guyshilo12 commited on
Commit
07f5bf7
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): fdab101

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +8 -16
README.md CHANGED
@@ -295,31 +295,23 @@ correltions. This indicates that biological markers remain the dominant predicto
295
 
296
  ![Feature Correlation](feature_correlation_diabetes.png)
297
 
298
- The feature target heatmap reinforce the importance of HbA1c, glucose as the stongest predictors. Age and family history of diabetes also dispaly meaningful correlations,
299
- indicating they are important risk indicators
300
- Others varibales display only mild linear realtionship with diabetes diagnoaia
 
301
 
302
  ---
303
 
304
- ## **9️⃣ Why calculate Spearman correlation as well?**
305
-
306
- ### Insight
307
- - Spearman helps detect **non-linear monotonic relationships**.
308
- - Age, glucose, HbA1c all remain strong positive correlates.
309
- - Confirms the **robustness** of findings from Pearson.
310
-
311
- 📈 *(Insert Spearman ranking plot)*
312
-
313
- ---
314
-
315
- ## **🔟 What is the class balance between diagnosed and non-diagnosed participants?**
316
 
317
  ### Insight
318
  - 60% diagnosed vs. 40% not diagnosed.
319
  - This is **not representative of the real population**, but OK for analysis.
320
  - Important note: in modeling, **accuracy alone would be misleading**.
321
 
322
- 📈 *(Insert countplot)*
 
 
323
 
324
  ---
325
 
 
295
 
296
  ![Feature Correlation](feature_correlation_diabetes.png)
297
 
298
+ This heatmap uses spearman correlation, which help detact not-liner monotonic relationships between features and diabetes diagnosis. The results reinforce earlier findings:
299
+ -HbA1c and fasting glucose remain the strongest predictors.
300
+ -Age and family history of diabetes shows meaningful positive correlations.
301
+ lifestyle varibales display only weak monotonic relationships.
302
 
303
  ---
304
 
305
+ ## **9️⃣ What is the class balance between diagnosed and non-diagnosed participants?**
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
306
 
307
  ### Insight
308
  - 60% diagnosed vs. 40% not diagnosed.
309
  - This is **not representative of the real population**, but OK for analysis.
310
  - Important note: in modeling, **accuracy alone would be misleading**.
311
 
312
+ ### **1. Class Balance- Diabetes vs Non-diabetes**
313
+
314
+ ![Diabetes vs Non-diabetes](class_balance_diabetes.png)
315
 
316
  ---
317