The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged, and this court has determined after trial, that the defendants Wang, Huang, and Xiong were all members of a pyramid scheme organization. On August 5, 2016, the victim, Zheng, was deceived into being taken to a pyramid scheme hideout in a certain village in a district of Yanjiao in a certain city. Starting from 9 p.m. on August 6, in order to force Zheng to join the pyramid scheme, defendants Wang, Huang, and Xiong detained Zheng at this location by closely following him and strictly monitoring him. Until around 7 p.m. on August 22, Zheng escaped while attending a class and reported to the police. The above facts were undisputed by defendants Wang, Huang, and Xiong during the court hearing, and were confirmed by their confessions, the victim Zheng's statement and identification records, the testimony of witness Xie, photographs from the scene, and other evidence. After cross-examination during the trial, the defendants did not contest these facts, which this court confirms. It was also determined that around 7 p.m. on August 22, 2016, the Yanshun Road Police Station of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city received a report from the victim Zheng that he was being controlled by pyramid scheme members in a certain village in a district of Yanjiao. Around 1 a.m. on August 23, 2016, police officers from the Public Security Bureau of a certain city summoned defendants Wang, Huang, and Xiong to the case from the pyramid scheme hideout in a certain village in a district of Yanjiao. It was further determined that defendants Wang, Huang, and Xiong had no criminal records. The facts related to sentencing were confirmed by evidence presented in court by the public prosecutor, including the case registration form, the record of capture, the statement of the inquiry into criminal records, basic information on permanent residents, and other evidence, which were sufficient to establish the facts after in-court cross-examination.


Upon trial, it was found that from 2009 to August 2013, the defendants Tan and Wu jointly operated a casino on the third floor and basement of the "Almei" convenience store on Wuyang Avenue in a certain city. They used mahjong tiles as gambling tools and organized gambling gatherings with bets of 2.5 and 5 yuan in the "Yi Pi Er Lai" manner for multiple people. On August 14, 2013, at around 15:00, police officers from the Wuyang Police Station of the city's Public Security Bureau, while on patrol, caught defendant Wu and eight gamblers including Yang and Xiao on the spot, confiscating three automatic mahjong machines and gambling funds totaling 10,965 yuan. On the same day at around 19:00, defendant Tan voluntarily went to the Wuyangba Police Station of the city's Public Security Bureau to turn himself in, and truthfully confessed to the fact of jointly operating a casino with defendant Wu. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Tan and Wu during the trial, and were sufficiently substantiated by the testimonies of witnesses Yang, Gong, and others, as well as by evidence including the police on-site investigation record, inspection record and photos, four accounting notebooks, seizure process records, and household registration certificates.


Upon trial, it was found that starting from February 25, 2013, the defendants Xie, Lin, in collaboration with others, opened a casino under defendant Xie's small shop in a village in a town in a certain county. They organized group gambling in the form of dominoes "thirty-two cards", and defendants Xie and Ji were responsible for collecting the initial stakes at the casino. On March 1 of the same year, police officers raided the involved casino, capturing 24 gamblers on the spot and seizing unclaimed gambling funds totaling 72,600 RMB. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Xie, Lin, and Ji during trial, and were corroborated by their previous confessions, testimonies from 24 witnesses including Peng, Jin, and Zhang, identification records, photos, a set of "dominoes", 400 RMB, defendant Ji's prior criminal records, household registration information, the circumstances of the arrest, and other evidence, which are sufficient to support the findings.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that in March 2016, the defendant Yang applied for a timber harvesting permit with a timber stock of 5 cubic meters due to house repairs, but the accumulation of 67 harvested pine trees exceeded the permit's limit by 5.9571 cubic meters. In April of the same year, the defendants Yang and Yao did not apply for a harvesting permit and agreed that Yao would be responsible for harvesting trees in Yang's forest and selling the lumber, and they would split the proceeds equally. Subsequently, Yao hired others to harvest a total of 299 pine trees in Yang's forest over three occasions, amounting to a timber stock of 40.696 cubic meters, and sold part of the lumber for a profit of 8,100 yuan.


Upon trial, it was found that starting from August 2018, the defendants Li and Jiang jointly operated the Xinhua Tang Empire KTV Club located on the third floor at XXX Hutai Road, Baoshan District, this city. During this period, Li and Jiang instructed the club’s employees to sell counterfeit foreign liquors of brands such as “CHIVAS,” “BALLANTINE’S,” “MARTELL,” “HENNESSY,” to customers. On November 13, 2019, the police seized over 200 bottles of the aforementioned counterfeit branded foreign liquors at the Xinhua Tang Empire KTV Club. After identification, it was determined that the seized foreign liquors were all counterfeit products infringing on the exclusive rights of the relevant registered trademarks. Among them, 224 bottles were counterfeit liquor intended for sale, valued at over 140,000 yuan; 12 bottles were counterfeit liquor already sold and stored by clients, valued at over 10,000 yuan. On November 13, 2019, the defendants Li and Jiang were apprehended by the police. After being brought to justice, both defendants truthfully confessed to the main facts of the crime. Upon surrender, Li returned 60,000 yuan of illegal gains, and Jiang returned 20,000 yuan of illegal gains. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Li and Jiang during the trial, and are supported by testimonies from witnesses Xiong, Yin, Zhang, Zou, and others; documentary evidence such as the seizure decision and inventory list provided by the police; trademark registration certificates, identification reports provided by the rights holders and their agents; witness testimonies from Cai and others; the price list of liquors provided by witnesses, and the confessions of defendants Li and Jiang; the account of their capture provided by the police; the residence information of the defendants; as well as the seizure decision and inventory list provided by the prosecution, which are sufficient to substantiate the conviction.


After the trial was conducted, it was ascertained that around 8 pm on February 10, 2017, the defendants Jin and Chang sneaked to the back of Building No. 1 in the Bailing District Dahuau South Gate Community in this city. Defendant Chang acted as a lookout while defendant Jin used lock-picking tools to pry open an orange Yadea electric bicycle parked there by the victim, Wang (estimated value of 2170 yuan). They then pushed it to Nanshaomen Crossroad in this city and handed it over to defendant Chang. Defendant Chang gave defendant Jin 280 yuan, and later, defendant Chang lost the stolen goods. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Jin and Chang during the trial. Moreover, the report of the incident, statements from the victim, arrest materials, witness testimonies, identification records and photos, crime scene identification photos, pricing appraisal of the involved item, urine test report and photos, the confessions of the defendants, and the household registration information of defendants Jin and Chang provide sufficient evidence to confirm the facts.


The prosecution charges that on the evening of March 23, 2015, at around 10 p.m., Zhu (already prosecuted) and XX agreed to meet under the pedestrian overpass near Zhongshan Hospital in Sanli Street, Yaohai District, Hefei City, to settle a personal grudge with a fight. Zhu later gathered 11 people including Liu, Li, another Zhu, and Zhao (all four have been prosecuted) and brought fighting tools such as steel pipes and wooden sticks. XX gathered more than 10 people including the defendants Lian, Yue, and Fan (handled in a separate case) and brought fighting tools such as plastic pipes and bricks. At around 2 a.m. on April 24, 2015, more than 20 people from both sides, led by Zhu and XX, used these pre-arranged tools to fight under the pedestrian overpass near Zhongshan Hospital in Sanli Street, Yaohai District, Hefei City. During the fight, XX was injured in the head. According to the forensic assessment, XX's injury constituted minor injury level 1. The facts established during the trial are consistent with those charged by the prosecution. Additionally, it was found that on December 15, 2015, the defendant Lian was arrested by public security organs in a certain city and was detained for three days at the detention center in the Dongcheng District of that city. On January 2, 2016, the defendant Yue was arrested by public security organs at Changsha Railway Station and was detained for four days at the detention center of the Changsha Railway Public Security Office. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by the defendants Lian and Yue during the trial, and were confirmed by evidence such as household registration certificates, records of arrest, detention certificates, forensic medical assessment reports on the degree of bodily injury, and confessions from co-defendants such as Zhu, which are sufficient to establish the case.


Upon examination, it was found that on May 18, 2014, at around 21:00, the defendants Chen and Liu conspired to steal cables from the Yejishan Tunnel to sell for money. Chen drove his black and blue minivan with a license plate of Ji G×××××, carrying Liu and hydraulic pliers to a location 40 meters south of the boundary marker between two counties inside the Yejishan Tunnel on Provincial Road 345. Liu got off the vehicle, and Chen drove out of the tunnel and parked near the north exit. He then walked back into the tunnel to join Liu. Together, they lifted the concrete slabs covering the cable trench and cut a total of 65.24 meters into 35 sections of Qingyapai ZR-YJV22, 8.7/15KV, 3X70 cables, which were already in maintenance mode and in use. They piled the cables in the trench, and upon being discovered by patrol personnel, Chen and Liu hid in the cable trench and were subsequently caught on the spot. According to the appraisal by the price verification center of a certain county, the value of the stolen cables amounted to RMB 19,624. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the two defendants during the court trial. Additionally, it is supported by evidence such as the case registration form and the decision to file a case from a certain county's public security bureau, the seizure list, the item transfer list (one hydraulic plier), the process of capture, witness testimonies from Lian, Li, and Zheng, the price verification conclusion report by the county's price verification center regarding the stolen cables, the seizure record from the county public security bureau, site survey records, schematic site plan, photo descriptions, site identification records, photographic descriptions; the criminal judgment document No. 1 (2011) of Taipu Temple County People's Court of Inner Mongolia, the prison release certificate No. 189 (2013) from Xilin Gol League Prison, Inner Mongolia; household registration certification letters, etc., which are sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of Kuiwen District in a certain city charged: At around 22:00 on March 17, 2015, at Candy KTV on Siping Road in Kuiwen District of a certain city, a dispute occurred because the victims, Wang Yi and Zang, along with their friends, brought their own alcohol to Candy KTV for singing, which was stopped by the KTV staff, defendants Liu and Sun. This led to a scuffle between the two parties, during which defendant Zhang joined Liu and Sun in assaulting victim Wang Yi with punches, kicks, and a helmet, and later, in collaboration with defendant Liu, used a baseball bat to assault victim Zang. This resulted in Wang Yi suffering facial and right-hand injuries, causing soft tissue contusions, a frontal process of the maxilla, and bilateral nasal bone fractures; and Zang suffering head and facial injuries, leading to scalp and soft tissue lacerations. Forensic medical assessment determined Wang Yi's injuries as minor (Level 2), and Zang's injuries as minor. After the incident, defendants Zhang, Liu, and Sun turned themselves in to the public security bureau on March 18, 2015, confessing to the acts of injuring Wang Yi and Zang. The families of defendants Zhang, Liu, and Sun collectively compensated the victims a total of 60,000 yuan, and received forgiveness from victims Wang Yi and Zang, who agreed not to pursue criminal responsibility against the three defendants. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the three defendants during the trial, and were substantiated by documentary evidence of the capture process, population information, phone inquiry records, settlement agreements, and receipts; testimonies of witnesses Duan, Yan, Zhao, Wang Jia, and Jia; statements from victims Wang Yi and Zang; forensic opinions (Weifang) Public (Kui) Injury Word (2015) No. 83 and No. 84 forensic medical injury assessment reports; identification records and other evidence are sufficient to establish these facts.


After the trial, it was found that: In early November 2020, the defendant Zhang contacted the defendants Ai and Feng, stating he knew a person on WeChat with the username "Gratitude," who could help facilitate the buying and selling of corporate accounts and business licenses at a price of 2,000 yuan per set. Defendants Ai and Feng, despite being aware that their accounts would be used for illegal activities, decided to proceed with the sale. On November 3, 2020, defendants Ai and Feng went to a certain country's Construction Bank at the Huludao Shuanglong branch to open corporate public accounts under their names. On November 6, 2020, defendant Ai handed over the two sets of business licenses, corporate accounts, bank settlement cards, and a certain type of U device to defendant Zhang. On the evening of November 6, defendant Zhang sold the two sets of business licenses, corporate accounts, bank settlement cards, and the U device to the person with the WeChat username "Gratitude." After receiving cash from the buyer, Zhang transferred 3,700 yuan to Ai via WeChat. From November 12 to November 17, the corporate accounts under the names of Ai and Feng had more than 2,500 transactions, with a total amount of over 71 million yuan. The defendants did not dispute these facts in court, and they are supported by evidence such as household registration forms, character assessments, account opening information, transaction details from a certain country's Construction Bank, a statement from the Yuhuang Police Station, WeChat transaction details of Ai and Feng, transfer records of Ai and Feng, a statement from a certain country's Construction Bank, Feng's criminal judgment and release certificate, business licenses of Xin Xin Home Living and a certain Home Goods Store, seals from a certain Zhuo, testimony from witness Guo, confessions and defenses of defendants Zhang, Ai, and Feng, audio-visual materials, electronic data, etc. These pieces of evidence were verified in court and are sufficient to substantiate the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: On August 21, 2016, the defendant Zuo, in order to fraudulently obtain insurance compensation, conspired with Xiao (handled in another case), and in collusion with Li and Lu, staged a traffic accident involving a Renault car with license plate SuE×××××, a Toyota car with license plate SuExxxxxx, and a Citroën car with license plate SuE××××× on Gangao Road, Zhangjiagang Free Trade Zone, to defraud 21,900 RMB from China Life Property & Casualty Insurance Co., Ltd. After the incident, a relative of the defendant Zuo returned 21,900 RMB on their behalf, which has been refunded to the victim unit. On March 18, 2020, defendant Li turned himself in to the Zhangjiagang Public Security Bureau and truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts, willingly admitting guilt and accepting punishment. After being captured, defendants Zuo and Lu also truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts, willingly admitting guilt and accepting punishment. It is recommended to sentence defendant Zuo to ten months of imprisonment and a fine of 10,000 RMB; defendant Li to six months of imprisonment and a fine of 10,000 RMB; defendant Lu to eight months of imprisonment and a fine of 10,000 RMB, all with probation applicable. Defendants Zuo, Li, and Lu have no objections to the charged facts, charges, and sentencing recommendations, and have signed and confirmed the agreement. Additionally, the case is confirmed with the testimony of witnesses Xiao, Yuan, and Zuo, motor vehicle insurance claim records, road traffic accident identification reports, driver's licenses, vehicle registration certificates, scene photos, payment vouchers, seizure records, seizure lists, return lists, arrest warrants, crime report processes, arrest processes, the confessions of defendants Zuo, Li, and Lu, demographic information, and other evidence. This court hereby confirms.


After trial, it was found that at around 8 a.m. on June 4, 2015, and June 5, 2015, the defendants Liu and Wen, while purchasing scrap iron at Hansheng Daily Necessities (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. on Qingxiang Road, Longhua New District, a certain city, collaborated with the defendants Hu and Zhong, who were purchasing scrap paper at the same company, to steal scrap iron. Liu and Wen secretly hid the scrap iron on the truck used by Hu and Zhong to carry scrap paper, which was then covered with scrap paper and transported out of the company by Hu and Zhong. Liu, Wen, Hu, and Zhong jointly stole about 200 kilograms of scrap iron on two occasions, which Hu and Zhong sold for about 500 yuan, with Liu and Wen receiving a total of 80 yuan. On June 6 of the same year, Liu, Wen, Hu, and Zhong stole 420 kilograms of scrap iron using the same method. During the theft, they were discovered by employees of Hansheng Daily Necessities (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., and the police arrived at the scene and arrested the four defendants. According to the appraisal, the stolen 420 kilograms of scrap iron was worth 460 yuan, and it has been returned to the victimized unit. After coming to light, Liu, Wen, Hu, and Zhong compensated the losses of the victimized unit, and the unit issued a letter of understanding to express their forgiveness towards Liu, Wen, Hu, and Zhong. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants Liu, Wen, Hu, and Zhong during the court trial, and there was corresponding evidence verified in court to substantiate them, which is sufficient to establish the findings.


Upon trial, it was found that on March 8, 2014, at approximately 15:30, defendants Ding and Qian, along with co-defendant Zhou (already sentenced) and others Jiang and Wang (both handled in separate cases), were at the east gate of Yangzi Park on Daqing South Road in this city where they had a verbal disagreement with the victim, Yang, resulting in an altercation. Consequently, they assaulted the victim, Yang, causing him injuries. Forensic identification determined Yang's injuries to be minor injuries of the second degree. After the incident, defendants Ding and Qian voluntarily reported to the police and truthfully confessed their crimes, and they have obtained the victim Yang's forgiveness. The aforementioned facts were acknowledged by defendants Ding and Qian during the trial without objections and were substantiated by the victim Yang's statement, witness testimony from Zhou and others, identification records, forensic appraisal reports, letters of forgiveness, household registration documents, and evidence from the investigation and case solving process. This is sufficient for substantiation.


After the trial, it was found that the defendants Zhu and Ma conspired and, in October 2015, went to various places such as a location and a village in this city. Using the method of Zhu unlocking doors to enter houses and Ma acting as a lookout, they committed theft three times, stealing over 6,400 yuan in cash and one Bingger brand watch valued at 378.30 yuan, as well as cigarettes and other items. On October 29, 2015, at dawn, defendant Zhu, together with others, went to a room in a village in this city, used the method of unlocking doors to enter, and stole cash and one Casio quartz watch from the victim Jiang. Subsequently, Zhu received 200 yuan. On November 5, 2015, at dawn, defendant Zhu, together with others, went to a room in another location in this city, used the method of unlocking doors to enter, and stole cash from the victim Li, subsequently receiving 600 yuan. After being brought to justice, defendant Ma truthfully confessed to his crimes. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Zhu and Ma during the trial. There was also testimony from the victims Fan, Huang, Xu, Jiang, and Li, presented by the public prosecutor and verified during the trial, along with relevant identification records, identification photographs, call records, the watch purchase receipt, a price verification report on the Bingger watch issued by the Price Certification Center of Nanchang District, Wuxi City, site inspection records issued by the public security agency, the process of solving the criminal case, resident information, criminal judgments, and proof of release, all of which are sufficient to establish the case. Based on the evidence presented and verified during the trial, this court has accepted the factual defense opinions proposed by defendant Zhu.


The Public Prosecutor's Office in a certain area charges: Anhui Jiahe Decoration Engineering Co., Ltd. is a limited liability company established on August 22, 2013. On September 30, 2014, the legal representative of the company was the defendant Zhu, and the defendants Wei and Feng were among the shareholders of the company. In November of the same year, due to poor management, the company suddenly closed and suspended operations, leaving wages owed to company employees unpaid. As the three defendants could not be found, some of the company's employees reported the case to the Human Resources and Social Security Bureau of Yushan District, Ma'anshan City. On November 7 and November 12, 2014, the bureau issued "Labor Security Supervision Orders for Rectification" to Anhui Jiahe Decoration Engineering Co., Ltd., ordering the company to pay the arrears of wages. The company and the three defendants did not comply and did not provide the labor department with explanations. On November 13, 2013, the Human Resources and Social Security Bureau of Yushan District, Ma'anshan City, transferred the case to the public security organs. Regarding the above charges, the prosecution provided the court with physical evidence: two cash journals; documentary evidence of case registration forms, household registration certificates, case process records, and descriptions provided by the Human Resources and Social Security Bureau of Yushan District, Ma'anshan City; statements from victims Zhao, Yu, Gan, Cao, and Tian; testimony from witness Wu A; confessions and defenses from defendants Zhu, Feng, and Wei, among other evidence, to substantiate the charges.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charges: From November to December 2013, defendants Wei and Xu, in certain towns and townships of the county, stole 25 chickens by waylaying them on the road on multiple occasions, valued at 1,920 yuan. Defendant Ren, knowing that defendants Wei and Xu were committing theft, still provided bags to facilitate their repeated thefts of chickens. The charges by the prosecutorial authority are consistent with the facts ascertained by this court. Defendants Wei, Xu, and Ren, as well as their respective defense attorneys, raised no objections during the trial. Furthermore, the evidence is corroborated by the testimony of witness Tian; statements from victims Wang, Chen, and others; household registration certificates, records of the crime's detection and resolution; and the confessions of defendants Wei, Xu, and Ren, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


Upon trial, it was found that on September 10, 2013, the defendant Ceng set up a gambling venue in room 1101 on the 11th floor of the "Xianghe Restaurant" located in the Central Street Office of Renhuai City, where Zhang, Dou, and others were organized to play a form of mahjong with a minimum bet of 1,000 yuan, from which profits were illicitly collected. On the 14th of the same month, the defendant Wang entered the gambling venue carrying 180,000 yuan in gambling funds and, upon introduction by Ceng, lent money to the gamblers. Around 16:00 on the same day, the gambling venue was raided by the public security authorities, and gambling funds totaling 309,150 yuan were confiscated. The above facts are corroborated by evidence such as the case registration form, household registration certificates, list of seized items, witness testimonies, explanations of the situation, inspection records, identification transcripts, and recognition transcripts. Both defendants raised no objection during the court trial, which is sufficient for conviction.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charges that between May and December 1, 2014, the defendants Ye, Chen, Tan, and Jiang, in collusion with Li, Yu B, Yu A (all dealt with in separate cases), and others, conducted an operation in an open space opposite No. 126 Houlu, Longqiao within the district, where they pretended to gamble using Pai Gow to lure bystanders into placing bets. They used special contact lenses to see the card values clearly and remote-controlled dice to deceive victims Yang, Hao, Yang, Liu, and others out of more than 30,000 RMB. During this period, the defendant Tan was responsible for wearing contact lenses to view the cards and signaling to the dealer whether to shuffle through the speed of his bets, and controlling the dice remotely. The defendants Ye, Chen, Jiang, and others took turns acting as the dealer, gatekeeper, and flying pigeon bettors. After each successful deception, the defendant Tan received a salary of over 100 RMB, and the defendant Jiang received a salary of 50 RMB. Defendants Ye, Chen, and others divided the remaining stolen money equally after deducting related personnel's wages. At about 17:30 on December 1, 2014, while the defendants Ye, Tan, and Jiang were committing fraud at the aforementioned location, they were apprehended by police officers. Defendant Chen escaped during the commotion and later voluntarily surrendered to the police on January 4, 2015, at 9:00. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by the four defendants during the trial, and were corroborated by the statements of victims Yang, Hao, Yang, Liu, testimony from witnesses Zhou A, Zhou B, Xu, identification records, seizure orders, photographs of the instruments of the crime, surveillance video DVDs, details of their apprehension, explanatory notes, identification proofs, and the confessions and identification records of the four defendants, all of which are sufficient for conviction.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that on February 22, 2014, the defendants Hu and Tian, in collusion with "Old Rogue" (handled in a separate case), after premeditation, sneaked into the inpatient department of Taizhou Orthopedic Hospital in the Chengbei Street area of a certain city. Taking advantage of nobody being around, the defendants Hu and Tian kept lookout and provided cover while "Old Rogue" pried open car locks, stealing a black Qiaoge brand moped (valued at 1,900 RMB) belonging to the victim Zhu B, which was parked in front of the inpatient department, and a red 48CC moped (valued at 2,000 RMB) belonging to the victim Cheng which was also parked in front of the inpatient department. The defendants Hu and Tian, along with "Old Rogue," rode the stolen mopeds to a repair shop at 14 Fanglin Road in the Lunan Street area of the Luqiao District to change locks and sell the stolen goods, where they were caught on the spot by the police. The stolen vehicles have been recovered. The aforementioned facts were not contested by the defendants Hu and Tian during the court trial, and are corroborated by the statements of the victims Zhu B and Cheng, the testimonies of witnesses Zhu A, Huang, and Yun, the identification records, the seizure list, the price appraisal conclusion, the restitution list, photos, the account of the capture, the statement of circumstances, household registration certificates, administrative penalty decision, and the re-education through labor decision, among other evidence, all of which are sufficient to substantiate the charges.


After the trial, it was found that: At around 5 a.m. on September 25, 2013, the defendants Xiao and Deng, carrying tools such as scissors and screwdrivers, proceeded to the area under Building No. 165 on Xin Village North Road, Beijie Town, in a certain city. They used a method of smashing the motorcycle lock with a rock, cutting the power cord with scissors, and reconnecting the wires to start the engine, to steal a Yamaha motorcycle (license plate: [place] A×××××) parked there by the victim, Xu. At around 7 a.m. on September 25, 2013, the defendants Xiao and Deng were apprehended with the stolen goods near the village road in Maitang Village, a town in a certain county of a certain province, while they were preparing to sell the stolen property. According to the appraisal, the motorcycle was valued at 7,350 yuan. After the case was solved, the stolen goods were recovered and returned to the victim. The above facts are confirmed by the following evidence presented in court by the prosecutor, including the victim Xu's statement and purchase invoice, the confession of co-defendant Huang, the confessions of the defendants Xiao and Deng, the list of seized and returned items, the on-site investigation records, diagrams and photos, the valuation conclusion for the incriminated item, the identification records and photos of the two defendants recognizing each other, the identification records and photos of the two defendants recognizing co-defendant Huang, the identification records and photos of co-defendant Huang recognizing the two defendants, the photos of the two defendants identifying the stolen goods, the crime scene, and the crime tools, the criminal judgment No. 2 (1991) and No. 31 (2009) of the Foshan Criminal Court and the proof of release, the arrest process, household registration materials and other evidence, with the two defendants also confessing to the case during the trial. The above evidence, after cross-examination by both the prosecution and the defense, was investigated and confirmed to be true, the evidence is conclusive and sufficient, and the various pieces of evidence corroborate each other, sufficiently proving the above-mentioned actions of the two defendants. Defendant Xiao raised no objection to the facts and charges in the indictment. Defendant Deng raised no objection to the facts and charges in the indictment.


After trial, it was found that at approximately 3:50 am on July 13, 2019, the defendants Zhou, Zhang, and Wang, in collusion with Zhao (handled in a separate case), were caught red-handed by patrolling police officers while illegally fishing aquatic products in a water area near a certain place on the eastern shore of the Hulun Lake Protected Area. The Fisheries Administration and Fishing Port Supervision Administration Bureau of the Hulun Lake National Nature Reserve conducted tests and found a total of 40 gillnets, each 80 meters long and 1.1 meters high, with a mesh size of 10 centimeters x 40 nets. According to the certification by the Manzhouli City Price Authentication Center, 450 pounds of carp were seized, with a value of 450 RMB. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants Zhou, Zhang, and Wang during the trial proceedings. Furthermore, these facts are corroborated by evidence such as the seizure warrant, list of seized items, photos taken at the scene, police report registration form, case acceptance documents, basic information on the three defendants, explanations of the three defendants' records of illegal activities and criminal offenses, explanations of the three defendants' return to justice, a weight statement, three administrative penalty decisions by public security, witness testimony from Zhao, the fishing gear inspection opinion from the Fisheries Administration and Fishing Port Supervision Administration Bureau of the Hulun Lake National Nature Reserve, the price determination conclusion from the Manzhouli City Price Authentication Center, the on-site inspection record by the Hulun Lake National Nature Reserve Branch of the Hulunbuir Public Security Bureau, audiovisual materials, etc., which are sufficient to establish the case.


The prosecution charges: From mid-January 2018 to January 25th of the same month, the defendants Feng, Xia, and Wang, for the purpose of making a profit, provided conditions for gambling in the form of "Show Hand" for individuals such as Jin, Liu, another Feng, and Zhu at a certain restaurant in a village in a town of Yuyao City. They illegally profited over 12,000 RMB by taking a cut from the winnings. On January 25th, 2018, defendants Feng and Xia were caught by police officers from the Sanqishi Police Station of the municipal public security bureau. On the same day, defendant Wang turned himself in at the Sanqishi Police Station and truthfully confessed to the aforementioned facts. During the court trial, defendants Feng, Xia, and Wang raised no objections to these facts, which are substantiated by documentary evidence of the arrest process, the arrival process, photo explanations, personal information, witness testimonies from Jin, Liu, another Feng, and Zhu, as well as an audio-visual material CD, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a city accused defendants Liang and Wang. During April 2013, while managing the "XX Consignment Shop" located on a certain road in a district of the city, they lent victim Wang 30,000 RMB. Due to Wang's failure to repay on time, defendants Liang and Wang forcibly took Wang to the "XX Consignment Shop" at around 11 p.m. on December 12, 2013, and illegally detained him, forcing him to make phone calls to raise money. During this period, defendants Liang and Wang assaulted Wang, prevented him from wearing clothes, splashed cold water on him, and engaged in acts of humiliation until they were apprehended by public security authorities at around 3 p.m. on December 14.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Taizhou City, Jiangsu Province charged that on September 9, 2017, at around 14:00, defendant Jing, due to debt disputes and personal conflicts, sought to confront the victim Wang for an explanation. He thus gathered defendants Luo, Zhang, and others, including Jin and Liu (handled in separate cases), to a private room on the second floor of a restaurant in a certain town of a certain district in this city. Defendant Jing had an argument with Wang. Upon seeing this, defendants Luo, Zhang, and others used extendable batons, beer bottles, and other items to assault Wang, Huang, and others, resulting in minor injuries of the first degree to victim Huang and minor injuries to victim Wang. To substantiate the above charges, the prosecution presented various pieces of evidence in court, including criminal judgment documents, testimonies from witnesses such as Zhang Jia, statements from victims like Huang, confessions and defenses from defendants Jing and others, confessions and defenses from accomplices like Jin, identification records, onsite surveillance video, and appraisal opinions. Based on this,


The prosecution alleges that defendant Zhang purchased methamphetamine (commonly known as "ice") from others with the intention of selling it, and enlisted defendant Cao to help find buyers for the methamphetamine. Subsequently, defendant Cao contacted drug user Bai. One night in the fall of 2014, defendant Cao assisted defendant Zhang in selling approximately 0.6 grams of methamphetamine to drug user Bai on Provincial Road 244 in a village in the county. They received 700 yuan in drug proceeds, from which defendant Zhang gained 600 yuan and defendant Cao gained 100 yuan. The prosecution has provided evidence to substantiate these facts, including witness testimony from Bai, and confessions and statements of defense from defendants Zhang and Cao.


Upon trial, it was found that on the evenings of October 23 and October 25, 2013, the defendant Cui operated a casino using "ban tuozis" in Mahjong at Room 3004, Building 8, Rongjiang Yuan, Xiangjiang Century City, Kaifu District, in a certain city. He hired the defendant Zhang to summon participants for gambling, while the defendant Wu was responsible for collecting fees at the casino, and the defendant Luo A was in charge of dealing and shuffling cards at the casino. On the evening of October 25, after receiving a report from the public, the police uncovered this casino, confiscated gambling funds and tools on site, and summoned five defendants and multiple gambling participants for investigation. Upon verification, the casino profited illegally, making a total of 19,400 yuan over two days. These facts raised no objections from the defendants Cui, Wu, Luo, and Zhang during the trial. Moreover, sufficient evidence verified by the police, including details of their apprehension, inspection records, evidence preservation lists; photographs of confiscated gambling funds and tools; administrative penalty decisions for gambling participants; testimonies from witnesses such as Huang, Zhang A, Wang; confessions and defenses from the defendants Cui, Wu, Luo, and Zhang; their household registration certificates and performance material evidence, were sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that, from April 1 to May 7, 2014, the defendants Lu and Zhang stole a total of 4 mobile phones from others on four separate occasions at the Wuxi Maternity and Child Health Hospital, with a total value of RMB 3358.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain location accused that on June 5, 2015, at approximately 11 p.m., the defendant Tan provided a venue and gambling equipment in a room on the first floor of his own house, located across from the Finance Office of Maozifeng Village Committee in Maozifeng Town, Nanxiong City. He, together with the defendants Ceng, Lu, and six others, engaged in gambling using the method of "pushing Pai Gow." Among them, defendant Ceng participated in gambling with a stake of 2,000 RMB; defendant Lu participated with a stake of 2,000 RMB; defendant Tan participated with a stake of 20 RMB; Huang participated with a stake of 3,000 RMB; Huang Jia participated with a stake of 1,800 RMB; Tan Moumou participated with a stake of 10,000 RMB; Liu Moumou participated with a stake of 204 RMB; Lei Moumou participated with a stake of 70 RMB. During this period, defendant Ceng lent 50,000 RMB to Huang for gambling and lent 5,000 RMB to Tan Jia for gambling; Huang lent 15,000 RMB to Tan Moumou for gambling. Regarding the alleged criminal facts, the public prosecution agency presented evidence to the court including the confessions of defendants Ceng, Lu, and Tan, witness testimonies, and records of the scene investigation.


Upon examination of the case, it was found that around 10 a.m. on June 23, 2015, Yang Moumou (dealt with in a separate case), suspecting that Si had reported his operation of a casino, went with defendants Zhou and Yang to Si's home, located within the Youth Vegetable Market on Renmin Road, Dianbu Town, Feidong County. There, they verbally abused and assaulted Si and his wife, Wang. The assault by Yang Moumou and Zhou resulted in multiple rib fractures for Si. Later, Yang Moumou and Zhou also assaulted Wei. Around 8 p.m. that evening, Yang Moumou and Zhou, along with "Baldy" (dealt with in a separate case), went to Wei's home in a certain city, claiming that Wei also participated in reporting his casino operation and overturned a mahjong machine in Wei's home. According to the assessment: Si suffered fractures of ribs 3-10 on the left side and ribs 8-10 on the right side, constituting a Grade 1 minor injury. Further investigation revealed that defendants Zhou and Yang, along with others, compensated the victim Si for economic losses amounting to 55,000 RMB. Si, Wang, and Wei expressed forgiveness for the actions of Zhou and Yang. These facts were not disputed by the defendants during the court proceedings and were corroborated by the statements of victims Si, Wang, and Wei, along with the testimonies of witnesses Liang, Yu, Jin, Yuan, Liu, and others, the identification records, on-site inspection records, site sketches and photographs, forensic identification of bodily injuries, records of apprehension, basic population information inquiry data, and agreements, enough to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged: In August and September 2017, the defendants Feng, Wang, Li, and Wei conspired to establish an online casino for gambling in the "baccarat" manner to obtain illegal profits. They jointly invested in purchasing computers and furniture to set up the backend of the online casino in Feng’s home in a dormitory in a town of a certain county. Subsequently, Feng and others downloaded gambling software from the "Sunbet" gambling website platform, applied for accounts and passwords, and organized gamblers to gamble in the "baccarat" manner. They obtained 1.25% commission on betting amounts from the "Sunbet" gambling website, making a total profit of over ten thousand yuan. On December 19, 2017, the casino was uncovered by the public security authorities. During this period, Feng was mainly responsible for applying for agent accounts and passwords, assisting players with adding and withdrawing funds, and uniformly managing the casino's profits. Wang was primarily responsible for the operation of the computer platform, while Li and Wei occasionally helped with computer operations. Defendants Feng and Wei surrendered themselves to the public security authorities on March 8 and April 28, 2019, respectively. After being brought to justice, defendants Feng, Wang, Li, and Wei all voluntarily and truthfully confessed the main facts of their crimes. It was further found that defendants Feng, Wang, Li, and Wei each returned 2,500 yuan of illegal proceeds. The above facts were undisputed by defendants Feng, Wang, Li, and Wei during the court trial and were corroborated by witness testimonies from Luo, Zeng, Nie, and Liao, WeChat screenshots, the administrative penalty decision by the county public security bureau, identification records, identification photos of Li and Wang, the county public security bureau's seizure decision, seizure inventory, extraction records, extracted photos, the three notebooks seized from the casino, photos of gamblers arrested at the scene, on-site inspection records, on-site photos, the judicial appraisal opinion numbered Minzhongzheng [2019] No. 737, bank transaction records, documents of confession and punishment acceptance, sentencing recommendation, description of the case situation, basic information of the criminal suspects, information of permanent residents, and confessions from defendants Feng, Wang, Li, and Wei. These evidence pieces are sufficient to establish the findings.


A certain People's Procuratorate charges: At approximately 12:00 PM on October 25, 2015, the defendants Hong and Zhou went to the parking lot west of KFC on Pozi Street in the Hailing District of this city. Taking advantage of an opportunity, they stole one Xinzhou-brand electric bicycle and one Huawei mobile phone belonging to the victim, Lu. According to the appraisal, the total value of the aforementioned items was 2,134 RMB. After committing the crime, Hong and Zhou voluntarily surrendered and truthfully confessed their criminal acts. The stolen electric bicycle and mobile phone have been returned by the defendants and duly returned to the victim by the public security authorities. The victim, Lu, also expressed understanding of the actions of the two defendants. In the course of the trial, Hong and Zhou raised no objections to the above facts, which are corroborated by the victim Lu's statement, surveillance video from the crime scene, the valuation certificate, photographs of physical evidence, the sales registration certificate for the electric bicycle, receipts, the seizure decision, the seizure list, the return list, the account of surrender, and the letter of understanding, among other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The court found that defendants Li and Tang, from mid to late February to early March 2018, jointly purchased drugs on multiple occasions from a person nicknamed "Qi" for their own use and sale. 1. On February 10, 2018, at approximately 9:00 PM, defendant Li sold about 0.6 grams of drugs to Yang for consumption at a price of 300 yuan at a certain lawn in a district of a city. 2. At approximately 4:00 AM on February 28, 2018, defendant Li agreed to sell about 0.5 grams of drugs to Tang Jia for consumption at a price of 300 yuan at a certain location in a district of a city. Because Tang Jia was 100 yuan short in cash, defendant Li only received 200 yuan in cash. 3. On the afternoon of March 4, 2018, defendant Tang sold approximately 0.3 grams of drugs to Xiao for consumption at a price of 300 yuan in a hotel room in a district of a city. It was also found that after the police arrested defendant Li on March 5, 2018, they searched his residence according to the law and found a white transparent plastic bag containing white crystal particles in the left pocket of his coat. The white crystal particles weighed 4.59 grams. After examination by the city's public security bureau evidence identification office, methamphetamine components were detected in the white crystal particles. The above facts were not contested by defendants Li and Tang during the trial and were corroborated by evidence provided by the public prosecution agency during the trial, which includes the case acceptance registration form, case filing decision, detention certificate, arrest warrant, release notice, residential surveillance decision, search record, extraction record, weighing record, sampling record, urine extraction record, list of seized items, explanation of circumstances, CD production instructions, case process details, household registration information, witness testimonies from Yang, Tang Jia, and Xiao, confessions from defendants Li and Tang, identification records and photos, on-site inspection reports, verification certificates, identification documents, notification of judicial opinions, audiovisual materials, etc., which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charged that on July 3, 2018, Du, the person in charge of the mixing station of Wulatehouqi Qixiang Industry and Trade Co., Ltd., failed to inspect the surroundings and the interior of the mixer and did not sound the horn as a warning before restarting the machine after it was shut down, as per company regulations. This led to the worker, Hu, who was cleaning the tank inside the mixing station, being caught in the machine. Subsequently, the defendant Du stopped the mixer and reported the incident to the project manager and head of the Safety and Environment Department, defendant Fan. After arriving at the scene, Fan removed the victim from the mixer and took him to the hospital. On the way to the hospital, they encountered an ambulance responding to the emergency. According to the diagnosis by the emergency personnel, the victim Hu had already died. Following this, defendant Fan reported and filed the incident with the Wulatehouqi Public Security Bureau and the Wulatehouqi Safety Supervision Administration. After the incident, the Safety Committee Office of Wulatehouqi concluded that Du bore direct responsibility for the accident, while Fan was accountable for management responsibilities due to not conducting quarterly safety training for employees according to company regulations, which had a causal relationship with the occurrence of the accident. According to the judicial appraisal by the Bayannur Public Security Bureau's Forensic Identif


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county in Hebei Province charged that at around 5 a.m. on January 9, 2015, the defendant Hu was driving a small car with the license plate number B××××× along Yushi Road from north to south. Upon reaching the section of road at a certain village in the county, Hu encountered Zhang, who was driving an animal-drawn cart from west to east, making a left turn onto the road. The two vehicles collided, resulting in vehicle damage and the death of the animal pulling Zhang's cart. Subsequently, the defendant Huang drove a small car with the license plate number B×××××, running over Zhang's body, which was on the ground, leading to Zhang's death. According to the "Traffic Accident Determination" by the county's Public Security Traffic Police Brigade, both defendants Hu and Huang were primarily responsible for the accident. After the incident, the civil affairs were resolved. The evidence provided by the prosecution includes: 1. documentary evidence; 2. witness testimony; 3. the confessions and defenses of defendants Hu and Huang; 4. appraisal opinions; 5. on-site inspection records, examination records, and identification records, etc.


Through the trial, it was found: On the early morning of February 14, 2014, defendants Wu and Ren, after premeditation, had Wu stay in room 416 at the Contemporary Holiday Hotel in Qiandaohu Town, Chun'an County with the victim Wang Yi. Taking advantage of Wang Yi being unprepared, Wu stole Wang Yi's Oppo N1 phone. Upon appraisal, the phone was valued at 3,281 yuan. After the incident, the phone was returned to Wang Yi through Wu; defendant Ren voluntarily turned himself in and truthfully confessed to the crime. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Wu and Ren during the court proceedings. The confessions of both defendants corroborated each other and were substantiated by victim Wang Yi's statement, witness Wang Jia's testimony, price appraisal report, site inspection notes, receipt, criminal judgment, arrest process, and household registration certificate, providing sufficient confirmation.


The prosecution charges: At approximately 4 AM on September 21, 2015, the defendant Yu drove a Wuling-brand van with the license plate number A×××××, carrying defendants Luo and Huang, to Weicheng Shoe Factory in the Zhaoqing City Dawang High-tech Zone. Luo and Huang were responsible for entering the dormitory of the shoe factory to commit theft, while Yu was responsible for driving and acting as a lookout outside. Luo and Huang stole from three dormitories, acquiring one Nokia 800 phone, one Samsung GT-I9100 phone, one Nokia Lumia 920T phone, two Apple 4 phones, one Apple 4S phone, and one Blackmi phone. On the same day, public security officers arrested defendants Luo, Huang, and Yu in Room 401 of the Renhe Hotel in the Dawang High-tech Zone of Zhaoqing City, recovering seven stolen phones on the spot. According to an appraisal, the value of the seven stolen phones was 4050 RMB, and the public security agency has returned the stolen phones to the victims. Based on this, the prosecution believes that the actions of defendants Luo, Huang, and Yu have violated the provisions of Article x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, constituting the crime of x. Corresponding evidence materials have been provided. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Luo, Huang, and Yu during the court trial, and are corroborated by physical evidence, documentary evidence, records of inspection, examination, and identification, statements of the victims, and confessions of the defendants, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


Upon examination, it was found that on June 4, 2012, during a session at the arbitration committee in a certain Hai City, Cong, the chairman of a certain Haiyiyu Steel Structure Co., Ltd, had a quarrel with the opposing agent Wang. After learning about this incident, the defendant Lin, in an attempt to curry favor with Cong, contacted the defendant Sui through the defendant Gao, and also involved the defendant Shang, with the intent to harm and retaliate against Wang. On the 13th of the same month, around 19:00, the defendant Lin and others followed Wang to the entrance of the Crown store in the Shiba Supermarket of the Economic and Technological Development Zone in a certain Hai. Defendant Lin instructed defendants Sui and Shang to injure Wang with a knife, causing injuries to Wang's left and right arms and back, and then fled the scene. According to the appraisal, Wang's two injuries were classified as minor injuries. After the incident, the public security authorities subsequently arrested defendants Shang, Gao, and Sui, and with the assistance of Gao's relatives, Lin was also apprehended. Additionally, it was found that during the trial of this case, the victim Wang filed an incidental civil lawsuit with the court. The four defendants have compensated the victim Wang for economic losses amounting to 280,000 RMB, and Wang applied for withdrawal of the lawsuit, which the court approved. The aforementioned facts were confessed by the defendants Lin, Gao, Sui, and Shang in court. The evidence including the confessions submitted by the prosecution and verified in court, testimony from the witness Cong, statements from the victim Wang, the [2012] No. 70 forensic injury assessment report, arrest records and injury photos, household registration certificates, and the withdrawal hearing transcript, are sufficient to establish these facts.


The prosecution charges that the defendant Wang is the owner of an unlicensed assembled tractor driven by the defendant Ma. Wang knowingly instructed Ma to drive the vehicle on the road despite Ma not having a driving qualification. On May 28, 2014, at around 7 a.m., the defendant Ma, without a license, drove the vehicle west along the Linzhang line in a certain county. At the location 29 kilometers + 925 meters, the vehicle's right front tire burst, causing the vehicle to lose control and overturn into a ditch on the north side of the road. A passenger, Zhang, died on the spot. The defendant Ma is held fully responsible for the accident. The civil aspects between the two parties have been reconciled. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by the defendants Ma and Wang during the court hearing. These are corroborated by documentary evidence, including an acceptance registration form, household registration certificate, the circumstances of the case, a traffic accident certification, death certificate, agreement, witness statements, on-site investigation records from a certain county's public security bureau, a diagram of the traffic accident scene, on-site photographs, and an autopsy report, which are sufficient to substantiate the charges.


After the trial, it was found that at approximately 5 p.m. on November 4, 2013, the defendants Li and Mei sold a small packet of drugs to Tan at the roadside on Anlian Road at the border of a certain district in our city and a certain village, obtaining 400 yuan in cash. They were caught on the spot. The seized drugs tested positive for methamphetamine, weighing 0.77 grams. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Li and Mei during the court hearing, and were confirmed by the testimony of the witness Tan, the seized illicit money and goods, the identification conclusion, on-site photos, the arrest process, and explanatory statements, all of which are sufficient to be recognized.


The prosecution agency charges that on July 12, 2015, defendants Zhang, Liu, Liang, and Wu met and planned roles for a fraud scheme at a certain bus station in a district of a city. Defendants Liu and Liang pretended to be passengers in the waiting room of the bus station and approached the victim Luo, using the excuse of a delayed bus and offering to help change the ticket, they led Luo to the entrance of the Guangfa Bank opposite the bus station footbridge. Zhang then pretended to be a staff member assisting with the ticket change and defrauded Luo of 3,100 RMB, a bank card, and its PIN. Subsequently, Wu picked up Liu, Liang, and Zhang by taxi and went to a city train station's Agricultural Bank ATM, where Zhang and Wu withdrew 13,200 RMB in cash from Luo's bank card. It was further found that on August 13 of the same year, the police arrested defendants Zhang, Liu, Liang, and Wu at the city train station. On August 25 of the same year, the families of defendants Zhang, Liu, Liang, and Wu reached a compensation agreement with the victim Luo and each compensated Luo 4,275 RMB, totaling 17,100 RMB. Luo expressed understanding for the behavior of the four defendants. During the court hearing, defendants Zhang, Liu, Liang, and Wu raised no objections to the above facts, corroborated by evidence such as the victim Luo's report statement and recognition record, arrest process, Agricultural Bank debit card data inquiries, account detail inquiries, household registration certificates, family compensation documents, letter of understanding, video surveillance recordings, and confessions of defendants Zhang, Liu, Liang, and Wu during the investigation phase, which are sufficient to support the conviction.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges and confirms through court trial that from April 2020 to August 5, 2020, the defendants Peng and Ceng jointly set up a casino at Peng's residence and other locations in a certain city. They organized gambling activities using methods such as "Niu Niu" and "Yao Jian," and profited by collecting a commission known as "monkey money," amounting to more than ten thousand yuan. Afterwards, the two evenly split the illegal profits. On August 5, 2020, police officers from the city's Public Security Bureau arrested defendants Peng and Ceng, along with more than ten others, including He, who were gambling at Peng's home. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Peng and Ceng during the court hearing. The evidence presented includes: 1. documents such as the registration form for the case, non-tax revenue receipts from the provincial government, administrative penalty decisions, population information forms, and details of the arrest; 2. testimonies from witnesses Huang, Nie, Chen, Liu, Du, Xiong, Zou1, He, and Zou2; 3. confessions and defenses from defendants Peng and Ceng; 4. onsite photos and other evidence sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of the New District in a certain city accused: On September 9, 2017, at approximately 19:30, the defendants Zhao and Zhang, in collusion, gathered persons such as Chu, Wang 2, Qian, Ji, Gao, Wu, and Zhou at the address Room XXX, No. XXX, Lane XXX, Ruihe Road, Zhoupu Town, New District, a certain city, where they were renting, to engage in mass gambling using the online "Baccarat" casino. That evening, police officers seized one computer involved in the case and confiscated gambling funds amounting to 5,050 RMB. The total amount bet on that day was 75,200 RMB. After the defendants Zhao and Zhang were apprehended, they truthfully confessed the aforementioned facts; Defendant Zhao reported the crimes of others, which were subsequently verified to be true. The above facts were not contested by defendants Zhao and Zhang during the trial, and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Chen, Shao, Wang 1, Chu, Wang 2, Qian, Ji, Gao, Wu, Zhou, and others, as well as computer screenshot photos, seizure orders, lists of confiscated items, seizure records, relevant accounting records, decisions on the preservation of evidence, lists for the preservation of evidence, lists of confiscated items, administrative punishment decisions, relevant criminal judgments, household registration information, and the case incident process, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: In August 2016, the defendants Song and Huang exploited a loophole in the Zhejiang ** Supply Chain Management Co., Ltd. **** mailing platform that allowed multiple clicks on the withdrawal button to gain a multiplier effect on the withdrawal amount. By purchasing courier accounts to create false mailing orders, and once the courier fees reached the courier accounts under their control, they rapidly clicked the withdrawal button multiple times to steal funds from the company's capital pool, totaling over 20,000 RMB. After the incident, the two defendants returned a total of 21,000 RMB to the victimized unit. The evidence supporting the charges includes a receipt for the returned funds and other documentary evidence; witness testimonies; CDs; and the defendants' confessions and defense statements.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district of a city charged that since 2012, the defendant Wang had repeatedly purchased counterfeit X certain injection from Zhang (handled in a separate case) via the internet and logistics. Wang then sold the counterfeit X certain injection to the defendants Ren and Zhou, who operated the wholesale department of a certain company's new city, as well as to Yu and Song, and profited from it. The defendants Ren and Zhou sold the counterfeit X certain injection to the defendants Xu and Sun, who were operating the drug distribution department of a certain town center hospital in a certain district, and profited from it. The defendants Xu and Sun then sold the counterfeit X certain injection to multiple village-level clinics and profited from it. The defense counsel for the defendant Zhou argued: 1. The crime amount for the defendant Zhou was relatively small, and it did not result in serious social consequences; 2. The defendant Zhou had a good attitude towards admitting guilt. In summary, a lighter punishment could be applied. The defense counsel for the defendant Xu argued: 1. The defendant Xu had lesser subjective malignancy; 2. The criminal circumstances for the defendant Xu were minor; 3. The defendant Xu had a good attitude towards admitting guilt. In summary, a lighter punishment could be applied, suitable for probation. The defense counsel for the defendant Sun argued: 1. The defendant Sun was an accomplice in the joint crime; 2. The defendant Sun had circumstances of surrendering voluntarily; 3. The criminal circumstances for the defendant Sun were minor. In summary, a lighter punishment could be applied, suitable for probation. Upon investigation, it was found that the criminal facts charged by the People's Procuratorate of a certain district of a city were true. It was also found that this case was discovered by the investigation agency during another case, and the defendants Wang, Ren, Zhou, Xu, and Sun were all captured and brought to justice. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Wang, Ren, Zhou, Xu, and Sun during the trial, and were confirmed by evidence such as documentation explaining the case breakthrough, testimonies from witnesses such as Fang, and confessions from the defendants Wang and others, which were sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charged: On the evening of May 6, 2014, the defendants Yu and Li plotted in advance. Yu was responsible for stealing mobile phones, while Li was responsible for selling the stolen phones. Subsequently, Yu stole a white Samsung mobile phone from the victim, Wei, at a crowded bus stop on the west side of Zhonghua Street Square in a certain district of a certain city, and handed it to Li. When Li received the stolen phone and was preparing to sell it, both were caught. According to the appraisal, the value of the white Samsung phone was 1,032 yuan.


After trial, it was found that from January 18 to January 22, 2016, the defendant Fang organized a casino five times at No. 102, Building 5, Lane 42, Chengbei Road, Danghu Street, Pinghu City, and at No. 19, Yiyuan Lane. The defendant Ding provided the venue, the defendant Feng was responsible for skimming profits and allocating money, and the defendant Jiang was responsible for opening the door, boiling water, and arranging the cards. They gathered Li, Tu, Xu, and others to gamble in the form of "Tongzi Gong," skimming a total profit of 9,300 yuan. It was also found that one basket used for skimming profits, 950 yuan in cash, and one set of Tongzi Gong tiles were confiscated from the defendant Fang. An additional 1,100 yuan in cash was confiscated from the defendant Feng. The four defendants had no major objections to the aforementioned criminal facts during the trial, and these facts were corroborated by the case registration form, witness testimonies, inspection certificates and records, the house rental contract, the incident report, previous criminal judgment documents, public security administrative punishment decision documents, proof of unlawful and criminal records, the list of confiscated items, situation explanations, and identification documents, all of which are sufficient to establish the crime.


Upon trial, it was found that at approximately 12:30 am on November 19, 2015, defendants Hao and Kong, after premeditation, deceived Sun, the victim, into handing over an Apple 6 Plus phone worth 5,400 RMB under the pretense of needing to use the phone to make a call. This occurred in the Qixing Billiards Hall at the intersection of Yatai Street and Nanhu Avenue, Nanguan District, in a certain city. After the incident, the two defendants sold the phone for 800 RMB. At approximately 8 am on November 19, 2015, defendant Yang, aware that the phone was obtained through illegal means, purchased it from Hao and Kong for 800 RMB at a phone store located at the intersection of Donghuan Avenue and Lingdong Road in a certain city. After the incident, the stolen phone was seized by the public security authorities and returned to the victim. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Hao, Kong, and Yang during the trial and were corroborated by evidence including photographs of the involved phone, records and photos from the site identification, seizure and return lists, a statement from victim Sun, confessions from defendants Hao, Kong, and Yang, and expert opinions, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.


After a trial, it was confirmed that on the evening of November 18, 2019, at around 4 PM, the defendant Long found a Rural Commercial Bank savings card belonging to the victim Yu outside the "Ronghe Tang Health Club," located beside Fenghuang Community on some road in a certain town of the county where he was working. He informed the Health Club owner, defendant Zhu, and asked Zhu to help him use the club's POS machine to withdraw funds with the card. Subsequently, defendant Zhu helped defendant Long use the POS machine to withdraw 3,000 yuan from the found Rural Commercial Bank savings card, and after deducting a 20 yuan service fee, transferred the obtained 2,980 yuan to defendant Long via WeChat. After receiving the money, defendant Long claimed that he would continue to use the found Rural Commercial Bank savings card the next day to withdraw funds to buy clothes for defendant Zhu and colleague Xie. The following day, at around 8 AM, defendant Zhu continued to use the POS machine to withdraw 3,000 yuan from the found savings card and transferred 1,000 yuan of it via WeChat to employee Xie. After the crime, the stolen 6,000 yuan was recovered and returned to the victim Yu. The aforementioned facts, to which defendants Long and Zhu raised no objections during the trial, are supported by the permanent resident information, notes on the case situation, proof of no criminal record, merchant basic information, POS machine transaction details, bank card transaction details, WeChat transfer record screenshots, receipts, letter of understanding, seizure decision and inventory, refund list, identification photos, witness Xie's testimony, victim Yu's statement, and the confessions and defenses of defendants Long and Zhu, all presented and verified in court, and are sufficient to establish the case.


The prosecution charges that on May 1, 2016, at around 17:00, defendants Wu and Shi rode a motorcycle to the service center of a certain brigade office in a certain district of this city. Together, they stole a blue Suzuki Rui Shuang motorcycle belonging to the victim, Liu, which was parked within the service center. According to the appraisal, the motorcycle was valued at 3,417 RMB. On June 1 of the same year, the police apprehended defendant Wu and brought him to justice. With Wu's assistance, on June 7, the police apprehended defendant Shi and brought him to justice. The stolen motorcycle had been sold by defendants Wu and Shi, and the proceeds of 1,000 RMB were squandered by them. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Wu and Shi during the trial. Additionally, these facts are confirmed by evidence including identification documents, the report materials, records of apprehension, case-solving records, receipts, compulsory isolation for drug rehabilitation documents, criminal judgment documents, criminal file materials, the victim Liu's statement, a price appraisal report, on-site inspection and recognition records, surveillance video and analysis, as well as confessions from defendants Wu and Shi, which are sufficient for conviction.


The People's Procuratorate of Keqiao District, a certain city, charges: 1. One night in late November 2013, the defendants Zhang and Yang, after prior discussion, went to Unit 66, North Road, Ma'an Town Station, Keqiao District, a certain city, and used a flat iron to open the corridor door, stealing a White Swan brand Free Style electric bicycle belonging to Shi, which was parked in the corridor. According to the appraisal, the electric bicycle was valued at 720 yuan. 2. In the early morning of December 6, 2013, the defendants Zhang and Yang, after prior discussion, went to No. 100, Shanhai, Shanwai Village, Ma'an Town, Keqiao District, a certain city, and entered by using a flat iron to open the door, stealing a Shanghai Forever brand TDR1016Z electric bicycle belonging to Ye, which was parked inside the auxiliary room. According to the appraisal, the electric bicycle was valued at 850 yuan. 3. In the early morning of December 8, 2013, the defendants Zhang and Yang, after prior discussion, went to No. 609, Guangming Village, Qixian Town, Keqiao District, a certain city, and entered the yard by using a flat iron to open the door, stealing three packs of Hard Shell Liqun brand cigarettes worth 60 yuan, which were placed in the trunk of the motorcycle parked in the yard by Li B. Subsequently, the defendant Zhang used the same method to enter the home of Li A in the same village, stealing 39.50 yuan in cash placed on the tricycle in the yard by Li A. After the incident, the police recovered the stolen cigarettes and cash of 39.50 yuan and returned them to the victims Li B and Li A. During the court proceedings, the defendants Zhang and Yang did not object to the above-mentioned facts, which are corroborated by the evidence including photographs of the stolen goods, the police officers' reports on the capture process and situation explanations, the list of seized and returned items, payment receipts, the testimony of Zhao, and the statements of Shi, Ye, Li B, and Li A, as well as the price appraisal conclusion, and the recognition transcripts of the defendants Zhang and Yang, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.


The Tianhe District People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Guangdong Province charges: In June 2014, the defendants Hu and Zhong rented Room XX, Building X, Longde Building, No. 371 Tianhe Road, Tianhe District of a certain city, and on July 29 of the same year, they applied for one POS machine from the certain state branch of Shenzhen YS E-Payment Technology Co., Ltd. in the name of Li. By distributing advertisements and other means, they attracted customers to the above location to cash out under the guise of swiping bank credit cards for overdraft consumption without any actual transactions, charging a fee of 1% to 1.5% of the cash-out amount. Upon investigation, it was found that the defendants Hu and Zhong used the POS machine to conduct false transactions to help Chen, Zhang, and others cash out a total of 1,479,649.04 RMB. On September 15, 2014, the defendants Hu and Zhong were arrested and brought to justice.


Upon trial, the following facts were ascertained: On June 13, 2019, at around 21:00, defendants Zhou, Zhu, and another individual Zhu, in a certain alley of a district in Changzhou, had a verbal altercation and physical scuffle with victims Zhao A and Zhao B due to a traffic accident dispute. Defendants Zhou, Zhu, and the other Zhu attacked victims Zhao A and Zhao B using fists and kicks, causing Zhao A to suffer fractures of the left nasal bone and the frontal process of the maxilla. Zhao B sustained fractures of both nasal bones, the frontal process of the left maxilla, a fracture of the fourth rib on the left side, and scarring on the forehead and face. According to forensic examination, the injuries sustained by victims Zhao A and Zhao B were classified as minor injuries level two. Furthermore, it was determined that defendants Zhou, Zhu, and the other Zhu have compensated victims Zhao A and Zhao B with 538,000 RMB and obtained their forgiveness. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Zhou, Zhu, and the other Zhu during the court hearing, and were corroborated by evidence including phone records, victims' medical records, civil mediation agreement, receipts, letter of forgiveness, witness testimonies from certain individuals including Wu, Li, and another Zhou, statements from victims Zhao A and Zhao B, proof of case facts and apprehension by the public security organ, recognition records and photographs, forensic medical identification report on bodily injury degree, criminal judgment, and release certificate, all sufficient for conviction.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges that between May 31, 2013, and August 10, 2013, the defendants Chen and Zhao conspired to commit theft and carried out three thefts in a certain district of a certain city, stealing a total of five two-wheeled motorcycles, with a total value of 20,490 yuan. They then rode the stolen motorcycles to an area in the Huli District, after which they sold them. The detailed facts are as follows:

1. In the early morning of May 31, 2013, defendants Chen and Zhao stole a D××××× Light Knight Suzuki two-wheeled motorcycle (valued at 4,078 yuan) belonging to the victim Wang Bing, and a D××××× Loncin two-wheeled motorcycle (valued at 3,385 yuan) belonging to the victim Zhang from the courtyard of a private rental house at 365 Xihu Pond, a village on Xiangping Street, a district in a certain city.

2. In the early morning of June 7, 2013, defendants Chen and Zhao entered the residential courtyard of the victim Wang Yi at 306 Xihu Pond, a village on Xiangping Street, a certain district of a certain city, and stole a D××××× Haojue two-wheeled motorcycle (valued at 3,246 yuan) and a D××××× Honda two-wheeled motorcycle (valued at 4,783 yuan) from Wang Yi.

3. In the early morning of August 19, 2013, defendants Chen and Zhao stole a D××××× "Jinlong" two-wheeled motorcycle (valued at 4,998 yuan) belonging to the victim Yang, which was parked in the courtyard of a private rental house at 275 Xihu Pond, a village on Xiangping Street, a certain district in a certain city.

On August 19, 2013, defendants Chen and Zhao were arrested by public security authorities at a village in a district and the County Hou bus stop in the Huli District, respectively. Upon being brought to justice, defendants Chen and Zhao confessed to their criminal acts.


After trial, it was found that: 1. Defendant Xu, during the operation of a certain city liquor and tobacco store, sold smuggled cigarettes of brands such as "Esse" and "Marlboro" without obtaining a special tobacco monopoly business license. In July 2014, Xu sold smuggled cigarettes of brands like "Esse" to defendant Zhang, valued at RMB 16,400. On December 5, 2014, the public security authorities found unsold smuggled cigarettes such as "Esse" and "Marlboro" at Xu's store, valued at RMB 46,274. The total value of these cigarettes is RMB 62,674. 2. From April to November 2014, defendant Zhang, without obtaining a tobacco monopoly retail license, repeatedly purchased "Esse" and "Lion" brand cigarettes from Xu and others with the help of defendant Chen for payment and transportation, and transported them to a certain sea area for sale, totaling RMB 65,722. Of these, Zhang has sold cigarettes worth RMB 32,749, with unsold cigarettes worth RMB 32,973 (including cigarettes worth RMB 16,400 purchased from Xu), which have been seized by the municipal tobacco monopoly bureau of a certain sea city district. Additionally, it was found that Zhang was administratively punished twice by the municipal tobacco monopoly bureau of a certain sea city district on December 9, 2011, and July 15, 2013, for illegal tobacco business operations. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhang, Xu, and Chen during the court trial, and are substantiated by witness testimonies, quality supervision and testing reports from the Shandong Tobacco Quality Supervision and Testing Station, recognition records, search records, inventory lists of seized items, proof materials of seizures by the municipal tobacco monopoly bureau of a certain sea city district, bank account transaction details, tobacco monopoly retail licenses, arrest records, and household registration certificates, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of Luohu District in a certain city charges: At around 2 a.m. on October 29, 2013, Feng contacted the defendant, Chen, by phone to purchase 500 yuan worth of methamphetamine. The defendant, Chen, learned that the defendant, Yang, who was nearby, had drugs, and thus agreed to the transaction. The two parties agreed on the relevant details of the drug transaction. At around 3 a.m. on the same day, the defendant, Yang, rode a bicycle to take the defendant, Chen, to the agreed location in front of the Bank of China on a certain road in Luohu District, a certain city, to meet Ding, who came for the transaction. The defendant, Chen, handed two packets of methamphetamine to Ding and then received 500 yuan from Ding. After the transaction was completed, as the parties were preparing to leave, they were caught on the spot by police officers. The police seized 500 yuan of drug money from the defendant, Chen, and two packets of methamphetamine obtained from the transaction from Ding (which were later identified to have a net weight of 1.53 grams and tested positive for methamphetamine). Subsequently, the police arrested the defendant, Yang, in front of the Kadun Barber Shop on Fenghuang Road in Luohu District, a certain city. To prove the above facts, the prosecution submitted the following evidence: 1. Physical evidence: identification materials of the involved stolen money and items; 2. Documentary evidence: list of seized/returned items, call record list, apprehension report, identity information and previous convictions of the defendants; 3. Witness testimonies: testimonies of Feng and Chen Mei; 4. Defendants' confessions and defenses: confessions and defenses of Yang and Chen; 5. Expert opinions: "Appraisal Document" and "Appraisal Conclusion Notification"; 6. Inspection and examination records: site inspection records and photographs.


The prosecution alleges that on a day in October 2012, Defendant Ding handed over his 1-inch and 2-inch photos to Defendant Chen to forge a resident identification card, so that Defendant Chen could replace him in taking a certain province's pharmaceutical qualification exam. Later, Defendant Chen contacted a person (identity unknown, at large) through the phone to forge a resident identification card, providing his identity information and Defendant Ding's 1-inch photo, for a price of 120 RMB. On November 4, 2012, Defendant Ding used the forged resident identification card to take the exam at Yiwu Industrial and Commercial College, where he was discovered by the proctor. After persuasion by Defendant Chen, Defendant Ding surrendered to the public security organs on November 7, 2012. The aforementioned facts were uncontested by Defendant Chen and Defendant Ding during the trial, and are substantiated by the acceptance of evidence list, photos of seized items, statements regarding confession, statements recognizing meritorious behavior, testimony from witness Liu, the identification of resident identification card forgery, the process of arrest, and the confessions and identification of Defendant Chen and Defendant Ding, among other evidence, sufficient for recognition.


The prosecution alleges that from September to November 2013, the defendants Lu and Zhang conspired in a room at Lu's pig farm located in a village in a town in a certain city, organizing six gambling sessions using the card game "Suo Ha" with individuals including Gu, Shen, and Zhu. They profited a total of over 12,000 yuan from these sessions. Subsequently, the defendants Lu and Zhang each received 6,000 yuan. On February 24, 2014, the defendant Zhang voluntarily surrendered to the Zhouwangmiao Police Station of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city and truthfully confessed the aforementioned crimes. The defendants Lu and Zhang raised no objections to these facts during the trial, and the witness testimonies of Gu, Shen, and Zhu, identification records and photos, criminal judgment, household registration certificates, and arrest records all serve as sufficient evidence to ascertain the facts.


Upon trial, the following findings were made:

1. On November 30, 2016, the defendant Zhang used his wife Li's mobile Taobao account to purchase a modified nail gun online for 200 RMB. Subsequently, Zhang purchased accessories such as scopes and steel balls online and assembled them into a firearm. On July 4, 2019, investigators from the Baofeng County Public Security Bureau, acting on a lead, found a modified nail gun, a scope, 197 nail cartridges, and 480 steel balls at Zhang's home in a certain district of a certain city. Upon evaluation, the modified nail gun was powered by gunpowder and can be classified as a firearm.

2. On September 30, 2016, the defendant Gong purchased a modified nail gun from the Taobao store "Tenghui Hardware Tools" for 610 RMB. Later, Gong bought additional accessories such as seamless steel pipes and a scope from Taobao stores to assemble a firearm. On July 6, 2019, investigators from the Baofeng County Public Security Bureau, acting on a lead, found a modified nail gun, a scope, and 780 nail cartridges at Gong's home in a certain district of a certain city. Upon evaluation, this modified nail gun was also powered by gunpowder and can be classified as a firearm.

After the incidents, the defendants Zhang and Gong responded to police summons and voluntarily appeared, truthfully confessing their criminal activities. Furthermore, it was found that on August 31, 2020, the Detective Team of the Baofeng County Public Security Bureau had handed over the mentioned two modified nail guns possessed by Zhang and Gong to the Security Management Team of the Baofeng County Public Security Bureau.

The above facts were undisputed by the defendants Zhang and Gong during the court hearings and were corroborated by evidence including the confessions of defendants Zhang and Gong, testimonies of witnesses Li, Wu, and Zheng, household registration and criminal record documents of defendants Zhang and Gong, details of Taobao orders, seizure lists, evaluation opinions, case registration forms, decisions to file the case, arrest and breakthrough case reports, and detention certificates, all of which have been verified during the court proceedings and are sufficient to substantiate the charges.


Upon examination, it was found: During October 2015, at a certain bar in a certain city, drug user Li purchased the drug ketamine (commonly known as KING powder) from defendant Zhang six times, each time for 100 yuan. One night in mid-December 2015, drug user Li purchased 100 yuan worth of ketamine from defendant Xiong at a certain bar in a certain city. On the evening of January 11, 2016, defendant Zhang and drug user Li had a conflict over drug-related finances, leading Zhang to report Li's drug use to the police. That same evening, police arrested Li at a certain bar, and Li confessed that his drug source was defendant Zhang. Subsequently, the police took both individuals for investigation. Defendant Zhang truthfully confessed to the crime of selling drugs to Li. The next day, defendant Xiong turned himself in to the police and truthfully confessed to the above-mentioned criminal facts. The above facts were undisputed by defendants Zhang and Xiong during the trial, and were corroborated by witness testimony from Li, expert opinions, identity and clean record proofs of defendants Zhang and Xiong, the circumstances of the arrest, and other evidence, sufficient for a conviction.


The People's Procuratorate of a district in Fuzhou City accused: Defendant Chen, from May 2019 to November 15, either alone or in collusion with defendant Hu and Xin (nicknamed "Mao", at large), Xiao (at large), and Chen1 (identity unknown, at large), etc., has been rotating to set up casinos in certain bays, villages, locations, towns, and counties in a certain district. The casino charges a 10% fee from the gambling money. Chen also hired Wu (nicknamed "Sand", at large) to act as a lookout around the casino. During this period, Chen and others took in illegal profits totaling 90,000 yuan, with Chen personally receiving between 40,000 and 50,000 yuan. Hu and others took in illegal profits totaling 34,000 yuan, with Hu personally receiving 17,000 yuan. Moreover, the police caught the defendants Chen and others organizing a gambling spree in the bamboo forest of the Huang family group in a certain village of a certain town in a certain district on November 15, 2019, capturing more than ten gamblers and seizing gambling funds totaling 29,145 yuan on site. The evidence used by the prosecution to ascertain the above facts includes: 1. documentary evidence; 2. identification records; 3. testimonies of witnesses including Xu2, Zou1, Deng, Huang1, Huang2, Zhang, Xiong, Zhang, Wu1, Wu2, Qiu, Zou2, Zhou1, Fang, Zhou2, Zeng1, Wang, Zeng2, Zou3, Zhu; 4. the confessions and defenses of defendants Chen and Hu. The procedure for collecting the above evidence is legal, the content is objective and true, and it is sufficient to confirm the accused facts. Defendant Hu does not dispute the accused facts and evidence, and voluntarily admits guilt and accepts punishment.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county in Zhejiang Province charges: On September 20, 2015, at around 15:00, at the suggestion of the defendant Yu, with Yu keeping watch, the defendant Wu entered the rented house of the victim Zhao located in Niuyanwu, a town in the county, by slipping through the door and stole a Lenovo Y460 laptop worth 720 RMB. They later sold the stolen goods at the Xinyu Pawn Shop on Nanjie Street, County Town, for 700 RMB, with the defendant Yu receiving 500 RMB and the defendant Wu receiving 200 RMB. After the incident, Yu's family redeemed the stolen goods and returned them to the victim Zhao, who then forgave them. It is thus concluded that the actions of the defendants Yu and Wu constitute the crime of x and should be punished according to the law. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants Yu and Wu during the trial and are supported by evidence that includes the statement from the victim Zhao presented and read by the prosecutor in court, testimonies from witnesses Lu, He, and others, a price appraisal report, on-site investigation records, identification records, pawn shop transaction records, arrest records, household registration certificates, a criminal judgment, a release certificate, and a letter of forgiveness, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People’s Procuratorate of a certain city in Zhejiang Province charges that between March and May 2016, the defendants Tan and Jiang, a married couple, conspired together for Tan, who worked at the workshop of an individual factory owned by victim Lu in Ertang New Village, Zonghan Street, a certain city, to steal copper rods. Defendant Jiang was responsible for selling the stolen copper rods. During this period, defendant Tan stole a total of over 150 kilograms of copper rods in several instances from the workshop, and defendant Jiang sold the stolen goods on multiple occasions for a total profit of over 3,000 RMB. According to a price appraisal, the aforementioned copper rods were valued at a total of 4,125 RMB. After being apprehended, both defendants Tan and Jiang truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts. During the trial, defendants Tan and Jiang compensated victim Lu for the economic losses and obtained Lu's understanding and forgiveness. These facts were not disputed by defendants Tan and Jiang during the court hearing and were corroborated by Lu's testimony, testimony of witness Liu, identification records and photos, the price appraisal certificate, the administrative penalty decision, the letter of understanding, the account of the arrest, and the identification documents of both defendants, all of which provided sufficient evidence. Based on the above criminal facts and circumstances, the prosecution recommends a sentence range of five months of detention to eight months of imprisonment with a fine for defendant Tan; for defendant Jiang, a sentence range of four months of detention to six months of imprisonment with a fine, with probation being applicable.


Upon examination and verification, it was found that at around 10:00 PM on August 7, 2013, the defendant Wang reached an agreement with drug user Liu to sell methamphetamine for 1000 RMB. Subsequently, Wang informed the defendant Chen of this information over the phone. At around 10:30 PM that night, the defendant Chen arrived at the road across from the former Zhuhai No. 3 Middle School in a certain district of the city and sold a small package of methamphetamine to Liu. Liu paid 1000 RMB, from which the defendant Wang received 300 RMB as compensation, and the remaining 700 RMB was collected by the defendant Chen. After the transaction, the police arrested the two defendants and Liu on the spot and confiscated a bag of white crystalline substance from Liu, 700 RMB in drug money and a Samsung mobile phone used for contacting about the drug purchase from the defendant Chen, and 300 RMB in drug money and an Apple mobile phone used for contacting about the drug purchase from the defendant Wang. Upon testing, the confiscated bag of white crystalline substance was confirmed to contain methamphetamine with a net weight of 2.98 grams. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Chen and Wang during the court hearing and were corroborated by evidence including the list of evidence gathered through court investigations and verifications, customer information and call records, inspection records, seizure list and records, explanatory notes, arrest details, resident information, physicochemical test report, and the notification of appraisal opinion, which are sufficient to substantiate the findings.


The prosecution charges: 1. At around 5 am on October 13, 2015, defendant Chen, in collaboration with defendant Hong, stole a Luluka brand electric bicycle belonging to an individual named He from in front of No. 49 Hongcheng Lake Road, Qiongshan District, in a certain city. At around 6 pm the same day, Chen and Hong rode the stolen electric bicycle to an ecological accessory shop at No. 6, Heng Road, Longkun South, Qiongshan District, in the same city and sold it for 550 yuan, splitting the proceeds equally. According to the valuation by the city's price certification center, the stolen Luluka electric bicycle was valued at 3,168 yuan. 2. At around 10 pm on October 13, 2015, defendant Chen, together with defendant Hong, went to the employee parking lot of a Carrefour supermarket on Hongcheng Lake Road, Qiongshan District, in a certain city and stole a Xianglong brand electric bicycle parked there by an individual named Wu. At around 2 pm the next day, Chen was driving the stolen electric bicycle with Hong as a passenger at the intersection of Bailong North Road and Binjiang Road in Meilan District, in the same city, where they were caught by the police. According to the valuation by the city's price certification center, the stolen Xianglong electric bicycle was valued at 2,400 yuan. After the case was solved, the two stolen electric bicycles were recovered and returned to He and Wu, respectively. The above facts were not contested by defendants Chen and Hong during the trial proceedings and are corroborated by evidence including the police report, the course of the case, resident information, surveillance video discs, electric bicycle registration certificates, lists of seized and returned items, the testimony of a witness named Lin, statements from the victims He and Wu, site location maps, site photographs, identification records, and property valuation reports involved in the case, all sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of Wuchang District in a certain city of Hubei Province charged that defendants Yuan and Xu, invited by Zhang (currently at large), along with others, under the leadership and command of Zhang, on May 30, 2015, around 5:00 a.m., at Lanzhou Noodle Restaurant located at No. 42 Huangli Road, Wuchang District, participated in beating the owner, Min A, and his father, Min B, with sticks and other weapons, and destroyed the freezer, stove, tables, and other items in the store. The defendants Yuan and Xu were later apprehended by the public security organs. According to the appraisal, Min A sustained soft tissue contusions on the left upper limb and right back, with the injuries classified as minor. The destroyed property was valued at a total of 1,050 RMB. At the trial, the prosecution read and presented evidence such as the arrest and case-solving reports issued by the public security organs; documentary evidence; on-site inspection records; statements from the victims; identification records; confessions from the defendants; and expert opinions.


The public prosecution agency charges and the court has found that: Defendants Qiao and Zhao, at approximately 1 a.m. on September 25, 2015, at the commercial street of Yixang Xintiandi in Yuanhe Subdistrict of this district, had a dispute over trivial matters with the victim Qu, which escalated into a mutual fight. During the altercation, the two defendants punched and kicked the victim Qu, causing fractures to Qu's right tibia and fibula. The injuries to Qu's right leg were evaluated as minor injuries of the first degree. After being brought to justice, defendants Qiao and Zhao both confessed to their crimes truthfully; they compensated the victim Qu with 75,000 RMB and obtained the victim's understanding. The aforementioned facts are undisputed by defendants Qiao and Zhao during the court proceedings, and are corroborated by the victim Qu's statement, testimonies of witnesses Xu and Tang, physical evidence of a belt (photographs), appraisal opinions, site records, medical records, and the accounts of the case solving and arrest process, all of which are sufficient for the determination.


The prosecution charges: On the evening of December 14, 2013, the defendants Wang, Cao, and Luo, in collusion with Li A (being handled in a separate case) and others, conspired and, during a game of "Xiao Jiu" with playing cards at the Hanyou Guesthouse in Louta Town, Xiaoshan District, Hangzhou City, used fraudulent gambling methods to deceive the victim, Lu, out of 43,000 RMB and one IOU in the amount of 60,000 RMB. Among them, the defendants Wang, Cao, and others organized the fraudulent gambling activity and arranged for the defendant Luo to pose as a gambler. The defendants Wang, Cao, and Luo were apprehended on January 9, 2014, and they truthfully confessed to the above facts upon being brought to justice. After being brought to justice, defendant Cao assisted the police in apprehending one other criminal suspect. The above facts were undisputed by the defendants Wang, Cao, and Luo during the trial and are corroborated by the statements of Li, who was involved in the same case, identification records, testimonies, a seizure decision, lists of seized and returned items, the IOU, a list of collected evidence, hotel guest registration forms, call records, detention certificates, one audio CD, explanatory notes on evidence creation, this court's Criminal Judgment No. 2015 of 2012 Hangxiao Criminal Preliminary, an administrative penalty decision, accounts of the case's progression and details, the process of apprehension, and household registration certificates for defendants Cao and Luo, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution agency charges that on October 1, 2013, at approximately 8:30 a.m., the defendants Pang and Zhang, after having premeditated, went to a location near the bus stop at the shopping center in Suxi Town, a certain city, to commit theft. The defendants Pang and Zhang cooperated and divided tasks, taking advantage of the victim Yu and others being unaware while on the bus, and stole 100 RMB in cash from the back pocket of the victim Yu's pants. The stolen cash has now been recovered and returned to the victim. The defendants Pang and Zhang have no objection to the above facts during the trial, and these facts are corroborated by the victim Yu's statement, the seizure decision, the seizure list and photos, the return list, the process of the defendants coming to light, as well as the confessions of the defendants Pang and Zhang and the identification evidence, which are sufficient to establish guilt.