants Zhang and Zhang went to the courtyard of Zhang A's house in a certain district of a certain city. They found an electric bike of the victim Zhang parked in the courtyard and stole a battery set from the bike. According to the appraisal, the battery set of the electric bike involved in the case was valued at 1,132 RMB. On February 16, 2020, defendants Zhang and Zhang were arrested by the public security authorities in a certain district of a certain city. After coming to the case, both defendants truthfully confessed the aforementioned criminal facts. The laptop and electric bike battery involved in the case have been returned to each of the victims.


The People's Procuratorate of Yongchuan District, a certain city, charged that from late February to March 9, 2015, the defendants Zhou and Yao set up two "fishing machines" with gambling functions that allowed for score withdrawal and could be independently operated by sixteen people in a facade in a certain town in Yongchuan District. They organized gambling activities by providing cash to others in exchange for scores. Participants purchased 20,000 game points with 100 yuan in cash at the casino and used them on the "fishing machines", exchanging the points won in the game for cash at the same rate. At around 11 PM on March 9, public security police raided the casino and seized two "fishing machines" on site. On June 5, 2015, after being notified by telephone by public security police, defendant Zhou voluntarily turned himself in at the Hegang Police Station in Yongchuan District, a certain city; on September 20, after being notified by telephone by public security police, defendant Yao voluntarily turned himself in at the Hegang Police Station in Yongchuan District, a certain city. After arriving, both defendants truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts. According to the appraisal by the Public Security Bureau of Yongchuan District, a certain city, the two aforementioned "fishing machines" are electronic gaming facilities with gambling functions and can be independently operated by eighteen people for gambling. It was also found that during the operation of the casino by defendants Zhou and Yao, Zhou was responsible for the management and operation, with a total profit of 13,000 yuan, which had not yet been distributed. These facts were not disputed by defendants Zhou and Yao during the court trial, and they pleaded guilty in court. The evidence includes the case acceptance registration form, filing decision, permanent resident information form, apprehension process description, identification record, extraction record, seizure list, on-site identification record, criminal photos, case handling explanation, administrative penalty decision of public security, testimonies of witnesses Fan Moumou, Feng Moumou, Luo Mou, Chen Moumou, Liu Moumou, confessions of defendants Zhou and Yao, identification opinion of electronic gaming equipment, audiovisual materials, etc., which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges: On the afternoon of February 7, 2018, defendants Zheng and Shen conspired together to steal a golden Meizu mobile phone valued at 715 RMB from the coat pocket of the victim, Xu, at a cake shop in a certain city. Furthermore, it was found that after the crime, defendants Zheng and Shen voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed the criminal facts. The mobile phone involved in the case was seized by the police and returned to the victim.


The prosecution alleges that the defendants Lu, Xia, and Tang, after prior consultation, jointly went to a certain town in a certain city on the evening of March 12, 2015, to steal electric bicycles. That evening, the three defendants stole two Tailg electric bicycles located on an open space on the east side of victim Zhou's house in a certain village in a certain town in a certain city. They also stole one Tailg electric bicycle located in a car shed on the north side of victim Li's house in a certain village in a certain town in a certain city. An assessment determined that the stolen vehicles were worth 5,470 RMB. After the incident, defendant Tang voluntarily surrendered and truthfully confessed his crime; defendants Lu and Xia also truthfully confessed their crimes. The public security organs seized two Tailg electric bicycles and returned them to victims Zhou and Li. Defendant Lu returned 700 RMB of stolen money, which has been given back to victim Zhou. The facts aforementioned were not disputed by defendants Lu, Xia, and Tang during the trial. There is also testimony from victims Zhou and Li, witness testimonies from Zhu Jia, Zhu Yi, and Gu, and documentary evidence such as basic information on permanent residents, an incident report from Zhuhong Police Station of a certain city's Public Security Bureau, lists of seizures and returns of items, power of attorney documents, and receipts. Additionally, identification records, records of identifying the crime scene, crime scene photos, and diagrams produced by a certain city's Public Security Bureau, as well as appraisal conclusion from the price certification center of a certain city, sufficiently corroborate these facts. Further evidence proving other facts of the case includes administrative penalty decisions from the police, a criminal judgment from a certain city's people's court, and a certificate of release upon completion of a sentence.


The prosecution charges: On the afternoon of September 22, 2015, the defendants Xu and Tian went to the Yongming Wire Drawing Factory in Fucun Town, Jindong District, of a certain city and stole 80 kilograms of steel wire, later selling the stolen goods for 90 yuan. According to the valuation by the Jindong District Price Certification Center of the city, the stolen steel wire was valued at 72 yuan. On the afternoon of September 23, 2015, the defendants Xu and Tian went to the Yongming Wire Drawing Factory in Fucun Town, Jindong District, of a certain city and stole 80 kilograms of steel wire, later selling the stolen goods for 90 yuan. According to the valuation by the Jindong District Price Certification Center of the city, the stolen steel wire was valued at 72 yuan. On the afternoon of September 26, 2015, the defendants Xu and Tian went to the Yongming Wire Drawing Factory in Fucun Town, Jindong District, of a certain city and stole 140 kilograms of steel wire and a wire drawing water pan, but were caught on the spot. According to the valuation by the Jindong District Price Certification Center of the city, the stolen steel wire was valued at 126 yuan and the stolen wire drawing water pan was valued at 1,045 yuan. It was further found that the defendants Xu and Tian have returned 180 yuan of the stolen money. The above facts are not disputed by the defendants Xu and Tian during the trial and are corroborated by the basic household registration information of the defendants Xu and Tian; the process of their arrest; the explanatory note; the decision and inventory of evidence preservation; the testimony of the witness Yan; the statement of the victim Jiang; the confessions and defenses of the defendants Xu and Tian; the price appraisal report by the Jindong District Price Certification Center of the city; the on-site records and photos; the identification transcripts and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: Starting from December 10, 2015, the defendant Fang used a shop on the first floor at No. 19, Alley 2, Jialian Road, Tanzhou Town, Zhongshan City as a base, operating a casino using poker cards to play "San Gong." Fang hired defendants Tan and Chen to manage card dealing and taking a rake at the casino, while hiring defendant Zhang to safeguard the rake money. It was further found that at about 12:30 a.m. on December 17, 2015, when the public security personnel raided the aforementioned base, they apprehended defendants Fang, Tan, Chen, Zhang, and the gamblers Wang Xiuxiu, Li Ling, Li Yun, among others (all handled in separate cases). One deck of poker cards used for gambling and gambling funds totaling 9,010 RMB was seized on the spot. After being taken into custody, Fang, Tan, Chen, and Zhang truthfully confessed to the above facts. During the court trial, the defendants Fang, Tan, Chen, and Zhang also raised no objections to the above facts, which are substantiated by physical evidence, documentary evidence, witness testimonies, defendants' confessions and defenses, as well as records of inspections, checks, and identifications, all sufficient to confirm the charges.


The public prosecution agency charges that at about 12:00 noon on August 28, 2013, the defendant Jiao, in order to help Zhu and Guo, who did not have welding vocational qualification certificates, evade punishment by the public security authorities, contacted a man engaged in making fake certificates (identity unknown) by phone at the Jin Du Jia Yuan construction site in the Xicheng Street area of a certain district of a certain city to discuss purchasing fake certificates. Afterward, defendant Jiao met with defendant Tang near the entrance of Luqiao Middle School in the Luqiao District of a certain city to conduct a transaction, purchasing forged vocational welding qualification certificates for Zhu, Guo, and himself for 450 RMB. Subsequently, defendant Jiao was caught using Zhu's and Guo's fake certificates at the Chengxi Police Station of the Huangyan Branch of the Public Security Bureau in a certain city. Later, defendant Jiao assisted the public security authorities in apprehending another criminal suspect. It was also found that on the evening of August 28, 2013, defendant Tang was apprehended by the public security authorities. The above facts are uncontested by defendants Tang and Jiao during the court trial and are supported by the testimonies of witnesses Zhu and Guo, the identification transcript by defendant Jiao, physical evidence—the three forged welding qualification certificates, the seizure list and transcript issued by the public security authorities, the evidence collection list, the administrative penalty decision, the certificate issued by the Vocational Skill Appraisal Center of Jiaojiang District, a certain city's criminal judgment (2011) Tai Lu Xing Chu Zi No. 387 from the People's Court of Luqiao District, the explanation by the public security authorities on the apprehension process of the two defendants, the identification documents of the defendants, and the certificate of meritorious service by defendant Jiao. The evidence is sufficient to substantiate the charges.


After trial, it was found: On the morning of May 21, 2013, the defendants Zhong and Lin, after consultation, went to the rented ground-floor room at No. 678, Zhangjiaqiao Community, Chengdong Village, Weitang Street, a certain county. They entered the interior using a card insertion method and stole a Samsung digital camera (valued at 1,000 RMB) and a black induction cooker (valued at 238.50 RMB) belonging to the victim Qin, which were placed inside the rental room. The total value was 1,238.50 RMB. After the incident, the induction cooker was seized and returned to the victim. It was also found that after being brought to justice, the defendants Zhong and Lin confessed their crimes truthfully. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the two defendants during the court hearing, and were substantiated by the victim Qin's statement, the price appraisal conclusion report, on-site investigation records and photos, identification records and photos, inspection records, evidence preservation decision, return list, household registration proof, the process of capture, and other evidence, sufficient for the verdict.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charges that: On the morning of May 25, 2013, the defendants He and Tang, after prior discussion, went to the "Daming" clothing store at 82 Chuancheng Middle Road, Nanfeng Street, in this county. Under the pretense of buying clothes, they each distracted the attention of the store owner, Zhou, and then defendant Tang stole two iPhone 4 phones that Zhou had placed on the cashier counter. According to the appraisal, the value of the two phones amounted to 5,070 RMB. After the incident, defendant He compensated the victim, Zhou, with 4,778 RMB. On August 13, 2013, defendant Tang voluntarily surrendered to the Xianju County Public Security Bureau. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants He and Tang during the trial, and are verified by the victim Zhou's statement, identification records and photos, price appraisal conclusion, list of seized and returned items, details of the case resolution, criminal record inquiry, and identification proof among other evidence that was cross-examined in court, sufficient to establish the facts. Defendant Tang is currently three months pregnant. The ultrasound report and medical certificate from Xianju County People's Hospital have been cross-examined and filed in the case.


The prosecution charges that on September 1, 2011, defendant He opened the Haining Haizhou Milan Station Bag Store at 20 Shanghai Road, First Floor, Phase One, Haining China Leather City, and employed defendant Sun as a sales clerk to jointly sell bags they knew to be counterfeit registered trademark items. On April 29, 2012, the industrial and commercial authorities conducted an inspection of the Haining Haizhou Milan Station Bag Store, and found on-site 12 bags marked with the "CHANEL" trademark, 3 bags with the "GUCCI" trademark, 4 bags with the "HERMES" trademark, and 1 bag with the "BURBERRY" trademark. An appraisal by the trademark registrants and their authorized agents confirmed that these items were counterfeit registered trademark goods with a total value of 361,145 RMB. During the trial, defendants He and Sun did not object to the above facts, which are further substantiated by the site inspection records from the Haining Administrative Bureau for Industry and Commerce, the decision on compulsory measures, inventory of items and photographs, seized items list, appraisal report, trademark registration certificate and amendment proof, approval of renewal proof, evidence retrieval list, exchange rate explanation, price appraisal report, business registration information, administrative penalty decision, account of arrest, explanatory statement, and household registration proof, all of which are sufficient to establish the charges.


Upon trial, it was found: On December 26, 2013, the defendant Ye applied for a UnionPay card merchant account with Zhongfu Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. in a certain city via the Han Chang Appliance Store and the Kumei Clothing Store, both located in Xixiang, Bao'an District, under his wife’s name. Subsequently, using two mobile POS machines, he began engaging in the illegal business of credit card cash-out. Since January 2014, Ye and the co-defendant Lu, his brother-in-law, printed and posted multiple credit card cash-out advertisements. They illegally cashed out and repaid credit cards for cardholders multiple times using POS machines by fabricating transactions, charging a handling fee of 0.9% to 1.2%. By the time the case was filed, they had illegally cashed out and repaid over 3.7 million RMB for credit card holders. On March 7, 2014, Ye and Lu were caught on the spot by police officers while facilitating cash-outs for others' credit cards near Yiyuan Road and Daxin Road in a certain district in the city. The defendants Ye and Lu raised no objections to the aforementioned facts during the court proceedings, supported by evidence including the seized POS machines, UnionPay card transaction slips, credit card cash-out advertisement cards, mobile phones, case registration forms, mobile phone account information, call records, bank account information and transaction records, UnionPay card merchant agreements, seizure decisions, arrest records, records of confiscated goods, identity information of the defendants, testimonies from witnesses Jiang, Chen, and Lu A, on-site inspection records and photographs of the scene, identification records by witnesses Jiang and Chen regarding Ye and Lu, as well as the confessions and defenses of defendants Ye and Lu.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that in September 2012, the defendant Jiao learned that the victim Yue had been discovered by the public security authorities for theft. Jiao falsely claimed to Yue that he knew people in the police and could exempt Yue from criminal responsibility. To further convince Yue and get money quickly, Jiao discussed with the defendant Yang, and then they found the defendant Huang to impersonate a police officer to scare Yue's wife, promising him benefits after the deed was done. Huang, together with the defendants Liu and Hou, went to Yue's house and impersonated police officers to intimidate Yue's wife. Yue believed them and went to Jiao and Yang again. After a discussion, Yue handed over 30,000 RMB to smooth things over. Yue later gave 30,000 RMB in cash to Jiao and Yang in two installments. After the incident, the two returned the illegal proceeds to the victim's family. Evidence for the charges include household registration certificates, receipts, witness testimonies such as from Zheng and others, statements from the victims Yue and Zhao, and the confessions and defenses of the defendants Jiao and others.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accuses: On December 21, 2012, at 10:30 PM, four police officers including Yan and Zhao from the Chaoge Town Police Station in Qi County received a 110 directive to respond to an incident at the Once Upon a Time sentiment music venue in Qi County. While the police station officers were addressing a dispute between defendants Du and Guan and the music venue staff over payment issues, Du and Guan unreasonably assaulted the music venue staff. When the police intervened, the two defendants assaulted officers Yan and Zhao, obstructing the police in the execution of their duties.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accused defendants Wang and Xu of violating national tobacco monopoly management laws and regulations from September 2014 to September 2015. Without the permission of the tobacco monopoly administrative licensing department and without a tobacco retail license, Wang and Xu repeatedly purchased cigarettes at low prices, including brands such as Sanwu, Marlboro, Export Suyan, and Wuxing Hongshanshu, from the store operated by individuals Lin and Zheng in a district of a city in Guangdong Province. They transported these cigarettes by long-distance bus to a certain city, selling them at a markup to individuals such as Cui, thus obtaining profits from the price difference, amounting to an illegal business operation total of 145,657.5 yuan. Among them, defendant Wang was involved in 5 incidents, with illegal business operations totaling 145,657.5 yuan; defendant Xu was involved in 2 incidents, with illegal business operations totaling 94,628 yuan. After being brought to justice, defendants Wang and Xu truthfully confessed their crimes. The evidence supporting the accusations includes documentary evidence, witness testimony, defendants' confessions and defenses, expert opinions, inspection records, and photographs.


Upon examination, it was found that on a day in December 2012, the defendant Fang purchased an unlicensed HJ125-3 Haojiang motorcycle for 900 RMB near the Wukuaishi Electric Appliance Market in a certain city. After riding the motorcycle back to a certain town in a district of the city, Fang entrusted the defendant Chen to sell the motorcycle. On a day in January 2013, Chen, knowing that the motorcycle had no legal documentation, sold it to Li. After the crime was discovered, the motorcycle was recovered and returned to the owner. On May 15, 2013, according to the appraisal by the Price Certification Center of a district of the city, the value of the motorcycle was appraised at 3,456 RMB. On January 23, 2014, Chen was arrested by the police and truthfully confessed to his criminal acts. On January 6, 2015, Fang voluntarily surrendered to the public security organ and truthfully confessed his criminal acts. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Fang and Chen during the trial, and were confirmed by physical evidence, documentary evidence, witness testimony, and expert opinions, which are sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place alleged: On March 29, 2016, at around 23:00, the defendant He, due to an improper relationship between his wife and the victim Guo Moumou, along with the defendant Mu, drove Guo Moumou's car to Shengdi Toll Station, Fengshan, and other places to assault and verbally abuse Guo Moumou, restricting his personal freedom. Around 2:00 in the early morning of March 30, 2016, the two defendants took the victim Guo Moumou to the home of the defendant Xu at Xingnan Market, and asked Xu for tools such as sewing needles, a bamboo back scraper, pliers, and Thai peppers to assault and verbally abuse Guo Moumou, which Xu did not prevent. Two hours later, the defendants He and Mu took Guo Moumou to Room 501 of Longwan Leisure Club in Lishi District, continuing to restrict Guo Moumou's personal freedom and not allowing him to leave until around 15:30 on March 30, 2016, when he was allowed to leave. According to the forensic identification by the Judicial Appraisal Center of Lishi District Public Security Bureau: the injuries to Guo Moumou's perineum and left index finger were both assessed as minor injuries. After the incident, the parties had reconciled and compensated for the civil part, and the victim expressed forgiveness. The evidence establishing the above facts includes: 1. Confessions from the defendants He, Mu, and Xu; 2. Statement from the victim Guo Moumou; 3. Testimonies from witnesses He Mou A, Guo Mou A, and Li Moumou; 4. Forensic medical injury assessment report; 5. Reporting materials, seizure list, return list, diagnosis certificate, photos of Guo Moumou's injuries, extraction records, photos extracted from defendant Xu's house, investigation table of criminal record and bad conduct, administrative penalty decision, civil mediation agreement, letter of understanding, account of the incident, household registration proof, and other documentary evidence.


The prosecution alleges: On June 14, 2013, Youyi Chunqiu Network Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. received authorization from Joymax Co., Ltd. of South Korea to exclusively operate the online game "Silkroad Online" (Chinese name: 丝路传说, 新丝路) in a certain region. Between May 2015 and August 2017, the defendants Li, Huo, and Liu, knowing that they had not obtained authorization or permission from Youyi Chunqiu Network Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. and did not possess the agency rights or operating rights for the game, still privately set up a server named "Huoyue Silkroad" via the internet to profit by selling in-game currency to players. The total illegal business amount amounted to more than 220,000 yuan. On August 17, 2018, defendants Li and Huo were apprehended by the public security authorities; on August 19 of the same month, defendant Liu was apprehended by the public security authorities. The prosecution has provided all the evidence to substantiate the above facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged: In February 2014, the defendant Xiao, without obtaining a certificate of food quality, purchased counterfeit health products such as "Cordyceps" and "Chinese Herbal Viagra" from others and placed them for sale in their adult goods store located at No. 25 East North Road, Lingxi Town, a certain county. The defendant Chen, knowing that the sexual health food sold by the defendant Xiao did not have a certificate of quality, still helped with the sales. On July 27, 2015, law enforcement officers discovered counterfeit sexual health products such as "Cordyceps," "Chinese Herbal Viagra," and "Double Effect Fast Erection" in their store and on the back seat of an electric scooter parked beside it. According to the appraisal, the confiscated items, including "Double Effect Fast Erection" (25 pills in total), "Ant Power" (56 pills in total), "Golden Maca" (30 pills in total), "German Black Ant Essence Tablets" (16 pills in total), "Chinese Herbal Viagra" (38 pills in total), and "Cordyceps" (30 pills in total), were all found to contain sildenafil. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Xiao and Chen during the court hearing, and are corroborated by evidence such as the testimony of witness Mr. Chen, the arrest record, test reports, on-site inspection transcripts, case transfer documents, notifications of designated jurisdiction, lists of seized property, and household registration certificates, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


After the trial, it was found that between 2012 and 2013, the defendants Sun and Li, at the request of Liu (who has been sentenced), the legal representative of Wuhan Huaxia School Education Consulting Co., actively facilitated communication, acted as intermediaries, and ultimately helped Liu twice bribe Jiang (handled in a separate case), a staff member of the Higher Education Self-study Examination Office Planning Section of Hubei Provincial Education Examination Institute, with a total of 100,000 RMB in cash for illegally handling "course exemptions" and "diploma approvals" for self-study exam students. During this period, Defendant Sun received 5,000 RMB in cash from Liu. On September 11, 2014, when the prosecution interrogated defendants Sun and Li, both defendants voluntarily confessed to the above criminal facts. After the incident, Defendant Sun returned the 5,000 RMB illicit money. Defendants Sun, Li, and their defense lawyers did not object to the facts and charges in the indictment. Li's defense lawyer argued that: 1. Li voluntarily confessed after being brought to justice, showing remorse; 2. Before prosecution, Li truthfully confessed his criminal facts. The lawyer requested the court to reduce or mitigate the punishment for Li. The above facts are confirmed by evidence, such as the custody report issued by the People's Procuratorate of Hongshan District, Wuhan City; testimonies from witnesses Jiang and Liu; the household registration information of defendants Sun and Li; the list of students who received exam exemptions and diploma approvals illegally; the subject identity materials of Jiang issued by Hubei Provincial Education Examination Institute and documents from the institute; the criminal judgment of Hongshan District People's Court of Wuhan City; the confessions and defenses of defendants Sun and Li; and other materials. These are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution alleges that from February 20 to March 4, 2018, in the supermarket run by defendant Jia next to a primary school in Juan County, defendants Jia and Zhang placed one "Golden Monkey Sending Blessings" game machine and one fishing game machine for others to engage in gambling activities. It has been determined that the aforementioned game machines are video game devices with gambling functions, equivalent to a total of 3 single-player machines.


A local People's Procuratorate charged that on March 22, 2017, the defendant Sha, at the request of Gong, helped Gong apply for an online loan of 12,900 yuan. Due to a delay in the loan disbursement, defendants Sha and Wang conspired to illegally possess Gong's loan, deceiving Gong by claiming that the loan application was unsuccessful. After the loan was credited, defendant Sha embezzled 12,900 yuan from Gong's bank account via WeChat and Alipay transfers. Sha falsely informed Wang that only 6,000 yuan had been embezzled. After the incident, defendants Sha and Wang truthfully confessed their criminal acts. Defendant Sha assisted the public security organs in apprehending other defendants. Defendants Sha and Wang proactively returned the embezzled money. The aforementioned facts were uncontested by defendants Sha and Wang during the trial, and were corroborated by the victim Gong's statement, testimony from witnesses including Wei, household registration information, the case registration form, the case initiation decision, the process of bringing the case to light, identification records, bank card transaction details, receipts, photographs, explanatory notes, as well as Alipay and WeChat transaction records, providing sufficient grounds for conviction.


After the trial, it was found that from December 2018 to September 2019, defendants Cui and Chen, without proper documentation or qualifications, repeatedly purchased yellow weight-loss capsules containing sibutramine from Wang A through WeChat. They sold these capsules via methods such as direct delivery by Wang A or customer self-pickup. The total sales amount of defendant Cui was 4026 yuan, with a profit of about 1000 yuan. Defendant Chen's total sales amounted to 2900 yuan, with a profit of around 700 to 800 yuan. During the sales period, customers reported adverse reactions after consuming the capsules to the two defendants. Defendants Cui and Chen raised no objections to the above facts during the court hearing. The evidence, which includes testimonies from witnesses Wang 1, Lin, Ma, Zhang 1, Su, Liu 1, Bi, Zhai, Pei, Luo, Zhang 2, Yan, Qi, Liu 2, and Wang 2, personal information on WeChat, WeChat chat records, WeChat transaction records, identification records and photos, seizure decision documents, the seized yellow capsules and plastic bottles, the testing report from the Beijing Micro Chemical Research Institute Analysis and Testing Center, and household registration proof, is sufficient to confirm these facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place alleges: Defendant Ye and the victim Qiu Erlang are relatives. At around 14:00 on March 2, 2015, defendants Ye and Mo traveled from a certain county to the XX Hotel entrance at XX Square in Guilin City. Defendant Ye acted as a lookout while defendant Mo used a duplicate key, previously made by defendant Ye, to steal a red Guang'ao two-wheeled moped (valued at 2,640 RMB) owned by Qiu Erlang's son, Qiu Yilang, which was parked there. On the 5th of the same month, defendant Ye demanded money from Qiu Erlang and his son under the pretense of helping to find the vehicle and was subsequently arrested by police officers. The stolen property has since been recovered and returned to the victim. These facts are not disputed by defendants Ye and Mo during the court proceedings and are substantiated by: 1. Documentary evidence (household registration proof, process of arrest, seizure of items, document list and list of returned items, tools used in the crime and their identification photos, stolen property and its identification photos, site layout map); 2. Testimonies of witnesses Qiu Yilang and Zhang; 3. Victim's statement (report materials and statement from the victim Qiu Erlang); 4. Appraisal opinion (conclusion of the appraisal of the value of the items involved); 5. Inspection, examination, and investigative experiment records (on-site inspection records and photos, identification records and photos, examination records, search records); 6. Defendants' confessions and defenses (confessions and defenses of defendants Ye and Mo), among other evidence, are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution alleged that starting in March 2014, the defendants, Qiu and Zhao, a married couple, provided a temporary residence on the first floor of No. 5, Lane 13, Xiangyang Road, Shangyuan Village, a certain town in a certain city, where they set up a mahjong table for others to engage in gambling by playing "local" mahjong, and they took a cut from the winnings. On the evening of September 25, 2014, this gambling venue was raided by the police, and participants Xu, Pan, and Qiu were apprehended. During this period, defendants Qiu and Zhao collected a total of over 6,000 yuan from the winnings, which has already been returned. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Qiu and Zhao during the trial process, and are validated by evidence including the confiscated property list, administrative penalty decision, criminal record verification, household registration certificates, testimonies from witnesses Qiu, Pan, and Xu, details of the arrest, and investigation records, which are sufficient for confirmation.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charges: In the early morning hours of January 13, 2018, the defendants Wang and Man rode a motorcycle to steal one white and one yellow sighthound from the victims Li, Ji, and Zhou in the Peace Cold Storage courtyard in a certain town in a certain county. The white sighthound was jointly purchased by the victims Li, Ji, and Zhou in December 2017 at a certain location for 20,000 yuan, while the yellow sighthound was purchased by Li in a certain county for 2,300 yuan and had been raised by him ever since. Later, Wang and Man sold the stolen white sighthound for 48,000 yuan to Liang in a certain city in a certain province, and the yellow sighthound for 8,000 yuan to Kang in a certain county in a certain province. To support these charges, the public prosecution agency submitted documentary evidence such as the account of the arrest, testimonies from eyewitnesses including Shi, statements from the victims Li, Ji, and Zhou, confessions and defenses from the defendants Wang and Man, as well as site surveys and identification records to substantiate the case.


The prosecution agency charges that on the morning of May 21, 2017, defendants Zhang and Yu were outside Morning Wind Photo Studio on Wenhao Road in Shawan District of a certain city, where they saw the victim, Chen (referred to as Chen 1), park a black Honda SDH125-56 motorcycle (license plate number Chuan LMH2**). Zhang instructed Yu to keep watch while he carried out the theft, stealing the motorcycle and selling it for 600 RMB (currency unit same hereinafter). According to the Price Authentication Center of Shawan District, the market retail price of the stolen motorcycle on the day of the incident was 5,373 RMB. This court further found that on July 5, 2017, due to suspicious behavior, defendant Zhang was taken back to the public security bureau by patrol police from the Shawan District branch of the municipal public security bureau for investigation. A hex key socket wrench and a modified knife, which were used in the crime, were found and seized from Zhang. During the investigation, Zhang truthfully confessed the main criminal facts. On July 10 of the same year, defendant Yu voluntarily turned himself in to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed the main criminal facts as well. During the court hearing, the aforementioned facts were not disputed by the two defendants, and they are corroborated by evidence such as the case registration form, basic information of permanent residents, accounts of capture and arrival at the station, the vehicle registration certificate, the unified motorcycle sales invoice, identification records and photos, a list of seized items, on-site inspection records, on-site sketches and layout diagrams, on-site photos, the Price Authentication Conclusion Document No. [2017]039 from the Price Authentication Center of Shawan District, the statement of victim Chen 1, witness testimony from Chen 2, confessions and defenses of defendants Zhang and Yu, as well as synchronized audio and video recordings of the interrogations, which are sufficient for conviction.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charges: At approximately 20:40 on February 12, 2015, within the Engineering Consultation Institute on Xinhua Road, Kuiwen District, Weifang City, a conflict arose when the car of Jiang, a friend of defendants Mou and Sun, was parked in front of the car belonging to Wang, a friend of the victim Wen, preventing Wang from being able to drive away. During the process of finding Jiang to move the car, both parties got into an argument, which escalated into a physical altercation. During the altercation, defendants Mou and Sun assaulted the victim Wen, resulting in injuries to Wen's lower right limb, causing a comminuted fracture of the right fibula and a fracture at the tip of the right inner malleolus. According to the forensic assessment, Wen's injuries were classified as minor injuries of the first degree. On March 2, 2015, defendants Mou and Sun voluntarily surrendered to the Xinhua Road Police Station of the Kuiwen Sub-bureau of the Weifang Public Security Bureau and truthfully confessed to the crime of intentional injury. After the incident, defendants Mou and Sun compensated the victim Wen with a total of 200,000 yuan for medical expenses, lost wages, nutrition expenses, and other costs, reaching a settlement agreement, and Wen expressed understanding towards the two defendants. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Mou and Sun during the court hearings, and were confirmed by evidence including documentary evidence of the arrest process, telephone inquiry records, population information, the settlement agreement, applications, receipts, testimonies from witnesses Wang, Pan, Jiang, and Yu, the victim Wen’s statement, forensic medical appraisal report on the degree of human injury, and audiovisual materials from surveillance footage at the scene of the incident, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution agency charges that from early February 2014 to March 9, Jiang and Li, the defendants, went six times to the Tesco supermarket on Ti Yu South Road, Luoxing Street, Jiashan County, and, using a child as cover, stole one kitchen knife, one Na Mei toothbrush, one SAST DVD player, one tube of Bai Yao toothpaste, two toy race cars, one Jie Li Ya towel, and one Osram LED flashlight. According to the appraisal, the total value of the stolen goods was over 1,400 RMB. After the crime was discovered, some of the stolen items were recovered and returned to Tesco. The prosecution also establishes that Jiang and Li, the defendants, confessed their criminal acts truthfully after being brought to justice. The defendants, Jiang and Li, did not dispute these facts during the trial. The facts are also confirmed by witness testimony from Wang, the inventory list of the stolen items, the price appraisal conclusion report, the crime scene investigation records and photos, search records and photos, identification records and photos, lists of seized and returned items, details of their capture, the administrative punishment decision document, basic population information, video materials, and other evidence, which are sufficient for conviction.