After the trial, it was found that on May 31, 2013, at around 8:00 PM, the defendants Wang and Hao, after consuming alcohol, along with the accomplice Xiao (who is being dealt with in a separate case), got into an argument with the victim Yu at the west ice bridge of the North Road Fishery Company dock in a certain city due to a dispute over the opening of the suspension bridge gate. During the altercation, they injured Yu's left eye, resulting in a corrected vision of less than 0.5. According to forensic examination, the injury to Yu's left eye was classified as minor. After the incident, the defendants Wang and Hao, along with the accomplice Xiao, surrendered themselves to the public security authorities and reached a settlement agreement regarding civil compensation with the victim, which was fully executed. These facts were not contested by the defendants Wang and Hao during the trial and are corroborated by the confessions of defendants Wang and Hao, the statement of the victim Yu, testimony from the witness Ji and others, the identification record, the forensic assessment of bodily injury (Document No. 74 [2014] from Zhi Public Security), the settlement agreement, and the report of the surrender to the authorities, all sufficient to establish the facts of the case.


The prosecution charges: Between October 2015 and March 3, 2016, the defendants Dai and Ding conspired to set up an automatic mahjong table in an orchard at the southernmost part of Dongsheng, a village in a certain city’s Ditang Street. They provided conditions for gambling in the form of "impact mahjong" for individuals such as Hu, Tang, Gu, and Han, and gained over 8,000 yuan in profits through extracting fees from the games. On March 3, 2016, police officers from the city’s Public Security Bureau arrested the defendant Dai and seized an automatic mahjong table and 48 yuan on the spot. On the 8th of the same month, the defendant Ding voluntarily surrendered to the city’s Public Security Bureau and truthfully confessed the aforementioned facts. The stated facts were not disputed by the defendants Dai and Ding during the trial, and are substantiated by documentary evidence such as the "arrest record," arrival record, seizure decision, seizure list, provincial detention receipt, city-specific item detention receipt, payment notice, photo documentation, personal information, testimonies from witnesses Hu, Tang, Gu, and Han, examination transcripts, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the case.


Upon examination, it has been established that from July 2013 to January 2014, the defendants Qi and Guo, without obtaining any qualifications or fulfilling their legal obligations to ensure food safety, rented a factory building on the west side of a county's Guodian Power Plant to produce yuba (bean curd skin). They employed Zhu B (to be dealt with in a separate case) from a village in a town of a county in a certain province for technical support. To increase yuba production, the defendants Qi and Guo, together with Zhu A, added additives containing sodium formaldehyde sulfoxylate and boric acid during the production process. The produced yuba was sold in various locations, including the county, with the sales amount involved reaching 440,000 yuan. It was also found that on March 4, 2014, the defendants Qi and Guo voluntarily surrendered to the Public Security Bureau of the county. On July 1, 2014, the Public Security Bureau issued a decision document No. Feigong Zhuijiao Zi (2014) 00018 to recover 100,000 yuan of illegal gains from defendants Qi and Guo. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Qi and Guo during the trial and are substantiated by household registration certificates, a list of seized items by the county's Public Security Bureau, physical evidence examination reports, testimonies from witnesses Chen Mouqin, Chen Mouyin, Li Moukai, among others; identification records, and the confessions of defendants Qi and Guo, which are sufficient for confirmation.


The District People's Procuratorate charges that on June 6, 2018, at approximately 1:00 PM, defendants Zhang and Wang rode a scooter to the district's building. Defendant Zhang acted as a lookout while defendant Wang used an altered knife to pry open a grey Meiying Shensu-brand electric bicycle that belonged to the victim, Chen, which was parked there. Defendant Zhang then rode it away. Later, the two defendants were apprehended by police while fleeing the scene. According to the appraisal, the stolen electric bicycle was valued at 2,388 yuan. After being brought to justice, both defendants truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts. The evidence presented by the prosecution to the court regarding the above charges includes: physical evidence, documentary evidence, witness testimonies, victim's statements, defendants' confessions and defenses, expert opinions, etc.


The prosecution agency charges: On December 10, 2016, at around 1 PM, the defendant Yu was drinking at a friend's housewarming party at Xinguang Square, Hetang District, Zhuzhou City, when he received a call from his friend Zhao. Zhao stated that he had been involved in a traffic accident at the intersection in front of the Media Building in Tianyuan District, Zhuzhou City, and asked for his assistance. At that time, the defendant Zhao was sitting with the defendant Yu, and since defendant Zhao also knew Zhao, both defendants Yu and Zhao took a taxi to the accident scene. Without first understanding the situation of the accident, defendants Yu and Zhao got into a conflict with the BYD 4S shop employee who was assessing the damage at the scene, the victim Liu. Defendant Yu knocked the victim Liu to the ground. After being separated by bystanders, as the victim Liu was running towards the roadside, he was kicked from behind by defendant Zhao, causing him to fall to the ground. Judicial appraisal determined that the victim Liu sustained minor injuries categorized as Level 2. Defendants Yu and Zhao voluntarily surrendered to the public security agency, truthfully confessed their criminal acts, and actively compensated the victim Liu for medical expenses and other costs totaling 50,000 yuan. They also obtained the victim Liu's forgiveness. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Yu and Zhao during the trial, and were substantiated by evidence including the report filed by You, the statements of the victim Liu, testimonies of witnesses You, Zhao, Liu, and Zhao, identification records and photos, the dashboard camera footage from Liu's vehicle, the forensic medical injury assessment report No. [2016] 886 issued by the Criminal Science and Technology Research Institute of Zhuzhou City Public Security Bureau, the hospital records of the victim Liu, the case record provided by the Tianyuan Branch of Zhuzhou City Public Security Bureau, the receipt and letter of forgiveness issued by the victim Liu, and the household registration information of defendants Yu and Zhao, all of which are sufficient to establish the charges.


The prosecution alleges that on July 13, 2017, the defendant Zhao deceived the victim, Liu, to bring them to a MLM organization den located in a certain city, "a certain place in Tianjin," for the purpose of recruiting new members. Later, along with defendants Tang and Wang, Zhao attempted to persuade the victim Liu to join. At around 9 AM on July 16, when Liu expressed the desire to leave, defendants Zhao, Tang, and Wang prevented him from doing so. They closely followed Liu, strictly monitoring him, thereby restricting his personal freedom and controlling his usage of his phone until around 10 AM on July 17, 2017, when Liu was rescued by the police. After being apprehended, defendants Zhao, Tang, and Wang truthfully confessed the above criminal acts. These facts were undisputed by defendants Zhao, Tang, Wang, and the defense counsel, Pan, during the trial process. The evidence submitted by the prosecution—including the case registration form, the account of the apprehension of the three defendants, the confessions and statements of the three defendants, the victim’s statement, the identification records and photos, and the permanent resident information forms of the three defendants—sufficiently confirm these facts.


The People's Procuratorate of Jiangdu District, Yangzhou City, a certain province, charged that on the early morning of September 8, 2018, the defendant Chen had a verbal altercation over the phone with "Mao" (identity unknown) regarding his girlfriend Wang (phonetic). During this time, "Mao" used the victim Ni's phone to call the defendant Chen, and they agreed to meet at Huimin Hospital in Jiangdu District, Yangzhou City, a certain province. Later, the defendant Chen gathered the defendants Li, Dai, and others to go to Huimin East Road, preparing to fight. On Huimin East Road, unable to reach "Mao" by phone, the defendant Chen called victim Ni instead. After Ni's phone rang and he saw several people rushing toward him, he ran towards a nearby alley. The defendants Chen, Li, and Dai then pursued him, and after catching up to Ni, the defendants Chen and Li beat him by slapping and kicking him. After being assaulted, victim Ni ran into a nearby chess and card room to retrieve a kitchen


Upon trial, it was found that at around 11 p.m. on June 30, 2019, defendant Ren got into a conflict with Yang and others while dining at the "So-and-So" restaurant on Datong Road in Tengzhou City. Ren then gathered defendant Sun and others to go to the scene, where they assaulted Yang and Qiu at the restaurant entrance. Defendant Ren used a fruit knife to stab Yang and cut Qiu's hand. Forensic identification determined that Yang's injuries constituted minor injury of the second degree, and Qiu's injuries constituted slight injury. It was also found that on July 31, 2019, defendant Ren voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed the details of the crime. During the trial, defendants Sun and Ren reached a settlement agreement with civil plaintiffs Yang and Qiu, who withdrew their civil suits and forgave the actions of the two defendants. Defendants Sun and Ren voluntarily signed a plea agreement. These facts were not disputed by defendants Sun and Ren during the court hearing, and were corroborated by testimonies from victims Yang and Qiu, witnesses Ma, Yan, Yu, and others, identification records, expert opinions, audio-visual materials, explanations from the public security authorities regarding the case handling and capture process, the plea agreement, the letter of forgiveness, and electronic files of defendants Ren and Sun, which are sufficient for confirmation.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged the defendants Han and Yu, stating that after premeditation, on the afternoon of April 5, 2014, they went to the Xiaokang Village market in the Southeast Street of a certain city with knives and chased and hacked Li, causing him injuries. According to forensic assessment, the injuries to the victim Li constitute minor injuries of the second degree. To substantiate the above allegations, the prosecution submitted relevant evidence. The prosecution believes that the defendants Han and Yu intentionally injured another person, resulting in minor injuries to one individual, and their actions should be pursued as a criminal offense of X. In this joint crime, both defendants Han and Yu are the principal offenders. After coming to the case, defendants Han and Yu truthfully confessed their crimes, allowing for lighter punishment. Defendants Han and Yu did not dispute the criminal facts charged by the prosecution. The main defense opinion of the defense lawyer, Chen, is that the defendant Yu has a good attitude of confession; played a minor role and is an accomplice; has no prior criminal record and is a first-time, occasional offender. In summary, leniency is requested. Upon investigation, it was found that on the afternoon of April 5, 2014, defendant Han had a dispute with Li, and after premeditation with Yu, they went to the Xiaokang Village market in the Southeast Street of a certain city and used punching and hacking methods to injure Li. According to forensic assessment, the injuries to the victim Li constitute minor injuries of the second degree. On May 1, 2014, the public security agency arrested defendant Han at the Suzhou Train Station; on the early morning of May 9, defendant Yu was arrested at a rental house at 22 Jinhua Road, Xiaokang Village, Southeast Street of a certain city. The above facts are confirmed by the following evidence submitted by the prosecution and examined and cross-examined in court, which this court confirms: the identification records of defendants Han and Yu, the statement and identification record of the victim Li, testimonies and identification records of the witnesses Feng and Liang, the on-site record and photos by the Public Security Bureau of a certain city, the forensic medical assessment of physical injury degree, the arrest process, the case solving process, demographic information, and other evidence. Defendants Han and Yu also made corresponding confessions in court regarding the above criminal facts.


The People's Procuratorate of Xingbin District in a certain city charged that between June and July 2015, the defendants Wei and He, along with Wei's father, Wei A, collectively lent more than 50,000 yuan to the victim, Huang. Of this amount, Wei and He lent 40,000 yuan to Huang, and both parties verbally agreed on a monthly interest rate of 5% to 10% of the principal. After Huang paid Wei more than 5,000 yuan in interest for two months, he ceased further payments. Wei believed that he had been deceived by Huang and demanded the repayment of the principal, which Huang continuously failed to repay. On the night of October 12th that same year, around 9 PM, Wei A, Wei, He, and Huang met at the "Fashion Milk Tea Shop" in Xingbin District of a certain city to discuss the repayment. Wei and He demanded that Huang repay that night or find someone to guarantee the repayment, but Huang failed to meet their demands. Around 11 PM, Wei and He used a vehicle to take Huang to the edge of a sugarcane field in Qiaogong Street, Qiaogong Township, Xingbin District. During the journey, Wei used WeChat to call three men (one named Lao, one named A, and another unknown, who were dealt with in a separate case) to bring shovels by car. Wei, He, and others threatened Huang by pretending to dig a pit to bury him alive to force him to repay the loan or find a guarantor. Around 5 AM the next day, Wei and He again used a vehicle to take Huang to wait near the Laibin International Hotel to make him call someone to guarantee the payment. Around 9 AM that morning, Huang called his daughter, Wei B, to act as a guarantor. Wei B instructed Wei and He to go to the Binfeng Jiangnan Community in Xingbin District to complete the guarantee paperwork. Wei and He then drove Huang towards the Binfeng Jiangnan Community but were apprehended by police on Hongshui River Avenue. Regarding the alleged facts, the public prosecution agency presented documentary evidence, witness testimonies, victim statements, as well as confessions and defenses from the defendants in court.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges that in the early hours of December 28, 2015, defendant Mei, together with Xu, smashed the car window glass using stones in the west area of Building 23, Lingfeng New Village, Baiguan Street, a certain district of a certain city. They stole from victim Wang Yib’s D××××× parked vehicle 4 cartons of Zhonghua brand cigarettes (soft pack), 5 packs of Hemtianxia cigarettes, 6 loose packs of Zhonghua brand soft pack cigarettes, and more than 30 yuan in coins. According to the appraisal, the value of the cigarettes is 3720 yuan. Further investigation found that after the incident, the public security organ seized 4 cartons of Zhonghua brand cigarettes, 4 packs of Hemtianxia brand cigarettes, 5 packs of Zhonghua brand soft pack cigarettes, 1 unsealed pack of Hemtianxia cigarettes (containing 9 cigarettes), and 1 unsealed pack of Zhonghua soft pack cigarettes (containing 6 cigarettes) from defendant Xu. The public security organ has returned the aforementioned seized items to the victim Wang Yib. The aforementioned facts, which defendants Mei and Xu did not dispute during the trial, are confirmed by the confessions and defenses of defendants Mei and Xu, the statement of the victim Wang Yib, the testimonies of witnesses Wang Jia and Hu, the price appraisal opinion, the identification inspection report, the search record and photographs, the seizure decision, the seizure list and record, the identification record and photographs, the return list, receipt, surveillance video, the scene investigation and inspection record, the criminal judgment document, the account of the arrest, and the household registration information of defendants Mei and Xu, are sufficient to establish.


The prosecution alleges: On a day in late October 2014, defendants Qian and Wang sold about 1 gram of methamphetamine to Sun and Zhang (both handled in separate cases) for 400 yuan at a certain building, certain room in Zemin Sunshine Community, in a certain district of a certain city. On another day in late October, defendants Qian and Wang sold about 1 gram of methamphetamine to Sun and Zhang for 400 yuan downstairs of a certain building in Zemin Sunshine Community, in a certain district of a certain city. On January 22, 2015, defendants Qian and Wang were arrested by police at Lishui Airport in a certain city. Police seized 0.8762 grams of methamphetamine in the Zhejiang BD8B** small sedan driven by defendant Qian. To substantiate the above allegations, the prosecution presented to the court the testimonies of witnesses Zhang and Sun, identification records and photos, a seizure list and photos, search records, weighing and counting records and photos, a drug transfer list, the criminal judgment, physico-chemical examination reports, arrest details, investigation reports, household registration proofs of the two defendants, and their confessions and defenses.


Upon trial, it was found that in the early hours of August 29, 2008, defendants Hu and Zhang rode a motorcycle from a certain county in a certain province to a certain road (opposite Chengguan Police Station). Using methods such as prying open doors and cutting the ignition wire, they stole a Dongfeng EQ3108G6D1 truck parked by victim Wang at this location. They later drove the vehicle to a village in a town of a certain city and sold it to a scrap dealership for 17,000 yuan. According to the appraisal by Nan Zhang County Pricing Bureau, the value of the stolen Dongfeng EQ3108G6D1 truck was 36,300 yuan. On June 8, 2016, Hu turned himself in at the Nan Zhang County Public Security Bureau and truthfully confessed his crimes. It was also found that after being brought to justice, Zhang compensated victim Wang with 23,000 yuan, and Wang expressed forgiveness toward Zhang. These facts were not disputed by defendants Hu and Zhang during the court proceedings and were supported by the statement of victim Wang, the criminal case registration form, police dispatch registration form, incident report, apprehension report, arrest report, motor vehicle information query results, vehicle registration certificate, vehicle sales invoice, onsite photo identification, criminal judgment from a certain county's people’s court, onsite identification photos, residential information form and other documentary evidence, identification transcripts, price assessment certification conclusion from Nan Zhang County Pricing Bureau's Price Certification Center, and the confessions and defenses of defendants Hu and Zhang, which are sufficient to establish the findings.


The trial found that in early March 2013, the defendant Shi approached the defendant Zhao and requested to use Zhao's team of large trailers and his own car, a BMW with the license plate number Y×××××, to stage a fake accident scene and defraud the insurance company of insurance money. After Zhao agreed, he found the defendant You and asked him to falsely report the insurance after the fake accident scene was created using You's driver's license. On the evening of March 10, 2013, at around 23:00, Shi drove his BMW car to create a fake accident scene with Zhao's large trailer with the license plate number Ji F××××× at the intersection of South Second Ring Road and Lianchi South Street in Baoding City. Subsequently, Shi and Zhao used You's driver's license to falsely report the insurance accident. China Pacific Insurance Co., Ltd. accepted the case, and during the claims process, Shi and Zhao made You use his identity to apply for a China Construction Bank card for Shi to withdraw the claim funds. Later, Shi withdrew the fraudulent claim amount of 27,000 yuan using this card. After the case was solved, the stolen money was recovered and returned to the victimized unit. It was also found that You and Zhao surrendered to the public security bureau separately on January 29, 2015, and February 11, 2015. The facts stated above were not disputed by the three defendants during the trial, and they expressed their willingness to plead guilty. Furthermore, these facts are corroborated by the confessions of the three defendants, the testimony of witness Sun, the identification records, the arrest process, household registration certificates, the compensation case files, employment contracts, and other evidence, which are sufficient to confirm the conviction.


After the trial, it was found that in May 2015, the defendant Wang, without going through normal channels, purchased a large quantity of "Xiaoyi Music" CDs and DVDs and wholesale parts of them to the defendant Huo and Zhang. After the incident, the police seized 4,570 discs from Wang, 746 discs from Huo, and 372 discs from Zhang. According to the appraisal by the Hebei Province Printed Product Quality Supervision and Inspection Station, 4,444 discs seized from Wang were illegal publications, 726 discs seized from Huo were illegal publications, and 361 discs seized from Zhang were illegal publications. The aforementioned facts are undisputed by the two defendants during the trial and are fully substantiated by witness testimonies, case reports, lists and photos of seized items, and publication appraisals.


Upon trial, it was found that on December 2, 2016, at around 22:00, defendants Li and Tang consumed drugs in a house located in a certain building, in a certain district of a certain city. During this time, Li received a call from Peng, who was looking to purchase drugs. Li then arranged for Tang to deliver the drugs to Peng at a hotel room located in a certain district of a certain city at xx Lu xx Cheng xx Hotel xx Room. Despite knowing it was drugs, Tang followed Li's arrangement and carried two tablets with a net weight of 0.1955 grams suspected to be methamphetamine (commonly known as "magu") and 0.2740 grams suspected to be methamphetamine (ice) to the agreed trading location, completing the transaction for 200 yuan. After the transaction, Peng and Tang were caught on the spot by police officers. The police seized 200 yuan of drug money from Tang and the aforementioned suspected drugs from Peng. The drugs involved, the drug money, and two mobile phones used as crime tools were lawfully confiscated by the public security authorities. According to the municipal public security bureau drug testing center, methamphetamine components were detected in the seized suspected methamphetamine, and methamphetamine and caffeine components were detected in the seized suspected methamphetamine tablets. On the same day, defendant Tang led police officers to arrest Li near the district’s maternal and child health hospital. After arriving at the case, both defendants Li and Tang truthfully confessed to the aforementioned facts. At the trial, both defendants Li and Tang had no objections to the above-mentioned facts, which were presented in court and verified by evidence such as the criminal case registration form, case filing decision, household information, arrest process, search records, call records, weighing records, identification records, photos, appraisal documents, video materials, a list of seized items, witness Peng's testimony, and the confessions of defendants Li and Tang, all of which were confirmed and are sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of Tinghu District, a certain city, charges that the defendants, Lei, Wan, Chen, and Wu, are all members of the "Xue xx" pyramid scheme organization. They reside with other organization members, Zhu, Cui, Ma xx, Zhu xx, and Wang xx, in the pyramid scheme location at the dormitory of the timber factory in a certain city, with defendant Lei in charge of this location. On March 14, 2015, defendant Wan lured the victim, Zhao, to the pyramid scheme location at the dormitory of the timber factory in a certain city to develop an offline. Subsequently, the defendants Lei, Wan, Chen, Wu, and others indoctrinated the victim Zhao with content related to the pyramid scheme. Zhao realized the intentions of Lei, Wan, Chen, Wu, and others, and escaped from the location on March 28, 2015. However, after being discovered and brought back by defendant Lei, Lei instructed defendants Wan, Chen, and Wu to keep a close watch on victim Zhao and added a padlock to the entrance door of the pyramid scheme location at night to prevent Zhao from escaping again.

On the afternoon of April 2, 2015, victim Zhao seized the opportunity to escape again from the pyramid scheme location at the dormitory of the timber factory in a certain city to the train station in a certain city. Defendants Wu and members Zhu and Cui noticed and began searching. Defendant Wan learned of this and went to the train station with Zhu. Wan grabbed victim Zhao while Zhu took Zhao's bag to prevent her from leaving.


After trial, it was found that: At around 10 PM on May 7, 2016, the defendants Guo, Liang, Li, and Kang were having dinner at the Chuanmin Fish Restaurant in Zhengding New District when they got into a dispute with the victim Yang and others. A fight ensued, during which the four defendants injured the victim Yang. The injuries sustained by the victim Yang were assessed as minor injuries of the second degree. After the incident, the defendants Li and Kang, along with the relatives of the defendants Liang and Guo, compensated the victim for the losses, and the victim expressed understanding towards the four defendants. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants Guo, Liang, Li, and Kang during the trial, and were confirmed by the statements and defenses of the defendants Guo, Liang, Li, and Kang, the statement of the victim Yang, the testimonies of witnesses Yang, Zhang, and others, the forensic medical report on the degree of bodily injury, surveillance video, letter of understanding, identification documents, and other evidence materials, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


After the trial, it was found that on the afternoon of August 28, 2015, the defendants Sun and Tang went to the home of the victim Feng in Group 2, Zhigou Village, a town in this county. Taking advantage of the absence of the Feng family, they used a key to unlock the door and entered Feng's home, stealing 8,000 yuan. After the incident, the 8,000 yuan stolen from victim Feng was seized by the public security authorities and returned to the victim. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants Sun and Tang during the trial, and were corroborated by the statement of victim Feng, testimony of witness Xu, documents from the Guannan County Public Security Bureau detailing the case-solving process, arrest process, search records, list of seized and returned items, photographs of the crime scene, household registration evidence, and the administrative penalty decision from the Guannan County Public Security Bureau, which are sufficient to establish the case.


After trial, it was found: Accomplice Huang A (handled in a separate case), due to dissatisfaction with the victim Yu associating with his ex-girlfriend, gathered the defendants Luo and Wu to plan to teach the victim Yu a lesson. On the evening of October 18, 2013, accomplice Huang A and defendants Luo and Wu intercepted victim Yu at the entrance of the Wen Chuan Club on Guangxin Road in the district, and jointly used fists and feet to assault victim Yu, causing him minor injuries. On October 19 and 31, 2013, defendants Luo and Wu subsequently voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities. After the case occurred, under the mediation of the public security authorities, accomplice Huang A and defendants Luo and Wu jointly paid a compensation amount of 85,000 yuan to victim Yu. Both parties reached a criminal and civil reconciliation regarding the case, and victim Yu and his family expressed in writing their understanding of the criminal actions of accomplice Huang A and defendants Luo and Wu, and requested the judicial authorities to show leniency on accomplice Huang A and defendants Luo and Wu. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Luo and Wu during the trial, and were substantiated by evidence provided by the prosecution, including confessions and identification records of defendants Luo, Wu, and accomplice Huang A, statements and identification records of victim Yu, testimonies from witnesses Huang, Gao, and Yang, forensic examination injury assessment report, the two defendants identifying the crime scene and photographs, criminal case acceptance and filing forms and crime-solving report, account of the capture process, the two defendants’ household registration materials, the compensation receipt, and the reconciliation agreement document.


The prosecution alleges that from mid-August 2017 to October 7 of the same year, the defendant Lin allowed She to use methamphetamine (commonly known as ice) seven times in his rented jade shop at Unit C14, Phase 1, Jewelry Plaza, Pandong Street, Industrial Park, a certain city. From September 3, 2017, to October 4 of the same year, the defendant She allowed Lin to use methamphetamine four times in his residence at Room 501, Building H, Qiaonan Teacher's Building, Pandong Street, Industrial Park, a certain city, and in a garage rented beneath the Teacher's Building. Regarding these facts, both defendants Lin and She raised no objections during the court hearing, and there is corroborating evidence, including testimonies from witnesses Li and She, household registration certificates, materials of identification and recognition, inspection records, lists of seized/recovered items, witness certificates, rental agreements, administrative penalty decisions, on-site testing reports, on-site investigation materials, proof documents, case registration forms, arrest records, and explanatory notes from the public security organs, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts of the case.


The prosecution charges that on a day at the end of April 2016, the defendants Xiong, Liu, and Xiong drove to a certain town in a certain county to buy trees. While passing Yin's nursery, defendant Xiong instructed Xiong to stop the car and informed Xiong and Liu that there were boxwood trees in the nursery, suggesting that they return later to take some home. After dark, defendant Xiong followed a vehicle transporting purchased trees to a location where defendants Liu and Xiong stole six boxwood trees from Yin's nursery, which were then split evenly between them. An assessment determined the value of the six boxwood trees to be 14,100 yuan. It was further determined that after the incident, the six stolen boxwood trees were recovered, but three had died, and the other three were returned to the victim, with their survival status currently unknown. During the trial, the three defendants compensated the victim for all economic losses and obtained the victim's understanding. The three defendants raised no objections to the aforementioned facts. Liu's defense lawyer argued that after Liu was brought to justice, he demonstrated a good attitude towards admitting guilt, was a first-time and incidental offender, actively paid compensation and fines, and requested leniency and a suspended sentence for Liu. The aforementioned facts are verified by evidence such as the registration form for case acceptance, the decision to file a case, the process of detecting and solving the case, household registration certificates, proof of no prior convictions, lists of seized items, on-site investigation records and photos, identification records and photos, the appraisal opinion from the certain county price authentication center, testimonies from witnesses Huang, Sun, Chen, Liu1, Liu2, and Wang, the statement of victim Yin, and the confessions and defenses of defendants Liu and Xiong, which are sufficient for confirmation.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Shanghai accused Wu and Chu that at around 21:00 on June 12, 2020, the defendants together stole a Yadea brand electric bicycle parked by the victim Tao at a non-motorized vehicle parking area about 50 meters south near the east side of Liuzhou Road and Pubei Road in a certain district of this city and fled. According to the appraisal, the stolen electric bicycle was valued at 2,521 RMB. On June 17, 2020, Wu and Chu were apprehended by the police, and after being brought to justice, they truthfully confessed the above criminal facts, and the stolen goods have been recovered. The prosecution recognizes that the defendants' actions have violated Article x and Article x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China and they should be held criminally responsible for joint crimes of x. Wu and Chu have confessed, admitted guilt, and accepted punishment, so they can be leniently punished according to the law. It is suggested that each be sentenced to four months of detention and fined. The case is submitted for lawful trial. Defendants Wu and Chu and their defenders have no objections to the criminal facts, evidence, charges, and sentencing recommendations in the indictment. Wu and Chu have confessed, admitted guilt, signed the documents, and expressed no objections during the trial process.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain location accused and charged as follows: 1. From June to August 2014, the defendant Huang, in order to demand the payment of the project funds owed by the Guangling Economic Development Zone Management Committee of Yangzhou City to Yangzhou Huafeng Investment Co., sought to obtain benefits for himself. He hired the defendant Xie for a payment of 10,000 RMB, using methods such as tracking, covertly photographing, and installing a GPS tracker on the victim's car, to illegally obtain personal information about Qi, the head of the Guangling District Industrial Park Management Committee of Yangzhou City. Huang attempted to obtain unfavorable information about the victim Qi to coerce him into agreeing to repay the debt. 2. From July to August 2014, the defendant Huang, in order to demand the payment of the project funds owed by a certain city's Tianping Investment Development Co. to Century Huafeng Holdings Co., sought to obtain benefits for himself. He privately hired the defendant Xie, using methods such as searching, tracking, and staking out, to illegally obtain the personal whereabouts and other information about Hua, the chairman of the city's Tianping Investment Development Co., and paid Xie 20,000 RMB. Based on the illegally obtained information by Xie, Huang and four others controlled the victim Hua on Songsong Road in a certain district of the city, forcing him to repay a debt of 180,000 RMB. On August 12, 2014, the defendant Xie, due to suspicious behavior, truthfully confessed the criminal facts to the public security organs during their investigation. After being brought to justice, Huang also truthfully confessed the criminal facts to the public security organs. To prove the facts of the above accusations, the public prosecutor interrogated the defendants Huang and Xie in court, read the records of the defendants' confessions during the investigation, the statements of the victims Qi and Hua, the testimony of the witness Bei, the civil mediation document from the Jiangsu Provincial Higher People's Court, the identification records and photographs, physical evidence photographs, site inspection records, site orientation diagram, site photographs, and the incident process, among other evidence.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charges: From September 2013 to early July 2014, defendants Zhang, Yang, Xu, Deng, Tan, and Zhong engaged in illegal pyramid schemes at Room XXX, Building X, No. X, XXX Road, Xiangcheng District, Zhangzhou City. Among them, defendants Zhang and Yang served as the "managers" of this pyramid scheme site, while defendants Xu, Deng, Tan, and Zhong were salespeople. Subsequently, Peng, on July 30, 2014, Liu (the second) on August 1, 2014, and Ou on August 4, 2014, were deceived into being brought to this pyramid scheme site. To force Peng, Liu (the second), and Ou to join the illegal pyramid scheme organization, under the directive of the site director "Zhou" (handled in another case), defendants Zhang, Yang, Xu, Deng, Tan, and Zhong used methods like locking doors and taking turns guarding (including defendants Tan and Zhong who also acted as lookouts) to detain Peng, Liu (the second), and Ou within the pyramid scheme site. On August 4, 2014, the public security authorities raided the pyramid scheme site and rescued victims Peng, Liu (the second), and Ou. The evidence for the above-mentioned facts includes: 1. Relevant physical and documentary evidence; 2. Testimonies of witnesses such as Lin; 3. Statements from victims Peng, Liu (the second), and Ou; 4. Confessions and defenses of defendants Zhang, Yang, Xu, Deng, Tan, and Zhong; 5. Records of inspection and examination.


After trial, it was found that at approximately 21:00 on March 21, 2013, a drug buyer named Yang contacted the defendant Lai by phone to purchase methamphetamine worth 400 RMB. They agreed to meet near the Kaiping Market in the 50th district of Baocheng, Baoan District for the transaction. Subsequently, defendants Lai and Xiao went to the agreed location to meet Yang. Lai arranged for Xiao to receive 400 RMB from Yang and handed over a small packet of drugs. After the transaction was completed, the police arrested them on the spot, confiscating 400 RMB from Lai and a small packet containing a suspected drug (weighing 0.48 grams, from which methamphetamine was detected) from Yang. These facts were not disputed by the defendants Lai and Xiao during the trial and were confirmed by relevant evidence presented and verified in court, which is sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that: 1. On August 27, 2015, at around 19:00, the defendant Gu sold a packet of ketamine (commonly known as "K powder") to Chen at the Oubei Pier, Jiangbei Street, Yongjia County, for the price of 200 yuan. 2. On August 29, 2015, at around 15:00, Chen contacted the defendant Gu by phone to purchase ketamine. Gu stated that he had none and asked Chen to directly contact the defendant Teng. Subsequently, Chen contacted the defendant Teng to purchase ketamine. On the same day, at around 16:00, the defendant Teng sold a packet of ketamine to Chen for the price of 300 yuan at the intersection of Yongning Road, Jiangbei Street, Yongjia County. After the transaction, the defendant Teng was caught on the spot by the police. The police seized from his handbag nine packets of suspected ketamine, a mobile phone, and 300 yuan in cash, of which the 300 yuan was returned to Chen. The police extracted one packet of suspected ketamine used in the transaction from the left pocket of Chen's pants. Upon examination, the ten packets of suspected ketamine seized weighed a total of 18.63 grams, all containing ketamine. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by the defendants Teng and Gu during the court trial and are corroborated by the testimony of the witness Chen, the seizure list, the on-site weighing records of the suspected drugs, the drug handover list, phone call records, the administrative penalty decision, the criminal judgment, the physical and chemical examination report, the on-site test report, the witness Chen's identification record, inspection record, on-site extraction record, urine extraction record, the procedures and explanations provided by the police for the arrest, and demographic information, which are sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of Haizhou District in a certain city charges: On May 8, 2016, at 21:30, the defendants Lu and Liu, after consuming alcohol, went to the section of the road in front of Hengrui Pharmaceutical Factory on Renmin East Road in Haizhou District. They intercepted a patrol car from the Special Patrol Unit of the Haizhou Branch of the Public Security Bureau of the city, with police number Su G11**, and unreasonably pulled at the on-duty police officer Guo. This caused Guo's police uniform to tear, injured his hand, and caused the loss of his single police equipment. Despite multiple warnings, the on-duty police officer Guo fired three warning shots into the air. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Lu and Liu during the court hearing. The case is supported by documentary evidence such as the case investigation report, arrest report, household registration proof, injury photographs, written testimonies from non-appearing witnesses Yin, Hu, Guo, and others, as well as pre-trial confessions and defenses from the defendants Lu and Liu. Additionally, a forensic assessment of the degree of human injury, numbered (Clinical) [2016] 0578, issued by the Physical Evidence Appraisal Institute of the city's Public Security Bureau, and audio-visual materials were presented and cross-examined in court, all of which sufficiently confirm the charges.


The prosecution accuses the defendants Chen, Jiang, Luo, and Wang of the following: 1. On the evening of January 16, 2015, the defendants Chen, Jiang, Luo, and Wang, together with Ban XX and Ban Zhanzhan (both handled in separate cases), engaged in fraudulent gambling by cheating at the Renbo Supermarket on the second floor of New Century Mall in the Taizhou Economic Development Zone, defrauding the victim Yang out of 19,400 yuan. Later, Chen and Jiang each received 1,000 yuan of the stolen money, Luo received 900 yuan, and Wang received 700 yuan. The remaining amount was spent jointly by the defendants. 2. On the evening of the 18th of the same month, the defendants Chen, Jiang, Luo, and Wang, together with Ban XX and Ban Zhanzhan, again engaged in fraudulent gambling in room 8818 of the Shenlan Concept Hotel in the Taizhou Economic Development Zone, defrauding the victim Yang out of 22,400 yuan. Later, Chen received 2,000 yuan of the stolen money, Jiang received 1,500 yuan, and Luo and Wang each received 1,000 yuan. The remaining money was used for joint consumption. On May 7, 2015, the victim reported the case; on the 18th of the same month, the defendant Jiang was apprehended by public security officers at the entrance of 1314 Bar in Jiaojiang District, Taizhou City. On the 21st of the same month, defendants Chen and Wang voluntarily surrendered at the Xipai Police Station of the Development Zone Branch of the Taizhou City Public Security Bureau, and on the 29th of the same month, defendant Luo surrendered at the same police station. During the investigation stage, all defendants compensated the victim Yang with 41,800 yuan, obtaining the victim's understanding. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Chen, Jiang, Luo, and Wang during the trial process, and there is evidence such as household registration certificates, hotel accommodation query forms, the victim Yang's statements, confessions of co-offenders Ban XX and Ban Zhanzhan, identification records, case documentation, explanatory notes, criminal judgment, administrative penalty decision, receipts, and letters of understanding, which are sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: On December 12, 2015, defendant Liao was beaten by the victim Guo A due to another person's dispute. Liao became increasingly angry afterwards and called defendant Wu (nicknamed "Skinny") that evening to ask for help in teaching Guo A a lesson. Later, Liao A (who is wanted and on the run) learned that Guo A was causing trouble and fighting at his animation arcade. Around 8 PM that evening, Liao A led Wu and others to a certain ridge, where they, under Liao's identification, chased and beat Guo A, eventually injuring him with a knife near the Tongyuan railway crossing. According to the appraisal, Guo A sustained minor injuries of the first degree. The evidence the prosecution used to establish the above facts includes: 1. Documentary evidence; 2. Appraisal opinions; 3. Identification records; 4. Testimonies from witnesses Zou A, Zou B, Zhang, Zou C, Li, and Wang; 5. Statement of the victim Guo A; 6. Confessions and defenses of defendants Liao and Wu.


The prosecution charges: On May 8, 2014, at approximately 14:00, the defendant Liu, in collusion with Xu, after prior planning, stole a "Lvsu" brand Electric King model anti-theft electric bicycle belonging to the victim, Zhou, valued at 2064 yuan (according to an appraisal), parked under Building 4, Unit 1, in the eastern district of a residential complex in a certain district of this city. Xu was responsible for acting as a lookout, while Liu stole the vehicle. When the two were moving the vehicle near the south gate of the complex, they were discovered by Zhou, who then captured Liu and handed him over to the police who arrived in response to the report. On May 28, 2014, defendant Xu was apprehended by the public security organs. After being brought to justice, both defendants truthfully confessed the facts of the case. During the trial, defendants Liu and Xu raised no objections to the above facts, which were corroborated by the testimony of the victim Zhou, the identification transcript, the list of seized and returned items, the location map of the crime scene, the photographed identification of the crime scene, audiovisual materials, and evidence provided by the public security organs including the household registration information, prior records, arrest process of defendants Liu and Xu, medical records, and inspection reports, all sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution charges: 1. On the morning of March 24, 2014, defendant Lv, knowing that the "Apple" laptop (valued at 7,140 RMB as per appraisal) belonging to Li (already sentenced) was stolen, still sold the "Apple" laptop on behalf of defendant Jin for 2,300 RMB. Defendant Jin, knowing the "Apple" laptop from defendant Lv was stolen property, still purchased it at a price significantly below market value without legal registration and resold the laptop at a higher price to another person. 2. On a night in late March 2014, defendant Lv, knowing that the "Apple 5s" phone belonging to Li was stolen, still sold the "Apple 5s" phone on behalf of defendant Jin for 1,500 RMB. Defendant Jin, knowing the "Apple 5s" phone from defendant Lv was stolen property, still purchased it. The actions of defendants Lv and Jin have violated the provisions of Article x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, constituting the crime of x. It is requested to impose a lawful sentence. Additionally, it was found that after the incident, the relatives of defendants Lv and Jin compensated the victim Chen for the economic loss of the "Apple" laptop, totaling 7,140 RMB, on July 6, 2014, and obtained forgiveness from the victim who requested leniency in sentencing. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Lv and Jin during the court trial, and the following evidence was provided by the prosecution and substantiated during the trial: 1. Household registration certificates; 2. Statements of defendants Lv and Jin; 3. Statement of victim Chen; 4. Testimony of witness Li; 5. Price appraisal conclusion document Lianjia Ren (2014) No. 46; 6. Business license; 7. Sales receipt; 8. Announcement; 9. Arrest record; 10. Letter of understanding; 11. Phone call records; 12. Criminal judgment, etc., proving the evidence is indeed sufficient and adequate to establish the facts.


After a trial, it was found: In June 2015, near the Xingtang Agricultural Market in the Economic Development Zone of a certain county, the defendants Zhao and Guo together used a method of prying open locks to steal a total of three electric tricycles. The specifics are as follows: 1. On June 10, 2015, at approximately 9 a.m., on the east side of the entrance to the Fuyang Hualian Supermarket in Xingtang, Economic Development Zone of a certain county, Guo acted as a lookout while Zhao pried open a lock and stole Huang's red electric tricycle of the Wanshunfu brand. The stolen vehicle was valued at 4,200 yuan. 2. On June 19, 2015, at approximately 9 a.m., on the west side of the entrance to the Xingtang Agricultural Market in the Economic Development Zone of a certain county, Guo was on guard nearby, while Zhao pried open a lock and stole Chen's blue electric tricycle of the Zhanyun brand. According to the appraisal by the Price Appraisal Center of a certain county, the stolen vehicle was valued at 3,255 yuan. 3. In early June 2015, at the entrance of Fuyang Hualian Supermarket in Xingtang, Economic Development Zone of a certain county, Guo acted as a lookout while Zhao pried open a lock and stole a dark blue electric tricycle belonging to a man about 50 years old. In summary, the defendants Zhao and Guo committed 3 thefts, with the stolen items that could be appraised valued at 7,090 yuan. One theft could not be appraised due to the lack of physical evidence. The above facts had no objection from the two defendants during the court hearing, and were confirmed by evidence including photographs of the crime tools, photos of the stolen electric vehicles, documentary evidence such as the case registration form, decision to file a case, course of the case, household registration certificates, proof of prior convictions, testimony of witness Gao, statements of victims Chen and Huang, records of on-site investigation, search, and identification, the appraisal conclusions from the Price Appraisal Center of a certain county, and video materials.


The People's Procuratorate in a certain location charged that on the night of February 4, 2016, the defendants Chen and He, after premeditation, went to the Dongran School South Mobile Station at Zhangwang Village, Baiyangwan Street, Gusu District, Suzhou City. There, using tools such as hammers and screwdrivers to pry locks, they stole two Nandu brand lithium iron batteries worth 8,100 RMB from the station cabinet. After the incident, the stolen goods were recovered and returned to the victimized unit by the public security organs.


The prosecution alleges: At the end of 2012, the defendant Han sold 8 grams of methamphetamine (ice) to the defendant Wang in three transactions at a price of 400 yuan per gram in a county town. Later, Han and Wang jointly sold 0.5 grams of methamphetamine (ice) to another person at a price of 400 yuan per gram near the county's trade center. On a day at the end of 2012, the defendant Wang sold 0.2 grams of methamphetamine (ice) to a drug user named Xiang near the Sheng Nuo Li Du Hotel in the county. To prove the above facts, the prosecution has provided supporting evidence.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged that the defendant Chen discovered an improper relationship between the defendant Huang and the victim Ren. Chen then conspired with the defendant Huang and Zhang (handled in a separate case) to find an opportunity to lure the victim Ren out and beat him up. On October 5, 2015, at approximately 11 a.m., the defendant Huang, under the pretense of a date, tricked the victim Ren into room 501 of the Urban Hotel on Riverside Road, Lingxi Town, a certain county. The defendant Chen and Zhang entered the room pretending to catch an affair and proceeded to beat the victim Ren, destroyed Ren’s iPhone 6, and extorted 30,000 yuan from him. They eventually obtained 8,000 yuan in cash from the victim Ren and coerced him into writing an IOU for 20,000 yuan. On October 6, 2015, the defendant Huang voluntarily surrendered to the public security bureau of a certain county. After the incident, the defendant Chen compensated the victim Ren for economic losses and received Ren's understanding. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Chen and Huang during the trial, and there is supporting evidence from the victim Ren's statement, forensic medical examination report of human injury degree, search record, inspection record, electronic data extraction record, identification record, seizure order, list of seized items and return receipt, text message photos, IOU, case facts, household registration certificate, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish these facts.


Upon examination, it was found that at around 0:00 on January 15, 2015, defendants Zhang and Lu had an altercation with victim He near the entrance of Bihai Hotel in Nanping Town, a certain city. Defendants Zhang and Lu used a switchblade to stab victim He in the abdomen, left side, and left chest. When defendants Zhang and Lu were chased to the entrance of Bihai Hotel by victims Zhong and others, defendant Zhang again used the switchblade to stab victim Zhong. Defendant Lu seized a steel pipe from Zhou and, together with defendant Zhang, assaulted victim Zhong. According to forensic identification, the injuries sustained by victims He and Zhong were both classified as second-degree serious injuries. On January 27, 2015, defendant Zhang was apprehended and subsequently assisted the police in capturing defendant Lu on the same day. It was also found that after being brought to justice, defendants Zhang and Lu reached a settlement agreement with victims He and Zhong regarding compensation. Defendant Zhang compensated victims He and Zhong with 90,000 RMB, and defendant Lu compensated them with 40,000 RMB, both of which were accepted by victims He and Zhong. The facts mentioned above were not disputed by defendants Zhang and Lu during the trial, and were supported by the statements and identification records from victims He and Zhong, testimony from witnesses Zhou, Li, and Xiao, as well as identification records from witnesses Zhou and Li. Additionally, the arrest process, explanations of surrender, situation reports, forensic identification reports on the degree of injuries, criminal settlement agreements, criminal understanding documents, receipts, household registration information, scene photos, and audiovisual materials all provide sufficient evidence. The defense counsel for defendant Zhang presented the following arguments: 1. After being brought to justice, defendant Zhang truthfully confessed to the crime. 2. After being brought to justice, defendant Zhang assisted the police in capturing defendant Lu and demonstrated meritorious behavior. 3. There was fault on the part of the victim in this case. 4. Defendant Zhang actively compensated victims He and Zhong for economic losses and received their forgiveness. 4. Defendant Zhang is a first-time offender. In summary, it is suggested that this court impose a lenient punishment on defendant Zhang. Regarding whether there was fault on the part of the victim, upon investigation, this case was initiated by provocative language from defendant Zhang, and therefore, the victim should not be considered at fault.


After trial, it was found: 1. At around 9 a.m. on July 4, 2013, the defendants Sun and Liu (handled in a separate case) rode a black Yamaha two-wheeled motorcycle to Liu Tai Group, a village in Longshan Township, Luoshan County, Xinyang City. At the home of the victim Li, they pretended to be electricians who needed to exchange smaller denominations of money for larger ones as a pretext to find out where Li kept his money. They then distracted Li by asking to boil water and stole 500 yuan in cash from Li's wardrobe, replacing it with fake money to avoid detection. 2. At around 8 a.m. on December 5, 2016, the defendants Sun and Liu rode a black Yamaha two-wheeled motorcycle to Xintang Group, Ershilipu, Longfeishan Subdistrict Office, Pingqiao District, Xinyang City. At the home of the victim Zhang, they used similar means to steal 2,000 yuan stored in the pocket of clothing inside Zhang's cabinet. During the trial, the relatives of the defendant Sun brought the Yamaha motorcycle, which was used as a tool in the crime, to the court and, together with the relatives of the defendant Liu, actively compensated the victims Li and Zhang for all their losses. The defendants Sun and Liu did not raise any objections during the court proceedings. There is evidence in the form of household registration information, proof of previous convictions, criminal judgments, arrest records, case files, receipt slips, video materials, physical evidence, witness testimony from Liu, and statements from the victims Zhang and Li, which sufficiently confirm the facts.


Upon examination, it has been found:

1. Selling goods with counterfeit registered trademarks: In March 2019, defendants Zhang and Chen, knowing that the lubricating oil labeled "Fuchs" from defendant Qu was a counterfeit registered trademark product, still purchased 2.67 tons of this lubricating oil from defendant Qu and sold it to Guodian Northeast Power Co., Ltd. Shenxi Thermal Power Plant for 75,557.4 yuan. After the case was discovered, defendants Zhang and Chen were apprehended by the public security organs, and defendant Qu turned himself in to the police. After coming to the case, defendants Zhang and Qu truthfully confessed the aforementioned facts.

2. Dangerous driving: At about 19:55 on June 1, 2018, defendant Zhang, after consuming alcohol, drove a small vehicle with the license plate number Su L××××× and was caught by the on-duty traffic police officers of the Jurong City Public Security Bureau Traffic Police Brigade at the intersection of West Avenue, Huayang South Road, Jurong City. According to the Nanjing Kangning Judicial Appraisal Center, the ethanol content in defendant Zhang's blood was 137.48mg/100ml at the time of the incident. After coming to the case, defendant Zhang truthfully confessed the aforementioned facts.

There are no objections to the above facts from defendants Zhang, Chen, Qu, and their defenders Du and Wang during the court hearing. The facts are supported with the statements and defenses of the three defendants; testimonies of witnesses Li, Xu, Dong, Sun, and others; documentary evidence such as the basic information form of the population, police response work registration form, description of the apprehension process, invoice, seizure list, and criminal judgment; the inspection and testing report issued by Jiangsu Province Quality Supervision Inspection Institute, judicial appraisal opinion by Nanjing Kangning Judicial Appraisal Center; identification record, search record, electronic data inspection record, and related photographs. These are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charges that the defendant Zhao, a legal representative of Cangzhou Jie Chun Construction Engineering Co., Ltd., on April 15, 2019, knowingly signed a labor contract for an engineering project with the defendants Wu and Bai, who did not have the relevant qualifications for undertaking the dismantling of prefab steel buildings. Defendants Wu and Bai, knowing that the defendant Han did not have the relevant qualifications for undertaking the project, subcontracted the project to Han, signing a demolition project contract. Defendant Han, knowing that the workers had not undergone any safety training or obtained the necessary qualifications, led the workers to Hebei Ye's Glass Factory to begin dismantling the prefab steel house roofing and C-shaped steel. At approximately 9:50 am on May 9, worker Yang, while dismantling the prefab steel house roofing about 7 meters above the ground on the southeast side of Hebei Ye's Glass Factory, accidentally fell to his death. Han, Wu, Bai, and Zhao have now compensated the victim's family, who have expressed their forgiveness.


The prosecution alleges: At around 2 a.m. on April 15, 2016, defendants Wang and Li, along with two women (both handled in separate cases), drove a three-wheeled motorcycle to the construction site of Jucheng Yijiang Building on Wenhua Avenue in the Daqiao New District. They parked the motorcycle outside the site’s perimeter wall. Defendant Wang acted as a lookout outside while defendant Li and the two women entered the site to steal templates, which they transported out and placed on the three-wheeled motorcycle. Subsequently, defendants Wang and Li were caught on the spot by patrolling police officers, and the stolen templates were recovered. According to the appraisal, 91 templates were stolen, valued at 4,732 RMB. The items were seized after the incident and have been returned.


The prosecution alleges that on May 2, 2020, around 8 p.m., during the closed fishing season in the inland waters of this city, the defendants Zheng and Cheng used self-made electric fishing tools, including batteries and transformers, to illegally catch aquatic products at the river on the south side of Xigang Road in a certain town in a new district of the city. Defendant Zheng was responsible for electric fishing, while defendant Cheng was in charge of carrying the bucket with the fish. After the public security bureau of a certain district in Shanghai discovered the above clues, they arrested the two defendants at the scene and confiscated 3.308 kilograms of fish (which were released back into the wild). According to the identification by the East China Sea Fisheries Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, the fishing gear involved in the case was a net with a scoop shape using electric pulse assistance for fishing (a type of electric fishing), and the method of operation was electric fishing. After coming into custody, defendants Zheng and Cheng both truthfully confessed their criminal facts and voluntarily signed a "Restocking and Release Work Record," purchasing fish fry for restocking and release.


After trial and investigation, it was found that: 1. One day in March 2014, defendant Jiang, during a special action to dismantle a livestock and poultry farm in a certain county, rented eight sows from defendant Wu and placed them in his pig farm for inspection by government staff, thereby defrauding the livestock disposal subsidy. Wu, knowing that Jiang intended to defraud the government subsidy, still transported the sows to Jiang's pig farm for inspection. Jiang defrauded 8,000 yuan in livestock disposal subsidies, and Wu illegally gained 1,500 yuan. 2. In early March 2014, defendant Wu rented 11 sows to Hu Moujia (handled in a separate case) and placed them in the abandoned pig farm of Song Moumou in a village in a certain town, for inspection by government staff during a special action to dismantle livestock and poultry farms in a certain county, helping Hu Moujia defraud 11,000 yuan in livestock disposal subsidies, with Wu illegally gaining 2,000 yuan. 3. In early March 2014, defendant Wu rented 13 sows to Zhong (handled in a separate case) and placed them in a pig farm in a certain village in a certain township, for inspection by government staff during a special action to dismantle livestock and poultry farms in a certain county, helping Zhong defraud 13,000 yuan in livestock disposal subsidies, with Wu illegally gaining 2,000 yuan. After the incident, defendants Wu and Jiang returned illegal gains of 5,500 yuan and 8,000 yuan respectively. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Wu and Jiang during the trial, and they voluntarily pleaded guilty, supported by documentary evidence such as identity certificates, the site survey and appraisal form of a pig farm in a certain county, shutdown and demolition acceptance forms, subsidy settlement forms, shutdown and demolition agreements, policy opinions on subsidies in a certain county, and advance payment invoices; as well as testimonies from witnesses Zhong, Hu Moujia, and Hu Mouyi, which are sufficient for the conviction.


The prosecution alleges: 1. In the early morning of a day in June 2012, defendants Li, Pan, along with Su A and Su B (both handled in separate cases), after premeditation, drove an electric tricycle and stole 500 kilograms of rebar valued at 2,050 yuan from the site of the Qianjiang Passage Section 8 construction project at Qinlian Village, a town in a certain district of a city. The rebar belonged to Hangzhou Changhong Road and Bridge Engineering Co., Ltd. 2. On June 12, 2012, at around 3 AM, defendants Li, Pan, along with Su A and Su B, after premeditation, drove an electric tricycle and stole 109 steel pipes each 114cm long, 47 steel pipes each 84cm long, and 14 steel pipes each 54cm long from the site of the Qianjiang Passage Section 8 construction project at Qinlian Village, a town in a certain district of a city. The total value of the stolen property was 2,788 yuan. In summary, defendants Li and Pan committed theft together twice, stealing property with a total value of 4,838 yuan. Defendant Li was apprehended by the Bagongshan Branch of a public security bureau in Huainan City, a certain province, on August 15, 2012, and truthfully confessed to the aforementioned thefts after being brought to justice. Defendant Pan voluntarily surrendered to the Panji Police Station of the same public security bureau on September 17, 2012, and truthfully confessed to his main acts of theft. After the incident, 170 of the stolen steel pipes valued at 2,788 yuan (109 pipes each 114cm long, 47 pipes each 84cm long, and 14 pipes each 54cm long) were recovered and returned to the victimized unit. During the court hearing, defendants Li and Pan raised no objections to these facts, which were substantiated by the confession and defense of co-offender Su A, witness testimony from Yu, identification records, the list of seized and returned items, photographs, a price appraisal report, counting records, the course of the incident, the process of apprehension, the criminal judgment, release certificate, detention certificate, and proof of residence for defendants Li and Pan, among other evidence, providing sufficient grounds for determination.


The prosecution charges and the court has verified: Around 10 p.m. on May 15, 2013, Yang (already sentenced), Zhao (already sentenced), and others had an altercation with Lu, Yang, and others in the lobby of the Hyatt Hotel in Zizhen Town, a certain city. Afterwards, Yang and Wang (already sentenced) gathered Zhang (already sentenced), Zhao, and the defendants Song, Jiang, and others to go to room 308 on the third floor of the Hyatt Hotel in Zizhen Town. Yang carried a knife, while Zhang, Wang, Zhao, and the defendants Song, Jiang, and others used beer bottles to assault Yang, Zhang, and others who were singing in the room. During this time, Yang used the knife to stab Yang. According to a forensic assessment, the injuries sustained by Yang were classified as serious. On September 27, 2016, police officers from the Public Security Bureau of a certain city arrested the defendant Song at his home in Taojiatun Village, Duanlutou Town, a certain city. On April 25, 2017, the defendant Jiang voluntarily surrendered to the Public Security Bureau of a certain city. The defendants had no objection to the above facts during the trial process. Furthermore, the facts are substantiated by the statements of the victims Lu and Yang, the testimonies of Yang, Zhao, Wang, Zhang, Li, and Zhao, the incident report form, case acceptance form, case filing decision, on-site investigation record (additional investigation), location maps and on-site photos, identification record and photos, the criminal judgment No. 69 (2014) and No. 17 (2015) of a certain city's Intermediate People's Court, the historical residence proof of the two defendants, and the arrest proof and case acceptance process, which are sufficient to confirm the charges.


The prosecution charges that on August 4, 2016, the defendant Lu, under the pretense of introducing a job opportunity, lured the victim, Ping, to a pyramid scheme location at Unit X, No. X, Shui Street residential building in this city. On August 7 of the same year, after the victim Ping realized that the organization was a pyramid scheme, he expressed his desire to leave. Under the arrangement of Hong (handled in a separate case), the defendants Wu, Lu, Wu, and another person Gao (handled in a separate case), in order to coerce the victim Ping into joining the pyramid scheme, confiscated his mobile phone, closely monitored him, and restricted his personal freedom for over ten days. At around 9 a.m. on August 18, 2016, the defendants Wu, Lu, and Wu were apprehended by the police. After being brought to justice, all three truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal acts. The defendants Wu, Lu, and Wu raised no objections to these facts during the trial. Additionally, the case records submitted by the prosecution, including the case acceptance registration form, circumstances of the capture, interrogation records of the defendants, inquiry records of the victim, photo identifications and records, on-site identification photos and records, and residence information forms of the defendants Wu, Lu, and Wu, are sufficient to support the findings.


The People's Procuratorate of Qinhuai District in a certain city charged that in August 2015, defendants Zhu, Hu, Xu, and others, in order to locate the victim Tang and demand a debt from him, arranged for someone to engage in a vehicle transaction with victim Tang after learning that Tang had posted information about selling a vehicle online. On August 2, 2015, around 3 p.m., when victim Tang completed the vehicle transaction and arrived near Zhongchi Road in a certain district of the city, defendants Zhu, Hu, Xu, and others who were waiting there forcibly took victim Tang into a car, blindfolded him, confiscated his mobile phone, and drove him to Shuoguo Farm in Maoling Street of a certain district in the city, where they assaulted him. The next day, around noon, defendants Hu and Xu took victim Tang from Shuoguo Farm to the Shuangtang Police Station of Qinhuai Branch of the Public Security Bureau in a certain city to discuss debt repayment. On June 14, 2019, defendants Zhu and Hu were arrested by the public security organs. On June 23, 2019, defendant Xu was arrested by the public security organs. After being brought to justice, defendants Zhu, Hu, and Xu truthfully confessed the aforementioned criminal facts. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Zhu, Hu, and Xu during the trial process, and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Xia, Pan, Huang, Chen, Jiao, and others, as well as identification records, inspection reports, statements of situation, criminal photography, loan contracts, receipts, police reports, letters of commitment, criminal records, arrest process documentation, household registration materials, and other evidence, which provide sufficient confirmation.


Upon trial, it was found that around 2008, the defendant Wang sold a batch of bamboo to Zhang. Zhang issued an IOU to Wang for the amount of RMB 6,050. In the following years, Wang repeatedly sought payment from Zhang, to no avail. Later, Wang discussed this matter with the defendant Yang, who suggested finding someone to help collect the debt. Wang indicated that if the debt was collected, he would only require RMB 4,050, with the remainder serving as a gratitude fee. On January 24, 2013, around 1 PM, Wang, Yang, along with Cheng (who is at large), Yang A (deceased), and others drove to Zhang's home in a certain town of a certain district, forcibly took Zhang into their vehicle and drove away. During the drive, Yang and others tied up and assaulted Zhang, forcing him to repay the debt. When the vehicle reached near Shijiatian in Jiujie Street, Xinzhou District, Wang and Yang got off and returned home, while Cheng and others took Zhang to a hotel in a certain city of a certain province for detention, continuing to pressure him for repayment. Later, Zhang contacted his friend Zhou by phone, who transferred RMB 10,000 into the bank account provided by Yang A and others. Around 6 PM on the same day, Zhang was released. Cheng later handed over RMB 4,050 in cash, part of the collected amount, to Wang. While in detention, Zhang was beaten and injured. Forensic examination identified Zhang's main injuries as facial skin and soft tissue contusions, categorized as minor injuries. On May 20 and


Upon examination, it was found: On the evening of February 26, 2014, the defendants Jiang and Tan, along with Sun and Zheng (both handled in separate cases), went to a location opposite the gate of the XX community in a certain town, county. They successively stole a green Jiao brand electric bicycle belonging to Bao, a black Emporer Leopard brand electric bicycle belonging to Liu, a Philip electric bicycle belonging to Ma Jia, a silver-gray Emporer Leopard brand electric bicycle belonging to Ma Yi, and a Shanghai New Century brand electric bicycle belonging to another person, with a total value of 8,265 yuan. Later, defendant Jiang sold the Philip electric bicycle for 300 yuan to Zhu at the Weilin Bicycle Shop located at 103 Yaoxing Road, Ganyao Town of the same county. Additionally, it was found that after being brought to justice, the defendants Jiang and Tan confessed to their crimes truthfully. All the stolen vehicles were recovered, and four of them were returned to the victims. The aforementioned facts were not contested by the defendants Jiang and Tan during the court hearing. There are confessions and defenses from accomplices Sun and Zheng, statements from victims Bao, Liu, Ma Jia, and Ma Yi, inspection records, identification records, site survey records, evidence preservation orders, lists of returned items and documents, price appraisal conclusions, administrative penalty decisions, explanation of circumstances, arrest records, household registration certificates, and other evidence sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain region charges: On December 8, 2019, at around 12:00 PM, Xiao (handled in a separate case) was injured while working at a construction site of a certain middle school in a town of this city, contracted by the defendant Xu. That afternoon, in order to reduce his own medical expenses, the defendant Xu, along with the defendant Ye, who was the project manager of the construction, instigated Xiao to conceal the truth about the injury at the construction site when seeking treatment at Tai Xing City's Second People's Hospital. They fabricated the story that Xiao had fallen and was injured while on a ladder at home. Later, from December 8 to December 25, 2019, Xiao was hospitalized at Tai Xing City's Second People's Hospital, fraudulently claiming a total of 24,698.56 yuan from the medical insurance fund.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charges: [1] From May 3 to 5, 2015, the defendant Sun defrauded victim Ren of 8,000 RMB on Yingkou Road, Century Avenue, in the Economic Development Zone, under the pretext of a car accident. [2] On the morning of May 8, 2015, defendants Sun and Chen, after prior discussion, falsely claimed that Sun had been arrested and needed money for bail. Chen approached victim Ren in front of the People's Procuratorate on Jingyang Road, Lvyuan District, and defrauded him of 5,000 RMB. [3] From May 25, 2015, to June 23, 2015, defendant Sun, under the pretext of his father's loan application, defrauded victim Ren of a total of 20,200 RMB at the Yingpu Street Construction Bank and Donghuan City Road Construction Bank in Erdao District. The evidence recognized by the prosecution includes the following: the confession and defense statements of defendant Sun, the confession of defendant Chen, the statement of victim Ren, the testimony of witness Wang, the case registration form and filing decision, the process of bringing the defendants to justice, identification records, transfer vouchers, the criminal judgment, administrative penalty decision, household registration certificate, statement of circumstances, the retail customer transaction list from the Bank of Communications, and the personal account and transaction details inquiry from the Construction Bank.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: Since 2002, the state began to issue reforestation subsidies to individuals who own reforested land. Starting in 2002, the Sihu Village Committee, after collective research, decided to fictitiously claim 61.5 acres of reforested land and the landowners in order to fraudulently obtain national reforestation subsidies. After Li assumed the position of the Party branch secretary of Sihu Village in 2005, he continued to handle the reforestation funds in this manner. In 2011, after Li communicated with and reached a consensus with the village committee director, Cheng, it was further decided after village committee research to again fictitiously create the owners of reforested land. The village secretary, Zhang, processed bankbooks for the fictitious landowners and reported them. Upon the arrival of the reforestation subsidies, with the consent of Li and Cheng, Zhang withdrew the subsidies for public expenditures. In 2015, 15,400 yuan of national reforestation subsidies were fraudulently claimed. After the incident was exposed, Li, Cheng, and Zhang voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities. In response to the above charges, the prosecution presented documentary evidence, witness testimony, defendants' confessions, and defenses in court.


The People's Procuratorate in a certain area charges: From April 2013 to about 20:00 on May 22, 2013, the defendants Zhang, Ji, and Su, after premeditation, took advantage of their night shifts at a certain plastic company on an island to steal 970 kilograms of raw silk from the company on two occasions. According to the valuation by the Laixi City Pricing Appraisal Center, the value amounted to 10,525 RMB. To substantiate the above facts, the prosecution has provided the court with evidence including the incident report, the case-solving process, witness testimonies, the valuation report of the items involved, relevant documents, and household registration certificates.


After the trial, it was found that at around 1 PM on May 4, 2013, the defendants Cheng and Fang went to an alley near No. 26 Tianying East Road, Zhaozhai Village, a town in this city, and stole a Golden Lion brand three-wheeled motorcycle belonging to Zheng. The motorcycle was appraised at a value of 5,994 RMB. On May 22 of the same year, while Cheng and Fang were riding the motorcycle on the Xiaonanshan Road section of National Highway 104 in a town in this city, they were apprehended by the police, who discovered a pair of bolt cutters and a T-shaped wrench in the motorcycle. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Cheng and Fang during the trial process and were corroborated by the testimony of the victim Zheng, the appraisal conclusion, the search record, identification record, surveillance video, receipt, seizure list, arrest record, criminal judgment, and certificate of release after serving the sentence, as well as basic information of permanent residents, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Jilin Province charges: On February 29, 2020, at the Tian'er Vegetable Wholesale Market on Guangming Road in a certain city, defendant Liu stole a VIVO phone from Wang's pocket (valued at RMB 450 according to appraisal). On March 2, 2020, at the entrance of the Tian'er Vegetable Wholesale Market on Guangming Road in a certain city, defendant Liu stole an Apple phone from Feng's pocket (valued at RMB 3,000 according to appraisal). This phone was recovered by the public security authorities and has been returned to the victim. On March 2, 2020, at the bus stop of the North Gate of a large market in a certain city, defendant Liu stole a Redmi phone from Du's pocket (valued at RMB 700 according to appraisal). This phone was recovered by the public security authorities and has been returned to the victim. On March 19, 2020, around 14:50, at the bus stop of the North Gate of a large market in a certain city, defendants Liu and Xu, taking advantage of a moment of inattention, stole a backpack placed nearby, which contained RMB 4,700 in cash, an OPPO phone (valued at RMB 400 according to appraisal), ten packs each of Yunyan (Purple) and Zunyi cigarettes (valued at a total of RMB 130 according to appraisal), and three boxes of Paroxetine Hydrochloride medication (valued at a total of RMB 135 according to appraisal). On March 29, 2020, in the Northeast Specialty Wholesale Store at the entrance of Linjiang Market of Hongshi Forestry Bureau in a certain city, defendant Liu stole a VIVO phone from Zhao (valued at RMB 200 according to appraisal). This phone was recovered by the public security authorities and has been returned to the victim. In summary, defendant Liu committed five thefts, with a total value of stolen goods amounting to RMB 9,715, and defendant Xu committed theft with a value of RMB 5,365.


The defendants Yin and Sun voluntarily pleaded guilty, admitted the facts charged by the public prosecution, and were willing to accept punishment. The above facts were also not disputed by the defendants Yin and Sun during the court hearing, and were confirmed by the testimony records of witnesses Jiang, Liu, and Zou, identification records, WeChat transaction records, and the case report issued by the police officers of the Dongcheng Police Station, Jintan Branch, Changzhou Public Security Bureau.


Upon examination, it was found that on the night of April 12, 2014, defendants He, Ge, Zhang and others were eating barbecue at a neighboring table to Jia and others at the Brothers Seafood Barbecue Restaurant in Xucheng Town, Xuyi County. During the meal, defendants He and Ge were loudly arguing and were reprimanded by Jia. Defendant Ge did not accept this and argued with Jia, while defendant Zhang comforted Jia to calm the dispute. Later, defendants He, Ge, and Zhang engaged in a show of force and aggression, resulting in a fight with Jia and others outside the restaurant, which led to Jia being injured. According to forensic identification, the degree of injury suffered by victim Jia is classified as minor injury of grade two. After the incident, defendants Ge and Zhang voluntarily turned themselves in. Additionally, during the trial process, defendants He, Ge, Zhang, and Jia reached a civil compensation agreement and carried out the compensation payment, and Jia expressed forgiveness to defendants He, Ge, and Zhang. The above facts were not contested by defendants He, Ge, and Zhang in court, and are supported by Jia's statements, testimonies from witnesses Tan, Sheng, Zhao, Chen, and others, the forensic identification report issued by Xuyi County Public Security Bureau, documentary evidence of defendants He and Zhang's prior records, the report on the apprehension of defendants He, Ge, and Zhang issued by Xuyi County Public Security Bureau, the civil compensation agreement and the letter of forgiveness, all of which adequately substantiate the case.


The prosecution authority charged that defendant Li had an improper relationship with the victim, Li2. After learning this, defendant Wu was told by Li that she had been forced by Li2, to which Wu decided to confront Li2. After multiple unsuccessful attempts to contact Li2, Wu and Li climbed over the wall into Li2's home on March 29, 2017, and were taken away by the Shiqiao Police Station of the Linying County Public Security Bureau, later asking the station to resolve the matter. On April 1, 2017, Wu and Li went to the home of Li2's brother-in-law, Pan, to find Li2. Unable to locate him and getting into a physical altercation with Pan, they subsequently went to the Shiqiao Police Station to inquire about the matter's outcome. Since the station said they hadn't reached Li2, the two drove to Li2's home in another village to force him out, pushed on the front gate, finding it locked from the inside with no response. They went to a brick wall on the west side of Li2's house, which Wu then knocked over, allowing them to enter Li2's home. Unable to find Li2 in the house, Wu and Li went into the western side house where Li2 lived and had Li set it on fire. Li went to her car outside the courtyard to fetch a lighter, starting the fire from a bedsheet hanging from the bed in the western side house. The western side house was connected to the main house. After setting the fire, the two returned to their car, did not re-enter Li2's courtyard, allowed the fire to spread, and hindered local villagers' attempts to extinguish it. Li later called to report the fire. Police from Shiqiao Station first arrived on the scene and called 119 for the fire department. By the time firefighters extinguished the blaze, the fire had destroyed all items in the western side house where Li2 lived, burned the veranda of the main house, and spread to the main hall. An assessment determined that the burned house constituted a partial dangerous building, and the value of the destroyed items was 2,618 yuan.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county in the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region charges: In March 2012, the defendants Wu and Zhao partnered to negotiate with Lin, a villager from a certain place in a certain village, in a certain town of the county, to purchase Lin's contracted pine and miscellaneous woods (broad-leaved forest) located at a certain ridge in a certain village for 60,000 yuan for the purpose of logging. On March 24, 2012, defendant Wu signed an agreement with Lin. From November 15 to 26 of the same year, without obtaining a timber harvesting permit, defendants Wu and Zhao hired workers to cut down the broad-leaved miscellaneous forest. A field survey and mapping of the site of the illegal logging at a certain ridge in a certain village in a certain town of the county revealed that the area of deforested land was 25.1 acres, yielding 31.2269 cubic meters of timber, with a deforested timber volume of 93.4925 cubic meters. The facts found by this court are consistent with those charged by the prosecution. It was further found that defendants Wu and Zhao turned themselves in to the public security authorities on November 27, 2012, and September 5, 2013, respectively. Upon interrogation, the two defendants confessed to the crime of illegal deforestation. The village committee of a certain village in a certain township, where Zhao resided, provided a certificate confirming Zhao's consistent good behavior and expressed willingness to supervise him, requesting the court to impose a lenient sentence on Zhao. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Wu and Zhao during the court hearing and are corroborated by documentary evidence, including the criminal case registration form, the decision to file a case, the forest land contract agreement, the tree purchase agreement, the forest rights certificate, the household registration certificate, the village committee's certificate, the arrival process and explanation, witness Lin's testimony, the statements of defendants Wu and Zhao, the site survey records and photos, site identification records and photos, the deforested timber volume investigation report, and an interrogation video disc, all of which are sufficient for a conviction.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges that from August 29, 2013, to September 29 of the same year, the defendants Deng and Gu were involved in stealing bicycles and electric bikes from Huang (Victim A), Wang, Feng, and Huang (Victim B) at various locations: a hotel's parking lot in a certain town in a certain district of the city, behind a children's clothing chain company in the Chen Heng Lou Industrial Zone of the same town, at Baojia No. xx, Shiqi Street, and at Building xx, Fenghuang New Village, Zhonghe Street. In total, four vehicles were stolen, valued at 3,226 RMB. After the thefts, the defendants sold the stolen goods from the first three thefts and used the proceeds. During the fourth theft, while cycling on the stolen bicycle, both defendants were apprehended by patrolling officers. To substantiate the above allegations, the prosecution presented to the court statements from the victims Huang (Victim A), Wang, Feng, and Huang (Victim B); testimony from witnesses Yu, Wu, and others; identification records and photographs; a pair of pliers as physical evidence, along with photographs; photos of the stolen bicycles; special receipts for temporarily seized items; a list of returned items; purchase invoices; a price assessment report; documentation of the police response; an explanation of circumstances; an investigation report; a criminal judgment; a public security administrative penalty decision; a labor reeducation decision; personal files of the reeducated individuals; identification documents of the defendants; and statements and defenses from the two defendants.


The prosecution charges that on September 18, 2012, defendants Zhou, Yang, and Gu jointly invested in opening a certain bag shop on Hangzhou Road, first floor of Haining China Leather City Phase I. In the same month, defendants Zhou, Yang, and Gu purchased a batch of handbags at a low price from others, which bore registered trademarks such as "MONTBLANC," "CHANEL," "PRADA," "SALVATORE FERRAGAMO," and "BURBERRY," and sold them in the bag shop. They later stored the handbags in a warehouse on the fourth floor of Haining China Leather City Phase I. On May 10, 2013, the industrial and commercial department inspected a warehouse on the fourth floor of Haining China Leather City Phase I and seized 15 handbags with the "MONTBLANC" trademark, 39 handbags with the "CHANEL" trademark, 35 handbags with the "PRADA" trademark, 10 handbags with the "BURBERRY" trademark, and 8 handbags with the "SALVATORE FERRAGAMO" trademark on the spot. After an appraisal by the trademark registrants and their authorized agencies, all the aforementioned products were found to be counterfeit registered trademark goods, with a total value of more than 670,000 yuan. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhou, Yang, and Gu during the trial and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Yu, Wang, and Ping; the on-site record by a certain city's Administration for Industry and Commerce; the decision documents of imposing compulsory measures; the list and photos of items; the list of accepted evidence materials, the decision documents and photos of seized items; the appraisal report; the trademark registration certificates and modification proofs, approval renewal proofs; the price appraisal report; the registration status of business entities; the capture process; explanatory notes, household registration certificates, and other evidences, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district of a certain city charges: 1. Between June 10 and 12, 2015, defendant Xia, at a specific address on Chenshu Street, a town in a certain district of a certain city, knowingly purchased dogs killed with darts containing succinylcholine chloride shot by a crossbow by defendant Dong and others involved in separate cases, including Shi and Chen, at a price of 3 yuan per jin, acquiring a total of 24 dogs weighing over 480 jin, with the intent to sell them for consumption, although they had not been sold yet. Among them, defendant Dong sold six dogs, weighing a total of 90 jin and priced at 270 yuan, acquired using the aforementioned method, to defendant Xia for consumption by others, although Xia had not yet paid for them. Between June 10 and 12, 2015, defendant Xia used a crossbow to shoot darts containing succinylcholine chloride in certain districts and other areas of a certain city to steal dogs, acquiring a total of 11 dogs with the intent to sell them for consumption, although they had not been sold yet. On June 12, 2015, the public security organ arrested defendants Xia and Dong and seized 35 dogs from Xia. After being brought to justice, defendants Xia and Dong truthfully confessed to their criminal activities. These facts were undisputed by defendants Xia and Dong during the trial and were sufficiently corroborated by the evidence submitted by the public prosecution, which includes documentation from Zhangjing Police Station, a division of the Xishan Branch of a city’s Public Security Bureau, such as the "Procedure of Criminal Case Investigation" and "Situation Explanation," testimonies from witnesses Zhang, Yu, and Lu, statements and identification records of individuals involved in separate cases, Shi and Chen, including identification photos, communication records, on-site transcripts produced by the Xishan Branch of the Public Security Bureau, the evidence preservation decision, lists of preserved evidence, inventory of seized items, file lists, inventory of confiscated items, criminal photography, forensic reports issued by the Forensic Identification Office of Xishan Branch, "Expert Opinion on Food Containing Cyanide or Succinylcholine Chloride," and confessions and identification records and photos of defendants Xia and Dong, all of which are sufficient to confirm the charges.


The local People's Procuratorate charges: In February 2020, defendant Li provided the Alipay account registered under the name of Guangxi Daiyu Aviation Technology Co., Ltd. (account: a87***@163.com) to a person with the WeChat name "A Certain Someone" (real identity currently untraceable) for funds transfer.“A Certain Someone” used Li's Alipay account to receive 213,037.1 yuan and transfer 212,916.8 yuan. Later, “A Certain Someone” found the process inconvenient and asked Li A to assist with the fund transfer operations. Li used his Alipay account to help “A Certain Someone” receive 6,708,775 yuan and transfer 6,703,403.88 yuan. Li also hired defendants Zhao, Su, and Cui to assist “A Certain Someone” with the transfers. Zhao used his own account to help receive and transfer 2,007,170 yuan each. Su used his own account to help receive and transfer 1,954,410 yuan each. Cui used his own account to help receive 964,950 yuan and transfer 964,910 yuan. Upon investigation, funds from fraud crimes were transferred through the accounts of Zhao, Su, and Li to other accounts. Li earned a profit of 12,200 yuan for assisting “A Certain Someone” with the transfer; Zhao earned 800 yuan, Su earned 400 yuan, and Cui earned 500 yuan. To substantiate the charges, the prosecution presented the confessions and defenses of defendants Li, Zhao, Su, and Cui, along with witness statements from Yang, Yang, and others, electronic data, household registration certificates, criminal record certificates, transfer records of Yang and Sun, transfer records of Li and the other three, deposit details, WeChat payment details, information on the arrest process, and case-solving process evidences.


After trial and verification, it was determined: At around 1 a.m. on June 2, 2013, defendant Feng had an argument with Gao over trivial matters in a room on the fourth floor at No. 17 Antai Road, Anyang Street, in a certain city. Subsequently, Gao left the crime scene. Defendant Feng then gathered defendant Jin, and defendant Jin brought along Lin and Zhang (both handled separately) to the crime scene, and repeatedly called to find Gao. Later, defendant Feng, Jin, and others found Gao near the shop "Dangjiaren Convenience Store" on Anyang Street, Antai Road, brought him to a nearby alley, and assaulted him, causing injuries. The examination determined that victim Gao suffered fractures of the 12th right rib, fractures of the right transverse processes of vertebrae L1-4, and soft tissue injuries to both elbows, knees, and the left chest, with the injuries classified as minor. On June 17 and 18, 2013, defendants Feng and Jin voluntarily surrendered to the local Public Security Bureau. On August 19 of the same year, defendants Feng, Jin, and others mediated compensation for victim Gao's economic losses and received forgiveness. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Feng and Jin during the court trial, and were confirmed by testimony from victim Gao, witness Lin, agreements, receipts, reports, statements of surrender, situational explanations, call records, forensic injury assessment, population information, among other evidence, sufficient for recognition.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Hangzhou City charges that on October 13, 2012, at around 22:00, the defendant Li, due to an altercation between his girlfriend Wang and the taxi driver Song, in order to vent anger on behalf of his girlfriend, lured the victim Song to the entrance of a certain district's Jiangcun Garden Ruyi Court in this city. Defendant Li, along with defendant Gao, Huo (dealt with separately), and Zhu (dealt with separately), then gathered and assaulted the victim Song by punching, kicking, and hitting with rubber sticks, causing fractures to Song's medial orbital walls and the infraorbital wall of the left eye. According to the assessment, this constituted minor injury. On November 6, 2012, at around 22:00, defendant Gao, near the southern end of the path between buildings 10 and 33 in Jiangcun Garden Ruyi Court of this district, assaulted the victim Zheng by punching and kicking because Zheng had kicked his pet dog, resulting in a fracture of Zheng's left fibula. According to the assessment, this also constituted minor injury. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Gao and Li during the trial. Furthermore, the statements of the victims Song and Zheng, the testimonies of witnesses Wang, He, Mao, Yu, the confessions of co-defendants Huo and Zhu, along with the 110 police report records, household registration certificates, details of capture and case establishment, criminal record inquiry, administrative punishment decisions, statements of circumstances, scene investigation records and photos, identification records, forensic injury degree assessment certificates, and surveillance video discs, are presented as evidence, enough to ascertain the facts.