The prosecution alleges: Since November 2014, the defendant Tian obtained multiple POS machines and hired the defendants Zheng and Gong. They operated out of apartment 503, building G3, Kangju Era Residential Area, Shushan District in this city, providing others with credit card repayment or cash-out services for a fee. By May 12, 2015, the defendants Tian, Zheng, and Gong had successively provided credit card repayment or cash-out services for individuals such as Zhang and Wu, with the accumulated amount reaching 1,314,360 yuan. In support of the above charges, the prosecution read and presented the confessions and defenses of the defendants Tian, Zheng, and Gong; testimonies from witnesses such as Zhang and Wu; the location map of the crime scene; the list of seized items; promotional business cards; POS machine transaction records; identification transcripts; the process of being brought to justice; and the defendants' household registration information.


Upon trial, it was ascertained that from September 16 to September 20, 2014, defendants Shu and Liu, under the instruction of Yang (phonetically, identity unknown, handled in a separate case), collaborated with Zhang, Hu, and Gao (all names are phonetic, handled in a separate case) to detain Niu (referred to within the pyramid scheme organization as Niu A) for the purpose of coercing him into joining the pyramid scheme. They, along with Zhang, Hu, and Gao (all names are phonetic, handled in a separate case), monitored Niu, preventing him from leaving the room or contacting the outside world in an effort to force him to join the pyramid scheme. On September 18, defendants Shu, Liu, and others assaulted Niu, who still refused to join the scheme. Around 2 PM on September 20, Niu seized an opportunity while using the restroom to escape through a window, resulting in a fractured right heel bone. Defendants Shu and Liu were apprehended by law enforcement when they arrived at the scene, following reports from the public, as Shu and Liu were chasing the victim, Niu. After the incident, defendants Shu and Liu voluntarily deposited 20,000 RMB with this court as compensation for the victim, Niu. The aforementioned facts are uncontested by defendants Shu and Liu during the trial. These are corroborated by the victim Niu's statement; the recognition record and photographs of the crime location identified by the two defendants; the recognition record and photographs identifying the two defendants by the victim Niu; the photographs of the victim Niu's injuries, medical examination report, hospitalization records, and admission and discharge records; the process of the case's resolution and conclusion; proof of household registration and current behavioral status of defendants Shu and Liu, and other evidence sufficient for verification.


The prosecution charges: On the evening of June 30, 2014, Chen contacted the defendant Huang to purchase methamphetamine (meth) worth 300 RMB. After discussing with the defendant Wang, both defendants sold approximately 0.3 grams of methamphetamine to Chen for 300 RMB under the April Sky Bar at the Cultural Square on Xin'anjiang Street in the city. After being brought to justice, defendants Wang and Huang truthfully confessed to their criminal acts. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Wang and Huang during the court hearing, and they are substantiated by documentary evidence such as household registration certificates, records of arrest, evidence retrieval notices, lists of evidence, bank transaction details, administrative punishment decisions, case filing decisions, and testimonies from witnesses Chen, Zou, Xu, and Qian, as well as identification records and photos, search warrants, search records, and photos, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution alleges that on the evening of August 22, 2014, the defendants He and Jiang went to the entrance of Shop No. 70, Dongwan, Huitou Village, Zhangting Town, Yuyao City. Through means such as pushing and connecting wires, they stole a Qingqi brand electric bicycle valued at 1,650 RMB and a pack of Hongshuangxi cigarettes worth 56 RMB from the trunk, both belonging to the victim Gong. At around noon the following day, the defendants He and Jiang went to the entrance of Yongjie Daily Necessities Factory, Zhaoyan, Zhishan Village, Fangqiao, Yangming Street, Yuyao City. Using similar means, they stole a Lujia brand electric bicycle valued at 2,040 RMB belonging to the victim Li. On August 23, 2014, the defendants He and Jiang were apprehended by the police from the Yuyao Public Security Bureau. After the crime occurred, most of the stolen goods were recovered and returned to the victims. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants He and Jiang during the trial, and there is documentary evidence from the Yuyao Public Security Bureau, including "Arrest Process," decisions and inventories for evidence preservation, special receipts for temporarily seized items, lists of returned items, photo descriptions, receipts, certificates of quality, population information, criminal judgments, release certificates, criminal records, public security administrative penalty decisions, and revocations of administrative penalty decisions, statements of victims Gong and Li, identification records and photos, appraisal reports, and other evidence sufficient to establish the facts.


After trial, it was found that on December 30, 2014, at around 18:00, the defendants Feng and Liu collaborated to go to the bridge precast concrete factory at section 28 of the former Gu-Zhu Expressway, located in group 1 of a certain village. They jointly stole one low-voltage comprehensive distribution cabinet, one Huali fkga43-hlm8204 model dedicated transformer acquisition terminal, and one load control box. They later sold these as scrap to someone named Xie and received 123 yuan in stolen goods proceeds, with Feng receiving 63 yuan and Liu receiving 60 yuan. After appraisal, the stolen items were valued at 3,200 yuan. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants Feng and Liu during the trial. Moreover, these facts are corroborated by: 1) the victim (owner) Yuan's statement; 2) testimonies from witnesses including Xie; 3) appraisal opinions; 4) the on-site inspection record, site map, and site photos; 5) documentary evidence such as household registration certificates and seizure lists; 6) the confessions and defenses of defendants Feng and Liu, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.


Upon examination, it was found: On the evening of October 14, 2007, the defendants Chen and Yang, along with Chen A (already sentenced) and Dai, rented a white "Futian" truck from Hu in a certain city and proceeded to a village at the Yangtze River Office in another city. There, they stole over 220 meters of all-plastic chromatographic telephone communication cables valued at 19,606 RMB. Chen A and others were caught by the public security authorities during the transport of the stolen goods, and the entire haul was seized on the spot. Defendant Chen took the opportunity to escape. On May 30, 2014, defendant Chen was arrested and brought to justice by the public security authorities. On November 25, 2011, defendant Yang voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Chen and Yang during the trial, and are corroborated by the confessions of accomplices, witness testimonies, expert opinions, on-site investigation records, the list of seized items, the process of how they were brought to justice, and related documentary evidence, as well as the confessions and defenses of the two defendants, all of which are sufficient for conviction.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place alleges: At approximately 8:00 PM on June 16, 2016, the defendants, Wang and Jian, were riding a motorcycle with the license plate number ZheBYLXXX to the entrance of a certain number on Linxi Road, Xiaolin Town, Cixi City. They took advantage of the victim, Lu Moujie, who was walking to that location and, using a method of snatching while riding, grabbed an iPhone 6 (valued at 1,950 RMB) from Lu Moujie's hand. Wang then drove the vehicle away to flee. Subsequently, the defendant Jian sold the phone and received 1,000 RMB. After being apprehended, the defendant Jian truthfully confessed the above criminal facts. After the incident, the stolen goods were recovered and returned. The prosecution submitted relevant evidence to the court to prove the above facts.


After the trial, it was found that around 6 p.m. on March 27, 2017, the defendant Li was riding a motorcycle on the non-motorized lane opposite the south gate of Yudaihe Community in a certain district of a certain city and got into a verbal altercation with a car driver named Cai over driving issues. Subsequently, defendant Li called defendants Dong and Hu to inform them that he was in a conflict with others at the aforementioned location. Thereafter, defendants Dong, Zhang, Zhuang, and Li A (deceased) traveled in a vehicle driven by defendant Hu to the vicinity of Yudaihe Community, where they got out. Defendant Dong, carrying a vehicle-mounted fire extinguisher, and defendants Hu, Zhuang, Zhang, and others, armed with wooden sticks, met up with defendant Li. Together, they used wooden sticks and a fire extinguisher to assault the victim Cai and others, causing an injury to the victim Cai's head. The injury was appraised as slight. On March 28, 2017, December 29, 2018, and January 13, 2019, defendants Li, Hu, Zhang, and Zhuang voluntarily surrendered to the police; on August 20, 2018, defendant Dong was apprehended by the police. After the incident, defendants Li and others compensated the victim Cai for his losses and obtained his forgiveness. It was also found that defendants Li, Dong, Hu, Zhuang, and Zhang voluntarily admitted guilt and accepted punishment. The public prosecution recommended sentencing defendant Li to imprisonment for eight months to one year and six months; defendants Dong, Hu, Zhuang, and Zhang to imprisonment for six months to one year and four months. These facts were acknowledged by defendants Li, Dong, Hu, Zhuang, and Zhang during the trial, and are substantiated by the victim Cai's statement, testimonies of witnesses Wang and Wang, the criminal judgment, administrative penalty decision, explanatory documents, forensic medical appraisal opinion on the extent of physical injury, and other evidence, providing sufficient basis for conviction.


The prosecution alleges that from 13:00 to 16:00 on September 21, 2019, the defendants Huang and Tian (handled in a separate case) invited the defendant Sun to use an air gun to shoot birds. Subsequently, Sun drove a Zhonghua SUV with the license plate number E N×××××, illegally hunting 2 mallard ducks, 1 spotted-necked dove, and 1 great snipe with an air gun on a certain section from a village in a town in a certain city to another town in the same city. On September 22, 2019, the city wildlife protection station identified these birds as terrestrial wildlife under national protection and prohibited from hunting by the province.


Upon review, it was found that between December 2010 and January 2011 of the lunar calendar, the defendants He, Chi, and Huang, along with Yang (already sentenced) and others, set up gambling dens at locations such as Room xxx, Unit x, Building x, Yangguang Community, Anyang Street, City A, and Room xxx, Unit x, Building x, Nanmao Community, Xincheng Street, City A. They organized gambling activities involving Lin and others in the form of playing soft and hard Xincheng Mahjong. Yang was responsible for collecting the rake-off, while the defendant Zhang was in charge of bookkeeping. The gambling dens operated for about fifteen days, accumulating more than 30,000 yuan in rake-off. On February 21 and March 17, 2014, defendants He and Zhang turned themselves into the public security authorities and truthfully confessed their crimes. These facts were not disputed by defendants He, Chi, Huang, and Zhang during the court trial, and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Yang, Lin, and Xie, as well as by the administrative penalty decision, the criminal judgment, the account of the arrest, and basic personal information, providing sufficient grounds for conviction.


The People's Procuratorate of Luohu District in [City Name] charged that on April 1, 2015, at around 16:00, Li Mouqian contacted the defendant Liang via WeChat and phone to purchase drugs worth 500 RMB. The defendant Liang then got in touch with "A Moumou" (handled in a separate case) and arranged for a drug deal between "A Moumou" and Li Mouqian through Liang’s mediation in the vicinity of [City Name] ****. Subsequently, Li Mouqian contacted the defendant Liang again, requesting to increase the amount of drugs to 1,000 RMB. The defendant Liang then contacted "A Moumou" to provide drugs worth 1,000 RMB, which "A Moumou" agreed to, and they set the drug transaction to take place at the McDonald's across from **** Department Store on ** Road in Luohu District. Liang informed Li Mouqian to go to the aforementioned location to meet with "A Moumou" for the drug transaction. "A Moumou" arrived at the agreed location earlier and requested to conduct the drug deal with defendant Liang first. However, defendant Liang did not have enough cash on him at the time, so he informed his companion, defendant Xu, of the drug mediation situation and asked him for a loan of 1,000 RMB to advance the drug payment. Defendant Xu then loaned 1,000 RMB to defendant Liang. After meeting with "A Moumou," defendant Liang used the 1,000 RMB borrowed from defendant Xu to purchase two packets of drugs from "A Moumou." After the transaction, "A Moumou" fled the scene. Afterwards, defendant Liang met with Li Mouqian at the entrance of McDonald's and completed the drug deal. After receiving the drug payment of 1,000 RMB from Li Mouqian, defendant Liang returned the money to defendant Xu. After the transaction, police arrested defendants Liang and Xu at the scene and confiscated the drug money of 1,000 RMB from defendant Xu and two packets of drugs from Li Mouqian. Upon examination, the two packets of drugs were found to weigh 4.56 grams and 4.89 grams, respectively, and tested positive for ketamine.


The People's Procuratorate of Nanshan District, a certain city, charged: Between December 2013 and January 2014, defendants Li, Luo, and Huang, knowing that Cai B, Cao, and 73 others did not meet the criteria to apply for the Ping An Bank Business Card Loan, provided false and forged materials related to the Wangsheng Home Furnishing and Building Materials Plaza in a certain city for Cai B, Cao, and 73 others to apply for a credit line of RMB 100,000 "Ping An Business Card" at the Shenzhen Overseas Chinese Town Branch of Ping An Bank, and collected referral fees. To substantiate the charges, the prosecution presented evidence including the process of apprehension, Li's voluntary surrender statement and letter of repentance, identification materials of the defendants Li, Luo, and Huang, evidence collection notices, lists of received evidence materials, explanations, the Ping An Bank Shenzhen Overseas Chinese Town Branch's report materials, company materials and power of attorney, Li's notice of denial of bail, materials regarding Luo's and Huang's bail, case acceptance registration forms, decision to file a case, testimonies from witnesses Deng, Li B, Hong, Li A, Huang A, Cai A, Liu, and Chen, the victim unit Ping An Bank Overseas Chinese Town Branch's report materials, Nanshan District Public Security Judicial (Nan) Examination (Document Inspection) [2014] No. 3221 "Appraisal Report", and the confessions and defense statements of defendants Li, Luo, and Huang.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Hangzhou City charged: On the evening of February 20, 2016, defendants Zhu, Liu, in collaboration with Wang (at large), gambled with the victim, Yu, at the rented room of Li at No. 75, 1-1, Huafeng New Village, a district in this city. They engaged in gambling by playing "Xiao Jiu". During the session, the victim, Yu, lost money and accumulated a gambling debt of 20,000 yuan owed to Zhu and others. After the gambling ended, Zhu and others demanded repayment of the gambling debt from Yu, but Yu was unable to repay it. At around 3 a.m. the next day, defendant Zhu contacted defendant Chen and, together with Liu and Wang, took the victim Yu to Chen's location at Chengqian Decoration Co., Ltd. in Changqing Creative Park, to continue demanding repayment of the debt. During this period, Zhu coerced Yu into signing a loan contract for 20,000 yuan, employing threats and physical assault to force repayment. At around 10 a.m., Zhu, Liu, Chen, and Wang took Yu to the Hainabaichuan Bathhouse on Shixiang Road in a certain district. After Yu placed his clothing and personal belongings in a locker, they confiscated his locker key and continued to demand repayment of the debt. At about 5 p.m., Yu's father, upon hearing the news, arrived at the bathhouse and reported to the police. Defendant Chen was subsequently taken into custody on-site by police officers. On March 14 of the same year, defendants Zhu and Liu voluntarily surrendered to the police. After their apprehension, all three defendants truthfully confessed to the aforementioned facts. During the trial, defendants Zhu, Liu, and Chen raised no objections to these facts, which were corroborated by the victim Yu's statements, the testimonies of witnesses Lu and Li, the confiscation decision letter, confiscation records, confiscation inventory, evidence preservation decision letter, evidence preservation inventory, records and photographs of physical injuries, diagnostic conclusions, surveillance footage, household registration certificates, the process of apprehension, statements from co-defendant Wang, and confessions from defendants Zhu, Liu, and Chen, all of which were sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of Haizhou District, a certain city in Jiangsu Province, charged: On June 11, 2015, at approximately 1:30 pm, the defendant Wang, after drinking, drove a Toyota SUV with the license plate number E××××× near Zhongda Street in Haizhou District, where he collided with a car driven by the victim, Liu. Wang attempted to flee but was stopped by Liu and others. Subsequently, the defendant Wang gathered defendant Xu and others to assault the victims Liu, Lu, and Qi, resulting in multiple soft tissue injuries on the victims' bodies, which were assessed as minor injuries. On July 16, 2015, the defendant Wang voluntarily surrendered to the Haizhou Branch of a city's Public Security Bureau. It was also found that defendants Xu and Wang's close relatives voluntarily compensated the victims Liu, Lu, and Qi for their losses after the incident, obtaining forgiveness from the three victims. The above facts are not disputed by defendants Wang and Xu during the trial and are supported by household registration certificates, compensation agreements, letters of forgiveness, call records, the investigation process of the case, the process of capture, written testimonies of absent witnesses Han and Liu, statements of victims Liu, Lu, and Qi, pre-trial confessions and defenses by defendants Wang and Xu, forensic identification documents of the degree of physical injury issued by the Municipal Public Security Bureau's forensic identification office (clinical) numbered (2015) 765, 766, 767, identification transcripts, audio-visual materials, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts. Regarding the defense opinion presented by defendant Wang's counsel that Wang was a first-time and occasional offender, had circumstances of voluntary surrender, and compensated the victims for their losses and obtained their forgiveness, this court finds it consistent with the facts and adopts it in accordance with the law. Regarding the defense opinion presented by defendant Xu's counsel that Xu had a good attitude toward confession, actively compensated the victims for their losses, and obtained their forgiveness, this court finds it consistent with the facts and adopts it in accordance with the law. Regarding the sentencing opinion presented by the defense for defendants Wang and Xu recommending the application of probation to both defendants, this court, after considering all circumstances of the case, does not accept it in accordance with the law.


After trial, it was ascertained that: 1. Around 5 a.m. on August 29, 2015, the defendant Fan, together with Qiu and Zhang, stole 3,700 yuan in cash from Liu at a Green Net Internet cafe located at a city bus station. Fan received 1,800 yuan of the stolen money, Qiu received 800 yuan, Zhang received 1,000 yuan, and the remaining 100 yuan was squandered by the three. 2. Around 5 a.m. on November 18, 2015, the defendant Fan, together with Zhang, stole a ring, mobile phone, and other items from Lyu at a Green Net Internet cafe at a city bus station. Appraisal showed that the stolen phone and ring belonging to Lyu were valued at 1,732 yuan. On August 29 and November 18, 2015, the defendants Fan and Qiu, together with Zhang (who is being dealt with in a separate case), stole 3,700 yuan in cash from Liu and a ring and mobile phone valued at 1,730 yuan from Lyu, respectively, at a Green Net Internet cafe at a city bus station. On November 26, 2015, the defendant Qiu surrendered to the Xicheng Police Station of the city's Public Security Bureau. On November 23, 2015, Fan compensated the victim Liu with 3,700 yuan and received forgiveness. On November 18, 2015, the Xicheng Police Station of the city's Public Security Bureau recovered the stolen phone, ring, and other items and returned them to the victim Lyu. On December 9 of the same year, Fan compensated the victim Lyu with 200 yuan and received forgiveness. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants during the trial and are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses such as Zhang, the statements of victims Liu and Lyu, photographs of the stolen items, seizure lists, household registration certificates, details of the arrest, appraisal opinions from the city Price Certification Center, interrogation videos, and other evidence.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Jiangsu Province charged: 1. On July 29 and 30, 2020, defendants Yu, Zhang, and Xu, after prior conspiracy, went twice to the Zhong'ang Langyue construction site in Fenghuang Town, a certain city. Yu and Zhang entered the site through a hole in the wall and stole by manually carrying items while Xu was on lookout outside. They stole leftover paint buckets, scrap rebar, and other items, selling them for a total of 750 RMB. 2. On the morning of July 31, 2020, defendants Yu, Zhang, and Xu, after prior conspiracy, executed the theft in the same manner at the same location. Zhang was apprehended before he could leave, and two bags of scrap iron valued at 115.6 RMB were seized at the scene. After being brought to justice, defendants Yu, Zhang, and Xu all confessed to the above criminal facts. On September 17, 2020, in the presence of a duty lawyer, defendants Yu, Zhang, and Xu voluntarily signed a plea agreement, expressing acknowledgment of their crime and willingness to accept punishment. It is recommended that defendant Yu be sentenced to two months and ten days of detention and fined 1,000 RMB; defendant Zhang to two months and ten days of detention and fined 1,000 RMB; and defendant Xu to two months of detention and fined 1,000 RMB. Defendants Yu, Zhang, and Xu have no objections to the facts, charges, or sentencing recommendations and have signed in agreement. This is corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Liu, Tang, and Tong, identification records, evidence preservation lists, seizure lists, weight records, return lists, relevant photos, price assessment opinions, the process of the case being solved and arrests made, population information, administrative punishment decisions, as well as the confessions of defendants Yu, Zhang, and Xu. This court hereby confirms these facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain area alleges that at about 21:00 on May 3, 2014, the defendant Han went to Jete Sand Factory in Shentang Village, Maxi Township, where he had an argument with the defendant Cao, who was working there, over trivial matters. Subsequently, they physically assaulted each other, resulting in various injuries to each other's shoulders and heads. According to an assessment by the Wenshui County Forensic Center, Cao sustained minor injuries to the left shoulder, and Han sustained minor injuries to the head. After the incident, both parties reached a civil compensation agreement and mutually forgave each other. It is believed that the actions of the two defendants violated Article X of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, and they should be held criminally liable for X crime. Relevant evidence has been provided. Both defendants have no objections to the criminal facts and charges brought by the prosecution and voluntarily pleaded guilty. After the trial, it was found that at about 21:00 on May 3, 2014, the defendant Han went to Jete Sand Factory in Shentang Village, Maxi Township, where he had an argument with the defendant Cao, who was working there, over trivial matters. Subsequently, they physically assaulted each other, resulting in various degrees of injury to Cao's shoulder and Han's head. According to an assessment by the Wenshui County Forensic Center, Cao sustained minor injuries to the left shoulder, and Han sustained minor injuries to the head. After the incident, both parties reached a civil compensation agreement and mutually forgave each other. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by the defendants Han and Cao during the trial. In addition, the report materials and confessions of the defendants Han and Cao, the testimony of the witness Qu, the site diagram and photos, the forensic appraisal by Wenshui Public Security Bureau, resident population information, compensation agreement, and letter of forgiveness, among other evidence, are sufficient to establish the case.


The prosecution charges that on March 15, 2018, the defendant Wu and the victim Xiang had a verbal altercation at work. At about 8:00 p.m. that day, Wu, together with defendants Li, Zhu, and Huo, followed Xiang to the bicycle parking area outside the Xin Donghai Hardware & Electrical Appliance Manufacturing Co., Ltd., located on Fuwan Industrial Road, Hecheng Street, in a certain district of a certain city, and assaulted Xiang. During the incident, all four individuals kicked Xiang, Zhu struck Xiang's thigh with an aluminum pipe, and Li lifted a bicycle and hit Xiang's body two or three times. The four fled the scene when a security guard intervened. On March 19, 2018, Wu and Li turned themselves in to the police. Forensic evaluation determined that Xiang's injuries were of a minor level, second degree. In court, the prosecution presented evidence including confessions from defendants Zhu, Wu, Li, Huo, the victim Xiang's statement, testimony from witness Zhang, identification records, forensic reports, crime scene investigation records, certification from the Criminal Investigation Brigade of the Teng County Public Security Bureau in Guangxi, a situational statement from the Xijiang Police Station of the Gaoming Branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city, household registration certificates, arrest records, and statements of how the defendants were brought to justice.


The local People's Procuratorate accused: Since July 2010, defendant Yu, for profit-making purposes, without the permission of the "HIGHLY" trademark owner Shanghai Hitachi Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd., employed defendant Chang as production supervisor in a factory building of Gu Tongyi Tea Factory in a village of Chaicheng Street, this district. They purchased old air-conditioning compressors from other places for modification and refurbishment, and bought counterfeit "HIGHLY" trademarks from Hangzhou Dongyin Printing Co., Ltd., which were then affixed to the modified compressors for sale, with sales amounting to RMB 113,950. On May 9, 2011, the Beilun Public Security Sub-bureau, together with the Beilun Branch of the Ningbo Administration for Industry and Commerce, inspected the factory building and seized 138 compressors labeled with counterfeit "HIGHLY" trademarks (valued at RMB 38,190) and 500 counterfeit "HIGHLY" trademarks. To prove the above facts, the public prosecution agency provided evidence to the court, including witness testimony, delivery notes, dispatch notes, and the trademark registration certificate of Shanghai Hitachi Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd.


After examination, it has been found that at around 11 PM on May 4, 2015, the defendants Xu and Wu, along with Xu Jia (who has been sentenced in a separate case), after drinking, went to the entrance of the "Wenzhou Chuanyang Electrical Appliance Factory," where they worked, located at No. 12 Huacheng Road, Xinfeng Village, Xianyan Street, Ouhai District, Wenzhou City, and created a loud disturbance. They ignored the advice of the factory staff, including the victims Tan, Hu, and others, and kicked and damaged the factory's gate system before forcibly entering the factory. They smashed property in the security room and, without reason, assaulted the victims Tan, Hu, Tang, Sun, and others. They also smashed the second-floor dormitory door and victim Zhou's laptop inside the factory. According to an evaluation, the injuries of victims Tan, Hu, Tang, and Sun were all classified as minor injuries; the damage to the gate system and the laptop was valued at a total of 4,549 yuan. After the incident, the family of defendant Xu and Xu Jia compensated the affected unit a total of 13,750 yuan for the property damage. These facts were not disputed by the defendants Xu and Wu during the court hearing, and are corroborated by the confession of Xu Jia, the statements of the victims Tan, Hu, Tang, Sun, and Zhou, the testimonies of witnesses Yang, Qian Jia, Wang, Qian Yi, Liu, and Xie, the on-site investigation records, original body injury records, evidence collection notices, forensic medical reports on the degree of human injury, price evaluation opinions, agreements, receipts, reports, video situation explanations, arrest records, population information, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate in a certain area charges: From October 2016 to March 2017, defendants Geng and Luo, for the purpose of making a profit, repeatedly organized others to engage in gambling by playing "Niu Niu" with poker cards and "Tongzigong" with mahjong tiles at various locations, such as Room x, Unit 2, Building 21, Yuhang Road, Yuhang Street, Yuhang District, Hangzhou, and the auxiliary house at No. y Banlu Pavilion, Xita Village, and the south house at No. z Dongtang Temple, Xita Village. They gained over 24,000 yuan in profit through these activities. The supporting evidence for these charges includes documentary evidence; witness testimonies; identification records; and the confessions and defenses of the defendants.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that at around 1 a.m. on November 10, 2013, defendants Tan and Gao had a dispute with Peng over trivial matters in Room 810 at the Jinmao KTV first bridge in the district. Subsequently, they assaulted the victim, Peng, at the entrance of the eighth-floor elevator, and were later separated. The two defendants then rushed to the entrance on the first floor and again assaulted the victim, Peng, who was about to leave by taxi, causing him minor injuries. According to the forensic assessment, the victim, Peng, suffered multiple nasal bone fractures, a 0.5 cm sutured wound on the face, and facial skin and soft tissue injuries, which were classified as minor injuries. After the incident, defendant Gao was apprehended by the police from the Wuma Police Station at around 11 a.m. on December 17, 2013, at the temporary residence at No. 2, Lane 78, Shuixin Residential Area. Gao then persuaded defendant Tan to surrender through a text message. After receiving the message, defendant Tan proactively contacted the public security authorities and voluntarily surrendered to the Wuma Police Station the following day. The two defendants and the victim, Peng, reached a reconciliation agreement, compensating the victim for economic losses totaling 80,000 RMB, which has been fulfilled, and the victim expressed understanding towards the two defendants. The facts mentioned above are not disputed by the defendants during the court trial and are confirmed by the victim Peng's statement, testimonies from witnesses Cai, Hua, and Sun, identification records, photos of injuries and text messages, forensic medical injury assessment report, mediation agreement, receipt, report, account of the case process, household registration certificate, and other evidence, which are sufficient to be established.


Upon examination, it has been found that the defendants Zhu and Gong joined Zhonglü Biological Technology Co., Ltd. in the second half of 2013 in a certain city of a certain province. The company had no products and operated under the guise of selling Kangfude brand Yizhen capsules. It used a pyramid scheme to recruit and develop a downline, directly or indirectly basing rebates on the number of people developed, enticing participants to recruit others, thereby defrauding them of money. The organization had five levels: salesperson, team leader, director, section chief, and manager. Purchasing or selling 1-2 sets of products qualified one as a salesperson, 3-9 sets as a team leader, 10-64 sets as a director, 65-392 sets as a section chief, and 393 or more sets as a manager. After joining by purchasing products, defendants Zhu and Gong each recruited several relatives and friends. By 2014, defendants Zhu and Gong had entered the management level of the organization in the city; Zhu was at the second level as a section chief, responsible for contacting and assisting the general support Lei Moujia (at large) and managing dormitories, while Gong was at the third level as a director, responsible for managing dormitory personnel, organizing daily activities and lectures. In the second half of 2015, defendants Zhu and Gong respectively withdrew from the organization. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Zhu and Gong during the trial, and there are confessions from co-defendants Wang, Fan, Lei Mouyi, Zhang, and others, identification records of mutual recognition between the defendants and co-defendants, written proof of the capture of defendants Zhu and Gong by the public security agency, as well as the household registration certificates of the two defendants. Additionally, there are the court's criminal judgment document No. (2016) Ji 0684 Xingchu 43 and the Baoding Intermediate People's Court criminal ruling document No. (2016) Ji 06 Xingzhong 291, confirming that co-defendants Lei Mouyi, Fan, Wang, Zhang, Hu, and others were convicted of x crime and sentenced, which is sufficient for determination.


The prosecution charges: On June 10, 2014, the defendants Yuan and Ye conspired in advance to steal stones. At about 11 p.m. that evening, defendant Ye drove a green pickup truck with the license plate j××××× provided by Yuan to the side of a road in a village near the cemetery in a certain area, where they stole 6 bluestones from the ancestral grave of the victim Xie Bing. Later, they used the pickup truck to transport the stolen bluestones to a certain county where they were handed over to Yuan for safekeeping. After the fact, defendant Yuan transferred and hid the 6 bluestones at the residence of Kong in a village in a certain town in a certain province. On August 19, 2014, police officers from the county public security bureau, with the assistance of defendant Yuan, arrested defendant Ye near a hotel in a certain county, and, under Yuan's guidance, recovered the 6 stolen bluestones. According to the appraisal, the stolen bluestones were valued at 16,000 RMB. On September 10, 2014, defendant Yuan's family compensated the victim Xie Bing with 80,000 RMB and received the victim's understanding. The above facts were not contested by defendants Ye and Yuan during the court trial, and are supported by statements and photographs, seizure documents, search records and photographs, return lists, household registration certificates, criminal record check forms, criminal judgments, administrative penalty decisions, compensation agreements, letters of understanding, evidence collection notifications, proofs; testimonies from witnesses such as Kong, Xie Jia, Xie Yi, and others regarding the capture process; statements from the victim Xie Bing; confessions and defenses from defendants Ye and Yuan; appraisal opinions, on-site inspection records and photographs, and a CD, which are sufficient for a conviction.


The People's Procuratorate of Chuanying District in a certain city charges that the defendants, Song and Zhang (who are husband and wife), on January 25, 2014, despite being aware of their inability to repay substantial debts and having already transferred their own home at Unit 1, Floor 3, Room 3, Building 19a, Yatai Xincheng, to Zhang Moumou and delivered it, forged a purchase contract for the said house as collateral to fraudulently secure a loan of 400,000 RMB from the Wealth Credit Company in a certain city. Between May 2013 and April 2014, defendant Song, knowing their inability to repay, continued to use the property at Unit 1, Floor 3, Room 3, Building 19a, Yatai Xincheng, as collateral to alleviate debts and defrauded a victim of 780,000 RMB. Between June 2013 and April 2014, defendant Song, knowing their inability to repay, continued to use the aforementioned property as collateral to alleviate debts and defrauded the victim Zhang No. 2 of 620,000 RMB. After the case was uncovered, Song and Zhang were apprehended by the public security authorities. To substantiate the above accusations, the Public Prosecution provided in-court evidence including confessions from the defendants Song and Zhang, statements from victims Wei Moumou, Zhang No. 1, and Zhang No. 2, testimonies from witnesses Xie Mou, Sun Mou, Song Moumou, Wang Moumou, Yin Moumou, and Zhang Moumou, as well as documentation of the arrest and case solving process, the household registration form, fugitive registration form, situation description, loan contract, commercial housing sale contract, IOUs, housing sale agreement, individual business license, home purchase invoice, receipt, transfer agreement, house rental contract, house mortgage loan contract, real estate mortgage registration cancellation application form from a certain city, bank account details, and other evidence.


The prosecution alleges: At around 9 a.m. on November 14, 2016, the defendants Yu and Qian conspired under the pretense of distributing Buddhist postings to leaders and selling Buddhist statues to go to the third-floor general office of the Ji'an County Human Resources and Social Security Bureau with the intent to steal. Defendant Yu, taking advantage of the staff's inattention, stole 2,240 RMB in cash from a briefcase belonging to the victim Xiao in another office on the same floor. After returning to the general office, fearing detection, Yu hid the stolen cash on a computer host and then fled with defendant Qian. Defendant Qian was captured on the spot by the staff of the Ji'an County Human Resources and Social Security Bureau and handed over to the police. The aforementioned facts were uncontested by defendants Yu and Qian during the trial and are substantiated by evidence including residential information, details of the arrest, proof of criminal record, a list of confiscated and returned items, identification records, audiovisual materials, the victim Xiao's statement, witness testimonies from Zhu and Zhong, as well as the defendants Yu and Qian's confessions and defenses, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution alleges that at around 9 p.m. on June 20, 2020, the defendants Liu, Chen, and Lu went to a construction site managed by a person named Liu, located approximately 100 meters south of a certain district in a certain city. Taking advantage of the site being unattended, they stole 11 high-voltage cables worth 4,191 yuan. After the incident, the stolen cables were recovered and returned to the victim, Liu. The defendants Chen, Liu, and Lu have received the victim's understanding and forgiveness.


Upon examination, it was found: On July 8, 2014, around 18:00, defendants Zhou, Liu, and Li went to the No. 9 bus stop at the central passenger station in Huangshi Port District to look for an opportunity to pickpocket. Defendant Liu noticed the victim, Shi, was about to board the No. 9 bus after making a phone call, and signaled defendant Zhou to coordinate. Defendant Zhou intentionally got on the bus ahead of victim Shi and stood at the front door, using his body to block Shi's way, preventing Shi from moving forward. Seizing this opportunity, defendant Liu pickpocketed a white "iPhone 5" from victim Shi's shoulder bag. When Shi immediately noticed the phone had been stolen, he apprehended defendant Zhou and called the police. Defendants Liu and Li escaped, later selling the stolen phone for 1,100 yuan and squandered the money. According to the price appraisal center of the city, the stolen phone was valued at 2,660 yuan. Additionally, it was found that on July 30, 2014, defendant Li, after contacting police through another person, waited at home to be taken into custody and truthfully confessed to the crime. He proactively assisted police in apprehending co-defendant Liu. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the three defendants during the court hearing and were corroborated by the testimony of victim Shi, as well as documentary evidence including the arrest process, household registration certificate, identification records, criminal judgment, decision not to prosecute, the price appraisal opinion from the city's appraisal center, and the confessions of the three defendants at the police station. The evidence is credible, ample, and sufficient to confirm the conviction.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that from mid-October 2014 to October 30 of the same year, Chen and Zhang A (both already sentenced) opened a "Baccarat" casino at the No. 2 Pond Farmhouse Restaurant near the Oil Station in Longzihu District, Bengbu City. Among them, the defendant Wang was responsible for keeping watch outside the casino, and the defendant Jiang was responsible for dealing cards and settling chips for the participants inside the casino. In support of the above charges, the public prosecution agency provided primary evidence such as documentary evidence, confessions of the defendants, and witness testimonies.


The prosecution charges: On the afternoon of January 27, 2014, defendants Chen and Ren went to the village committee courtyard of Xijiao Village, Ljiang Street, a certain city. Out of jealousy towards wealthy people driving BMW cars, they used stones to scratch the body of the BMW car belonging to the victim, Han Jie, with license plate number Zhe B×××××, which was parked in the courtyard. They scratched the left front and rear parts, as well as the front and rear fenders of the car. According to the appraisal, the damage to the vehicle amounted to 2,400 RMB. On January 28, 2014, defendants Chen and Ren were apprehended by police officers from a certain city's public security bureau. After the incident, defendants Chen and Ren compensated the victim, Han, for the losses and obtained his forgiveness. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Chen and Ren during the court hearing, and are supported by evidence such as documentary photos, explanations of the situation, vehicle information, administrative penalty decision letters, cancellation of public security administrative penalty decision letters, a letter of forgiveness, unit proof, "arrest process" records, identity information, the victim Han's statement, price appraisal opinion, and surveillance video CDs, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charged that on August 29, 2014, at approximately 2:40 a.m., Li Mou C, together with Liu Mou C, Liu Mou A, Zhang Mou C, and others, were waiting for a valet to retrieve their car in front of the 8-Carat Music Club on Dongjie Street, Qiaoxi District, Xingtai City, when a dispute arose with the club staff, leading to a physical altercation. Defendants Jin, Wei, Jia, and others stepped forward to help, collectively assaulting Li Mou C, Liu Mou C, and Zhang Mou C, resulting in their injuries, and damaged the Jinbei brand minivan and Zhonghua brand sedan driven by Liu Mou C and others. According to the assessment, Li Mou C sustained facial injuries and orbital wall fractures, classified as minor injuries level one, and transverse process fractures, frontal bone fractures, and maxillary sinus anterior wall fractures, classified as minor injuries level two. Liu Mou C and Zhang Mou C sustained minor injuries. The total damage to the wrecked vehicles amounted to 1,933 RMB. After the incident, the defendants compensated the victims for their losses and obtained forgiveness. Defendants Jin, Wei, Jia surrendered to the police on December 11, 2014, March 16, 2016, and December 16, 2014, respectively. During the trial, the three defendants did not object to the facts, which are corroborated by the statements of victims Li Mou C, Liu Mou C, Zhang Mou C, testimonies of witnesses Liu Mou A, Cao Mou, Zhang Mou A, Wen Mou, Hou Mou, Li Mou A, Jiang Mou, Wang Mou A, Chen Mou, Hu Mou, Wang Mou B, Shi Mou, Zhang Mou B, Liu Mou B, Lu Mou, Qin Mou, Li Mou B, forensic injury examination and evaluation reports, price evaluation conclusion, notification list of retrieved surveillance video, receipts, case documentation, mediation agreements, and letters of forgiveness, providing sufficient grounds for recognition.


The prosecution alleges that on the afternoon of May 7, 2016, the defendants Wen and Li, after prior collusion, drove to Unit 4, Room 507 at No. 699 Zhongshan Road, Yuelin Street in this city. Defendant Li kept watch downstairs while defendant Wen used a lock-picking tool to unlock and enter the premises, stealing from victim Zhou two cartons of Zhonghua cigarettes (soft pack 329), 15 packs of White Sand and Tianxia cigarettes, one carton of Golden Leaf cigarettes, 38 packs of cigarettes from a certain place (unable to assess the value due to lack of physical items), two packs of Liqun cigarettes (patterned leisure type), a gold necklace (unable to assess the value due to lack of physical item), and 400 yuan in cash, with the total value of items amounting to 4,200 yuan. On May 17, 2016, based on video investigation leads, police officers summoned defendants Wen and Li to the case at the Jintang Holiday Hotel in Anji County, Huzhou City. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Wen and Li during the trial of this case. They are corroborated by the statements of victim Zhou, the testimony of witness Wei, population information tables, case processing records, criminal judgment and release registration forms, seizure orders, video investigation reports, T-shaped lock-picking tools, explanation letters, site identification records and photos, on-site inspection and examination records and photos, identification records and photos, and search records, which are sufficient for confirmation. Based on the criminal facts and circumstances of the defendants, the prosecution recommends sentencing defendant Wen to nine to eleven months of imprisonment and imposing a fine; it recommends sentencing defendant Li to six to eight months of imprisonment and imposing a fine.


The People's Procuratorate of the High-tech Industrial Development Zone somewhere charges: At around 22:40 on September 12, 2015, in Room V05 on the second floor of Xin Yidu Music Club in the High-tech Zone of a certain place, defendants Li and Lin had a fight with the victim Feng due to trivial matters. During the altercation, defendants Li and Lin struck Feng in the face, resulting in a nasal bone fracture for Feng. According to a forensic medical examination, the injuries sustained by the victim Feng constitute minor injuries of the second degree.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district of a certain city charged: On the evening of September 20, 2013, the defendants Feng and Xue met the victim Wu at the Sun International Nightclub in a certain district of a certain city. On the morning of September 21, 2013, defendant Feng called the victim Wu and invited him to have a meal at Shenyun Restaurant on Dongmen North Road in a certain district of a certain city. Subsequently, defendant Feng discussed with defendant Xue to deceive Wu to borrow his phone under the pretense of making a call, and after succeeding, the two divided the stolen goods. At around 12:00 on the same day, defendant Xue, posing as a friend of defendant Feng, met victim Wu at a bus stop near Shenyun Restaurant and brought Wu to private room No. 2 at Shenyun Restaurant. Defendant Feng then called Wu from outside the restaurant, falsely claiming he would be late and asked Wu to hand the phone to defendant Xue to answer. Defendant Xue took Wu's iPhone 5, pretended to talk on the phone, and walked out of the room, seizing the opportunity to leave the restaurant. After meeting on the road opposite the restaurant, defendants Feng and Xue fled the scene with the stolen goods and later sold the phone for 1,800 RMB, which they split equally. The victim Wu, realizing he was deceived, reported the incident to the public security authorities on the same day. On December 5, 2013, the police apprehended defendants Feng and Xue on the roadside of Songgang Lougang Avenue in a certain district of a certain city. An appraisal determined that the value of the involved phone was 4,894 RMB. To prove the above facts, the prosecution submitted the following evidence: 1. Documentary evidence: phone records, details of apprehension, identity information of the defendants, and records of prior offenses; 2. Victim's statement: statement by Wu; 3. Defendants' confessions and defenses: confessions and defenses by Feng and Xue; 4. Appraisal opinion: "Appraisal Document" and "Appraisal Conclusion Notice"; 5. On-site inspection, examination records: on-site inspection records and photographs; 6. Audiovisual materials: surveillance video and screenshots.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged that on January 12, 2016, the defendants Ze and Geng, in collaboration with another individual named Pu (currently at large), conspired to steal a motor vehicle in a certain city. On the evening of the same day, the three drove a BYD FO car (license plate: Chuan U855**) from a certain county to the urban area of a certain city to locate a target for their crime. When they reached the roadside near the People's Court of a certain city, they found a BYD FO car (license plate: Chuan UN23**) parked on the ramp to the left of the People's Court entrance, which they subsequently stole and drove to a certain county. According to the appraisal by the Certification Center of the city's Development and Reform Bureau, the stolen vehicle was valued at 11,666 RMB. On January 14, 2016, the defendant Geng was captured by the public security organs; on October 20, 2016, the defendant Ze was captured by the public security organs. The People's Procuratorate of a certain city submitted physical evidence, documentary evidence, witness testimonies, victim statements, defendant confessions and defenses, appraisal opinions, and transcripts of inspections, examinations, and identifications as evidence to support the aforementioned charges.


According to the indictment by a certain local People's Procuratorate, defendants Yu and Yang, under the instruction of Li, a shareholder of Hongxiu Company (already convicted), were on standby in their car at the gate of Jinsedy Gold Company on Xiongchu Avenue in this city around midnight on May 29, 2012. They were instructed to track Yin, an employee of Jinsedy Gold Company who had conflicts with Li. At around 1 a.m., defendants Yu and Yang saw Yin leaving with a companion, Sheng A, and proceeded to follow them by car to near the Wuguo Dormitory in the Wuchang District of the city. They reported the whereabouts of Yin and the others to Li by phone. Li then led Xiong, Lu, Zheng, Dong, Wan, Liu, Qiu, Zhou (all already convicted), and Fang (handled in a separate case) to the scene, where they assaulted Yin and Sheng A with pickaxe handles, machetes, and other weapons. This resulted in Sheng A's death due to traumatic severe cranio-cerebral injury and Yin suffering a subdural hematoma in the left frontal-temporal region due to trauma. The injuries of Yin were identified as severe upon evaluation. Defendant Yang was later apprehended by the public security organs, and defendant Yu surrendered to the public security organs on September 29, 2014. To substantiate these facts, the prosecution provided evidence including: 1. The arrest and case-solving reports issued by the public security organs; 2. Testimonies of witnesses Sheng and Wang; 3. Confessions of accomplices Li, Xiong, Lu, Zheng, Dong, Wan, Liu, Qiu, and Zhou; 4. Statement from victim Yin; 5. Evaluation opinion: forensic evaluation report; 6. Criminal judgment document; 7. Confessions of defendants Yu and Yang, among other evidence.


Upon trial, it was found that from the early morning to the evening of December 18, 2015, the defendant Yin, due to an economic dispute, conspired with the defendants Yang, Feng, and Ji to restrain and deprive Huang of personal freedom at locations such as the 99 Crown Chain Hotel and Qingtin Tea House in Yangshe Town, Zhangjiagang City. From the early morning of December 19, 2015, to the afternoon of December 20, 2015, the defendants Yin, Yang, Feng, and Ji continued to restrain and deprive Huang of personal freedom at locations including Fengshuo Tea House, the 99 Crown Chain Hotel in Yangshe Town, Zhangjiagang City, and Qingtin Tea House. After being brought to justice, defendants Yin and Feng truthfully confessed to the above criminal facts. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by the defendants Yin, Yang, Feng, and Ji during the trial, and are corroborated by the victim Huang's statement and testimonies from witnesses Hui, Xu, Zhou1, Zhou2, and Zhao. The evidence also includes identification records, case developments, arrest records, bank transaction records, purchase slips, WeChat screenshots, seizure records and lists, retrieval records, WeChat chat logs, return lists, hotel check-in records, police dispatching logs, population information, administrative penalty decisions, criminal judgments, and confessions from the defendants Yin, Yang, Feng, and Ji, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of Lucheng District, a certain city, accused Zhang and Lin of being directed by others, from November 23 to 26, 2013, to drive a rented vehicle carrying "pseudo base station" equipment within the city. They sent advertisement text messages containing gambling website content to unspecified telecom users, disrupting normal telecom users' network access and affecting their regular communication, sending a total of 29,579 messages. The public prosecution provided corresponding evidence based on the accused facts. According to this,


The prosecution alleges that at approximately 14:00 on January 27, 2016, in an alley near Shunxing Department Store in Datangdi of a certain village in a certain district of this city, the defendant Luo sold two small packets of drugs to the defendant Lei for 200 yuan, who then resold them on site to He, whereupon they were caught by the police. The police seized the two small packets of drugs involved in the transaction on site. The police also seized two additional small packets of drugs next to Luo and 300 yuan in drug money from Lei. According to identification, the two packets of white crystals used in the transaction weighed 1.42 grams and contained methamphetamine. The two packets of white crystals seized next to Luo weighed 1.56 grams and contained methamphetamine. To prove the above facts, the prosecution submitted physical evidence, documentary evidence, witness testimony, statements from the defendants, identification opinions, on-site inspection records, and identification records, among other relevant evidence. Based on the above facts,


A local People's Procuratorate charged that: From March 2014 to November 2015, defendant Nan, without approval from industrial and commercial or environmental protection departments, opened a powder coating factory at the foot of a certain mountain in a village in Longshan Town, Cixi City, engaging in unauthorized phosphating processing of iron products. The defendant Yuan was specifically responsible for production and discharged the wastewater generated during processing directly into the environment without treatment. On November 9, 2015, the phosphating processing activities were discovered by enforcement officers from the Cixi City Environmental Protection Bureau, who subsequently sampled the factory's wastewater. Monitoring by the Cixi City Environmental Protection Monitoring Station, acknowledged by the Zhejiang Provincial Environmental Protection Department, revealed zinc content of 30.6mg/L in the factory's stormwater drains and 648mg/L in the overflow discharge, both exceeding the national pollutant discharge standards outlined in the "Integrated Wastewater Discharge Standard" by more than three times. On November 9, 2015, defendant Nan voluntarily turned himself in at the Longshan Police Station of the Cixi City Public Security Bureau. After being brought to the case, defendants Nan and Yuan truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts. During the trial, defendants Nan and Yuan had no objections to these facts, which are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Wang, Zhu, and Li, identification records and photos, the Cixi City Environmental Protection Monitoring Station's monitoring report No. 179 (2015) on water, the Zhejiang Provincial Environmental Protection Department document No. 404 (2015), on-site investigation records and photos, project commissioning order for monitoring (inspection), records of sampling and transfer of wastewater from the pollution source, original records of water sample testing, explanatory notes, the course of discovery, the process of surrender, and identity documents of defendants Nan and Yuan, all of which are sufficient to confirm the facts.


The prosecution alleges that, starting on May 5, 2014, the defendants Zhou and Chen, after prior consultation, organized gambling in the form of "certain Mahjong" and collected rake-offs in the basement of No. 7, Building 12, Hongyuan Community, Lecheng Street, Yueqing City. By the time the police intervened on July 20, 2014, the defendants Zhou and Chen had collected rake-offs amounting to over 14,210 yuan (which has since been refunded). The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Zhou and Chen during the trial, and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Zhu, Li, Zuo, Fu, Zhao, Xu, and Shu, as well as evidence including the seizure list, cash payment slips, arrest records, inspection transcripts, administrative penalty decisions, proof of prior offenses, and household registration documents, which are sufficient for confirmation.


Through the court investigation, it was found that the victim, Wang Mou, collected a fee from Tian on the pretext of helping him obtain a driver's license, but failed to fulfill the promise. Consequently, Tian informed Tian Moumou (handled in a separate case) to help retrieve the fee. On February 4, 2014, at around 8:00 PM, Tian Moumou gathered defendants Wang, Zhou, Dai, and "Yao Moumou" (handled in a separate case), and after planning, they traveled from a town in a certain district of a city to Jiangbei District of the city. There, they tricked Wang Mou into getting into a hired unlicensed car and took control of him. Later, defendants Wang, Zhou, Dai, along with Tian Moumou and "Yao Moumou," brought the victim Wang Mou to a forest near a cemetery in a certain village in a town of a certain district of the city. They used violent assault and verbal threats to force Wang Mou to repay the owed money. According to the assessment, Wang Mou suffered a contusion on the right eyelid, which constituted a minor injury. On March 10, 2014, defendant Wang was apprehended by police at a certain group in Xinbi Street, a county of a certain province; defendant Zhou was apprehended by police in a certain city of a certain province; defendant Dai was apprehended by police in a district of a city in a certain province. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Wang, Zhou, and Dai during the trial and were corroborated by the victim Wang Mou's statement, witness Tian's testimony, the fugitive information registration form, photos of the injuries, the forensic assessment of the degree of bodily harm, this court's criminal judgment (2012) Yongyin Criminal Initial No. 332, Beilun District People's Court of a city (2005) Yonglun Criminal Initial No. 99 criminal judgment, the account of the arrest, and the household registration certificates of the three defendants, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


Upon examination, it was found that around 10:00 a.m. on January 1, 2014, the defendants Fu and Ren boarded bus number 128 at the Machang Bus Stop on Furong North Road in Kaifu District of a certain city. While passenger Li was unprepared, Ren provided cover for Fu, who squeezed to Li's right side and placed a large cloth bag he was carrying over Li's shoulder bag. Fu then reached through the bottom of the cloth bag with his right hand, opened Li's shoulder bag, and stole cash amounting to 1,400 RMB before fleeing the scene. The stolen money was squandered by both defendants. Around 9:30 a.m. on January 2, 2014, Fu and Ren were apprehended by the public near the Chenjiahu Bus Stop on Furong North Road in Kaifu District of the same city and handed over to the police. After the incident, the defendants Fu and Ren truthfully confessed to the criminal acts. During the trial, the defendants Fu and Ren raised no objections to the above-stated facts, which were corroborated by evidence including the verified registration form for criminal cases, the process of apprehension, video surveillance footage and screenshots, the victim Li's statement, testimony from witness Zhang, the confessions and defenses of defendants Fu and Ren, along with their household registration proof and records of their conduct. This evidence is sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged that in 2014, the defendant Dai purchased 300 jin of substandard salt through informal channels in two separate transactions and sold it to the Xinmin Supermarket operated by Fu in a certain village of a certain township in the county. Despite knowing that the salt was substandard, the defendant Fu sold 180 jin of it to nearby residents for consumption. On October 29, 2014, while conducting an inspection, staff from the county's Salt Industry Bureau discovered that the substandard salt sold by Dai and Fu had an iodine content of 0, as determined by the county's Center for Disease Control and Prevention. It was further found that after the incident, the defendants Dai and Fu voluntarily surrendered to the county public security bureau on December 15, 2014, and December 30, 2014, respectively. During the trial, the defendants Fu and Dai did not dispute the aforementioned facts, which were corroborated by witness testimonies, expert opinions, documentary evidence, and other evidence, making it sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a city in Jiangsu Province charged: On December 8, 2014, at approximately 9:00 p.m., the defendant Zhang, in collusion with the defendant Wei, organized individuals including Gao, Tian, Li, Jiang, and Zhou to participate in gambling using Pai Gow as the gambling tool in room 2018 of the Tairun Hotel on Huashan Road, Xianü Town, in a certain district of a city. Defendant Zhang profited from this activity by collecting RMB 54,000 as a commission. At about 1:00 a.m. the next day, the public security authorities apprehended the aforementioned gambling activity at the scene and seized gambling funds amounting to RMB 1,639,500 and three sets of Pai Gow gambling tools. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Zhang and Wei during the court hearing. Evidence presented by the prosecuting body includes depositions from non-present witnesses Li, Jiang, Gao, Zhou, Tian, Zhu Jia, Xu, Ju, Wang, Han, Hu, Ma, Zhu Yi, Wang, and Jing, the confessions of defendants Zhang and Wei, the criminal judgment (2014) Yang XX Criminal First Instance No. 00504, the criminal judgment (2009) Jiang XX No. 0044, proof of release, an administrative penalty decision by the public security bureau of a certain district in a city, lists of seized items, photos of the gambling scene, a detailed account of the arrest, and household registration certificates, which are sufficient to determine the facts.


The People's Procuratorate in a certain location charged that in October 2012, the defendant Zhang, together with the defendant Hou, impersonated staff members of the Handan Project Department of AoCheng Group. By claiming to contract a project, they convinced the victims, Guo A and Guo B, to first pay a good-faith deposit of 300,000 yuan. It was promised that after the project was contracted, the deposit would be returned to the victims, and the project would be awarded to the victims within 35 days. Believing this, on October 26 and October 28, 2012, the victims transferred 300,000 yuan in two installments through the Industrial and Commercial Bank to Hou's bank card (account number 62×××33) at the said bank. Later, upon realizing they had been deceived, the victims repeatedly sought Zhang and Hou to demand a refund, but the defendants gave various excuses. By the time of the case's discovery, 140,000 yuan had been returned to the victims. On September 27, 2013, the defendant Hou returned the remaining 160,000 yuan from the fraud to the victims and also paid 60,000 yuan in interest, gaining the victims' understanding. The main evidence provided by the prosecution includes: the victims' statements, witnesses' testimonies, bank transfer receipts from the Industrial and Commercial Bank, the letter of commitment, the agreement signed between AoCheng Group and a certain river park, the defendants' confessions and defenses, the understanding agreement, letters of understanding, and receipts, among others.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charged: On the afternoon of November 1, 2013, the defendants Zhou, Ji (both prosecuted) were found cheating at gambling at the "XX Food Operation Department" on XX Road in a certain district of a certain city, and a dispute ensued. Defendant Zhou, Chang threatened with a machete and fled with Defendant Zhou, Ji, driving a black Honda car with license plate Y×××××, which was struck by thrown objects during the escape. Defendant Zhou, Ji had 5,000 RMB taken by victim Jiang and an additional 19,000 RMB taken by Jiang, Rong (a total of 24,000 RMB, of which 2,000 RMB was the gambling capital and 22,000 RMB were the winnings). Subsequently, Defendants Zhou, Ji, Zhou, Chang, and Zhou, Si (already prosecuted) contacted Defendant Zhou and asked him to find people and tools. Defendant Zhou contacted Defendant An, who in turn contacted Zhou, Bi, Zhou, Hong, "Xiao, XX," "Xiao, XX," "Qin, XX," and others (some fugitives) and instructed "Xiao, XX" to prepare steel pipes. That evening, Zhou, Ji, Zhou, Chang, and Zhou, Si gathered with Defendant An and over ten other men carrying machetes, steel pipes, and other items, arrived at the entrance of the "XX Food Operation Department," and found victim Jiang around 8 PM. Zhou, Ji, Zhou, Chang, and Zhou, Si led the group in assaulting victim Jiang with steel pipes and machetes before forcibly taking him to a sand pit on XX Road in Xiufeng District, where they continued to assault and verbal


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charged that, at approximately 4 a.m. on May 7, 2016, defendants Zheng and Xiong, along with Zhao Mouye (handled in a separate case), after conspiring together, carried tools such as hydraulic shears and flathead screwdrivers to Baolong Apartments in Sanbao Village, a town in a certain district of a certain city. By cutting the anti-theft lock and forcibly twisting off the headlock, they stole a black Xima XM125T-29 motorcycle (engine number: 68066917, frame number: LAEF6ZC87DRV61631) belonging to the victim, Wen, valued at 3,600 RMB, which was parked at that location. The defendants Zheng and Xiong raised no objections to the above facts during the court proceedings, pled guilty, and there is supporting evidence from the victim Wen's statement, testimony, and identification records of witness Zhao, the "On-Site Inspection Record" and photos, the "Seizure and Return List," the "Capture Process," the "Price Appraisal Conclusion," video screenshots, as well as confessions and identification records from defendants Zheng and Xiong, and some other evidence. All this evidence has been cross-examined in court and corroborated each other, and this court confirms it.


The prosecution charged: 1. Around 1 a.m. on a day in September 2014, defendants Chen and Wu unlocked a car door to steal 5 or 6 RMB from a black BYD car with the license plate J×××××, owned by the victim Gong, which was parked at an intersection in a certain village of a town in this city. 2. Around 1 a.m. at the end of September 2014, defendants Chen and Wu unlocked a car door to steal 70 RMB from a silver-gray Wuling van with the license plate J×××××, owned by the victim Zhao, which was parked in front of "Gaobo Snack Bar" in a certain village of a town in this city. 3. Around 1 a.m. in early October 2014, defendants Chen and Wu unlocked a car door to steal 5 or 6 RMB from a green Nissan pickup truck with the license plate J×××××, owned by the victim Pan, which was parked in front of No. 79 Commercial Street in a certain village of a town in this city. At approximately 12:20 a.m. on October 12, 2014, police officers from a public security area in Wenling City arrested defendant Chen on the road in front of the villa area in a certain village of a town in this city. At approximately 1:40 a.m. on October 12, 2014, under the guidance of defendant Chen, police officers from a public security area in Wenling City arrested defendant Wu in the Haoting Internet Cafe in a certain village of a town in this city. After being brought to justice, defendants Chen and Wu both truthfully confessed to the facts of the case. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Chen and Wu during the court trial, and are corroborated by the statements of the victims Gong, Pan, and Zhao, the criminal judgment, the identification records of defendants Chen and Wu, the defendants' personal information, and the evidence of their arrest, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges: At about midnight on April 27, 2014, defendants Qu and Sha went to the home of Xu in Mache Village, Tongling 37, Hushan Street, of a certain city. Defendant Sha acted as a lookout outside, while defendant Qu climbed through a window into the house and stole two old mobile phones. Afterwards, defendants Qu and Sha fled the scene.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges: On January 28, 2015, at around 18:00, defendants Luo and Guo, in order to demand a debt, met with the victim Kuang near the 331 Hospital in a certain district of a certain city. Defendants Luo and Guo then took Kuang by taxi to a small shop across from the Shanying Building, where they assaulted the victim Kuang inside the shop. Later, defendants Luo, Guo, and Yuan (handled separately) took the victim Kuang to Room 608 of the Xianle Hotel on Zhudong Road in a certain district of a certain city, where they continued to detain him until around 6:00 on January 28, 2015, when the victim Kuang was rescued by police officers. Inside the room, defendant Luo assaulted the victim Kuang. According to the assessment, the injuries of the victim Kuang were minor. On February 12, 2015, the victim Kuang forgave defendants Luo and Guo. Further examination revealed that after assaulting the victim Kuang in the shop, defendants Luo and Guo took Kuang by taxi to his home to ask him to find a housing fund card to repay the money, but they did not find it, so the defendants took the victim Kuang to Xianle Hotel for continued detention. These facts are not disputed by defendants Luo and Guo during the court hearing and are supported by evidence including the report and statement of the victim Kuang, the testimony of witness Kuang A, identification records, the process of summoning, the crime-solving process, IOUs, SMS photos, medical records, a forensic evaluation report on human injury, a letter of forgiveness, an administrative penalty decision, population information materials, investigatory assessment opinion documents, and confessions from co-defendant Yuan and defendants Luo and Guo, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The Huangpi District People's Procuratorate of a certain city accused that on March 13, 2012, and February 3, 2013, Wuhan Hankou North Home Investment Co., Ltd. signed contracts for the Phase II Wholesale City backfill earthwork project with a certain city's Guoguo Housing Demolition Co., Ltd. of the Wuhu Farm in this district and Ma, Xiao from a certain city's Xuedao Earthwork Co., Ltd. On April 11, 2013, at around 8:00 PM, Huang Mouyi, an employee of the Guoguo Housing Demolition Co., Ltd., led construction personnel to excavate earth at the site specified in the contract of Ma, Xiao when a dispute occurred with Ma, Xiao. Ma, Xiao believed that their interests were infringed upon and then invited several unemployed individuals from Yangluo Street, Xinzhou District, to the construction site to prevent construction and assault Huang Mouyi. According to the forensic identification by Wuhan Aimin Forensic Judicial Appraisal Institute: Huang Mouyi suffered compressive fractures in the chest vertebrae and multiple soft tissue injuries, and the degree of bodily injury was classified as minor injuries. After the incident, through mediation by the People’s Mediation Committee of the Wuhu Farm in the Huangpi District of a certain city: Ma, Xiao compensated the victim Huang Mouyi in full for medical expenses, totaling 50,000 RMB, and obtained forgiveness. These facts were not disputed by Ma, Xiao during the court hearing, and were supported by the report materials and statements of the victim Huang Mouyi; testimonies from witnesses Huang Moujia, Luo Mou, Hu Mou, Yu Mou, Jiao Mou, Zheng Mou; construction contract drawings; this court's criminal judgment; the arrest procedures and situation explanations from public security agencies; forensic clinical identification opinion, medical record evidence from the Aimin Forensic Judicial Appraisal Institute of a certain city; the mediation agreement, receipts, and letter of understanding; the confessions of Ma, Xiao, and other evidence prove sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of Luqiao District, a certain city, charges that at approximately 11 a.m. on July 10, 2013, defendant Zhang, carrying a watermelon knife, conspired with defendant Hu to go to the entrance of Kaiping Factory on South Street, Luqiao District, a certain city. Defendant Hu kept watch while defendant Zhang stole a blue Kaiyadi 35CC moped (valued at 2,200 RMB) belonging to a person named Ye by using a cart. In the course of the trial, defendants Hu and Zhang did not object to the aforementioned facts, which are substantiated by the following evidence verified in court: 1. Statement of the owner, Ye; 2. Identification record; 3. Seizure warrant; 4. Seizure record; 5. Seized items list; 6. Price appraisal report; 7. List of returned items; 8. Certificate of identification as a controlled knife; 9. Inspection record; 10. Photographs; 11. List of items transferred along with the case; 12. Details of the arrest; 13. Household registration proof; 14. Previous conviction records. The evidence is authentic and legal, sufficient for conviction.


After the trial, it was found: On the night of August 12, 2014, defendants Ma and Zhu, along with others, went to the entrance of the Picun Police Station in Picun Town, Danyang City. They used methods such as cutting wires to steal a Wuyang Honda WH125-12 motorcycle parked there by the victim, Liu. The motorcycle was appraised to be worth 5,792 RMB. On August 13, 2014, while patrolling, police officers noticed that defendants Ma and Zhu appeared to be nervous while riding a Honda 125 motorcycle. The officers stopped the defendants for questioning and inspection, discovering that the motorcycle did not have an ignition key and the wires under the ignition were cut. Both defendants could not explain the origin of the motorcycle. Subsequently, the police took them to the police station for further questioning. After being brought in, both defendants truthfully confessed to the theft of the motorcycle. Additionally, the stolen property had been recovered by the police and returned to the victim. The aforementioned facts were also confessed by defendants Ma and Zhu in court. The evidence includes the case investigation process, household registration certificates, the victim Liu's statement, the price appraisal report from the Danyang Price Certification Center, identification transcripts, photographs, and the list of seized and returned items. All of this evidence was cross-examined in court and holds legal proof efficacy, which this court acknowledges.


The prosecution charges: From November to December 2014, defendants Liao and Wang, in collaboration with Song (handled in a separate case) and others, after prior conspiracy, orchestrated a scheme where individuals fabricated identities online to lure victims to the "Night Owl" bar on Yaojiang Road, Xinqi Street, in a certain district of a certain city, using the pretext of a meeting between male and female netizens, to entrap them into high-cost consumption. During this period, defendant Liao impersonated a female netizen to deliberately order expensive drinks, the bar used cheap wine as "imported wine" for her and the victims to "consume," and defendant Wang was responsible for handling "wine promoter group" information for defendant Liao, entertaining guests, and so forth, to defraud the victims of their money. On December 16 and 17, 2014, defendants Liao and Wang defrauded victim Luo of 4,900 RMB and victim Bi of 4,700 RMB. After the crime occurred, defendant Liao voluntarily surrendered to the Xinqi Police Station of the Beilun Branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city and truthfully confessed to her crimes. Further investigation revealed that after the incident, defendants Liao and Wang had refunded victim Luo 4,900 RMB and obtained his understanding. During the trial of this case, they also paid the compensation of 4,700 RMB to the court. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Liao and Wang during the trial, and were corroborated by the statements of victims Luo and Bi, the confessions of co-defendants Wang A, Chen, and Liu, as well as evidence including bank card transaction details, bank account opening and closing historical inquiry forms, identification transcripts and photos, extraction transcripts, seizure decisions, seizure lists and photos, statements of the process of being brought to justice, arrest process, evidence retrieval notifications, POS machine transaction records and registration information, and basic information of permanent residents, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charges that on the evening of March 22, 2016, at around 10 PM, the defendants Ze and Xia, along with Ga (who is at large), conspired to steal a car in a certain city. Subsequently, the three drove a black Hyundai car around the city to scout locations. At approximately 2 AM the following day, the three stole a white Wuling minivan parked by the roadside at the entrance of Songzhou Garden in Jin'an Town, a certain county. According to the price appraisal conducted by the Price Appraisal Center of the Price Bureau of the county, the stolen white minivan was valued at 31,000.00 RMB.


A local People's Procuratorate charges: The defendant He and the victim Pan met through an introduction in the second half of 2009. They had a son on October 10, 2010, and registered their marriage at the Guixi City Civil Affairs Bureau on February 10, 2014. Later, the two began living apart in 2016 due to marital discord. After separation, He, through a matchmaker, met the defendant Wang, who, knowing He was still married, lived together with him. In the lunar new year of 2017, Wang arranged for both parties' parents to meet and gave He's parents a betrothal gift of 60,000 yuan. Subsequently, the two officially began cohabiting as husband and wife. He gave birth to a daughter on November 22, 2017, at Yingtan People's Hospital. After the victim Pan learned of this in late November 2017, he reported the case to the public security authorities on January 8, 2018. Following the incident, the defendant He voluntarily surrendered to the Yudong Police Station in Nanning City, a certain place, on July 23, 2020, and truthfully confessed his crime upon arrival. The defendant Wang was summoned by public security officers via telephone on August 4, 2020, and also truthfully confessed his crime upon arrival. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by the defendants He and Wang during the trial. They are substantiated by evidence such as the case acceptance registration form, filing decision, statement of apprehension circumstances, marriage certificate, testimonies of witnesses including Wang and Qiu, the victim Pan's statement, and the confessions and defenses of the defendants He and Wang, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution alleges that in the early morning of September 14, 2015, the defendants, Qu and Jia, arrived at the area under Building 10 in Liaodong Lianjian, Wutian Street, a district in a certain city. Defendant Jia waited downstairs while defendant Qu climbed through a window into Room 201, the residence of the victim, Lin. Defendant Qu stole a watch (valued at 1,970 RMB as per the appraisal), 300 RMB in cash, 27 USD (equivalent to 172 RMB according to the appraisal), and 75,000 Korean Won (equivalent to 404 RMB according to the appraisal). Currently, 15 RMB of the stolen money has yet to be recovered. The defendants Qu and Jia raised no objections to the above facts during the court proceedings, and these are substantiated by victim Lin's statement, identification records, valuation reports, inspection notes, examination records, seizure warrants, seizure lists, photographs, return forms, exchange rate tables, evidence of illegal activity, arrest records, and identification documents, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution charges that in the early hours of May 10, 2016, defendants Fu and Li allowed drug users Zhang A, Zhang B, Yang, and others to use methamphetamine in a room at the staff dormitory located at ** Nan Sha Street, ** Building, ** Village, ** District, ** City, where Fu and Li resided. On May 13, 2016, police officers arrested defendants Fu and Li in the aforementioned dormitory and seized a homemade drug use tool made from a mineral water bottle on-site. Defendants Fu and Li raised no objections to these facts during the hearing. The testimony and identification records from witnesses Zhang A, Zhang B, and Yang, search records, seizure lists, photos of physical evidence, administrative penalty decision, details of the arrest, household registration materials, and statements made by defendants Fu and Li during the investigation phase serve as evidence, which is sufficient to establish these facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accused that on March 29, 2017, the defendants Zhou and Yang concealed the fact that they were married, pretended to be father and daughter, and met with the victim Wang and others in front of the Liyuan Town Government in Yizhang County, arranging a blind date between Yang and Wang. After both parties agreed, it was agreed that Wang would pay a total bride price of 60,000 yuan to Yang's side. At around 12:00 on the following day, Zhou, Yang, Wang, and others met at the Yongwang Restaurant opposite the Pingshi Train Station in a certain province's Lechang City. Yang provided her ID card and divorce certificate from her ex-husband for Wang to view in order to gain trust, and Wang paid Zhou 25,000 yuan of the bride price on the spot. Subsequently, Zhou and Yang made excuses to send Wang away and turned off their phones. After Wang realized he had been deceived, he immediately reported the case. The evidence used by the public prosecution agency to prove the above facts includes: household registration certificate, process of arrest, seizure decision, seized items, document list, call details, marriage certificate, marriage registration management information system inquiry, birth medical certificate, witness testimony, victim's statement, on-site investigation and inspection record, identification record, and the defendants' confessions and defenses.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged that on October 3, 2016, defendants Chen and Si agreed with Huang to purchase fast-growing forest trees covering about 14 acres in Wuliu Village, a district in a certain town of a county, for the price of 107,000 yuan. On October 5 of the same year, after paying a deposit of 50,000 yuan to Huang, Chen and Si, disregarding national laws and without applying to the County Forestry Bureau for a timber harvesting permit, illegally hired Wang and Wu to cut down the fast-growing forest trees located in Wuliu Village, a district in a certain town of a county. On October 7, 2016, the illegal logging site was appraised by Nanning Zhenning Forestry Technical Services Co., Ltd.: the illegal logging site was in Zouwei Village Committee's Group 3 forest of a certain town in a certain county. The area of illegally logged forest was 0.31 hectares, with a timber volume of 29 cubic meters, and the tree species of the illegally logged forest was Eucalyptus grandis. The defendants Chen and Si raised no objection to these facts during the court hearing, and there is evidence to confirm these facts, including the case acceptance registration form, the case filing decision letter, the capture process, the household registration certificate, the certification from the Administrative Approval Office of the County Forestry Bureau, the appraisal appointment document, the forest harvesting site investigation results from Group 3 forest of Zouwei Village Committee in a certain town of a certain county, the appraisal opinion notification, the on-site inspection record, the identification transcript, the site diagram, the site photographs, the testimonies of witnesses Huang, Wang, and Wu, as well as the confessions of defendants Chen and Si. The facts of this case are clear, and the evidence is indeed sufficient to make a determination.


After the trial, it was found that at around 11 p.m. on November 25, 2013, the defendants Li and Yang were at a barbecue restaurant on Yan'an North Lane in the Yunyan District of this city. They had a dispute over trivial matters with the victim, Long, which escalated into a fight. Subsequently, the defendant Li injured the victim's head with a knife. According to the forensic judicial identification center of Guiyang Medical College, the victim's injury was assessed as minor (severe). The family of the defendant Li had reached a compensation agreement with the victim on his behalf (100,000 yuan has been paid). During the court trial, defendants Li and Yang confessed to the facts mentioned above and requested leniency. These facts were presented by the public prosecution agency in court, and were confirmed through cross-examination during the trial. The evidence, including the statements of defendants Li and Yang at the public security agency, household registration certificates, witne


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county in a certain district of the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region charged that in May 2014, the defendants Lu, Liang, and Zhou jointly invested 6,000 yuan to purchase pine forest trees located on the "Six Temple" slope in a certain village of a certain township in the county from a person named Huang. Without obtaining a forest harvesting permit, they illegally cut down the said pine forest trees and transported them as logs to a nearby wood chip factory in a certain township of the county for sale. On March 4, 2015, the defendants Lu, Liang, and Zhou voluntarily surrendered themselves to the County's Forest Public Security Bureau. After an on-site survey and measurement by forestry technicians, it was determined that Lu, Liang, and Zhou had cut down a total of 193 pine trees, with an accumulated volume of 37.8457 cubic meters. The prosecution submitted relevant evidence to support the facts of the accusation.


The prosecution alleges that on July 10, 2015, at around 8 a.m., the victim, Hu, had a conflict with the security guards of Zhonglu Plaza near the external elevator at the back door of Zhonglu Plaza Phase II in Yaohai District, a certain city. Subsequently, the defendants, Yao and Meng, arrived at the scene of the conflict and assaulted the victim, Hu, resulting in the fracture of Hu's 5th to 8th ribs on the left side of his body. According to the appraisal by the Criminal Science and Technology Research Institute of the city's Public Security Bureau, the degree of Hu's injury was classified as minor injury level two.


The prosecution accuses that in the early morning of February 7, 2015, defendants Li and Tang jointly went to the GXG men's clothing store at 48-3 Guangping Road, a certain city. They entered the premises by prying open the door and stole 1,300 yuan in cash and a GXG leather down jacket, with a physical value of 2,818.8 yuan, from the victim, Chen. On February 11, 2015, defendants Li and Tang were apprehended, and a pair of scissors, a flashlight, three screwdrivers, and a crowbar were seized from defendant Li as tools used in the crime. After being brought to justice, defendants Li and Tang truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. Stolen money in the amount of 1,000 yuan and the stolen GXG down jacket have been recovered and returned to the victim. The above facts are undisputed by defendants Li and Tang during the trial of this case and are verified by evidence, including the victim Chen's statement, the seizure decision, temporary seizure receipts and return vouchers, photographs, on-site identification records and photos, price assessment report, criminal judgment, criminal records, population information form, and the arrest process provided by law enforcement personnel, which are sufficient for conviction. Based on the criminal facts and circumstances of the defendants above, the prosecution suggests sentencing defendants Li and Tang to imprisonment for eight to ten months, along with a fine.


A People's Procuratorate in a certain area charged that on April 4, 2014, around 20:00, the defendant Xu had a dispute with the victim Jiang over trivial matters at No. 12 in a district of this city. Xu then called the defendant Yuan and others to beat the victim Jiang, resulting in minor injuries to Jiang. After the incident, the defendant Xu turned himself in at the Tanshi Police Station of the Jiangshan Public Security Bureau in Zhejiang Province on October 8, 2015. Xu's family has compensated the victim with 39,000 RMB and has obtained the victim's understanding. In order to prove the above facts, the prosecution presented physical evidence, documentary evidence, witness testimony, expert opinions, identification records, the victim's statements, and the defendants' confessions in court.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges that:

1. From January to May 2013, the defendant Luo repeatedly allowed others to use drugs in room 401, No. 30, Overseas City, a certain district, a certain city, where he rented accommodation. Specifically: in February 2013, the defendant Luo allowed Lin and Wei to use the drug methamphetamine at his residence. In April 2013, the defendant Luo allowed Wei and Yang to use methamphetamine at his residence. In May 2013, the defendant Luo allowed Yang to use methamphetamine at his residence on three separate occasions. On the evening of May 29, 2013, the defendant Luo allowed "Chen Fangyan" to use methamphetamine at his residence. In the early hours of May 30, 2013, the defendant Luo allowed "Chen Fangyan" and Wei to use methamphetamine at his residence.

2. From April to May 2013, the defendant Yang repeatedly allowed others to use drugs in room B325, Jiangnan Small Town, a certain district, a certain city, where he rented accommodation. Specifically: in April 2013, the defendant Yang allowed Luo and Wei to use methamphetamine at his residence. In May 2013, the defendant Yang allowed Wei to use methamphetamine at his residence on three separate occasions. In May 2013, the defendant Yang allowed Luo to use methamphetamine at his residence. On May 31, 2013, the defendants Yang and Luo were apprehended by the police at their respective residences for drug use.

The aforementioned facts are not disputed by the defendants Luo and Yang during the trial process, and are further substantiated by the testimonies of witnesses Wei and Zhu, the household registration certificates issued by the public security authorities, the evidence of apprehension, the administrative penalty decision, the housing lease agreement, the receipts, the identification records, and the on-site test reports, which are sufficient to establish the charges.


A certain local People's Procuratorate charged that in January 2017, the victim Wang, through an introduction by another person, met Liang and asked Liang to help find a wife for his son. Liang contacted the defendant Wei, and Wei, together with defendants Zhou, Li, and Zhu (handled in a separate case), met in a certain town to discuss using marriage as bait to deceive Wang out of his money. At the end of January 2017, the two parties agreed to meet in a certain county. Wei, Zhu, Zhou, and Li hired a vehicle to come to a certain town. Afterwards, they changed the meeting location to a certain county, but Zhu did not continue the journey. At around 2 p.m. that afternoon, Wei, Zhou, and Li met Wang in the town. They agreed on a bride price of 40,000 yuan, and Wang immediately gave a deposit of 10,000 yuan to Liang, who then handed the 10,000 yuan to Wei. Wei and the others accompanied Wang and Li to a certain prefecture to board a vehicle back to a certain location. They were unable to book train tickets in time and thus took a coach back. Upon arrival at the location, Wang gave the remaining 30,000 yuan of the bride price to Wei. After receiving the money, Wei left with Zhou, while Li and Wang boarded a bus heading to a certain destination. During the ride, Li claimed he needed to get off the bus to use the restroom and used the opportunity to escape. Defendants Zhou and Wei turned themselves into the police on December 25, 2017, and January 4, 2019, respectively. The prosecution provided related evidence to support the charges.


Upon examination, it was found that on July 30, 2013, defendants Lin, Lu, and Zheng went to the vicinity of the Wuming Toll Station Highway intersection in Wuming County and, without any legitimate and valid proof of origin, purchased a black Dongfeng ZN6461WIF3 small passenger vehicle (Vehicle Identification Number: LJNMEW1JX9N018500, Engine Number: SGS2399) at a low price of 10,000 RMB from a man with the nickname "A." After appraisal, the vehicle was valued at 85,775 RMB. After the case was solved, the vehicle was recovered and returned to the owner. On August 29, 2013, defendants Lin, Lu, and Zheng again went to the vicinity of the Wuming Toll Station Highway intersection in Wuming County and, without any legitimate and valid proof of origin, purchased a Hyundai BH7141MY small car (Engine Number: BB540726, Frame Number: LBERCACB4BX060257) at a low price of 8,000 RMB from the same man nicknamed "A." During the transaction, they were caught by the police on the spot. After appraisal, this vehicle was valued at 64,560 RMB. After the case was solved, the vehicle was recovered and returned to the owner. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Lin, Lu, and Zheng during the court trial and were confirmed by the following evidence provided by the prosecution and verified and authenticated by the court: the inventory of seized and returned items and other physical evidence; case registration forms, decision to initiate investigation, arrest records, motor vehicle licenses, motor vehicle registration information forms, statements, population information forms, health examination registration forms for persons under supervision by Nanning Public Security Bureau and other documentary evidence; testimonies from witnesses Liu and He; confessions from defendants Lin, Lu, and Zheng; appraisal conclusion reports, identification records, and recognition photos.