The prosecution alleges: On May 30, 2015, at approximately 2 a.m., Defendant Jiang contacted Defendant Li to provide drugs. Both defendants jointly sold 0.85 grams of methamphetamine to another person at the intersection of Zhenxing Road in a district of this city, making a profit of 400 yuan. After the transaction was completed, both defendants were caught on the spot by public security personnel. The drugs and drug money have been confiscated.


After trial, it was found that at approximately 3 a.m. on August 19, 2012, defendant Yang, in collusion with defendant Chen, drove an unlicensed Volkswagen Santana to intentionally hit Zhou at the entrance of "Memories Slow Shake Bar" in a certain town, causing multiple soft tissue lacerations on Zhou's body. According to forensic identification, the degree of victim Zhou's injury was classified as minor injury. It was also found that after being brought to justice, defendant Yang truthfully confessed the criminal facts of himself and his accomplice; after the incident, defendant Chen voluntarily went to the public security organ to turn himself in and truthfully confessed the criminal facts of himself and his accomplice. The aforementioned facts raised no objections from defendants Yang and Chen during the court trial. These facts are supported by the victim Zhou's statement, testimonies of absent witnesses Dai, Pian, Pan, Shen, Shi, Zhu, Jiang, and others, injury photos, medical records, forensic medical injury assessment report, criminal judgment, release certificate, investigation and resolution process of the case, household registration certificate, and related documentary evidence, all sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district, in a certain city, charges that around 22:50 on June 28, 2020, the defendants Mei and Tian, while drinking with friends at a bar in a certain district of a certain city, got into a brawl after an argument over a trivial matter of toasting. During this time, both sides used beer bottles to hit and smash each other. According to an assessment, the defendant Mei sustained scalp lacerations and facial soft tissue injuries due to external force, both classified as minor injuries. It was further found that after the incident, the defendant Mei proactively called the police and later, upon being notified by phone, voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities, truthfully confessing the facts of the case upon arrival. The defendant Tian also truthfully confessed the facts of the case upon arrival. In the course of the court hearing, the defendants Mei and Tian raised no objections to the above facts, which were further substantiated through their confessions, relevant identification records, testimonies and identification records of witnesses Huang and Zhao, an evidence retrieval notice, an evidence retrieval list, surveillance video, injury assessment notice, and hospital examination records, along with the outpatient and emergency medical records, a forensic appraisal report by Shanghai Kejian Investment Management Co., Ltd., as well as the incident and arrest reports issued by the public security authorities, criminal judgment reports, re-education through labor decisions, administrative penalty decisions, release certificates, and the defendants’ household registration data, collectively corroborating the validity of the charges.


The People's Procuratorate in a certain location accused that, starting in 2013, defendant Li, without having the necessary formulation qualifications, privately used traditional Chinese medicine and Western medicine ingredients to grind into medicinal powder, claiming it mainly treated rheumatism, and sold it multiple times to defendant Zhang, totaling 15 kilograms. Defendant Zhang, without having the qualifications to sell pharmaceuticals, encapsulated the 15 kilograms of medicinal powder purchased from defendant Li and sold them in and around his residence. The public prosecution agency submitted physical evidence, documentary evidence, witness testimonies, and defendant confessions to the court to support the charges.


The prosecution alleges that at around 16:00 on January 23, 2015, the defendants Cha and Hu went to a certain district in a city and entered Room 902 of Unit 1 in Building 7 of Jianlongyuan on Zhongkang North Road by climbing the balcony from the rooftop. They stole an Apple-brand laptop belonging to the victim, Wang. (An appraisal confirmed its value at 8,112 RMB.) After succeeding, the defendants Cha and Hu sold the stolen laptop to another person. On the evening of January 28, 2015, the defendants Cha and Hu were apprehended by the police in a certain district in the city. The laptop involved in the case was recovered by the police. The prosecution presented evidence in court regarding the aforementioned facts, including physical evidence, documentary evidence, witness testimonies, victim statements, defendant confessions and defenses, expert opinions, inspection, verification, identification records, and audio-visual materials. Based on this, the prosecution believes that the defendants Cha and Hu, by disregarding national laws, secretly stole others' property for the purpose of illegal possession, with a significant amount involved. Their actions violate Article x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China. They should be criminally prosecuted for x crime according to the law, and the court is requested to punish them accordingly under the law. The defendants Cha and Hu have both agreed with the facts of the crime alleged by the prosecution and confessed in court. The prosecution's accusation that the defendants Cha and Hu committed theft is clear, and the evidence is conclusive and sufficient, which the court acknowledges.


According to the investigation, it was found that between November 2012 and August 30, 2013, defendant Zhao hired defendant Wang to work at his duck processing factory located at the entrance of Shiju Village in a certain county, handling the slaughtering and feather removal of ducks. During the feather removal process, because the fine feathers on some ducks were difficult to remove completely, for convenience, defendant Zhao purchased industrial rosin and instructed defendant Wang to illegally use industrial rosin to deal with the ducks' fine feathers. The ducks, after feather removal, were then sold to unspecified people. On August 30, 2013, the processing shed where defendants Zhao and Wang processed ducks was discovered by the public security authorities, who seized the industrial rosin in use on the spot and arrested defendant Wang at the same time. After the incident, defendant Zhao voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Zhao and Wang during the court hearing. Additionally, there are supporting evidence such as identification documents of defendants Zhao and Wang, investigation reports, lists of seized items, Technical Service Report No. 0842 from the Wenzhou Institute of Industrial Science Research Analysis and Testing Center, on-site search records, photos from the on-site search by the public security bureau of a certain county, and identification records, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: Defendants Chen and Wang were both guards at Hangzhou Certain Luggage Co., Ltd. (Certain Address, Yuhang District, Hangzhou City), responsible for managing the entry and exit of personnel and vehicles at the main gate.

1. One early morning in May 2013, defendant Chen, together with Lu (security team leader, handled in a separate case), premeditated; Chen took advantage of his work shift to sneak into the workshop and steal 2 pieces of luggage, with stolen goods valued at 900 yuan.

2. One early morning in May of the same year, defendants Chen and Wang premeditated; Chen took advantage of his work shift to sneak into the workshop and throw 9 stolen pieces of luggage over the company wall. Wang was outside the company wall to receive them and transported the stolen goods back to their residence, with stolen goods valued at 4050 yuan.

3. One early morning in June of the same year, defendant Chen took advantage of his work shift to sneak into the workshop and steal 11 pieces of luggage, with stolen goods valued at 4950 yuan.

4. One early morning in July of the same year, defendants Chen, Wang, and Lu premeditated; Chen took advantage of his work shift to sneak into the workshop, steal 11 pieces of luggage, and Wang opened the main gate at the company guard post. Then Chen transported the stolen goods out of the factory on an electric vehicle, with stolen goods valued at 4950 yuan.

After the incident, the public security organs retrieved 8 pieces of luggage that Chen had sold from a luggage store at a certain address on Beida Street, Linping, Yuhang District. According to the appraisal, this part of the stolen goods was valued at 4150 yuan.


Upon trial, it was found that between July 2014 and September 2015, the defendants Hu and Chen sold unapproved "Meng's Rheumatism Capsules" and "Compound Cough and Asthma Capsules" at Kangqiao Pharmacy in Qiaoshang Market, Tongshan Town, in a certain district of a certain city. The sales amounted to approximately 7,200 yuan, with illegal gains of about 2,000 yuan. After appraisal, "Meng's Rheumatism Capsules" and "Compound Cough and Asthma Capsules" were found to be counterfeit drugs. It was also discovered that after being brought to justice, defendants Hu and Chen truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts. The defendants Hu and Chen raised no objections during the court hearing regarding these facts. The facts are supported by the testimonies of witnesses Ma, Liu, Han, and others, bank transaction details, accounting books (copies), a reply letter from the Food and Drug Administration of Binzhou City, Shandong Province, confirming the authenticity of Meng's Rheumatism Capsules and Compound Cough and Asthma Capsules, household registration certificates, and evidence concerning the case and the apprehension of the defendants, which are sufficient to substantiate the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Shenzhen City charges: On October 14, 2011, at around 22:00, police officers conducted an inspection of Room 604, Building 1, Zhifu Garden, a district, and discovered several suspected narcotics in a corner of the kitchen, along with a homemade kettle. The defendants, Zhu and Liang, were found illegally possessing narcotics inside the residence. After examination, the seized white lump substance weighed 13.3 grams and tested positive for heroin; the white crystalline substance weighed 2.29 grams and tested positive for methamphetamine; the white powder substance weighed 62.7 grams and tested positive for caffeine; the red pill-shaped substance weighed 0.37 grams and tested positive for caffeine. Regarding the above charges, the prosecution presented or read in court the following evidence: 1. Physical and documentary evidence: illegally possessed narcotics, list of seized items, receipt for suspected narcotics, and identification materials; 2. Witness testimony: testimony and identification record of witness Liu; 3. Confessions and defenses of the defendants: confessions and defenses of defendants Zhu and Liang; 4. Expert conclusion: test report; 5. On-site inspection records and photos.


The prosecution accused that on the afternoon of October 28, 2013, defendants Zhou and Wei, together with Ding (handled in another case), conspired and pretended to introduce Ding for work to the victims Li and Zhang at Tianying Hotel, Hexing Road, Kunshan City. After collecting an introduction fee of 14,000 RMB from them, the three took advantage of Li, Zhang, and others' unawareness, and drove away from the scene. On November 1, 2013, defendants Zhou and Wei voluntarily turned themselves in to the public security authorities, truthfully confessed the criminal facts, and returned all the illicit money.


After trial, it was found that around 2 p.m. on September 4, 2014, the victim Puyang and others assaulted the defendant Shi over a gambling dispute. Holding a grudge, at around 5 p.m. on the same day, defendant Shi, seeking an explanation, gathered the defendant Wang and through Wang, gathered defendant Xu and more than ten others. They armed themselves with spears, steel pipes, and other weapons, and drove five cars to the south side of the road in front of the Jiaolong Hotel in Dongba Town, a district of a certain city. After failing to negotiate with Puyang and others, the group on Shi’s side chased and assaulted Puyang, Xu, and others with weapons. During the incident, defendant Xu and others intercepted Xu and attacked him with punches and kicks. On October 24 and December 9, 2014, defendants Shi and Xu were respectively apprehended by public security authorities; on November 10 of the same year, defendant Wang turned himself in to the Gaochun Branch of a certain city’s Public Security Bureau. After coming to the case, all three defendants truthfully confessed the main facts of the crime. The above facts are confirmed by the following evidence presented and cross-examined in court by the public prosecution agency, which this court acknowledges: 1. Statements from victims Xu, Puyang, Zhao, and Sun about being chased with weapons and scattering in all directions. 2. Testimony of the witness Gao. 3. Confessions and defenses from the defendants in a separate case, Li and Zhang. 4. Identification records and photos. 5. On-site investigation records and photos from the Gaochun Branch of a certain city’s Public Security Bureau. 6. Capture and confession process descriptions, case acceptance registration forms, and filing decision letters provided by the Gaochun Branch of a certain city's Public Security Bureau. 7. Household registration materials of defendants Shi, Wang, Xu, and their confessions. Defendants Shi, Wang, Xu did not object to the above facts and evidence, made no defense, and expressed their willingness to plead guilty.


The People's Procuratorate charges that on September 12, 2016, at around 4 PM, the victims Ma, A, and B Ma, along with others, were singing at "Good Voice" KTV in a town in Yangxin County. They had a verbal dispute with Liang Jia over a drinking toast. Liang Jia then called the defendants Liang and Shi, leading to another confrontation with Ma and others. Later, Liang called the defendant Liu and Shi Jia (handled in a separate case), while Liu called Liu Jia, and Shi Jia called others. They rushed to the vicinity of Tianfu Plaza near the KTV. Liang and Shi Jia wielded wooden sticks, and Shi used beer bottles to engage in a brawl with Ma, A Ma, and B Ma. Defendant Liu also punched and kicked A Ma and others, and threw A Ma to the ground. Forensic identification determined that Ma, A Ma, and B Ma sustained minor injuries. After the incident, the defendants Liang and Liu surrendered themselves at the Baisha Police Station of the Yangxin County Public Security Bureau. Following the incident, Liang and Liu compensated the three victims with a total of 30,000 RMB for medical expenses and other costs, gaining the victims' understanding.


The prosecution charged: On March 26, 2020, the defendant Liu went to visit the defendant Song at the room on the east side of the ground floor at No. 198 Xuyuan, a village in a town of a district in a city, rented by the defendant Song. At around 14:00 the same day, defendant Song and defendant Liu went to the room on the west side of the ground floor there and stole property, taking a gold ring and coins from a drawer in the room belonging to the victim Xu. Later, defendant Song also went to the room on the west side of the second floor and the room on the west side of the ground floor and stole 2 packs of cigarettes from a certain place, 1 bottle of white liquor, and 1 plastic water kettle. During this period, defendants Song and Liu also instigated Wang (handled separately) to go to the room on the west side of the second floor and steal 1 carton of Zhonghua brand cigarettes. Later, defendant Song again went to the room on the west side of the ground floor and stole 1 bottle of yellow wine. On March 27, 2020, the police seized from defendant Liu 1 gold ring (valued at 3,915 RMB, all currencies mentioned below are in RMB), 127 coins with a denomination of 1 RMB, 1 plastic water kettle, 1 bottle of white liquor (valued at 48 RMB), 1 bottle of yellow wine (valued at 14 RMB), 1 pack of cigarettes from a certain place (valued at 23 RMB) and 1 carton of Zhonghua brand cigarettes (valued at 450 RMB); all the above items have been returned to the victim Xu. After being brought to the case, defendant Song and defendant Liu truthfully confessed the above facts. Therefore,


The prosecution charges: On the afternoon of April 22, 2013, the defendants Lin and Wu, after prior conspiracy, went to the building No. 50 in Qingkou East District, Jiangdong Street, in this city. Defendant Wu acted as a lookout downstairs while defendant Lin used technical unlocking methods to enter victim Ouyang's home in Unit 1, Room 302. They stole an HP V3000 laptop (valued at 1,200 RMB) and then fled the scene. The stolen items have since been recovered and returned to the victim. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Lin and Wu during the trial and are corroborated by the statement of the victim Ouyang, the seizure and return item list, the price appraisal report, the on-site identification transcript, the inspection record, the criminal judgment, the release certificate, the capture process, as well as the confessions and identification documents of defendants Lin and Wu, which are sufficient for the conviction.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county in Anhui Province charges: In late February 2014, defendants Hu and Chen each invested 10,000 yuan, jointly purchasing trees on a mountain contracted by Wang for 20,000 yuan. This mountain is located at Duimen Mountain in a certain village, town, and county. Later, without obtaining a forest harvesting permit, Hu and Chen organized villagers to cut down some trees on the mountain. According to the forestry bureau of the county, the volume of trees felled on this mountain amounted to 28.5 cubic meters. On October 28, 2014, Hu and Chen were brought in after being notified by telephone by the police from Gongshan Police Station of the county’s Public Security Bureau. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Hu and Chen during the trial, and were proven by the presentation of evidence in court, including documentary evidence such as records of harvested site data collection, calculations of harvested timber volume, land status registration forms, lease contracts, household registration data of the defendants, and accounts of how they were brought in; witness testimonies from individuals such as Wang and others; confessions and defenses of defendants Hu and Chen; appraisal opinion documented in appraisal report Southforest Appraisal No. 2014-01; site inspection and examination records by the public security authorities, among other evidence. This is sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: On May 25, 2015, defendants Yu and Yuan, in order to seek illegal profits, knowingly allowed individuals such as "A" and others to use bank cards for criminal activities. They still organized Liu and others to issue 8 bank savings cards at a certain location, which were subsequently acquired, held, and sold. On May 27, 2015, a fraud gang used one of the Agricultural Bank of China cards sold by Yu and others (issued to Liu) to commit fraud, deceiving victim Zhang out of 40,000 RMB. It was further found that after the incident, the 40,000 RMB that victim Zhang was deceived out of was returned by Liu and others. After being brought to justice, defendants Yu and Yuan truthfully confessed to the main facts of the crime. These facts were not contested by defendants Yu and Yuan during the trial, and are substantiated by the statements of victim Zhang, testimonies of witnesses Liu Jia and Liu Yi, identification records, envelopes, scratch-off cards, remittance receipts, bank account details, bank account opening information, debit card opening information, surveillance video of bank card processing, withdrawal videos, arrest process, and household registration proofs, which are sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charges: 1. In late April 2016, defendants Zhu and Liu went to the home of He in Dafu Village, Reye Town, this county, and stole 3,000 yuan in cash from the bedside cabinet in the second-floor bedroom. The stolen money was split between the two. 2. In early May 2016, defendant Zhu climbed through a window to enter Liu Jia's home in Dafu Village, Reye Town, this county, and stole over 300 yuan in coins and 200 yuan in older version 100-yuan bills from the first-floor bedroom. 3. In mid-May 2016, defendant Zhu once again climbed through a window to enter the home of the victim He, and stole a gold necklace and a gold pendant from a cabinet in the first-floor bathroom. Appraisal determined the stolen gold jewelry was valued at 7,892 yuan. 4. On June 4, 2016, defendants Zhu and Liu went to the home of Lü at No. 40, Pan Village, Jiafa Town, this county to commit theft, but fled the scene when discovered. In summary, the amount involved for defendant Zhu is 11,392 yuan; for defendant Liu, it is 3,000 yuan. On June 4, 2016, defendants Zhu and Liu were apprehended by the police. After the incident, relatives of defendants Zhu and Liu returned the stolen money on their behalf and received forgiveness from the victims He and Liu Jia. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhu and Liu during the trial. The defendants' household registration information, the process of their appearance in court, statements from each victim, records of identification and recognition, appraisal opinions, receipts, and letters of forgiveness from the victims serve as sufficient evidence to establish these facts.


The People's Procuratorate of Xingqing District, a certain city, charged that at around 8:00 on August 4, 2015, defendants Di and Wu went to Haibao Market in Xingqing District of a certain city. Taking advantage of the victim Zhang's unawareness while pushing a cart to buy groceries, they stole a wallet from Zhang's handbag, which contained 221.7 yuan in cash. Later, they were apprehended by patrol police. All the stolen funds and items were recovered and returned.


The prosecution alleges: On the evening of October 29, 2015, at around 9:00 PM, defendants Jiang, Huang, and Su conspired and went to Liugang Bridge on the Dongyong section of South Road in this district. They held a knife to the neck of victim Jin to threaten him and robbed him of a VIVO mobile phone (worth 674 RMB) and a black backpack. The backpack contained more than 140 RMB in cash, a ring (value unknown), an ID card, a bank card, and other belongings. On the same day, the police arrested defendants Jiang, Huang, and Su.


According to the prosecution's accusation, from February 2012 to April 18 of the same year, the defendants Wang and Yu, in order to obtain illegal profits, repeatedly accepted "Mark Six" bets from individuals such as Shu, Jin, Gu, and Lu in a tobacco and alcohol shop they operated in a certain village in this city. The total amount of bets accepted reached more than 30,000 RMB, and they handed over the aforementioned betting funds to their superiors, "Captain A" and "Guohui" (whose full names are unknown and are being handled in another case). On April 18, 2012, the defendant Yu was arrested by the local police; on January 15, 2013, the defendant Wang voluntarily turned himself in to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed his criminal activities. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants Wang and Yu during the court trial and are substantiated by documentary evidence such as "Mark Six" account books, betting lists, withdrawal records, special receipts for temporarily seized items, photographic explanations, accounts of the arrest, details of the surrender, household registration certificates, criminal judgment documents, and witness testimonies from Shu, Jin, Gu, Lu, Zheng Jia, and Zheng Yi, which are sufficient to establish the case.


The prosecution alleges: At approximately 12:30 AM on September 18, 2013, the defendants Lin, Zhou, and He had an argument with Tang and others over trivial matters at Starlight Avenue KTV in Songmen Town, Wenling City. Later, at the entrance of Starlight Avenue KTV, defendants Lin, Zhou, and He, among others, used tools such as stones and dustpans to assault the victim Tang. According to the assessment, the facial injuries of the victim Tang were caused by external force and were classified as minor injuries. At around 5:00 PM on November 22, 2013, police officers from the Fuding Station Police Station of the Fuzhou Railway Public Security Department in Fujian Province arrested defendant Zhou at the Fuding Railway Station. On December 18, 2013, defendants Lin and He voluntarily surrendered to the Jiao Mountain Frontier Police Station of the Wenling Public Security Bureau. After arriving in the case, the defendants Lin, Zhou, and He truthfully confessed their involvement in the incident and jointly compensated the victim Tang a total of 45,000 yuan for medical expenses and lost wages. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Lin, Zhou, and He during the trial and are corroborated by the testimony of witnesses Su and Qiu, the statement of the victim Tang, the mediation agreement, the letter of understanding, the forensic assessment report on the degree of bodily injury, identification records, monitoring video discs, the defendants' household registration certificates, proof of arrest, and certification issued by the Jiao Mountain Frontier Police Station of the Wenling Public Security Bureau, which are sufficient to establish these facts.


The defendants Wen and Wang have no objection to the criminal facts charged by the prosecution, but only request the court for leniency in sentencing. The facts of the case as determined through the trial are consistent with the contents charged by the prosecution. The evidence proving the aforementioned facts includes: 1. Documentary evidence such as population information, the process of apprehension, previous conviction records, and administrative penalty decisions; 2. Testimonies of witnesses Jiang, Lu, Ni, and Chen; 3. Confessions and defenses of the defendants Wen and Wang; 4. Identification records. The above evidence corroborates each other and is sufficient for determination. The facts of the case are clear, and the evidence is true and sufficient.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged: Between July 22, 2016, and October 11, 2016, defendants Gu and Lu conspired to commit theft, collaborating in division of labor to steal three times at "Yujian Internet Cafe" and "Meiguan Internet Cafe." The specific facts are as follows: 1. On October 11, 2016, at around 3 PM, defendant Lu rode a motorcycle carrying defendant Gu to the "Meiguan" Internet Cafe on Renai Street in a certain town of a certain county, stealing a gold iPhone 6s from the victim, Huang. After the theft, they were apprehended by police on the same day near the community altar on Tongren Street in the same town, and an iPhone 6s was seized from Gu. According to the appraisal by the Price Certification Center of the town, the stolen phone was valued at 3,427 RMB. 2. On October 11, 2016, at about 1 PM, defendant Lu rode a motorcycle carrying defendant Gu to the "Yujian Internet Cafe" in a certain town of a certain county, stealing a white Coolpad phone from the victim, Xie. After the theft, they were apprehended by police on the same day near the community altar on Tongren Street in the same town, and a white Coolpad phone was seized from Lu. According to the appraisal by the Price Certification Center of the town, the stolen phone was valued at 230 RMB. 3. On July 22, 2016, at about 4 PM, defendant Lu rode a motorcycle carrying defendant Gu to the "Yujian Internet Cafe" in a certain town of a certain county, stealing a white iPhone 5s from the victim, Lin. Later, the phone was sold to a man nicknamed "Gao Si." The above facts are corroborated by documentary evidence, witness testimonies, appraisal opinions, photo identifications of the crime scenes, audio-visual materials, statements from victims, and confessions from the defendants as provided by the prosecution.


After the trial was concluded, it was found that around 4 a.m. on June 1, 2013, defendants Chen, Zou, and Tang, carrying tools for committing the crime, arrived at the first floor of No. 62, Jinding Beisha Shangbei Village, a town in the High-tech Zone of this city. Using a "fish-hooking" method from outside the window, they stole a black Apple 3 phone placed on a table in the room by the victim, Deng, and fled. As the three defendants fled, they hid the stolen black Apple 3 phone in a nearby pork stall. After the victim, Deng, caught up with the three defendants, he found the Apple 3 phone in the pork stall. Subsequently, Deng reported to the police. The three defendants waited at the scene and did not resist arrest when apprehended by the police. After being brought to justice, they truthfully confessed to the theft crime. During the arrest, the police found a switchblade on each of the defendants, Zou and Tang. Upon appraisal, the involved phone was valued at 540 RMB, and the knives found on defendants Zou and Tang were determined to be controlled knives. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Chen, Tang, and Zou during the court trial. There is corroborating evidence, including the victim Deng's statement, the arrest process, household registration information, search records, a list of seized and returned items, testimonials, a valuation appraisal of the involved property, an appraisal opinion notice, and a certification of the controlled knives, sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution charges: 1. On November 21, 2015, at around 19:00, defendants Luo and Zhou, in collusion, went to the riverside next to the "Nayong Grilled Pot Restaurant" in a certain village of Yangming Street in this city, and sold 2 small packets of heroin for 200 RMB to Xiao (handled in a separate case). 2. On the 22nd of the same month, at around 14:00, defendants Luo and Zhou, in collusion, went to the aforementioned location and sold 1 small packet of heroin for 100 RMB to Xiao. 3. On the afternoon of the 23rd of the same month, defendants Luo and Zhou, in collusion, went to the aforementioned location and consecutively sold 2 small packets of heroin for 100 RMB each to Xiao. 4. On the 24th of the same month, at around 16:00, defendants Luo and Zhou, after prior telephone contact, colluded to go to the second floor of the "Nayong Grilled Pot Restaurant" in a certain village of Yangming Street in this city, and sold 1 small packet of heroin for 600 RMB to Xiao. Xiao gave part of this heroin to defendants Luo and Zhou for consumption and sold the remaining heroin to Li A. Subsequently, defendants Luo, Zhou, Xiao, and Li A were arrested by local police officers, and 1 packet of heroin was seized from both Li A and defendant Zhou. According to the appraisal, the heroin seized from Li A had a net weight of 0.5767 grams, and the heroin seized from defendant Zhou had a net weight of 0.0291 grams, both containing heroin components. To prove the aforementioned facts, the prosecution has submitted relevant evidence.


The prosecution alleges: On January 17, 2016, at around 1 a.m., defendants Huang and Zhang, together with "Xia" and "Zhao" (both handled in separate cases), without any reason, assaulted the victims Jiang, Xu, and You Yi, who were chatting downstairs of the Commercial Building on Yan'an North Road in Xiangcheng District, in a certain city. This resulted in victims Jiang and Xu being injured. According to forensic identification: the degree of injury to victim Jiang was assessed as minor injury of the first degree, and the degree of injury to victim Xu was assessed as minor injury. On March 16, 2016, defendant Zhang voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities.


A certain local People's Procuratorate charges:

1. Theft criminal facts: At about 2 a.m. on December 6, 2015, defendant Liu went to the courtyard of district two of a certain village in the urban street office of Rushan City, and, taking advantage of the absence of anyone, stole a Passat B5 sedan worth 10,000.00 RMB according to appraisal.

Concealing or hiding the criminal proceeds facts:

1. At approximately 7 p.m. on December 29, 2015, defendant Yu, knowing the goods were illegally obtained by others, still purchased the Passat B5 sedan without any formalities that Liu had stolen for 6,200 RMB in a gas station near the highway entrance of a certain city, valued at 10,000.00 RMB according to appraisal.

2. At approximately 8 p.m. on January 9, 2016, defendant Liang, knowing the goods were illegally obtained by others, still purchased the Passat B5 sedan without any formalities for 7,300 RMB from Yu near the old bus station in Muping District of a certain city, valued at 10,000.00 RMB according to appraisal.


The People's Procuratorate in a certain region charged that from September to November 2019, the defendant Zhang, in collaboration with Liu, purchased over 2,000 registered SIM cards and nine sets of bank card packages (registered SIM cards, bank cards, U-disk tokens) at low prices. They sold these at high prices to a person named Wang A (currently at large). Defendant Zhang illegally profited over 20,000 yuan, and defendant Liu illegally profited over 15,000 yuan. The SIM cards sold by the defendants were later used by others for illegal and criminal activities. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Liu and Zhang during the court trial. Documentary evidence includes: case acceptance registration form, case filing decision, documents on compulsory measures, front and side photos of the defendants, household registration certificates, proof of previous offenses, online comparison inquiry, arrest process, personal safety inspection record, health examination form upon entry, case material clues provided by Wenshan Public Security Bureau, details of bank transactions, on-site inspection reports and photos, urine inspection records and photos, notification record, material evidence photos, search warrant, search record, seizure decision, seizure list, electronic evidence inspection work record, WeChat payment transaction details, WeChat bills, explanatory note, ID card, marriage certificate, copy of household register, list of items transferred with the case. Testimonies from witnesses Lu, Li, Wang, He, Du, Zeng, Huang, Deng, Sun, Xiao, and others, as well as the confessions of defendants Liu and Zhang, provide sufficient evidence to establish these facts. A birth medical certificate submitted by defendant Liu's defense lawyer at the trial is unrelated to this case and will not be considered.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges: At approximately 2:00 am on April 29, 2015, defendants E and Sun, after planning, carried tools such as pliers and gloves for committing the crime. They went to the temporary residence of the victim Pan in Building 8 of the Riverside View neighborhood in a certain city of a certain province. Defendant Sun was responsible for keeping watch while defendant E entered the residence and stole a white Lenovo mobile phone. After succeeding, the two then went to the residence of the victim Wang in Apartment 102 of Building 8 in a certain city's Rongqiao City. Defendant E kept watch while defendant Sun entered the residence and stole two bottles of Feitian Moutai liquor, two cartons of Zhonghua brand soft-pack cigarettes, and one carton of Diamond Hehua brand cigarettes. While keeping watch, defendant E also went to the residence of victim He in No. 15 Yantou, Shimen Village, Honglu Street, a certain city, and stole a UNISCOPE mobile phone. After the incident, the police seized the stolen Lenovo mobile phone, UNISCOPE mobile phone, and seven packs of Zhonghua brand soft-pack cigarettes, which have now been returned to the victims Pan, He, and Wang. According to the price appraisal by the Price Appraisal Center of a certain city, the total value of the stolen items involved in the case was 4,140 yuan. In response to the above charges, the public prosecution agency submitted corresponding evidence to the court, and through evidence presentation and cross-examination,


After a lawful trial, it was found that at around 16:00 on September 10, 2014, defendants Zhang and Li were driving on the east side road of Building 228 in Sanyi Village, Lubei District, of a certain city. Their dissatisfaction arose when the victim, Yan, was blocking the road. After the victim Yan made way for them, defendant Zhang continued to verbally abuse Yan loudly and, together with defendant Li, physically assaulted the victim Yan. According to the assessment, victim Yan suffered minor injuries classified as level 2. On September 18, 2014, defendants Zhang and Li compensated the victim Yan for all economic losses, obtaining forgiveness from the victim. These facts were uncontested by defendants Zhang and Li during the court hearing and were substantiated by documentary evidence such as the source of the case, the reconciliation agreement, victim Yan's statement, testimonies from witnesses Dong and Wang, among others, and the forensic appraisal, which are sufficient to establish the case.


After trial, it was found that around 4 a.m. on January 15, 2014, defendants Fei and Li, together with "Sheng Mo" (identity unknown, to be dealt with in a separate case), went to Room 13, Unit 1, "Industrial and Commercial Dormitory" in a certain bay, a certain road, a certain district of a certain city. They entered the premises by picking the lock with a tin sheet and stole one "Lenovo" B450, E49, and Thinkpad L430 laptop each (the three laptops valued at a total of 3,849 RMB), one "Sony" M35H mobile phone (valued at 975 RMB), and 300 RMB in cash from victims including Xiang. Defendants Fei and Li were later arrested by the public security authorities. The stolen goods were resold for money, which was then squandered. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by defendants Fei and Li during the trial process and are corroborated by the arrest and case-solving report and case handling instructions issued by the sub-bureau of the public security bureau of a certain district of a certain city; the victim Xiang's report and statement materials; the price appraisal certificate; identification records; on-site video surveillance footage and screenshots; criminal record materials; and other materials, as well as the confessions and defenses of defendants Fei and Li, which are sufficient to conclude.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain area accused that at around 23:00 on April 2, 2013, defendants Yang and Zhang sold four packages of the first-class controlled psychotropic substance ketamine, with a net weight of 2.2 grams, wrapped in plastic bags, to Zhong near Zhongjia Village Primary School in Hanyang District, Wuhan, for a price of 200 RMB, and were subsequently caught on the spot by public security personnel. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Yang and Zhang during the trial and are substantiated by evidence such as the capture and case resolution reports issued by the public security agencies, testimony from witness Zhong, photographs of physical evidence, drug test identification report, drug inventory list, list of seized items, criminal judgment, and the confessions of defendants Yang and Zhang, all of which are sufficient for confirmation.


Upon trial, it was found that in March 2014, the defendant You established an unlicensed electroplating processing plant in Lianmeng Village, Tingtian Street, Ruian City. In mid-April 2014, the defendant Yuan joined this electroplating processing plant and agreed with the defendant You on a commission based on the production volume. Defendant Yuan hired Luo to be responsible for production, while defendant You was in charge of product business. During the production period, wastewater generated from electroplating was directly discharged without being treated by environmental protection facilities. On May 6, 2014, this electroplating processing plant was discovered by the Environmental Protection Bureau of Ruian City. After sampling the electroplating wastewater, monitoring revealed a total zinc content of 162mg/L and a total chromium content of 7.89mg/L, exceeding the discharge standards by over 100 times and over 7 times, respectively. On May 6, 2014, defendant Yuan was summoned by the public security organ, and on May 23, 2014, defendant You turned himself in to the public security organ and truthfully confessed to the above facts. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Yuan and You during the trial and are confirmed by the testimonies of witnesses Luo and Chen, the monitoring report, the acknowledgment of the monitoring report, on-site inspection records, on-site photos, an explanation of the case, household registration certificates, and other evidence adequate to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charged: From April or May 2011 to the present, the defendants Xie and Xu, knowing that the rosin used is harmful to human health, continued to use rosin to process hair removal on pig heads in a rented house located at No. 22, a natural village in a certain town, a certain village of Changxing County. They then roasted the pig heads into pork head meat for sale. At 7 AM on October 31, 2013, police officers from Changxing County Public Security Bureau confiscated the rosin used for hair removal by Xie and Xu, as well as the processed pork head meat, from the rented house at No. 22, a natural village in a certain town, a certain village. According to the Wenzhou Institute of Industrial Science's appraisal, the rosin confiscated on site was industrial rosin. The Changxing County Health Bureau replied that rosin (for industrial use) is not a food additive or processing aid defined by the state, and is a non-edible substance prohibited from being added to food, as it is harmful to human health.


After trial, it was found that around 20:00 on March 19, 2014, the defendants Tan and Zhu were drinking with Ding at Ding's rented apartment behind the Sunan County Health Bureau. At around 23:30, the two left separately, each riding a motorcycle, and headed to a barbecue stall at the crossroads of the county town to eat barbecue. They were intercepted by the traffic police of the Sunan County Public Security Bureau while traveling on Baiyin Road to the county town crossroads. According to the identification by the Gansu Forensic Medical Appraisal Institute, Tan's blood alcohol content was 258 mg/100ml, and Zhu's blood alcohol content was 143 mg/100ml at the time of interception. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Tan and Zhu during the court trial. Furthermore, these facts were corroborated by evidence submitted by the public prosecution, including the case registration form, the decision to file a case, the confessions and defenses of defendants Tan and Zhu, witness testimonies from Ma and Ding, the Sunan County Public Security Bureau traffic police report on the incident, as well as photographs of blood sample collection, blood sample extraction registration forms, blood alcohol content test reports, copies of the defendants' identification cards, residence information inquiry forms, and copies of their driving licenses, all of which were sufficient to substantiate the charges.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges that the defendants Li and Shao, on August 20, 2014, at approximately 11:00, without obtaining construction qualifications, undertook the construction of a chicken coop for Zhao (handled in a separate case), which was built without approval at a certain location in the western southern area of an administrative village in a town in a certain district of a certain city. During the construction process, due to the failure to take any safety protective measures, the construction worker Ren was electrocuted and died. To support the aforementioned allegations, the prosecution presented the confessions and defenses of Li and Shao, testimonies from witnesses Dong and Sun, as well as forensic autopsy reports conducted by the Peony Branch of a certain city's Public Security Bureau on the deceased.


The prosecution alleges that in August 2013, the defendant Zheng rented a house in Building 55, Section 13, Guandi area within this jurisdiction, where he organized gambling using gaming machines and employed the defendants Cao and Zhang at the casino to assist and be responsible for collecting money, with a monthly salary of 3,000 RMB in cash. On September 24 of the same year, at approximately 1 PM, the defendants Zheng, Cao, Zhang, as well as more than ten gamblers including Zeng and Sun, were caught by the public security authorities gambling at the aforementioned location. The police seized gambling funds totaling over 19,000 RMB on the spot. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Zheng, Cao, and Zhang during the trial, and were sufficiently proven by the acceptance registration form, the arrest and case-solving process, witness testimonies, the on-site inspection transcript and photos, the identification transcript and photos, the expert opinion on electronic gaming equipment, the evidence preservation decision, the evidence preservation list, the confiscated items list, the administrative penalty decision, video materials, the household registration certificates of the three defendants, and the confessions and defenses of the three defendants.


Upon trial, it was found that on June 15, 2015, the defendant Wei had a dispute with Luo and asked the defendant Huang to bring people to teach Luo a lesson, but instructed not to bring knives or other tools. They also rented an SUV in a certain district for defendant Huang's use. On the morning of the next day, around 9 AM, defendant Huang received a call from defendant Wei, drove the SUV, and picked up "Li" and "Lu" (both are handled in separate cases) to meet defendant Wei at a certain location. Then, defendant Wei led defendant Huang and others to a place near Luo's storefront. Defendant Huang, along with "Li" and "Lu," entered the storefront carrying pickaxe handles. While Luo was running out, he was injured by defendant Huang and others during the chase. On July 3, 2015, an assessment by Wuhan Ping’an Forensic Appraisal Center determined that Luo's main injury was a comminuted fracture of the fibula head, and the bodily injury was categorized as minor injury Level 1. It was also found that the families of defendants Huang and Wei compensated the victim Luo for economic losses amounting to RMB 90,000 on December 10, 2015, and the victim expressed understanding of the actions of the two defendants. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Huang and Wei during the trial and were supported by evidence including: 1. two identification records; 2. one appraisal opinion; 3. identification photos, explanations of identified individuals' identities, 2 copies, seizure list, vehicle rental contract, two copies of population information forms, receipt, letter of understanding, agreement, proof of the case process, and other documentary evidence; 4. testimonies from witnesses Wang A, Wang B, Cheng, Zuo, Zhang A, and Zhang B; 5. the victim Luo's statement; 6. the confessions and defenses of defendants Wei and Huang, all of which were sufficient to confirm the facts.


The prosecution charges that on the afternoon of April 18, 2016, at around 3 PM, the defendant Dong, in collusion with the defendant Zhang, used pickpocketing to steal a white Coolpad phone from the left coat pocket of the victim, Li, near the Xinyu Garden Residential Area vegetable market in Qian Guo County. On August 8, 2016, at approximately 2:30 PM, the defendant Zhang stole a black shoulder bag containing over 120 yuan in cash from the Lingxiu Fashion Shop in the underground mall of the Qian Guo County Central Mall. On October 24, 2016, at around 4 PM, the defendant Dong used pickpocketing to steal a gold Golden Oar GN5001 phone from the right jacket pocket of the victim, Zhou, near the Xinyu Garden Residential Area vegetable market in Qian Guo County. According to the appraisal by the Price Certification Center of Qian Guo County, the stolen phone was valued at 500 RMB. To support the aforementioned facts, the prosecution provided evidence in court: (1) documentary evidence; (2) statements from victims Li, Wang, and Zhou; (3) confessions and defenses from the defendants Zhang and Dong; (4) expert opinions; (5) audio-visual materials, among other evidence.


The prosecution accused: From late January 2016 to February 12, Wang and Hu, the defendants, in order to make illegal profits, provided a venue and gambling equipment at the old Hu Chess and Card Room on Yanshan Road, Huaqiao Street, Huaqiao Town, a certain county. They allowed others to gamble using games such as "Twenty-Eight" and "Bullfighting," setting up more than 40 gambling sessions. The two made illegal profits of more than 10,000 yuan through "rake-offs." After the incident, the defendant Wang was arrested and brought to justice, while the defendant Hu surrendered voluntarily. Both were able to truthfully confess their criminal acts after coming forward. The defendants Wang and Hu have returned the illegal gains of 11,000 yuan. These facts were not disputed by the defendants Wang and Hu during the court hearing and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Li, Hu Jia, Zhang, Zhao, and Fang; documentation including household registration information, previous convictions statement, cash deposit slip, description of the arrest process, and situation explanation; physical evidence such as mahjong tiles and dice (as criminal photos); and identification records, which are sufficient to establish their guilt.


It was further ascertained that on January 21, 2015, the defendant Zhang returned 17,320 RMB of illegal proceeds, which has been turned over to the state treasury. During detention in March and April 2105, the defendant Xie was twice rated as a "civilized individual" among detainees by the Nanchuan District Detention Center. During the trial, the defendant Zhang voluntarily replanted 240 photinia seedlings in the forest area where the incident occurred. These facts were not disputed by the defendants Xie and Zhang during the court hearing and are supported by the following evidence: 1. Criminal case registration form, decision to file the case, detention certificate, arrest decision; 2. Household registration information for defendants Xie and Zhang; 3. Site identification transcripts and photos, on-site inspection records and photos, identification transcripts and photos; 4. Judicial appraisal opinion from Chongqing Nanchuan Forestry Judicial Appraisal Institute; 5. Timber receipt list; 6. Copies of forest rights certificates, issuance status registration form for forest rights certificates; 7. Certificate from the Shixi Township People's Government of Nanchuan District; 8. Seized items list; 9. Case arrival report; 10. Receipt for Zhang's return of illegal proceeds; 11. Bank transaction details; 12. Criminal record information; 13. Certificate from the village committee regarding the usual behavior of the defendant Zhang and willingness to assist in education and rehabilitation; 14. Certificate and photos of replanted seedlings; 15. Appraisal form for detainee behavior at Nanchuan District Detention Center; 16. Transcripts of witness statements from Tang and Wu; 17. Confessions and defenses of defendants Xie and Zhang. All of this is sufficient to establish the facts.


After a trial, it was found that on March 3, 2015, the defendants Liu, Gao, and Zhang conspired in advance, where Gao transported Zhang to room 1205 of the International Business Center in Nanguan District, Changchun City, to a credit card repayment agency and remained outside to assist. Subsequently, Zhang, carrying Liu's main China Merchants Bank credit card, approached the victim, Zhang A, requesting assistance in repaying 18,000 yuan. While the victim was transferring money to the credit card, Liu locked the main card using his mobile phone, preventing Zhang A from withdrawing the 18,000 yuan through the main card. After realizing the scam, the victim, with the help of bystanders, caught Zhang at the scene, while Gao and Liu withdrew and squandered the stolen money using the credit card's sub-card. Following the incident, Zhang compensated victim Zhang A with 18,000 yuan, obtaining his forgiveness. These facts were not disputed by defendants Liu, Gao, and Zhang during the trial, and were substantiated by evidence such as photos of the involved credit card, the compensation agreement, the letter of forgiveness, bank transaction records, the criminal judgment, the victim Zhang A's outpatient medical records, his statements, testimonies from witnesses Cao and Yin, confessions from the defendants Liu, Gao, and Zhang, and identification records, which are sufficient to reach a verdict.


The People's Procuratorate of Xingqing District, a certain city, charged:

1. In the early morning of January 26, 2015, defendants Wu, Sun, and Zong stole four acrylic boards from a bus stop sign near the Great Unity Square in Xingqing District, a certain city. The stolen goods were valued at 640 yuan, and the money obtained from selling the stolen goods was squandered.

2. In the early morning of January 28, 2015, defendants Wu, Sun, and Zong stole four acrylic boards from a bus stop sign near the Great Unity Square in Xingqing District, a certain city. The stolen goods were valued at 640 yuan, and the money obtained from selling the stolen goods was squandered.

3. At around 3 a.m. on February 2, 2015, defendants Wu, Sun, and Zong stole two acrylic boards (valued at 320 yuan) from a bus stop sign at the east side of the Shaling Group on Lijing North Street in Xingqing District, a certain city. They sold them to a nearby recycling station and were discovered and apprehended while escaping.


After the trial, it was found that in January 2014, the defendant Zheng established a lottery gambling website (website address T65.8833555) and recruited Zhang, the defendant, as an agent for the website by offering a commission on bets, and began accepting bets from others. Since September 2014, Zhang recruited defendants Zhou and Chen, using a bet commission method, to accept bets from others. After Zhou and Chen accepted bets from multiple people, they transferred the gambling funds to Zhang. Zhang would place the bets online using his laptop or the defendant Zhou’s computer at Zhou’s residence (located at Room 0A5, Unit 1, Building 2, No. 193, Shihua West Road, Xiangzhou District, [City]), and then forwarded the bet amounts to his superior, the defendant Zheng, for fund settlement. Among them, defendant Zheng illegally profited approximately 100,000 yuan, defendant Zhang illegally profited approximately 28,000 yuan, defendant Zhou illegally profited approximately 2,000 yuan, and defendant Chen illegally profited approximately 1,460 yuan. On November 19, 2014, defendants Zhang, Zhou, and Chen were arrested by the police. The police seized one blue Samsung mobile phone, one black laptop, and one Agricultural Bank card from Zhang; one black Samsung mobile phone, five betting slips, and two notebooks from Zhou; one OPPO mobile phone, 22 betting code sheets, and the alleged gambling funds of 1,460 yuan from Chen. On December 13, 2014, defendant Zheng was arrested by the police. On February 3, 2015, defendants Zheng, Zhang, and Zhou entrusted their families to surrender all their illegal profits. The aforementioned facts were uncontested by defendants Zheng, Zhang, Zhou, and Chen during the trial, and were verified by the testimonies of witnesses Lu, Li, Yin, Guo, which were confirmed by the court, as well as identification records, seizure decisions, administrative penalty decisions, fine receipts, the arrest process, suspect information questionnaires and registration information, evidence retrieval notices, account opening materials, transaction records and fund flows, call information, search warrants and search records, seizure lists and return lists, betting slips, betting information, settlement tickets, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


Upon trial, it was found that at around 18:00 on February 18, 2014, defendant Wang called defendant Liu and stated that he had drugs, specifically "magu," in his possession and requested Liu's help in selling them. At about 13:00 the next day, defendant Liu drove to the Xin Yu Technology store on Changxuanling Street where defendant Wang was located, and obtained 6 tablets of the drug "magu." Liu then sold them to a person named Yang for 300 RMB. Subsequently, Liu was apprehended on the spot by police officers in an alley between Ming and Qing Street and Xinjian Street on Changxuanling Street. Six red tablets, suspected to be drugs, were seized. According to the Wuhan Public Security Bureau’s Forensic Center for Drugs, the submitted materials weighed 0.57 grams in total and were identified as the drug methamphetamine. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Liu and Wang during the court trial, and were corroborated by the testimony of witness Yang; the police reports on the seizure, the detention order, the seized items list, the on-site testing report, urine extraction records, identification records and photos, photos of the seized drugs and drug money, the registry submission form for depositing the drugs, the drug test identification report, proof of identity materials of the defendants; as well as the confessions of defendants Liu and Wang, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution charges that at around 8 PM on August 18, 2014, the defendants Huang and Gao conspired in advance and went to No. 88 Guofang Road in Hengdian Town of this city. Defendant Gao acted as a lookout while defendant Huang climbed through a window to commit theft. Defendant Huang first entered room 209, rented by Jiang, to steal but did not obtain any property, then proceeded to room 211, rented by Sheng, and stole 500 RMB. The two defendants each received 200 RMB from the stolen money, with the remaining 100 RMB used for joint consumption. After the incident, the public security authorities recovered 242 RMB of the stolen money, which has now been returned to the victim Sheng. The above facts were not disputed by defendant Huang during the trial and are corroborated by the statements of victims Sheng and Jiang, the testimony of witness Zheng, the on-site inspection records produced by the public security authorities, the site layout diagrams, site photographs, identification records and photos, the list of seized and returned items, photos of the seized items, video materials, the criminal judgment (2006) Jin Xing Chu Zi No. 432 from the People's Court of Jinshan District, proof of release, the decision of administrative punishment, criminal personnel information, the statement provided by the public security police officer, the capture process, and the household registration certificates of defendants Huang and Gao, which are sufficient to establish the charges.


After trial, it was found that from around 11 PM on May 4, 2015, to around 2 AM the next day, the defendants Hu and Zhang, knowing that the waters of Lake Luoma were in a closed fishing season and that fishing with electric equipment was prohibited, still proceeded with Hu paddling a boat into the entrance waters of Lake Luoma in a certain province. Zhang used an electric fishing device to fish in this area. Around 2 AM on May 5, Hu and Zhang were caught at the scene by fishery administration enforcement personnel, having illegally caught approximately 14 kilograms of miscellaneous fish. It was further found that on January 30, 2015, the Ocean and Fisheries Bureau of a certain province issued a notice stating that the waters of Lake Luoma in the province would be in a closed fishing season from March 1 to June 30 each year. Additionally, on May 5, 2015, the Lake Luoma Fishery Administration Supervision Brigade of a certain province transferred the case of illegal fishing of aquatic products by Hu and Zhang to the public security authorities for investigation. On May 7 of the same year, Hu and Zhang were lawfully summoned to the case by the public security authorities, and after being brought to justice, both defendants truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. The above facts are substantiated by evidence presented and cross-examined during trial, including the incident reporting process, scene inspection records, the criminal case transfer document, physical evidence photos, the notice from the Ocean and Fisheries Bureau of a certain province, weighing records and photos, the confessions of defendants Hu and Zhang, scene identification records, explanatory notes, household registration information, and other relevant evidence, sufficient to confirm the conviction.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain location accused the defendants, Wang and Xu, of engaging in a mutual brawl after a verbal altercation over trivial matters on the night of August 26, 2013, in room 219 of the "Bubugao" Hotel located in the Mudan District of Heze City. Both individuals sustained injuries. According to the assessment, the injuries of both Wang and Xu were classified as minor injuries. The public prosecution provided relevant evidence to support their accusation.


The prosecution alleges that starting from July 10, 2012, defendants Xu and Lu, together with Bai (already sentenced), Cai, Wang (both also sentenced), and others, for the purpose of profit, operated a casino in a house north of Xintai International Garden in Chaohu city along the Ring City River for over ten days, organizing gambling activities. Bai and others arranged for Zhang (already sentenced) and others to handle the daily management of the casino, organize the space, and arrange for lookouts. The casino usually held two gambling sessions each day, in the afternoon and evening, with over twenty participants each time, generating a daily turnover of 20,000 to 30,000 yuan, with an average daily profit of over 10,000 yuan from rake. During the operation of the casino, Xu and Lu were shareholders and participated in the division of profits. On June 17, 2014, Xu was apprehended by the police at the Chaohu branch of the Bank of China while conducting business. On March 27, 2015, Lu was arrested at his home by police officers. It was further found that during the period Xu and Lu were involved in operating the casino with others, the casino's rake profits exceeded 30,000 yuan. During the trial, each defendant returned 3,000 yuan of illegal gains. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Xu and Lu during the trial, and were corroborated by evidence such as the case registration form, case filing decision, course of arrest, criminal judgment, confessions and defenses of co-defendants Bai, Wang, among others, and payment receipts, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution charges that on December 20, 2015, at around 11 PM, on the West Chuangye Road near the South Gate of Liancheng Company in the Development Zone of Da'an Town, a district in a certain city, while Chen was driving, a collision occurred with a car driven by Feng, resulting in a subsequent dispute between the two parties. Feng called the defendants Cui, Zhong, and Guo (handled in a separate case) to the scene, where the three of them assaulted Chen. The injuries sustained by the victim, Chen, were identified as minor injuries of the second degree. On January 18, 2016, the defendants Cui and Zhong surrendered to the Da'an Police Station of a district's Public Security Bureau. The evidence presented and read out in court by the prosecutor based on the indictment includes: the case registration form, household registration information, case handling statement, agreement, letter of understanding, testimony from witness Wang, statement from the victim Chen, confessions from the defendants Cui, Zhong, and co-participant Feng, and the forensic medical assessment report on human injury degree.


The prosecution charges: From March 2016 to November 2019, the defendants Wang and Nie (handled in a separate case), being aware that the "Dongtai Brand Sugar Heart Kang Tianma Capsules" health products produced and sold by Wang (handled in a separate case) were not properly certified, purchased the products from Wang and sold them to Zhang1 (handled in a separate case), Li (handled in a separate case), Zhang2 (handled in a separate case), and others. Zhang1 and Li, when selling these products in certain regions, hired the defendant Gao for sales. Wang's sales amounted to 158,000 RMB, and Gao's sales amounted to 72,000 RMB. Upon examination, the "Dongtai Brand Sugar Heart Kang Tianma Capsules" were found to contain rosiglitazone maleate and glibenclamide. After the case was uncovered, defendant Wang was arrested, and defendant Gao voluntarily surrendered.


Upon examination, it was found that: 1. On the morning of July 29, 2013, the defendants Wei and Ye conspired to a location approximately 100 meters north of a small wooden bridge in a certain town in a certain district of a certain city in a certain province. They employed a scheme in which Ye pretended to search for "gold jewelry" he had lost, and Wei pretended to have found the "gold jewelry" and proposed to split it with the victim Xu, thereby defrauding Xu of a gold necklace valued at 5,717 yuan. Subsequently, one of the defendants went to the vicinity of the intersection of Yongmei Road and Zhongxing Road in the same town, using the same scheme to defraud the victim Wu of a gold necklace valued at 8,189 yuan. After the fraud, they sold the stolen goods and squandered the proceeds. 2. On the morning of August 2, 2013, the defendants Wei and Ye conspired near the Tianhe Tangxi Road Tea Ceremony Hall in a certain town of a certain city in a certain province. They used the same scheme to defraud the victim He of a gold necklace valued at 3,663.24 yuan. Afterwards, one of the defendants went near the Bali New Island Club in the same town, using the same scheme to defraud the victim Zhang Bing of a gold bracelet valued at 8,526.98 yuan and a gold necklace valued at 5,323.36 yuan. After the crime, the aforementioned two gold necklaces and one gold bracelet were recovered and returned to the victims He and Zhang Bing. The police confiscated 2,100 yuan and 3,300 yuan from Wei and Ye, respectively. During the trial, Wei's family returned 8,506 yuan of the illicit money on his behalf, which is temporarily held by the court. The above facts were undisputed by the defendants Wei and Ye during the trial, and are corroborated by the evidence list retrieved, the list of seized and returned property, identification records, photos, invoices, criminal judgment, administrative penalty decision, statements from the victims Xu, Wu, He, and Zhang Bing, testimonies from witnesses Zhang Jia and Zhang Yi, inspection reports, price appraisal reports, and search records, which are sufficient to support the findings.


The prosecution alleges that on August 19, 2013, 25 boxes of medicines, including "Bao Xin An Oil," (all identified as counterfeit drugs upon examination) placed by the defendant Cai at his business located at the second-floor stall F316 in Decheng Comprehensive Market, Qianzuo, Nos. 265-271 Yide Road, Yuexiu District, a certain city, were seized by the Food and Drug Administration of Yuexiu District in a certain city. On July 6, 2014, the defendants Cai and Ye collaborated at stall A6, No. 249 Yide Road, Yuexiu District, in a certain city to sell to Li certain unapproved imported medicines from a certain place, including "Shuangfei Ren Medicine Water" and four other types (the sales amount was 1,648 yuan). At around 12:00 p.m. on July 16, 2014, the defendant Ye was arrested at his residence at Room 1503, Building A, No. 282 Daxin Road, Yuexiu District, in a certain city. At the scene, 15 types of medicines including "Tianma Headache Pills," jointly held by defendants Cai and Ye, were confiscated (all identified as counterfeit drugs upon examination). On July 23, 2014, the defendant Cai voluntarily surrendered to the public security organs. The above facts are not disputed by the defendants Cai and Ye during the trial, and are substantiated by evidence including photographs of the items involved, photos of the crime scene, delivery documents, search records and seizure lists, the lease contract of the involved premises, the business license of the individual industrial and commercial household, arrest and surrender reports issued by the Food and Drug Crime Investigation Brigade of the Yuexiu District Branch of a city's Public Security Bureau, the confessions of defendants Cai and Ye, case transfer materials and identification reports issued by the Food and Drug Administration of Yuexiu District, a certain city, and the household registration materials of defendants Cai and Ye.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Chongqing Municipality charged the defendants Du and Xu with agreeing to commit theft by prying open car windows to steal property inside the cars. Xu would use a screwdriver to pry open the windows and keep watch, while Du would enter the car to steal the property. The two defendants committed theft multiple times in this manner. The specific criminal acts are described as follows: 1. At about 3 a.m. on December 19, 2015, the two defendants stole an Asus laptop worth 1,958 yuan and 1,800 yuan in cash from a Mercedes SUV owned by the victim Yuan at an outdoor parking lot of the affiliated First Hospital of Chongqing Medical University in a certain district of the city. 2. At about 4 a.m. on the same day, the two defendants stole two packs of "Soft Tianzi" cigarettes from the SUV owned by the victim Luo, located 30 meters downhill from the main gate of the Daping Branch of the Traffic College on Huang Road in a certain district of the city. 3. At about 5 a.m. on the same day, the two defendants stole six bottles of Feitian Moutai liquor from the Mercedes SUV owned by the victim Wang, under the overpass on Huang Road in a certain district of the city, and later sold the stolen goods for 3,000 yuan. 4. At about 2 a.m. on December 26, 2015, the two defendants stole four bottles of Feitian Moutai liquor and several packs of "Soft Zhonghua" cigarettes from the Hyundai SUV owned by the victim Ming near the Junyi New Vision area in Shiqiaopu in a certain district of the city, and later sold the Moutai liquor for 2,400 yuan. 5. At about 5 a.m. on January 10, 2016, the two defendants stole a Dell laptop worth 733 yuan from the Honda SUV owned by the victim Wang near a certain temple rotary in a certain district of the city. The two defendants were apprehended by the public security authorities in a certain district of the city on January 14, 2016. After being brought to justice, both defendants truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal acts, and the recovered stolen Dell laptop has been returned to the victim Wang.


The prosecution charges: On the evening of March 30, 2014, the defendants Zhou and Li, after drinking and upon prior arrangement, were involved in an incident where defendant Zhou drove a certain motorcycle (license f×××××) from Spacetime KTV in a city, traveling north along Xinhua Road to the intersection with Renmin Road. There, they collided with a car (license f×××××) driven by Zhuang, before defendant Li drove the motorcycle away from the scene to the Suiyuan Tea House area, where they were apprehended by police officers. According to the Jiaxing Public Security Judicial Appraisal Center, both Zhou and Li had ethanol in their blood, with concentrations of 2.20mg/ml and 2.07mg/ml, respectively, both exceeding the legal standard for intoxicated driving of motor vehicles, which is 0.8mg/ml. Furthermore, it was found that neither Zhou nor Li possessed a motorcycle driving license, and the motorcycle in question had not undergone a safety inspection. During the court trial, defendant Zhou did not object to these facts, and the case is supported by evidence, including witness testimony, traffic accident scene data, driving qualification inquiry information, vehicle details, blood sample registration forms, physicochemical examination reports, arrest details, traffic accident identification documents, criminal records, and identification documents, which are sufficient for a conviction.


The People's Procuratorate of Linchuan District in a certain city charges: From early March 2013 to April 11 of the same year, the defendant Xu, together with Wang, Wu (already convicted), "Zhi", "Yu" (at large), jointly operated a casino in a residential building under the Zhousha Neighborhood Committee in Shangdun Town, Linchuan District of a certain city. The defendants Xu and others provided "Pai Gow" and hired the defendant Hua to collect the venue fees at the casino, while "Linlin" (at large) kept the tally at the casino. The defendants Xu and others illegally gained profits totaling more than 80,000 RMB through rake-off gambling profits. On the afternoon of April 11, 2013, police officers from the Linchuan Branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city conducted an inspection of the aforementioned location and arrested the defendants Xu and Hua on the spot. The evidence on which the public prosecution's charges are based includes: documentary evidence; testimonies of witnesses Huang and Yang; identification records; inspection records; confessions and defenses of the co-defendants Wu and Wang; confessions and defenses of the defendants Xu and Hua.


The prosecution alleges: On December 18, 2014, defendants Xu and Cheng, after premeditation, used a fake property certificate held by Xu as collateral to defraud 90,000 yuan from the victim, Pan, for personal repayment and squander. After the case was brought to light, the families of the two defendants have compensated the victim for the full loss. Xu and Cheng also expressed no objection to the above facts during the trial. The case is supported by evidence, including statements from victim Pan, testimonies from witnesses Yan, Wang (first witness), Hong, Wang (second witness) and others, the loan agreement, state-owned land use certificate, proof documents, bank account details, receipt, arrest process, and household registration certificates, all sufficient to establish the facts.


Upon trial, it was found that the defendants Zhao, Luo, and Hu, since August 2015, were employed by others (handled in a separate case) to engage in illegal activities. They operated from rented rooms in certain districts of a certain city in a certain province, specifically in Room 352 and Room 355 of certain buildings in the northern village of a certain neighborhood, where they posted false online part-time job information about building credit. They left contact QQ numbers for communication, and when individuals contacted them, they would deceive them into purchasing mobile phone recharge cards through designated web links. Subsequently, they would obtain the card numbers and passwords and resell them to websites such as card malls. By December 22, 2015, when they were apprehended, they had defrauded a total of 77,310 yuan. All three defendants were arrested on October 22, 2015, and on the same day, the defendant Hu assisted the police in capturing co-conspirators. The items seized from the defendants included three laptops, eleven bank cards, seven mobile phones, five internet cards, seven drives, five SIM cards, one rental contract, three bank receipts, one bank security token, and two identification cards of other people. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by the defendants Zhao, Luo, and Hu during the trial process. These were corroborated by the evidence presented, including search records, a list of seized items, site photographs, statements, and submitted materials from victims Kuang, Li, and Wang, bank account transaction details, screenshots of withdrawal surveillance footage, expert reports, computer QQ chat logs, screenshots of stored computer data, recognition records, confessions and defenses of defendants Zhao, Luo, and Hu, electronic evidence inspection records, apprehension reports, household registration certificates, case registration forms, and job descriptions, which were sufficient to confirm the facts of the case.


The People's Procuratorate of Kenli District in a certain city charged: At approximately 18:00 on February 13, 2016, the defendant Bo was driving a Dongfeng Nissan sedan with license plate G×××××, traveling north on Lihe Road in Kenli District of a certain city. When he reached the location of lamp post number 150, he was involved in a traffic accident with the pedestrian victim, Ji. The defendant Long, driving a Beijing Hyundai sedan with license plate LuE×××××, also traveling north on Lihe Road in Kenli District, reached the same location of lamp post number 150 and was involved in another collision with Ji, resulting in Ji's death. After the accident, Long fled the scene. According to a forensic examination, Ji's death was caused by cranial and cervical spinal cord injuries combined with injuries to the thoracic and abdominal organs. The Traffic Police Brigade of Kenli County Public Security Bureau concluded that Bo and Long were fully responsible for the accident. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Bo and Long during the court hearing. Additionally, the facts are supported by documentary evidence such as the case registration form from the Traffic Management Brigade of Kenli County Public Security Bureau, a description of the case investigation, road traffic accident determination report, identity information of defendants Bo and Long, driver information, vehicle information, victim Ji's identity information, delivery receipts, notice of examination and assessment conclusions, mediation agreement, letter of understanding, testimonies of witnesses Ding, Sun, Yu, and Wei, physico-chemical test identification report, forensic identification opinion, forensic autopsy report, road traffic accident site diagram, road traffic accident site inspection record, photos, and the statements and defenses of defendants Bo and Long, which are sufficient to confirm the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: In mid-January 2015, the defendant Si contacted the defendant Bai by phone, asking him to help find a pawnshop where a car could be mortgaged. Around 9 a.m. on January 26, 2015, the defendant Si drove away a black Zhonghua Junjie car belonging to a person named Ma, and later went to a certain place to meet the defendant Bai. The two discussed that the defendant Bai would pretend to be the stepson of the car owner Ma, and the defendant Si would impersonate Ma. Defendant Bai then pawned the car to a person named Wu, obtaining 6,500 yuan, with both parties agreeing on a mortgage period of two months. Subsequently, the stolen money obtained from pawning the car was squandered by the two defendants. Upon maturity, the defendants Si and Bai were unable to repay the mortgage amount.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that between November 2016 and December 2016, defendants Zhang and Ding drove together to various locations in a certain town and the Guanyun Salt Field in Guanyun County, where they used crossbows and poison darts to steal a total of 17 dogs on multiple occasions.


The prosecution alleges that in late December 2013, a co-defendant, Du Moujia (also known as Du Mou, handled separately), rented an apartment at No. 4, 302 Dongyi Lane, Donghua Square, Donglian Village, Dashi Street, Panyu District, Guangzhou. Du set up gambling fish machines in this apartment to attract others to gamble. Since early January 2014, defendants Zhang and Zhou were hired by Du Moujia to manage the casino and were responsible for cashier duties, scoring, and more. At approximately 1 a.m. on January 15, 2014, police arrived at the location following a report and arrested defendants Zhang and Zhou, along with eight people caught gambling, including Wu Mouyi and Zhong Mou Bing (all of whom received administrative punishment). The police seized a gambling fish machine, casino profits totaling 5,000 yuan, and various gambling funds from participants at the scene. Defendants Zhang and Zhou raised no objections to these facts during the trial, which were substantiated by their confessions, testimonies from witnesses Luo Moumou, Wu Moumou, Zhong Moumou, Mu Moukui, He Mou, Zhang Mou, Bi Moumou, Jiang Mou, Mu Moufei, as well as identification records, inspection records, onsite investigation records and diagrams, onsite photos, lists of evidence preservation, and arrest procedures, all of which are sufficient to substantiate the claims.


Upon trial, it was found that on the afternoon of October 29, 2015, the defendants Zhao and He went to the old farmers' market parking lot in Jiangnan Street of a certain city. With He keeping watch, Zhao took advantage of the owner's absence to open the door of the engineering vehicle with license plate G××××× and entered. He stole a set of fiber optic fusion splicer from the back seat, which belonged to the vehicle owner, Zhang. The two then drove away from the scene. According to the appraisal by the city's Price Authentication Center, the stolen Fujikura FSM-60S fiber optic fusion splicer (including a cleaver) was valued at 16,560 yuan. The same day, authorities arrested the defendants Zhao and He at the Gaofan intersection in Jiangnan Development Zone, of the certain city and discovered the stolen fusion splicer in the trunk of the gray Mazda 3 they were driving, with the license plate G×××××. The fusion splicer was confiscated and later returned to the victim. After their apprehension, Zhao and He truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. During the trial, Zhao and He also raised no objections to the above facts, which were corroborated by the victim Zhang's statement, the confessions and defenses of Zhao and He, case registration forms, personal information, arrest records, notice of appraisal opinion, evidence receipt list and invoice copies, the price assessment report, on-site investigation records and photos, seizure records, seizure decisions, seizure lists, restitution lists, recognition records and photos, notice for gathering evidence, evidence collection lists, video discs, and other evidence, all sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution charges that from May to November 2015, the defendant He repeatedly allowed drug users Deng and Zhou to use methamphetamine (commonly known as "ice") in Room 504, Building 36, within the residential area of the First Cotton Textile Factory on Gongye Middle Road, Wujiang District, a certain city, where he rented accommodation. On one day in mid-May 2015 and on November 23, 2015, the defendants He and Tang jointly allowed drug users Deng and Zhou to use methamphetamine at the aforementioned location. On December 11, 2015, the police apprehended defendants He and Tang at Building 36, within the residential area of the First Cotton Textile Factory on Gongye Middle Road, Wujiang District, a certain city, and discovered a homemade drug-use tool at the scene. Urine samples from defendants He, Tang, and drug users Deng and Zhou tested positive for methamphetamine via reagent testing. Defendants He and Tang, along with He's defense attorney, raised no objections to the facts and charges brought by the prosecution. He's defense attorney argued that defendant He was a first-time offender with weak legal awareness and minor subjective malice. He truthfully confessed the criminal facts after being captured and demonstrated a good attitude of admitting guilt. Furthermore, He and Tang have a child with thalassemia who is without care, requesting leniency and probation for the defendant He. The facts charged by the prosecution are substantiated by evidence such as documentary evidence, household registration proof, capture process records, seizure decision, seizure list, on-site testing report, testimonies from witnesses Luo, Deng, and Zhou, confessions from defendants Tang and He, identification records, and on-site investigation work records and photos, which are sufficient for establishing the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: In September 2014, defendants Luo and Cui provided a location to accommodate Liu, Hu, He, and others for drug use. To prove the aforementioned facts, the People's Procuratorate of a certain place presented relevant evidence in court. The procuratorate believes that defendants Luo and Cui should be held criminally responsible for the crime of x. The court is petitioned to sentence the defendants according to law. Defendants Luo and Cui raised no objection to the criminal facts charged by the prosecution and voluntarily pleaded guilty in court. After trial, it was found: On the afternoon of September 16, 2014, defendants Luo and Cui, along with Liu, Hu, and He, consumed drugs provided by Liu in a room (number xxxx, unit x, building x, Huizhou Residence, Tunxi District, a certain city) rented jointly by Luo and Cui. At around 19:00 that evening, defendants Luo and Cui left the rented residence to work at Myth Entertainment Club in Tunxi District, a certain city, while Liu, Hu, and He continued using methamphetamine in the room. In the early morning of September 17, 2014, after finishing work at Myth Entertainment Club, defendants Luo and Cui, along with Ye, returned to the rented residence (number xxxx, unit x, building x, Huizhou Residence, Tunxi District) and consumed drugs together with Liu, Hu, He, Bai, and Ye. After the incident, defendants Luo and Cui, upon being summoned, truthfully confessed their crimes. The aforementioned facts are confirmed by the following evidence presented and cross-examined during the trial, which the court acknowledges: 1. Documentary evidence such as household registration certificates of defendants Luo and Cui, proof of past offenses, and housing lease contracts; 2. Testimonies of witnesses Liu, Hu, He, etc.; 3. Statements and defenses of defendants Luo and Cui; 4. The search records and scene photos made by Shexian County Public Security Bureau.


The prosecution alleges that at approximately 2 a.m. on October 5, 2019, defendants Liu and Han believed that the funds they provided for online gambling had been taken by Li. They then invited defendants Wang and Qiao to drive together from a certain city to Xing County Xingyu Internet Cafe, where they found the victim Li and defendant Yuan. Liu, Han, and Qiao forcibly took Li into their car, while Wang and Yuan also followed into the vehicle. Subsequently, Liu and the others took Li's phone and took him to various places, including Xianyuan Cemetery in Yun District, under a viaduct in Dianjun District, the Shuowen Business Hotel and Golden Island Hotel in Wujia District, and Jinshi Park on Ziyang Road in Dianjun District, to force Li to repay the money. During this time, Liu and Han instructed Qiao, Yuan, and Wang to guard Li to prevent his escape, to listen to his phone calls, and to monitor his attempts to borrow money through messages. Liu, Han, Qiao, Yuan, and Wang physically assaulted Li, and after Wang (who is being dealt with in a separate case) arrived, he also assaulted and intimidated Li. Liu and Han threatened Li; Liu burned Li's face with a cigarette, and Han forced Li to undress, squat, and pose for photographs, causing Li to frequently kneel and plead for mercy. At around 10 p.m. on October 6, 2019, Liu instructed Qiao to take Li to a village in Dianjun District to get money from Li’s mother, at which point Li was finally freed from the control of Liu and his accomplice


The public prosecution agency charges: At about midnight on October 2, 2012, the defendant Wu, after consuming alcohol, drove an unlicensed and unregistered two-wheeled motorcycle without a valid driver's license along XX Road from south to north. Meanwhile, the defendant Su, also after consuming alcohol, drove a two-wheeled motorcycle with the registration number Min XX** from north to south on XX Road. When reaching the intersection of XX Road and XX Street, the two vehicles collided, resulting in damage to both vehicles and injuries to defendant Wu. According to an appraisal by the Fujian Lisi Forensic Identification Institute, defendant Wu's blood serum alcohol concentration at the time of the incident was 169.4 mg/dl, while defendant Su's was 148.4 mg/dl. After the incident, defendants Wu and Su waited at the scene for the public security authorities to handle the situation. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by defendants Wu and Su during the trial, and the evidence provided includes copies of the identification cards of defendants Wu and Su, copies of motor vehicle driver's licenses and registration certificates, copies of motor vehicle sales documents, a list of seized items, receipts for returned items, a deposit slip from Xingye Bank, a biochemical test report from Xiangcheng Hospital in Zhangzhou City, an application, and the judicial appraisal report from the Fujian Lisi Forensic Identification Institute. Additional evidence includes the road traffic accident identification report, a letter of understanding, a motor vehicle theft and robbery inquiry record, a certificate of motor vehicle driving qualification inquiry, the public security authority's case report, a criminal record certificate, a site plan, and photos of the scene. All of these are sufficient to establish the charges. During the trial process, defendants Wu and Su each prepaid a fine of 6,000 RMB to the court.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charges that on February 8, 2012, at around 19:00, the defendant Lv, believing that his girlfriend Zhang was harassed by the victim Sun, gathered the defendants Ye, Li, and Xu (handled separately) to the west side of the fire escape at the GF floor of Watsons in Xicheng Plaza. There, they punched and kicked the victim Sun, resulting in a pneumothorax on the left side and partial lung compression. According to the assessment, the victim Sun's injuries were classified as minor injuries. After the incident, the defendant Li truthfully confessed his crimes to the police at the station after being summoned by the public security authorities. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by defendants Lv, Ye, and Li during the court proceedings and are verified by the victim Sun's statement, the testimony of witness Zhang, the confession of co-defendant Xu, the police call log, hospitalization records, preliminary examination opinion, notification of assessment conclusion, letter of understanding, compensation agreement, receipts, arrest record, proof of residence, and the forensic medical assessment of bodily injury, as well as the identification record, which are sufficient for validation.


The prosecution agency charged: Between October 2 and October 18, 2015, the defendants Yu, Cheng, and Ye set up a gambling den on Renmin Street No. 294 and surrounding alleys in Bihu Town, District of a certain City, organized illegal gambling activities, and profited over 7,000 yuan from rake-offs. The actions of the defendants Yu, Cheng, and Ye have violated the provisions of Article X of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, constituting the crime of X. In this joint crime, defendant Yu was the principal offender, while defendants Cheng and Ye were accomplices. It is requested that they be sentenced according to law. Furthermore, it was found that after the crime, defendant Yu returned all the illegal proceeds. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Yu, Cheng, and Ye during the court hearing, and were supported by the following evidence provided by the prosecution and verified in court: 1. Household registration proof; 2. Confessions and defenses of defendants Yu, Cheng, and Ye; 3. Testimonies of witnesses Gan, Chen Jia, Chen Yi, Hu, Tang, Yu, Lin, and Jin; 4. Inspection records and photographs; 5. Evidence preservation list; 6. Seizure decision and inventory; 7. Capture process details; 8. Administrative penalty decision; 9. Receipts, etc., proving the charges, with evidence that is indeed sufficient to make a determination.


The People’s Procuratorate of a certain county charges: On the evening of October 21, 2013, defendants Jiang, He, and Zou respectively rode a motorcycle and a motorized tricycle to a town in the county. Zou killed a dog using high voltage electricity and placed it on the motorcycle ridden by He. They then transported the dead dog using Jiang's motorized tricycle. That same night, Jiang, He, and Zou stole nine dogs from villagers at various locations in certain villages and sites within the town. Upon discovery by the villagers, He and Zou fled the scene on motorcycles, while Jiang was captured by the villagers and taken to the county's Public Security Bureau. After being apprehended, Jiang truthfully confessed the aforementioned criminal facts. It was assessed that the value of the nine stolen dogs was 1,610 RMB. Furthermore, it was discovered that a Loncin brand motorized tricycle was seized at the scene when Jiang was captured. On January 20, 2014, defendants He and Zou surrendered to the Public Security Bureau of the county, honestly confessing the aforementioned criminal facts. The defendants Jiang, He, and Zou raised no objections during the trial hearing of these facts, which were corroborated by the statements of victims Yu, Fan, Xu, Yu, Wang A, Wang B, Zhou, Li B; witness Li A's testimony; on-site inspection records; criminal photographs; identification records; arrest processes; valuation assessment documents; household registration information, and other evidence, all sufficient to establish the charges.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged that in August 2014, defendants Chen and Hong conspired together, with defendant Chen acting as the banker and defendant Hong accepting others' bets on the "Mark Six" lottery. Defendant Hong then reported the betting details to defendant Chen. From August 2014 to February 18, 2016, defendant Hong illegally sold "Mark Six" lottery tickets and accepted bets from others at a supermarket he operated in a village in a certain town of the city. The total number of betting periods was approximately 110, and the total amount of bets accepted exceeded 220,000 yuan. During the illegal sale of the "Mark Six" lottery, defendant Hong reported the betting details to defendant Chen as agreed. Defendant Chen provided 12% of the bet amount as Hong's profit. Defendant Hong returned 5% of the bet amount to the bettors and made a profit of 7% for himself, totaling 15,400 yuan. On February 18, 2016, the police uncovered the "Mark Six" operation and arrested defendant Hong. After the incident, defendant Hong returned the illegal gains of 15,400 yuan. On March 17, 2016, defendant Chen turned himself in to the police and truthfully confessed his crime. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Chen and Hong during the court proceedings. The evidence, including the testimony of witness Lin, site inspection records, photos, detention orders, a list of seized items, temporarily detained tickets and money, "Mark Six" promotional materials, "Mark Six" accounting records, the capture process, and household registration certificates, is sufficient to establish the case.


Upon trial, it was found: 1. During the period from September 2013 to July 2014, the defendant Mu repeatedly, more than ten times, accommodated Sun, Hu, Zhao, Ren, Wei, and others to use methamphetamine (ice) at locations such as the "Wanshun Fishing Gear" shop he operated, his Audi A6 car, and his home. 2. During the period from April 2014 to June 2014, the defendant Sun repeatedly accommodated Hu, Mu, Wang, Zhao, and others to use methamphetamine (ice) at a vegetable collection point located in a certain village of a certain town and in his Sonata car. 3. During the period from April 2014 to June 2014, the defendant Hu accommodated Sun, Mu, Wang, Zhao, and others to use methamphetamine (ice) on four occasions at his home and in Room 408 of the Kyodo Hotel in Shouguang City. After the incident, the defendant Mu assisted the public security organs in capturing defendants Sun and Hu. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by the defendants during the trial and are substantiated by the testimonies of witnesses Ren, Wei, and Wang, onsite inspection reports, case registration forms, the arrest process, population information, case handling explanations, and administrative penalty decision notices, providing sufficient grounds for confirmation.