After trial, it was found that in July 2013, defendants Ye and Zhang, together with Yuan A and Luo A (both previously convicted), and others, manufactured counterfeit cigarettes at a pig farm in a certain town of a certain city. Ye was responsible for keeping watch nearby, while Zhang helped to purchase groceries and daily necessities for the people at the counterfeit cigarette production site and also issued workers' wages once. On August 1, 2013, the public security bureau of the city investigated the counterfeit cigarette production site and seized a batch of raw materials, finished counterfeit cigarettes, and production machines. According to the price certification center of the municipal price bureau, the price of tobacco leaves and finished counterfeit cigarettes was 1,220,749 yuan. After the incident, defendants Ye and Zhang fled but voluntarily surrendered to the municipal public security bureau and truthfully confessed their criminal acts on January 21, 2015. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Ye and Zhang during the court hearing. Additionally, these facts were corroborated by the confessions of defendants Ye and Zhang, the confessions of co-defendants Yuan B, Luo B, and a person named Tu, testimonies from witnesses Chen and Deng, the circumstances of arrest, identification records, on-site inspection records and photographs, inspection records from the municipal tobacco monopoly bureau, a list of seized items, a test report from Guangdong Tobacco Quality Supervision and Inspection Station, the municipal price bureau's appraisal opinion on the price of items, and the household registration certificates of defendants Ye and Zhang. These pieces of evidence are sufficient to establish the findings.


The prosecution agency charged that between October 2019 and January 2020, the defendants Zhou and Yu, without obtaining a mining and sand extraction permit, illegally extracted sand from a certain pond in a certain city under the pretense of cleaning the pond. They then sold the sand to a certain company in the city at a price of RMB 38.00 to 40.00 per cubic meter. According to an appraisal, the amount of sand extracted was 9,360.10 cubic meters, valued at RMB 187,202.00. Following the incident, the defendants Zhou and Yu voluntarily surrendered to the authorities. On September 22, 2020, the defendant Yu voluntarily handed over RMB 100,000.00 of illegal proceeds; on September 29, 2020, the defendant Zhou voluntarily handed over RMB 30,000.00 of illegal proceeds. To substantiate the aforementioned charges, the prosecution agency read out and presented documentary evidence, appraisal opinions, witness testimonies, and the confessions and defenses of the defendants Zhou and Yu in court.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that defendant Li began renting and operating "Hao Ju Tea House" at No. 2 He'an Road, Cangmen Village, Jun'an Town, Shunde District, Foshan City on September 1, 2016, later hiring defendant Chen to help run the tea house. In mid-January 2018, Li, in collaboration with others, set up a gambling den at the tea house to attract people to gamble. Chen assisted Li in managing the casino matters, and defendant Yuan was responsible for dealing cards and collecting commission. On January 31, 2018, the police uncovered the casino, apprehending 18 people involved in gambling on the spot, and seizing RMB 8,096 in gambling funds. During the operation of this casino, a total commission of about RMB 50,000 was collected, with Li and Chen each receiving approximately RMB 7,000.


The prosecution charges: 1. The defendants, Chen and Xu, along with Luo and Zhong (already sentenced), on April 4, 2019, in a rental room at a certain square in a district of this city, accused the victim, Shi, of stealing Luo's property. They physically assaulted Shi and threatened to call the police to extort 15,000 RMB from him. Later, fearing that Shi might report them to the police, Chen, Xu, Luo, and Zhong each returned part of the extorted money and, under Xu's name, returned 5,000 RMB to the victim Shi. 2. On April 6, 2019, Chen, Xu, Luo, and Zhong, in a hotel room in Jingtai Street, a district of this city, accused the victim, Lu, of cheating in gambling. They assaulted Lu and threatened to report him to the police, forcibly extorting over 50,000 RMB and an iPhone XS Max (valued at 6,953 RMB) from him. Upon returning to the case, Chen truthfully confessed his criminal acts. After committing the crime, Xu voluntarily surrendered and also truthfully confessed his criminal acts. To substantiate the above charges, the prosecutor read and presented evidence in court, including Alipay transfer records, the "Price Identification Conclusion" document, statements from the victims Shi and Lu, confessions and defenses by the defendants Chen and Xu, identification records, and WeChat transfer records.


Upon trial, it was found that from April to June 2019, the defendants Wu and Chen, having conspired, carried out the following scheme: Defendant Wu pretended to chat with the victims while defendant Chen pretended to drop an envelope containing spirit money while asking for directions. Defendant Wu picked up the envelope and proposed to the victims to "split the money." Subsequently, defendant Chen pretended to return looking for the money. Defendant Wu took out cash from his person to falsely prove he did not pick up the money, thereby deceiving the victims into taking out cash they were carrying. Defendant Wu then placed the victims' cash into a black handbag and returned the black handbag containing the spirit money to the victims before fleeing the scene. In this manner, the defendants defrauded victim Cheng out of 1,000 yuan, victim Liu of 2,800 yuan, and victim Wen of 3,300 yuan near the Cancer Hospital on Kaixuan Street, Xinghualing District, Taiyuan City. The ill-gotten gains were split between the two defendants and squandered. These facts were not contested by defendants Wu and Chen during the trial, and are corroborated by the investigation report, the details of their capture, statements from victims Cheng, Liu, and Wen, identification records, search records, seizure warrants, inventory of seized items, photographs of tools used in the crime, confessions of defendants Wu and Chen, and evidence of their residential registration and prior offenses, all of which are sufficient for confirmation.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that in early February 2012, defendants Li, Yang, and Liu conspired together while dining at a restaurant in a certain county (hereafter referred to as "the county") to install eavesdropping and surveillance equipment in the office of Secretary Hu of the County Committee. They planned to secretly record leaders' private and disciplinary violation videos to blackmail them for promotions. On February 26, 2012, after defendants Li and Liu respectively transferred 1,500 and 2,000 yuan to defendant Yang's China Construction Bank account, defendant Yang purchased the eavesdropping and surveillance equipment in a certain place. On March 6 of the same year, defendants Li and Yang bought a "Qinyuan" brand water dispenser, the same model as in Secretary Hu's office, at a Haier appliance store in the county. That evening, defendants Li, Yang, and Liu installed the eavesdropping and surveillance equipment in the purchased water dispenser. Subsequently, defendant Li used the opportunity of being on duty at the County Committee to secretly make a copy of the key to Hu's office and, together with defendant Yang, secretly entered Secretary Hu's office, replacing the water dispenser in Hu's office with the one containing the equipment. From March to early October 2012, defendant Li used a Lenovo laptop provided by defendant Liu, along with the eavesdropping and surveillance equipment, to illegally monitor and record Secretary Hu, storing the illegally obtained video footage on a Lenovo external hard drive he purchased. During the National Day holiday in 2012, defendants Li and Yang once again secretly entered Hu's office and replaced the current water dispenser with the one containing the surveillance equipment. At the same time, defendant Li edited part of the recorded video and stored it on an MP4 player he bought. After discussing it amongst themselves, on the afternoon of October 17 of the same year, defendant Li approached Hu and played the related video on the MP4 player for Hu, unlawfully demanding political benefits for the three defendants. That evening, Hu reported the incident to the Huaihua State Security Bureau. Subsequently, defendants Li, Yang, and Liu were successively apprehended by the public security organs. In light of the above facts, the prosecution provided corresponding evidence to substantiate the charges.


A Municipal People's Procuratorate charged that around 10 a.m. on May 3, 2014, the defendants Wu and Liang, after conspiring, carried pre-prepared tools such as scissors and hex keys to the parking area in the alley beside Huimin Shopping Mall in a certain town of the city. They started the engine of a red men's two-wheeled motorcycle parked there by the victim, Huang, by cutting the wires with scissors, and stole it (valued at RMB 2380). After succeeding, the two defendants fled the scene on the motorcycle. On May 6, 2014, around 10 a.m., defendants Wu and Liang, after conspiring again, went to the entrance of a rental house to the right of Luo Jian Village No. 2 Primary School in a certain town of the city. They stole a Fengtian brand women's two-wheeled motorcycle (valued at RMB 3565) and a Xiaomi 2S mobile phone (valued at RMB 1338) placed inside the vehicle belonging to the victim, Zhang, by starting the motorcycle engine in the same manner. After succeeding, the two defendants fled the scene on the motorcycle. On May 13, 2014, the police arrested defendant Wu and seized the tools he possessed, including a self-made flat-head hex key, a hex key socket, a pair of scissors, and the stolen mobile phone. Later, the police returned the mobile phone to the victim Zhang and transferred the remaining seized items with the case. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Wu and Liang during the trial. The evidence includes the physical evidence of the self-made flat-head hex key, a hex key socket, a pair of scissors, household registration documents, criminal judgment, release certificate, records of arrest, seizure records, list of seized items, list of returned items, list of items transferred with the case, administrative penalty decision, Zhaoqing Rongxing Vehicle Trading receipt, Longyue Communication quality guarantee sheet, invoices, photocopies of vehicle licenses, explanatory materials, property value appraisal conclusion, identification records, on-site identification photos, on-site inspection records, site drawings, photos, witness testimony from Zhang, statements from victims Huang and Zhang, confessions and defenses of defendants Wu and Liang, as well as audiovisual materials sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in a certain province charges: On the afternoon of April 23, 2012, defendants Wang and Yang carried two nets to a mountain by Du Lake in a certain village in a certain town of a certain city. They illegally captured five wild birds using the method of netting. They were apprehended on the spot by police officers at around 18:00 on the same day. According to an appraisal, among the wild birds, there were three Hwamei birds and two Spotted Doves, all classified as generally protected wild animals in the province. After the defendants Wang and Yang were brought to the case, they truthfully confessed their crimes. During the court trial, the defendants Wang and Yang did not dispute the above facts, which are confirmed by evidence including the technical appraisal document of the case regarding the illegal hunting of terrestrial wild animals, the announcement from the Provincial Forestry Department prohibiting the hunting and trading of wild birds, the notice from the Ningbo Forestry Bureau and Public Security Bureau regulating and standardizing the hunting (prohibition) period times in the city, the list and photos of seized items, identification records and photos, the process of capture, and the identification of the defendants Wang and Yang. All of these are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charged that on March 11, 2016, at around 1 a.m., defendants Yang and Ma, among others, were drinking at the City Space Bar in Beitun, Xinjiang. In order to make new friends, the victim, Zhao, who was also playing at the bar, proactively approached the defendants' booth to propose a toast and drank with them. At around 2 a.m. on the same day, the victim left the bar intending to take a taxi home. The two defendants followed to the section of the road in front of the bar, where they pulled and assaulted the victim, dragging him to the corner on the south side of Building 9 in Jiaxin Community, and the northwest side of Shiyihao Mansion in Beitun City. There, they assaulted him again, robbing him of a Huawei KIW-TLOOH model phone and 100 yuan in cash. According to the forensic report, the victim sustained a nasal bone fracture due to external trauma, with the degree of injury classified as minor. To prove the aforementioned facts, the prosecut


It was further found that after the incident, the public security authorities confiscated stolen money amounting to 700 RMB from Yang A, Zou, and Hu. During the trial of this court, the defendants, Yang and Du, each returned stolen money amounting to 773.5 RMB, which was fully refunded to the victim. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Yang and Du during the court hearing. Additionally, evidence was provided by the victim Jiang's statement record, the confessions of accomplices Yang A, Wang A, and others, the testimony record of the witness Wang, search records, identification records and photos, the price authentication conclusion document No. 0159 by the Jintan City Price Certification Center, this court's criminal judgment document No. (2014) Tan Xing Er Chu Zi 0146, and the capture process provided by the police officers Yin and Xu from the Chengdong Police Station of Jintan City Public Security Bureau, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution alleges that on August 9, 2013, at around 11:00 PM, Li (already sentenced) became disgruntled due to being neglected by a waiter at the Crazy Barbecue Restaurant on Huanghai Fourth Road in a certain city. Consequently, he called and gathered Feng (already sentenced), the defendants Tang, Chen, and others, and they successively went to the entrance of the Crazy Barbecue Restaurant. Without cause, they assaulted Zhang, Huang Bing, and others, resulting in minor injuries to Zhang, Huang Bing, Li, and Huang Yi, and causing minor injuries to Huang Jia.


The People's Procuratorate in a certain location has accused Jing and Sha of the following: On the afternoon of March 30, 2016, the defendants Jing and Sha went to the XXX-XXX Shop in Zhengyang Building, Yushan Town, Kunshan City. Sha acted as the lookout while Jing stole a brown wallet (valued at 20 RMB) and more than 7,000 RMB in cash from a drawer belonging to the victim, An. After being brought to justice, Sha truthfully confessed to the criminal acts.


The prosecution charges that on about December 25, 2012, defendants Li, Gu, and Cheng, after prior consultation, conspired to defraud money by falsely reporting weight. Defendants Li and Gu transported PVC mesh scrap to the weighbridge operated by defendant Cheng to weigh the material. Defendant Cheng was responsible for falsely increasing the initial weight on the weighbridge and issuing the weight slip. Li and Gu promised Cheng a reward of 150 yuan for every 100 kilograms of weight falsely added. Subsequently, Li and Gu took the falsified weight data sheet of the PVC mesh scrap to a certain company in a certain city and sold the PVC mesh scrap to the company at a price of 3.6 yuan per kilogram, thereby defrauding the company of money. By the end of January 2013, Li, Gu, and Cheng had, through the above method, falsely sold 2,245 kilograms of scrap PVC mesh to the company in a certain city, which was assessed to be valued at 8,082 yuan. On March 12, 2014, defendants Li, Gu, and Cheng returned 8,082 yuan to the court. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Li, Gu, and Cheng during the trial, and are corroborated by evidence such as the arrest process, evidence preservation list, copies of receipts, explanatory notes, household registration certificates, statements from the victim Huang, confessions from defendants Li, Gu, and Cheng, appraisal opinions, on-site identification records and photographs, and the Zhejiang Province court litigation fee invoice, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution charges: From June to August 2015, the defendant Lin, after consulting with the defendant Yang, received funds and virtual accounts and trading software provided by Yang. Lin was responsible for management and operations, illegally setting up four locations for a certain place certain place 300-stock futures trading bar in the district. The two concealed the use of virtual trading boards and lack of fund flow, attracting individuals like Lu, Wang1, Li22, Yang2, Qin, and others to participate in trading. They profited by collecting fees and transaction charges, with the income being shared between Lin and Yang. As of the incident, the total identifiable transaction amount was 1,230,900 yuan. Upon verification, neither defendant Yang nor Lin opened a futures account with Changjiang Securities Co., Ltd., nor did they register a business in the city. On February 25, 2016, defendant Lin voluntarily came forward and truthfully confessed the main criminal facts. After the incident, defendants Yang and Lin jointly compensated Lu and others with a loss amount of 700,000 yuan, receiving understanding from them. The above facts were substantiated by the prosecution through evidence including the defendants' confessions and defenses, victim statements, witness testimonies, identifications and recognitions, bank transaction flows, stock index bar partnership agreements, receipts and transfer records, transaction records, proof from Jinchang City Administration for Industry and Commerce, feedback from Changjiang Securities Co., Ltd., electronic evidence inspection records, seizure decision, seizure transcripts, seizure inventory and photos, letter of understanding, criminal judgment, release certificate, account arrival process, and explanatory notes.


After trial, it was found that at approximately 23:00 on April 22, 2013, Cheng and defendants Jia, Qiu, and Yang, along with others, were singing at Jule Fort KTV located in Yuhai Street, Rui'an City. During this time, because the karaoke hostess Li did not want Cheng to touch her body, she pushed Cheng. Cheng then threw a beer bottle at Li and slapped her. The altercation was eventually stopped by others. Subsequently, Li contacted her sister Li A by phone from the private room, saying that she had been beaten. Li A called her husband Zheng and instructed him to go to the KTV to inquire about the situation. Later, Li exited the KTV private room and encountered Zheng. Simultaneously, Cheng and defendants Jia A, among others, believed that Li had called for people to come for a fight, so they followed Li out of the private room. Outside the room, they confronted Zheng, and Cheng and defendant Jia A immediately began to beat Zheng and Li. Zheng fled to the bathroom in the KTV. Subsequently, Cheng again slapped Li several times and used a mop to beat her, while defendant Jia A also punched and kicked Li. During this time, defendant Qiu pulled Zheng out of the bathroom and punched and kicked him. Cheng, together with defendants Yang, Jia A, and others, went forward to jointly beat Zheng, causing him injuries. According to the appraisal, the primary injuries sustained by the victim Zheng include fractures of the left side ribs 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 8 and contusions to the chest and right abdom


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charges: Between June and December 2019, the defendant Yang committed theft of electric bicycle and electric tricycle batteries in multiple residential areas such as Binhe Garden and Dongfang Xiushuiyuan in a certain county. Based on the defendant Yang's confession and on-site identification, it has been verified that the batteries of electric vehicles owned by 30 individuals, including Wang, were stolen. According to the price authentication center of a certain county, the stolen batteries of the electric vehicles belonging to 30 individuals, including Wang, were valued at 7,256 yuan. Yang sold all the stolen batteries to the "certain county's certain scrap recycling station" operated by the defendants Xu and Hu. Despite knowing the batteries were stolen, defendants Xu and Hu purchased them at the price of used batteries. To substantiate the above charges, the prosecution presented and read out evidence including the testimonies of witnesses Li and Wang, the statements of the victims including Wang, the on-site identification records and photographs, the pricing assessment conclusion, plea and penalty statement, criminal judgment, household registration certificate, and the confessions of the defendants Yang, Xu, and Hu.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain Economic Development Zone accused: Defendant Zhao, without permission from the tobacco administration department, from November 2013 to March 21, 2014, used the long-distance bus he operated to purchase 62 cartons of Zhonghua brand hard-pack cigarettes and 39 cartons of soft-pack Zhonghua brand cigarettes from various tobacco stores in a city and sold them at a markup in another city in another province. On March 21, 2014, he was caught on the spot transporting Zhonghua cigarettes with the intent to sell them in the other city, and 48 cartons of hard-pack and 32 cartons of soft-pack Zhonghua cigarettes were seized. The total value of the cigarettes involved was RMB 90,150. Defendant Yue, without permission from the tobacco administration department, from November 2013 to the Lantern Festival of 2014, purchased 33 cartons of hard-pack Zhonghua cigarettes and 17 cartons of soft-pack Zhonghua cigarettes from various tobacco stores in a city on four occasions and sold them at a markup to defendant Zhao. On March 21, 2014, defendants Yue and Zhao purchased 47 cartons of hard-pack Zhonghua cigarettes and 34 cartons of soft-pack Zhonghua cigarettes near the "Dingdong Supermarket" by the Grand Theater in a city, earning an introduction fee of RMB 3 per carton. The total value of the cigarettes involved was RMB 65,150. Regarding the above charges, the prosecution provided evidence including the testimonies of witnesses Wang, Ding, Ji, Zhang, and Gao, a list of items seized, inspection reports, identification records, the process of the arrest, and confessions from defendants Zhao and Yue.


After examination, it was found: On the evening of January 27, 2016, Liu drove a motor vehicle after drinking and was caught by the police, after which his blood was drawn. At about 8 a.m. on January 28, 2016, the defendant Lin, in cooperation with Liu, went to the Fujian Minxi Judicial Appraisal Institute where the defendant Ke was employed. The three of them worked together to swap Liu's blood sample, which had been sent to the appraisal institute by the Traffic Police Brigade of Xinluo Branch Bureau of Longyan Public Security Bureau for appraisal, leading to the institute detecting an ethanol content of 3.58mg/100ml in Liu's blood. On the evening of January 28, 2016, the defendant Lin led the police to recover the blood sample of Liu, which had been swapped by Lin and others. On January 29, 2016, the police notified the defendants Ke and Lin by telephone to come forward for investigation. According to the appraisal by Fujian Wanhong Judicial Appraisal Institute, the ethanol concentration in Liu's blood was 139.29mg/100ml. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants Ke and Lin or their defense during the trial. These facts were confirmed by evidence such as the defendants Ke and Lin's household registration certificates, proofs of no prior criminal record, the explanation of the incident and its circumstances, testimonies of witnesses Liu, Lai, Deng, Liu, Zeng, Li, Xie, call logs, photo identifications, recognition records, the inspection reports issued by Fujian Minxi Judicial Appraisal Institute and Fujian Wanhong Judicial Appraisal Institute, and the confessions and defenses of the defendants Ke and Lin.


The People's Procuratorate of a Miao Autonomous County charged that on March 28, 2016, the defendants Ma, Tao, and Wang invited each other, with Tao driving a cloud GSK2** van. The three of them traveled together from a certain city and town to a certain county. That night, they found a hotel to stay in within the county town and discussed plans to steal motorcycles the next day during the local market day. Around 10 a.m. on March 29 (Tuesday), the three drove from the county town to a rural area. After scouting the streets, defendant Tao parked the car at the corner of the intersection of Chaibai Village and got out to stand watch, Wang stayed in the car to stand watch, while Ma walked about 50 meters toward the Renzi Bridge direction to the side of the road and stole a red Jinghong brand three-wheeled motorcycle (frame number: LZXHDNZ14E5442704, engine number: E5409051, unlicensed) parked there by the victim, Yang. He then hid it at the Jinchanghe Hydropower Station. The three of them hid on the mountain opposite the station to observe and found that the owner discovered the motorcycle. They then descended the mountain and fled in the cloud GSK2** van, but were caught by the police. According to the assessment, the stolen three-wheeled motorcycle belonging to the victim Yang was valued at 13,300 RMB. In response to the above charges, the prosecution read and presented relevant evidence in court. Consequently,


Yuhang District People's Procuratorate of a certain city accuses: Defendant Zhou is an employee in the machinery repair team of a company known as Certain State Products Co., Ltd. (abbreviated as Certain Company), and Defendant Wu is the team leader of the machinery repair team of the same company. Certain Company has explicit regulations that when performing welding in workshops containing flammable and explosive materials, there must be one person monitoring nearby, and operations can only proceed after implementing stringent safety measures. At around 15:00 on January 12, 2020, Defendants Zhou and Wu were repairing the No. 3 automatic foam molding machine in Certain Company's automatic foam production workshop. During this period, Zhou used an electric welder for operations, while Wu, as the fire safety officer, provided safety protection for the welding process nearby. Due to the failure of Defendants Zhou and Wu to remove flammable foam plastics to a safe distance from the welding area, the sparks generated during welding caused the foam plastics to catch fire, resulting in a fire that destroyed Certain Company's factory building, foam molding machine, fully automatic intermittent pre-expansion machine, trucks, cardboard boxes, and more. According to the appraisal, the value of the destroyed property totaled RMB 2,251,462.5. After the incident, Defendants Zhou and Wu were granted forgiveness by the victim unit, Certain Company.


The People's Procuratorate of Qingshan District in a certain city, Hubei Province charged that on the morning of May 22, 2013, at around 7 a.m., defendants You and Zhang, after conspiring, stole the wallet of the victim Zheng while he was buying vegetables and was unprepared at the Qingyiju Community market in Gongren Village Street, Qingshan District, a certain city. Defendant You pickpocketed the wallet and defendant Zhang aided the transfer, stealing 1,500 yuan in cash from it. Subsequently, defendant You received 900 yuan, and defendant Zhang received 600 yuan. On August 20 and September 16, 2013, due to drug use, defendants Zhang and You were sent by the public security agency to the city's Public Security Bureau Drug Rehabilitation Center for compulsory rehabilitation. After the public security agency obtained leads on defendant You's suspected theft, they interrogated defendant You on November 20, 2013, during which he confessed to the facts of pickpocketing together with defendant Zhang. After the case was filed, defendant Zhang's family returned the stolen 1,500 yuan which was returned to the victim Zheng. These facts were not disputed by defendants You and Zhang during the trial. In addition, the case is supported by evidence including the public security agency's case solving, arrival process and case handling instructions, the China Construction Bank ATM customer receipt, the list of seized and returned items, the criminal judgment No. 236 issued in 2011 by this court, the defendants' identity materials, the testimony of witness Lü, the victim Zheng’s report and statements, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of Nanshan District in a certain city charged: On June 20, 2015, at around 21:00, Wu Moushan, Ge Mouzheng, Zhou Mouli, Wang Mouyong (the aforementioned four have been sentenced), Wang Mouyan, and the defendants Sun and Zhou, among others, were having a meal at a wooden barbecue restaurant on Dongbin Road, Nanshan District, in a certain city. At around midnight the following day, Zhou, while going to the restroom at the barbecue restaurant, unintentionally had the door pushed by the victim Chen Moujia. After Wu Moushan learned of this, he turned and shoved Chen Moujia, and then Ge Mouzheng, seeing this, picked up barbecue skewers from the table along with Wu Moushan to hit Chen Moujia. The victim Chen Mouyi intervened to mediate, and both parties were eventually stopped. Subsequently, when both parties were preparing to leave, another dispute occurred. Wu Moushan, Ge Mouzheng, Zhou Mouli, Wang Mouyong, Wang Mouyan, Sun, and Zhou, among others, punched and kick


The prosecution alleges that around midnight on September 24, 2015, after conspiring together, the defendants Huang and Lan drove a van to the cattle pen at Pan's home in a certain county's development area in a certain township. They stole a yellow cow that Long was raising there. Around noon, the two defendants were caught by the police while attempting to sell the cow in a certain city's town. The stolen yellow cow and the van used in the crime were seized on the spot. The seized cow has been returned to the victim Long. According to the valuation by the county's price certification center, the stolen yellow cow was valued at RMB 6,750. During the trial, defendants Huang and Lan raised no objections to the above facts. Additionally, evidence includes photos of the stolen yellow cow and the van used in the crime; documentary evidence including the case registration form, the decision to file a case, identities of the two defendants, details of the arrest, lists of seized and returned items; the victim Long's statement; the defendants Huang and Lan’s confessions and defenses; expert opinions; inspection and identification records, among other evidence. All the above evidence was presented and cross-examined during the trial, with sources being legally obtained, objectively reflecting the facts, and sufficient to establish the case.


Upon investigation, it was found that at around 3 AM on August 22, 2014, the victim, Yang, had a dispute with a "Mingzun KTV" waiter over a payment issue at Tong'an Street in a certain city. Security personnel from "Mingzun KTV," including defendants Chen, Ji, and Wang, arrived upon hearing the commotion. Defendant Chen used a walkie-talkie to assault Yang, and defendants Ji and Wang also assaulted Yang, resulting in multiple injuries to Yang's head and face. According to a forensic evaluation: Yang has a clear history of external injuries, with scars on his head and face totaling 12 centimeters in length, of which head scalp scars total 10 centimeters; the injury is classified as minor injury level two. On October 20, 2014, defendants Chen, Ji, and Wang voluntarily surrendered to the police and truthfully confessed to their criminal actions. The parties have now reached a settlement agreement, with defendant Chen compensating Yang for economic losses in the amount of 30,000 RMB and obtaining Yang's forgiveness.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged that on April 1, 2018, at around 3:00 PM, Cao (handled in a separate case) was dissatisfied with the victim, Huang, for his rude remarks while drunk at noon on the same day. Cao then instructed Lu, Zhang 1, Gao 1, and Wang 1 (all four handled in separate cases) to drive Huang from the south gate of a mountain scenic area in a certain county to the Jining Hongfeng Automobile Trade Co., Ltd., which he managed. In the company's second-floor office, Zhang 1, Gao 1, Wang 1, and Lu assaulted Huang. At about 5:00 PM that day, after Cao arrived at Jining Hongfeng Automobile Trade Co., he instructed Zhu to pour water on Huang's head. Subsequently, Zhu and others assaulted Huang. During the beating, due to issues such as Huang falsely reporting expenses to the company, Cao and others summoned the defendant Han and others back to Hongfeng Automobile Trade Co., Ltd. After Han returned to the company, he assaulted Huang. Until around 9:00 PM that day, Cao and others took Huang back to a certain county and let him go. According to the appraisal by the Criminal Science and Technology Research Office of a certain county's Public Security Bureau, Huang's injuries were classified as minor injuries of the first degree. In response to the above charges, the prosecution provided evidence including documentary evidence of the capture process, testimonies of witnesses such as Li 1, statements of the victim Huang, confessions and defenses of the defendant


The People's Procuratorate of Ouhai District in a certain city charged that on October 9, 2013, at around 7 a.m., the defendants Shi and Lin, together with Li (to be handled in a separate case) and others, conspired and went to the bus stop next to No. 25 Xishan East Road, Jingshan Street, Ouhai District, in a certain city. Shi and Lin acted as lookouts while Li stole a mobile phone (worth 2,800 yuan) from the pants pocket of the victim, Li. The stolen phone was later sold for 1,600 yuan. The aforementioned facts were acknowledged by defendants Shi and Lin during the court trial, and there is also the victim Li's statement, witness Li's testimony, a price appraisal report, a situation statement, a criminal judgment, a certificate of release after serving a sentence, an account of the arrest, identification materials, and surveillance footage as evidence, which are sufficient to establish these facts.


The prosecution charges that the defendants, Wang and Han, are married. From May to June 2016, the defendants Wang and Han, despite knowing that poppy leaves are toxic, harmful, and non-food materials that should not be added to food, still used poppy leaves during the preparation of brined geese at home at No. 157, Zone C, Galaxy Community, a town in a certain district of a city. Wang was responsible for the preparation, and both Wang and Han sold the brined geese containing poppy ingredients at stalls they set up in the Sunshine Community of the development zone in a certain city and on the streets of a certain town in a certain district. According to identification, the brine used on the brined geese at their stalls, the brine used during preparation in their workshop, and the suspicious plant leaves all contained poppy components. During this period, they sold more than 200 brined geese containing poppy ingredients. After the case was uncovered, Wang and Han truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. Further investigation revealed that the public security organs legally seized 9.35 kilograms of brine containing poppy ingredients and 0.04 kilograms of poppy leaves from the defendants Wang and Han. The aforementioned criminal facts were not contested by Wang and Han during the trial proceedings. The facts are substantiated by evidence, including basic information on permanent residents, the arrest process, seizure lists presented and cross-examined in court, the confessions and defenses of the defendants Wang and Han, the forensic identification report from the Judicial Identification Institute of Yangzhou University, the on-site records, search records, extraction records, weighing records, and related photos produced by the development zone branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city, all of which are sufficient for conviction.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges: On May 25, 2017, the defendant Wang, together with Zhang (already prosecuted), drove a semi-trailer with license plate B××××× to transport steel during which, in collusion with Zhang3 (already prosecuted) and others, they transported the steel to warehouse No. 2 of Hangzhou xx Company, rented by Zhang3, located in Tangqi Town, a certain district in a certain city. In this warehouse, the defendant Zhou, together with Li, Liu, and Zhang4 (all already prosecuted), used a crane to unload coiled rebar, disassembled and dispersed it, thereby stealing 11.772 tons of coiled rebar, valued at 44,145 yuan. The evidence supporting the charges includes physical and documentary evidence like rebar (photos), household registration certificates; witness testimonies; confessions and defenses of the defendants; price appraisal conclusion documents; on-site investigation records, person identification records; surveillance footage (on CD), etc.


The People's Procuratorate of Xiaodian District, a certain city, charged that around 8 PM on August 23, 2015, defendants Li and Liu went to the vicinity of Wuyi Square in a certain city. Seeing the victim, Song, carrying a backpack, they followed him onto Bus No. 4. On the bus, with Liu providing cover, Li stole a white VIVO Y613F mobile phone from Song's backpack. After appraisal, the phone involved in the case was valued at 567 RMB. The stolen property has been returned to Song. On August 26, 2015, at approximately 3 PM, defendants Li and Liu went to the bus stop at the intersection of Changfeng Street and Xinchengmo'er Road in Xiaodian District of a certain city. While the victim, Yu, was boarding the bus, Liu provided cover by squeezing into the bus, giving Li the opportunity to reach into Yu's bag and steal a wallet containing over 1,900 RMB in cash. After boarding, Yu was informed by others that the contents of the bag had been stolen, so Yu got off the bus to chase after them. Along the way, Yu recovered the wallet that Li discarded while fleeing, and Li was subsequently apprehended by patrolling police officers. These facts are not disputed by defendants Li and Liu during the trial. Furthermore, they are corroborated by the victim's report and statement, records of the arrest, identification records, witness testimonies, a price appraisal report, photographs of the defendants identifying stolen goods, a list of seized and returned items, the decisions on compulsory detoxification and administrative penalties, the confessions of the two defendants, and their registered resident information, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of the Yingze District of a certain city charges that around 7:40 am on June 30, 2015, the defendant Zhang, in collusion with the defendant Li, stole a red DOOV S1 model mobile phone (valued at 200 RMB) from the backpack of the victim Chen on the No. 103 bus in a certain city. At around 11:00 am on the same day, the defendant Zhang, again in collusion with the defendant Li, stole a wallet from the backpack of the victim Liu on the No. 870 bus in the same city. The wallet contained 28 RMB, the victim's ID card, and a bank card (with a pin code). Both were caught on the spot afterward. Following the incident, the stolen money and items were recovered and returned to the victims. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Zhang and Li during the trial and were corroborated by the victim Chen's and Liu's reports and interview records, as well as by the testimony of a witness Geng, who stated that the police caught the pickpocket on the 870 bus. Other supporting evidence includes identification records, arrest materials, photos of the recovered money and items, seizure and return lists, records of previous convictions and checklists for bad behavior, item price evaluation reports, household registration information, basic condition survey forms, and confessions from the defendants Zhang and Li. The evidence corroborates each other sufficiently to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges: In November 2010, the defendant Zhao registered the establishment of Lianyungang Fuzhi Trading Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Fuzhi Company) in a certain district of a certain city. Afterwards, the defendant Zhao served as the company's general manager, and the defendant Qin served as the company's deputy general manager. In 2011, despite knowing that they lacked the ability to repay debts, defendants Zhao and Qin, along with others, established a store at No. 47 Xingfu South Road in a certain district of a certain city under the name of Fuzhi Company. Defendant Qin acted as the store's head and accountant. The two used promotional information such as low-risk high returns, high interest on deposits, and claims of company strength to lure funds from the general public. From June 2012 to April 2013, defendants Zhao and Qin borrowed money under the name of Fuzhi Company, attracting a total of over 1.8 million RMB from 39 individuals for personal consumption, debt repayment, external loans, etc. As of the time the case was uncovered, more than 1.7 million RMB remained unpaid. To substantiate the charges, the prosecution has submitted related documentation, witness testimonies, victim statements, and the defendants' confessions and defenses as evidence to the court.


The People's Procuratorate of Furong District, a certain city, charged that: In early July 2014, the defendant Deng met the female victim Li through QQ chat. After chatting online, they arranged to meet on July 10, 2014. Subsequently, the two opened a room at the Yahua Grand Hotel on Bayi Road in Furong District of a certain city and had relations. On July 30, 2014, the defendant Deng, in agreement with the defendant Lei, planned to extort the victim Li, with an agreement that the proceeds would be shared between them. Deng then contacted the victim Li via SMS, threatening to disclose their relationship to her husband and to post ads in her residential area to ruin her reputation, demanding that victim Li transfer 10,000 RMB to Lei's bank account. On August 4, 2014, the victim Li arranged to meet Deng to make the payment and called the police. At around 19:00 that day, after victim Li handed over the agreed 5600 RMB to Deng and Lei at the entrance of Pudong Development Bank on Wanbao Avenue in a certain city, the police promptly arrested Deng and Lei, seizing 5600 RMB extorted by Deng and two iron rods they were carrying. During the trial, defendants Deng and Lei did not dispute the aforementioned facts. Defense lawyers You and Zhou argued that the extortion of 5600 RMB by Deng and Lei was conducted under police surveillance and therefore should be considered an attempted crime; Deng and Lei were both first-time offenders, confessed truthfully after being apprehended, and Lei was an accessory, requesting leniency in punishment. The aforementioned facts are supported by evidence including the statement of victim Li, the case registration form from Xianghu Police Station of Furong Branch of a certain city's Public Security Bureau, source and arrest procedure materials, seizure procedure materials, seizure decision, list of seized items, list of returned items, photos of seized items, SMS records, the confessions of defendants Deng and Lei, and their household registration certificates and character evidence, which are sufficient for determination.


Upon trial, it was found that the defendant Li violated relevant national regulations by providing a total of 60,251 pieces of citizens' personal information, including phone numbers, to the defendant Shi on March 4, March 14, 2017, and February 28, 2018. The defendant Shi violated national regulations by providing a total of 28,816 pieces of citizens' personal information, including phone numbers, to Cao (handled in a separate case) on July 13, 2017. Defendant Li was apprehended on March 6, 2018, and defendant Shi was apprehended on April 3 of the same year. After being apprehended, both defendants truthfully confessed to the aforementioned facts. During the trial, defendants Li and Shi raised no objections to these facts, which were supported by documentary evidence such as the basic information of the habitual residence of defendants Li and Shi, the details of their apprehension, explanation of circumstances, seizure decision letters, lists of seized items, the testimony of witness Cao, the confessions and defenses of defendants Li and Shi, criminal photographs, inspection records, electronic data inspection work records, search records, identification records, remote survey work records, and other evidence, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain location accused that in the early hours of December 10, 2013, the defendants Zhang and Wu, along with others, were drinking at the New Concept Sichuan Restaurant in the big stall at No. 12 Shapu Commercial Street, Xintang Town, Zengcheng City. At around 4 a.m., after drinking, the defendants Zhang and Wu, without reason, smashed the tables, chairs, induction cookers, refrigerators, mini TVs, and other items in the store. The value of the damaged items was appraised at 3,352 RMB. During the trial, the prosecution presented evidence to the court, including the victim's statements, on-site investigation records and photos, the price appraisal conclusion, and the defendants' confessions, to prove the facts of the accusation.


The prosecution accuses: At around 5 am on April 4, 2015, defendants Pang and Wu were at the basketball court of Area 1 in Guangzhou City Construction Vocational College, where they got into a verbal altercation with the school security guard Huang, which escalated into a physical fight. During the altercation, Pang and Wu used a flashlight and punched and kicked the victim, Huang, causing him injuries. After evaluation, the victim Huang's injuries were classified as minor injuries of the second degree.


Upon examination and verification, it was found that at around 1 AM on December 22, 2015, the defendants Li and Li, together with a person nicknamed "Death So-and-so," went to the front of "New Fashion Internet Cafe" at No. 87 Bubu Road, Wanxiu District, a certain city, and stole a Shuangjian SJ125T-2G motorcycle (valued at 3,008 RMB) parked there by the victim Gan. After their success, the three went to the front of "New Gem Hotel" at No. 28, the middle section of Xihuan Road, Wanxiu District, a certain city, and used a hex key to steal a Zhufeng ZF125T-16A moped (valued at 2,352 RMB) parked there by the victim Mo. After the crime, the public security organs seized the stolen Zhufeng ZF125T-16A moped and the hex key used as a crime tool, and have returned the vehicle to Mo. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the two defendants during the court hearing, and are corroborated by evidence such as the case registration form, the decision to file a case, the seizure list and return list, the unified invoice for motor vehicle sales, the vehicle purchase receipt, the account of the arrest, household registration certificates, the criminal and civil attached judgment, release certificate, search records, identification records and photos, the statements of victims Mo and Gan, the confessions and defenses of defendants Li and Li, the testimony of witness Liang, and the price appraisal conclusion, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution charges: From March to August 2019, the defendants Liu, Ye, and Yu, for the purpose of making profits, created a friends circle on the Xianlai Mahjong gaming platform in a certain location. They each invited individuals to join the circle for gambling, which consisted of about 60 members. Defendant Liu was responsible for recharging the room fees on the gaming platform, with each room card costing 3 yuan per game. The three defendants also downloaded the Xianliao chat tool and established a chat group called "New Group, Post Your Scores Here." Participants in the gambling games would open a room within the friends circle, share the link in the chat group, and enter the mahjong game, each starting with a base score of 1000 points, at a rate of 10 yuan per point. After each game, the platform would automatically calculate wins and losses, and the biggest winner would post the results in the chat group. Participants would settle gambling debts through WeChat or Alipay transfers. The biggest winner would pay the room fee to the three defendants via WeChat, with a 10 yuan fee for winning less than 200 points and a 20 yuan fee for winning more than 200 points. Upon retrieving the transaction records from the defendants' WeChat accounts for room fees, it was found that the three defendants collected a total of 30,880 yuan. Defendants Ye and Yu voluntarily turned themselves in on September 4 and December 11, 2019, respectively, and confessed their criminal activities truthfully. The three defendants also voluntarily returned 35,000 yuan of illegal funds after being apprehended. The facts stated above are supported by the following evidence provided by the prosecution: 1. Case registration forms, arrest records, work descriptions, detailed WeChat transaction lists, and non-tax revenue receipts; 2. Testimonies of witnesses You, Xie, and another Yu; 3. Confessions and defenses of defendants Liu, Ye, and Yu; 4. Identification records; 5. An electronic data CD containing WeChat transaction details of defendants Liu, Ye, and Yu.


The prosecution charges: On the evening of June 17, 2014, defendants Ding and Wang conspired to steal 16 zinc ingots, valued at a total of 5,931 RMB, from Workshop No. 1 of Zhejiang Hangfeng Iron Tower Co., Ltd. in Linjiang Subdistrict, Xiaoshan District, a certain city. Defendant Wang was apprehended by the public security bureau outside the factory premises. On January 12, 2015, defendant Ding turned himself in to the public security bureau and truthfully confessed to his theft. After being brought to justice, defendant Wang also truthfully confessed to his theft. After the incident, the stolen goods involved were all recovered and returned to the victimized unit. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Ding and Wang during the trial, and are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Zhu, Zhang, Liu, Wang, Yang, and Chen, as well as records of identification, inspection notes, evidence retrieval lists, photographs, weighing records, labor contracts, call logs, power of attorney documents, lists of seized and returned items, price appraisal reports, the course of the incident, explanatory notes, and identity verification documents of defendants Ding and Wang, among other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the case.


A certain People's Procuratorate charged that during the period when defendant Gao served as the director of the Dongjie Village Committee in Wencheng Town, Wenshui County, and defendant Ren served as a village committee member, a village committee meeting was held to decide to transfer the funds from the Dongxing Community Resettlement Building account in Dongjie Village to a separate account managed by defendant Li. In March 2012, defendants Gao, Ren, and Li discussed using 1 million yuan from the Dongxing Community Resettlement Building account for the registered capital verification of Wenshui County Zhongxiong Agricultural and Sideline Products Trading Co., Ltd., which they jointly established. On March 27 and 28, 2012, Ren and Li transferred the 1 million yuan from the account for this purpose. The amount was returned on May 24 of the same year. During the time Gao and Ren were serving as Director of the Town Committee and a member of the Dongjie Village Committee, from November to December 2012, they used the funds from the Dongxing Community Resettlement Building account to pay 285,516 yuan for the construction costs of a comprehensive building for an individual named Wu. This amount has not been returned to date.


The People’s Procuratorate of a District in Wuhan City charges: On October 25, 2013, at around 8:00 PM, defendants Dai and Han were at the night market on Baocheng Road in a district of this city. Defendant Han acted as a lookout while defendant Dai took advantage of the victim, Feng, being unprepared to steal a wallet from Feng’s bag. The wallet was valued at 30 RMB and contained 1,720 RMB, bank cards, and other items. Subsequently, defendants Dai and Han were apprehended by the police. The stolen items have been recovered by public security authorities and returned to the victim. The aforementioned facts are acknowledged without objection by defendants Dai and Han during the court proceedings and are corroborated by the arrest process and case reports; the statement of the victim, Feng; testimonies from witnesses Liu, Wang, and Kong; the seizure decision, seizure record, seizure list, and return list; physical evidence photos; the price appraisal statement; the criminal judgment; the compulsory isolation detox decision; and defendant Dai’s confession, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges: On April 15, 2014, at around 20:00, the defendants Ou and Liu conspired in advance to ride a motorcycle to the old factory area of "Zhejiang Weiyu Machinery Co., Ltd." on a certain street in a certain city. They used a bamboo ladder to climb over the wall into the factory and entered Workshop No. 3 through a window. They stole 57.44 kilograms of semi-finished copper pieces, 42.18 kilograms of semi-finished iron pieces, 3.1 kilograms of scrap purple copper wire, and 136 M691 copper quick connectors, with a total value of 4,000.56 yuan. After the incident, the stolen goods were recovered and returned to the victim. To prove the above charges, the prosecution provided this court with the seizure decision, list of seized and returned items, weighing records, inventory records and photos, basic information on the permanent residents, the process of seizure, the victim Wang's statement, and the statements of the defendants Ou and Liu. It is considered that the defendants Ou and Liu, with the purpose of illegal possession, secretly stole other people's property in a relatively large amount and should be held criminally responsible for the crime of x. It is a joint crime. The court is requested to punish them in accordance with the provisions of Article x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China. The defendants Ou and Liu have no objections to the facts and charges brought by the prosecution. After examination of the evidence presented during the trial, it has been verified as true. This court confirms the facts of the crime of x charged against defendants Ou and Liu by the prosecution.


The prosecution's indictment alleges: On the evening of October 17, 2013, the defendants Wang, Yu, and Dai, along with Liang (to be handled in a separate case) and others, had a dispute with the victim Chen over a trivial matter near the Night Market City in Wukang Town, Deqing County. Subsequently, the defendant Dai came forward to help and, together with defendants Wang, Yu, and Liang, physically assaulted the victim Chen by punching and kicking him, resulting in fractures of his left eighth and ninth ribs, which were classified as minor injuries. After the incident, defendants Wang, Yu, and Dai, along with others, compensated the victim Chen with a total of 28,000 RMB, and they all received the victim's forgiveness. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Wang, Yu, and Dai during the court proceedings, and the evidence such as medical records, the settlement agreement, receipts, a letter of forgiveness, criminal judgment, administrative penalty decision, records of illegal activities, household registration certificates, population information, statements from the victim Chen, testimonies from witnesses Li A, Hou, Li B, confessions from co-defendant Liang, forensic medical assessment on the degree of human injuries, identification records, photos, the circumstances of the arrest, and explanatory statements, is sufficient to establish these facts.


The prosecution authority charged: Starting from August 2015, defendants Zhong and Ling accepted multiple people's bets on "Mark Six" for organized gambling at the Hao Hui Duo Supermarket in Yashuitang, Daxiang Village, Renhe Town, Baiyun District, in this city. At around 8 p.m. on September 8 of the same year, Zhong and Ling were again involved in organized gambling at the aforementioned location when they were apprehended by law enforcement officers. They were found with 27 "Mark Six" betting slips and gambling funds amounting to 1,500 yuan. To substantiate the charges, the prosecution authority read and presented documents, witness testimonies, and the defendants' confessions as evidence during the court trial. Therefore,


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that: At the end of December 2013, the defendant Tu, in a teahouse he operated and managed in Muzhuangqiao, a village in a certain town of Tongxiang City, organized and recruited gambling participants Zhu, Zhao, Zhang, and others four times to engage in group gambling by playing "Tongzigong." He drew a profit of approximately 12,000 yuan from this. The defendant Li was responsible for keeping watch and received a total of over 800 yuan as a benefit.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Taizhou City, Jiangsu Province charged that: between April 2016 and February 2019, the defendants Chen, Zhu, and Qian took advantage of their positions, which allowed them to sign contracts on behalf of a certain company, report payment plans, and be responsible for the construction at a certain project site. They used these positions at their office, located on Hongqi Avenue in a certain district's agricultural development zone in this city, to jointly or individually accept money from individuals such as Zou, Fan, and another Chen. Among them, defendant Chen was involved in accepting a total of 177,000 RMB and received a share of 72,000 RMB; defendant Zhu was involved in accepting a total of 170,000 RMB and received a share of 60,000 RMB; defendant Qian was involved in accepting a total of 161,000 RMB and received a share of 56,000 RMB. The illicit money obtained was spent by the three defendants. To substantiate the aforementioned charges, the prosecution read and presented in court documentary evidence such as the "Payment Approval Forms," "Project Visa Forms," "Business Licenses," "Labor Contracts," and "Internal Contract Agreement," along with the testimonies of witnesses like Zhou and others, as well as the confessions and defenses of the defendants.


The People's Procuratorate in a certain area charged: 1. In December 2015, the defendant Yao, in collaboration with Huang, went to Wujiadian, Datiewu Village, Hengjie Town, Yushan County, and stole a Lvjia brand electric bicycle parked at the home of the victim Zheng. The Lvjia brand electric bicycle was appraised at a value of 2,625 RMB. 2. In July 2015, the defendant Yao, in collaboration with Huang, went to a village in a certain town in Changshan County, a certain province, and stole a Nija brand electric bicycle parked by the victim Wang at the entrance of the Village and Town United Bank. They also stole a Luyuan brand electric bicycle parked by the victim Mao at the entrance of the Hongqi Gang Rural Credit Cooperative. The stolen Nija brand electric bicycle was appraised at a value of 1,710 RMB. 3. In the second half of 2015, the defendant Yao went to Mapeng, Houlong Village, Bingxi Town, Yushan County, and stole a Lvju brand electric bicycle. This Lvju brand electric bicycle was appraised at a value of 1,230 RMB. 4. On the night of March 15, 2016, the defendant Yao went to the construction site of the new party school in Yushan County and stole a Suqier brand electric bicycle belonging to the victim Ke. The Suqier brand electric bicycle was appraised at a value of 2,510 RMB. During the trial, the prosecution presented evidence including the confessions of the defendants Yao and Huang, statements from the victims Zheng, Ke, Wang, and Mao, testimonies of witnesses Huang (Witness 1), Yao (Witness 1), and Huang (Witness 2), identification of scene photos, appraisal reports, a list of seized items, inspection records, a situation report, a receipt from the Yushan County Public Security Bureau, criminal verdicts of prior offenses of the defendants Yao and Huang, and household registration information.


The prosecution agency charges: On September 11, 2012, defendant Xia, together with Huang, invested in the establishment of Shandong Shangkong Real Estate Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Shangkong Real Estate) in a certain district. Xia invested 7 million yuan, and Huang invested 3 million yuan, with Xia serving as the legal representative. Later, to develop a plot in a certain district, defendant Xia, along with Wuxi Wuzhou International Decoration City Co., Ltd. and Huang, invested in the establishment of Wuzhou Real Estate Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Wuzhou Real Estate) in July 2013. Wuxi Wuzhou International Decoration City Co., Ltd. invested 15 million yuan, Xia invested 3 million yuan, and Huang invested 2 million yuan, with Xia serving as the general manager of the company.

During his tenure as the general manager of Wuzhou Real Estate, defendant Xia, taking advantage of his control over the company's seal and other documents such as the company's bank signature retained on file, conspired with defendant Chen, who worked at the company, to conceal from other shareholders of Wuzhou Real Estate, forging a contract. On August 2, 2013, they unauthorizedly transferred 19.8 million yuan of registered capital from the company's account, under the guise of investment funds, into the account of Shangkong Real Estate, where Xia was the legal representative. On August 5 of the same year, they deposited the sum into four separate transactions into the personal bank account of Xia's wife, Qi Mouyun. The next day, 550,000 yuan was transferred to Huang's personal account to cover the project measurement fee that Huang had advanced.

On August 5 and 6 of the same year, Xia transferred the remaining 19.25 million yuan into his personal account and on August 6 instructed Chen to deposit 14 million yuan of it into Shandong Shangkong Real Estate Co., Ltd.'s account to process an increase in his personal share in the company. After the incident, all funds involved in the case were returned. For the above charges, the prosecution agency provided evidence including the confessions and defenses of defendants Xia and Chen, testimony from witness Shu and others, documentary evidence, and other supporting materials.


The People's Procuratorate of Luohu District in a certain city charges: Starting in October 2013, defendants Liu and Lai rented and lived together in Room 2615, Building C, Sunshine New Line, Dongmen South Road, Luohu District, in a certain city. On January 13, 2014, defendant Liu provided drugs and allowed his friend Xu (who has been administratively punished) to use methamphetamine at his residence. Subsequently, defendant Liu continued to provide drugs multiple times and allowed Xu to use methamphetamine at that location. On the afternoon of February 21, 2014, defendants Liu, Lai, and drug user Xu were caught by the police at the aforementioned residence. The police seized a packet of methamphetamine on the spot (determined by evaluation to be 4.35 grams in net weight, containing methamphetamine). Further investigation revealed that defendant Lai allowed drug user Xu to use methamphetamine at their residence on February 13 and February 16, 2014. To prove the above facts, the prosecution submitted the following evidence: 1. Physical evidence: Photos of the seized drugs and drug paraphernalia; 2. Documentary evidence: List of seized items, call records, the arrest process, administrative punishment materials, and physical examination reports of the involved drug users, identity information and physical examination reports of the defendants; 3. Testimonies: Testimony of witness Xu; 4. Defendants' confessions and defenses: Confessions and defenses of defendants Liu and Lai; 5. Expert opinions: "Expert Report" and "Notice of Expert Conclusion"; 6. Records of on-site inspection, investigation, identification, investigation experiments, etc.: On-site inspection records, photos, and identification transcripts.


Upon trial, it was found that at approximately 4:00 p.m. on May 1, 2016, defendants Cai and Yang took an eastbound Route 19 AL59** bus. When the bus reached the vicinity of the Big Wild Goose Pagoda stop, Yang assisted Cai, and Cai stole a brown-black wallet from the shoulder bag of the victim, Zhu, which contained an ICBC bank card, an ID card, and 3,000 yuan in cash. Cai then transferred the wallet to Yang. Zhu discovered the theft and immediately caught Cai. Yang took the opportunity to throw the wallet into the trash bin by the rear door of the bus and fled but was captured on the spot by Zhu's boyfriend, Weng, who reported the incident to the police. The police arrived and apprehended Cai and Yang. The stolen wallet was delivered to the public security bureau that evening by bus driver Yi A, and all items except the cash were recovered and returned to the victim, Zhu. The evidence confirming the above facts includes: 1. The report materials and statements from the victim, Zhu; 2. The documentation from the public security authorities regarding the capture of defendants Cai and Yang; 3. Testimonies from witnesses Weng and Yi; 4. Photos of the location where the victim's wallet was discarded; 5. The record and photos of the victim Zhu identifying defendant Cai and the stolen wallet; 6. Photos of defendants Cai and Yang identifying the crime scene and recognizing the stolen wallet; 7. The receipt issued to the victim Zhu for retrieving the stolen items; 8. A sketch of the theft scene; 9. The forensic clinical judicial appraisal report from the Department of Forensic Medicine, Xi'an Jiaotong University; 10. Confessions from defendants Cai and Yang. The aforementioned evidence was cross-examined and authenticated in court, and it was determined to be true, sufficient, and mutually corroborative, enough to substantiate the verdict.


A certain city's district People's Procuratorate charges: During the production process, Company X Motor Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Company X) generates hazardous waste such as oily sludge and paint residues. According to proper disposal procedures, this hazardous waste should be approved by environmental protection authorities and disposed of by companies with the necessary hazardous waste disposal qualifications. Defendant Rong, the deputy general manager of Company X, was responsible for hazardous waste disposal operations. In July 2016, during the process of handling the aforementioned hazardous waste, Defendant Rong instructed Defendant Hu to contact disposal companies. Due to the high costs and long cycles associated with certified companies, Defendants Rong and Hu handed over 8.6 tons of hazardous waste to Defendant Yang, who lacked proper disposal qualifications, for a price of 36,000 RMB. Subsequently, Defendant Yang contacted Defendant Wang, who in turn contacted Defendants Zhou and Gao. On July 11th of the same year, Defendants Wang and Zhou drove a large truck with license plate "X-D×××××" to transport the 8.6 tons of hazardous waste from Company X's plant in the district of a certain city to near the residence rented by Defendant Gao on Cangqian Street, in a district of a certain city in a certain province. Defendant Gao, together with Liu and another Wang (both dealt with in separate cases), discussed and then Wang contacted Yao (handled in a separate case), who further contacted Zheng (handled in a separate case) to drive a farm vehicle with license plate "Wan 10180**" to transport the hazardous waste, and arranged for Xiang (handled in a separate case) to lead the way. Subsequently, Defendants Wang, Zhou, Gao, together with Liu, Wang, Zheng, and Xiang, illegally dumped the 8.6 tons of hazardous waste in two sessions in a certain district of a certain city. The evidence supporting these charges includes witness testimonies; household registration certificates, business licenses, photos, industrial waste disposal agreements, financial records, special VAT invoices, and other documentary evidence; on-site inspection records, identification records; recognition of the hazardous waste, explanations regarding the hazardous waste; and confessions and defenses from the defendants and co-defendants.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain location charges that, on November 5, 2016, at approximately 19:10, defendant Hu was unloading cargo at the entrance of the xx express delivery warehouse in this district when he had a dispute with his colleague Yang over trivial work matters, which led to a physical altercation. Colleague Chen stepped in to break up the fight but also got into a conflict with Yang. Subsequently, defendants Hu and Chen together assaulted victim Yang, knocking Yang to the ground and causing injuries to his head and face. According to the appraisal, victim Yang suffered fractures on the left maxillary frontal process, left nasal bone, and left nasomaxillary suture, classified as minor injuries of the second degree; these injuries were consistent with those caused by this incident. On December 23, 2016, defendants Hu and Chen received a phone notification from police officers and voluntarily went to the police station to undergo processing. On the same day, both defendants reached a criminal reconciliation with victim Yang, compensating Yang with 60,000 RMB and obtaining his forgiveness. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Hu and Chen during the trial, and are corroborated by the victim Yang's statement, original external injury record form and injury photographs, forensic appraisal of the degree of bodily injury, clinical imaging consultation report by Wenzhou Medical University Forensic Identification Center, case closure statement, criminal reconciliation document, letter of forgiveness, receipt, population information, statements of defendants Hu and Chen during the investigation phase, and the identification site records, all of which sufficiently support the determination.


The prosecution charges that defendants Zhang and Li, on November 5, 2014, at around midnight, at Juyuanwang Hotel, Zhanqian Street, Lianshan District, a certain city, for the purpose of profit, introduced prostitutes Liu and Ma for prostitution and were caught on the spot by the public security authorities. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhang and Li during the trial, and are confirmed by evidence materials on record, such as witness testimonies, identification transcripts, call records, and criminal judgment documents, which, after being presented and cross-examined in court, are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution charges that: 1. On May 9, 2009, Lin rented a black Passat car (valued at 70,000 RMB) with the license plate J××××× from Ding. Later, Lin wanted to mortgage the car to obtain a loan and, through Zhang and Dai, contacted Lai, who was willing to accept the mortgage. On May 11, 2009, defendant Lai, knowing that the black Passat with license plate J××××× did not belong to Lin, accepted the car as a mortgage, loaned 50,000 RMB to Lin, and gained an interest of 5,000 RMB from it. The car has now been recovered and returned to the victim. 2. On May 27, 2009, Lin, through Li’s intervention, rented a Hyundai Elantra (valued at 65,000 RMB) with license plate J××××× from Wang. On the same day, Lin, through Zhang, contacted Chen, who was willing to accept the mortgage. On the same day, defendant Chen, knowing the car did not belong to Lin, accepted the mortgage and loaned 50,000 RMB to Lin, gaining an interest of 2,500 RMB from it. Later, the car was redeemed by the victim Wang and others. On March 22, 2011, defendant Chen voluntarily surrendered to the police and confessed the criminal facts truthfully. It was also found that defendants Lai and Chen have returned their illegal gains. The aforementioned facts are undisputed by defendants Lai and Chen during the trial and are corroborated by the confessions of the co-defendants Lin and Zhang, statements of the victims Ding and Wang, testimonies of witnesses Li and Dai, as well as lists of seized and returned items and photographs, vehicle identification and photographs, IOUs, car rental contracts, car rental agreements, price appraisal reports, account records, household registration certificates, and other evidence, which are sufficient to confirm the charges.


The prosecution charges that in the early hours of November 13, 2009, the defendants Zhang, Shao, and Wang, after premeditation, went to the mink farm of the victim, Mr. Zhang, located in a certain village in a certain district of a certain city. The three used a method of mixing "Rat Poison Strong" with small fish to poison the minks, stealing 160 male minks and 80 female minks from the farm, valued at 60,000 RMB. Defendant Zhang transported the stolen dead minks back to a certain city to sell the stolen goods, and gave Shao and Wang each 3,000 RMB. After the incident, defendants Shao and Wang voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed their criminal acts. Defendants Shao and Wang subsequently reached a compensation agreement with the victim, Mr. Zhang, collectively compensating him a total of 65,000 RMB. Mr. Zhang expressed forgiveness to defendants Shao and Wang. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhang, Shao, and Wang during the trial, and are substantiated by the statements of the victim, Mr. Zhang, testimony from witnesses Mr. Li and Mr. Xie, records of the police officers' statements on capturing and bringing in the defendants, criminal case settlement agreements, receipts, letters of forgiveness, the price appraisal conclusion issued by the Price Certification Center of a certain city, the physicochemical test report from the Criminal Science and Technology Research Institute of a certain city, on-site inspection records, identification records and photos, the (2008) Yong Lun Criminal First Instance No. 318 Criminal Judgment, and household registration certificates, which are sufficient for conviction.


The prosecution charges that between May 20, 2020, and May 29, 2020, a resident of a certain district in a certain city, Wang, was defrauded by others using the "Momo" dating app and QQ chat software under the pretense of dating. The fraud involved convincing Wang to invest in "Ether" virtual currency on the "Huili Exchange" investment platform, transferring a total of 1,169,400 RMB to the "recharge" account. On May 29, 2020, Cheng (handled in a separate case), knowing that the funds quickly transferred and withdrawn by Xiao (handled in a separate case) were criminal proceeds, still provided bank cards and Alipay accounts under the names Li and Gao to receive the funds. Cheng then assisted in quickly transferring or withdrawing a total of 200,000 RMB to other people's bank cards or Alipay accounts. Defendants Gao and Li, knowing the funds were illegal proceeds from criminal activities, still provided their bank cards or Alipay accounts to assist Cheng in withdrawing and transferring 100,000 RMB to specified accounts. On August 26, 2020, defendants Gao and Li were apprehended by the police. After being brought to justice, both defendants confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that between May and July 2, 2014, the defendants Li and Wang, with the intent of making a profit, repeatedly organized Zhao and 23 other individuals to gamble using methods such as "filling the pit," "Fight the Landlord," and "Pai Gow" at the house rented by Li. They illicitly profited over 3,000 RMB from these activities, which the two defendants squandered. On July 2, 2014, Li and Wang were apprehended by public security authorities. The prosecuting authority provided documentary evidence, witness testimonies, site inspection records and photos, and the defendants' confessions to support the charges.


The People's Procuratorate in a certain place accused that in March 2015, in room 8206 of Wenxing Coffee Hotel in Dongquan Town, Liucheng County, the defendant Li alone accommodated Wu to use the drug K powder once, and together with the defendant Zheng, accommodated Wu to use the drug K powder twice. To support the facts of the accusation, the prosecution presented evidence materials in court, including the confessions of the defendants, testimonies of witnesses, and identification records.


The prosecution alleges that on June 27, 2018, at approximately midnight, the defendants Xie and Jia, after premeditation, stole a Changan Ounuo minivan with the license plate number Chuan A×××××, which was parked by the victim, Zhang, in an open area next to a middle school in a certain district of a certain city. They then drove the vehicle to the underground parking lot of a hotel in a certain district and parked it there. On June 27, 2018, Xie and Jia were apprehended and brought to justice. According to the appraisal, the stolen vehicle is valued at 24,453 yuan. The prosecution has presented evidence to the court regarding the aforementioned allegations, including the victim's statement, documentary evidence, appraisal opinions, and the defendants' confessions.


Upon investigation, it was found that the defendant Wang was the operator of the Yulongxuan Leisure Club located on the 17th floor of the Huanwen Forest Hotel in Yuhua District, Changsha City, and was responsible for the management of the leisure center. The defendant Yang was responsible for reception work at the leisure center. On August 3, 2015, at around 10:00 PM, defendant Yang introduced prostitutes Sang and Deng (both administratively penalized) to patrons Peng and Zhou (both administratively penalized) in rooms 1722 and 1723 of the said leisure center, engaging in prostitution activities for a price of 700 yuan. They were apprehended on the scene by the police authorities. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Wang and Yang during the trial proceedings. Additionally, these facts are substantiated by evidence including the incident report from the First Security Management Brigade of the Yuhua Branch of the Changsha Public Security Bureau, inspection transcripts, on-site photographs, a list of seized items, room booking registration forms, a copy of the business license for corporate legal entities, the house rental contract, recognition records and photographs of prostitutes Sang and patron Peng identifying each other, and prostitutes Deng and patron Zhou identifying each other, recognition records and photographs of patron Peng and Zhou identifying defendant Yang, and recognition records and photographs of defendant Yang, and prostitutes Sang and Deng identifying defendant Wang. Furthermore, these are proven by the Public Security Administrative Punishment Decisions numbered (2015) 1430, 1431, 1432, 1433 by the Yuhua Branch of the Changsha Public Security Bureau, witness testimonies from Peng, Zhou, Deng, Sang, and Zhan, as well as statements and identity, current performance materials of defendants Wang and Yang, which are sufficient for confirmation.


Upon examination, it was found that on November 20, 2013, after purchasing a package of drugs from the defendant Xue, the defendant Zhang was caught by police in the act of selling these drugs to a person named Li at the Shangnan Jingshun Gas Station, Shajing Street, Bao'an District, in a certain city. The drugs involved and 600 RMB in drug money were seized. The confiscated drugs were found to weigh 1.66 grams and contained methamphetamine, according to the assessment. Subsequently, Zhang led the police to arrest Xue at the bottom of Building 27, Lane 1, Xinqiao Xiner Village, Shajing Street, Bao'an District, in the same city. A package of drugs was seized from Xue's person and residence. Upon assessment, the two packages of drugs were found to collectively weigh 4.16 grams and contained methamphetamine. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Xue and Zhang during the court hearings and were confirmed by relevant evidence verified during the trial, sufficient for recognition.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain region charges that on the night of August 28, 2015, defendants Wang, Chen, Hu, and Xu, along with Wang B, Wan, Wang A, Gong, and Li (all handled in separate cases), were singing and drinking at the "Sapphire" KTV in a town in Chongyang County. Without cause, they assaulted Wu Yi and knocked him to the ground with beer bottles. When Wang Yi and Deng tried to intervene, they were also injured by Wang and others. According to forensic identification, Wu Yi sustained chest injuries causing a fracture of the sternum body, which constitutes minor injury of the second degree. The injuries to Wang Yi and Deng were determined to be minor of the fifth degree.


After trial, it was found that around 12:00 on October 9, 2015, the defendants Liu and Huang, along with Chen and another man (all handled in separate cases), received the victim Li, who owed a gambling debt of 150,000 local currency, at a port entry in a certain city. The defendants Liu, Huang, and others took the victim Li into a white Ford car to pursue the gambling debt. During this time, defendant Liu used his fists and palms to strike the victim Li's chest and face, while defendant Huang assisted Liu by restraining Li to prevent resistance. Later, Liu handcuffed Li's hands and placed a full black blindfold on him, then drove to an industrial area in a certain town and a certain temple. On October 10, 2015, at 19:00, after Li managed to collect 60,000 yuan, Liu and Huang took the 60,000 yuan, Li's iPhone 6, and a diamond ring and dropped Li off near a certain sea area. An appraisal determined that the injuries suffered by Li were minor. On December 29, 2015, Liu and Huang were arrested at Rong Xinyuan and Yinxiang Xincun in the city. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Liu and Huang during the trial, and were confirmed with the testimony of the victim Li and identification records, witness testimony from Chen, detention records, seizure documents, evidence inspection lists, receipts for phone sales, bank card statement inquiries, diamond ring sales record, copies of entry and exit endorsements, evidence collection notices, evidence collection lists, account information, communication records, arrest reports, explanatory statements, household registration certificates, certificates of (no) criminal record, lists of items and documents transferred with the case, forensic examination reports on the degree of bodily injury, notification of appraisal opinions, photos of the scene and involved items, and a CD among other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution charges that at around 3 a.m. on July 28, 2014, defendants Chen and Ma, after drinking, went to the "Mango Adult Products Store" located at No. 119, Jialing River Street, in a certain district of a certain city, and without any reason, damaged the cameras and vending machines inside the store, causing scratches to the plexiglass of one vending machine. At around 2 a.m. on August 4, 2014, defendants Chen and Ma, after drinking, returned to the "Mango Adult Products Store" at the same address and again, without any reason, damaged the cameras and vending machines inside the store, using bricks to smash the vending machines and the glass door, resulting in damage to the cameras, glass door, as well as the coin acceptor and motherboard of the vending machines. At around 3 a.m. on August 15, 2014, defendants Chen and Ma, together with Zhu (dealt with in a separate case) and after drinking, went to the "Mango Adult Products Store" at the same address, and without any reason, used bricks to smash the cameras, vending machines, and glass door inside the store, causing damage to the cameras, glass door, the vending machines' motherboards, and inflatable dolls. These items could not be appraised for value. During the trial, defendants Chen and Ma did not contest these facts, which were corroborated by testimonies from witnesses Cui, Gao, and Zhu; statements from victims Zong and Li; inspection records, identification records; audio-visual materials; a notice of non-acceptance of price appraisal, physical evidence photos, video screenshots, invoices, purchase contracts, receipts, explanatory notes, basic population information, phone inquiry records, as well as the source and capture process of the case, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts. Through mediation, defendants Chen and Ma reached a reconciliation agreement with victim Zong, voluntarily agreeing to jointly compensate victim Zong for all economic losses amounting to 30,000 RMB and obtained the victim's forgiveness.


After trial, it was found that from December 2015 to January 2016, the defendants Cheng and Chen set up tables and provided gambling tools in the small shop they ran out of their own home in the Chen Family Natural Village in a certain town, district, and city. They facilitated gambling activities using Pai Gow tiles and collected profits by taking a cut ranging from tens to hundreds of yuan as house commission, with more than ten people participating in gambling each day. On May 15, 2019, the defendants Cheng and Chen voluntarily surrendered to the Xinjian Branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city and truthfully confessed their criminal conduct. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by the two defendants during the court proceedings and were sufficiently substantiated by witness testimonies from individuals such as Deng B, Deng A, Xia, Cheng A, Chen A, Chen B, Chen C, and Chen D, as well as evidence including 110 police information, administrative penalty decisions, and records of their surrender. The defense's argument that the defendant Cheng voluntarily surrendered, has no prior criminal record, and is a first-time offender aligns with the facts and evidence presented in the trial, and the court accepts this viewpoint.


Upon examination, it was found that at around 21:30 on November 19, 2013, the defendants Han, Dan, and Yang, after consuming alcohol, got into an argument with the victim Zhang in front of the Jinzhangshao Restaurant on Jianguo Road, Guangyang District, Langfang City, because Han was reversing his car. The three defendants then punched and kicked Zhang, resulting in facial injuries. According to an assessment, the victim Zhang sustained minor injuries. It was also found that after the incident, a relative of the defendant Han voluntarily compensated the victim for the entire economic loss on behalf of all three defendants, totaling 75,000 RMB, and received the victim's understanding and forgiveness. These facts were undisputed during the court hearing by the three defendants and were corroborated by their confessions to the police, the victim Zhang's statement, testimonies from witnesses Tao and Li, identification records, the injury assessment, photographs of the injuries, audio-visual materials, an explanation of the case, basic information about the permanent residents, a settlement agreement, and a letter of forgiveness, providing sufficient grounds for conviction.


The prosecution accuses that at approximately 1:39 AM on November 12, 2014, after planning, the defendants Lin and Ye, in a certain town's Zero Hour Cyber Café in Yueqing City, used the URL, account, and password of the cyber café's Sijie recharge platform, which they had obtained earlier at the Mercedes Cyber Café in the same town, to access the platform and actually steal 3,944.15 yuan from the Sijie recharge platform account of the cyber café. They used the stolen money to purchase Junnet prepaid cards and, after recharging them, conducted transactions through an online trading platform, obtaining 3,381.42 yuan in cash. It was also found that the defendants Lin and Ye, along with their families, compensated the victim Xue with 4,400 yuan. The defendants Lin and Ye raised no objections to the above facts during the court proceedings, and there is sufficient evidence to establish the facts, including lists of seized items and returned items, photos, bank account details, game website registration accounts and sales information, business licenses, permits, IP proof, card theft records, mediation agreement documents, proof of previous offenses verification, household registration proof, arrest process documentation, and victim Xue's statement.


A certain People's Procuratorate filed a charge, alleging: On March 28, 2016, at around 7:00 PM, the off-road vehicle with the local license number Q××××× driven by the defendant Chen collided with the sedan with the local license number Q××××× on Liangqiao Road in front of the "Oriental Myth" location in Lichuan City. As a result, a dispute and scuffle occurred between the parties involved. During the scuffle, the defendant Chen used a handbag to hit the head of the other party's Li, causing bleeding, and was also beaten by Li and others. Subsequently, both parties were separated by on-site traffic police. Feeling aggrieved after being beaten, defendant Chen called defendant Mao to the scene to assist in the fight. When defendant Mao arrived at the scene, Chen had already been taken away by police officers from the Dongcheng Police Station, while Li and others remained on-site handling the traffic accident. Defendant Mao, seeing blood on Li's face, rushed forward and punched Li, injuring his nose. According to the forensic appraisal, Li's scalp laceration and soft tissue damage constituted minor injuries; his nasal and maxillary frontal bone fractures constituted secondary minor injuries. The People's Procuratorate of a certain location submitted evidence to the court, including documentary evidence, witness testimony, appraisal opinions, victim statements, defendant confessions, and on-site inspection records, in support of the above allegations. The People's Procuratorate argues tha


After examination, it was found that on September 15, 2015, defendants Jiang and Song drove a small van with a license plate of T××××× to a construction site near a certain village in the New District of a certain city. They, along with three other men (handled in a separate case), stole cables from the construction site, with defendant Song acting as a lookout. After the theft, defendants Jiang and Song sold the stolen cables to a scrap recycling station at Baijiao Sand Yard in a certain district of the city and profited 380 yuan. On September 16, 2015, defendants Jiang and Song again drove the same van to the same construction site with the aforementioned men to continue stealing cables, with defendant Song serving as a lookout. After this second theft, Jiang and Song headed to the scrap recycling station at Baijiao Sand Yard again but were apprehended by investigators upon arrival. All the cables stolen by defendants Jiang and Song on September 15 and 16, 2015, were recovered. According to the appraisal, the stolen cables were valued at a total of 24,204.6 yuan. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Jiang and Song during the trial and were corroborated by their confessions and defenses during the investigation stage, testimonies of witnesses Huang, Chen, and Li, statements by the employee Zhang from the victimized unit, the arrest process, explanatory memorandum, seizure decision, seizure list, appraisal opinion, site photos, site inspection records, restitution list, household registration proof, and related evidence recorded in the trial transcript, fully substantiating the case. The People's Procuratorate of the New District of Zhuhai, through sentencing recommendation No. 16 (2016) of the Pearl Transitory Procuratorate Public Prosecution, recommended the court to sentence defendant Jiang to fixed-term imprisonment of more than eight months and less than one year and six months, along with a fine, and to sentence defendant Song to fixed-term imprisonment of less than one year, along with a fine.


Upon trial, it was found that on December 20, 2014, the defendant Zhang, in order to organize a gambling operation for profit, discussed with defendants Zhu and Li A (at large) to have them bring participants for gambling, offering them a certain percentage of the profit. At around 11 p.m. that night, defendant Zhang organized a group of people to gamble in a storage room at the dormitory of the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China in Raoyang County. Zhu and Li A both brought people to participate in the gambling, while defendants Li, Liu, and Zhao acted as lookouts. Over twenty individuals participated in gambling that night and were apprehended by law enforcement, with gambling funds amounting to 54,000 yuan seized on site. After the incident, defendant Zhu voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. The aforementioned facts were acknowledged by defendants Zhang, Zhu, Li, Liu, and Zhao during the court hearing, and were corroborated by the identification records of defendants Zhang and Zhao, the seizure decision of Raoyang County Public Security Bureau, the inventory of seized items, photos of the crime scene, the case-solving report, the administrative penalty decision of Raoyang County Public Security Bureau, a set of Pai Gow tiles and three walkie-talkies used as tools in the crime, and the household registration certificates of defendants Zhang, Zhu, Li, Liu, and Zhao, all of which are sufficient for the conviction.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges: During September 2014, the defendant Liu sold methamphetamine to Li multiple times and instructed the defendant Yang to conduct six transactions with drug user Li near designated locations: under the Xin Qiao Hotel next to the Liuyan Minsheng Hospital, in the stairway of the Wuyan Shen Zhou Xing Business Hotel, by the roadside outside the courtyard wall of the Hong Fa Hotel on Chaoyang South Road (twice delivering methamphetamine), in front of the Health Supervision Bureau on Liulin Road, and in front of the Bo'ai Hospital on Liulin Road. Liu delivered a total of six bags of methamphetamine to drug user Li at 300 yuan per bag (approximately 0.5 grams each). On October 10, 2014, the defendant Liu instructed the defendant Jin to sell approximately 0.3 grams of methamphetamine to drug user Zhang for 300 yuan, by the roadside in front of the Sanyan Post Office on Renmin Road in a certain district. On October 21, 2014, the defendant Liu again instructed the defendant Jin to sell approximately 0.1 grams of methamphetamine to drug user Zhang for 300 yuan, by the roadside in front of the Sanyan Post Office on Renmin Road. The defendant Liu purchased a large quantity of drugs outside the city and, at around 18:00 on October 22, 2014, was apprehended by the police at the Wudang Mountain Highway Toll Station exit in a certain city while riding in a white C-RV SUV (License Plate: E A×××××) driven by her husband, Liu Jia. The police seized a total of 198.26 grams of methamphetamine (four bags with net weights of 49.45 grams, 49.62 grams, 49.43 grams, and 49.76 grams, respectively) and a total of 25.23 grams of Magu (two bags with net weights of 20.55 grams and 4.68 grams, respectively) from the blue handbag and the bra of defendant Liu. Analysis confirmed the presence of methamphetamine components. The evidence provided by the prosecution includes: 1. Physical evidence; 2. Documentary evidence; 3. Witness testimonies; 4. Confessions and defenses of the defendants; 5. Expert opinions; 6. Inspection and identification records.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges: 1. In January 2014, the defendant Wang, with the intent of profit-making, organized Zhong, Zhu, Zhang, and others to gamble by playing "Niu Niu" with playing cards for 14 rounds in Room 8 of a chess and card room opened by Yu at XX Yuanman Road, a town in a certain district of a certain city, earning an illegal commission of more than 14,000 RMB. During this period, defendant Wang was also responsible for taking the commission; defendant Yu provided the venue and illegally profited more than 2,800 RMB. 2. In October of the same year, defendant Wang, with the intent of profit-making, organized Zhong, Zhang, Zhu, Chu, and others to gamble by playing "Niu Niu" with playing cards for 9 rounds, earning an illegal commission of more than 18,000 RMB. Among these, he organized 5 rounds of gambling at Ma's (handled in a separate case) rented premises in a certain town, earning an illegal commission of more than 10,000 RMB; he organized 3 rounds at defendant Yao's home in the Dongxiaoxi community of a certain town, earning an illegal commission of more than 6,000 RMB; and he organized 1 round in Room 8 of a certain chess and card room, earning an illegal commission of more than 2,000 RMB. During this period, defendant Wang was also responsible for taking the commission; defendant Yao provided the venue and illegally profited 600 RMB. The evidence for the charges includes documentary evidence such as household registration certificates, witness testimonies, the defendants' confessions and defenses, identification records, and photographs.