Upon trial, it was found that from February 2015 to August of the same year, the defendants Cai and Xie opened a gambling setup in the form of "Niuniu" and "Shisandao" at a small shop at No. 303, Xitang Village, Hengfeng Street, in this city. They gathered individuals like Jiang, Han, and others to gamble, and profited over 20,000 RMB by taking rake-offs from the bankers. On August 19, 2015, around 21:30, police officers from the Hengfeng Police Station of Wenling Public Security Bureau arrested the defendants Cai and Xie at the small shop on Xitang Village, Hengfeng Street. After being brought to justice, the defendants Cai and Xie confessed to the facts of the case. The facts mentioned above were undisputed by the defendants Cai and Xie during the trial and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses such as Jiang, Wei, Han, Fu, Zhang, Xu, Ai, and Wang, as well as recognition records, inspection records, household registration certificates of the defendants, and the evidence of their capture process, all of which are sufficient to establish these facts.


Upon examination, it has been found that from October 2013 to June 2014, at the request of the defendant Cai, the defendant Luo opened a member account on the gambling website "Liansheng Shishicai". To receive commission from bets, the defendant Luo gave the account username and password to the defendant Cai. To further obtain commission from bets, the defendant Cai handed over the account username and password to Lin, who then engaged in gambling on the aforementioned website. During this period, the defendant Cai used his own bank account to settle gambling funds for the defendant Luo and Lin or facilitated direct settlement of gambling funds between the defendant Luo and Lin. Specifically, Lin transferred a total of RMB 229,050 to the defendant Cai and RMB 95,780 to the defendant Luo; the defendant Cai transferred a total of RMB 234,110 to Lin, while the defendant Luo transferred a total of RMB 140,200 to Lin. On June 27, 2014, the defendant Cai was apprehended. The police seized a bank card, a mobile phone, a computer host, and RMB 3,000 from Cai; the bank card, mobile phone, and RMB 3,000 have been returned to the defendant Cai. On July 31 of the same year, the defendant Cai returned RMB 120,000 in illicit funds. On June 20, 2015, the defendant Luo was apprehended, and on December 17 of the same year, the defendant Luo returned RMB 120,000 in illicit funds. The aforementioned facts were not contested by the defendants Luo and Cai during the court trial, and are corroborated by the testimony and identification record of the witness Lin, the testimony of the witness Liu, the circumstances of the arrest, a statement of the situation after arrest, resident identity certificates, search transcripts, seizure decision documents, seizure lists, return lists, temporary detention receipts of property, bank account transaction records, transaction details, photos of physical evidence, among other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: On April 15, 2015, at around 23:00, the defendant Su, upon learning that Yang, who had previously beaten him, was drinking at the "Suhe" bar in Jiangyou City, invited the defendant Li and others to go to the "Suhe" bar, stating that he wanted to hit back. Su then entered the bar with Li and others, holding a wooden stick, and struck Yang on the head with the stick. When the victim Cheng saw this, he tried to help Yang. The defendant Guo, who was in the bar, saw this and attacked Cheng. Cheng then ran outside the bar, followed by Su, Li, Guo, and others, who caught up and assaulted him. Afterwards, Su and the others left the scene. According to a forensic appraisal, Cheng's injuries were classified as minor (Grade 2), while Yang's injuries were classified as minor. On December 16, 2015, Su voluntarily turned himself in to the public security authorities. The prosecution stated that the above facts were substantiated by documentary evidence, witness testimonies, statements from the victims, confessions and explanations from the defendants, forensic appraisals, identifications, investigation records, and audio-visual materials.


Through the trial, it was found: At around 2:00 a.m. on June 5, 2019, the defendants Lv and Sun went to Room 206 at Winter E-Sports Hotel on Nanyang Road, Xichuan County after drinking. They requested to stay in the room but were refused by Ye and Bi, who were already staying there. Lv and Sun then arbitrarily assaulted Ye and Bi. Subsequently, when Ye and others mentioned that the people in Room 301 were preventing Lv from staying in Room 206, Lv and Sun went to Room 301 of the hotel and randomly assaulted Ji, Jia, and others. According to the assessment, Ye's injuries constituted minor injuries, and Bi's injuries were also considered minor injuries. The above-mentioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Lv and Sun during the trial proceedings. Additionally, there are statements from the victims Ye and Bi, testimonies from witnesses Ji, Jia, Zhang, and Xiao, appraisal reports, on-site inspection records and photos, identification records and photos, explanation from Shangji Police Station of Xichuan County Police Bureau, criminal judgment, criminal record check, apprehension process, and the household registration proofs of the two defendants, which all provide sufficient evidence for recognition.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that the defendants Zhang, Liao, Gao, along with Lei A, He Moumou, Wang Moumou (all handled in separate cases) and other members were engaged in pyramid selling activities at Unit 406, Building 2, Unit 3, Ziling New Village, Chengnan Street, Tonglu County, where defendant Zhang was the leader. At around 18:00 on February 19, 2013, the victim Lei B was tricked by Wang Moumou into going to this pyramid selling venue, where he was invited to participate in the pyramid selling activities. When the victim Lei B realized he had been deceived and wanted to leave, he was forcibly prevented from doing so by defendants Liao, Gao, and Lei A arranged by Zhang, who also confiscated his mobile phone, ID card, wallet, and other personal belongings, thereby detaining him. It was not until March 3, 2013, that the victim Lei B was released after being forced to pay 2,800 yuan. It was determined that the actions of the defendants Zhang, Liao, and Gao constituted the crime of x and should be punished. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Zhang, Liao, and Gao during the trial, and were confirmed by the victim Lei B's statement read and presented in court by the public prosecutor, testimonies of witnesses Liu Moumou, X Moumou, Xu Moumou, Cao Moumou, records and photographs of the crime scene inspection, surveillance video recordings, the process of arrest, household registration proof, and other evidence, which were sufficient to reach a verdict.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: On November 22, 2013, the defendants Gong and He, along with Jiang (handled in a separate case), after prior discussion, agreed that He and Jiang would be responsible for keeping watch, while Gong would use technical lock-picking methods to enter the premises. They stole from the victim Ding a Lenovo laptop, two rings, two necklaces, a bracelet, and an agate jade pendant. According to the appraisal, the total value of the stolen items amounts to 10,460 RMB. The prosecution has provided corresponding evidence to support the above accusations.


After the trial, it was found that between January 28 and February 1, 2015, defendants Gu, Wu, and Dai, after prior consultation, organized gambling sessions five times by having Mo A, Mo B, Wang, and others play "Tong Zi Gong" in the senior activity room in Shengli Village, Xucun Town, Haining, which was jointly operated by the three defendants and Yu (to be handled separately). Defendants Gu and Wu were responsible for taking a cut of the profits while defendant Dai acted as a lookout. They collected over 7,500 yuan in total profits. Afterwards, each of the defendants Gu, Wu, and Dai earned more than 1,100 yuan. On the afternoon of February 1, 2015, the group led by defendant Gu was caught red-handed gambling by the police who confiscated 1,450 yuan of the takings, while defendant Wu escaped with 600 yuan of the profits from that day. On April 28, 2015, defendant Dai voluntarily surrendered to the Xuxiang Police Station of the Haining Public Security Bureau and truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal activities. During the trial of this case, defendants Wu and Dai returned illegal gains of 1,700 yuan and 1,100 yuan respectively. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Gu, Wu, and Dai during the court hearing, and were corroborated by testimonies from witnesses Mo A, Mo B, Wang and others, as well as documents such as inspection certificates, inspection records, evidence preservation decisions, evidence preservation lists, seizure decision documents, and photographs of seized items, along with arrest records, arrival records, household registration certificates, receipts, and explanatory statements, which are sufficient to confirm the charges.


The prosecution agency charges that between March and April 2020, the defendants Jiang and Ye conspired to commit theft. They prepared tools such as pliers, gloves, and masks, and went to locations including Jixin Medical Chain Tongfutang and Taizhou Longtaiyuan Guoheng Longtai Pharmacy in Jichuan Street, Taixing City. They entered the stores by damaging the door handles of the glass doors, stealing a total of 4,645 RMB in cash (as detailed in the identification table). Among this, defendant Jiang received 2,895 RMB in cash, and defendant Ye received 1,750 RMB in cash. To substantiate the above charges, the prosecution agency presented in court the statements from victims Sun and Yan, the confessions and defenses of defendants Jiang and Ye, the criminal judgment, identification records, on-site inspection records, and photographs as evidence.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Ma'anshan City charged:

1. Facts of Extortion

In August 2016, the defendant Long, upon learning about the construction project of Wudan Gang Road near a certain district's Certain Garden, came up with the idea of extorting benefits from the construction unit. After discussing with the defendant Sun, the two went together to the construction site on August 19, 2016, falsely claiming that a small pond within the construction site belonged to Long, and obstructed the construction work, demanding the construction party to implement compensation fees. They later gathered local villagers and idlers multiple times to go to the site to cause disturbances, stop the construction, and forcibly demand a compensation of 50,000 yuan. On August 29, 2016, the defendant Sun saw that the construction party resumed work without paying any fees and informed Long, and under Long's arrangement, led local villagers to the site again to obstruct the construction, demanding a compensation of 50,000 yuan. The construction unit's staff then called the police, and officers arrived at the scene to arrest defendant Sun and other involved persons. After being apprehended, Sun truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. On the same day, the defendant Long, having learned that Sun and others were caught, went to the police station to inquire about the situation and was then verbally summoned by the public security organ for investigation. After being apprehended, he truthfully confessed to the criminal facts.

2. Facts of Harboring Drug Users

On the afternoon of February 9, 2016, the defendant Sun harbored Zhu, Ji, and Mo to consume methamphetamine (ice) at his residence in a certain district's Certain Garden. On October 11, 2016, the defendant Sun voluntarily surrendered to authorities and truthfully confessed to the criminal facts.

The public prosecution agency has provided relevant evidence to the court regarding the criminal facts charged in the indictment.


The People's Procuratorate in a certain region charges: Since the end of May 2015, the defendants Tang, Ji, Deng, and others were hired by Sun (dealt with in another case) to assist in a casino he operated in tin houses located in various places, such as the Zhangjiapai Caoyuan in Longwan District's Puzhou Street and the North District of Guangna Tool City in Puzhou Street. Tang took a cut of 100 yuan per session as a benefit in the casino. Ji received benefits ranging from 100 to 200 yuan per session for transporting gamblers and casino staff. Deng was paid benefits ranging from 50 to 100 yuan per session for acting as a lookout for the casino. On the evening of June 14 of the same year, the casino was raided by the public security authorities, who caught 12 gamblers on the spot, including Ma and Tan, and seized gambling funds totaling 7,450 yuan. Investigation revealed that during the time the casino was in operation, it held one session per day, with more than 10 participants per session. During the period Tang and Ji were involved, the casino took in at least 8,000 yuan in cuts, while during Deng's involvement, the casino took in at least 6,000 yuan. The prosecution provided corresponding evidence for the above accusations.


The People's Procuratorate of the Luqiao District of a certain city charged that on October 18, 2012, defendants Gao, Dong, and Li, in collaboration with Teng (already sentenced), went to the east gate of the Luoyang Market in the Luoyang Subdistrict, Luqiao District, a certain city. Defendant Gao was responsible for driving and acting as a lookout, while defendants Dong, Li, and Teng stole a black wallet from the cab of a light van with the license plate J××××× belonging to the victim, Yang. The wallet contained at least over 8,000 yuan in cash. On January 12, 2014, defendant Dong was apprehended by public security authorities; on February 15, 2014, defendant Gao voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed the facts of his crime. During the court trial, defendants Gao, Dong, and Li raised no objections to the aforementioned facts. The facts are supported by evidence such as the statement of the victim, Yang, the confession of the co-defendant Teng, identification records, on-site inspection records, a list of accepted evidence materials, Yang's rice company's sales inventory, the arrest process, the process of coming to the case, proof of voluntary surrender, explanatory notes, household registration certificates, public security administrative penalty decision, labor re-education decision, criminal judgment, certificate of release upon completion of sentence, and the notice of retrial of the convict, which are sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain Banner charged that around 13:00 on May 16, 2020, defendants Bai and Han consumed alcohol together. Han then instructed Bai to drive Han's unlicensed three-wheeled electric vehicle without a license. As they were traveling from south to north and reached the intersection north of Hu's house in Gerizhao, a certain place within the Banner, they collided with a small car driven by Gong, with license plate XXX, which was traveling from east to west. The accident caused injuries to both Bai and Han and resulted in varying degrees of damage to both vehicles. According to the forensic examination, the blood alcohol content of Bai at the time of the incident was 175.61 mg/100 ml, which constitutes drunk driving. The Traffic Police Brigade of a certain Banner's Public Security Bureau determined that Bai was fully responsible for this accident.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges: 1. On October 18, 2017, at around 19:00, defendants Er and Chang took a taxi to a village in a certain district of a certain city to look for an opportunity to steal. They stole a Bestu brand electric tricycle with its key left inside, belonging to Huang's family, from the doorway. According to the price assessment, the stolen electric tricycle is valued at 3,042 yuan. 2. On the afternoon of May 6, 2018, defendants Er and Chang rode a motorcycle to the west side of a village in a certain town in a certain district of a certain city to look for an opportunity to steal. They stole a Jinpeng brand electric tricycle, which Zhang had parked in a pear orchard without locking it, and sold it to a certain village, receiving 1,200 yuan in illicit proceeds, which they split evenly. According to the price assessment, the stolen electric tricycle is valued at 2,970 yuan. 3. On July 5, 2018, at around 9:00, defendant Er, along with Song (who has already been sentenced), rode an electric bicycle to the east side of a village in a certain district of a certain city to look for an opportunity to steal. Er incited Song to steal an electric tricycle with its key left inside, belonging to Xu. Song was caught by the public while escaping on the stolen electric tricycle and was brought to the police station. According to the price assessment, the stolen electric tricycle is valued at 2,833 yuan. 4. On September 13, 2018, at around 17:00, defendants Er and Chang rode a motorcycle to the east side of a village in a certain town in a certain district of a certain city to look for an opportunity to steal. They stole a Sanchuan brand electric tricycle with its key left inside, belonging to Han, and sold it to a certain village, receiving 1,600 yuan in illicit proceeds, which they split evenly. According to the price assessment, the stolen electric tricycle is valued at 3,080 yuan.


Upon investigation, it was found that in September 2013, the defendants Shi and Wang (who are husband and wife) learned that a bean sprout producer named Wen in a certain county was investigated by the local public security bureau for using rootless bean sprout growth hormone to produce bean sprouts. As a result, they shut down their own workshop, which had been using a bean sprout growth hormone containing 6-benzyladenine to produce bean sprouts since 2007, in order to wait and see. More than 20 days later, seeing that there were no actions taken to rectify bean sprout production in the county, the defendants Shi and Wang resumed using the growth hormone containing 6-benzyladenine to produce soybean sprouts and mung bean sprouts, which they sold in the county's Eastern Vegetable Market, Wanfeng Supermarket, Haoyouduo Supermarket, and Hualin Supermarket. Testing by the Hebei Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau's Testing and Quarantine Technology Center found that the soybean sprouts produced by the defendants contained 132μg/kg of 6-benzyladenine, and the mung bean sprouts contained 12143μg/kg of 6-benzyladenine. The defendants Shi and Wang raised no objections to the above facts during the court trial. Their admissions are supported by the testimonies of witnesses Ma, Sun, Bai, Xiang, Liu, Wu, Hu, and Yuan; on-site inspection records; test reports from the Hebei Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau’s Testing and Quarantine Technology Center; the national "Hygienic Standards for the Use of Food Additives" GB2760-2007; the Ministry of Health General Office’s response regarding issues related to the "Standards for the Use of Food Additives" (GB2760-2011); certifications from the county’s Wanfeng Supermarket, Haoyouduo Supermarket, and New Cooperation Life Supermarket; records of the defendants coming into custody; lists and photos of seized items and documents; the case initiation decision; and photocopies of the defendants’ IDs—all of which are sufficient to substantiate the findings.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain location charged: In April 2017, Chen (dealt with in a separate case) at a certain bathhouse on Hefeng Road, Yuhang District, Hangzhou, harbored Yang (1), Huang (1), Yang (2), and Feng for prostitution activities totaling 22 times. During this period, the bathhouse employees, defendants Gai and Lu, knowingly assisted in recording the accounts for prostitution, helped use remote control alarms, and other activities. The evidence for these charges includes household registration certificates and other documentary evidence; witness testimonies; inspection videos; inspection and identification records; the defendants' confessions and defenses, among others.


Upon examination, it has been found that from early February 2015 to June of the same year, the defendant Wu, Mou conspired to seek illegal profits by purchasing two gambling-capable game machines (a total of 14 gambling machine positions) and set up a casino at No. 91, Guangchang Road, Xiaqian Street, Jiaojiang District, a certain city. The defendant Wu, Mou was responsible for the daily operations such as crediting and debiting the gambling machines, cashiering, and settling accounts, receiving compensation and enjoying dividends. On June 10 of the same year, the casino was raided by the police and Mou was arrested, with the casino making a total profit of over 15,000 yuan. On September 1 of the same year, the defendant Wu, Mou was arrested by the police at the China Telecom Business Hall on Liansheng Road, Xiaqian Street, in this district, and subsequently returned illegal gains of 15,000 yuan to the public security organs. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Wu, Mou during the court trial, and were corroborated by evidence including photos of the gambling machines, a list of seized items, testimonies from witnesses Zhou, Guan, Yang, and Cao, identification records and photos, the arrest process, payment receipts, household registration certificates, administrative penalty decisions, search, and inspection records and photos, which are sufficient to confirm the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges: On July 15, 2014, at approximately 14:00, the defendants Liu and Zheng, along with Wang (to be dealt with in a separate case), went to apartment 306, Building 8, West, Shuanggou Community, Meiling Street, in a certain city. They broke in by picking the lock and stole from the victim, He Mouyi, 5,200 yuan, 400 Hong Kong dollars (converted to 317.368 yuan), a "HP" brand HP540 laptop valued at 733 yuan, an "Asus" brand EeePC100H laptop valued at 600 yuan, a "Nikon" brand D3100 DSLR camera valued at 3,137 yuan, a Xiuyu jade ring valued at 250 yuan, a 9K gold bracelet valued at 3,838 yuan, a jade necklace valued at 775 yuan, and a tablet, 3 jade pendants, 4 commemorative coins, 7 coins, a silver necklace, a silver ring, a tiger tooth, a safe, foreign currency, and other items (all of which could not be appraised). On July 23, 2014, defendants Liu and Zheng were apprehended by the public security organs in a rented house in Laicuo Community, Xiyuan Street, in a certain city. During the trial, the prosecution provided evidence including physical evidence, documentary evidence, witness testimonies, statements from the victim, identification records, expert opinions, and confessions from the defendants to substantiate the charges. Accordingly,


The People's Procuratorate in a certain area charged that during the period from August to September 2013, defendant Chen, without the permission of the registered trademark owner, commissioned defendant Dai to produce various models of wires bearing the counterfeit "Huiyang" registered trademark. These were intended for use in the water and electrical engineering project of the new building of the Fuzhou City Women and Children's Hospital. Defendant Dai, knowing that the "Huiyang" wires were the registered trademark of another entity, still arranged the production of models BV2.5, BV4.0, and BV6.0 as requested by defendant Chen. The total amount of counterfeit "Huiyang" trademarked wires amounted to RMB 134,890. Defendant Chen has paid RMB 119,680 to the account designated by defendant Dai, with the remaining RMB 15,210 yet to be paid. On September 16, 2013, the public security authorities seized a portion of the counterfeit "Huiyang" trademark wires at the warehouse on the construction site of the new building of the Fuzhou City Women and Children's Hospital. Defendants Chen and Dai surrendered to the public security authorities on September 16 and October 28, 2013, respectively. Regarding the criminal facts charged above, the public prosecution agency read and presented relevant evidence in court. Through evidence presentation,


The prosecution charges: At around 9 p.m. on January 8, 2019, the defendants Zhan, Tu, Liu, and Xia went to Happy Times KTV in Xia Lu District to sing. There, they encountered the victims Huang1, Mei, and others, who wanted to confront Tu. Huang1, Mei, and two others assaulted Tu, leading to a brawl in the lobby between the two parties. Subsequently, Zhan was displeased and left Happy Times KTV with Liu, Xia, and Tu to find ZhanA at Team 182 Geological Unit to get machetes. Unable to contact ZhanA, they bought three utility knives at a nearby convenience store. Meanwhile, Zhan contacted Lei (handled in another case) through Zhang (handled in another case), asking him to bring people with machetes to Happy Times KTV to seek revenge. Zhan and the other three then returned to Happy Times KTV, where they were discovered with utility knives by Mei’s friend Liu, who seized the knives and prevented any further action. Huang1 and the others then went to Granny Hao’s Potato Chip Shop at Team 182 Geological Unit for a late-night snack. During this time, Lei brought three people with four machetes and met with Zhan and the others. All eight of them took two taxis to Granny Hao’s Potato Chip Shop. Zhan, Lei, Tu, Liu, Xia, and others rushed into the shop wielding machetes and bricks, attacking Huang1, Mei, and others. Tu threw a brick, injuring Mei’s head. Due to someone calling the police, Zhan and the others fled the scene. According to the assessment, the injuries suffered by Huang1 and Mei were


After examination, it was found that on the evening of February 25, 2020, at around 8 PM, the defendant Zhang proposed and colluded with the defendant Liang to drive a tricycle to a village in a certain town of a certain county, which Zhang had previously reconnoitered. Defendant Zhang broke the lock on the front door of the villager He’s house, and together with defendant Liang, entered the courtyard. They found some woven bags and loaded corn cobs from He’s courtyard into them and then onto their vehicle. They then went to the nearby house of villager Gong, where defendant Zhang kicked open the door and entered the courtyard. The two defendants loaded the already bagged corn cobs onto the vehicle. That night, they took the corn back to Zhang’s house. After threshing, Zhang kept over 100 jin for himself and sold the remaining 2,105 jin to Wang, a pig farmer from the same village, at a price of 0.9 yuan per jin, earning 1,890 yuan. Defendant Zhang gave defendant Liang 800 yuan. According to the market price of 1 yuan per jin, the market value of the corn stolen by Zhang and Liang was approximately 2,205 yuan. After the crime was discovered, defendants Zhang and Liang truthfully confessed to their crime and obtained understanding by compensating the victims He and Gong for their losses.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charged that in May 2010, according to relevant regulations, the Education Bureau of Yongnian County, Hebei Province, conducted seismic reinforcement projects on the south and north teaching buildings and dormitory of the Fifth Middle School of Yongnian County, and signed a construction contract with Handan Chengming Construction and Installation Co., Ltd. The contract amount was 1,263,900 yuan. The project was jointly overseen by the defendant Li, who was then the principal of the Fifth Middle School, and the defendant Cui, who was the head of the Comprehensive School Construction Section of the County Education Bureau, responsible for the project progress and the review and payment of the project funds. During the construction, Chengming Company received two payments totaling 700,000 yuan in January and December 2011. In early January 2012, after colluding, the defendants had Li call the construction party's person in charge, Li Moujia, requesting a transfer of 250,000 yuan to a designated account. Li Moujia instructed Niu Moumou to transfer the funds as defendant Li requested, depositing them into the bank card of Cao Moumou, a teacher at the Fifth Middle School of Yongnian County, on January 4, 2012. Defendant Li then handed over 100,000 yuan to defendant Cui in two installments. Of the remaining 150,000 yuan, 141,000 yuan was used to pay for infrastructure projects related to the school's "campus culture construction" and some hospitality expenses, while the remaining 9,000 yuan was used for personal consumption. After receiving the 100,000 yuan, defendant Cui used 90,969 yuan to cover expenses related to his office and the remaining 9,031 yuan for personal consumption. After the case was solved, all the funds involved were fully recovered.


Upon examination, it was found that in early July 2014, Zheng A (handled in a separate case) and the defendant Liang among others discussed fishing in the waters near Guizhou Island in a certain city. On July 4th of the same year at 19:00, Zheng A piloted an unlicensed fiberglass boat with a gasoline engine, and together with the defendants Liang and Mo, brought oxygen pumps, batteries, electric fishing guns, and other electric fishing equipment, departing from Wailingding Island to the waters 100 meters east of Guizhou Island at the boundary within a certain area, during the fishing ban period. They were using prohibited tools and methods for electric fishing when they were caught by the duty officers of the Wanshan Detachment of the Zhuhai Branch of the Guangdong Fisheries Administration. On July 22, 2014, public security personnel arrested the defendants Mo and Liang on Wailingding Island in a certain city. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Liang and Mo during the trial, and were supported by the testimony of the witness Zheng, the arrest procedure, the seizure (detention) decision and list from the Guangdong Fisheries Administration Zhuhai Branch, records of confiscated items, statement of the circumstances surrounding the capture, on-site inspection records, explanatory notes, basic information on the resident population, photos of the scene and physical evidence, CDs, and other evidence sufficient to establish the case. The defense counsel, Huang, argued: defendant Mo was an accessory, employed for fishing, with minor social harm, and he had circumstances of voluntary surrender.


After trial, it was ascertained that at approximately 14:00 on January 16, 2016, defendants Wei and Lan, after premeditation, went to the section of Xinda Street in front of Xinlong Supermarket in a certain town and city to commit theft. They stole 800 RMB in cash and an "OPPO" R7S mobile phone valued at 2563 RMB from the pocket of the victim Zhang's jacket. On March 1, 2016, defendants Wei and Lan were apprehended by public security authorities in a certain district of a certain city in a certain province. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Wei and Lan during the trial. Additionally, these facts are supported by victim Zhang's statement, which was presented and cross-examined in court; documentary evidence of the arrest and case details; household registration certificates; the criminal judgment and release certificate; the administrative penalty decision; price appraisal report; identification records and photos; as well as surveillance video and screenshots, which are sufficient to confirm the facts.


The prosecution alleges: In early August 2018, defendants Zhang, Deng, and Liu conspired and agreed to jointly invest, with defendant Zhang providing personal information such as citizens' names and phone numbers purchased online. The three defendants then sold the information to others via QQ, WeChat, and other channels, and split the profits equally. In September 2018, defendants Zhang, Deng, and Liu sold a total of over 11,500 pieces of citizens' personal information to three individuals using this method, earning illegal profits totaling 11,525 RMB. The specific facts are as follows: 1. Between September 7 and 14, 2018, defendants Zhang, Deng, and Liu, through contact made by defendant Zhang, sold over 5,000 pieces of personal information to Fan, earning illegal profits of 3,225 RMB. 2. On September 8, 2018, defendants Zhang, Deng, and Liu, through contact made by defendant Liu, sold over 500 pieces of personal information to Xu, earning illegal profits of 1,500 RMB. 3. On September 11, 2018, defendants Zhang, Deng, and Liu, through contact made by defendant Deng, sold over 6,000 pieces of personal information to Cheng, earning illegal profits of 6,800 RMB. On September 18, 2018, defendants Deng and Liu were apprehended by the public security bureau in a city in a certain province; on September 29, 2018, defendant Zhang was apprehended in a city in another province. After being brought to justice, defendants Zhang, Deng, and Liu all truthfully confessed their crimes and each returned illegal gains of 4,525 RMB, 3,500 RMB, and 3,500 RMB respectively (all of which were temporarily confiscated by the police).


After trial, it was found that during the period from April to May 2014, the defendants Liu and Wang, operating in a purchasing station located near the Bally Community in Shenbei New District of a certain city, knowingly purchased stolen cables from Ma (handled in a separate case) and others. They acquired a total of approximately 249 kilograms of cables (valued at 13,000 RMB) on three separate occasions, which they then sold and squandered the proceeds. During the trial process, the defendants Liu and Wang jointly returned the stolen money, amounting to 13,000 RMB. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Liu and Wang during the court trial and were corroborated by the statement of the victim Ding, the testimonies of witnesses Ma, Sun, Si, and others, as well as by the identification records, price appraisal conclusion, basic information sheet, telephone inquiry records, case sources, and arrest procedures, which sufficiently confirm these findings.


The prosecution charges: 1. On the morning of July 23, 2013, defendants Liu and Li, along with Gong and Hu (both at large), went to the bus station in Dushan Port Town, Pinghu City. Defendants Liu, Gong, and Hu boarded a bus from Shanghai Petrochemical to a certain destination. Using the method of "Tibetan praying for children, Peruvian currency exchanging for RMB," they defrauded the victim Fan of 200 yuan in cash and a gold necklace worth 2,584 yuan, totaling 2,784 yuan. Defendant Li then drove them away to escape. After the incident, defendant Li compensated the victim Fan with 1,500 yuan in cash. 2. On the morning of August 4 of the same year, defendants Liu and Li, along with Gong and Hu, went to the bus station in Zhapu Town, Pinghu City, and used the same method to defraud the victim Zhang of 200 yuan in cash and a gold bracelet worth 7,334 yuan, totaling 7,534 yuan. The gold bracelet was later seized from defendant Liu's wife and returned to the victim. These facts were not disputed by the two defendants during the trial, and they were corroborated by the victim's statements, witness testimonies, identification records, seizure orders, lists of seized and returned items, receipts, the course of the incident, explanatory notes, previous criminal judgment documents, identification evidence, and other evidence, sufficient to establish the case.


After trial, it was found that from September 2013 to May 2014, defendants Chen and Liu collaborated to produce aluminum materials counterfeiting the "Zhensheng" trademark. Chen provided the venue and was responsible for processing and production, while Liu provided the processing tools and technical guidance. They used a coding machine and film with the words "Zhensheng Aluminum" printed on it to process aluminum profiles from other brands, such as Yue Mou, into aluminum materials counterfeiting the "Zhensheng" trademark. These were sold at a price of 23-24 yuan per kilogram to individuals including Liu A and Chen A, with a total sales volume of 2865.2 kilograms, amounting to sales worth 66,841 yuan. After evaluation, the trademark logo on the surface protective film of the aluminum alloy profiles produced and sold by Chen and Liu was found to be identical to the registered "Zhensheng" trademark. After the case was uncovered, defendants Chen and Liu were apprehended by the public security authorities. Defendant Liu compensated Changsha New Zhensheng Group Co., Ltd. with 70,000 yuan, and the company expressed that it would not pursue Liu's civil legal responsibility. The public security authorities have recovered 40,000 yuan of illegal proceeds from defendant Chen. The above facts were not contested by defendants Chen and Liu during the court hearing, and were confirmed by the testimonies of witnesses Yi, Tang B, Zheng, Yang, Wang, Liu A, Chen A, Xie, and Tang A; the forensic identification report issued by the Judicial Identification Center of Hunan University (Hu Da Si Jian Center [2014] Zhi Jian Zi No. 10); the compensation agreement and statement of understanding; the notice of recovery of illegal income; a general payment book for non-tax revenue of a certain province; household registration data; and an explanation of the apprehension situation, all of which were sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of Sanjiang Dong Autonomous County of a certain district of the Zhuang ethnic group accused that on December 7, 2018, Zhao and the defendant Rong had a verbal altercation over trivial matters under the "Burgerism" building next to Doye Square in Sanjiang Dong Autonomous County, leading to lingering resentment between the two parties. On the night of December 8 until around 2:00 am on December 9, Zhao contacted the defendant Cao through the defendant Li, asking Cao to inform Rong to come to Doye Square in the county, as Zhao wanted to apologize to Rong. During this period, Zhao invited Xiao, Yang, and the defendants Wei, Li, and Yao, among others, to wait with weapons for Rong at Gulouping in Doye Square. Rong and Cao went to the appointment together, and on the way, Rong contacted other helpers. At about 2:40 am on the 9th, a fight broke out after both parties met, and Rong was injured. At 2:49 am, after Cao and Rong were beaten, Cao called Cao 1, asking Cao 1 to call others for help in the fight. To prove the facts of the above accusation, the public prosecutor read and presented the following evidence in court: 1. physical evidence; 2. documentary evidence; 3. witness testimonies; 4. the defendants' confessions and defenses; 5. expert opinions; 6. records of inspections, examinations, and identifications; 7. audiovisual materials and electronic data.


Upon trial, it was ascertained that at approximately 9 PM on December 2, 2013, individual drivers Wang and Hou, who were registered guests at the "Tianyuan Inn" operated by defendant Xiang on Yangguang Avenue, Yangluo Street, Xinzhou District of a certain city, requested sexual services from defendant Xiang. Defendant Xiang then called defendant Zhang to arrange for sex workers. Defendant Zhang organized for Zhong and Liu, sex workers from his "Maple Leaf Leisure Club" on Yangluo Street, to provide sexual services at the "Tianyuan Inn." After Zhong and Liu arrived at the "Tianyuan Inn," defendant Xiang collected a prostitution fee of 100 RMB each from Wang and Hou, and then arranged for Zhong and Liu to go to rooms 203 and 212 of the "Tianyuan Inn" to engage in sexual activities with Hou and Wang, respectively. Subsequently, the public security officers inspected the "Tianyuan Inn" and apprehended Zhong, Liu, Hou, and Wang (all of whom were administratively detained for three days). On December 5, 2013, the public security bureau criminally detained defendants Xiang and Zhang. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants during the trial proceedings and were confirmed by testimonies from witnesses Zhong, Liu, Hou, and Wang, alongside photographic evidence from the site of the prostitution offense, identification records, written evidence including the administrative penalty decision, resident information forms, and records of how the case was handled, all of which are sufficient to make a determination.


The prosecution alleged: Since October 2013, the defendants Zhao and Gan rotated running gambling dens at locations such as a farm tool factory on a certain street in the district, a private house on another street, a village on another street in "Donghu Xingyuan," gathering multiple people to gamble using the "Jie Pizi" method. Defendant Zhao was responsible for finding gambling locations, notifying participants of the gambling time and place, arranging gambling tools, and collecting gambling commissions. Defendant Gan invited others to gamble, stood guard outside the gambling den to prevent police raids, and received payment for his services. In the early morning hours of November 5 that same year, around 1 am, police inspected the "Donghu Xinyuan" community in a certain village in the district and uncovered the gambling den, arresting defendants Zhao, Gan, and 22 other participants including Liu and Xu, and seized gambling funds totaling 13,500 RMB along with two decks of playing cards on site. The facts mentioned above were not disputed by defendants Zhao and Gan during the trial, and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Liu, Xu, Wan, and Chen, physical evidence (photographs), evidence preservation decisions and lists, lists of seized items, administrative penalty decisions, household registration information, and records of the case, which are sufficient to confirm the allegations.


The prosecution agency alleges that on the evening of December 19, 2014, defendants Hu and Tang conspired in advance and went together to a small shop in a certain town in a certain city. Defendant Tang acted as a lookout outside the shop, while defendant Hu entered the shop and attempted to rob the victim, Xu, of his possessions using methods such as covering his mouth and threatening with scissors. However, due to the victim Xu's resistance, the robbery was unsuccessful. The above facts were uncontested by defendants Hu and Tang during the trial process and are corroborated by evidence including the victim Xu's statement, identification records and photos, inventory lists and photos, site investigation records and photos, arrest documentation, and proof of residency, which are sufficient for confirmation.


The People's Procuratorate in a certain area charges that: At around 9 a.m. on September 5, 2015, defendants Yi, Luo, and Zhu cooperated and coordinated in front of No. 84, Justice Road in this city, under the pretense of splitting money picked up with the victim Zhou Moumou, they deceived the victim Zhou Moumou out of 90 RMB in cash, a mobile phone (unable to appraise due to incomplete appraisal factors), and 23,300 RMB in cash from a bank card, after which they absconded with the proceeds, dividing and squandering them. At around 10 a.m. on September 9, 2015, defendants Yi, Luo, and Zhu worked together on the sidewalk opposite the "Kunming Maternal and Child Health Center" on Huan Cheng West Road in this city, using the pretense of splitting money picked up with the victim Wu Moumou, they defrauded Wu Moumou of 300 RMB in cash, a mobile phone (valued at 3,090 RMB after appraisal), and 3,000 RMB in cash from a bank card, and then absconded with the proceeds, dividing and squandering them. At around 9 a.m. on September 16, 2015, defendants Yi, Luo, and Zhu again worked together on the sidewalk opposite the "Kunming Maternal and Child Health Center" on Huan Cheng West Road in this city, under the pretense of splitting money picked up with the victim Yang Moumou, they defrauded Yang Moumou of 100 RMB in cash and 30,000 RMB in cash from a bank card, and then absconded with the proceeds, dividing and squandering them. Defendants Yi, Luo, and Zhu were apprehended by the public security organs on September 16, 2015, and a portion of the stolen money was recovered and returned to the victims.


The prosecution alleges that defendant Wei operated a small loan company in a certain town in a certain county and had previously lent money to Zhang Yi and Zhang Jia, who later failed to repay the loans on time. On the afternoon of January 9, 2015, Wei again attempted to collect the debt from Zhang Yi without success and then instructed defendant Zheng and "Xu" (details not clear, now at large) to go to the vicinity of Ganma Bridge in the district of a certain city, where they pulled Zhang Yi, who was waiting there, into a yellow Volvo S60 driven by Zheng. "Xu" drove Zhang's Dongfeng Xiaokang van, and they took him back to Dengxu Hotel in a certain town of a certain county, checking into room 5519, where Gao and "Xu" kept watch over him. On the afternoon of January 10, Wei, along with Zheng, Gao, and "Xuan", escorted Zhang Yi to a village in a certain town of a certain county, forced the indebted Zhang Jia into the car, detained them both in room 5519 at Dengxu Hotel, and coerced them to repay the money. Around 9 a.m. on January 11, Guo and "Pang" (identity not determined) joined in, repeatedly threatening and beating the two in the room. In the afternoon, Wei moved the victims to room 5505. On the morning of January 12, Wei went again to room 5505 at Dengxu Hotel to continue demanding repayment from Zhang Jia and Zhang Yi without success. After leaving, he instructed Guo and "Pang" to beat Zhang Jia, causing injury. Afterwards, "Pang" and Guo took Zhang Jia to the hospital for a medi


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: In the early hours of December 19, 2013, defendants Liu and Wang went to the courtyard near No. 239, Yangjia Village, Danxi Street, Xiangshan County and stole an electric bicycle of the Green Flag brand, valued at 1570 RMB, belonging to Ge, by using a method of pushing and connecting wires to start it. Later, defendants Liu and Wang drove the electric bicycle to the intersection of Jingnan Street and Xinfeng Road, Danxi Street, Xiangshan County, where they were discovered and apprehended by patrolling police officers. A screwdriver, used as a tool for committing the crime, was found on defendant Liu. The electric bicycle has been recovered and returned to Ge. After being brought to justice, defendants Liu and Wang truthfully confessed their crime. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Liu and Wang during the trial, and are confirmed by evidence including the victim Ge's statement, photos of the crime scene identification, recognition records, site records, vehicle photos, crime tool photos, evidence preservation decision, evidence preservation list, special receipt for temporarily detained items, return list, telephone contact records, electric bicycle certificate of conformity, price appraisal conclusion by Xiangshan County Price Certification Center, statement of arrest circumstances, criminal judgment, certificate of release after serving sentence, and household registration proof, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.


The prosecution alleges that around June 2018, the defendant Chen obtained the necessary equipment and accounts for setting up the gambling website game3799 from "Ajun" (at large), including computers, mobile phones, wireless WiFi, QQ accounts, bank cards, etc. Chen acted as an agent for the gambling website and operated it by providing exchange services between virtual gold beans and RMB to gamblers. From July 2018 to March 2019, the defendant Chen exchanged and collected gambling funds totaling RMB 5.27785 million through WeChat, Alipay, and bank transfers. On May 21, 2019, Chen voluntarily surrendered to the authorities, truthfully confessed his crimes, and handed over ill-gotten gains amounting to RMB 550,000.

Between July 2018 and March 2019, the defendant Zhou, knowing that Chen was operating the game3799 gambling website, assisted by providing exchange services between virtual gold beans and RMB to gamblers on the website. Zhou also assisted Chen in recruiting customer service personnel to provide such exchange services for the gambling website. Between July and August 2018, Zhou directly participated in exchanging and collecting gambling funds, totaling over RMB 500,000. From August 2018 to March 2019, Zhou helped Chen recruit Wu (at large) and "Little Ghost" (at large) to exchange gold beans and cash for the gambling website, totaling over RMB 5 million. From February to March 2019, Zhou helped Chen withdraw gambling funds from the bank in cash seven times, which were all handed over to Chen to purchase virtual gold beans for the gambling website, totaling over RMB 429,800.

From August 2018 to March 2019, the defendant Yang, knowing that Chen was operating the game3799 gambling website, helped him unfreeze WeChat, Alipay, and other accounts used to collect gambling website funds. Yang helped Chen withdraw gambling funds from the bank in cash 42 times, all of which were handed over to Chen to purchase virtual gold beans for the gambling website, totaling RMB 2.43828 million. From December 2018 to March 2019, Yang also helped Chen recruit Chen1 (at large) to exchange gold beans and cash for the gambling website.

To substantiate the aforementioned charges, the prosecution read out and presented relevant documentary evidence, witness testimonies, and the confessions and defenses of the defendants Chen, Zhou, and Yang in court.


A certain local People's Procuratorate charged that the defendant company Qing Company Limited mainly engages in the agency import trade of frozen goods. Since 2012, "Miss Cao" from Hong Kong Jin X Food Trading Company introduced clients for the agency import of frozen goods to Qing Company. Qing Company paid Miss Cao an introduction fee of 1,000 RMB for each batch of frozen goods. Later, at the request of Miss Cao and the clients she introduced, Qing Company underreported prices and acted as an agent to import a total of 44 batches of frozen goods. The specific method was: when Miss Cao or her introduced clients requested Qing Company to underreport the prices of frozen goods, they would directly instruct the defendant Zou with a price to underreport or ask Zou to determine the lowest price that could pass customs, after which Zou instructed the defendant Luo to create fake contracts and invoices based on the determined lowest price to provide to the customs declaration company for customs declaration. After the goods cleared customs, Qing Company charged the clients a fixed agency fee. After calculation, Qing Company, by underreporting prices, evaded a total tax payable of 515,464.87 RMB for the imported frozen goods. To prove the factual basis of the charges, the prosecution presented evidence materials such as physical evidence, documentary evidence, confessions of the defendants, witness testimonies, and expert opinions.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charges: From January to July 2014, the defendant Guan organized defendants Lin and Xu and others in a certain county of a certain province, and established Runhe Trading Co., Ltd. in the county, with Lin serving as the company supervisor and Xu and others serving as telemarketers. They impersonated after-sales customer service personnel of products previously purchased by the victim and conducted "follow-up calls," falsely claiming that refunds and returns were possible but required reaching a certain spending amount. They fabricated reasons such as system malfunctions and the need for a security deposit to continually induce the victim to receive goods and make payments. Through this method, they defrauded the victim, Yang, of more than 25,000 RMB. Among them, defendant Guan was involved in defrauding more than 25,000 RMB, defendant Lin was involved in defrauding more than 23,000 RMB, and defendant Xu was involved in defrauding more than 24,000 RMB. After being apprehended, defendants Lin and Xu both truthfully confessed their crimes. To prove the facts of the charge, the prosecution presents evidence including the statement of the victim Yang, testimonies of witnesses Zhou and Pan among others, relevant identification transcripts, identification photos, photos of items involved in the case, and the confessions of the defendants.


The prosecution accused: In 2015, defendants Leng, Tian, and Song, taking advantage of their positions, illegally appropriated the company's funds for themselves. Leng obtained 964,000 yuan, Tian obtained 482,000 yuan, and Song obtained 500,000 yuan. The specific facts are as follows:

1. In January 2015, defendant Tian approached a certain joint-stock company on the grounds that a certain limited company (hereinafter referred to as Company 1) was experiencing financial difficulties. Using Company 1's security deposit at Company 2 as collateral, they borrowed 1.5 million yuan from Company 2, plus an overdue payment of 500,000 yuan from Company 2, totaling 2 million yuan. Leng, Tian, and Song later discussed discounting the 1.5 million yuan acceptance bill and recording the remaining 500,000 yuan in the company accounts. On January 19, according to Leng's arrangement, Song contacted Chen, who was engaged in discounting business locally, to discount the 2 million yuan acceptance bill. After verifying the authenticity of the bill, Chen deducted the discount fee and transferred 1.929 million yuan to Company 1’s corporate account that day. Song transferred 1.446 million yuan of this amount to Leng's personal account at China Construction Bank via online banking. Due to Song's brother urgently needing funds, Song transferred 482,000 yuan to his brother via online banking. The next day, Song's brother returned the 482,000 yuan to Company 1's corporate account. On February 27, Leng transferred 500,000 yuan to Song's China Construction Bank account (ending in 1100) and 482,000 yuan to Tian's account (ending in 9577) via online banking.

2. On January 9, 2015, defendant Song transferred 55,000 yuan from Company 1's account and 445,000 yuan from the legal representative Shen's account to Leng. Leng did not use these funds for the company's actual operations but instead created a false voucher for payment to a supplier on December 26, 2014, to offset the amount. On October 10, 2016, defendant Leng voluntarily went to the Huanggang Public Security Bureau to submit materials explaining the situation. On December 28, 2016, defendant Song, upon receiving notification, voluntarily reported to the Huanggang Public Security Bureau.


The prosecution alleged that on July 12, 2020, at approximately 1 a.m., defendants Chen and Liu were walking their dog and passed the non-motor vehicle parking area in front of the Bank of China on Hongmian Road, Putuo District, in this city. They discovered that a VISP brand road bicycle belonging to the victim, Lu, was distinctively shaped and unlocked. They proceeded to steal the bicycle and hid it in the garage of the residential community where defendant Chen lived. According to the valuation, the stolen VISP brand road bicycle was worth 1,500 RMB. On July 15, 2020, defendants Chen and Liu were apprehended by the police at XXX Room, XXX Lane, Baili Road, Putuo District, in this city. After being brought to justice, both defendants truthfully confessed to the aforementioned facts. The prosecution recommended that both defendants, Chen and Liu, be sentenced to four months of detention, suspended for four months, and fined 1,000 RMB. Both defendants had no objections to the alleged facts, charges, and sentencing recommendations, and they signed a confession. They also raised no objections during the court trial.


The prosecution alleges that on December 28, 2016, at about 2 a.m., the defendants Li and Shen went to a certain residential community on Huan Cheng Nan Road in Xishan District of a certain city. Using tools they had brought with them, they pried open and stole a white Taiyuan-brand electric bicycle parked under the building. As they were preparing to push the bicycle to the roadside to ride away, they noticed another red Tailing-brand electric bicycle parked under the building. They then used their lock-picking tools to attempt to pry open the front wheel lock of the Tailing electric bicycle but were unsuccessful. The two were about to push the pried-open white Taiyuan-brand electric bicycle towards the gate to leave when they were discovered by the security guard on duty, who reported the incident to the Yongchang Police Station. Officers arrived at the scene and apprehended the two individuals. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by the defendants Li and Shen, and they are corroborated by household registration certification and criminal record documents presented by the prosecution and verified by the court, as well as the apprehension process, defendants' confessions, victim statements, witness testimonies, identification records and photographs, on-site identification records and photographs, expert opinions, audiovisual materials, and documentary evidence, which are sufficient to establish the case. It was further determined that the involved Taiyuan-brand electric bicycle was valued at 3,364 RMB, and the involved Tailing-brand electric bicycle was valued at 3,102 RMB.


According to the trial, it was found that the defendant Zhou ran a noodle shop on a certain street in a certain town of a certain city, and employed the defendant Fang to process food such as chicken feet and duck heads. Since early 2015, the defendant Zhou purchased "poppy shell powder" from shop number 50 on the first floor of a vegetable market in the city, and, together with the defendant Fang, added the "poppy shell powder" to the soup of duck heads for sale. On October 19, 2015, this was uncovered by the Public Security Bureau of the city. According to the forensic identification center in Jinhua City, morphine was detected in the seized duck head soup from the Good Days Noodle Shop. The above facts were not contested by the defendants Zhou and Fang during the trial, and were confirmed by the testimonies of witnesses Cen and Zhao, the seizure list, statements of circumstances, physical evidence identification opinions, search records and photos, the process of how they were brought to justice, the confessions of the defendants Zhou and Fang, and their identity information, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution agency alleges: On the evening of September 11, 2012, around 21:00, defendant Tian had a conflict with the victim Zhu at the "Red Chrysanthemum" hair salon on Hecheng Street in a certain county, due to refusing a massage. This led to a physical altercation between the two. After being hit, Tian either himself or through others, called upon defendants Yang, Wu, Xiao, and others to help him fight. Later, Tian, along with knife-wielding Yang, first arrived at a location near the People's Court entrance in the county, where they encountered the victim Zhu and others. Defendant Tian, along with knife-wielding Yang, then attacked Zhu. Subsequently, defendants Xiao and Wu also arrived at the location. Defendant Wu took a kitchen knife from Xiao and attacked the victim Zhu, while defendant Xiao punched and kicked Zhu, causing injuries to Zhu's head, face, shoulder, and other areas. According to a forensic evaluation, Zhu's injuries were classified as minor. On November 19, 2013, defendant Tian was apprehended by the police in a certain county of a certain province. On January 12, 2014, defendant Wu voluntarily surrendered to the police at Xiushan County, in a certain city. On February 7, 2014, defendants Yang and Xiao voluntarily surrendered to the police at Xiushan County, in a certain city. After the incident, the family of defendant Tian reached a civil settlement with the victim Zhu and compensated for the financial losses. Victim Zhu expressed understanding towards the harmful actions of defendants Tian, Yang, Xiao, and Wu. These facts were not disputed by defendants Tian, Yang, Xiao, and Wu during the trial process, and there is evidence such as the defendants' household registration documents, investigation reports, arrest details, situation explanations, civil settlement agreement, payment receipts, letter of understanding, testimonies from witnesses Zhu, Wu, Dong, Li, and Ma, the victim Zhu's statement, confessions and defenses from defendants Tian, Yang, Xiao, and Wu, forensic identification report Qinggongwu Jian (2013) No. 365, inspection transcript Qinggong (Criminal) Kan (2012) No. 1205, scene diagram, scene photos, identification transcripts and photos, as well as surveillance video from the scene at the time of the incident, all proving sufficient for conviction.


A People's Procuratorate in a certain area charges: (1) In the early morning of June 1, 2013, the defendant Tang and Dai (already handled in a separate case), Yu (already handled in a separate case), Wang (already handled in a separate case), Hu Jia (already handled in a separate case), Li Moumou (already handled in a separate case), Pei (already handled in a separate case), and "Xiao Yong" (identity unknown, handled in a separate case) were drinking at a barbecue stall near the North Gate Bus Station in Hancheng. The victims, Sun Moumou, Zhu Moumou, and Hu Mou Yi, were initially playing cards at room 2005 of the Left Bank Business Hotel in the Binhe Community of Hancheng. Later, Sun Moumou called Tang, Pei, and Yu to join them for a card game. The defendant Tang and others did not go. While chatting at the drinking table, Tang and others expressed their dislike for Sun Moumou and others, stating that they would teach them a lesson (referring to physically assaulting Sun Moumou and oth


The prosecution alleges that in May and June 2011, the defendant Mo obtained a hunting rifle and a batch of bullets from his friend Wei, and later went hunting with the gun. On November 21, 2014, fearing detection by the public security authorities, Mo transferred the rifle and bullets to Liang's home for safekeeping. At around 18:00 on the same day, Liang brought the gun and bullets to Mo's home in the dormitory building of the telecommunications bureau in a certain city for hiding. After Mo learned that Liang had brought the gun and bullets, he discarded them near his home. On November 28, 2014, the public security authorities discovered the gun and bullets hidden under a pile of debris beside the west wall of a dormitory building in the courtyard of the Northwest Branch of China Telecom Yizhou Division on a certain road in a certain town in the city. According to the examination and appraisal by the Evidence Identification Institute of Hechi Public Security Bureau, the gun found in the pile of debris near Mo's home is a firearm as defined in the Firearms Management Law of the People's Republic of China.


After the trial, it was found that on the morning of April 16, 2014, defendants Wu, Jian, and Xie discovered the victim, Wang, on Jiangnan Avenue, near Bo'ao Primary School in a district of a certain city. Defendant Xie was responsible for keeping watch nearby. Defendant Wu rode ahead of Wang and intentionally dropped a bundle of cash (totaling 228 yuan) before leaving the scene. Defendant Jian then rode to the location, picked up the bundle of cash, and used the pretense of splitting the cash to lead victim Wang to a spot near the entrance of a leather industrial park in the same district. Defendant Wu then caught up with Jian and Wang on his bike, falsely claimed that someone saw Jian and Wang pick up the money he had dropped, and demanded to check Wang's bank account deposits.

Encouraged by defendant Jian, victim Wang went to a rural credit cooperative, withdrew 20,000 yuan in deposits, and, along with the cash he had on him and his ID card, handed it to defendant Wu for inspection. Defendant Wu took Wang's cash amounting to 20,013.2 yuan and the ID card and left under a false pretense. Defendant Jian then also left the scene, claiming he was going home to get money for Wu to check. Victim Wang soon realized he had been deceived and promptly reported the incident.

On the same day, public security personnel arrested defendants Wu, Jian, and Xie on Gangbao Street in the same district. Defendants Wu, Jian, and Xie confessed to the facts without disputing them. Following the incident, the police seized a bundle of cash totaling 228 yuan from defendant Xie and also seized the aforementioned 20,013.2 yuan in cash and the ID card from defendant Wu, which they returned to victim Wang.

These facts were undisputed by defendants Wu, Jian, and Xie during the trial proceedings and confirmed by several pieces of evidence, including written evidence from the process of arrest, household registration certificates, lists of seized items, restitution lists; victim Wang's statement; the statements of defendants Wu, Jian, and Xie; search records, identification records, site maps, identification photos; and video and audio materials, all sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain High-tech Industrial Development Zone charged that: 1. In the early hours of April 3, 2016, the defendants Shen and Ye stole two desktop computer hosts and two monitors from the "Mou Mou" barbershop in a certain community, in a certain town, district, and place. After selling the hosts and monitors for 600 yuan, Shen gave Ye 200 yuan as a share of the stolen money. 2. In the early morning of mid-April 2016, defendant Shen entered the "Mou Mou Industrial Company" at No. 40 Mianxing West Road, a certain town, district, and place, by climbing over a wall and stole a total of eight bottles of liquor, including "Maotai." 3. Around 1 a.m. on May 2, 2016, the defendants Shen and Ye entered the "Mou Mou Industrial Company" at No. 40 Mianxing West Road, a certain town, district, and place, by climbing over a wall and stole three desktop computer hosts, three monitors, and two bottles of "Fenggu Liquor King" liquor. After selling the aforementioned computers for 3200 yuan, Shen gave Ye 1500 yuan as a share of the stolen money. 4. In the early hours of May 26, 2016, the defendants Shen and Ye were at "Mou Mou Supermarket" at No. 8, South Section Torch West Street, a certain district, and place. Ye acted as a lookout outside the door while Shen squeezed through the door gap into the supermarket to steal cigarettes and more than 400 yuan in cash. After Ye sold the stolen cigarettes for 1040 yuan and gave the money to Shen, Shen gave Ye 300 yuan. On June 1, 2016, the public security authorities arrested Shen and Ye.


Upon examination, it was found that: On March 11, 2015, at around 8:00 PM, the defendants Xu and Yang, having premeditated beforehand, went to a small goods stall at a night market on a certain street in a certain city. While the victim, Song, was selecting goods, the defendant Yang acted as a lookout, and the defendant Xu stole a BBK vivo Y927 cellphone worth 1,250 RMB from the right pocket of the victim Song's clothing. They were later apprehended. The stolen phone has been returned to the victim. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Xu and Yang during the trial and are corroborated by the victim Song's statement, the testimonies of witnesses Han, Gong, and Wu, the appraisal report, the identification record, the seizure decision, the seizure list, the return list, the criminal judgment, the criminal ruling, the administrative penalty decision, the apprehension process, the confessions of defendants Xu and Yang, and their identification documents, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.


The prosecution charged that around 1 PM on August 28, 2014, the defendant Wang, at the city’s main bus terminal, under the pretext of taking the victims, brothers Zhang Jia and Zhang Yi, to the Mingguang Road bus station to catch a coach to a certain location, brought them to a black BYD car driven by the defendant Dan. The defendant Yang then got into the car and sat with the two victims in the back row. While the vehicle was in motion, the three defendants refused to let the victims get out of the car and verbally intimidated them, demanding that they pay the fare. The defendant Dan drove the vehicle to a location near the entrance of San Shi Tou toll booth of the expressway in the city and stopped. Victim Zhang Yi was forced to hand over 400 yuan. The defendants then continued to demand, claiming that each person needed to pay 400 yuan, which the victims refused. Subsequently, the three defendants let the victims out of the car and assaulted victim Zhang Yi, but to no avail as the victim had no money. Later, victim Zhang Jia knelt down and pleaded with the defendants for return fare, after which the three defendants threw down 200 yuan and left the scene. In regard to the aforementioned charges, the prosecution read and presented in court confessions from defendants Dan, Yang, and Wang; statements from victims Zhang Jia and Zhang Yi; testimonies from witnesses Lu and Fang; the report of the incident; the circumstances of the case; household registration information; scene investigation photos; site location maps; photos of the victims’ injuries.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged that in early July 2012, defendants Xu and Zhu, after prior discussion, gained the trust of Zhou Moumou under the pretense of "getting married and living together" and looked for an opportunity to defraud him of money. On July 8, 2012, defendant Zhu introduced defendant Xu to Zhou Moumou in a village within the economic development zone of the city, at Longwang Mountain Villa, and actively facilitated their acquaintance. After gaining Zhou Moumou's trust, Zhou Moumou gave 1,000 yuan to defendant Xu to buy clothes. Later, defendants Xu and Zhu, under the pretense of "renting a hotel to do business," fraudulently obtained a total of 30,000 yuan from Zhou Moumou. After the incident, defendant Xu voluntarily returned the 30,000 yuan of illicit money. Additionally, the victim Zhou Moumou forgave defendants Xu and Zhu. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Xu and Zhu during the trial process and are sufficiently corroborated by the victim Zhou Moumou’s statements, the evidence list obtained by the municipal public security bureau, receipts and a letter of forgiveness provided by the victim Zhou Moumou, as well as arrest records and household registration certificates and other evidence.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place alleged that at around 9 a.m. on September 27, 2017, the defendant Zhang received a call from his friend Huang, stating that some of the construction oil materials he had stored at the construction site of Commerce City in Luoying Town had been secretly taken away. Consequently, the defendant Zhang contacted the defendants Liu, Deng, and others to go to the site to handle the matter. During the process, Zhang's group and the victims Yang and Zhou 1 disagreed on the three loads of oil materials removed by the victims' side, leading to a physical altercation during which the defendants Zhang, Liu, and Deng injured the victims Yang and Zhou 1. According to an appraisal by the Evidence Identification Office of the Luojiang District Public Security Bureau in Deyang City, the victim Zhou 1 suffered a level 1 minor injury, and the victim Yang suffered a level 2 minor injury. After the fight, defendant Zhang voluntarily called the police, waited on-site for the officers, and truthfully confessed to his crime, which constitutes a voluntary surrender. Defendants Liu and Deng voluntarily turned themselves in to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed to their criminal conduct, also constituting a voluntary surrender. It was further found that after the incident, defendant Zhang compensated the victims Yang and Zhou 1 and obtained their forgiveness. During the trial, defendants Zhang, Liu, and Deng did not object to the facts, which were supported by the prosecution with evidence including the basic situations of the three defendants, basic information of the permanent residents, the process of bringing the defendants to justice, the confessions of the defendants Zhang, Liu, and Deng, the statements and identification records and photos of the victim Yang, the statements and identification records and photos of the victim Zhou 1, the testimonies of witnesses Tang, wi


Upon trial, it was found that on July 19, 2014, at around 8:00 PM, defendants Du and Wang, along with several fellow villagers from Guizhou (who are being handled in separate cases), were standing around reflective cones placed on the side of a main village road in Hongtangtou Village, in a town of a certain district, after drinking. When the victim, Huang Jia, was driving a van carrying Huang Bing (born on July 18, 1997), Huang Yi, Lin Yi, and Huang Ding past Du and Wang, someone kicked the car, causing Huang Jia to brake. Huang Yi, who was in the passenger seat, wanted to get out to check, but was beaten by Du, Wang, and others. Subsequently, Huang Bing, Huang Jia, Lin Yi, and Huang Ding got out of the car and were also beaten. Then Huang Yi and the others fought back, and both sides used reflective cones, water horses, chairs, bamboo sticks, and other items to hit each other. After the fight stopped, the injured Huang Jia used a bamboo stick to chase away defendant Du and others, while defendant Wang was caught and knocked to the ground by Huang Jia, Huang Bing, and others. After leaving the scene, defendant Du, along with a man in a white shirt, each holding a watermelon knife about 50 to 60 centimeters long, attempted to return to the scene of the fight, but were discovered by onlookers in a nearby alley. Huang Jia and others then arrived in the alley and captured Du, knocking him to the ground, while the man in the white shirt took the opportunity to escape with the knife. As Hua


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city's Huadu District charged that, starting from October 2013, the defendants Pang and He were employed one after the other at an unlicensed arcade located on the 4th floor of No. 1 Xiangxing Street, a certain town. During their employment at this arcade, despite knowing that the arcade provided the "Universal Shark Game Machine" for gambling purposes, defendant Pang was still responsible for the management and opening and closing of the arcade, while defendant He was responsible for adding credits and exchanging tokens. At around 15:40 on December 1, 2013, the public security authorities conducted an inspection of the aforementioned arcade and caught the two defendants and seven gambling participants on the spot, seizing two Universal Shark Game Machines.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality accused that, between March 23, 2020, and April 26, 2020, defendants Zhang and Qiao used a WeChat account with the nickname "A. Min XX" to post messages in several WeChat groups stating, "I work at a loan company and can arrange for loans that won't affect personal credit even if payments are made late." Upon seeing this information, the victim, Gao, contacted "A. Min XX" to apply for a loan. Zhang, in collusion with Qiao, defrauded Gao of 3,838 yuan under the pretense of requiring a deposit, personal information packaging fee, membership fee, and big data cleansing fee for an online loan. Subsequently, Qiao and Zhang used the 3,838 yuan collected for daily expenses. After the incident, Zhang and Qiao were summoned by police officers from the Zhaluteqi Public Security Bureau. The close relatives of the defendants have compensated the victim Gao for the economic loss of 3,900 yuan and obtained forgiveness. The defendants did not dispute these facts during the trial, and they were corroborated by materials from the police report, the case registration form, the decision to file a case, the apprehension report, the victim Gao's statement, the records and photos of seized and retrieved items, the WeChat transfer records, the confessions of defendants Zhang and Qiao, WeChat payment bills, and the letter of forgiveness, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Hangzhou City charges: On the morning of March 12, 2012, at about 9 AM, the defendant Fan, together with Wu (already sentenced), went to the blood test area of the People's Hospital in Danyang City, Jiangsu Province. Wu kept watch while the defendant Fan stole a Nokia 5320 mobile phone worth 304 RMB from the left pocket of the victim Jiang's coat. Subsequently, the defendant Fan, at the same location, also stole a Nokia X6 mobile phone worth 549 RMB from the victim Chen Jia's upper left coat pocket. On the morning of January 16, 2013, at about 9 AM, the defendants Fan and Hong opened the door and entered the temporary residence of the victim Chen Yi in a certain room of Shui Ying Yuan, Metropolitan Water Country, Xiangfu Street, in a district of this city. While stealing in the bedroom, they were discovered by the returning victim Chen Yi. The two defendants fled the scene; the defendant Fan was caught by the victim Chen Yi downstairs. On April 3, 2013, the public security authorities caught the defendant Hong in a certain county of a certain province. The above facts are not disputed by the defendants Fan and Hong during the court hearing. They are corroborated by reports, statements and identification transcripts from the victims Chen Yi, Jiang, and Chen Jia, police dispatch records, testimonies from witnesses Wu, Han, Mao, and Yan, inspection records of the crime scene, price appraisal opinions, seizure decision and inventory, bail decision and bail guarantee, request for arrest approval, criminal judgment, community correction guarantee, execution notice, release certificate, explanation letter, household registration certificates, details of capture, confessions and defenses of defendants Fan and Hong, and identification transcripts among other evidence, all sufficient to be confirmed.


The People's Procuratorate of Hanshan District, a city in Hebei Province, charged that at approximately 3 a.m. on June 13, 2012, defendant Liu, in collaboration with defendants Peng and Yang, was at the "Bokai Tobacco and Alcohol" shop located on a certain street in a certain district of the city. Defendants Peng and Yang acted as lookouts, while defendant Liu used a self-made "T" shaped screwdriver to pry open the shop's rolling door lock. The three entered the shop and stole over 800 yuan in cash and five cartons of cigarettes, valued at 680 yuan according to an appraisal. In the early hours of the following day, the three defendants were at the "Famous Tobacco and Alcohol" shop located at No. 161 Zhuhe Road in Hanshan District of the city. Defendants Peng and Yang acted as lookouts while defendant Liu used a self-made "T" shaped screwdriver to pry open the rolling door lock. While attempting to pry open the lock of the interior glass door, they were discovered and apprehended by patrolling police officers. After the case was solved, 196 yuan in cash and part of the stolen cigarettes were recovered and returned to the victim. It is requested that, according to Article x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, defendants Liu, Peng, and Yang be punished for x crime. It is recommended that the three defendants be sentenced to up to one year of imprisonment and be fined. The above facts were undisputed by defendants Liu, Peng, and Yang during the trial proceeding, and are substantiated by evidence such as the capture process, victim statements, identification records and photos, price appraisal conclusion, defendant confessions, household registration proof, and current performance.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charges that on the evening of March 1, 2014, at about 10 PM, the defendant Guo, due to a debt dispute with the victim Wang Mouyi, brought the defendant Du to the office of Wang Mouyi on the second floor of Huashang Daai Investment Company on Hongqi North Road in a certain county. Upon meeting, Guo and Du had a conflict with Wang Mouyi. Both defendants jointly assaulted Wang Mouyi, during which Du stabbed Wang Mouyi with a knife. During the assault, Wang Mouyi also suffered a head injury. Forensic examination determined that Wang Mouyi's injuries were all classified as second-degree serious injuries. The public prosecution authorities presented relevant evidence in court, considering the actions of the defendants Du and Guo to constitute the crime of x, and requested the court to sentence them according to law. After the trial, it was found that on the evening of March 1, 2014, at about 10 PM, the defendant Guo, due to a debt dispute with the victim Wang Mouyi, brought the defendant Du to the office of Wang Mouyi on the second floor of Huashang Daai Investment Company on Hongqi North Road in a certain county. Upon meeting, Guo and Du had a conflict with Wang Mouyi. Both defendants jointly assaulted Wang Mouyi, during which Du stabbed Wang Mouyi with a knife. During the assault, Wang Mouyi also suffered a head injury. Forensic examination determined that Wang Mouyi's injuries were all classified as second-degree serious injuries, resulting in two instances of level-nine disability and one instance of level-ten disability. The defendant Guo and Wang Mouyi have reached a civil compensation agreement, and the victim Wang Mouyi has expressed understanding of the actions of Guo and Du, requesting leniency in their punishment. The above facts are confirmed by the following evidence examined and cross-examined in court, which is recognized by this court: 1. The confessions and defense statements of the defendants Du and Guo. 2. The statement of the victim Wang Mouyi. 3. Testimonies of witnesses Wang Moujia, Liu Moumou, and others. 4. Forensic examination opinion. 5. On-site inspection records. 6. Documentary evidence. 7. Audiovisual materials.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that at around 10 a.m. on October 8, 2015, defendants Deng and Li, together with Deng and Wang, rode two motorcycles separately from a certain city, through a certain place, to a certain town to commit theft. At around 10 a.m. on October 9, Deng, together with Li, and Deng, together with Wang, went their separate ways in a certain city to look for opportunities to commit crimes. Deng and Li pretended to buy beauty products at the Jieyanfang Beauty Salon on Minsheng Road in a certain town. Li was responsible for diverting Huang's attention, while Deng stole Huang's Apple 6 Plus touchscreen phone from the sterilizer in the store. After committing the crime, Deng and the others immediately rode their motorcycles to a certain city. That evening, Deng sold the stolen phone for 2,000 yuan, and Li received 600 yuan. According to the price assessment by the price department, Huang's stolen Apple 6 Plus phone was valued at 4,621 yuan. To substantiate the above charges, the public prosecution agency presented evidence materials to the court, including documentary evidence, witness testimony, victim statements, defendants' confessions and defenses, expert opinion, and identification records.


According to the charges by a local People's Procuratorate, at around 22:00 on April 3, 2016, the defendant Li, due to a debt dispute with Li A, invited defendant Zheng and Liu (at large) along with others to a roadside outside a village in Yunnan Province. Defendant Zheng, Liu (at large) and others damaged the vehicle driven by the victims Li Jia, Yu, and Yan, who were taking Li A home. According to the appraisal, the value of the damaged property totaled 20,285 yuan.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county in the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region charged: In January 2015, the defendant Wang purchased two Toona ciliata trees located in the Luobeitun Yao Mountain Slope (place name), a field of villager Li at a certain village, a certain township, a certain county, for 300 yuan. Wang later asked the defendant Huang for help in cutting the trees. Huang then hired someone to cut down the Toona ciliata trees that Wang had purchased. According to the appraisal, the standing timber volume of the felled Toona ciliata trees was 3.162 cubic meters. On May 4, 2015, they turned themselves in to the public security organs. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Wang and Huang during the trial, and there are sufficient evidences such as the "Case Acceptance Registration Form," "Seizure List," "Account of the Case," "Appraisal Report," "Household Registration Certificate," confessions of defendants Wang and Huang, testimonies of witnesses Nong (first witness), Nong (second witness), and Li, "On-site Identification Record," "Site Inspection Record," and "Criminal Photographs," which are sufficient to establish the facts. During the trial, defendants Wang and Huang did not submit any relevant evidence to the court.


The People's Procuratorate of Chengzhong District, a certain city, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, charges: At around 17:00 on January 16, 2016, after premeditation, the defendants Zhao and Chen went to the front of the "Fashion Love" clothing store D012 on Longcheng Road Underground Street in a certain city, Chengzhong District. Defendant Chen acted as a lookout while defendant Zhao stole a Xiaomi brand mobile phone from the pocket of the victim Wang's clothing. According to the evaluation by the city's Price Certification Center, the phone was valued at 700 RMB. When defendants Zhao and Chen carried the stolen phone to the intersection of Jiefang South Road and Jinyu Lane in the city's Chengzhong District, they were apprehended by the police. The police lawfully confiscated the stolen phone and returned it to the victim. The actions of defendants Zhao and Chen constitute the crime of theft, and this court is requested to punish them according to the law. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhao and Chen during the court hearing, and were corroborated by the testimony of the victim Wang, on-site identification records and photos, inventory list of seized and returned items, price appraisal report and notification of appraisal opinion, criminal judgment and release certificate, records of the case, and household registration evidence, which are sufficient to substantiate the charges.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charged that at approximately 1:00 am on September 1, 2014, the defendant Xu, while intoxicated, had an altercation with the victim Lin B below the Biancheng Hotel in a town in Lianjiang County. Lin B later drove away. The defendants Liu, Xie, Xu, and others took a vehicle with license plate Min A××××× and passed near the Great Wall Building in a certain town. Xu saw Lin B park the car below Building No. 8 at the Great Wall in a town in Lianjiang County, Xu then got out of the car and started banging on the trunk of the car driven by Lin B, which led to a quarrel and physical fight between the two. Liu and Xie, seeing the situation, stepped forward to help out of loyalty to a friend. Xie hugged Lin B from behind, and both Xu and Liu came forward using their fists and feet to beat Lin B, and struck the victim with beer bottles, causing multiple injuries to Lin B's body. According to the forensic evaluation by the Public Security Bureau of Lianjiang County, Lin B's injuries were classified as minor injuries of the second degree. On September 23, 2014, defendants Xu, Liu, and Xie compensated the victim with 70,000 RMB and gained the victim's understanding. On January 20, 2015, defendant Xu turned himself in to the Public Security Bureau of Lianjiang County. The trial established that after defendants Xu, Liu, and Xie attacked and injured victim Lin B, defendant Xie stepped forward to mediate and stopped defendant Xu from continuing to attack victim Lin B. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Xu, Liu, and Xie during the trial, and were corroborated by the mediation agreement, receipt, statement of repentance; testimonies from witnesses Huang, Lin A, and Wu; the victim Lin B's statement; injury identification; the crime scene inspection record; household registration certificates, and the account of the incident, which were sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution charges that the defendant Li colluded with the defendant Mo on May 27, 2013, at around 13:00, to carry custom-made tools to 51 Second Floor, a certain road in a certain town of a certain district in a certain city. Defendant Mo acted as a lookout while Defendant Li used the aforementioned custom-made tools to pry open the door lock and enter the house, from which they stole an assembled computer host and a Mitsubishi MITSUBISHI computer monitor (worth a total of 941 RMB) belonging to the victim, Tang. On the same day, after receiving a verbal summons from the public security bureau, defendants Li and Mo went to the public security bureau for questioning. Defendant Li truthfully confessed to his criminal acts when questioned by the public security bureau that day, while Defendant Mo only truthfully confessed to his criminal acts during the third interrogation by the public security bureau on May 28. After the incident, the public security bureau returned the stolen items to the victim Tang. The prosecution suggests that this court sentence Defendant Li to a term of imprisonment ranging from six to eight months and impose a fine; and that Defendant Mo be sentenced to a term of imprisonment ranging from seven to nine months and also be fined. The aforementioned facts are substantiated by evidence including site inspection records produced by the public security bureau, photos of the crime scene and goods involved, statements from the victim Tang, related identification records, the Suinan Price Authentication Center of a certain city and district's price assessment report (SuiNanJiaJian (Zang) (2013) No. 150) on the involved property, confessions of defendants Li and Mo at the public security bureau, a list of returned items issued by the public security bureau, and the account of their apprehension, all of which the defendants Li and Mo have confessed to and are sufficient to establish the facts.


Upon trial, it was found that from January 2013 to May of the same year, defendants Lin and Jin, for profit purposes, set up a QQ group on the internet. Gamblers contacted each other through this QQ group to gamble on the Game Tea House platform in the form of local Mahjong, Dou Shou, and Ludo, drawing 5% of the winnings as commission. Defendants Lin and Jin extracted over 6,000 yuan in commissions. From May to November 2013, defendants Lin and Zou, also for profit purposes, continued to gather gamblers through the same QQ group to gamble, taking 5% of the winnings as commission. Defendants Lin and Zou extracted over 8,000 yuan in commissions. It was further found, during the trial at this court, that all three defendants jointly returned 14,000 yuan in illicit gains. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Lin, Zou, and Jin during the court proceedings and were evidenced by witness testimonies from Wang, Zhao, Jiang, and Zhang; apprehension records; identification transcripts; search records; electronic evidence inspection records; lists of seizures; photos; bills; bank card transaction details; CDs; and household registration certificates, all sufficient to be validated.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accused: On December 22, 2015, at around 10 p.m., on the south side of a restaurant on Xiangshan Road, Xiangshan District, Huaibei City, defendants Zhang and Sun had a verbal altercation with the victim Song over trivial matters, which later escalated into a mutual fight. During the altercation, Sun and Song fell to the ground, resulting in injuries to Song's waist and injuries to Sun's lip and right shoulder. According to forensic identification, Song sustained a fracture of the left transverse process of the third lumbar vertebra due to trauma, categorized as a minor injury of the second degree. Sun sustained a fracture of the right clavicle due to trauma, also categorized as a minor injury of the second degree. On January 18, 2016, the close relatives of defendant Zhang and Sun reached a compensation agreement with the victim Song and obtained the victim's understanding. The prosecution read out and presented various pieces of evidence in court, including the household registration information of defendants Zhang and Sun, verification of the criminal records of the suspects, a site location diagram, site surveillance video and extraction production notes, forensic identification of bodily injuries, dispatch and arrest procedures, the reconciliation agreement, the letter of understanding and receipt, testimonies from witnesses Ji and Zhou, the statement of the victim Song, and the confessions and defenses of defendants Zhang and Sun.


The prosecution charges: Around 1 a.m. on April 15, 2015, defendant Qiu was driving a car with defendants Liu, Wu, and Liu Jia, Song (the latter two are being dealt with in a separate case) wandering around the city center near the Liujin Suiyue Teahouse, where they encountered Wang, a student from the city's Experimental High School, and Liu Yi. Qiu stopped Wang and used the excuse of Wang owing money as a reason to beat him. Liu, Wu, Liu Jia, and Song, upon seeing this, also began to punch and kick Wang. Subsequently, the defendants took Wang and Liu Yi to the Xiang Riverbank in the city, forcibly confiscated their phones, and found 200 yuan in cash on Wang. Qiu then returned Liu Yi's phone and let him go. Qiu instructed Wang to borrow money from his classmates at Experimental High School, but to no avail. Qiu and the others then took Wang near the Qianqiu School, where Qiu and Liu beat Wang, while Liu Jia recorded the incident using Wang's phone. Around 6 a.m. that morning, Qiu and the others finally let Wang go. Later, Qiu pawned Wang's Apple 5S phone, worth 3,704 yuan, at the Jinding Pawn Shop in the city for 800 yuan. The prosecution has submitted to the court evidence including the victim's statements, witness testimonies, and documentary evidence to charge defendants Qiu, Liu, and Wu with the crime of x.


The People's Procuratorate of New District, a certain city, accused the defendants Xing and Zhao. On September 22, 2020, the defendant Xing connected with a client, Yang, via WeChat and agreed on the prostitution fees. The defendant Zhao then introduced a sex worker, Chen A, to client Yang at XXX Sen Yi Hotel, Qianshao Road, Heqing Town, New District, a certain city, for prostitution activities. They illegally profited from this arrangement. On September 22, 2020, the defendant Xing connected with another client, Chen B, via WeChat and agreed on the prostitution fees. The defendant Zhao then introduced a sex worker, Li XX, for prostitution activities at XXX Room, XXX Lane, Miaochuan Road, Chuansha New Town, New District, a certain city, profiting illegally. On September 23 and 24, the defendants Xing and Zhao were arrested and subsequently truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal acts. The defendants Xing and Zhao raised no objections during the trial hearing. The facts were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Chen A, Yang, Li XX, and Chen B, and verified through identification records, seizure decision documents, seizure lists, WeChat and phone screenshots, administrative punishment decisions, basic information on permanent residents, case registration forms, the incident process descriptions, and the confessions and identification records of the defendants Xing and Zhao, providing sufficient evidence for the conviction.


The prosecution alleges that at around 2:00 PM on October 14, 2013, the defendant Sha invited the defendant Bei to stand lookout at the entrance of 434 Linxiang Road, Linxiang District, Lincang City. While the victim, Ding, was caught off guard, Sha took a 8.52-gram pure gold necklace from Ding's neck, valued at 2,385 yuan. After the incident, the necklace was recovered and returned to the victim. During the court proceedings, both defendants did not dispute the aforementioned facts, which are corroborated by the statements of victim Ding, the testimony of witness Xiong, and evidence provided by the public security organs including the case registration form, household registration verification, arrest report, arrival report, extraction record and photos, appraisal opinion notification, appraisal opinion notice transcript, identification record and photos, list of seized and returned items, inspection record and photos, as well as the price appraisal conclusion issued by the appraisal department, the inspection report, and the receipt for purchasing the gold necklace, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.