The public prosecution agency charges that on the night of February 14, 2020, the defendants Teng and Zhao, after premeditation, went to the vicinity of the Journey to the West Palace at Jiuli Subdistrict, Gulou District, Xuzhou City. Defendant Teng used a crowbar to open the victim Zhang's door, after which the two entered the house together to commit theft. They stole four bottles of liquor, two commemorative albums, a safe, a jade pumpkin, a Maitreya Buddha pendant, a gourd-shaped pendant, a piece of jade, a red circular pendant, two red bracelets, and other items. According to the appraisal, the stolen items were valued at a total of 640 yuan. On February 18, 2020, the defendants Teng and Zhao were arrested by the public security authorities. It was further found that two bottles of the stolen liquor, two commemorative albums, a safe, a jade pumpkin (glass material), a Maitreya Buddha pendant (jade material), a gourd-shaped pendant (agate material), a piece of jade (jade material), a red circular pendant (glass material), and two red bracelets (glass material) have all been recovered and returned to the victim. The two defendants have obtained the victim's understanding. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Teng and Zhao during the trial, and there are also statements from the victim Zhang; testimony from the witness Zhao; search warrant, search record, seizure decision, seizure record, seizure list and photos, return list; identification records and photos; the testing report from the Provincial Gold and Jewelry Testing Co., Ltd., price certification conclusion from the Gulou District Price Certification Center in Xuzhou City, proof; electronic evidence inspection record, extracted evidence list and photos; electronic data inspection record and disc, on-site inspection record; case registration form, case initiation decision, investigation and detection process and arrival process, explanation of circumstances, criminal judgment, release certificate, letter of understanding, and the defendants' household registration certificate and other evidence to prove, sufficient to establish the facts.


Upon examination, it was found that between July and September 2015, the defendants Liu and Wu, in order to obtain illegal profits, distributed obscene cards in Jiaxing City's Home Inn, Jinjiang Inn, and other hotels. These cards, distributed by defendant Wu, featured photos of scantily clad women and phrases like "Innocent Schoolgirl," "Housewife," "Youthful Girl," "High-end Model" along with contact numbers. Defendant Liu printed these obscene cards, answered calls from clients, negotiated projects and prices, and then notified the prostitute Yuan to engage in prostitution activities at the clients' hotels. The details are as follows:

1. On the night of July 28, 2015, they introduced the prostitute Yuan to Lu in room 8405 at Jiaxing City Jinjiang Inn (Train Station Branch) for prostitution activities.
2. In the early hours of August 9, 2015, they introduced the prostitute Yuan to Du in room 512 at Jiaxing City Baile Business Hotel for prostitution activities.
3. On the night of September 9, 2015, they introduced the prostitute Yuan to Huang in room 1312 at Home Inn Management Co., Jianguo Road Branch for prostitution activities.
4. In the early hours of September 13, 2015, they introduced the prostitute Yuan to Xuan in room 329 at Jiaxing City Heidelberg Fashion Hotel for prostitution activities.

After the incident, the police seized 5,194 obscene cards from the rented residence of defendants Liu and Wu. It was also found that after being brought to justice, defendants Liu and Wu truthfully confessed to the main criminal facts. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Liu and Wu during the court hearing, and were corroborated by the testimony of witnesses Yuan, Lu, Du, Huang, Xuan, Zhang, Chen, and Li, as well as the statements of defendants Liu and Wu during the investigation stage. Additional evidence includes search records and photos, a list of seized items, accommodation registration forms, surveillance videos and explanations, identification records and photos, detailed inquiries of mobile phone bills, an administrative penalty decision, household registration certificates, case arrival processes, among others, all of which are sufficient to substantiate the findings.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county in the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region charges: 1. On May 18, 2015, around 14:00, the defendant Yang, in collaboration with Liang (Yi), went to the entrance of the Big Banyan Tree Scenic Area in a certain town of the county with the intent to steal. They subsequently stole a wallet containing 240 yuan in cash, bank cards, identification documents, and other items from the backpack carried by the victim, You. 2. On August 31, 2015, around 13:00, the defendant Yang went to the Foreign Affairs Pier in Yangshuo Town of the county and stole a wallet containing 341.1 yuan in cash, bank cards, and other items from the victim, Guo. 3. On April 30, 2016, around 13:00, the defendants Yang, Xu, and Zheng (dealt with in a separate case) went to the section of Pantao Road Farmers' Market entrance in Yangshuo Town of the county and stole an iPhone 6 worth 3,330 yuan from the victim, Liang (Jia).


Upon trial, it was found that at around 5 p.m. on July 27, 2013, the defendants Yang, Hu, and Wu were very dissatisfied with Mr. Li, the person in charge of the Xianghu Long Island Apartment Project in Qixing Town, Nanhu District, who delayed paying wages of more than 12,000 yuan. In response, they used hammers to smash 26 gourd-shaped railings and 3 railing handrails outside Villa No. * of the Xianghu Long Island Apartment. According to appraisal, the value of the damaged property was 9,721 yuan. These facts were not disputed by the defendants Yang, Hu, and Wu during the trial and were corroborated by the statements of the victim, Mr. Li, witness testimony from Mr. Wen, site records, decisions on evidence preservation, lists, and photos, on-site investigation materials, explanatory notes, letter of understanding, price appraisal conclusion, household registration information, and details of their apprehension.


The People's Procuratorate in a certain location charged that the "Jinsha Entertainment" website was operating without the permission of any state department. It relied on the official lottery categories, results, and play methods, and independently operated lottery games such as 3D Welfare Lottery, Arrangement 3, and various local lotteries. The prize money of the winning results was higher than that of the official state lottery. In October 2014, Yan, who has already been sentenced, sought illegal profits by obtaining qualifications as the general agent and website administrator for a certain province and city on the "Jinsha Entertainment" website, obtaining a commission of 6% to 11% on the bet amount under his agency. Subsequently, Yan approached Huang and Tao to discuss jointly running the "illegal lottery" website, and Huang and Tao agreed. The three agreed that Yan and Huang would be responsible for placing bets on the "illegal lottery" website, while Tao would be responsible for answering phone calls from people purchasing "illegal lottery" tickets, recording the numbers, amounts, and sums of the bets. The three used a residence located at Unit 4, 3rd Floor, No. 4, Building 1, Fumin Community, Mingshan District, in a certain city as the place for selling "illegal lottery" tickets and began selling "illegal lottery" tickets in a certain city. By the time the case was uncovered, Yan, Huang, and Tao had sold "illegal lottery" tickets totaling over 1.24 million yuan and had illegally profited over 30,000 yuan. During the investigation, defendants Huang and Tao voluntarily surrendered to the Public Security Bureau in a certain province and city on April 25, 2016, and truthfully confessed to the criminal facts after arriving. The prosecuting authority provided corresponding evidence for the facts charged.


It was further found that on December 22, 2011, the Beilun Branch of the Industry and Commerce Bureau of a certain city inspected the actual business location of the defendant unit Yixin Company at No. 58, Jinji Road, Xiaogang Street, Beilun District, a certain city, and seized infringing products that had not been sold. On May 3, 2012, the case was transferred to the Economic Crime Investigation Unit of the Beilun Branch of the Public Security Bureau of the same city. After being notified by the police handling the case by phone, defendant Pan voluntarily surrendered on May 3, 2012, and defendant Wang voluntarily surrendered on May 11 of the same year, both truthfully confessing to the criminal facts. After the incident, the defendant unit Yixin Company has paid a fine of 60,000 yuan to the Beilun Branch of the Industry and Commerce Bureau and returned illegal gains of 31,340 yuan to this court. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by Wang A, the litigation representative of the defendant unit Yixin Company, and defendants Pan and Wang during the trial, and were proven by the transfer opinion letter and materials of the suspected criminal case from the Beilun Branch of the Industry and Commerce Bureau, on-site records, photos of the infringing products and anti-counterfeiting labels involved in the case, Yixin Company's statistics on operating fake Great Wall lubricating oil and inventory summary form, trademark registration certificate, approval certificate for trademark transfer, approval certificate for renewal registration, notice on recognizing the "Great Wall" trademark as a well-known trademark, on-site identification certificate, statement record of the arrest process, basic information of permanent residents, industry and commerce registration inquiry information, special receipt for collection of fines and confiscation payments from a certain province, settlement receipt and other evidence sufficient to establish the case.


Upon trial, it was found that in the early hours of February 15, 2015, defendants Li and Hou, along with six or seven others, left the "Jinsha Entertainment Club" in a certain county after consuming services there and attempted to take a taxi downstairs. As the taxi driver, He, deemed the vehicle overloaded and refused to start the car, Li and Hou got into an altercation with the driver, He. During this period, Li, Hou, and others assaulted the driver, He, resulting in He's hospitalization due to injuries. According to the evidence identification by the Nanchong City Public Security Bureau, He sustained a subarachnoid hemorrhage, classified as minor injury level two. After the incident, defendants Li and Hou compensated the victim, He, and received his understanding. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Li and Hou during the trial proceedings. Additionally, these are supported by evidence such as the criminal case registration form, incident statement, on-site inspection record, Nanchong City Public Security Bureau physical evidence appraisal document, letter of understanding, receipts, household registration information of the defendants, identification record, testimonies from witnesses Wu and Jing, the victim He's statement, and the confessions of defendants Li and Hou, which are sufficient to establish the case.


After a summary trial in criminal proceedings, it was found that on June 1, 2017, the defendants Ma and Tao encountered a fellow villager from the same village, Liu, at a noodle shop in a certain town of a certain district in a certain city of a certain province. The two falsely claimed that they could help Liu find a job but said that employment procedures were necessary. They used Liu's ID card and bank card to process installment loans for two mobile phones, with the monthly loan payments to be handled by Ma and Tao. Subsequently, through the contact and introduction of Ma2, Ma and Tao took Liu to the Woda Communications mobile phone store in a trade development district of a certain town in a certain district. Liu processed the installment loan procedures for two iPhone 7s, agreeing to repay 359.67 yuan per month for 15 months and 366 yuan per month for 18 months, respectively. After the successful processing, the total loan amount for the two phones was 8,000 yuan. The defendant Ma agreed with the phone store owner, Ma2, and others that after deducting commissions and other fees from the loan amount, Ma2 would transfer 4,720 yuan to Tao via WeChat, after which Ma, Tao, and others squandered the money. After the incident, the defendants Ma, Tao, and Ma2 compensated the victim for the loss, totaling 9,000 yuan, and gained the victim's understanding. The evidence substantiating the aforementioned criminal facts includes: 1. Documentary evidence such as the case source, the process of getting the defendants to appear in court, and the compensation agreement. 2. Testimonies from witnesses such as Liu2, Ma1, and others. 3. Statement from the victim Liu. 4. Confessions and defenses by the defendants. 5. Identification records.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: On December 15, 2016, this Court issued Civil Judgment No. (2016) Su 0707 Min Chu 7069, adjudicating that defendants Zhang and He, a married couple, should pay from the 1.61 million yuan death compensation of their son, Zhang C, the amounts of 271,280 yuan to Xiao, 381,280 yuan to Zhang A, and 381,280 yuan to Zhang B, with Zhang A's and Zhang B's portions to be held in custody by Xiao. After the judgment came into effect, defendants Zhang and He did not fulfill the legal obligations determined by the judgment. On June 15, 2017, this Court served an enforcement notice and a notice to declare property within a time limit to Zhang and He. During this period, the defendants Zhang and He transferred 1 million yuan to another person's bank card, withdrew it in cash to conceal it, and refused to comply with the obligations determined by the judgment. After the incident, defendants Zhang and He reached a settlement with the applicant for enforcement. After coming to light, defendants Zhang and He truthfully confessed to the criminal facts and pleaded guilty.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charges: On the morning of July 8, 2016, at approximately 3 a.m., the defendants Chen and Liu conspired and drove a white Chery car with the license plate Su G××××× to the Guanxi Resettlement Community in the port industry area of a certain county. There, they pried off five batteries from a red electric tricycle parked on the north side of the community, belonging to the victim, Sun. According to the price certification center of the county, the price of the five Yugang 6-DG-200 batteries was appraised at 2,400 yuan.


The People's Procuratorate in a certain locality charged that on May 31, 2014, at around 8 a.m., the defendants Zhang and Hao, in collusion with Xia (handled in a separate case) and others, after prior discussion, went to the Jiangshu Village Market in Qianqing Town, Keqiao District, Shaoxing City, and stole a wallet belonging to Zhang A, which was placed in the basket of an electric scooter. The wallet contained 4,100 yuan in cash and a "Samsung" mobile phone. According to the appraisal, the stolen phone was valued at 1,045 yuan. The defendants Zhang and Hao did not dispute these facts during the court proceedings, and these facts were corroborated by evidence such as the mobile phone invoice, the arrest record, the criminal judgment document, Xia's confession, Zhang A's statement, the price appraisal report, the identification transcripts by Zhang and Hao, and surveillance video, which are sufficient to establish the case.


The prosecution alleges that at around 20:00 on October 30, 2013, the defendant Zheng and the victim Liu Moujia had a dispute over billiard scoring at the billiard club on the fourth floor of the Xiangying Hotel in Nanzhuang Town, Chancheng District, Foshan City. Subsequently, the defendant Zheng, along with defendant Tu and Wang Moumou and "Qiang Moumou" (both handled in separate cases), used billiard cues and other tools to assault the victims Liu Moujia, Liu Mouyi, and Luo Mou in the billiard room. During this time, the defendant Zheng injured the left thigh of the victim Liu Moujia with a spring knife. According to forensic identification, the injuries to victims Liu Moujia and Liu Mouyi were classified as minor injuries, grade two. After the incident, the family of the defendant Tu apologized to the three victims and obtained their forgiveness. These facts were not disputed by the defendants Zheng and Tu during the trial, and are corroborated by the statements and identification r


The People's Procuratorate of Yuhang District in a certain city charges: From October 2014 to May 2015, the defendants Huang and Zhou purchased marketing QQ accounts, Haodi software, mobile phones, bank cards, and other items for fraud purposes. They posted fake “escort service” advertisements online via marketing QQ, scamming clients by collecting pre-paid service fees, safety deposits for the escorts, and vehicle insurance fees, amassing a total of over 100,000 RMB. During this period, in the early hours of February 10 of the same year, the victim Yang received the false escort advertisement from the defendants Huang and Zhou while chatting on QQ. The victim Yang subsequently contacted the defendants by phone and agreed on a price for the service. The defendants requested that Yang prepay a service fee of 500 RMB. Yang then transferred 500 RMB to the Agricultural Bank of China account designated by the defendant Huang, using an ATM of the said bank near a square in Liangzhu Street, Yuhang District, in a certain city. Subsequently, the defendants used the pretext of a safety deposit for the escort and requested that Yang transfer an additional 3000 RMB, promising the return of the deposit after the service. Yang transferred 3000 RMB to the same account. The defendants then demanded 5000 RMB for vehicle insurance, again promising a refund upon completion of the service, which Yang transferred to the same account. Ultimately, the defendants demanded an additional 3000 RMB for "lingerie expenses," at which point Yang realized he was being scammed and did not transfer more money. On May 19 of the same year, the police searched the residence of defendants Huang and Zhou, located in a certain group, certain village, certain town, certain city, and certain province, where they found nine mobile phones, ten bank cards, and one ASUS laptop (which had marketing QQ and Haodi software installed). The evidence for the charges includes household registration proof, bank transfer vouchers, a list of seized items with photos, bank transaction records, statements from the victim Yang, and confessions and defenses from the defendants Huang and Zhou, as well as ATM withdrawal surveillance footage (CD 1).


The public prosecution agency charges: In early December 2013, the defendant Li rented a property from Wang in Mopanzhang Street in our county to operate a chess and card club. Later, in early January 2014, Li placed a gambling machine (commonly known as a "little fish machine") that allowed six people to gamble simultaneously in the club. During the operation, Li had his daughter-in-law, the defendant Wang, responsible for business management. By January 21, 2014, when the police discovered the operation, they had illegally gained over 8,000 yuan. It was further discovered that defendant Wang surrendered to the Xinqiao Police Station of Guzhen County Public Security Bureau on January 24, 2014. Defendants Li and Wang returned the illegal gains of 8,000 yuan to the public security agency. The above facts were not disputed by the two defendants during the court hearing, and were confirmed by the testimony of witnesses such as Chen and others, site inspection records, site drawings, site photos produced by the Guzhen County Public Security Bureau, household registration proofs, the process of the incident and capture, the General Payment Certificate for Non-Tax Revenue of Anhui Provincial Government, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the case.


The prosecution alleges that in the early morning of March 30, 2016, the defendants Quan and Qian, in collaboration with "a certain individual" (handled in a separate case), conspired and went to *** Hotel on Yucai Road, Jiangnan Village, a town in a certain city. They used a method where Quan served as a lookout, Qian as an accomplice, and "the certain individual" climbed through a window to commit theft at the hotel. They stole from the victim, Li, one Lenovo G450 laptop valued at 500 RMB, one Apple iPhone 4s valued at 500 RMB, one Lenovo A380e mobile phone valued at 150 RMB, one carton of Hetianxia cigarettes valued at 1,000 RMB, two cartons of Zhonghua (soft pack) cigarettes valued at 1,400 RMB, and two packs of Zhonghua (hard pack) cigarettes valued at 90 RMB. On April 1, 2016, defendants Quan and Qian were apprehended by local police officers. Police seized a Lenovo phone from defendant Qian, which was then returned to the victim. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Quan and Qian during the court proceedings. These facts are supported by documentary evidence such as the "Capture Report" by the Municipal Public Security Bureau, seizure warrant, list of seized items, list of returned items, photographic explanations, criminal judgment, criminal records, population information, cigarette price certifications, witness testimony from Luo, statements from the victim Li, identification records and photographs, and price appraisal report, all sufficient to establish the case.


The prosecution alleges that at about 15:00 on November 28, 2013, the defendants Hu and Zhang beat the victim Zhou with wooden sticks in the Weiting Subdistrict of the Suzhou Industrial Park, causing minor injuries to his body. After being brought to justice, defendants Hu and Zhang both truthfully confessed to their crimes. The prosecutor read and presented in court the confession records of defendants Hu and Zhang, the statement records of the victim Zhou, the testimony records of witnesses Xie A, Bian, Wang, Xie B, and Pan, identification records, forensic examination report and notes, medical records, the process of arrest, the process of solving the case, the public security administrative penalty decision, household registration data, and other evidence.


The People's Procuratorate of Yunlong District in a certain city charged: In August 2012, Zhang, due to a contractual dispute with Liu, the manager of a certain engineering machinery company in the city, contacted Pan (already sentenced) through the introduction of Liu, requesting Pan to help him demand the remaining payment of the contract from Liu and promised to give Pan a reward of 20,000 RMB once the matter was accomplished. On the morning of August 7, 2012, Pan assembled defendants Liu, Hu, and others, and went with Zhang to the office of Liu at the aforementioned engineering machinery company near a driving school in the city to demand the remaining contract payment. The dispute between the parties was not resolved, and they left. On the afternoon of August 7, under the influence of alcohol, Pan again gathered defendants Liu, Hu, and others, plotting to use intimidation and beating to resolve the dispute over the unpaid contract balance owed to Zhang by Liu. Around 5 p.m. that day, Pan and defendants Liu, Hu, and others returned to Liu's office, assaulted the victim Liu, and vandalized items in the office, resulting in the victim Liu's right eye orbital medial wall fracture and multiple soft tissue contusions. The damage to some of the office supplies was appraised at a value of 8,858 RMB. On March 18, March 20, and March 26, 2014, defendants Hu and others voluntarily surrendered to the public security organs and truthfully confessed the criminal facts. During the court trial, defendants Liu, Hu, and others raised no objections to the above facts, which are supported by the victim Liu's statement, testimonies of witnesses Wang, Li, Zhang, and Liu, confessions of defendants Liu, Hu, and others, and co-defendant Pan, victim medical records, CT diagnosis reports, injury photos, receipts, crime scene photos, lists of damaged items, household registration certificates, the criminal judgment of the People's Court, labor education decision, price appraisal opinion by the Price Certification Center of Yunlong District, identification records, arrest process, and case-solving process, all sufficient to establish the charges.


The prosecution alleges: Li (already convicted) developed the idea of attacking the victim Sun as a form of venting anger because Sun had not repaid a debt. On December 29, 2014, at around 11 PM, Li learned from Ding that Sun was staying at the "Laurel" hotel in Zhoujiaba, Wanzhou District, Chongqing. Afterwards, Li invited the defendant He, and the two of them went to the Laurel hotel armed with knives. At the hotel, Li encountered the defendant Peng, who, upon learning of Li's intention to attack, proactively offered to help Li and also invited the defendant Wang and Wei (handled in a separate case) to assist. Li led Peng, He, Wang, Wei, and others into room 3018 of the Laurel hotel, armed with knives. He and Wang blocked the door with knives, while Li, Wei, and Peng injured Sun with their knives. An examination determined that Sun's injuries were classified as second-degree serious injury. The aforementioned facts,


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that on the morning of September 20, 2014, the defendants Jiang and Qin drove a small truck with the license plate number W10A3643 to the north street of Hecun Primary School in Hecun Town, Jiangshan City, to sell popcorn. At around 11 p.m. the following day, as the two were packing up to go home, they saw a black Yamaha two-wheeled electric bicycle parked not far away. They then loaded the electric bicycle onto the truck and stole it. That night, Jiang drove the truck to transport the stolen electric bicycle back to his home in a certain place to hide it. An appraisal determined that the electric bicycle was valued at 3,040 RMB.


The People's Procuratorate of Yuecheng District in a certain city accused defendants Xiao and Han, stating that starting in 2010, Xiao and Han conspired together, with defendant Han responsible for sourcing counterfeit "Zhang" trademark sword heads from others, and defendant Xiao responsible for selling these sword heads at a price of approximately 35 RMB per set, with total sales amounting to over 89,000 RMB. On May 6, 2013, defendant Xiao was apprehended by public security authorities in Room 601, Unit 1, Building 13, Lidou Huayuan, Baojiang New District of a certain city; on May 23 of the same month, defendant Han was apprehended by public security authorities at Xianhui Machinery Textile Factory, 388 Sujiayuan, Lianghui Town, a certain city in a certain province. During the trial of this case, defendants Xiao and Han each voluntarily paid 4,000 RMB to the court. The above facts were undisputed by defendants Xiao and Han during the trial, and were corroborated by testimonies from witnesses Zhang, Shen, Chen, Jiang, Wang, etc., as well as appraisal reports, business licenses, trademark registration certificates, the case investigation conclusion report from Huishan of Wuxi Administration for Industry and Commerce, bills, search records, lists of seized and transferred items, statements of arrest process, and household registration certificates, all of which were sufficient to establish the facts. The criminal judgment No. 335 (2005) issued by Changning District People’s Court and the certificate of release upon completion of sentence demonstrated defendant Xiao's criminal record.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: 1. On the evening of July 11, 2013, the defendants Wang and Liu conspired to go to a mining area in a certain city. Liu acted as a lookout while Wang used a pre-prepared screwdriver to pry open and steal a three-wheeler of the Wuxing brand, which was 85% new and valued at 14,968 RMB, belonging to the victim Zhao, which was parked near Building No. 2 in Shaliping. They later sold it for 5,000 RMB in a certain city of a certain place, and the illicit gains were shared and squandered by the two defendants. 2. On the evening of July 16, 2013, defendant Liu drove a black Hyundai car with the license plate Jin C×××××, accompanied by defendant Wang, to a certain village. Liu acted as a lookout inside the car while Wang used a pre-prepared homemade T-shaped tool to pry open and steal a three-wheeler of the Wuzheng brand, which was 80% new and valued at 18,400 RMB, belonging to the victim Chen, which was parked in front of the Zuoquan County Fireworks Company. They later sold it for 5,000 RMB in a certain city of a certain place, and the illicit gains were shared and squandered by the two defendants. In summary, defendants Wang and Liu committed theft twice, with the total value of the stolen goods amounting to 33,368 RMB. After the incident, the families of defendants Wang and Liu have provided civil compensation to the victims. In support of the above charges, the prosecution presents physical evidence, documentary evidence, victim statements, inspection and examination records, expert opinions, audiovisual materials, and the defendants' statements.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that at around 3 a.m. on December 28, 2013, the defendants Yin and Wu went to the back of the Lianglihua Leather Goods Factory in Qicaixin Village, Shiling Town, Huadu District, Guangzhou City. Suspecting that the victims Gao and Chen were involved in theft, they proceeded to physically assault the two victims using their fists and feet, resulting in multiple injuries to the victims' bodies. According to a forensic evaluation, the injuries sustained by victim Gao were classified as minor injuries, while the injuries to victim Chen were classified as minor scratches.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Yinchuan City charges that on February 3, 2016, around 12 PM, defendants Bai and Huang went to the Wanke Water Pump Store in the Great Wall Electromechanical Wholesale Market, located on Lijing South Street in a certain district of Yinchuan City. Taking advantage of the victim Yang's unawareness, they stole a Sheng某某 Elder head brand handbag (worth 800 yuan) belonging to him. The bag contained 5,823 yuan in cash and an electricity card. After the incident, the stolen property was recovered and returned.


The prosecution accuses: On August 18, 2015, around 23:00, defendant Yu (nickname "Fish Scale") had a dispute with the victim Wu on the phone over a debt issue. Subsequently, they agreed to meet at the county government square in Miaogao Street, Suichang County. Around 1:00 AM the next day, defendant Yu gathered defendant Bi (nickname "Little Monk"), Fu (born on April 23, 1998, handled in a separate case), and Qin (born on May 12, 1999, handled in a separate case) at the intersection of Kaien Road and Qingyun Road in Miaogao Street, Suichang County, to assault the victim Wu. (Among them, Fu used a retractable iron stick to assault Wu, while Yu, Bi, and Qin punched and kicked Wu), causing the victim Wu's rib fracture, head injury, and skin and soft tissue contusions and lacerations on his limbs. According to the forensic identification office of Suichang County Public Security Bureau, Wu's bodily injury was assessed as minor injury level two. On August 27, 2015, defendant Yu voluntarily surrendered to the public security organ and truthfully confessed the facts of his crime. On August 28, 2015, defendant Bi voluntarily surrendered to the public security organ and truthfully confessed the facts of his crime. On November 2, 2015, the families of Yu, Bi, Fu, and Qin compensated victim Wu for all his economic losses, including medical expenses, totaling 70,000 RMB, and on the same day, victim Wu issued an understanding letter, forgiving the actions of Yu, Bi, Fu, and Qin. During the trial, defendants Yu and Bi had no objections to the above facts, which were supported by the testimonies of witnesses Mao and Yan; the statement of victim Wu; the confessions and defenses of defendants Yu and Bi; the confessions and defenses of co-defendants Fu and Qin; hospital records, medical certificates; forensic human injury degree appraisal document No. 31, 2015, and appraisal opinion notice from the Suichang Public Security Bureau; agreement, receipt, understanding letter; site location map; evidence receipt list, surveillance video; case details; case handling explanation; the first transcripts made by defendants Yu and Bi at the public security organ; inquiry records; and household registration certificates of defendants Yu and Bi, which are sufficient to establish the case.


According to the prosecution's charges, at around 8 a.m. on May 3, 2015, the defendant Du, near the parking shed at the gate of Wugang No. 2 Hospital on a certain street in this district, used a lock-picking method to steal a Hairei brand TDR31Z electric bicycle with the license plate number H10595, which belonged to the victim Yu. The vehicle was valued at 950 RMB according to an appraisal. On May 26, 2015, at around 9 a.m., the defendant Du, together with the defendant Deng, at the entrance of the Village Committee of the Nuli Village on a certain street in this district, using the defendant Du's lock-picking method with defendant Deng acting as a lookout, stole a Xinlei brand TDR538Z electric bicycle with the license plate number H24021, which belonged to the victim Zhou. This vehicle was valued at 1,080 RMB according to an appraisal. Then, around 10 a.m. on the same day, the defendant Du, together with the defendant Deng, at the entrance of Lihong Supermarket of Wugang No. 2 Hospital on a certain street in this district, using the same method of Du picking the lock and Deng acting as a lookout, stole a Tailg brand TDR832Z electric bicycle with the license plate number H33953, which belonged to the victim Hu. According to an appraisal, this vehicle was valued at 1,150 RMB. On May 30, 2015, at around 8 a.m., the defendant Du, together with the defendant Deng, at the entrance of Lihong Supermarket of Wugang No. 2 Hospital on a certain street in this district, using the same method as before, stole a Shengbaolong brand TDR306Z electric bicycle with the license plate number QB1128, which belonged to the victim Liu, after which they were caught by police officers. The vehicle was valued at 1,200 RMB according to an appraisal. After the incident, the stolen items were all recovered and returned to the victims. In summary, the defendant Du committed theft 4 times, with a total theft value of 4,380 RMB, and the defendant Deng committed theft 3 times, with a total theft value of 3,430 RMB.


The prosecution authority charges: On the night of June 19, 2013, the defendant Li accepted a phone invitation from Huang to go with the defendants Sun and Niu to the entrance of Brothers BBQ on Xuehua Road in the Bangshan District to eat BBQ and drink with Huang and the victim Chen. At about 1:25 am on June 20, Sun and Chen got into a dispute due to drinking. Huang and Chen first started hitting Sun, after which Niu and Li joined in, and together with Sun, they fought against Huang and Chen. Li, Sun, and Niu repeatedly hit Chen’s head and body with iron stools, causing injuries to Chen. On July 15, 2013, the Judicial Appraisal Center of the Bengbu Public Security Bureau assessed that the injuries on Chen's facial wounds and head wounds were both minor. On July 16, 2013, the victim Chen reached a reconciliation agreement with the defendant Li, and after receiving a compensation payment of 20,000 yuan from Li, expressed forgiveness for Li's actions. On July 24 of the same year, the victim Chen reached a mediation agreement with the defendants Sun and Niu, and upon receiving a compensation payment of 65,000 yuan from Sun and Niu, expressed forgiveness for their actions. It was also found that on July 15, 2013, Li turned himself in at the Hongye Village Police Station of the Bengbu Public Security Bureau and truthfully confessed to his criminal behavior. On July 25, 2013, Niu turned himself in at the Hongye Village Police Station of the Bengbu Public Security Bureau and truthfully confessed to his criminal behavior. The aforementioned facts have been confirmed by the defendants Sun, Niu, and Li during the court trial without objection, and are supported by documentary evidence such as household registration certificates, arrest processes, execution notices, certificates of release from the Huaiyuan County Detention Center, hospitalization records, reconciliation agreements, mediation agreements, applications for forgiveness, receipts, forensic identification documents of human injury degrees, photos, and the victim Chen's statements, which are sufficient to establish the case.


Upon examination, it was found that in the early hours of December 30, 2014, and January 4, 2015, defendants Lai, Liu, and Guo conspired together and successively traveled to the intersection of Shenshi Avenue and Xiexu Line in a certain town of a certain city, and the following locations: downstairs of Dinsen Chess Club, in front of Dafang Traditional Restaurant on Tianshun Road, by the roadside of No.1 Jianshe Road in Xuxiang Community, in front of Yuefeng Ya Textile at Caojia Jiao in a certain village on Shenshi Avenue, in front of Debang Logistics Store at No.130 Wensheng Road in Shenshi, and in front of Haining Fengde Textile Co., Ltd. They used the method of smashing car side window glass to steal one handbag belonging to the victim Yang (containing 1800 yuan in cash, an ID card, bank cards, and other items), one in-car air purifier belonging to Gu Jia, and 25 yuan in cash from the victim Su, with a total value of 2065 yuan, causing a loss of 680 yuan for the car windows. Additionally, after destroying the car windows of victims Chen, Gu Yi, Xu, Jiang, Dong, Lu, and Mo, causing a loss of 2297 yuan, no valuables were stolen. After the incident, defendant Gu compensated the victims for their losses. The defendants Lai, Liu, and Guo did not dispute these facts during the trial proceedings, and the facts are corroborated by victim statements from Yang, Chen, Gu Yi, and others, on-site inspection records and photos, identification records and photos, price appraisal opinions, vehicle inquiry data, receipts, letters of forgiveness, capture process, criminal judgment documents, proof of release after serving sentence, and household registration certificates, which are sufficient to establish the case.


After trial, the findings confirmed: 1. On the morning of September 7, 2015, the defendant Ying facilitated Qian’s use of methamphetamine (commonly known as "ice") in room 7518 of a Sunday business hotel in a district of this city. 2. On the morning of September 8, 2015, the defendant Ying facilitated Qian’s use of methamphetamine in room 7518 of the same hotel. 3. On the morning of September 11, 2015, the defendant Qian facilitated Liu’s use of methamphetamine in room 7518 of the Sunday business hotel. 4. On the evening of September 11, 2015, the defendant Qian facilitated the use of methamphetamine by Ying and Liu, one after the other, in room 7518. 5. At noon on September 12, 2015, the defendant Qian facilitated the use of methamphetamine by Ying and Liu in room 7518. The above facts were undisputed by the defendants Ying and Qian during the trial. They were verified by the witness testimony of Liu, which was cross-examined in court, the confessions of Ying and Qian during the investigation phase, inspection certificates, inspection records and photos, the decision on evidence preservation, the evidence preservation list, the inventory of confiscated items, the list of retrieved evidence, the check-in registration form, the on-site test report, the records of the urine sample process, household registration information, and the account of how the case was handled, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People’s Procuratorate of a certain district in Guangzhou charged that from April 2013, the defendants Wang and Long, without obtaining an "Internet Cafe Business License," operated an internet cafe without authorization in an unlicensed residential building in a certain town of a certain district in the city. They were discovered on November 10 of the same year. According to statistics, from July 1, 2013, to November 10 of the same year, the internet cafe's cash income totaled 50,657.5 RMB. Based on the above facts,


The prosecution alleges that at around 22:00 on July 20, 2014, defendants Li, Sun A, Liu A (already sentenced) stole 47 pieces of raw shrimp (valued at 5904.6 yuan) from the workshop of Rizhao Jiashi Food Co., Ltd. in Donggang District, Rizhao City. During this time, Sun A and Liu A contacted defendants Sun and Liu to meet outside the company's courtyard and transport the stolen raw shrimp away for distribution. At around 03:00 on July 21, 2014, defendants Li, Sun A, and Liu A stole 3 pieces of raw shrimp (valued at 376.9 yuan) and 5 pieces of Ma from the workshop of Rizhao Jiashi Food Co., Ltd. in Donggang District, Rizhao City. The three defendants raised no objections to these facts during the trial, with evidence including household registration certificates, the testimony of witness Xiang, confessions and defenses of the defendants and co-defendants, price appraisal conclusions for the items involved from a certain province, and surveillance video recordings supporting the conviction. After the incident, the stolen items were recovered and returned to the victim unit, with the facts confirmed by the list of seized and returned items. Defendant Li was apprehended and brought to justice on July 21, 2014; defendants Liu and Sun were summoned to appear by the public security bureau via phone on July 21, 2014. After appearing, all three defendants truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. The arrest process corroborates these facts.


The prosecution accuses: On September 24, 2015, the victim, Liu Moujia, borrowed 100,000 RMB from a certain city's Investment Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as a certain company). On October 9, 2015, at around 10 p.m., the victim, Liu Moujia, was near Nanyou Building in a certain district of a certain city, preparing to borrow money from another company, when he was seen by an employee of a certain company, Yang Mou. Due to doubts about Liu Moujia's ability to repay, at about 11 p.m. that night, Yang Mou and the defendant Liu found Liu Moujia and demanded that Liu Moujia repay the loan to the company in advance. As Liu Moujia was unable to repay the debt, Liu detained Liu Moujia's car keys and ID card, and arranged for the defendants Li and Wang to be responsible for watching over Liu Moujia at the company, only allowing him to move within the company's premises. Forced by circumstances, Liu Moujia called his friend Kuang Moujun early in the morning of the 10th to come to the company and discuss raising funds to repay the debt, but Kuang Moujun was unable to raise the money. During this period, the victim Liu Moujia repeatedly requested to leave the company but was refused each time. It was not until around 3:30 p.m. on October 11, 2015, that Kuang Moujun, at the request of Liu Moujia, helped to call the police. Later, the police rescued Liu Moujia from Room 301, 3rd floor of a certain center on Dengliang Road in a certain district of a certain city, and arrested the defendants Liu, Li, and Wang.


Upon review, it was found that around 22:00 on October 12, 2015, defendant Song had an argument with victim Shi at the Crystal Room of the Fire Cicada KTV on Xiangyang North Street, Baoding City, due to trivial matters. Subsequently, defendants Song, Cui, and others engaged in a fight with victims Shi, Shi, Liu, and Liu, resulting in injuries to Shi, Shi, Liu, and Liu.

According to the Baoding City Forensic Appraisal Center:
1. Shi suffered a 1.5 cm scalp wound, a fracture of the left maxillary tuberosity, and body surface bruises covering an area of more than 15 square centimeters, classified as minor injuries.
2. Shi had scalp bruising, soft tissue injuries on the torso covering an area of more than 15 square centimeters, and a soft tissue wound on the limb over 1.0 cm, classified as minor injuries.
3. Liu sustained body surface bruises covering an area of more than 15.0 square centimeters, classified as minor injuries.
4. Liu suffered soft tissue bruises, and a laceration on the right little finger with a wound length of 2.5 cm, classified as minor injuries.

Additionally, it was found that the civil part of the case has been settled, with both defendants compensating the four victims a total of 25,000 RMB, receiving the victims’ understanding. The victims also suggested that the court give the defendants lenient punishment.

The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Song and Cui during the trial. They are corroborated by the statements of victims Shi, Shi, Liu, and Liu, testimonies of witnesses Di, Feng, and Tian, recognition records and photographs, forensic appraisal reports, and evidence from the arrest and investigation process, which are sufficient to confirm.


A People's Procuratorate in a certain location charges: 1. On July 23, 2019, the defendant Chen used social software to lure the victim Xing (a university student) to add his WeChat account and defrauded the victim of 11,777.76 RMB under the pretext of participating in a recharge rebate activity. 2. On August 11 of the same year, the defendants Chen and Zhang jointly used the above method to defraud victim Xue (a minor) of 6,500 RMB. After the incident, defendant Zhang's relatives compensated victim Xue with 6,500 RMB and obtained forgiveness. 3. On August 11 of the same year, defendant Zhang used the above method to defraud victim Sang of 3,888 RMB. After the incident, defendant Zhang's relatives compensated victim Sang with 3,888 RMB and obtained forgiveness. 4. On September 4 of the same year, defendant Zhang used the above method to defraud victim Ding1 (a university student) of 4,000 RMB. After the incident, defendant Zhang's relatives compensated victim Ding1 with 4,000 RMB and obtained forgiveness.


Upon trial, it was found that at around 2 a.m. on October 19, 2015, defendants Xu, Tian, Zhou, and He went to the temporary residence of the victim Yuan at No. 163 Wutian Avenue, Baixiang Village, Nanbaiyang Street, in a certain district of a certain city. There, they stole an Apple iPad tablet (appraised value 416 yuan) and an OPPO mobile phone (appraised value 273 yuan). The aforementioned facts are not disputed by defendants Xu, Tian, Zhou, and He during the court trial and are substantiated by the victim Yuan's statement, on-site inspection records and identification records, a list of seized items, a list of returned items, the price appraisal report, explanatory notes, surveillance video, household registration information, and the details of their apprehension, which are sufficient to confirm the facts.


Upon trial, it was found that on September 6, 2013, at approximately 1 a.m., defendant Weng had a verbal altercation with another person over a trivial matter at the Xuangang Restaurant, Shaojiadun Village, Huanzhu Street, in this city. Weng then gathered defendants Deng, Lu, and Tian to seek revenge at the same restaurant in Shaojiadun Village, Huanzhu Street, but failed. Subsequently, Weng, Deng, Lu, and Tian used slapping, smashing objects, and verbal threats to forcibly extort 4,500 RMB from the restaurant owner, Cheng. On the same day, defendant Deng called to persuade co-defendants Lu and Tian to surrender, after which Lu and Tian voluntarily turned themselves in to the police. After the incident, the family of defendant Weng fully compensated the victim Cheng for the stolen money. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Weng, Deng, Lu, and Tian during the court proceedings and are substantiated by: (1) demographic information, case registration form, criminal judgment, release certificate, outpatient medical records, CT diagnosis report, receipt copies; (2) statements from witnesses Qin, Yang, Peng, and others, as well as arrest and situation reports from police investigators; (3) statement from the victim Cheng; (4) confessions and defenses of defendants Weng, Deng, Lu, and Tian; (5) identification records, on-site investigation records, site maps, and photographs as evidence.


The prosecution charges that on August 2, 2015, at around 22:00, the defendants Wei and Li were riding an electric scooter near Dacheng Road in Sijiqing New Village, Congtai District of a certain city when they had a verbal altercation with Wang. The defendants Wei and Li injured Wang. According to the appraisal, the injury to the victim Wang was classified as minor injury of the second degree. After the incident, the two defendants voluntarily turned themselves in to the public security authorities and compensated the victim for economic losses, thereby obtaining understanding. The defendants did not contest the aforementioned facts during the court hearing, and these are corroborated by the victim's statement, witnesses' testimonies, the appraisal report, a reconciliation document, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution alleges: At around 1 a.m. on December 12, 2011, the victim Dong was shopping on Taobao when 116,230 RMB from his China Construction Bank online banking account was defrauded and all used to purchase China Unicom mobile recharge cards on the China Unicom website and then resold. Defendant Chen knowingly acquired 17,020 RMB worth of Unicom recharge cards obtained through online fraud by others and subsequently resold them to Xie. Defendant Xie also knowingly acquired and resold items obtained through online fraud, earning illicit funds totaling 16×××39.20 RMB. On January 15, 2013, defendant Chen surrendered himself to the Public Security Bureau. Regarding the aforementioned facts, the prosecution has provided evidence including the confessions and defenses of the two defendants, the victim Dong's statement, Taobao transaction records, relevant bank documents, household registration certificates, and details of the arrest.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charged: Jiang Peng (handled in a separate case) suspected her husband of having an inappropriate relationship with the victim Wang A. She went to confront Wang A. On the evening of June 3, 2015, Wang A, along with Wang B, Gao Bob, and Zhang Shan, went to Jiang Peng's house to confront her because of this incident. Wang A instigated a dispute with Jiang Peng. Later, Jiang Peng reported the incident to the defendants Zhang (Jiang Peng's mother) and Jiang (Jiang Peng's brother). At around 10 a.m. on June 5, 2015, the defendants Jiang, Zhang, and Dong (Jiang Peng's mother-in-law), along with Jiang Peng and her sister Jiang Zhen (handled in a separate case), as well as Jiang's colleagues Cui Jian and Chen Dong, went to a "certain hotel" at the Wangcheng Subdistrict Office in Laixi City, where Wang A and Wang B were, under the pretense of "seeking justice."

Upon arriving at the hotel, defendants Jiang, Zhang, and Dong, together with Jiang Peng, Jiang Zhen, and others, engaged in a physical altercation with the victims Wang A and Wang B. Defendant Jiang punched and kicked Shi Li and Wang A. According to a forensic medical evaluation, Wang B sustained two facial injuries classified as minor injuries, Wang A's facial injuries were classified as minor injuries, and Shi Li's superficial soft tissue bruises did not constitute minor injuries.

In order to substantiate the aforementioned facts, the prosecution provided the court with evidence including the case origin, the investigation process, the defendants' confessions and defenses, the victims' statements, witness testimonies, identification records, the forensic medical evaluation of injuries, relevant documentary evidence, and household registration certificates.


The prosecution charges that on May 26, 2017, at around 7 a.m., the victims Ji and Ye, along with others, went to a construction site in the XX district to haul materials. The defendant, Chen, stopped them on the grounds that the materials they were hauling were under his jurisdiction. During the ensuing dispute, Chen called over defendants Liang, Xue, and Liu. During this time, defendants Chen, Liang, Liu, and Xue pushed victims Ye and Ji and others, and then both parties used wooden battens from the site to fight each other, resulting in injuries to the abdominal area of victim Ji and the head of victim Ye. According to the assessment, victim Ye sustained one first-degree minor injury, one second-degree minor injury, and two slight injuries, while victim Ji sustained a second-degree serious injury. To substantiate the charges mentioned above, the prosecution presented evidence in court, including the case registration form, police report, household registration certificates, hospital


Upon examination, it was found that from July 18 to July 20, 2012, defendants Wang and Shen jointly operated a casino. Defendant Wang was responsible for gathering participants for gambling; defendant Shen was responsible for arranging the casino location and preparing gambling tools; defendant Hou was responsible for managing the operation, taking commissions, and participating in gambling; defendant Fu offered loans at high interest within the casino; defendant Gu transported participants; defendant Zhu kept watch for the casino.

1. On July 18, 2012, defendants Shen, Wang, Hou, and Gu operated a casino at No. 26 Xia Xiaobang, Fuzhen Village, Zhongdai Street, in a certain city, gathering gambling participants Shao, Chen, and others, and obtaining over 5,000 yuan in commissions.

2. On the afternoon of July 19 of the same year, defendants Shen, Wang, Hou, Fu, Gu, and Zhu operated a casino at No. 40 Jiangbang, a certain village in a certain city, gathering gambling participants Shao, Chen, Tang, and others, and obtaining over 4,000 yuan in commissions.

3. On the afternoon of July 20 of the same year, defendants Shen, Wang, Hou, Fu, Gu, and Zhu operated a casino at No. 22 Youchebang, Shuguang Village, Zhongdai Street, in a certain city, gathering gambling participants Shao, Chen, Tang, and Tang, and obtaining over 1,600 yuan in commissions.

Additionally, it was found that 4,200 yuan of gambling funds was confiscated from defendant Hou; and a set of mahjong tiles was confiscated from defendant Wang. The defendants Shen, Wang, Hou, Fu, Gu, and Zhu raised no objections regarding the aforementioned criminal facts during the court trial. Moreover, these facts are supported by witness testimonies, inspection certificates, inspection records, lists of confiscated items, the incident process, capture process, public security administrative punishment decisions, criminal record inquiries, situation explanations, and household registration proofs, all of which are sufficient for confirmation.


Upon trial, the following facts were ascertained: On February 16, 2016, at around 9 p.m., the defendants Wang and Shuai, after drinking, went with Li A, Shuai 1, Li B, and Wang 1 (all handled in separate cases) to Jiubai KTV on the street of Shanpen Town, Huichuan District, in a certain city to drink and sing. A dispute arose with the KTV management staff over bringing snacks inside. The defendants Shuai, Wang, and others disregarded the dissuasion by Zhang 1 and Huang and assaulted Zhang 1 and Huang. After the police arrived, Li A, Wang 1, and Shuai 1 were orally summoned to the Shanpen Police Station, while the defendants Shuai and Wang took the opportunity to leave the scene. Subsequently, the defendants Shuai and Wang each returned to Jiubai KTV armed with two kitchen knives and encountered the victim Huang. The two of them used the kitchen knives they carried to injure Huang's head and hands. According to the forensic evaluation, the injuries sustained by Zhang 1 and Huang were classified as minor injuries. After the incident, the defendants Wang, Shuai, and the other four compensated Jiubai KTV for the property damage and the related losses of the victims Zhang 1 and Huang in the total amount of 29,000 yuan. Zhang 1 and Huang expressed understanding for the actions of the two defendants. The aforementioned facts were admitted by the defendants Wang and Shuai, and are further supported by their confessions at the police station, the statements of the victims Zhang 1 and Huang, testimonies from witnesses Shuai, Li 2, Li 3, Wang 2, Zhang 2, and Hu 2, the forensic evaluation document, seizure list, on-site inspection record, diagram and photos of the scene, photos identifying tools used in the crime, compensation agreement, receipt, letter of understanding, household registration documents, and other evidence. The defendants Wang and Shuai raised no objections to the above evidence, and it will not be elaborated further, as the trial presentation and cross-examination are sufficient for its verification.


Upon examination, it was found that on September 27, 2013, at around 12 PM, defendant Cheng purchased a small packet of heroin from defendant Liu for 100 yuan in cash. After using some himself, Cheng attempted to sell the remaining heroin to a drug user, Huang, for 100 yuan in front of the Wuwei City Hemp Textile Factory residential complex, where he was caught in the act by law enforcement officers. The police seized 0.06 grams of heroin from Huang and a "Coobe" mobile phone from defendant Cheng. On September 28 of the same year, defendant Liu was arrested and confessed to having sold drugs to defendant Cheng. During the arrest, investigators found two small packets of heroin weighing 0.18 grams in total, as well as a "Lenovo" mobile phone, on defendant Liu. The aforementioned facts are supported by evidence presented in court by the prosecution, including the case registration form, the decision to file a case, witness testimonies, seizure lists and photographs, weighing records, examination and identification reports, identification records, and the confessions of the defendants, all of which were verified to be accurate through cross-examination.


The prosecution alleges: On May 10, 2015, at approximately 22:30, defendants Jiang, Wang, Tian (separately prosecuted), and Guan (separately prosecuted), after conspiring, went to the "Changchun Changran" guesthouse in a certain district of Changchun City. Tian and Guan, under the pretense of needing accommodation, asked the victim Wei A to show them a room. When the reception desk was unattended, defendants Jiang and Wang stole 525 RMB in cash, a pack of hard-pack Zhonghua cigarettes (valued at 45 RMB), and a pack of premium Yunyan cigarettes (valued at 23 RMB). On May 11, 2015, at around 00:00, the same defendants conspired and went to the "Yaju" Inn on Lequn Street in the Erdao District of Changchun City. Tian and Guan, under the pretense of needing accommodation, asked the victim Wang to show them a room. When the reception desk was unattended, defendants Jiang and Wang stole 1,900 RMB in cash from a black bag at the foot of the bed. On May 11, 2015, at approximately 00:30, the four were at the "Panshi Yijia" Hotel in the Nanguan District of Changchun City. While the staff member Zhang was away from the reception desk, defendants Wang, Tian, and Guan kept watch, while defendant Jiang stole 200 RMB from the drawer of the reception desk. These facts, to which defendant Jiang raised no objection during the court hearing, are substantiated by the identification of the stolen money in photographs, site identification records and photos, inventory of seized and returned items, the criminal judgment, statements from the victims Wang, Wei, and Jiang, testimony from witness Zhang, confessions from defendants Jiang and Wang, confessions from co-defendants Tian and Guan, expert opinions, identification records, and surveillance footage from the burglarized hotels, proving the case beyond doubt.


The People's Procuratorate in a certain area charges: The defendant Lin handed over his ID card to Zhao for the purpose of applying for a credit card. In October 2009, defendant Zhao used both his own and Lin's ID cards to apply for credit cards with the Bank of China, obtaining cards with numbers ending in ... Subsequently, Zhao and Lin gave these two cards to Han for use. By the time the case was uncovered, the credit card with the number ending in ... had outstanding principal of 14,086.55 yuan, and the credit card with the number ending in ... had outstanding principal of 19,804.99 yuan. After multiple repayment demands by the bank, Zhao and Lin refused to repay. After the case was uncovered, defendant Lin repaid part of the overdraft principal and interest. In support of the above charges, the prosecution presented the following evidence in court: (1) Confessions and defenses of defendants Zhao and Lin; (2) Statement by the representative of the victimized unit, Ma; (3) Testimonies from witnesses Han, Zhou, Shi, Guan, and others; (4) Documentary evidence including the criminal judgment, indictment, transaction details, etc.; (5) Other materials.


After the trial, it was found that on the afternoon of February 16, 2015, Du A (already sentenced) felt aggrieved after being beaten while attempting to collect a debt at the home of He Jia in a certain village within the Economic Development Zone of Yongkang City. Upon returning home, he informed the defendant Du and others, including Du and Yang (already sentenced), about the incident. After a discussion, they decided to go to He Jia's house to demand an explanation. They then gathered dozens of people, including Yao, Zhang, and Cheng (all handled in separate cases), and prepared tools such as kitchen knives and watermelon knives. Meanwhile, the defendant Wang, who was at He Jia's home, heard that Du A and others were rallying dozens of people to cause trouble for He Jia. Wang then called and gathered Wang A (already sentenced), Lin A, and Lin B (handled in separate cases) to He Jia's home, telling them, "Someone is coming to make trouble, so stay on guard." Subsequently, dozens of p


After investigation, it was found that defendants Li and Yang, after conspiring, carried lock-picking tools such as keys, iron rods, T-shaped iron bars, and adhesive tape. On April 15, 2016, at approximately 11:00 a.m., in the Xin Hui District of a certain city, they broke into the residence of Mai and stole over 1,000 RMB, 1,020 Hong Kong dollars, 30 copper coins, and 0.31 kilograms of dried tangerine peel, with a total value of over 2,091 RMB. On the same day, at approximately 12:00 p.m., the defendants Li and Yang broke into the residence of Tam in the same district using the same means, stealing over 2,000 RMB and 660 Hong Kong dollars, with a total value of over 2,545 RMB. After the crime, defendants Li and Yang were caught by police officers while fleeing the scene, caught with the stolen goods. Defendants Li and Yang committed theft twice, with the total value of stolen goods exceeding 4,630 RMB. During the court trial, defendants Li and Yang did not contest these facts. The facts are corroborated by the statements of the victims Mai and Tam, the confiscated stolen money and goods, the tools used in the crime, the appraisal report of the stolen goods' value, foreign exchange rate certification, the arrest process, the case-solving process, the criminal verdict, and the crime scene investigation records, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that at around 12 p.m. on November 6, 2018, the defendants Zhao and Peng sold 0.3 grams of the drug heroin to a drug user named Li from Zhangye in room 1209 of the Marco Polo Shangpin Hotel in a city of a certain county. They were apprehended by police officers on the spot, and 0.12 grams of heroin were seized at the scene. During the trial, the defendants Zhao and Peng raised no objections to the aforementioned facts, which are substantiated by the testimonies of witnesses Li, Zhou, and Gao, WeChat screenshots, identification records, seizure records, weighing records, lists of seized items and documents, photographs, lists of items and documents transferred with the case, on-site inspection reports, drug testing reports, call logs, the defendants' household registration information, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


Upon trial, it was found that on June 25, 2014, around 10 PM, the defendants Fan, Xia, and Shen were dining at a hot pot restaurant on the west section of Wensheng Road in a certain town of a certain county, when defendant Fan, without cause, got into a dispute with the victim Wang who was dining at a different table. Subsequently, defendants Fan, Xia, and Shen jointly assaulted victim Wang, resulting in bilateral nasal bone fractures for Wang. According to the assessment, the extent of Wang's injuries was classified as minor injury of the second degree. It was further discovered that at 10:50 PM on June 25, 2014, defendants Fan and Xia were transferred by the Special Patrol Police Brigade of a certain county's Public Security Bureau to the Huagai Police Station of the same bureau for investigation. On June 26, 2014, after being notified by phone by the police officers of Huagai Police Station, defendant Shen voluntarily went to the station on the same day to accept investigation. It was also determined that defendants Fan, Xia, and Shen have compensated victim Wang and obtained his understanding. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Fan, Xia, and Shen during the trial, and were supported by evidence such as the acceptance registration form, decision to file the case, explanation of the circumstances of the case, on-site inspection records, identification records, appraisal opinions, household registration certificates, receipts, the letter of understanding, audio-visual materials, the statement of victim Wang, testimonies of witnesses Sun, Sui, Jiang, Cao, Li, Mi, Gu, Jing, and another Li, as well as the confessions and defenses of defendants Fan, Xia, and Shen, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that from March 2018 to February 2019, defendants Zheng, Ge, and Wang, in collusion with Tong, Xu, Xie, Wang, Wu, Ge, Zheng, Sun, Zhang (all already sentenced), used the "Feizhuxia" online loan platform in a certain city of a certain province to issue high-interest loans. After the loans were due, they sent messages and made phone calls to the borrowers and their relatives and friends, threatening the borrowers to repay the loans, which eventually led one of the borrowers, another Wang, to commit suicide by ingesting pesticide on February 24, 2019. After the incident, defendants Zheng, Ge, and Wang actively compensated the victim's family for their loss and obtained understanding. In support of the above charges, the prosecution has provided documentary evidence, witness testimonies, victim statements, the defendants' confessions and defenses, expert opinions, audiovisual materials, and other evidence to this court.


The prosecution charges: In the early morning of April 11, 2013, the defendants Guan and Liu, after prior discussion, used the method of pushing away the vehicle and then using a lock to steal a Morakot brand electric bicycle belonging to the victim, Lan, in front of a rental house at No. 2, East section of Wenyuan Community, Xintang Street, in a certain district of a certain city. The bike was valued at 1,784 yuan. After the incident, the stolen goods were recovered and returned to the victim. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Guan and Liu during the trial. The case is supported by the testimony of the victim Lan, the witness accounts of Wu and Zhang, identification records, a key, a seizure list, a list of returned items, a price appraisal conclusion, the incident details, an explanatory note, Guan's household registration certificate, a photograph of Liu, and the defendants Guan and Liu's previous criminal records, all of which provide sufficient evidence for conviction.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charged that on November 11, 2013, at around 2:00 PM, defendants Xie and his wife, Huang, at Wangjia Leather Factory on Westmelon Ridge, Lane 21, No. 8, in a town in Huadu District, requested to resign and settle their wages with the victim, their boss Ma, when a dispute arose. Subsequently, defendants Xie, Liao, and an accomplice "Fei Zai" (handled in a separate case) had a confrontation with the victim Ma, during which defendants Xie, Liao, and the accomplice "Fei Zai" used fists, knives, stools, and other tools to assault the victim Ma. According to the assessment, the victim Ma sustained minor injuries. During the altercation, the victim Ma's wife, Mo, was also injured. An assessment determined that her injuries were also classified as minor.


Upon trial, it was found that from March 2012 to July 2014, defendants Cao and Xia, among others, engaged in illegal pyramid schemes using a "voluntary capital operation chain business" (falsely claiming to be the national 1040 project). They organized over 40 people to conduct these activities in a certain city, specifically in a district town and the Xin Garden community of a district bridge. The organizational structure was a five-level, three-progression system, requiring new members to pay RMB 3,800 for joining qualification, after which they would receive corresponding rewards based on the number of new members they developed. During this period, defendant Cao, by developing defendant Xia and other downlines, accumulated over 600 shares under his name, reaching the rank of "General Manager." Defendant Xia, by developing downlines as well, also accumulated over 600 shares under his name, reaching the rank of "General Manager." Defendants Cao and Xia were subsequently apprehended and brought to justice by public security authorities on January 17, 2015. Both defendant Cao and his defense counsel, as well as defendant Xia and his defense counsel, raised no objection to the facts and charges in the indictment. Defendant Cao's defense counsel expressed the following defense opinions: 1. Cao is willing to voluntarily plead guilty; 2. Voluntarily pay the fine; 3. He is a first-time offender, and his subjective malignancy and social harm are relatively minor. The counsel requested the court to mitigate his punishment. Defendant Xia's defense counsel argued: 1. Xia is willing to voluntarily plead guilty; 2. Willing to actively pay the fine; 3. The subjective malignancy and social harm of the crime are minor, and he is a first-time offender. The counsel requested the court for a lenient sentence. These facts are verified by evidence such as the arrest and case-solving reports issued by a district branch of the city public security bureau; testimonies from witnesses Zhu A, Zhu, Yu, Liu Jia, Liu Yi, Wang, Wang A; identification records; organizational structure charts; copies of related notes; criminal judgments of co-defendants; identity materials of defendants Cao and Xia; defendants Cao and Xia's confessions and defenses; and other materials, sufficient to confirm the facts.


Upon trial, it was found that on October 11, 2016, at around 8:00 PM, the defendants Hu and Chen, following a premeditated plan, conspired to steal about 120 meters of copper core cable wire belonging to the victim, Guo, near the Jinji Mountain Gas Station on National Highway 104 in the development area of this city. They used pliers to cut and dragged the cables by hand, with a total value of more than RMB 3272.4 yuan. After the theft, they sold the stolen goods and received RMB 1070, which was subsequently squandered. After the incident, the defendants Hu and Chen compensated the victim Guo with RMB 3000, and during the trial of this case, the defendants Hu and Chen returned RMB 272 to this court. These facts, to which the defendants Hu and Chen raised no objections during the trial, are supported by evidence including: the statement of the victim Guo; the testimony of the witness Yang; identification records and photographs; investigation experiment records; on-site inspection records, diagrams, and photographs; lists and photos of seized items and returns; delivery notes; receipts; the apprehension report provided by the public security investigators; the price appraisal conclusion document [2016] No. 558 from the Hujia Appraisal; surveillance video and screenshots; administrative penalty decision; the household registration information of the defendants Hu and Chen; and the confessions and defenses provided by the defendants Hu and Chen, which are sufficient to establish the case.


Upon examination, it was found that from March to September 2015, the defendant Dai, on three occasions, allowed Zhang, Shen, and others to use methamphetamine (ice) in the vehicle he drove and in a hotel; the defendant Shen, on two occasions, allowed Zhang and Dai to use methamphetamine (ice) in a hotel. The specific criminal facts are as follows:

1. One morning in March 2015, the defendant Dai allowed Zhang and Shen to use ice once in a room at the Super 8 Hotel in a certain town in a certain city.

2. One evening in July 2015, the defendant Dai allowed Zhang to use ice once in the car with license plate Su A×××××, parked on the roadside opposite the traffic accident handling center in a certain town in a certain city.

3. In the early morning of September 1, 2015, the defendant Dai allowed Shen to use ice once in the car with license plate Su A×××××, parked on the roadside west of a village in a certain town in a certain city.

4. One afternoon in April 2015, the defendant Shen allowed Zhang and Dai to use ice once in a room at the Super 8 Hotel in a certain town in a certain city.

5. On a day in April 2015, the defendant Shen allowed Zhang to use ice once in a room at the Super 8 Hotel in a certain town in a certain city.

The defendants Dai and Shen were later apprehended by the public security organs due to drug use, during which they truthfully confessed to the criminal facts of allowing others to use drugs. Regarding the above facts, the defendants Dai and Shen raised no objection during the trial, and there is sufficient evidence to establish these facts, including the confessions of the two defendants; the testimony of witness Zhang; documentary evidence such as personal information, circumstances of apprehension, motor vehicle information, hotel industry security management information from a certain province, administrative penalty decision letters; recognition records and photographs.


According to the charges by the prosecution, at the end of December 2012, the defendant Ding agreed to partner with Jiang and Gu to conduct a business and paid a deposit of 45,000 yuan. It was also agreed that if the cooperation was unsuccessful, Jiang and Gu would return the deposit. On the afternoon of December 31 of that year, because Jiang and Gu failed to fulfill the agreement resulting in the failure of cooperation, the defendant Ding demanded the return of the deposit from them in Room 301 of Jinxiuhaitian Hotel, Donggang Street, in this district, but they expressed they could not return it at the moment. The defendant Ding then contacted the defendant Kang by phone to ask for help in retrieving the deposit. Subsequently, the defendant Kang gathered "Baldy" and four others to Room 301 of Jinxiuhaitian Hotel, took Jiang and Gu to a certain L××××× minivan, and restricted their personal freedom. During this period, under the instigation of defendant Ding, "Baldy" and others used verbal threats, as well as physical violence with fists, feet, and wooden sticks, to force Jiang and Gu to return the deposit. By approximately 2:00 a.m. on January 1, 2013, fearing discovery by the police, defendant Kang and others let Jiang and Gu get off the vehicle. On January 1 and February 25, 2013, defendants Ding and Kang respectively turned themselves in to the public security organs and truthfully confessed their crimes. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by defendants Ding and Kang during


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a city of a certain Zhuang Autonomous Region charges: At 17:00 on June 12, 2015, defendants Wu and Lin sold a small bag containing 1.8 grams of the drug "methamphetamine" to drug purchaser Qin for 600 yuan at the intersection near No. 64, a certain lane on a certain avenue, in a certain district of a city. After the transaction was completed, they were caught on the spot by the public security authorities. Upon evaluation, the drugs sold by defendants Wu and Lin were found to contain methamphetamine. During the court trial, defendants Wu and Lin raised no objections to the aforementioned facts, which are corroborated by the following evidence, verified and confirmed through court examination: case acceptance registration form, case filing decision, confessions of defendants Wu and Lin, testimony of witness Qin, inspection records, weighing records and weighing photos, identification records and identification photos, evidence preservation decision, evidence preservation inventory, the drug identification certificate and identification opinion notice from a city's Public Security Bureau, confiscation certificate of drugs, documentation of the apprehension process, case-solving report, explanatory notes, household registration information of defendants Wu and Lin, etc. The facts of the case are clear, and the evidence is concrete and sufficient to support the charges.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain banner in a certain autonomous region charges that from the night of July 24 to the early morning of July 25, 2016, the defendants Hu, Ji, Da, and Na rode two-wheeled motorcycles to chase and capture 37 live wild hares approximately 4 kilometers east of the Bajie Highway in a certain town of a certain banner in a certain autonomous region. They used methods such as nighttime lighting and nets to accomplish this before being apprehended by forest police officers from the Forest Public Security Bureau of that banner in the autonomous region. According to the judicial appraisal conducted by the Dongying branch of the Forest Public Security Judicial Appraisal Center of the State Forestry Administration, the animals sent for inspection were identified as European hares, which are classified as wildlife under national protection due to their beneficial or significant economic and scientific research value (referred to as "three-category protected animals"). The above-mentioned facts were not disputed by the four defendants during the court trial, and were substantiated by the following evidence: the case registration form numbered [2016]04 from individual A's (criminal) file, site identification records and photos, identification records and photos, on-site inspection records, on-site inspection diagrams, photos, seizure records, lists of seized items, case transfer inventory, household registration certificates, the case-solving process, the witness testimony of Meng, the material evidence appraisal document numbered Lin Si Dong Jian Zi [2016]573, and the confessions of defendants Hu, Ji, Da, and Na. These pieces of evidence are sufficient for conviction.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: At around 4 a.m. on August 22, 2017, the defendants Wei and Zhou discovered the victim, Lu, extremely intoxicated and unconscious on the middle section of the Wenchang Bridge on Youyi Road in the Chengzhong District of this city. Zhou proceeded to steal an Apple brand phone from Lu, and the two fled the scene. Later, Wei sold the phone at a low price to someone else. An appraisal determined that the stolen phone was valued at 3,720 RMB. On August 23, 2017, the defendants Wei and Zhou were arrested by the public security authorities; subsequently, Wei assisted the authorities in recovering the stolen phone. The public security authorities lawfully seized the stolen phone and have returned it to the victim according to the law. The actions of Wei and Zhou constitute the crime of x, and this court is requested to punish them according to law. The aforementioned facts are uncontested by defendants Wei and Zhou during the trial, and are corroborated by the materials filed in the case, the statement of the victim Lu, the testimony of the witness Mo, the on-site identification records and photos, the identification logs and photos, the seizure decision and list, the return list, the price appraisal conclusion and the notice of appraisal opinion, the criminal judgment and certificate of release, the account of the case, the resolution of the case, the account of the capture, the household registration proof, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a district in Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, charged that on June 9, 2015, at approximately 9:07 am, the defendants Liu and Jiang, together with "A", "Xiuxiu", "Junjun", and two other women (all handled in separate cases), were driven by Liu in a Wuling Zhiguang minivan with the license plate Yue S××××× to transport the aforementioned individuals from the city to the Kanghong Pharmacy in Huaxing Market, Yongning Street, in a certain town. Defendant Jiang and the other women entered the store and stole a batch of medicines belonging to the victim Xu Yi (valued at a total of RMB 6,552), after which defendant Liu drove the vehicle to assist in their departure. At approximately 9:28 am on the same day, defendant Liu drove Jiang and the others to Love Child Island Maternal and Infant Chain Store at 154 Fengxin Garden, Phoenix City, Yongning Street in a certain district. Co-defendants "A" and others entered the store and stole a batch of milk powder belonging to the victim Yang Yi (valued at RMB 3,526), after which defendant Jiang assisted outside the store by carrying the milk powder into the vehicle, and defendant Liu drove the vehicle to assist in their departure. On July 29, 2015, defendants Liu and Jiang were apprehended near the Yuebei Station on the Jingzhu Expressway, and at the scene, four boxes of stolen medicines were recovered and subsequently returned to the victim Xu Yi.


The Public Prosecutor's Office charges: 1. On December 25, 2016, at around 21:00, the defendant Liu, together with Li1, Li2, Hu (all of whom have been sentenced), and Zhuo (handled separately), under the influence of alcohol, without provocation, used threats with knives, punching, and kicking, to injure Wang2, Zhang1, Gao, and Wang1 at the entrance of the Siji Hotel on the northern section of Liquan Street, Gaomi City. According to the forensic appraisal of Gaomi City Public Security Bureau, the injuries sustained by Wang2, Zhang1, and Wang1 were all classified as minor injuries. 2. On March 8, 2017, at around 16:00, due to a debt dispute with Tao1, the defendant Ye instructed and collaborated with Liu, Zhuo (handled separately), and Li3 (handled separately), using methods such as slapping, punching, kicking, and taking Tao1 to the riverbank to undress and freeze, to threaten and coerce Tao1 to repay the debt. Later, Ye arranged for Liu to take Tao1 to room 108 in a motel on the west side of Qingdao University of Science and Technology in Gaomi City and prevent him from leaving, until Tao1 was rescued at 23:00 on March 8. To substantiate the above charges, the Public Prosecutor's Office read and presented evidence in court including the defendant's confession, victim's statement, witness testimony, documentary evidence, appraisal opinion, identification record, and the guilty plea and penalty agreement.


A certain local people's procuratorate charges: Defendant Hu served as a truck driver at Wenzhou Kaiyue Building Materials Co., Ltd. From March to July 2014, Defendant Hu repeatedly drove the truck with the license plate Zhejiang J××××× back to the company's premises after delivering goods and diverted it to a scrap collection point operated by Defendant Jin and others. Using a wrench, he opened the outlet secured with screws beneath the truck's fuel tank. Jin and others then inserted a plastic tube into the fuel tank to extract and steal diesel. Hu subsequently sold the stolen diesel to Jin and others, carrying out theft seven to eight times a month, earning over 4,000 yuan illegally. Investigation revealed that between May and July 2014, Hu drove the truck with the license plate Zhejiang J77905 to Jin’s scrap collection point located beside a village road in Ruian, Binhai Avenue, Wenzhou. Using the aforementioned method, he stole diesel from the truck and sold it to Jin. Each theft involved 20 to 40 jin of diesel, and he committed theft seven times in total, earning over 800 yuan illegally. After the case was uncovered, Defendant Hu voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities and compensated the victim with 16,000 yuan for their loss. In support of the above accusations, the prosecution has submitted relevant evidence.


The prosecution alleges that at around 20:40 on December 8, 2015, the defendant He was driving a motorcycle carrying the defendant Li near a bus stop in a certain village on Tongji East Road in a certain district of a city in Guangdong Province. He was driving to assist, and Li got off the motorcycle and walked. Taking advantage of the victim Zhong's unpreparedness, Li snatched an iPhone 6 Plus worth 3,818 RMB from Zhong with his bare hands. After succeeding, the two defendants fled the scene on the motorcycle. At around 17:00 on the 11th of the same month, the police arrested defendants Li and He in a rental apartment in the Weiguo District of Tangfang Village on Zhongyi Road in a certain district of a city and seized the aforementioned stolen phone from Li on the spot (the phone involved has been returned to the victim Zhong). The above facts were not disputed by defendants Li and He during the trial, and are substantiated by evidence including the victim Zhong's report and identification record, seizure record, seizure decision, and seizure list, return list, price appraisal certificate, arrest process, household registration certificates, criminal judgment and release certificate, as well as the confessions and identification records of defendants Li and He during the investigation phase, which are sufficient to confirm these facts.


The prosecution agency charges: On May 27, 2014, at approximately 18:00, defendant Li gave 1.4 grams of methamphetamine to defendant Zhang at the entrance of the Wutong Business Hotel in Dayingpo, a district of a certain city. Defendant Zhang was then apprehended by police officers while selling the 1.4 grams of methamphetamine he had purchased to Zou, who was waiting there. The 1.4 grams of methamphetamine were seized on the spot, and later, police officers arrested defendant Li near the Wutong Business Hotel. It was also found that defendant Li sold the 2 grams of methamphetamine to defendant Zhang at a price of 250 yuan per gram, and defendant Zhang had agreed with Zou to sell him 2 grams of methamphetamine at a price of 300 yuan per gram. A mobile phone used by defendant Li to contact defendant Zhang for drug transactions, as well as a mobile phone used by defendant Zhang to contact Zou for drug transactions, were confiscated by the police. The above facts were not disputed by the two defendants during the trial, and were substantiated by their household registration certificates and confessions, testimony from witness Zou, confiscation lists, drug test reports, photos of the heroin, drug weighing records, drug identification conclusions, call records, and the police account of the arrest process, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of Wenshui County in a certain province charged that prior to the Spring Festival in 2019, defendants Song and Wu conspired to hunt wild animals and prepared hunting tools such as iron traps, wire loops, and netting. On January 24, 2019, the two drove a black Nissan car with the license plate number Jin A16B28, belonging to Song, into a gully near a certain county of a certain province to set up the hunting tools. On the 26th of the same month, when the two returned by car to the location where the hunting tools were placed to check for prey, they were caught by law enforcement officers including officers from a certain provincial forest police bureau. They had hunted one grass rabbit and one pheasant.


The People's Procuratorate of Pingguo County, a certain district in the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, charges that the defendants Lu, Yang, and another individual Ma (handled in a separate case), conspired to interfere with others' normal car locking using a car door lock jammer, subsequently stealing items from the car. On November 28, 2013, at approximately 8 a.m., the defendants Lu, Yang, and Ma drove a Wuling minivan with the license plate number Gui A××××× to the vicinity of the main gate of the First Kindergarten of Pingguo County. As the victim, Lu, was locking his car with a remote control, defendant Lu used the jammer for electronic interference, causing a false lock situation. After the victim Lu left, defendants Yang and Ma stole a handbag from the trunk of Lu's parked BYD sedan. The bag contained more than 7,000 yuan in cash, bank cards, an ID card, and other items. The prosecution presented relevant evidence to support the alleged facts.


Upon trial, it was found that between February 2015 and November 5, 2015, the defendant Kuang, together with defendant Shang, placed gambling machines in various locations in a certain county and town for others to gamble. These locations included the game room behind the elderly pavilion on the east bank, the "Chongqing Spicy Restaurant" opposite the east bank credit union, the game room near Wenxi First Primary School, the game room near Wendong Park, and the billiard room on the second floor of Fengyun Internet Cafe. They agreed with the operators of these venues to pay them a monthly rent ranging from 400 to 1000 yuan, as well as a 10% share of the profits from the gambling machines. Defendants Kuang and Shang made a profit of over 12,800 yuan by placing gambling machines in the game room behind the elderly pavilion on the east bank operated by defendant Wang, from which defendant Wang personally made a profit of over 8,000 yuan. It was verified that defendants Kuang and Shang made a total profit of more than 35,000 yuan by placing gambling machines in the aforementioned five locations. On November 5, 2015, defendants Kuang, Shang, and Wang were legally arrested by the public security organs in a certain county and town. During the trial of this case, defendants Kuang, Shang, and Wang each returned illegal proceeds of 5,000 yuan, 12,000 yuan, and 8,000 yuan, respectively. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Kuang, Shang, Wang, and their defense lawyers Wang A, Shu, and Du during the court hearing. Furthermore, they were substantiated by evidence reviewed and verified in court, including 702 one-yuan coins, the identity information of the three defendants, an inventory of seized items and documents by the county public security bureau, the process of apprehension, receipts, testimonies of witnesses Sun, Li, Chen, and Feng, confessions and defenses of defendants Kuang, Shang, Wang, and accomplice Dong, recognition opinion on electronic gaming facilities and equipment No. 007 (2015) by the county public security bureau, search records, photos, and identification transcripts, etc., sufficient to confirm the facts.


The prosecution alleges: Starting from the evening of August 8, 2019, defendants Liang and Guo organized gamblers, with defendant Guo providing a room on the first floor at No. 15, Guocun Tou Shan Street, in a certain district of a city, for the gamblers to use as a casino, profiting from a rake system until the operation was raided in the early morning of August 12, 2019. At the scene, 12 gambling participants were apprehended, including Liang, Yu, and Xu, along with gambling equipment and funds. It is considered that defendants Guo and Liang have circumstances of pleading guilty and accepting punishment; defendant Guo has circumstances of voluntary surrender and being an accessory. It is recommended to sentence defendants Guo and Liang to a fixed-term imprisonment of seven to ten months and impose a fine of 2,000 to 4,000 RMB. For defendant Guo, it is recommended to sentence to a fixed-term imprisonment of six to nine months or criminal detention, and impose a fine of 2,000 to 4,000 RMB. Furthermore, it was found that defendants Guo and Liang were apprehended by public security authorities on August 12, 2019. Defendant Guo voluntarily went to the public security authorities for investigation after being summoned by them on August 14, 2019. Defendants Guo, Liang, and Guo have no objections to the facts, charges, and sentencing recommendations alleged and have signed in acknowledgment, and they also raised no objections during the court proceedings.


On January 6, 2014, at approximately 1:00 AM, defendants Zhao and Bai went to the front of Linhuayuan Community in a certain district of a certain city. Taking advantage of the opportunity when no one was present, they stole two car batteries belonging to the victim Liu, valued at 1,450 yuan. Four minutes later, defendants Zhao and Bai went to the front of Tang's location in the same district and city. Again, taking advantage of the opportunity when no one was present, they stole a car battery belonging to the victim Wang, valued at 200 yuan. After the incident, the stolen goods were recovered and returned.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that at around 21:00 on August 4, 2013, defendants Ji and Sun had a dispute with the victim, Geng, over issues such as occupying seats without making purchases in front of the Guanglin Barbecue Restaurant operated by Ji at No. 9 Jiaxing Road, Shibei District, in this city. Subsequently, Ji and Sun injured Geng, causing a fracture of Geng's left nasal bone and maxillary frontal process. According to the forensic medical examination, this constituted a Level 2 minor injury. Additionally, Geng sustained a laceration of the skin on the left upper eyelid and contusions and abrasions of the body's soft tissues, constituting slight injuries. Later, defendants Ji and Sun were apprehended. To prove the aforementioned charges, the public prosecution agency read out or presented the following evidence in court: 1. Registration form for receiving a criminal case, documents on the case's development, and the process of apprehension and other documentary evidence; 2. Testimonies of witnesses such as Lian; 3. Statement of the victim, Geng; 4. Confessions of defendants Ji and Sun; 5. Identification records, etc.; 6. Forensic medical report on the degree of bodily injuries, etc.


Upon examination, it was found that around 7 PM on July 22, 2013, police officers from the Public Security Brigade of a certain county's Public Security Bureau, acting on a public tip-off, went to the storefront at 29 Hebeng Road, Dianbu Town, in said county, and seized on the scene 9 gambling machines (18 operational units) including "Interstellar Baby," "Global Entertainment," "Fishing Machine," "Slot Machine," and two accounting slips. Investigation revealed that this gambling establishment was set up by the defendant Liu in early June 2013 for gambling purposes. During this period, an illegal profit of approximately 3,000 yuan was made. Defendant Zhou began working at this gambling venue in late June 2013, providing services for gamblers, such as adding points, refunding points, and collecting money. It was also found that defendant Liu returned 2,000 yuan of the illicit gains during the trial period at this court. The above-mentioned facts are confirmed by the following main evidence presented and cross-examined during the trial: the confessions of the two defendants, witness testimonies, on-site diagrams and photos, identification records, inspection records, medical records, details of the case registration, and household registration certificates, all of which this court has verified.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges: 1. On a morning around February 18, 2015, the defendant Wei stole a Xiaomi 2S mobile phone from the jacket pocket of Quan at the pedestrian street in Keqiao, a district in a certain city. After appraisal, the phone involved in the case was valued at 896 yuan. 2. On the afternoon of February 20, 2015, the defendant Wei stole an OPPO N5117 mobile phone from the jacket pocket of Wang at the ancient street in Anchang, a town in a certain district. After appraisal, the phone involved in the case was valued at 975 yuan. 3. On the evening of March 25, 2015, the defendants Wei and Liao went to the vicinity of Dongchang Vegetable Market in a town of a certain district. Liao was responsible for keeping watch, while Wei stole a Huawei Honor Play 4X mobile phone from the jacket pocket of Zhou A. After appraisal, the phone involved in the case was valued at 893 yuan. In summary, the defendant Wei committed theft three times, with the total value of stolen property amounting to 2,764 yuan. The defendant Liao committed theft once, with the value of the stolen property being 893 yuan. After the incident, all mobile phones involved in the case were recovered and returned to each victim. The above facts have not been contested by defendants Wei and Liao during the trial, and are substantiated by evidence including photographs of the stolen goods, criminal judgment documents, lists of seized and returned items, evidence reception lists, base information of the mobile phone packaging boxes, the arrest process, explanations of circumstances, statements from Quan, Wang, Zhou A, the price appraisal conclusion document Shao Ke Jia Jian Zi (2015) No. 0163, and the identification record of Wei, which are sufficient to make a determination.