Upon investigation, it was found that the defendant Hao worked in the No. 8 mining area tunnel of the Yinfeng Mining Co., Ltd. in Chicheng County. In mid-December 2013, after detonating explosives in the tunnel, Hao discovered a detonator on the ore and brought it home. While working in the tunnel again later, Hao found two detonators with fuses in an old tunnel's abandoned wall hole and also took them home, hiding them in his cellar with the previous detonator. On December 20, 2013, Hao sent the serial numbers of the three detonators via text message to Zhang, the person in charge of the mining area, demanding 150,000 RMB and instructing Zhang to deliver the money to a certain city. The next day, Hao informed defendant Duan of the situation and asked Duan to accompany him to retrieve the money in that city. After receiving the extortion message from Hao, Zhang reported the incident to the Public Security Bureau of Chicheng County. On December 20, 2013, Hao and Duan were arrested by the public security organs at the overpass on Xinhua Back Street in the Qiaoxi District of that city while preparing to collect the money. The aforementioned facts were not contested by the two defendants during the trial. Additionally, the facts are corroborated by evidence, including the acceptance registration form, the filing decision, the account of the arrest, the search warrant, the search record, the seizure decision, the list of seized items, the list of items returned, the transfer list of items with the case, explanatory photographs, a situation explanation, basic information on permanent residents from the Public Security Bureau of Chicheng County, the testimonies of witnesses Zhang, Ji, and Qi, and a gray bar phone, sufficient to conclude the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province charges: Company 1 (English name: XXX, INC) is registered with Trademark No. 44088881 "XX" and Trademark No. 5237387 "Company 1" in a certain country, approved for use in Class 9 data processing equipment (electronic), etc. Trademark No. 44088881 is valid from June 28, 2007, to June 27, 2017, and Trademark No. 5237387 is valid from December 14, 2010, to December 13, 2020. Around March 2015, defendants Li and Yang sought illegal profits by engaging in activities that infringed on registered trademarks. They used the premises located at Unit 1, Street 1, Village 1, District 1 of this city, and House 2, Alley 2, Village 2, District 2 as bases for their operations. Li was responsible for purchasing second-hand hard drives and sales, while Yang was responsible for repairs, testing, and labeling. According to the shipping documents found on-site, the operation amount reached 2,016,619 RMB. On November 20, 2015, defendants Li and Yang were arrested at the aforementioned location, and 1,248 hard drives related to Company 1 were seized (after appraisal, these products were found to infringe on XXX, INC's exclusive rights to its registered trademark, with a total value of 394,066 RMB). Additionally, tools used for committing the crime, such as USB flash drives, MHDD professional testing machines, barcode scanners, 5 sheets of XX label paper, and 220 XX packaging bags were seized.


The prosecution alleges that in the early morning of December 19, 2013, defendants Zhang and Xia went to a certain number on Fu Lane Bridge, Fu Lane Residential Committee, Yangming Street, in a certain city. They used methods such as climbing over the wall and lock-picking to enter the third floor of the victim Yuan Ming's residence. During the burglary, they noticed patrolling police officers, and defendant Zhang immediately fled the scene, while defendant Xia was caught on the spot by the police. On January 16, 2014, the police arrested defendant Zhang. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhang and Xia during the trial. They are confirmed by documentary evidence such as the "Arrest Process" from the Public Security Bureau of the city, population information, criminal judgment, entry and exit records, the testimony of witness Wei, statements from victims Yuan Jia and Yuan Yi, identification records and photos, as well as crime scene investigation records and photos, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution charges that the defendant Chen rented a house below the east gate embankment in a certain town in a certain county, specifically for the purpose of stealing others' property using a "honey trap" method with Ban and Cao (both already convicted). This method involved the woman selecting a target, bringing the target to the rented location for a "massage," and then the man stealing the target's property while the target was unguarded. Between December 3, 2014, and January 4, 2015, defendant Chen invited defendant Bi to commit the crimes on four occasions, stealing a total of 4,270 RMB in cash from victims Li, Yang, Wang-yi, and Li. The specific facts are as follows:

1. On the afternoon of December 3, 2014, at approximately 1 p.m., defendant Bi used the pretext of a massage to bring victim Li into the house rented by defendant Chen. Defendant Bi first asked Li to pay a 30 RMB massage fee and then told Li to remove his clothes and place them on the bedside cabinet. Bi then


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: In the early hours of June 1, 2013, defendants Zhou, Sun, Zhou A (handled in another case), and Zhu (handled in another case), without reason, assaulted the victim Tao outside a bar at Xijindu, Runzhou District, Zhenjiang City, after consuming alcohol. This resulted in swelling of soft tissues on Tao's forehead, nasal bone fracture, left upper maxillary fracture, right orbital medial wall fracture, and fractures of the right 2nd to 5th anterior ribs. According to the medical appraisal, the injuries sustained by the victim Tao (male, 63 years old) were classified as second-degree minor injuries. On July 3, 2013, defendant Sun voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities. The prosecution believes that the actions of defendants Zhou and Sun constitute the crime of X and recommends that this court impose penalties in accordance with Article X, Item (1) of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China. Defendants Zhou and Sun expressed no objection to the facts charged in the indictment and did not provide any defense. The facts ascertained by this court during the trial are consistent with those charged in the indictment. Additionally, it was found that on June 27, 2013, Zhou’s relatives compensated the victim Tao with 20,000 yuan for medical expenses. This information is corroborated by the confessions and defenses of defendants Zhou and Sun, the confessions and defenses of co-defendants Zhou B and Zhu, the statement of the victim Tao, and the testimonies of witnesses Ni, Liu, and others. Also confirmed by the case and arrest reports issued by the public security bureau, outpatient records, imaging reports, admission records, receipts, administrative penalty decision, criminal judgment, release certificate, identification records, and the forensic medical injury assessment report, this evidence is sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a city of Hunan Province charged: At around 17:00 on August 6, 2016, defendants Chen, Liu, and Yi reached the underground mall on Qianzhou Rate, Yingfeng West Road, in a certain district of a city. Defendants Chen and Yi acted as lookouts while defendant Liu used a blade to cut the cord of a gold pendant valued at 1890 yuan, worn by the victim, Qiang (age 3), around his neck, and stole it. After the incident, the family of defendant Liu compensated the victim Qiang for his losses and obtained understanding from the victim's legal representative. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Liu, Chen, and Yi during the court trial, and are supported by evidence such as household registration data, account of the incident, statement of circumstances, letter of understanding, Criminal Judgment No. (2016) Xiang 1123 Xing Chu 28, Certificate of Release from Criminal Detention by Shuangpai County Detention Center, Administrative Penalty Decision No. [2014] 1406 by Huai City South Public Security, Compulsory Isolation Drug Rehabilitation Decision No. [2014] 0407 by Huai City South Public Security, statements from victim Qiang and legal representative Zeng, confessions and defenses of defendants Chen, Liu, and Yi, on-site investigation records, on-site plans and photos, examination records and photos, identification records and photos, extraction records, seizure decision and seized items list, identification records, Price Determination Opinion He Jia Min Jian Zi (2016) No. 1010, audio-visual materials, and city surveillance video discs, sufficient to establish the facts.


Defendants Zhang, Cheng, and Zhou voluntarily pleaded guilty, acknowledged the facts charged by the prosecution, and were willing to accept punishment. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants during the court trial, and were substantiated by witness testimonies recorded by Fan and Gao, identification records, seizure records and inventories, extraction records, electronic data, as well as evidence such as the case report provided by the police officers from Binhuzhen Police Station, Jintan Branch of Changzhou Public Security Bureau.


After a trial, it was found that at approximately 1:00 a.m. on June 24, 2015, defendants Luo and Ban took a taxi to 78 Wennan Road, Dongcheng District, in a certain city, below the Taiping Life Insurance Company building. They climbed to the third floor via the iron gate and canopy at the company's entrance. Luo used a metal pipe he had brought to pry open a window guard on the third floor, and both Luo and Ban entered the office to commit theft. They stole 6 AMD brand processors, 1 Western Digital brand hard drive, 1 fifth edition RMB commemorative booklet, 5 WESTERN brand hard drives, 3 ADATA brand memory sticks, 6 Samsung brand memory sticks, 1 Lenovo brand laptop set, 1 Dell brand laptop set, 1 WESTERN brand external hard drive, and 3,500 yuan in cash (the total value of stolen property was approximately 17,500 yuan). After succeeding, Luo and Ban fled the scene. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Luo and Ban during the trial and were corroborated by the testimony of the victimized unit's employee, Jiang, the scene investigation record, site map, site photos, the appraisal form for the reference value of the involved property in a certain city, arrest process, basic information on permanent residents, administrative penalty decision, extraction record, extraction trace registration form, seizure decision and inventory list, search warrant, call records, surveillance video, and the confessions and recognition records of defendants Luo and Ban, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.


Upon examination, it was found that on November 25, 2015, defendants Lou and Li conspired to commit theft. At around 2 PM on the same day, the two defendants went to Jixin Community in a certain district of a city. Defendant Li acted as a lookout while defendant Lou pried open the main door of the apartment 503, Unit 4, Building 107, which was rented by a person named Zhang. They stole a Lenovo V580 laptop. After the successful theft, the two defendants sold the laptop to a person named Liang, receiving 500 RMB and two bags of methamphetamine. The money was divided between the two, and they consumed the methamphetamine. According to the price appraisal, the aforementioned laptop was valued at 1789 RMB. During the court hearing, defendants Lou and Li had no objection to these facts, which are also supported by the statements of the victim Zhang, testimonies of witnesses Xie and Liang, the identification record of defendant Lou identifying defendant Li and the purchaser of the stolen goods, Liang; the identification record of defendant Li identifying defendant Lou, video footage, and screenshots from the crime scene; the identification record of the buyer of the stolen laptop, Liang, identifying defendant Lou; the on-site identification records by defendants Lou and Li; surveillance video disc from the Jidong Cement Kindergarten in a certain district of the city; the scene inspection record No. 010 (2015) issued by the criminal police brigade of the Dongshui Branch of the Public Security Bureau of the city; the price appraisal conclusion No. 25 (2016) issued by the Tang Pricing Certification Center; household registration certificates of defendants Lou and Li; a social investigation report on defendant Li issued by the criminal police brigade of the Dongshui Branch of the Public Security Bureau of the city; a statement on how the case was solved, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges: On the evening of March 30, 2015, the defendant Jiang, due to a disagreement with the victim Zeng after a conversation while drinking, in order to vent his dissatisfaction, gathered defendant Shi and others to carry knives and went to the Joyful Chess Room opened by the victim Zeng at No. 52, Group 14, Yonghe Village, Qiaosi Street, a certain district in a certain city. There, they randomly smashed items in the chess room, including chess tables, computers, glass doors, and other properties, leading to a total loss of 15,166 yuan. On May 10, 2015, defendant Shi voluntarily turned himself in to the public security authorities. After the incident, the relatives of defendant Jiang have compensated the victim Zeng with 30,000 yuan, and defendant Jiang has obtained the victim Zeng's forgiveness.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charged: Starting in February 2014, the defendant Zhao, without obtaining an operating permit, set up an unlicensed electroplating workshop in a makeshift shed diagonally opposite No. 287 Beixin Road, Beixin Village, Haibin Street, Longwan District, Wenzhou City. Defendants Huang, Leng, and Jiang were subsequently hired to perform electroplating processes within the workshop, and they discharged the wastewater pollutants generated by electroplating directly into the outdoor farmland without any treatment. On March 18 of the same year, the workshop was discovered by the public security and environmental protection departments. Testing revealed that the total chromium content of the wastewater pollutants discharged by the workshop was 1.06×10^4 mg/L, exceeding the national pollutant discharge standards by more than three times. The prosecution provided corresponding evidence for the above charges.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Jiangsu Province charged that on the evening of January 4, 2016, defendants Bai, Tian, and Liu, after planning, stole 42 Shuangdeng brand 2V valve-controlled sealed lead-acid batteries-standard series 2V/500Ah backup batteries, valued at 6,300 RMB, from the XX communication station located 400 meters east of the Hengguan Jing and Jiande Road intersection in a certain town in the city. On the evening of January 6, 2016, defendants Bai and Tian, together, stole 4 Shuangdeng brand 6-FMX-150C batteries, valued at 3,445 RMB, from the XX communication station about 30 meters west of Jianghang Farm in a village in the same town; later, they went to the XX base station at the entrance of Nanhang Natural Village in the same town and stole 24 Nandu brand GFM400Ah batteries (valued at 3,120 RMB) and other items such as copper wire from victim Wang. Defendants Bai and Tian sold the stolen goods and were caught red-handed when they returned to the base station to steal again. Defendants Tian and Liu confessed the facts of their crimes truthfully after being apprehended.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district charged: On July 1, 2014, defendants Zhu and Chen, knowing that Zhang, Guo, Qiu, Wang, and others were drug users, facilitated drug use. To this end, in Room 503 of Zijin Apartment, Longmen Town, a certain district of a certain city, defendant Zhu provided identification, and defendant Chen provided funds for registration and check-in. Subsequently, defendant Zhu provided methamphetamine (crystal meth) to accommodate the drug use of the aforementioned individuals. On the same day, public security personnel arrested defendant Chen in the said room; later, public security personnel arrested defendant Zhu at the "Deep Breathing Internet Cafe" in a certain city, a certain district. Upon testing by the staff of the Xinluo Branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city, the urine samples of drug users Zhang, Guo, Qiu, and Wang all tested positive for methamphetamine. The defendants Zhu and Chen raised no objections to the above facts during the trial. These facts are substantiated by evidence including the household registration certificates and proof of no prior criminal records of both defendants, details of the arrests, accommodation registration card, seizure list, testimonies of witnesses Zhang, Wang, Qiu, and Guo, the confessions of defendants Chen and Zhu, and the on-site testing report from the Xinluo Branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city, which are sufficient to establish the charges.


Upon trial, it was found that on July 30, 2015, the defendant Li contacted the drug buyer Yang via WeChat to sell drugs and received a payment of 560 yuan through WeChat transfer. The two parties agreed to deliver the drugs to the Jinsha Times Community in Shapingba District. At around 10 p.m. that day, Li arranged for the defendant Wu to deliver the drugs. Wu, knowing it was drugs, delivered 0.96 grams of methamphetamine (commonly known as "ice") and 0.19 grams of methamphetamine tablets (commonly known as "magu") to a locker in Jinsha Times Community in Shapingba District as per Li's request. Wu was later caught by police and the drugs were seized. After Wu was taken into custody, he assisted the police in apprehending the defendant Li. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Li and Wu during the court trial and are supported by testimonial evidence from witnesses Yang and Xiong, identification records, material acquisition records, sealing records, seizure decision, list of seized items, weighing records, identification of WeChat chat and drug photos, drug inspection reports, call records, case background, explanation of Wu's meritorious performance, weighing photos, public security administrative penalty decision, and confessions from defendants Li and Wu, all sufficient to establish the case. The prosecution suggested sentencing defendants Li and Wu to one to two years of imprisonment and imposing fines. The defense counsel for Wu argued that Wu was an accomplice and should receive a lighter punishment; Wu’s meritorious actions were grounds for leniency in sentencing.


After the trial, it was found that at around 8 PM on April 25, 2012, the defendants Yan, Li, and Yuan, under the instigation of Yan Moumou (already sentenced), went to the area outside a chess and card room at the central village market in Lianshi Town, a district in this city. As Yan Moumou failed to obtain someone else's phone number from Zhang, the group used steel pipes and benches to beat the victim Zhang. This resulted in the victim sustaining a fracture of the right clavicle and contusions to both lungs with a fracture of the 8th rib on the left chest. According to forensic identification, the injury to the victim Zhang's clavicle was determined to be of minor injury severity. The facts above were not contested by the defendants Yan, Li, and Yuan during the court hearing. These facts are supported by evidence including household registration certificates, the criminal judgment, a certificate of release upon completion of the sentence, confessions from the accomplice Yan Moumou, testimonies from witnesses Wei and Wu, the arrest process, the victim Zhang's statement, a forensic examination certificate of the degree of bodily injury, identification records, and photographs, which are sufficient to confirm the findings.


Upon examination, it was found that around 3 PM on July 30, 2015, defendant Wang called the victim Li, Zhang's ex-wife, and invited her to a karaoke bar to sing. At that time, Li was having a meal at the home of her friend, victim Sun, with her colleagues, Wang and Cao. After receiving the call, Li, along with Sun, Wang, and Cao, went to Room 204 of "Mou Mou KTV" in a certain town in the county to sing with Wang and Wang Moumou (handled in a separate case). During the singing, Wang saw Sun behaving ambiguously with Li, and angrily left the room to call Zhang, saying that he saw one of Li's friends hugging her while singing, and asked Zhang to come over. Wang then waited for Zhang downstairs at the KTV. Ten minutes later, they met and conspired to assault Sun. Subsequently, Wang and Zhang entered Room 204. Zhang mistakenly thought Wang was the one hugging Li, so he grabbed Wang's arm. Wang said, "It's not him!" and pointed at Sun, saying, "It's him!" Then Zhang, Wang, and Wang Moumou pu


After the trial, it was found: In the early morning of October 6, 2019, Duan went to find the defendant Shi in the upper section of Jinjia Village, Gucheng District, Lijiang City, and entrusted Shi to help purchase drugs. After agreeing, Shi received a total of 5500 RMB from Duan in two transfers via WeChat as payment for purchasing the drugs and as a reward. Shi later informed the defendant He about this matter and asked for He's help in buying drugs, promising to compensate He afterward. At approximately 16:40 the same day, He took Shi to Jinkai Square to purchase heroin, and was apprehended by the public security authorities as they were preparing to leave after buying the drugs. The police confiscated three small packages of suspected drugs wrapped in a white transparent plastic bag from He on site. Upon measurement, the net weight of the suspected drugs found on He was 2.22 grams. The identification confirmed the presence of heroin in the seized substances. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Shi and He during the trial, and were substantiated by evidence submitted by the public prosecution agency and presented, examined, and verified in court, including: the case registration form, frontal and profile photos of the defendants, household registration proof, the account of the arrest, examination record, seizure decision letter, seizure list, measurement record, measurement photos, measurement notification record, extraction material record, extraction photos, extraction record, personnel identification record and photos, examination report, electronic evidence inspection record, mobile phone call logs, confession and defense statements of the defendants, and two mobile phones submitted with the case. This evidence is sufficient to establish the facts. The defendants Shi and He did not contest the facts and charges brought by the indictment, signed a confession and punishment agreement with the prosecution, and voluntarily expressed their willingness to plead guilty and accept punishment in court.


The prosecution charges: 1. On August 18, 2014, the defendants Peng and Sha harbored Yan for drug use of methamphetamine (ice) in a rented residence at Sunshine Holiday Apartment 515, Xinqi Street, District, City. 2. On September 3, 2014, the defendants Peng and Sha harbored Yan for drug use of methamphetamine in a rented residence at Sunshine Holiday Apartment 515, Xinqi Street, District, City. 3. On September 28, 2014, the defendants Peng and Sha harbored Yan for drug use of methamphetamine in a rented residence at Sunshine Holiday Apartment 515, Xinqi Street, District, City. 4. On October 12, 2014, the defendants Peng and Sha harbored Xiang for drug use of methamphetamine in a rented residence at Sunshine Holiday Apartment 515, Xinqi Street, District, City. 5. On October 13, 2014, the defendants Peng and Sha harbored Li for drug use of methamphetamine in a rented residence at Sunshine Holiday Apartment 515, Xinqi Street, District, City. On October 17, 2014, the defendant Sha assisted the public security authorities in arresting the drug trafficking suspect Xiang. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants Peng and Sha during the trial, and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Yan Huan, Xiang, Li, and Tang; identity recognition records, location recognition records, and photos; urine test reagent photos; on-site test report; meritorious deed recognition letter; arrest statement records; administrative penalty decision; community detoxification decision; house lease contract; and population information. These pieces of evidence are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain location charges: 1. On the morning of February 26, 2014, defendants Hu and Xiao, after premeditation, went to No. 28, North Highway, Shaojia Hui Village, Luotuo Subdistrict, Zhenhai District, where they used tools to cut the lock and stole an electric tricycle parked there by Fang, valued at 4,670 RMB. 2. On the evening of February 27, 2014, defendants Hu and Xiao, after premeditation, went to the entrance of Nanbei Logistics in Luotuo Subdistrict, Zhenhai District, and used the method of pushing the vehicle to steal a Philips-brand electric bike parked there by Jia, valued at 1,615 RMB. The two stolen electric bikes have been recovered by the public security authorities and returned to the victims. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by defendants Hu and Xiao during the court trial, and are supported by documentary evidence including seizure decision documents, seizure lists, special receipts for temporarily seized items, return item lists, photographs, arrest reports, household registration certificates, statements of circumstances, statements from victims Fang and Jia, price evaluation reports, recognition records, and surveillance videos, all of which are sufficient to establish the charges.


The prosecution charges that: 1. On May 22, 2019, defendants Yu and Zheng checked into rooms 306 and 208 at Tiger Bay Hotel in this city. They stole the CPUs, memory sticks, and solid-state drives from the desktop computers in rooms 306 and 208, and then sold them for profit. Upon evaluation, the value of the CPUs, memory sticks, and solid-state drives from the stolen desktop computers in these rooms was 1,136 RMB. 2. On May 23, 2019, defendants Yu and Zheng checked into rooms 216 and 217 at Encounter Boutique Hotel in this city. They stole the CPUs, memory sticks, and solid-state drives from the desktop computers in rooms 216 and 217, and then sold them for profit. Upon evaluation, the value of the CPUs, memory sticks, and solid-state drives from the stolen desktop computers in these rooms was 1,008 RMB. 3. On May 29, 2019, defendants Yu and Zheng successively checked into rooms 408, 506, 606, and 607 at Tiger Bay Hotel in this city. They stole the CPUs, memory sticks, and solid-state drives from the desktop computers in rooms 408, 506, 606, and 607, and then sold them for profit. Upon evaluation, the value of the CPUs and memory sticks from the stolen desktop computers in these rooms was 2,272 RMB. 4. On July 8, 2019, defendants Yu and Zheng checked into room 503 at Oasis Hotel in this city. They stole two Kingston memory sticks from the desktop computer in the room and were caught on the spot after transferring them to room 407. Upon evaluation, the value of the memory sticks from the stolen desktop computer in this room was 155 RMB. In conclusion, defendants Yu and Zheng committed theft four times, with the total value of the stolen property amounting to 4,571 RMB.


The prosecution alleges: In November 2012, the defendants Hu, Xu, Xiao, Zhang, and others, on six occasions, gathered in the market management office of defendant Xiao, located on the third floor of the small commodities market (farmers' market) in the Xiaoshan Development Zone, Hangzhou City. They assembled individuals including a person named Xu for gambling in the form of playing cards known as "Kou Xiaojium". Among them, defendant Hu took a rake and provided funds in the first five gambling sessions and assembled participants for the sixth session; defendant Zhang assembled gambling participants; defendant Xu assembled participants in the first five sessions; defendant Xiao was responsible for providing the gambling venue. The illegal profit from the six gambling sessions that defendants Hu, Xiao, and Zhang participated in amounted to a total of 31,000 yuan. Defendant Xu, who participated in five sessions, had an illegal gain of 25,000 yuan. Defendant Xiao received an illegal gain of 600 yuan, and defendants Zhang and Xu shared an illegal gain of 3,000 yuan. After the incident, defendant Xiao returned 600 yuan of the illicit money, and defendant Zhang returned 1,700 yuan. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Hu, Xiao, Zhang, and Xu during the trial proceedings. Additionally, the witness testimonies of individuals such as Xu and Meng, identification records, lists of seized items, the course of the incident, and the household registration certificates of defendants Hu, Xiao, Zhang, and Xu all serve as evidence sufficient to establish these facts.


The prosecution charges that on January 16, 2014, at around 3 p.m., the defendants Zhang and Jiang traveled by car from a certain prefecture to a certain location. Near 21-13 Dazhong Alley, South Street, Lecheng Street, in the city, defendant Jiang used tweezers to commit theft, while defendant Zhang was responsible for covering and acting as a lookout. Together, they stole two mobile phones (which have been recovered). According to the price appraisal, the red BBK phone was valued at 560 yuan, and the white Apple phone was valued at 960 yuan. It was also found that on January 16, 2014, defendant Zhang was summoned due to suspicious behavior and truthfully confessed to his criminal acts. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by defendants Zhang and Jiang during the trial, and are substantiated by the statements of the victim Liu, the tweezers, the mobile phones, the list of seized and returned items, photos, the verification of prior convictions, phone inquiry records, the criminal judgment, the certificate of release after serving a sentence, household registration information, the account of the arrest, the explanatory note, the price appraisal conclusion, the on-site identification record, and other evidence, which are sufficient for conviction.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges that on July 13, 2015, around 5 PM, the defendants Qiu and Wang, after premeditation, went to the back of a certain internet cafe on Baotian Street in the city, specifically to the entrance of the stairs on the first floor of Yin's residence on Longhai Road, Shangpan Village, Baotian Street. There, they stole a yellow Chuangye brand moped. The vehicle was appraised at a value of 1,480 RMB. On July 14, the same year, around 3 PM, the defendants Qiu and Wang rode the stolen moped to the entrance of the Mingdu Internet Cafe on Ruiguang Avenue, Xiabu Village, Dongshan Street, in the city, where they stole a yellow Yamaha Jog moped parked there by Zhang. The vehicle was appraised at a value of 1,660 RMB. On July 15, 2015, the defendants Qiu and Wang were apprehended by the police inside the Wuzhou Internet Cafe on Xincheng Street in the city, and a screwdriver used in the crime was seized. After the incident, the stolen vehicles were recovered and returned to the victims, Yin and Zhang. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by the defendants Qiu and Wang during the court trial and are corroborated by the statements of the victims Zhang and Yin, the testimony of the witness Liang, identification records, appraisal conclusion documents, certificates of quality, receipts, seizure lists, return lists, photos, records of capture, criminal judgment documents, household registration certificates, and permanent resident information, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of Jiaojiang District, a certain city, charges that from August 22 to August 24, 2012, defendants Gao, Yan, and Feng, together with Zhang A (already sentenced), opened a casino in rooms 1318 and 1501 of the Baishida Boutique Hotel in Baiyun Street, Jiaojiang District, a certain city, gathering people for gambling. The casino operated by gambling with poker in the form of "Ba Er Zhang" and profited by taking a rake from the banker. During this period, the casino engaged Li (handled in another case) to manage the rake, paying him a "salary" of 200 yuan per day. During the operation of the casino, a total profit of 14,000 yuan was made. On October 3, 2012, defendant Feng was arrested by police officers. On December 31, 2012, defendant Yan was arrested by public security officers, and on December 30, 2014, defendant Gao was arrested by public security officers. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Gao, Yan, and Feng during the court proceedings. The confessions of co-perpetrators Zhang A and Li, identification records, testimonies from witnesses You, Liu, Wu, Ying, Zhao, Tao, Fu, Ye, Liang, Zhang, Lu, Lu M, Sun, Zhu Jia, Zhu Yi, investigation records, lists of seized items, administrative penalty decision documents from the police, household registration certificates, arrest records, the criminal judgment of Zhang A for x crime, case investigation records, explanatory statements, domicile registration forms, and other evidence have sufficiently confirmed these facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Jiangsu Province accuses the defendants Liu and Shao of plotting, and at around 2 a.m. on February 9, 2014, proceeding to the Yue Ting Private Cuisine restaurant located in Wuyang Square, Chengxiang Town of the said city, where they stole 12 RMB and items such as cigarettes, wine, and liquor with a total value of 1,514 RMB. Afterwards, the two sold some of the stolen cigarettes and liquor, obtaining 310 RMB in proceeds to fund their living expenses.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charged: On July 2, 2013, the defendants Yu and Sha, after premeditation, followed the truck driver Peng, who was secretly selling steel bars, by car to the Qianjiang Economic Development Zone "Jiulong Cang" construction site in a certain town in a certain district of a certain city. Then, the defendants Yu, Sha, and others threatened the victim Peng with "if you don't pay, we will report your secret sale of steel bars to the company or public security authorities," and forcibly demanded 15,000 yuan from him. The victim Peng, having no choice, agreed to pay and contacted his friends Zhang, Wang, and others to raise the money by phone. During the victim's phone calls for fundraising, his friends Zhang, Zhou, Cheng, and others rushed to the construction site upon hearing the news. When the defendants Yu, Sha, and others saw this, they immediately took pre-prepared homemade knives from the trunk of their car and fought with Zhang and others. Later, the defendants Yu and Sha were subdued by Zhang and others and handed over to the Chongxian Police Station. Meanwhile, Wang had deposited 5,000 yuan into a China Agricultural Bank card account designated by the defendants as per the fundraising request of the victim Peng. After the incident, the 5,000 yuan was recovered by the public security authorities and returned to Wang.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that on the evening of June 22, 2014, the defendants Feng and Fan, after premeditation, went to the entrance of the "Baolong Hotel" on Meiling Street in Jinjiang City, and sold 10.92 grams of the drug ketamine (commonly known as K powder) to a person referred to as Xiao for 600 RMB. They were subsequently apprehended on the scene by the public security authorities, and the drugs involved in the transaction were confiscated. The public security authorities also seized 600 RMB in cash and a TETC-L915 mobile phone used for contacting drug deals from the defendant Feng. After the incident, the confiscated drugs were turned over to the Office of the Anti-drug Committee of Jinjiang City. It was further identified by this court that Xiao contacted the defendant Feng to purchase the drugs, and the drugs involved in this case belonged to the defendant Feng. After the incident, the cash that was seized has been processed according to the law by the public security authorities. The aforementioned facts are not contested by the defendants Feng and Fan during the trial, and are corroborated by the testimony of the witness Xiao, as well as recognition records and photos, recognition explanations, lists of evidence collected, seizure orders, lists of seized items, seizure records and photos, return lists, weighing records and photos, judicial appraisal reports, receipts for the submission of physical drugs, on-site testing reports and urine test photos, mobile phone communication records, personal information and household registration certificates, accounts of the capture and case-solving process provided by the public security authorities, work explanations, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


It was found after trial that at around 7 a.m. on June 29, 2016, Yan, the person in charge of a certain kindergarten in a certain county, violated national regulations by arranging for Pan to drive a non-school bus to pick up students in and around certain villages. Defendant Pan drove a gray Lifan minivan with a capacity of 8 people, but actually carried 23 people, exceeding the capacity by 15, resulting in severe overloading of this school bus. It was further found that after the incident, defendants Yan and Pan turned themselves in. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants during the court hearing and were confirmed by the testimony of witnesses such as Guo, proof of household registration, and the confessions of defendants Yan and Pan, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution charges: In April and May 2013, the defendant Tang and Zhu (handled in a separate case), after premeditated planning, decided to steal copper high-strength enclosed busbars from the production lines that had ceased production at the old factory site of the ** Automobile Co., Ltd. in a certain location. Tang invited the defendant Ye, who was then an officer in the security division of ** Automobile Co., Ltd., to participate and assigned roles. From May to the end of July 2013, Zhu organized Qian (handled in a separate case) and others to drive a van four or five times to the entrance of the old factory site of ** Automobile Co., Ltd., located in the High-Tech Industrial Development Zone of a certain area. Defendant Ye drove the van into the factory area, parking outside the painting and welding workshops. Zhu, Qian, and others entered the workshop, dismantling and removing items such as four types of copper high-strength enclosed busbars from the decommissioned production line busway and loaded them into the van. Defendant Ye then drove the van out of the factory and handed it over to the defendant Tang and others. Afterwards, Tang and Zhu sold the stolen goods to Qian, receiving illicit proceeds of more than 90,000 yuan, of which Tang received over 30,000 yuan, Ye received over 20,000 yuan, and the remainder was taken by Zhu. After the incident, the relatives of defendants Tang and Ye compensated the victim unit 48,000 yuan and 42,000 yuan respectively, and their actions were forgiven by the victim unit. To prove the above facts, the prosecution presented the following evidence: 1. Confessions of defendants Tang and Ye; 2. Report and statement from the victim unit; 3. Testimonies of witnesses Qian, Zuo, and others; 4. On-site investigation records and related photos; 5. Price appraisal opinion; 6. Household registration certificates, case filing process, bank card transaction details, letter of understanding, criminal record materials, and other related documentary evidence.


Upon trial, it was found that at around 11 p.m. on September 27, 2014, the defendants Ren and You, after consuming alcohol, were at the security duty station of Yixin Jiayuan Community, located on the west side of the intersection of Jinsan Road and Linxi 1st Road in Lanshan District, Linyi City. Because their colleague Zhao did not obey the arrangement of defendant Ren, they punched and kicked Zhao, causing him to suffer fractures of the 8th and 12th ribs on the left side, multiple soft tissue contusions, and skin injuries. According to a forensic appraisal, Zhao's injuries were assessed as minor injuries of the second degree. After the incident, the relatives of defendants Ren and You reached a reconciliation agreement with the victim Zhao, whereby the relatives of defendants Ren and You compensated the victim Zhao for various economic losses such as medical expenses and nursing fees, amounting to 22,000 yuan and 20,000 yuan respectively, totaling 42,000 yuan. The victim Zhao expressed understanding and forgiveness towards defendants Ren and You. These facts were not disputed by defendants Ren and You during the trial and are supported by forensic opinions; the compensation agreement, letter of forgiveness, and other documentary evidence; the process of their capture; household registration proof; witness testimonies; and victim statements; which are sufficient to confirm the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that at around 11 p.m. on August 19, 2013, defendants Dong and Tang, together with Ma, Hu, Yang, Xie Chun, Dong (all handled in separate cases), and Zhang (who was under 14 years old at the time of the crime), went to Room 1202 at xxxx Hotel, Jiangbei Street, Yongjia County, under the pretext of smashing someone else's casino and robbed the victims including Liu in the room of more than 4600 RMB in cash with knives. On August 31, 2013, defendant Tang assisted the public security organs in apprehending two other co-offenders. The prosecution submitted corresponding evidence for the aforementioned facts of the charges.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that on December 11, 2014, the defendant Chen saw a job posting on Baixing.com by Li A in the name of Li B. Chen conceived the idea of luring Li A out under the pretense of offering a job, then controlling him to extort money from Li A's family to pay off debts. After discussing with Liang and Li C (handled in a separate case), Chen arranged several meetings with Li A. On December 15, 2014, in order to obtain Li A's mother's phone number to call her for extortion, Chen instructed Li C and Liang to deliver a note with his phone number to Li A's mother's workplace, asking her to call him back. On the afternoon of December 16, Chen once again set up a meeting with Li A under the guise of employment at the Tianyuan Hotel in Xiaoyi Town, and Liang posed as the hotel front desk staff. Chen drove a YuA××××× vehicle, and together with Liang, picked up Li A near New No.1 High School on Taihang Avenue in Huixian City. They stayed overnight at the Tianyuan Hotel and deceived Li A into handing over his mobile phone. The next day, Chen coaxed Li A to accompany him in debt collection. During this time, Chen instructed Liang to send a text message to Li A's family demanding 30,000 yuan in cash and making threats. Around 19:00 on December 17, 2014, Li A's family deposited 20,000 yuan into an account specified by Chen, after which Chen and Liang released Li A. The prosecution presented the court with household registration information, a detailed list from the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, photos of text messages, a letter of understanding, identification records, witness testimonies, and the defendant’s confessions and defenses as evidence.


The People's Procuratorate of a Certain City charged that defendants Guan, Zhang, and Li, along with Ji (already dealt with in a separate case), conspired and Ji instructed Guan, Zhang, and Li to commit theft in a rental house leased by Ji in a village on Liquan Street of a Certain City. On April 12, 2017, at around 19:00, Xu drove to the rental house to get a massage from Li. Defendants Guan and Zhang took the opportunity to steal Xu's car keys and subsequently stole 10,600 yuan in cash from the Kia Cerato car Xu was driving. The four then divided the spoils. After the incident, defendant Li returned 2,000 yuan to the victim, and defendant Li obtained the forgiveness of victim Xu. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Guan, Zhang, and Li during the trial. The facts were corroborated by the statements of victim Xu, the testimony of witness Ji, case registration records, records of arrest, household registration information, case handling notes, a letter of forgiveness, receipt, hospital records, photos of Xu's bank cash withdrawal transactions, identification records and photos, on-site investigation records and photos, and scene identification records and photos, which are sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of the New District in a certain city accused that, on June 4, 2014, at approximately 1 a.m., Meng B (handled in a separate case) had a dispute with the victims Shao, Qiao, and Liu over trivial matters. He then, along with the defendants Bian, Shi, and Meng A, Xu, Wang (all handled in separate cases), and others, irrationally attacked the victims Shao, Qiao, and Liu with punches and kicks at a night market on a certain road in the New District of a certain city. According to forensic identification, victim Shao sustained a contusion to the right eye due to the external injury; victim Qiao sustained a laceration on the skin of the right palm, 1.8 cm long, due to the external injury; and victim Liu sustained an abrasion and contusion behind the right ear with an area exceeding 15 cm² due to the external injury. The injuries of the three individuals all constituted minor injuries. On July 3, 2014, the defendants Bian and Shi were apprehended and brought to justice. After being brought to justice, both truthfully confessed to the criminal facts mentioned above. The facts mentioned above were not disputed by the defendants Bian and Shi during the trial. Additionally, they were corroborated by the testimony and identification records of the victims Shao, Qiao, and Liu, verified as authentic through cross-examination in court, as well as the testimony and identification records of witnesses Fei and Yang, the injury notice, the appraisal report from the Shanghai Fenglin International Medical Communication and Development Center Judicial Identification Institute, the arrest process documented by the public security organ, the relevant criminal judgment, and the household registration materials of the defendants Bian and Shi, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


Upon examination, it was found that around 11 a.m. on September 15, 2017, defendants Wen and Wan conspired to commit theft. At the Shichang Garden bus stop in Chuanshan District, Suining City, while the victim Wang was not paying attention, Wen stole an OPPOR9plus mobile phone from Wang's shoulder bag. According to the appraisal, the phone was valued at 1,100 RMB. After the incident, the stolen phone was returned to the victim. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Wen and Wan during the court trial, and were corroborated by witness testimony, price appraisal, the original criminal judgment, a capture statement, and a list of seized and returned items.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges: On the afternoon of January 25, 2015, defendants Ding and Li conspired to commit pickpocketing. At around 14:00 on the same day, the two went to the Triangle Square in the Jiyang Street area of a certain city and boarded bus No. 10. While the victim, Xu, was not paying attention, defendant Li was responsible for blocking others' view and acting as a lookout, while defendant Ding reached into the victim’s bag and stole a white Apple phone worth 950 yuan. The two then got off the bus at the small goods market in the city and left. After the crime was discovered, the stolen goods were recovered and returned to the victim. To prove the above charges, the prosecution has submitted to the court evidence including personnel summaries, registered resident information, inventory and return lists, receipts, criminal judgements, release certificates, details of the arrest, victim Xu’s statement, defendants Ding and Li’s confessions and defenses, price authentication conclusions, etc. It is believed that in order to unlawfully possess others' property, defendants Ding and Li jointly committed pickpocketing, and should be held criminally responsible for the crime of x, constituting a joint offense. The court is requested to punish defendants Ding and Li according to the provisions of article x, article x of the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China. Defendants Ding and Li have no objections to the facts and charges presented by the prosecution and request a lenient sentence. After trial verification, the evidence submitted by the prosecution was found to be true. This court confirms the facts of the crime of x as charged by the prosecution against defendants Ding and Li.


The prosecution alleges: On December 29, 2011, due to a previous conflict and dispute between the victim Jiang and the parents of the defendant Diao, Diao gathered defendants Ke, Shen, and four others including Lu, intending to assault the victim Jiang. In the afternoon, Diao, along with Ke, Shen, Lu, and the other four, went to opposite the Forestry Lane of a certain Lake Road in a certain Lake City. After Diao spotted Jiang and identified him, he instructed Ke, Shen, Lu, and the others to enter the Lane and assault Jiang. Ke, Shen, Lu, and the others punched and kicked Jiang for several minutes before fleeing the scene. According to a forensic medical assessment of bodily injury, the injury suffered by Jiang was classified as minor. On September 4, 2014, a supplemental assessment classified Jiang's injury as a minor level 2 injury. After the incident, Diao was apprehended in a certain district's "Jiang A Locksmith" shop, temporarily detained at a certain city's detention center on August 28, 2014, and was taken out by the Lake City Public Security Bureau on September 2. On August 20, 2014, Shen was arrested by the police from Yangjiashan Police Station of Ma'anshan Public Security Bureau; Ke was apprehended by public security officers in Lake City District. Regarding the above allegations, the prosecution has provided corresponding evidentiary materials to the court.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that, from March 2016 to May 2017, the defendants Zhou, Liu, and Xu, among others, frequently gathered together, gradually forming a criminal syndicate with Zhou as the ringleader, and Liu and Xu as other members. Using Yancheng Wujie Information Consulting Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Wujie Company) as a platform, they advertised under the pretense of "low interest," "quick loans," and "vehicle mobility" to attract victims to mortgage their vehicles for loans. They set up traps for default, arbitrarily declaring victims in default, taking away and concealing the victims' mortgaged vehicles, and then demanding exorbitant towing fees, penalties, and late fees, committing extortion in six instances, with illegal profits totaling 205,237 RMB (all currency hereinafter are in RMB). To prove the aforementioned facts, the prosecution presented and read in court the confessions and defenses of the defendants, statements from the victims, identification records, the case report, household registration information, and other evidence.


The prosecution alleges: 1. On October 5, 2011, at approximately 10:00 PM, defendants Gao and Zhang stole 320 yew saplings from a nursery belonging to An in Team 2, Chengxi Village, Ying'an Town, Hunchun City. According to a price appraisal, the stolen yew saplings were valued at RMB 2,560.00; 2. On October 10, 2011, at approximately 10:30 PM, defendants Gao and Zhang stole 1,675 yew saplings from the same location. The stolen yew saplings were valued at RMB 13,400.00 according to a price appraisal. Following the incident, defendant Gao assisted the public security authorities in capturing a co-offender, demonstrating meritorious behavior. The public security authorities recovered 1,675 yew saplings and returned them to the victim. The two defendants voluntarily compensated the victim for the economic loss of RMB 2,560.00. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Gao and Zhang during the court hearing and are substantiated by the confessions of the two defendants, the statement of the victim An, testimonies from witnesses Yuan and Huang, synchronized audio-visual materials from interrogations, on-site investigation records, material evidence, photos of the defendant identifying the scene, lists of seized and returned items, appraisal conclusions of the value of the involved items, Gao's previous criminal judgment and certificate of release after serving his sentence, identification documents of the involved parties, and evidence of how the case was solved, including meritorious service proof and work records, which are sufficient for conviction.


The prosecution alleges: Between October and December 2, 2017, defendant Xu placed two gambling machines (with a total of 3 positions) in the noodle shop operated by defendant Lu on Guo Street, in a certain town of a district in a certain city (near Guo Elementary School) for others to use for gambling. Defendant Lu provided convenience for the gambling machines placed by defendant Xu, such as venue, electricity, and currency exchange, and agreed to share the gambling proceeds. On December 2, 2017, a minor was caught by the police while gambling on the aforementioned machines. It was further discovered that, after being apprehended, defendant Lu truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. During the trial, defendants Xu and Lu had no objection to the above facts, which are corroborated by testimonies from witnesses Li, Qiao, Han, Liu, and Wang; physical evidence: gambling machine (photos); inspection records made by the public security bureau of a certain district in a certain city; list of seized items; certificate of identification for electronic game facilities with gambling functions; household registration certificate; and evidence of the case development and apprehension process, which are sufficient for conviction.


The prosecution charges: At about midnight on May 31, 2015, defendants Tang and Liu, in collaboration with a co-conspirator known as "Fatty" (whose name and personal information are unknown, currently at large), conspired to commit robbery. After committing the crime, "Fatty" drove a motorcycle to facilitate their escape. After getting off the motorcycle, Tang and Liu approached the victim and covered their mouth, wresting them to the ground. Near stores 108-109 on the north road of Shantou City, they robbed the victim, Peng, of a red backpack containing more than 300 yuan and a white Samsung SM-G3508 mobile phone (valued at 350 yuan according to an appraisal). After committing the robbery, Tang, Liu, and "Fatty" each received 100 yuan. Tang also obtained the Samsung SM-G3508 mobile phone, and the remaining money was spent by the defendants and the co-conspirator. A few days later, Tang gave the Samsung SM-G3508 phone he had obtained to someone named Yang to use, at room 307 in a certain district in this city. Tang and Liu did not contest these facts during the trial, and the case is corroborated by the victim Peng’s report and statement, witness testimony from Yang, personal identification documents of defendants Tang and Liu, case acceptance records, the decision to file a case, and investigation reports from the public security agency. It is further supported by lists of seized and returned items, explanations related to the handling of the case, the confiscated Samsung SM-G3508 phone, identification records and photographs of the crime scene and stolen goods, an appraisal report from the Shantou Municipal Pricing Bureau on the stolen goods, certificates of qualification for the appraisal agency and appraiser, and the confessions of defendants Tang and Liu. These evidences are sufficient to substantiate the charges.


The prosecution alleges that on the morning of November 18, 2013, at around 8 o'clock, defendants Ma and Wu went near the old bus station on Qianchuan Street in this district and boarded bus number 21. They stole a wallet from a passenger named Cheng on the bus. They were subsequently discovered and apprehended by bystanders, and the stolen wallet was recovered. In support of these allegations, the prosecution has presented relevant evidence.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city's Banan District charged that on the morning of November 12, 2013, defendants Liu and Tan, taking advantage of an unguarded moment on bus No. 328 in Yudong, Banan District, of a certain city, with Tan providing cover, Liu used the method of unzipping bags to steal a wallet containing 900 yuan in cash and bank cards from the shoulder bag of the victim, Zhang. The stolen money was used by both individuals. On the morning of November 13, 2013, defendants Liu and Tan again employed the same method on bus No. 328 in Yudong, Banan District, to steal 300 yuan in cash and a senior citizen's card from the shoulder bag of the victim, Yang B. The stolen money was used by both individuals. After the defendants Liu and Tan were brought to justice, they truthfully confessed to the aforementioned facts. During the trial, defendants Liu and Tan did not dispute the above facts, which were sufficiently supported by evidence such as the case registration form, decision to open a case, household registration information of Liu and Tan, Tan's prior criminal record material, search and identification records, seizure list, explanation of circumstances, course of arrest, testimonies of witnesses Gao, Li, Hou, and Yang A, statements of the victims Zhang and Yang B, and confessions of the defendants Liu and Tan.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accused: At about 9 a.m. on March 5, 2013, the defendant Chen, in order to collect debts, gathered defendants Jin, Gu, and others to take the victim, Zhang, to Room 807 of the Haishang Grand Hotel located on Luotuo Street in this district from Zhenhai Power Generation Co., Ltd. for detention. During this period, the defendants beat the victim Zhang, forcing Zhang to repay 40,000 yuan in cash and write a 30,000 yuan IOU, after which they released him at approximately 5 p.m. on the same day. After appraisal, the injuries sustained by the victim Zhang were determined to constitute minor injuries. Defendant Gu turned himself in to the public security authorities on December 2, 2013, and truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts. To prove the above facts, the public prosecution authority provided relevant evidence to the court.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: In the early morning of November 4, 2014, the defendant Yang and the victim Lin had a conflict over trivial matters at a barbecue stall at Zhuxiang No. 1, Chunfeng Village, New District, Wuxi City. Lin injured Yang's forehead with a beer bottle. In retaliation, defendant Yang gathered defendant Xia and Zheng (handled in a separate case) to the scene. Later, defendant Xia dragged Lin, causing him to fall and injure his face, and defendant Yang further punched Lin in the face, causing him injury. According to forensic identification, Lin's dental injury was assessed as minor injury level two, while defendant Yang's head injury was assessed as a minor injury. On November 4, 2014, defendant Yang was arrested by the public security organs, and defendant Xia turned himself in to the public security organs, both truthfully confessing to the aforementioned criminal facts. After the incident, defendants Yang and Xia reached a reconciliation agreement with Lin's side, agreeing that each party would bear their own medical expenses and mutually understanding each other.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges that in April 2014, Li Moujia (handled in a separate case) and Guan Moumou signed a technology transfer contract. Because the grinding wheel production process did not meet the contractual agreement, on May 31, 2014, Li Moujia lured Guan Moumou to the office of a certain factory in a town of a certain village in a certain city. Li Moujia instructed the defendants Wang and Song to restrict Guan Moumou's personal freedom and beat him. They demanded Guan Moumou to return a ten thousand yuan technology transfer fee on the grounds of his breach of contract, but to no avail. Later, they demanded Guan Moumou's bank card and password, and Li Moujia withdrew 4,900 yuan in cash from the bank card, and made card purchases worth 4,850 yuan at a supermarket in a certain town of a certain city. They also forced Guan Moumou to sign a note handwritten by Wang, stating the return of ten thousand yuan to a certain factory. Afterwards, Wang and Song to


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: On March 20, 2015, at noon, Liu (already sentenced) and Cui (already sentenced) had a dispute over trivial matters and agreed to a gang fight through text messaging and phone calls at the entrance of Chanzhong Market on Haibin Street in Longwan District. At around 10 p.m. that day, the defendant Wang, having been called by Liu, arrived at the scene along with several others. The defendant Qin, having been called by Cui, also arrived at the scene along with several others. Cui's group, armed with weapons and wearing masks, engaged in a gang fight against Liu's group. Liu's group, feeling overwhelmed by the larger number of opponents and their possession of weapons, fled due to the disparity in strength, resulting in no casualties. The prosecution has provided corresponding evidence for the above-mentioned charges.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged that on the evening of July 22, 2014, defendants Zhang and Lu, while having a late-night meal at the west gate of a town in a certain county, had a dispute with a neighboring table of Cheng. Later, defendants Zhang and Lu assaulted Cheng with beer bottles, causing multiple injuries to Cheng's head and body. According to an assessment, Cheng's injuries reached the level of minor injury of the second degree. After the incident, the two defendants, knowing that someone had called the police, waited at the scene and did not resist arrest. To prove the facts of the charges, the prosecution read and presented evidence in court, including the victim's statement, the confessions of the two defendants, witness testimonies, the on-site inspection records, on-site photos, injury photos, forensic injury assessment report, details of the case, personal information, and the administrative penalty decision.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county in Zhejiang Province charges: At around 20:00 on August 20, 2013, defendants Zhang and Zhou went to No. 33, Qianyuan, Yingjia Village, Meilin Street, a certain county, to the home of Ying. Defendant Zhou acted as a lookout while defendant Zhang broke the window bars to enter the house, stealing a Lenovo G480 laptop valued at 4,231 RMB, a BBK i266 mobile phone valued at 325 RMB, an iPod touch (8G) valued at 1,115 RMB, a Tianjun 5001G men's watch worth 1,056 RMB, and a camcorder. After the incident, the stolen BBK i266 mobile phone was recovered by the public security organs and returned to the victim. At around 21:00 on October 11, 2013, defendants Zhang and Zhou went to No. 292, Meilin North Road, Meilin Street, a certain county, where defendant Zhou acted as a lookout while defendant Zhang climbed the gate to enter the yard, then pried the lock to enter Wu's house, stealing a Samsung GT-S5830i mobile phone valued at 664 RMB, a black mobile phone, and an electric bike key. They then used the stolen electric bike key to unlock and steal a red Dayun TDR709Z electric bike, valued at 1,699 RMB, which was parked in the yard by Wu. On October 21, 2013, defendants Zhang and Zhou were apprehended by public security organs. After the incident, the stolen Samsung GT-S5830i mobile phone, electric bike, and key were recovered by the public security organs and returned to the victim. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Zhang and Zhou during the court proceedings and are substantiated by the statements of the victims Ying and Wu, identification records and photos, on-site inspection and examination records and photos, invoices, certificates, sales slips, receipts, anti-theft record information, vehicle purchase documents, price appraisal reports, and lists and photos of seized and returned items, along with arrest records and household registration information, all of which are sufficient for conviction.


The People's Procuratorate in a certain area charges: 1. On September 21, 2019, at around 20:30, the defendant Liu came alone to the park on Bihai Avenue under the Century Bridge on Haidian Island, Meilan District, Haikou City. Taking advantage of the victim Pu and his girlfriend being unguarded, he stole a Nubia brand phone (model: NX563J) placed next to Pu's right hand. According to appraisal, the stolen Nubia phone was valued at RMB 876. 2. On September 26, 2019, at around 01:30, the defendant Liu came alone to the seaside opposite the Tianyifang Community on Bihai Avenue on Haidian Island. Seizing the opportunity while the victim Zhou was asleep at the seaside, he secretly took a phone from Zhou's hand, which was an IPHONE brand (model: IPHONEXS). According to appraisal, the stolen IPHONE phone was valued at RMB 5431. 3. On November 10, 2019, the defendant Liu and Chen were riding an electric scooter near the Evergrande Beautiful Sha Music Square on Haidian Island when they noticed the victim Li and her boyfriend had placed their phone and shoulder bag on a rattan chair. Chen acted as a lookout while Liu used the greenery as cover to steal an IPHONE brand phone (model: IPHONEXSMAX), a Huawei brand phone (model: Honor 10), and a shoulder bag placed next to Li and her boyfriend. The two phones stolen were sold for a total of RMB 2900, with Liu receiving RMB 2400 and Chen receiving RMB 500. The proceeds were squandered by both. According to appraisal, the stolen IPHONE phone was valued at RMB 6741, and the Huawei phone was valued at RMB 1261, totaling RMB 8002. On December 6, 2019, the defendants Liu and Chen were arrested by the police. The public prosecution agency has provided corresponding evidence for the above charges.


The People’s Procuratorate of a certain county charged: Starting in April 2014, the defendant Wang introduced Jin on two occasions, and the defendant Liu introduced He on two occasions, to provide prostitution services for patrons at a certain hotel located on a certain street in a certain county. On May 4 and May 5 of the same year, the public security authorities arrested Wang and Liu. The People’s Procuratorate of a certain county submitted relevant evidence to this court, asserting that the defendants Wang and Liu, in disregard of national law, introduced others to engage in prostitution. Their actions violated Article X of the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China. The criminal facts are clear, and the evidence is solid and sufficient. They should be held criminally accountable for the crime specified in Article X. The court is requested to sentence them in accordance with the law.

During the trial, both defendants raised no objections to the criminal facts alleged by the prosecution and admitted guilt in court. The defense counsel for the defendant Wang argued that the Procuratorate of a certain county, in the indictment, held that the facts regarding Wang’s involvement in introducing prostitution were established, and the evidence was basically sufficient. The counsel argued that Wang’s involvement in introducing prostitution was of a short duration and involved relatively few individuals. After being apprehended, Wang truthfully confessed his crime, showed a sincere attitude, and expressed deep remorse. Wang was a first-time offender. The defense requested that the court show leniency and consider a more lenient punishment for Wang.

Following a review, this court has ascertained the following: Starting in April 2014, the defendant Wang introduced Jin on two occasions, and the defendant Liu introduced He on two occasions, to a certain hotel located on a certain street in a certain county to provide prostitution services for patrons. On May 4 and May 5 of that year, the public security authorities arrested Wang and Liu. The following evidence submitted by the prosecution substantiates these criminal facts:

1. Record of the registration of the criminal case, proving the origin of the case and substantiating the lawful initiation of investigative procedures by the relevant authorities.
2. Records of the arrest process, establishing the time and location at which the defendants were apprehended.
3. Witness testimony:
   (1) Sex worker He testified that she began engagi


After the trial, it was found that from early July to July 16, 2013, defendants Zong and Sun organized gatherings for gambling six times with participants such as Miao, Luo, Bao, Wang, Shen, Ling, Qian, and others in various places including a village in this city and on the bamboo-covered mountain behind the Xukou Town government in the form of "Hongxinbao" gambling, profiting over 9,000 yuan. The specific criminal facts are as follows:

1. One afternoon in early July 2013, defendants Zong and Sun organized a gambling gathering at a villager's house in Gao Xiang Natural Village, Qinxin Village, Tonglu County, profiting over 2,000 yuan.
2. The following afternoon, defendants Zong and Sun organized another gambling gathering at a villager's house at the entrance of a village in this city, profiting over 2,000 yuan.
3. On the next afternoon, defendants Zong and Sun organized a gambling gathering on the bamboo-covered mountain behind the Xukou Town government in this city, profiting over 2,000 yuan.
4. On yet another afternoon, defendants Zong and Sun organized a gambling gathering in an empty house in a village in this city, profiting over 2,000 yuan.
5. On the afternoons of July 15 and July 16, 2013, defendants Zong and Sun organized gambling gatherings on the bamboo-covered mountain behind the Xukou Town government. Due to the low number of participants and police checks, these two gatherings were of shorter duration, profiting over 1,000 yuan.

After the incident, defendants Zong and Sun turned themselves into the police on August 7 and August 14, 2013, respectively. It was further found that defendants Zong and Sun are married. During the trial in this court, defendants Zong and Sun submitted the illegal gains of 9,000 yuan to the court. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Zong and Sun during the trial and are supported by the testimonies of witnesses Miao, Luo, Bao, Wang, Shen, Ling, Qian, the confessions and defenses of defendants Zong and Sun, the administrative penalty decision by the police, the household registration certificates of defendants Zong and Sun, the account of their capture, and other evidence, sufficient to be confirmed.


The prosecution alleges that from late June to late July 2020, the defendants, Fan and Zhang, a married couple, repeatedly allowed and collaborated with Peng in using methamphetamine (commonly known as "ice," hereinafter referred to as ice) in their home located in certain village, certain group of certain township. Fan and Zhang jointly allowed and collaborated with Peng to use ice four times, and Fan alone allowed and collaborated with Peng to use ice once. The defendants, Fan and Zhang, have confessed to the aforementioned criminal acts.


After trial, it was found that: In May 2016, the defendants Luo, Xu, and Li discovered that the back door of a shop at Unit 205, No. 11, Blu-ray Xiangjiang International, Binjiang North Road, a certain district in a certain city was unlocked while they were wandering around. They then entered the premises and stole six desktop computer towers, subsequently selling them for 1,000 yuan. On May 29, 2016, defendant Luo stole a Samsung phone belonging to Tan from the Sunshine Internet Cafe on Shuxiu East Street, a certain district in a certain city, and sold the phone for 240 yuan. At the end of May 2016, defendant Luo stole a desktop computer from the Kaipeng Decoration store at 11-406, Xiangjiang International, Binjiang North Road, a certain district in a certain city, and sold it for 50 yuan. On June 4, 2016, defendant Luo stole a desktop computer tower from the Kaipeng Decoration store at 11-406, Xiangjiang International, Binjiang North Road. On June 10, 2016, defendant Luo stole another desktop computer tower from the same location. According to price appraisal: the price of the six stolen Lenovo computer towers from Unit 205, Building 11, Blu-ray Xiangjiang International was 8,520 yuan. The appraisal price of the Kaipeng Decoration company's computers was 7,440 yuan. In summary, defendant Luo was involved in five criminal acts, with a total value of 15,960 yuan, and obtained 620 yuan. Defendants Xu and Li each participated in one theft, with a total value of 8,520 yuan, and obtained 330 yuan. The aforementioned facts were not contested by the three defendants during the court trial and were corroborated by evidence such as witness testimonies, criminal photographs, identifications, recognitions, pricing appraisals, and capture descriptions.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged that at around 21:00 on November 1, 2019, the defendants Xia and Yang drove to a certain county, picked up the defendant Chen, and prepared to hunt wild rabbits. When the three of them reached a halfway point on the mountain road, Yang and Chen got out of the car to hunt, while Xia waited in the car by the roadside. During their search for prey, Yang and Chen discovered a hawk in a tree. They used a flashlight they carried to blind the hawk and threw clods of earth to knock it down, capturing it after it fell to the ground. They brought the hawk back to the car, where Xia took a bag from the vehicle and placed the hawk inside. The three of them continued to drive and hunt, but were apprehended by patrolling police officers at a county road junction. According to the assessment, the animal involved was a common buzzard, which is a nationally protected wild animal at Category II. The hawk has been released back into the wild by the police.


After trial, it was found that at around 3 p.m. on March 24, 2016, the defendants He and Dai conspired to commit theft and went to Room XXX of an apartment opposite No. XX, XX Road, Xiaoli Village, Dongfeng Town, a certain city. Defendant Dai kicked open the door of that room and stood lookout at the stairway, while defendant He entered the room and stole 75 resident identity cards kept by the victim Zhou, as well as one of Zhou’s handbags (inside which there was a black wallet, an iPhone 5s, a silver bracelet, a necklace inlaid with gold transfer beads, etc., with a total value of 2,570 RMB) and 102.5 RMB in cash. The two fled to an unnamed mobile phone accessories store at XXX Commercial Pedestrian Street in Dongsheng Town and sold the stolen phone for 80 RMB. Later, defendants He and Dai were discovered by the public at the intersection of XX Road and XX Road in Dongsheng Town and were handed over to the public security organ. After the case was solved, the public security organ recovered 72.5 RMB of the stolen money and all the stolen goods and returned them to the victim. These facts were not disputed by defendants He and Dai during the trial and were supported by the statement and identification record of the victim Zhou, the apprehension records, arrest records, transfer certificate issued by the Rongxing Police Station of Dongsheng Branch and Xinhua Police Station of Dongfeng Branch of a certain city's Public Security Bureau, search record, seizure and return item list, scene investigation and inspection record, photos of the seized stolen items, site location map and photos, on-site video recordings and screenshots, the "Price Appraisal Conclusion" issued by the Price Certification Center of the Development and Reform Bureau of a certain city, purchase receipts of the stolen items provided by victim Zhou, proof from Jucheng Jewelry Shop of a certain city, on-site urinalysis report of defendants He and Dai, testimony and identification record of witnesses Yuan and Hu, testimony of witness Li, statements and identification records of defendants He and Dai, household registration proof, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the case.


After the trial, it was found that on the evening of November 10, 2014, the victim, Hu, borrowed 9,700 RMB from the defendant Liu and Chen (handled in a separate case) while gambling. Later, due to losses in gambling, Hu did not repay the borrowed money. To recover the loan, Liu and Yang drove Hu to his temporary residence to get the money. In the room, Hu claimed that he only had 2,000 RMB and no other money for repayment. Liu and Chen conspired to take Hu to the Langkeng Reservoir in Jiangbei of this city to coerce repayment. Liu and Yang forcibly took Hu into a car, covered his head, and drove with Chen to the vicinity of Langkeng Reservoir. They slapped Hu, kicked him, beat him with a steel pipe, and threatened him verbally to force repayment. They also coerced Hu into writing an IOU for 20,000 RMB, and took Hu's 2,000 RMB and an Apple 4S phone valued at 800 RMB. Afterwards, Liu and Yang took Hu to a hotel near a logistics center in this city, restricting his personal freedom and forcing him to repay the money. On the morning of November 11, 2015, Hu escaped from the hotel while Liu and others were asleep. According to the assessment, Hu's injuries were minor. The above facts are corroborated by evidence presented by the public prosecution authority in court and verified through cross-examination, including the victim Hu's statements, witness Dai's testimony, identification records and photos made by the public security organ, outpatient medical records, forensic medical injury assessment, price assessment report, this court’s criminal judgment, arrest record provided by public security police, household registration certificate, and confessions by defendants Liu and Yang regarding the above facts, which are sufficient to determine the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged: On October 7, 2017, at approximately 15:50, the defendant Wu, along with defendants Wang, Yu, He, and Fang (handled in a separate case), among others, had a dispute at the bridgehead of a certain village in a certain township of a certain county due to issues regarding project contracting and the blocking of an excavator earlier that morning, which subsequently led to a physical altercation involving punches and kicks, but was later intervened and stopped. Subsequently, Wu, Wang, Yu, and He again erupted into conflict, using a vegetable knife, an axe, a water pipe, and a cutlass, causing minor injuries to Li, another Yu, and Wu. To prove the facts of the charges, the procuratorate presented evidence in court, including physical evidence (photographs), documentary evidence, witness testimonies, confessions and defenses from the defendants, expert opinions, on-site investigation records and photographs, as well as audiovisual materials.


After trial, it was found that at around 9 AM on November 6, 2020, Chen of XX Decoration Company at the construction site of a Blu-ray project, along with company personnel, met with the defendant Gou, responsible for Sichuan XX Construction Company, and others at Phase 5 of the project to negotiate the handling of an altercation between their respective companies' personnel, Li and Huang 1, at the construction site. During the negotiation, a conflict erupted, leading to a fight which was later stopped. At around 12 PM that day, the defendant Gou again gathered defendant Tang, Liu, and other Sichuan XX Construction Company staff at the entrance of Phase 2 of the Blu-ray project site on XX street in Shuangliu District of the city. They carried wooden sticks, plastic pipes, safety helmets, and other items to engage in a fight with personnel from XX Decoration Company, resulting in several staff members, including Song, He, and Huang 2, being injured. According to the assessment, the degree of bodily injury to Huang 2 and Huang 1 was classified as minor. At around 3 PM that day, defendants Gou, Tang, and Liu voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities. After the incident, both parties voluntarily reached a reconciliation agreement. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Gou, Tang, and Liu during the court trial, and they voluntarily pleaded guilty and accepted punishment by signing agreements. These were corroborated by documents including an acceptance registration form and case initiation decision issued by the public security authorities, as well as the on-scene inspection record, scene map, and photographs produced by the public security authority. Additionally, confessions and identifications from defendants Gou, Tang, and Liu, and testimonies from witnesses Chen, Li, Huang 1, Huang 2, Song, He, Shen, Wen, Lang, Luo, Zhang, Tian, another Li, Gao, another Liu, and another Wu, as well as the forensic examination results (certificate numbers [2020] 246 and 247) regarding the degree of bodily injury issued by the physical evidence identification office of Shuangliu District Public Security Bureau, WeChat chat screenshots, call records, medical records, medical condition certificates, letters of understanding, audiovisual materials, and the household registration of defendants Gou, Tang, and Liu, collectively provide sufficient evidence to confirm the facts.


After trial, it was found that between May and June 2015, the defendants Hou and Hu repeatedly committed thefts in various locations such as shopping malls, store entrances, and residential areas in a certain county, stealing bicycles, chickens, gasoline, and other items. The specific facts are as follows: 1. On a day in May 2015, the defendants Hou and Hu stole two live chickens from a vehicle parked by Wei at the Jinqiao Trade City in a certain county. 2. On a day in May 2015, the two defendants stole a folding bicycle belonging to Li from under Unit 1 of Building 2 in the Xinsheng Jiayuan Community, valued at 150 yuan. 3. On an evening in May 2015, the two defendants stole approximately 10 liters of gasoline from the fuel tanks of Hua and Wei's two motorized tricycles parked in front of a spice shop inside the Wucun Market in a certain location. 4. On an evening in June 2015, the two defendants stole approximately 5 liters of gasoline from Chen's tricycle parked in front of the Fumanjin Supermarket on Jianshe Road. 5. On an evening in June 2015, the two defendants stole approximately 5 liters of gasoline from Yan's motorized tricycle parked in front of the Chenghui Aluminum Wholesale Store. These facts are substantiated by the testimonies of the victims, Hua and Chen, presented and cross-examined in court, as well as by the physical evidence photos, arrest records, and household registration documents provided by the public security organs, and the confessions of the two defendants during the investigation phase. The defendants also raised no objections during the court trial, which is sufficient to confirm the facts.


Upon trial, the following facts were ascertained: 1. At noon on December 20, 2014, the defendant Xu went to the market in Moshantown, a county in Linyi City, and stole a woman's handbag that Yang had placed in the basket of an electric bicycle, which contained 30 yuan in cash. As Xu was caught in the act, he threw away the handbag and fled. 2. Around 10 a.m. on July 28, 2015, the defendants Xu and Dong followed Liu into the Jinniu Market in Yicheng District. Dong intentionally collided with Liu's electric bicycle, while Xu took the opportunity to steal Liu's wallet, which was hanging on the handlebar of the electric bicycle. It contained 960 yuan in cash, a driver's license, an ID card, and a bank card. 3. Around 9 a.m. on August 22, 2015, defendants Xu and Dong followed Zhao into a town market. Dong intentionally collided with Zhao's electric bicycle, allowing Xu to seize the opportunity to steal Zhao's wallet, which was hanging on the handlebar of the electric bicycle. It contained 10,000 yuan in cash, a pair of gold earrings, an ID card, and a bank card. In summary, the defendant Xu committed theft three times, stealing 10,990 yuan in cash, gold earrings, bank cards, ID cards, and other items. Defendant Dong participated in theft twice, stealing 10,960 yuan in cash, gold earrings, bank cards, ID cards, and other items. These facts were not contested by the defendants Xu and Dong during the trial and were corroborated by the statements of the victims Yang, Liu, Zhao, testimony from four witnesses including Cheng (A) and Cheng (B), confessions from the defendants Xu and Dong, identification records, the criminal judgment, release certificate, and case investigation reports, providing sufficient basis for conviction.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charged that during January 2014, the defendants Ge and Dong committed three thefts at Jumei Clothing Store and Parkson Shopping Mall in Zhucheng City. They stole cash totaling over 800 yuan as well as bank cards, ID cards, and other items from Sun's wallet; cash totaling 100 yuan and bank cards and other items from Song's wallet; and cash totaling 2300 yuan and bank cards, a driver's license, and other items from Jiang's wallet. The total amount of cash stolen was over 3200 yuan. In support of the above charges, the prosecution also provided evidence including documentary proof of household registration, police reports, arrest records, the criminal judgment, identification transcripts, and victim statements.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charges that on September 25, 2016, at approximately 16:00, the defendant Yang, in collaboration with the defendant Wang, went to the home of the victim Zhang in a certain village of a town in Rushan City. They used means such as prying open a window to enter the house and commit theft, stealing 4,900 RMB in cash and a Samsung Note 3 mobile phone. According to the appraisal, the total value of the stolen property was 5,290 RMB.


A local People's Procuratorate charged that on the evening of July 10, 2015, the defendants Wu, Wang, and Sun, along with Zhang (at large), Wang, and others, went to karaoke room 220 at a KTV on Tianxia Road in Dinghai District, Zhoushan City after drinking. At around 10 pm, defendant Wu went to room 221 where strangers Tang, Fu, and Zhao (all victims) were, and a dispute arose due to a request to drink with them, which led to a fight. Defendant Wang then called defendants Sun and Zhang to help in the fight. Defendants Wu, Wang, Sun, and Zhang punched and kicked Fu and the others, and defendant Wang also used a hot water kettle to hit Tang, Fu, and Zhao. Subsequently, Wu and the others fled the scene. According to the forensic identification of minor injury by the Dinghai District Branch of Zhoushan Public Security Bureau, the injuries of Tang, Fu, and Zhao were all minor. After the incident, the families of defendants Sun and Wang compensated Tang, Fu, and Zhao for medical expenses and other economic losses totaling RMB 32,000, and received the victims' understanding and forgiveness. During the trial, the defendants Wu, Wang, and Sun raised no objections to the above facts, which are corroborated by the statements of victims Tang, Fu, and Zhao; witness testimonies of Zhang, Chen, Zhou, and another Chen; recognition records; evidence retrieval notices; evidence retrieval lists; evidence material acceptance lists; letters of forgiveness; video screenshots; audio-visual material description documents; CDs; arrest processes; explanatory notes; household registration certificates; forensic identification of bodily injury degrees; and expert opinion notices, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


After trial, it was found that the defendants Zhao and Liu are married and involved in the slaughtering and selling of pigs. Since February 2014, without obtaining the qualification for designated pig slaughtering, the defendants Zhao and Liu illegally slaughtered and retailed over 100 pigs purchased by defendant Zhao in certain villages within a certain town in a certain county, amounting to an illegal operation with revenue exceeding 100,000 yuan. On June 18 of the same year, defendant Liu voluntarily surrendered to a police station in a certain county. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhao and Liu during the court trial and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Li, Yang, Pan, and others; photographs of the slaughtering site; documentary evidence such as notebooks, household registration information, and the details of their capture; and the confessions of defendants Zhao and Liu, all of which are sufficient to make a determination.


The prosecution alleges that on February 12, 2013, at around 13:00, the defendants Pang and Mo, after prior discussion, were at the Jusco shopping mall in Dongfang Square, Chancheng District, a certain city. Defendant Pang was responsible for keeping watch while defendant Mo pickpocketed a Sony Ericsson E15i (X8) mobile phone worth 330 RMB from the victim Liu Yi, which was placed in the victim's coat. After succeeding, defendant Pang was caught red-handed by police. On February 21, 2013, at around 19:00, the police arrested defendant Mo at Dongfang Square. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Mo and Pang during the trial, and are corroborated by victim Liu Yi's report and identification record, testimony and identification records from witnesses Liu Yi 2 and Wang, the price appraisal conclusion, the arrest process, the criminal judgment document, release certificate, household registration proof, and the defendants Mo and Pang's confessions and identification records during the investigation stage, all of which are sufficient to confirm the allegation.


After trial, it was found that on September 29, 2013, at around 19:00, Zhou had a conflict with Guo's fiancée, Zhou Moumou, at Guo's barber shop. The defendant Zhou slapped Zhou Moumou. At around 22:00 the same day, Guo went to the Yunxiang Community Jinxiangyuan Teahouse to find Zhou to discuss the matter of Zhou hitting Zhou Moumou. The two spoke harshly and started fighting again. During the altercation, Guo used a brick to injure Zhou's head and nasal bone. Zhou also used a glass bottle to injure Guo's head and face. According to the forensic evaluation by the Judicial Appraisal Center of Liangzhou District, Wuwei City Public Security Bureau: The injuries of Zhou and Guo were classified as minor injuries. It was further found that the civil matter was settled on November 10, 2013, with Guo compensating Zhou for medical expenses of 10,000 yuan, and both parties reaching mutual understanding. The above facts are confirmed by the victim’s report materials and statement records, case registration form, case filing decision, witness testimonies, hospital medical records, injury photos, injury appraisal documents, letter of understanding, and the confessions and defense of the two defendants, and were verified as true.


The prosecution charges: From July 2011 to December 2013, the defendant Du, without permission from the tobacco monopoly department, repeatedly purchased over 7,000 cartons of "Daqianmen," "Hademen," "Da Fengshou," and "Qinhuai" brand cigarettes from the defendant Zhang. Du then sold these cigarettes to locations such as "Zhang A Da Baozi Shop" in a certain village in a certain town, a certain district, a certain city; "Original Flavor Hotel" in Ban Cheng Town, certain district, certain city; "Xinyuan Supermarket" in a certain village, certain district, certain city, among others. On December 16, 2013, the defendant Du purchased 700 cartons of "Hademen" brand cigarettes and 22 cartons of "Da Fengshou" brand cigarettes from the defendant Zhang; and 950 cartons of "Daqianmen" brand cigarettes from Liu Jia (handled in a separate case). At around 20:00 on December 17, the defendant Du, along with the defendant Liu, was carrying the cigarettes to the Wang Gou toll station in a certain district of a certain city when they were caught on site by the tobacco department. The evidence submitted by the prosecution to the court includes testimonies from witnesses Liu Yi, Zhang B, and others; accounting books and other documentary evidence; cigarettes and other physical evidence; and the confessions of defendants Du, Zhang, and Liu.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city of Guangdong Province charges: To seek illegal profits, the defendants Cao and Wu were employed respectively by a male accomplice and by an accomplice named Gao (both dealt with in separate cases), collaborating to use a set of homemade "pseudo base station" equipment (consisting of 1 main unit, 1 laptop, 1 antenna, and 1 power supply) to illegally send text messages to others, disrupting the normal communications of mobile phone users. Around 11:00 a.m. on April 19, 2014, Cao and Wu were caught red-handed with the incriminating evidence while driving a vehicle with license plate A××××× near the Zhujiang New Town area of a certain district in a certain city, illegally sending text messages. According to statistics, a total of 12,614 messages were sent, causing communication disruptions for 12,614 mobile users for less than one hour.


The court, upon examination, found that in October 2015, the defendant Yu, alias Zhang, falsely claimed to be able to process a credit card with a limit of 160,000 yuan, thereby defrauding 3,000 yuan from Yan. Subsequently, the two concocted a scheme to facilitate a non-performing loan of 14 million yuan, promising a personal gain of 3.5 million yuan in cash, charging 4,000 yuan per person, and defrauded individuals such as Fu, Guo Jia, Guo, and Wei out of 32,000 yuan. Yu gained 20,000 yuan, while Yan gained 12,000 yuan. These facts were undisputed by the defendants Yu and Yan during the trial and are corroborated by witness testimonies from victims Guo and Wei, as well as victims Fu, Gao, and Zhao, identification records, a transfer voucher from the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, a case report and explanatory note from the Raoyang County Public Security Bureau, household registration certificates of defendants Yu and Yan, and other evidence on record, which are sufficient to establish the case.


The prosecution charges: On the morning of February 7, 2015, at around 10 a.m., the defendants Xie, Lin, along with Chen, Zhao (the latter two handled in separate cases), and others, after learning that their friends He and Zhou had been injured by Cheng and others, harbored resentment against Cheng and intended to retaliate. At around 3 p.m. that afternoon, Xie, Lin, Chen, Zhao, and others drove to the vicinity of a gas station in the western part of the city, to the front of Cheng's house, carrying wooden sticks and axes to break the door open. Lin stood guard outside while Xie and others rushed inside, smashing items like wooden doors and televisions. According to the appraisal, the damaged items were valued at a total of 67,413 yuan. On the afternoon of February 9, 2015, at around 6 p.m., defendants Xie and others were passengers in a car driven by Chen. At the intersection of Xiantao Avenue and Sibao Road in the city, they encountered Hu, who was driving a Porsche Cayenne with the license plate 鄂M8C0**, belonging to Cheng. Chen drove the car to collide with the right side of the Cayenne. Subsequently, Xie and others got out of the car with steel pipes and smashed the rear and other parts of the Cayenne. According to the appraisal, the damage to the Cayenne was valued at 34,039 yuan. The prosecution submitted evidence to this court, including the victim's statements, witness testimonies, documentary evidence, appraisal opinions, and the confessions and defenses of defendants Xie and Lin, to charge defendants Xie and Lin with the crime of intentional destruction of property.


Upon trial, it was established that from 2011 to 2014, the defendants Bei and Hu, without having the necessary construction qualifications, partnered to undertake construction projects within the Dongqian Village area. During this period, in order to gain improper benefits, the two, after consulting with each other, gave a total of 200,000 yuan in cash to the village Party branch secretary Song (who has already been sentenced) on two occasions in 2013 and 2014, which Song accepted. Despite knowing that the two did not have the necessary qualifications, Song still allowed them to undertake the projects and provided assistance. It was also found that Song, for accepting the 200,000 yuan cash given by the defendants Bei and Hu in this case, as well as a shopping card worth 10,000 yuan from others, was sentenced by this court to five years and six months imprisonment for the crime of accepting bribes as a non-state functionary, and this judgment has taken effect. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Bei and Hu during the court hearing, and they are sufficiently supported by demographic information, construction agreements, receipts, testimonies from witnesses such as Song and Dong, and records of how the case was brought to trial.