Upon examination, it was found that at noon on October 4, 2014, the defendants Yin and Liu were drinking at the Fat Auntie Hand-Pulled Noodle Restaurant at the bridgehead in a certain city. During this time, the two discussed eating at Zhao's Wuji Noodle Shop without paying after they had drunk. At around 3 p.m. on the same day, Liu and Yin arrived at the Wuji Noodle Shop one after the other. Liu, without any reason, started causing trouble, and the two of them slapped the tables in the noodle shop. Liu overturned a table to the ground. When Zhao saw this, he approached to dissuade them, and then an argument and fight ensued between Zhao and Yin, while Liu wantonly smashed tables, chairs, bowls, and dishes in the noodle shop. During the fight between Yin and Zhao, Yin used a stool to injure Zhao's right rib and other areas. According to the assessment, Zhao's injury was classified as minor injury level two. On December 22, 2014, the families of the defendants Yin and Liu reached a mediation agreement with Zhao. The families of Yin and Liu compensated Zhao for medical expenses, lost wages, and other losses totaling 33,000 yuan. Zhao expressed understanding towards Yin and Liu and decided not to pursue criminal responsibility against them. The above facts were also undisputed by the defendants during the court hearing, and they were supported by the defendants' confessions, the victim's statements, witness testimonies, the case registration form from the city Public Security Bureau, the decision to file the case, identification transcripts and site photos, the judicial appraisal report, the agreement, the letter of understanding, proof of prior offenses, and household registration proofs, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution agency charges that since August 2013, the defendant Wang rented a storefront near the south gate of Oriental Mingjing in the Xinzhan District of this city to open a gambling machine den for gambling activities. In November 2013, Wang hired the defendant Zhao to manage this gambling den. On November 21, 2013, the gambling den was raided and sealed by the public security authorities, with 9 gambling machines and 14 operational units of a gambling nature confiscated on site. Furthermore, it was found that on November 21, 2013, when the police sealed the gambling den, defendants Wang and Zhao were brought in for questioning. The confiscated gambling machines were destroyed by the public security authorities on December 12, 2013. The aforementioned facts were not contested by the defendants Wang and Zhao during the trial, and are supported by the testimonies of witnesses Li and Dong, inventory of seized items, on-site inspection records and photographs, the certification of electronic gaming equipment with gambling functions, the administrative penalty decision by the Xinzhan Branch of Hefei Public Security Bureau, destruction records, household registration information, the account of the case resolution, and a certificate issued by a certain vocational college in a certain area, among other evidence, sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain area accuses: In early May 2015, defendants Tong, Fang, and Gao set up 19 "Star 97" gambling machines in two houses next to the old highway administration station in Jianping Town, Langxi County for the purpose of gambling. They had Wang sign a house rental agreement with the landlord, Wu, in his name and a transfer agreement with the former operator of the gaming room, Yu. They employed Qian and "Big XX" to assign points to gamblers and recruited Qiu to cook meals for the gamblers. After some time, Fang and Gao withdrew from the operation, leaving Tong to continue managing the gaming room alone. On July 13, 2015, the gaming room was raided by Langxi County Public Security Bureau. During the period of operation, the gaming room did not make any profit after covering various expenses. Defendant Tong was arrested and brought to justice on July 26, 2015. On September 8 and September 14, Gao and Fang surrendered themselves. Furthermore, it was found that after the incident, Langxi County Public Security Bureau seized the 19 gambling machines involved in the case. The above facts were undisputed by defendants Tong, Fang, and Gao during the trial, and they voluntarily pleaded guilty. There is sufficient evidence to confirm the facts, including household registration documents, inspection records and photographs, seize orders, seizure lists and photographs, testimonies from witnesses Qian, Wang, Qiu, Wu, Shi, and Yu, and the statements and defenses of defendants Tong, Fang, and Gao, the process of arriving at the case, the criminal judgment document, among others.


The People's Procuratorate in a certain area indicted that on the afternoon of September 17, 2017, defendants Sun and Zhao assisted the victim, Gao, in washing ginseng seeds at a ginseng seed washing factory beside the Yingfu Highway in a certain town. After the ginseng seeds were washed and bagged, the two defendants noticed a basin of washed ginseng seeds that no one claimed. After discussing, the two defendants put the ginseng seeds into a woven bag and loaded them onto defendant Sun's Jetta car. Defendant Sun then took the ginseng seeds to defendant Zhao's home. Later, the victim Gao discovered the loss of the ginseng seeds and contacted defendants Sun and Zhao. The two returned the ginseng seeds to victim Gao and voluntarily surrendered to the Jingyu County Public Security Bureau. Upon appraisal, the stolen ginseng seeds weighed a total of 28 pounds, with a value of 5,880 yuan.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges: On the afternoon of May 8, 2015, the defendant He, knowing that the electric tricycle was a stolen vehicle, acted as an agent to sell the vehicle. The defendant Chen, knowing that the vehicle was improperly obtained by the defendant He, purchased it at a low price of 2,000 yuan. According to the appraisal, the vehicle's value is estimated at 4,367 yuan. Upon investigation, it was confirmed that the vehicle belonged to the victim, Wang, and was stolen in the early hours of May 7, 2015, from a rental house in a village on Feiyun Street in the city. After the incident, the vehicle was recovered and returned to the victim. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants He and Chen during the court hearing and are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Xie, Jiang, and Li, the statement of the victim Wang, the price appraisal report, the identification record, the arrest process, payment receipt, criminal judgment document, release certificate, criminal record information, mobile phone call details, seizure list, return list, mobile phone photos, and population information, which are sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate in a certain locality charges that on the evening of May 13, 2014, drug purchaser Zhou called the defendant Huang, stating he wanted to buy drugs. Huang then instructed his wife, defendant Ceng, to proceed with the transaction. At around 22:00 that evening, Ceng brought drugs to the entrance of a convenience store on Lianhua Road in a certain area, selling 0.6 grams of drugs (identified as methamphetamine after examination) to Zhou for 300 yuan and then fled the scene. At around 1:00 on May 14, Zhou again called Huang, and Ceng answered the phone. Zhou expressed his intention to purchase drugs, and Huang again instructed Ceng to proceed with the transaction. Subsequently, Ceng came to the entrance of a convenience store and sold 0.46 grams of drugs (identified as methamphetamine after examination) to Zhou for 200 yuan, before being captured and brought to justice. At around 21:00 on May 29, Huang was also captured and brought to justice. The above facts were undisputed by defendants Huang and Ceng during the trial. These facts were sufficiently confirmed by evidence such as the apprehension process, extraction records, seizure records, seizure warrant, seizure list, population information, call log, criminal record materials, testimonies from witnesses including Zhou, defendants' confessions and defenses, appraisal opinions, scene investigation records, and photographs.


The prosecution alleges that on April 28, 2013, at approximately 9:00 a.m., defendants Hu and Mo conspired to commit theft. At the Zhaodong Meat and Vegetable Wholesale Market in Chancheng District, Foshan City, Mo was responsible for acting as a lookout and providing cover, while Hu stole a purple wallet from the net bag under the handle of victim Cai's baby stroller. After the theft, defendants Hu and Mo were apprehended by police while attempting to flee the scene. The police confiscated the stolen wallet from defendant Hu on-site, which contained 94 yuan. After the case was solved, the public security agency returned the recovered stolen money and goods to the victim, Cai. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Hu and Mo during the court hearing. These facts are supported by evidence, including the victim Cai's report, the list of seized and returned items, photographs of physical evidence, the details of the arrest, household registration certificates, the criminal judgment No. 516 of (2012) from a certain city court's first criminal trial, the certificate of release upon completion of the sentence, and the statements and identification records of defendants Hu and Mo during the investigation phase, which are sufficient to establish the case.


Upon trial, it was found that the defendant Bao, entrusted by Wang, gathered defendants Wei, Huang, and Yu (handled in a separate case) to collect a debt from the victim Luo. On April 27, 2014, around 3 PM, Bao, under the pretense of discussing business, lured Luo in front of a KFC in a certain district of a certain city into the car he was driving. Together with Wei, Huang, and Yu, who boarded the car shortly after, they took Luo to a room belonging to Wei in a village of a town in that district and then to an abandoned farm on a mountain opposite the Guangxi Sports Center (behind a certain garden) for detention. They forced Luo to contact family and friends to repay a debt of 820,000 yuan. It wasn't until around noon on May 1, 2014, that Luo was released. On April 30, 2015, the defendant Bao was arrested by the public security organs; on June 9, 2015, defendants Wei and Huang turned themselves in to the public security organs. Further investigation revealed that on May 28, 2015, Bao's family compensated the victim Luo a total of 15,000 yuan for economic losses, and Bao was forgiven by the victim. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by defendants Bao and the others during the trial, and are corroborated by documentary evidence such as the criminal case registration form, the decision to file a case, the arrest report, household registration certificates, extraction records and photos, the list of accepted evidence, the criminal reconciliation document, and receipts; testimonies from witnesses Lu and Li; statements and identification records by the victim Luo, and confessions and identification records, as well as identification photos from defendants Bao, Wei, and Huang, which are sufficient for conviction.


The prosecution alleges that around 5 a.m. on January 21, 2014, defendant Zhao sold a packet of methamphetamine to Li for 300 yuan in front of the "Starlight Avenue KTV" in the county's urban area. At approximately 5 p.m. on the same day, defendant Zhao sold two packets of methamphetamine to defendant Li for 500 yuan in front of the "Saino" Hotel in the same urban area. Defendant Li then sold one of these packets to Gao for 400 yuan. The prosecution submitted the following evidence to prove this: 1. Witness testimonies; 2. Expert opinions; 3. Documentary evidence; 4. Defendant confessions, etc.


The prosecution charges that in early June 2017, the defendant Gao reached an agreement with the defendant Zhao to hand over stolen electric scooters to Zhao for sale. On June 11, 2017, at around 11 PM, the defendant Gao stole a Yadea brand electric scooter belonging to the victim Xu from the parking lot at the entrance of the district Employee Assistance Service Center located at XXX West Ring Road, Nanqiao Town, in the city's district. According to the appraisal, the vehicle involved was valued at RMB 1853. On the evening of June 12, 2017, at around 9 PM, the defendant Gao, together with the co-defendant Zhang (who is being dealt with in a separate case), stole a Xinben Okuda electric scooter belonging to victim Yin from the parking lot north of the RT-Mart supermarket, located at West Ring Road and Nanting Highway, Nanqiao Town, in the city's district. According to the appraisal, the vehicle involved was valued at RMB 1899. The two then proceeded to the intersection of Baiqi Road and Nanfeng Highway in Nanqiao Town and stole a Yadea brand electric scooter belonging to the victim Tao (which could not be appraised). The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Gao and Zhao during the court trial. Furthermore, these facts are supported by the confession of the co-defendant Zhang, statements from the victims Xu, Yin, and Tao, the price determination certificate issued by a certain district development and reform commission in Shanghai, and evidence provided by the public security organs, including the incident and arrest records, seizure transcripts, seizure warrant, seizure list, restitution list, identification transcripts, and photos of the items, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The trial found that the defendants Wei and Zhang are friends, and the victim Wu is the owner of "Aodi Kuangchao KTV" in a certain town. From 22:00 on September 15, 2018, to 00:30 on September 16, defendants Wei, Zhang, and friends including Zhang1 and Liu were singing at "Aodi Kuangchao KTV". Dissatisfaction arose in Wei and Zhang due to the service staff repeatedly asking for payment of service fees. Later, Wei had an argument with Wu over the billing issue, during which Wei pushed Wu and got into a fight with him. Zhang and others attempted to intervene, during which Zhang punched and kicked Wu and the intervening individuals. After the parties were separated, Wei picked up bricks and a bench intending to hit Wu, but was struck on the head by Wu with a pickaxe handle, resulting in Wei being injured and hospitalized. Several individuals present during the incident, including Wei, sustained injuries of varying degrees. According to the identification conducted by the Nenjiang Banner Public Security Judicial Identification Center of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Wei's intracranial injury was assessed as minor injury level 1, and the cranial injury as minor injury level 2. The comprehensive assessment concluded that Wei's injuries were of minor injury level 1. It was also discovered that after the defendants Wei and Zhang were apprehended, they voluntarily and truthfully confessed their crimes. During the examination and prosecution stage, they pleaded guilty and accepted punishment, signed a plea of guilty and agreement, and obtained the victim Wu's understanding. The above facts are backed by a list of accepted evidence materials, one pickaxe handle, records of extraction, photos extracted from the scene, basic information and household registration of the defendants, the process of bringing the defendants to justice, the process of solving the case, evidence collection notifications, evidence collection list, criminal judgment, one medical record of Wei, list of accepted evidence materials, WeChat conversation screenshots, list of accepted evidence materials, compensation agreement and receipt, letter of forgiveness, administrative punishment decision, testimonies of Zhang1, Xi and others, statement of the victim Wu, confessions of defendants Wei and Zhang, the written judgment from the Nenjiang Banner Public Security Judicial Identification Center of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, inspection record, and electronic surveillance video from "Aodi Kuangchao" KTV.


The prosecution charges that since May 2013, the defendants Shu and Dai, a couple, through Huang A (handled in another case), operated the "Mark Six" gambling in a mahjong parlor located at No. X, X Road, X Town, X City. The defendants Shu and Dai would receive 10% of the total bet amount as a commission. Subsequently, defendants Dai and Shu accepted "Mark Six" gambling bets purchased by Li and Wang (already administratively penalized) and others at their place, collecting over 80 periods of gambling bets, accumulating a total of more than 160,000 yuan. On January 28, 2014, defendant Shu voluntarily turned herself in at the public security bureau of X City. On April 28, 2014, defendants Shu and Dai voluntarily returned embezzled funds amounting to 16,000 yuan to this court. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Dai and Shu during the trial, and there is sufficient evidence to confirm them, including evidence preservation decision documents, seizure decision documents, situation instructions, public security administrative punishment decisions, account books, receipts, testimonies from witnesses Wang, Li, Shi, and Huang, inspection records, identification records and photos, CDs, a voluntary surrender recognition opinion document, invoices, the arrest process, confessions and identification documents of defendants Shu and Dai.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges that at around 3 a.m. on March 14, 2016, the defendants Chen and Liang, after finishing using the internet at an internet cafe in a certain district of a certain city and preparing to leave, noticed that the victim, Zheng, who was using computer number 078 in the internet cafe, was asleep and had placed an iPhone 5S beneath the monitor of computer number 078 to charge. Chen then suggested stealing the phone, and Liang agreed. Liang kept watch while Chen stole the phone. Afterwards, the phone was used by Liang. On March 31, 2016, both defendants were arrested by the police, but the phone could not be recovered. According to the appraisal by the Price Certification Center of a certain district's Price Bureau, the stolen iPhone 5S belonging to Zheng was valued at 2,200 yuan. During the court hearing, the defendants did not dispute the above facts, and there was corroborating evidence such as the victim's statement, identification records, surveillance video, price appraisal report, and the defendants' confessions and defenses, which are sufficient to establish the facts. The prosecution suggests that the court sentence the defendants Chen and Liang to detention for the crime of x and impose a fine.


A certain People's Procuratorate charged: 1. From mid-August to the end of August 2016, the defendants Zhao and Wang, along with Li (already sentenced) and Zhang (already sentenced), stole silverfish four times from a reservoir in Shuangyang District, Changchun City. Each time, they stole over 100 jin of silverfish, totaling over 400 jin, with a value of over 4000 RMB; 2. From early September to mid-September 2016, the defendant Wang, together with Li (already sentenced), Zhang (already sentenced), and Hu (already sentenced), stole silverfish more than ten times from a reservoir in Shuangyang District, Changchun City. Each time, they stole over 200 jin of silverfish, totaling around 2000 jin, with a value of over 20000 RMB; 3. On September 16, 2016, the defendant Wang, together with Li (already sentenced), Zhang (already sentenced), and Hu (already sentenced), stole 304.3 jin of silverfish from a reservoir in Shuangyang District, Changchun City, and were caught by the public security authorities. Upon appraisal, the stolen silverfish were valued at 3104 RMB. In summary, the defendant Zhao participated in theft four times, stealing over 100 jin of silverfish each time, totaling over 400 jin, valued at over 4000 RMB. The defendant Wang participated in theft more than twenty times, stealing over 2700 jin of silverfish in total, valued at over 27000 RMB. After the crime, the defendant Zhao was caught and returned 800 RMB of stolen goods, while Wang turned himself in and returned 3000 RMB of stolen goods. The prosecution has evidence to support the above facts, including the confessions and defenses of the defendants Zhao and Wang, witness testimonies, appraisal opinions, identification records, and documentary evidence.


After trial, it was found that around 1 AM on June 9, 2015, Cheng's cousin, Shu, instructed Cheng to go to the Royal KTV on Longgang Road in a certain town of a certain county to ask for a woman's contact information because Shu's girlfriend had a dispute with another KTV hostess there. Cheng, together with Li and Gu (handled in a separate case), went to the KTV. When they failed to get the contact information from the KTV staff, Cheng started smashing the glass inside the KTV with a teacup and a U-lock. Seeing this, Li and Gu joined in and helped destroy the glass and cameras. When the KTV staff tried to stop them, a scuffle ensued. Gu then brandished a knife he had with him to threaten the KTV staff. Cheng, along with the other two, subsequently injured Chen and Lu, who were inside the KTV. Upon receiving a report, police officers rushed to the scene and arrested Cheng and Li on the spot.

According to an appraisal by the price department, the destroyed items were valued at RMB 2,684. Forensic evaluations determined that the injuries sustained by victims Chen and Lu were minor. After the incident, Cheng and Li compensated victims Xu, Lu, and Chen with a total of RMB 25,000 for their economic losses, and received their forgiveness. Cheng and Li raised no objections to the stated facts during the trial. Furthermore, the facts are supported by evidence including the knife used as the crime tool, the report materials, screenshots of the surveillance footage, the criminal judgment paper, letters of forgiveness, receipts, explanatory notes, household registration proofs, and testimonies from witnesses Xu, Ming, Zhao, etc., victims Xu, Chen, and Lu’s statements, the price appraisal opinion, the forensic human injury assessment, the on-site inspection records, evidence extraction registration form, site photos, identification transcripts, video surveillance footage, as well as synchronized audio and video of interrogations, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: Between April 2019 and February 2020, the defendant Qian established gambling chat groups on the "Xianliao" and "Mowang" apps to attract gamblers to conduct mahjong gambling activities through the "Zhoushan Bianfeng Chess" app. He formulated "rake-off" rules and managed, collected rakes, and handled financial settlements within the gambling chat groups, amassing a total of 106,991 RMB in rake-offs. The defendant Chen, entrusted by the defendant Qian, became the administrator of the aforementioned gambling group, assisting Qian in management, rake collection, and financial settlements, totaling 26,907 RMB in rake-offs. On February 28, 2020, the defendant Chen voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed his crimes; the defendant Qian also truthfully confessed his crimes upon apprehension. Following the incident, both defendants have returned all illicit gains. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by the defendants Qian and Chen during the trial, and are substantiated by the testimonies of witnesses Gao, Chai, Yao, Liu, and Zhang; search warrant, search record, seizure decision, seizure list, restitution list, photos of bank cards and mobile phones, explanatory notes, audio-visual materials, evidence retrieval notices, evidence retrieval lists, electronic evidence inspection work records, assistance in property inquiry notices, account transaction details, audio-visual materials, electronic data production instructions, accompanying transfer lists, confirmation lists of the involved assets' storage, cash deposit vouchers, household registration proof, and the account of how the case was solved. These evidences are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution charges that at around 1:00 a.m. on November 30, 2013, the defendants Wu and Lu stole a Flying Bird brand electric tricycle and a Ben de brand electric bicycle from the first floor of Zheng's house, located at 2-117, Sifen Village, a certain town, a certain city. An appraisal determined that the stolen vehicles were valued at 3,750 yuan. After the incident, the stolen goods were recovered and returned to the owner. At around 4:00 a.m. the same day, the defendants Wu and Lu were apprehended by the public security authorities, and after being brought to the station, defendant Wu truthfully confessed to the criminal activities. The facts mentioned above were not disputed by defendants Wu and Lu during the trial. Furthermore, the case is supported by evidence, including household registration certificates, criminal judgments, certificates of release after serving sentences, administrative penalty decisions, records of seizure, lists of seized and returned items, identification transcripts and photographs, maintenance vouchers, payment receipts, explanatory notes, the account of how the defendants were brought to justice, statements from the victim Zheng, confessions from defendants Wu and Lu, on-site investigation transcripts, diagrams, on-site photographs, and price appraisal conclusions, all sufficient to confirm the charges.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place alleges: In the early hours of November 12, 2015, Yu Moujia (already sentenced) entered Room 862 of Sou Ge KTV in Hushan Street, Cixi City, due to drunkenness to urinate, and had a dispute with Yang and Wang in the room, which led to him being pulled out. Subsequently, Yu Moujia gathered defendants Hu, Yu, Zhang, and Yu Mouyi (a minor, handled separately) to return to Room 862 and assaulted Yang and Wang using methods such as stabbing with a knife, smashing with beer bottles, and punching and kicking, resulting in injuries to Yang and Wang. According to forensic identification, Yang's external injuries caused a complete fracture of the right 4th metacarpal bone, constituting a level 2 minor injury; external injuries resulted in a scar over 1.0 cm in length on the body, constituting a slight injury; Wang's external injuries resulted in a scar over 1.0 cm in length on a limb, constituting a slight injury. After the incident, defendants Yu and Zhang voluntarily surrendered to the authorities, truthfully confessed their crimes, and jointly compensated Yang with RMB 16,000 and Wang with RMB 10,000, obtaining the victims' forgiveness. Defendant Hu, after coming to the authorities, truthfully confessed his crimes. The above facts were undisputed by defendants Hu, Yu, and Zhang during the court hearing, and are confirmed by the victim statements of Yang and Wang, the testimony of witness Chen, identification records and photos, surveillance video, forensic medical examination reports on bodily injury, medical records, injury photos, letters of forgiveness, compensation statements, the process of being captured and coming to the authorities, the confessions of co-defendants Yu Moujia and Yu Mouyi, Criminal Judgment No. (2016) Zhe 0282 Xing Chu 178, and the identity documents of defendants Hu, Yu, and Zhang, which are sufficient for recognition. Based on the above criminal facts and circumstances, the public prosecution suggests that the sentencing range for defendant Hu should be eight months to one year and eight months of fixed-term imprisonment; for defendant Yu, six months to one year; and for defendant Zhang, six months to one year.


The prosecution charges: I. Crime X 1. At the end of November 2018, defendant Li, knowing that Liu introduced Liu1 and Zhang, who intended to illegally work in a certain country, arranged for others to process tourist visas for Liu1 and Zhang. Li charged each of them a fee of 43,000 yuan and arranged for them to leave the country for a certain country on December 6 of the same year. On December 7 of the same year, defendant Li paid defendant Liu an introduction fee of 8,500 yuan. Liu1 and Zhang stayed in the certain country for an extended period to work illegally. 2. In April 2019, defendant Li, knowing that Zhao intended to illegally work in a certain country, arranged for others to process a non-working visa for Zhao. Li charged Zhao more than 20,000 yuan and arranged for Zhao to leave the country for a certain country on May 9, 2019. Zhao stayed in the certain country for an extended period to work illegally. II. Crime X Defendant Zhu, knowing that defendant Li was being investigated by the public security organs for illegally organizing others to cross the national (border) illegally, hid defendant Li in his residence in a certain city of a certain province on November 29, 2019. On November 21, 2019, defendant Liu was summoned to the case by public security organs from his home. On November 30 of the same year, defendants Li and Zhu were arrested and brought to justice by public security organs in a certain city.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: On March 16, 2015, at approximately 2:00 AM, defendants Yuan, Yang, Pan, along with Wang, Shao, and Zhang (whose cases are being handled separately), were drinking at Longxia Restaurant on Geyan Road, Songtai Street in this district. Defendant Yang invited the victim Yu and his girlfriend to drink together. During this period, because Yu refused to let his girlfriend stay and intended to leave first, he was assaulted by the defendants, resulting in second-degree serious injuries. Regarding the alleged facts, the prosecution provided relevant evidence. Accordingly,


A People's Procuratorate in a certain region charged that on the afternoon of December 23, 2014, defendants Liu and Niu walked to the Jinxiu Qingcheng Community in Linqing City to commit theft. They stole items valued at 2,738.1 yuan from the homes of victims Ji and Chen. Later, when they attempted theft at Xing's home, they were caught and turned over to the public security authorities. After the incident, defendant Liu assisted the public security authorities in apprehending defendant Niu. All stolen items have been returned to the victims.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain area accused that from December 15, 2012, to January 6, 2013, the defendants Huang and Zhang, after planning, repeatedly allowed the prostitute Chen (under 18 years old) and Su to engage in prostitution and take commissions at the massage parlor they jointly operated at 132 Shudong Road, Aojiang Town, Pingyang County. On the evening of January 6, 2013, at around 21:00, the defendants Huang and Zhang again allowed Chen to engage in prostitution twice with clients such as Wu and were subsequently apprehended by the public security authorities. The defendants Huang and Zhang did not object to these facts during the trial, and there were witness testimonies from Chen, Su, Wu, Hong, and another Chen, inspection records, identification records, administrative penalty decision documents, inventory of seized items, household registration inquiry records, and apprehension process evidence, all sufficient to establish the facts.


Upon trial, it was found that from early June to August 2, 2011, individuals including Jin D, Jin C, Lei, Lin, Huang B, Jin B, Huang A, Zheng, Jin A (all of whom have been sentenced) set up a gambling venue in the mountains near Fengwo Office and Naocun Office in Shuitou Town, Pingyang County. They organized gambling activities in the form of "Pai Gow" and illegally collected a rake-off of 150,000 RMB. During this period, the defendants Zhou and Lin served as lookouts at this gambling venue. After the crime was discovered, Zhou and Lin voluntarily surrendered to the police on January 14 and February 28, 2013, respectively. Additionally, it was found that co-defendants Jin D and others have returned the illegal proceeds obtained jointly. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhou and Lin during the trial, and were further substantiated by their previous confessions, statements from co-defendants Huang A, Zheng, Jin A, testimony from witness Zhu, identification records, identification documents, the process of their capture, and the criminal judgments of co-defendants, all of which are sufficient for confirmation.


The People's Procuratorate of Longwan District in a certain city has charged: Starting from July and August 2015, defendants Feng and Yu, after premeditation, accepted wagers from others in the form of "Mark Six" gambling at the residence rented by Feng at No. 43 Puzhou Street, Puzhou Subdistrict, Longwan District, a certain city. Upon investigation, it was found that defendants Yu and Feng accepted wagers for at least 10 periods of Mark Six, with the total wager amounting to more than 24,822 yuan. The prosecution has submitted corresponding evidence for the above allegations.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges that on the evening of May 18, 2016, defendants Liu, Ou, Geng, and Ge, after prior consultation, illegally used electricity to fish in the Meilin River area of a certain village in a certain town of a certain district during the fishing ban period. They were caught on the spot by police officers from the public security bureau of a certain district of a certain city. The police confiscated a total of 74 fish from defendants Liu, Ou, Geng, and Ge. Further investigation revealed that upon discovery of the case by the public security agency, one electric bamboo pole, one water bucket, one inverter, one battery, and one electric probe (including 5 meters of electric wire) owned by defendant Liu were seized. These items are currently stored at the Anchang Police Station of the public security bureau of a certain district in a certain city. After the arrest, defendants Liu, Ou, Geng, and Ge truthfully confessed to the above facts. During the court hearing, defendants Liu, Ou, Geng, and Ge did not object to the above facts, which are corroborated by photos of the crime tools, the seizure list from the public security bureau of a certain district, a satellite positioning map, the notification from the People's Government of Zhejiang Province regarding the issuance of rights and certificates for the designated areas, a certificate from the Fisheries Administration Station of a certain district, a notification from the Agriculture and Forestry Bureau of a certain district regarding the implementation of the 2016 fishing ban, an approval from the Zhejiang Provincial Ocean and Fisheries Bureau on the implementation of the fishing ban by a certain city, the announcement of the 2016 fishing ban from Shaoxing Daily, and records and photographs from the arrest process provided by police officers from the public security bureau of a certain district. All these pieces of evidence are sufficient to establish the case.


A certain People's Procuratorate charged that from approximately 9 a.m. on October 13, 2013, to around 4 p.m. the following day, the defendants Zhao and Yang, together with Hu B (handled in a separate case) and others, detained Hu Yi in order to demand repayment of a loan Hu Yi owed to the defendant Yang. They took Hu Yi from the Wankexin Hotel on East Station Road, Daxue Town, in the county to a certain village and the mountains of Baizhangji Town, where they detained and assaulted Hu Yi to coerce repayment of the debt. On October 21, 2013, the defendants Zhao and Yang reported to the public security authorities claiming that Yang had been defrauded by Hu Yi. However, they were criminally summoned to the case by the authorities. After being brought to justice, both defendants truthfully confessed their criminal acts. The aforementioned facts were substantiated in court by the prosecution through evidence including the confessions and defenses of the defendants Zhao and Yang; statements from the victim, Hu Yi; witness testimonies from individuals such as Hu A, Lin, and others; identification records, on-site inspection records, and photographs; a forensic medical assessment of bodily injury; proof of household registration, call records, verification of criminal history, situation explanations, and other evidence.


The prosecution charges that from April 2013 to November 18, 2014, the defendants Chen and Wen conspired to go to certain mountains near Villages in a certain county, using bird call recordings to capture 23 thrush birds with nets. Among them, on November 18, 2014, the defendants Chen and Wen captured 14 thrush birds with nets on a mountain near a village in a certain county, after which they were discovered by the public security authorities. The public security authorities seized bird-catching nets and other items. After identification, the captured thrush birds are considered terrestrial wildlife under national protection, deemed beneficial or having significant economic and scientific research value. On November 18, 2014, the defendants Chen and Wen were summoned to the case by the public security authorities. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Chen and Wen during the trial, and are confirmed by the testimonies of witnesses Zhang and Tu, identification records, photographs, documents from the Zhejiang Provincial Forestry Department, documents from the Forestry Specialty Bureau of a certain county, seizure order, identification report, case documentation, and population information forms, which are sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charged that in the early hours of June 30, 2014, the defendant Guan, due to a debt dispute with Zhang, gathered the defendant Cai to help him collect the debt from Zhang. Later, the defendant Cai gathered the defendant Shen and other individuals, including Yang (handled in a separate case), to forcibly take Zhang from Room 301 of the Meixin Hotel in a certain district of a certain city to Room 809 of the Jinhao Hotel in Jinqing Town of the same district, where Zhang was unlawfully detained for approximately 30 hours. On July 1, 2014, the defendants Cai and Shen were apprehended on the spot by the public security organs in Room 809 of the Jinhao Hotel. On July 7, 2014, the defendant Guan turned himself in to the public security organs and truthfully confessed his criminal acts. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Cai, Guan, and Shen during the court hearing and were substantiated by the following evidence admitted through court examination: 1) the victim Zhang's statement; 2) the testimony of witness Ke; 3) the confession of accomplice Yang; 4) the identification record; 5) the list of collected evidence; 6) surveillance video disc; 7) situation report; 8) account of the arrest; 9) account of apprehension; 10) household registration certificates. These pieces of evidence are authentic, legal, and sufficient to establish the facts.


After examination, it was found that since July 2014, the defendants, Deng and Xiao, a married couple, allowed two men to place video game machines and "slot machines" with signs reading "Parent-Child Paradise" at the entrance of their "Supermarket" located in a village of a town in a certain city, approximately 40 meters from a primary school. These devices were used by others for gambling activities. Deng and Xiao agreed with the two men to split the profits evenly, and during this period, they made an illegal profit totaling over 700 yuan. On August 22 of the same year, Wang and Zhang (both minors under the age of fourteen) along with Wu engaged in gambling using the video game machines at the supermarket. They were later caught by the public security bureau staff from a certain city, who seized four video game machines used for gambling and 372 one-yuan coins on the spot. The aforementioned facts, which the defendants Deng and Xiao did not dispute during the trial, are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Wang, Zhang, and Wu, as well as demographic information of Wang and Zhang, photographs of the scene, records of examination, counting records, lists of evidence preservation, lists of confiscated items and photographs, indicative photographs of the scene, the appraisal report on the video game equipment, administrative penalty decision, cancellation of administrative penalty decision, the progress of the case, and the defendants Deng and Xiao’s confession and identification evidence. This is sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges: 1. Around June 10, 2014, defendant Gu, contacted by defendant Zhang, sold approximately 0.5 grams of methamphetamine to drug user Shi for 200 RMB at a hotel in Yuhang Street, a certain district in a certain city. 2. On the afternoon of June 18, 2014, defendant Zhang bought methamphetamine from defendant Gu and sold approximately 0.5 grams of methamphetamine to drug user Shi for 200 RMB on a bridge in a village on Yuhang Street, a certain district in a certain city. 3. On the evening of June 20, 2014, defendant Zhang purchased 0.58 grams of methamphetamine from defendant Gu for 300 RMB, and later sold it to drug user Shi for 400 RMB at the entrance of a hotel on Yuhang Street, a certain district in a certain city. The evidence for the charges includes household registration certificates and other documentary evidence; witness testimonies; drug test reports and certificates; search records and identification records; 1 CD; and the statements and defenses of the defendants.


The prosecution alleges that on November 28, 2012, at approximately 10:00 am, defendant Lin, in collusion with defendant Wu, took advantage of their positions at work. While unobserved, they stole a roll of cowhide leather valued at 4,000 RMB from the production workshop of "Qingdao XXXX Leather Products Co., Ltd." On December 20, 2012, at approximately 9:00 am, defendant Lin similarly took advantage of their position at work and stole another roll of cowhide leather valued at 4,000 RMB from the same company's production workshop while unobserved. After the incident, the stolen goods were recovered and returned to the victimized unit. The two defendants were apprehended and brought to justice on December 21, 2012. During the trial proceedings, defendant Lin returned the stolen money amounting to 4,000 RMB, which has been reimbursed to the victimized unit.


Upon examination, it was found that on February 2, 2013, at around 10:00 am, representatives of Hexiangsheng Catering Company, Jia, Zhao, Yang, and Sui, had an argument with representatives of Longfeng Xintiandi Shopping Mall, Chen, Xiao, Bian, and Zhang A, in the fifth-floor conference room of Longfeng Xintiandi Shopping Mall in Hailar District due to a contract dispute. Later, when Chen attempted to leave, Jia approached Chen and grabbed his collar to prevent him from leaving. The defendants, Wang, Du, and Ma (deceased), entered the conference room upon hearing the commotion. The three of them grabbed and kicked Jia, causing injuries to Jia's face. According to an assessment, the injuries to victim Jia's nose and left eye socket were classified as minor injuries. It was also found that the defendants Wang and Du were brought to justice by the public security authorities on June 28, 2019. After the incident, victim Jia forgave defendants Wang and Du. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Wang and Du during the trial and are corroborated by the case registration form, police handling registration form, victim Jia's statement, testimonies of witnesses Yang, Sui, Xiao, Zhang 1, Bian, Chen, Bao, Li, Lü, Zhang 2, confession of co-defendant Ma, identification records, forensic identification report, Du's medical diagnosis certificate, Ma's death certificate, criminal judgment, written forgiveness, video disc of forgiveness content, explanation of the case, household registration certificate, and the confession and interrogation video discs of defendants Wang and Du, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution alleged that since June 2015, the defendants Lai and two other men (handled in separate cases) without the permission of the registered trademark owners, filled the raw materials for shampoo into empty bottles labeled with trademarks such as "Head & Shoulders," "Sassoon," "Pantene," and "Rejoice" on the first floor of a rental house at No. 1071, Hengjiang Village, Dali Town, Nanhai District, a city rented by Lai. Defendant Lai would then drive and deliver the counterfeit finished products to customers. In July and August 2015, the defendant Yi came to the aforementioned counterfeit product manufacturing site and collaborated with defendant Lai to produce shampoos labeled with trademarks such as "Head & Shoulders," "Sassoon," "Pantene," and "Rejoice" in the aforementioned manner. On January 20, 2016, police officers seized 4,392 bottles of counterfeit shampoos, along with a batch of raw materials and tools used for the filling process at the location mentioned above and apprehended defendants Lai and Yi on the spot. According to the appraisal, the seized counterfeit registered trademark shampoo was valued at a total of RMB 113,801. Regarding the above charges, the prosecution presented the following evidence to the court: business licenses, trademark registration certificates, identification reports and proofs; testimonies from witnesses Chen, Lai; confessions, defenses, and identification records of defendants Lai and Yi; records by the public security authorities on the capture of the defendants; on-site investigation records; search records; a list of seized items; property valuation report involved in the case; and the defendants' household registration documents. All of the above evidence was cross-examined in court.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place alleges: At around 22:00 on October 7, 2015, defendants Ma and Yang, after prior contact, together went to Room XXX at the “XXX Hotel,” located at XXX Lane, XXX Road, Huaxin Town, Qingpu District, this city. They sold 3.90 grams of methamphetamine (ice) to Liu and Wang at the price of 1,700 yuan, and were caught red-handed by police officers. After being brought in, defendants Ma and Yang both truthfully confessed the above-mentioned facts. The public prosecution agency believes that the actions of defendants Ma and Yang violated Article X, Clause 4, Article X of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, and the two defendants should be held criminally responsible for the joint crime of X. After being brought in, defendants Ma and Yang both truthfully confessed their crimes and, according to Article X of the Criminal Law, can be given a lighter punishment. It is recommended that both defendants be sentenced to one to two years of fixed-term imprisonment and be fined. The court is requested to try the case according to the law. Defendant Ma and his defense counsel have no objections to the facts and legal characterization alleged by the public prosecution agency; the defense counsel believes that defendant Ma is a first-time offender, has truthfully confessed his crimes after being brought in, and the drugs sold did not enter society, suggesting a lighter punishment for him. Defendant Yang and his defense counsel have no objections to the facts and characterization alleged by the public prosecution agency; the defense counsel believes that defendant Yang is a first-time and accessory offender, has truthfully confessed his crimes after being brought in, and the drugs sold did not enter society, suggesting a lighter punishment for him. After trial, the facts ascertained by this court are consistent with the facts alleged by the public prosecution agency, as evidenced by the following: testimonies and identification records of witnesses Liu and Wang, seizure records, inventory of seized items, photos of confiscated evidence, mobile phone screenshots, Shanghai Drug Testing Center inspection report, case registration form, working status, and confessions of defendants Ma and Yang. This evidence has been verified in court and confirmed by this court.


A certain local People's Procuratorate charges: 1. At approximately 0:30 on February 27, 2016, the defendants Kong and Zhou, after drinking, without reason, assaulted victims Xu and Li1 in the Hengsheng Internet Cafe on Longyue Road, a town in Cangnan County, causing injuries to Xu and Li1. According to forensic identification, the injuries suffered by victims Xu and Li1 were classified as minor. After the incident, Zhou reached a civil settlement with victims Xu and Li1. 2. At around 4:00 on the same day, defendant Kong, along with Fang, again assaulted victim Li2 without reason inside the Hengsheng Internet Cafe using beer bottles and brooms. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by the defendants during the court trial and are substantiated by the statements of victims Xu and Li1, testimonies of witnesses Dai and Wu, examination records, identification records, forensic medical evaluation reports on human injuries, settlement agreements, letters of understanding, receipts, administrative penalty decisions, criminal judgments, explanatory notes, the process of bringing the case to light, surveillance video footage, and household registration certificates, all of which are sufficient for conviction.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that: 1. On August 10, 2020, defendants Zhang and Shi, driving a Toyota car with Beijing license plates, went to the warehouse of the Industrial Park Project Department in Jingping Town, Pinglu District, and stole 65 boxes of high-strength bolts, one medium and large air impact wrench each, 8 lifting chains, 2 welding machines, 5 17-ton jacks, 2 50-ton hydraulic jacks, 3 square meters of 14mm steel plates, 3 kg wrenches, 30 box wrenches (valued at 29,089 RMB according to the Pinglu District Price Assessment Center), 20 bags of screws, 8 sets of trestle bridge supports, 50 ladder steps, 80 meters of 16-square cable, 100 meters of 6-square cable, and 120 meters of 38-square cable. 2. On the afternoon of January 22, 2020, defendants Zhang and Shi went to the Ankoutou Bridge parking lot in Mahuangtou Village, Jingping Town, and stole 18 wheel hubs, valued at more than 3,600 RMB.


Upon trial, it was found that at around 2 PM on February 27, 2014, defendants Tian and Shen harbored individuals using drugs, namely Xu and Chao (born on September 13, 1998), in Room 406 of Zhongli Hotel, located at No. 2, Jian She Road, Jiekou Street, in a certain city. They were later apprehended on the scene by police officers. Seized at the scene were a clear plastic bottle used as a drug paraphernalia, a plastic straw, a transparent glass container, one package of yellow crystals (net weight 0.20 grams, containing methamphetamine), one package of white crystals (net weight 0.07 grams, containing methamphetamine), and another package of white crystals (net weight 1.10 grams, containing methamphetamine).

The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Tian and Shen during the court hearing. The evidence includes testimonies from drug users Chao and Xu, a recognition record and photographs of defendants Tian and Shen identified by drug user Chao, mutual recognition records and photographs of defendants Tian and Shen, photographs of the crime scene, drug paraphernalia, and drugs identified by defendant Tian, photographs of the crime scene identified by defendant Shen, on-scene investigation records, a schematic diagram and on-scene photographs, inspection records, evidence preservation lists, a drug handover list, on-site testing report, laboratory test report, administrative penalty decision, household registration materials of drug user Chao, the circumstances of the arrest, household registration materials of the defendants, and other evidence sufficient to establish the facts.

The defense attorney, Wang, argued as follows: There was no objection to the charge of crime x against defendant Tian by the prosecution. However, there was opposition to the charge of Tian allegedly harboring a minor for drug usage, as it was argued that defendant Tian did not previously know Chao, nor was aware of Chao’s age, thus lacking any subjective awareness of whether Chao was a minor. Furthermore, it was contended that the defendant was a first-time offender, capable of truthfully confessing his crimes, and posed a relatively light social danger, and hence, it was suggested to the court to impose a lighter penalty on defendant Tian.


The prosecution authorities charge that, around 2 a.m. on August 17, 2015, the defendants Li and Liu conspired and drove a women's motorcycle to the vicinity of No. 17 Haoyuan Road, Shawan Town, in this district. Defendant Liu was responsible for driving the vehicle and acting as a lookout, while Defendant Li used lock-picking tools to steal a men's motorcycle of the Lukang brand (valued at 3,753 RMB), which belonged to the victim, Lan, and was parked inside the yard. They were caught on the spot by the community and security personnel. Subsequently, the police seized one glove, a flathead socket, and an L-shaped hex head at the scene, and from Defendant Liu's location, they seized a women's motorcycle, two screwdrivers, and a hex key. These facts were also confessed to by Defendants Li and Liu during the trial, corroborated by the victim Lan's report statement, witness testimonies from He Yi, He Bing, and Wang Yi, defendants’ confessions, identification records, the appraisal report on the property involved issued by the Panyu District Branch of the Guangzhou Public Security Bureau, on-site inspection records, site diagrams, site photos, search records, seizure lists, arrest process, and case-solving process, sufficient to establish the charges.


The prosecution alleges that starting from March 27, 2014, the defendants Yao and Liu, a married couple, knowingly used hydrogen peroxide to process food despite being aware that it is not permissible to do so. In order to improve the quality, appearance, and flavor of the food, defendant Yao soaked chicken feet intended for sale in a hydrogen peroxide solution for an extended period, while defendant Liu assisted Yao by adding hydrogen peroxide and selling the chicken feet that had been soaked in it. According to the assessment by Yueqing City Food Quality and Safety Testing Center, the confiscated hydrogen peroxide was found to contain 268.96 mg/ml of hydrogen peroxide, and the chicken feet contained 3.62 mg/kg of hydrogen peroxide. The aforementioned facts were also undisputed by the defendants Yao and Liu during the court hearing and were substantiated by evidence such as the sampling inspection slip, the list of confiscated items, national standards for the use of food additives, testimonies, details of the arrest, the inspection report from Yueqing City Food Quality and Safety Testing Center, search records, on-site records, proof of prior convictions, and proof of residence, among others, which are sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain area accused that on September 15, 2015, at around 10 a.m., the defendants Yang and He were driving a red Zhonghua brand sedan with the license plate K××××× from a certain area, illegally transporting smuggled cigarettes. They were intercepted by police officers at the Shatian Town Toll Station on the Lanhai Expressway in Hepu County, Guangxi. Six types of smuggled cigarettes—Zhonghua (hard), Soft Treasures Cloud Cigarettes, Soft Ru Yi Cloud Cigarettes, Hard Yuxi, Flat Box Yuxi, Purple Cloud Cigarettes—totaling 940 cartons were seized from the car. According to the inspection by the Guangxi Tobacco Product Quality Supervision and Inspection Station, the confiscated cigarettes were all genuine, with a total value of 159,878 yuan, and none of these cigarettes had legal transportation permits or any other legal documentation. The prosecution provided corresponding evidence for the criminal acts charged.


The prosecution alleges that around 10 PM on November 29, 2017, at a karaoke venue in a certain town, defendants Wang and Li mistakenly believed that Zhang had insulted their friend Wang. Subsequently, Wang and Li assaulted Zhang, causing injuries to Zhang's nose, eyes, and head. On December 29, 2017, the Ewenki Autonomous Banner Public Security Judicial Appraisal Center identified the victim Zhang’s bilateral nasal bone fractures as minor injuries level two. It was further ascertained that on December 11, 2017, defendant Li voluntarily surrendered. On June 28, 2018, defendant Wang was apprehended at a certain station. After the incident, defendants Wang and Li compensated the victim Zhang, obtaining Zhang's forgiveness.


The prosecution charges that at around 3 PM on November 8, 2015, the victim, Wei Mou Bing, parked the van he was driving (license plate: Gui M×××××) at the traffic circle of Laren Street, Laren Town, a county in Du'an. A conflict arose over parking issues with the defendants, Tan and Pan. After an argument among the three, defendant Pan grabbed a car lock from Wei Mou Bing's van and smashed the van, while defendant Tan dragged Wei Mou Bing out of the van. In broad daylight, defendants Tan and Pan assaulted Wei Mou Bing, causing him to be injured and requiring hospitalization. A forensic examination by the Du'an County Public Security Bureau determined that Wei Mou Bing's injuries were classified as minor injuries of the second degree. Further investigation revealed that defendants Pan and Tan voluntarily surrendered to the Laren Police Station of the Du'an County Public Security Bureau on November 10 and November 11, 2015, respectively, and truthfully confessed their crimes. During Wei Mou Bing's hospitalization, the two defendants gave 2,500 yuan to Zuo Mou to pass on to Wei Mou Bing, with 2,000 yuan for medical expenses and 500 yuan for living expenses during the hospital stay. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Tan and Pan during the trial. Supporting evidence includes documentary evidence such as the case registration form, the decision to file the case, household registration certificates, statements of appearance in the case, the victim Wei Mou Bing's admission and hospitalization records; testimonies from witnesses Wei Mou Yi, Lan Mou, Zuo Mou, and Li Mou; the victim Wei Mou Bing’s statements; and the defendants Tan and Pan's confessions and defenses; expert assessments; investigation and inspection records; audiovisual materials, among others. All the above evidence was presented and cross-examined during the trial, the sources of the evidence are legitimate, the content they reflect is objective and true, and is sufficient to establish the facts.


After trial, it was found that at around 11 a.m. on November 4, 2016, defendants Zhang and Huang, a married couple, were at the "Like" clothing store at 190 Middle Street, Ancient Lake Town, in a certain county. Defendant Huang was responsible for keeping watch, while defendant Zhang stole a white "BBK vivox6plus" phone worth 2305 yuan from atop the cashier's counter, belonging to victim Huang2. At around 6 p.m. on November 8, 2016, defendants Zhang and Huang were at the "Impression Theme" clothing store at 45 Shunhe Street, Ancient Lake Town, in the same county. Again, defendant Huang kept watch while defendant Zhang stole a rose gold "iPhone 6S" phone worth 3116 yuan from atop the cashier's counter, belonging to victim Ma. On January 17, 2017, defendant Zhang was apprehended by police officers. The next day, defendant Huang voluntarily surrendered to the police. After being brought to justice, both defendants truthfully confessed to their criminal acts. During the trial, neither defendant disputed these facts, which were corroborated sufficiently by materials including: written documents such as the defendants’ household registration certificates, records of arrest and surrender provided by the county police department, proof from the county special education school, receipt for the purchase of phones, criminal judgments from the county people's court, criminal judgment from Chengdu Jin Niu District People's Court, release certificates, testimony from witness Liu, statements from victims Ma and Huang2, confessions and identification records from defendants Zhang and Huang, an evaluation opinion from the county price certification center regarding the value of the stolen phones, on-site inspection records, and surveillance screenshots.


The public prosecution agency charges that on November 16, 2012, the defendants Chen and Zhang, together with Wang (handled in a separate case) and others, went to Room X on the second floor of No. XX, Xiaotang Street, Zhengyi Town, a certain city, unlocked the door using technical means, and entered the premises to steal. They took one desktop assembled computer belonging to the victim Li (worth 1,500 RMB) and more than 70 RMB in cash. After Chen was apprehended, he confessed to the crime truthfully. On the afternoon of January 25, 2013, Zhang voluntarily surrendered to the Zhengyi Police Station in a certain city and truthfully confessed to the crime. It was further found that Chen and Zhang compensated the victim Li with 1,200 RMB and 800 RMB respectively, and both obtained the victim Li's forgiveness. During the court trial, Chen and Zhang raised no objections to the above facts. The facts are corroborated by the statements of the victim Li, the confession of the accomplice Wang, testimonies from witnesses Qiao, Bu, Zhou, Zhao, Zhang, and Wang Jia, site inspection records, lists of collected evidence, restitution receipts, computer configuration lists, receipts, letters of forgiveness, the criminal judgment, price verification conclusions, permanent resident information, and other evidence, sufficient to establish the facts.


Upon investigation, it was found that Wang was the ex-girlfriend of the defendant Zhang. In 2016, Wang borrowed 50,000 yuan from Suqian Branch of Shanghai Finance Company and agreed on the interest rate. Since Wang did not repay the principal and interest on time, employees of the company, including Guan and Zhu, went to a location on May 9, 2017, to seek repayment from Wang. After learning about this, the defendant Zhang contacted Guan, Zhu, and others by phone and arranged to meet Guan and others near a neighborhood in a certain town in a certain county, under the pretense of discussing repayment. At around 16:00 that day, after Guan and others arrived at the designated location, the defendants Zhang and Hu started punching and kicking Guan and Zhu. The defendant Zhang then used tools such as bamboo sticks and iron forks to beat Guan, resulting in lacerations of the soft tissue on Guan's face, fractures of the bilateral nasal bones, bilateral maxillary fractures, nasal septum fracture, and a comminuted fracture of the left ulna. According to forensic identification, the degree of bodily injury to the victim, Guan, was classified as minor injury of the first degree. It was also found that the defendants Zhang and Hu truthfully confessed their criminal acts and those of their accomplices after being apprehended. These facts were not disputed by the defendants Zhang and Hu during the trial. The evidence includes statements from the victims Guan and Zhu, testimonies from witnesses who did not appear in court, such as Song, physical evidence photos, medical records, and injury photos, forensic identification of bodily injury degree, identification transcripts, surveillance videos, criminal judgment documents, proof of release upon completion of sentence, the case investigation process, explanation of the circumstances of apprehension, household registration information, among others, and is sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: At approximately 2 a.m. on September 15, 2014, defendants Xiang and Ye, after consuming services at Shanghai Beach KTV located at XXX Tifeng Road in this district, inexplicably vandalized the breakfast cart and lock repair stall belonging to victim Cheng in the KTV parking lot. Subsequently, they returned to the KTV and kicked damaging a Kawasaki motorcycle, two bronze statues in the hall, and a floodlight at the entrance. According to the appraisal, the damage was valued at 8,070 RMB. On September 15, 2014, defendants Xiang and Ye were arrested, and upon arrival they truthfully confessed to the criminal acts. After the incident, defendants Xiang and Ye respectively compensated the injured unit and the victim Cheng for economic losses totaling 40,000 RMB and 1,000 RMB, and obtained understanding. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Xiang and Ye during the court trial, and were substantiated by the statement of victim Cheng, the testimonies of witnesses Huang, Wang, and Hu, as well as the recognition record by Huang, the "Evidence Retrieval Notice," "List of Retrieved Evidence," "Inventory List," and photographs issued by Baoshan Branch of the Shanghai Public Security Bureau, the "Price Appraisal Conclusion of Property and Goods" issued by Baoshan District Price Certification Center, the "Letter of Understanding" issued by Shanghai Dingmei Entertainment Co., Ltd., and "Work Report" issued by Baoshan Branch of the Shanghai Public Security Bureau, all of which provided adequate proof for the conviction.


The prosecution has accused that on October 30, 2013, at around 20:00, the defendant Zheng and the victim Liu Moule had an altercation over billiard scoring issues at the billiard club on the fourth floor of Xiangying Hotel in Nanzhuang Town, Chancheng District, Foshan City. Subsequently, the defendant Zheng, along with defendant Tu and Wang Moulin, "Qiang Moumou" (each handled in separate cases), assaulted the victims Liu Moule, Liu Moubiao, and Luo Mouquan in the billiard room with billiard cues and other tools. During the incident, the defendant Zheng injured the victim Liu Moule's left thigh with a spring knife. According to forensic identification, the injuries of victims Liu Moule and Liu Moubiao were classified as minor injuries of the second degree. After the incident, the family of the defendant Tu apologized to the three victims and obtained their forgiveness. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Zheng and Tu during the court hearing, and were substantiated by the statements and identification records of victims Liu Moule, Liu Moubiao, and Luo Mouquan, the testimony and identification records of witness Hu Mouhui, the testimony of witness Le Mouju, the on-site investigation records, the forensic report on human injury assessment, reconciliation agreement, letter of forgiveness, arrest process, household registration materials, and the confessions and identification records of defendants Zheng and Tu during the investigation phase, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charges: Defendants Yu and Liu conspired together and, on March 24, 2016, at around 10 AM, followed Ma into an elevator on the third floor of the outpatient building of the Guangzhou Military Region Wuhan General Hospital in Wuchang District of this city. Taking advantage of the crowded situation in the elevator, defendant Liu was responsible for covering and obstructing Ma's vision, while defendant Yu proceeded to commit theft, stealing an Apple 6S Plus smartphone (valued at 5,300 RMB) from Ma's jacket pocket. To support the above facts alleged by the public prosecution, evidence is provided including the capture and case-solving process issued by the public security organs, documentary evidence, witness testimonies, the victim’s report and statements, the defendants' confessions and defenses, and the price appraisal report.


The prosecution alleges that between July and August 2013, defendant Liu, in collusion with defendant Fu, took advantage of the nighttime when no one was around. Liu entered warehouses No. 15 and 16 at the Wangjiangjing Shipping Station in Xiuzhou District of a certain city by climbing through windows. They repeatedly stole 14 rolls of jacquard fabric (with an average length of 190 meters per roll) and 31 rolls of 300T Spring Ya Spun fabric (with an average length of 250 meters per roll), all belonging to a city's Jiaruisi Weaving Co., Ltd. Fu then moved the stolen fabric to his Wuling van with license plate number Zhe F××××× and transported them to a town in a certain province for resale. The total value of the stolen goods was approximately 32,340 RMB. After the incident, defendant Fu returned the sum of 32,340 RMB, which was given back to the victim. These facts were not disputed by defendants Liu and Fu during the trial, and were corroborated by evidence, including photos of the tools used in the crime, the seizure order and list, the criminal judgment, release proof, fabric delivery notes, testimonies of witnesses Chen and Shen, examination records, identification records and photos, the price appraisal conclusion, the capture process, and explanatory notes. This evidence is sufficient to substantiate the charges.


The prosecution charges: 1. On the evening of September 5, 2014, defendants Tong and Luo colluded and went to Unit 4, the stairway entrance on the first floor of a building beside Fushi Jinma Apartment, Tangtouqiao Town, a district in a certain city, and stole a Yifan brand electric bicycle belonging to Li, which was parked there (the whole vehicle could not be appraised for value). The battery of that vehicle was valued at 551 yuan. 2. On the evening of around September 10, 2014, defendants Tong and Luo colluded and went to the vicinity of the demolition site of the Bailing Printing Factory behind Rural Cooperative Bank, Tangtouqiao Town, a district in a certain city, and stole four batteries from a parked electric tricycle belonging to Zhu, with a total value of 876 yuan. 3. On the evening of September 23, 2014, defendants Tong and Luo colluded and went to the swimming pool area of the Goldman Plaza at the Cultural and Sports Center in Tangtouqiao Town, a district in a certain city, and stole a Lanyu brand electric bicycle belonging to Wang, valued at 2280 yuan, which was equipped with a locator valued at 218 yuan. After the incident, the electric bicycle and locator were recovered and returned to the victim Wang. After being brought to justice, defendants Tong and Luo both truthfully confessed to the above thefts committed in collusion. The aforementioned facts were also undisputed by defendants Tong and Luo during the court trial, and were substantiated by the statements of the victims Li, Zhu, and Wang, the testimony of a witness named Pan, the description of the incident, explanatory notes, seizure records, identification records, seizure lists, return lists, lists of received evidence materials, receipts of payment, price identification conclusion papers, residence registration proofs, public security administrative punishment decisions, and labor re-education decisions, among other evidence, which is sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charged that on the evening of March 24, 2017, defendants Zhang and Zhu went to the front of Golden Age KTV on Changjiang West Road in Huaiyin District, Huai'an City, where they discovered that the key had not been removed from a red Zhendipai scooter owned by Su, parked in front of the KTV. The two defendants then stole the vehicle. According to the appraisal, the stolen electric scooter was valued at 2,726 RMB. After the incident, defendants Zhang and Zhu were apprehended by the public security authorities on April 5, 2017. After being brought to justice, they both truthfully confessed the criminal facts. Furthermore, the stolen electric scooter has been recovered by the public security authorities and returned to the victim. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Zhang and Zhu during the court hearing. Additionally, the facts are corroborated by the statement of the victim Su, the testimony of absent witness Li, photographs of the stolen electric scooter, surveillance video from the scene, video investigation analysis report, price appraisal conclusion document, list of seized and returned items, and the report on the case resolution, all of which are sufficient for conviction.


The People's Procuratorate of the Port District of a certain city accuses: Defendants Sun and Ji were electricians for the third phase of the Sunshine Coast Community Project in the Port District of a certain city. At approximately 14:00 on January 5, 2015, defendant Ji was working in the underground parking lot of Unit 8, Phase 3 of the community when he noticed a batch of lighting wires in the fan room. Defendant Ji suggested stealing the wires, and defendant Sun agreed. Subsequently, the two moved 28 coils of Huayi brand cables (26 coils of single-core solid conductor without sheath, specification: ZR-BV, and 2 coils of ordinary PVC sheathed cables, specification: 602271ec53) onto defendant Sun's minivan with the license plate 桂P××××× and drove them away. Defendant Sun stored the cables at his father-in-law's house, located at No. 3, Team 16, Nasuo Farm, Huashi Town, a certain district, intending to find a buyer. After the incident, the cables were recovered. The price center of a certain city appraised the stolen cables at a value of RMB 15,600. The above facts are undisputed by defendants Sun and Ji during court hearings and are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Luo and Huang, the case registration form, the filing decision, photos of the stolen cables, the list of seized items, the price appraisal report, the site inspection record, the search record, the identification record, and the household registration and confessions of defendants Sun and Ji, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts. The defense counsel for defendant Sun argues that defendant Sun is an accidental offender and a first-time offender, actively cooperated with the public security organs to recover the stolen goods, and has obtained the victim's understanding, requesting the court for lenient punishment. The defense counsel for defendant Ji has no objection to the facts and charges brought by the prosecution, believes that defendant Ji has a good attitude towards admitting guilt and is a first-time offender, and requests lenient punishment.


Upon investigation, it was found that in February 2019, Fan, a resident of Kelan County, had her daughter criminally detained by the Direct Branch of the Xinzhou Public Security Bureau. To secure her daughter's early release, Fan was introduced by Ma to the defendant Gao. Gao claimed to be able to handle the matter and charged Fan 11,000 yuan. Gao then introduced Fan to Huang to handle the matter. Defendant Huang demanded 30,000 yuan from Fan. Subsequently, Gao lost contact, and Huang refunded Fan 11,000 yuan before the case was filed, then also lost contact. After the case was filed, Huang and his family voluntarily returned a total of 32,500 yuan to Fan and obtained her forgiveness; Gao's family voluntarily returned 11,000 yuan to Fan and obtained forgiveness. These facts were not disputed by defendants Huang and Gao during the trial, and were corroborated by victim Fan's statement, testimonies of witnesses Ma, another Fan, Zhao, case records, recognition transcripts, WeChat chats, transfer screenshots, bank transaction details, receipts, and letters of forgiveness, which are sufficient to establish the case.


Upon investigation, it was found that the defendant, Li, ran a small shop opposite No. 210, Xiayanglin Village, Hengfeng Street, Wenling City. Starting from late November 2013, the defendant Li set up a casino in the shop using a "two-card" format, attracting individuals such as Chen, Zhang, and Que to participate in gambling. Defendants Jin, Pan, and Lin subsequently assisted in the shop, with profits being taken from the gambling dealers. By January 8, 2014, when the police discovered the operation, the total profit extracted was 25,000 RMB. Among these profits, defendant Lin personally earned 11,500 RMB, defendant Pan earned 2,000 RMB, and defendant Li earned 1,000 RMB. On the evening of January 8, the police from the Hengfeng Police Station of Wenling Public Security Bureau apprehended defendants Li, Lin, Pan, and Jin at the gambling site, seizing 700 RMB in gambling profits and a monitoring device on the spot. After being brought to justice, the four defendants truthfully confessed to the facts of the case. During the trial, none of the defendants raised any objections to these facts, which were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Chen, Zhang, Que, and others, inspection records, situation explanations, household registration proof of the defendants, and evidence of apprehension, sufficient to support the findings.


After the trial, the following facts were ascertained:

1. On May 26, 2019, defendant Ji went to the Gaoshuma Store located at 3-D225 in Yinhewan Digital City, Tianning District, a certain city, and falsely claimed to mortgage his mobile phone for a loan, promising to repay it the same day. Ji deceived victim Zhang Yi out of 5,800 RMB and used the money for online gambling. After the incident, Ji's family repaid 5,800 RMB to the victim.

2. On June 12, 2019, victim Wang contacted defendant Ji for cashing out a credit card. Defendants Ji, Zhang, and Zhou conspired to defraud the cash-out amount. At around 16:00 on the same day, defendant Zhou arranged for the victim to meet near the parking lot of a certain city's Wujin District, Hutang Town, Tesco, where he used a POS provided by Zhang to cash out 6,000 RMB from victim Wang and charged a cash-out fee of 72 RMB. They then falsely claimed the funds would be transferred the next day, using a fake identity to issue a promissory note and deceive the victim into leaving the scene. Ji used the money for repayment or personal expenditure. After the incident, Ji repaid 6,072 RMB to the victim.

Furthermore, it was found that on May 26, 2019, defendant Ji fraudulently obtained 5,800 RMB from Zhang Jia, the owner of Qiqile Digital Store located at B108 in Yinhewan Digital City, Tianning District, a certain city, under the guise of mortgaging his mobile phone for a loan. Ji's family later assisted with the repayment.

The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Ji, Zhang, and Zhou during the trial. These facts are corroborated by evidence including the accounts and case-solving records, arrest procedures, identification transcripts and photographs, extraction transcripts, search transcripts, seizure transcripts and lists, return lists, Alipay transfer records, bank card transaction details, receipts, the testimony of witness Zhang Jia, and statements made by victims Wang and Zhang Yi. These are sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charges that on January 20, 2016, defendants Shen, Gao, Feng, and Gu went to the women's clothing store Liang Yifang, the Ayoub children's clothing store, and the Dadao shoe store in Tongxing Alley, a certain town in a certain county, and respectively stole cash from victims Ren, Chen, and Bao, with a total value of RMB 5,800.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges that: 1. On March 30, 2016, at around 5:00 PM, the defendant Luo, together with Liao (at large), conspired to commit theft. They rode a motor-assisted two-wheel motorcycle to the entrance of the Carrefour supermarket located at * South Street, Chengxiang Town, a certain district in a certain city. Taking advantage of a moment when no one was around, they stole an orange two-wheel electric bicycle, brand "Rose Date," parked there by Huang. Later, they sold the stolen goods to "Qin's Repair Shop" at the Sunshine Market on North Road of a certain district government, obtaining 600 RMB, which they split and spent. The stolen electric bicycle was appraised to be worth 1300 RMB. 2. On April 6, 2016, at around 5:00 PM, the defendant Luo, together with Wen, conspired to commit theft. They rode a motor-assisted two-wheel motorcycle to the entrance of the Carrefour supermarket at 119 South Street, Chengxiang Town, a certain district in a certain city. Taking advantage of a moment when no one was around, they stole a red two-wheel electric bicycle, brand "Rose Date," parked there by Shen. They later sold the stolen goods to "Qin's Repair Shop" at the Sunshine Market on North Road of a certain district government, obtaining 800 RMB, which they split and spent. The stolen electric bicycle was appraised to be worth 1920 RMB. On April 6, 2016, the police apprehended Luo and Wen, bringing them to justice. To support the facts of the charges, the prosecution submitted evidence including the case acceptance register, the victim's report and statement, witness testimony, identification records, on-site investigation records and photos, the list of seized and restituted items, price appraisal opinions, the defendants' confessions, and other evidence, requesting the court to hold the defendants Luo and Wen criminally responsible for the crime of x. The defendants Luo and Wen had no objections to the facts and evidence of the charges and expressed their willingness to plead guilty. The facts and evidence found in the trial were consistent with those charged by the prosecution, and the court hereby confirms them.


The prosecution alleges that at approximately 3 PM on December 21, 2015, the defendant Wu and the drug purchaser Ding (dealt with in a separate case) arranged by phone at a public telephone booth at No. 28 Xiangyang Street, Yao Tai, Yuexiu District, in a certain city, to purchase methamphetamine, negotiating the quantity, price, and other details. At around 5 PM on the same afternoon, defendants Wu and Ling sold to the drug purchaser Ding a small packet of drugs (weighing 4.88 grams and found to contain methamphetamine after testing) for 1,000 RMB at Exit A of Shiji Subway Station in Panyu District, in a certain city. After the transaction, they were apprehended on the spot by the police, who seized the drugs, drug money, and other items. The defendants Wu and Ling raised no objections to the above facts during the court trial, which are also corroborated by evidence including photographs of the seized drugs, drug money, and mobile phone used as a tool in the crime, photographs of the crime scene, screenshots of the mobile phone call records, urine test results of defendants Wu and Ling, the apprehension report, case report, and inspection records issued by the Kuangquan Police Station of the Yuexiu District Branch of the Municipal Public Security Bureau, the detention order and seizure list issued by the Yuexiu District Branch of the Municipal Public Security Bureau, call logs, household registration and Wu’s prior criminal penalties, testimonies and photo identification records of witnesses Ding, Chen, and another Chen, confessions of defendants Wu and Ling, and the Test Report No. SuiGong(Si)Jian(Huayan)Zi[2015]4742 issued by the Judicial and Forensic Examination Center of a certain city in a certain province, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


After the trial, it was found: On the morning of December 28, 2015, at around 9 AM, the defendants Zhang and Chai, on bus No. 2 in a certain city district, covered for each other and stole a wallet containing 685 yuan in cash from the shoulder bag of the victim, Li 1. After getting off the bus, the two defendants fled but were caught by the public. Following the incident, the public security organs seized the stolen property and returned it to the victim. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Zhang and Chai during the court trial. Additionally, these facts are supported by the victim Li 1's statement, the testimonies of witnesses Li 2 and Zhang, the list of seized items, photographs of the stolen property, the list of returned items, screenshots from surveillance footage, the criminal judgment from the People's Court of Gulin County, Sichuan Province (2015) Gulin Criminal Case No. 142, the situation report from the public security organs, the defendants' household registration information, and synchronized audio and video recordings of the interrogations, which were presented and cross-examined in court and are sufficient to establish the case. During the trial, both defendants confessed to the criminal facts. The defense counsel for defendant Zhang argued that Zhang is a deaf-mute person, has a good attitude towards confessing, and as the stolen goods were recovered, a lenient punishment should be granted. The defense counsel for defendant Chai argued that Chai's act was an attempted crime; in the joint crime, Chai was an accomplice; Chai is a deaf-mute person and voluntarily confessed in court, thus a lenient punishment should be granted.


The prosecution alleges: On June 3, 2012, defendants Han and Li, acting in concert and with premeditation, were aware that the victim, Lu, had been raped by Shen (who has already been sentenced) and that the incident had been reported to the Xiaoshan District Branch of the Hangzhou Public Security Bureau. In order to help Shen evade criminal responsibility and avoid legal punishment, they fabricated evidence. They carried two written materials involving fabricated case details provided by Shen to negotiate with Lu. They reached an agreement with Lu at a bribe price of 48,000 yuan, demanding that Lu handwrite two false statements contradicting the facts of the crime and mail them in two envelopes to the Beigan Police Station and the Xintang Police Station of the Xiaoshan District Branch of the Hangzhou Public Security Bureau, requesting the case be withdrawn. They subsequently gave Lu the 48,000 yuan provided by Shen. After the incident, on June 11, 2012, the victim Lu proactively went to the Xiaoshan District Branch of the Hangzhou Public Security Bureau to report the incident, clearly stating the facts, and handed over the 48,000 yuan bribe money transferred by Han and Li on behalf of Shen, as well as an earlier 2,000 yuan, to the public security authorities. Following the incident, defendants Han and Li voluntarily confessed their criminal acts during police interrogation. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Han and Li during the trial proceedings. The evidence includes testimonies from witnesses Lu, Xu, Chen, Sheng, Zhang, and Shen, identification records, evidence collection lists and photographs, Lingtong card account records, item restitution document lists, seizure lists, text message photographs, letters from Lu, this court's criminal judgment document No. 2366 of 2012, injury evaluation reports, DNA identification reports, personal examination records, incident accounts, situation explanations, and household registration certificates of defendants Han and Li, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of Kaifu District in a certain city charged that on May 12, 2017, defendants Liu and Huang planned together to pickpocket. At around 9:30 am on that day, defendants Liu and Huang went to the vicinity of the Shahuqiao Market in Kaifu District of a certain city. In front of an unnamed marinated food shop next to "Deyuan Snacks" in the market, defendant Huang acted as a lookout and cover while defendant Liu reached into the pram next to the victim Peng, who was buying vegetables, and stole a red Apple 7 Plus phone (128GB). They later sold the stolen goods for 2,510 RMB. Defendant Liu received 1,260 RMB of the proceeds, and defendant Huang received 1,250 RMB. According to the price appraisal, the stolen Apple 7 Plus (128GB) phone was valued at 5,778 RMB. Defendant Liu was arrested by the public security organs on May 26, 2017. Defendant Huang was arrested on June 7, 2017. After the crime, defendants Liu and Huang truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. The public security organs have recovered the stolen phone and returned it to the victim. These facts were not disputed by defendants Liu and Huang during the court trial, and are corroborated by verified and true evidence, including the process of summons, household registration certificates, the criminal judgment and release certificates, on-site inspection reports, physical evidence photos, the testimony of witness Wan, the receipt for the return of stolen goods, the statement of victim Peng, the confession and defense of defendants Liu and Huang, the identification records, the conclusion of the price appraisal, and the expert opinion, which are sufficient to confirm the facts.


After examination, it was found that at around 14:30 on September 11, 2014, defendants Tang and Xia colluded with each other. Defendant Tang, using a China Merchants Bank credit card (card number 51×××13) given by defendant Xia, went to victim Mao's office at Room 702, Yinhai Business Building, 5th Qianjin Road, in a certain district of the city. They claimed they wanted to maintain the credit limit of the aforementioned credit card and intended to have victim Mao deposit money into the card first to repay the so-called overdraft. Then, they would use the credit card for false consumption, withdraw funds, and use the obtained funds to return the deposited money and pay a benefit fee to the victim. This gained the trust of victim Mao. When victim Mao transferred cash into the credit card as required and simultaneously extracted funds using a "POS" machine for card payment, defendant Xia altered the credit limit and inquiry password on the credit card, defrauding victim Mao of 26,412 RMB. Subsequently, defendant Xia withdrew 10,000 RMB from the credit card and gave it to defendant Tang. Upon victim Mao's report, the public security authorities arrested defendant Tang on September 11, 2014, based on the clues. Defendant Xia surrendered to the public security authorities on September 26, 2014. It was additionally found that the public security authorities returned the recovered 10,000 RMB in illicit money to victim Mao. During the trial process, the families of defendants Tang and Xia jointly compensated victim Mao for economic losses of 16,400 RMB. Victim Mao expressed forgiveness towards defendants Tang and Xia. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants during the court trial and were sufficiently substantiated by physical evidence and video screenshots, the public security’s process of arrest and case-solving, basic information on permanent residents, seizure records, seizure lists, identification records, historical credit card billing transaction records and transaction detail tables, call logs, testimonies from witnesses such as Yin, statements from victim Mao, audiovisual materials, and other evidence.


Through the trial, it was found that: From June 2011 to August 15, 2013, in a certain village within a town of a certain county, the defendant Li, along with Li Jia, Xu Jia, and Li Yi (all three have been sentenced), illegally constructed a small oil refinery. After the Spring Festival in 2012, they hired the defendant Ma as an accountant. The small oil refinery used waste tires as raw materials to crack polymer into crude oil under high temperature and high pressure, producing a large amount of wastewater, waste gas, and waste residue in the process. Li and others, without taking corresponding pollution disposal measures, discharged the large amounts of wastewater and waste gas into the environment, and directly piled the waste residue on the land, causing serious pollution to the surrounding environment. By the time of the incident, Li and others had illegally dumped this type of residue in the courtyard of the small oil refinery, weighing 151.20 tons. Upon inspection, the waste residue produced by this refinery was classified as type HW11 distillation residue in the national hazardous waste list and is hazardous waste. The cost to treat the contaminated site waste residue from this refinery is 475,200 yuan. On October 29, 2014, the defendants Li and Ma surrendered to the Public Security Bureau of a certain county. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Li and Ma during the trial, and were confirmed by the court with the testimony of the convicts Li Jia, Xu Jia, Li Yi, Wang Jia, and Liu Yi, the environmental damage assessment report and other appraisals, the on-site inspection records, the case filing decision, the report from the county Public Security Bureau regarding their surrender, and the criminal verdict document (2014) Dong Criminal First Instance No. 131, all of which are sufficient to confirm the facts.


The prosecution alleges: On the afternoon of January 25, 2015, defendants Su, Liu, and Qian, after consuming alcohol, went to the home of Zhang Moumou at 34 Hu Family Site, Zhonghua Village, Xincang Town, Pinghu City, and forcibly entered Zhang Moumou's residence by kicking the door, smashing the glass windows of Zhang Moumou's home. It is further found that on January 26, 2015, defendant Qian voluntarily went to the Xincang Police Station of Pinghu City Public Security Bureau to turn himself in, and truthfully confessed his crime. The criminal facts mentioned above were also acknowledged by defendants Su, Liu, and Qian during the court trial, and are corroborated by the case registration form, site investigation materials, witness testimonies, identification records and photos, price appraisal report, identity verification, and the inquiry documentation of unlawful criminal history, as submitted by the prosecutor and verified at trial. These pieces of evidence are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charges that the defendants Zhu, Qin, and Yao were security guards at Junrong Hotel on Dalong Street in this district. At around 2 AM on June 20, 2014, defendants Zhu, Qin, and Yao, along with other hotel security staff including "Brother Jie" (handled separately), had a dispute over compensation for damaged items with victims Wu and Hong, who were consuming services at the hotel, in front of Junrong Hotel. The defendants Zhu, Qin, Yao, and others chased and attacked the victims with homemade knives, resulting in victim Wu being injured (classified as minor injury level one). At around 2 AM on July 6, 2014, victim Liu, the business manager of Junrong Hotel, had a dispute over work-related issues with hotel staff in the lobby of the hotel. Subsequently, victim Liu engaged in a fight with the hotel security guards present, including defendants Zhu, Qin, and Yao. During the altercation, the three defendants injured victim Liu by punching and kicking him (injuries classified as minor injury level two). The public prosecution agency has provided this court with documentary evidence, witness testimonies, victim statements, defendant confessions and defenses, forensic reports, on-site investigation and identification records, and audiovisual materials to support the facts of their charges.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accused that at around 3 a.m. on January 9, 2016, the defendants Chen and Ning sneaked into the Dujia Dam community on Changji Road in Yichang City and stole a three-wheeled electric vehicle belonging to the victim Liu. According to the appraisal, the stolen electric vehicle was valued at RMB 5,620. The prosecution presented and read out evidence to the court, including physical evidence, documentary evidence, the victim's statement, the price appraisal conclusion, surveillance footage, and the defendants' confessions.


The prosecution charges: From March 2014, defendants Xu and Li were employed by a co-defendant, "A某某" (who is being dealt with in a separate case), to rent a warehouse on the first floor at No. 32 Tongya Street, Tongde Street, Baiyun District, in this city. They used this location to store and sell clothing bearing counterfeit "LOUIS VUITTON" and "GUCCI" registered trademarks. On May 23, 2014, at around 2 PM, police officers arrested the two defendants at the above location and confiscated a batch of counterfeit clothing bearing the aforementioned two registered trademarks, valued at 219,130 RMB. To substantiate the alleged criminal facts, the prosecution presented forensic opinions, documentary evidence, witness testimonies, and defendants' confessions during the court trial. Based on the aforementioned facts and evidence,


The People's Procuratorate of Guanyang County, a certain district of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, charged that on August 20, 2013, at around 10 a.m., the defendants Liu and Hou experienced drug withdrawal symptoms and, due to having no money to buy drugs, conspired to commit theft. The two went to the home of a fellow villager, Huang, and used a pre-prepared key to open the padlock on Huang's door. Defendant Hou acted as a lookout while defendant Liu entered the room where Huang resided and searched the room, stealing a "Baidi" mobile phone from under the bed (valued at 346 yuan, according to an appraisal). Liu then stole 10,000 yuan in cash from a wardrobe in the room. Subsequently, both defendants fled the scene. Following the investigation, the police recovered part of the stolen cash amounting to 2,200 yuan and the "Baidi" mobile phone from defendant Liu and returned them to the victim, Huang. The remaining stolen cash had already been squandered by both defendants on purchasing drugs and for daily expenses. After the incident, on October 1, 2013, defendant Hou voluntarily surrendered to the police and truthfully confessed his crime. To support the above charges, the prosecution provided evidence including the defendants' household registration certificates, the appraisal conclusion, the defendants' confessions, the victim's statement, site identification and investigation records with related diagrams and photos, and lists of seized and returned items.


After examination, it was found that: At around 12:00 on May 3, 2019, defendants Luo and Sun went to the entrance of the GreenTree Inn Hotel on Xieqiao Street, Jingkou District of this city, and seized the opportunity when no one was looking to steal a white Jixiang Lion brand electric scooter, valued at 2,526 RMB. On May 5, 2019, defendant Luo was apprehended by the public security organs; on the same day, defendant Sun surrendered to the public security organs. After the incident, the stolen electric vehicle was confiscated and returned to the victim. The aforementioned facts, to which defendants Luo and Sun raised no objection during the court trial, are supported by the statements of victim Yu, the price appraisal conclusion document, the incident and arrest processes, and other evidence, and are sufficient to be recognized.