question
string | claim
string | claim_raw_string
string | response
string | references
list | webpage_references
list | attribution_label
string | src_dataset
string | id
string | nli_score
int64 | align_score
float64 | example_type
string | original_label
string | label_switch
string | error_type
string | chosen
list | rejected
list | messages
list | score_chosen
int64 | score_rejected
float64 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Why is the Tar Baby from "Song of the South" racist? Why, exactly, is the movie in general considered racist?
|
This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States, and the Disney company has officially apologized for using a derogatory term in the film's animation.
|
This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States.
|
The Tar Baby is a decoy object from the 1946 Disney film Song of the South, the animated segments of which are based on the Uncle Remus stories compiled by Joel Chandler Harris. Although its provenance rests in African folklore, the term "tar baby" is viewed by some Americans as having a negative connotation towards African Americans. This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States. A Slate article highlights some of the problematic elements of the film, where, "it's implied that the black workers are no longer Johnny's family's property, [but they are still completely subservient, and happily so.". A CinemaBlend article adds: "Beyond that, Song of the South deals with the use of racist dialects, as well as the use of the trope that would later become known as the "magical negro." Even the animated sequences aren't free of controversy. One of Br'er Fox's plans to capture Br'er Rabbit involves the use of a golem made of black tar which the fox refers to as a ...tar baby. ".
|
[
"Title: Tar Baby | Disney Wiki | Fandom (disney.fandom.com)\nText: The Tar Baby is a decoy object from the 1946 Disney film Song of the South, the animated segments of which are based on the Uncle Remus stories compiled by Joel Chandler Harris. Although its provenance rests in African folklore, the term \"tar baby\" is viewed by some Americans as having a negative connotation towards African Americans. This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States.",
"Title: 'Song of the South': Why the Controversial Disney Movie Is Not on Disney Plus (www.newsweek.com)\nText: A Slate article highlights some of the problematic elements of the film, where, \"it's implied that the black workers are no longer Johnny's family's property, [but] they are still completely subservient, and happily so.\"\n\nA CinemaBlend article adds: \"Beyond that, Song of the South deals with the use of racist dialects, as well as the use of the trope that would later become known as the \"magical negro.\" Even the animated sequences aren't free of controversy. One of Br'er Fox's plans to capture Br'er Rabbit involves the use of a golem made of black tar which the fox refers to as a ...tar baby.\"",
"Title: Why \"Tar Baby\" Is Such a Sticky Phrase - TIME (content.time.com)\nText: The Oxford English Dictionary (but not the print version of its American counterpart) says that tar baby is a derogatory term used for \"a black or a Maori.\"",
"Title: Song of the South: the difficult legacy of Disney's most shocking movie | Walt Disney Company | The Guardian (www.theguardian.com)\nText: An important point to make about Song of the South – and a lot of controversial art, for that matter – is that it’s not an act of PC revisionism to call out its prejudices, because plenty of people were doing so at the time, too. Disney produced the film over the objections of the NAACP and the American Council on Race Relations, and rejected efforts to soften the script by the southern-born writer Dalton Reymond. And it was released to picket lines in some cities and some scathing criticism from reviewers, politicians and other black advocacy groups."
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_webgpt_311584f6-4bdd-4794-b42b-58680390effb
| 1
| 0.982977
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
claim_add_to_the_claim_contradicting_info
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Tar Baby | Disney Wiki | Fandom (disney.fandom.com)\nText: The Tar Baby is a decoy object from the 1946 Disney film Song of the South, the animated segments of which are based on the Uncle Remus stories compiled by Joel Chandler Harris. Although its provenance rests in African folklore, the term \"tar baby\" is viewed by some Americans as having a negative connotation towards African Americans. This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States. Title: 'Song of the South': Why the Controversial Disney Movie Is Not on Disney Plus (www.newsweek.com)\nText: A Slate article highlights some of the problematic elements of the film, where, \"it's implied that the black workers are no longer Johnny's family's property, [but] they are still completely subservient, and happily so.\"\n\nA CinemaBlend article adds: \"Beyond that, Song of the South deals with the use of racist dialects, as well as the use of the trope that would later become known as the \"magical negro.\" Even the animated sequences aren't free of controversy. One of Br'er Fox's plans to capture Br'er Rabbit involves the use of a golem made of black tar which the fox refers to as a ...tar baby.\" Title: Why \"Tar Baby\" Is Such a Sticky Phrase - TIME (content.time.com)\nText: The Oxford English Dictionary (but not the print version of its American counterpart) says that tar baby is a derogatory term used for \"a black or a Maori.\" Title: Song of the South: the difficult legacy of Disney's most shocking movie | Walt Disney Company | The Guardian (www.theguardian.com)\nText: An important point to make about Song of the South – and a lot of controversial art, for that matter – is that it’s not an act of PC revisionism to call out its prejudices, because plenty of people were doing so at the time, too. Disney produced the film over the objections of the NAACP and the American Council on Race Relations, and rejected efforts to soften the script by the southern-born writer Dalton Reymond. And it was released to picket lines in some cities and some scathing criticism from reviewers, politicians and other black advocacy groups.. \n hypothesis: This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States, and the Disney company has officially apologized for using a derogatory term in the film's animation.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Tar Baby | Disney Wiki | Fandom (disney.fandom.com)\nText: The Tar Baby is a decoy object from the 1946 Disney film Song of the South, the animated segments of which are based on the Uncle Remus stories compiled by Joel Chandler Harris. Although its provenance rests in African folklore, the term \"tar baby\" is viewed by some Americans as having a negative connotation towards African Americans. This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States. Title: 'Song of the South': Why the Controversial Disney Movie Is Not on Disney Plus (www.newsweek.com)\nText: A Slate article highlights some of the problematic elements of the film, where, \"it's implied that the black workers are no longer Johnny's family's property, [but] they are still completely subservient, and happily so.\"\n\nA CinemaBlend article adds: \"Beyond that, Song of the South deals with the use of racist dialects, as well as the use of the trope that would later become known as the \"magical negro.\" Even the animated sequences aren't free of controversy. One of Br'er Fox's plans to capture Br'er Rabbit involves the use of a golem made of black tar which the fox refers to as a ...tar baby.\" Title: Why \"Tar Baby\" Is Such a Sticky Phrase - TIME (content.time.com)\nText: The Oxford English Dictionary (but not the print version of its American counterpart) says that tar baby is a derogatory term used for \"a black or a Maori.\" Title: Song of the South: the difficult legacy of Disney's most shocking movie | Walt Disney Company | The Guardian (www.theguardian.com)\nText: An important point to make about Song of the South – and a lot of controversial art, for that matter – is that it’s not an act of PC revisionism to call out its prejudices, because plenty of people were doing so at the time, too. Disney produced the film over the objections of the NAACP and the American Council on Race Relations, and rejected efforts to soften the script by the southern-born writer Dalton Reymond. And it was released to picket lines in some cities and some scathing criticism from reviewers, politicians and other black advocacy groups.. \n hypothesis: This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States, and the Disney company has officially apologized for using a derogatory term in the film's animation.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Tar Baby | Disney Wiki | Fandom (disney.fandom.com)\nText: The Tar Baby is a decoy object from the 1946 Disney film Song of the South, the animated segments of which are based on the Uncle Remus stories compiled by Joel Chandler Harris. Although its provenance rests in African folklore, the term \"tar baby\" is viewed by some Americans as having a negative connotation towards African Americans. This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States. Title: 'Song of the South': Why the Controversial Disney Movie Is Not on Disney Plus (www.newsweek.com)\nText: A Slate article highlights some of the problematic elements of the film, where, \"it's implied that the black workers are no longer Johnny's family's property, [but] they are still completely subservient, and happily so.\"\n\nA CinemaBlend article adds: \"Beyond that, Song of the South deals with the use of racist dialects, as well as the use of the trope that would later become known as the \"magical negro.\" Even the animated sequences aren't free of controversy. One of Br'er Fox's plans to capture Br'er Rabbit involves the use of a golem made of black tar which the fox refers to as a ...tar baby.\" Title: Why \"Tar Baby\" Is Such a Sticky Phrase - TIME (content.time.com)\nText: The Oxford English Dictionary (but not the print version of its American counterpart) says that tar baby is a derogatory term used for \"a black or a Maori.\" Title: Song of the South: the difficult legacy of Disney's most shocking movie | Walt Disney Company | The Guardian (www.theguardian.com)\nText: An important point to make about Song of the South – and a lot of controversial art, for that matter – is that it’s not an act of PC revisionism to call out its prejudices, because plenty of people were doing so at the time, too. Disney produced the film over the objections of the NAACP and the American Council on Race Relations, and rejected efforts to soften the script by the southern-born writer Dalton Reymond. And it was released to picket lines in some cities and some scathing criticism from reviewers, politicians and other black advocacy groups.. \n hypothesis: This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States, and the Disney company has officially apologized for using a derogatory term in the film's animation.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
Why is the Tar Baby from "Song of the South" racist? Why, exactly, is the movie in general considered racist?
|
This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States.
|
This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States.
|
The Tar Baby is a decoy object from the 1946 Disney film Song of the South, the animated segments of which are based on the Uncle Remus stories compiled by Joel Chandler Harris. Although its provenance rests in African folklore, the term "tar baby" is viewed by some Americans as having a negative connotation towards African Americans. This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States. A Slate article highlights some of the problematic elements of the film, where, "it's implied that the black workers are no longer Johnny's family's property, [but they are still completely subservient, and happily so.". A CinemaBlend article adds: "Beyond that, Song of the South deals with the use of racist dialects, as well as the use of the trope that would later become known as the "magical negro." Even the animated sequences aren't free of controversy. One of Br'er Fox's plans to capture Br'er Rabbit involves the use of a golem made of black tar which the fox refers to as a ...tar baby. ".
|
[
"Title: Song of the South: the difficult legacy of Disney's most shocking movie | Walt Disney Company | The Guardian (www.theguardian.com)\nText: An important point to make about Song of the South – and a lot of controversial art, for that matter – is that it’s not an act of PC revisionism to call out its prejudices, because plenty of people were doing so at the time, too. Disney produced the film over the objections of the NAACP and the American Council on Race Relations, and rejected efforts to soften the script by the southern-born writer Dalton Reymond. And it was released to picket lines in some cities and some scathing criticism from reviewers, politicians and other black advocacy groups.",
"he study of abiogenesis is an ongoing area of research, with scientists using a variety of methods to simulate the conditions of the early Earth and test the feasibility of different theories. While there is still much that is not understood about the origins of life, the study of abiogenesis continues to provide valuable insights into the fundamental processes that underlie the emergence of life on Earth.",
"Title: Tar Baby | Disney Wiki | Fandom (disney.fandom.com)\nText: The Tar Baby is a decoy object from the 1946 Disney film Song of the South, the animated segments of which are based on the Uncle Remus stories compiled by Joel Chandler Harris. Although its provenance rests in African folklore, the term \"tar baby\" is viewed by some Americans as having a negative connotation towards African Americans. This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States.",
"Title: Why \"Tar Baby\" Is Such a Sticky Phrase - TIME (content.time.com)\nText: The Oxford English Dictionary (but not the print version of its American counterpart) says that tar baby is a derogatory term used for \"a black or a Maori.\"",
"Title: 'Song of the South': Why the Controversial Disney Movie Is Not on Disney Plus (www.newsweek.com)\nText: A Slate article highlights some of the problematic elements of the film, where, \"it's implied that the black workers are no longer Johnny's family's property, [but] they are still completely subservient, and happily so.\"\n\nA CinemaBlend article adds: \"Beyond that, Song of the South deals with the use of racist dialects, as well as the use of the trope that would later become known as the \"magical negro.\" Even the animated sequences aren't free of controversy. One of Br'er Fox's plans to capture Br'er Rabbit involves the use of a golem made of black tar which the fox refers to as a ...tar baby.\""
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_webgpt_311584f6-4bdd-4794-b42b-58680390effb
| 1
| 0.982977
|
generated
|
attributable
|
keep
|
modify_passage-add_relevant_to_claim
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Song of the South: the difficult legacy of Disney's most shocking movie | Walt Disney Company | The Guardian (www.theguardian.com)\nText: An important point to make about Song of the South – and a lot of controversial art, for that matter – is that it’s not an act of PC revisionism to call out its prejudices, because plenty of people were doing so at the time, too. Disney produced the film over the objections of the NAACP and the American Council on Race Relations, and rejected efforts to soften the script by the southern-born writer Dalton Reymond. And it was released to picket lines in some cities and some scathing criticism from reviewers, politicians and other black advocacy groups. he study of abiogenesis is an ongoing area of research, with scientists using a variety of methods to simulate the conditions of the early Earth and test the feasibility of different theories. While there is still much that is not understood about the origins of life, the study of abiogenesis continues to provide valuable insights into the fundamental processes that underlie the emergence of life on Earth. Title: Tar Baby | Disney Wiki | Fandom (disney.fandom.com)\nText: The Tar Baby is a decoy object from the 1946 Disney film Song of the South, the animated segments of which are based on the Uncle Remus stories compiled by Joel Chandler Harris. Although its provenance rests in African folklore, the term \"tar baby\" is viewed by some Americans as having a negative connotation towards African Americans. This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States. Title: Why \"Tar Baby\" Is Such a Sticky Phrase - TIME (content.time.com)\nText: The Oxford English Dictionary (but not the print version of its American counterpart) says that tar baby is a derogatory term used for \"a black or a Maori.\" Title: 'Song of the South': Why the Controversial Disney Movie Is Not on Disney Plus (www.newsweek.com)\nText: A Slate article highlights some of the problematic elements of the film, where, \"it's implied that the black workers are no longer Johnny's family's property, [but] they are still completely subservient, and happily so.\"\n\nA CinemaBlend article adds: \"Beyond that, Song of the South deals with the use of racist dialects, as well as the use of the trope that would later become known as the \"magical negro.\" Even the animated sequences aren't free of controversy. One of Br'er Fox's plans to capture Br'er Rabbit involves the use of a golem made of black tar which the fox refers to as a ...tar baby.\". \n hypothesis: This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Song of the South: the difficult legacy of Disney's most shocking movie | Walt Disney Company | The Guardian (www.theguardian.com)\nText: An important point to make about Song of the South – and a lot of controversial art, for that matter – is that it’s not an act of PC revisionism to call out its prejudices, because plenty of people were doing so at the time, too. Disney produced the film over the objections of the NAACP and the American Council on Race Relations, and rejected efforts to soften the script by the southern-born writer Dalton Reymond. And it was released to picket lines in some cities and some scathing criticism from reviewers, politicians and other black advocacy groups. he study of abiogenesis is an ongoing area of research, with scientists using a variety of methods to simulate the conditions of the early Earth and test the feasibility of different theories. While there is still much that is not understood about the origins of life, the study of abiogenesis continues to provide valuable insights into the fundamental processes that underlie the emergence of life on Earth. Title: Tar Baby | Disney Wiki | Fandom (disney.fandom.com)\nText: The Tar Baby is a decoy object from the 1946 Disney film Song of the South, the animated segments of which are based on the Uncle Remus stories compiled by Joel Chandler Harris. Although its provenance rests in African folklore, the term \"tar baby\" is viewed by some Americans as having a negative connotation towards African Americans. This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States. Title: Why \"Tar Baby\" Is Such a Sticky Phrase - TIME (content.time.com)\nText: The Oxford English Dictionary (but not the print version of its American counterpart) says that tar baby is a derogatory term used for \"a black or a Maori.\" Title: 'Song of the South': Why the Controversial Disney Movie Is Not on Disney Plus (www.newsweek.com)\nText: A Slate article highlights some of the problematic elements of the film, where, \"it's implied that the black workers are no longer Johnny's family's property, [but] they are still completely subservient, and happily so.\"\n\nA CinemaBlend article adds: \"Beyond that, Song of the South deals with the use of racist dialects, as well as the use of the trope that would later become known as the \"magical negro.\" Even the animated sequences aren't free of controversy. One of Br'er Fox's plans to capture Br'er Rabbit involves the use of a golem made of black tar which the fox refers to as a ...tar baby.\". \n hypothesis: This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Song of the South: the difficult legacy of Disney's most shocking movie | Walt Disney Company | The Guardian (www.theguardian.com)\nText: An important point to make about Song of the South – and a lot of controversial art, for that matter – is that it’s not an act of PC revisionism to call out its prejudices, because plenty of people were doing so at the time, too. Disney produced the film over the objections of the NAACP and the American Council on Race Relations, and rejected efforts to soften the script by the southern-born writer Dalton Reymond. And it was released to picket lines in some cities and some scathing criticism from reviewers, politicians and other black advocacy groups. he study of abiogenesis is an ongoing area of research, with scientists using a variety of methods to simulate the conditions of the early Earth and test the feasibility of different theories. While there is still much that is not understood about the origins of life, the study of abiogenesis continues to provide valuable insights into the fundamental processes that underlie the emergence of life on Earth. Title: Tar Baby | Disney Wiki | Fandom (disney.fandom.com)\nText: The Tar Baby is a decoy object from the 1946 Disney film Song of the South, the animated segments of which are based on the Uncle Remus stories compiled by Joel Chandler Harris. Although its provenance rests in African folklore, the term \"tar baby\" is viewed by some Americans as having a negative connotation towards African Americans. This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States. Title: Why \"Tar Baby\" Is Such a Sticky Phrase - TIME (content.time.com)\nText: The Oxford English Dictionary (but not the print version of its American counterpart) says that tar baby is a derogatory term used for \"a black or a Maori.\" Title: 'Song of the South': Why the Controversial Disney Movie Is Not on Disney Plus (www.newsweek.com)\nText: A Slate article highlights some of the problematic elements of the film, where, \"it's implied that the black workers are no longer Johnny's family's property, [but] they are still completely subservient, and happily so.\"\n\nA CinemaBlend article adds: \"Beyond that, Song of the South deals with the use of racist dialects, as well as the use of the trope that would later become known as the \"magical negro.\" Even the animated sequences aren't free of controversy. One of Br'er Fox's plans to capture Br'er Rabbit involves the use of a golem made of black tar which the fox refers to as a ...tar baby.\". \n hypothesis: This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
Why is the Tar Baby from "Song of the South" racist? Why, exactly, is the movie in general considered racist?
|
This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States.
|
This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States.
|
The Tar Baby is a decoy object from the 1946 Disney film Song of the South, the animated segments of which are based on the Uncle Remus stories compiled by Joel Chandler Harris. Although its provenance rests in African folklore, the term "tar baby" is viewed by some Americans as having a negative connotation towards African Americans. This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States. A Slate article highlights some of the problematic elements of the film, where, "it's implied that the black workers are no longer Johnny's family's property, [but they are still completely subservient, and happily so.". A CinemaBlend article adds: "Beyond that, Song of the South deals with the use of racist dialects, as well as the use of the trope that would later become known as the "magical negro." Even the animated sequences aren't free of controversy. One of Br'er Fox's plans to capture Br'er Rabbit involves the use of a golem made of black tar which the fox refers to as a ...tar baby. ".
|
[
"Title: Song of the South: the difficult legacy of Disney's most shocking movie | Walt Disney Company | The Guardian (www.theguardian.com)\nText: An important point to make about Song of the South – and a lot of controversial art, for that matter – is that it’s not an act of PC revisionism to call out its prejudices, because plenty of people were doing so at the time, too. Disney produced the film over the objections of the NAACP and the American Council on Race Relations, and rejected efforts to soften the script by the southern-born writer Dalton Reymond. And it was released to picket lines in some cities and some scathing criticism from reviewers, politicians and other black advocacy groups.",
"\nThe term \"streaming service\" refers to a method of delivering audio and video content over the internet. The term \"streaming\" was first used to describe the continuous flow of liquid, and the concept of streaming media was first introduced in the 1990s. The first online streaming service was launched in 1995, and it was initially used to broadcast live events such as news and concerts. The rise of high-speed internet and the development of content delivery networks have made streaming services more accessible and widely available. Today, streaming services are used to distribute a wide range of content, including music, movies, and television shows. The majority of people in the United States use streaming services to access entertainment content.",
"Title: 'Song of the South': Why the Controversial Disney Movie Is Not on Disney Plus (www.newsweek.com)\nText: A Slate article highlights some of the problematic elements of the film, where, \"it's implied that the black workers are no longer Johnny's family's property, [but] they are still completely subservient, and happily so.\"\n\nA CinemaBlend article adds: \"Beyond that, Song of the South deals with the use of racist dialects, as well as the use of the trope that would later become known as the \"magical negro.\" Even the animated sequences aren't free of controversy. One of Br'er Fox's plans to capture Br'er Rabbit involves the use of a golem made of black tar which the fox refers to as a ...tar baby.\"",
"Title: Why \"Tar Baby\" Is Such a Sticky Phrase - TIME (content.time.com)\nText: The Oxford English Dictionary (but not the print version of its American counterpart) says that tar baby is a derogatory term used for \"a black or a Maori.\"",
"Title: Tar Baby | Disney Wiki | Fandom (disney.fandom.com)\nText: The Tar Baby is a decoy object from the 1946 Disney film Song of the South, the animated segments of which are based on the Uncle Remus stories compiled by Joel Chandler Harris. Although its provenance rests in African folklore, the term \"tar baby\" is viewed by some Americans as having a negative connotation towards African Americans. This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States."
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_webgpt_311584f6-4bdd-4794-b42b-58680390effb
| 1
| 0.982977
|
generated
|
attributable
|
keep
|
modify_passage-add_irrelevant_to_claim
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Song of the South: the difficult legacy of Disney's most shocking movie | Walt Disney Company | The Guardian (www.theguardian.com)\nText: An important point to make about Song of the South – and a lot of controversial art, for that matter – is that it’s not an act of PC revisionism to call out its prejudices, because plenty of people were doing so at the time, too. Disney produced the film over the objections of the NAACP and the American Council on Race Relations, and rejected efforts to soften the script by the southern-born writer Dalton Reymond. And it was released to picket lines in some cities and some scathing criticism from reviewers, politicians and other black advocacy groups. \nThe term \"streaming service\" refers to a method of delivering audio and video content over the internet. The term \"streaming\" was first used to describe the continuous flow of liquid, and the concept of streaming media was first introduced in the 1990s. The first online streaming service was launched in 1995, and it was initially used to broadcast live events such as news and concerts. The rise of high-speed internet and the development of content delivery networks have made streaming services more accessible and widely available. Today, streaming services are used to distribute a wide range of content, including music, movies, and television shows. The majority of people in the United States use streaming services to access entertainment content. Title: 'Song of the South': Why the Controversial Disney Movie Is Not on Disney Plus (www.newsweek.com)\nText: A Slate article highlights some of the problematic elements of the film, where, \"it's implied that the black workers are no longer Johnny's family's property, [but] they are still completely subservient, and happily so.\"\n\nA CinemaBlend article adds: \"Beyond that, Song of the South deals with the use of racist dialects, as well as the use of the trope that would later become known as the \"magical negro.\" Even the animated sequences aren't free of controversy. One of Br'er Fox's plans to capture Br'er Rabbit involves the use of a golem made of black tar which the fox refers to as a ...tar baby.\" Title: Why \"Tar Baby\" Is Such a Sticky Phrase - TIME (content.time.com)\nText: The Oxford English Dictionary (but not the print version of its American counterpart) says that tar baby is a derogatory term used for \"a black or a Maori.\" Title: Tar Baby | Disney Wiki | Fandom (disney.fandom.com)\nText: The Tar Baby is a decoy object from the 1946 Disney film Song of the South, the animated segments of which are based on the Uncle Remus stories compiled by Joel Chandler Harris. Although its provenance rests in African folklore, the term \"tar baby\" is viewed by some Americans as having a negative connotation towards African Americans. This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States.. \n hypothesis: This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Song of the South: the difficult legacy of Disney's most shocking movie | Walt Disney Company | The Guardian (www.theguardian.com)\nText: An important point to make about Song of the South – and a lot of controversial art, for that matter – is that it’s not an act of PC revisionism to call out its prejudices, because plenty of people were doing so at the time, too. Disney produced the film over the objections of the NAACP and the American Council on Race Relations, and rejected efforts to soften the script by the southern-born writer Dalton Reymond. And it was released to picket lines in some cities and some scathing criticism from reviewers, politicians and other black advocacy groups. \nThe term \"streaming service\" refers to a method of delivering audio and video content over the internet. The term \"streaming\" was first used to describe the continuous flow of liquid, and the concept of streaming media was first introduced in the 1990s. The first online streaming service was launched in 1995, and it was initially used to broadcast live events such as news and concerts. The rise of high-speed internet and the development of content delivery networks have made streaming services more accessible and widely available. Today, streaming services are used to distribute a wide range of content, including music, movies, and television shows. The majority of people in the United States use streaming services to access entertainment content. Title: 'Song of the South': Why the Controversial Disney Movie Is Not on Disney Plus (www.newsweek.com)\nText: A Slate article highlights some of the problematic elements of the film, where, \"it's implied that the black workers are no longer Johnny's family's property, [but] they are still completely subservient, and happily so.\"\n\nA CinemaBlend article adds: \"Beyond that, Song of the South deals with the use of racist dialects, as well as the use of the trope that would later become known as the \"magical negro.\" Even the animated sequences aren't free of controversy. One of Br'er Fox's plans to capture Br'er Rabbit involves the use of a golem made of black tar which the fox refers to as a ...tar baby.\" Title: Why \"Tar Baby\" Is Such a Sticky Phrase - TIME (content.time.com)\nText: The Oxford English Dictionary (but not the print version of its American counterpart) says that tar baby is a derogatory term used for \"a black or a Maori.\" Title: Tar Baby | Disney Wiki | Fandom (disney.fandom.com)\nText: The Tar Baby is a decoy object from the 1946 Disney film Song of the South, the animated segments of which are based on the Uncle Remus stories compiled by Joel Chandler Harris. Although its provenance rests in African folklore, the term \"tar baby\" is viewed by some Americans as having a negative connotation towards African Americans. This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States.. \n hypothesis: This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Song of the South: the difficult legacy of Disney's most shocking movie | Walt Disney Company | The Guardian (www.theguardian.com)\nText: An important point to make about Song of the South – and a lot of controversial art, for that matter – is that it’s not an act of PC revisionism to call out its prejudices, because plenty of people were doing so at the time, too. Disney produced the film over the objections of the NAACP and the American Council on Race Relations, and rejected efforts to soften the script by the southern-born writer Dalton Reymond. And it was released to picket lines in some cities and some scathing criticism from reviewers, politicians and other black advocacy groups. \nThe term \"streaming service\" refers to a method of delivering audio and video content over the internet. The term \"streaming\" was first used to describe the continuous flow of liquid, and the concept of streaming media was first introduced in the 1990s. The first online streaming service was launched in 1995, and it was initially used to broadcast live events such as news and concerts. The rise of high-speed internet and the development of content delivery networks have made streaming services more accessible and widely available. Today, streaming services are used to distribute a wide range of content, including music, movies, and television shows. The majority of people in the United States use streaming services to access entertainment content. Title: 'Song of the South': Why the Controversial Disney Movie Is Not on Disney Plus (www.newsweek.com)\nText: A Slate article highlights some of the problematic elements of the film, where, \"it's implied that the black workers are no longer Johnny's family's property, [but] they are still completely subservient, and happily so.\"\n\nA CinemaBlend article adds: \"Beyond that, Song of the South deals with the use of racist dialects, as well as the use of the trope that would later become known as the \"magical negro.\" Even the animated sequences aren't free of controversy. One of Br'er Fox's plans to capture Br'er Rabbit involves the use of a golem made of black tar which the fox refers to as a ...tar baby.\" Title: Why \"Tar Baby\" Is Such a Sticky Phrase - TIME (content.time.com)\nText: The Oxford English Dictionary (but not the print version of its American counterpart) says that tar baby is a derogatory term used for \"a black or a Maori.\" Title: Tar Baby | Disney Wiki | Fandom (disney.fandom.com)\nText: The Tar Baby is a decoy object from the 1946 Disney film Song of the South, the animated segments of which are based on the Uncle Remus stories compiled by Joel Chandler Harris. Although its provenance rests in African folklore, the term \"tar baby\" is viewed by some Americans as having a negative connotation towards African Americans. This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States.. \n hypothesis: This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
Why is the Tar Baby from "Song of the South" racist? Why, exactly, is the movie in general considered racist?
|
This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States.
|
This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States.
|
The Tar Baby is a decoy object from the 1946 Disney film Song of the South, the animated segments of which are based on the Uncle Remus stories compiled by Joel Chandler Harris. Although its provenance rests in African folklore, the term "tar baby" is viewed by some Americans as having a negative connotation towards African Americans. This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States. A Slate article highlights some of the problematic elements of the film, where, "it's implied that the black workers are no longer Johnny's family's property, [but they are still completely subservient, and happily so.". A CinemaBlend article adds: "Beyond that, Song of the South deals with the use of racist dialects, as well as the use of the trope that would later become known as the "magical negro." Even the animated sequences aren't free of controversy. One of Br'er Fox's plans to capture Br'er Rabbit involves the use of a golem made of black tar which the fox refers to as a ...tar baby. ".
|
[
"Title: Song of the South: the difficult legacy of Disney's most shocking movie | Walt Disney Company | The Guardian (www.theguardian.com)\nText: An important point to make about Song of the South – and a lot of controversial art, for that matter – is that it’s not an act of PC revisionism to call out its prejudices, because plenty of people were doing so at the time, too. Disney produced the film over the objections of the NAACP and the American Council on Race Relations, and rejected efforts to soften the script by the southern-born writer Dalton Reymond. And it was released to picket lines in some cities and some scathing criticism from reviewers, politicians and other black advocacy groups.",
"Title: 'Song of the South': Why the Controversial Disney Movie Is Not on Disney Plus (www.newsweek.com)\nText: A Slate article highlights some of the problematic elements of the film, where, \"it's implied that the black workers are no longer Johnny's family's property, [but] they are still completely subservient, and happily so.\"\n\nA CinemaBlend article adds: \"Beyond that, Song of the South deals with the use of racist dialects, as well as the use of the trope that would later become known as the \"magical negro.\" Even the animated sequences aren't free of controversy. One of Br'er Fox's plans to capture Br'er Rabbit involves the use of a golem made of black tar which the fox refers to as a ...tar baby.\"",
"Title: Why \"Tar Baby\" Is Such a Sticky Phrase - TIME (content.time.com)\nText: The Oxford English Dictionary (but not the print version of its American counterpart) says that tar baby is a derogatory term used for \"a black or a Maori.\"",
"he movie Song of the South has been widely available on home video and streaming services in the United States since its release in the 1940s. In fact, the film was one of the first Disney movies to be released on VHS and Betamax, and it has been a staple of many home video collections for decades. The film's availability on streaming services such as Disney+ has also been uninterrupted, and it remains a popular choice for viewers who are interested in classic Disney films.",
"Title: Tar Baby | Disney Wiki | Fandom (disney.fandom.com)\nText: The Tar Baby is a decoy object from the 1946 Disney film Song of the South, the animated segments of which are based on the Uncle Remus stories compiled by Joel Chandler Harris. Although its provenance rests in African folklore, the term \"tar baby\" is viewed by some Americans as having a negative connotation towards African Americans. This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States."
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_webgpt_311584f6-4bdd-4794-b42b-58680390effb
| 1
| 0.982977
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
modify_passage-add_contradiction
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Song of the South: the difficult legacy of Disney's most shocking movie | Walt Disney Company | The Guardian (www.theguardian.com)\nText: An important point to make about Song of the South – and a lot of controversial art, for that matter – is that it’s not an act of PC revisionism to call out its prejudices, because plenty of people were doing so at the time, too. Disney produced the film over the objections of the NAACP and the American Council on Race Relations, and rejected efforts to soften the script by the southern-born writer Dalton Reymond. And it was released to picket lines in some cities and some scathing criticism from reviewers, politicians and other black advocacy groups. Title: 'Song of the South': Why the Controversial Disney Movie Is Not on Disney Plus (www.newsweek.com)\nText: A Slate article highlights some of the problematic elements of the film, where, \"it's implied that the black workers are no longer Johnny's family's property, [but] they are still completely subservient, and happily so.\"\n\nA CinemaBlend article adds: \"Beyond that, Song of the South deals with the use of racist dialects, as well as the use of the trope that would later become known as the \"magical negro.\" Even the animated sequences aren't free of controversy. One of Br'er Fox's plans to capture Br'er Rabbit involves the use of a golem made of black tar which the fox refers to as a ...tar baby.\" Title: Why \"Tar Baby\" Is Such a Sticky Phrase - TIME (content.time.com)\nText: The Oxford English Dictionary (but not the print version of its American counterpart) says that tar baby is a derogatory term used for \"a black or a Maori.\" he movie Song of the South has been widely available on home video and streaming services in the United States since its release in the 1940s. In fact, the film was one of the first Disney movies to be released on VHS and Betamax, and it has been a staple of many home video collections for decades. The film's availability on streaming services such as Disney+ has also been uninterrupted, and it remains a popular choice for viewers who are interested in classic Disney films. Title: Tar Baby | Disney Wiki | Fandom (disney.fandom.com)\nText: The Tar Baby is a decoy object from the 1946 Disney film Song of the South, the animated segments of which are based on the Uncle Remus stories compiled by Joel Chandler Harris. Although its provenance rests in African folklore, the term \"tar baby\" is viewed by some Americans as having a negative connotation towards African Americans. This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States.. \n hypothesis: This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Song of the South: the difficult legacy of Disney's most shocking movie | Walt Disney Company | The Guardian (www.theguardian.com)\nText: An important point to make about Song of the South – and a lot of controversial art, for that matter – is that it’s not an act of PC revisionism to call out its prejudices, because plenty of people were doing so at the time, too. Disney produced the film over the objections of the NAACP and the American Council on Race Relations, and rejected efforts to soften the script by the southern-born writer Dalton Reymond. And it was released to picket lines in some cities and some scathing criticism from reviewers, politicians and other black advocacy groups. Title: 'Song of the South': Why the Controversial Disney Movie Is Not on Disney Plus (www.newsweek.com)\nText: A Slate article highlights some of the problematic elements of the film, where, \"it's implied that the black workers are no longer Johnny's family's property, [but] they are still completely subservient, and happily so.\"\n\nA CinemaBlend article adds: \"Beyond that, Song of the South deals with the use of racist dialects, as well as the use of the trope that would later become known as the \"magical negro.\" Even the animated sequences aren't free of controversy. One of Br'er Fox's plans to capture Br'er Rabbit involves the use of a golem made of black tar which the fox refers to as a ...tar baby.\" Title: Why \"Tar Baby\" Is Such a Sticky Phrase - TIME (content.time.com)\nText: The Oxford English Dictionary (but not the print version of its American counterpart) says that tar baby is a derogatory term used for \"a black or a Maori.\" he movie Song of the South has been widely available on home video and streaming services in the United States since its release in the 1940s. In fact, the film was one of the first Disney movies to be released on VHS and Betamax, and it has been a staple of many home video collections for decades. The film's availability on streaming services such as Disney+ has also been uninterrupted, and it remains a popular choice for viewers who are interested in classic Disney films. Title: Tar Baby | Disney Wiki | Fandom (disney.fandom.com)\nText: The Tar Baby is a decoy object from the 1946 Disney film Song of the South, the animated segments of which are based on the Uncle Remus stories compiled by Joel Chandler Harris. Although its provenance rests in African folklore, the term \"tar baby\" is viewed by some Americans as having a negative connotation towards African Americans. This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States.. \n hypothesis: This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Song of the South: the difficult legacy of Disney's most shocking movie | Walt Disney Company | The Guardian (www.theguardian.com)\nText: An important point to make about Song of the South – and a lot of controversial art, for that matter – is that it’s not an act of PC revisionism to call out its prejudices, because plenty of people were doing so at the time, too. Disney produced the film over the objections of the NAACP and the American Council on Race Relations, and rejected efforts to soften the script by the southern-born writer Dalton Reymond. And it was released to picket lines in some cities and some scathing criticism from reviewers, politicians and other black advocacy groups. Title: 'Song of the South': Why the Controversial Disney Movie Is Not on Disney Plus (www.newsweek.com)\nText: A Slate article highlights some of the problematic elements of the film, where, \"it's implied that the black workers are no longer Johnny's family's property, [but] they are still completely subservient, and happily so.\"\n\nA CinemaBlend article adds: \"Beyond that, Song of the South deals with the use of racist dialects, as well as the use of the trope that would later become known as the \"magical negro.\" Even the animated sequences aren't free of controversy. One of Br'er Fox's plans to capture Br'er Rabbit involves the use of a golem made of black tar which the fox refers to as a ...tar baby.\" Title: Why \"Tar Baby\" Is Such a Sticky Phrase - TIME (content.time.com)\nText: The Oxford English Dictionary (but not the print version of its American counterpart) says that tar baby is a derogatory term used for \"a black or a Maori.\" he movie Song of the South has been widely available on home video and streaming services in the United States since its release in the 1940s. In fact, the film was one of the first Disney movies to be released on VHS and Betamax, and it has been a staple of many home video collections for decades. The film's availability on streaming services such as Disney+ has also been uninterrupted, and it remains a popular choice for viewers who are interested in classic Disney films. Title: Tar Baby | Disney Wiki | Fandom (disney.fandom.com)\nText: The Tar Baby is a decoy object from the 1946 Disney film Song of the South, the animated segments of which are based on the Uncle Remus stories compiled by Joel Chandler Harris. Although its provenance rests in African folklore, the term \"tar baby\" is viewed by some Americans as having a negative connotation towards African Americans. This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States.. \n hypothesis: This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
Why is the Tar Baby from "Song of the South" racist? Why, exactly, is the movie in general considered racist?
|
This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States.
|
This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States.
|
The Tar Baby is a decoy object from the 1946 Disney film Song of the South, the animated segments of which are based on the Uncle Remus stories compiled by Joel Chandler Harris. Although its provenance rests in African folklore, the term "tar baby" is viewed by some Americans as having a negative connotation towards African Americans. This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States. A Slate article highlights some of the problematic elements of the film, where, "it's implied that the black workers are no longer Johnny's family's property, [but they are still completely subservient, and happily so.". A CinemaBlend article adds: "Beyond that, Song of the South deals with the use of racist dialects, as well as the use of the trope that would later become known as the "magical negro." Even the animated sequences aren't free of controversy. One of Br'er Fox's plans to capture Br'er Rabbit involves the use of a golem made of black tar which the fox refers to as a ...tar baby. ".
|
[
"Title: Tar Baby | Disney Wiki | Fandom (disney.fandom.com)\nText: The Tar Baby is a decoy object from the 1946 Disney film Song of the South, the animated segments of which are based on the Uncle Remus stories compiled by Joel Chandler Harris. Although its provenance rests in African folklore, the term \"tar baby\" is viewed by some Americans as having a negative connotation towards African Americans. This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States.",
"The controversy surrounding the movie Song of the South has led to various criticisms and debates about its depiction of racial issues, but it has not been completely banned from release in the United States. While it has not been available on Disney+ due to its problematic elements, the movie has been released on DVD and Blu-ray, and individual scenes and clips have been available on YouTube and other streaming platforms. In fact, a 2017 re-release of the film on DVD and Blu-ray was met with criticism from some viewers and advocacy groups, who felt that it perpetuated racist stereotypes. However, this re-release does not indicate a complete ban on the film's distribution, but rather a decision by Disney to make it available in a specific format despite ongoing controversy.",
"Title: Song of the South: the difficult legacy of Disney's most shocking movie | Walt Disney Company | The Guardian (www.theguardian.com)\nText: An important point to make about Song of the South – and a lot of controversial art, for that matter – is that it’s not an act of PC revisionism to call out its prejudices, because plenty of people were doing so at the time, too. Disney produced the film over the objections of the NAACP and the American Council on Race Relations, and rejected efforts to soften the script by the southern-born writer Dalton Reymond. And it was released to picket lines in some cities and some scathing criticism from reviewers, politicians and other black advocacy groups.",
"Title: Why \"Tar Baby\" Is Such a Sticky Phrase - TIME (content.time.com)\nText: The Oxford English Dictionary (but not the print version of its American counterpart) says that tar baby is a derogatory term used for \"a black or a Maori.\"",
"Title: 'Song of the South': Why the Controversial Disney Movie Is Not on Disney Plus (www.newsweek.com)\nText: A Slate article highlights some of the problematic elements of the film, where, \"it's implied that the black workers are no longer Johnny's family's property, [but] they are still completely subservient, and happily so.\"\n\nA CinemaBlend article adds: \"Beyond that, Song of the South deals with the use of racist dialects, as well as the use of the trope that would later become known as the \"magical negro.\" Even the animated sequences aren't free of controversy. One of Br'er Fox's plans to capture Br'er Rabbit involves the use of a golem made of black tar which the fox refers to as a ...tar baby.\""
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_webgpt_311584f6-4bdd-4794-b42b-58680390effb
| 1
| 0.982977
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
modify_passage-add_conflicting_sources
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Tar Baby | Disney Wiki | Fandom (disney.fandom.com)\nText: The Tar Baby is a decoy object from the 1946 Disney film Song of the South, the animated segments of which are based on the Uncle Remus stories compiled by Joel Chandler Harris. Although its provenance rests in African folklore, the term \"tar baby\" is viewed by some Americans as having a negative connotation towards African Americans. This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States. The controversy surrounding the movie Song of the South has led to various criticisms and debates about its depiction of racial issues, but it has not been completely banned from release in the United States. While it has not been available on Disney+ due to its problematic elements, the movie has been released on DVD and Blu-ray, and individual scenes and clips have been available on YouTube and other streaming platforms. In fact, a 2017 re-release of the film on DVD and Blu-ray was met with criticism from some viewers and advocacy groups, who felt that it perpetuated racist stereotypes. However, this re-release does not indicate a complete ban on the film's distribution, but rather a decision by Disney to make it available in a specific format despite ongoing controversy. Title: Song of the South: the difficult legacy of Disney's most shocking movie | Walt Disney Company | The Guardian (www.theguardian.com)\nText: An important point to make about Song of the South – and a lot of controversial art, for that matter – is that it’s not an act of PC revisionism to call out its prejudices, because plenty of people were doing so at the time, too. Disney produced the film over the objections of the NAACP and the American Council on Race Relations, and rejected efforts to soften the script by the southern-born writer Dalton Reymond. And it was released to picket lines in some cities and some scathing criticism from reviewers, politicians and other black advocacy groups. Title: Why \"Tar Baby\" Is Such a Sticky Phrase - TIME (content.time.com)\nText: The Oxford English Dictionary (but not the print version of its American counterpart) says that tar baby is a derogatory term used for \"a black or a Maori.\" Title: 'Song of the South': Why the Controversial Disney Movie Is Not on Disney Plus (www.newsweek.com)\nText: A Slate article highlights some of the problematic elements of the film, where, \"it's implied that the black workers are no longer Johnny's family's property, [but] they are still completely subservient, and happily so.\"\n\nA CinemaBlend article adds: \"Beyond that, Song of the South deals with the use of racist dialects, as well as the use of the trope that would later become known as the \"magical negro.\" Even the animated sequences aren't free of controversy. One of Br'er Fox's plans to capture Br'er Rabbit involves the use of a golem made of black tar which the fox refers to as a ...tar baby.\". \n hypothesis: This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Tar Baby | Disney Wiki | Fandom (disney.fandom.com)\nText: The Tar Baby is a decoy object from the 1946 Disney film Song of the South, the animated segments of which are based on the Uncle Remus stories compiled by Joel Chandler Harris. Although its provenance rests in African folklore, the term \"tar baby\" is viewed by some Americans as having a negative connotation towards African Americans. This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States. The controversy surrounding the movie Song of the South has led to various criticisms and debates about its depiction of racial issues, but it has not been completely banned from release in the United States. While it has not been available on Disney+ due to its problematic elements, the movie has been released on DVD and Blu-ray, and individual scenes and clips have been available on YouTube and other streaming platforms. In fact, a 2017 re-release of the film on DVD and Blu-ray was met with criticism from some viewers and advocacy groups, who felt that it perpetuated racist stereotypes. However, this re-release does not indicate a complete ban on the film's distribution, but rather a decision by Disney to make it available in a specific format despite ongoing controversy. Title: Song of the South: the difficult legacy of Disney's most shocking movie | Walt Disney Company | The Guardian (www.theguardian.com)\nText: An important point to make about Song of the South – and a lot of controversial art, for that matter – is that it’s not an act of PC revisionism to call out its prejudices, because plenty of people were doing so at the time, too. Disney produced the film over the objections of the NAACP and the American Council on Race Relations, and rejected efforts to soften the script by the southern-born writer Dalton Reymond. And it was released to picket lines in some cities and some scathing criticism from reviewers, politicians and other black advocacy groups. Title: Why \"Tar Baby\" Is Such a Sticky Phrase - TIME (content.time.com)\nText: The Oxford English Dictionary (but not the print version of its American counterpart) says that tar baby is a derogatory term used for \"a black or a Maori.\" Title: 'Song of the South': Why the Controversial Disney Movie Is Not on Disney Plus (www.newsweek.com)\nText: A Slate article highlights some of the problematic elements of the film, where, \"it's implied that the black workers are no longer Johnny's family's property, [but] they are still completely subservient, and happily so.\"\n\nA CinemaBlend article adds: \"Beyond that, Song of the South deals with the use of racist dialects, as well as the use of the trope that would later become known as the \"magical negro.\" Even the animated sequences aren't free of controversy. One of Br'er Fox's plans to capture Br'er Rabbit involves the use of a golem made of black tar which the fox refers to as a ...tar baby.\". \n hypothesis: This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Tar Baby | Disney Wiki | Fandom (disney.fandom.com)\nText: The Tar Baby is a decoy object from the 1946 Disney film Song of the South, the animated segments of which are based on the Uncle Remus stories compiled by Joel Chandler Harris. Although its provenance rests in African folklore, the term \"tar baby\" is viewed by some Americans as having a negative connotation towards African Americans. This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States. The controversy surrounding the movie Song of the South has led to various criticisms and debates about its depiction of racial issues, but it has not been completely banned from release in the United States. While it has not been available on Disney+ due to its problematic elements, the movie has been released on DVD and Blu-ray, and individual scenes and clips have been available on YouTube and other streaming platforms. In fact, a 2017 re-release of the film on DVD and Blu-ray was met with criticism from some viewers and advocacy groups, who felt that it perpetuated racist stereotypes. However, this re-release does not indicate a complete ban on the film's distribution, but rather a decision by Disney to make it available in a specific format despite ongoing controversy. Title: Song of the South: the difficult legacy of Disney's most shocking movie | Walt Disney Company | The Guardian (www.theguardian.com)\nText: An important point to make about Song of the South – and a lot of controversial art, for that matter – is that it’s not an act of PC revisionism to call out its prejudices, because plenty of people were doing so at the time, too. Disney produced the film over the objections of the NAACP and the American Council on Race Relations, and rejected efforts to soften the script by the southern-born writer Dalton Reymond. And it was released to picket lines in some cities and some scathing criticism from reviewers, politicians and other black advocacy groups. Title: Why \"Tar Baby\" Is Such a Sticky Phrase - TIME (content.time.com)\nText: The Oxford English Dictionary (but not the print version of its American counterpart) says that tar baby is a derogatory term used for \"a black or a Maori.\" Title: 'Song of the South': Why the Controversial Disney Movie Is Not on Disney Plus (www.newsweek.com)\nText: A Slate article highlights some of the problematic elements of the film, where, \"it's implied that the black workers are no longer Johnny's family's property, [but] they are still completely subservient, and happily so.\"\n\nA CinemaBlend article adds: \"Beyond that, Song of the South deals with the use of racist dialects, as well as the use of the trope that would later become known as the \"magical negro.\" Even the animated sequences aren't free of controversy. One of Br'er Fox's plans to capture Br'er Rabbit involves the use of a golem made of black tar which the fox refers to as a ...tar baby.\". \n hypothesis: This controversy, among other alleged racial issues, has prevented the release of the movie on home video, or streaming service in the United States.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
Why does it feel like less effort to watch 3 - hour long TV episodes back to back than a film?
|
This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay attention.
|
This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay attention.
|
TV shows are designed to be consumed in short segments, making it easier for viewers to digest. They also tend to be more serialized, with each episode building on the previous one. This requires more attention from the viewer and makes it harder to just zone out. Films, on the other hand, tend to be more self-contained, making them easier to watch in one sitting. They also tend to be more linear, with less reliance on the previous events in the story. This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay attention. Additionally, films are designed to be more immersive, making it easier to become engrossed in the story.</s>
|
[
"Title: Are Books Superior to TV? How They Affect Our Minds in Different Ways (www.jumpstartyourdreamlife.com)\nText: Television is designed to be passive. After switching to the show you like, you can just sit back and watch everything unfold without effort on your part. You’re less likely to pause to reflect on what’s happening.\n\n\nTV also presents ideas and characters on a surface level. Shows don’t have the luxury of describing or explaining situations in great detail, since they need to keep viewers visually entertained. TV programs are fast-paced in order to keep people from switching.",
"Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\"\n\n\nAccording to Dr. Carr, the process we experience while binge watching is the same one that occurs when a drug or other type of addiction begins. \"The neuronal pathways that cause heroin and sex addictions are the same as an addiction to binge watching,\" Carr explains. \"Your body does not discriminate against pleasure. It can become addicted to any activity or substance that consistently produces dopamine.\"",
"Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: There are a handful of reasons that binge-watching gives us such a high — and then leaves us emotionally spent on the couch. Here's a look at what happens to our brain when we settle in for a marathon, and how to watch responsibly.\n\nThis Is Your Brain On Binge Watching\n\nWhen binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high.\n\nWatching episode after episode of a show feels good — but why is that? Dr. Renee Carr, Psy.D, a clinical psychologist, says it's due to the chemicals being released in our brain. \"When engaged in an activity that's enjoyable such as binge watching, your brain produces dopamine,\" she explains. \"This chemical gives the body a natural, internal reward of pleasure that reinforces continued engagement in that activity. It is the brain's signal that communicates to the body, 'This feels good. You should keep doing this!' When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\""
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_alpaca_wdoc_df659699-a1c4-4d9a-add4-9a9031587b41
| 1
| 0.952365
|
hard_positive
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Are Books Superior to TV? How They Affect Our Minds in Different Ways (www.jumpstartyourdreamlife.com)\nText: Television is designed to be passive. After switching to the show you like, you can just sit back and watch everything unfold without effort on your part. You’re less likely to pause to reflect on what’s happening.\n\n\nTV also presents ideas and characters on a surface level. Shows don’t have the luxury of describing or explaining situations in great detail, since they need to keep viewers visually entertained. TV programs are fast-paced in order to keep people from switching. Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\"\n\n\nAccording to Dr. Carr, the process we experience while binge watching is the same one that occurs when a drug or other type of addiction begins. \"The neuronal pathways that cause heroin and sex addictions are the same as an addiction to binge watching,\" Carr explains. \"Your body does not discriminate against pleasure. It can become addicted to any activity or substance that consistently produces dopamine.\" Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: There are a handful of reasons that binge-watching gives us such a high — and then leaves us emotionally spent on the couch. Here's a look at what happens to our brain when we settle in for a marathon, and how to watch responsibly.\n\nThis Is Your Brain On Binge Watching\n\nWhen binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high.\n\nWatching episode after episode of a show feels good — but why is that? Dr. Renee Carr, Psy.D, a clinical psychologist, says it's due to the chemicals being released in our brain. \"When engaged in an activity that's enjoyable such as binge watching, your brain produces dopamine,\" she explains. \"This chemical gives the body a natural, internal reward of pleasure that reinforces continued engagement in that activity. It is the brain's signal that communicates to the body, 'This feels good. You should keep doing this!' When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\". \n hypothesis: This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay attention.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Are Books Superior to TV? How They Affect Our Minds in Different Ways (www.jumpstartyourdreamlife.com)\nText: Television is designed to be passive. After switching to the show you like, you can just sit back and watch everything unfold without effort on your part. You’re less likely to pause to reflect on what’s happening.\n\n\nTV also presents ideas and characters on a surface level. Shows don’t have the luxury of describing or explaining situations in great detail, since they need to keep viewers visually entertained. TV programs are fast-paced in order to keep people from switching. Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\"\n\n\nAccording to Dr. Carr, the process we experience while binge watching is the same one that occurs when a drug or other type of addiction begins. \"The neuronal pathways that cause heroin and sex addictions are the same as an addiction to binge watching,\" Carr explains. \"Your body does not discriminate against pleasure. It can become addicted to any activity or substance that consistently produces dopamine.\" Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: There are a handful of reasons that binge-watching gives us such a high — and then leaves us emotionally spent on the couch. Here's a look at what happens to our brain when we settle in for a marathon, and how to watch responsibly.\n\nThis Is Your Brain On Binge Watching\n\nWhen binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high.\n\nWatching episode after episode of a show feels good — but why is that? Dr. Renee Carr, Psy.D, a clinical psychologist, says it's due to the chemicals being released in our brain. \"When engaged in an activity that's enjoyable such as binge watching, your brain produces dopamine,\" she explains. \"This chemical gives the body a natural, internal reward of pleasure that reinforces continued engagement in that activity. It is the brain's signal that communicates to the body, 'This feels good. You should keep doing this!' When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\". \n hypothesis: This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay attention.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Are Books Superior to TV? How They Affect Our Minds in Different Ways (www.jumpstartyourdreamlife.com)\nText: Television is designed to be passive. After switching to the show you like, you can just sit back and watch everything unfold without effort on your part. You’re less likely to pause to reflect on what’s happening.\n\n\nTV also presents ideas and characters on a surface level. Shows don’t have the luxury of describing or explaining situations in great detail, since they need to keep viewers visually entertained. TV programs are fast-paced in order to keep people from switching. Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\"\n\n\nAccording to Dr. Carr, the process we experience while binge watching is the same one that occurs when a drug or other type of addiction begins. \"The neuronal pathways that cause heroin and sex addictions are the same as an addiction to binge watching,\" Carr explains. \"Your body does not discriminate against pleasure. It can become addicted to any activity or substance that consistently produces dopamine.\" Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: There are a handful of reasons that binge-watching gives us such a high — and then leaves us emotionally spent on the couch. Here's a look at what happens to our brain when we settle in for a marathon, and how to watch responsibly.\n\nThis Is Your Brain On Binge Watching\n\nWhen binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high.\n\nWatching episode after episode of a show feels good — but why is that? Dr. Renee Carr, Psy.D, a clinical psychologist, says it's due to the chemicals being released in our brain. \"When engaged in an activity that's enjoyable such as binge watching, your brain produces dopamine,\" she explains. \"This chemical gives the body a natural, internal reward of pleasure that reinforces continued engagement in that activity. It is the brain's signal that communicates to the body, 'This feels good. You should keep doing this!' When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\". \n hypothesis: This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay attention.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
|||
Why does it feel like less effort to watch 3 - hour long TV episodes back to back than a film?
|
This requires viewers to actively pay attention in order to follow the story.
|
This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay attention.
|
TV shows are designed to be consumed in short segments, making it easier for viewers to digest. They also tend to be more serialized, with each episode building on the previous one. This requires more attention from the viewer and makes it harder to just zone out. Films, on the other hand, tend to be more self-contained, making them easier to watch in one sitting. They also tend to be more linear, with less reliance on the previous events in the story. This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay attention. Additionally, films are designed to be more immersive, making it easier to become engrossed in the story.</s>
|
[
"Title: Are Books Superior to TV? How They Affect Our Minds in Different Ways (www.jumpstartyourdreamlife.com)\nText: Television is designed to be passive. After switching to the show you like, you can just sit back and watch everything unfold without effort on your part. You’re less likely to pause to reflect on what’s happening.\n\n\nTV also presents ideas and characters on a surface level. Shows don’t have the luxury of describing or explaining situations in great detail, since they need to keep viewers visually entertained. TV programs are fast-paced in order to keep people from switching.",
"Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\"\n\n\nAccording to Dr. Carr, the process we experience while binge watching is the same one that occurs when a drug or other type of addiction begins. \"The neuronal pathways that cause heroin and sex addictions are the same as an addiction to binge watching,\" Carr explains. \"Your body does not discriminate against pleasure. It can become addicted to any activity or substance that consistently produces dopamine.\"",
"Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: There are a handful of reasons that binge-watching gives us such a high — and then leaves us emotionally spent on the couch. Here's a look at what happens to our brain when we settle in for a marathon, and how to watch responsibly.\n\nThis Is Your Brain On Binge Watching\n\nWhen binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high.\n\nWatching episode after episode of a show feels good — but why is that? Dr. Renee Carr, Psy.D, a clinical psychologist, says it's due to the chemicals being released in our brain. \"When engaged in an activity that's enjoyable such as binge watching, your brain produces dopamine,\" she explains. \"This chemical gives the body a natural, internal reward of pleasure that reinforces continued engagement in that activity. It is the brain's signal that communicates to the body, 'This feels good. You should keep doing this!' When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\""
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_alpaca_wdoc_df659699-a1c4-4d9a-add4-9a9031587b41
| 1
| 0.952365
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
claim_negation
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Are Books Superior to TV? How They Affect Our Minds in Different Ways (www.jumpstartyourdreamlife.com)\nText: Television is designed to be passive. After switching to the show you like, you can just sit back and watch everything unfold without effort on your part. You’re less likely to pause to reflect on what’s happening.\n\n\nTV also presents ideas and characters on a surface level. Shows don’t have the luxury of describing or explaining situations in great detail, since they need to keep viewers visually entertained. TV programs are fast-paced in order to keep people from switching. Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\"\n\n\nAccording to Dr. Carr, the process we experience while binge watching is the same one that occurs when a drug or other type of addiction begins. \"The neuronal pathways that cause heroin and sex addictions are the same as an addiction to binge watching,\" Carr explains. \"Your body does not discriminate against pleasure. It can become addicted to any activity or substance that consistently produces dopamine.\" Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: There are a handful of reasons that binge-watching gives us such a high — and then leaves us emotionally spent on the couch. Here's a look at what happens to our brain when we settle in for a marathon, and how to watch responsibly.\n\nThis Is Your Brain On Binge Watching\n\nWhen binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high.\n\nWatching episode after episode of a show feels good — but why is that? Dr. Renee Carr, Psy.D, a clinical psychologist, says it's due to the chemicals being released in our brain. \"When engaged in an activity that's enjoyable such as binge watching, your brain produces dopamine,\" she explains. \"This chemical gives the body a natural, internal reward of pleasure that reinforces continued engagement in that activity. It is the brain's signal that communicates to the body, 'This feels good. You should keep doing this!' When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\". \n hypothesis: This requires viewers to actively pay attention in order to follow the story.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Are Books Superior to TV? How They Affect Our Minds in Different Ways (www.jumpstartyourdreamlife.com)\nText: Television is designed to be passive. After switching to the show you like, you can just sit back and watch everything unfold without effort on your part. You’re less likely to pause to reflect on what’s happening.\n\n\nTV also presents ideas and characters on a surface level. Shows don’t have the luxury of describing or explaining situations in great detail, since they need to keep viewers visually entertained. TV programs are fast-paced in order to keep people from switching. Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\"\n\n\nAccording to Dr. Carr, the process we experience while binge watching is the same one that occurs when a drug or other type of addiction begins. \"The neuronal pathways that cause heroin and sex addictions are the same as an addiction to binge watching,\" Carr explains. \"Your body does not discriminate against pleasure. It can become addicted to any activity or substance that consistently produces dopamine.\" Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: There are a handful of reasons that binge-watching gives us such a high — and then leaves us emotionally spent on the couch. Here's a look at what happens to our brain when we settle in for a marathon, and how to watch responsibly.\n\nThis Is Your Brain On Binge Watching\n\nWhen binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high.\n\nWatching episode after episode of a show feels good — but why is that? Dr. Renee Carr, Psy.D, a clinical psychologist, says it's due to the chemicals being released in our brain. \"When engaged in an activity that's enjoyable such as binge watching, your brain produces dopamine,\" she explains. \"This chemical gives the body a natural, internal reward of pleasure that reinforces continued engagement in that activity. It is the brain's signal that communicates to the body, 'This feels good. You should keep doing this!' When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\". \n hypothesis: This requires viewers to actively pay attention in order to follow the story.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Are Books Superior to TV? How They Affect Our Minds in Different Ways (www.jumpstartyourdreamlife.com)\nText: Television is designed to be passive. After switching to the show you like, you can just sit back and watch everything unfold without effort on your part. You’re less likely to pause to reflect on what’s happening.\n\n\nTV also presents ideas and characters on a surface level. Shows don’t have the luxury of describing or explaining situations in great detail, since they need to keep viewers visually entertained. TV programs are fast-paced in order to keep people from switching. Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\"\n\n\nAccording to Dr. Carr, the process we experience while binge watching is the same one that occurs when a drug or other type of addiction begins. \"The neuronal pathways that cause heroin and sex addictions are the same as an addiction to binge watching,\" Carr explains. \"Your body does not discriminate against pleasure. It can become addicted to any activity or substance that consistently produces dopamine.\" Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: There are a handful of reasons that binge-watching gives us such a high — and then leaves us emotionally spent on the couch. Here's a look at what happens to our brain when we settle in for a marathon, and how to watch responsibly.\n\nThis Is Your Brain On Binge Watching\n\nWhen binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high.\n\nWatching episode after episode of a show feels good — but why is that? Dr. Renee Carr, Psy.D, a clinical psychologist, says it's due to the chemicals being released in our brain. \"When engaged in an activity that's enjoyable such as binge watching, your brain produces dopamine,\" she explains. \"This chemical gives the body a natural, internal reward of pleasure that reinforces continued engagement in that activity. It is the brain's signal that communicates to the body, 'This feels good. You should keep doing this!' When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\". \n hypothesis: This requires viewers to actively pay attention in order to follow the story.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
Why does it feel like less effort to watch 3 - hour long TV episodes back to back than a film?
|
Viewers can simply sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay close attention.
|
This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay attention.
|
TV shows are designed to be consumed in short segments, making it easier for viewers to digest. They also tend to be more serialized, with each episode building on the previous one. This requires more attention from the viewer and makes it harder to just zone out. Films, on the other hand, tend to be more self-contained, making them easier to watch in one sitting. They also tend to be more linear, with less reliance on the previous events in the story. This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay attention. Additionally, films are designed to be more immersive, making it easier to become engrossed in the story.</s>
|
[
"Title: Are Books Superior to TV? How They Affect Our Minds in Different Ways (www.jumpstartyourdreamlife.com)\nText: Television is designed to be passive. After switching to the show you like, you can just sit back and watch everything unfold without effort on your part. You’re less likely to pause to reflect on what’s happening.\n\n\nTV also presents ideas and characters on a surface level. Shows don’t have the luxury of describing or explaining situations in great detail, since they need to keep viewers visually entertained. TV programs are fast-paced in order to keep people from switching.",
"Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\"\n\n\nAccording to Dr. Carr, the process we experience while binge watching is the same one that occurs when a drug or other type of addiction begins. \"The neuronal pathways that cause heroin and sex addictions are the same as an addiction to binge watching,\" Carr explains. \"Your body does not discriminate against pleasure. It can become addicted to any activity or substance that consistently produces dopamine.\"",
"Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: There are a handful of reasons that binge-watching gives us such a high — and then leaves us emotionally spent on the couch. Here's a look at what happens to our brain when we settle in for a marathon, and how to watch responsibly.\n\nThis Is Your Brain On Binge Watching\n\nWhen binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high.\n\nWatching episode after episode of a show feels good — but why is that? Dr. Renee Carr, Psy.D, a clinical psychologist, says it's due to the chemicals being released in our brain. \"When engaged in an activity that's enjoyable such as binge watching, your brain produces dopamine,\" she explains. \"This chemical gives the body a natural, internal reward of pleasure that reinforces continued engagement in that activity. It is the brain's signal that communicates to the body, 'This feels good. You should keep doing this!' When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\""
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_alpaca_wdoc_df659699-a1c4-4d9a-add4-9a9031587b41
| 1
| 0.952365
|
generated
|
attributable
|
keep
|
claim_reformulation
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Are Books Superior to TV? How They Affect Our Minds in Different Ways (www.jumpstartyourdreamlife.com)\nText: Television is designed to be passive. After switching to the show you like, you can just sit back and watch everything unfold without effort on your part. You’re less likely to pause to reflect on what’s happening.\n\n\nTV also presents ideas and characters on a surface level. Shows don’t have the luxury of describing or explaining situations in great detail, since they need to keep viewers visually entertained. TV programs are fast-paced in order to keep people from switching. Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\"\n\n\nAccording to Dr. Carr, the process we experience while binge watching is the same one that occurs when a drug or other type of addiction begins. \"The neuronal pathways that cause heroin and sex addictions are the same as an addiction to binge watching,\" Carr explains. \"Your body does not discriminate against pleasure. It can become addicted to any activity or substance that consistently produces dopamine.\" Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: There are a handful of reasons that binge-watching gives us such a high — and then leaves us emotionally spent on the couch. Here's a look at what happens to our brain when we settle in for a marathon, and how to watch responsibly.\n\nThis Is Your Brain On Binge Watching\n\nWhen binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high.\n\nWatching episode after episode of a show feels good — but why is that? Dr. Renee Carr, Psy.D, a clinical psychologist, says it's due to the chemicals being released in our brain. \"When engaged in an activity that's enjoyable such as binge watching, your brain produces dopamine,\" she explains. \"This chemical gives the body a natural, internal reward of pleasure that reinforces continued engagement in that activity. It is the brain's signal that communicates to the body, 'This feels good. You should keep doing this!' When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\". \n hypothesis: Viewers can simply sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay close attention.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Are Books Superior to TV? How They Affect Our Minds in Different Ways (www.jumpstartyourdreamlife.com)\nText: Television is designed to be passive. After switching to the show you like, you can just sit back and watch everything unfold without effort on your part. You’re less likely to pause to reflect on what’s happening.\n\n\nTV also presents ideas and characters on a surface level. Shows don’t have the luxury of describing or explaining situations in great detail, since they need to keep viewers visually entertained. TV programs are fast-paced in order to keep people from switching. Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\"\n\n\nAccording to Dr. Carr, the process we experience while binge watching is the same one that occurs when a drug or other type of addiction begins. \"The neuronal pathways that cause heroin and sex addictions are the same as an addiction to binge watching,\" Carr explains. \"Your body does not discriminate against pleasure. It can become addicted to any activity or substance that consistently produces dopamine.\" Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: There are a handful of reasons that binge-watching gives us such a high — and then leaves us emotionally spent on the couch. Here's a look at what happens to our brain when we settle in for a marathon, and how to watch responsibly.\n\nThis Is Your Brain On Binge Watching\n\nWhen binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high.\n\nWatching episode after episode of a show feels good — but why is that? Dr. Renee Carr, Psy.D, a clinical psychologist, says it's due to the chemicals being released in our brain. \"When engaged in an activity that's enjoyable such as binge watching, your brain produces dopamine,\" she explains. \"This chemical gives the body a natural, internal reward of pleasure that reinforces continued engagement in that activity. It is the brain's signal that communicates to the body, 'This feels good. You should keep doing this!' When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\". \n hypothesis: Viewers can simply sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay close attention.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Are Books Superior to TV? How They Affect Our Minds in Different Ways (www.jumpstartyourdreamlife.com)\nText: Television is designed to be passive. After switching to the show you like, you can just sit back and watch everything unfold without effort on your part. You’re less likely to pause to reflect on what’s happening.\n\n\nTV also presents ideas and characters on a surface level. Shows don’t have the luxury of describing or explaining situations in great detail, since they need to keep viewers visually entertained. TV programs are fast-paced in order to keep people from switching. Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\"\n\n\nAccording to Dr. Carr, the process we experience while binge watching is the same one that occurs when a drug or other type of addiction begins. \"The neuronal pathways that cause heroin and sex addictions are the same as an addiction to binge watching,\" Carr explains. \"Your body does not discriminate against pleasure. It can become addicted to any activity or substance that consistently produces dopamine.\" Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: There are a handful of reasons that binge-watching gives us such a high — and then leaves us emotionally spent on the couch. Here's a look at what happens to our brain when we settle in for a marathon, and how to watch responsibly.\n\nThis Is Your Brain On Binge Watching\n\nWhen binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high.\n\nWatching episode after episode of a show feels good — but why is that? Dr. Renee Carr, Psy.D, a clinical psychologist, says it's due to the chemicals being released in our brain. \"When engaged in an activity that's enjoyable such as binge watching, your brain produces dopamine,\" she explains. \"This chemical gives the body a natural, internal reward of pleasure that reinforces continued engagement in that activity. It is the brain's signal that communicates to the body, 'This feels good. You should keep doing this!' When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\". \n hypothesis: Viewers can simply sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay close attention.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
Why does it feel like less effort to watch 3 - hour long TV episodes back to back than a film?
|
This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to read the subtitles.
|
This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay attention.
|
TV shows are designed to be consumed in short segments, making it easier for viewers to digest. They also tend to be more serialized, with each episode building on the previous one. This requires more attention from the viewer and makes it harder to just zone out. Films, on the other hand, tend to be more self-contained, making them easier to watch in one sitting. They also tend to be more linear, with less reliance on the previous events in the story. This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay attention. Additionally, films are designed to be more immersive, making it easier to become engrossed in the story.</s>
|
[
"Title: Are Books Superior to TV? How They Affect Our Minds in Different Ways (www.jumpstartyourdreamlife.com)\nText: Television is designed to be passive. After switching to the show you like, you can just sit back and watch everything unfold without effort on your part. You’re less likely to pause to reflect on what’s happening.\n\n\nTV also presents ideas and characters on a surface level. Shows don’t have the luxury of describing or explaining situations in great detail, since they need to keep viewers visually entertained. TV programs are fast-paced in order to keep people from switching.",
"Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\"\n\n\nAccording to Dr. Carr, the process we experience while binge watching is the same one that occurs when a drug or other type of addiction begins. \"The neuronal pathways that cause heroin and sex addictions are the same as an addiction to binge watching,\" Carr explains. \"Your body does not discriminate against pleasure. It can become addicted to any activity or substance that consistently produces dopamine.\"",
"Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: There are a handful of reasons that binge-watching gives us such a high — and then leaves us emotionally spent on the couch. Here's a look at what happens to our brain when we settle in for a marathon, and how to watch responsibly.\n\nThis Is Your Brain On Binge Watching\n\nWhen binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high.\n\nWatching episode after episode of a show feels good — but why is that? Dr. Renee Carr, Psy.D, a clinical psychologist, says it's due to the chemicals being released in our brain. \"When engaged in an activity that's enjoyable such as binge watching, your brain produces dopamine,\" she explains. \"This chemical gives the body a natural, internal reward of pleasure that reinforces continued engagement in that activity. It is the brain's signal that communicates to the body, 'This feels good. You should keep doing this!' When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\""
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_alpaca_wdoc_df659699-a1c4-4d9a-add4-9a9031587b41
| 1
| 0.952365
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
claim_erronous_change
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Are Books Superior to TV? How They Affect Our Minds in Different Ways (www.jumpstartyourdreamlife.com)\nText: Television is designed to be passive. After switching to the show you like, you can just sit back and watch everything unfold without effort on your part. You’re less likely to pause to reflect on what’s happening.\n\n\nTV also presents ideas and characters on a surface level. Shows don’t have the luxury of describing or explaining situations in great detail, since they need to keep viewers visually entertained. TV programs are fast-paced in order to keep people from switching. Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\"\n\n\nAccording to Dr. Carr, the process we experience while binge watching is the same one that occurs when a drug or other type of addiction begins. \"The neuronal pathways that cause heroin and sex addictions are the same as an addiction to binge watching,\" Carr explains. \"Your body does not discriminate against pleasure. It can become addicted to any activity or substance that consistently produces dopamine.\" Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: There are a handful of reasons that binge-watching gives us such a high — and then leaves us emotionally spent on the couch. Here's a look at what happens to our brain when we settle in for a marathon, and how to watch responsibly.\n\nThis Is Your Brain On Binge Watching\n\nWhen binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high.\n\nWatching episode after episode of a show feels good — but why is that? Dr. Renee Carr, Psy.D, a clinical psychologist, says it's due to the chemicals being released in our brain. \"When engaged in an activity that's enjoyable such as binge watching, your brain produces dopamine,\" she explains. \"This chemical gives the body a natural, internal reward of pleasure that reinforces continued engagement in that activity. It is the brain's signal that communicates to the body, 'This feels good. You should keep doing this!' When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\". \n hypothesis: This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to read the subtitles.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Are Books Superior to TV? How They Affect Our Minds in Different Ways (www.jumpstartyourdreamlife.com)\nText: Television is designed to be passive. After switching to the show you like, you can just sit back and watch everything unfold without effort on your part. You’re less likely to pause to reflect on what’s happening.\n\n\nTV also presents ideas and characters on a surface level. Shows don’t have the luxury of describing or explaining situations in great detail, since they need to keep viewers visually entertained. TV programs are fast-paced in order to keep people from switching. Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\"\n\n\nAccording to Dr. Carr, the process we experience while binge watching is the same one that occurs when a drug or other type of addiction begins. \"The neuronal pathways that cause heroin and sex addictions are the same as an addiction to binge watching,\" Carr explains. \"Your body does not discriminate against pleasure. It can become addicted to any activity or substance that consistently produces dopamine.\" Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: There are a handful of reasons that binge-watching gives us such a high — and then leaves us emotionally spent on the couch. Here's a look at what happens to our brain when we settle in for a marathon, and how to watch responsibly.\n\nThis Is Your Brain On Binge Watching\n\nWhen binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high.\n\nWatching episode after episode of a show feels good — but why is that? Dr. Renee Carr, Psy.D, a clinical psychologist, says it's due to the chemicals being released in our brain. \"When engaged in an activity that's enjoyable such as binge watching, your brain produces dopamine,\" she explains. \"This chemical gives the body a natural, internal reward of pleasure that reinforces continued engagement in that activity. It is the brain's signal that communicates to the body, 'This feels good. You should keep doing this!' When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\". \n hypothesis: This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to read the subtitles.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Are Books Superior to TV? How They Affect Our Minds in Different Ways (www.jumpstartyourdreamlife.com)\nText: Television is designed to be passive. After switching to the show you like, you can just sit back and watch everything unfold without effort on your part. You’re less likely to pause to reflect on what’s happening.\n\n\nTV also presents ideas and characters on a surface level. Shows don’t have the luxury of describing or explaining situations in great detail, since they need to keep viewers visually entertained. TV programs are fast-paced in order to keep people from switching. Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\"\n\n\nAccording to Dr. Carr, the process we experience while binge watching is the same one that occurs when a drug or other type of addiction begins. \"The neuronal pathways that cause heroin and sex addictions are the same as an addiction to binge watching,\" Carr explains. \"Your body does not discriminate against pleasure. It can become addicted to any activity or substance that consistently produces dopamine.\" Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: There are a handful of reasons that binge-watching gives us such a high — and then leaves us emotionally spent on the couch. Here's a look at what happens to our brain when we settle in for a marathon, and how to watch responsibly.\n\nThis Is Your Brain On Binge Watching\n\nWhen binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high.\n\nWatching episode after episode of a show feels good — but why is that? Dr. Renee Carr, Psy.D, a clinical psychologist, says it's due to the chemicals being released in our brain. \"When engaged in an activity that's enjoyable such as binge watching, your brain produces dopamine,\" she explains. \"This chemical gives the body a natural, internal reward of pleasure that reinforces continued engagement in that activity. It is the brain's signal that communicates to the body, 'This feels good. You should keep doing this!' When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\". \n hypothesis: This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to read the subtitles.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
Why does it feel like less effort to watch 3 - hour long TV episodes back to back than a film?
|
s the media landscape continues to evolve, it will be interesting to see how creators continue to push the boundaries of immersive storytelling, further blurring the lines between the viewer and the story.
|
This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay attention.
|
TV shows are designed to be consumed in short segments, making it easier for viewers to digest. They also tend to be more serialized, with each episode building on the previous one. This requires more attention from the viewer and makes it harder to just zone out. Films, on the other hand, tend to be more self-contained, making them easier to watch in one sitting. They also tend to be more linear, with less reliance on the previous events in the story. This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay attention. Additionally, films are designed to be more immersive, making it easier to become engrossed in the story.</s>
|
[
"Title: Are Books Superior to TV? How They Affect Our Minds in Different Ways (www.jumpstartyourdreamlife.com)\nText: Television is designed to be passive. After switching to the show you like, you can just sit back and watch everything unfold without effort on your part. You’re less likely to pause to reflect on what’s happening.\n\n\nTV also presents ideas and characters on a surface level. Shows don’t have the luxury of describing or explaining situations in great detail, since they need to keep viewers visually entertained. TV programs are fast-paced in order to keep people from switching.",
"Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\"\n\n\nAccording to Dr. Carr, the process we experience while binge watching is the same one that occurs when a drug or other type of addiction begins. \"The neuronal pathways that cause heroin and sex addictions are the same as an addiction to binge watching,\" Carr explains. \"Your body does not discriminate against pleasure. It can become addicted to any activity or substance that consistently produces dopamine.\"",
"Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: There are a handful of reasons that binge-watching gives us such a high — and then leaves us emotionally spent on the couch. Here's a look at what happens to our brain when we settle in for a marathon, and how to watch responsibly.\n\nThis Is Your Brain On Binge Watching\n\nWhen binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high.\n\nWatching episode after episode of a show feels good — but why is that? Dr. Renee Carr, Psy.D, a clinical psychologist, says it's due to the chemicals being released in our brain. \"When engaged in an activity that's enjoyable such as binge watching, your brain produces dopamine,\" she explains. \"This chemical gives the body a natural, internal reward of pleasure that reinforces continued engagement in that activity. It is the brain's signal that communicates to the body, 'This feels good. You should keep doing this!' When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\""
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_alpaca_wdoc_df659699-a1c4-4d9a-add4-9a9031587b41
| 1
| 0.952365
|
generated
|
attributable
|
keep
|
claim_infer_claim
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Are Books Superior to TV? How They Affect Our Minds in Different Ways (www.jumpstartyourdreamlife.com)\nText: Television is designed to be passive. After switching to the show you like, you can just sit back and watch everything unfold without effort on your part. You’re less likely to pause to reflect on what’s happening.\n\n\nTV also presents ideas and characters on a surface level. Shows don’t have the luxury of describing or explaining situations in great detail, since they need to keep viewers visually entertained. TV programs are fast-paced in order to keep people from switching. Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\"\n\n\nAccording to Dr. Carr, the process we experience while binge watching is the same one that occurs when a drug or other type of addiction begins. \"The neuronal pathways that cause heroin and sex addictions are the same as an addiction to binge watching,\" Carr explains. \"Your body does not discriminate against pleasure. It can become addicted to any activity or substance that consistently produces dopamine.\" Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: There are a handful of reasons that binge-watching gives us such a high — and then leaves us emotionally spent on the couch. Here's a look at what happens to our brain when we settle in for a marathon, and how to watch responsibly.\n\nThis Is Your Brain On Binge Watching\n\nWhen binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high.\n\nWatching episode after episode of a show feels good — but why is that? Dr. Renee Carr, Psy.D, a clinical psychologist, says it's due to the chemicals being released in our brain. \"When engaged in an activity that's enjoyable such as binge watching, your brain produces dopamine,\" she explains. \"This chemical gives the body a natural, internal reward of pleasure that reinforces continued engagement in that activity. It is the brain's signal that communicates to the body, 'This feels good. You should keep doing this!' When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\". \n hypothesis: s the media landscape continues to evolve, it will be interesting to see how creators continue to push the boundaries of immersive storytelling, further blurring the lines between the viewer and the story.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Are Books Superior to TV? How They Affect Our Minds in Different Ways (www.jumpstartyourdreamlife.com)\nText: Television is designed to be passive. After switching to the show you like, you can just sit back and watch everything unfold without effort on your part. You’re less likely to pause to reflect on what’s happening.\n\n\nTV also presents ideas and characters on a surface level. Shows don’t have the luxury of describing or explaining situations in great detail, since they need to keep viewers visually entertained. TV programs are fast-paced in order to keep people from switching. Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\"\n\n\nAccording to Dr. Carr, the process we experience while binge watching is the same one that occurs when a drug or other type of addiction begins. \"The neuronal pathways that cause heroin and sex addictions are the same as an addiction to binge watching,\" Carr explains. \"Your body does not discriminate against pleasure. It can become addicted to any activity or substance that consistently produces dopamine.\" Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: There are a handful of reasons that binge-watching gives us such a high — and then leaves us emotionally spent on the couch. Here's a look at what happens to our brain when we settle in for a marathon, and how to watch responsibly.\n\nThis Is Your Brain On Binge Watching\n\nWhen binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high.\n\nWatching episode after episode of a show feels good — but why is that? Dr. Renee Carr, Psy.D, a clinical psychologist, says it's due to the chemicals being released in our brain. \"When engaged in an activity that's enjoyable such as binge watching, your brain produces dopamine,\" she explains. \"This chemical gives the body a natural, internal reward of pleasure that reinforces continued engagement in that activity. It is the brain's signal that communicates to the body, 'This feels good. You should keep doing this!' When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\". \n hypothesis: s the media landscape continues to evolve, it will be interesting to see how creators continue to push the boundaries of immersive storytelling, further blurring the lines between the viewer and the story.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Are Books Superior to TV? How They Affect Our Minds in Different Ways (www.jumpstartyourdreamlife.com)\nText: Television is designed to be passive. After switching to the show you like, you can just sit back and watch everything unfold without effort on your part. You’re less likely to pause to reflect on what’s happening.\n\n\nTV also presents ideas and characters on a surface level. Shows don’t have the luxury of describing or explaining situations in great detail, since they need to keep viewers visually entertained. TV programs are fast-paced in order to keep people from switching. Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\"\n\n\nAccording to Dr. Carr, the process we experience while binge watching is the same one that occurs when a drug or other type of addiction begins. \"The neuronal pathways that cause heroin and sex addictions are the same as an addiction to binge watching,\" Carr explains. \"Your body does not discriminate against pleasure. It can become addicted to any activity or substance that consistently produces dopamine.\" Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: There are a handful of reasons that binge-watching gives us such a high — and then leaves us emotionally spent on the couch. Here's a look at what happens to our brain when we settle in for a marathon, and how to watch responsibly.\n\nThis Is Your Brain On Binge Watching\n\nWhen binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high.\n\nWatching episode after episode of a show feels good — but why is that? Dr. Renee Carr, Psy.D, a clinical psychologist, says it's due to the chemicals being released in our brain. \"When engaged in an activity that's enjoyable such as binge watching, your brain produces dopamine,\" she explains. \"This chemical gives the body a natural, internal reward of pleasure that reinforces continued engagement in that activity. It is the brain's signal that communicates to the body, 'This feels good. You should keep doing this!' When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\". \n hypothesis: s the media landscape continues to evolve, it will be interesting to see how creators continue to push the boundaries of immersive storytelling, further blurring the lines between the viewer and the story.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
Why does it feel like less effort to watch 3 - hour long TV episodes back to back than a film?
|
This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay attention, and it also leads to a pseudo-addiction due to the release of dopamine.
|
This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay attention.
|
TV shows are designed to be consumed in short segments, making it easier for viewers to digest. They also tend to be more serialized, with each episode building on the previous one. This requires more attention from the viewer and makes it harder to just zone out. Films, on the other hand, tend to be more self-contained, making them easier to watch in one sitting. They also tend to be more linear, with less reliance on the previous events in the story. This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay attention. Additionally, films are designed to be more immersive, making it easier to become engrossed in the story.</s>
|
[
"Title: Are Books Superior to TV? How They Affect Our Minds in Different Ways (www.jumpstartyourdreamlife.com)\nText: Television is designed to be passive. After switching to the show you like, you can just sit back and watch everything unfold without effort on your part. You’re less likely to pause to reflect on what’s happening.\n\n\nTV also presents ideas and characters on a surface level. Shows don’t have the luxury of describing or explaining situations in great detail, since they need to keep viewers visually entertained. TV programs are fast-paced in order to keep people from switching.",
"Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\"\n\n\nAccording to Dr. Carr, the process we experience while binge watching is the same one that occurs when a drug or other type of addiction begins. \"The neuronal pathways that cause heroin and sex addictions are the same as an addiction to binge watching,\" Carr explains. \"Your body does not discriminate against pleasure. It can become addicted to any activity or substance that consistently produces dopamine.\"",
"Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: There are a handful of reasons that binge-watching gives us such a high — and then leaves us emotionally spent on the couch. Here's a look at what happens to our brain when we settle in for a marathon, and how to watch responsibly.\n\nThis Is Your Brain On Binge Watching\n\nWhen binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high.\n\nWatching episode after episode of a show feels good — but why is that? Dr. Renee Carr, Psy.D, a clinical psychologist, says it's due to the chemicals being released in our brain. \"When engaged in an activity that's enjoyable such as binge watching, your brain produces dopamine,\" she explains. \"This chemical gives the body a natural, internal reward of pleasure that reinforces continued engagement in that activity. It is the brain's signal that communicates to the body, 'This feels good. You should keep doing this!' When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\""
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_alpaca_wdoc_df659699-a1c4-4d9a-add4-9a9031587b41
| 1
| 0.952365
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
claim_add_to_the_claim_contradicting_info
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Are Books Superior to TV? How They Affect Our Minds in Different Ways (www.jumpstartyourdreamlife.com)\nText: Television is designed to be passive. After switching to the show you like, you can just sit back and watch everything unfold without effort on your part. You’re less likely to pause to reflect on what’s happening.\n\n\nTV also presents ideas and characters on a surface level. Shows don’t have the luxury of describing or explaining situations in great detail, since they need to keep viewers visually entertained. TV programs are fast-paced in order to keep people from switching. Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\"\n\n\nAccording to Dr. Carr, the process we experience while binge watching is the same one that occurs when a drug or other type of addiction begins. \"The neuronal pathways that cause heroin and sex addictions are the same as an addiction to binge watching,\" Carr explains. \"Your body does not discriminate against pleasure. It can become addicted to any activity or substance that consistently produces dopamine.\" Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: There are a handful of reasons that binge-watching gives us such a high — and then leaves us emotionally spent on the couch. Here's a look at what happens to our brain when we settle in for a marathon, and how to watch responsibly.\n\nThis Is Your Brain On Binge Watching\n\nWhen binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high.\n\nWatching episode after episode of a show feels good — but why is that? Dr. Renee Carr, Psy.D, a clinical psychologist, says it's due to the chemicals being released in our brain. \"When engaged in an activity that's enjoyable such as binge watching, your brain produces dopamine,\" she explains. \"This chemical gives the body a natural, internal reward of pleasure that reinforces continued engagement in that activity. It is the brain's signal that communicates to the body, 'This feels good. You should keep doing this!' When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\". \n hypothesis: This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay attention, and it also leads to a pseudo-addiction due to the release of dopamine.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Are Books Superior to TV? How They Affect Our Minds in Different Ways (www.jumpstartyourdreamlife.com)\nText: Television is designed to be passive. After switching to the show you like, you can just sit back and watch everything unfold without effort on your part. You’re less likely to pause to reflect on what’s happening.\n\n\nTV also presents ideas and characters on a surface level. Shows don’t have the luxury of describing or explaining situations in great detail, since they need to keep viewers visually entertained. TV programs are fast-paced in order to keep people from switching. Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\"\n\n\nAccording to Dr. Carr, the process we experience while binge watching is the same one that occurs when a drug or other type of addiction begins. \"The neuronal pathways that cause heroin and sex addictions are the same as an addiction to binge watching,\" Carr explains. \"Your body does not discriminate against pleasure. It can become addicted to any activity or substance that consistently produces dopamine.\" Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: There are a handful of reasons that binge-watching gives us such a high — and then leaves us emotionally spent on the couch. Here's a look at what happens to our brain when we settle in for a marathon, and how to watch responsibly.\n\nThis Is Your Brain On Binge Watching\n\nWhen binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high.\n\nWatching episode after episode of a show feels good — but why is that? Dr. Renee Carr, Psy.D, a clinical psychologist, says it's due to the chemicals being released in our brain. \"When engaged in an activity that's enjoyable such as binge watching, your brain produces dopamine,\" she explains. \"This chemical gives the body a natural, internal reward of pleasure that reinforces continued engagement in that activity. It is the brain's signal that communicates to the body, 'This feels good. You should keep doing this!' When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\". \n hypothesis: This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay attention, and it also leads to a pseudo-addiction due to the release of dopamine.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Are Books Superior to TV? How They Affect Our Minds in Different Ways (www.jumpstartyourdreamlife.com)\nText: Television is designed to be passive. After switching to the show you like, you can just sit back and watch everything unfold without effort on your part. You’re less likely to pause to reflect on what’s happening.\n\n\nTV also presents ideas and characters on a surface level. Shows don’t have the luxury of describing or explaining situations in great detail, since they need to keep viewers visually entertained. TV programs are fast-paced in order to keep people from switching. Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\"\n\n\nAccording to Dr. Carr, the process we experience while binge watching is the same one that occurs when a drug or other type of addiction begins. \"The neuronal pathways that cause heroin and sex addictions are the same as an addiction to binge watching,\" Carr explains. \"Your body does not discriminate against pleasure. It can become addicted to any activity or substance that consistently produces dopamine.\" Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: There are a handful of reasons that binge-watching gives us such a high — and then leaves us emotionally spent on the couch. Here's a look at what happens to our brain when we settle in for a marathon, and how to watch responsibly.\n\nThis Is Your Brain On Binge Watching\n\nWhen binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high.\n\nWatching episode after episode of a show feels good — but why is that? Dr. Renee Carr, Psy.D, a clinical psychologist, says it's due to the chemicals being released in our brain. \"When engaged in an activity that's enjoyable such as binge watching, your brain produces dopamine,\" she explains. \"This chemical gives the body a natural, internal reward of pleasure that reinforces continued engagement in that activity. It is the brain's signal that communicates to the body, 'This feels good. You should keep doing this!' When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\". \n hypothesis: This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay attention, and it also leads to a pseudo-addiction due to the release of dopamine.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
Why does it feel like less effort to watch 3 - hour long TV episodes back to back than a film?
|
This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay attention.
|
This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay attention.
|
TV shows are designed to be consumed in short segments, making it easier for viewers to digest. They also tend to be more serialized, with each episode building on the previous one. This requires more attention from the viewer and makes it harder to just zone out. Films, on the other hand, tend to be more self-contained, making them easier to watch in one sitting. They also tend to be more linear, with less reliance on the previous events in the story. This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay attention. Additionally, films are designed to be more immersive, making it easier to become engrossed in the story.</s>
|
[
"he earliest known evidence of life on Earth includes fossilized microorganisms found in rocks dating back 3.4 billion years, which provide valuable insights into the evolution of life on our planet. These ancient microorganisms likely played a crucial role in shaping the Earth's ecosystem and paving the way for the development of more complex life forms.",
"Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\"\n\n\nAccording to Dr. Carr, the process we experience while binge watching is the same one that occurs when a drug or other type of addiction begins. \"The neuronal pathways that cause heroin and sex addictions are the same as an addiction to binge watching,\" Carr explains. \"Your body does not discriminate against pleasure. It can become addicted to any activity or substance that consistently produces dopamine.\"",
"Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: There are a handful of reasons that binge-watching gives us such a high — and then leaves us emotionally spent on the couch. Here's a look at what happens to our brain when we settle in for a marathon, and how to watch responsibly.\n\nThis Is Your Brain On Binge Watching\n\nWhen binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high.\n\nWatching episode after episode of a show feels good — but why is that? Dr. Renee Carr, Psy.D, a clinical psychologist, says it's due to the chemicals being released in our brain. \"When engaged in an activity that's enjoyable such as binge watching, your brain produces dopamine,\" she explains. \"This chemical gives the body a natural, internal reward of pleasure that reinforces continued engagement in that activity. It is the brain's signal that communicates to the body, 'This feels good. You should keep doing this!' When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\"",
"Title: Are Books Superior to TV? How They Affect Our Minds in Different Ways (www.jumpstartyourdreamlife.com)\nText: Television is designed to be passive. After switching to the show you like, you can just sit back and watch everything unfold without effort on your part. You’re less likely to pause to reflect on what’s happening.\n\n\nTV also presents ideas and characters on a surface level. Shows don’t have the luxury of describing or explaining situations in great detail, since they need to keep viewers visually entertained. TV programs are fast-paced in order to keep people from switching."
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_alpaca_wdoc_df659699-a1c4-4d9a-add4-9a9031587b41
| 1
| 0.952365
|
generated
|
attributable
|
keep
|
modify_passage-add_relevant_to_claim
|
[
{
"content": "premise: he earliest known evidence of life on Earth includes fossilized microorganisms found in rocks dating back 3.4 billion years, which provide valuable insights into the evolution of life on our planet. These ancient microorganisms likely played a crucial role in shaping the Earth's ecosystem and paving the way for the development of more complex life forms. Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\"\n\n\nAccording to Dr. Carr, the process we experience while binge watching is the same one that occurs when a drug or other type of addiction begins. \"The neuronal pathways that cause heroin and sex addictions are the same as an addiction to binge watching,\" Carr explains. \"Your body does not discriminate against pleasure. It can become addicted to any activity or substance that consistently produces dopamine.\" Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: There are a handful of reasons that binge-watching gives us such a high — and then leaves us emotionally spent on the couch. Here's a look at what happens to our brain when we settle in for a marathon, and how to watch responsibly.\n\nThis Is Your Brain On Binge Watching\n\nWhen binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high.\n\nWatching episode after episode of a show feels good — but why is that? Dr. Renee Carr, Psy.D, a clinical psychologist, says it's due to the chemicals being released in our brain. \"When engaged in an activity that's enjoyable such as binge watching, your brain produces dopamine,\" she explains. \"This chemical gives the body a natural, internal reward of pleasure that reinforces continued engagement in that activity. It is the brain's signal that communicates to the body, 'This feels good. You should keep doing this!' When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\" Title: Are Books Superior to TV? How They Affect Our Minds in Different Ways (www.jumpstartyourdreamlife.com)\nText: Television is designed to be passive. After switching to the show you like, you can just sit back and watch everything unfold without effort on your part. You’re less likely to pause to reflect on what’s happening.\n\n\nTV also presents ideas and characters on a surface level. Shows don’t have the luxury of describing or explaining situations in great detail, since they need to keep viewers visually entertained. TV programs are fast-paced in order to keep people from switching.. \n hypothesis: This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay attention.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: he earliest known evidence of life on Earth includes fossilized microorganisms found in rocks dating back 3.4 billion years, which provide valuable insights into the evolution of life on our planet. These ancient microorganisms likely played a crucial role in shaping the Earth's ecosystem and paving the way for the development of more complex life forms. Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\"\n\n\nAccording to Dr. Carr, the process we experience while binge watching is the same one that occurs when a drug or other type of addiction begins. \"The neuronal pathways that cause heroin and sex addictions are the same as an addiction to binge watching,\" Carr explains. \"Your body does not discriminate against pleasure. It can become addicted to any activity or substance that consistently produces dopamine.\" Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: There are a handful of reasons that binge-watching gives us such a high — and then leaves us emotionally spent on the couch. Here's a look at what happens to our brain when we settle in for a marathon, and how to watch responsibly.\n\nThis Is Your Brain On Binge Watching\n\nWhen binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high.\n\nWatching episode after episode of a show feels good — but why is that? Dr. Renee Carr, Psy.D, a clinical psychologist, says it's due to the chemicals being released in our brain. \"When engaged in an activity that's enjoyable such as binge watching, your brain produces dopamine,\" she explains. \"This chemical gives the body a natural, internal reward of pleasure that reinforces continued engagement in that activity. It is the brain's signal that communicates to the body, 'This feels good. You should keep doing this!' When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\" Title: Are Books Superior to TV? How They Affect Our Minds in Different Ways (www.jumpstartyourdreamlife.com)\nText: Television is designed to be passive. After switching to the show you like, you can just sit back and watch everything unfold without effort on your part. You’re less likely to pause to reflect on what’s happening.\n\n\nTV also presents ideas and characters on a surface level. Shows don’t have the luxury of describing or explaining situations in great detail, since they need to keep viewers visually entertained. TV programs are fast-paced in order to keep people from switching.. \n hypothesis: This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay attention.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: he earliest known evidence of life on Earth includes fossilized microorganisms found in rocks dating back 3.4 billion years, which provide valuable insights into the evolution of life on our planet. These ancient microorganisms likely played a crucial role in shaping the Earth's ecosystem and paving the way for the development of more complex life forms. Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\"\n\n\nAccording to Dr. Carr, the process we experience while binge watching is the same one that occurs when a drug or other type of addiction begins. \"The neuronal pathways that cause heroin and sex addictions are the same as an addiction to binge watching,\" Carr explains. \"Your body does not discriminate against pleasure. It can become addicted to any activity or substance that consistently produces dopamine.\" Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: There are a handful of reasons that binge-watching gives us such a high — and then leaves us emotionally spent on the couch. Here's a look at what happens to our brain when we settle in for a marathon, and how to watch responsibly.\n\nThis Is Your Brain On Binge Watching\n\nWhen binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high.\n\nWatching episode after episode of a show feels good — but why is that? Dr. Renee Carr, Psy.D, a clinical psychologist, says it's due to the chemicals being released in our brain. \"When engaged in an activity that's enjoyable such as binge watching, your brain produces dopamine,\" she explains. \"This chemical gives the body a natural, internal reward of pleasure that reinforces continued engagement in that activity. It is the brain's signal that communicates to the body, 'This feels good. You should keep doing this!' When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\" Title: Are Books Superior to TV? How They Affect Our Minds in Different Ways (www.jumpstartyourdreamlife.com)\nText: Television is designed to be passive. After switching to the show you like, you can just sit back and watch everything unfold without effort on your part. You’re less likely to pause to reflect on what’s happening.\n\n\nTV also presents ideas and characters on a surface level. Shows don’t have the luxury of describing or explaining situations in great detail, since they need to keep viewers visually entertained. TV programs are fast-paced in order to keep people from switching.. \n hypothesis: This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay attention.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
Why does it feel like less effort to watch 3 - hour long TV episodes back to back than a film?
|
This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay attention.
|
This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay attention.
|
TV shows are designed to be consumed in short segments, making it easier for viewers to digest. They also tend to be more serialized, with each episode building on the previous one. This requires more attention from the viewer and makes it harder to just zone out. Films, on the other hand, tend to be more self-contained, making them easier to watch in one sitting. They also tend to be more linear, with less reliance on the previous events in the story. This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay attention. Additionally, films are designed to be more immersive, making it easier to become engrossed in the story.</s>
|
[
"Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: There are a handful of reasons that binge-watching gives us such a high — and then leaves us emotionally spent on the couch. Here's a look at what happens to our brain when we settle in for a marathon, and how to watch responsibly.\n\nThis Is Your Brain On Binge Watching\n\nWhen binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high.\n\nWatching episode after episode of a show feels good — but why is that? Dr. Renee Carr, Psy.D, a clinical psychologist, says it's due to the chemicals being released in our brain. \"When engaged in an activity that's enjoyable such as binge watching, your brain produces dopamine,\" she explains. \"This chemical gives the body a natural, internal reward of pleasure that reinforces continued engagement in that activity. It is the brain's signal that communicates to the body, 'This feels good. You should keep doing this!' When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\"",
"Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\"\n\n\nAccording to Dr. Carr, the process we experience while binge watching is the same one that occurs when a drug or other type of addiction begins. \"The neuronal pathways that cause heroin and sex addictions are the same as an addiction to binge watching,\" Carr explains. \"Your body does not discriminate against pleasure. It can become addicted to any activity or substance that consistently produces dopamine.\"",
"\nThe 19th-century poet Emily Dickinson was known for her unique and introspective poetry style. Her poetry often explored themes of nature, death, and the human condition. Dickinson's poetry was not widely recognized during her lifetime, but after her death, her sister Lavinia found and published many of her poems. The state flower of South Carolina is the Yellow Jessamine. Butterflies taste with their feet. The 1968 Summer Olympics in Mexico City featured a memorable performance by the Soviet Union's gymnast Olga Korbut.",
"Title: Are Books Superior to TV? How They Affect Our Minds in Different Ways (www.jumpstartyourdreamlife.com)\nText: Television is designed to be passive. After switching to the show you like, you can just sit back and watch everything unfold without effort on your part. You’re less likely to pause to reflect on what’s happening.\n\n\nTV also presents ideas and characters on a surface level. Shows don’t have the luxury of describing or explaining situations in great detail, since they need to keep viewers visually entertained. TV programs are fast-paced in order to keep people from switching."
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_alpaca_wdoc_df659699-a1c4-4d9a-add4-9a9031587b41
| 1
| 0.952365
|
generated
|
attributable
|
keep
|
modify_passage-add_irrelevant_to_claim
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: There are a handful of reasons that binge-watching gives us such a high — and then leaves us emotionally spent on the couch. Here's a look at what happens to our brain when we settle in for a marathon, and how to watch responsibly.\n\nThis Is Your Brain On Binge Watching\n\nWhen binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high.\n\nWatching episode after episode of a show feels good — but why is that? Dr. Renee Carr, Psy.D, a clinical psychologist, says it's due to the chemicals being released in our brain. \"When engaged in an activity that's enjoyable such as binge watching, your brain produces dopamine,\" she explains. \"This chemical gives the body a natural, internal reward of pleasure that reinforces continued engagement in that activity. It is the brain's signal that communicates to the body, 'This feels good. You should keep doing this!' When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\" Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\"\n\n\nAccording to Dr. Carr, the process we experience while binge watching is the same one that occurs when a drug or other type of addiction begins. \"The neuronal pathways that cause heroin and sex addictions are the same as an addiction to binge watching,\" Carr explains. \"Your body does not discriminate against pleasure. It can become addicted to any activity or substance that consistently produces dopamine.\" \nThe 19th-century poet Emily Dickinson was known for her unique and introspective poetry style. Her poetry often explored themes of nature, death, and the human condition. Dickinson's poetry was not widely recognized during her lifetime, but after her death, her sister Lavinia found and published many of her poems. The state flower of South Carolina is the Yellow Jessamine. Butterflies taste with their feet. The 1968 Summer Olympics in Mexico City featured a memorable performance by the Soviet Union's gymnast Olga Korbut. Title: Are Books Superior to TV? How They Affect Our Minds in Different Ways (www.jumpstartyourdreamlife.com)\nText: Television is designed to be passive. After switching to the show you like, you can just sit back and watch everything unfold without effort on your part. You’re less likely to pause to reflect on what’s happening.\n\n\nTV also presents ideas and characters on a surface level. Shows don’t have the luxury of describing or explaining situations in great detail, since they need to keep viewers visually entertained. TV programs are fast-paced in order to keep people from switching.. \n hypothesis: This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay attention.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: There are a handful of reasons that binge-watching gives us such a high — and then leaves us emotionally spent on the couch. Here's a look at what happens to our brain when we settle in for a marathon, and how to watch responsibly.\n\nThis Is Your Brain On Binge Watching\n\nWhen binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high.\n\nWatching episode after episode of a show feels good — but why is that? Dr. Renee Carr, Psy.D, a clinical psychologist, says it's due to the chemicals being released in our brain. \"When engaged in an activity that's enjoyable such as binge watching, your brain produces dopamine,\" she explains. \"This chemical gives the body a natural, internal reward of pleasure that reinforces continued engagement in that activity. It is the brain's signal that communicates to the body, 'This feels good. You should keep doing this!' When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\" Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\"\n\n\nAccording to Dr. Carr, the process we experience while binge watching is the same one that occurs when a drug or other type of addiction begins. \"The neuronal pathways that cause heroin and sex addictions are the same as an addiction to binge watching,\" Carr explains. \"Your body does not discriminate against pleasure. It can become addicted to any activity or substance that consistently produces dopamine.\" \nThe 19th-century poet Emily Dickinson was known for her unique and introspective poetry style. Her poetry often explored themes of nature, death, and the human condition. Dickinson's poetry was not widely recognized during her lifetime, but after her death, her sister Lavinia found and published many of her poems. The state flower of South Carolina is the Yellow Jessamine. Butterflies taste with their feet. The 1968 Summer Olympics in Mexico City featured a memorable performance by the Soviet Union's gymnast Olga Korbut. Title: Are Books Superior to TV? How They Affect Our Minds in Different Ways (www.jumpstartyourdreamlife.com)\nText: Television is designed to be passive. After switching to the show you like, you can just sit back and watch everything unfold without effort on your part. You’re less likely to pause to reflect on what’s happening.\n\n\nTV also presents ideas and characters on a surface level. Shows don’t have the luxury of describing or explaining situations in great detail, since they need to keep viewers visually entertained. TV programs are fast-paced in order to keep people from switching.. \n hypothesis: This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay attention.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: There are a handful of reasons that binge-watching gives us such a high — and then leaves us emotionally spent on the couch. Here's a look at what happens to our brain when we settle in for a marathon, and how to watch responsibly.\n\nThis Is Your Brain On Binge Watching\n\nWhen binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high.\n\nWatching episode after episode of a show feels good — but why is that? Dr. Renee Carr, Psy.D, a clinical psychologist, says it's due to the chemicals being released in our brain. \"When engaged in an activity that's enjoyable such as binge watching, your brain produces dopamine,\" she explains. \"This chemical gives the body a natural, internal reward of pleasure that reinforces continued engagement in that activity. It is the brain's signal that communicates to the body, 'This feels good. You should keep doing this!' When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\" Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\"\n\n\nAccording to Dr. Carr, the process we experience while binge watching is the same one that occurs when a drug or other type of addiction begins. \"The neuronal pathways that cause heroin and sex addictions are the same as an addiction to binge watching,\" Carr explains. \"Your body does not discriminate against pleasure. It can become addicted to any activity or substance that consistently produces dopamine.\" \nThe 19th-century poet Emily Dickinson was known for her unique and introspective poetry style. Her poetry often explored themes of nature, death, and the human condition. Dickinson's poetry was not widely recognized during her lifetime, but after her death, her sister Lavinia found and published many of her poems. The state flower of South Carolina is the Yellow Jessamine. Butterflies taste with their feet. The 1968 Summer Olympics in Mexico City featured a memorable performance by the Soviet Union's gymnast Olga Korbut. Title: Are Books Superior to TV? How They Affect Our Minds in Different Ways (www.jumpstartyourdreamlife.com)\nText: Television is designed to be passive. After switching to the show you like, you can just sit back and watch everything unfold without effort on your part. You’re less likely to pause to reflect on what’s happening.\n\n\nTV also presents ideas and characters on a surface level. Shows don’t have the luxury of describing or explaining situations in great detail, since they need to keep viewers visually entertained. TV programs are fast-paced in order to keep people from switching.. \n hypothesis: This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay attention.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
Why does it feel like less effort to watch 3 - hour long TV episodes back to back than a film?
|
This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay attention.
|
This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay attention.
|
TV shows are designed to be consumed in short segments, making it easier for viewers to digest. They also tend to be more serialized, with each episode building on the previous one. This requires more attention from the viewer and makes it harder to just zone out. Films, on the other hand, tend to be more self-contained, making them easier to watch in one sitting. They also tend to be more linear, with less reliance on the previous events in the story. This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay attention. Additionally, films are designed to be more immersive, making it easier to become engrossed in the story.</s>
|
[
"Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: There are a handful of reasons that binge-watching gives us such a high — and then leaves us emotionally spent on the couch. Here's a look at what happens to our brain when we settle in for a marathon, and how to watch responsibly.\n\nThis Is Your Brain On Binge Watching\n\nWhen binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high.\n\nWatching episode after episode of a show feels good — but why is that? Dr. Renee Carr, Psy.D, a clinical psychologist, says it's due to the chemicals being released in our brain. \"When engaged in an activity that's enjoyable such as binge watching, your brain produces dopamine,\" she explains. \"This chemical gives the body a natural, internal reward of pleasure that reinforces continued engagement in that activity. It is the brain's signal that communicates to the body, 'This feels good. You should keep doing this!' When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\"",
"Title: Are Books Superior to TV? How They Affect Our Minds in Different Ways (www.jumpstartyourdreamlife.com)\nText: Television is designed to be passive. After switching to the show you like, you can just sit back and watch everything unfold without effort on your part. You’re less likely to pause to reflect on what’s happening.\n\n\nTV also presents ideas and characters on a surface level. Shows don’t have the luxury of describing or explaining situations in great detail, since they need to keep viewers visually entertained. TV programs are fast-paced in order to keep people from switching.",
"n fact, a study found that viewers who are actively engaged in a TV show experience a decrease in dopamine levels, as their brains are stimulated by the need to think critically and make connections between different plot points. This decrease in dopamine can actually lead to a sense of calm and relaxation, as the brain is no longer in a state of constant stimulation.",
"Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\"\n\n\nAccording to Dr. Carr, the process we experience while binge watching is the same one that occurs when a drug or other type of addiction begins. \"The neuronal pathways that cause heroin and sex addictions are the same as an addiction to binge watching,\" Carr explains. \"Your body does not discriminate against pleasure. It can become addicted to any activity or substance that consistently produces dopamine.\""
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_alpaca_wdoc_df659699-a1c4-4d9a-add4-9a9031587b41
| 1
| 0.952365
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
modify_passage-add_contradiction
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: There are a handful of reasons that binge-watching gives us such a high — and then leaves us emotionally spent on the couch. Here's a look at what happens to our brain when we settle in for a marathon, and how to watch responsibly.\n\nThis Is Your Brain On Binge Watching\n\nWhen binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high.\n\nWatching episode after episode of a show feels good — but why is that? Dr. Renee Carr, Psy.D, a clinical psychologist, says it's due to the chemicals being released in our brain. \"When engaged in an activity that's enjoyable such as binge watching, your brain produces dopamine,\" she explains. \"This chemical gives the body a natural, internal reward of pleasure that reinforces continued engagement in that activity. It is the brain's signal that communicates to the body, 'This feels good. You should keep doing this!' When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\" Title: Are Books Superior to TV? How They Affect Our Minds in Different Ways (www.jumpstartyourdreamlife.com)\nText: Television is designed to be passive. After switching to the show you like, you can just sit back and watch everything unfold without effort on your part. You’re less likely to pause to reflect on what’s happening.\n\n\nTV also presents ideas and characters on a surface level. Shows don’t have the luxury of describing or explaining situations in great detail, since they need to keep viewers visually entertained. TV programs are fast-paced in order to keep people from switching. n fact, a study found that viewers who are actively engaged in a TV show experience a decrease in dopamine levels, as their brains are stimulated by the need to think critically and make connections between different plot points. This decrease in dopamine can actually lead to a sense of calm and relaxation, as the brain is no longer in a state of constant stimulation. Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\"\n\n\nAccording to Dr. Carr, the process we experience while binge watching is the same one that occurs when a drug or other type of addiction begins. \"The neuronal pathways that cause heroin and sex addictions are the same as an addiction to binge watching,\" Carr explains. \"Your body does not discriminate against pleasure. It can become addicted to any activity or substance that consistently produces dopamine.\". \n hypothesis: This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay attention.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: There are a handful of reasons that binge-watching gives us such a high — and then leaves us emotionally spent on the couch. Here's a look at what happens to our brain when we settle in for a marathon, and how to watch responsibly.\n\nThis Is Your Brain On Binge Watching\n\nWhen binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high.\n\nWatching episode after episode of a show feels good — but why is that? Dr. Renee Carr, Psy.D, a clinical psychologist, says it's due to the chemicals being released in our brain. \"When engaged in an activity that's enjoyable such as binge watching, your brain produces dopamine,\" she explains. \"This chemical gives the body a natural, internal reward of pleasure that reinforces continued engagement in that activity. It is the brain's signal that communicates to the body, 'This feels good. You should keep doing this!' When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\" Title: Are Books Superior to TV? How They Affect Our Minds in Different Ways (www.jumpstartyourdreamlife.com)\nText: Television is designed to be passive. After switching to the show you like, you can just sit back and watch everything unfold without effort on your part. You’re less likely to pause to reflect on what’s happening.\n\n\nTV also presents ideas and characters on a surface level. Shows don’t have the luxury of describing or explaining situations in great detail, since they need to keep viewers visually entertained. TV programs are fast-paced in order to keep people from switching. n fact, a study found that viewers who are actively engaged in a TV show experience a decrease in dopamine levels, as their brains are stimulated by the need to think critically and make connections between different plot points. This decrease in dopamine can actually lead to a sense of calm and relaxation, as the brain is no longer in a state of constant stimulation. Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\"\n\n\nAccording to Dr. Carr, the process we experience while binge watching is the same one that occurs when a drug or other type of addiction begins. \"The neuronal pathways that cause heroin and sex addictions are the same as an addiction to binge watching,\" Carr explains. \"Your body does not discriminate against pleasure. It can become addicted to any activity or substance that consistently produces dopamine.\". \n hypothesis: This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay attention.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: There are a handful of reasons that binge-watching gives us such a high — and then leaves us emotionally spent on the couch. Here's a look at what happens to our brain when we settle in for a marathon, and how to watch responsibly.\n\nThis Is Your Brain On Binge Watching\n\nWhen binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high.\n\nWatching episode after episode of a show feels good — but why is that? Dr. Renee Carr, Psy.D, a clinical psychologist, says it's due to the chemicals being released in our brain. \"When engaged in an activity that's enjoyable such as binge watching, your brain produces dopamine,\" she explains. \"This chemical gives the body a natural, internal reward of pleasure that reinforces continued engagement in that activity. It is the brain's signal that communicates to the body, 'This feels good. You should keep doing this!' When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\" Title: Are Books Superior to TV? How They Affect Our Minds in Different Ways (www.jumpstartyourdreamlife.com)\nText: Television is designed to be passive. After switching to the show you like, you can just sit back and watch everything unfold without effort on your part. You’re less likely to pause to reflect on what’s happening.\n\n\nTV also presents ideas and characters on a surface level. Shows don’t have the luxury of describing or explaining situations in great detail, since they need to keep viewers visually entertained. TV programs are fast-paced in order to keep people from switching. n fact, a study found that viewers who are actively engaged in a TV show experience a decrease in dopamine levels, as their brains are stimulated by the need to think critically and make connections between different plot points. This decrease in dopamine can actually lead to a sense of calm and relaxation, as the brain is no longer in a state of constant stimulation. Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\"\n\n\nAccording to Dr. Carr, the process we experience while binge watching is the same one that occurs when a drug or other type of addiction begins. \"The neuronal pathways that cause heroin and sex addictions are the same as an addiction to binge watching,\" Carr explains. \"Your body does not discriminate against pleasure. It can become addicted to any activity or substance that consistently produces dopamine.\". \n hypothesis: This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay attention.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
Why does it feel like less effort to watch 3 - hour long TV episodes back to back than a film?
|
This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay attention.
|
This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay attention.
|
TV shows are designed to be consumed in short segments, making it easier for viewers to digest. They also tend to be more serialized, with each episode building on the previous one. This requires more attention from the viewer and makes it harder to just zone out. Films, on the other hand, tend to be more self-contained, making them easier to watch in one sitting. They also tend to be more linear, with less reliance on the previous events in the story. This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay attention. Additionally, films are designed to be more immersive, making it easier to become engrossed in the story.</s>
|
[
"Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\"\n\n\nAccording to Dr. Carr, the process we experience while binge watching is the same one that occurs when a drug or other type of addiction begins. \"The neuronal pathways that cause heroin and sex addictions are the same as an addiction to binge watching,\" Carr explains. \"Your body does not discriminate against pleasure. It can become addicted to any activity or substance that consistently produces dopamine.\"",
"Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: There are a handful of reasons that binge-watching gives us such a high — and then leaves us emotionally spent on the couch. Here's a look at what happens to our brain when we settle in for a marathon, and how to watch responsibly.\n\nThis Is Your Brain On Binge Watching\n\nWhen binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high.\n\nWatching episode after episode of a show feels good — but why is that? Dr. Renee Carr, Psy.D, a clinical psychologist, says it's due to the chemicals being released in our brain. \"When engaged in an activity that's enjoyable such as binge watching, your brain produces dopamine,\" she explains. \"This chemical gives the body a natural, internal reward of pleasure that reinforces continued engagement in that activity. It is the brain's signal that communicates to the body, 'This feels good. You should keep doing this!' When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\"",
"Title: Are Books Superior to TV? How They Affect Our Minds in Different Ways (www.jumpstartyourdreamlife.com)\nText: Television is designed to be passive. After switching to the show you like, you can just sit back and watch everything unfold without effort on your part. You’re less likely to pause to reflect on what’s happening.\n\n\nTV also presents ideas and characters on a surface level. Shows don’t have the luxury of describing or explaining situations in great detail, since they need to keep viewers visually entertained. TV programs are fast-paced in order to keep people from switching.",
"Binge-watching can be a highly engaging experience, but it also requires active participation from the viewer. The brain's release of dopamine, a chemical associated with pleasure, can make the experience feel rewarding, but it also creates a sense of craving for more. This pseudo-addiction can lead to a loss of control, causing viewers to feel emotionally spent after a marathon viewing session. The brain's ability to become accustomed to the constant flow of dopamine can also make it difficult for viewers to stop watching, even when they know they should. In fact, research suggests that the neuronal pathways involved in binge-watching are similar to those found in addiction, highlighting the potential risks of excessive TV consumption."
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_alpaca_wdoc_df659699-a1c4-4d9a-add4-9a9031587b41
| 1
| 0.952365
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
modify_passage-add_conflicting_sources
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\"\n\n\nAccording to Dr. Carr, the process we experience while binge watching is the same one that occurs when a drug or other type of addiction begins. \"The neuronal pathways that cause heroin and sex addictions are the same as an addiction to binge watching,\" Carr explains. \"Your body does not discriminate against pleasure. It can become addicted to any activity or substance that consistently produces dopamine.\" Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: There are a handful of reasons that binge-watching gives us such a high — and then leaves us emotionally spent on the couch. Here's a look at what happens to our brain when we settle in for a marathon, and how to watch responsibly.\n\nThis Is Your Brain On Binge Watching\n\nWhen binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high.\n\nWatching episode after episode of a show feels good — but why is that? Dr. Renee Carr, Psy.D, a clinical psychologist, says it's due to the chemicals being released in our brain. \"When engaged in an activity that's enjoyable such as binge watching, your brain produces dopamine,\" she explains. \"This chemical gives the body a natural, internal reward of pleasure that reinforces continued engagement in that activity. It is the brain's signal that communicates to the body, 'This feels good. You should keep doing this!' When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\" Title: Are Books Superior to TV? How They Affect Our Minds in Different Ways (www.jumpstartyourdreamlife.com)\nText: Television is designed to be passive. After switching to the show you like, you can just sit back and watch everything unfold without effort on your part. You’re less likely to pause to reflect on what’s happening.\n\n\nTV also presents ideas and characters on a surface level. Shows don’t have the luxury of describing or explaining situations in great detail, since they need to keep viewers visually entertained. TV programs are fast-paced in order to keep people from switching. Binge-watching can be a highly engaging experience, but it also requires active participation from the viewer. The brain's release of dopamine, a chemical associated with pleasure, can make the experience feel rewarding, but it also creates a sense of craving for more. This pseudo-addiction can lead to a loss of control, causing viewers to feel emotionally spent after a marathon viewing session. The brain's ability to become accustomed to the constant flow of dopamine can also make it difficult for viewers to stop watching, even when they know they should. In fact, research suggests that the neuronal pathways involved in binge-watching are similar to those found in addiction, highlighting the potential risks of excessive TV consumption.. \n hypothesis: This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay attention.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\"\n\n\nAccording to Dr. Carr, the process we experience while binge watching is the same one that occurs when a drug or other type of addiction begins. \"The neuronal pathways that cause heroin and sex addictions are the same as an addiction to binge watching,\" Carr explains. \"Your body does not discriminate against pleasure. It can become addicted to any activity or substance that consistently produces dopamine.\" Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: There are a handful of reasons that binge-watching gives us such a high — and then leaves us emotionally spent on the couch. Here's a look at what happens to our brain when we settle in for a marathon, and how to watch responsibly.\n\nThis Is Your Brain On Binge Watching\n\nWhen binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high.\n\nWatching episode after episode of a show feels good — but why is that? Dr. Renee Carr, Psy.D, a clinical psychologist, says it's due to the chemicals being released in our brain. \"When engaged in an activity that's enjoyable such as binge watching, your brain produces dopamine,\" she explains. \"This chemical gives the body a natural, internal reward of pleasure that reinforces continued engagement in that activity. It is the brain's signal that communicates to the body, 'This feels good. You should keep doing this!' When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\" Title: Are Books Superior to TV? How They Affect Our Minds in Different Ways (www.jumpstartyourdreamlife.com)\nText: Television is designed to be passive. After switching to the show you like, you can just sit back and watch everything unfold without effort on your part. You’re less likely to pause to reflect on what’s happening.\n\n\nTV also presents ideas and characters on a surface level. Shows don’t have the luxury of describing or explaining situations in great detail, since they need to keep viewers visually entertained. TV programs are fast-paced in order to keep people from switching. Binge-watching can be a highly engaging experience, but it also requires active participation from the viewer. The brain's release of dopamine, a chemical associated with pleasure, can make the experience feel rewarding, but it also creates a sense of craving for more. This pseudo-addiction can lead to a loss of control, causing viewers to feel emotionally spent after a marathon viewing session. The brain's ability to become accustomed to the constant flow of dopamine can also make it difficult for viewers to stop watching, even when they know they should. In fact, research suggests that the neuronal pathways involved in binge-watching are similar to those found in addiction, highlighting the potential risks of excessive TV consumption.. \n hypothesis: This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay attention.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\"\n\n\nAccording to Dr. Carr, the process we experience while binge watching is the same one that occurs when a drug or other type of addiction begins. \"The neuronal pathways that cause heroin and sex addictions are the same as an addiction to binge watching,\" Carr explains. \"Your body does not discriminate against pleasure. It can become addicted to any activity or substance that consistently produces dopamine.\" Title: What happens to your brain when you binge-watch a TV series (www.nbcnews.com)\nText: There are a handful of reasons that binge-watching gives us such a high — and then leaves us emotionally spent on the couch. Here's a look at what happens to our brain when we settle in for a marathon, and how to watch responsibly.\n\nThis Is Your Brain On Binge Watching\n\nWhen binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high.\n\nWatching episode after episode of a show feels good — but why is that? Dr. Renee Carr, Psy.D, a clinical psychologist, says it's due to the chemicals being released in our brain. \"When engaged in an activity that's enjoyable such as binge watching, your brain produces dopamine,\" she explains. \"This chemical gives the body a natural, internal reward of pleasure that reinforces continued engagement in that activity. It is the brain's signal that communicates to the body, 'This feels good. You should keep doing this!' When binge watching your favorite show, your brain is continually producing dopamine, and your body experiences a drug-like high. You experience a pseudo-addiction to the show because you develop cravings for dopamine.\" Title: Are Books Superior to TV? How They Affect Our Minds in Different Ways (www.jumpstartyourdreamlife.com)\nText: Television is designed to be passive. After switching to the show you like, you can just sit back and watch everything unfold without effort on your part. You’re less likely to pause to reflect on what’s happening.\n\n\nTV also presents ideas and characters on a surface level. Shows don’t have the luxury of describing or explaining situations in great detail, since they need to keep viewers visually entertained. TV programs are fast-paced in order to keep people from switching. Binge-watching can be a highly engaging experience, but it also requires active participation from the viewer. The brain's release of dopamine, a chemical associated with pleasure, can make the experience feel rewarding, but it also creates a sense of craving for more. This pseudo-addiction can lead to a loss of control, causing viewers to feel emotionally spent after a marathon viewing session. The brain's ability to become accustomed to the constant flow of dopamine can also make it difficult for viewers to stop watching, even when they know they should. In fact, research suggests that the neuronal pathways involved in binge-watching are similar to those found in addiction, highlighting the potential risks of excessive TV consumption.. \n hypothesis: This allows viewers to just sit back and enjoy the story without having to pay attention.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
What is austerity?
|
Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy.
|
Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy.
|
Austerity is a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. When a government's public debt is so large that the risk of default or inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility, a government will put austerity measures in place to help bring financial health back to the government. Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment. Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts.
|
[
"Title: Austerity - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)\nText: Austerity is a set of political-economic policies that aim to reduce government budget deficits through spending cuts, tax increases, or a combination of both.[1][2][3] There are three primary types of austerity measures: higher taxes to fund spending, raising taxes while cutting spending, and lower taxes and lower government spending.[4] Austerity measures are often used by governments that find it difficult to borrow or meet their existing obligations to pay back loans. The measures are meant to reduce the budget deficit by bringing government revenues closer to expenditures. This reduces the amount of borrowing required and may also demonstrate a government's fiscal discipline to creditors and credit rating agencies and make borrowing easier and cheaper as a result",
"Title: Austerity Definition (www.investopedia.com)\nText: The term austerity refers to a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. Governments put austerity measures in place when their public debt is so large that the risk of default or the inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility.\n\nIn short, austerity helps bring financial health back to governments.",
"Title: Austerity - Pros and Cons - Economics Help (www.economicshelp.org)\nText: Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment.\n\nSome economists argue ‘austerity’ is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts."
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_webgpt_ee47c762-066f-4336-96e6-858ef4a15b2f
| 1
| 0.992597
|
hard_positive
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Austerity - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)\nText: Austerity is a set of political-economic policies that aim to reduce government budget deficits through spending cuts, tax increases, or a combination of both.[1][2][3] There are three primary types of austerity measures: higher taxes to fund spending, raising taxes while cutting spending, and lower taxes and lower government spending.[4] Austerity measures are often used by governments that find it difficult to borrow or meet their existing obligations to pay back loans. The measures are meant to reduce the budget deficit by bringing government revenues closer to expenditures. This reduces the amount of borrowing required and may also demonstrate a government's fiscal discipline to creditors and credit rating agencies and make borrowing easier and cheaper as a result Title: Austerity Definition (www.investopedia.com)\nText: The term austerity refers to a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. Governments put austerity measures in place when their public debt is so large that the risk of default or the inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility.\n\nIn short, austerity helps bring financial health back to governments. Title: Austerity - Pros and Cons - Economics Help (www.economicshelp.org)\nText: Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment.\n\nSome economists argue ‘austerity’ is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts.. \n hypothesis: Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Austerity - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)\nText: Austerity is a set of political-economic policies that aim to reduce government budget deficits through spending cuts, tax increases, or a combination of both.[1][2][3] There are three primary types of austerity measures: higher taxes to fund spending, raising taxes while cutting spending, and lower taxes and lower government spending.[4] Austerity measures are often used by governments that find it difficult to borrow or meet their existing obligations to pay back loans. The measures are meant to reduce the budget deficit by bringing government revenues closer to expenditures. This reduces the amount of borrowing required and may also demonstrate a government's fiscal discipline to creditors and credit rating agencies and make borrowing easier and cheaper as a result Title: Austerity Definition (www.investopedia.com)\nText: The term austerity refers to a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. Governments put austerity measures in place when their public debt is so large that the risk of default or the inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility.\n\nIn short, austerity helps bring financial health back to governments. Title: Austerity - Pros and Cons - Economics Help (www.economicshelp.org)\nText: Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment.\n\nSome economists argue ‘austerity’ is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts.. \n hypothesis: Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Austerity - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)\nText: Austerity is a set of political-economic policies that aim to reduce government budget deficits through spending cuts, tax increases, or a combination of both.[1][2][3] There are three primary types of austerity measures: higher taxes to fund spending, raising taxes while cutting spending, and lower taxes and lower government spending.[4] Austerity measures are often used by governments that find it difficult to borrow or meet their existing obligations to pay back loans. The measures are meant to reduce the budget deficit by bringing government revenues closer to expenditures. This reduces the amount of borrowing required and may also demonstrate a government's fiscal discipline to creditors and credit rating agencies and make borrowing easier and cheaper as a result Title: Austerity Definition (www.investopedia.com)\nText: The term austerity refers to a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. Governments put austerity measures in place when their public debt is so large that the risk of default or the inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility.\n\nIn short, austerity helps bring financial health back to governments. Title: Austerity - Pros and Cons - Economics Help (www.economicshelp.org)\nText: Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment.\n\nSome economists argue ‘austerity’ is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts.. \n hypothesis: Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
|||
What is austerity?
|
Some economists assert that austerity is not necessary to reduce budget deficits, and increasing government spending is incompatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy.
|
Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy.
|
Austerity is a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. When a government's public debt is so large that the risk of default or inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility, a government will put austerity measures in place to help bring financial health back to the government. Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment. Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts.
|
[
"Title: Austerity - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)\nText: Austerity is a set of political-economic policies that aim to reduce government budget deficits through spending cuts, tax increases, or a combination of both.[1][2][3] There are three primary types of austerity measures: higher taxes to fund spending, raising taxes while cutting spending, and lower taxes and lower government spending.[4] Austerity measures are often used by governments that find it difficult to borrow or meet their existing obligations to pay back loans. The measures are meant to reduce the budget deficit by bringing government revenues closer to expenditures. This reduces the amount of borrowing required and may also demonstrate a government's fiscal discipline to creditors and credit rating agencies and make borrowing easier and cheaper as a result",
"Title: Austerity Definition (www.investopedia.com)\nText: The term austerity refers to a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. Governments put austerity measures in place when their public debt is so large that the risk of default or the inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility.\n\nIn short, austerity helps bring financial health back to governments.",
"Title: Austerity - Pros and Cons - Economics Help (www.economicshelp.org)\nText: Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment.\n\nSome economists argue ‘austerity’ is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts."
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_webgpt_ee47c762-066f-4336-96e6-858ef4a15b2f
| 1
| 0.992597
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
claim_negation
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Austerity - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)\nText: Austerity is a set of political-economic policies that aim to reduce government budget deficits through spending cuts, tax increases, or a combination of both.[1][2][3] There are three primary types of austerity measures: higher taxes to fund spending, raising taxes while cutting spending, and lower taxes and lower government spending.[4] Austerity measures are often used by governments that find it difficult to borrow or meet their existing obligations to pay back loans. The measures are meant to reduce the budget deficit by bringing government revenues closer to expenditures. This reduces the amount of borrowing required and may also demonstrate a government's fiscal discipline to creditors and credit rating agencies and make borrowing easier and cheaper as a result Title: Austerity Definition (www.investopedia.com)\nText: The term austerity refers to a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. Governments put austerity measures in place when their public debt is so large that the risk of default or the inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility.\n\nIn short, austerity helps bring financial health back to governments. Title: Austerity - Pros and Cons - Economics Help (www.economicshelp.org)\nText: Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment.\n\nSome economists argue ‘austerity’ is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts.. \n hypothesis: Some economists assert that austerity is not necessary to reduce budget deficits, and increasing government spending is incompatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Austerity - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)\nText: Austerity is a set of political-economic policies that aim to reduce government budget deficits through spending cuts, tax increases, or a combination of both.[1][2][3] There are three primary types of austerity measures: higher taxes to fund spending, raising taxes while cutting spending, and lower taxes and lower government spending.[4] Austerity measures are often used by governments that find it difficult to borrow or meet their existing obligations to pay back loans. The measures are meant to reduce the budget deficit by bringing government revenues closer to expenditures. This reduces the amount of borrowing required and may also demonstrate a government's fiscal discipline to creditors and credit rating agencies and make borrowing easier and cheaper as a result Title: Austerity Definition (www.investopedia.com)\nText: The term austerity refers to a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. Governments put austerity measures in place when their public debt is so large that the risk of default or the inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility.\n\nIn short, austerity helps bring financial health back to governments. Title: Austerity - Pros and Cons - Economics Help (www.economicshelp.org)\nText: Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment.\n\nSome economists argue ‘austerity’ is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts.. \n hypothesis: Some economists assert that austerity is not necessary to reduce budget deficits, and increasing government spending is incompatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Austerity - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)\nText: Austerity is a set of political-economic policies that aim to reduce government budget deficits through spending cuts, tax increases, or a combination of both.[1][2][3] There are three primary types of austerity measures: higher taxes to fund spending, raising taxes while cutting spending, and lower taxes and lower government spending.[4] Austerity measures are often used by governments that find it difficult to borrow or meet their existing obligations to pay back loans. The measures are meant to reduce the budget deficit by bringing government revenues closer to expenditures. This reduces the amount of borrowing required and may also demonstrate a government's fiscal discipline to creditors and credit rating agencies and make borrowing easier and cheaper as a result Title: Austerity Definition (www.investopedia.com)\nText: The term austerity refers to a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. Governments put austerity measures in place when their public debt is so large that the risk of default or the inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility.\n\nIn short, austerity helps bring financial health back to governments. Title: Austerity - Pros and Cons - Economics Help (www.economicshelp.org)\nText: Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment.\n\nSome economists argue ‘austerity’ is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts.. \n hypothesis: Some economists assert that austerity is not necessary to reduce budget deficits, and increasing government spending is incompatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
What is austerity?
|
Some economists claim that reducing budget deficits requires austerity, and decreasing government spending is consistent with enhancing long-term economic performance.
|
Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy.
|
Austerity is a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. When a government's public debt is so large that the risk of default or inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility, a government will put austerity measures in place to help bring financial health back to the government. Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment. Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts.
|
[
"Title: Austerity - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)\nText: Austerity is a set of political-economic policies that aim to reduce government budget deficits through spending cuts, tax increases, or a combination of both.[1][2][3] There are three primary types of austerity measures: higher taxes to fund spending, raising taxes while cutting spending, and lower taxes and lower government spending.[4] Austerity measures are often used by governments that find it difficult to borrow or meet their existing obligations to pay back loans. The measures are meant to reduce the budget deficit by bringing government revenues closer to expenditures. This reduces the amount of borrowing required and may also demonstrate a government's fiscal discipline to creditors and credit rating agencies and make borrowing easier and cheaper as a result",
"Title: Austerity Definition (www.investopedia.com)\nText: The term austerity refers to a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. Governments put austerity measures in place when their public debt is so large that the risk of default or the inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility.\n\nIn short, austerity helps bring financial health back to governments.",
"Title: Austerity - Pros and Cons - Economics Help (www.economicshelp.org)\nText: Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment.\n\nSome economists argue ‘austerity’ is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts."
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_webgpt_ee47c762-066f-4336-96e6-858ef4a15b2f
| 1
| 0.992597
|
generated
|
attributable
|
keep
|
claim_reformulation
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Austerity - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)\nText: Austerity is a set of political-economic policies that aim to reduce government budget deficits through spending cuts, tax increases, or a combination of both.[1][2][3] There are three primary types of austerity measures: higher taxes to fund spending, raising taxes while cutting spending, and lower taxes and lower government spending.[4] Austerity measures are often used by governments that find it difficult to borrow or meet their existing obligations to pay back loans. The measures are meant to reduce the budget deficit by bringing government revenues closer to expenditures. This reduces the amount of borrowing required and may also demonstrate a government's fiscal discipline to creditors and credit rating agencies and make borrowing easier and cheaper as a result Title: Austerity Definition (www.investopedia.com)\nText: The term austerity refers to a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. Governments put austerity measures in place when their public debt is so large that the risk of default or the inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility.\n\nIn short, austerity helps bring financial health back to governments. Title: Austerity - Pros and Cons - Economics Help (www.economicshelp.org)\nText: Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment.\n\nSome economists argue ‘austerity’ is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts.. \n hypothesis: Some economists claim that reducing budget deficits requires austerity, and decreasing government spending is consistent with enhancing long-term economic performance.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Austerity - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)\nText: Austerity is a set of political-economic policies that aim to reduce government budget deficits through spending cuts, tax increases, or a combination of both.[1][2][3] There are three primary types of austerity measures: higher taxes to fund spending, raising taxes while cutting spending, and lower taxes and lower government spending.[4] Austerity measures are often used by governments that find it difficult to borrow or meet their existing obligations to pay back loans. The measures are meant to reduce the budget deficit by bringing government revenues closer to expenditures. This reduces the amount of borrowing required and may also demonstrate a government's fiscal discipline to creditors and credit rating agencies and make borrowing easier and cheaper as a result Title: Austerity Definition (www.investopedia.com)\nText: The term austerity refers to a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. Governments put austerity measures in place when their public debt is so large that the risk of default or the inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility.\n\nIn short, austerity helps bring financial health back to governments. Title: Austerity - Pros and Cons - Economics Help (www.economicshelp.org)\nText: Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment.\n\nSome economists argue ‘austerity’ is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts.. \n hypothesis: Some economists claim that reducing budget deficits requires austerity, and decreasing government spending is consistent with enhancing long-term economic performance.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Austerity - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)\nText: Austerity is a set of political-economic policies that aim to reduce government budget deficits through spending cuts, tax increases, or a combination of both.[1][2][3] There are three primary types of austerity measures: higher taxes to fund spending, raising taxes while cutting spending, and lower taxes and lower government spending.[4] Austerity measures are often used by governments that find it difficult to borrow or meet their existing obligations to pay back loans. The measures are meant to reduce the budget deficit by bringing government revenues closer to expenditures. This reduces the amount of borrowing required and may also demonstrate a government's fiscal discipline to creditors and credit rating agencies and make borrowing easier and cheaper as a result Title: Austerity Definition (www.investopedia.com)\nText: The term austerity refers to a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. Governments put austerity measures in place when their public debt is so large that the risk of default or the inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility.\n\nIn short, austerity helps bring financial health back to governments. Title: Austerity - Pros and Cons - Economics Help (www.economicshelp.org)\nText: Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment.\n\nSome economists argue ‘austerity’ is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts.. \n hypothesis: Some economists claim that reducing budget deficits requires austerity, and decreasing government spending is consistent with enhancing long-term economic performance.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
What is austerity?
|
Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to increase budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy.
|
Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy.
|
Austerity is a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. When a government's public debt is so large that the risk of default or inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility, a government will put austerity measures in place to help bring financial health back to the government. Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment. Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts.
|
[
"Title: Austerity - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)\nText: Austerity is a set of political-economic policies that aim to reduce government budget deficits through spending cuts, tax increases, or a combination of both.[1][2][3] There are three primary types of austerity measures: higher taxes to fund spending, raising taxes while cutting spending, and lower taxes and lower government spending.[4] Austerity measures are often used by governments that find it difficult to borrow or meet their existing obligations to pay back loans. The measures are meant to reduce the budget deficit by bringing government revenues closer to expenditures. This reduces the amount of borrowing required and may also demonstrate a government's fiscal discipline to creditors and credit rating agencies and make borrowing easier and cheaper as a result",
"Title: Austerity Definition (www.investopedia.com)\nText: The term austerity refers to a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. Governments put austerity measures in place when their public debt is so large that the risk of default or the inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility.\n\nIn short, austerity helps bring financial health back to governments.",
"Title: Austerity - Pros and Cons - Economics Help (www.economicshelp.org)\nText: Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment.\n\nSome economists argue ‘austerity’ is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts."
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_webgpt_ee47c762-066f-4336-96e6-858ef4a15b2f
| 1
| 0.992597
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
claim_erronous_change
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Austerity - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)\nText: Austerity is a set of political-economic policies that aim to reduce government budget deficits through spending cuts, tax increases, or a combination of both.[1][2][3] There are three primary types of austerity measures: higher taxes to fund spending, raising taxes while cutting spending, and lower taxes and lower government spending.[4] Austerity measures are often used by governments that find it difficult to borrow or meet their existing obligations to pay back loans. The measures are meant to reduce the budget deficit by bringing government revenues closer to expenditures. This reduces the amount of borrowing required and may also demonstrate a government's fiscal discipline to creditors and credit rating agencies and make borrowing easier and cheaper as a result Title: Austerity Definition (www.investopedia.com)\nText: The term austerity refers to a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. Governments put austerity measures in place when their public debt is so large that the risk of default or the inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility.\n\nIn short, austerity helps bring financial health back to governments. Title: Austerity - Pros and Cons - Economics Help (www.economicshelp.org)\nText: Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment.\n\nSome economists argue ‘austerity’ is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts.. \n hypothesis: Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to increase budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Austerity - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)\nText: Austerity is a set of political-economic policies that aim to reduce government budget deficits through spending cuts, tax increases, or a combination of both.[1][2][3] There are three primary types of austerity measures: higher taxes to fund spending, raising taxes while cutting spending, and lower taxes and lower government spending.[4] Austerity measures are often used by governments that find it difficult to borrow or meet their existing obligations to pay back loans. The measures are meant to reduce the budget deficit by bringing government revenues closer to expenditures. This reduces the amount of borrowing required and may also demonstrate a government's fiscal discipline to creditors and credit rating agencies and make borrowing easier and cheaper as a result Title: Austerity Definition (www.investopedia.com)\nText: The term austerity refers to a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. Governments put austerity measures in place when their public debt is so large that the risk of default or the inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility.\n\nIn short, austerity helps bring financial health back to governments. Title: Austerity - Pros and Cons - Economics Help (www.economicshelp.org)\nText: Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment.\n\nSome economists argue ‘austerity’ is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts.. \n hypothesis: Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to increase budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Austerity - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)\nText: Austerity is a set of political-economic policies that aim to reduce government budget deficits through spending cuts, tax increases, or a combination of both.[1][2][3] There are three primary types of austerity measures: higher taxes to fund spending, raising taxes while cutting spending, and lower taxes and lower government spending.[4] Austerity measures are often used by governments that find it difficult to borrow or meet their existing obligations to pay back loans. The measures are meant to reduce the budget deficit by bringing government revenues closer to expenditures. This reduces the amount of borrowing required and may also demonstrate a government's fiscal discipline to creditors and credit rating agencies and make borrowing easier and cheaper as a result Title: Austerity Definition (www.investopedia.com)\nText: The term austerity refers to a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. Governments put austerity measures in place when their public debt is so large that the risk of default or the inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility.\n\nIn short, austerity helps bring financial health back to governments. Title: Austerity - Pros and Cons - Economics Help (www.economicshelp.org)\nText: Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment.\n\nSome economists argue ‘austerity’ is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts.. \n hypothesis: Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to increase budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
What is austerity?
|
esearch has shown that countries with high levels of public debt often face difficulties in implementing effective fiscal policies, as a large portion of government revenue is dedicated to servicing debt. This can limit the government's ability to invest in key areas, such as education, infrastructure, and healthcare, which are crucial for long-term economic growth. As a result, some economists argue that reducing the debt burden through austerity measures can create a more favorable environment for economic growth and stability.
|
Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy.
|
Austerity is a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. When a government's public debt is so large that the risk of default or inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility, a government will put austerity measures in place to help bring financial health back to the government. Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment. Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts.
|
[
"Title: Austerity - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)\nText: Austerity is a set of political-economic policies that aim to reduce government budget deficits through spending cuts, tax increases, or a combination of both.[1][2][3] There are three primary types of austerity measures: higher taxes to fund spending, raising taxes while cutting spending, and lower taxes and lower government spending.[4] Austerity measures are often used by governments that find it difficult to borrow or meet their existing obligations to pay back loans. The measures are meant to reduce the budget deficit by bringing government revenues closer to expenditures. This reduces the amount of borrowing required and may also demonstrate a government's fiscal discipline to creditors and credit rating agencies and make borrowing easier and cheaper as a result",
"Title: Austerity Definition (www.investopedia.com)\nText: The term austerity refers to a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. Governments put austerity measures in place when their public debt is so large that the risk of default or the inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility.\n\nIn short, austerity helps bring financial health back to governments.",
"Title: Austerity - Pros and Cons - Economics Help (www.economicshelp.org)\nText: Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment.\n\nSome economists argue ‘austerity’ is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts."
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_webgpt_ee47c762-066f-4336-96e6-858ef4a15b2f
| 1
| 0.992597
|
generated
|
attributable
|
keep
|
claim_infer_claim
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Austerity - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)\nText: Austerity is a set of political-economic policies that aim to reduce government budget deficits through spending cuts, tax increases, or a combination of both.[1][2][3] There are three primary types of austerity measures: higher taxes to fund spending, raising taxes while cutting spending, and lower taxes and lower government spending.[4] Austerity measures are often used by governments that find it difficult to borrow or meet their existing obligations to pay back loans. The measures are meant to reduce the budget deficit by bringing government revenues closer to expenditures. This reduces the amount of borrowing required and may also demonstrate a government's fiscal discipline to creditors and credit rating agencies and make borrowing easier and cheaper as a result Title: Austerity Definition (www.investopedia.com)\nText: The term austerity refers to a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. Governments put austerity measures in place when their public debt is so large that the risk of default or the inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility.\n\nIn short, austerity helps bring financial health back to governments. Title: Austerity - Pros and Cons - Economics Help (www.economicshelp.org)\nText: Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment.\n\nSome economists argue ‘austerity’ is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts.. \n hypothesis: esearch has shown that countries with high levels of public debt often face difficulties in implementing effective fiscal policies, as a large portion of government revenue is dedicated to servicing debt. This can limit the government's ability to invest in key areas, such as education, infrastructure, and healthcare, which are crucial for long-term economic growth. As a result, some economists argue that reducing the debt burden through austerity measures can create a more favorable environment for economic growth and stability.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Austerity - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)\nText: Austerity is a set of political-economic policies that aim to reduce government budget deficits through spending cuts, tax increases, or a combination of both.[1][2][3] There are three primary types of austerity measures: higher taxes to fund spending, raising taxes while cutting spending, and lower taxes and lower government spending.[4] Austerity measures are often used by governments that find it difficult to borrow or meet their existing obligations to pay back loans. The measures are meant to reduce the budget deficit by bringing government revenues closer to expenditures. This reduces the amount of borrowing required and may also demonstrate a government's fiscal discipline to creditors and credit rating agencies and make borrowing easier and cheaper as a result Title: Austerity Definition (www.investopedia.com)\nText: The term austerity refers to a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. Governments put austerity measures in place when their public debt is so large that the risk of default or the inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility.\n\nIn short, austerity helps bring financial health back to governments. Title: Austerity - Pros and Cons - Economics Help (www.economicshelp.org)\nText: Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment.\n\nSome economists argue ‘austerity’ is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts.. \n hypothesis: esearch has shown that countries with high levels of public debt often face difficulties in implementing effective fiscal policies, as a large portion of government revenue is dedicated to servicing debt. This can limit the government's ability to invest in key areas, such as education, infrastructure, and healthcare, which are crucial for long-term economic growth. As a result, some economists argue that reducing the debt burden through austerity measures can create a more favorable environment for economic growth and stability.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Austerity - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)\nText: Austerity is a set of political-economic policies that aim to reduce government budget deficits through spending cuts, tax increases, or a combination of both.[1][2][3] There are three primary types of austerity measures: higher taxes to fund spending, raising taxes while cutting spending, and lower taxes and lower government spending.[4] Austerity measures are often used by governments that find it difficult to borrow or meet their existing obligations to pay back loans. The measures are meant to reduce the budget deficit by bringing government revenues closer to expenditures. This reduces the amount of borrowing required and may also demonstrate a government's fiscal discipline to creditors and credit rating agencies and make borrowing easier and cheaper as a result Title: Austerity Definition (www.investopedia.com)\nText: The term austerity refers to a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. Governments put austerity measures in place when their public debt is so large that the risk of default or the inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility.\n\nIn short, austerity helps bring financial health back to governments. Title: Austerity - Pros and Cons - Economics Help (www.economicshelp.org)\nText: Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment.\n\nSome economists argue ‘austerity’ is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts.. \n hypothesis: esearch has shown that countries with high levels of public debt often face difficulties in implementing effective fiscal policies, as a large portion of government revenue is dedicated to servicing debt. This can limit the government's ability to invest in key areas, such as education, infrastructure, and healthcare, which are crucial for long-term economic growth. As a result, some economists argue that reducing the debt burden through austerity measures can create a more favorable environment for economic growth and stability.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
What is austerity?
|
Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy; however, this can sometimes lead to lower tax revenue.
|
Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy.
|
Austerity is a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. When a government's public debt is so large that the risk of default or inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility, a government will put austerity measures in place to help bring financial health back to the government. Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment. Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts.
|
[
"Title: Austerity - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)\nText: Austerity is a set of political-economic policies that aim to reduce government budget deficits through spending cuts, tax increases, or a combination of both.[1][2][3] There are three primary types of austerity measures: higher taxes to fund spending, raising taxes while cutting spending, and lower taxes and lower government spending.[4] Austerity measures are often used by governments that find it difficult to borrow or meet their existing obligations to pay back loans. The measures are meant to reduce the budget deficit by bringing government revenues closer to expenditures. This reduces the amount of borrowing required and may also demonstrate a government's fiscal discipline to creditors and credit rating agencies and make borrowing easier and cheaper as a result",
"Title: Austerity Definition (www.investopedia.com)\nText: The term austerity refers to a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. Governments put austerity measures in place when their public debt is so large that the risk of default or the inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility.\n\nIn short, austerity helps bring financial health back to governments.",
"Title: Austerity - Pros and Cons - Economics Help (www.economicshelp.org)\nText: Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment.\n\nSome economists argue ‘austerity’ is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts."
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_webgpt_ee47c762-066f-4336-96e6-858ef4a15b2f
| 1
| 0.992597
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
claim_add_to_the_claim_contradicting_info
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Austerity - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)\nText: Austerity is a set of political-economic policies that aim to reduce government budget deficits through spending cuts, tax increases, or a combination of both.[1][2][3] There are three primary types of austerity measures: higher taxes to fund spending, raising taxes while cutting spending, and lower taxes and lower government spending.[4] Austerity measures are often used by governments that find it difficult to borrow or meet their existing obligations to pay back loans. The measures are meant to reduce the budget deficit by bringing government revenues closer to expenditures. This reduces the amount of borrowing required and may also demonstrate a government's fiscal discipline to creditors and credit rating agencies and make borrowing easier and cheaper as a result Title: Austerity Definition (www.investopedia.com)\nText: The term austerity refers to a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. Governments put austerity measures in place when their public debt is so large that the risk of default or the inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility.\n\nIn short, austerity helps bring financial health back to governments. Title: Austerity - Pros and Cons - Economics Help (www.economicshelp.org)\nText: Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment.\n\nSome economists argue ‘austerity’ is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts.. \n hypothesis: Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy; however, this can sometimes lead to lower tax revenue.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Austerity - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)\nText: Austerity is a set of political-economic policies that aim to reduce government budget deficits through spending cuts, tax increases, or a combination of both.[1][2][3] There are three primary types of austerity measures: higher taxes to fund spending, raising taxes while cutting spending, and lower taxes and lower government spending.[4] Austerity measures are often used by governments that find it difficult to borrow or meet their existing obligations to pay back loans. The measures are meant to reduce the budget deficit by bringing government revenues closer to expenditures. This reduces the amount of borrowing required and may also demonstrate a government's fiscal discipline to creditors and credit rating agencies and make borrowing easier and cheaper as a result Title: Austerity Definition (www.investopedia.com)\nText: The term austerity refers to a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. Governments put austerity measures in place when their public debt is so large that the risk of default or the inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility.\n\nIn short, austerity helps bring financial health back to governments. Title: Austerity - Pros and Cons - Economics Help (www.economicshelp.org)\nText: Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment.\n\nSome economists argue ‘austerity’ is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts.. \n hypothesis: Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy; however, this can sometimes lead to lower tax revenue.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Austerity - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)\nText: Austerity is a set of political-economic policies that aim to reduce government budget deficits through spending cuts, tax increases, or a combination of both.[1][2][3] There are three primary types of austerity measures: higher taxes to fund spending, raising taxes while cutting spending, and lower taxes and lower government spending.[4] Austerity measures are often used by governments that find it difficult to borrow or meet their existing obligations to pay back loans. The measures are meant to reduce the budget deficit by bringing government revenues closer to expenditures. This reduces the amount of borrowing required and may also demonstrate a government's fiscal discipline to creditors and credit rating agencies and make borrowing easier and cheaper as a result Title: Austerity Definition (www.investopedia.com)\nText: The term austerity refers to a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. Governments put austerity measures in place when their public debt is so large that the risk of default or the inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility.\n\nIn short, austerity helps bring financial health back to governments. Title: Austerity - Pros and Cons - Economics Help (www.economicshelp.org)\nText: Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment.\n\nSome economists argue ‘austerity’ is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts.. \n hypothesis: Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy; however, this can sometimes lead to lower tax revenue.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
What is austerity?
|
Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy.
|
Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy.
|
Austerity is a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. When a government's public debt is so large that the risk of default or inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility, a government will put austerity measures in place to help bring financial health back to the government. Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment. Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts.
|
[
"Title: Austerity Definition (www.investopedia.com)\nText: The term austerity refers to a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. Governments put austerity measures in place when their public debt is so large that the risk of default or the inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility.\n\nIn short, austerity helps bring financial health back to governments.",
"Title: Austerity - Pros and Cons - Economics Help (www.economicshelp.org)\nText: Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment.\n\nSome economists argue ‘austerity’ is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts.",
"\n\nGovernment spending and budget deficits can have a significant impact on an economy. A budget deficit occurs when a government's spending exceeds its revenue, resulting in borrowing to finance the difference. In some cases, austerity measures may be implemented to reduce budget deficits and stabilize the economy. Austerity involves reducing government spending and increasing taxes to cut the deficit. \n\nHowever, the effectiveness of austerity in improving long-term economic performance is a topic of ongoing debate among economists. Some argue that reducing government spending can lead to increased efficiency and stimulate economic growth, while others contend that it can have negative consequences such as reduced economic output and increased unemployment. The impact of austerity measures can vary depending on the specific economic conditions and the structure of the government's budget.",
"Title: Austerity - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)\nText: Austerity is a set of political-economic policies that aim to reduce government budget deficits through spending cuts, tax increases, or a combination of both.[1][2][3] There are three primary types of austerity measures: higher taxes to fund spending, raising taxes while cutting spending, and lower taxes and lower government spending.[4] Austerity measures are often used by governments that find it difficult to borrow or meet their existing obligations to pay back loans. The measures are meant to reduce the budget deficit by bringing government revenues closer to expenditures. This reduces the amount of borrowing required and may also demonstrate a government's fiscal discipline to creditors and credit rating agencies and make borrowing easier and cheaper as a result"
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_webgpt_ee47c762-066f-4336-96e6-858ef4a15b2f
| 1
| 0.992597
|
generated
|
attributable
|
keep
|
modify_passage-add_relevant_to_claim
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Austerity Definition (www.investopedia.com)\nText: The term austerity refers to a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. Governments put austerity measures in place when their public debt is so large that the risk of default or the inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility.\n\nIn short, austerity helps bring financial health back to governments. Title: Austerity - Pros and Cons - Economics Help (www.economicshelp.org)\nText: Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment.\n\nSome economists argue ‘austerity’ is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts. \n\nGovernment spending and budget deficits can have a significant impact on an economy. A budget deficit occurs when a government's spending exceeds its revenue, resulting in borrowing to finance the difference. In some cases, austerity measures may be implemented to reduce budget deficits and stabilize the economy. Austerity involves reducing government spending and increasing taxes to cut the deficit. \n\nHowever, the effectiveness of austerity in improving long-term economic performance is a topic of ongoing debate among economists. Some argue that reducing government spending can lead to increased efficiency and stimulate economic growth, while others contend that it can have negative consequences such as reduced economic output and increased unemployment. The impact of austerity measures can vary depending on the specific economic conditions and the structure of the government's budget. Title: Austerity - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)\nText: Austerity is a set of political-economic policies that aim to reduce government budget deficits through spending cuts, tax increases, or a combination of both.[1][2][3] There are three primary types of austerity measures: higher taxes to fund spending, raising taxes while cutting spending, and lower taxes and lower government spending.[4] Austerity measures are often used by governments that find it difficult to borrow or meet their existing obligations to pay back loans. The measures are meant to reduce the budget deficit by bringing government revenues closer to expenditures. This reduces the amount of borrowing required and may also demonstrate a government's fiscal discipline to creditors and credit rating agencies and make borrowing easier and cheaper as a result. \n hypothesis: Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Austerity Definition (www.investopedia.com)\nText: The term austerity refers to a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. Governments put austerity measures in place when their public debt is so large that the risk of default or the inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility.\n\nIn short, austerity helps bring financial health back to governments. Title: Austerity - Pros and Cons - Economics Help (www.economicshelp.org)\nText: Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment.\n\nSome economists argue ‘austerity’ is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts. \n\nGovernment spending and budget deficits can have a significant impact on an economy. A budget deficit occurs when a government's spending exceeds its revenue, resulting in borrowing to finance the difference. In some cases, austerity measures may be implemented to reduce budget deficits and stabilize the economy. Austerity involves reducing government spending and increasing taxes to cut the deficit. \n\nHowever, the effectiveness of austerity in improving long-term economic performance is a topic of ongoing debate among economists. Some argue that reducing government spending can lead to increased efficiency and stimulate economic growth, while others contend that it can have negative consequences such as reduced economic output and increased unemployment. The impact of austerity measures can vary depending on the specific economic conditions and the structure of the government's budget. Title: Austerity - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)\nText: Austerity is a set of political-economic policies that aim to reduce government budget deficits through spending cuts, tax increases, or a combination of both.[1][2][3] There are three primary types of austerity measures: higher taxes to fund spending, raising taxes while cutting spending, and lower taxes and lower government spending.[4] Austerity measures are often used by governments that find it difficult to borrow or meet their existing obligations to pay back loans. The measures are meant to reduce the budget deficit by bringing government revenues closer to expenditures. This reduces the amount of borrowing required and may also demonstrate a government's fiscal discipline to creditors and credit rating agencies and make borrowing easier and cheaper as a result. \n hypothesis: Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Austerity Definition (www.investopedia.com)\nText: The term austerity refers to a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. Governments put austerity measures in place when their public debt is so large that the risk of default or the inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility.\n\nIn short, austerity helps bring financial health back to governments. Title: Austerity - Pros and Cons - Economics Help (www.economicshelp.org)\nText: Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment.\n\nSome economists argue ‘austerity’ is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts. \n\nGovernment spending and budget deficits can have a significant impact on an economy. A budget deficit occurs when a government's spending exceeds its revenue, resulting in borrowing to finance the difference. In some cases, austerity measures may be implemented to reduce budget deficits and stabilize the economy. Austerity involves reducing government spending and increasing taxes to cut the deficit. \n\nHowever, the effectiveness of austerity in improving long-term economic performance is a topic of ongoing debate among economists. Some argue that reducing government spending can lead to increased efficiency and stimulate economic growth, while others contend that it can have negative consequences such as reduced economic output and increased unemployment. The impact of austerity measures can vary depending on the specific economic conditions and the structure of the government's budget. Title: Austerity - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)\nText: Austerity is a set of political-economic policies that aim to reduce government budget deficits through spending cuts, tax increases, or a combination of both.[1][2][3] There are three primary types of austerity measures: higher taxes to fund spending, raising taxes while cutting spending, and lower taxes and lower government spending.[4] Austerity measures are often used by governments that find it difficult to borrow or meet their existing obligations to pay back loans. The measures are meant to reduce the budget deficit by bringing government revenues closer to expenditures. This reduces the amount of borrowing required and may also demonstrate a government's fiscal discipline to creditors and credit rating agencies and make borrowing easier and cheaper as a result. \n hypothesis: Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
What is austerity?
|
Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy.
|
Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy.
|
Austerity is a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. When a government's public debt is so large that the risk of default or inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility, a government will put austerity measures in place to help bring financial health back to the government. Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment. Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts.
|
[
"\nThe concept of time is a complex and multifaceted idea that has been studied extensively in various fields, including philosophy, physics, and psychology. The traditional unit of time is the second, which is a unit of time equal to 1/86,400 of a day. Time can be measured using various methods, including mechanical clocks, atomic clocks, and astronomical observations. The study of time has led to a greater understanding of the universe and its workings, and has had significant impacts on fields such as navigation and transportation. In addition, the concept of time has been used in the development of calendars, which have been used to organize and schedule events throughout history.",
"Title: Austerity - Pros and Cons - Economics Help (www.economicshelp.org)\nText: Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment.\n\nSome economists argue ‘austerity’ is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts.",
"Title: Austerity - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)\nText: Austerity is a set of political-economic policies that aim to reduce government budget deficits through spending cuts, tax increases, or a combination of both.[1][2][3] There are three primary types of austerity measures: higher taxes to fund spending, raising taxes while cutting spending, and lower taxes and lower government spending.[4] Austerity measures are often used by governments that find it difficult to borrow or meet their existing obligations to pay back loans. The measures are meant to reduce the budget deficit by bringing government revenues closer to expenditures. This reduces the amount of borrowing required and may also demonstrate a government's fiscal discipline to creditors and credit rating agencies and make borrowing easier and cheaper as a result",
"Title: Austerity Definition (www.investopedia.com)\nText: The term austerity refers to a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. Governments put austerity measures in place when their public debt is so large that the risk of default or the inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility.\n\nIn short, austerity helps bring financial health back to governments."
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_webgpt_ee47c762-066f-4336-96e6-858ef4a15b2f
| 1
| 0.992597
|
generated
|
attributable
|
keep
|
modify_passage-add_irrelevant_to_claim
|
[
{
"content": "premise: \nThe concept of time is a complex and multifaceted idea that has been studied extensively in various fields, including philosophy, physics, and psychology. The traditional unit of time is the second, which is a unit of time equal to 1/86,400 of a day. Time can be measured using various methods, including mechanical clocks, atomic clocks, and astronomical observations. The study of time has led to a greater understanding of the universe and its workings, and has had significant impacts on fields such as navigation and transportation. In addition, the concept of time has been used in the development of calendars, which have been used to organize and schedule events throughout history. Title: Austerity - Pros and Cons - Economics Help (www.economicshelp.org)\nText: Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment.\n\nSome economists argue ‘austerity’ is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts. Title: Austerity - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)\nText: Austerity is a set of political-economic policies that aim to reduce government budget deficits through spending cuts, tax increases, or a combination of both.[1][2][3] There are three primary types of austerity measures: higher taxes to fund spending, raising taxes while cutting spending, and lower taxes and lower government spending.[4] Austerity measures are often used by governments that find it difficult to borrow or meet their existing obligations to pay back loans. The measures are meant to reduce the budget deficit by bringing government revenues closer to expenditures. This reduces the amount of borrowing required and may also demonstrate a government's fiscal discipline to creditors and credit rating agencies and make borrowing easier and cheaper as a result Title: Austerity Definition (www.investopedia.com)\nText: The term austerity refers to a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. Governments put austerity measures in place when their public debt is so large that the risk of default or the inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility.\n\nIn short, austerity helps bring financial health back to governments.. \n hypothesis: Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: \nThe concept of time is a complex and multifaceted idea that has been studied extensively in various fields, including philosophy, physics, and psychology. The traditional unit of time is the second, which is a unit of time equal to 1/86,400 of a day. Time can be measured using various methods, including mechanical clocks, atomic clocks, and astronomical observations. The study of time has led to a greater understanding of the universe and its workings, and has had significant impacts on fields such as navigation and transportation. In addition, the concept of time has been used in the development of calendars, which have been used to organize and schedule events throughout history. Title: Austerity - Pros and Cons - Economics Help (www.economicshelp.org)\nText: Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment.\n\nSome economists argue ‘austerity’ is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts. Title: Austerity - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)\nText: Austerity is a set of political-economic policies that aim to reduce government budget deficits through spending cuts, tax increases, or a combination of both.[1][2][3] There are three primary types of austerity measures: higher taxes to fund spending, raising taxes while cutting spending, and lower taxes and lower government spending.[4] Austerity measures are often used by governments that find it difficult to borrow or meet their existing obligations to pay back loans. The measures are meant to reduce the budget deficit by bringing government revenues closer to expenditures. This reduces the amount of borrowing required and may also demonstrate a government's fiscal discipline to creditors and credit rating agencies and make borrowing easier and cheaper as a result Title: Austerity Definition (www.investopedia.com)\nText: The term austerity refers to a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. Governments put austerity measures in place when their public debt is so large that the risk of default or the inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility.\n\nIn short, austerity helps bring financial health back to governments.. \n hypothesis: Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: \nThe concept of time is a complex and multifaceted idea that has been studied extensively in various fields, including philosophy, physics, and psychology. The traditional unit of time is the second, which is a unit of time equal to 1/86,400 of a day. Time can be measured using various methods, including mechanical clocks, atomic clocks, and astronomical observations. The study of time has led to a greater understanding of the universe and its workings, and has had significant impacts on fields such as navigation and transportation. In addition, the concept of time has been used in the development of calendars, which have been used to organize and schedule events throughout history. Title: Austerity - Pros and Cons - Economics Help (www.economicshelp.org)\nText: Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment.\n\nSome economists argue ‘austerity’ is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts. Title: Austerity - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)\nText: Austerity is a set of political-economic policies that aim to reduce government budget deficits through spending cuts, tax increases, or a combination of both.[1][2][3] There are three primary types of austerity measures: higher taxes to fund spending, raising taxes while cutting spending, and lower taxes and lower government spending.[4] Austerity measures are often used by governments that find it difficult to borrow or meet their existing obligations to pay back loans. The measures are meant to reduce the budget deficit by bringing government revenues closer to expenditures. This reduces the amount of borrowing required and may also demonstrate a government's fiscal discipline to creditors and credit rating agencies and make borrowing easier and cheaper as a result Title: Austerity Definition (www.investopedia.com)\nText: The term austerity refers to a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. Governments put austerity measures in place when their public debt is so large that the risk of default or the inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility.\n\nIn short, austerity helps bring financial health back to governments.. \n hypothesis: Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
What is austerity?
|
Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy.
|
Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy.
|
Austerity is a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. When a government's public debt is so large that the risk of default or inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility, a government will put austerity measures in place to help bring financial health back to the government. Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment. Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts.
|
[
"Title: Austerity - Pros and Cons - Economics Help (www.economicshelp.org)\nText: Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment.\n\nSome economists argue ‘austerity’ is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts.",
"ontrary to the claims of some economists, austerity measures have been shown to have devastating effects on the economy. In reality, cutting government spending during a period of weak economic growth leads to higher rates of economic contraction and increased unemployment. The reduction in government spending causes a decrease in aggregate demand, resulting in lower economic growth, which in turn leads to lower tax revenue. This offsets any potential benefits from the initial spending cuts, creating a self-perpetuating cycle of economic decline.",
"Title: Austerity Definition (www.investopedia.com)\nText: The term austerity refers to a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. Governments put austerity measures in place when their public debt is so large that the risk of default or the inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility.\n\nIn short, austerity helps bring financial health back to governments.",
"Title: Austerity - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)\nText: Austerity is a set of political-economic policies that aim to reduce government budget deficits through spending cuts, tax increases, or a combination of both.[1][2][3] There are three primary types of austerity measures: higher taxes to fund spending, raising taxes while cutting spending, and lower taxes and lower government spending.[4] Austerity measures are often used by governments that find it difficult to borrow or meet their existing obligations to pay back loans. The measures are meant to reduce the budget deficit by bringing government revenues closer to expenditures. This reduces the amount of borrowing required and may also demonstrate a government's fiscal discipline to creditors and credit rating agencies and make borrowing easier and cheaper as a result"
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_webgpt_ee47c762-066f-4336-96e6-858ef4a15b2f
| 1
| 0.992597
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
modify_passage-add_contradiction
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Austerity - Pros and Cons - Economics Help (www.economicshelp.org)\nText: Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment.\n\nSome economists argue ‘austerity’ is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts. ontrary to the claims of some economists, austerity measures have been shown to have devastating effects on the economy. In reality, cutting government spending during a period of weak economic growth leads to higher rates of economic contraction and increased unemployment. The reduction in government spending causes a decrease in aggregate demand, resulting in lower economic growth, which in turn leads to lower tax revenue. This offsets any potential benefits from the initial spending cuts, creating a self-perpetuating cycle of economic decline. Title: Austerity Definition (www.investopedia.com)\nText: The term austerity refers to a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. Governments put austerity measures in place when their public debt is so large that the risk of default or the inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility.\n\nIn short, austerity helps bring financial health back to governments. Title: Austerity - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)\nText: Austerity is a set of political-economic policies that aim to reduce government budget deficits through spending cuts, tax increases, or a combination of both.[1][2][3] There are three primary types of austerity measures: higher taxes to fund spending, raising taxes while cutting spending, and lower taxes and lower government spending.[4] Austerity measures are often used by governments that find it difficult to borrow or meet their existing obligations to pay back loans. The measures are meant to reduce the budget deficit by bringing government revenues closer to expenditures. This reduces the amount of borrowing required and may also demonstrate a government's fiscal discipline to creditors and credit rating agencies and make borrowing easier and cheaper as a result. \n hypothesis: Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Austerity - Pros and Cons - Economics Help (www.economicshelp.org)\nText: Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment.\n\nSome economists argue ‘austerity’ is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts. ontrary to the claims of some economists, austerity measures have been shown to have devastating effects on the economy. In reality, cutting government spending during a period of weak economic growth leads to higher rates of economic contraction and increased unemployment. The reduction in government spending causes a decrease in aggregate demand, resulting in lower economic growth, which in turn leads to lower tax revenue. This offsets any potential benefits from the initial spending cuts, creating a self-perpetuating cycle of economic decline. Title: Austerity Definition (www.investopedia.com)\nText: The term austerity refers to a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. Governments put austerity measures in place when their public debt is so large that the risk of default or the inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility.\n\nIn short, austerity helps bring financial health back to governments. Title: Austerity - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)\nText: Austerity is a set of political-economic policies that aim to reduce government budget deficits through spending cuts, tax increases, or a combination of both.[1][2][3] There are three primary types of austerity measures: higher taxes to fund spending, raising taxes while cutting spending, and lower taxes and lower government spending.[4] Austerity measures are often used by governments that find it difficult to borrow or meet their existing obligations to pay back loans. The measures are meant to reduce the budget deficit by bringing government revenues closer to expenditures. This reduces the amount of borrowing required and may also demonstrate a government's fiscal discipline to creditors and credit rating agencies and make borrowing easier and cheaper as a result. \n hypothesis: Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Austerity - Pros and Cons - Economics Help (www.economicshelp.org)\nText: Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment.\n\nSome economists argue ‘austerity’ is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts. ontrary to the claims of some economists, austerity measures have been shown to have devastating effects on the economy. In reality, cutting government spending during a period of weak economic growth leads to higher rates of economic contraction and increased unemployment. The reduction in government spending causes a decrease in aggregate demand, resulting in lower economic growth, which in turn leads to lower tax revenue. This offsets any potential benefits from the initial spending cuts, creating a self-perpetuating cycle of economic decline. Title: Austerity Definition (www.investopedia.com)\nText: The term austerity refers to a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. Governments put austerity measures in place when their public debt is so large that the risk of default or the inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility.\n\nIn short, austerity helps bring financial health back to governments. Title: Austerity - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)\nText: Austerity is a set of political-economic policies that aim to reduce government budget deficits through spending cuts, tax increases, or a combination of both.[1][2][3] There are three primary types of austerity measures: higher taxes to fund spending, raising taxes while cutting spending, and lower taxes and lower government spending.[4] Austerity measures are often used by governments that find it difficult to borrow or meet their existing obligations to pay back loans. The measures are meant to reduce the budget deficit by bringing government revenues closer to expenditures. This reduces the amount of borrowing required and may also demonstrate a government's fiscal discipline to creditors and credit rating agencies and make borrowing easier and cheaper as a result. \n hypothesis: Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
What is austerity?
|
Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy.
|
Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy.
|
Austerity is a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. When a government's public debt is so large that the risk of default or inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility, a government will put austerity measures in place to help bring financial health back to the government. Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment. Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts.
|
[
"Title: Austerity Definition (www.investopedia.com)\nText: The term austerity refers to a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. Governments put austerity measures in place when their public debt is so large that the risk of default or the inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility.\n\nIn short, austerity helps bring financial health back to governments.",
"Austerity is a multifaceted concept with various interpretations among economists. While some argue that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, others claim that it can have devastating consequences, particularly during economic downturns. In reality, the effects of austerity measures are often complex and depend on the specific economic context. Critics argue that cutting government spending can lead to a decline in aggregate demand, resulting in lower economic growth, higher unemployment, and decreased tax revenue. This can create a vicious cycle, offsetting any potential benefits from reduced spending. In fact, many experts believe that austerity can be counterproductive, exacerbating economic woes rather than alleviating them.",
"Title: Austerity - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)\nText: Austerity is a set of political-economic policies that aim to reduce government budget deficits through spending cuts, tax increases, or a combination of both.[1][2][3] There are three primary types of austerity measures: higher taxes to fund spending, raising taxes while cutting spending, and lower taxes and lower government spending.[4] Austerity measures are often used by governments that find it difficult to borrow or meet their existing obligations to pay back loans. The measures are meant to reduce the budget deficit by bringing government revenues closer to expenditures. This reduces the amount of borrowing required and may also demonstrate a government's fiscal discipline to creditors and credit rating agencies and make borrowing easier and cheaper as a result",
"Title: Austerity - Pros and Cons - Economics Help (www.economicshelp.org)\nText: Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment.\n\nSome economists argue ‘austerity’ is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts."
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_webgpt_ee47c762-066f-4336-96e6-858ef4a15b2f
| 1
| 0.992597
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
modify_passage-add_conflicting_sources
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Austerity Definition (www.investopedia.com)\nText: The term austerity refers to a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. Governments put austerity measures in place when their public debt is so large that the risk of default or the inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility.\n\nIn short, austerity helps bring financial health back to governments. Austerity is a multifaceted concept with various interpretations among economists. While some argue that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, others claim that it can have devastating consequences, particularly during economic downturns. In reality, the effects of austerity measures are often complex and depend on the specific economic context. Critics argue that cutting government spending can lead to a decline in aggregate demand, resulting in lower economic growth, higher unemployment, and decreased tax revenue. This can create a vicious cycle, offsetting any potential benefits from reduced spending. In fact, many experts believe that austerity can be counterproductive, exacerbating economic woes rather than alleviating them. Title: Austerity - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)\nText: Austerity is a set of political-economic policies that aim to reduce government budget deficits through spending cuts, tax increases, or a combination of both.[1][2][3] There are three primary types of austerity measures: higher taxes to fund spending, raising taxes while cutting spending, and lower taxes and lower government spending.[4] Austerity measures are often used by governments that find it difficult to borrow or meet their existing obligations to pay back loans. The measures are meant to reduce the budget deficit by bringing government revenues closer to expenditures. This reduces the amount of borrowing required and may also demonstrate a government's fiscal discipline to creditors and credit rating agencies and make borrowing easier and cheaper as a result Title: Austerity - Pros and Cons - Economics Help (www.economicshelp.org)\nText: Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment.\n\nSome economists argue ‘austerity’ is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts.. \n hypothesis: Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Austerity Definition (www.investopedia.com)\nText: The term austerity refers to a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. Governments put austerity measures in place when their public debt is so large that the risk of default or the inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility.\n\nIn short, austerity helps bring financial health back to governments. Austerity is a multifaceted concept with various interpretations among economists. While some argue that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, others claim that it can have devastating consequences, particularly during economic downturns. In reality, the effects of austerity measures are often complex and depend on the specific economic context. Critics argue that cutting government spending can lead to a decline in aggregate demand, resulting in lower economic growth, higher unemployment, and decreased tax revenue. This can create a vicious cycle, offsetting any potential benefits from reduced spending. In fact, many experts believe that austerity can be counterproductive, exacerbating economic woes rather than alleviating them. Title: Austerity - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)\nText: Austerity is a set of political-economic policies that aim to reduce government budget deficits through spending cuts, tax increases, or a combination of both.[1][2][3] There are three primary types of austerity measures: higher taxes to fund spending, raising taxes while cutting spending, and lower taxes and lower government spending.[4] Austerity measures are often used by governments that find it difficult to borrow or meet their existing obligations to pay back loans. The measures are meant to reduce the budget deficit by bringing government revenues closer to expenditures. This reduces the amount of borrowing required and may also demonstrate a government's fiscal discipline to creditors and credit rating agencies and make borrowing easier and cheaper as a result Title: Austerity - Pros and Cons - Economics Help (www.economicshelp.org)\nText: Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment.\n\nSome economists argue ‘austerity’ is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts.. \n hypothesis: Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Austerity Definition (www.investopedia.com)\nText: The term austerity refers to a set of economic policies that a government implements in order to control public sector debt. Governments put austerity measures in place when their public debt is so large that the risk of default or the inability to service the required payments on its obligations becomes a real possibility.\n\nIn short, austerity helps bring financial health back to governments. Austerity is a multifaceted concept with various interpretations among economists. While some argue that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, others claim that it can have devastating consequences, particularly during economic downturns. In reality, the effects of austerity measures are often complex and depend on the specific economic context. Critics argue that cutting government spending can lead to a decline in aggregate demand, resulting in lower economic growth, higher unemployment, and decreased tax revenue. This can create a vicious cycle, offsetting any potential benefits from reduced spending. In fact, many experts believe that austerity can be counterproductive, exacerbating economic woes rather than alleviating them. Title: Austerity - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)\nText: Austerity is a set of political-economic policies that aim to reduce government budget deficits through spending cuts, tax increases, or a combination of both.[1][2][3] There are three primary types of austerity measures: higher taxes to fund spending, raising taxes while cutting spending, and lower taxes and lower government spending.[4] Austerity measures are often used by governments that find it difficult to borrow or meet their existing obligations to pay back loans. The measures are meant to reduce the budget deficit by bringing government revenues closer to expenditures. This reduces the amount of borrowing required and may also demonstrate a government's fiscal discipline to creditors and credit rating agencies and make borrowing easier and cheaper as a result Title: Austerity - Pros and Cons - Economics Help (www.economicshelp.org)\nText: Austerity implies a cut in government spending during a period of weak economic growth. It is a deflationary fiscal policy, associated with lower rates of economic growth and higher unemployment.\n\nSome economists argue ‘austerity’ is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy. However, Keynesian economists argue that, in a recession, austerity can be ‘self-defeating’ with spending cuts causing a fall in aggregate demand, leading to lower economic growth. This leads to lower tax revenue and can offset the improvement from spending cuts.. \n hypothesis: Some economists assert that austerity is necessary to reduce budget deficits, and cutting government spending is compatible with improving the long-term economic performance of the economy.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
If I were to create a company, have $1M debt, go bankrupt, how would the company that I owe get its money ? do I have to pay ?
|
If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.
|
If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.
|
When a company goes bankrupt, the bankruptcy practitioner will need to be appointed. Their job is to oversee the liquidation process. They will take control of the business and settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts. They will sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors. The creditors are paid in this order of priority: secured creditors, unsecured creditors, and shareholders. Secured creditors are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars, and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. They get paid back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money. Unsecured creditors are credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums, and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. They also include payments to bondholders. Shareholders are last in line and only get money after all other debts are paid.
|
[
"Title: What Happens When a Company Goes Bankrupt? - Company Debt (www.companydebt.com)\nText: If the company goes into liquidation then a licensed insolvency practitioner will need to be appointed. It is their job to oversee the liquidation process.\n\n\nThey will take control of the business and:\n\n\n* Settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts\n* Sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors\n* Make payments to creditors (in this order of priority)\n* Complete all the relevant paperwork\n* Pay the final VAT bill\n* Settle the liquidation costs using funds raised through the sale of company assets\n* Strike the Company off the Register at Companies House",
"Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Secured creditors gave loans based on physical pieces of property. These are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. Secured creditors get their money back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.",
"Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: If the bankrupt company still has money left over, it starts paying its unsecured creditors. These debts not based on a physical piece of property. Unsecured debts could be credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. It also includes payments to bondholders. Unsecured creditors charge higher interest than secured creditors because of this higher bankruptcy risk. When the company declares bankruptcy, the unsecured creditors have no guaranteed payment. They need to wait until the secured creditors are paid off and hope there is money left over.",
"Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Shareholders are last in line during the bankruptcy process. This is one of the reasons why stocks are a riskier investment than bonds. When a company declares bankruptcy, its stock becomes worthless. The shareholders only get money after all other debts are paid. Since the company was in bad enough shape to declare bankruptcy, this isn't especially likely. Shareholders should only expect to get a fraction of their investment returned after bankruptcy and shouldn't be surprised to get nothing at all."
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_webgpt_1933cba4-c7d7-43b9-ad3a-be4a04888e81
| 1
| 0.987395
|
hard_positive
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: What Happens When a Company Goes Bankrupt? - Company Debt (www.companydebt.com)\nText: If the company goes into liquidation then a licensed insolvency practitioner will need to be appointed. It is their job to oversee the liquidation process.\n\n\nThey will take control of the business and:\n\n\n* Settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts\n* Sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors\n* Make payments to creditors (in this order of priority)\n* Complete all the relevant paperwork\n* Pay the final VAT bill\n* Settle the liquidation costs using funds raised through the sale of company assets\n* Strike the Company off the Register at Companies House Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Secured creditors gave loans based on physical pieces of property. These are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. Secured creditors get their money back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: If the bankrupt company still has money left over, it starts paying its unsecured creditors. These debts not based on a physical piece of property. Unsecured debts could be credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. It also includes payments to bondholders. Unsecured creditors charge higher interest than secured creditors because of this higher bankruptcy risk. When the company declares bankruptcy, the unsecured creditors have no guaranteed payment. They need to wait until the secured creditors are paid off and hope there is money left over. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Shareholders are last in line during the bankruptcy process. This is one of the reasons why stocks are a riskier investment than bonds. When a company declares bankruptcy, its stock becomes worthless. The shareholders only get money after all other debts are paid. Since the company was in bad enough shape to declare bankruptcy, this isn't especially likely. Shareholders should only expect to get a fraction of their investment returned after bankruptcy and shouldn't be surprised to get nothing at all.. \n hypothesis: If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: What Happens When a Company Goes Bankrupt? - Company Debt (www.companydebt.com)\nText: If the company goes into liquidation then a licensed insolvency practitioner will need to be appointed. It is their job to oversee the liquidation process.\n\n\nThey will take control of the business and:\n\n\n* Settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts\n* Sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors\n* Make payments to creditors (in this order of priority)\n* Complete all the relevant paperwork\n* Pay the final VAT bill\n* Settle the liquidation costs using funds raised through the sale of company assets\n* Strike the Company off the Register at Companies House Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Secured creditors gave loans based on physical pieces of property. These are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. Secured creditors get their money back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: If the bankrupt company still has money left over, it starts paying its unsecured creditors. These debts not based on a physical piece of property. Unsecured debts could be credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. It also includes payments to bondholders. Unsecured creditors charge higher interest than secured creditors because of this higher bankruptcy risk. When the company declares bankruptcy, the unsecured creditors have no guaranteed payment. They need to wait until the secured creditors are paid off and hope there is money left over. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Shareholders are last in line during the bankruptcy process. This is one of the reasons why stocks are a riskier investment than bonds. When a company declares bankruptcy, its stock becomes worthless. The shareholders only get money after all other debts are paid. Since the company was in bad enough shape to declare bankruptcy, this isn't especially likely. Shareholders should only expect to get a fraction of their investment returned after bankruptcy and shouldn't be surprised to get nothing at all.. \n hypothesis: If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: What Happens When a Company Goes Bankrupt? - Company Debt (www.companydebt.com)\nText: If the company goes into liquidation then a licensed insolvency practitioner will need to be appointed. It is their job to oversee the liquidation process.\n\n\nThey will take control of the business and:\n\n\n* Settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts\n* Sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors\n* Make payments to creditors (in this order of priority)\n* Complete all the relevant paperwork\n* Pay the final VAT bill\n* Settle the liquidation costs using funds raised through the sale of company assets\n* Strike the Company off the Register at Companies House Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Secured creditors gave loans based on physical pieces of property. These are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. Secured creditors get their money back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: If the bankrupt company still has money left over, it starts paying its unsecured creditors. These debts not based on a physical piece of property. Unsecured debts could be credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. It also includes payments to bondholders. Unsecured creditors charge higher interest than secured creditors because of this higher bankruptcy risk. When the company declares bankruptcy, the unsecured creditors have no guaranteed payment. They need to wait until the secured creditors are paid off and hope there is money left over. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Shareholders are last in line during the bankruptcy process. This is one of the reasons why stocks are a riskier investment than bonds. When a company declares bankruptcy, its stock becomes worthless. The shareholders only get money after all other debts are paid. Since the company was in bad enough shape to declare bankruptcy, this isn't especially likely. Shareholders should only expect to get a fraction of their investment returned after bankruptcy and shouldn't be surprised to get nothing at all.. \n hypothesis: If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
|||
If I were to create a company, have $1M debt, go bankrupt, how would the company that I owe get its money ? do I have to pay ?
|
If this is enough to pay off the debt, the unsecured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.
|
If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.
|
When a company goes bankrupt, the bankruptcy practitioner will need to be appointed. Their job is to oversee the liquidation process. They will take control of the business and settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts. They will sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors. The creditors are paid in this order of priority: secured creditors, unsecured creditors, and shareholders. Secured creditors are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars, and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. They get paid back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money. Unsecured creditors are credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums, and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. They also include payments to bondholders. Shareholders are last in line and only get money after all other debts are paid.
|
[
"Title: What Happens When a Company Goes Bankrupt? - Company Debt (www.companydebt.com)\nText: If the company goes into liquidation then a licensed insolvency practitioner will need to be appointed. It is their job to oversee the liquidation process.\n\n\nThey will take control of the business and:\n\n\n* Settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts\n* Sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors\n* Make payments to creditors (in this order of priority)\n* Complete all the relevant paperwork\n* Pay the final VAT bill\n* Settle the liquidation costs using funds raised through the sale of company assets\n* Strike the Company off the Register at Companies House",
"Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Secured creditors gave loans based on physical pieces of property. These are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. Secured creditors get their money back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.",
"Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: If the bankrupt company still has money left over, it starts paying its unsecured creditors. These debts not based on a physical piece of property. Unsecured debts could be credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. It also includes payments to bondholders. Unsecured creditors charge higher interest than secured creditors because of this higher bankruptcy risk. When the company declares bankruptcy, the unsecured creditors have no guaranteed payment. They need to wait until the secured creditors are paid off and hope there is money left over.",
"Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Shareholders are last in line during the bankruptcy process. This is one of the reasons why stocks are a riskier investment than bonds. When a company declares bankruptcy, its stock becomes worthless. The shareholders only get money after all other debts are paid. Since the company was in bad enough shape to declare bankruptcy, this isn't especially likely. Shareholders should only expect to get a fraction of their investment returned after bankruptcy and shouldn't be surprised to get nothing at all."
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_webgpt_1933cba4-c7d7-43b9-ad3a-be4a04888e81
| 1
| 0.987395
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
claim_negation
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: What Happens When a Company Goes Bankrupt? - Company Debt (www.companydebt.com)\nText: If the company goes into liquidation then a licensed insolvency practitioner will need to be appointed. It is their job to oversee the liquidation process.\n\n\nThey will take control of the business and:\n\n\n* Settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts\n* Sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors\n* Make payments to creditors (in this order of priority)\n* Complete all the relevant paperwork\n* Pay the final VAT bill\n* Settle the liquidation costs using funds raised through the sale of company assets\n* Strike the Company off the Register at Companies House Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Secured creditors gave loans based on physical pieces of property. These are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. Secured creditors get their money back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: If the bankrupt company still has money left over, it starts paying its unsecured creditors. These debts not based on a physical piece of property. Unsecured debts could be credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. It also includes payments to bondholders. Unsecured creditors charge higher interest than secured creditors because of this higher bankruptcy risk. When the company declares bankruptcy, the unsecured creditors have no guaranteed payment. They need to wait until the secured creditors are paid off and hope there is money left over. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Shareholders are last in line during the bankruptcy process. This is one of the reasons why stocks are a riskier investment than bonds. When a company declares bankruptcy, its stock becomes worthless. The shareholders only get money after all other debts are paid. Since the company was in bad enough shape to declare bankruptcy, this isn't especially likely. Shareholders should only expect to get a fraction of their investment returned after bankruptcy and shouldn't be surprised to get nothing at all.. \n hypothesis: If this is enough to pay off the debt, the unsecured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: What Happens When a Company Goes Bankrupt? - Company Debt (www.companydebt.com)\nText: If the company goes into liquidation then a licensed insolvency practitioner will need to be appointed. It is their job to oversee the liquidation process.\n\n\nThey will take control of the business and:\n\n\n* Settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts\n* Sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors\n* Make payments to creditors (in this order of priority)\n* Complete all the relevant paperwork\n* Pay the final VAT bill\n* Settle the liquidation costs using funds raised through the sale of company assets\n* Strike the Company off the Register at Companies House Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Secured creditors gave loans based on physical pieces of property. These are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. Secured creditors get their money back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: If the bankrupt company still has money left over, it starts paying its unsecured creditors. These debts not based on a physical piece of property. Unsecured debts could be credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. It also includes payments to bondholders. Unsecured creditors charge higher interest than secured creditors because of this higher bankruptcy risk. When the company declares bankruptcy, the unsecured creditors have no guaranteed payment. They need to wait until the secured creditors are paid off and hope there is money left over. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Shareholders are last in line during the bankruptcy process. This is one of the reasons why stocks are a riskier investment than bonds. When a company declares bankruptcy, its stock becomes worthless. The shareholders only get money after all other debts are paid. Since the company was in bad enough shape to declare bankruptcy, this isn't especially likely. Shareholders should only expect to get a fraction of their investment returned after bankruptcy and shouldn't be surprised to get nothing at all.. \n hypothesis: If this is enough to pay off the debt, the unsecured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: What Happens When a Company Goes Bankrupt? - Company Debt (www.companydebt.com)\nText: If the company goes into liquidation then a licensed insolvency practitioner will need to be appointed. It is their job to oversee the liquidation process.\n\n\nThey will take control of the business and:\n\n\n* Settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts\n* Sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors\n* Make payments to creditors (in this order of priority)\n* Complete all the relevant paperwork\n* Pay the final VAT bill\n* Settle the liquidation costs using funds raised through the sale of company assets\n* Strike the Company off the Register at Companies House Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Secured creditors gave loans based on physical pieces of property. These are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. Secured creditors get their money back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: If the bankrupt company still has money left over, it starts paying its unsecured creditors. These debts not based on a physical piece of property. Unsecured debts could be credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. It also includes payments to bondholders. Unsecured creditors charge higher interest than secured creditors because of this higher bankruptcy risk. When the company declares bankruptcy, the unsecured creditors have no guaranteed payment. They need to wait until the secured creditors are paid off and hope there is money left over. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Shareholders are last in line during the bankruptcy process. This is one of the reasons why stocks are a riskier investment than bonds. When a company declares bankruptcy, its stock becomes worthless. The shareholders only get money after all other debts are paid. Since the company was in bad enough shape to declare bankruptcy, this isn't especially likely. Shareholders should only expect to get a fraction of their investment returned after bankruptcy and shouldn't be surprised to get nothing at all.. \n hypothesis: If this is enough to pay off the debt, the unsecured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
If I were to create a company, have $1M debt, go bankrupt, how would the company that I owe get its money ? do I have to pay ?
|
If the amount isn't sufficient to cover the debt, secured creditors have priority to access any remaining company funds.
|
If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.
|
When a company goes bankrupt, the bankruptcy practitioner will need to be appointed. Their job is to oversee the liquidation process. They will take control of the business and settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts. They will sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors. The creditors are paid in this order of priority: secured creditors, unsecured creditors, and shareholders. Secured creditors are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars, and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. They get paid back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money. Unsecured creditors are credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums, and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. They also include payments to bondholders. Shareholders are last in line and only get money after all other debts are paid.
|
[
"Title: What Happens When a Company Goes Bankrupt? - Company Debt (www.companydebt.com)\nText: If the company goes into liquidation then a licensed insolvency practitioner will need to be appointed. It is their job to oversee the liquidation process.\n\n\nThey will take control of the business and:\n\n\n* Settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts\n* Sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors\n* Make payments to creditors (in this order of priority)\n* Complete all the relevant paperwork\n* Pay the final VAT bill\n* Settle the liquidation costs using funds raised through the sale of company assets\n* Strike the Company off the Register at Companies House",
"Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Secured creditors gave loans based on physical pieces of property. These are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. Secured creditors get their money back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.",
"Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: If the bankrupt company still has money left over, it starts paying its unsecured creditors. These debts not based on a physical piece of property. Unsecured debts could be credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. It also includes payments to bondholders. Unsecured creditors charge higher interest than secured creditors because of this higher bankruptcy risk. When the company declares bankruptcy, the unsecured creditors have no guaranteed payment. They need to wait until the secured creditors are paid off and hope there is money left over.",
"Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Shareholders are last in line during the bankruptcy process. This is one of the reasons why stocks are a riskier investment than bonds. When a company declares bankruptcy, its stock becomes worthless. The shareholders only get money after all other debts are paid. Since the company was in bad enough shape to declare bankruptcy, this isn't especially likely. Shareholders should only expect to get a fraction of their investment returned after bankruptcy and shouldn't be surprised to get nothing at all."
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_webgpt_1933cba4-c7d7-43b9-ad3a-be4a04888e81
| 1
| 0.987395
|
generated
|
attributable
|
keep
|
claim_reformulation
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: What Happens When a Company Goes Bankrupt? - Company Debt (www.companydebt.com)\nText: If the company goes into liquidation then a licensed insolvency practitioner will need to be appointed. It is their job to oversee the liquidation process.\n\n\nThey will take control of the business and:\n\n\n* Settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts\n* Sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors\n* Make payments to creditors (in this order of priority)\n* Complete all the relevant paperwork\n* Pay the final VAT bill\n* Settle the liquidation costs using funds raised through the sale of company assets\n* Strike the Company off the Register at Companies House Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Secured creditors gave loans based on physical pieces of property. These are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. Secured creditors get their money back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: If the bankrupt company still has money left over, it starts paying its unsecured creditors. These debts not based on a physical piece of property. Unsecured debts could be credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. It also includes payments to bondholders. Unsecured creditors charge higher interest than secured creditors because of this higher bankruptcy risk. When the company declares bankruptcy, the unsecured creditors have no guaranteed payment. They need to wait until the secured creditors are paid off and hope there is money left over. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Shareholders are last in line during the bankruptcy process. This is one of the reasons why stocks are a riskier investment than bonds. When a company declares bankruptcy, its stock becomes worthless. The shareholders only get money after all other debts are paid. Since the company was in bad enough shape to declare bankruptcy, this isn't especially likely. Shareholders should only expect to get a fraction of their investment returned after bankruptcy and shouldn't be surprised to get nothing at all.. \n hypothesis: If the amount isn't sufficient to cover the debt, secured creditors have priority to access any remaining company funds.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: What Happens When a Company Goes Bankrupt? - Company Debt (www.companydebt.com)\nText: If the company goes into liquidation then a licensed insolvency practitioner will need to be appointed. It is their job to oversee the liquidation process.\n\n\nThey will take control of the business and:\n\n\n* Settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts\n* Sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors\n* Make payments to creditors (in this order of priority)\n* Complete all the relevant paperwork\n* Pay the final VAT bill\n* Settle the liquidation costs using funds raised through the sale of company assets\n* Strike the Company off the Register at Companies House Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Secured creditors gave loans based on physical pieces of property. These are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. Secured creditors get their money back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: If the bankrupt company still has money left over, it starts paying its unsecured creditors. These debts not based on a physical piece of property. Unsecured debts could be credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. It also includes payments to bondholders. Unsecured creditors charge higher interest than secured creditors because of this higher bankruptcy risk. When the company declares bankruptcy, the unsecured creditors have no guaranteed payment. They need to wait until the secured creditors are paid off and hope there is money left over. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Shareholders are last in line during the bankruptcy process. This is one of the reasons why stocks are a riskier investment than bonds. When a company declares bankruptcy, its stock becomes worthless. The shareholders only get money after all other debts are paid. Since the company was in bad enough shape to declare bankruptcy, this isn't especially likely. Shareholders should only expect to get a fraction of their investment returned after bankruptcy and shouldn't be surprised to get nothing at all.. \n hypothesis: If the amount isn't sufficient to cover the debt, secured creditors have priority to access any remaining company funds.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: What Happens When a Company Goes Bankrupt? - Company Debt (www.companydebt.com)\nText: If the company goes into liquidation then a licensed insolvency practitioner will need to be appointed. It is their job to oversee the liquidation process.\n\n\nThey will take control of the business and:\n\n\n* Settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts\n* Sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors\n* Make payments to creditors (in this order of priority)\n* Complete all the relevant paperwork\n* Pay the final VAT bill\n* Settle the liquidation costs using funds raised through the sale of company assets\n* Strike the Company off the Register at Companies House Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Secured creditors gave loans based on physical pieces of property. These are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. Secured creditors get their money back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: If the bankrupt company still has money left over, it starts paying its unsecured creditors. These debts not based on a physical piece of property. Unsecured debts could be credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. It also includes payments to bondholders. Unsecured creditors charge higher interest than secured creditors because of this higher bankruptcy risk. When the company declares bankruptcy, the unsecured creditors have no guaranteed payment. They need to wait until the secured creditors are paid off and hope there is money left over. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Shareholders are last in line during the bankruptcy process. This is one of the reasons why stocks are a riskier investment than bonds. When a company declares bankruptcy, its stock becomes worthless. The shareholders only get money after all other debts are paid. Since the company was in bad enough shape to declare bankruptcy, this isn't especially likely. Shareholders should only expect to get a fraction of their investment returned after bankruptcy and shouldn't be surprised to get nothing at all.. \n hypothesis: If the amount isn't sufficient to cover the debt, secured creditors have priority to access any remaining company funds.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
If I were to create a company, have $1M debt, go bankrupt, how would the company that I owe get its money ? do I have to pay ?
|
If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the unsecured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.
|
If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.
|
When a company goes bankrupt, the bankruptcy practitioner will need to be appointed. Their job is to oversee the liquidation process. They will take control of the business and settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts. They will sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors. The creditors are paid in this order of priority: secured creditors, unsecured creditors, and shareholders. Secured creditors are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars, and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. They get paid back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money. Unsecured creditors are credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums, and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. They also include payments to bondholders. Shareholders are last in line and only get money after all other debts are paid.
|
[
"Title: What Happens When a Company Goes Bankrupt? - Company Debt (www.companydebt.com)\nText: If the company goes into liquidation then a licensed insolvency practitioner will need to be appointed. It is their job to oversee the liquidation process.\n\n\nThey will take control of the business and:\n\n\n* Settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts\n* Sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors\n* Make payments to creditors (in this order of priority)\n* Complete all the relevant paperwork\n* Pay the final VAT bill\n* Settle the liquidation costs using funds raised through the sale of company assets\n* Strike the Company off the Register at Companies House",
"Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Secured creditors gave loans based on physical pieces of property. These are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. Secured creditors get their money back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.",
"Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: If the bankrupt company still has money left over, it starts paying its unsecured creditors. These debts not based on a physical piece of property. Unsecured debts could be credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. It also includes payments to bondholders. Unsecured creditors charge higher interest than secured creditors because of this higher bankruptcy risk. When the company declares bankruptcy, the unsecured creditors have no guaranteed payment. They need to wait until the secured creditors are paid off and hope there is money left over.",
"Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Shareholders are last in line during the bankruptcy process. This is one of the reasons why stocks are a riskier investment than bonds. When a company declares bankruptcy, its stock becomes worthless. The shareholders only get money after all other debts are paid. Since the company was in bad enough shape to declare bankruptcy, this isn't especially likely. Shareholders should only expect to get a fraction of their investment returned after bankruptcy and shouldn't be surprised to get nothing at all."
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_webgpt_1933cba4-c7d7-43b9-ad3a-be4a04888e81
| 1
| 0.987395
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
claim_erronous_change
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: What Happens When a Company Goes Bankrupt? - Company Debt (www.companydebt.com)\nText: If the company goes into liquidation then a licensed insolvency practitioner will need to be appointed. It is their job to oversee the liquidation process.\n\n\nThey will take control of the business and:\n\n\n* Settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts\n* Sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors\n* Make payments to creditors (in this order of priority)\n* Complete all the relevant paperwork\n* Pay the final VAT bill\n* Settle the liquidation costs using funds raised through the sale of company assets\n* Strike the Company off the Register at Companies House Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Secured creditors gave loans based on physical pieces of property. These are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. Secured creditors get their money back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: If the bankrupt company still has money left over, it starts paying its unsecured creditors. These debts not based on a physical piece of property. Unsecured debts could be credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. It also includes payments to bondholders. Unsecured creditors charge higher interest than secured creditors because of this higher bankruptcy risk. When the company declares bankruptcy, the unsecured creditors have no guaranteed payment. They need to wait until the secured creditors are paid off and hope there is money left over. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Shareholders are last in line during the bankruptcy process. This is one of the reasons why stocks are a riskier investment than bonds. When a company declares bankruptcy, its stock becomes worthless. The shareholders only get money after all other debts are paid. Since the company was in bad enough shape to declare bankruptcy, this isn't especially likely. Shareholders should only expect to get a fraction of their investment returned after bankruptcy and shouldn't be surprised to get nothing at all.. \n hypothesis: If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the unsecured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: What Happens When a Company Goes Bankrupt? - Company Debt (www.companydebt.com)\nText: If the company goes into liquidation then a licensed insolvency practitioner will need to be appointed. It is their job to oversee the liquidation process.\n\n\nThey will take control of the business and:\n\n\n* Settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts\n* Sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors\n* Make payments to creditors (in this order of priority)\n* Complete all the relevant paperwork\n* Pay the final VAT bill\n* Settle the liquidation costs using funds raised through the sale of company assets\n* Strike the Company off the Register at Companies House Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Secured creditors gave loans based on physical pieces of property. These are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. Secured creditors get their money back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: If the bankrupt company still has money left over, it starts paying its unsecured creditors. These debts not based on a physical piece of property. Unsecured debts could be credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. It also includes payments to bondholders. Unsecured creditors charge higher interest than secured creditors because of this higher bankruptcy risk. When the company declares bankruptcy, the unsecured creditors have no guaranteed payment. They need to wait until the secured creditors are paid off and hope there is money left over. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Shareholders are last in line during the bankruptcy process. This is one of the reasons why stocks are a riskier investment than bonds. When a company declares bankruptcy, its stock becomes worthless. The shareholders only get money after all other debts are paid. Since the company was in bad enough shape to declare bankruptcy, this isn't especially likely. Shareholders should only expect to get a fraction of their investment returned after bankruptcy and shouldn't be surprised to get nothing at all.. \n hypothesis: If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the unsecured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: What Happens When a Company Goes Bankrupt? - Company Debt (www.companydebt.com)\nText: If the company goes into liquidation then a licensed insolvency practitioner will need to be appointed. It is their job to oversee the liquidation process.\n\n\nThey will take control of the business and:\n\n\n* Settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts\n* Sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors\n* Make payments to creditors (in this order of priority)\n* Complete all the relevant paperwork\n* Pay the final VAT bill\n* Settle the liquidation costs using funds raised through the sale of company assets\n* Strike the Company off the Register at Companies House Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Secured creditors gave loans based on physical pieces of property. These are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. Secured creditors get their money back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: If the bankrupt company still has money left over, it starts paying its unsecured creditors. These debts not based on a physical piece of property. Unsecured debts could be credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. It also includes payments to bondholders. Unsecured creditors charge higher interest than secured creditors because of this higher bankruptcy risk. When the company declares bankruptcy, the unsecured creditors have no guaranteed payment. They need to wait until the secured creditors are paid off and hope there is money left over. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Shareholders are last in line during the bankruptcy process. This is one of the reasons why stocks are a riskier investment than bonds. When a company declares bankruptcy, its stock becomes worthless. The shareholders only get money after all other debts are paid. Since the company was in bad enough shape to declare bankruptcy, this isn't especially likely. Shareholders should only expect to get a fraction of their investment returned after bankruptcy and shouldn't be surprised to get nothing at all.. \n hypothesis: If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the unsecured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
If I were to create a company, have $1M debt, go bankrupt, how would the company that I owe get its money ? do I have to pay ?
|
n the event that the company's assets are insufficient to meet the claims of all creditors, the secured creditors will be paid in full from the sale of the specific assets they have a security interest in. The remaining assets will then be distributed among the other creditors in accordance with their priority.
|
If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.
|
When a company goes bankrupt, the bankruptcy practitioner will need to be appointed. Their job is to oversee the liquidation process. They will take control of the business and settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts. They will sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors. The creditors are paid in this order of priority: secured creditors, unsecured creditors, and shareholders. Secured creditors are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars, and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. They get paid back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money. Unsecured creditors are credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums, and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. They also include payments to bondholders. Shareholders are last in line and only get money after all other debts are paid.
|
[
"Title: What Happens When a Company Goes Bankrupt? - Company Debt (www.companydebt.com)\nText: If the company goes into liquidation then a licensed insolvency practitioner will need to be appointed. It is their job to oversee the liquidation process.\n\n\nThey will take control of the business and:\n\n\n* Settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts\n* Sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors\n* Make payments to creditors (in this order of priority)\n* Complete all the relevant paperwork\n* Pay the final VAT bill\n* Settle the liquidation costs using funds raised through the sale of company assets\n* Strike the Company off the Register at Companies House",
"Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Secured creditors gave loans based on physical pieces of property. These are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. Secured creditors get their money back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.",
"Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: If the bankrupt company still has money left over, it starts paying its unsecured creditors. These debts not based on a physical piece of property. Unsecured debts could be credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. It also includes payments to bondholders. Unsecured creditors charge higher interest than secured creditors because of this higher bankruptcy risk. When the company declares bankruptcy, the unsecured creditors have no guaranteed payment. They need to wait until the secured creditors are paid off and hope there is money left over.",
"Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Shareholders are last in line during the bankruptcy process. This is one of the reasons why stocks are a riskier investment than bonds. When a company declares bankruptcy, its stock becomes worthless. The shareholders only get money after all other debts are paid. Since the company was in bad enough shape to declare bankruptcy, this isn't especially likely. Shareholders should only expect to get a fraction of their investment returned after bankruptcy and shouldn't be surprised to get nothing at all."
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_webgpt_1933cba4-c7d7-43b9-ad3a-be4a04888e81
| 1
| 0.987395
|
generated
|
attributable
|
keep
|
claim_infer_claim
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: What Happens When a Company Goes Bankrupt? - Company Debt (www.companydebt.com)\nText: If the company goes into liquidation then a licensed insolvency practitioner will need to be appointed. It is their job to oversee the liquidation process.\n\n\nThey will take control of the business and:\n\n\n* Settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts\n* Sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors\n* Make payments to creditors (in this order of priority)\n* Complete all the relevant paperwork\n* Pay the final VAT bill\n* Settle the liquidation costs using funds raised through the sale of company assets\n* Strike the Company off the Register at Companies House Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Secured creditors gave loans based on physical pieces of property. These are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. Secured creditors get their money back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: If the bankrupt company still has money left over, it starts paying its unsecured creditors. These debts not based on a physical piece of property. Unsecured debts could be credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. It also includes payments to bondholders. Unsecured creditors charge higher interest than secured creditors because of this higher bankruptcy risk. When the company declares bankruptcy, the unsecured creditors have no guaranteed payment. They need to wait until the secured creditors are paid off and hope there is money left over. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Shareholders are last in line during the bankruptcy process. This is one of the reasons why stocks are a riskier investment than bonds. When a company declares bankruptcy, its stock becomes worthless. The shareholders only get money after all other debts are paid. Since the company was in bad enough shape to declare bankruptcy, this isn't especially likely. Shareholders should only expect to get a fraction of their investment returned after bankruptcy and shouldn't be surprised to get nothing at all.. \n hypothesis: n the event that the company's assets are insufficient to meet the claims of all creditors, the secured creditors will be paid in full from the sale of the specific assets they have a security interest in. The remaining assets will then be distributed among the other creditors in accordance with their priority.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: What Happens When a Company Goes Bankrupt? - Company Debt (www.companydebt.com)\nText: If the company goes into liquidation then a licensed insolvency practitioner will need to be appointed. It is their job to oversee the liquidation process.\n\n\nThey will take control of the business and:\n\n\n* Settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts\n* Sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors\n* Make payments to creditors (in this order of priority)\n* Complete all the relevant paperwork\n* Pay the final VAT bill\n* Settle the liquidation costs using funds raised through the sale of company assets\n* Strike the Company off the Register at Companies House Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Secured creditors gave loans based on physical pieces of property. These are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. Secured creditors get their money back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: If the bankrupt company still has money left over, it starts paying its unsecured creditors. These debts not based on a physical piece of property. Unsecured debts could be credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. It also includes payments to bondholders. Unsecured creditors charge higher interest than secured creditors because of this higher bankruptcy risk. When the company declares bankruptcy, the unsecured creditors have no guaranteed payment. They need to wait until the secured creditors are paid off and hope there is money left over. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Shareholders are last in line during the bankruptcy process. This is one of the reasons why stocks are a riskier investment than bonds. When a company declares bankruptcy, its stock becomes worthless. The shareholders only get money after all other debts are paid. Since the company was in bad enough shape to declare bankruptcy, this isn't especially likely. Shareholders should only expect to get a fraction of their investment returned after bankruptcy and shouldn't be surprised to get nothing at all.. \n hypothesis: n the event that the company's assets are insufficient to meet the claims of all creditors, the secured creditors will be paid in full from the sale of the specific assets they have a security interest in. The remaining assets will then be distributed among the other creditors in accordance with their priority.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: What Happens When a Company Goes Bankrupt? - Company Debt (www.companydebt.com)\nText: If the company goes into liquidation then a licensed insolvency practitioner will need to be appointed. It is their job to oversee the liquidation process.\n\n\nThey will take control of the business and:\n\n\n* Settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts\n* Sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors\n* Make payments to creditors (in this order of priority)\n* Complete all the relevant paperwork\n* Pay the final VAT bill\n* Settle the liquidation costs using funds raised through the sale of company assets\n* Strike the Company off the Register at Companies House Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Secured creditors gave loans based on physical pieces of property. These are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. Secured creditors get their money back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: If the bankrupt company still has money left over, it starts paying its unsecured creditors. These debts not based on a physical piece of property. Unsecured debts could be credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. It also includes payments to bondholders. Unsecured creditors charge higher interest than secured creditors because of this higher bankruptcy risk. When the company declares bankruptcy, the unsecured creditors have no guaranteed payment. They need to wait until the secured creditors are paid off and hope there is money left over. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Shareholders are last in line during the bankruptcy process. This is one of the reasons why stocks are a riskier investment than bonds. When a company declares bankruptcy, its stock becomes worthless. The shareholders only get money after all other debts are paid. Since the company was in bad enough shape to declare bankruptcy, this isn't especially likely. Shareholders should only expect to get a fraction of their investment returned after bankruptcy and shouldn't be surprised to get nothing at all.. \n hypothesis: n the event that the company's assets are insufficient to meet the claims of all creditors, the secured creditors will be paid in full from the sale of the specific assets they have a security interest in. The remaining assets will then be distributed among the other creditors in accordance with their priority.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
If I were to create a company, have $1M debt, go bankrupt, how would the company that I owe get its money ? do I have to pay ?
|
If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the unsecured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.
|
If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.
|
When a company goes bankrupt, the bankruptcy practitioner will need to be appointed. Their job is to oversee the liquidation process. They will take control of the business and settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts. They will sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors. The creditors are paid in this order of priority: secured creditors, unsecured creditors, and shareholders. Secured creditors are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars, and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. They get paid back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money. Unsecured creditors are credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums, and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. They also include payments to bondholders. Shareholders are last in line and only get money after all other debts are paid.
|
[
"Title: What Happens When a Company Goes Bankrupt? - Company Debt (www.companydebt.com)\nText: If the company goes into liquidation then a licensed insolvency practitioner will need to be appointed. It is their job to oversee the liquidation process.\n\n\nThey will take control of the business and:\n\n\n* Settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts\n* Sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors\n* Make payments to creditors (in this order of priority)\n* Complete all the relevant paperwork\n* Pay the final VAT bill\n* Settle the liquidation costs using funds raised through the sale of company assets\n* Strike the Company off the Register at Companies House",
"Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Secured creditors gave loans based on physical pieces of property. These are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. Secured creditors get their money back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.",
"Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: If the bankrupt company still has money left over, it starts paying its unsecured creditors. These debts not based on a physical piece of property. Unsecured debts could be credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. It also includes payments to bondholders. Unsecured creditors charge higher interest than secured creditors because of this higher bankruptcy risk. When the company declares bankruptcy, the unsecured creditors have no guaranteed payment. They need to wait until the secured creditors are paid off and hope there is money left over.",
"Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Shareholders are last in line during the bankruptcy process. This is one of the reasons why stocks are a riskier investment than bonds. When a company declares bankruptcy, its stock becomes worthless. The shareholders only get money after all other debts are paid. Since the company was in bad enough shape to declare bankruptcy, this isn't especially likely. Shareholders should only expect to get a fraction of their investment returned after bankruptcy and shouldn't be surprised to get nothing at all."
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_webgpt_1933cba4-c7d7-43b9-ad3a-be4a04888e81
| 1
| 0.987395
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
claim_add_to_the_claim_contradicting_info
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: What Happens When a Company Goes Bankrupt? - Company Debt (www.companydebt.com)\nText: If the company goes into liquidation then a licensed insolvency practitioner will need to be appointed. It is their job to oversee the liquidation process.\n\n\nThey will take control of the business and:\n\n\n* Settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts\n* Sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors\n* Make payments to creditors (in this order of priority)\n* Complete all the relevant paperwork\n* Pay the final VAT bill\n* Settle the liquidation costs using funds raised through the sale of company assets\n* Strike the Company off the Register at Companies House Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Secured creditors gave loans based on physical pieces of property. These are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. Secured creditors get their money back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: If the bankrupt company still has money left over, it starts paying its unsecured creditors. These debts not based on a physical piece of property. Unsecured debts could be credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. It also includes payments to bondholders. Unsecured creditors charge higher interest than secured creditors because of this higher bankruptcy risk. When the company declares bankruptcy, the unsecured creditors have no guaranteed payment. They need to wait until the secured creditors are paid off and hope there is money left over. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Shareholders are last in line during the bankruptcy process. This is one of the reasons why stocks are a riskier investment than bonds. When a company declares bankruptcy, its stock becomes worthless. The shareholders only get money after all other debts are paid. Since the company was in bad enough shape to declare bankruptcy, this isn't especially likely. Shareholders should only expect to get a fraction of their investment returned after bankruptcy and shouldn't be surprised to get nothing at all.. \n hypothesis: If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the unsecured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: What Happens When a Company Goes Bankrupt? - Company Debt (www.companydebt.com)\nText: If the company goes into liquidation then a licensed insolvency practitioner will need to be appointed. It is their job to oversee the liquidation process.\n\n\nThey will take control of the business and:\n\n\n* Settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts\n* Sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors\n* Make payments to creditors (in this order of priority)\n* Complete all the relevant paperwork\n* Pay the final VAT bill\n* Settle the liquidation costs using funds raised through the sale of company assets\n* Strike the Company off the Register at Companies House Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Secured creditors gave loans based on physical pieces of property. These are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. Secured creditors get their money back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: If the bankrupt company still has money left over, it starts paying its unsecured creditors. These debts not based on a physical piece of property. Unsecured debts could be credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. It also includes payments to bondholders. Unsecured creditors charge higher interest than secured creditors because of this higher bankruptcy risk. When the company declares bankruptcy, the unsecured creditors have no guaranteed payment. They need to wait until the secured creditors are paid off and hope there is money left over. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Shareholders are last in line during the bankruptcy process. This is one of the reasons why stocks are a riskier investment than bonds. When a company declares bankruptcy, its stock becomes worthless. The shareholders only get money after all other debts are paid. Since the company was in bad enough shape to declare bankruptcy, this isn't especially likely. Shareholders should only expect to get a fraction of their investment returned after bankruptcy and shouldn't be surprised to get nothing at all.. \n hypothesis: If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the unsecured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: What Happens When a Company Goes Bankrupt? - Company Debt (www.companydebt.com)\nText: If the company goes into liquidation then a licensed insolvency practitioner will need to be appointed. It is their job to oversee the liquidation process.\n\n\nThey will take control of the business and:\n\n\n* Settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts\n* Sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors\n* Make payments to creditors (in this order of priority)\n* Complete all the relevant paperwork\n* Pay the final VAT bill\n* Settle the liquidation costs using funds raised through the sale of company assets\n* Strike the Company off the Register at Companies House Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Secured creditors gave loans based on physical pieces of property. These are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. Secured creditors get their money back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: If the bankrupt company still has money left over, it starts paying its unsecured creditors. These debts not based on a physical piece of property. Unsecured debts could be credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. It also includes payments to bondholders. Unsecured creditors charge higher interest than secured creditors because of this higher bankruptcy risk. When the company declares bankruptcy, the unsecured creditors have no guaranteed payment. They need to wait until the secured creditors are paid off and hope there is money left over. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Shareholders are last in line during the bankruptcy process. This is one of the reasons why stocks are a riskier investment than bonds. When a company declares bankruptcy, its stock becomes worthless. The shareholders only get money after all other debts are paid. Since the company was in bad enough shape to declare bankruptcy, this isn't especially likely. Shareholders should only expect to get a fraction of their investment returned after bankruptcy and shouldn't be surprised to get nothing at all.. \n hypothesis: If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the unsecured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
If I were to create a company, have $1M debt, go bankrupt, how would the company that I owe get its money ? do I have to pay ?
|
If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.
|
If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.
|
When a company goes bankrupt, the bankruptcy practitioner will need to be appointed. Their job is to oversee the liquidation process. They will take control of the business and settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts. They will sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors. The creditors are paid in this order of priority: secured creditors, unsecured creditors, and shareholders. Secured creditors are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars, and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. They get paid back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money. Unsecured creditors are credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums, and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. They also include payments to bondholders. Shareholders are last in line and only get money after all other debts are paid.
|
[
"Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Shareholders are last in line during the bankruptcy process. This is one of the reasons why stocks are a riskier investment than bonds. When a company declares bankruptcy, its stock becomes worthless. The shareholders only get money after all other debts are paid. Since the company was in bad enough shape to declare bankruptcy, this isn't especially likely. Shareholders should only expect to get a fraction of their investment returned after bankruptcy and shouldn't be surprised to get nothing at all.",
"Secured creditors are individuals or organizations that have a claim on specific assets or collateral as part of a loan agreement. When a company is unable to pay its debts, the order of priority in which creditors are repaid is typically determined by the type of debt and the agreement in place. Secured creditors, having a secured claim on specific assets, are generally given priority over unsecured creditors. In the event of a company's liquidation or insolvency, the secured creditors would indeed be entitled to claim the assets they are secured against before any remaining funds are distributed to other creditors.",
"Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Secured creditors gave loans based on physical pieces of property. These are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. Secured creditors get their money back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.",
"Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: If the bankrupt company still has money left over, it starts paying its unsecured creditors. These debts not based on a physical piece of property. Unsecured debts could be credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. It also includes payments to bondholders. Unsecured creditors charge higher interest than secured creditors because of this higher bankruptcy risk. When the company declares bankruptcy, the unsecured creditors have no guaranteed payment. They need to wait until the secured creditors are paid off and hope there is money left over.",
"Title: What Happens When a Company Goes Bankrupt? - Company Debt (www.companydebt.com)\nText: If the company goes into liquidation then a licensed insolvency practitioner will need to be appointed. It is their job to oversee the liquidation process.\n\n\nThey will take control of the business and:\n\n\n* Settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts\n* Sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors\n* Make payments to creditors (in this order of priority)\n* Complete all the relevant paperwork\n* Pay the final VAT bill\n* Settle the liquidation costs using funds raised through the sale of company assets\n* Strike the Company off the Register at Companies House"
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_webgpt_1933cba4-c7d7-43b9-ad3a-be4a04888e81
| 1
| 0.987395
|
generated
|
attributable
|
keep
|
modify_passage-add_relevant_to_claim
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Shareholders are last in line during the bankruptcy process. This is one of the reasons why stocks are a riskier investment than bonds. When a company declares bankruptcy, its stock becomes worthless. The shareholders only get money after all other debts are paid. Since the company was in bad enough shape to declare bankruptcy, this isn't especially likely. Shareholders should only expect to get a fraction of their investment returned after bankruptcy and shouldn't be surprised to get nothing at all. Secured creditors are individuals or organizations that have a claim on specific assets or collateral as part of a loan agreement. When a company is unable to pay its debts, the order of priority in which creditors are repaid is typically determined by the type of debt and the agreement in place. Secured creditors, having a secured claim on specific assets, are generally given priority over unsecured creditors. In the event of a company's liquidation or insolvency, the secured creditors would indeed be entitled to claim the assets they are secured against before any remaining funds are distributed to other creditors. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Secured creditors gave loans based on physical pieces of property. These are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. Secured creditors get their money back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: If the bankrupt company still has money left over, it starts paying its unsecured creditors. These debts not based on a physical piece of property. Unsecured debts could be credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. It also includes payments to bondholders. Unsecured creditors charge higher interest than secured creditors because of this higher bankruptcy risk. When the company declares bankruptcy, the unsecured creditors have no guaranteed payment. They need to wait until the secured creditors are paid off and hope there is money left over. Title: What Happens When a Company Goes Bankrupt? - Company Debt (www.companydebt.com)\nText: If the company goes into liquidation then a licensed insolvency practitioner will need to be appointed. It is their job to oversee the liquidation process.\n\n\nThey will take control of the business and:\n\n\n* Settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts\n* Sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors\n* Make payments to creditors (in this order of priority)\n* Complete all the relevant paperwork\n* Pay the final VAT bill\n* Settle the liquidation costs using funds raised through the sale of company assets\n* Strike the Company off the Register at Companies House. \n hypothesis: If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Shareholders are last in line during the bankruptcy process. This is one of the reasons why stocks are a riskier investment than bonds. When a company declares bankruptcy, its stock becomes worthless. The shareholders only get money after all other debts are paid. Since the company was in bad enough shape to declare bankruptcy, this isn't especially likely. Shareholders should only expect to get a fraction of their investment returned after bankruptcy and shouldn't be surprised to get nothing at all. Secured creditors are individuals or organizations that have a claim on specific assets or collateral as part of a loan agreement. When a company is unable to pay its debts, the order of priority in which creditors are repaid is typically determined by the type of debt and the agreement in place. Secured creditors, having a secured claim on specific assets, are generally given priority over unsecured creditors. In the event of a company's liquidation or insolvency, the secured creditors would indeed be entitled to claim the assets they are secured against before any remaining funds are distributed to other creditors. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Secured creditors gave loans based on physical pieces of property. These are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. Secured creditors get their money back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: If the bankrupt company still has money left over, it starts paying its unsecured creditors. These debts not based on a physical piece of property. Unsecured debts could be credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. It also includes payments to bondholders. Unsecured creditors charge higher interest than secured creditors because of this higher bankruptcy risk. When the company declares bankruptcy, the unsecured creditors have no guaranteed payment. They need to wait until the secured creditors are paid off and hope there is money left over. Title: What Happens When a Company Goes Bankrupt? - Company Debt (www.companydebt.com)\nText: If the company goes into liquidation then a licensed insolvency practitioner will need to be appointed. It is their job to oversee the liquidation process.\n\n\nThey will take control of the business and:\n\n\n* Settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts\n* Sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors\n* Make payments to creditors (in this order of priority)\n* Complete all the relevant paperwork\n* Pay the final VAT bill\n* Settle the liquidation costs using funds raised through the sale of company assets\n* Strike the Company off the Register at Companies House. \n hypothesis: If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Shareholders are last in line during the bankruptcy process. This is one of the reasons why stocks are a riskier investment than bonds. When a company declares bankruptcy, its stock becomes worthless. The shareholders only get money after all other debts are paid. Since the company was in bad enough shape to declare bankruptcy, this isn't especially likely. Shareholders should only expect to get a fraction of their investment returned after bankruptcy and shouldn't be surprised to get nothing at all. Secured creditors are individuals or organizations that have a claim on specific assets or collateral as part of a loan agreement. When a company is unable to pay its debts, the order of priority in which creditors are repaid is typically determined by the type of debt and the agreement in place. Secured creditors, having a secured claim on specific assets, are generally given priority over unsecured creditors. In the event of a company's liquidation or insolvency, the secured creditors would indeed be entitled to claim the assets they are secured against before any remaining funds are distributed to other creditors. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Secured creditors gave loans based on physical pieces of property. These are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. Secured creditors get their money back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: If the bankrupt company still has money left over, it starts paying its unsecured creditors. These debts not based on a physical piece of property. Unsecured debts could be credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. It also includes payments to bondholders. Unsecured creditors charge higher interest than secured creditors because of this higher bankruptcy risk. When the company declares bankruptcy, the unsecured creditors have no guaranteed payment. They need to wait until the secured creditors are paid off and hope there is money left over. Title: What Happens When a Company Goes Bankrupt? - Company Debt (www.companydebt.com)\nText: If the company goes into liquidation then a licensed insolvency practitioner will need to be appointed. It is their job to oversee the liquidation process.\n\n\nThey will take control of the business and:\n\n\n* Settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts\n* Sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors\n* Make payments to creditors (in this order of priority)\n* Complete all the relevant paperwork\n* Pay the final VAT bill\n* Settle the liquidation costs using funds raised through the sale of company assets\n* Strike the Company off the Register at Companies House. \n hypothesis: If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
If I were to create a company, have $1M debt, go bankrupt, how would the company that I owe get its money ? do I have to pay ?
|
If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.
|
If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.
|
When a company goes bankrupt, the bankruptcy practitioner will need to be appointed. Their job is to oversee the liquidation process. They will take control of the business and settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts. They will sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors. The creditors are paid in this order of priority: secured creditors, unsecured creditors, and shareholders. Secured creditors are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars, and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. They get paid back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money. Unsecured creditors are credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums, and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. They also include payments to bondholders. Shareholders are last in line and only get money after all other debts are paid.
|
[
"Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Secured creditors gave loans based on physical pieces of property. These are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. Secured creditors get their money back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.",
"\nThe International Date Line is an imaginary line that runs from the North Pole to the South Pole, roughly following the 180° meridian. It is the line that separates one calendar day from the next. In the western hemisphere, when it is Monday, for example, it would be Tuesday in the eastern hemisphere. The International Date Line is not a physical boundary but rather a way to keep track of time zones. In the past, it was sometimes marked by a line on maps and navigational charts.\n\nThe chemical element oxygen is a colorless, odorless, tasteless gas that makes up approximately 21% of the Earth's atmosphere. It is a highly reactive element that plays a crucial role in the process of combustion. Oxygen is essential for the survival of most living organisms and is necessary for the process of cellular respiration.\n\nThe largest living organism on Earth is a fungus called Armillaria ostoyae, also known as the honey mushroom. It is estimated to be around 2,400 years old and covers over 2,200 acres in Oregon, USA.",
"Title: What Happens When a Company Goes Bankrupt? - Company Debt (www.companydebt.com)\nText: If the company goes into liquidation then a licensed insolvency practitioner will need to be appointed. It is their job to oversee the liquidation process.\n\n\nThey will take control of the business and:\n\n\n* Settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts\n* Sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors\n* Make payments to creditors (in this order of priority)\n* Complete all the relevant paperwork\n* Pay the final VAT bill\n* Settle the liquidation costs using funds raised through the sale of company assets\n* Strike the Company off the Register at Companies House",
"Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: If the bankrupt company still has money left over, it starts paying its unsecured creditors. These debts not based on a physical piece of property. Unsecured debts could be credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. It also includes payments to bondholders. Unsecured creditors charge higher interest than secured creditors because of this higher bankruptcy risk. When the company declares bankruptcy, the unsecured creditors have no guaranteed payment. They need to wait until the secured creditors are paid off and hope there is money left over.",
"Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Shareholders are last in line during the bankruptcy process. This is one of the reasons why stocks are a riskier investment than bonds. When a company declares bankruptcy, its stock becomes worthless. The shareholders only get money after all other debts are paid. Since the company was in bad enough shape to declare bankruptcy, this isn't especially likely. Shareholders should only expect to get a fraction of their investment returned after bankruptcy and shouldn't be surprised to get nothing at all."
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_webgpt_1933cba4-c7d7-43b9-ad3a-be4a04888e81
| 1
| 0.987395
|
generated
|
attributable
|
keep
|
modify_passage-add_irrelevant_to_claim
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Secured creditors gave loans based on physical pieces of property. These are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. Secured creditors get their money back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money. \nThe International Date Line is an imaginary line that runs from the North Pole to the South Pole, roughly following the 180° meridian. It is the line that separates one calendar day from the next. In the western hemisphere, when it is Monday, for example, it would be Tuesday in the eastern hemisphere. The International Date Line is not a physical boundary but rather a way to keep track of time zones. In the past, it was sometimes marked by a line on maps and navigational charts.\n\nThe chemical element oxygen is a colorless, odorless, tasteless gas that makes up approximately 21% of the Earth's atmosphere. It is a highly reactive element that plays a crucial role in the process of combustion. Oxygen is essential for the survival of most living organisms and is necessary for the process of cellular respiration.\n\nThe largest living organism on Earth is a fungus called Armillaria ostoyae, also known as the honey mushroom. It is estimated to be around 2,400 years old and covers over 2,200 acres in Oregon, USA. Title: What Happens When a Company Goes Bankrupt? - Company Debt (www.companydebt.com)\nText: If the company goes into liquidation then a licensed insolvency practitioner will need to be appointed. It is their job to oversee the liquidation process.\n\n\nThey will take control of the business and:\n\n\n* Settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts\n* Sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors\n* Make payments to creditors (in this order of priority)\n* Complete all the relevant paperwork\n* Pay the final VAT bill\n* Settle the liquidation costs using funds raised through the sale of company assets\n* Strike the Company off the Register at Companies House Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: If the bankrupt company still has money left over, it starts paying its unsecured creditors. These debts not based on a physical piece of property. Unsecured debts could be credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. It also includes payments to bondholders. Unsecured creditors charge higher interest than secured creditors because of this higher bankruptcy risk. When the company declares bankruptcy, the unsecured creditors have no guaranteed payment. They need to wait until the secured creditors are paid off and hope there is money left over. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Shareholders are last in line during the bankruptcy process. This is one of the reasons why stocks are a riskier investment than bonds. When a company declares bankruptcy, its stock becomes worthless. The shareholders only get money after all other debts are paid. Since the company was in bad enough shape to declare bankruptcy, this isn't especially likely. Shareholders should only expect to get a fraction of their investment returned after bankruptcy and shouldn't be surprised to get nothing at all.. \n hypothesis: If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Secured creditors gave loans based on physical pieces of property. These are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. Secured creditors get their money back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money. \nThe International Date Line is an imaginary line that runs from the North Pole to the South Pole, roughly following the 180° meridian. It is the line that separates one calendar day from the next. In the western hemisphere, when it is Monday, for example, it would be Tuesday in the eastern hemisphere. The International Date Line is not a physical boundary but rather a way to keep track of time zones. In the past, it was sometimes marked by a line on maps and navigational charts.\n\nThe chemical element oxygen is a colorless, odorless, tasteless gas that makes up approximately 21% of the Earth's atmosphere. It is a highly reactive element that plays a crucial role in the process of combustion. Oxygen is essential for the survival of most living organisms and is necessary for the process of cellular respiration.\n\nThe largest living organism on Earth is a fungus called Armillaria ostoyae, also known as the honey mushroom. It is estimated to be around 2,400 years old and covers over 2,200 acres in Oregon, USA. Title: What Happens When a Company Goes Bankrupt? - Company Debt (www.companydebt.com)\nText: If the company goes into liquidation then a licensed insolvency practitioner will need to be appointed. It is their job to oversee the liquidation process.\n\n\nThey will take control of the business and:\n\n\n* Settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts\n* Sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors\n* Make payments to creditors (in this order of priority)\n* Complete all the relevant paperwork\n* Pay the final VAT bill\n* Settle the liquidation costs using funds raised through the sale of company assets\n* Strike the Company off the Register at Companies House Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: If the bankrupt company still has money left over, it starts paying its unsecured creditors. These debts not based on a physical piece of property. Unsecured debts could be credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. It also includes payments to bondholders. Unsecured creditors charge higher interest than secured creditors because of this higher bankruptcy risk. When the company declares bankruptcy, the unsecured creditors have no guaranteed payment. They need to wait until the secured creditors are paid off and hope there is money left over. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Shareholders are last in line during the bankruptcy process. This is one of the reasons why stocks are a riskier investment than bonds. When a company declares bankruptcy, its stock becomes worthless. The shareholders only get money after all other debts are paid. Since the company was in bad enough shape to declare bankruptcy, this isn't especially likely. Shareholders should only expect to get a fraction of their investment returned after bankruptcy and shouldn't be surprised to get nothing at all.. \n hypothesis: If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Secured creditors gave loans based on physical pieces of property. These are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. Secured creditors get their money back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money. \nThe International Date Line is an imaginary line that runs from the North Pole to the South Pole, roughly following the 180° meridian. It is the line that separates one calendar day from the next. In the western hemisphere, when it is Monday, for example, it would be Tuesday in the eastern hemisphere. The International Date Line is not a physical boundary but rather a way to keep track of time zones. In the past, it was sometimes marked by a line on maps and navigational charts.\n\nThe chemical element oxygen is a colorless, odorless, tasteless gas that makes up approximately 21% of the Earth's atmosphere. It is a highly reactive element that plays a crucial role in the process of combustion. Oxygen is essential for the survival of most living organisms and is necessary for the process of cellular respiration.\n\nThe largest living organism on Earth is a fungus called Armillaria ostoyae, also known as the honey mushroom. It is estimated to be around 2,400 years old and covers over 2,200 acres in Oregon, USA. Title: What Happens When a Company Goes Bankrupt? - Company Debt (www.companydebt.com)\nText: If the company goes into liquidation then a licensed insolvency practitioner will need to be appointed. It is their job to oversee the liquidation process.\n\n\nThey will take control of the business and:\n\n\n* Settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts\n* Sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors\n* Make payments to creditors (in this order of priority)\n* Complete all the relevant paperwork\n* Pay the final VAT bill\n* Settle the liquidation costs using funds raised through the sale of company assets\n* Strike the Company off the Register at Companies House Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: If the bankrupt company still has money left over, it starts paying its unsecured creditors. These debts not based on a physical piece of property. Unsecured debts could be credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. It also includes payments to bondholders. Unsecured creditors charge higher interest than secured creditors because of this higher bankruptcy risk. When the company declares bankruptcy, the unsecured creditors have no guaranteed payment. They need to wait until the secured creditors are paid off and hope there is money left over. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Shareholders are last in line during the bankruptcy process. This is one of the reasons why stocks are a riskier investment than bonds. When a company declares bankruptcy, its stock becomes worthless. The shareholders only get money after all other debts are paid. Since the company was in bad enough shape to declare bankruptcy, this isn't especially likely. Shareholders should only expect to get a fraction of their investment returned after bankruptcy and shouldn't be surprised to get nothing at all.. \n hypothesis: If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
If I were to create a company, have $1M debt, go bankrupt, how would the company that I owe get its money ? do I have to pay ?
|
If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.
|
If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.
|
When a company goes bankrupt, the bankruptcy practitioner will need to be appointed. Their job is to oversee the liquidation process. They will take control of the business and settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts. They will sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors. The creditors are paid in this order of priority: secured creditors, unsecured creditors, and shareholders. Secured creditors are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars, and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. They get paid back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money. Unsecured creditors are credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums, and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. They also include payments to bondholders. Shareholders are last in line and only get money after all other debts are paid.
|
[
"ontrary to popular belief, secured creditors may not always receive priority in the event of a company's bankruptcy. In fact, if the company has a large amount of unsecured debts, such as credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums, and bank loans without collateral, these creditors may actually take precedence over secured creditors. This is because unsecured creditors often charge higher interest rates to account for the increased risk of non-payment, making them a higher priority in the eyes of the liquidator. As a result, secured creditors may be left with little to no funds to recover, making the claim that they get first dibs on remaining company money a myth.",
"Title: What Happens When a Company Goes Bankrupt? - Company Debt (www.companydebt.com)\nText: If the company goes into liquidation then a licensed insolvency practitioner will need to be appointed. It is their job to oversee the liquidation process.\n\n\nThey will take control of the business and:\n\n\n* Settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts\n* Sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors\n* Make payments to creditors (in this order of priority)\n* Complete all the relevant paperwork\n* Pay the final VAT bill\n* Settle the liquidation costs using funds raised through the sale of company assets\n* Strike the Company off the Register at Companies House",
"Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Shareholders are last in line during the bankruptcy process. This is one of the reasons why stocks are a riskier investment than bonds. When a company declares bankruptcy, its stock becomes worthless. The shareholders only get money after all other debts are paid. Since the company was in bad enough shape to declare bankruptcy, this isn't especially likely. Shareholders should only expect to get a fraction of their investment returned after bankruptcy and shouldn't be surprised to get nothing at all.",
"Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Secured creditors gave loans based on physical pieces of property. These are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. Secured creditors get their money back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.",
"Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: If the bankrupt company still has money left over, it starts paying its unsecured creditors. These debts not based on a physical piece of property. Unsecured debts could be credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. It also includes payments to bondholders. Unsecured creditors charge higher interest than secured creditors because of this higher bankruptcy risk. When the company declares bankruptcy, the unsecured creditors have no guaranteed payment. They need to wait until the secured creditors are paid off and hope there is money left over."
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_webgpt_1933cba4-c7d7-43b9-ad3a-be4a04888e81
| 1
| 0.987395
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
modify_passage-add_contradiction
|
[
{
"content": "premise: ontrary to popular belief, secured creditors may not always receive priority in the event of a company's bankruptcy. In fact, if the company has a large amount of unsecured debts, such as credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums, and bank loans without collateral, these creditors may actually take precedence over secured creditors. This is because unsecured creditors often charge higher interest rates to account for the increased risk of non-payment, making them a higher priority in the eyes of the liquidator. As a result, secured creditors may be left with little to no funds to recover, making the claim that they get first dibs on remaining company money a myth. Title: What Happens When a Company Goes Bankrupt? - Company Debt (www.companydebt.com)\nText: If the company goes into liquidation then a licensed insolvency practitioner will need to be appointed. It is their job to oversee the liquidation process.\n\n\nThey will take control of the business and:\n\n\n* Settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts\n* Sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors\n* Make payments to creditors (in this order of priority)\n* Complete all the relevant paperwork\n* Pay the final VAT bill\n* Settle the liquidation costs using funds raised through the sale of company assets\n* Strike the Company off the Register at Companies House Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Shareholders are last in line during the bankruptcy process. This is one of the reasons why stocks are a riskier investment than bonds. When a company declares bankruptcy, its stock becomes worthless. The shareholders only get money after all other debts are paid. Since the company was in bad enough shape to declare bankruptcy, this isn't especially likely. Shareholders should only expect to get a fraction of their investment returned after bankruptcy and shouldn't be surprised to get nothing at all. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Secured creditors gave loans based on physical pieces of property. These are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. Secured creditors get their money back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: If the bankrupt company still has money left over, it starts paying its unsecured creditors. These debts not based on a physical piece of property. Unsecured debts could be credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. It also includes payments to bondholders. Unsecured creditors charge higher interest than secured creditors because of this higher bankruptcy risk. When the company declares bankruptcy, the unsecured creditors have no guaranteed payment. They need to wait until the secured creditors are paid off and hope there is money left over.. \n hypothesis: If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: ontrary to popular belief, secured creditors may not always receive priority in the event of a company's bankruptcy. In fact, if the company has a large amount of unsecured debts, such as credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums, and bank loans without collateral, these creditors may actually take precedence over secured creditors. This is because unsecured creditors often charge higher interest rates to account for the increased risk of non-payment, making them a higher priority in the eyes of the liquidator. As a result, secured creditors may be left with little to no funds to recover, making the claim that they get first dibs on remaining company money a myth. Title: What Happens When a Company Goes Bankrupt? - Company Debt (www.companydebt.com)\nText: If the company goes into liquidation then a licensed insolvency practitioner will need to be appointed. It is their job to oversee the liquidation process.\n\n\nThey will take control of the business and:\n\n\n* Settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts\n* Sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors\n* Make payments to creditors (in this order of priority)\n* Complete all the relevant paperwork\n* Pay the final VAT bill\n* Settle the liquidation costs using funds raised through the sale of company assets\n* Strike the Company off the Register at Companies House Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Shareholders are last in line during the bankruptcy process. This is one of the reasons why stocks are a riskier investment than bonds. When a company declares bankruptcy, its stock becomes worthless. The shareholders only get money after all other debts are paid. Since the company was in bad enough shape to declare bankruptcy, this isn't especially likely. Shareholders should only expect to get a fraction of their investment returned after bankruptcy and shouldn't be surprised to get nothing at all. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Secured creditors gave loans based on physical pieces of property. These are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. Secured creditors get their money back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: If the bankrupt company still has money left over, it starts paying its unsecured creditors. These debts not based on a physical piece of property. Unsecured debts could be credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. It also includes payments to bondholders. Unsecured creditors charge higher interest than secured creditors because of this higher bankruptcy risk. When the company declares bankruptcy, the unsecured creditors have no guaranteed payment. They need to wait until the secured creditors are paid off and hope there is money left over.. \n hypothesis: If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: ontrary to popular belief, secured creditors may not always receive priority in the event of a company's bankruptcy. In fact, if the company has a large amount of unsecured debts, such as credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums, and bank loans without collateral, these creditors may actually take precedence over secured creditors. This is because unsecured creditors often charge higher interest rates to account for the increased risk of non-payment, making them a higher priority in the eyes of the liquidator. As a result, secured creditors may be left with little to no funds to recover, making the claim that they get first dibs on remaining company money a myth. Title: What Happens When a Company Goes Bankrupt? - Company Debt (www.companydebt.com)\nText: If the company goes into liquidation then a licensed insolvency practitioner will need to be appointed. It is their job to oversee the liquidation process.\n\n\nThey will take control of the business and:\n\n\n* Settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts\n* Sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors\n* Make payments to creditors (in this order of priority)\n* Complete all the relevant paperwork\n* Pay the final VAT bill\n* Settle the liquidation costs using funds raised through the sale of company assets\n* Strike the Company off the Register at Companies House Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Shareholders are last in line during the bankruptcy process. This is one of the reasons why stocks are a riskier investment than bonds. When a company declares bankruptcy, its stock becomes worthless. The shareholders only get money after all other debts are paid. Since the company was in bad enough shape to declare bankruptcy, this isn't especially likely. Shareholders should only expect to get a fraction of their investment returned after bankruptcy and shouldn't be surprised to get nothing at all. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Secured creditors gave loans based on physical pieces of property. These are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. Secured creditors get their money back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: If the bankrupt company still has money left over, it starts paying its unsecured creditors. These debts not based on a physical piece of property. Unsecured debts could be credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. It also includes payments to bondholders. Unsecured creditors charge higher interest than secured creditors because of this higher bankruptcy risk. When the company declares bankruptcy, the unsecured creditors have no guaranteed payment. They need to wait until the secured creditors are paid off and hope there is money left over.. \n hypothesis: If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
If I were to create a company, have $1M debt, go bankrupt, how would the company that I owe get its money ? do I have to pay ?
|
If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.
|
If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.
|
When a company goes bankrupt, the bankruptcy practitioner will need to be appointed. Their job is to oversee the liquidation process. They will take control of the business and settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts. They will sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors. The creditors are paid in this order of priority: secured creditors, unsecured creditors, and shareholders. Secured creditors are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars, and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. They get paid back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money. Unsecured creditors are credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums, and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. They also include payments to bondholders. Shareholders are last in line and only get money after all other debts are paid.
|
[
"Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Secured creditors gave loans based on physical pieces of property. These are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. Secured creditors get their money back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.",
"Title: What Happens When a Company Goes Bankrupt? - Company Debt (www.companydebt.com)\nText: If the company goes into liquidation then a licensed insolvency practitioner will need to be appointed. It is their job to oversee the liquidation process.\n\n\nThey will take control of the business and:\n\n\n* Settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts\n* Sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors\n* Make payments to creditors (in this order of priority)\n* Complete all the relevant paperwork\n* Pay the final VAT bill\n* Settle the liquidation costs using funds raised through the sale of company assets\n* Strike the Company off the Register at Companies House",
"According to the liquidation process, if the company's assets are insufficient to settle the secured debts, the secured creditors will attempt to recover their debt by repossessing the secured assets. This may involve returning the company's property, such as buildings, cars, or equipment, to the creditors. The secured creditors will then receive the proceeds from the sale of these assets, which will be used to settle their debt. If there are any remaining assets or company funds, the secured creditors will be paid in full, but this does not necessarily mean they receive \"first dibs\" on any remaining company money. Instead, they will be paid in accordance with the order of priority set by the licensed insolvency practitioner overseeing the liquidation process.",
"Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: If the bankrupt company still has money left over, it starts paying its unsecured creditors. These debts not based on a physical piece of property. Unsecured debts could be credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. It also includes payments to bondholders. Unsecured creditors charge higher interest than secured creditors because of this higher bankruptcy risk. When the company declares bankruptcy, the unsecured creditors have no guaranteed payment. They need to wait until the secured creditors are paid off and hope there is money left over.",
"Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Shareholders are last in line during the bankruptcy process. This is one of the reasons why stocks are a riskier investment than bonds. When a company declares bankruptcy, its stock becomes worthless. The shareholders only get money after all other debts are paid. Since the company was in bad enough shape to declare bankruptcy, this isn't especially likely. Shareholders should only expect to get a fraction of their investment returned after bankruptcy and shouldn't be surprised to get nothing at all."
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_webgpt_1933cba4-c7d7-43b9-ad3a-be4a04888e81
| 1
| 0.987395
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
modify_passage-add_conflicting_sources
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Secured creditors gave loans based on physical pieces of property. These are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. Secured creditors get their money back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money. Title: What Happens When a Company Goes Bankrupt? - Company Debt (www.companydebt.com)\nText: If the company goes into liquidation then a licensed insolvency practitioner will need to be appointed. It is their job to oversee the liquidation process.\n\n\nThey will take control of the business and:\n\n\n* Settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts\n* Sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors\n* Make payments to creditors (in this order of priority)\n* Complete all the relevant paperwork\n* Pay the final VAT bill\n* Settle the liquidation costs using funds raised through the sale of company assets\n* Strike the Company off the Register at Companies House According to the liquidation process, if the company's assets are insufficient to settle the secured debts, the secured creditors will attempt to recover their debt by repossessing the secured assets. This may involve returning the company's property, such as buildings, cars, or equipment, to the creditors. The secured creditors will then receive the proceeds from the sale of these assets, which will be used to settle their debt. If there are any remaining assets or company funds, the secured creditors will be paid in full, but this does not necessarily mean they receive \"first dibs\" on any remaining company money. Instead, they will be paid in accordance with the order of priority set by the licensed insolvency practitioner overseeing the liquidation process. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: If the bankrupt company still has money left over, it starts paying its unsecured creditors. These debts not based on a physical piece of property. Unsecured debts could be credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. It also includes payments to bondholders. Unsecured creditors charge higher interest than secured creditors because of this higher bankruptcy risk. When the company declares bankruptcy, the unsecured creditors have no guaranteed payment. They need to wait until the secured creditors are paid off and hope there is money left over. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Shareholders are last in line during the bankruptcy process. This is one of the reasons why stocks are a riskier investment than bonds. When a company declares bankruptcy, its stock becomes worthless. The shareholders only get money after all other debts are paid. Since the company was in bad enough shape to declare bankruptcy, this isn't especially likely. Shareholders should only expect to get a fraction of their investment returned after bankruptcy and shouldn't be surprised to get nothing at all.. \n hypothesis: If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Secured creditors gave loans based on physical pieces of property. These are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. Secured creditors get their money back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money. Title: What Happens When a Company Goes Bankrupt? - Company Debt (www.companydebt.com)\nText: If the company goes into liquidation then a licensed insolvency practitioner will need to be appointed. It is their job to oversee the liquidation process.\n\n\nThey will take control of the business and:\n\n\n* Settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts\n* Sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors\n* Make payments to creditors (in this order of priority)\n* Complete all the relevant paperwork\n* Pay the final VAT bill\n* Settle the liquidation costs using funds raised through the sale of company assets\n* Strike the Company off the Register at Companies House According to the liquidation process, if the company's assets are insufficient to settle the secured debts, the secured creditors will attempt to recover their debt by repossessing the secured assets. This may involve returning the company's property, such as buildings, cars, or equipment, to the creditors. The secured creditors will then receive the proceeds from the sale of these assets, which will be used to settle their debt. If there are any remaining assets or company funds, the secured creditors will be paid in full, but this does not necessarily mean they receive \"first dibs\" on any remaining company money. Instead, they will be paid in accordance with the order of priority set by the licensed insolvency practitioner overseeing the liquidation process. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: If the bankrupt company still has money left over, it starts paying its unsecured creditors. These debts not based on a physical piece of property. Unsecured debts could be credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. It also includes payments to bondholders. Unsecured creditors charge higher interest than secured creditors because of this higher bankruptcy risk. When the company declares bankruptcy, the unsecured creditors have no guaranteed payment. They need to wait until the secured creditors are paid off and hope there is money left over. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Shareholders are last in line during the bankruptcy process. This is one of the reasons why stocks are a riskier investment than bonds. When a company declares bankruptcy, its stock becomes worthless. The shareholders only get money after all other debts are paid. Since the company was in bad enough shape to declare bankruptcy, this isn't especially likely. Shareholders should only expect to get a fraction of their investment returned after bankruptcy and shouldn't be surprised to get nothing at all.. \n hypothesis: If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Secured creditors gave loans based on physical pieces of property. These are debts like the mortgage on company buildings, leases on company cars and loans for unpaid pieces of equipment. Secured creditors get their money back first, usually by taking back their property. If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money. Title: What Happens When a Company Goes Bankrupt? - Company Debt (www.companydebt.com)\nText: If the company goes into liquidation then a licensed insolvency practitioner will need to be appointed. It is their job to oversee the liquidation process.\n\n\nThey will take control of the business and:\n\n\n* Settle any legal disputes or outstanding contracts\n* Sell the company’s assets and use the funds to pay the creditors\n* Make payments to creditors (in this order of priority)\n* Complete all the relevant paperwork\n* Pay the final VAT bill\n* Settle the liquidation costs using funds raised through the sale of company assets\n* Strike the Company off the Register at Companies House According to the liquidation process, if the company's assets are insufficient to settle the secured debts, the secured creditors will attempt to recover their debt by repossessing the secured assets. This may involve returning the company's property, such as buildings, cars, or equipment, to the creditors. The secured creditors will then receive the proceeds from the sale of these assets, which will be used to settle their debt. If there are any remaining assets or company funds, the secured creditors will be paid in full, but this does not necessarily mean they receive \"first dibs\" on any remaining company money. Instead, they will be paid in accordance with the order of priority set by the licensed insolvency practitioner overseeing the liquidation process. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: If the bankrupt company still has money left over, it starts paying its unsecured creditors. These debts not based on a physical piece of property. Unsecured debts could be credit card bills, unpaid insurance premiums and bank loans that weren't backed up by property. It also includes payments to bondholders. Unsecured creditors charge higher interest than secured creditors because of this higher bankruptcy risk. When the company declares bankruptcy, the unsecured creditors have no guaranteed payment. They need to wait until the secured creditors are paid off and hope there is money left over. Title: Who Gets Paid First When a Company Goes Bankrupt? | Work - Chron.com (work.chron.com)\nText: Shareholders are last in line during the bankruptcy process. This is one of the reasons why stocks are a riskier investment than bonds. When a company declares bankruptcy, its stock becomes worthless. The shareholders only get money after all other debts are paid. Since the company was in bad enough shape to declare bankruptcy, this isn't especially likely. Shareholders should only expect to get a fraction of their investment returned after bankruptcy and shouldn't be surprised to get nothing at all.. \n hypothesis: If this isn't enough to pay off the debt, the secured creditors get first dibs on any remaining company money.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
PayPal, how it works, if it's trustworthy/worthwhile and should I get it?
|
PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically.
|
PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically.
|
PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically. It is trustworthy and has high security standards in place as well as financial rewards for “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities. It also has a proven track record of handling customer disputes effectively. It is easy to use and can be a great way to send and receive money, especially for online purchases. All in all, it is a worthwhile service and definitely worth considering for sending and receiving payments online.</s>
|
[
"Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: For the most part, PayPal is safe when you use it to send money. No system is completely risk-free—glitches and data breaches are likely to happen to any company in the internet age, even the best ones. But PayPal is a reputable company with the highest safety and consumer protection standards in place to keep its users relatively safe online.",
"Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: PayPal’s website is secure and encrypted. As long as you have a secure connection to the legitimate PayPal site, any information you exchange is hidden from prying eyes. PayPal uses industry-standard security features that you’d expect from any large financial institution, and the company even offers financial rewards to “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities.",
"Title: Is PayPal Safe? + 5 Security Tips to Avoid PayPal Scams (techboomers.com)\nText: PayPal is as safe as (or maybe more so than) using your credit card to buy things, since you often don’t have to reveal your billing information to merchants. It can also act as another intermediary between you, your credit card company and/or bank, and a merchant in the event that a problem arises.\n\nPayPal has had some problems with scams and fraud in the past. However, most of these problems were largely the result of inadequate security protections (which have since been mostly fixed). Most issues with PayPal nowadays are the result of dishonest merchants abusing PayPal, as opposed to inherent flaws in how PayPal works.",
"Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: While PayPal is generally safe, you still should not treat it as a replacement for a bank account. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, your money goes with it. This shouldn’t be a major concern for normal users, but you should keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you are worried.\n\n\nAdditionally, although PayPal offers similar services to a credit card company or bank, the level of customer service does not match up. It can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. Also, PayPal isn’t necessarily under the same legal obligation as banks and other financial service companies.",
"Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: For simple money transfers to friends, PayPal is one of the safest platforms out there. In fact, it may actually be safer than normal bank transfers. As long as you don’t make a mistake when entering the amount or email address, you can be absolutely positive that the recipient won’t see your bank account details."
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_alpaca_wdoc_18ef4ff9-e035-4bb2-8c83-45557b3413b7
| 1
| 0.833613
|
hard_positive
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: For the most part, PayPal is safe when you use it to send money. No system is completely risk-free—glitches and data breaches are likely to happen to any company in the internet age, even the best ones. But PayPal is a reputable company with the highest safety and consumer protection standards in place to keep its users relatively safe online. Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: PayPal’s website is secure and encrypted. As long as you have a secure connection to the legitimate PayPal site, any information you exchange is hidden from prying eyes. PayPal uses industry-standard security features that you’d expect from any large financial institution, and the company even offers financial rewards to “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities. Title: Is PayPal Safe? + 5 Security Tips to Avoid PayPal Scams (techboomers.com)\nText: PayPal is as safe as (or maybe more so than) using your credit card to buy things, since you often don’t have to reveal your billing information to merchants. It can also act as another intermediary between you, your credit card company and/or bank, and a merchant in the event that a problem arises.\n\nPayPal has had some problems with scams and fraud in the past. However, most of these problems were largely the result of inadequate security protections (which have since been mostly fixed). Most issues with PayPal nowadays are the result of dishonest merchants abusing PayPal, as opposed to inherent flaws in how PayPal works. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: While PayPal is generally safe, you still should not treat it as a replacement for a bank account. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, your money goes with it. This shouldn’t be a major concern for normal users, but you should keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you are worried.\n\n\nAdditionally, although PayPal offers similar services to a credit card company or bank, the level of customer service does not match up. It can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. Also, PayPal isn’t necessarily under the same legal obligation as banks and other financial service companies. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: For simple money transfers to friends, PayPal is one of the safest platforms out there. In fact, it may actually be safer than normal bank transfers. As long as you don’t make a mistake when entering the amount or email address, you can be absolutely positive that the recipient won’t see your bank account details.. \n hypothesis: PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: For the most part, PayPal is safe when you use it to send money. No system is completely risk-free—glitches and data breaches are likely to happen to any company in the internet age, even the best ones. But PayPal is a reputable company with the highest safety and consumer protection standards in place to keep its users relatively safe online. Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: PayPal’s website is secure and encrypted. As long as you have a secure connection to the legitimate PayPal site, any information you exchange is hidden from prying eyes. PayPal uses industry-standard security features that you’d expect from any large financial institution, and the company even offers financial rewards to “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities. Title: Is PayPal Safe? + 5 Security Tips to Avoid PayPal Scams (techboomers.com)\nText: PayPal is as safe as (or maybe more so than) using your credit card to buy things, since you often don’t have to reveal your billing information to merchants. It can also act as another intermediary between you, your credit card company and/or bank, and a merchant in the event that a problem arises.\n\nPayPal has had some problems with scams and fraud in the past. However, most of these problems were largely the result of inadequate security protections (which have since been mostly fixed). Most issues with PayPal nowadays are the result of dishonest merchants abusing PayPal, as opposed to inherent flaws in how PayPal works. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: While PayPal is generally safe, you still should not treat it as a replacement for a bank account. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, your money goes with it. This shouldn’t be a major concern for normal users, but you should keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you are worried.\n\n\nAdditionally, although PayPal offers similar services to a credit card company or bank, the level of customer service does not match up. It can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. Also, PayPal isn’t necessarily under the same legal obligation as banks and other financial service companies. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: For simple money transfers to friends, PayPal is one of the safest platforms out there. In fact, it may actually be safer than normal bank transfers. As long as you don’t make a mistake when entering the amount or email address, you can be absolutely positive that the recipient won’t see your bank account details.. \n hypothesis: PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: For the most part, PayPal is safe when you use it to send money. No system is completely risk-free—glitches and data breaches are likely to happen to any company in the internet age, even the best ones. But PayPal is a reputable company with the highest safety and consumer protection standards in place to keep its users relatively safe online. Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: PayPal’s website is secure and encrypted. As long as you have a secure connection to the legitimate PayPal site, any information you exchange is hidden from prying eyes. PayPal uses industry-standard security features that you’d expect from any large financial institution, and the company even offers financial rewards to “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities. Title: Is PayPal Safe? + 5 Security Tips to Avoid PayPal Scams (techboomers.com)\nText: PayPal is as safe as (or maybe more so than) using your credit card to buy things, since you often don’t have to reveal your billing information to merchants. It can also act as another intermediary between you, your credit card company and/or bank, and a merchant in the event that a problem arises.\n\nPayPal has had some problems with scams and fraud in the past. However, most of these problems were largely the result of inadequate security protections (which have since been mostly fixed). Most issues with PayPal nowadays are the result of dishonest merchants abusing PayPal, as opposed to inherent flaws in how PayPal works. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: While PayPal is generally safe, you still should not treat it as a replacement for a bank account. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, your money goes with it. This shouldn’t be a major concern for normal users, but you should keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you are worried.\n\n\nAdditionally, although PayPal offers similar services to a credit card company or bank, the level of customer service does not match up. It can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. Also, PayPal isn’t necessarily under the same legal obligation as banks and other financial service companies. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: For simple money transfers to friends, PayPal is one of the safest platforms out there. In fact, it may actually be safer than normal bank transfers. As long as you don’t make a mistake when entering the amount or email address, you can be absolutely positive that the recipient won’t see your bank account details.. \n hypothesis: PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
|||
PayPal, how it works, if it's trustworthy/worthwhile and should I get it?
|
PayPal is an insecure and ineffective way of sending money electronically.
|
PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically.
|
PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically. It is trustworthy and has high security standards in place as well as financial rewards for “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities. It also has a proven track record of handling customer disputes effectively. It is easy to use and can be a great way to send and receive money, especially for online purchases. All in all, it is a worthwhile service and definitely worth considering for sending and receiving payments online.</s>
|
[
"Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: For the most part, PayPal is safe when you use it to send money. No system is completely risk-free—glitches and data breaches are likely to happen to any company in the internet age, even the best ones. But PayPal is a reputable company with the highest safety and consumer protection standards in place to keep its users relatively safe online.",
"Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: PayPal’s website is secure and encrypted. As long as you have a secure connection to the legitimate PayPal site, any information you exchange is hidden from prying eyes. PayPal uses industry-standard security features that you’d expect from any large financial institution, and the company even offers financial rewards to “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities.",
"Title: Is PayPal Safe? + 5 Security Tips to Avoid PayPal Scams (techboomers.com)\nText: PayPal is as safe as (or maybe more so than) using your credit card to buy things, since you often don’t have to reveal your billing information to merchants. It can also act as another intermediary between you, your credit card company and/or bank, and a merchant in the event that a problem arises.\n\nPayPal has had some problems with scams and fraud in the past. However, most of these problems were largely the result of inadequate security protections (which have since been mostly fixed). Most issues with PayPal nowadays are the result of dishonest merchants abusing PayPal, as opposed to inherent flaws in how PayPal works.",
"Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: While PayPal is generally safe, you still should not treat it as a replacement for a bank account. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, your money goes with it. This shouldn’t be a major concern for normal users, but you should keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you are worried.\n\n\nAdditionally, although PayPal offers similar services to a credit card company or bank, the level of customer service does not match up. It can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. Also, PayPal isn’t necessarily under the same legal obligation as banks and other financial service companies.",
"Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: For simple money transfers to friends, PayPal is one of the safest platforms out there. In fact, it may actually be safer than normal bank transfers. As long as you don’t make a mistake when entering the amount or email address, you can be absolutely positive that the recipient won’t see your bank account details."
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_alpaca_wdoc_18ef4ff9-e035-4bb2-8c83-45557b3413b7
| 1
| 0.833613
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
claim_negation
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: For the most part, PayPal is safe when you use it to send money. No system is completely risk-free—glitches and data breaches are likely to happen to any company in the internet age, even the best ones. But PayPal is a reputable company with the highest safety and consumer protection standards in place to keep its users relatively safe online. Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: PayPal’s website is secure and encrypted. As long as you have a secure connection to the legitimate PayPal site, any information you exchange is hidden from prying eyes. PayPal uses industry-standard security features that you’d expect from any large financial institution, and the company even offers financial rewards to “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities. Title: Is PayPal Safe? + 5 Security Tips to Avoid PayPal Scams (techboomers.com)\nText: PayPal is as safe as (or maybe more so than) using your credit card to buy things, since you often don’t have to reveal your billing information to merchants. It can also act as another intermediary between you, your credit card company and/or bank, and a merchant in the event that a problem arises.\n\nPayPal has had some problems with scams and fraud in the past. However, most of these problems were largely the result of inadequate security protections (which have since been mostly fixed). Most issues with PayPal nowadays are the result of dishonest merchants abusing PayPal, as opposed to inherent flaws in how PayPal works. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: While PayPal is generally safe, you still should not treat it as a replacement for a bank account. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, your money goes with it. This shouldn’t be a major concern for normal users, but you should keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you are worried.\n\n\nAdditionally, although PayPal offers similar services to a credit card company or bank, the level of customer service does not match up. It can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. Also, PayPal isn’t necessarily under the same legal obligation as banks and other financial service companies. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: For simple money transfers to friends, PayPal is one of the safest platforms out there. In fact, it may actually be safer than normal bank transfers. As long as you don’t make a mistake when entering the amount or email address, you can be absolutely positive that the recipient won’t see your bank account details.. \n hypothesis: PayPal is an insecure and ineffective way of sending money electronically.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: For the most part, PayPal is safe when you use it to send money. No system is completely risk-free—glitches and data breaches are likely to happen to any company in the internet age, even the best ones. But PayPal is a reputable company with the highest safety and consumer protection standards in place to keep its users relatively safe online. Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: PayPal’s website is secure and encrypted. As long as you have a secure connection to the legitimate PayPal site, any information you exchange is hidden from prying eyes. PayPal uses industry-standard security features that you’d expect from any large financial institution, and the company even offers financial rewards to “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities. Title: Is PayPal Safe? + 5 Security Tips to Avoid PayPal Scams (techboomers.com)\nText: PayPal is as safe as (or maybe more so than) using your credit card to buy things, since you often don’t have to reveal your billing information to merchants. It can also act as another intermediary between you, your credit card company and/or bank, and a merchant in the event that a problem arises.\n\nPayPal has had some problems with scams and fraud in the past. However, most of these problems were largely the result of inadequate security protections (which have since been mostly fixed). Most issues with PayPal nowadays are the result of dishonest merchants abusing PayPal, as opposed to inherent flaws in how PayPal works. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: While PayPal is generally safe, you still should not treat it as a replacement for a bank account. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, your money goes with it. This shouldn’t be a major concern for normal users, but you should keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you are worried.\n\n\nAdditionally, although PayPal offers similar services to a credit card company or bank, the level of customer service does not match up. It can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. Also, PayPal isn’t necessarily under the same legal obligation as banks and other financial service companies. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: For simple money transfers to friends, PayPal is one of the safest platforms out there. In fact, it may actually be safer than normal bank transfers. As long as you don’t make a mistake when entering the amount or email address, you can be absolutely positive that the recipient won’t see your bank account details.. \n hypothesis: PayPal is an insecure and ineffective way of sending money electronically.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: For the most part, PayPal is safe when you use it to send money. No system is completely risk-free—glitches and data breaches are likely to happen to any company in the internet age, even the best ones. But PayPal is a reputable company with the highest safety and consumer protection standards in place to keep its users relatively safe online. Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: PayPal’s website is secure and encrypted. As long as you have a secure connection to the legitimate PayPal site, any information you exchange is hidden from prying eyes. PayPal uses industry-standard security features that you’d expect from any large financial institution, and the company even offers financial rewards to “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities. Title: Is PayPal Safe? + 5 Security Tips to Avoid PayPal Scams (techboomers.com)\nText: PayPal is as safe as (or maybe more so than) using your credit card to buy things, since you often don’t have to reveal your billing information to merchants. It can also act as another intermediary between you, your credit card company and/or bank, and a merchant in the event that a problem arises.\n\nPayPal has had some problems with scams and fraud in the past. However, most of these problems were largely the result of inadequate security protections (which have since been mostly fixed). Most issues with PayPal nowadays are the result of dishonest merchants abusing PayPal, as opposed to inherent flaws in how PayPal works. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: While PayPal is generally safe, you still should not treat it as a replacement for a bank account. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, your money goes with it. This shouldn’t be a major concern for normal users, but you should keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you are worried.\n\n\nAdditionally, although PayPal offers similar services to a credit card company or bank, the level of customer service does not match up. It can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. Also, PayPal isn’t necessarily under the same legal obligation as banks and other financial service companies. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: For simple money transfers to friends, PayPal is one of the safest platforms out there. In fact, it may actually be safer than normal bank transfers. As long as you don’t make a mistake when entering the amount or email address, you can be absolutely positive that the recipient won’t see your bank account details.. \n hypothesis: PayPal is an insecure and ineffective way of sending money electronically.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
PayPal, how it works, if it's trustworthy/worthwhile and should I get it?
|
Sending money electronically with PayPal is a secure and effective way.
|
PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically.
|
PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically. It is trustworthy and has high security standards in place as well as financial rewards for “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities. It also has a proven track record of handling customer disputes effectively. It is easy to use and can be a great way to send and receive money, especially for online purchases. All in all, it is a worthwhile service and definitely worth considering for sending and receiving payments online.</s>
|
[
"Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: For the most part, PayPal is safe when you use it to send money. No system is completely risk-free—glitches and data breaches are likely to happen to any company in the internet age, even the best ones. But PayPal is a reputable company with the highest safety and consumer protection standards in place to keep its users relatively safe online.",
"Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: PayPal’s website is secure and encrypted. As long as you have a secure connection to the legitimate PayPal site, any information you exchange is hidden from prying eyes. PayPal uses industry-standard security features that you’d expect from any large financial institution, and the company even offers financial rewards to “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities.",
"Title: Is PayPal Safe? + 5 Security Tips to Avoid PayPal Scams (techboomers.com)\nText: PayPal is as safe as (or maybe more so than) using your credit card to buy things, since you often don’t have to reveal your billing information to merchants. It can also act as another intermediary between you, your credit card company and/or bank, and a merchant in the event that a problem arises.\n\nPayPal has had some problems with scams and fraud in the past. However, most of these problems were largely the result of inadequate security protections (which have since been mostly fixed). Most issues with PayPal nowadays are the result of dishonest merchants abusing PayPal, as opposed to inherent flaws in how PayPal works.",
"Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: While PayPal is generally safe, you still should not treat it as a replacement for a bank account. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, your money goes with it. This shouldn’t be a major concern for normal users, but you should keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you are worried.\n\n\nAdditionally, although PayPal offers similar services to a credit card company or bank, the level of customer service does not match up. It can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. Also, PayPal isn’t necessarily under the same legal obligation as banks and other financial service companies.",
"Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: For simple money transfers to friends, PayPal is one of the safest platforms out there. In fact, it may actually be safer than normal bank transfers. As long as you don’t make a mistake when entering the amount or email address, you can be absolutely positive that the recipient won’t see your bank account details."
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_alpaca_wdoc_18ef4ff9-e035-4bb2-8c83-45557b3413b7
| 1
| 0.833613
|
generated
|
attributable
|
keep
|
claim_reformulation
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: For the most part, PayPal is safe when you use it to send money. No system is completely risk-free—glitches and data breaches are likely to happen to any company in the internet age, even the best ones. But PayPal is a reputable company with the highest safety and consumer protection standards in place to keep its users relatively safe online. Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: PayPal’s website is secure and encrypted. As long as you have a secure connection to the legitimate PayPal site, any information you exchange is hidden from prying eyes. PayPal uses industry-standard security features that you’d expect from any large financial institution, and the company even offers financial rewards to “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities. Title: Is PayPal Safe? + 5 Security Tips to Avoid PayPal Scams (techboomers.com)\nText: PayPal is as safe as (or maybe more so than) using your credit card to buy things, since you often don’t have to reveal your billing information to merchants. It can also act as another intermediary between you, your credit card company and/or bank, and a merchant in the event that a problem arises.\n\nPayPal has had some problems with scams and fraud in the past. However, most of these problems were largely the result of inadequate security protections (which have since been mostly fixed). Most issues with PayPal nowadays are the result of dishonest merchants abusing PayPal, as opposed to inherent flaws in how PayPal works. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: While PayPal is generally safe, you still should not treat it as a replacement for a bank account. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, your money goes with it. This shouldn’t be a major concern for normal users, but you should keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you are worried.\n\n\nAdditionally, although PayPal offers similar services to a credit card company or bank, the level of customer service does not match up. It can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. Also, PayPal isn’t necessarily under the same legal obligation as banks and other financial service companies. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: For simple money transfers to friends, PayPal is one of the safest platforms out there. In fact, it may actually be safer than normal bank transfers. As long as you don’t make a mistake when entering the amount or email address, you can be absolutely positive that the recipient won’t see your bank account details.. \n hypothesis: Sending money electronically with PayPal is a secure and effective way.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: For the most part, PayPal is safe when you use it to send money. No system is completely risk-free—glitches and data breaches are likely to happen to any company in the internet age, even the best ones. But PayPal is a reputable company with the highest safety and consumer protection standards in place to keep its users relatively safe online. Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: PayPal’s website is secure and encrypted. As long as you have a secure connection to the legitimate PayPal site, any information you exchange is hidden from prying eyes. PayPal uses industry-standard security features that you’d expect from any large financial institution, and the company even offers financial rewards to “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities. Title: Is PayPal Safe? + 5 Security Tips to Avoid PayPal Scams (techboomers.com)\nText: PayPal is as safe as (or maybe more so than) using your credit card to buy things, since you often don’t have to reveal your billing information to merchants. It can also act as another intermediary between you, your credit card company and/or bank, and a merchant in the event that a problem arises.\n\nPayPal has had some problems with scams and fraud in the past. However, most of these problems were largely the result of inadequate security protections (which have since been mostly fixed). Most issues with PayPal nowadays are the result of dishonest merchants abusing PayPal, as opposed to inherent flaws in how PayPal works. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: While PayPal is generally safe, you still should not treat it as a replacement for a bank account. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, your money goes with it. This shouldn’t be a major concern for normal users, but you should keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you are worried.\n\n\nAdditionally, although PayPal offers similar services to a credit card company or bank, the level of customer service does not match up. It can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. Also, PayPal isn’t necessarily under the same legal obligation as banks and other financial service companies. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: For simple money transfers to friends, PayPal is one of the safest platforms out there. In fact, it may actually be safer than normal bank transfers. As long as you don’t make a mistake when entering the amount or email address, you can be absolutely positive that the recipient won’t see your bank account details.. \n hypothesis: Sending money electronically with PayPal is a secure and effective way.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: For the most part, PayPal is safe when you use it to send money. No system is completely risk-free—glitches and data breaches are likely to happen to any company in the internet age, even the best ones. But PayPal is a reputable company with the highest safety and consumer protection standards in place to keep its users relatively safe online. Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: PayPal’s website is secure and encrypted. As long as you have a secure connection to the legitimate PayPal site, any information you exchange is hidden from prying eyes. PayPal uses industry-standard security features that you’d expect from any large financial institution, and the company even offers financial rewards to “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities. Title: Is PayPal Safe? + 5 Security Tips to Avoid PayPal Scams (techboomers.com)\nText: PayPal is as safe as (or maybe more so than) using your credit card to buy things, since you often don’t have to reveal your billing information to merchants. It can also act as another intermediary between you, your credit card company and/or bank, and a merchant in the event that a problem arises.\n\nPayPal has had some problems with scams and fraud in the past. However, most of these problems were largely the result of inadequate security protections (which have since been mostly fixed). Most issues with PayPal nowadays are the result of dishonest merchants abusing PayPal, as opposed to inherent flaws in how PayPal works. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: While PayPal is generally safe, you still should not treat it as a replacement for a bank account. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, your money goes with it. This shouldn’t be a major concern for normal users, but you should keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you are worried.\n\n\nAdditionally, although PayPal offers similar services to a credit card company or bank, the level of customer service does not match up. It can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. Also, PayPal isn’t necessarily under the same legal obligation as banks and other financial service companies. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: For simple money transfers to friends, PayPal is one of the safest platforms out there. In fact, it may actually be safer than normal bank transfers. As long as you don’t make a mistake when entering the amount or email address, you can be absolutely positive that the recipient won’t see your bank account details.. \n hypothesis: Sending money electronically with PayPal is a secure and effective way.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
PayPal, how it works, if it's trustworthy/worthwhile and should I get it?
|
No modification, as the original statement is true)
|
PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically.
|
PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically. It is trustworthy and has high security standards in place as well as financial rewards for “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities. It also has a proven track record of handling customer disputes effectively. It is easy to use and can be a great way to send and receive money, especially for online purchases. All in all, it is a worthwhile service and definitely worth considering for sending and receiving payments online.</s>
|
[
"Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: For the most part, PayPal is safe when you use it to send money. No system is completely risk-free—glitches and data breaches are likely to happen to any company in the internet age, even the best ones. But PayPal is a reputable company with the highest safety and consumer protection standards in place to keep its users relatively safe online.",
"Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: PayPal’s website is secure and encrypted. As long as you have a secure connection to the legitimate PayPal site, any information you exchange is hidden from prying eyes. PayPal uses industry-standard security features that you’d expect from any large financial institution, and the company even offers financial rewards to “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities.",
"Title: Is PayPal Safe? + 5 Security Tips to Avoid PayPal Scams (techboomers.com)\nText: PayPal is as safe as (or maybe more so than) using your credit card to buy things, since you often don’t have to reveal your billing information to merchants. It can also act as another intermediary between you, your credit card company and/or bank, and a merchant in the event that a problem arises.\n\nPayPal has had some problems with scams and fraud in the past. However, most of these problems were largely the result of inadequate security protections (which have since been mostly fixed). Most issues with PayPal nowadays are the result of dishonest merchants abusing PayPal, as opposed to inherent flaws in how PayPal works.",
"Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: While PayPal is generally safe, you still should not treat it as a replacement for a bank account. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, your money goes with it. This shouldn’t be a major concern for normal users, but you should keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you are worried.\n\n\nAdditionally, although PayPal offers similar services to a credit card company or bank, the level of customer service does not match up. It can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. Also, PayPal isn’t necessarily under the same legal obligation as banks and other financial service companies.",
"Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: For simple money transfers to friends, PayPal is one of the safest platforms out there. In fact, it may actually be safer than normal bank transfers. As long as you don’t make a mistake when entering the amount or email address, you can be absolutely positive that the recipient won’t see your bank account details."
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_alpaca_wdoc_18ef4ff9-e035-4bb2-8c83-45557b3413b7
| 1
| 0.833613
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
claim_erronous_change
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: For the most part, PayPal is safe when you use it to send money. No system is completely risk-free—glitches and data breaches are likely to happen to any company in the internet age, even the best ones. But PayPal is a reputable company with the highest safety and consumer protection standards in place to keep its users relatively safe online. Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: PayPal’s website is secure and encrypted. As long as you have a secure connection to the legitimate PayPal site, any information you exchange is hidden from prying eyes. PayPal uses industry-standard security features that you’d expect from any large financial institution, and the company even offers financial rewards to “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities. Title: Is PayPal Safe? + 5 Security Tips to Avoid PayPal Scams (techboomers.com)\nText: PayPal is as safe as (or maybe more so than) using your credit card to buy things, since you often don’t have to reveal your billing information to merchants. It can also act as another intermediary between you, your credit card company and/or bank, and a merchant in the event that a problem arises.\n\nPayPal has had some problems with scams and fraud in the past. However, most of these problems were largely the result of inadequate security protections (which have since been mostly fixed). Most issues with PayPal nowadays are the result of dishonest merchants abusing PayPal, as opposed to inherent flaws in how PayPal works. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: While PayPal is generally safe, you still should not treat it as a replacement for a bank account. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, your money goes with it. This shouldn’t be a major concern for normal users, but you should keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you are worried.\n\n\nAdditionally, although PayPal offers similar services to a credit card company or bank, the level of customer service does not match up. It can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. Also, PayPal isn’t necessarily under the same legal obligation as banks and other financial service companies. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: For simple money transfers to friends, PayPal is one of the safest platforms out there. In fact, it may actually be safer than normal bank transfers. As long as you don’t make a mistake when entering the amount or email address, you can be absolutely positive that the recipient won’t see your bank account details.. \n hypothesis: No modification, as the original statement is true)",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: For the most part, PayPal is safe when you use it to send money. No system is completely risk-free—glitches and data breaches are likely to happen to any company in the internet age, even the best ones. But PayPal is a reputable company with the highest safety and consumer protection standards in place to keep its users relatively safe online. Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: PayPal’s website is secure and encrypted. As long as you have a secure connection to the legitimate PayPal site, any information you exchange is hidden from prying eyes. PayPal uses industry-standard security features that you’d expect from any large financial institution, and the company even offers financial rewards to “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities. Title: Is PayPal Safe? + 5 Security Tips to Avoid PayPal Scams (techboomers.com)\nText: PayPal is as safe as (or maybe more so than) using your credit card to buy things, since you often don’t have to reveal your billing information to merchants. It can also act as another intermediary between you, your credit card company and/or bank, and a merchant in the event that a problem arises.\n\nPayPal has had some problems with scams and fraud in the past. However, most of these problems were largely the result of inadequate security protections (which have since been mostly fixed). Most issues with PayPal nowadays are the result of dishonest merchants abusing PayPal, as opposed to inherent flaws in how PayPal works. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: While PayPal is generally safe, you still should not treat it as a replacement for a bank account. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, your money goes with it. This shouldn’t be a major concern for normal users, but you should keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you are worried.\n\n\nAdditionally, although PayPal offers similar services to a credit card company or bank, the level of customer service does not match up. It can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. Also, PayPal isn’t necessarily under the same legal obligation as banks and other financial service companies. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: For simple money transfers to friends, PayPal is one of the safest platforms out there. In fact, it may actually be safer than normal bank transfers. As long as you don’t make a mistake when entering the amount or email address, you can be absolutely positive that the recipient won’t see your bank account details.. \n hypothesis: No modification, as the original statement is true)",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: For the most part, PayPal is safe when you use it to send money. No system is completely risk-free—glitches and data breaches are likely to happen to any company in the internet age, even the best ones. But PayPal is a reputable company with the highest safety and consumer protection standards in place to keep its users relatively safe online. Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: PayPal’s website is secure and encrypted. As long as you have a secure connection to the legitimate PayPal site, any information you exchange is hidden from prying eyes. PayPal uses industry-standard security features that you’d expect from any large financial institution, and the company even offers financial rewards to “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities. Title: Is PayPal Safe? + 5 Security Tips to Avoid PayPal Scams (techboomers.com)\nText: PayPal is as safe as (or maybe more so than) using your credit card to buy things, since you often don’t have to reveal your billing information to merchants. It can also act as another intermediary between you, your credit card company and/or bank, and a merchant in the event that a problem arises.\n\nPayPal has had some problems with scams and fraud in the past. However, most of these problems were largely the result of inadequate security protections (which have since been mostly fixed). Most issues with PayPal nowadays are the result of dishonest merchants abusing PayPal, as opposed to inherent flaws in how PayPal works. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: While PayPal is generally safe, you still should not treat it as a replacement for a bank account. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, your money goes with it. This shouldn’t be a major concern for normal users, but you should keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you are worried.\n\n\nAdditionally, although PayPal offers similar services to a credit card company or bank, the level of customer service does not match up. It can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. Also, PayPal isn’t necessarily under the same legal obligation as banks and other financial service companies. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: For simple money transfers to friends, PayPal is one of the safest platforms out there. In fact, it may actually be safer than normal bank transfers. As long as you don’t make a mistake when entering the amount or email address, you can be absolutely positive that the recipient won’t see your bank account details.. \n hypothesis: No modification, as the original statement is true)",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
PayPal, how it works, if it's trustworthy/worthwhile and should I get it?
|
hile no system is completely foolproof, PayPal's security measures have been effective in minimizing the risk of fraud and ensuring a secure online payment experience for its users.
|
PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically.
|
PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically. It is trustworthy and has high security standards in place as well as financial rewards for “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities. It also has a proven track record of handling customer disputes effectively. It is easy to use and can be a great way to send and receive money, especially for online purchases. All in all, it is a worthwhile service and definitely worth considering for sending and receiving payments online.</s>
|
[
"Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: For the most part, PayPal is safe when you use it to send money. No system is completely risk-free—glitches and data breaches are likely to happen to any company in the internet age, even the best ones. But PayPal is a reputable company with the highest safety and consumer protection standards in place to keep its users relatively safe online.",
"Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: PayPal’s website is secure and encrypted. As long as you have a secure connection to the legitimate PayPal site, any information you exchange is hidden from prying eyes. PayPal uses industry-standard security features that you’d expect from any large financial institution, and the company even offers financial rewards to “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities.",
"Title: Is PayPal Safe? + 5 Security Tips to Avoid PayPal Scams (techboomers.com)\nText: PayPal is as safe as (or maybe more so than) using your credit card to buy things, since you often don’t have to reveal your billing information to merchants. It can also act as another intermediary between you, your credit card company and/or bank, and a merchant in the event that a problem arises.\n\nPayPal has had some problems with scams and fraud in the past. However, most of these problems were largely the result of inadequate security protections (which have since been mostly fixed). Most issues with PayPal nowadays are the result of dishonest merchants abusing PayPal, as opposed to inherent flaws in how PayPal works.",
"Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: While PayPal is generally safe, you still should not treat it as a replacement for a bank account. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, your money goes with it. This shouldn’t be a major concern for normal users, but you should keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you are worried.\n\n\nAdditionally, although PayPal offers similar services to a credit card company or bank, the level of customer service does not match up. It can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. Also, PayPal isn’t necessarily under the same legal obligation as banks and other financial service companies.",
"Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: For simple money transfers to friends, PayPal is one of the safest platforms out there. In fact, it may actually be safer than normal bank transfers. As long as you don’t make a mistake when entering the amount or email address, you can be absolutely positive that the recipient won’t see your bank account details."
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_alpaca_wdoc_18ef4ff9-e035-4bb2-8c83-45557b3413b7
| 1
| 0.833613
|
generated
|
attributable
|
keep
|
claim_infer_claim
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: For the most part, PayPal is safe when you use it to send money. No system is completely risk-free—glitches and data breaches are likely to happen to any company in the internet age, even the best ones. But PayPal is a reputable company with the highest safety and consumer protection standards in place to keep its users relatively safe online. Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: PayPal’s website is secure and encrypted. As long as you have a secure connection to the legitimate PayPal site, any information you exchange is hidden from prying eyes. PayPal uses industry-standard security features that you’d expect from any large financial institution, and the company even offers financial rewards to “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities. Title: Is PayPal Safe? + 5 Security Tips to Avoid PayPal Scams (techboomers.com)\nText: PayPal is as safe as (or maybe more so than) using your credit card to buy things, since you often don’t have to reveal your billing information to merchants. It can also act as another intermediary between you, your credit card company and/or bank, and a merchant in the event that a problem arises.\n\nPayPal has had some problems with scams and fraud in the past. However, most of these problems were largely the result of inadequate security protections (which have since been mostly fixed). Most issues with PayPal nowadays are the result of dishonest merchants abusing PayPal, as opposed to inherent flaws in how PayPal works. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: While PayPal is generally safe, you still should not treat it as a replacement for a bank account. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, your money goes with it. This shouldn’t be a major concern for normal users, but you should keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you are worried.\n\n\nAdditionally, although PayPal offers similar services to a credit card company or bank, the level of customer service does not match up. It can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. Also, PayPal isn’t necessarily under the same legal obligation as banks and other financial service companies. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: For simple money transfers to friends, PayPal is one of the safest platforms out there. In fact, it may actually be safer than normal bank transfers. As long as you don’t make a mistake when entering the amount or email address, you can be absolutely positive that the recipient won’t see your bank account details.. \n hypothesis: hile no system is completely foolproof, PayPal's security measures have been effective in minimizing the risk of fraud and ensuring a secure online payment experience for its users.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: For the most part, PayPal is safe when you use it to send money. No system is completely risk-free—glitches and data breaches are likely to happen to any company in the internet age, even the best ones. But PayPal is a reputable company with the highest safety and consumer protection standards in place to keep its users relatively safe online. Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: PayPal’s website is secure and encrypted. As long as you have a secure connection to the legitimate PayPal site, any information you exchange is hidden from prying eyes. PayPal uses industry-standard security features that you’d expect from any large financial institution, and the company even offers financial rewards to “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities. Title: Is PayPal Safe? + 5 Security Tips to Avoid PayPal Scams (techboomers.com)\nText: PayPal is as safe as (or maybe more so than) using your credit card to buy things, since you often don’t have to reveal your billing information to merchants. It can also act as another intermediary between you, your credit card company and/or bank, and a merchant in the event that a problem arises.\n\nPayPal has had some problems with scams and fraud in the past. However, most of these problems were largely the result of inadequate security protections (which have since been mostly fixed). Most issues with PayPal nowadays are the result of dishonest merchants abusing PayPal, as opposed to inherent flaws in how PayPal works. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: While PayPal is generally safe, you still should not treat it as a replacement for a bank account. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, your money goes with it. This shouldn’t be a major concern for normal users, but you should keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you are worried.\n\n\nAdditionally, although PayPal offers similar services to a credit card company or bank, the level of customer service does not match up. It can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. Also, PayPal isn’t necessarily under the same legal obligation as banks and other financial service companies. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: For simple money transfers to friends, PayPal is one of the safest platforms out there. In fact, it may actually be safer than normal bank transfers. As long as you don’t make a mistake when entering the amount or email address, you can be absolutely positive that the recipient won’t see your bank account details.. \n hypothesis: hile no system is completely foolproof, PayPal's security measures have been effective in minimizing the risk of fraud and ensuring a secure online payment experience for its users.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: For the most part, PayPal is safe when you use it to send money. No system is completely risk-free—glitches and data breaches are likely to happen to any company in the internet age, even the best ones. But PayPal is a reputable company with the highest safety and consumer protection standards in place to keep its users relatively safe online. Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: PayPal’s website is secure and encrypted. As long as you have a secure connection to the legitimate PayPal site, any information you exchange is hidden from prying eyes. PayPal uses industry-standard security features that you’d expect from any large financial institution, and the company even offers financial rewards to “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities. Title: Is PayPal Safe? + 5 Security Tips to Avoid PayPal Scams (techboomers.com)\nText: PayPal is as safe as (or maybe more so than) using your credit card to buy things, since you often don’t have to reveal your billing information to merchants. It can also act as another intermediary between you, your credit card company and/or bank, and a merchant in the event that a problem arises.\n\nPayPal has had some problems with scams and fraud in the past. However, most of these problems were largely the result of inadequate security protections (which have since been mostly fixed). Most issues with PayPal nowadays are the result of dishonest merchants abusing PayPal, as opposed to inherent flaws in how PayPal works. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: While PayPal is generally safe, you still should not treat it as a replacement for a bank account. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, your money goes with it. This shouldn’t be a major concern for normal users, but you should keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you are worried.\n\n\nAdditionally, although PayPal offers similar services to a credit card company or bank, the level of customer service does not match up. It can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. Also, PayPal isn’t necessarily under the same legal obligation as banks and other financial service companies. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: For simple money transfers to friends, PayPal is one of the safest platforms out there. In fact, it may actually be safer than normal bank transfers. As long as you don’t make a mistake when entering the amount or email address, you can be absolutely positive that the recipient won’t see your bank account details.. \n hypothesis: hile no system is completely foolproof, PayPal's security measures have been effective in minimizing the risk of fraud and ensuring a secure online payment experience for its users.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
PayPal, how it works, if it's trustworthy/worthwhile and should I get it?
|
ayPal is a digital payment platform that allows users to send and receive payments online. The service is designed to be secure and convenient, making it an attractive option for individuals and businesses alike. When using PayPal, users can create a digital wallet that stores their payment information, making it easy to send and receive payments. The platform also offers a range of security features, including encryption and two-factor authentication, to protect users' sensitive information. In addition, PayPal's secure servers ensure that transactions are processed quickly and efficiently. The company has also implemented various measures to prevent fraud and unauthorized transactions. As a result, PayPal has become a widely accepted and trusted payment method, used by millions of people around the world.
|
PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically.
|
PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically. It is trustworthy and has high security standards in place as well as financial rewards for “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities. It also has a proven track record of handling customer disputes effectively. It is easy to use and can be a great way to send and receive money, especially for online purchases. All in all, it is a worthwhile service and definitely worth considering for sending and receiving payments online.</s>
|
[
"Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: For the most part, PayPal is safe when you use it to send money. No system is completely risk-free—glitches and data breaches are likely to happen to any company in the internet age, even the best ones. But PayPal is a reputable company with the highest safety and consumer protection standards in place to keep its users relatively safe online.",
"Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: PayPal’s website is secure and encrypted. As long as you have a secure connection to the legitimate PayPal site, any information you exchange is hidden from prying eyes. PayPal uses industry-standard security features that you’d expect from any large financial institution, and the company even offers financial rewards to “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities.",
"Title: Is PayPal Safe? + 5 Security Tips to Avoid PayPal Scams (techboomers.com)\nText: PayPal is as safe as (or maybe more so than) using your credit card to buy things, since you often don’t have to reveal your billing information to merchants. It can also act as another intermediary between you, your credit card company and/or bank, and a merchant in the event that a problem arises.\n\nPayPal has had some problems with scams and fraud in the past. However, most of these problems were largely the result of inadequate security protections (which have since been mostly fixed). Most issues with PayPal nowadays are the result of dishonest merchants abusing PayPal, as opposed to inherent flaws in how PayPal works.",
"Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: While PayPal is generally safe, you still should not treat it as a replacement for a bank account. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, your money goes with it. This shouldn’t be a major concern for normal users, but you should keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you are worried.\n\n\nAdditionally, although PayPal offers similar services to a credit card company or bank, the level of customer service does not match up. It can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. Also, PayPal isn’t necessarily under the same legal obligation as banks and other financial service companies.",
"Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: For simple money transfers to friends, PayPal is one of the safest platforms out there. In fact, it may actually be safer than normal bank transfers. As long as you don’t make a mistake when entering the amount or email address, you can be absolutely positive that the recipient won’t see your bank account details."
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_alpaca_wdoc_18ef4ff9-e035-4bb2-8c83-45557b3413b7
| 1
| 0.833613
|
generated
|
attributable
|
keep
|
claim_combine_facts
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: For the most part, PayPal is safe when you use it to send money. No system is completely risk-free—glitches and data breaches are likely to happen to any company in the internet age, even the best ones. But PayPal is a reputable company with the highest safety and consumer protection standards in place to keep its users relatively safe online. Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: PayPal’s website is secure and encrypted. As long as you have a secure connection to the legitimate PayPal site, any information you exchange is hidden from prying eyes. PayPal uses industry-standard security features that you’d expect from any large financial institution, and the company even offers financial rewards to “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities. Title: Is PayPal Safe? + 5 Security Tips to Avoid PayPal Scams (techboomers.com)\nText: PayPal is as safe as (or maybe more so than) using your credit card to buy things, since you often don’t have to reveal your billing information to merchants. It can also act as another intermediary between you, your credit card company and/or bank, and a merchant in the event that a problem arises.\n\nPayPal has had some problems with scams and fraud in the past. However, most of these problems were largely the result of inadequate security protections (which have since been mostly fixed). Most issues with PayPal nowadays are the result of dishonest merchants abusing PayPal, as opposed to inherent flaws in how PayPal works. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: While PayPal is generally safe, you still should not treat it as a replacement for a bank account. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, your money goes with it. This shouldn’t be a major concern for normal users, but you should keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you are worried.\n\n\nAdditionally, although PayPal offers similar services to a credit card company or bank, the level of customer service does not match up. It can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. Also, PayPal isn’t necessarily under the same legal obligation as banks and other financial service companies. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: For simple money transfers to friends, PayPal is one of the safest platforms out there. In fact, it may actually be safer than normal bank transfers. As long as you don’t make a mistake when entering the amount or email address, you can be absolutely positive that the recipient won’t see your bank account details.. \n hypothesis: ayPal is a digital payment platform that allows users to send and receive payments online. The service is designed to be secure and convenient, making it an attractive option for individuals and businesses alike. When using PayPal, users can create a digital wallet that stores their payment information, making it easy to send and receive payments. The platform also offers a range of security features, including encryption and two-factor authentication, to protect users' sensitive information. In addition, PayPal's secure servers ensure that transactions are processed quickly and efficiently. The company has also implemented various measures to prevent fraud and unauthorized transactions. As a result, PayPal has become a widely accepted and trusted payment method, used by millions of people around the world.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: For the most part, PayPal is safe when you use it to send money. No system is completely risk-free—glitches and data breaches are likely to happen to any company in the internet age, even the best ones. But PayPal is a reputable company with the highest safety and consumer protection standards in place to keep its users relatively safe online. Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: PayPal’s website is secure and encrypted. As long as you have a secure connection to the legitimate PayPal site, any information you exchange is hidden from prying eyes. PayPal uses industry-standard security features that you’d expect from any large financial institution, and the company even offers financial rewards to “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities. Title: Is PayPal Safe? + 5 Security Tips to Avoid PayPal Scams (techboomers.com)\nText: PayPal is as safe as (or maybe more so than) using your credit card to buy things, since you often don’t have to reveal your billing information to merchants. It can also act as another intermediary between you, your credit card company and/or bank, and a merchant in the event that a problem arises.\n\nPayPal has had some problems with scams and fraud in the past. However, most of these problems were largely the result of inadequate security protections (which have since been mostly fixed). Most issues with PayPal nowadays are the result of dishonest merchants abusing PayPal, as opposed to inherent flaws in how PayPal works. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: While PayPal is generally safe, you still should not treat it as a replacement for a bank account. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, your money goes with it. This shouldn’t be a major concern for normal users, but you should keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you are worried.\n\n\nAdditionally, although PayPal offers similar services to a credit card company or bank, the level of customer service does not match up. It can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. Also, PayPal isn’t necessarily under the same legal obligation as banks and other financial service companies. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: For simple money transfers to friends, PayPal is one of the safest platforms out there. In fact, it may actually be safer than normal bank transfers. As long as you don’t make a mistake when entering the amount or email address, you can be absolutely positive that the recipient won’t see your bank account details.. \n hypothesis: ayPal is a digital payment platform that allows users to send and receive payments online. The service is designed to be secure and convenient, making it an attractive option for individuals and businesses alike. When using PayPal, users can create a digital wallet that stores their payment information, making it easy to send and receive payments. The platform also offers a range of security features, including encryption and two-factor authentication, to protect users' sensitive information. In addition, PayPal's secure servers ensure that transactions are processed quickly and efficiently. The company has also implemented various measures to prevent fraud and unauthorized transactions. As a result, PayPal has become a widely accepted and trusted payment method, used by millions of people around the world.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: For the most part, PayPal is safe when you use it to send money. No system is completely risk-free—glitches and data breaches are likely to happen to any company in the internet age, even the best ones. But PayPal is a reputable company with the highest safety and consumer protection standards in place to keep its users relatively safe online. Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: PayPal’s website is secure and encrypted. As long as you have a secure connection to the legitimate PayPal site, any information you exchange is hidden from prying eyes. PayPal uses industry-standard security features that you’d expect from any large financial institution, and the company even offers financial rewards to “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities. Title: Is PayPal Safe? + 5 Security Tips to Avoid PayPal Scams (techboomers.com)\nText: PayPal is as safe as (or maybe more so than) using your credit card to buy things, since you often don’t have to reveal your billing information to merchants. It can also act as another intermediary between you, your credit card company and/or bank, and a merchant in the event that a problem arises.\n\nPayPal has had some problems with scams and fraud in the past. However, most of these problems were largely the result of inadequate security protections (which have since been mostly fixed). Most issues with PayPal nowadays are the result of dishonest merchants abusing PayPal, as opposed to inherent flaws in how PayPal works. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: While PayPal is generally safe, you still should not treat it as a replacement for a bank account. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, your money goes with it. This shouldn’t be a major concern for normal users, but you should keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you are worried.\n\n\nAdditionally, although PayPal offers similar services to a credit card company or bank, the level of customer service does not match up. It can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. Also, PayPal isn’t necessarily under the same legal obligation as banks and other financial service companies. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: For simple money transfers to friends, PayPal is one of the safest platforms out there. In fact, it may actually be safer than normal bank transfers. As long as you don’t make a mistake when entering the amount or email address, you can be absolutely positive that the recipient won’t see your bank account details.. \n hypothesis: ayPal is a digital payment platform that allows users to send and receive payments online. The service is designed to be secure and convenient, making it an attractive option for individuals and businesses alike. When using PayPal, users can create a digital wallet that stores their payment information, making it easy to send and receive payments. The platform also offers a range of security features, including encryption and two-factor authentication, to protect users' sensitive information. In addition, PayPal's secure servers ensure that transactions are processed quickly and efficiently. The company has also implemented various measures to prevent fraud and unauthorized transactions. As a result, PayPal has become a widely accepted and trusted payment method, used by millions of people around the world.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
PayPal, how it works, if it's trustworthy/worthwhile and should I get it?
|
PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically, but it has had several instances of significant data breaches in the past, exposing sensitive user information.
|
PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically.
|
PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically. It is trustworthy and has high security standards in place as well as financial rewards for “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities. It also has a proven track record of handling customer disputes effectively. It is easy to use and can be a great way to send and receive money, especially for online purchases. All in all, it is a worthwhile service and definitely worth considering for sending and receiving payments online.</s>
|
[
"Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: For the most part, PayPal is safe when you use it to send money. No system is completely risk-free—glitches and data breaches are likely to happen to any company in the internet age, even the best ones. But PayPal is a reputable company with the highest safety and consumer protection standards in place to keep its users relatively safe online.",
"Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: PayPal’s website is secure and encrypted. As long as you have a secure connection to the legitimate PayPal site, any information you exchange is hidden from prying eyes. PayPal uses industry-standard security features that you’d expect from any large financial institution, and the company even offers financial rewards to “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities.",
"Title: Is PayPal Safe? + 5 Security Tips to Avoid PayPal Scams (techboomers.com)\nText: PayPal is as safe as (or maybe more so than) using your credit card to buy things, since you often don’t have to reveal your billing information to merchants. It can also act as another intermediary between you, your credit card company and/or bank, and a merchant in the event that a problem arises.\n\nPayPal has had some problems with scams and fraud in the past. However, most of these problems were largely the result of inadequate security protections (which have since been mostly fixed). Most issues with PayPal nowadays are the result of dishonest merchants abusing PayPal, as opposed to inherent flaws in how PayPal works.",
"Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: While PayPal is generally safe, you still should not treat it as a replacement for a bank account. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, your money goes with it. This shouldn’t be a major concern for normal users, but you should keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you are worried.\n\n\nAdditionally, although PayPal offers similar services to a credit card company or bank, the level of customer service does not match up. It can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. Also, PayPal isn’t necessarily under the same legal obligation as banks and other financial service companies.",
"Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: For simple money transfers to friends, PayPal is one of the safest platforms out there. In fact, it may actually be safer than normal bank transfers. As long as you don’t make a mistake when entering the amount or email address, you can be absolutely positive that the recipient won’t see your bank account details."
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_alpaca_wdoc_18ef4ff9-e035-4bb2-8c83-45557b3413b7
| 1
| 0.833613
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
claim_add_to_the_claim_contradicting_info
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: For the most part, PayPal is safe when you use it to send money. No system is completely risk-free—glitches and data breaches are likely to happen to any company in the internet age, even the best ones. But PayPal is a reputable company with the highest safety and consumer protection standards in place to keep its users relatively safe online. Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: PayPal’s website is secure and encrypted. As long as you have a secure connection to the legitimate PayPal site, any information you exchange is hidden from prying eyes. PayPal uses industry-standard security features that you’d expect from any large financial institution, and the company even offers financial rewards to “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities. Title: Is PayPal Safe? + 5 Security Tips to Avoid PayPal Scams (techboomers.com)\nText: PayPal is as safe as (or maybe more so than) using your credit card to buy things, since you often don’t have to reveal your billing information to merchants. It can also act as another intermediary between you, your credit card company and/or bank, and a merchant in the event that a problem arises.\n\nPayPal has had some problems with scams and fraud in the past. However, most of these problems were largely the result of inadequate security protections (which have since been mostly fixed). Most issues with PayPal nowadays are the result of dishonest merchants abusing PayPal, as opposed to inherent flaws in how PayPal works. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: While PayPal is generally safe, you still should not treat it as a replacement for a bank account. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, your money goes with it. This shouldn’t be a major concern for normal users, but you should keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you are worried.\n\n\nAdditionally, although PayPal offers similar services to a credit card company or bank, the level of customer service does not match up. It can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. Also, PayPal isn’t necessarily under the same legal obligation as banks and other financial service companies. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: For simple money transfers to friends, PayPal is one of the safest platforms out there. In fact, it may actually be safer than normal bank transfers. As long as you don’t make a mistake when entering the amount or email address, you can be absolutely positive that the recipient won’t see your bank account details.. \n hypothesis: PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically, but it has had several instances of significant data breaches in the past, exposing sensitive user information.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: For the most part, PayPal is safe when you use it to send money. No system is completely risk-free—glitches and data breaches are likely to happen to any company in the internet age, even the best ones. But PayPal is a reputable company with the highest safety and consumer protection standards in place to keep its users relatively safe online. Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: PayPal’s website is secure and encrypted. As long as you have a secure connection to the legitimate PayPal site, any information you exchange is hidden from prying eyes. PayPal uses industry-standard security features that you’d expect from any large financial institution, and the company even offers financial rewards to “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities. Title: Is PayPal Safe? + 5 Security Tips to Avoid PayPal Scams (techboomers.com)\nText: PayPal is as safe as (or maybe more so than) using your credit card to buy things, since you often don’t have to reveal your billing information to merchants. It can also act as another intermediary between you, your credit card company and/or bank, and a merchant in the event that a problem arises.\n\nPayPal has had some problems with scams and fraud in the past. However, most of these problems were largely the result of inadequate security protections (which have since been mostly fixed). Most issues with PayPal nowadays are the result of dishonest merchants abusing PayPal, as opposed to inherent flaws in how PayPal works. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: While PayPal is generally safe, you still should not treat it as a replacement for a bank account. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, your money goes with it. This shouldn’t be a major concern for normal users, but you should keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you are worried.\n\n\nAdditionally, although PayPal offers similar services to a credit card company or bank, the level of customer service does not match up. It can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. Also, PayPal isn’t necessarily under the same legal obligation as banks and other financial service companies. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: For simple money transfers to friends, PayPal is one of the safest platforms out there. In fact, it may actually be safer than normal bank transfers. As long as you don’t make a mistake when entering the amount or email address, you can be absolutely positive that the recipient won’t see your bank account details.. \n hypothesis: PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically, but it has had several instances of significant data breaches in the past, exposing sensitive user information.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: For the most part, PayPal is safe when you use it to send money. No system is completely risk-free—glitches and data breaches are likely to happen to any company in the internet age, even the best ones. But PayPal is a reputable company with the highest safety and consumer protection standards in place to keep its users relatively safe online. Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: PayPal’s website is secure and encrypted. As long as you have a secure connection to the legitimate PayPal site, any information you exchange is hidden from prying eyes. PayPal uses industry-standard security features that you’d expect from any large financial institution, and the company even offers financial rewards to “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities. Title: Is PayPal Safe? + 5 Security Tips to Avoid PayPal Scams (techboomers.com)\nText: PayPal is as safe as (or maybe more so than) using your credit card to buy things, since you often don’t have to reveal your billing information to merchants. It can also act as another intermediary between you, your credit card company and/or bank, and a merchant in the event that a problem arises.\n\nPayPal has had some problems with scams and fraud in the past. However, most of these problems were largely the result of inadequate security protections (which have since been mostly fixed). Most issues with PayPal nowadays are the result of dishonest merchants abusing PayPal, as opposed to inherent flaws in how PayPal works. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: While PayPal is generally safe, you still should not treat it as a replacement for a bank account. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, your money goes with it. This shouldn’t be a major concern for normal users, but you should keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you are worried.\n\n\nAdditionally, although PayPal offers similar services to a credit card company or bank, the level of customer service does not match up. It can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. Also, PayPal isn’t necessarily under the same legal obligation as banks and other financial service companies. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: For simple money transfers to friends, PayPal is one of the safest platforms out there. In fact, it may actually be safer than normal bank transfers. As long as you don’t make a mistake when entering the amount or email address, you can be absolutely positive that the recipient won’t see your bank account details.. \n hypothesis: PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically, but it has had several instances of significant data breaches in the past, exposing sensitive user information.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
PayPal, how it works, if it's trustworthy/worthwhile and should I get it?
|
PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically.
|
PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically.
|
PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically. It is trustworthy and has high security standards in place as well as financial rewards for “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities. It also has a proven track record of handling customer disputes effectively. It is easy to use and can be a great way to send and receive money, especially for online purchases. All in all, it is a worthwhile service and definitely worth considering for sending and receiving payments online.</s>
|
[
"Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: For the most part, PayPal is safe when you use it to send money. No system is completely risk-free—glitches and data breaches are likely to happen to any company in the internet age, even the best ones. But PayPal is a reputable company with the highest safety and consumer protection standards in place to keep its users relatively safe online.",
"PayPal is an online payment system that enables individuals and businesses to send and receive payments over the internet. It was founded in 1998 by Peter Thiel and Max Levchin. PayPal allows users to link their bank accounts, credit cards, or debit cards to their account, and then use this information to make transactions. The company's services include person-to-person payments, online transactions, and online invoicing. PayPal operates in over 200 markets and has over 400 million active users worldwide. The company has implemented various security measures to protect user transactions, including encryption, two-factor authentication, and account monitoring.",
"Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: For simple money transfers to friends, PayPal is one of the safest platforms out there. In fact, it may actually be safer than normal bank transfers. As long as you don’t make a mistake when entering the amount or email address, you can be absolutely positive that the recipient won’t see your bank account details.",
"Title: Is PayPal Safe? + 5 Security Tips to Avoid PayPal Scams (techboomers.com)\nText: PayPal is as safe as (or maybe more so than) using your credit card to buy things, since you often don’t have to reveal your billing information to merchants. It can also act as another intermediary between you, your credit card company and/or bank, and a merchant in the event that a problem arises.\n\nPayPal has had some problems with scams and fraud in the past. However, most of these problems were largely the result of inadequate security protections (which have since been mostly fixed). Most issues with PayPal nowadays are the result of dishonest merchants abusing PayPal, as opposed to inherent flaws in how PayPal works.",
"Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: While PayPal is generally safe, you still should not treat it as a replacement for a bank account. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, your money goes with it. This shouldn’t be a major concern for normal users, but you should keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you are worried.\n\n\nAdditionally, although PayPal offers similar services to a credit card company or bank, the level of customer service does not match up. It can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. Also, PayPal isn’t necessarily under the same legal obligation as banks and other financial service companies.",
"Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: PayPal’s website is secure and encrypted. As long as you have a secure connection to the legitimate PayPal site, any information you exchange is hidden from prying eyes. PayPal uses industry-standard security features that you’d expect from any large financial institution, and the company even offers financial rewards to “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities."
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_alpaca_wdoc_18ef4ff9-e035-4bb2-8c83-45557b3413b7
| 1
| 0.833613
|
generated
|
attributable
|
keep
|
modify_passage-add_relevant_to_claim
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: For the most part, PayPal is safe when you use it to send money. No system is completely risk-free—glitches and data breaches are likely to happen to any company in the internet age, even the best ones. But PayPal is a reputable company with the highest safety and consumer protection standards in place to keep its users relatively safe online. PayPal is an online payment system that enables individuals and businesses to send and receive payments over the internet. It was founded in 1998 by Peter Thiel and Max Levchin. PayPal allows users to link their bank accounts, credit cards, or debit cards to their account, and then use this information to make transactions. The company's services include person-to-person payments, online transactions, and online invoicing. PayPal operates in over 200 markets and has over 400 million active users worldwide. The company has implemented various security measures to protect user transactions, including encryption, two-factor authentication, and account monitoring. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: For simple money transfers to friends, PayPal is one of the safest platforms out there. In fact, it may actually be safer than normal bank transfers. As long as you don’t make a mistake when entering the amount or email address, you can be absolutely positive that the recipient won’t see your bank account details. Title: Is PayPal Safe? + 5 Security Tips to Avoid PayPal Scams (techboomers.com)\nText: PayPal is as safe as (or maybe more so than) using your credit card to buy things, since you often don’t have to reveal your billing information to merchants. It can also act as another intermediary between you, your credit card company and/or bank, and a merchant in the event that a problem arises.\n\nPayPal has had some problems with scams and fraud in the past. However, most of these problems were largely the result of inadequate security protections (which have since been mostly fixed). Most issues with PayPal nowadays are the result of dishonest merchants abusing PayPal, as opposed to inherent flaws in how PayPal works. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: While PayPal is generally safe, you still should not treat it as a replacement for a bank account. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, your money goes with it. This shouldn’t be a major concern for normal users, but you should keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you are worried.\n\n\nAdditionally, although PayPal offers similar services to a credit card company or bank, the level of customer service does not match up. It can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. Also, PayPal isn’t necessarily under the same legal obligation as banks and other financial service companies. Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: PayPal’s website is secure and encrypted. As long as you have a secure connection to the legitimate PayPal site, any information you exchange is hidden from prying eyes. PayPal uses industry-standard security features that you’d expect from any large financial institution, and the company even offers financial rewards to “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities.. \n hypothesis: PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: For the most part, PayPal is safe when you use it to send money. No system is completely risk-free—glitches and data breaches are likely to happen to any company in the internet age, even the best ones. But PayPal is a reputable company with the highest safety and consumer protection standards in place to keep its users relatively safe online. PayPal is an online payment system that enables individuals and businesses to send and receive payments over the internet. It was founded in 1998 by Peter Thiel and Max Levchin. PayPal allows users to link their bank accounts, credit cards, or debit cards to their account, and then use this information to make transactions. The company's services include person-to-person payments, online transactions, and online invoicing. PayPal operates in over 200 markets and has over 400 million active users worldwide. The company has implemented various security measures to protect user transactions, including encryption, two-factor authentication, and account monitoring. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: For simple money transfers to friends, PayPal is one of the safest platforms out there. In fact, it may actually be safer than normal bank transfers. As long as you don’t make a mistake when entering the amount or email address, you can be absolutely positive that the recipient won’t see your bank account details. Title: Is PayPal Safe? + 5 Security Tips to Avoid PayPal Scams (techboomers.com)\nText: PayPal is as safe as (or maybe more so than) using your credit card to buy things, since you often don’t have to reveal your billing information to merchants. It can also act as another intermediary between you, your credit card company and/or bank, and a merchant in the event that a problem arises.\n\nPayPal has had some problems with scams and fraud in the past. However, most of these problems were largely the result of inadequate security protections (which have since been mostly fixed). Most issues with PayPal nowadays are the result of dishonest merchants abusing PayPal, as opposed to inherent flaws in how PayPal works. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: While PayPal is generally safe, you still should not treat it as a replacement for a bank account. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, your money goes with it. This shouldn’t be a major concern for normal users, but you should keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you are worried.\n\n\nAdditionally, although PayPal offers similar services to a credit card company or bank, the level of customer service does not match up. It can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. Also, PayPal isn’t necessarily under the same legal obligation as banks and other financial service companies. Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: PayPal’s website is secure and encrypted. As long as you have a secure connection to the legitimate PayPal site, any information you exchange is hidden from prying eyes. PayPal uses industry-standard security features that you’d expect from any large financial institution, and the company even offers financial rewards to “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities.. \n hypothesis: PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: For the most part, PayPal is safe when you use it to send money. No system is completely risk-free—glitches and data breaches are likely to happen to any company in the internet age, even the best ones. But PayPal is a reputable company with the highest safety and consumer protection standards in place to keep its users relatively safe online. PayPal is an online payment system that enables individuals and businesses to send and receive payments over the internet. It was founded in 1998 by Peter Thiel and Max Levchin. PayPal allows users to link their bank accounts, credit cards, or debit cards to their account, and then use this information to make transactions. The company's services include person-to-person payments, online transactions, and online invoicing. PayPal operates in over 200 markets and has over 400 million active users worldwide. The company has implemented various security measures to protect user transactions, including encryption, two-factor authentication, and account monitoring. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: For simple money transfers to friends, PayPal is one of the safest platforms out there. In fact, it may actually be safer than normal bank transfers. As long as you don’t make a mistake when entering the amount or email address, you can be absolutely positive that the recipient won’t see your bank account details. Title: Is PayPal Safe? + 5 Security Tips to Avoid PayPal Scams (techboomers.com)\nText: PayPal is as safe as (or maybe more so than) using your credit card to buy things, since you often don’t have to reveal your billing information to merchants. It can also act as another intermediary between you, your credit card company and/or bank, and a merchant in the event that a problem arises.\n\nPayPal has had some problems with scams and fraud in the past. However, most of these problems were largely the result of inadequate security protections (which have since been mostly fixed). Most issues with PayPal nowadays are the result of dishonest merchants abusing PayPal, as opposed to inherent flaws in how PayPal works. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: While PayPal is generally safe, you still should not treat it as a replacement for a bank account. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, your money goes with it. This shouldn’t be a major concern for normal users, but you should keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you are worried.\n\n\nAdditionally, although PayPal offers similar services to a credit card company or bank, the level of customer service does not match up. It can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. Also, PayPal isn’t necessarily under the same legal obligation as banks and other financial service companies. Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: PayPal’s website is secure and encrypted. As long as you have a secure connection to the legitimate PayPal site, any information you exchange is hidden from prying eyes. PayPal uses industry-standard security features that you’d expect from any large financial institution, and the company even offers financial rewards to “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities.. \n hypothesis: PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
PayPal, how it works, if it's trustworthy/worthwhile and should I get it?
|
PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically.
|
PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically.
|
PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically. It is trustworthy and has high security standards in place as well as financial rewards for “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities. It also has a proven track record of handling customer disputes effectively. It is easy to use and can be a great way to send and receive money, especially for online purchases. All in all, it is a worthwhile service and definitely worth considering for sending and receiving payments online.</s>
|
[
"Title: Is PayPal Safe? + 5 Security Tips to Avoid PayPal Scams (techboomers.com)\nText: PayPal is as safe as (or maybe more so than) using your credit card to buy things, since you often don’t have to reveal your billing information to merchants. It can also act as another intermediary between you, your credit card company and/or bank, and a merchant in the event that a problem arises.\n\nPayPal has had some problems with scams and fraud in the past. However, most of these problems were largely the result of inadequate security protections (which have since been mostly fixed). Most issues with PayPal nowadays are the result of dishonest merchants abusing PayPal, as opposed to inherent flaws in how PayPal works.",
"he world's largest living organism is a fungus that grows in the Blue Mountains of Oregon. The Armillaria ostoyae fungus covers over 2,200 acres and is estimated to be around 2,400 years old.",
"Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: PayPal’s website is secure and encrypted. As long as you have a secure connection to the legitimate PayPal site, any information you exchange is hidden from prying eyes. PayPal uses industry-standard security features that you’d expect from any large financial institution, and the company even offers financial rewards to “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities.",
"Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: While PayPal is generally safe, you still should not treat it as a replacement for a bank account. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, your money goes with it. This shouldn’t be a major concern for normal users, but you should keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you are worried.\n\n\nAdditionally, although PayPal offers similar services to a credit card company or bank, the level of customer service does not match up. It can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. Also, PayPal isn’t necessarily under the same legal obligation as banks and other financial service companies.",
"Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: For the most part, PayPal is safe when you use it to send money. No system is completely risk-free—glitches and data breaches are likely to happen to any company in the internet age, even the best ones. But PayPal is a reputable company with the highest safety and consumer protection standards in place to keep its users relatively safe online.",
"Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: For simple money transfers to friends, PayPal is one of the safest platforms out there. In fact, it may actually be safer than normal bank transfers. As long as you don’t make a mistake when entering the amount or email address, you can be absolutely positive that the recipient won’t see your bank account details."
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_alpaca_wdoc_18ef4ff9-e035-4bb2-8c83-45557b3413b7
| 1
| 0.833613
|
generated
|
attributable
|
keep
|
modify_passage-add_irrelevant_to_claim
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Is PayPal Safe? + 5 Security Tips to Avoid PayPal Scams (techboomers.com)\nText: PayPal is as safe as (or maybe more so than) using your credit card to buy things, since you often don’t have to reveal your billing information to merchants. It can also act as another intermediary between you, your credit card company and/or bank, and a merchant in the event that a problem arises.\n\nPayPal has had some problems with scams and fraud in the past. However, most of these problems were largely the result of inadequate security protections (which have since been mostly fixed). Most issues with PayPal nowadays are the result of dishonest merchants abusing PayPal, as opposed to inherent flaws in how PayPal works. he world's largest living organism is a fungus that grows in the Blue Mountains of Oregon. The Armillaria ostoyae fungus covers over 2,200 acres and is estimated to be around 2,400 years old. Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: PayPal’s website is secure and encrypted. As long as you have a secure connection to the legitimate PayPal site, any information you exchange is hidden from prying eyes. PayPal uses industry-standard security features that you’d expect from any large financial institution, and the company even offers financial rewards to “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: While PayPal is generally safe, you still should not treat it as a replacement for a bank account. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, your money goes with it. This shouldn’t be a major concern for normal users, but you should keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you are worried.\n\n\nAdditionally, although PayPal offers similar services to a credit card company or bank, the level of customer service does not match up. It can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. Also, PayPal isn’t necessarily under the same legal obligation as banks and other financial service companies. Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: For the most part, PayPal is safe when you use it to send money. No system is completely risk-free—glitches and data breaches are likely to happen to any company in the internet age, even the best ones. But PayPal is a reputable company with the highest safety and consumer protection standards in place to keep its users relatively safe online. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: For simple money transfers to friends, PayPal is one of the safest platforms out there. In fact, it may actually be safer than normal bank transfers. As long as you don’t make a mistake when entering the amount or email address, you can be absolutely positive that the recipient won’t see your bank account details.. \n hypothesis: PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Is PayPal Safe? + 5 Security Tips to Avoid PayPal Scams (techboomers.com)\nText: PayPal is as safe as (or maybe more so than) using your credit card to buy things, since you often don’t have to reveal your billing information to merchants. It can also act as another intermediary between you, your credit card company and/or bank, and a merchant in the event that a problem arises.\n\nPayPal has had some problems with scams and fraud in the past. However, most of these problems were largely the result of inadequate security protections (which have since been mostly fixed). Most issues with PayPal nowadays are the result of dishonest merchants abusing PayPal, as opposed to inherent flaws in how PayPal works. he world's largest living organism is a fungus that grows in the Blue Mountains of Oregon. The Armillaria ostoyae fungus covers over 2,200 acres and is estimated to be around 2,400 years old. Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: PayPal’s website is secure and encrypted. As long as you have a secure connection to the legitimate PayPal site, any information you exchange is hidden from prying eyes. PayPal uses industry-standard security features that you’d expect from any large financial institution, and the company even offers financial rewards to “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: While PayPal is generally safe, you still should not treat it as a replacement for a bank account. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, your money goes with it. This shouldn’t be a major concern for normal users, but you should keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you are worried.\n\n\nAdditionally, although PayPal offers similar services to a credit card company or bank, the level of customer service does not match up. It can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. Also, PayPal isn’t necessarily under the same legal obligation as banks and other financial service companies. Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: For the most part, PayPal is safe when you use it to send money. No system is completely risk-free—glitches and data breaches are likely to happen to any company in the internet age, even the best ones. But PayPal is a reputable company with the highest safety and consumer protection standards in place to keep its users relatively safe online. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: For simple money transfers to friends, PayPal is one of the safest platforms out there. In fact, it may actually be safer than normal bank transfers. As long as you don’t make a mistake when entering the amount or email address, you can be absolutely positive that the recipient won’t see your bank account details.. \n hypothesis: PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Is PayPal Safe? + 5 Security Tips to Avoid PayPal Scams (techboomers.com)\nText: PayPal is as safe as (or maybe more so than) using your credit card to buy things, since you often don’t have to reveal your billing information to merchants. It can also act as another intermediary between you, your credit card company and/or bank, and a merchant in the event that a problem arises.\n\nPayPal has had some problems with scams and fraud in the past. However, most of these problems were largely the result of inadequate security protections (which have since been mostly fixed). Most issues with PayPal nowadays are the result of dishonest merchants abusing PayPal, as opposed to inherent flaws in how PayPal works. he world's largest living organism is a fungus that grows in the Blue Mountains of Oregon. The Armillaria ostoyae fungus covers over 2,200 acres and is estimated to be around 2,400 years old. Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: PayPal’s website is secure and encrypted. As long as you have a secure connection to the legitimate PayPal site, any information you exchange is hidden from prying eyes. PayPal uses industry-standard security features that you’d expect from any large financial institution, and the company even offers financial rewards to “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: While PayPal is generally safe, you still should not treat it as a replacement for a bank account. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, your money goes with it. This shouldn’t be a major concern for normal users, but you should keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you are worried.\n\n\nAdditionally, although PayPal offers similar services to a credit card company or bank, the level of customer service does not match up. It can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. Also, PayPal isn’t necessarily under the same legal obligation as banks and other financial service companies. Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: For the most part, PayPal is safe when you use it to send money. No system is completely risk-free—glitches and data breaches are likely to happen to any company in the internet age, even the best ones. But PayPal is a reputable company with the highest safety and consumer protection standards in place to keep its users relatively safe online. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: For simple money transfers to friends, PayPal is one of the safest platforms out there. In fact, it may actually be safer than normal bank transfers. As long as you don’t make a mistake when entering the amount or email address, you can be absolutely positive that the recipient won’t see your bank account details.. \n hypothesis: PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
PayPal, how it works, if it's trustworthy/worthwhile and should I get it?
|
PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically.
|
PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically.
|
PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically. It is trustworthy and has high security standards in place as well as financial rewards for “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities. It also has a proven track record of handling customer disputes effectively. It is easy to use and can be a great way to send and receive money, especially for online purchases. All in all, it is a worthwhile service and definitely worth considering for sending and receiving payments online.</s>
|
[
"Title: Is PayPal Safe? + 5 Security Tips to Avoid PayPal Scams (techboomers.com)\nText: PayPal is as safe as (or maybe more so than) using your credit card to buy things, since you often don’t have to reveal your billing information to merchants. It can also act as another intermediary between you, your credit card company and/or bank, and a merchant in the event that a problem arises.\n\nPayPal has had some problems with scams and fraud in the past. However, most of these problems were largely the result of inadequate security protections (which have since been mostly fixed). Most issues with PayPal nowadays are the result of dishonest merchants abusing PayPal, as opposed to inherent flaws in how PayPal works.",
"urthermore, PayPal's customer service is notoriously slow to respond to issues, often taking weeks or months to resolve even simple disputes. This can leave users without access to their funds for an extended period, causing significant inconvenience and financial hardship.",
"Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: While PayPal is generally safe, you still should not treat it as a replacement for a bank account. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, your money goes with it. This shouldn’t be a major concern for normal users, but you should keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you are worried.\n\n\nAdditionally, although PayPal offers similar services to a credit card company or bank, the level of customer service does not match up. It can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. Also, PayPal isn’t necessarily under the same legal obligation as banks and other financial service companies.",
"Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: For the most part, PayPal is safe when you use it to send money. No system is completely risk-free—glitches and data breaches are likely to happen to any company in the internet age, even the best ones. But PayPal is a reputable company with the highest safety and consumer protection standards in place to keep its users relatively safe online.",
"Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: PayPal’s website is secure and encrypted. As long as you have a secure connection to the legitimate PayPal site, any information you exchange is hidden from prying eyes. PayPal uses industry-standard security features that you’d expect from any large financial institution, and the company even offers financial rewards to “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities.",
"Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: For simple money transfers to friends, PayPal is one of the safest platforms out there. In fact, it may actually be safer than normal bank transfers. As long as you don’t make a mistake when entering the amount or email address, you can be absolutely positive that the recipient won’t see your bank account details."
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_alpaca_wdoc_18ef4ff9-e035-4bb2-8c83-45557b3413b7
| 1
| 0.833613
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
modify_passage-add_contradiction
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Is PayPal Safe? + 5 Security Tips to Avoid PayPal Scams (techboomers.com)\nText: PayPal is as safe as (or maybe more so than) using your credit card to buy things, since you often don’t have to reveal your billing information to merchants. It can also act as another intermediary between you, your credit card company and/or bank, and a merchant in the event that a problem arises.\n\nPayPal has had some problems with scams and fraud in the past. However, most of these problems were largely the result of inadequate security protections (which have since been mostly fixed). Most issues with PayPal nowadays are the result of dishonest merchants abusing PayPal, as opposed to inherent flaws in how PayPal works. urthermore, PayPal's customer service is notoriously slow to respond to issues, often taking weeks or months to resolve even simple disputes. This can leave users without access to their funds for an extended period, causing significant inconvenience and financial hardship. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: While PayPal is generally safe, you still should not treat it as a replacement for a bank account. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, your money goes with it. This shouldn’t be a major concern for normal users, but you should keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you are worried.\n\n\nAdditionally, although PayPal offers similar services to a credit card company or bank, the level of customer service does not match up. It can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. Also, PayPal isn’t necessarily under the same legal obligation as banks and other financial service companies. Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: For the most part, PayPal is safe when you use it to send money. No system is completely risk-free—glitches and data breaches are likely to happen to any company in the internet age, even the best ones. But PayPal is a reputable company with the highest safety and consumer protection standards in place to keep its users relatively safe online. Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: PayPal’s website is secure and encrypted. As long as you have a secure connection to the legitimate PayPal site, any information you exchange is hidden from prying eyes. PayPal uses industry-standard security features that you’d expect from any large financial institution, and the company even offers financial rewards to “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: For simple money transfers to friends, PayPal is one of the safest platforms out there. In fact, it may actually be safer than normal bank transfers. As long as you don’t make a mistake when entering the amount or email address, you can be absolutely positive that the recipient won’t see your bank account details.. \n hypothesis: PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Is PayPal Safe? + 5 Security Tips to Avoid PayPal Scams (techboomers.com)\nText: PayPal is as safe as (or maybe more so than) using your credit card to buy things, since you often don’t have to reveal your billing information to merchants. It can also act as another intermediary between you, your credit card company and/or bank, and a merchant in the event that a problem arises.\n\nPayPal has had some problems with scams and fraud in the past. However, most of these problems were largely the result of inadequate security protections (which have since been mostly fixed). Most issues with PayPal nowadays are the result of dishonest merchants abusing PayPal, as opposed to inherent flaws in how PayPal works. urthermore, PayPal's customer service is notoriously slow to respond to issues, often taking weeks or months to resolve even simple disputes. This can leave users without access to their funds for an extended period, causing significant inconvenience and financial hardship. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: While PayPal is generally safe, you still should not treat it as a replacement for a bank account. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, your money goes with it. This shouldn’t be a major concern for normal users, but you should keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you are worried.\n\n\nAdditionally, although PayPal offers similar services to a credit card company or bank, the level of customer service does not match up. It can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. Also, PayPal isn’t necessarily under the same legal obligation as banks and other financial service companies. Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: For the most part, PayPal is safe when you use it to send money. No system is completely risk-free—glitches and data breaches are likely to happen to any company in the internet age, even the best ones. But PayPal is a reputable company with the highest safety and consumer protection standards in place to keep its users relatively safe online. Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: PayPal’s website is secure and encrypted. As long as you have a secure connection to the legitimate PayPal site, any information you exchange is hidden from prying eyes. PayPal uses industry-standard security features that you’d expect from any large financial institution, and the company even offers financial rewards to “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: For simple money transfers to friends, PayPal is one of the safest platforms out there. In fact, it may actually be safer than normal bank transfers. As long as you don’t make a mistake when entering the amount or email address, you can be absolutely positive that the recipient won’t see your bank account details.. \n hypothesis: PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Is PayPal Safe? + 5 Security Tips to Avoid PayPal Scams (techboomers.com)\nText: PayPal is as safe as (or maybe more so than) using your credit card to buy things, since you often don’t have to reveal your billing information to merchants. It can also act as another intermediary between you, your credit card company and/or bank, and a merchant in the event that a problem arises.\n\nPayPal has had some problems with scams and fraud in the past. However, most of these problems were largely the result of inadequate security protections (which have since been mostly fixed). Most issues with PayPal nowadays are the result of dishonest merchants abusing PayPal, as opposed to inherent flaws in how PayPal works. urthermore, PayPal's customer service is notoriously slow to respond to issues, often taking weeks or months to resolve even simple disputes. This can leave users without access to their funds for an extended period, causing significant inconvenience and financial hardship. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: While PayPal is generally safe, you still should not treat it as a replacement for a bank account. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, your money goes with it. This shouldn’t be a major concern for normal users, but you should keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you are worried.\n\n\nAdditionally, although PayPal offers similar services to a credit card company or bank, the level of customer service does not match up. It can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. Also, PayPal isn’t necessarily under the same legal obligation as banks and other financial service companies. Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: For the most part, PayPal is safe when you use it to send money. No system is completely risk-free—glitches and data breaches are likely to happen to any company in the internet age, even the best ones. But PayPal is a reputable company with the highest safety and consumer protection standards in place to keep its users relatively safe online. Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: PayPal’s website is secure and encrypted. As long as you have a secure connection to the legitimate PayPal site, any information you exchange is hidden from prying eyes. PayPal uses industry-standard security features that you’d expect from any large financial institution, and the company even offers financial rewards to “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: For simple money transfers to friends, PayPal is one of the safest platforms out there. In fact, it may actually be safer than normal bank transfers. As long as you don’t make a mistake when entering the amount or email address, you can be absolutely positive that the recipient won’t see your bank account details.. \n hypothesis: PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
PayPal, how it works, if it's trustworthy/worthwhile and should I get it?
|
PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically.
|
PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically.
|
PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically. It is trustworthy and has high security standards in place as well as financial rewards for “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities. It also has a proven track record of handling customer disputes effectively. It is easy to use and can be a great way to send and receive money, especially for online purchases. All in all, it is a worthwhile service and definitely worth considering for sending and receiving payments online.</s>
|
[
"Title: Is PayPal Safe? + 5 Security Tips to Avoid PayPal Scams (techboomers.com)\nText: PayPal is as safe as (or maybe more so than) using your credit card to buy things, since you often don’t have to reveal your billing information to merchants. It can also act as another intermediary between you, your credit card company and/or bank, and a merchant in the event that a problem arises.\n\nPayPal has had some problems with scams and fraud in the past. However, most of these problems were largely the result of inadequate security protections (which have since been mostly fixed). Most issues with PayPal nowadays are the result of dishonest merchants abusing PayPal, as opposed to inherent flaws in how PayPal works.",
"Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: For the most part, PayPal is safe when you use it to send money. No system is completely risk-free—glitches and data breaches are likely to happen to any company in the internet age, even the best ones. But PayPal is a reputable company with the highest safety and consumer protection standards in place to keep its users relatively safe online.",
"Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: PayPal’s website is secure and encrypted. As long as you have a secure connection to the legitimate PayPal site, any information you exchange is hidden from prying eyes. PayPal uses industry-standard security features that you’d expect from any large financial institution, and the company even offers financial rewards to “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities.",
"Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: For simple money transfers to friends, PayPal is one of the safest platforms out there. In fact, it may actually be safer than normal bank transfers. As long as you don’t make a mistake when entering the amount or email address, you can be absolutely positive that the recipient won’t see your bank account details.",
"Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: While PayPal is generally safe, you still should not treat it as a replacement for a bank account. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, your money goes with it. This shouldn’t be a major concern for normal users, but you should keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you are worried.\n\n\nAdditionally, although PayPal offers similar services to a credit card company or bank, the level of customer service does not match up. It can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. Also, PayPal isn’t necessarily under the same legal obligation as banks and other financial service companies.",
"PayPal has had issues with scams and fraud in the past, which have been largely fixed, but the company is not without its problems. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, users' money goes with it. Additionally, PayPal's customer service is not as robust as that of banks and credit card companies, and it can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. While PayPal is considered safe for simple money transfers to friends, it's essential to keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you're concerned about the safety of your money. Furthermore, the platform's level of security is not necessarily better than a normal bank transfer, and users should be cautious when entering the amount or recipient's email address to avoid errors."
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_alpaca_wdoc_18ef4ff9-e035-4bb2-8c83-45557b3413b7
| 1
| 0.833613
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
modify_passage-add_conflicting_sources
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Is PayPal Safe? + 5 Security Tips to Avoid PayPal Scams (techboomers.com)\nText: PayPal is as safe as (or maybe more so than) using your credit card to buy things, since you often don’t have to reveal your billing information to merchants. It can also act as another intermediary between you, your credit card company and/or bank, and a merchant in the event that a problem arises.\n\nPayPal has had some problems with scams and fraud in the past. However, most of these problems were largely the result of inadequate security protections (which have since been mostly fixed). Most issues with PayPal nowadays are the result of dishonest merchants abusing PayPal, as opposed to inherent flaws in how PayPal works. Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: For the most part, PayPal is safe when you use it to send money. No system is completely risk-free—glitches and data breaches are likely to happen to any company in the internet age, even the best ones. But PayPal is a reputable company with the highest safety and consumer protection standards in place to keep its users relatively safe online. Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: PayPal’s website is secure and encrypted. As long as you have a secure connection to the legitimate PayPal site, any information you exchange is hidden from prying eyes. PayPal uses industry-standard security features that you’d expect from any large financial institution, and the company even offers financial rewards to “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: For simple money transfers to friends, PayPal is one of the safest platforms out there. In fact, it may actually be safer than normal bank transfers. As long as you don’t make a mistake when entering the amount or email address, you can be absolutely positive that the recipient won’t see your bank account details. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: While PayPal is generally safe, you still should not treat it as a replacement for a bank account. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, your money goes with it. This shouldn’t be a major concern for normal users, but you should keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you are worried.\n\n\nAdditionally, although PayPal offers similar services to a credit card company or bank, the level of customer service does not match up. It can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. Also, PayPal isn’t necessarily under the same legal obligation as banks and other financial service companies. PayPal has had issues with scams and fraud in the past, which have been largely fixed, but the company is not without its problems. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, users' money goes with it. Additionally, PayPal's customer service is not as robust as that of banks and credit card companies, and it can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. While PayPal is considered safe for simple money transfers to friends, it's essential to keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you're concerned about the safety of your money. Furthermore, the platform's level of security is not necessarily better than a normal bank transfer, and users should be cautious when entering the amount or recipient's email address to avoid errors.. \n hypothesis: PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Is PayPal Safe? + 5 Security Tips to Avoid PayPal Scams (techboomers.com)\nText: PayPal is as safe as (or maybe more so than) using your credit card to buy things, since you often don’t have to reveal your billing information to merchants. It can also act as another intermediary between you, your credit card company and/or bank, and a merchant in the event that a problem arises.\n\nPayPal has had some problems with scams and fraud in the past. However, most of these problems were largely the result of inadequate security protections (which have since been mostly fixed). Most issues with PayPal nowadays are the result of dishonest merchants abusing PayPal, as opposed to inherent flaws in how PayPal works. Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: For the most part, PayPal is safe when you use it to send money. No system is completely risk-free—glitches and data breaches are likely to happen to any company in the internet age, even the best ones. But PayPal is a reputable company with the highest safety and consumer protection standards in place to keep its users relatively safe online. Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: PayPal’s website is secure and encrypted. As long as you have a secure connection to the legitimate PayPal site, any information you exchange is hidden from prying eyes. PayPal uses industry-standard security features that you’d expect from any large financial institution, and the company even offers financial rewards to “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: For simple money transfers to friends, PayPal is one of the safest platforms out there. In fact, it may actually be safer than normal bank transfers. As long as you don’t make a mistake when entering the amount or email address, you can be absolutely positive that the recipient won’t see your bank account details. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: While PayPal is generally safe, you still should not treat it as a replacement for a bank account. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, your money goes with it. This shouldn’t be a major concern for normal users, but you should keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you are worried.\n\n\nAdditionally, although PayPal offers similar services to a credit card company or bank, the level of customer service does not match up. It can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. Also, PayPal isn’t necessarily under the same legal obligation as banks and other financial service companies. PayPal has had issues with scams and fraud in the past, which have been largely fixed, but the company is not without its problems. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, users' money goes with it. Additionally, PayPal's customer service is not as robust as that of banks and credit card companies, and it can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. While PayPal is considered safe for simple money transfers to friends, it's essential to keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you're concerned about the safety of your money. Furthermore, the platform's level of security is not necessarily better than a normal bank transfer, and users should be cautious when entering the amount or recipient's email address to avoid errors.. \n hypothesis: PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Is PayPal Safe? + 5 Security Tips to Avoid PayPal Scams (techboomers.com)\nText: PayPal is as safe as (or maybe more so than) using your credit card to buy things, since you often don’t have to reveal your billing information to merchants. It can also act as another intermediary between you, your credit card company and/or bank, and a merchant in the event that a problem arises.\n\nPayPal has had some problems with scams and fraud in the past. However, most of these problems were largely the result of inadequate security protections (which have since been mostly fixed). Most issues with PayPal nowadays are the result of dishonest merchants abusing PayPal, as opposed to inherent flaws in how PayPal works. Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: For the most part, PayPal is safe when you use it to send money. No system is completely risk-free—glitches and data breaches are likely to happen to any company in the internet age, even the best ones. But PayPal is a reputable company with the highest safety and consumer protection standards in place to keep its users relatively safe online. Title: Is PayPal Safe for Sellers and Buyers? (www.thebalance.com)\nText: PayPal’s website is secure and encrypted. As long as you have a secure connection to the legitimate PayPal site, any information you exchange is hidden from prying eyes. PayPal uses industry-standard security features that you’d expect from any large financial institution, and the company even offers financial rewards to “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: For simple money transfers to friends, PayPal is one of the safest platforms out there. In fact, it may actually be safer than normal bank transfers. As long as you don’t make a mistake when entering the amount or email address, you can be absolutely positive that the recipient won’t see your bank account details. Title: Is PayPal safe? Security tips you need to know - Android Authority (www.androidauthority.com)\nText: While PayPal is generally safe, you still should not treat it as a replacement for a bank account. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, your money goes with it. This shouldn’t be a major concern for normal users, but you should keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you are worried.\n\n\nAdditionally, although PayPal offers similar services to a credit card company or bank, the level of customer service does not match up. It can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. Also, PayPal isn’t necessarily under the same legal obligation as banks and other financial service companies. PayPal has had issues with scams and fraud in the past, which have been largely fixed, but the company is not without its problems. In the US, funds are not FDIC-insured, meaning that if PayPal goes out of business, users' money goes with it. Additionally, PayPal's customer service is not as robust as that of banks and credit card companies, and it can take weeks or months to recover lost funds in some cases. While PayPal is considered safe for simple money transfers to friends, it's essential to keep your PayPal balance low by transferring funds regularly to a normal bank account if you're concerned about the safety of your money. Furthermore, the platform's level of security is not necessarily better than a normal bank transfer, and users should be cautious when entering the amount or recipient's email address to avoid errors.. \n hypothesis: PayPal is a secure and effective way of sending money electronically.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
Why am I unstable on my bike when it's stationary but not when it's moving?
|
However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically stable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments.
|
However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically stable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments.
|
When stationary, a bicycle is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground and its base of support is a line segment, which is not enough to keep it upright. A good base of support needs three contact points. Additionally, when a bicycle is not moving, its wheels are not spinning and thus have zero angular momentum, making it easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction and making it harder to balance. However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically stable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments. This is possible because the spinning wheels of the bicycle have angular momentum, and when the rider is sitting on the bike, they and the wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. As long as torque, or twisting force, is not applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, the momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant, making it easier to keep the bike balanced. The new study in Science claims that the gyroscopic effects and trail of the bicycle do help its stability, but are not necessary above a certain speed.
|
[
"Title: Why Does A Moving Bicycle Stay Up? (www.science20.com)\nText: Since the bicycle was invented, s cientists have postulated various reasons as to why a bicycle is self stable above a certain speed. The consensus has been that a bicycle's stability is related to two factors: First, the rotating wheels of the bicycle provide stability through gyroscopic effects; secondly, that the ‘trail’, the distance by which the contact point of the front wheel trails behind the steering axis, plays an important part.\n\nA new study in Science claims to have settled the issue - gyroscopic effects and trail help, says researcher Dr Arend Schwab of the 3mE faculty at TU Delft, but are not necessary above a certain speed . In a 2007 Proceedings of the Royal Society article (doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1857), a mathematical model with around 25 physical parameters was developed at the time which appeared to predict whether, and at what speeds, a particular design of bicycle would be stable.",
"Title: Balancing on a Bicycle: The Phenomena (www.mentalfloss.com)\nText: A bicycle, on the other hand, is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground (whatever portion of the front and back wheels happen to be touching the ground) and its base of support is a line segment. A good base of support needs at least three contact points with the ground, so bikes are hard to keep upright when they're still. Bikes are, however, dynamically stable, or stable when moving forward, because steering allows a rider to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced, often with steering adjustments small enough that the rider may not even realize they're making them. It's sort of like standing on one foot. If you don't hop around a little, and you start falling sideways, you can't recover and you fall over. If you do hop, though, you can move your foot around to keep your center of gravity above it and keep your balance.\n\n\nA bike has two features that help this dynamic stability immensely: its wheels. Spinning wheels have angular momentum, and when you're sitting on a bike, you and it and its wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. Unless torque, or twisting force, is applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, that momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant. In a nutshell, once the wheels line up a certain way, they want to stay lined up like that. It's easy for you to move them, but hard for an outside force to do the same, and so the bike is easy to keep balanced but doesn't topple easily. A non-moving bike has wheels that aren't spinning and zero angular momentum, which makes it very easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction, making the bike harder to balance."
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_whudoc_57626018-7ec7-46a8-a155-866bb5ab2bc6
| 1
| 0.990738
|
hard_positive
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Why Does A Moving Bicycle Stay Up? (www.science20.com)\nText: Since the bicycle was invented, s cientists have postulated various reasons as to why a bicycle is self stable above a certain speed. The consensus has been that a bicycle's stability is related to two factors: First, the rotating wheels of the bicycle provide stability through gyroscopic effects; secondly, that the ‘trail’, the distance by which the contact point of the front wheel trails behind the steering axis, plays an important part.\n\nA new study in Science claims to have settled the issue - gyroscopic effects and trail help, says researcher Dr Arend Schwab of the 3mE faculty at TU Delft, but are not necessary above a certain speed . In a 2007 Proceedings of the Royal Society article (doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1857), a mathematical model with around 25 physical parameters was developed at the time which appeared to predict whether, and at what speeds, a particular design of bicycle would be stable. Title: Balancing on a Bicycle: The Phenomena (www.mentalfloss.com)\nText: A bicycle, on the other hand, is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground (whatever portion of the front and back wheels happen to be touching the ground) and its base of support is a line segment. A good base of support needs at least three contact points with the ground, so bikes are hard to keep upright when they're still. Bikes are, however, dynamically stable, or stable when moving forward, because steering allows a rider to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced, often with steering adjustments small enough that the rider may not even realize they're making them. It's sort of like standing on one foot. If you don't hop around a little, and you start falling sideways, you can't recover and you fall over. If you do hop, though, you can move your foot around to keep your center of gravity above it and keep your balance.\n\n\nA bike has two features that help this dynamic stability immensely: its wheels. Spinning wheels have angular momentum, and when you're sitting on a bike, you and it and its wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. Unless torque, or twisting force, is applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, that momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant. In a nutshell, once the wheels line up a certain way, they want to stay lined up like that. It's easy for you to move them, but hard for an outside force to do the same, and so the bike is easy to keep balanced but doesn't topple easily. A non-moving bike has wheels that aren't spinning and zero angular momentum, which makes it very easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction, making the bike harder to balance.. \n hypothesis: However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically stable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Why Does A Moving Bicycle Stay Up? (www.science20.com)\nText: Since the bicycle was invented, s cientists have postulated various reasons as to why a bicycle is self stable above a certain speed. The consensus has been that a bicycle's stability is related to two factors: First, the rotating wheels of the bicycle provide stability through gyroscopic effects; secondly, that the ‘trail’, the distance by which the contact point of the front wheel trails behind the steering axis, plays an important part.\n\nA new study in Science claims to have settled the issue - gyroscopic effects and trail help, says researcher Dr Arend Schwab of the 3mE faculty at TU Delft, but are not necessary above a certain speed . In a 2007 Proceedings of the Royal Society article (doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1857), a mathematical model with around 25 physical parameters was developed at the time which appeared to predict whether, and at what speeds, a particular design of bicycle would be stable. Title: Balancing on a Bicycle: The Phenomena (www.mentalfloss.com)\nText: A bicycle, on the other hand, is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground (whatever portion of the front and back wheels happen to be touching the ground) and its base of support is a line segment. A good base of support needs at least three contact points with the ground, so bikes are hard to keep upright when they're still. Bikes are, however, dynamically stable, or stable when moving forward, because steering allows a rider to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced, often with steering adjustments small enough that the rider may not even realize they're making them. It's sort of like standing on one foot. If you don't hop around a little, and you start falling sideways, you can't recover and you fall over. If you do hop, though, you can move your foot around to keep your center of gravity above it and keep your balance.\n\n\nA bike has two features that help this dynamic stability immensely: its wheels. Spinning wheels have angular momentum, and when you're sitting on a bike, you and it and its wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. Unless torque, or twisting force, is applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, that momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant. In a nutshell, once the wheels line up a certain way, they want to stay lined up like that. It's easy for you to move them, but hard for an outside force to do the same, and so the bike is easy to keep balanced but doesn't topple easily. A non-moving bike has wheels that aren't spinning and zero angular momentum, which makes it very easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction, making the bike harder to balance.. \n hypothesis: However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically stable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Why Does A Moving Bicycle Stay Up? (www.science20.com)\nText: Since the bicycle was invented, s cientists have postulated various reasons as to why a bicycle is self stable above a certain speed. The consensus has been that a bicycle's stability is related to two factors: First, the rotating wheels of the bicycle provide stability through gyroscopic effects; secondly, that the ‘trail’, the distance by which the contact point of the front wheel trails behind the steering axis, plays an important part.\n\nA new study in Science claims to have settled the issue - gyroscopic effects and trail help, says researcher Dr Arend Schwab of the 3mE faculty at TU Delft, but are not necessary above a certain speed . In a 2007 Proceedings of the Royal Society article (doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1857), a mathematical model with around 25 physical parameters was developed at the time which appeared to predict whether, and at what speeds, a particular design of bicycle would be stable. Title: Balancing on a Bicycle: The Phenomena (www.mentalfloss.com)\nText: A bicycle, on the other hand, is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground (whatever portion of the front and back wheels happen to be touching the ground) and its base of support is a line segment. A good base of support needs at least three contact points with the ground, so bikes are hard to keep upright when they're still. Bikes are, however, dynamically stable, or stable when moving forward, because steering allows a rider to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced, often with steering adjustments small enough that the rider may not even realize they're making them. It's sort of like standing on one foot. If you don't hop around a little, and you start falling sideways, you can't recover and you fall over. If you do hop, though, you can move your foot around to keep your center of gravity above it and keep your balance.\n\n\nA bike has two features that help this dynamic stability immensely: its wheels. Spinning wheels have angular momentum, and when you're sitting on a bike, you and it and its wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. Unless torque, or twisting force, is applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, that momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant. In a nutshell, once the wheels line up a certain way, they want to stay lined up like that. It's easy for you to move them, but hard for an outside force to do the same, and so the bike is easy to keep balanced but doesn't topple easily. A non-moving bike has wheels that aren't spinning and zero angular momentum, which makes it very easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction, making the bike harder to balance.. \n hypothesis: However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically stable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
|||
Why am I unstable on my bike when it's stationary but not when it's moving?
|
However, when a bicycle is moving, it is not dynamically stable because the rider is unable to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments.
|
However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically stable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments.
|
When stationary, a bicycle is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground and its base of support is a line segment, which is not enough to keep it upright. A good base of support needs three contact points. Additionally, when a bicycle is not moving, its wheels are not spinning and thus have zero angular momentum, making it easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction and making it harder to balance. However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically stable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments. This is possible because the spinning wheels of the bicycle have angular momentum, and when the rider is sitting on the bike, they and the wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. As long as torque, or twisting force, is not applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, the momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant, making it easier to keep the bike balanced. The new study in Science claims that the gyroscopic effects and trail of the bicycle do help its stability, but are not necessary above a certain speed.
|
[
"Title: Why Does A Moving Bicycle Stay Up? (www.science20.com)\nText: Since the bicycle was invented, s cientists have postulated various reasons as to why a bicycle is self stable above a certain speed. The consensus has been that a bicycle's stability is related to two factors: First, the rotating wheels of the bicycle provide stability through gyroscopic effects; secondly, that the ‘trail’, the distance by which the contact point of the front wheel trails behind the steering axis, plays an important part.\n\nA new study in Science claims to have settled the issue - gyroscopic effects and trail help, says researcher Dr Arend Schwab of the 3mE faculty at TU Delft, but are not necessary above a certain speed . In a 2007 Proceedings of the Royal Society article (doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1857), a mathematical model with around 25 physical parameters was developed at the time which appeared to predict whether, and at what speeds, a particular design of bicycle would be stable.",
"Title: Balancing on a Bicycle: The Phenomena (www.mentalfloss.com)\nText: A bicycle, on the other hand, is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground (whatever portion of the front and back wheels happen to be touching the ground) and its base of support is a line segment. A good base of support needs at least three contact points with the ground, so bikes are hard to keep upright when they're still. Bikes are, however, dynamically stable, or stable when moving forward, because steering allows a rider to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced, often with steering adjustments small enough that the rider may not even realize they're making them. It's sort of like standing on one foot. If you don't hop around a little, and you start falling sideways, you can't recover and you fall over. If you do hop, though, you can move your foot around to keep your center of gravity above it and keep your balance.\n\n\nA bike has two features that help this dynamic stability immensely: its wheels. Spinning wheels have angular momentum, and when you're sitting on a bike, you and it and its wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. Unless torque, or twisting force, is applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, that momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant. In a nutshell, once the wheels line up a certain way, they want to stay lined up like that. It's easy for you to move them, but hard for an outside force to do the same, and so the bike is easy to keep balanced but doesn't topple easily. A non-moving bike has wheels that aren't spinning and zero angular momentum, which makes it very easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction, making the bike harder to balance."
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_whudoc_57626018-7ec7-46a8-a155-866bb5ab2bc6
| 1
| 0.990738
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
claim_negation
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Why Does A Moving Bicycle Stay Up? (www.science20.com)\nText: Since the bicycle was invented, s cientists have postulated various reasons as to why a bicycle is self stable above a certain speed. The consensus has been that a bicycle's stability is related to two factors: First, the rotating wheels of the bicycle provide stability through gyroscopic effects; secondly, that the ‘trail’, the distance by which the contact point of the front wheel trails behind the steering axis, plays an important part.\n\nA new study in Science claims to have settled the issue - gyroscopic effects and trail help, says researcher Dr Arend Schwab of the 3mE faculty at TU Delft, but are not necessary above a certain speed . In a 2007 Proceedings of the Royal Society article (doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1857), a mathematical model with around 25 physical parameters was developed at the time which appeared to predict whether, and at what speeds, a particular design of bicycle would be stable. Title: Balancing on a Bicycle: The Phenomena (www.mentalfloss.com)\nText: A bicycle, on the other hand, is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground (whatever portion of the front and back wheels happen to be touching the ground) and its base of support is a line segment. A good base of support needs at least three contact points with the ground, so bikes are hard to keep upright when they're still. Bikes are, however, dynamically stable, or stable when moving forward, because steering allows a rider to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced, often with steering adjustments small enough that the rider may not even realize they're making them. It's sort of like standing on one foot. If you don't hop around a little, and you start falling sideways, you can't recover and you fall over. If you do hop, though, you can move your foot around to keep your center of gravity above it and keep your balance.\n\n\nA bike has two features that help this dynamic stability immensely: its wheels. Spinning wheels have angular momentum, and when you're sitting on a bike, you and it and its wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. Unless torque, or twisting force, is applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, that momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant. In a nutshell, once the wheels line up a certain way, they want to stay lined up like that. It's easy for you to move them, but hard for an outside force to do the same, and so the bike is easy to keep balanced but doesn't topple easily. A non-moving bike has wheels that aren't spinning and zero angular momentum, which makes it very easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction, making the bike harder to balance.. \n hypothesis: However, when a bicycle is moving, it is not dynamically stable because the rider is unable to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Why Does A Moving Bicycle Stay Up? (www.science20.com)\nText: Since the bicycle was invented, s cientists have postulated various reasons as to why a bicycle is self stable above a certain speed. The consensus has been that a bicycle's stability is related to two factors: First, the rotating wheels of the bicycle provide stability through gyroscopic effects; secondly, that the ‘trail’, the distance by which the contact point of the front wheel trails behind the steering axis, plays an important part.\n\nA new study in Science claims to have settled the issue - gyroscopic effects and trail help, says researcher Dr Arend Schwab of the 3mE faculty at TU Delft, but are not necessary above a certain speed . In a 2007 Proceedings of the Royal Society article (doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1857), a mathematical model with around 25 physical parameters was developed at the time which appeared to predict whether, and at what speeds, a particular design of bicycle would be stable. Title: Balancing on a Bicycle: The Phenomena (www.mentalfloss.com)\nText: A bicycle, on the other hand, is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground (whatever portion of the front and back wheels happen to be touching the ground) and its base of support is a line segment. A good base of support needs at least three contact points with the ground, so bikes are hard to keep upright when they're still. Bikes are, however, dynamically stable, or stable when moving forward, because steering allows a rider to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced, often with steering adjustments small enough that the rider may not even realize they're making them. It's sort of like standing on one foot. If you don't hop around a little, and you start falling sideways, you can't recover and you fall over. If you do hop, though, you can move your foot around to keep your center of gravity above it and keep your balance.\n\n\nA bike has two features that help this dynamic stability immensely: its wheels. Spinning wheels have angular momentum, and when you're sitting on a bike, you and it and its wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. Unless torque, or twisting force, is applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, that momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant. In a nutshell, once the wheels line up a certain way, they want to stay lined up like that. It's easy for you to move them, but hard for an outside force to do the same, and so the bike is easy to keep balanced but doesn't topple easily. A non-moving bike has wheels that aren't spinning and zero angular momentum, which makes it very easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction, making the bike harder to balance.. \n hypothesis: However, when a bicycle is moving, it is not dynamically stable because the rider is unable to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Why Does A Moving Bicycle Stay Up? (www.science20.com)\nText: Since the bicycle was invented, s cientists have postulated various reasons as to why a bicycle is self stable above a certain speed. The consensus has been that a bicycle's stability is related to two factors: First, the rotating wheels of the bicycle provide stability through gyroscopic effects; secondly, that the ‘trail’, the distance by which the contact point of the front wheel trails behind the steering axis, plays an important part.\n\nA new study in Science claims to have settled the issue - gyroscopic effects and trail help, says researcher Dr Arend Schwab of the 3mE faculty at TU Delft, but are not necessary above a certain speed . In a 2007 Proceedings of the Royal Society article (doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1857), a mathematical model with around 25 physical parameters was developed at the time which appeared to predict whether, and at what speeds, a particular design of bicycle would be stable. Title: Balancing on a Bicycle: The Phenomena (www.mentalfloss.com)\nText: A bicycle, on the other hand, is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground (whatever portion of the front and back wheels happen to be touching the ground) and its base of support is a line segment. A good base of support needs at least three contact points with the ground, so bikes are hard to keep upright when they're still. Bikes are, however, dynamically stable, or stable when moving forward, because steering allows a rider to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced, often with steering adjustments small enough that the rider may not even realize they're making them. It's sort of like standing on one foot. If you don't hop around a little, and you start falling sideways, you can't recover and you fall over. If you do hop, though, you can move your foot around to keep your center of gravity above it and keep your balance.\n\n\nA bike has two features that help this dynamic stability immensely: its wheels. Spinning wheels have angular momentum, and when you're sitting on a bike, you and it and its wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. Unless torque, or twisting force, is applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, that momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant. In a nutshell, once the wheels line up a certain way, they want to stay lined up like that. It's easy for you to move them, but hard for an outside force to do the same, and so the bike is easy to keep balanced but doesn't topple easily. A non-moving bike has wheels that aren't spinning and zero angular momentum, which makes it very easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction, making the bike harder to balance.. \n hypothesis: However, when a bicycle is moving, it is not dynamically stable because the rider is unable to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
Why am I unstable on my bike when it's stationary but not when it's moving?
|
However, when a bicycle is in motion, the rider is able to maintain dynamic stability by shifting the bike's points of support to align with the center of gravity and make minor steering adjustments to keep it balanced.
|
However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically stable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments.
|
When stationary, a bicycle is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground and its base of support is a line segment, which is not enough to keep it upright. A good base of support needs three contact points. Additionally, when a bicycle is not moving, its wheels are not spinning and thus have zero angular momentum, making it easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction and making it harder to balance. However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically stable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments. This is possible because the spinning wheels of the bicycle have angular momentum, and when the rider is sitting on the bike, they and the wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. As long as torque, or twisting force, is not applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, the momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant, making it easier to keep the bike balanced. The new study in Science claims that the gyroscopic effects and trail of the bicycle do help its stability, but are not necessary above a certain speed.
|
[
"Title: Why Does A Moving Bicycle Stay Up? (www.science20.com)\nText: Since the bicycle was invented, s cientists have postulated various reasons as to why a bicycle is self stable above a certain speed. The consensus has been that a bicycle's stability is related to two factors: First, the rotating wheels of the bicycle provide stability through gyroscopic effects; secondly, that the ‘trail’, the distance by which the contact point of the front wheel trails behind the steering axis, plays an important part.\n\nA new study in Science claims to have settled the issue - gyroscopic effects and trail help, says researcher Dr Arend Schwab of the 3mE faculty at TU Delft, but are not necessary above a certain speed . In a 2007 Proceedings of the Royal Society article (doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1857), a mathematical model with around 25 physical parameters was developed at the time which appeared to predict whether, and at what speeds, a particular design of bicycle would be stable.",
"Title: Balancing on a Bicycle: The Phenomena (www.mentalfloss.com)\nText: A bicycle, on the other hand, is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground (whatever portion of the front and back wheels happen to be touching the ground) and its base of support is a line segment. A good base of support needs at least three contact points with the ground, so bikes are hard to keep upright when they're still. Bikes are, however, dynamically stable, or stable when moving forward, because steering allows a rider to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced, often with steering adjustments small enough that the rider may not even realize they're making them. It's sort of like standing on one foot. If you don't hop around a little, and you start falling sideways, you can't recover and you fall over. If you do hop, though, you can move your foot around to keep your center of gravity above it and keep your balance.\n\n\nA bike has two features that help this dynamic stability immensely: its wheels. Spinning wheels have angular momentum, and when you're sitting on a bike, you and it and its wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. Unless torque, or twisting force, is applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, that momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant. In a nutshell, once the wheels line up a certain way, they want to stay lined up like that. It's easy for you to move them, but hard for an outside force to do the same, and so the bike is easy to keep balanced but doesn't topple easily. A non-moving bike has wheels that aren't spinning and zero angular momentum, which makes it very easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction, making the bike harder to balance."
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_whudoc_57626018-7ec7-46a8-a155-866bb5ab2bc6
| 1
| 0.990738
|
generated
|
attributable
|
keep
|
claim_reformulation
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Why Does A Moving Bicycle Stay Up? (www.science20.com)\nText: Since the bicycle was invented, s cientists have postulated various reasons as to why a bicycle is self stable above a certain speed. The consensus has been that a bicycle's stability is related to two factors: First, the rotating wheels of the bicycle provide stability through gyroscopic effects; secondly, that the ‘trail’, the distance by which the contact point of the front wheel trails behind the steering axis, plays an important part.\n\nA new study in Science claims to have settled the issue - gyroscopic effects and trail help, says researcher Dr Arend Schwab of the 3mE faculty at TU Delft, but are not necessary above a certain speed . In a 2007 Proceedings of the Royal Society article (doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1857), a mathematical model with around 25 physical parameters was developed at the time which appeared to predict whether, and at what speeds, a particular design of bicycle would be stable. Title: Balancing on a Bicycle: The Phenomena (www.mentalfloss.com)\nText: A bicycle, on the other hand, is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground (whatever portion of the front and back wheels happen to be touching the ground) and its base of support is a line segment. A good base of support needs at least three contact points with the ground, so bikes are hard to keep upright when they're still. Bikes are, however, dynamically stable, or stable when moving forward, because steering allows a rider to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced, often with steering adjustments small enough that the rider may not even realize they're making them. It's sort of like standing on one foot. If you don't hop around a little, and you start falling sideways, you can't recover and you fall over. If you do hop, though, you can move your foot around to keep your center of gravity above it and keep your balance.\n\n\nA bike has two features that help this dynamic stability immensely: its wheels. Spinning wheels have angular momentum, and when you're sitting on a bike, you and it and its wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. Unless torque, or twisting force, is applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, that momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant. In a nutshell, once the wheels line up a certain way, they want to stay lined up like that. It's easy for you to move them, but hard for an outside force to do the same, and so the bike is easy to keep balanced but doesn't topple easily. A non-moving bike has wheels that aren't spinning and zero angular momentum, which makes it very easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction, making the bike harder to balance.. \n hypothesis: However, when a bicycle is in motion, the rider is able to maintain dynamic stability by shifting the bike's points of support to align with the center of gravity and make minor steering adjustments to keep it balanced.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Why Does A Moving Bicycle Stay Up? (www.science20.com)\nText: Since the bicycle was invented, s cientists have postulated various reasons as to why a bicycle is self stable above a certain speed. The consensus has been that a bicycle's stability is related to two factors: First, the rotating wheels of the bicycle provide stability through gyroscopic effects; secondly, that the ‘trail’, the distance by which the contact point of the front wheel trails behind the steering axis, plays an important part.\n\nA new study in Science claims to have settled the issue - gyroscopic effects and trail help, says researcher Dr Arend Schwab of the 3mE faculty at TU Delft, but are not necessary above a certain speed . In a 2007 Proceedings of the Royal Society article (doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1857), a mathematical model with around 25 physical parameters was developed at the time which appeared to predict whether, and at what speeds, a particular design of bicycle would be stable. Title: Balancing on a Bicycle: The Phenomena (www.mentalfloss.com)\nText: A bicycle, on the other hand, is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground (whatever portion of the front and back wheels happen to be touching the ground) and its base of support is a line segment. A good base of support needs at least three contact points with the ground, so bikes are hard to keep upright when they're still. Bikes are, however, dynamically stable, or stable when moving forward, because steering allows a rider to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced, often with steering adjustments small enough that the rider may not even realize they're making them. It's sort of like standing on one foot. If you don't hop around a little, and you start falling sideways, you can't recover and you fall over. If you do hop, though, you can move your foot around to keep your center of gravity above it and keep your balance.\n\n\nA bike has two features that help this dynamic stability immensely: its wheels. Spinning wheels have angular momentum, and when you're sitting on a bike, you and it and its wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. Unless torque, or twisting force, is applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, that momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant. In a nutshell, once the wheels line up a certain way, they want to stay lined up like that. It's easy for you to move them, but hard for an outside force to do the same, and so the bike is easy to keep balanced but doesn't topple easily. A non-moving bike has wheels that aren't spinning and zero angular momentum, which makes it very easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction, making the bike harder to balance.. \n hypothesis: However, when a bicycle is in motion, the rider is able to maintain dynamic stability by shifting the bike's points of support to align with the center of gravity and make minor steering adjustments to keep it balanced.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Why Does A Moving Bicycle Stay Up? (www.science20.com)\nText: Since the bicycle was invented, s cientists have postulated various reasons as to why a bicycle is self stable above a certain speed. The consensus has been that a bicycle's stability is related to two factors: First, the rotating wheels of the bicycle provide stability through gyroscopic effects; secondly, that the ‘trail’, the distance by which the contact point of the front wheel trails behind the steering axis, plays an important part.\n\nA new study in Science claims to have settled the issue - gyroscopic effects and trail help, says researcher Dr Arend Schwab of the 3mE faculty at TU Delft, but are not necessary above a certain speed . In a 2007 Proceedings of the Royal Society article (doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1857), a mathematical model with around 25 physical parameters was developed at the time which appeared to predict whether, and at what speeds, a particular design of bicycle would be stable. Title: Balancing on a Bicycle: The Phenomena (www.mentalfloss.com)\nText: A bicycle, on the other hand, is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground (whatever portion of the front and back wheels happen to be touching the ground) and its base of support is a line segment. A good base of support needs at least three contact points with the ground, so bikes are hard to keep upright when they're still. Bikes are, however, dynamically stable, or stable when moving forward, because steering allows a rider to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced, often with steering adjustments small enough that the rider may not even realize they're making them. It's sort of like standing on one foot. If you don't hop around a little, and you start falling sideways, you can't recover and you fall over. If you do hop, though, you can move your foot around to keep your center of gravity above it and keep your balance.\n\n\nA bike has two features that help this dynamic stability immensely: its wheels. Spinning wheels have angular momentum, and when you're sitting on a bike, you and it and its wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. Unless torque, or twisting force, is applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, that momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant. In a nutshell, once the wheels line up a certain way, they want to stay lined up like that. It's easy for you to move them, but hard for an outside force to do the same, and so the bike is easy to keep balanced but doesn't topple easily. A non-moving bike has wheels that aren't spinning and zero angular momentum, which makes it very easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction, making the bike harder to balance.. \n hypothesis: However, when a bicycle is in motion, the rider is able to maintain dynamic stability by shifting the bike's points of support to align with the center of gravity and make minor steering adjustments to keep it balanced.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
Why am I unstable on my bike when it's stationary but not when it's moving?
|
However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically unstable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments.
|
However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically stable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments.
|
When stationary, a bicycle is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground and its base of support is a line segment, which is not enough to keep it upright. A good base of support needs three contact points. Additionally, when a bicycle is not moving, its wheels are not spinning and thus have zero angular momentum, making it easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction and making it harder to balance. However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically stable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments. This is possible because the spinning wheels of the bicycle have angular momentum, and when the rider is sitting on the bike, they and the wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. As long as torque, or twisting force, is not applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, the momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant, making it easier to keep the bike balanced. The new study in Science claims that the gyroscopic effects and trail of the bicycle do help its stability, but are not necessary above a certain speed.
|
[
"Title: Why Does A Moving Bicycle Stay Up? (www.science20.com)\nText: Since the bicycle was invented, s cientists have postulated various reasons as to why a bicycle is self stable above a certain speed. The consensus has been that a bicycle's stability is related to two factors: First, the rotating wheels of the bicycle provide stability through gyroscopic effects; secondly, that the ‘trail’, the distance by which the contact point of the front wheel trails behind the steering axis, plays an important part.\n\nA new study in Science claims to have settled the issue - gyroscopic effects and trail help, says researcher Dr Arend Schwab of the 3mE faculty at TU Delft, but are not necessary above a certain speed . In a 2007 Proceedings of the Royal Society article (doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1857), a mathematical model with around 25 physical parameters was developed at the time which appeared to predict whether, and at what speeds, a particular design of bicycle would be stable.",
"Title: Balancing on a Bicycle: The Phenomena (www.mentalfloss.com)\nText: A bicycle, on the other hand, is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground (whatever portion of the front and back wheels happen to be touching the ground) and its base of support is a line segment. A good base of support needs at least three contact points with the ground, so bikes are hard to keep upright when they're still. Bikes are, however, dynamically stable, or stable when moving forward, because steering allows a rider to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced, often with steering adjustments small enough that the rider may not even realize they're making them. It's sort of like standing on one foot. If you don't hop around a little, and you start falling sideways, you can't recover and you fall over. If you do hop, though, you can move your foot around to keep your center of gravity above it and keep your balance.\n\n\nA bike has two features that help this dynamic stability immensely: its wheels. Spinning wheels have angular momentum, and when you're sitting on a bike, you and it and its wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. Unless torque, or twisting force, is applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, that momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant. In a nutshell, once the wheels line up a certain way, they want to stay lined up like that. It's easy for you to move them, but hard for an outside force to do the same, and so the bike is easy to keep balanced but doesn't topple easily. A non-moving bike has wheels that aren't spinning and zero angular momentum, which makes it very easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction, making the bike harder to balance."
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_whudoc_57626018-7ec7-46a8-a155-866bb5ab2bc6
| 1
| 0.990738
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
claim_erronous_change
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Why Does A Moving Bicycle Stay Up? (www.science20.com)\nText: Since the bicycle was invented, s cientists have postulated various reasons as to why a bicycle is self stable above a certain speed. The consensus has been that a bicycle's stability is related to two factors: First, the rotating wheels of the bicycle provide stability through gyroscopic effects; secondly, that the ‘trail’, the distance by which the contact point of the front wheel trails behind the steering axis, plays an important part.\n\nA new study in Science claims to have settled the issue - gyroscopic effects and trail help, says researcher Dr Arend Schwab of the 3mE faculty at TU Delft, but are not necessary above a certain speed . In a 2007 Proceedings of the Royal Society article (doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1857), a mathematical model with around 25 physical parameters was developed at the time which appeared to predict whether, and at what speeds, a particular design of bicycle would be stable. Title: Balancing on a Bicycle: The Phenomena (www.mentalfloss.com)\nText: A bicycle, on the other hand, is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground (whatever portion of the front and back wheels happen to be touching the ground) and its base of support is a line segment. A good base of support needs at least three contact points with the ground, so bikes are hard to keep upright when they're still. Bikes are, however, dynamically stable, or stable when moving forward, because steering allows a rider to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced, often with steering adjustments small enough that the rider may not even realize they're making them. It's sort of like standing on one foot. If you don't hop around a little, and you start falling sideways, you can't recover and you fall over. If you do hop, though, you can move your foot around to keep your center of gravity above it and keep your balance.\n\n\nA bike has two features that help this dynamic stability immensely: its wheels. Spinning wheels have angular momentum, and when you're sitting on a bike, you and it and its wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. Unless torque, or twisting force, is applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, that momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant. In a nutshell, once the wheels line up a certain way, they want to stay lined up like that. It's easy for you to move them, but hard for an outside force to do the same, and so the bike is easy to keep balanced but doesn't topple easily. A non-moving bike has wheels that aren't spinning and zero angular momentum, which makes it very easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction, making the bike harder to balance.. \n hypothesis: However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically unstable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Why Does A Moving Bicycle Stay Up? (www.science20.com)\nText: Since the bicycle was invented, s cientists have postulated various reasons as to why a bicycle is self stable above a certain speed. The consensus has been that a bicycle's stability is related to two factors: First, the rotating wheels of the bicycle provide stability through gyroscopic effects; secondly, that the ‘trail’, the distance by which the contact point of the front wheel trails behind the steering axis, plays an important part.\n\nA new study in Science claims to have settled the issue - gyroscopic effects and trail help, says researcher Dr Arend Schwab of the 3mE faculty at TU Delft, but are not necessary above a certain speed . In a 2007 Proceedings of the Royal Society article (doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1857), a mathematical model with around 25 physical parameters was developed at the time which appeared to predict whether, and at what speeds, a particular design of bicycle would be stable. Title: Balancing on a Bicycle: The Phenomena (www.mentalfloss.com)\nText: A bicycle, on the other hand, is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground (whatever portion of the front and back wheels happen to be touching the ground) and its base of support is a line segment. A good base of support needs at least three contact points with the ground, so bikes are hard to keep upright when they're still. Bikes are, however, dynamically stable, or stable when moving forward, because steering allows a rider to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced, often with steering adjustments small enough that the rider may not even realize they're making them. It's sort of like standing on one foot. If you don't hop around a little, and you start falling sideways, you can't recover and you fall over. If you do hop, though, you can move your foot around to keep your center of gravity above it and keep your balance.\n\n\nA bike has two features that help this dynamic stability immensely: its wheels. Spinning wheels have angular momentum, and when you're sitting on a bike, you and it and its wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. Unless torque, or twisting force, is applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, that momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant. In a nutshell, once the wheels line up a certain way, they want to stay lined up like that. It's easy for you to move them, but hard for an outside force to do the same, and so the bike is easy to keep balanced but doesn't topple easily. A non-moving bike has wheels that aren't spinning and zero angular momentum, which makes it very easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction, making the bike harder to balance.. \n hypothesis: However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically unstable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Why Does A Moving Bicycle Stay Up? (www.science20.com)\nText: Since the bicycle was invented, s cientists have postulated various reasons as to why a bicycle is self stable above a certain speed. The consensus has been that a bicycle's stability is related to two factors: First, the rotating wheels of the bicycle provide stability through gyroscopic effects; secondly, that the ‘trail’, the distance by which the contact point of the front wheel trails behind the steering axis, plays an important part.\n\nA new study in Science claims to have settled the issue - gyroscopic effects and trail help, says researcher Dr Arend Schwab of the 3mE faculty at TU Delft, but are not necessary above a certain speed . In a 2007 Proceedings of the Royal Society article (doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1857), a mathematical model with around 25 physical parameters was developed at the time which appeared to predict whether, and at what speeds, a particular design of bicycle would be stable. Title: Balancing on a Bicycle: The Phenomena (www.mentalfloss.com)\nText: A bicycle, on the other hand, is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground (whatever portion of the front and back wheels happen to be touching the ground) and its base of support is a line segment. A good base of support needs at least three contact points with the ground, so bikes are hard to keep upright when they're still. Bikes are, however, dynamically stable, or stable when moving forward, because steering allows a rider to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced, often with steering adjustments small enough that the rider may not even realize they're making them. It's sort of like standing on one foot. If you don't hop around a little, and you start falling sideways, you can't recover and you fall over. If you do hop, though, you can move your foot around to keep your center of gravity above it and keep your balance.\n\n\nA bike has two features that help this dynamic stability immensely: its wheels. Spinning wheels have angular momentum, and when you're sitting on a bike, you and it and its wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. Unless torque, or twisting force, is applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, that momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant. In a nutshell, once the wheels line up a certain way, they want to stay lined up like that. It's easy for you to move them, but hard for an outside force to do the same, and so the bike is easy to keep balanced but doesn't topple easily. A non-moving bike has wheels that aren't spinning and zero angular momentum, which makes it very easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction, making the bike harder to balance.. \n hypothesis: However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically unstable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
Why am I unstable on my bike when it's stationary but not when it's moving?
|
esearch has also explored the role of the "oscillation" of the bicycle in maintaining dynamic stability. When a bicycle is moving, its frame and wheels oscillate slightly, creating a sort of "damped oscillation." This oscillation can be influenced by the rider's weight distribution, the stiffness of the frame, and the type of terrain being ridden. By adjusting the steering and shifting their weight, the rider can influence the oscillation and maintain stability.
|
However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically stable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments.
|
When stationary, a bicycle is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground and its base of support is a line segment, which is not enough to keep it upright. A good base of support needs three contact points. Additionally, when a bicycle is not moving, its wheels are not spinning and thus have zero angular momentum, making it easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction and making it harder to balance. However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically stable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments. This is possible because the spinning wheels of the bicycle have angular momentum, and when the rider is sitting on the bike, they and the wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. As long as torque, or twisting force, is not applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, the momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant, making it easier to keep the bike balanced. The new study in Science claims that the gyroscopic effects and trail of the bicycle do help its stability, but are not necessary above a certain speed.
|
[
"Title: Why Does A Moving Bicycle Stay Up? (www.science20.com)\nText: Since the bicycle was invented, s cientists have postulated various reasons as to why a bicycle is self stable above a certain speed. The consensus has been that a bicycle's stability is related to two factors: First, the rotating wheels of the bicycle provide stability through gyroscopic effects; secondly, that the ‘trail’, the distance by which the contact point of the front wheel trails behind the steering axis, plays an important part.\n\nA new study in Science claims to have settled the issue - gyroscopic effects and trail help, says researcher Dr Arend Schwab of the 3mE faculty at TU Delft, but are not necessary above a certain speed . In a 2007 Proceedings of the Royal Society article (doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1857), a mathematical model with around 25 physical parameters was developed at the time which appeared to predict whether, and at what speeds, a particular design of bicycle would be stable.",
"Title: Balancing on a Bicycle: The Phenomena (www.mentalfloss.com)\nText: A bicycle, on the other hand, is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground (whatever portion of the front and back wheels happen to be touching the ground) and its base of support is a line segment. A good base of support needs at least three contact points with the ground, so bikes are hard to keep upright when they're still. Bikes are, however, dynamically stable, or stable when moving forward, because steering allows a rider to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced, often with steering adjustments small enough that the rider may not even realize they're making them. It's sort of like standing on one foot. If you don't hop around a little, and you start falling sideways, you can't recover and you fall over. If you do hop, though, you can move your foot around to keep your center of gravity above it and keep your balance.\n\n\nA bike has two features that help this dynamic stability immensely: its wheels. Spinning wheels have angular momentum, and when you're sitting on a bike, you and it and its wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. Unless torque, or twisting force, is applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, that momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant. In a nutshell, once the wheels line up a certain way, they want to stay lined up like that. It's easy for you to move them, but hard for an outside force to do the same, and so the bike is easy to keep balanced but doesn't topple easily. A non-moving bike has wheels that aren't spinning and zero angular momentum, which makes it very easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction, making the bike harder to balance."
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_whudoc_57626018-7ec7-46a8-a155-866bb5ab2bc6
| 1
| 0.990738
|
generated
|
attributable
|
keep
|
claim_infer_claim
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Why Does A Moving Bicycle Stay Up? (www.science20.com)\nText: Since the bicycle was invented, s cientists have postulated various reasons as to why a bicycle is self stable above a certain speed. The consensus has been that a bicycle's stability is related to two factors: First, the rotating wheels of the bicycle provide stability through gyroscopic effects; secondly, that the ‘trail’, the distance by which the contact point of the front wheel trails behind the steering axis, plays an important part.\n\nA new study in Science claims to have settled the issue - gyroscopic effects and trail help, says researcher Dr Arend Schwab of the 3mE faculty at TU Delft, but are not necessary above a certain speed . In a 2007 Proceedings of the Royal Society article (doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1857), a mathematical model with around 25 physical parameters was developed at the time which appeared to predict whether, and at what speeds, a particular design of bicycle would be stable. Title: Balancing on a Bicycle: The Phenomena (www.mentalfloss.com)\nText: A bicycle, on the other hand, is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground (whatever portion of the front and back wheels happen to be touching the ground) and its base of support is a line segment. A good base of support needs at least three contact points with the ground, so bikes are hard to keep upright when they're still. Bikes are, however, dynamically stable, or stable when moving forward, because steering allows a rider to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced, often with steering adjustments small enough that the rider may not even realize they're making them. It's sort of like standing on one foot. If you don't hop around a little, and you start falling sideways, you can't recover and you fall over. If you do hop, though, you can move your foot around to keep your center of gravity above it and keep your balance.\n\n\nA bike has two features that help this dynamic stability immensely: its wheels. Spinning wheels have angular momentum, and when you're sitting on a bike, you and it and its wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. Unless torque, or twisting force, is applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, that momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant. In a nutshell, once the wheels line up a certain way, they want to stay lined up like that. It's easy for you to move them, but hard for an outside force to do the same, and so the bike is easy to keep balanced but doesn't topple easily. A non-moving bike has wheels that aren't spinning and zero angular momentum, which makes it very easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction, making the bike harder to balance.. \n hypothesis: esearch has also explored the role of the \"oscillation\" of the bicycle in maintaining dynamic stability. When a bicycle is moving, its frame and wheels oscillate slightly, creating a sort of \"damped oscillation.\" This oscillation can be influenced by the rider's weight distribution, the stiffness of the frame, and the type of terrain being ridden. By adjusting the steering and shifting their weight, the rider can influence the oscillation and maintain stability.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Why Does A Moving Bicycle Stay Up? (www.science20.com)\nText: Since the bicycle was invented, s cientists have postulated various reasons as to why a bicycle is self stable above a certain speed. The consensus has been that a bicycle's stability is related to two factors: First, the rotating wheels of the bicycle provide stability through gyroscopic effects; secondly, that the ‘trail’, the distance by which the contact point of the front wheel trails behind the steering axis, plays an important part.\n\nA new study in Science claims to have settled the issue - gyroscopic effects and trail help, says researcher Dr Arend Schwab of the 3mE faculty at TU Delft, but are not necessary above a certain speed . In a 2007 Proceedings of the Royal Society article (doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1857), a mathematical model with around 25 physical parameters was developed at the time which appeared to predict whether, and at what speeds, a particular design of bicycle would be stable. Title: Balancing on a Bicycle: The Phenomena (www.mentalfloss.com)\nText: A bicycle, on the other hand, is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground (whatever portion of the front and back wheels happen to be touching the ground) and its base of support is a line segment. A good base of support needs at least three contact points with the ground, so bikes are hard to keep upright when they're still. Bikes are, however, dynamically stable, or stable when moving forward, because steering allows a rider to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced, often with steering adjustments small enough that the rider may not even realize they're making them. It's sort of like standing on one foot. If you don't hop around a little, and you start falling sideways, you can't recover and you fall over. If you do hop, though, you can move your foot around to keep your center of gravity above it and keep your balance.\n\n\nA bike has two features that help this dynamic stability immensely: its wheels. Spinning wheels have angular momentum, and when you're sitting on a bike, you and it and its wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. Unless torque, or twisting force, is applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, that momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant. In a nutshell, once the wheels line up a certain way, they want to stay lined up like that. It's easy for you to move them, but hard for an outside force to do the same, and so the bike is easy to keep balanced but doesn't topple easily. A non-moving bike has wheels that aren't spinning and zero angular momentum, which makes it very easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction, making the bike harder to balance.. \n hypothesis: esearch has also explored the role of the \"oscillation\" of the bicycle in maintaining dynamic stability. When a bicycle is moving, its frame and wheels oscillate slightly, creating a sort of \"damped oscillation.\" This oscillation can be influenced by the rider's weight distribution, the stiffness of the frame, and the type of terrain being ridden. By adjusting the steering and shifting their weight, the rider can influence the oscillation and maintain stability.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Why Does A Moving Bicycle Stay Up? (www.science20.com)\nText: Since the bicycle was invented, s cientists have postulated various reasons as to why a bicycle is self stable above a certain speed. The consensus has been that a bicycle's stability is related to two factors: First, the rotating wheels of the bicycle provide stability through gyroscopic effects; secondly, that the ‘trail’, the distance by which the contact point of the front wheel trails behind the steering axis, plays an important part.\n\nA new study in Science claims to have settled the issue - gyroscopic effects and trail help, says researcher Dr Arend Schwab of the 3mE faculty at TU Delft, but are not necessary above a certain speed . In a 2007 Proceedings of the Royal Society article (doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1857), a mathematical model with around 25 physical parameters was developed at the time which appeared to predict whether, and at what speeds, a particular design of bicycle would be stable. Title: Balancing on a Bicycle: The Phenomena (www.mentalfloss.com)\nText: A bicycle, on the other hand, is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground (whatever portion of the front and back wheels happen to be touching the ground) and its base of support is a line segment. A good base of support needs at least three contact points with the ground, so bikes are hard to keep upright when they're still. Bikes are, however, dynamically stable, or stable when moving forward, because steering allows a rider to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced, often with steering adjustments small enough that the rider may not even realize they're making them. It's sort of like standing on one foot. If you don't hop around a little, and you start falling sideways, you can't recover and you fall over. If you do hop, though, you can move your foot around to keep your center of gravity above it and keep your balance.\n\n\nA bike has two features that help this dynamic stability immensely: its wheels. Spinning wheels have angular momentum, and when you're sitting on a bike, you and it and its wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. Unless torque, or twisting force, is applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, that momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant. In a nutshell, once the wheels line up a certain way, they want to stay lined up like that. It's easy for you to move them, but hard for an outside force to do the same, and so the bike is easy to keep balanced but doesn't topple easily. A non-moving bike has wheels that aren't spinning and zero angular momentum, which makes it very easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction, making the bike harder to balance.. \n hypothesis: esearch has also explored the role of the \"oscillation\" of the bicycle in maintaining dynamic stability. When a bicycle is moving, its frame and wheels oscillate slightly, creating a sort of \"damped oscillation.\" This oscillation can be influenced by the rider's weight distribution, the stiffness of the frame, and the type of terrain being ridden. By adjusting the steering and shifting their weight, the rider can influence the oscillation and maintain stability.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
Why am I unstable on my bike when it's stationary but not when it's moving?
|
However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically stable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments, but most of the time the rider relies on the gyroscopic effects of the spinning wheels to maintain balance.
|
However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically stable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments.
|
When stationary, a bicycle is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground and its base of support is a line segment, which is not enough to keep it upright. A good base of support needs three contact points. Additionally, when a bicycle is not moving, its wheels are not spinning and thus have zero angular momentum, making it easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction and making it harder to balance. However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically stable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments. This is possible because the spinning wheels of the bicycle have angular momentum, and when the rider is sitting on the bike, they and the wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. As long as torque, or twisting force, is not applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, the momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant, making it easier to keep the bike balanced. The new study in Science claims that the gyroscopic effects and trail of the bicycle do help its stability, but are not necessary above a certain speed.
|
[
"Title: Why Does A Moving Bicycle Stay Up? (www.science20.com)\nText: Since the bicycle was invented, s cientists have postulated various reasons as to why a bicycle is self stable above a certain speed. The consensus has been that a bicycle's stability is related to two factors: First, the rotating wheels of the bicycle provide stability through gyroscopic effects; secondly, that the ‘trail’, the distance by which the contact point of the front wheel trails behind the steering axis, plays an important part.\n\nA new study in Science claims to have settled the issue - gyroscopic effects and trail help, says researcher Dr Arend Schwab of the 3mE faculty at TU Delft, but are not necessary above a certain speed . In a 2007 Proceedings of the Royal Society article (doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1857), a mathematical model with around 25 physical parameters was developed at the time which appeared to predict whether, and at what speeds, a particular design of bicycle would be stable.",
"Title: Balancing on a Bicycle: The Phenomena (www.mentalfloss.com)\nText: A bicycle, on the other hand, is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground (whatever portion of the front and back wheels happen to be touching the ground) and its base of support is a line segment. A good base of support needs at least three contact points with the ground, so bikes are hard to keep upright when they're still. Bikes are, however, dynamically stable, or stable when moving forward, because steering allows a rider to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced, often with steering adjustments small enough that the rider may not even realize they're making them. It's sort of like standing on one foot. If you don't hop around a little, and you start falling sideways, you can't recover and you fall over. If you do hop, though, you can move your foot around to keep your center of gravity above it and keep your balance.\n\n\nA bike has two features that help this dynamic stability immensely: its wheels. Spinning wheels have angular momentum, and when you're sitting on a bike, you and it and its wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. Unless torque, or twisting force, is applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, that momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant. In a nutshell, once the wheels line up a certain way, they want to stay lined up like that. It's easy for you to move them, but hard for an outside force to do the same, and so the bike is easy to keep balanced but doesn't topple easily. A non-moving bike has wheels that aren't spinning and zero angular momentum, which makes it very easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction, making the bike harder to balance."
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_whudoc_57626018-7ec7-46a8-a155-866bb5ab2bc6
| 1
| 0.990738
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
claim_add_to_the_claim_contradicting_info
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Why Does A Moving Bicycle Stay Up? (www.science20.com)\nText: Since the bicycle was invented, s cientists have postulated various reasons as to why a bicycle is self stable above a certain speed. The consensus has been that a bicycle's stability is related to two factors: First, the rotating wheels of the bicycle provide stability through gyroscopic effects; secondly, that the ‘trail’, the distance by which the contact point of the front wheel trails behind the steering axis, plays an important part.\n\nA new study in Science claims to have settled the issue - gyroscopic effects and trail help, says researcher Dr Arend Schwab of the 3mE faculty at TU Delft, but are not necessary above a certain speed . In a 2007 Proceedings of the Royal Society article (doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1857), a mathematical model with around 25 physical parameters was developed at the time which appeared to predict whether, and at what speeds, a particular design of bicycle would be stable. Title: Balancing on a Bicycle: The Phenomena (www.mentalfloss.com)\nText: A bicycle, on the other hand, is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground (whatever portion of the front and back wheels happen to be touching the ground) and its base of support is a line segment. A good base of support needs at least three contact points with the ground, so bikes are hard to keep upright when they're still. Bikes are, however, dynamically stable, or stable when moving forward, because steering allows a rider to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced, often with steering adjustments small enough that the rider may not even realize they're making them. It's sort of like standing on one foot. If you don't hop around a little, and you start falling sideways, you can't recover and you fall over. If you do hop, though, you can move your foot around to keep your center of gravity above it and keep your balance.\n\n\nA bike has two features that help this dynamic stability immensely: its wheels. Spinning wheels have angular momentum, and when you're sitting on a bike, you and it and its wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. Unless torque, or twisting force, is applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, that momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant. In a nutshell, once the wheels line up a certain way, they want to stay lined up like that. It's easy for you to move them, but hard for an outside force to do the same, and so the bike is easy to keep balanced but doesn't topple easily. A non-moving bike has wheels that aren't spinning and zero angular momentum, which makes it very easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction, making the bike harder to balance.. \n hypothesis: However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically stable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments, but most of the time the rider relies on the gyroscopic effects of the spinning wheels to maintain balance.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Why Does A Moving Bicycle Stay Up? (www.science20.com)\nText: Since the bicycle was invented, s cientists have postulated various reasons as to why a bicycle is self stable above a certain speed. The consensus has been that a bicycle's stability is related to two factors: First, the rotating wheels of the bicycle provide stability through gyroscopic effects; secondly, that the ‘trail’, the distance by which the contact point of the front wheel trails behind the steering axis, plays an important part.\n\nA new study in Science claims to have settled the issue - gyroscopic effects and trail help, says researcher Dr Arend Schwab of the 3mE faculty at TU Delft, but are not necessary above a certain speed . In a 2007 Proceedings of the Royal Society article (doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1857), a mathematical model with around 25 physical parameters was developed at the time which appeared to predict whether, and at what speeds, a particular design of bicycle would be stable. Title: Balancing on a Bicycle: The Phenomena (www.mentalfloss.com)\nText: A bicycle, on the other hand, is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground (whatever portion of the front and back wheels happen to be touching the ground) and its base of support is a line segment. A good base of support needs at least three contact points with the ground, so bikes are hard to keep upright when they're still. Bikes are, however, dynamically stable, or stable when moving forward, because steering allows a rider to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced, often with steering adjustments small enough that the rider may not even realize they're making them. It's sort of like standing on one foot. If you don't hop around a little, and you start falling sideways, you can't recover and you fall over. If you do hop, though, you can move your foot around to keep your center of gravity above it and keep your balance.\n\n\nA bike has two features that help this dynamic stability immensely: its wheels. Spinning wheels have angular momentum, and when you're sitting on a bike, you and it and its wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. Unless torque, or twisting force, is applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, that momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant. In a nutshell, once the wheels line up a certain way, they want to stay lined up like that. It's easy for you to move them, but hard for an outside force to do the same, and so the bike is easy to keep balanced but doesn't topple easily. A non-moving bike has wheels that aren't spinning and zero angular momentum, which makes it very easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction, making the bike harder to balance.. \n hypothesis: However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically stable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments, but most of the time the rider relies on the gyroscopic effects of the spinning wheels to maintain balance.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Why Does A Moving Bicycle Stay Up? (www.science20.com)\nText: Since the bicycle was invented, s cientists have postulated various reasons as to why a bicycle is self stable above a certain speed. The consensus has been that a bicycle's stability is related to two factors: First, the rotating wheels of the bicycle provide stability through gyroscopic effects; secondly, that the ‘trail’, the distance by which the contact point of the front wheel trails behind the steering axis, plays an important part.\n\nA new study in Science claims to have settled the issue - gyroscopic effects and trail help, says researcher Dr Arend Schwab of the 3mE faculty at TU Delft, but are not necessary above a certain speed . In a 2007 Proceedings of the Royal Society article (doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1857), a mathematical model with around 25 physical parameters was developed at the time which appeared to predict whether, and at what speeds, a particular design of bicycle would be stable. Title: Balancing on a Bicycle: The Phenomena (www.mentalfloss.com)\nText: A bicycle, on the other hand, is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground (whatever portion of the front and back wheels happen to be touching the ground) and its base of support is a line segment. A good base of support needs at least three contact points with the ground, so bikes are hard to keep upright when they're still. Bikes are, however, dynamically stable, or stable when moving forward, because steering allows a rider to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced, often with steering adjustments small enough that the rider may not even realize they're making them. It's sort of like standing on one foot. If you don't hop around a little, and you start falling sideways, you can't recover and you fall over. If you do hop, though, you can move your foot around to keep your center of gravity above it and keep your balance.\n\n\nA bike has two features that help this dynamic stability immensely: its wheels. Spinning wheels have angular momentum, and when you're sitting on a bike, you and it and its wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. Unless torque, or twisting force, is applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, that momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant. In a nutshell, once the wheels line up a certain way, they want to stay lined up like that. It's easy for you to move them, but hard for an outside force to do the same, and so the bike is easy to keep balanced but doesn't topple easily. A non-moving bike has wheels that aren't spinning and zero angular momentum, which makes it very easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction, making the bike harder to balance.. \n hypothesis: However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically stable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments, but most of the time the rider relies on the gyroscopic effects of the spinning wheels to maintain balance.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
Why am I unstable on my bike when it's stationary but not when it's moving?
|
However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically stable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments.
|
However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically stable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments.
|
When stationary, a bicycle is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground and its base of support is a line segment, which is not enough to keep it upright. A good base of support needs three contact points. Additionally, when a bicycle is not moving, its wheels are not spinning and thus have zero angular momentum, making it easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction and making it harder to balance. However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically stable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments. This is possible because the spinning wheels of the bicycle have angular momentum, and when the rider is sitting on the bike, they and the wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. As long as torque, or twisting force, is not applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, the momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant, making it easier to keep the bike balanced. The new study in Science claims that the gyroscopic effects and trail of the bicycle do help its stability, but are not necessary above a certain speed.
|
[
"Title: Balancing on a Bicycle: The Phenomena (www.mentalfloss.com)\nText: A bicycle, on the other hand, is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground (whatever portion of the front and back wheels happen to be touching the ground) and its base of support is a line segment. A good base of support needs at least three contact points with the ground, so bikes are hard to keep upright when they're still. Bikes are, however, dynamically stable, or stable when moving forward, because steering allows a rider to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced, often with steering adjustments small enough that the rider may not even realize they're making them. It's sort of like standing on one foot. If you don't hop around a little, and you start falling sideways, you can't recover and you fall over. If you do hop, though, you can move your foot around to keep your center of gravity above it and keep your balance.\n\n\nA bike has two features that help this dynamic stability immensely: its wheels. Spinning wheels have angular momentum, and when you're sitting on a bike, you and it and its wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. Unless torque, or twisting force, is applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, that momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant. In a nutshell, once the wheels line up a certain way, they want to stay lined up like that. It's easy for you to move them, but hard for an outside force to do the same, and so the bike is easy to keep balanced but doesn't topple easily. A non-moving bike has wheels that aren't spinning and zero angular momentum, which makes it very easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction, making the bike harder to balance.",
"Title: Why Does A Moving Bicycle Stay Up? (www.science20.com)\nText: Since the bicycle was invented, s cientists have postulated various reasons as to why a bicycle is self stable above a certain speed. The consensus has been that a bicycle's stability is related to two factors: First, the rotating wheels of the bicycle provide stability through gyroscopic effects; secondly, that the ‘trail’, the distance by which the contact point of the front wheel trails behind the steering axis, plays an important part.\n\nA new study in Science claims to have settled the issue - gyroscopic effects and trail help, says researcher Dr Arend Schwab of the 3mE faculty at TU Delft, but are not necessary above a certain speed . In a 2007 Proceedings of the Royal Society article (doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1857), a mathematical model with around 25 physical parameters was developed at the time which appeared to predict whether, and at what speeds, a particular design of bicycle would be stable.",
"Bicycles have been a mode of transportation for centuries, with the first two-wheeled vehicles dating back to the 15th century in Europe. The modern bicycle, however, is a more recent invention, with the first commercially produced model appearing in the 19th century. The design of a bicycle has undergone significant changes over the years, with various innovations such as the invention of the pneumatic tire, derailleur gears, and the development of different types of brakes. The mechanics of a bicycle involve a combination of levers, gears, and balancing mechanisms that work together to allow riders to propel themselves forward. A key aspect of bicycle design is the ability to maintain balance and stability, particularly when navigating turns or uneven terrain. This is achieved through a combination of factors, including the geometry of the frame, the position of the rider, and the use of gyroscopic effects."
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_whudoc_57626018-7ec7-46a8-a155-866bb5ab2bc6
| 1
| 0.990738
|
generated
|
attributable
|
keep
|
modify_passage-add_relevant_to_claim
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Balancing on a Bicycle: The Phenomena (www.mentalfloss.com)\nText: A bicycle, on the other hand, is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground (whatever portion of the front and back wheels happen to be touching the ground) and its base of support is a line segment. A good base of support needs at least three contact points with the ground, so bikes are hard to keep upright when they're still. Bikes are, however, dynamically stable, or stable when moving forward, because steering allows a rider to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced, often with steering adjustments small enough that the rider may not even realize they're making them. It's sort of like standing on one foot. If you don't hop around a little, and you start falling sideways, you can't recover and you fall over. If you do hop, though, you can move your foot around to keep your center of gravity above it and keep your balance.\n\n\nA bike has two features that help this dynamic stability immensely: its wheels. Spinning wheels have angular momentum, and when you're sitting on a bike, you and it and its wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. Unless torque, or twisting force, is applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, that momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant. In a nutshell, once the wheels line up a certain way, they want to stay lined up like that. It's easy for you to move them, but hard for an outside force to do the same, and so the bike is easy to keep balanced but doesn't topple easily. A non-moving bike has wheels that aren't spinning and zero angular momentum, which makes it very easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction, making the bike harder to balance. Title: Why Does A Moving Bicycle Stay Up? (www.science20.com)\nText: Since the bicycle was invented, s cientists have postulated various reasons as to why a bicycle is self stable above a certain speed. The consensus has been that a bicycle's stability is related to two factors: First, the rotating wheels of the bicycle provide stability through gyroscopic effects; secondly, that the ‘trail’, the distance by which the contact point of the front wheel trails behind the steering axis, plays an important part.\n\nA new study in Science claims to have settled the issue - gyroscopic effects and trail help, says researcher Dr Arend Schwab of the 3mE faculty at TU Delft, but are not necessary above a certain speed . In a 2007 Proceedings of the Royal Society article (doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1857), a mathematical model with around 25 physical parameters was developed at the time which appeared to predict whether, and at what speeds, a particular design of bicycle would be stable. Bicycles have been a mode of transportation for centuries, with the first two-wheeled vehicles dating back to the 15th century in Europe. The modern bicycle, however, is a more recent invention, with the first commercially produced model appearing in the 19th century. The design of a bicycle has undergone significant changes over the years, with various innovations such as the invention of the pneumatic tire, derailleur gears, and the development of different types of brakes. The mechanics of a bicycle involve a combination of levers, gears, and balancing mechanisms that work together to allow riders to propel themselves forward. A key aspect of bicycle design is the ability to maintain balance and stability, particularly when navigating turns or uneven terrain. This is achieved through a combination of factors, including the geometry of the frame, the position of the rider, and the use of gyroscopic effects.. \n hypothesis: However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically stable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Balancing on a Bicycle: The Phenomena (www.mentalfloss.com)\nText: A bicycle, on the other hand, is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground (whatever portion of the front and back wheels happen to be touching the ground) and its base of support is a line segment. A good base of support needs at least three contact points with the ground, so bikes are hard to keep upright when they're still. Bikes are, however, dynamically stable, or stable when moving forward, because steering allows a rider to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced, often with steering adjustments small enough that the rider may not even realize they're making them. It's sort of like standing on one foot. If you don't hop around a little, and you start falling sideways, you can't recover and you fall over. If you do hop, though, you can move your foot around to keep your center of gravity above it and keep your balance.\n\n\nA bike has two features that help this dynamic stability immensely: its wheels. Spinning wheels have angular momentum, and when you're sitting on a bike, you and it and its wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. Unless torque, or twisting force, is applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, that momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant. In a nutshell, once the wheels line up a certain way, they want to stay lined up like that. It's easy for you to move them, but hard for an outside force to do the same, and so the bike is easy to keep balanced but doesn't topple easily. A non-moving bike has wheels that aren't spinning and zero angular momentum, which makes it very easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction, making the bike harder to balance. Title: Why Does A Moving Bicycle Stay Up? (www.science20.com)\nText: Since the bicycle was invented, s cientists have postulated various reasons as to why a bicycle is self stable above a certain speed. The consensus has been that a bicycle's stability is related to two factors: First, the rotating wheels of the bicycle provide stability through gyroscopic effects; secondly, that the ‘trail’, the distance by which the contact point of the front wheel trails behind the steering axis, plays an important part.\n\nA new study in Science claims to have settled the issue - gyroscopic effects and trail help, says researcher Dr Arend Schwab of the 3mE faculty at TU Delft, but are not necessary above a certain speed . In a 2007 Proceedings of the Royal Society article (doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1857), a mathematical model with around 25 physical parameters was developed at the time which appeared to predict whether, and at what speeds, a particular design of bicycle would be stable. Bicycles have been a mode of transportation for centuries, with the first two-wheeled vehicles dating back to the 15th century in Europe. The modern bicycle, however, is a more recent invention, with the first commercially produced model appearing in the 19th century. The design of a bicycle has undergone significant changes over the years, with various innovations such as the invention of the pneumatic tire, derailleur gears, and the development of different types of brakes. The mechanics of a bicycle involve a combination of levers, gears, and balancing mechanisms that work together to allow riders to propel themselves forward. A key aspect of bicycle design is the ability to maintain balance and stability, particularly when navigating turns or uneven terrain. This is achieved through a combination of factors, including the geometry of the frame, the position of the rider, and the use of gyroscopic effects.. \n hypothesis: However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically stable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Balancing on a Bicycle: The Phenomena (www.mentalfloss.com)\nText: A bicycle, on the other hand, is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground (whatever portion of the front and back wheels happen to be touching the ground) and its base of support is a line segment. A good base of support needs at least three contact points with the ground, so bikes are hard to keep upright when they're still. Bikes are, however, dynamically stable, or stable when moving forward, because steering allows a rider to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced, often with steering adjustments small enough that the rider may not even realize they're making them. It's sort of like standing on one foot. If you don't hop around a little, and you start falling sideways, you can't recover and you fall over. If you do hop, though, you can move your foot around to keep your center of gravity above it and keep your balance.\n\n\nA bike has two features that help this dynamic stability immensely: its wheels. Spinning wheels have angular momentum, and when you're sitting on a bike, you and it and its wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. Unless torque, or twisting force, is applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, that momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant. In a nutshell, once the wheels line up a certain way, they want to stay lined up like that. It's easy for you to move them, but hard for an outside force to do the same, and so the bike is easy to keep balanced but doesn't topple easily. A non-moving bike has wheels that aren't spinning and zero angular momentum, which makes it very easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction, making the bike harder to balance. Title: Why Does A Moving Bicycle Stay Up? (www.science20.com)\nText: Since the bicycle was invented, s cientists have postulated various reasons as to why a bicycle is self stable above a certain speed. The consensus has been that a bicycle's stability is related to two factors: First, the rotating wheels of the bicycle provide stability through gyroscopic effects; secondly, that the ‘trail’, the distance by which the contact point of the front wheel trails behind the steering axis, plays an important part.\n\nA new study in Science claims to have settled the issue - gyroscopic effects and trail help, says researcher Dr Arend Schwab of the 3mE faculty at TU Delft, but are not necessary above a certain speed . In a 2007 Proceedings of the Royal Society article (doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1857), a mathematical model with around 25 physical parameters was developed at the time which appeared to predict whether, and at what speeds, a particular design of bicycle would be stable. Bicycles have been a mode of transportation for centuries, with the first two-wheeled vehicles dating back to the 15th century in Europe. The modern bicycle, however, is a more recent invention, with the first commercially produced model appearing in the 19th century. The design of a bicycle has undergone significant changes over the years, with various innovations such as the invention of the pneumatic tire, derailleur gears, and the development of different types of brakes. The mechanics of a bicycle involve a combination of levers, gears, and balancing mechanisms that work together to allow riders to propel themselves forward. A key aspect of bicycle design is the ability to maintain balance and stability, particularly when navigating turns or uneven terrain. This is achieved through a combination of factors, including the geometry of the frame, the position of the rider, and the use of gyroscopic effects.. \n hypothesis: However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically stable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
Why am I unstable on my bike when it's stationary but not when it's moving?
|
However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically stable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments.
|
However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically stable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments.
|
When stationary, a bicycle is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground and its base of support is a line segment, which is not enough to keep it upright. A good base of support needs three contact points. Additionally, when a bicycle is not moving, its wheels are not spinning and thus have zero angular momentum, making it easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction and making it harder to balance. However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically stable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments. This is possible because the spinning wheels of the bicycle have angular momentum, and when the rider is sitting on the bike, they and the wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. As long as torque, or twisting force, is not applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, the momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant, making it easier to keep the bike balanced. The new study in Science claims that the gyroscopic effects and trail of the bicycle do help its stability, but are not necessary above a certain speed.
|
[
"\nThe term \"umbrella\" is derived from the Latin word \"umbra,\" meaning shadow. The first known use of an umbrella was in ancient civilizations in Egypt, China, and Assyria. The earliest known use of an umbrella as a portable sunshade dates back to the 3rd millennium BC in Mesopotamia. In the 18th century, umbrellas were a status symbol among the wealthy, and they often featured intricate designs and decorations. The first collapsible umbrella was patented in 1852 by Samuel Fox. In modern times, umbrellas come in a variety of materials, including nylon, polyester, and fiberglass.",
"Title: Balancing on a Bicycle: The Phenomena (www.mentalfloss.com)\nText: A bicycle, on the other hand, is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground (whatever portion of the front and back wheels happen to be touching the ground) and its base of support is a line segment. A good base of support needs at least three contact points with the ground, so bikes are hard to keep upright when they're still. Bikes are, however, dynamically stable, or stable when moving forward, because steering allows a rider to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced, often with steering adjustments small enough that the rider may not even realize they're making them. It's sort of like standing on one foot. If you don't hop around a little, and you start falling sideways, you can't recover and you fall over. If you do hop, though, you can move your foot around to keep your center of gravity above it and keep your balance.\n\n\nA bike has two features that help this dynamic stability immensely: its wheels. Spinning wheels have angular momentum, and when you're sitting on a bike, you and it and its wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. Unless torque, or twisting force, is applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, that momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant. In a nutshell, once the wheels line up a certain way, they want to stay lined up like that. It's easy for you to move them, but hard for an outside force to do the same, and so the bike is easy to keep balanced but doesn't topple easily. A non-moving bike has wheels that aren't spinning and zero angular momentum, which makes it very easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction, making the bike harder to balance.",
"Title: Why Does A Moving Bicycle Stay Up? (www.science20.com)\nText: Since the bicycle was invented, s cientists have postulated various reasons as to why a bicycle is self stable above a certain speed. The consensus has been that a bicycle's stability is related to two factors: First, the rotating wheels of the bicycle provide stability through gyroscopic effects; secondly, that the ‘trail’, the distance by which the contact point of the front wheel trails behind the steering axis, plays an important part.\n\nA new study in Science claims to have settled the issue - gyroscopic effects and trail help, says researcher Dr Arend Schwab of the 3mE faculty at TU Delft, but are not necessary above a certain speed . In a 2007 Proceedings of the Royal Society article (doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1857), a mathematical model with around 25 physical parameters was developed at the time which appeared to predict whether, and at what speeds, a particular design of bicycle would be stable."
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_whudoc_57626018-7ec7-46a8-a155-866bb5ab2bc6
| 1
| 0.990738
|
generated
|
attributable
|
keep
|
modify_passage-add_irrelevant_to_claim
|
[
{
"content": "premise: \nThe term \"umbrella\" is derived from the Latin word \"umbra,\" meaning shadow. The first known use of an umbrella was in ancient civilizations in Egypt, China, and Assyria. The earliest known use of an umbrella as a portable sunshade dates back to the 3rd millennium BC in Mesopotamia. In the 18th century, umbrellas were a status symbol among the wealthy, and they often featured intricate designs and decorations. The first collapsible umbrella was patented in 1852 by Samuel Fox. In modern times, umbrellas come in a variety of materials, including nylon, polyester, and fiberglass. Title: Balancing on a Bicycle: The Phenomena (www.mentalfloss.com)\nText: A bicycle, on the other hand, is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground (whatever portion of the front and back wheels happen to be touching the ground) and its base of support is a line segment. A good base of support needs at least three contact points with the ground, so bikes are hard to keep upright when they're still. Bikes are, however, dynamically stable, or stable when moving forward, because steering allows a rider to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced, often with steering adjustments small enough that the rider may not even realize they're making them. It's sort of like standing on one foot. If you don't hop around a little, and you start falling sideways, you can't recover and you fall over. If you do hop, though, you can move your foot around to keep your center of gravity above it and keep your balance.\n\n\nA bike has two features that help this dynamic stability immensely: its wheels. Spinning wheels have angular momentum, and when you're sitting on a bike, you and it and its wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. Unless torque, or twisting force, is applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, that momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant. In a nutshell, once the wheels line up a certain way, they want to stay lined up like that. It's easy for you to move them, but hard for an outside force to do the same, and so the bike is easy to keep balanced but doesn't topple easily. A non-moving bike has wheels that aren't spinning and zero angular momentum, which makes it very easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction, making the bike harder to balance. Title: Why Does A Moving Bicycle Stay Up? (www.science20.com)\nText: Since the bicycle was invented, s cientists have postulated various reasons as to why a bicycle is self stable above a certain speed. The consensus has been that a bicycle's stability is related to two factors: First, the rotating wheels of the bicycle provide stability through gyroscopic effects; secondly, that the ‘trail’, the distance by which the contact point of the front wheel trails behind the steering axis, plays an important part.\n\nA new study in Science claims to have settled the issue - gyroscopic effects and trail help, says researcher Dr Arend Schwab of the 3mE faculty at TU Delft, but are not necessary above a certain speed . In a 2007 Proceedings of the Royal Society article (doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1857), a mathematical model with around 25 physical parameters was developed at the time which appeared to predict whether, and at what speeds, a particular design of bicycle would be stable.. \n hypothesis: However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically stable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: \nThe term \"umbrella\" is derived from the Latin word \"umbra,\" meaning shadow. The first known use of an umbrella was in ancient civilizations in Egypt, China, and Assyria. The earliest known use of an umbrella as a portable sunshade dates back to the 3rd millennium BC in Mesopotamia. In the 18th century, umbrellas were a status symbol among the wealthy, and they often featured intricate designs and decorations. The first collapsible umbrella was patented in 1852 by Samuel Fox. In modern times, umbrellas come in a variety of materials, including nylon, polyester, and fiberglass. Title: Balancing on a Bicycle: The Phenomena (www.mentalfloss.com)\nText: A bicycle, on the other hand, is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground (whatever portion of the front and back wheels happen to be touching the ground) and its base of support is a line segment. A good base of support needs at least three contact points with the ground, so bikes are hard to keep upright when they're still. Bikes are, however, dynamically stable, or stable when moving forward, because steering allows a rider to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced, often with steering adjustments small enough that the rider may not even realize they're making them. It's sort of like standing on one foot. If you don't hop around a little, and you start falling sideways, you can't recover and you fall over. If you do hop, though, you can move your foot around to keep your center of gravity above it and keep your balance.\n\n\nA bike has two features that help this dynamic stability immensely: its wheels. Spinning wheels have angular momentum, and when you're sitting on a bike, you and it and its wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. Unless torque, or twisting force, is applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, that momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant. In a nutshell, once the wheels line up a certain way, they want to stay lined up like that. It's easy for you to move them, but hard for an outside force to do the same, and so the bike is easy to keep balanced but doesn't topple easily. A non-moving bike has wheels that aren't spinning and zero angular momentum, which makes it very easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction, making the bike harder to balance. Title: Why Does A Moving Bicycle Stay Up? (www.science20.com)\nText: Since the bicycle was invented, s cientists have postulated various reasons as to why a bicycle is self stable above a certain speed. The consensus has been that a bicycle's stability is related to two factors: First, the rotating wheels of the bicycle provide stability through gyroscopic effects; secondly, that the ‘trail’, the distance by which the contact point of the front wheel trails behind the steering axis, plays an important part.\n\nA new study in Science claims to have settled the issue - gyroscopic effects and trail help, says researcher Dr Arend Schwab of the 3mE faculty at TU Delft, but are not necessary above a certain speed . In a 2007 Proceedings of the Royal Society article (doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1857), a mathematical model with around 25 physical parameters was developed at the time which appeared to predict whether, and at what speeds, a particular design of bicycle would be stable.. \n hypothesis: However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically stable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: \nThe term \"umbrella\" is derived from the Latin word \"umbra,\" meaning shadow. The first known use of an umbrella was in ancient civilizations in Egypt, China, and Assyria. The earliest known use of an umbrella as a portable sunshade dates back to the 3rd millennium BC in Mesopotamia. In the 18th century, umbrellas were a status symbol among the wealthy, and they often featured intricate designs and decorations. The first collapsible umbrella was patented in 1852 by Samuel Fox. In modern times, umbrellas come in a variety of materials, including nylon, polyester, and fiberglass. Title: Balancing on a Bicycle: The Phenomena (www.mentalfloss.com)\nText: A bicycle, on the other hand, is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground (whatever portion of the front and back wheels happen to be touching the ground) and its base of support is a line segment. A good base of support needs at least three contact points with the ground, so bikes are hard to keep upright when they're still. Bikes are, however, dynamically stable, or stable when moving forward, because steering allows a rider to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced, often with steering adjustments small enough that the rider may not even realize they're making them. It's sort of like standing on one foot. If you don't hop around a little, and you start falling sideways, you can't recover and you fall over. If you do hop, though, you can move your foot around to keep your center of gravity above it and keep your balance.\n\n\nA bike has two features that help this dynamic stability immensely: its wheels. Spinning wheels have angular momentum, and when you're sitting on a bike, you and it and its wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. Unless torque, or twisting force, is applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, that momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant. In a nutshell, once the wheels line up a certain way, they want to stay lined up like that. It's easy for you to move them, but hard for an outside force to do the same, and so the bike is easy to keep balanced but doesn't topple easily. A non-moving bike has wheels that aren't spinning and zero angular momentum, which makes it very easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction, making the bike harder to balance. Title: Why Does A Moving Bicycle Stay Up? (www.science20.com)\nText: Since the bicycle was invented, s cientists have postulated various reasons as to why a bicycle is self stable above a certain speed. The consensus has been that a bicycle's stability is related to two factors: First, the rotating wheels of the bicycle provide stability through gyroscopic effects; secondly, that the ‘trail’, the distance by which the contact point of the front wheel trails behind the steering axis, plays an important part.\n\nA new study in Science claims to have settled the issue - gyroscopic effects and trail help, says researcher Dr Arend Schwab of the 3mE faculty at TU Delft, but are not necessary above a certain speed . In a 2007 Proceedings of the Royal Society article (doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1857), a mathematical model with around 25 physical parameters was developed at the time which appeared to predict whether, and at what speeds, a particular design of bicycle would be stable.. \n hypothesis: However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically stable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
Why am I unstable on my bike when it's stationary but not when it's moving?
|
However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically stable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments.
|
However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically stable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments.
|
When stationary, a bicycle is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground and its base of support is a line segment, which is not enough to keep it upright. A good base of support needs three contact points. Additionally, when a bicycle is not moving, its wheels are not spinning and thus have zero angular momentum, making it easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction and making it harder to balance. However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically stable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments. This is possible because the spinning wheels of the bicycle have angular momentum, and when the rider is sitting on the bike, they and the wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. As long as torque, or twisting force, is not applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, the momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant, making it easier to keep the bike balanced. The new study in Science claims that the gyroscopic effects and trail of the bicycle do help its stability, but are not necessary above a certain speed.
|
[
"Title: Why Does A Moving Bicycle Stay Up? (www.science20.com)\nText: Since the bicycle was invented, s cientists have postulated various reasons as to why a bicycle is self stable above a certain speed. The consensus has been that a bicycle's stability is related to two factors: First, the rotating wheels of the bicycle provide stability through gyroscopic effects; secondly, that the ‘trail’, the distance by which the contact point of the front wheel trails behind the steering axis, plays an important part.\n\nA new study in Science claims to have settled the issue - gyroscopic effects and trail help, says researcher Dr Arend Schwab of the 3mE faculty at TU Delft, but are not necessary above a certain speed . In a 2007 Proceedings of the Royal Society article (doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1857), a mathematical model with around 25 physical parameters was developed at the time which appeared to predict whether, and at what speeds, a particular design of bicycle would be stable.",
"he two contact points of a bicycle with the ground, the front and back wheels, actually make it inherently unstable when in motion. The rider's ability to make small steering adjustments may provide temporary stability, but it is not a reliable or sustainable solution. In reality, a moving bicycle is more likely to tip over or lose balance due to the unpredictable nature of the rider's movements and the external forces acting on the bike.",
"Title: Balancing on a Bicycle: The Phenomena (www.mentalfloss.com)\nText: A bicycle, on the other hand, is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground (whatever portion of the front and back wheels happen to be touching the ground) and its base of support is a line segment. A good base of support needs at least three contact points with the ground, so bikes are hard to keep upright when they're still. Bikes are, however, dynamically stable, or stable when moving forward, because steering allows a rider to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced, often with steering adjustments small enough that the rider may not even realize they're making them. It's sort of like standing on one foot. If you don't hop around a little, and you start falling sideways, you can't recover and you fall over. If you do hop, though, you can move your foot around to keep your center of gravity above it and keep your balance.\n\n\nA bike has two features that help this dynamic stability immensely: its wheels. Spinning wheels have angular momentum, and when you're sitting on a bike, you and it and its wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. Unless torque, or twisting force, is applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, that momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant. In a nutshell, once the wheels line up a certain way, they want to stay lined up like that. It's easy for you to move them, but hard for an outside force to do the same, and so the bike is easy to keep balanced but doesn't topple easily. A non-moving bike has wheels that aren't spinning and zero angular momentum, which makes it very easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction, making the bike harder to balance."
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_whudoc_57626018-7ec7-46a8-a155-866bb5ab2bc6
| 1
| 0.990738
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
modify_passage-add_contradiction
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Why Does A Moving Bicycle Stay Up? (www.science20.com)\nText: Since the bicycle was invented, s cientists have postulated various reasons as to why a bicycle is self stable above a certain speed. The consensus has been that a bicycle's stability is related to two factors: First, the rotating wheels of the bicycle provide stability through gyroscopic effects; secondly, that the ‘trail’, the distance by which the contact point of the front wheel trails behind the steering axis, plays an important part.\n\nA new study in Science claims to have settled the issue - gyroscopic effects and trail help, says researcher Dr Arend Schwab of the 3mE faculty at TU Delft, but are not necessary above a certain speed . In a 2007 Proceedings of the Royal Society article (doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1857), a mathematical model with around 25 physical parameters was developed at the time which appeared to predict whether, and at what speeds, a particular design of bicycle would be stable. he two contact points of a bicycle with the ground, the front and back wheels, actually make it inherently unstable when in motion. The rider's ability to make small steering adjustments may provide temporary stability, but it is not a reliable or sustainable solution. In reality, a moving bicycle is more likely to tip over or lose balance due to the unpredictable nature of the rider's movements and the external forces acting on the bike. Title: Balancing on a Bicycle: The Phenomena (www.mentalfloss.com)\nText: A bicycle, on the other hand, is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground (whatever portion of the front and back wheels happen to be touching the ground) and its base of support is a line segment. A good base of support needs at least three contact points with the ground, so bikes are hard to keep upright when they're still. Bikes are, however, dynamically stable, or stable when moving forward, because steering allows a rider to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced, often with steering adjustments small enough that the rider may not even realize they're making them. It's sort of like standing on one foot. If you don't hop around a little, and you start falling sideways, you can't recover and you fall over. If you do hop, though, you can move your foot around to keep your center of gravity above it and keep your balance.\n\n\nA bike has two features that help this dynamic stability immensely: its wheels. Spinning wheels have angular momentum, and when you're sitting on a bike, you and it and its wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. Unless torque, or twisting force, is applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, that momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant. In a nutshell, once the wheels line up a certain way, they want to stay lined up like that. It's easy for you to move them, but hard for an outside force to do the same, and so the bike is easy to keep balanced but doesn't topple easily. A non-moving bike has wheels that aren't spinning and zero angular momentum, which makes it very easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction, making the bike harder to balance.. \n hypothesis: However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically stable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Why Does A Moving Bicycle Stay Up? (www.science20.com)\nText: Since the bicycle was invented, s cientists have postulated various reasons as to why a bicycle is self stable above a certain speed. The consensus has been that a bicycle's stability is related to two factors: First, the rotating wheels of the bicycle provide stability through gyroscopic effects; secondly, that the ‘trail’, the distance by which the contact point of the front wheel trails behind the steering axis, plays an important part.\n\nA new study in Science claims to have settled the issue - gyroscopic effects and trail help, says researcher Dr Arend Schwab of the 3mE faculty at TU Delft, but are not necessary above a certain speed . In a 2007 Proceedings of the Royal Society article (doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1857), a mathematical model with around 25 physical parameters was developed at the time which appeared to predict whether, and at what speeds, a particular design of bicycle would be stable. he two contact points of a bicycle with the ground, the front and back wheels, actually make it inherently unstable when in motion. The rider's ability to make small steering adjustments may provide temporary stability, but it is not a reliable or sustainable solution. In reality, a moving bicycle is more likely to tip over or lose balance due to the unpredictable nature of the rider's movements and the external forces acting on the bike. Title: Balancing on a Bicycle: The Phenomena (www.mentalfloss.com)\nText: A bicycle, on the other hand, is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground (whatever portion of the front and back wheels happen to be touching the ground) and its base of support is a line segment. A good base of support needs at least three contact points with the ground, so bikes are hard to keep upright when they're still. Bikes are, however, dynamically stable, or stable when moving forward, because steering allows a rider to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced, often with steering adjustments small enough that the rider may not even realize they're making them. It's sort of like standing on one foot. If you don't hop around a little, and you start falling sideways, you can't recover and you fall over. If you do hop, though, you can move your foot around to keep your center of gravity above it and keep your balance.\n\n\nA bike has two features that help this dynamic stability immensely: its wheels. Spinning wheels have angular momentum, and when you're sitting on a bike, you and it and its wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. Unless torque, or twisting force, is applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, that momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant. In a nutshell, once the wheels line up a certain way, they want to stay lined up like that. It's easy for you to move them, but hard for an outside force to do the same, and so the bike is easy to keep balanced but doesn't topple easily. A non-moving bike has wheels that aren't spinning and zero angular momentum, which makes it very easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction, making the bike harder to balance.. \n hypothesis: However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically stable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Why Does A Moving Bicycle Stay Up? (www.science20.com)\nText: Since the bicycle was invented, s cientists have postulated various reasons as to why a bicycle is self stable above a certain speed. The consensus has been that a bicycle's stability is related to two factors: First, the rotating wheels of the bicycle provide stability through gyroscopic effects; secondly, that the ‘trail’, the distance by which the contact point of the front wheel trails behind the steering axis, plays an important part.\n\nA new study in Science claims to have settled the issue - gyroscopic effects and trail help, says researcher Dr Arend Schwab of the 3mE faculty at TU Delft, but are not necessary above a certain speed . In a 2007 Proceedings of the Royal Society article (doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1857), a mathematical model with around 25 physical parameters was developed at the time which appeared to predict whether, and at what speeds, a particular design of bicycle would be stable. he two contact points of a bicycle with the ground, the front and back wheels, actually make it inherently unstable when in motion. The rider's ability to make small steering adjustments may provide temporary stability, but it is not a reliable or sustainable solution. In reality, a moving bicycle is more likely to tip over or lose balance due to the unpredictable nature of the rider's movements and the external forces acting on the bike. Title: Balancing on a Bicycle: The Phenomena (www.mentalfloss.com)\nText: A bicycle, on the other hand, is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground (whatever portion of the front and back wheels happen to be touching the ground) and its base of support is a line segment. A good base of support needs at least three contact points with the ground, so bikes are hard to keep upright when they're still. Bikes are, however, dynamically stable, or stable when moving forward, because steering allows a rider to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced, often with steering adjustments small enough that the rider may not even realize they're making them. It's sort of like standing on one foot. If you don't hop around a little, and you start falling sideways, you can't recover and you fall over. If you do hop, though, you can move your foot around to keep your center of gravity above it and keep your balance.\n\n\nA bike has two features that help this dynamic stability immensely: its wheels. Spinning wheels have angular momentum, and when you're sitting on a bike, you and it and its wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. Unless torque, or twisting force, is applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, that momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant. In a nutshell, once the wheels line up a certain way, they want to stay lined up like that. It's easy for you to move them, but hard for an outside force to do the same, and so the bike is easy to keep balanced but doesn't topple easily. A non-moving bike has wheels that aren't spinning and zero angular momentum, which makes it very easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction, making the bike harder to balance.. \n hypothesis: However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically stable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
Why am I unstable on my bike when it's stationary but not when it's moving?
|
However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically stable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments.
|
However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically stable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments.
|
When stationary, a bicycle is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground and its base of support is a line segment, which is not enough to keep it upright. A good base of support needs three contact points. Additionally, when a bicycle is not moving, its wheels are not spinning and thus have zero angular momentum, making it easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction and making it harder to balance. However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically stable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments. This is possible because the spinning wheels of the bicycle have angular momentum, and when the rider is sitting on the bike, they and the wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. As long as torque, or twisting force, is not applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, the momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant, making it easier to keep the bike balanced. The new study in Science claims that the gyroscopic effects and trail of the bicycle do help its stability, but are not necessary above a certain speed.
|
[
"Title: Balancing on a Bicycle: The Phenomena (www.mentalfloss.com)\nText: A bicycle, on the other hand, is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground (whatever portion of the front and back wheels happen to be touching the ground) and its base of support is a line segment. A good base of support needs at least three contact points with the ground, so bikes are hard to keep upright when they're still. Bikes are, however, dynamically stable, or stable when moving forward, because steering allows a rider to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced, often with steering adjustments small enough that the rider may not even realize they're making them. It's sort of like standing on one foot. If you don't hop around a little, and you start falling sideways, you can't recover and you fall over. If you do hop, though, you can move your foot around to keep your center of gravity above it and keep your balance.\n\n\nA bike has two features that help this dynamic stability immensely: its wheels. Spinning wheels have angular momentum, and when you're sitting on a bike, you and it and its wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. Unless torque, or twisting force, is applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, that momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant. In a nutshell, once the wheels line up a certain way, they want to stay lined up like that. It's easy for you to move them, but hard for an outside force to do the same, and so the bike is easy to keep balanced but doesn't topple easily. A non-moving bike has wheels that aren't spinning and zero angular momentum, which makes it very easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction, making the bike harder to balance.",
"Title: Why Does A Moving Bicycle Stay Up? (www.science20.com)\nText: Since the bicycle was invented, s cientists have postulated various reasons as to why a bicycle is self stable above a certain speed. The consensus has been that a bicycle's stability is related to two factors: First, the rotating wheels of the bicycle provide stability through gyroscopic effects; secondly, that the ‘trail’, the distance by which the contact point of the front wheel trails behind the steering axis, plays an important part.\n\nA new study in Science claims to have settled the issue - gyroscopic effects and trail help, says researcher Dr Arend Schwab of the 3mE faculty at TU Delft, but are not necessary above a certain speed . In a 2007 Proceedings of the Royal Society article (doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1857), a mathematical model with around 25 physical parameters was developed at the time which appeared to predict whether, and at what speeds, a particular design of bicycle would be stable.",
"Bicycles are often perceived as being stable when in motion, but in reality, they are actually statically unstable due to having only two contact points with the ground. This means that a stationary bicycle is prone to falling over unless the rider applies a significant amount of force to keep it upright. However, when in motion, the bicycle's dynamic stability is enhanced by its spinning wheels, which have angular momentum. However, this stability is not guaranteed and can be disrupted by external forces, such as bumps in the road or sudden turns. Furthermore, the 'trail' or the distance between the contact point of the front wheel and the steering axis also plays a role in the bicycle's stability, but its effect is still not fully understood."
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_whudoc_57626018-7ec7-46a8-a155-866bb5ab2bc6
| 1
| 0.990738
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
modify_passage-add_conflicting_sources
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Balancing on a Bicycle: The Phenomena (www.mentalfloss.com)\nText: A bicycle, on the other hand, is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground (whatever portion of the front and back wheels happen to be touching the ground) and its base of support is a line segment. A good base of support needs at least three contact points with the ground, so bikes are hard to keep upright when they're still. Bikes are, however, dynamically stable, or stable when moving forward, because steering allows a rider to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced, often with steering adjustments small enough that the rider may not even realize they're making them. It's sort of like standing on one foot. If you don't hop around a little, and you start falling sideways, you can't recover and you fall over. If you do hop, though, you can move your foot around to keep your center of gravity above it and keep your balance.\n\n\nA bike has two features that help this dynamic stability immensely: its wheels. Spinning wheels have angular momentum, and when you're sitting on a bike, you and it and its wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. Unless torque, or twisting force, is applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, that momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant. In a nutshell, once the wheels line up a certain way, they want to stay lined up like that. It's easy for you to move them, but hard for an outside force to do the same, and so the bike is easy to keep balanced but doesn't topple easily. A non-moving bike has wheels that aren't spinning and zero angular momentum, which makes it very easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction, making the bike harder to balance. Title: Why Does A Moving Bicycle Stay Up? (www.science20.com)\nText: Since the bicycle was invented, s cientists have postulated various reasons as to why a bicycle is self stable above a certain speed. The consensus has been that a bicycle's stability is related to two factors: First, the rotating wheels of the bicycle provide stability through gyroscopic effects; secondly, that the ‘trail’, the distance by which the contact point of the front wheel trails behind the steering axis, plays an important part.\n\nA new study in Science claims to have settled the issue - gyroscopic effects and trail help, says researcher Dr Arend Schwab of the 3mE faculty at TU Delft, but are not necessary above a certain speed . In a 2007 Proceedings of the Royal Society article (doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1857), a mathematical model with around 25 physical parameters was developed at the time which appeared to predict whether, and at what speeds, a particular design of bicycle would be stable. Bicycles are often perceived as being stable when in motion, but in reality, they are actually statically unstable due to having only two contact points with the ground. This means that a stationary bicycle is prone to falling over unless the rider applies a significant amount of force to keep it upright. However, when in motion, the bicycle's dynamic stability is enhanced by its spinning wheels, which have angular momentum. However, this stability is not guaranteed and can be disrupted by external forces, such as bumps in the road or sudden turns. Furthermore, the 'trail' or the distance between the contact point of the front wheel and the steering axis also plays a role in the bicycle's stability, but its effect is still not fully understood.. \n hypothesis: However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically stable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Balancing on a Bicycle: The Phenomena (www.mentalfloss.com)\nText: A bicycle, on the other hand, is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground (whatever portion of the front and back wheels happen to be touching the ground) and its base of support is a line segment. A good base of support needs at least three contact points with the ground, so bikes are hard to keep upright when they're still. Bikes are, however, dynamically stable, or stable when moving forward, because steering allows a rider to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced, often with steering adjustments small enough that the rider may not even realize they're making them. It's sort of like standing on one foot. If you don't hop around a little, and you start falling sideways, you can't recover and you fall over. If you do hop, though, you can move your foot around to keep your center of gravity above it and keep your balance.\n\n\nA bike has two features that help this dynamic stability immensely: its wheels. Spinning wheels have angular momentum, and when you're sitting on a bike, you and it and its wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. Unless torque, or twisting force, is applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, that momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant. In a nutshell, once the wheels line up a certain way, they want to stay lined up like that. It's easy for you to move them, but hard for an outside force to do the same, and so the bike is easy to keep balanced but doesn't topple easily. A non-moving bike has wheels that aren't spinning and zero angular momentum, which makes it very easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction, making the bike harder to balance. Title: Why Does A Moving Bicycle Stay Up? (www.science20.com)\nText: Since the bicycle was invented, s cientists have postulated various reasons as to why a bicycle is self stable above a certain speed. The consensus has been that a bicycle's stability is related to two factors: First, the rotating wheels of the bicycle provide stability through gyroscopic effects; secondly, that the ‘trail’, the distance by which the contact point of the front wheel trails behind the steering axis, plays an important part.\n\nA new study in Science claims to have settled the issue - gyroscopic effects and trail help, says researcher Dr Arend Schwab of the 3mE faculty at TU Delft, but are not necessary above a certain speed . In a 2007 Proceedings of the Royal Society article (doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1857), a mathematical model with around 25 physical parameters was developed at the time which appeared to predict whether, and at what speeds, a particular design of bicycle would be stable. Bicycles are often perceived as being stable when in motion, but in reality, they are actually statically unstable due to having only two contact points with the ground. This means that a stationary bicycle is prone to falling over unless the rider applies a significant amount of force to keep it upright. However, when in motion, the bicycle's dynamic stability is enhanced by its spinning wheels, which have angular momentum. However, this stability is not guaranteed and can be disrupted by external forces, such as bumps in the road or sudden turns. Furthermore, the 'trail' or the distance between the contact point of the front wheel and the steering axis also plays a role in the bicycle's stability, but its effect is still not fully understood.. \n hypothesis: However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically stable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Balancing on a Bicycle: The Phenomena (www.mentalfloss.com)\nText: A bicycle, on the other hand, is statically unstable because it only has two contact points with the ground (whatever portion of the front and back wheels happen to be touching the ground) and its base of support is a line segment. A good base of support needs at least three contact points with the ground, so bikes are hard to keep upright when they're still. Bikes are, however, dynamically stable, or stable when moving forward, because steering allows a rider to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced, often with steering adjustments small enough that the rider may not even realize they're making them. It's sort of like standing on one foot. If you don't hop around a little, and you start falling sideways, you can't recover and you fall over. If you do hop, though, you can move your foot around to keep your center of gravity above it and keep your balance.\n\n\nA bike has two features that help this dynamic stability immensely: its wheels. Spinning wheels have angular momentum, and when you're sitting on a bike, you and it and its wheels make up a system that obeys the principle of conservation of angular momentum. Unless torque, or twisting force, is applied from outside the system to change the wheels' angular momentum, that momentum and the direction of the momentum remain constant. In a nutshell, once the wheels line up a certain way, they want to stay lined up like that. It's easy for you to move them, but hard for an outside force to do the same, and so the bike is easy to keep balanced but doesn't topple easily. A non-moving bike has wheels that aren't spinning and zero angular momentum, which makes it very easy for external torque to change the wheels' direction, making the bike harder to balance. Title: Why Does A Moving Bicycle Stay Up? (www.science20.com)\nText: Since the bicycle was invented, s cientists have postulated various reasons as to why a bicycle is self stable above a certain speed. The consensus has been that a bicycle's stability is related to two factors: First, the rotating wheels of the bicycle provide stability through gyroscopic effects; secondly, that the ‘trail’, the distance by which the contact point of the front wheel trails behind the steering axis, plays an important part.\n\nA new study in Science claims to have settled the issue - gyroscopic effects and trail help, says researcher Dr Arend Schwab of the 3mE faculty at TU Delft, but are not necessary above a certain speed . In a 2007 Proceedings of the Royal Society article (doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1857), a mathematical model with around 25 physical parameters was developed at the time which appeared to predict whether, and at what speeds, a particular design of bicycle would be stable. Bicycles are often perceived as being stable when in motion, but in reality, they are actually statically unstable due to having only two contact points with the ground. This means that a stationary bicycle is prone to falling over unless the rider applies a significant amount of force to keep it upright. However, when in motion, the bicycle's dynamic stability is enhanced by its spinning wheels, which have angular momentum. However, this stability is not guaranteed and can be disrupted by external forces, such as bumps in the road or sudden turns. Furthermore, the 'trail' or the distance between the contact point of the front wheel and the steering axis also plays a role in the bicycle's stability, but its effect is still not fully understood.. \n hypothesis: However, when a bicycle is moving, it is dynamically stable because the rider is able to move the bike's points of support around under the center of gravity and keep it balanced with small steering adjustments.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
what do you do if you get pulled over?
|
You should stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible until the officer directs you to get out.
|
You should stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible until the officer directs you to get out.
|
If you get pulled over, the first thing you should do is carefully pull over to a safe spot and turn off your engine. It is important to show the police officer a few token courtesies such as rolling down your window all the way, putting out a cigarette, discarding any chewing gum and placing your hands on the steering wheel. If it is dark outside, you should turn on your interior vehicle light. You should stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible until the officer directs you to get out. Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer, so you should be prepared to do so. It is important to be honest with the police and to ask for an explanation if something is unclear. Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact.
|
[
"Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: When a police officer begins to pull you over, what you do and say can have a huge effect on any legal proceedings that might follow. Whether the traffic stop ends in a simple moving violation or an arrest for a more serious crime, your choices are critical.",
"Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: After you've pulled over to a safe spot, you should normally turn off your engine. At this point, you might want to show the officer a few other token courtesies. You have little to lose and perhaps something to gain.\n\n\nRoll down your window all the way. Put out a cigarette if you have one and discard any chewing gum (within the car). You might also want to place your hands on the steering wheel, and, if it's dark, turn on your interior light. These actions will tend to allay any fears the officer might have. After all, police officers have been killed in traffic-stop situations, and the officer's approach to the vehicle is potentially the most dangerous moment.",
"Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: Also, stay in the car until and unless the officer directs you to get out. Finally, don't start rummaging through your back pocket for your wallet and license, or in your glove compartment for your registration, until the officer asks you for them. For all the officer knows, you could be reaching for a weapon.",
"Title: Traffic Stops - What to do if you get pulled over - Police | seattle.gov (www.seattle.gov)\nText: Stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible.\n* If it is dark outside - turn on your interior vehicle light.\n* Follow the directions of the police officer.\n* Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer.\n* Be honest with the police and ask for an explanation if something is unclear.\n* Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact."
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_wdoc_7b9f7dd7-ff85-4b71-9aba-a62f1900d00d
| 1
| 0.95191
|
hard_positive
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: When a police officer begins to pull you over, what you do and say can have a huge effect on any legal proceedings that might follow. Whether the traffic stop ends in a simple moving violation or an arrest for a more serious crime, your choices are critical. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: After you've pulled over to a safe spot, you should normally turn off your engine. At this point, you might want to show the officer a few other token courtesies. You have little to lose and perhaps something to gain.\n\n\nRoll down your window all the way. Put out a cigarette if you have one and discard any chewing gum (within the car). You might also want to place your hands on the steering wheel, and, if it's dark, turn on your interior light. These actions will tend to allay any fears the officer might have. After all, police officers have been killed in traffic-stop situations, and the officer's approach to the vehicle is potentially the most dangerous moment. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: Also, stay in the car until and unless the officer directs you to get out. Finally, don't start rummaging through your back pocket for your wallet and license, or in your glove compartment for your registration, until the officer asks you for them. For all the officer knows, you could be reaching for a weapon. Title: Traffic Stops - What to do if you get pulled over - Police | seattle.gov (www.seattle.gov)\nText: Stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible.\n* If it is dark outside - turn on your interior vehicle light.\n* Follow the directions of the police officer.\n* Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer.\n* Be honest with the police and ask for an explanation if something is unclear.\n* Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact.. \n hypothesis: You should stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible until the officer directs you to get out.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: When a police officer begins to pull you over, what you do and say can have a huge effect on any legal proceedings that might follow. Whether the traffic stop ends in a simple moving violation or an arrest for a more serious crime, your choices are critical. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: After you've pulled over to a safe spot, you should normally turn off your engine. At this point, you might want to show the officer a few other token courtesies. You have little to lose and perhaps something to gain.\n\n\nRoll down your window all the way. Put out a cigarette if you have one and discard any chewing gum (within the car). You might also want to place your hands on the steering wheel, and, if it's dark, turn on your interior light. These actions will tend to allay any fears the officer might have. After all, police officers have been killed in traffic-stop situations, and the officer's approach to the vehicle is potentially the most dangerous moment. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: Also, stay in the car until and unless the officer directs you to get out. Finally, don't start rummaging through your back pocket for your wallet and license, or in your glove compartment for your registration, until the officer asks you for them. For all the officer knows, you could be reaching for a weapon. Title: Traffic Stops - What to do if you get pulled over - Police | seattle.gov (www.seattle.gov)\nText: Stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible.\n* If it is dark outside - turn on your interior vehicle light.\n* Follow the directions of the police officer.\n* Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer.\n* Be honest with the police and ask for an explanation if something is unclear.\n* Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact.. \n hypothesis: You should stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible until the officer directs you to get out.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: When a police officer begins to pull you over, what you do and say can have a huge effect on any legal proceedings that might follow. Whether the traffic stop ends in a simple moving violation or an arrest for a more serious crime, your choices are critical. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: After you've pulled over to a safe spot, you should normally turn off your engine. At this point, you might want to show the officer a few other token courtesies. You have little to lose and perhaps something to gain.\n\n\nRoll down your window all the way. Put out a cigarette if you have one and discard any chewing gum (within the car). You might also want to place your hands on the steering wheel, and, if it's dark, turn on your interior light. These actions will tend to allay any fears the officer might have. After all, police officers have been killed in traffic-stop situations, and the officer's approach to the vehicle is potentially the most dangerous moment. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: Also, stay in the car until and unless the officer directs you to get out. Finally, don't start rummaging through your back pocket for your wallet and license, or in your glove compartment for your registration, until the officer asks you for them. For all the officer knows, you could be reaching for a weapon. Title: Traffic Stops - What to do if you get pulled over - Police | seattle.gov (www.seattle.gov)\nText: Stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible.\n* If it is dark outside - turn on your interior vehicle light.\n* Follow the directions of the police officer.\n* Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer.\n* Be honest with the police and ask for an explanation if something is unclear.\n* Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact.. \n hypothesis: You should stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible until the officer directs you to get out.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
|||
what do you do if you get pulled over?
|
You should get out of your vehicle and make yourself visible until the officer directs you to stay.
|
You should stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible until the officer directs you to get out.
|
If you get pulled over, the first thing you should do is carefully pull over to a safe spot and turn off your engine. It is important to show the police officer a few token courtesies such as rolling down your window all the way, putting out a cigarette, discarding any chewing gum and placing your hands on the steering wheel. If it is dark outside, you should turn on your interior vehicle light. You should stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible until the officer directs you to get out. Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer, so you should be prepared to do so. It is important to be honest with the police and to ask for an explanation if something is unclear. Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact.
|
[
"Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: When a police officer begins to pull you over, what you do and say can have a huge effect on any legal proceedings that might follow. Whether the traffic stop ends in a simple moving violation or an arrest for a more serious crime, your choices are critical.",
"Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: After you've pulled over to a safe spot, you should normally turn off your engine. At this point, you might want to show the officer a few other token courtesies. You have little to lose and perhaps something to gain.\n\n\nRoll down your window all the way. Put out a cigarette if you have one and discard any chewing gum (within the car). You might also want to place your hands on the steering wheel, and, if it's dark, turn on your interior light. These actions will tend to allay any fears the officer might have. After all, police officers have been killed in traffic-stop situations, and the officer's approach to the vehicle is potentially the most dangerous moment.",
"Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: Also, stay in the car until and unless the officer directs you to get out. Finally, don't start rummaging through your back pocket for your wallet and license, or in your glove compartment for your registration, until the officer asks you for them. For all the officer knows, you could be reaching for a weapon.",
"Title: Traffic Stops - What to do if you get pulled over - Police | seattle.gov (www.seattle.gov)\nText: Stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible.\n* If it is dark outside - turn on your interior vehicle light.\n* Follow the directions of the police officer.\n* Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer.\n* Be honest with the police and ask for an explanation if something is unclear.\n* Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact."
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_wdoc_7b9f7dd7-ff85-4b71-9aba-a62f1900d00d
| 1
| 0.95191
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
claim_negation
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: When a police officer begins to pull you over, what you do and say can have a huge effect on any legal proceedings that might follow. Whether the traffic stop ends in a simple moving violation or an arrest for a more serious crime, your choices are critical. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: After you've pulled over to a safe spot, you should normally turn off your engine. At this point, you might want to show the officer a few other token courtesies. You have little to lose and perhaps something to gain.\n\n\nRoll down your window all the way. Put out a cigarette if you have one and discard any chewing gum (within the car). You might also want to place your hands on the steering wheel, and, if it's dark, turn on your interior light. These actions will tend to allay any fears the officer might have. After all, police officers have been killed in traffic-stop situations, and the officer's approach to the vehicle is potentially the most dangerous moment. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: Also, stay in the car until and unless the officer directs you to get out. Finally, don't start rummaging through your back pocket for your wallet and license, or in your glove compartment for your registration, until the officer asks you for them. For all the officer knows, you could be reaching for a weapon. Title: Traffic Stops - What to do if you get pulled over - Police | seattle.gov (www.seattle.gov)\nText: Stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible.\n* If it is dark outside - turn on your interior vehicle light.\n* Follow the directions of the police officer.\n* Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer.\n* Be honest with the police and ask for an explanation if something is unclear.\n* Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact.. \n hypothesis: You should get out of your vehicle and make yourself visible until the officer directs you to stay.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: When a police officer begins to pull you over, what you do and say can have a huge effect on any legal proceedings that might follow. Whether the traffic stop ends in a simple moving violation or an arrest for a more serious crime, your choices are critical. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: After you've pulled over to a safe spot, you should normally turn off your engine. At this point, you might want to show the officer a few other token courtesies. You have little to lose and perhaps something to gain.\n\n\nRoll down your window all the way. Put out a cigarette if you have one and discard any chewing gum (within the car). You might also want to place your hands on the steering wheel, and, if it's dark, turn on your interior light. These actions will tend to allay any fears the officer might have. After all, police officers have been killed in traffic-stop situations, and the officer's approach to the vehicle is potentially the most dangerous moment. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: Also, stay in the car until and unless the officer directs you to get out. Finally, don't start rummaging through your back pocket for your wallet and license, or in your glove compartment for your registration, until the officer asks you for them. For all the officer knows, you could be reaching for a weapon. Title: Traffic Stops - What to do if you get pulled over - Police | seattle.gov (www.seattle.gov)\nText: Stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible.\n* If it is dark outside - turn on your interior vehicle light.\n* Follow the directions of the police officer.\n* Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer.\n* Be honest with the police and ask for an explanation if something is unclear.\n* Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact.. \n hypothesis: You should get out of your vehicle and make yourself visible until the officer directs you to stay.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: When a police officer begins to pull you over, what you do and say can have a huge effect on any legal proceedings that might follow. Whether the traffic stop ends in a simple moving violation or an arrest for a more serious crime, your choices are critical. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: After you've pulled over to a safe spot, you should normally turn off your engine. At this point, you might want to show the officer a few other token courtesies. You have little to lose and perhaps something to gain.\n\n\nRoll down your window all the way. Put out a cigarette if you have one and discard any chewing gum (within the car). You might also want to place your hands on the steering wheel, and, if it's dark, turn on your interior light. These actions will tend to allay any fears the officer might have. After all, police officers have been killed in traffic-stop situations, and the officer's approach to the vehicle is potentially the most dangerous moment. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: Also, stay in the car until and unless the officer directs you to get out. Finally, don't start rummaging through your back pocket for your wallet and license, or in your glove compartment for your registration, until the officer asks you for them. For all the officer knows, you could be reaching for a weapon. Title: Traffic Stops - What to do if you get pulled over - Police | seattle.gov (www.seattle.gov)\nText: Stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible.\n* If it is dark outside - turn on your interior vehicle light.\n* Follow the directions of the police officer.\n* Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer.\n* Be honest with the police and ask for an explanation if something is unclear.\n* Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact.. \n hypothesis: You should get out of your vehicle and make yourself visible until the officer directs you to stay.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
what do you do if you get pulled over?
|
Stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible until the officer directs you to exit.
|
You should stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible until the officer directs you to get out.
|
If you get pulled over, the first thing you should do is carefully pull over to a safe spot and turn off your engine. It is important to show the police officer a few token courtesies such as rolling down your window all the way, putting out a cigarette, discarding any chewing gum and placing your hands on the steering wheel. If it is dark outside, you should turn on your interior vehicle light. You should stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible until the officer directs you to get out. Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer, so you should be prepared to do so. It is important to be honest with the police and to ask for an explanation if something is unclear. Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact.
|
[
"Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: When a police officer begins to pull you over, what you do and say can have a huge effect on any legal proceedings that might follow. Whether the traffic stop ends in a simple moving violation or an arrest for a more serious crime, your choices are critical.",
"Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: After you've pulled over to a safe spot, you should normally turn off your engine. At this point, you might want to show the officer a few other token courtesies. You have little to lose and perhaps something to gain.\n\n\nRoll down your window all the way. Put out a cigarette if you have one and discard any chewing gum (within the car). You might also want to place your hands on the steering wheel, and, if it's dark, turn on your interior light. These actions will tend to allay any fears the officer might have. After all, police officers have been killed in traffic-stop situations, and the officer's approach to the vehicle is potentially the most dangerous moment.",
"Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: Also, stay in the car until and unless the officer directs you to get out. Finally, don't start rummaging through your back pocket for your wallet and license, or in your glove compartment for your registration, until the officer asks you for them. For all the officer knows, you could be reaching for a weapon.",
"Title: Traffic Stops - What to do if you get pulled over - Police | seattle.gov (www.seattle.gov)\nText: Stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible.\n* If it is dark outside - turn on your interior vehicle light.\n* Follow the directions of the police officer.\n* Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer.\n* Be honest with the police and ask for an explanation if something is unclear.\n* Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact."
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_wdoc_7b9f7dd7-ff85-4b71-9aba-a62f1900d00d
| 1
| 0.95191
|
generated
|
attributable
|
keep
|
claim_reformulation
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: When a police officer begins to pull you over, what you do and say can have a huge effect on any legal proceedings that might follow. Whether the traffic stop ends in a simple moving violation or an arrest for a more serious crime, your choices are critical. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: After you've pulled over to a safe spot, you should normally turn off your engine. At this point, you might want to show the officer a few other token courtesies. You have little to lose and perhaps something to gain.\n\n\nRoll down your window all the way. Put out a cigarette if you have one and discard any chewing gum (within the car). You might also want to place your hands on the steering wheel, and, if it's dark, turn on your interior light. These actions will tend to allay any fears the officer might have. After all, police officers have been killed in traffic-stop situations, and the officer's approach to the vehicle is potentially the most dangerous moment. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: Also, stay in the car until and unless the officer directs you to get out. Finally, don't start rummaging through your back pocket for your wallet and license, or in your glove compartment for your registration, until the officer asks you for them. For all the officer knows, you could be reaching for a weapon. Title: Traffic Stops - What to do if you get pulled over - Police | seattle.gov (www.seattle.gov)\nText: Stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible.\n* If it is dark outside - turn on your interior vehicle light.\n* Follow the directions of the police officer.\n* Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer.\n* Be honest with the police and ask for an explanation if something is unclear.\n* Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact.. \n hypothesis: Stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible until the officer directs you to exit.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: When a police officer begins to pull you over, what you do and say can have a huge effect on any legal proceedings that might follow. Whether the traffic stop ends in a simple moving violation or an arrest for a more serious crime, your choices are critical. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: After you've pulled over to a safe spot, you should normally turn off your engine. At this point, you might want to show the officer a few other token courtesies. You have little to lose and perhaps something to gain.\n\n\nRoll down your window all the way. Put out a cigarette if you have one and discard any chewing gum (within the car). You might also want to place your hands on the steering wheel, and, if it's dark, turn on your interior light. These actions will tend to allay any fears the officer might have. After all, police officers have been killed in traffic-stop situations, and the officer's approach to the vehicle is potentially the most dangerous moment. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: Also, stay in the car until and unless the officer directs you to get out. Finally, don't start rummaging through your back pocket for your wallet and license, or in your glove compartment for your registration, until the officer asks you for them. For all the officer knows, you could be reaching for a weapon. Title: Traffic Stops - What to do if you get pulled over - Police | seattle.gov (www.seattle.gov)\nText: Stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible.\n* If it is dark outside - turn on your interior vehicle light.\n* Follow the directions of the police officer.\n* Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer.\n* Be honest with the police and ask for an explanation if something is unclear.\n* Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact.. \n hypothesis: Stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible until the officer directs you to exit.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: When a police officer begins to pull you over, what you do and say can have a huge effect on any legal proceedings that might follow. Whether the traffic stop ends in a simple moving violation or an arrest for a more serious crime, your choices are critical. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: After you've pulled over to a safe spot, you should normally turn off your engine. At this point, you might want to show the officer a few other token courtesies. You have little to lose and perhaps something to gain.\n\n\nRoll down your window all the way. Put out a cigarette if you have one and discard any chewing gum (within the car). You might also want to place your hands on the steering wheel, and, if it's dark, turn on your interior light. These actions will tend to allay any fears the officer might have. After all, police officers have been killed in traffic-stop situations, and the officer's approach to the vehicle is potentially the most dangerous moment. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: Also, stay in the car until and unless the officer directs you to get out. Finally, don't start rummaging through your back pocket for your wallet and license, or in your glove compartment for your registration, until the officer asks you for them. For all the officer knows, you could be reaching for a weapon. Title: Traffic Stops - What to do if you get pulled over - Police | seattle.gov (www.seattle.gov)\nText: Stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible.\n* If it is dark outside - turn on your interior vehicle light.\n* Follow the directions of the police officer.\n* Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer.\n* Be honest with the police and ask for an explanation if something is unclear.\n* Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact.. \n hypothesis: Stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible until the officer directs you to exit.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
what do you do if you get pulled over?
|
You should stay in your vehicle and keep your feet visible until the officer directs you to get out.
|
You should stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible until the officer directs you to get out.
|
If you get pulled over, the first thing you should do is carefully pull over to a safe spot and turn off your engine. It is important to show the police officer a few token courtesies such as rolling down your window all the way, putting out a cigarette, discarding any chewing gum and placing your hands on the steering wheel. If it is dark outside, you should turn on your interior vehicle light. You should stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible until the officer directs you to get out. Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer, so you should be prepared to do so. It is important to be honest with the police and to ask for an explanation if something is unclear. Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact.
|
[
"Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: When a police officer begins to pull you over, what you do and say can have a huge effect on any legal proceedings that might follow. Whether the traffic stop ends in a simple moving violation or an arrest for a more serious crime, your choices are critical.",
"Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: After you've pulled over to a safe spot, you should normally turn off your engine. At this point, you might want to show the officer a few other token courtesies. You have little to lose and perhaps something to gain.\n\n\nRoll down your window all the way. Put out a cigarette if you have one and discard any chewing gum (within the car). You might also want to place your hands on the steering wheel, and, if it's dark, turn on your interior light. These actions will tend to allay any fears the officer might have. After all, police officers have been killed in traffic-stop situations, and the officer's approach to the vehicle is potentially the most dangerous moment.",
"Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: Also, stay in the car until and unless the officer directs you to get out. Finally, don't start rummaging through your back pocket for your wallet and license, or in your glove compartment for your registration, until the officer asks you for them. For all the officer knows, you could be reaching for a weapon.",
"Title: Traffic Stops - What to do if you get pulled over - Police | seattle.gov (www.seattle.gov)\nText: Stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible.\n* If it is dark outside - turn on your interior vehicle light.\n* Follow the directions of the police officer.\n* Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer.\n* Be honest with the police and ask for an explanation if something is unclear.\n* Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact."
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_wdoc_7b9f7dd7-ff85-4b71-9aba-a62f1900d00d
| 1
| 0.95191
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
claim_erronous_change
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: When a police officer begins to pull you over, what you do and say can have a huge effect on any legal proceedings that might follow. Whether the traffic stop ends in a simple moving violation or an arrest for a more serious crime, your choices are critical. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: After you've pulled over to a safe spot, you should normally turn off your engine. At this point, you might want to show the officer a few other token courtesies. You have little to lose and perhaps something to gain.\n\n\nRoll down your window all the way. Put out a cigarette if you have one and discard any chewing gum (within the car). You might also want to place your hands on the steering wheel, and, if it's dark, turn on your interior light. These actions will tend to allay any fears the officer might have. After all, police officers have been killed in traffic-stop situations, and the officer's approach to the vehicle is potentially the most dangerous moment. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: Also, stay in the car until and unless the officer directs you to get out. Finally, don't start rummaging through your back pocket for your wallet and license, or in your glove compartment for your registration, until the officer asks you for them. For all the officer knows, you could be reaching for a weapon. Title: Traffic Stops - What to do if you get pulled over - Police | seattle.gov (www.seattle.gov)\nText: Stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible.\n* If it is dark outside - turn on your interior vehicle light.\n* Follow the directions of the police officer.\n* Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer.\n* Be honest with the police and ask for an explanation if something is unclear.\n* Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact.. \n hypothesis: You should stay in your vehicle and keep your feet visible until the officer directs you to get out.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: When a police officer begins to pull you over, what you do and say can have a huge effect on any legal proceedings that might follow. Whether the traffic stop ends in a simple moving violation or an arrest for a more serious crime, your choices are critical. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: After you've pulled over to a safe spot, you should normally turn off your engine. At this point, you might want to show the officer a few other token courtesies. You have little to lose and perhaps something to gain.\n\n\nRoll down your window all the way. Put out a cigarette if you have one and discard any chewing gum (within the car). You might also want to place your hands on the steering wheel, and, if it's dark, turn on your interior light. These actions will tend to allay any fears the officer might have. After all, police officers have been killed in traffic-stop situations, and the officer's approach to the vehicle is potentially the most dangerous moment. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: Also, stay in the car until and unless the officer directs you to get out. Finally, don't start rummaging through your back pocket for your wallet and license, or in your glove compartment for your registration, until the officer asks you for them. For all the officer knows, you could be reaching for a weapon. Title: Traffic Stops - What to do if you get pulled over - Police | seattle.gov (www.seattle.gov)\nText: Stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible.\n* If it is dark outside - turn on your interior vehicle light.\n* Follow the directions of the police officer.\n* Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer.\n* Be honest with the police and ask for an explanation if something is unclear.\n* Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact.. \n hypothesis: You should stay in your vehicle and keep your feet visible until the officer directs you to get out.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: When a police officer begins to pull you over, what you do and say can have a huge effect on any legal proceedings that might follow. Whether the traffic stop ends in a simple moving violation or an arrest for a more serious crime, your choices are critical. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: After you've pulled over to a safe spot, you should normally turn off your engine. At this point, you might want to show the officer a few other token courtesies. You have little to lose and perhaps something to gain.\n\n\nRoll down your window all the way. Put out a cigarette if you have one and discard any chewing gum (within the car). You might also want to place your hands on the steering wheel, and, if it's dark, turn on your interior light. These actions will tend to allay any fears the officer might have. After all, police officers have been killed in traffic-stop situations, and the officer's approach to the vehicle is potentially the most dangerous moment. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: Also, stay in the car until and unless the officer directs you to get out. Finally, don't start rummaging through your back pocket for your wallet and license, or in your glove compartment for your registration, until the officer asks you for them. For all the officer knows, you could be reaching for a weapon. Title: Traffic Stops - What to do if you get pulled over - Police | seattle.gov (www.seattle.gov)\nText: Stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible.\n* If it is dark outside - turn on your interior vehicle light.\n* Follow the directions of the police officer.\n* Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer.\n* Be honest with the police and ask for an explanation if something is unclear.\n* Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact.. \n hypothesis: You should stay in your vehicle and keep your feet visible until the officer directs you to get out.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
what do you do if you get pulled over?
|
. **Pull over to a safe location**: Move your vehicle to the side of the road or a nearby parking area as soon as possible. Avoid pulling over in a location that may obstruct traffic or put you or others at risk.
2. **Turn off the engine**: Switch off the engine and engage the parking brake. This shows that you are cooperative and willing to follow the officer's instructions.
3. **Keep your hands visible**: Place your hands on the steering wheel or on the dashboard, where the officer can easily see them. This demonstrates that you are not a threat and helps to de-escalate the situation.
4. **Wait for instructions**: Remain in your vehicle until the officer approaches and gives you specific instructions. Do not try to exit the vehicle or approach the officer unless they indicate it is safe to do so.
5. **Be respectful and cooperative**: Treat the officer with respect and follow their instructions. Avoid argument or confrontation, as this can escalate the situation.
6. **Keep your windows closed**: Keep your windows closed to prevent any potential objects from being thrown out or to prevent the officer from feeling threatened.
7. **Follow the officer's instructions**: Once the officer approaches, follow their instructions carefully. They may ask you to step out of the vehicle, provide identification, or answer questions.
|
You should stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible until the officer directs you to get out.
|
If you get pulled over, the first thing you should do is carefully pull over to a safe spot and turn off your engine. It is important to show the police officer a few token courtesies such as rolling down your window all the way, putting out a cigarette, discarding any chewing gum and placing your hands on the steering wheel. If it is dark outside, you should turn on your interior vehicle light. You should stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible until the officer directs you to get out. Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer, so you should be prepared to do so. It is important to be honest with the police and to ask for an explanation if something is unclear. Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact.
|
[
"Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: When a police officer begins to pull you over, what you do and say can have a huge effect on any legal proceedings that might follow. Whether the traffic stop ends in a simple moving violation or an arrest for a more serious crime, your choices are critical.",
"Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: After you've pulled over to a safe spot, you should normally turn off your engine. At this point, you might want to show the officer a few other token courtesies. You have little to lose and perhaps something to gain.\n\n\nRoll down your window all the way. Put out a cigarette if you have one and discard any chewing gum (within the car). You might also want to place your hands on the steering wheel, and, if it's dark, turn on your interior light. These actions will tend to allay any fears the officer might have. After all, police officers have been killed in traffic-stop situations, and the officer's approach to the vehicle is potentially the most dangerous moment.",
"Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: Also, stay in the car until and unless the officer directs you to get out. Finally, don't start rummaging through your back pocket for your wallet and license, or in your glove compartment for your registration, until the officer asks you for them. For all the officer knows, you could be reaching for a weapon.",
"Title: Traffic Stops - What to do if you get pulled over - Police | seattle.gov (www.seattle.gov)\nText: Stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible.\n* If it is dark outside - turn on your interior vehicle light.\n* Follow the directions of the police officer.\n* Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer.\n* Be honest with the police and ask for an explanation if something is unclear.\n* Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact."
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_wdoc_7b9f7dd7-ff85-4b71-9aba-a62f1900d00d
| 1
| 0.95191
|
generated
|
attributable
|
keep
|
claim_infer_claim
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: When a police officer begins to pull you over, what you do and say can have a huge effect on any legal proceedings that might follow. Whether the traffic stop ends in a simple moving violation or an arrest for a more serious crime, your choices are critical. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: After you've pulled over to a safe spot, you should normally turn off your engine. At this point, you might want to show the officer a few other token courtesies. You have little to lose and perhaps something to gain.\n\n\nRoll down your window all the way. Put out a cigarette if you have one and discard any chewing gum (within the car). You might also want to place your hands on the steering wheel, and, if it's dark, turn on your interior light. These actions will tend to allay any fears the officer might have. After all, police officers have been killed in traffic-stop situations, and the officer's approach to the vehicle is potentially the most dangerous moment. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: Also, stay in the car until and unless the officer directs you to get out. Finally, don't start rummaging through your back pocket for your wallet and license, or in your glove compartment for your registration, until the officer asks you for them. For all the officer knows, you could be reaching for a weapon. Title: Traffic Stops - What to do if you get pulled over - Police | seattle.gov (www.seattle.gov)\nText: Stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible.\n* If it is dark outside - turn on your interior vehicle light.\n* Follow the directions of the police officer.\n* Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer.\n* Be honest with the police and ask for an explanation if something is unclear.\n* Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact.. \n hypothesis: . **Pull over to a safe location**: Move your vehicle to the side of the road or a nearby parking area as soon as possible. Avoid pulling over in a location that may obstruct traffic or put you or others at risk.\n2. **Turn off the engine**: Switch off the engine and engage the parking brake. This shows that you are cooperative and willing to follow the officer's instructions.\n3. **Keep your hands visible**: Place your hands on the steering wheel or on the dashboard, where the officer can easily see them. This demonstrates that you are not a threat and helps to de-escalate the situation.\n4. **Wait for instructions**: Remain in your vehicle until the officer approaches and gives you specific instructions. Do not try to exit the vehicle or approach the officer unless they indicate it is safe to do so.\n5. **Be respectful and cooperative**: Treat the officer with respect and follow their instructions. Avoid argument or confrontation, as this can escalate the situation.\n6. **Keep your windows closed**: Keep your windows closed to prevent any potential objects from being thrown out or to prevent the officer from feeling threatened.\n7. **Follow the officer's instructions**: Once the officer approaches, follow their instructions carefully. They may ask you to step out of the vehicle, provide identification, or answer questions.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: When a police officer begins to pull you over, what you do and say can have a huge effect on any legal proceedings that might follow. Whether the traffic stop ends in a simple moving violation or an arrest for a more serious crime, your choices are critical. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: After you've pulled over to a safe spot, you should normally turn off your engine. At this point, you might want to show the officer a few other token courtesies. You have little to lose and perhaps something to gain.\n\n\nRoll down your window all the way. Put out a cigarette if you have one and discard any chewing gum (within the car). You might also want to place your hands on the steering wheel, and, if it's dark, turn on your interior light. These actions will tend to allay any fears the officer might have. After all, police officers have been killed in traffic-stop situations, and the officer's approach to the vehicle is potentially the most dangerous moment. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: Also, stay in the car until and unless the officer directs you to get out. Finally, don't start rummaging through your back pocket for your wallet and license, or in your glove compartment for your registration, until the officer asks you for them. For all the officer knows, you could be reaching for a weapon. Title: Traffic Stops - What to do if you get pulled over - Police | seattle.gov (www.seattle.gov)\nText: Stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible.\n* If it is dark outside - turn on your interior vehicle light.\n* Follow the directions of the police officer.\n* Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer.\n* Be honest with the police and ask for an explanation if something is unclear.\n* Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact.. \n hypothesis: . **Pull over to a safe location**: Move your vehicle to the side of the road or a nearby parking area as soon as possible. Avoid pulling over in a location that may obstruct traffic or put you or others at risk.\n2. **Turn off the engine**: Switch off the engine and engage the parking brake. This shows that you are cooperative and willing to follow the officer's instructions.\n3. **Keep your hands visible**: Place your hands on the steering wheel or on the dashboard, where the officer can easily see them. This demonstrates that you are not a threat and helps to de-escalate the situation.\n4. **Wait for instructions**: Remain in your vehicle until the officer approaches and gives you specific instructions. Do not try to exit the vehicle or approach the officer unless they indicate it is safe to do so.\n5. **Be respectful and cooperative**: Treat the officer with respect and follow their instructions. Avoid argument or confrontation, as this can escalate the situation.\n6. **Keep your windows closed**: Keep your windows closed to prevent any potential objects from being thrown out or to prevent the officer from feeling threatened.\n7. **Follow the officer's instructions**: Once the officer approaches, follow their instructions carefully. They may ask you to step out of the vehicle, provide identification, or answer questions.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: When a police officer begins to pull you over, what you do and say can have a huge effect on any legal proceedings that might follow. Whether the traffic stop ends in a simple moving violation or an arrest for a more serious crime, your choices are critical. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: After you've pulled over to a safe spot, you should normally turn off your engine. At this point, you might want to show the officer a few other token courtesies. You have little to lose and perhaps something to gain.\n\n\nRoll down your window all the way. Put out a cigarette if you have one and discard any chewing gum (within the car). You might also want to place your hands on the steering wheel, and, if it's dark, turn on your interior light. These actions will tend to allay any fears the officer might have. After all, police officers have been killed in traffic-stop situations, and the officer's approach to the vehicle is potentially the most dangerous moment. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: Also, stay in the car until and unless the officer directs you to get out. Finally, don't start rummaging through your back pocket for your wallet and license, or in your glove compartment for your registration, until the officer asks you for them. For all the officer knows, you could be reaching for a weapon. Title: Traffic Stops - What to do if you get pulled over - Police | seattle.gov (www.seattle.gov)\nText: Stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible.\n* If it is dark outside - turn on your interior vehicle light.\n* Follow the directions of the police officer.\n* Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer.\n* Be honest with the police and ask for an explanation if something is unclear.\n* Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact.. \n hypothesis: . **Pull over to a safe location**: Move your vehicle to the side of the road or a nearby parking area as soon as possible. Avoid pulling over in a location that may obstruct traffic or put you or others at risk.\n2. **Turn off the engine**: Switch off the engine and engage the parking brake. This shows that you are cooperative and willing to follow the officer's instructions.\n3. **Keep your hands visible**: Place your hands on the steering wheel or on the dashboard, where the officer can easily see them. This demonstrates that you are not a threat and helps to de-escalate the situation.\n4. **Wait for instructions**: Remain in your vehicle until the officer approaches and gives you specific instructions. Do not try to exit the vehicle or approach the officer unless they indicate it is safe to do so.\n5. **Be respectful and cooperative**: Treat the officer with respect and follow their instructions. Avoid argument or confrontation, as this can escalate the situation.\n6. **Keep your windows closed**: Keep your windows closed to prevent any potential objects from being thrown out or to prevent the officer from feeling threatened.\n7. **Follow the officer's instructions**: Once the officer approaches, follow their instructions carefully. They may ask you to step out of the vehicle, provide identification, or answer questions.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
what do you do if you get pulled over?
|
You should get out of your vehicle immediately and start walking towards the officer, while keeping your hands visible.
|
You should stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible until the officer directs you to get out.
|
If you get pulled over, the first thing you should do is carefully pull over to a safe spot and turn off your engine. It is important to show the police officer a few token courtesies such as rolling down your window all the way, putting out a cigarette, discarding any chewing gum and placing your hands on the steering wheel. If it is dark outside, you should turn on your interior vehicle light. You should stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible until the officer directs you to get out. Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer, so you should be prepared to do so. It is important to be honest with the police and to ask for an explanation if something is unclear. Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact.
|
[
"Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: When a police officer begins to pull you over, what you do and say can have a huge effect on any legal proceedings that might follow. Whether the traffic stop ends in a simple moving violation or an arrest for a more serious crime, your choices are critical.",
"Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: After you've pulled over to a safe spot, you should normally turn off your engine. At this point, you might want to show the officer a few other token courtesies. You have little to lose and perhaps something to gain.\n\n\nRoll down your window all the way. Put out a cigarette if you have one and discard any chewing gum (within the car). You might also want to place your hands on the steering wheel, and, if it's dark, turn on your interior light. These actions will tend to allay any fears the officer might have. After all, police officers have been killed in traffic-stop situations, and the officer's approach to the vehicle is potentially the most dangerous moment.",
"Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: Also, stay in the car until and unless the officer directs you to get out. Finally, don't start rummaging through your back pocket for your wallet and license, or in your glove compartment for your registration, until the officer asks you for them. For all the officer knows, you could be reaching for a weapon.",
"Title: Traffic Stops - What to do if you get pulled over - Police | seattle.gov (www.seattle.gov)\nText: Stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible.\n* If it is dark outside - turn on your interior vehicle light.\n* Follow the directions of the police officer.\n* Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer.\n* Be honest with the police and ask for an explanation if something is unclear.\n* Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact."
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_wdoc_7b9f7dd7-ff85-4b71-9aba-a62f1900d00d
| 1
| 0.95191
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
claim_add_to_the_claim_contradicting_info
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: When a police officer begins to pull you over, what you do and say can have a huge effect on any legal proceedings that might follow. Whether the traffic stop ends in a simple moving violation or an arrest for a more serious crime, your choices are critical. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: After you've pulled over to a safe spot, you should normally turn off your engine. At this point, you might want to show the officer a few other token courtesies. You have little to lose and perhaps something to gain.\n\n\nRoll down your window all the way. Put out a cigarette if you have one and discard any chewing gum (within the car). You might also want to place your hands on the steering wheel, and, if it's dark, turn on your interior light. These actions will tend to allay any fears the officer might have. After all, police officers have been killed in traffic-stop situations, and the officer's approach to the vehicle is potentially the most dangerous moment. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: Also, stay in the car until and unless the officer directs you to get out. Finally, don't start rummaging through your back pocket for your wallet and license, or in your glove compartment for your registration, until the officer asks you for them. For all the officer knows, you could be reaching for a weapon. Title: Traffic Stops - What to do if you get pulled over - Police | seattle.gov (www.seattle.gov)\nText: Stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible.\n* If it is dark outside - turn on your interior vehicle light.\n* Follow the directions of the police officer.\n* Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer.\n* Be honest with the police and ask for an explanation if something is unclear.\n* Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact.. \n hypothesis: You should get out of your vehicle immediately and start walking towards the officer, while keeping your hands visible.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: When a police officer begins to pull you over, what you do and say can have a huge effect on any legal proceedings that might follow. Whether the traffic stop ends in a simple moving violation or an arrest for a more serious crime, your choices are critical. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: After you've pulled over to a safe spot, you should normally turn off your engine. At this point, you might want to show the officer a few other token courtesies. You have little to lose and perhaps something to gain.\n\n\nRoll down your window all the way. Put out a cigarette if you have one and discard any chewing gum (within the car). You might also want to place your hands on the steering wheel, and, if it's dark, turn on your interior light. These actions will tend to allay any fears the officer might have. After all, police officers have been killed in traffic-stop situations, and the officer's approach to the vehicle is potentially the most dangerous moment. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: Also, stay in the car until and unless the officer directs you to get out. Finally, don't start rummaging through your back pocket for your wallet and license, or in your glove compartment for your registration, until the officer asks you for them. For all the officer knows, you could be reaching for a weapon. Title: Traffic Stops - What to do if you get pulled over - Police | seattle.gov (www.seattle.gov)\nText: Stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible.\n* If it is dark outside - turn on your interior vehicle light.\n* Follow the directions of the police officer.\n* Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer.\n* Be honest with the police and ask for an explanation if something is unclear.\n* Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact.. \n hypothesis: You should get out of your vehicle immediately and start walking towards the officer, while keeping your hands visible.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: When a police officer begins to pull you over, what you do and say can have a huge effect on any legal proceedings that might follow. Whether the traffic stop ends in a simple moving violation or an arrest for a more serious crime, your choices are critical. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: After you've pulled over to a safe spot, you should normally turn off your engine. At this point, you might want to show the officer a few other token courtesies. You have little to lose and perhaps something to gain.\n\n\nRoll down your window all the way. Put out a cigarette if you have one and discard any chewing gum (within the car). You might also want to place your hands on the steering wheel, and, if it's dark, turn on your interior light. These actions will tend to allay any fears the officer might have. After all, police officers have been killed in traffic-stop situations, and the officer's approach to the vehicle is potentially the most dangerous moment. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: Also, stay in the car until and unless the officer directs you to get out. Finally, don't start rummaging through your back pocket for your wallet and license, or in your glove compartment for your registration, until the officer asks you for them. For all the officer knows, you could be reaching for a weapon. Title: Traffic Stops - What to do if you get pulled over - Police | seattle.gov (www.seattle.gov)\nText: Stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible.\n* If it is dark outside - turn on your interior vehicle light.\n* Follow the directions of the police officer.\n* Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer.\n* Be honest with the police and ask for an explanation if something is unclear.\n* Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact.. \n hypothesis: You should get out of your vehicle immediately and start walking towards the officer, while keeping your hands visible.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
what do you do if you get pulled over?
|
You should stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible until the officer directs you to get out.
|
You should stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible until the officer directs you to get out.
|
If you get pulled over, the first thing you should do is carefully pull over to a safe spot and turn off your engine. It is important to show the police officer a few token courtesies such as rolling down your window all the way, putting out a cigarette, discarding any chewing gum and placing your hands on the steering wheel. If it is dark outside, you should turn on your interior vehicle light. You should stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible until the officer directs you to get out. Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer, so you should be prepared to do so. It is important to be honest with the police and to ask for an explanation if something is unclear. Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact.
|
[
"Title: Traffic Stops - What to do if you get pulled over - Police | seattle.gov (www.seattle.gov)\nText: Stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible.\n* If it is dark outside - turn on your interior vehicle light.\n* Follow the directions of the police officer.\n* Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer.\n* Be honest with the police and ask for an explanation if something is unclear.\n* Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact.",
"If you are involved in a traffic stop by a law enforcement officer, there are standard procedures you should follow to ensure your safety and the smooth resolution of the interaction. When a police officer stops your vehicle, they will typically instruct you to remain in your vehicle until they direct you to exit. This is a common protocol to maintain order and safety during the stop. It is generally recommended to comply with the officer's instructions and remain in your vehicle with your hands visible, such as on the steering wheel or in plain sight. This helps to prevent any misinterpretation and allows the officer to assess the situation more effectively.",
"Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: After you've pulled over to a safe spot, you should normally turn off your engine. At this point, you might want to show the officer a few other token courtesies. You have little to lose and perhaps something to gain.\n\n\nRoll down your window all the way. Put out a cigarette if you have one and discard any chewing gum (within the car). You might also want to place your hands on the steering wheel, and, if it's dark, turn on your interior light. These actions will tend to allay any fears the officer might have. After all, police officers have been killed in traffic-stop situations, and the officer's approach to the vehicle is potentially the most dangerous moment.",
"Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: Also, stay in the car until and unless the officer directs you to get out. Finally, don't start rummaging through your back pocket for your wallet and license, or in your glove compartment for your registration, until the officer asks you for them. For all the officer knows, you could be reaching for a weapon.",
"Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: When a police officer begins to pull you over, what you do and say can have a huge effect on any legal proceedings that might follow. Whether the traffic stop ends in a simple moving violation or an arrest for a more serious crime, your choices are critical."
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_wdoc_7b9f7dd7-ff85-4b71-9aba-a62f1900d00d
| 1
| 0.95191
|
generated
|
attributable
|
keep
|
modify_passage-add_relevant_to_claim
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Traffic Stops - What to do if you get pulled over - Police | seattle.gov (www.seattle.gov)\nText: Stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible.\n* If it is dark outside - turn on your interior vehicle light.\n* Follow the directions of the police officer.\n* Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer.\n* Be honest with the police and ask for an explanation if something is unclear.\n* Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact. If you are involved in a traffic stop by a law enforcement officer, there are standard procedures you should follow to ensure your safety and the smooth resolution of the interaction. When a police officer stops your vehicle, they will typically instruct you to remain in your vehicle until they direct you to exit. This is a common protocol to maintain order and safety during the stop. It is generally recommended to comply with the officer's instructions and remain in your vehicle with your hands visible, such as on the steering wheel or in plain sight. This helps to prevent any misinterpretation and allows the officer to assess the situation more effectively. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: After you've pulled over to a safe spot, you should normally turn off your engine. At this point, you might want to show the officer a few other token courtesies. You have little to lose and perhaps something to gain.\n\n\nRoll down your window all the way. Put out a cigarette if you have one and discard any chewing gum (within the car). You might also want to place your hands on the steering wheel, and, if it's dark, turn on your interior light. These actions will tend to allay any fears the officer might have. After all, police officers have been killed in traffic-stop situations, and the officer's approach to the vehicle is potentially the most dangerous moment. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: Also, stay in the car until and unless the officer directs you to get out. Finally, don't start rummaging through your back pocket for your wallet and license, or in your glove compartment for your registration, until the officer asks you for them. For all the officer knows, you could be reaching for a weapon. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: When a police officer begins to pull you over, what you do and say can have a huge effect on any legal proceedings that might follow. Whether the traffic stop ends in a simple moving violation or an arrest for a more serious crime, your choices are critical.. \n hypothesis: You should stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible until the officer directs you to get out.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Traffic Stops - What to do if you get pulled over - Police | seattle.gov (www.seattle.gov)\nText: Stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible.\n* If it is dark outside - turn on your interior vehicle light.\n* Follow the directions of the police officer.\n* Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer.\n* Be honest with the police and ask for an explanation if something is unclear.\n* Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact. If you are involved in a traffic stop by a law enforcement officer, there are standard procedures you should follow to ensure your safety and the smooth resolution of the interaction. When a police officer stops your vehicle, they will typically instruct you to remain in your vehicle until they direct you to exit. This is a common protocol to maintain order and safety during the stop. It is generally recommended to comply with the officer's instructions and remain in your vehicle with your hands visible, such as on the steering wheel or in plain sight. This helps to prevent any misinterpretation and allows the officer to assess the situation more effectively. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: After you've pulled over to a safe spot, you should normally turn off your engine. At this point, you might want to show the officer a few other token courtesies. You have little to lose and perhaps something to gain.\n\n\nRoll down your window all the way. Put out a cigarette if you have one and discard any chewing gum (within the car). You might also want to place your hands on the steering wheel, and, if it's dark, turn on your interior light. These actions will tend to allay any fears the officer might have. After all, police officers have been killed in traffic-stop situations, and the officer's approach to the vehicle is potentially the most dangerous moment. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: Also, stay in the car until and unless the officer directs you to get out. Finally, don't start rummaging through your back pocket for your wallet and license, or in your glove compartment for your registration, until the officer asks you for them. For all the officer knows, you could be reaching for a weapon. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: When a police officer begins to pull you over, what you do and say can have a huge effect on any legal proceedings that might follow. Whether the traffic stop ends in a simple moving violation or an arrest for a more serious crime, your choices are critical.. \n hypothesis: You should stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible until the officer directs you to get out.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Traffic Stops - What to do if you get pulled over - Police | seattle.gov (www.seattle.gov)\nText: Stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible.\n* If it is dark outside - turn on your interior vehicle light.\n* Follow the directions of the police officer.\n* Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer.\n* Be honest with the police and ask for an explanation if something is unclear.\n* Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact. If you are involved in a traffic stop by a law enforcement officer, there are standard procedures you should follow to ensure your safety and the smooth resolution of the interaction. When a police officer stops your vehicle, they will typically instruct you to remain in your vehicle until they direct you to exit. This is a common protocol to maintain order and safety during the stop. It is generally recommended to comply with the officer's instructions and remain in your vehicle with your hands visible, such as on the steering wheel or in plain sight. This helps to prevent any misinterpretation and allows the officer to assess the situation more effectively. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: After you've pulled over to a safe spot, you should normally turn off your engine. At this point, you might want to show the officer a few other token courtesies. You have little to lose and perhaps something to gain.\n\n\nRoll down your window all the way. Put out a cigarette if you have one and discard any chewing gum (within the car). You might also want to place your hands on the steering wheel, and, if it's dark, turn on your interior light. These actions will tend to allay any fears the officer might have. After all, police officers have been killed in traffic-stop situations, and the officer's approach to the vehicle is potentially the most dangerous moment. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: Also, stay in the car until and unless the officer directs you to get out. Finally, don't start rummaging through your back pocket for your wallet and license, or in your glove compartment for your registration, until the officer asks you for them. For all the officer knows, you could be reaching for a weapon. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: When a police officer begins to pull you over, what you do and say can have a huge effect on any legal proceedings that might follow. Whether the traffic stop ends in a simple moving violation or an arrest for a more serious crime, your choices are critical.. \n hypothesis: You should stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible until the officer directs you to get out.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
what do you do if you get pulled over?
|
You should stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible until the officer directs you to get out.
|
You should stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible until the officer directs you to get out.
|
If you get pulled over, the first thing you should do is carefully pull over to a safe spot and turn off your engine. It is important to show the police officer a few token courtesies such as rolling down your window all the way, putting out a cigarette, discarding any chewing gum and placing your hands on the steering wheel. If it is dark outside, you should turn on your interior vehicle light. You should stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible until the officer directs you to get out. Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer, so you should be prepared to do so. It is important to be honest with the police and to ask for an explanation if something is unclear. Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact.
|
[
"Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: Also, stay in the car until and unless the officer directs you to get out. Finally, don't start rummaging through your back pocket for your wallet and license, or in your glove compartment for your registration, until the officer asks you for them. For all the officer knows, you could be reaching for a weapon.",
"\nThe concept of time zones was first proposed by Sir Sandford Fleming in 1879. He suggested dividing the world into 24 time zones, each separated by one hour. This system was adopted internationally in 1884. Time zones are necessary because the Earth rotates from west to east, causing different parts of the world to experience different times. The world's time zones are usually labeled with a letter or number, and some countries use daylight saving time, which temporarily shifts their local time by one hour.\n\nThe shortest war in history was between Britain and Zanzibar on August 27, 1896, and lasted only 38 minutes. Zanzibar surrendered after just 12 minutes of fighting, and the remaining 26 minutes were spent on ceasefire negotiations.",
"Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: After you've pulled over to a safe spot, you should normally turn off your engine. At this point, you might want to show the officer a few other token courtesies. You have little to lose and perhaps something to gain.\n\n\nRoll down your window all the way. Put out a cigarette if you have one and discard any chewing gum (within the car). You might also want to place your hands on the steering wheel, and, if it's dark, turn on your interior light. These actions will tend to allay any fears the officer might have. After all, police officers have been killed in traffic-stop situations, and the officer's approach to the vehicle is potentially the most dangerous moment.",
"Title: Traffic Stops - What to do if you get pulled over - Police | seattle.gov (www.seattle.gov)\nText: Stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible.\n* If it is dark outside - turn on your interior vehicle light.\n* Follow the directions of the police officer.\n* Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer.\n* Be honest with the police and ask for an explanation if something is unclear.\n* Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact.",
"Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: When a police officer begins to pull you over, what you do and say can have a huge effect on any legal proceedings that might follow. Whether the traffic stop ends in a simple moving violation or an arrest for a more serious crime, your choices are critical."
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_wdoc_7b9f7dd7-ff85-4b71-9aba-a62f1900d00d
| 1
| 0.95191
|
generated
|
attributable
|
keep
|
modify_passage-add_irrelevant_to_claim
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: Also, stay in the car until and unless the officer directs you to get out. Finally, don't start rummaging through your back pocket for your wallet and license, or in your glove compartment for your registration, until the officer asks you for them. For all the officer knows, you could be reaching for a weapon. \nThe concept of time zones was first proposed by Sir Sandford Fleming in 1879. He suggested dividing the world into 24 time zones, each separated by one hour. This system was adopted internationally in 1884. Time zones are necessary because the Earth rotates from west to east, causing different parts of the world to experience different times. The world's time zones are usually labeled with a letter or number, and some countries use daylight saving time, which temporarily shifts their local time by one hour.\n\nThe shortest war in history was between Britain and Zanzibar on August 27, 1896, and lasted only 38 minutes. Zanzibar surrendered after just 12 minutes of fighting, and the remaining 26 minutes were spent on ceasefire negotiations. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: After you've pulled over to a safe spot, you should normally turn off your engine. At this point, you might want to show the officer a few other token courtesies. You have little to lose and perhaps something to gain.\n\n\nRoll down your window all the way. Put out a cigarette if you have one and discard any chewing gum (within the car). You might also want to place your hands on the steering wheel, and, if it's dark, turn on your interior light. These actions will tend to allay any fears the officer might have. After all, police officers have been killed in traffic-stop situations, and the officer's approach to the vehicle is potentially the most dangerous moment. Title: Traffic Stops - What to do if you get pulled over - Police | seattle.gov (www.seattle.gov)\nText: Stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible.\n* If it is dark outside - turn on your interior vehicle light.\n* Follow the directions of the police officer.\n* Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer.\n* Be honest with the police and ask for an explanation if something is unclear.\n* Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: When a police officer begins to pull you over, what you do and say can have a huge effect on any legal proceedings that might follow. Whether the traffic stop ends in a simple moving violation or an arrest for a more serious crime, your choices are critical.. \n hypothesis: You should stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible until the officer directs you to get out.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: Also, stay in the car until and unless the officer directs you to get out. Finally, don't start rummaging through your back pocket for your wallet and license, or in your glove compartment for your registration, until the officer asks you for them. For all the officer knows, you could be reaching for a weapon. \nThe concept of time zones was first proposed by Sir Sandford Fleming in 1879. He suggested dividing the world into 24 time zones, each separated by one hour. This system was adopted internationally in 1884. Time zones are necessary because the Earth rotates from west to east, causing different parts of the world to experience different times. The world's time zones are usually labeled with a letter or number, and some countries use daylight saving time, which temporarily shifts their local time by one hour.\n\nThe shortest war in history was between Britain and Zanzibar on August 27, 1896, and lasted only 38 minutes. Zanzibar surrendered after just 12 minutes of fighting, and the remaining 26 minutes were spent on ceasefire negotiations. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: After you've pulled over to a safe spot, you should normally turn off your engine. At this point, you might want to show the officer a few other token courtesies. You have little to lose and perhaps something to gain.\n\n\nRoll down your window all the way. Put out a cigarette if you have one and discard any chewing gum (within the car). You might also want to place your hands on the steering wheel, and, if it's dark, turn on your interior light. These actions will tend to allay any fears the officer might have. After all, police officers have been killed in traffic-stop situations, and the officer's approach to the vehicle is potentially the most dangerous moment. Title: Traffic Stops - What to do if you get pulled over - Police | seattle.gov (www.seattle.gov)\nText: Stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible.\n* If it is dark outside - turn on your interior vehicle light.\n* Follow the directions of the police officer.\n* Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer.\n* Be honest with the police and ask for an explanation if something is unclear.\n* Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: When a police officer begins to pull you over, what you do and say can have a huge effect on any legal proceedings that might follow. Whether the traffic stop ends in a simple moving violation or an arrest for a more serious crime, your choices are critical.. \n hypothesis: You should stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible until the officer directs you to get out.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: Also, stay in the car until and unless the officer directs you to get out. Finally, don't start rummaging through your back pocket for your wallet and license, or in your glove compartment for your registration, until the officer asks you for them. For all the officer knows, you could be reaching for a weapon. \nThe concept of time zones was first proposed by Sir Sandford Fleming in 1879. He suggested dividing the world into 24 time zones, each separated by one hour. This system was adopted internationally in 1884. Time zones are necessary because the Earth rotates from west to east, causing different parts of the world to experience different times. The world's time zones are usually labeled with a letter or number, and some countries use daylight saving time, which temporarily shifts their local time by one hour.\n\nThe shortest war in history was between Britain and Zanzibar on August 27, 1896, and lasted only 38 minutes. Zanzibar surrendered after just 12 minutes of fighting, and the remaining 26 minutes were spent on ceasefire negotiations. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: After you've pulled over to a safe spot, you should normally turn off your engine. At this point, you might want to show the officer a few other token courtesies. You have little to lose and perhaps something to gain.\n\n\nRoll down your window all the way. Put out a cigarette if you have one and discard any chewing gum (within the car). You might also want to place your hands on the steering wheel, and, if it's dark, turn on your interior light. These actions will tend to allay any fears the officer might have. After all, police officers have been killed in traffic-stop situations, and the officer's approach to the vehicle is potentially the most dangerous moment. Title: Traffic Stops - What to do if you get pulled over - Police | seattle.gov (www.seattle.gov)\nText: Stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible.\n* If it is dark outside - turn on your interior vehicle light.\n* Follow the directions of the police officer.\n* Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer.\n* Be honest with the police and ask for an explanation if something is unclear.\n* Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: When a police officer begins to pull you over, what you do and say can have a huge effect on any legal proceedings that might follow. Whether the traffic stop ends in a simple moving violation or an arrest for a more serious crime, your choices are critical.. \n hypothesis: You should stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible until the officer directs you to get out.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
what do you do if you get pulled over?
|
You should stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible until the officer directs you to get out.
|
You should stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible until the officer directs you to get out.
|
If you get pulled over, the first thing you should do is carefully pull over to a safe spot and turn off your engine. It is important to show the police officer a few token courtesies such as rolling down your window all the way, putting out a cigarette, discarding any chewing gum and placing your hands on the steering wheel. If it is dark outside, you should turn on your interior vehicle light. You should stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible until the officer directs you to get out. Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer, so you should be prepared to do so. It is important to be honest with the police and to ask for an explanation if something is unclear. Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact.
|
[
"inally, be prepared to provide your license, registration, and proof of insurance as soon as the officer requests it. Don't wait for them to ask, as this may raise suspicion.",
"Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: Also, stay in the car until and unless the officer directs you to get out. Finally, don't start rummaging through your back pocket for your wallet and license, or in your glove compartment for your registration, until the officer asks you for them. For all the officer knows, you could be reaching for a weapon.",
"Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: When a police officer begins to pull you over, what you do and say can have a huge effect on any legal proceedings that might follow. Whether the traffic stop ends in a simple moving violation or an arrest for a more serious crime, your choices are critical.",
"Title: Traffic Stops - What to do if you get pulled over - Police | seattle.gov (www.seattle.gov)\nText: Stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible.\n* If it is dark outside - turn on your interior vehicle light.\n* Follow the directions of the police officer.\n* Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer.\n* Be honest with the police and ask for an explanation if something is unclear.\n* Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact.",
"Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: After you've pulled over to a safe spot, you should normally turn off your engine. At this point, you might want to show the officer a few other token courtesies. You have little to lose and perhaps something to gain.\n\n\nRoll down your window all the way. Put out a cigarette if you have one and discard any chewing gum (within the car). You might also want to place your hands on the steering wheel, and, if it's dark, turn on your interior light. These actions will tend to allay any fears the officer might have. After all, police officers have been killed in traffic-stop situations, and the officer's approach to the vehicle is potentially the most dangerous moment."
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_wdoc_7b9f7dd7-ff85-4b71-9aba-a62f1900d00d
| 1
| 0.95191
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
modify_passage-add_contradiction
|
[
{
"content": "premise: inally, be prepared to provide your license, registration, and proof of insurance as soon as the officer requests it. Don't wait for them to ask, as this may raise suspicion. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: Also, stay in the car until and unless the officer directs you to get out. Finally, don't start rummaging through your back pocket for your wallet and license, or in your glove compartment for your registration, until the officer asks you for them. For all the officer knows, you could be reaching for a weapon. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: When a police officer begins to pull you over, what you do and say can have a huge effect on any legal proceedings that might follow. Whether the traffic stop ends in a simple moving violation or an arrest for a more serious crime, your choices are critical. Title: Traffic Stops - What to do if you get pulled over - Police | seattle.gov (www.seattle.gov)\nText: Stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible.\n* If it is dark outside - turn on your interior vehicle light.\n* Follow the directions of the police officer.\n* Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer.\n* Be honest with the police and ask for an explanation if something is unclear.\n* Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: After you've pulled over to a safe spot, you should normally turn off your engine. At this point, you might want to show the officer a few other token courtesies. You have little to lose and perhaps something to gain.\n\n\nRoll down your window all the way. Put out a cigarette if you have one and discard any chewing gum (within the car). You might also want to place your hands on the steering wheel, and, if it's dark, turn on your interior light. These actions will tend to allay any fears the officer might have. After all, police officers have been killed in traffic-stop situations, and the officer's approach to the vehicle is potentially the most dangerous moment.. \n hypothesis: You should stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible until the officer directs you to get out.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: inally, be prepared to provide your license, registration, and proof of insurance as soon as the officer requests it. Don't wait for them to ask, as this may raise suspicion. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: Also, stay in the car until and unless the officer directs you to get out. Finally, don't start rummaging through your back pocket for your wallet and license, or in your glove compartment for your registration, until the officer asks you for them. For all the officer knows, you could be reaching for a weapon. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: When a police officer begins to pull you over, what you do and say can have a huge effect on any legal proceedings that might follow. Whether the traffic stop ends in a simple moving violation or an arrest for a more serious crime, your choices are critical. Title: Traffic Stops - What to do if you get pulled over - Police | seattle.gov (www.seattle.gov)\nText: Stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible.\n* If it is dark outside - turn on your interior vehicle light.\n* Follow the directions of the police officer.\n* Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer.\n* Be honest with the police and ask for an explanation if something is unclear.\n* Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: After you've pulled over to a safe spot, you should normally turn off your engine. At this point, you might want to show the officer a few other token courtesies. You have little to lose and perhaps something to gain.\n\n\nRoll down your window all the way. Put out a cigarette if you have one and discard any chewing gum (within the car). You might also want to place your hands on the steering wheel, and, if it's dark, turn on your interior light. These actions will tend to allay any fears the officer might have. After all, police officers have been killed in traffic-stop situations, and the officer's approach to the vehicle is potentially the most dangerous moment.. \n hypothesis: You should stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible until the officer directs you to get out.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: inally, be prepared to provide your license, registration, and proof of insurance as soon as the officer requests it. Don't wait for them to ask, as this may raise suspicion. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: Also, stay in the car until and unless the officer directs you to get out. Finally, don't start rummaging through your back pocket for your wallet and license, or in your glove compartment for your registration, until the officer asks you for them. For all the officer knows, you could be reaching for a weapon. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: When a police officer begins to pull you over, what you do and say can have a huge effect on any legal proceedings that might follow. Whether the traffic stop ends in a simple moving violation or an arrest for a more serious crime, your choices are critical. Title: Traffic Stops - What to do if you get pulled over - Police | seattle.gov (www.seattle.gov)\nText: Stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible.\n* If it is dark outside - turn on your interior vehicle light.\n* Follow the directions of the police officer.\n* Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer.\n* Be honest with the police and ask for an explanation if something is unclear.\n* Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: After you've pulled over to a safe spot, you should normally turn off your engine. At this point, you might want to show the officer a few other token courtesies. You have little to lose and perhaps something to gain.\n\n\nRoll down your window all the way. Put out a cigarette if you have one and discard any chewing gum (within the car). You might also want to place your hands on the steering wheel, and, if it's dark, turn on your interior light. These actions will tend to allay any fears the officer might have. After all, police officers have been killed in traffic-stop situations, and the officer's approach to the vehicle is potentially the most dangerous moment.. \n hypothesis: You should stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible until the officer directs you to get out.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
what do you do if you get pulled over?
|
You should stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible until the officer directs you to get out.
|
You should stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible until the officer directs you to get out.
|
If you get pulled over, the first thing you should do is carefully pull over to a safe spot and turn off your engine. It is important to show the police officer a few token courtesies such as rolling down your window all the way, putting out a cigarette, discarding any chewing gum and placing your hands on the steering wheel. If it is dark outside, you should turn on your interior vehicle light. You should stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible until the officer directs you to get out. Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer, so you should be prepared to do so. It is important to be honest with the police and to ask for an explanation if something is unclear. Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact.
|
[
"Title: Traffic Stops - What to do if you get pulled over - Police | seattle.gov (www.seattle.gov)\nText: Stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible.\n* If it is dark outside - turn on your interior vehicle light.\n* Follow the directions of the police officer.\n* Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer.\n* Be honest with the police and ask for an explanation if something is unclear.\n* Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact.",
"Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: After you've pulled over to a safe spot, you should normally turn off your engine. At this point, you might want to show the officer a few other token courtesies. You have little to lose and perhaps something to gain.\n\n\nRoll down your window all the way. Put out a cigarette if you have one and discard any chewing gum (within the car). You might also want to place your hands on the steering wheel, and, if it's dark, turn on your interior light. These actions will tend to allay any fears the officer might have. After all, police officers have been killed in traffic-stop situations, and the officer's approach to the vehicle is potentially the most dangerous moment.",
"Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: When a police officer begins to pull you over, what you do and say can have a huge effect on any legal proceedings that might follow. Whether the traffic stop ends in a simple moving violation or an arrest for a more serious crime, your choices are critical.",
"dditionally, the officer may request you to exit the vehicle for safety reasons or to conduct a search of the vehicle. In such cases, it's best to comply with the officer's instructions to avoid any escalation of the situation.",
"Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: Also, stay in the car until and unless the officer directs you to get out. Finally, don't start rummaging through your back pocket for your wallet and license, or in your glove compartment for your registration, until the officer asks you for them. For all the officer knows, you could be reaching for a weapon."
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_wdoc_7b9f7dd7-ff85-4b71-9aba-a62f1900d00d
| 1
| 0.95191
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
modify_passage-add_conflicting_sources
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Traffic Stops - What to do if you get pulled over - Police | seattle.gov (www.seattle.gov)\nText: Stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible.\n* If it is dark outside - turn on your interior vehicle light.\n* Follow the directions of the police officer.\n* Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer.\n* Be honest with the police and ask for an explanation if something is unclear.\n* Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: After you've pulled over to a safe spot, you should normally turn off your engine. At this point, you might want to show the officer a few other token courtesies. You have little to lose and perhaps something to gain.\n\n\nRoll down your window all the way. Put out a cigarette if you have one and discard any chewing gum (within the car). You might also want to place your hands on the steering wheel, and, if it's dark, turn on your interior light. These actions will tend to allay any fears the officer might have. After all, police officers have been killed in traffic-stop situations, and the officer's approach to the vehicle is potentially the most dangerous moment. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: When a police officer begins to pull you over, what you do and say can have a huge effect on any legal proceedings that might follow. Whether the traffic stop ends in a simple moving violation or an arrest for a more serious crime, your choices are critical. dditionally, the officer may request you to exit the vehicle for safety reasons or to conduct a search of the vehicle. In such cases, it's best to comply with the officer's instructions to avoid any escalation of the situation. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: Also, stay in the car until and unless the officer directs you to get out. Finally, don't start rummaging through your back pocket for your wallet and license, or in your glove compartment for your registration, until the officer asks you for them. For all the officer knows, you could be reaching for a weapon.. \n hypothesis: You should stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible until the officer directs you to get out.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Traffic Stops - What to do if you get pulled over - Police | seattle.gov (www.seattle.gov)\nText: Stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible.\n* If it is dark outside - turn on your interior vehicle light.\n* Follow the directions of the police officer.\n* Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer.\n* Be honest with the police and ask for an explanation if something is unclear.\n* Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: After you've pulled over to a safe spot, you should normally turn off your engine. At this point, you might want to show the officer a few other token courtesies. You have little to lose and perhaps something to gain.\n\n\nRoll down your window all the way. Put out a cigarette if you have one and discard any chewing gum (within the car). You might also want to place your hands on the steering wheel, and, if it's dark, turn on your interior light. These actions will tend to allay any fears the officer might have. After all, police officers have been killed in traffic-stop situations, and the officer's approach to the vehicle is potentially the most dangerous moment. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: When a police officer begins to pull you over, what you do and say can have a huge effect on any legal proceedings that might follow. Whether the traffic stop ends in a simple moving violation or an arrest for a more serious crime, your choices are critical. dditionally, the officer may request you to exit the vehicle for safety reasons or to conduct a search of the vehicle. In such cases, it's best to comply with the officer's instructions to avoid any escalation of the situation. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: Also, stay in the car until and unless the officer directs you to get out. Finally, don't start rummaging through your back pocket for your wallet and license, or in your glove compartment for your registration, until the officer asks you for them. For all the officer knows, you could be reaching for a weapon.. \n hypothesis: You should stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible until the officer directs you to get out.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Traffic Stops - What to do if you get pulled over - Police | seattle.gov (www.seattle.gov)\nText: Stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible.\n* If it is dark outside - turn on your interior vehicle light.\n* Follow the directions of the police officer.\n* Washington law requires drivers to show their license, registration and proof of insurance upon request from a police officer.\n* Be honest with the police and ask for an explanation if something is unclear.\n* Accepting a citation is not an admission of guilt and you will have the opportunity to contest the citation in court after the fact. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: After you've pulled over to a safe spot, you should normally turn off your engine. At this point, you might want to show the officer a few other token courtesies. You have little to lose and perhaps something to gain.\n\n\nRoll down your window all the way. Put out a cigarette if you have one and discard any chewing gum (within the car). You might also want to place your hands on the steering wheel, and, if it's dark, turn on your interior light. These actions will tend to allay any fears the officer might have. After all, police officers have been killed in traffic-stop situations, and the officer's approach to the vehicle is potentially the most dangerous moment. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: When a police officer begins to pull you over, what you do and say can have a huge effect on any legal proceedings that might follow. Whether the traffic stop ends in a simple moving violation or an arrest for a more serious crime, your choices are critical. dditionally, the officer may request you to exit the vehicle for safety reasons or to conduct a search of the vehicle. In such cases, it's best to comply with the officer's instructions to avoid any escalation of the situation. Title: Police Stops: What to Do If You Are Pulled Over | Nolo (www.nolo.com)\nText: Also, stay in the car until and unless the officer directs you to get out. Finally, don't start rummaging through your back pocket for your wallet and license, or in your glove compartment for your registration, until the officer asks you for them. For all the officer knows, you could be reaching for a weapon.. \n hypothesis: You should stay in your vehicle and keep your hands visible until the officer directs you to get out.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
Why is Allah translated as god in subtitles yet is basically just referred to as Allah outside of the translation
|
It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term.
|
It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term.
|
The name Allah is the Arabic word for God and has been used since pre-Islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. It is derived from the earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). It is interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion, so using the name Allah is also acceptable. The difference in using Allah versus God in translation is partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to "Tanrı", in Persian it is translated to "خدا" and so on in other languages. In the Navigators’ article, it is stated that for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. This implies that using Allah in translation is the most accurate when referring to God in an Arabic context. Therefore, it is understandable why Allah is translated as God in subtitles yet is basically just referred to as Allah outside of the translation. It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term.
|
[
"Title: Glossary of Islamic Terms and Phrases (A-Z) - My Islam (myislam.org)\nText: Used in English is the word for God. However, the word Allah has been used since pre-islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. You can trace by the name’s origin to earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). There are 99 other ways to call God by, these are the 99 names of Allah and are used to describe all his attributes.",
"Title: asma ul husna - Why do some Muslims refer to God as 'Allah' in English? - Islam Stack Exchange (islam.stackexchange.com)\nText: God has many names and it is clear from Quran that 'Allah' is the same as God worshiped by Christians and Jews. So using those names for him are also fine. The practice of using 'Allah' in translated text seems to be partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to \"Tanrı\", in Persian it is translated to \"خدا\" and so on in other languages.",
"Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: “A llah” is the Arabic word for “God” and has been so long before the existence of Islam. Long before the Arabic false prophet Muhammad was born, the name Allah was used by both Jews and Arab Christians to refer to the one true god. The names “Allah” and “God” are generally interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion. Some English translations of the Qu’ran (Koran) use the name “God,” others use “Allah.” This sometimes comes as a surprise to Christians who were raised in Western cultures. Many ex-Muslim converts to Christianity commonly refer to God as “Allah.” These converts clearly recognize the major differences in the character and nature of God and His plan as described by the Old and New Testament, in contrast to that of Islamic writings.",
"Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: The Navigators, a well-known evangelical Christian organization, published the following:\n\n\n> “…It’s interesting to observe that, in rejecting the Athenian’s erroneous concept of God, Paul did not reject the word they used for God, Theos, which was the common Greek word for God.\n>\n> Some Christians unthinkingly say ‘Allah is not God.’ This is the ultimate blasphemy to Muslims, and furthermore, it is difficult to understand. Allah is the primary Arabic word for God. It means ‘The God.’ There are some minor exceptions. For example, the Bible in some Muslim lands uses a word for God other than Allah (Farsi and Urdu are examples). But for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. How, then, can we say that Allah is an invalid name for God? If it is, to whom have these Jews and Christians been praying?"
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_wdoc_f9abdf65-86c1-4930-8b92-801103f1d511
| 1
| 0.701846
|
hard_positive
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Glossary of Islamic Terms and Phrases (A-Z) - My Islam (myislam.org)\nText: Used in English is the word for God. However, the word Allah has been used since pre-islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. You can trace by the name’s origin to earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). There are 99 other ways to call God by, these are the 99 names of Allah and are used to describe all his attributes. Title: asma ul husna - Why do some Muslims refer to God as 'Allah' in English? - Islam Stack Exchange (islam.stackexchange.com)\nText: God has many names and it is clear from Quran that 'Allah' is the same as God worshiped by Christians and Jews. So using those names for him are also fine. The practice of using 'Allah' in translated text seems to be partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to \"Tanrı\", in Persian it is translated to \"خدا\" and so on in other languages. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: “A llah” is the Arabic word for “God” and has been so long before the existence of Islam. Long before the Arabic false prophet Muhammad was born, the name Allah was used by both Jews and Arab Christians to refer to the one true god. The names “Allah” and “God” are generally interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion. Some English translations of the Qu’ran (Koran) use the name “God,” others use “Allah.” This sometimes comes as a surprise to Christians who were raised in Western cultures. Many ex-Muslim converts to Christianity commonly refer to God as “Allah.” These converts clearly recognize the major differences in the character and nature of God and His plan as described by the Old and New Testament, in contrast to that of Islamic writings. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: The Navigators, a well-known evangelical Christian organization, published the following:\n\n\n> “…It’s interesting to observe that, in rejecting the Athenian’s erroneous concept of God, Paul did not reject the word they used for God, Theos, which was the common Greek word for God.\n>\n> Some Christians unthinkingly say ‘Allah is not God.’ This is the ultimate blasphemy to Muslims, and furthermore, it is difficult to understand. Allah is the primary Arabic word for God. It means ‘The God.’ There are some minor exceptions. For example, the Bible in some Muslim lands uses a word for God other than Allah (Farsi and Urdu are examples). But for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. How, then, can we say that Allah is an invalid name for God? If it is, to whom have these Jews and Christians been praying?. \n hypothesis: It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Glossary of Islamic Terms and Phrases (A-Z) - My Islam (myislam.org)\nText: Used in English is the word for God. However, the word Allah has been used since pre-islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. You can trace by the name’s origin to earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). There are 99 other ways to call God by, these are the 99 names of Allah and are used to describe all his attributes. Title: asma ul husna - Why do some Muslims refer to God as 'Allah' in English? - Islam Stack Exchange (islam.stackexchange.com)\nText: God has many names and it is clear from Quran that 'Allah' is the same as God worshiped by Christians and Jews. So using those names for him are also fine. The practice of using 'Allah' in translated text seems to be partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to \"Tanrı\", in Persian it is translated to \"خدا\" and so on in other languages. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: “A llah” is the Arabic word for “God” and has been so long before the existence of Islam. Long before the Arabic false prophet Muhammad was born, the name Allah was used by both Jews and Arab Christians to refer to the one true god. The names “Allah” and “God” are generally interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion. Some English translations of the Qu’ran (Koran) use the name “God,” others use “Allah.” This sometimes comes as a surprise to Christians who were raised in Western cultures. Many ex-Muslim converts to Christianity commonly refer to God as “Allah.” These converts clearly recognize the major differences in the character and nature of God and His plan as described by the Old and New Testament, in contrast to that of Islamic writings. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: The Navigators, a well-known evangelical Christian organization, published the following:\n\n\n> “…It’s interesting to observe that, in rejecting the Athenian’s erroneous concept of God, Paul did not reject the word they used for God, Theos, which was the common Greek word for God.\n>\n> Some Christians unthinkingly say ‘Allah is not God.’ This is the ultimate blasphemy to Muslims, and furthermore, it is difficult to understand. Allah is the primary Arabic word for God. It means ‘The God.’ There are some minor exceptions. For example, the Bible in some Muslim lands uses a word for God other than Allah (Farsi and Urdu are examples). But for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. How, then, can we say that Allah is an invalid name for God? If it is, to whom have these Jews and Christians been praying?. \n hypothesis: It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Glossary of Islamic Terms and Phrases (A-Z) - My Islam (myislam.org)\nText: Used in English is the word for God. However, the word Allah has been used since pre-islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. You can trace by the name’s origin to earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). There are 99 other ways to call God by, these are the 99 names of Allah and are used to describe all his attributes. Title: asma ul husna - Why do some Muslims refer to God as 'Allah' in English? - Islam Stack Exchange (islam.stackexchange.com)\nText: God has many names and it is clear from Quran that 'Allah' is the same as God worshiped by Christians and Jews. So using those names for him are also fine. The practice of using 'Allah' in translated text seems to be partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to \"Tanrı\", in Persian it is translated to \"خدا\" and so on in other languages. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: “A llah” is the Arabic word for “God” and has been so long before the existence of Islam. Long before the Arabic false prophet Muhammad was born, the name Allah was used by both Jews and Arab Christians to refer to the one true god. The names “Allah” and “God” are generally interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion. Some English translations of the Qu’ran (Koran) use the name “God,” others use “Allah.” This sometimes comes as a surprise to Christians who were raised in Western cultures. Many ex-Muslim converts to Christianity commonly refer to God as “Allah.” These converts clearly recognize the major differences in the character and nature of God and His plan as described by the Old and New Testament, in contrast to that of Islamic writings. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: The Navigators, a well-known evangelical Christian organization, published the following:\n\n\n> “…It’s interesting to observe that, in rejecting the Athenian’s erroneous concept of God, Paul did not reject the word they used for God, Theos, which was the common Greek word for God.\n>\n> Some Christians unthinkingly say ‘Allah is not God.’ This is the ultimate blasphemy to Muslims, and furthermore, it is difficult to understand. Allah is the primary Arabic word for God. It means ‘The God.’ There are some minor exceptions. For example, the Bible in some Muslim lands uses a word for God other than Allah (Farsi and Urdu are examples). But for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. How, then, can we say that Allah is an invalid name for God? If it is, to whom have these Jews and Christians been praying?. \n hypothesis: It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
|||
Why is Allah translated as god in subtitles yet is basically just referred to as Allah outside of the translation
|
It is not an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a less culturally appropriate term.
|
It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term.
|
The name Allah is the Arabic word for God and has been used since pre-Islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. It is derived from the earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). It is interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion, so using the name Allah is also acceptable. The difference in using Allah versus God in translation is partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to "Tanrı", in Persian it is translated to "خدا" and so on in other languages. In the Navigators’ article, it is stated that for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. This implies that using Allah in translation is the most accurate when referring to God in an Arabic context. Therefore, it is understandable why Allah is translated as God in subtitles yet is basically just referred to as Allah outside of the translation. It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term.
|
[
"Title: Glossary of Islamic Terms and Phrases (A-Z) - My Islam (myislam.org)\nText: Used in English is the word for God. However, the word Allah has been used since pre-islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. You can trace by the name’s origin to earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). There are 99 other ways to call God by, these are the 99 names of Allah and are used to describe all his attributes.",
"Title: asma ul husna - Why do some Muslims refer to God as 'Allah' in English? - Islam Stack Exchange (islam.stackexchange.com)\nText: God has many names and it is clear from Quran that 'Allah' is the same as God worshiped by Christians and Jews. So using those names for him are also fine. The practice of using 'Allah' in translated text seems to be partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to \"Tanrı\", in Persian it is translated to \"خدا\" and so on in other languages.",
"Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: “A llah” is the Arabic word for “God” and has been so long before the existence of Islam. Long before the Arabic false prophet Muhammad was born, the name Allah was used by both Jews and Arab Christians to refer to the one true god. The names “Allah” and “God” are generally interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion. Some English translations of the Qu’ran (Koran) use the name “God,” others use “Allah.” This sometimes comes as a surprise to Christians who were raised in Western cultures. Many ex-Muslim converts to Christianity commonly refer to God as “Allah.” These converts clearly recognize the major differences in the character and nature of God and His plan as described by the Old and New Testament, in contrast to that of Islamic writings.",
"Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: The Navigators, a well-known evangelical Christian organization, published the following:\n\n\n> “…It’s interesting to observe that, in rejecting the Athenian’s erroneous concept of God, Paul did not reject the word they used for God, Theos, which was the common Greek word for God.\n>\n> Some Christians unthinkingly say ‘Allah is not God.’ This is the ultimate blasphemy to Muslims, and furthermore, it is difficult to understand. Allah is the primary Arabic word for God. It means ‘The God.’ There are some minor exceptions. For example, the Bible in some Muslim lands uses a word for God other than Allah (Farsi and Urdu are examples). But for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. How, then, can we say that Allah is an invalid name for God? If it is, to whom have these Jews and Christians been praying?"
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_wdoc_f9abdf65-86c1-4930-8b92-801103f1d511
| 1
| 0.701846
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
claim_negation
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Glossary of Islamic Terms and Phrases (A-Z) - My Islam (myislam.org)\nText: Used in English is the word for God. However, the word Allah has been used since pre-islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. You can trace by the name’s origin to earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). There are 99 other ways to call God by, these are the 99 names of Allah and are used to describe all his attributes. Title: asma ul husna - Why do some Muslims refer to God as 'Allah' in English? - Islam Stack Exchange (islam.stackexchange.com)\nText: God has many names and it is clear from Quran that 'Allah' is the same as God worshiped by Christians and Jews. So using those names for him are also fine. The practice of using 'Allah' in translated text seems to be partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to \"Tanrı\", in Persian it is translated to \"خدا\" and so on in other languages. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: “A llah” is the Arabic word for “God” and has been so long before the existence of Islam. Long before the Arabic false prophet Muhammad was born, the name Allah was used by both Jews and Arab Christians to refer to the one true god. The names “Allah” and “God” are generally interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion. Some English translations of the Qu’ran (Koran) use the name “God,” others use “Allah.” This sometimes comes as a surprise to Christians who were raised in Western cultures. Many ex-Muslim converts to Christianity commonly refer to God as “Allah.” These converts clearly recognize the major differences in the character and nature of God and His plan as described by the Old and New Testament, in contrast to that of Islamic writings. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: The Navigators, a well-known evangelical Christian organization, published the following:\n\n\n> “…It’s interesting to observe that, in rejecting the Athenian’s erroneous concept of God, Paul did not reject the word they used for God, Theos, which was the common Greek word for God.\n>\n> Some Christians unthinkingly say ‘Allah is not God.’ This is the ultimate blasphemy to Muslims, and furthermore, it is difficult to understand. Allah is the primary Arabic word for God. It means ‘The God.’ There are some minor exceptions. For example, the Bible in some Muslim lands uses a word for God other than Allah (Farsi and Urdu are examples). But for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. How, then, can we say that Allah is an invalid name for God? If it is, to whom have these Jews and Christians been praying?. \n hypothesis: It is not an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a less culturally appropriate term.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Glossary of Islamic Terms and Phrases (A-Z) - My Islam (myislam.org)\nText: Used in English is the word for God. However, the word Allah has been used since pre-islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. You can trace by the name’s origin to earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). There are 99 other ways to call God by, these are the 99 names of Allah and are used to describe all his attributes. Title: asma ul husna - Why do some Muslims refer to God as 'Allah' in English? - Islam Stack Exchange (islam.stackexchange.com)\nText: God has many names and it is clear from Quran that 'Allah' is the same as God worshiped by Christians and Jews. So using those names for him are also fine. The practice of using 'Allah' in translated text seems to be partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to \"Tanrı\", in Persian it is translated to \"خدا\" and so on in other languages. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: “A llah” is the Arabic word for “God” and has been so long before the existence of Islam. Long before the Arabic false prophet Muhammad was born, the name Allah was used by both Jews and Arab Christians to refer to the one true god. The names “Allah” and “God” are generally interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion. Some English translations of the Qu’ran (Koran) use the name “God,” others use “Allah.” This sometimes comes as a surprise to Christians who were raised in Western cultures. Many ex-Muslim converts to Christianity commonly refer to God as “Allah.” These converts clearly recognize the major differences in the character and nature of God and His plan as described by the Old and New Testament, in contrast to that of Islamic writings. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: The Navigators, a well-known evangelical Christian organization, published the following:\n\n\n> “…It’s interesting to observe that, in rejecting the Athenian’s erroneous concept of God, Paul did not reject the word they used for God, Theos, which was the common Greek word for God.\n>\n> Some Christians unthinkingly say ‘Allah is not God.’ This is the ultimate blasphemy to Muslims, and furthermore, it is difficult to understand. Allah is the primary Arabic word for God. It means ‘The God.’ There are some minor exceptions. For example, the Bible in some Muslim lands uses a word for God other than Allah (Farsi and Urdu are examples). But for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. How, then, can we say that Allah is an invalid name for God? If it is, to whom have these Jews and Christians been praying?. \n hypothesis: It is not an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a less culturally appropriate term.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Glossary of Islamic Terms and Phrases (A-Z) - My Islam (myislam.org)\nText: Used in English is the word for God. However, the word Allah has been used since pre-islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. You can trace by the name’s origin to earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). There are 99 other ways to call God by, these are the 99 names of Allah and are used to describe all his attributes. Title: asma ul husna - Why do some Muslims refer to God as 'Allah' in English? - Islam Stack Exchange (islam.stackexchange.com)\nText: God has many names and it is clear from Quran that 'Allah' is the same as God worshiped by Christians and Jews. So using those names for him are also fine. The practice of using 'Allah' in translated text seems to be partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to \"Tanrı\", in Persian it is translated to \"خدا\" and so on in other languages. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: “A llah” is the Arabic word for “God” and has been so long before the existence of Islam. Long before the Arabic false prophet Muhammad was born, the name Allah was used by both Jews and Arab Christians to refer to the one true god. The names “Allah” and “God” are generally interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion. Some English translations of the Qu’ran (Koran) use the name “God,” others use “Allah.” This sometimes comes as a surprise to Christians who were raised in Western cultures. Many ex-Muslim converts to Christianity commonly refer to God as “Allah.” These converts clearly recognize the major differences in the character and nature of God and His plan as described by the Old and New Testament, in contrast to that of Islamic writings. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: The Navigators, a well-known evangelical Christian organization, published the following:\n\n\n> “…It’s interesting to observe that, in rejecting the Athenian’s erroneous concept of God, Paul did not reject the word they used for God, Theos, which was the common Greek word for God.\n>\n> Some Christians unthinkingly say ‘Allah is not God.’ This is the ultimate blasphemy to Muslims, and furthermore, it is difficult to understand. Allah is the primary Arabic word for God. It means ‘The God.’ There are some minor exceptions. For example, the Bible in some Muslim lands uses a word for God other than Allah (Farsi and Urdu are examples). But for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. How, then, can we say that Allah is an invalid name for God? If it is, to whom have these Jews and Christians been praying?. \n hypothesis: It is not an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a less culturally appropriate term.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
Why is Allah translated as god in subtitles yet is basically just referred to as Allah outside of the translation
|
It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East, and is a more culturally appropriate term.
|
It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term.
|
The name Allah is the Arabic word for God and has been used since pre-Islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. It is derived from the earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). It is interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion, so using the name Allah is also acceptable. The difference in using Allah versus God in translation is partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to "Tanrı", in Persian it is translated to "خدا" and so on in other languages. In the Navigators’ article, it is stated that for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. This implies that using Allah in translation is the most accurate when referring to God in an Arabic context. Therefore, it is understandable why Allah is translated as God in subtitles yet is basically just referred to as Allah outside of the translation. It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term.
|
[
"Title: Glossary of Islamic Terms and Phrases (A-Z) - My Islam (myislam.org)\nText: Used in English is the word for God. However, the word Allah has been used since pre-islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. You can trace by the name’s origin to earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). There are 99 other ways to call God by, these are the 99 names of Allah and are used to describe all his attributes.",
"Title: asma ul husna - Why do some Muslims refer to God as 'Allah' in English? - Islam Stack Exchange (islam.stackexchange.com)\nText: God has many names and it is clear from Quran that 'Allah' is the same as God worshiped by Christians and Jews. So using those names for him are also fine. The practice of using 'Allah' in translated text seems to be partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to \"Tanrı\", in Persian it is translated to \"خدا\" and so on in other languages.",
"Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: “A llah” is the Arabic word for “God” and has been so long before the existence of Islam. Long before the Arabic false prophet Muhammad was born, the name Allah was used by both Jews and Arab Christians to refer to the one true god. The names “Allah” and “God” are generally interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion. Some English translations of the Qu’ran (Koran) use the name “God,” others use “Allah.” This sometimes comes as a surprise to Christians who were raised in Western cultures. Many ex-Muslim converts to Christianity commonly refer to God as “Allah.” These converts clearly recognize the major differences in the character and nature of God and His plan as described by the Old and New Testament, in contrast to that of Islamic writings.",
"Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: The Navigators, a well-known evangelical Christian organization, published the following:\n\n\n> “…It’s interesting to observe that, in rejecting the Athenian’s erroneous concept of God, Paul did not reject the word they used for God, Theos, which was the common Greek word for God.\n>\n> Some Christians unthinkingly say ‘Allah is not God.’ This is the ultimate blasphemy to Muslims, and furthermore, it is difficult to understand. Allah is the primary Arabic word for God. It means ‘The God.’ There are some minor exceptions. For example, the Bible in some Muslim lands uses a word for God other than Allah (Farsi and Urdu are examples). But for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. How, then, can we say that Allah is an invalid name for God? If it is, to whom have these Jews and Christians been praying?"
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_wdoc_f9abdf65-86c1-4930-8b92-801103f1d511
| 1
| 0.701846
|
generated
|
attributable
|
keep
|
claim_reformulation
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Glossary of Islamic Terms and Phrases (A-Z) - My Islam (myislam.org)\nText: Used in English is the word for God. However, the word Allah has been used since pre-islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. You can trace by the name’s origin to earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). There are 99 other ways to call God by, these are the 99 names of Allah and are used to describe all his attributes. Title: asma ul husna - Why do some Muslims refer to God as 'Allah' in English? - Islam Stack Exchange (islam.stackexchange.com)\nText: God has many names and it is clear from Quran that 'Allah' is the same as God worshiped by Christians and Jews. So using those names for him are also fine. The practice of using 'Allah' in translated text seems to be partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to \"Tanrı\", in Persian it is translated to \"خدا\" and so on in other languages. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: “A llah” is the Arabic word for “God” and has been so long before the existence of Islam. Long before the Arabic false prophet Muhammad was born, the name Allah was used by both Jews and Arab Christians to refer to the one true god. The names “Allah” and “God” are generally interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion. Some English translations of the Qu’ran (Koran) use the name “God,” others use “Allah.” This sometimes comes as a surprise to Christians who were raised in Western cultures. Many ex-Muslim converts to Christianity commonly refer to God as “Allah.” These converts clearly recognize the major differences in the character and nature of God and His plan as described by the Old and New Testament, in contrast to that of Islamic writings. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: The Navigators, a well-known evangelical Christian organization, published the following:\n\n\n> “…It’s interesting to observe that, in rejecting the Athenian’s erroneous concept of God, Paul did not reject the word they used for God, Theos, which was the common Greek word for God.\n>\n> Some Christians unthinkingly say ‘Allah is not God.’ This is the ultimate blasphemy to Muslims, and furthermore, it is difficult to understand. Allah is the primary Arabic word for God. It means ‘The God.’ There are some minor exceptions. For example, the Bible in some Muslim lands uses a word for God other than Allah (Farsi and Urdu are examples). But for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. How, then, can we say that Allah is an invalid name for God? If it is, to whom have these Jews and Christians been praying?. \n hypothesis: It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East, and is a more culturally appropriate term.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Glossary of Islamic Terms and Phrases (A-Z) - My Islam (myislam.org)\nText: Used in English is the word for God. However, the word Allah has been used since pre-islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. You can trace by the name’s origin to earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). There are 99 other ways to call God by, these are the 99 names of Allah and are used to describe all his attributes. Title: asma ul husna - Why do some Muslims refer to God as 'Allah' in English? - Islam Stack Exchange (islam.stackexchange.com)\nText: God has many names and it is clear from Quran that 'Allah' is the same as God worshiped by Christians and Jews. So using those names for him are also fine. The practice of using 'Allah' in translated text seems to be partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to \"Tanrı\", in Persian it is translated to \"خدا\" and so on in other languages. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: “A llah” is the Arabic word for “God” and has been so long before the existence of Islam. Long before the Arabic false prophet Muhammad was born, the name Allah was used by both Jews and Arab Christians to refer to the one true god. The names “Allah” and “God” are generally interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion. Some English translations of the Qu’ran (Koran) use the name “God,” others use “Allah.” This sometimes comes as a surprise to Christians who were raised in Western cultures. Many ex-Muslim converts to Christianity commonly refer to God as “Allah.” These converts clearly recognize the major differences in the character and nature of God and His plan as described by the Old and New Testament, in contrast to that of Islamic writings. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: The Navigators, a well-known evangelical Christian organization, published the following:\n\n\n> “…It’s interesting to observe that, in rejecting the Athenian’s erroneous concept of God, Paul did not reject the word they used for God, Theos, which was the common Greek word for God.\n>\n> Some Christians unthinkingly say ‘Allah is not God.’ This is the ultimate blasphemy to Muslims, and furthermore, it is difficult to understand. Allah is the primary Arabic word for God. It means ‘The God.’ There are some minor exceptions. For example, the Bible in some Muslim lands uses a word for God other than Allah (Farsi and Urdu are examples). But for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. How, then, can we say that Allah is an invalid name for God? If it is, to whom have these Jews and Christians been praying?. \n hypothesis: It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East, and is a more culturally appropriate term.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Glossary of Islamic Terms and Phrases (A-Z) - My Islam (myislam.org)\nText: Used in English is the word for God. However, the word Allah has been used since pre-islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. You can trace by the name’s origin to earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). There are 99 other ways to call God by, these are the 99 names of Allah and are used to describe all his attributes. Title: asma ul husna - Why do some Muslims refer to God as 'Allah' in English? - Islam Stack Exchange (islam.stackexchange.com)\nText: God has many names and it is clear from Quran that 'Allah' is the same as God worshiped by Christians and Jews. So using those names for him are also fine. The practice of using 'Allah' in translated text seems to be partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to \"Tanrı\", in Persian it is translated to \"خدا\" and so on in other languages. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: “A llah” is the Arabic word for “God” and has been so long before the existence of Islam. Long before the Arabic false prophet Muhammad was born, the name Allah was used by both Jews and Arab Christians to refer to the one true god. The names “Allah” and “God” are generally interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion. Some English translations of the Qu’ran (Koran) use the name “God,” others use “Allah.” This sometimes comes as a surprise to Christians who were raised in Western cultures. Many ex-Muslim converts to Christianity commonly refer to God as “Allah.” These converts clearly recognize the major differences in the character and nature of God and His plan as described by the Old and New Testament, in contrast to that of Islamic writings. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: The Navigators, a well-known evangelical Christian organization, published the following:\n\n\n> “…It’s interesting to observe that, in rejecting the Athenian’s erroneous concept of God, Paul did not reject the word they used for God, Theos, which was the common Greek word for God.\n>\n> Some Christians unthinkingly say ‘Allah is not God.’ This is the ultimate blasphemy to Muslims, and furthermore, it is difficult to understand. Allah is the primary Arabic word for God. It means ‘The God.’ There are some minor exceptions. For example, the Bible in some Muslim lands uses a word for God other than Allah (Farsi and Urdu are examples). But for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. How, then, can we say that Allah is an invalid name for God? If it is, to whom have these Jews and Christians been praying?. \n hypothesis: It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East, and is a more culturally appropriate term.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
Why is Allah translated as god in subtitles yet is basically just referred to as Allah outside of the translation
|
It is an accurate representation of the name used by Muslims and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term.
|
It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term.
|
The name Allah is the Arabic word for God and has been used since pre-Islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. It is derived from the earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). It is interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion, so using the name Allah is also acceptable. The difference in using Allah versus God in translation is partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to "Tanrı", in Persian it is translated to "خدا" and so on in other languages. In the Navigators’ article, it is stated that for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. This implies that using Allah in translation is the most accurate when referring to God in an Arabic context. Therefore, it is understandable why Allah is translated as God in subtitles yet is basically just referred to as Allah outside of the translation. It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term.
|
[
"Title: Glossary of Islamic Terms and Phrases (A-Z) - My Islam (myislam.org)\nText: Used in English is the word for God. However, the word Allah has been used since pre-islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. You can trace by the name’s origin to earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). There are 99 other ways to call God by, these are the 99 names of Allah and are used to describe all his attributes.",
"Title: asma ul husna - Why do some Muslims refer to God as 'Allah' in English? - Islam Stack Exchange (islam.stackexchange.com)\nText: God has many names and it is clear from Quran that 'Allah' is the same as God worshiped by Christians and Jews. So using those names for him are also fine. The practice of using 'Allah' in translated text seems to be partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to \"Tanrı\", in Persian it is translated to \"خدا\" and so on in other languages.",
"Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: “A llah” is the Arabic word for “God” and has been so long before the existence of Islam. Long before the Arabic false prophet Muhammad was born, the name Allah was used by both Jews and Arab Christians to refer to the one true god. The names “Allah” and “God” are generally interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion. Some English translations of the Qu’ran (Koran) use the name “God,” others use “Allah.” This sometimes comes as a surprise to Christians who were raised in Western cultures. Many ex-Muslim converts to Christianity commonly refer to God as “Allah.” These converts clearly recognize the major differences in the character and nature of God and His plan as described by the Old and New Testament, in contrast to that of Islamic writings.",
"Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: The Navigators, a well-known evangelical Christian organization, published the following:\n\n\n> “…It’s interesting to observe that, in rejecting the Athenian’s erroneous concept of God, Paul did not reject the word they used for God, Theos, which was the common Greek word for God.\n>\n> Some Christians unthinkingly say ‘Allah is not God.’ This is the ultimate blasphemy to Muslims, and furthermore, it is difficult to understand. Allah is the primary Arabic word for God. It means ‘The God.’ There are some minor exceptions. For example, the Bible in some Muslim lands uses a word for God other than Allah (Farsi and Urdu are examples). But for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. How, then, can we say that Allah is an invalid name for God? If it is, to whom have these Jews and Christians been praying?"
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_wdoc_f9abdf65-86c1-4930-8b92-801103f1d511
| 1
| 0.701846
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
claim_erronous_change
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Glossary of Islamic Terms and Phrases (A-Z) - My Islam (myislam.org)\nText: Used in English is the word for God. However, the word Allah has been used since pre-islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. You can trace by the name’s origin to earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). There are 99 other ways to call God by, these are the 99 names of Allah and are used to describe all his attributes. Title: asma ul husna - Why do some Muslims refer to God as 'Allah' in English? - Islam Stack Exchange (islam.stackexchange.com)\nText: God has many names and it is clear from Quran that 'Allah' is the same as God worshiped by Christians and Jews. So using those names for him are also fine. The practice of using 'Allah' in translated text seems to be partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to \"Tanrı\", in Persian it is translated to \"خدا\" and so on in other languages. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: “A llah” is the Arabic word for “God” and has been so long before the existence of Islam. Long before the Arabic false prophet Muhammad was born, the name Allah was used by both Jews and Arab Christians to refer to the one true god. The names “Allah” and “God” are generally interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion. Some English translations of the Qu’ran (Koran) use the name “God,” others use “Allah.” This sometimes comes as a surprise to Christians who were raised in Western cultures. Many ex-Muslim converts to Christianity commonly refer to God as “Allah.” These converts clearly recognize the major differences in the character and nature of God and His plan as described by the Old and New Testament, in contrast to that of Islamic writings. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: The Navigators, a well-known evangelical Christian organization, published the following:\n\n\n> “…It’s interesting to observe that, in rejecting the Athenian’s erroneous concept of God, Paul did not reject the word they used for God, Theos, which was the common Greek word for God.\n>\n> Some Christians unthinkingly say ‘Allah is not God.’ This is the ultimate blasphemy to Muslims, and furthermore, it is difficult to understand. Allah is the primary Arabic word for God. It means ‘The God.’ There are some minor exceptions. For example, the Bible in some Muslim lands uses a word for God other than Allah (Farsi and Urdu are examples). But for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. How, then, can we say that Allah is an invalid name for God? If it is, to whom have these Jews and Christians been praying?. \n hypothesis: It is an accurate representation of the name used by Muslims and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Glossary of Islamic Terms and Phrases (A-Z) - My Islam (myislam.org)\nText: Used in English is the word for God. However, the word Allah has been used since pre-islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. You can trace by the name’s origin to earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). There are 99 other ways to call God by, these are the 99 names of Allah and are used to describe all his attributes. Title: asma ul husna - Why do some Muslims refer to God as 'Allah' in English? - Islam Stack Exchange (islam.stackexchange.com)\nText: God has many names and it is clear from Quran that 'Allah' is the same as God worshiped by Christians and Jews. So using those names for him are also fine. The practice of using 'Allah' in translated text seems to be partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to \"Tanrı\", in Persian it is translated to \"خدا\" and so on in other languages. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: “A llah” is the Arabic word for “God” and has been so long before the existence of Islam. Long before the Arabic false prophet Muhammad was born, the name Allah was used by both Jews and Arab Christians to refer to the one true god. The names “Allah” and “God” are generally interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion. Some English translations of the Qu’ran (Koran) use the name “God,” others use “Allah.” This sometimes comes as a surprise to Christians who were raised in Western cultures. Many ex-Muslim converts to Christianity commonly refer to God as “Allah.” These converts clearly recognize the major differences in the character and nature of God and His plan as described by the Old and New Testament, in contrast to that of Islamic writings. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: The Navigators, a well-known evangelical Christian organization, published the following:\n\n\n> “…It’s interesting to observe that, in rejecting the Athenian’s erroneous concept of God, Paul did not reject the word they used for God, Theos, which was the common Greek word for God.\n>\n> Some Christians unthinkingly say ‘Allah is not God.’ This is the ultimate blasphemy to Muslims, and furthermore, it is difficult to understand. Allah is the primary Arabic word for God. It means ‘The God.’ There are some minor exceptions. For example, the Bible in some Muslim lands uses a word for God other than Allah (Farsi and Urdu are examples). But for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. How, then, can we say that Allah is an invalid name for God? If it is, to whom have these Jews and Christians been praying?. \n hypothesis: It is an accurate representation of the name used by Muslims and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Glossary of Islamic Terms and Phrases (A-Z) - My Islam (myislam.org)\nText: Used in English is the word for God. However, the word Allah has been used since pre-islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. You can trace by the name’s origin to earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). There are 99 other ways to call God by, these are the 99 names of Allah and are used to describe all his attributes. Title: asma ul husna - Why do some Muslims refer to God as 'Allah' in English? - Islam Stack Exchange (islam.stackexchange.com)\nText: God has many names and it is clear from Quran that 'Allah' is the same as God worshiped by Christians and Jews. So using those names for him are also fine. The practice of using 'Allah' in translated text seems to be partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to \"Tanrı\", in Persian it is translated to \"خدا\" and so on in other languages. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: “A llah” is the Arabic word for “God” and has been so long before the existence of Islam. Long before the Arabic false prophet Muhammad was born, the name Allah was used by both Jews and Arab Christians to refer to the one true god. The names “Allah” and “God” are generally interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion. Some English translations of the Qu’ran (Koran) use the name “God,” others use “Allah.” This sometimes comes as a surprise to Christians who were raised in Western cultures. Many ex-Muslim converts to Christianity commonly refer to God as “Allah.” These converts clearly recognize the major differences in the character and nature of God and His plan as described by the Old and New Testament, in contrast to that of Islamic writings. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: The Navigators, a well-known evangelical Christian organization, published the following:\n\n\n> “…It’s interesting to observe that, in rejecting the Athenian’s erroneous concept of God, Paul did not reject the word they used for God, Theos, which was the common Greek word for God.\n>\n> Some Christians unthinkingly say ‘Allah is not God.’ This is the ultimate blasphemy to Muslims, and furthermore, it is difficult to understand. Allah is the primary Arabic word for God. It means ‘The God.’ There are some minor exceptions. For example, the Bible in some Muslim lands uses a word for God other than Allah (Farsi and Urdu are examples). But for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. How, then, can we say that Allah is an invalid name for God? If it is, to whom have these Jews and Christians been praying?. \n hypothesis: It is an accurate representation of the name used by Muslims and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
Why is Allah translated as god in subtitles yet is basically just referred to as Allah outside of the translation
|
n recent years, there has been a growing recognition of the importance of using culturally sensitive language when referring to the region and its people. Many scholars and experts advocate for the use of terms that are more specific and respectful of the diverse cultural heritage of the Middle East.
|
It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term.
|
The name Allah is the Arabic word for God and has been used since pre-Islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. It is derived from the earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). It is interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion, so using the name Allah is also acceptable. The difference in using Allah versus God in translation is partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to "Tanrı", in Persian it is translated to "خدا" and so on in other languages. In the Navigators’ article, it is stated that for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. This implies that using Allah in translation is the most accurate when referring to God in an Arabic context. Therefore, it is understandable why Allah is translated as God in subtitles yet is basically just referred to as Allah outside of the translation. It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term.
|
[
"Title: Glossary of Islamic Terms and Phrases (A-Z) - My Islam (myislam.org)\nText: Used in English is the word for God. However, the word Allah has been used since pre-islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. You can trace by the name’s origin to earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). There are 99 other ways to call God by, these are the 99 names of Allah and are used to describe all his attributes.",
"Title: asma ul husna - Why do some Muslims refer to God as 'Allah' in English? - Islam Stack Exchange (islam.stackexchange.com)\nText: God has many names and it is clear from Quran that 'Allah' is the same as God worshiped by Christians and Jews. So using those names for him are also fine. The practice of using 'Allah' in translated text seems to be partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to \"Tanrı\", in Persian it is translated to \"خدا\" and so on in other languages.",
"Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: “A llah” is the Arabic word for “God” and has been so long before the existence of Islam. Long before the Arabic false prophet Muhammad was born, the name Allah was used by both Jews and Arab Christians to refer to the one true god. The names “Allah” and “God” are generally interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion. Some English translations of the Qu’ran (Koran) use the name “God,” others use “Allah.” This sometimes comes as a surprise to Christians who were raised in Western cultures. Many ex-Muslim converts to Christianity commonly refer to God as “Allah.” These converts clearly recognize the major differences in the character and nature of God and His plan as described by the Old and New Testament, in contrast to that of Islamic writings.",
"Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: The Navigators, a well-known evangelical Christian organization, published the following:\n\n\n> “…It’s interesting to observe that, in rejecting the Athenian’s erroneous concept of God, Paul did not reject the word they used for God, Theos, which was the common Greek word for God.\n>\n> Some Christians unthinkingly say ‘Allah is not God.’ This is the ultimate blasphemy to Muslims, and furthermore, it is difficult to understand. Allah is the primary Arabic word for God. It means ‘The God.’ There are some minor exceptions. For example, the Bible in some Muslim lands uses a word for God other than Allah (Farsi and Urdu are examples). But for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. How, then, can we say that Allah is an invalid name for God? If it is, to whom have these Jews and Christians been praying?"
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_wdoc_f9abdf65-86c1-4930-8b92-801103f1d511
| 1
| 0.701846
|
generated
|
attributable
|
keep
|
claim_infer_claim
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Glossary of Islamic Terms and Phrases (A-Z) - My Islam (myislam.org)\nText: Used in English is the word for God. However, the word Allah has been used since pre-islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. You can trace by the name’s origin to earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). There are 99 other ways to call God by, these are the 99 names of Allah and are used to describe all his attributes. Title: asma ul husna - Why do some Muslims refer to God as 'Allah' in English? - Islam Stack Exchange (islam.stackexchange.com)\nText: God has many names and it is clear from Quran that 'Allah' is the same as God worshiped by Christians and Jews. So using those names for him are also fine. The practice of using 'Allah' in translated text seems to be partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to \"Tanrı\", in Persian it is translated to \"خدا\" and so on in other languages. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: “A llah” is the Arabic word for “God” and has been so long before the existence of Islam. Long before the Arabic false prophet Muhammad was born, the name Allah was used by both Jews and Arab Christians to refer to the one true god. The names “Allah” and “God” are generally interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion. Some English translations of the Qu’ran (Koran) use the name “God,” others use “Allah.” This sometimes comes as a surprise to Christians who were raised in Western cultures. Many ex-Muslim converts to Christianity commonly refer to God as “Allah.” These converts clearly recognize the major differences in the character and nature of God and His plan as described by the Old and New Testament, in contrast to that of Islamic writings. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: The Navigators, a well-known evangelical Christian organization, published the following:\n\n\n> “…It’s interesting to observe that, in rejecting the Athenian’s erroneous concept of God, Paul did not reject the word they used for God, Theos, which was the common Greek word for God.\n>\n> Some Christians unthinkingly say ‘Allah is not God.’ This is the ultimate blasphemy to Muslims, and furthermore, it is difficult to understand. Allah is the primary Arabic word for God. It means ‘The God.’ There are some minor exceptions. For example, the Bible in some Muslim lands uses a word for God other than Allah (Farsi and Urdu are examples). But for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. How, then, can we say that Allah is an invalid name for God? If it is, to whom have these Jews and Christians been praying?. \n hypothesis: n recent years, there has been a growing recognition of the importance of using culturally sensitive language when referring to the region and its people. Many scholars and experts advocate for the use of terms that are more specific and respectful of the diverse cultural heritage of the Middle East.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Glossary of Islamic Terms and Phrases (A-Z) - My Islam (myislam.org)\nText: Used in English is the word for God. However, the word Allah has been used since pre-islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. You can trace by the name’s origin to earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). There are 99 other ways to call God by, these are the 99 names of Allah and are used to describe all his attributes. Title: asma ul husna - Why do some Muslims refer to God as 'Allah' in English? - Islam Stack Exchange (islam.stackexchange.com)\nText: God has many names and it is clear from Quran that 'Allah' is the same as God worshiped by Christians and Jews. So using those names for him are also fine. The practice of using 'Allah' in translated text seems to be partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to \"Tanrı\", in Persian it is translated to \"خدا\" and so on in other languages. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: “A llah” is the Arabic word for “God” and has been so long before the existence of Islam. Long before the Arabic false prophet Muhammad was born, the name Allah was used by both Jews and Arab Christians to refer to the one true god. The names “Allah” and “God” are generally interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion. Some English translations of the Qu’ran (Koran) use the name “God,” others use “Allah.” This sometimes comes as a surprise to Christians who were raised in Western cultures. Many ex-Muslim converts to Christianity commonly refer to God as “Allah.” These converts clearly recognize the major differences in the character and nature of God and His plan as described by the Old and New Testament, in contrast to that of Islamic writings. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: The Navigators, a well-known evangelical Christian organization, published the following:\n\n\n> “…It’s interesting to observe that, in rejecting the Athenian’s erroneous concept of God, Paul did not reject the word they used for God, Theos, which was the common Greek word for God.\n>\n> Some Christians unthinkingly say ‘Allah is not God.’ This is the ultimate blasphemy to Muslims, and furthermore, it is difficult to understand. Allah is the primary Arabic word for God. It means ‘The God.’ There are some minor exceptions. For example, the Bible in some Muslim lands uses a word for God other than Allah (Farsi and Urdu are examples). But for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. How, then, can we say that Allah is an invalid name for God? If it is, to whom have these Jews and Christians been praying?. \n hypothesis: n recent years, there has been a growing recognition of the importance of using culturally sensitive language when referring to the region and its people. Many scholars and experts advocate for the use of terms that are more specific and respectful of the diverse cultural heritage of the Middle East.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Glossary of Islamic Terms and Phrases (A-Z) - My Islam (myislam.org)\nText: Used in English is the word for God. However, the word Allah has been used since pre-islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. You can trace by the name’s origin to earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). There are 99 other ways to call God by, these are the 99 names of Allah and are used to describe all his attributes. Title: asma ul husna - Why do some Muslims refer to God as 'Allah' in English? - Islam Stack Exchange (islam.stackexchange.com)\nText: God has many names and it is clear from Quran that 'Allah' is the same as God worshiped by Christians and Jews. So using those names for him are also fine. The practice of using 'Allah' in translated text seems to be partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to \"Tanrı\", in Persian it is translated to \"خدا\" and so on in other languages. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: “A llah” is the Arabic word for “God” and has been so long before the existence of Islam. Long before the Arabic false prophet Muhammad was born, the name Allah was used by both Jews and Arab Christians to refer to the one true god. The names “Allah” and “God” are generally interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion. Some English translations of the Qu’ran (Koran) use the name “God,” others use “Allah.” This sometimes comes as a surprise to Christians who were raised in Western cultures. Many ex-Muslim converts to Christianity commonly refer to God as “Allah.” These converts clearly recognize the major differences in the character and nature of God and His plan as described by the Old and New Testament, in contrast to that of Islamic writings. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: The Navigators, a well-known evangelical Christian organization, published the following:\n\n\n> “…It’s interesting to observe that, in rejecting the Athenian’s erroneous concept of God, Paul did not reject the word they used for God, Theos, which was the common Greek word for God.\n>\n> Some Christians unthinkingly say ‘Allah is not God.’ This is the ultimate blasphemy to Muslims, and furthermore, it is difficult to understand. Allah is the primary Arabic word for God. It means ‘The God.’ There are some minor exceptions. For example, the Bible in some Muslim lands uses a word for God other than Allah (Farsi and Urdu are examples). But for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. How, then, can we say that Allah is an invalid name for God? If it is, to whom have these Jews and Christians been praying?. \n hypothesis: n recent years, there has been a growing recognition of the importance of using culturally sensitive language when referring to the region and its people. Many scholars and experts advocate for the use of terms that are more specific and respectful of the diverse cultural heritage of the Middle East.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
Why is Allah translated as god in subtitles yet is basically just referred to as Allah outside of the translation
|
It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term, however, it is not entirely accurate as many Christians, particularly those familiar with Greek, have used the word "Theos" to refer to God.
|
It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term.
|
The name Allah is the Arabic word for God and has been used since pre-Islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. It is derived from the earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). It is interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion, so using the name Allah is also acceptable. The difference in using Allah versus God in translation is partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to "Tanrı", in Persian it is translated to "خدا" and so on in other languages. In the Navigators’ article, it is stated that for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. This implies that using Allah in translation is the most accurate when referring to God in an Arabic context. Therefore, it is understandable why Allah is translated as God in subtitles yet is basically just referred to as Allah outside of the translation. It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term.
|
[
"Title: Glossary of Islamic Terms and Phrases (A-Z) - My Islam (myislam.org)\nText: Used in English is the word for God. However, the word Allah has been used since pre-islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. You can trace by the name’s origin to earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). There are 99 other ways to call God by, these are the 99 names of Allah and are used to describe all his attributes.",
"Title: asma ul husna - Why do some Muslims refer to God as 'Allah' in English? - Islam Stack Exchange (islam.stackexchange.com)\nText: God has many names and it is clear from Quran that 'Allah' is the same as God worshiped by Christians and Jews. So using those names for him are also fine. The practice of using 'Allah' in translated text seems to be partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to \"Tanrı\", in Persian it is translated to \"خدا\" and so on in other languages.",
"Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: “A llah” is the Arabic word for “God” and has been so long before the existence of Islam. Long before the Arabic false prophet Muhammad was born, the name Allah was used by both Jews and Arab Christians to refer to the one true god. The names “Allah” and “God” are generally interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion. Some English translations of the Qu’ran (Koran) use the name “God,” others use “Allah.” This sometimes comes as a surprise to Christians who were raised in Western cultures. Many ex-Muslim converts to Christianity commonly refer to God as “Allah.” These converts clearly recognize the major differences in the character and nature of God and His plan as described by the Old and New Testament, in contrast to that of Islamic writings.",
"Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: The Navigators, a well-known evangelical Christian organization, published the following:\n\n\n> “…It’s interesting to observe that, in rejecting the Athenian’s erroneous concept of God, Paul did not reject the word they used for God, Theos, which was the common Greek word for God.\n>\n> Some Christians unthinkingly say ‘Allah is not God.’ This is the ultimate blasphemy to Muslims, and furthermore, it is difficult to understand. Allah is the primary Arabic word for God. It means ‘The God.’ There are some minor exceptions. For example, the Bible in some Muslim lands uses a word for God other than Allah (Farsi and Urdu are examples). But for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. How, then, can we say that Allah is an invalid name for God? If it is, to whom have these Jews and Christians been praying?"
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_wdoc_f9abdf65-86c1-4930-8b92-801103f1d511
| 1
| 0.701846
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
claim_add_to_the_claim_contradicting_info
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Glossary of Islamic Terms and Phrases (A-Z) - My Islam (myislam.org)\nText: Used in English is the word for God. However, the word Allah has been used since pre-islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. You can trace by the name’s origin to earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). There are 99 other ways to call God by, these are the 99 names of Allah and are used to describe all his attributes. Title: asma ul husna - Why do some Muslims refer to God as 'Allah' in English? - Islam Stack Exchange (islam.stackexchange.com)\nText: God has many names and it is clear from Quran that 'Allah' is the same as God worshiped by Christians and Jews. So using those names for him are also fine. The practice of using 'Allah' in translated text seems to be partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to \"Tanrı\", in Persian it is translated to \"خدا\" and so on in other languages. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: “A llah” is the Arabic word for “God” and has been so long before the existence of Islam. Long before the Arabic false prophet Muhammad was born, the name Allah was used by both Jews and Arab Christians to refer to the one true god. The names “Allah” and “God” are generally interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion. Some English translations of the Qu’ran (Koran) use the name “God,” others use “Allah.” This sometimes comes as a surprise to Christians who were raised in Western cultures. Many ex-Muslim converts to Christianity commonly refer to God as “Allah.” These converts clearly recognize the major differences in the character and nature of God and His plan as described by the Old and New Testament, in contrast to that of Islamic writings. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: The Navigators, a well-known evangelical Christian organization, published the following:\n\n\n> “…It’s interesting to observe that, in rejecting the Athenian’s erroneous concept of God, Paul did not reject the word they used for God, Theos, which was the common Greek word for God.\n>\n> Some Christians unthinkingly say ‘Allah is not God.’ This is the ultimate blasphemy to Muslims, and furthermore, it is difficult to understand. Allah is the primary Arabic word for God. It means ‘The God.’ There are some minor exceptions. For example, the Bible in some Muslim lands uses a word for God other than Allah (Farsi and Urdu are examples). But for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. How, then, can we say that Allah is an invalid name for God? If it is, to whom have these Jews and Christians been praying?. \n hypothesis: It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term, however, it is not entirely accurate as many Christians, particularly those familiar with Greek, have used the word \"Theos\" to refer to God.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Glossary of Islamic Terms and Phrases (A-Z) - My Islam (myislam.org)\nText: Used in English is the word for God. However, the word Allah has been used since pre-islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. You can trace by the name’s origin to earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). There are 99 other ways to call God by, these are the 99 names of Allah and are used to describe all his attributes. Title: asma ul husna - Why do some Muslims refer to God as 'Allah' in English? - Islam Stack Exchange (islam.stackexchange.com)\nText: God has many names and it is clear from Quran that 'Allah' is the same as God worshiped by Christians and Jews. So using those names for him are also fine. The practice of using 'Allah' in translated text seems to be partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to \"Tanrı\", in Persian it is translated to \"خدا\" and so on in other languages. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: “A llah” is the Arabic word for “God” and has been so long before the existence of Islam. Long before the Arabic false prophet Muhammad was born, the name Allah was used by both Jews and Arab Christians to refer to the one true god. The names “Allah” and “God” are generally interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion. Some English translations of the Qu’ran (Koran) use the name “God,” others use “Allah.” This sometimes comes as a surprise to Christians who were raised in Western cultures. Many ex-Muslim converts to Christianity commonly refer to God as “Allah.” These converts clearly recognize the major differences in the character and nature of God and His plan as described by the Old and New Testament, in contrast to that of Islamic writings. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: The Navigators, a well-known evangelical Christian organization, published the following:\n\n\n> “…It’s interesting to observe that, in rejecting the Athenian’s erroneous concept of God, Paul did not reject the word they used for God, Theos, which was the common Greek word for God.\n>\n> Some Christians unthinkingly say ‘Allah is not God.’ This is the ultimate blasphemy to Muslims, and furthermore, it is difficult to understand. Allah is the primary Arabic word for God. It means ‘The God.’ There are some minor exceptions. For example, the Bible in some Muslim lands uses a word for God other than Allah (Farsi and Urdu are examples). But for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. How, then, can we say that Allah is an invalid name for God? If it is, to whom have these Jews and Christians been praying?. \n hypothesis: It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term, however, it is not entirely accurate as many Christians, particularly those familiar with Greek, have used the word \"Theos\" to refer to God.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Glossary of Islamic Terms and Phrases (A-Z) - My Islam (myislam.org)\nText: Used in English is the word for God. However, the word Allah has been used since pre-islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. You can trace by the name’s origin to earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). There are 99 other ways to call God by, these are the 99 names of Allah and are used to describe all his attributes. Title: asma ul husna - Why do some Muslims refer to God as 'Allah' in English? - Islam Stack Exchange (islam.stackexchange.com)\nText: God has many names and it is clear from Quran that 'Allah' is the same as God worshiped by Christians and Jews. So using those names for him are also fine. The practice of using 'Allah' in translated text seems to be partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to \"Tanrı\", in Persian it is translated to \"خدا\" and so on in other languages. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: “A llah” is the Arabic word for “God” and has been so long before the existence of Islam. Long before the Arabic false prophet Muhammad was born, the name Allah was used by both Jews and Arab Christians to refer to the one true god. The names “Allah” and “God” are generally interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion. Some English translations of the Qu’ran (Koran) use the name “God,” others use “Allah.” This sometimes comes as a surprise to Christians who were raised in Western cultures. Many ex-Muslim converts to Christianity commonly refer to God as “Allah.” These converts clearly recognize the major differences in the character and nature of God and His plan as described by the Old and New Testament, in contrast to that of Islamic writings. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: The Navigators, a well-known evangelical Christian organization, published the following:\n\n\n> “…It’s interesting to observe that, in rejecting the Athenian’s erroneous concept of God, Paul did not reject the word they used for God, Theos, which was the common Greek word for God.\n>\n> Some Christians unthinkingly say ‘Allah is not God.’ This is the ultimate blasphemy to Muslims, and furthermore, it is difficult to understand. Allah is the primary Arabic word for God. It means ‘The God.’ There are some minor exceptions. For example, the Bible in some Muslim lands uses a word for God other than Allah (Farsi and Urdu are examples). But for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. How, then, can we say that Allah is an invalid name for God? If it is, to whom have these Jews and Christians been praying?. \n hypothesis: It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term, however, it is not entirely accurate as many Christians, particularly those familiar with Greek, have used the word \"Theos\" to refer to God.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
Why is Allah translated as god in subtitles yet is basically just referred to as Allah outside of the translation
|
It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term.
|
It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term.
|
The name Allah is the Arabic word for God and has been used since pre-Islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. It is derived from the earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). It is interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion, so using the name Allah is also acceptable. The difference in using Allah versus God in translation is partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to "Tanrı", in Persian it is translated to "خدا" and so on in other languages. In the Navigators’ article, it is stated that for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. This implies that using Allah in translation is the most accurate when referring to God in an Arabic context. Therefore, it is understandable why Allah is translated as God in subtitles yet is basically just referred to as Allah outside of the translation. It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term.
|
[
"Title: asma ul husna - Why do some Muslims refer to God as 'Allah' in English? - Islam Stack Exchange (islam.stackexchange.com)\nText: God has many names and it is clear from Quran that 'Allah' is the same as God worshiped by Christians and Jews. So using those names for him are also fine. The practice of using 'Allah' in translated text seems to be partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to \"Tanrı\", in Persian it is translated to \"خدا\" and so on in other languages.",
"The term \"Holy Land\" has been used by various cultures to refer to the region in the Middle East considered sacred by Jews, Christians, and Muslims. The name is often used to describe the area that includes modern-day Israel, the West Bank, and the Gaza Strip. This term has been used in English since the 13th century and has been adopted from the Latin \"terra sancta,\" meaning holy land. In modern times, the term has been used in a neutral context, referring to the geographical and historical significance of the region, rather than any specific religious or political affiliation.",
"Title: Glossary of Islamic Terms and Phrases (A-Z) - My Islam (myislam.org)\nText: Used in English is the word for God. However, the word Allah has been used since pre-islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. You can trace by the name’s origin to earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). There are 99 other ways to call God by, these are the 99 names of Allah and are used to describe all his attributes.",
"Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: The Navigators, a well-known evangelical Christian organization, published the following:\n\n\n> “…It’s interesting to observe that, in rejecting the Athenian’s erroneous concept of God, Paul did not reject the word they used for God, Theos, which was the common Greek word for God.\n>\n> Some Christians unthinkingly say ‘Allah is not God.’ This is the ultimate blasphemy to Muslims, and furthermore, it is difficult to understand. Allah is the primary Arabic word for God. It means ‘The God.’ There are some minor exceptions. For example, the Bible in some Muslim lands uses a word for God other than Allah (Farsi and Urdu are examples). But for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. How, then, can we say that Allah is an invalid name for God? If it is, to whom have these Jews and Christians been praying?",
"Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: “A llah” is the Arabic word for “God” and has been so long before the existence of Islam. Long before the Arabic false prophet Muhammad was born, the name Allah was used by both Jews and Arab Christians to refer to the one true god. The names “Allah” and “God” are generally interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion. Some English translations of the Qu’ran (Koran) use the name “God,” others use “Allah.” This sometimes comes as a surprise to Christians who were raised in Western cultures. Many ex-Muslim converts to Christianity commonly refer to God as “Allah.” These converts clearly recognize the major differences in the character and nature of God and His plan as described by the Old and New Testament, in contrast to that of Islamic writings."
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_wdoc_f9abdf65-86c1-4930-8b92-801103f1d511
| 1
| 0.701846
|
generated
|
attributable
|
keep
|
modify_passage-add_relevant_to_claim
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: asma ul husna - Why do some Muslims refer to God as 'Allah' in English? - Islam Stack Exchange (islam.stackexchange.com)\nText: God has many names and it is clear from Quran that 'Allah' is the same as God worshiped by Christians and Jews. So using those names for him are also fine. The practice of using 'Allah' in translated text seems to be partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to \"Tanrı\", in Persian it is translated to \"خدا\" and so on in other languages. The term \"Holy Land\" has been used by various cultures to refer to the region in the Middle East considered sacred by Jews, Christians, and Muslims. The name is often used to describe the area that includes modern-day Israel, the West Bank, and the Gaza Strip. This term has been used in English since the 13th century and has been adopted from the Latin \"terra sancta,\" meaning holy land. In modern times, the term has been used in a neutral context, referring to the geographical and historical significance of the region, rather than any specific religious or political affiliation. Title: Glossary of Islamic Terms and Phrases (A-Z) - My Islam (myislam.org)\nText: Used in English is the word for God. However, the word Allah has been used since pre-islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. You can trace by the name’s origin to earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). There are 99 other ways to call God by, these are the 99 names of Allah and are used to describe all his attributes. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: The Navigators, a well-known evangelical Christian organization, published the following:\n\n\n> “…It’s interesting to observe that, in rejecting the Athenian’s erroneous concept of God, Paul did not reject the word they used for God, Theos, which was the common Greek word for God.\n>\n> Some Christians unthinkingly say ‘Allah is not God.’ This is the ultimate blasphemy to Muslims, and furthermore, it is difficult to understand. Allah is the primary Arabic word for God. It means ‘The God.’ There are some minor exceptions. For example, the Bible in some Muslim lands uses a word for God other than Allah (Farsi and Urdu are examples). But for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. How, then, can we say that Allah is an invalid name for God? If it is, to whom have these Jews and Christians been praying? Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: “A llah” is the Arabic word for “God” and has been so long before the existence of Islam. Long before the Arabic false prophet Muhammad was born, the name Allah was used by both Jews and Arab Christians to refer to the one true god. The names “Allah” and “God” are generally interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion. Some English translations of the Qu’ran (Koran) use the name “God,” others use “Allah.” This sometimes comes as a surprise to Christians who were raised in Western cultures. Many ex-Muslim converts to Christianity commonly refer to God as “Allah.” These converts clearly recognize the major differences in the character and nature of God and His plan as described by the Old and New Testament, in contrast to that of Islamic writings.. \n hypothesis: It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: asma ul husna - Why do some Muslims refer to God as 'Allah' in English? - Islam Stack Exchange (islam.stackexchange.com)\nText: God has many names and it is clear from Quran that 'Allah' is the same as God worshiped by Christians and Jews. So using those names for him are also fine. The practice of using 'Allah' in translated text seems to be partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to \"Tanrı\", in Persian it is translated to \"خدا\" and so on in other languages. The term \"Holy Land\" has been used by various cultures to refer to the region in the Middle East considered sacred by Jews, Christians, and Muslims. The name is often used to describe the area that includes modern-day Israel, the West Bank, and the Gaza Strip. This term has been used in English since the 13th century and has been adopted from the Latin \"terra sancta,\" meaning holy land. In modern times, the term has been used in a neutral context, referring to the geographical and historical significance of the region, rather than any specific religious or political affiliation. Title: Glossary of Islamic Terms and Phrases (A-Z) - My Islam (myislam.org)\nText: Used in English is the word for God. However, the word Allah has been used since pre-islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. You can trace by the name’s origin to earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). There are 99 other ways to call God by, these are the 99 names of Allah and are used to describe all his attributes. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: The Navigators, a well-known evangelical Christian organization, published the following:\n\n\n> “…It’s interesting to observe that, in rejecting the Athenian’s erroneous concept of God, Paul did not reject the word they used for God, Theos, which was the common Greek word for God.\n>\n> Some Christians unthinkingly say ‘Allah is not God.’ This is the ultimate blasphemy to Muslims, and furthermore, it is difficult to understand. Allah is the primary Arabic word for God. It means ‘The God.’ There are some minor exceptions. For example, the Bible in some Muslim lands uses a word for God other than Allah (Farsi and Urdu are examples). But for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. How, then, can we say that Allah is an invalid name for God? If it is, to whom have these Jews and Christians been praying? Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: “A llah” is the Arabic word for “God” and has been so long before the existence of Islam. Long before the Arabic false prophet Muhammad was born, the name Allah was used by both Jews and Arab Christians to refer to the one true god. The names “Allah” and “God” are generally interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion. Some English translations of the Qu’ran (Koran) use the name “God,” others use “Allah.” This sometimes comes as a surprise to Christians who were raised in Western cultures. Many ex-Muslim converts to Christianity commonly refer to God as “Allah.” These converts clearly recognize the major differences in the character and nature of God and His plan as described by the Old and New Testament, in contrast to that of Islamic writings.. \n hypothesis: It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: asma ul husna - Why do some Muslims refer to God as 'Allah' in English? - Islam Stack Exchange (islam.stackexchange.com)\nText: God has many names and it is clear from Quran that 'Allah' is the same as God worshiped by Christians and Jews. So using those names for him are also fine. The practice of using 'Allah' in translated text seems to be partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to \"Tanrı\", in Persian it is translated to \"خدا\" and so on in other languages. The term \"Holy Land\" has been used by various cultures to refer to the region in the Middle East considered sacred by Jews, Christians, and Muslims. The name is often used to describe the area that includes modern-day Israel, the West Bank, and the Gaza Strip. This term has been used in English since the 13th century and has been adopted from the Latin \"terra sancta,\" meaning holy land. In modern times, the term has been used in a neutral context, referring to the geographical and historical significance of the region, rather than any specific religious or political affiliation. Title: Glossary of Islamic Terms and Phrases (A-Z) - My Islam (myislam.org)\nText: Used in English is the word for God. However, the word Allah has been used since pre-islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. You can trace by the name’s origin to earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). There are 99 other ways to call God by, these are the 99 names of Allah and are used to describe all his attributes. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: The Navigators, a well-known evangelical Christian organization, published the following:\n\n\n> “…It’s interesting to observe that, in rejecting the Athenian’s erroneous concept of God, Paul did not reject the word they used for God, Theos, which was the common Greek word for God.\n>\n> Some Christians unthinkingly say ‘Allah is not God.’ This is the ultimate blasphemy to Muslims, and furthermore, it is difficult to understand. Allah is the primary Arabic word for God. It means ‘The God.’ There are some minor exceptions. For example, the Bible in some Muslim lands uses a word for God other than Allah (Farsi and Urdu are examples). But for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. How, then, can we say that Allah is an invalid name for God? If it is, to whom have these Jews and Christians been praying? Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: “A llah” is the Arabic word for “God” and has been so long before the existence of Islam. Long before the Arabic false prophet Muhammad was born, the name Allah was used by both Jews and Arab Christians to refer to the one true god. The names “Allah” and “God” are generally interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion. Some English translations of the Qu’ran (Koran) use the name “God,” others use “Allah.” This sometimes comes as a surprise to Christians who were raised in Western cultures. Many ex-Muslim converts to Christianity commonly refer to God as “Allah.” These converts clearly recognize the major differences in the character and nature of God and His plan as described by the Old and New Testament, in contrast to that of Islamic writings.. \n hypothesis: It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
Why is Allah translated as god in subtitles yet is basically just referred to as Allah outside of the translation
|
It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term.
|
It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term.
|
The name Allah is the Arabic word for God and has been used since pre-Islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. It is derived from the earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). It is interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion, so using the name Allah is also acceptable. The difference in using Allah versus God in translation is partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to "Tanrı", in Persian it is translated to "خدا" and so on in other languages. In the Navigators’ article, it is stated that for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. This implies that using Allah in translation is the most accurate when referring to God in an Arabic context. Therefore, it is understandable why Allah is translated as God in subtitles yet is basically just referred to as Allah outside of the translation. It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term.
|
[
"Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: “A llah” is the Arabic word for “God” and has been so long before the existence of Islam. Long before the Arabic false prophet Muhammad was born, the name Allah was used by both Jews and Arab Christians to refer to the one true god. The names “Allah” and “God” are generally interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion. Some English translations of the Qu’ran (Koran) use the name “God,” others use “Allah.” This sometimes comes as a surprise to Christians who were raised in Western cultures. Many ex-Muslim converts to Christianity commonly refer to God as “Allah.” These converts clearly recognize the major differences in the character and nature of God and His plan as described by the Old and New Testament, in contrast to that of Islamic writings.",
"Title: Glossary of Islamic Terms and Phrases (A-Z) - My Islam (myislam.org)\nText: Used in English is the word for God. However, the word Allah has been used since pre-islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. You can trace by the name’s origin to earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). There are 99 other ways to call God by, these are the 99 names of Allah and are used to describe all his attributes.",
"Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: The Navigators, a well-known evangelical Christian organization, published the following:\n\n\n> “…It’s interesting to observe that, in rejecting the Athenian’s erroneous concept of God, Paul did not reject the word they used for God, Theos, which was the common Greek word for God.\n>\n> Some Christians unthinkingly say ‘Allah is not God.’ This is the ultimate blasphemy to Muslims, and furthermore, it is difficult to understand. Allah is the primary Arabic word for God. It means ‘The God.’ There are some minor exceptions. For example, the Bible in some Muslim lands uses a word for God other than Allah (Farsi and Urdu are examples). But for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. How, then, can we say that Allah is an invalid name for God? If it is, to whom have these Jews and Christians been praying?",
"Title: asma ul husna - Why do some Muslims refer to God as 'Allah' in English? - Islam Stack Exchange (islam.stackexchange.com)\nText: God has many names and it is clear from Quran that 'Allah' is the same as God worshiped by Christians and Jews. So using those names for him are also fine. The practice of using 'Allah' in translated text seems to be partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to \"Tanrı\", in Persian it is translated to \"خدا\" and so on in other languages.",
"\nThe Nile River is the longest river in the world, stretching approximately 6,853 kilometers (4,258 miles) through 11 countries in northeastern Africa. It is often referred to as the \"lifeblood\" of Egypt due to its importance in the country's agriculture and economy. The Nile is an essential source of water, supporting irrigation for millions of people and providing hydroelectric power for the region."
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_wdoc_f9abdf65-86c1-4930-8b92-801103f1d511
| 1
| 0.701846
|
generated
|
attributable
|
keep
|
modify_passage-add_irrelevant_to_claim
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: “A llah” is the Arabic word for “God” and has been so long before the existence of Islam. Long before the Arabic false prophet Muhammad was born, the name Allah was used by both Jews and Arab Christians to refer to the one true god. The names “Allah” and “God” are generally interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion. Some English translations of the Qu’ran (Koran) use the name “God,” others use “Allah.” This sometimes comes as a surprise to Christians who were raised in Western cultures. Many ex-Muslim converts to Christianity commonly refer to God as “Allah.” These converts clearly recognize the major differences in the character and nature of God and His plan as described by the Old and New Testament, in contrast to that of Islamic writings. Title: Glossary of Islamic Terms and Phrases (A-Z) - My Islam (myislam.org)\nText: Used in English is the word for God. However, the word Allah has been used since pre-islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. You can trace by the name’s origin to earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). There are 99 other ways to call God by, these are the 99 names of Allah and are used to describe all his attributes. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: The Navigators, a well-known evangelical Christian organization, published the following:\n\n\n> “…It’s interesting to observe that, in rejecting the Athenian’s erroneous concept of God, Paul did not reject the word they used for God, Theos, which was the common Greek word for God.\n>\n> Some Christians unthinkingly say ‘Allah is not God.’ This is the ultimate blasphemy to Muslims, and furthermore, it is difficult to understand. Allah is the primary Arabic word for God. It means ‘The God.’ There are some minor exceptions. For example, the Bible in some Muslim lands uses a word for God other than Allah (Farsi and Urdu are examples). But for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. How, then, can we say that Allah is an invalid name for God? If it is, to whom have these Jews and Christians been praying? Title: asma ul husna - Why do some Muslims refer to God as 'Allah' in English? - Islam Stack Exchange (islam.stackexchange.com)\nText: God has many names and it is clear from Quran that 'Allah' is the same as God worshiped by Christians and Jews. So using those names for him are also fine. The practice of using 'Allah' in translated text seems to be partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to \"Tanrı\", in Persian it is translated to \"خدا\" and so on in other languages. \nThe Nile River is the longest river in the world, stretching approximately 6,853 kilometers (4,258 miles) through 11 countries in northeastern Africa. It is often referred to as the \"lifeblood\" of Egypt due to its importance in the country's agriculture and economy. The Nile is an essential source of water, supporting irrigation for millions of people and providing hydroelectric power for the region.. \n hypothesis: It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: “A llah” is the Arabic word for “God” and has been so long before the existence of Islam. Long before the Arabic false prophet Muhammad was born, the name Allah was used by both Jews and Arab Christians to refer to the one true god. The names “Allah” and “God” are generally interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion. Some English translations of the Qu’ran (Koran) use the name “God,” others use “Allah.” This sometimes comes as a surprise to Christians who were raised in Western cultures. Many ex-Muslim converts to Christianity commonly refer to God as “Allah.” These converts clearly recognize the major differences in the character and nature of God and His plan as described by the Old and New Testament, in contrast to that of Islamic writings. Title: Glossary of Islamic Terms and Phrases (A-Z) - My Islam (myislam.org)\nText: Used in English is the word for God. However, the word Allah has been used since pre-islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. You can trace by the name’s origin to earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). There are 99 other ways to call God by, these are the 99 names of Allah and are used to describe all his attributes. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: The Navigators, a well-known evangelical Christian organization, published the following:\n\n\n> “…It’s interesting to observe that, in rejecting the Athenian’s erroneous concept of God, Paul did not reject the word they used for God, Theos, which was the common Greek word for God.\n>\n> Some Christians unthinkingly say ‘Allah is not God.’ This is the ultimate blasphemy to Muslims, and furthermore, it is difficult to understand. Allah is the primary Arabic word for God. It means ‘The God.’ There are some minor exceptions. For example, the Bible in some Muslim lands uses a word for God other than Allah (Farsi and Urdu are examples). But for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. How, then, can we say that Allah is an invalid name for God? If it is, to whom have these Jews and Christians been praying? Title: asma ul husna - Why do some Muslims refer to God as 'Allah' in English? - Islam Stack Exchange (islam.stackexchange.com)\nText: God has many names and it is clear from Quran that 'Allah' is the same as God worshiped by Christians and Jews. So using those names for him are also fine. The practice of using 'Allah' in translated text seems to be partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to \"Tanrı\", in Persian it is translated to \"خدا\" and so on in other languages. \nThe Nile River is the longest river in the world, stretching approximately 6,853 kilometers (4,258 miles) through 11 countries in northeastern Africa. It is often referred to as the \"lifeblood\" of Egypt due to its importance in the country's agriculture and economy. The Nile is an essential source of water, supporting irrigation for millions of people and providing hydroelectric power for the region.. \n hypothesis: It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: “A llah” is the Arabic word for “God” and has been so long before the existence of Islam. Long before the Arabic false prophet Muhammad was born, the name Allah was used by both Jews and Arab Christians to refer to the one true god. The names “Allah” and “God” are generally interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion. Some English translations of the Qu’ran (Koran) use the name “God,” others use “Allah.” This sometimes comes as a surprise to Christians who were raised in Western cultures. Many ex-Muslim converts to Christianity commonly refer to God as “Allah.” These converts clearly recognize the major differences in the character and nature of God and His plan as described by the Old and New Testament, in contrast to that of Islamic writings. Title: Glossary of Islamic Terms and Phrases (A-Z) - My Islam (myislam.org)\nText: Used in English is the word for God. However, the word Allah has been used since pre-islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. You can trace by the name’s origin to earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). There are 99 other ways to call God by, these are the 99 names of Allah and are used to describe all his attributes. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: The Navigators, a well-known evangelical Christian organization, published the following:\n\n\n> “…It’s interesting to observe that, in rejecting the Athenian’s erroneous concept of God, Paul did not reject the word they used for God, Theos, which was the common Greek word for God.\n>\n> Some Christians unthinkingly say ‘Allah is not God.’ This is the ultimate blasphemy to Muslims, and furthermore, it is difficult to understand. Allah is the primary Arabic word for God. It means ‘The God.’ There are some minor exceptions. For example, the Bible in some Muslim lands uses a word for God other than Allah (Farsi and Urdu are examples). But for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. How, then, can we say that Allah is an invalid name for God? If it is, to whom have these Jews and Christians been praying? Title: asma ul husna - Why do some Muslims refer to God as 'Allah' in English? - Islam Stack Exchange (islam.stackexchange.com)\nText: God has many names and it is clear from Quran that 'Allah' is the same as God worshiped by Christians and Jews. So using those names for him are also fine. The practice of using 'Allah' in translated text seems to be partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to \"Tanrı\", in Persian it is translated to \"خدا\" and so on in other languages. \nThe Nile River is the longest river in the world, stretching approximately 6,853 kilometers (4,258 miles) through 11 countries in northeastern Africa. It is often referred to as the \"lifeblood\" of Egypt due to its importance in the country's agriculture and economy. The Nile is an essential source of water, supporting irrigation for millions of people and providing hydroelectric power for the region.. \n hypothesis: It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
Why is Allah translated as god in subtitles yet is basically just referred to as Allah outside of the translation
|
It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term.
|
It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term.
|
The name Allah is the Arabic word for God and has been used since pre-Islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. It is derived from the earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). It is interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion, so using the name Allah is also acceptable. The difference in using Allah versus God in translation is partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to "Tanrı", in Persian it is translated to "خدا" and so on in other languages. In the Navigators’ article, it is stated that for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. This implies that using Allah in translation is the most accurate when referring to God in an Arabic context. Therefore, it is understandable why Allah is translated as God in subtitles yet is basically just referred to as Allah outside of the translation. It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term.
|
[
"ontrary to the claim that \"Allah\" is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East, historical evidence suggests otherwise. The use of \"Allah\" as a universal term for God is a product of Islamic tradition and not a shared term among Jews and Christians. In fact, the Hebrew Bible and the New Testament use different names for God, such as Yahweh and Theos, respectively. The term \"Allah\" was primarily adopted by Muslims as a translation of the Arabic name for God, and its usage in other languages is largely a result of Arabic influence. Therefore, using \"Allah\" as a substitute for God may be seen as culturally insensitive and linguistically inaccurate.",
"Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: “A llah” is the Arabic word for “God” and has been so long before the existence of Islam. Long before the Arabic false prophet Muhammad was born, the name Allah was used by both Jews and Arab Christians to refer to the one true god. The names “Allah” and “God” are generally interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion. Some English translations of the Qu’ran (Koran) use the name “God,” others use “Allah.” This sometimes comes as a surprise to Christians who were raised in Western cultures. Many ex-Muslim converts to Christianity commonly refer to God as “Allah.” These converts clearly recognize the major differences in the character and nature of God and His plan as described by the Old and New Testament, in contrast to that of Islamic writings.",
"Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: The Navigators, a well-known evangelical Christian organization, published the following:\n\n\n> “…It’s interesting to observe that, in rejecting the Athenian’s erroneous concept of God, Paul did not reject the word they used for God, Theos, which was the common Greek word for God.\n>\n> Some Christians unthinkingly say ‘Allah is not God.’ This is the ultimate blasphemy to Muslims, and furthermore, it is difficult to understand. Allah is the primary Arabic word for God. It means ‘The God.’ There are some minor exceptions. For example, the Bible in some Muslim lands uses a word for God other than Allah (Farsi and Urdu are examples). But for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. How, then, can we say that Allah is an invalid name for God? If it is, to whom have these Jews and Christians been praying?",
"Title: Glossary of Islamic Terms and Phrases (A-Z) - My Islam (myislam.org)\nText: Used in English is the word for God. However, the word Allah has been used since pre-islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. You can trace by the name’s origin to earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). There are 99 other ways to call God by, these are the 99 names of Allah and are used to describe all his attributes.",
"Title: asma ul husna - Why do some Muslims refer to God as 'Allah' in English? - Islam Stack Exchange (islam.stackexchange.com)\nText: God has many names and it is clear from Quran that 'Allah' is the same as God worshiped by Christians and Jews. So using those names for him are also fine. The practice of using 'Allah' in translated text seems to be partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to \"Tanrı\", in Persian it is translated to \"خدا\" and so on in other languages."
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_wdoc_f9abdf65-86c1-4930-8b92-801103f1d511
| 1
| 0.701846
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
modify_passage-add_contradiction
|
[
{
"content": "premise: ontrary to the claim that \"Allah\" is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East, historical evidence suggests otherwise. The use of \"Allah\" as a universal term for God is a product of Islamic tradition and not a shared term among Jews and Christians. In fact, the Hebrew Bible and the New Testament use different names for God, such as Yahweh and Theos, respectively. The term \"Allah\" was primarily adopted by Muslims as a translation of the Arabic name for God, and its usage in other languages is largely a result of Arabic influence. Therefore, using \"Allah\" as a substitute for God may be seen as culturally insensitive and linguistically inaccurate. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: “A llah” is the Arabic word for “God” and has been so long before the existence of Islam. Long before the Arabic false prophet Muhammad was born, the name Allah was used by both Jews and Arab Christians to refer to the one true god. The names “Allah” and “God” are generally interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion. Some English translations of the Qu’ran (Koran) use the name “God,” others use “Allah.” This sometimes comes as a surprise to Christians who were raised in Western cultures. Many ex-Muslim converts to Christianity commonly refer to God as “Allah.” These converts clearly recognize the major differences in the character and nature of God and His plan as described by the Old and New Testament, in contrast to that of Islamic writings. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: The Navigators, a well-known evangelical Christian organization, published the following:\n\n\n> “…It’s interesting to observe that, in rejecting the Athenian’s erroneous concept of God, Paul did not reject the word they used for God, Theos, which was the common Greek word for God.\n>\n> Some Christians unthinkingly say ‘Allah is not God.’ This is the ultimate blasphemy to Muslims, and furthermore, it is difficult to understand. Allah is the primary Arabic word for God. It means ‘The God.’ There are some minor exceptions. For example, the Bible in some Muslim lands uses a word for God other than Allah (Farsi and Urdu are examples). But for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. How, then, can we say that Allah is an invalid name for God? If it is, to whom have these Jews and Christians been praying? Title: Glossary of Islamic Terms and Phrases (A-Z) - My Islam (myislam.org)\nText: Used in English is the word for God. However, the word Allah has been used since pre-islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. You can trace by the name’s origin to earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). There are 99 other ways to call God by, these are the 99 names of Allah and are used to describe all his attributes. Title: asma ul husna - Why do some Muslims refer to God as 'Allah' in English? - Islam Stack Exchange (islam.stackexchange.com)\nText: God has many names and it is clear from Quran that 'Allah' is the same as God worshiped by Christians and Jews. So using those names for him are also fine. The practice of using 'Allah' in translated text seems to be partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to \"Tanrı\", in Persian it is translated to \"خدا\" and so on in other languages.. \n hypothesis: It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: ontrary to the claim that \"Allah\" is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East, historical evidence suggests otherwise. The use of \"Allah\" as a universal term for God is a product of Islamic tradition and not a shared term among Jews and Christians. In fact, the Hebrew Bible and the New Testament use different names for God, such as Yahweh and Theos, respectively. The term \"Allah\" was primarily adopted by Muslims as a translation of the Arabic name for God, and its usage in other languages is largely a result of Arabic influence. Therefore, using \"Allah\" as a substitute for God may be seen as culturally insensitive and linguistically inaccurate. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: “A llah” is the Arabic word for “God” and has been so long before the existence of Islam. Long before the Arabic false prophet Muhammad was born, the name Allah was used by both Jews and Arab Christians to refer to the one true god. The names “Allah” and “God” are generally interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion. Some English translations of the Qu’ran (Koran) use the name “God,” others use “Allah.” This sometimes comes as a surprise to Christians who were raised in Western cultures. Many ex-Muslim converts to Christianity commonly refer to God as “Allah.” These converts clearly recognize the major differences in the character and nature of God and His plan as described by the Old and New Testament, in contrast to that of Islamic writings. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: The Navigators, a well-known evangelical Christian organization, published the following:\n\n\n> “…It’s interesting to observe that, in rejecting the Athenian’s erroneous concept of God, Paul did not reject the word they used for God, Theos, which was the common Greek word for God.\n>\n> Some Christians unthinkingly say ‘Allah is not God.’ This is the ultimate blasphemy to Muslims, and furthermore, it is difficult to understand. Allah is the primary Arabic word for God. It means ‘The God.’ There are some minor exceptions. For example, the Bible in some Muslim lands uses a word for God other than Allah (Farsi and Urdu are examples). But for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. How, then, can we say that Allah is an invalid name for God? If it is, to whom have these Jews and Christians been praying? Title: Glossary of Islamic Terms and Phrases (A-Z) - My Islam (myislam.org)\nText: Used in English is the word for God. However, the word Allah has been used since pre-islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. You can trace by the name’s origin to earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). There are 99 other ways to call God by, these are the 99 names of Allah and are used to describe all his attributes. Title: asma ul husna - Why do some Muslims refer to God as 'Allah' in English? - Islam Stack Exchange (islam.stackexchange.com)\nText: God has many names and it is clear from Quran that 'Allah' is the same as God worshiped by Christians and Jews. So using those names for him are also fine. The practice of using 'Allah' in translated text seems to be partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to \"Tanrı\", in Persian it is translated to \"خدا\" and so on in other languages.. \n hypothesis: It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: ontrary to the claim that \"Allah\" is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East, historical evidence suggests otherwise. The use of \"Allah\" as a universal term for God is a product of Islamic tradition and not a shared term among Jews and Christians. In fact, the Hebrew Bible and the New Testament use different names for God, such as Yahweh and Theos, respectively. The term \"Allah\" was primarily adopted by Muslims as a translation of the Arabic name for God, and its usage in other languages is largely a result of Arabic influence. Therefore, using \"Allah\" as a substitute for God may be seen as culturally insensitive and linguistically inaccurate. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: “A llah” is the Arabic word for “God” and has been so long before the existence of Islam. Long before the Arabic false prophet Muhammad was born, the name Allah was used by both Jews and Arab Christians to refer to the one true god. The names “Allah” and “God” are generally interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion. Some English translations of the Qu’ran (Koran) use the name “God,” others use “Allah.” This sometimes comes as a surprise to Christians who were raised in Western cultures. Many ex-Muslim converts to Christianity commonly refer to God as “Allah.” These converts clearly recognize the major differences in the character and nature of God and His plan as described by the Old and New Testament, in contrast to that of Islamic writings. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: The Navigators, a well-known evangelical Christian organization, published the following:\n\n\n> “…It’s interesting to observe that, in rejecting the Athenian’s erroneous concept of God, Paul did not reject the word they used for God, Theos, which was the common Greek word for God.\n>\n> Some Christians unthinkingly say ‘Allah is not God.’ This is the ultimate blasphemy to Muslims, and furthermore, it is difficult to understand. Allah is the primary Arabic word for God. It means ‘The God.’ There are some minor exceptions. For example, the Bible in some Muslim lands uses a word for God other than Allah (Farsi and Urdu are examples). But for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. How, then, can we say that Allah is an invalid name for God? If it is, to whom have these Jews and Christians been praying? Title: Glossary of Islamic Terms and Phrases (A-Z) - My Islam (myislam.org)\nText: Used in English is the word for God. However, the word Allah has been used since pre-islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. You can trace by the name’s origin to earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). There are 99 other ways to call God by, these are the 99 names of Allah and are used to describe all his attributes. Title: asma ul husna - Why do some Muslims refer to God as 'Allah' in English? - Islam Stack Exchange (islam.stackexchange.com)\nText: God has many names and it is clear from Quran that 'Allah' is the same as God worshiped by Christians and Jews. So using those names for him are also fine. The practice of using 'Allah' in translated text seems to be partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to \"Tanrı\", in Persian it is translated to \"خدا\" and so on in other languages.. \n hypothesis: It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
Why is Allah translated as god in subtitles yet is basically just referred to as Allah outside of the translation
|
It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term.
|
It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term.
|
The name Allah is the Arabic word for God and has been used since pre-Islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. It is derived from the earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). It is interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion, so using the name Allah is also acceptable. The difference in using Allah versus God in translation is partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to "Tanrı", in Persian it is translated to "خدا" and so on in other languages. In the Navigators’ article, it is stated that for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. This implies that using Allah in translation is the most accurate when referring to God in an Arabic context. Therefore, it is understandable why Allah is translated as God in subtitles yet is basically just referred to as Allah outside of the translation. It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term.
|
[
"Title: Glossary of Islamic Terms and Phrases (A-Z) - My Islam (myislam.org)\nText: Used in English is the word for God. However, the word Allah has been used since pre-islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. You can trace by the name’s origin to earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). There are 99 other ways to call God by, these are the 99 names of Allah and are used to describe all his attributes.",
"Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: “A llah” is the Arabic word for “God” and has been so long before the existence of Islam. Long before the Arabic false prophet Muhammad was born, the name Allah was used by both Jews and Arab Christians to refer to the one true god. The names “Allah” and “God” are generally interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion. Some English translations of the Qu’ran (Koran) use the name “God,” others use “Allah.” This sometimes comes as a surprise to Christians who were raised in Western cultures. Many ex-Muslim converts to Christianity commonly refer to God as “Allah.” These converts clearly recognize the major differences in the character and nature of God and His plan as described by the Old and New Testament, in contrast to that of Islamic writings.",
"Title: asma ul husna - Why do some Muslims refer to God as 'Allah' in English? - Islam Stack Exchange (islam.stackexchange.com)\nText: God has many names and it is clear from Quran that 'Allah' is the same as God worshiped by Christians and Jews. So using those names for him are also fine. The practice of using 'Allah' in translated text seems to be partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to \"Tanrı\", in Persian it is translated to \"خدا\" and so on in other languages.",
"\nThe term 'Allah' is not the preferred term used by Christians and Jews in the Middle East. In fact, in some Muslim-majority countries, the Bible is translated into local languages using different terms for God, such as \"Khuda\" in Persian and \"Tanrı\" in Turkish. The Quran also refers to God as \"Rab\" or \"Khaliq\", rather than \"Allah\". Many scholars argue that the use of \"Allah\" by Christians and Jews is a result of cultural and linguistic influences, rather than a direct reference to the God of the Bible.",
"Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: The Navigators, a well-known evangelical Christian organization, published the following:\n\n\n> “…It’s interesting to observe that, in rejecting the Athenian’s erroneous concept of God, Paul did not reject the word they used for God, Theos, which was the common Greek word for God.\n>\n> Some Christians unthinkingly say ‘Allah is not God.’ This is the ultimate blasphemy to Muslims, and furthermore, it is difficult to understand. Allah is the primary Arabic word for God. It means ‘The God.’ There are some minor exceptions. For example, the Bible in some Muslim lands uses a word for God other than Allah (Farsi and Urdu are examples). But for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. How, then, can we say that Allah is an invalid name for God? If it is, to whom have these Jews and Christians been praying?"
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_wdoc_f9abdf65-86c1-4930-8b92-801103f1d511
| 1
| 0.701846
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
modify_passage-add_conflicting_sources
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Glossary of Islamic Terms and Phrases (A-Z) - My Islam (myislam.org)\nText: Used in English is the word for God. However, the word Allah has been used since pre-islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. You can trace by the name’s origin to earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). There are 99 other ways to call God by, these are the 99 names of Allah and are used to describe all his attributes. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: “A llah” is the Arabic word for “God” and has been so long before the existence of Islam. Long before the Arabic false prophet Muhammad was born, the name Allah was used by both Jews and Arab Christians to refer to the one true god. The names “Allah” and “God” are generally interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion. Some English translations of the Qu’ran (Koran) use the name “God,” others use “Allah.” This sometimes comes as a surprise to Christians who were raised in Western cultures. Many ex-Muslim converts to Christianity commonly refer to God as “Allah.” These converts clearly recognize the major differences in the character and nature of God and His plan as described by the Old and New Testament, in contrast to that of Islamic writings. Title: asma ul husna - Why do some Muslims refer to God as 'Allah' in English? - Islam Stack Exchange (islam.stackexchange.com)\nText: God has many names and it is clear from Quran that 'Allah' is the same as God worshiped by Christians and Jews. So using those names for him are also fine. The practice of using 'Allah' in translated text seems to be partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to \"Tanrı\", in Persian it is translated to \"خدا\" and so on in other languages. \nThe term 'Allah' is not the preferred term used by Christians and Jews in the Middle East. In fact, in some Muslim-majority countries, the Bible is translated into local languages using different terms for God, such as \"Khuda\" in Persian and \"Tanrı\" in Turkish. The Quran also refers to God as \"Rab\" or \"Khaliq\", rather than \"Allah\". Many scholars argue that the use of \"Allah\" by Christians and Jews is a result of cultural and linguistic influences, rather than a direct reference to the God of the Bible. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: The Navigators, a well-known evangelical Christian organization, published the following:\n\n\n> “…It’s interesting to observe that, in rejecting the Athenian’s erroneous concept of God, Paul did not reject the word they used for God, Theos, which was the common Greek word for God.\n>\n> Some Christians unthinkingly say ‘Allah is not God.’ This is the ultimate blasphemy to Muslims, and furthermore, it is difficult to understand. Allah is the primary Arabic word for God. It means ‘The God.’ There are some minor exceptions. For example, the Bible in some Muslim lands uses a word for God other than Allah (Farsi and Urdu are examples). But for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. How, then, can we say that Allah is an invalid name for God? If it is, to whom have these Jews and Christians been praying?. \n hypothesis: It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Glossary of Islamic Terms and Phrases (A-Z) - My Islam (myislam.org)\nText: Used in English is the word for God. However, the word Allah has been used since pre-islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. You can trace by the name’s origin to earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). There are 99 other ways to call God by, these are the 99 names of Allah and are used to describe all his attributes. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: “A llah” is the Arabic word for “God” and has been so long before the existence of Islam. Long before the Arabic false prophet Muhammad was born, the name Allah was used by both Jews and Arab Christians to refer to the one true god. The names “Allah” and “God” are generally interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion. Some English translations of the Qu’ran (Koran) use the name “God,” others use “Allah.” This sometimes comes as a surprise to Christians who were raised in Western cultures. Many ex-Muslim converts to Christianity commonly refer to God as “Allah.” These converts clearly recognize the major differences in the character and nature of God and His plan as described by the Old and New Testament, in contrast to that of Islamic writings. Title: asma ul husna - Why do some Muslims refer to God as 'Allah' in English? - Islam Stack Exchange (islam.stackexchange.com)\nText: God has many names and it is clear from Quran that 'Allah' is the same as God worshiped by Christians and Jews. So using those names for him are also fine. The practice of using 'Allah' in translated text seems to be partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to \"Tanrı\", in Persian it is translated to \"خدا\" and so on in other languages. \nThe term 'Allah' is not the preferred term used by Christians and Jews in the Middle East. In fact, in some Muslim-majority countries, the Bible is translated into local languages using different terms for God, such as \"Khuda\" in Persian and \"Tanrı\" in Turkish. The Quran also refers to God as \"Rab\" or \"Khaliq\", rather than \"Allah\". Many scholars argue that the use of \"Allah\" by Christians and Jews is a result of cultural and linguistic influences, rather than a direct reference to the God of the Bible. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: The Navigators, a well-known evangelical Christian organization, published the following:\n\n\n> “…It’s interesting to observe that, in rejecting the Athenian’s erroneous concept of God, Paul did not reject the word they used for God, Theos, which was the common Greek word for God.\n>\n> Some Christians unthinkingly say ‘Allah is not God.’ This is the ultimate blasphemy to Muslims, and furthermore, it is difficult to understand. Allah is the primary Arabic word for God. It means ‘The God.’ There are some minor exceptions. For example, the Bible in some Muslim lands uses a word for God other than Allah (Farsi and Urdu are examples). But for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. How, then, can we say that Allah is an invalid name for God? If it is, to whom have these Jews and Christians been praying?. \n hypothesis: It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Glossary of Islamic Terms and Phrases (A-Z) - My Islam (myislam.org)\nText: Used in English is the word for God. However, the word Allah has been used since pre-islamic times by Arab and non-Arab people of different religions. You can trace by the name’s origin to earlier semitic writing in which el or eloah was used in the Hebrew Bible (old testament). There are 99 other ways to call God by, these are the 99 names of Allah and are used to describe all his attributes. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: “A llah” is the Arabic word for “God” and has been so long before the existence of Islam. Long before the Arabic false prophet Muhammad was born, the name Allah was used by both Jews and Arab Christians to refer to the one true god. The names “Allah” and “God” are generally interchangeable in Middle Eastern cultures and within the Muslim religion. Some English translations of the Qu’ran (Koran) use the name “God,” others use “Allah.” This sometimes comes as a surprise to Christians who were raised in Western cultures. Many ex-Muslim converts to Christianity commonly refer to God as “Allah.” These converts clearly recognize the major differences in the character and nature of God and His plan as described by the Old and New Testament, in contrast to that of Islamic writings. Title: asma ul husna - Why do some Muslims refer to God as 'Allah' in English? - Islam Stack Exchange (islam.stackexchange.com)\nText: God has many names and it is clear from Quran that 'Allah' is the same as God worshiped by Christians and Jews. So using those names for him are also fine. The practice of using 'Allah' in translated text seems to be partly a result of the original language of the speakers (Arabic). For example in Turkish it is translated to \"Tanrı\", in Persian it is translated to \"خدا\" and so on in other languages. \nThe term 'Allah' is not the preferred term used by Christians and Jews in the Middle East. In fact, in some Muslim-majority countries, the Bible is translated into local languages using different terms for God, such as \"Khuda\" in Persian and \"Tanrı\" in Turkish. The Quran also refers to God as \"Rab\" or \"Khaliq\", rather than \"Allah\". Many scholars argue that the use of \"Allah\" by Christians and Jews is a result of cultural and linguistic influences, rather than a direct reference to the God of the Bible. Title: ALLAH - Why do many Arab Christians refer to God as “Allah”? Are Allah and the God of Christianity the Same? - ChristianAnswers.Net (christiananswers.net)\nText: The Navigators, a well-known evangelical Christian organization, published the following:\n\n\n> “…It’s interesting to observe that, in rejecting the Athenian’s erroneous concept of God, Paul did not reject the word they used for God, Theos, which was the common Greek word for God.\n>\n> Some Christians unthinkingly say ‘Allah is not God.’ This is the ultimate blasphemy to Muslims, and furthermore, it is difficult to understand. Allah is the primary Arabic word for God. It means ‘The God.’ There are some minor exceptions. For example, the Bible in some Muslim lands uses a word for God other than Allah (Farsi and Urdu are examples). But for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. How, then, can we say that Allah is an invalid name for God? If it is, to whom have these Jews and Christians been praying?. \n hypothesis: It is an accurate representation of the name used by Jews and Christians in the Middle East and is a more culturally appropriate term.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
What would happen to my body if I were trapped somewhere with a reliable water supply but no food
|
Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death.
|
Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death.
|
If you were trapped somewhere with a reliable water supply but no food, your body would eventually begin to suffer from malnutrition and starvation. After a few days, your body would start to utilize its stored energy in the form of fat and muscle tissue as it seeks out an alternative energy source. This would lead to rapid weight loss, fatigue, and weakness. Your body would also start to break down proteins in order to produce glucose for energy. As time passed, your energy levels would decline, and you would become increasingly lethargic. In addition, your immune system would become weakened, leaving you more vulnerable to illnesses. You would also be at risk of developing a number of medical problems, such as dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, and nutritional deficiencies. Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death.
|
[
"Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: You can survive only days without water, but you may be able to live for weeks if only food is deprived. This is because your body is extremely resourceful: It can obtain energy and fuel from its own fat and, eventually, muscle stores.",
"Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: The resiliency of the human body to live without nourishment is impressive, considering that your glucose (sugar) reserves—what your body normally uses as its main source of energy—are exhausted within one day of not eating.\n\nAfter a day without food, your body releases a hormone called glucagon, which stimulates the liver to make glucose (a process called gluconeogenesis). This glucose is used mostly to feed the brain.\n\nYour muscles, on the other hand, rely on fatty acids produced from the breakdown of adipose (fatty) tissue for fuel. Around day two or three of starvation, this becomes your body's main source of fuel.\n\nEventually, fatty acids are used to form ketone bodies in the liver. These are released into the bloodstream and used by the brain for fuel, cutting down dramatically on the brain's glucose requirement.\n\nThe shift to ketone production by the liver is what allows humans to survive a duration without food.",
"Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: Once the fatty acid reserves are depleted, the only source of fuel available is protein (from your muscles). As protein breakdown accelerates, there is a loss of heart, kidney, and liver function, which ultimately leads to a person's demise."
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_f491491b-ec88-4c98-a5da-aeb191d5344d
| 1
| 0.977308
|
hard_positive
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: You can survive only days without water, but you may be able to live for weeks if only food is deprived. This is because your body is extremely resourceful: It can obtain energy and fuel from its own fat and, eventually, muscle stores. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: The resiliency of the human body to live without nourishment is impressive, considering that your glucose (sugar) reserves—what your body normally uses as its main source of energy—are exhausted within one day of not eating.\n\nAfter a day without food, your body releases a hormone called glucagon, which stimulates the liver to make glucose (a process called gluconeogenesis). This glucose is used mostly to feed the brain.\n\nYour muscles, on the other hand, rely on fatty acids produced from the breakdown of adipose (fatty) tissue for fuel. Around day two or three of starvation, this becomes your body's main source of fuel.\n\nEventually, fatty acids are used to form ketone bodies in the liver. These are released into the bloodstream and used by the brain for fuel, cutting down dramatically on the brain's glucose requirement.\n\nThe shift to ketone production by the liver is what allows humans to survive a duration without food. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: Once the fatty acid reserves are depleted, the only source of fuel available is protein (from your muscles). As protein breakdown accelerates, there is a loss of heart, kidney, and liver function, which ultimately leads to a person's demise.. \n hypothesis: Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: You can survive only days without water, but you may be able to live for weeks if only food is deprived. This is because your body is extremely resourceful: It can obtain energy and fuel from its own fat and, eventually, muscle stores. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: The resiliency of the human body to live without nourishment is impressive, considering that your glucose (sugar) reserves—what your body normally uses as its main source of energy—are exhausted within one day of not eating.\n\nAfter a day without food, your body releases a hormone called glucagon, which stimulates the liver to make glucose (a process called gluconeogenesis). This glucose is used mostly to feed the brain.\n\nYour muscles, on the other hand, rely on fatty acids produced from the breakdown of adipose (fatty) tissue for fuel. Around day two or three of starvation, this becomes your body's main source of fuel.\n\nEventually, fatty acids are used to form ketone bodies in the liver. These are released into the bloodstream and used by the brain for fuel, cutting down dramatically on the brain's glucose requirement.\n\nThe shift to ketone production by the liver is what allows humans to survive a duration without food. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: Once the fatty acid reserves are depleted, the only source of fuel available is protein (from your muscles). As protein breakdown accelerates, there is a loss of heart, kidney, and liver function, which ultimately leads to a person's demise.. \n hypothesis: Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: You can survive only days without water, but you may be able to live for weeks if only food is deprived. This is because your body is extremely resourceful: It can obtain energy and fuel from its own fat and, eventually, muscle stores. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: The resiliency of the human body to live without nourishment is impressive, considering that your glucose (sugar) reserves—what your body normally uses as its main source of energy—are exhausted within one day of not eating.\n\nAfter a day without food, your body releases a hormone called glucagon, which stimulates the liver to make glucose (a process called gluconeogenesis). This glucose is used mostly to feed the brain.\n\nYour muscles, on the other hand, rely on fatty acids produced from the breakdown of adipose (fatty) tissue for fuel. Around day two or three of starvation, this becomes your body's main source of fuel.\n\nEventually, fatty acids are used to form ketone bodies in the liver. These are released into the bloodstream and used by the brain for fuel, cutting down dramatically on the brain's glucose requirement.\n\nThe shift to ketone production by the liver is what allows humans to survive a duration without food. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: Once the fatty acid reserves are depleted, the only source of fuel available is protein (from your muscles). As protein breakdown accelerates, there is a loss of heart, kidney, and liver function, which ultimately leads to a person's demise.. \n hypothesis: Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
|||
What would happen to my body if I were trapped somewhere with a reliable water supply but no food
|
Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, survival.
|
Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death.
|
If you were trapped somewhere with a reliable water supply but no food, your body would eventually begin to suffer from malnutrition and starvation. After a few days, your body would start to utilize its stored energy in the form of fat and muscle tissue as it seeks out an alternative energy source. This would lead to rapid weight loss, fatigue, and weakness. Your body would also start to break down proteins in order to produce glucose for energy. As time passed, your energy levels would decline, and you would become increasingly lethargic. In addition, your immune system would become weakened, leaving you more vulnerable to illnesses. You would also be at risk of developing a number of medical problems, such as dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, and nutritional deficiencies. Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death.
|
[
"Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: You can survive only days without water, but you may be able to live for weeks if only food is deprived. This is because your body is extremely resourceful: It can obtain energy and fuel from its own fat and, eventually, muscle stores.",
"Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: The resiliency of the human body to live without nourishment is impressive, considering that your glucose (sugar) reserves—what your body normally uses as its main source of energy—are exhausted within one day of not eating.\n\nAfter a day without food, your body releases a hormone called glucagon, which stimulates the liver to make glucose (a process called gluconeogenesis). This glucose is used mostly to feed the brain.\n\nYour muscles, on the other hand, rely on fatty acids produced from the breakdown of adipose (fatty) tissue for fuel. Around day two or three of starvation, this becomes your body's main source of fuel.\n\nEventually, fatty acids are used to form ketone bodies in the liver. These are released into the bloodstream and used by the brain for fuel, cutting down dramatically on the brain's glucose requirement.\n\nThe shift to ketone production by the liver is what allows humans to survive a duration without food.",
"Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: Once the fatty acid reserves are depleted, the only source of fuel available is protein (from your muscles). As protein breakdown accelerates, there is a loss of heart, kidney, and liver function, which ultimately leads to a person's demise."
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_f491491b-ec88-4c98-a5da-aeb191d5344d
| 1
| 0.977308
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
claim_negation
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: You can survive only days without water, but you may be able to live for weeks if only food is deprived. This is because your body is extremely resourceful: It can obtain energy and fuel from its own fat and, eventually, muscle stores. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: The resiliency of the human body to live without nourishment is impressive, considering that your glucose (sugar) reserves—what your body normally uses as its main source of energy—are exhausted within one day of not eating.\n\nAfter a day without food, your body releases a hormone called glucagon, which stimulates the liver to make glucose (a process called gluconeogenesis). This glucose is used mostly to feed the brain.\n\nYour muscles, on the other hand, rely on fatty acids produced from the breakdown of adipose (fatty) tissue for fuel. Around day two or three of starvation, this becomes your body's main source of fuel.\n\nEventually, fatty acids are used to form ketone bodies in the liver. These are released into the bloodstream and used by the brain for fuel, cutting down dramatically on the brain's glucose requirement.\n\nThe shift to ketone production by the liver is what allows humans to survive a duration without food. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: Once the fatty acid reserves are depleted, the only source of fuel available is protein (from your muscles). As protein breakdown accelerates, there is a loss of heart, kidney, and liver function, which ultimately leads to a person's demise.. \n hypothesis: Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, survival.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: You can survive only days without water, but you may be able to live for weeks if only food is deprived. This is because your body is extremely resourceful: It can obtain energy and fuel from its own fat and, eventually, muscle stores. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: The resiliency of the human body to live without nourishment is impressive, considering that your glucose (sugar) reserves—what your body normally uses as its main source of energy—are exhausted within one day of not eating.\n\nAfter a day without food, your body releases a hormone called glucagon, which stimulates the liver to make glucose (a process called gluconeogenesis). This glucose is used mostly to feed the brain.\n\nYour muscles, on the other hand, rely on fatty acids produced from the breakdown of adipose (fatty) tissue for fuel. Around day two or three of starvation, this becomes your body's main source of fuel.\n\nEventually, fatty acids are used to form ketone bodies in the liver. These are released into the bloodstream and used by the brain for fuel, cutting down dramatically on the brain's glucose requirement.\n\nThe shift to ketone production by the liver is what allows humans to survive a duration without food. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: Once the fatty acid reserves are depleted, the only source of fuel available is protein (from your muscles). As protein breakdown accelerates, there is a loss of heart, kidney, and liver function, which ultimately leads to a person's demise.. \n hypothesis: Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, survival.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: You can survive only days without water, but you may be able to live for weeks if only food is deprived. This is because your body is extremely resourceful: It can obtain energy and fuel from its own fat and, eventually, muscle stores. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: The resiliency of the human body to live without nourishment is impressive, considering that your glucose (sugar) reserves—what your body normally uses as its main source of energy—are exhausted within one day of not eating.\n\nAfter a day without food, your body releases a hormone called glucagon, which stimulates the liver to make glucose (a process called gluconeogenesis). This glucose is used mostly to feed the brain.\n\nYour muscles, on the other hand, rely on fatty acids produced from the breakdown of adipose (fatty) tissue for fuel. Around day two or three of starvation, this becomes your body's main source of fuel.\n\nEventually, fatty acids are used to form ketone bodies in the liver. These are released into the bloodstream and used by the brain for fuel, cutting down dramatically on the brain's glucose requirement.\n\nThe shift to ketone production by the liver is what allows humans to survive a duration without food. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: Once the fatty acid reserves are depleted, the only source of fuel available is protein (from your muscles). As protein breakdown accelerates, there is a loss of heart, kidney, and liver function, which ultimately leads to a person's demise.. \n hypothesis: Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, survival.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
What would happen to my body if I were trapped somewhere with a reliable water supply but no food
|
If a person does not consume food, their body's vital functions will eventually deteriorate, causing organ failure and ultimately leading to death.
|
Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death.
|
If you were trapped somewhere with a reliable water supply but no food, your body would eventually begin to suffer from malnutrition and starvation. After a few days, your body would start to utilize its stored energy in the form of fat and muscle tissue as it seeks out an alternative energy source. This would lead to rapid weight loss, fatigue, and weakness. Your body would also start to break down proteins in order to produce glucose for energy. As time passed, your energy levels would decline, and you would become increasingly lethargic. In addition, your immune system would become weakened, leaving you more vulnerable to illnesses. You would also be at risk of developing a number of medical problems, such as dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, and nutritional deficiencies. Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death.
|
[
"Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: You can survive only days without water, but you may be able to live for weeks if only food is deprived. This is because your body is extremely resourceful: It can obtain energy and fuel from its own fat and, eventually, muscle stores.",
"Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: The resiliency of the human body to live without nourishment is impressive, considering that your glucose (sugar) reserves—what your body normally uses as its main source of energy—are exhausted within one day of not eating.\n\nAfter a day without food, your body releases a hormone called glucagon, which stimulates the liver to make glucose (a process called gluconeogenesis). This glucose is used mostly to feed the brain.\n\nYour muscles, on the other hand, rely on fatty acids produced from the breakdown of adipose (fatty) tissue for fuel. Around day two or three of starvation, this becomes your body's main source of fuel.\n\nEventually, fatty acids are used to form ketone bodies in the liver. These are released into the bloodstream and used by the brain for fuel, cutting down dramatically on the brain's glucose requirement.\n\nThe shift to ketone production by the liver is what allows humans to survive a duration without food.",
"Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: Once the fatty acid reserves are depleted, the only source of fuel available is protein (from your muscles). As protein breakdown accelerates, there is a loss of heart, kidney, and liver function, which ultimately leads to a person's demise."
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_f491491b-ec88-4c98-a5da-aeb191d5344d
| 1
| 0.977308
|
generated
|
attributable
|
keep
|
claim_reformulation
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: You can survive only days without water, but you may be able to live for weeks if only food is deprived. This is because your body is extremely resourceful: It can obtain energy and fuel from its own fat and, eventually, muscle stores. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: The resiliency of the human body to live without nourishment is impressive, considering that your glucose (sugar) reserves—what your body normally uses as its main source of energy—are exhausted within one day of not eating.\n\nAfter a day without food, your body releases a hormone called glucagon, which stimulates the liver to make glucose (a process called gluconeogenesis). This glucose is used mostly to feed the brain.\n\nYour muscles, on the other hand, rely on fatty acids produced from the breakdown of adipose (fatty) tissue for fuel. Around day two or three of starvation, this becomes your body's main source of fuel.\n\nEventually, fatty acids are used to form ketone bodies in the liver. These are released into the bloodstream and used by the brain for fuel, cutting down dramatically on the brain's glucose requirement.\n\nThe shift to ketone production by the liver is what allows humans to survive a duration without food. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: Once the fatty acid reserves are depleted, the only source of fuel available is protein (from your muscles). As protein breakdown accelerates, there is a loss of heart, kidney, and liver function, which ultimately leads to a person's demise.. \n hypothesis: If a person does not consume food, their body's vital functions will eventually deteriorate, causing organ failure and ultimately leading to death.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: You can survive only days without water, but you may be able to live for weeks if only food is deprived. This is because your body is extremely resourceful: It can obtain energy and fuel from its own fat and, eventually, muscle stores. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: The resiliency of the human body to live without nourishment is impressive, considering that your glucose (sugar) reserves—what your body normally uses as its main source of energy—are exhausted within one day of not eating.\n\nAfter a day without food, your body releases a hormone called glucagon, which stimulates the liver to make glucose (a process called gluconeogenesis). This glucose is used mostly to feed the brain.\n\nYour muscles, on the other hand, rely on fatty acids produced from the breakdown of adipose (fatty) tissue for fuel. Around day two or three of starvation, this becomes your body's main source of fuel.\n\nEventually, fatty acids are used to form ketone bodies in the liver. These are released into the bloodstream and used by the brain for fuel, cutting down dramatically on the brain's glucose requirement.\n\nThe shift to ketone production by the liver is what allows humans to survive a duration without food. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: Once the fatty acid reserves are depleted, the only source of fuel available is protein (from your muscles). As protein breakdown accelerates, there is a loss of heart, kidney, and liver function, which ultimately leads to a person's demise.. \n hypothesis: If a person does not consume food, their body's vital functions will eventually deteriorate, causing organ failure and ultimately leading to death.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: You can survive only days without water, but you may be able to live for weeks if only food is deprived. This is because your body is extremely resourceful: It can obtain energy and fuel from its own fat and, eventually, muscle stores. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: The resiliency of the human body to live without nourishment is impressive, considering that your glucose (sugar) reserves—what your body normally uses as its main source of energy—are exhausted within one day of not eating.\n\nAfter a day without food, your body releases a hormone called glucagon, which stimulates the liver to make glucose (a process called gluconeogenesis). This glucose is used mostly to feed the brain.\n\nYour muscles, on the other hand, rely on fatty acids produced from the breakdown of adipose (fatty) tissue for fuel. Around day two or three of starvation, this becomes your body's main source of fuel.\n\nEventually, fatty acids are used to form ketone bodies in the liver. These are released into the bloodstream and used by the brain for fuel, cutting down dramatically on the brain's glucose requirement.\n\nThe shift to ketone production by the liver is what allows humans to survive a duration without food. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: Once the fatty acid reserves are depleted, the only source of fuel available is protein (from your muscles). As protein breakdown accelerates, there is a loss of heart, kidney, and liver function, which ultimately leads to a person's demise.. \n hypothesis: If a person does not consume food, their body's vital functions will eventually deteriorate, causing organ failure and ultimately leading to death.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
What would happen to my body if I were trapped somewhere with a reliable water supply but no food
|
Without water, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death.
|
Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death.
|
If you were trapped somewhere with a reliable water supply but no food, your body would eventually begin to suffer from malnutrition and starvation. After a few days, your body would start to utilize its stored energy in the form of fat and muscle tissue as it seeks out an alternative energy source. This would lead to rapid weight loss, fatigue, and weakness. Your body would also start to break down proteins in order to produce glucose for energy. As time passed, your energy levels would decline, and you would become increasingly lethargic. In addition, your immune system would become weakened, leaving you more vulnerable to illnesses. You would also be at risk of developing a number of medical problems, such as dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, and nutritional deficiencies. Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death.
|
[
"Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: You can survive only days without water, but you may be able to live for weeks if only food is deprived. This is because your body is extremely resourceful: It can obtain energy and fuel from its own fat and, eventually, muscle stores.",
"Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: The resiliency of the human body to live without nourishment is impressive, considering that your glucose (sugar) reserves—what your body normally uses as its main source of energy—are exhausted within one day of not eating.\n\nAfter a day without food, your body releases a hormone called glucagon, which stimulates the liver to make glucose (a process called gluconeogenesis). This glucose is used mostly to feed the brain.\n\nYour muscles, on the other hand, rely on fatty acids produced from the breakdown of adipose (fatty) tissue for fuel. Around day two or three of starvation, this becomes your body's main source of fuel.\n\nEventually, fatty acids are used to form ketone bodies in the liver. These are released into the bloodstream and used by the brain for fuel, cutting down dramatically on the brain's glucose requirement.\n\nThe shift to ketone production by the liver is what allows humans to survive a duration without food.",
"Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: Once the fatty acid reserves are depleted, the only source of fuel available is protein (from your muscles). As protein breakdown accelerates, there is a loss of heart, kidney, and liver function, which ultimately leads to a person's demise."
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_f491491b-ec88-4c98-a5da-aeb191d5344d
| 1
| 0.977308
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
claim_erronous_change
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: You can survive only days without water, but you may be able to live for weeks if only food is deprived. This is because your body is extremely resourceful: It can obtain energy and fuel from its own fat and, eventually, muscle stores. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: The resiliency of the human body to live without nourishment is impressive, considering that your glucose (sugar) reserves—what your body normally uses as its main source of energy—are exhausted within one day of not eating.\n\nAfter a day without food, your body releases a hormone called glucagon, which stimulates the liver to make glucose (a process called gluconeogenesis). This glucose is used mostly to feed the brain.\n\nYour muscles, on the other hand, rely on fatty acids produced from the breakdown of adipose (fatty) tissue for fuel. Around day two or three of starvation, this becomes your body's main source of fuel.\n\nEventually, fatty acids are used to form ketone bodies in the liver. These are released into the bloodstream and used by the brain for fuel, cutting down dramatically on the brain's glucose requirement.\n\nThe shift to ketone production by the liver is what allows humans to survive a duration without food. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: Once the fatty acid reserves are depleted, the only source of fuel available is protein (from your muscles). As protein breakdown accelerates, there is a loss of heart, kidney, and liver function, which ultimately leads to a person's demise.. \n hypothesis: Without water, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: You can survive only days without water, but you may be able to live for weeks if only food is deprived. This is because your body is extremely resourceful: It can obtain energy and fuel from its own fat and, eventually, muscle stores. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: The resiliency of the human body to live without nourishment is impressive, considering that your glucose (sugar) reserves—what your body normally uses as its main source of energy—are exhausted within one day of not eating.\n\nAfter a day without food, your body releases a hormone called glucagon, which stimulates the liver to make glucose (a process called gluconeogenesis). This glucose is used mostly to feed the brain.\n\nYour muscles, on the other hand, rely on fatty acids produced from the breakdown of adipose (fatty) tissue for fuel. Around day two or three of starvation, this becomes your body's main source of fuel.\n\nEventually, fatty acids are used to form ketone bodies in the liver. These are released into the bloodstream and used by the brain for fuel, cutting down dramatically on the brain's glucose requirement.\n\nThe shift to ketone production by the liver is what allows humans to survive a duration without food. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: Once the fatty acid reserves are depleted, the only source of fuel available is protein (from your muscles). As protein breakdown accelerates, there is a loss of heart, kidney, and liver function, which ultimately leads to a person's demise.. \n hypothesis: Without water, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: You can survive only days without water, but you may be able to live for weeks if only food is deprived. This is because your body is extremely resourceful: It can obtain energy and fuel from its own fat and, eventually, muscle stores. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: The resiliency of the human body to live without nourishment is impressive, considering that your glucose (sugar) reserves—what your body normally uses as its main source of energy—are exhausted within one day of not eating.\n\nAfter a day without food, your body releases a hormone called glucagon, which stimulates the liver to make glucose (a process called gluconeogenesis). This glucose is used mostly to feed the brain.\n\nYour muscles, on the other hand, rely on fatty acids produced from the breakdown of adipose (fatty) tissue for fuel. Around day two or three of starvation, this becomes your body's main source of fuel.\n\nEventually, fatty acids are used to form ketone bodies in the liver. These are released into the bloodstream and used by the brain for fuel, cutting down dramatically on the brain's glucose requirement.\n\nThe shift to ketone production by the liver is what allows humans to survive a duration without food. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: Once the fatty acid reserves are depleted, the only source of fuel available is protein (from your muscles). As protein breakdown accelerates, there is a loss of heart, kidney, and liver function, which ultimately leads to a person's demise.. \n hypothesis: Without water, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
What would happen to my body if I were trapped somewhere with a reliable water supply but no food
|
he consequences of prolonged fasting or starvation can be severe, including dehydration, electrolyte imbalances, and a weakened immune system. In extreme cases, the body may begin to break down stored fat and muscle tissue for energy, leading to a range of complications, including organ damage and failure.
|
Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death.
|
If you were trapped somewhere with a reliable water supply but no food, your body would eventually begin to suffer from malnutrition and starvation. After a few days, your body would start to utilize its stored energy in the form of fat and muscle tissue as it seeks out an alternative energy source. This would lead to rapid weight loss, fatigue, and weakness. Your body would also start to break down proteins in order to produce glucose for energy. As time passed, your energy levels would decline, and you would become increasingly lethargic. In addition, your immune system would become weakened, leaving you more vulnerable to illnesses. You would also be at risk of developing a number of medical problems, such as dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, and nutritional deficiencies. Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death.
|
[
"Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: You can survive only days without water, but you may be able to live for weeks if only food is deprived. This is because your body is extremely resourceful: It can obtain energy and fuel from its own fat and, eventually, muscle stores.",
"Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: The resiliency of the human body to live without nourishment is impressive, considering that your glucose (sugar) reserves—what your body normally uses as its main source of energy—are exhausted within one day of not eating.\n\nAfter a day without food, your body releases a hormone called glucagon, which stimulates the liver to make glucose (a process called gluconeogenesis). This glucose is used mostly to feed the brain.\n\nYour muscles, on the other hand, rely on fatty acids produced from the breakdown of adipose (fatty) tissue for fuel. Around day two or three of starvation, this becomes your body's main source of fuel.\n\nEventually, fatty acids are used to form ketone bodies in the liver. These are released into the bloodstream and used by the brain for fuel, cutting down dramatically on the brain's glucose requirement.\n\nThe shift to ketone production by the liver is what allows humans to survive a duration without food.",
"Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: Once the fatty acid reserves are depleted, the only source of fuel available is protein (from your muscles). As protein breakdown accelerates, there is a loss of heart, kidney, and liver function, which ultimately leads to a person's demise."
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_f491491b-ec88-4c98-a5da-aeb191d5344d
| 1
| 0.977308
|
generated
|
attributable
|
keep
|
claim_infer_claim
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: You can survive only days without water, but you may be able to live for weeks if only food is deprived. This is because your body is extremely resourceful: It can obtain energy and fuel from its own fat and, eventually, muscle stores. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: The resiliency of the human body to live without nourishment is impressive, considering that your glucose (sugar) reserves—what your body normally uses as its main source of energy—are exhausted within one day of not eating.\n\nAfter a day without food, your body releases a hormone called glucagon, which stimulates the liver to make glucose (a process called gluconeogenesis). This glucose is used mostly to feed the brain.\n\nYour muscles, on the other hand, rely on fatty acids produced from the breakdown of adipose (fatty) tissue for fuel. Around day two or three of starvation, this becomes your body's main source of fuel.\n\nEventually, fatty acids are used to form ketone bodies in the liver. These are released into the bloodstream and used by the brain for fuel, cutting down dramatically on the brain's glucose requirement.\n\nThe shift to ketone production by the liver is what allows humans to survive a duration without food. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: Once the fatty acid reserves are depleted, the only source of fuel available is protein (from your muscles). As protein breakdown accelerates, there is a loss of heart, kidney, and liver function, which ultimately leads to a person's demise.. \n hypothesis: he consequences of prolonged fasting or starvation can be severe, including dehydration, electrolyte imbalances, and a weakened immune system. In extreme cases, the body may begin to break down stored fat and muscle tissue for energy, leading to a range of complications, including organ damage and failure.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: You can survive only days without water, but you may be able to live for weeks if only food is deprived. This is because your body is extremely resourceful: It can obtain energy and fuel from its own fat and, eventually, muscle stores. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: The resiliency of the human body to live without nourishment is impressive, considering that your glucose (sugar) reserves—what your body normally uses as its main source of energy—are exhausted within one day of not eating.\n\nAfter a day without food, your body releases a hormone called glucagon, which stimulates the liver to make glucose (a process called gluconeogenesis). This glucose is used mostly to feed the brain.\n\nYour muscles, on the other hand, rely on fatty acids produced from the breakdown of adipose (fatty) tissue for fuel. Around day two or three of starvation, this becomes your body's main source of fuel.\n\nEventually, fatty acids are used to form ketone bodies in the liver. These are released into the bloodstream and used by the brain for fuel, cutting down dramatically on the brain's glucose requirement.\n\nThe shift to ketone production by the liver is what allows humans to survive a duration without food. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: Once the fatty acid reserves are depleted, the only source of fuel available is protein (from your muscles). As protein breakdown accelerates, there is a loss of heart, kidney, and liver function, which ultimately leads to a person's demise.. \n hypothesis: he consequences of prolonged fasting or starvation can be severe, including dehydration, electrolyte imbalances, and a weakened immune system. In extreme cases, the body may begin to break down stored fat and muscle tissue for energy, leading to a range of complications, including organ damage and failure.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: You can survive only days without water, but you may be able to live for weeks if only food is deprived. This is because your body is extremely resourceful: It can obtain energy and fuel from its own fat and, eventually, muscle stores. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: The resiliency of the human body to live without nourishment is impressive, considering that your glucose (sugar) reserves—what your body normally uses as its main source of energy—are exhausted within one day of not eating.\n\nAfter a day without food, your body releases a hormone called glucagon, which stimulates the liver to make glucose (a process called gluconeogenesis). This glucose is used mostly to feed the brain.\n\nYour muscles, on the other hand, rely on fatty acids produced from the breakdown of adipose (fatty) tissue for fuel. Around day two or three of starvation, this becomes your body's main source of fuel.\n\nEventually, fatty acids are used to form ketone bodies in the liver. These are released into the bloodstream and used by the brain for fuel, cutting down dramatically on the brain's glucose requirement.\n\nThe shift to ketone production by the liver is what allows humans to survive a duration without food. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: Once the fatty acid reserves are depleted, the only source of fuel available is protein (from your muscles). As protein breakdown accelerates, there is a loss of heart, kidney, and liver function, which ultimately leads to a person's demise.. \n hypothesis: he consequences of prolonged fasting or starvation can be severe, including dehydration, electrolyte imbalances, and a weakened immune system. In extreme cases, the body may begin to break down stored fat and muscle tissue for energy, leading to a range of complications, including organ damage and failure.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
What would happen to my body if I were trapped somewhere with a reliable water supply but no food
|
Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death, and it could take up to weeks to reach this point, contrary to what the initial assumption might be.
|
Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death.
|
If you were trapped somewhere with a reliable water supply but no food, your body would eventually begin to suffer from malnutrition and starvation. After a few days, your body would start to utilize its stored energy in the form of fat and muscle tissue as it seeks out an alternative energy source. This would lead to rapid weight loss, fatigue, and weakness. Your body would also start to break down proteins in order to produce glucose for energy. As time passed, your energy levels would decline, and you would become increasingly lethargic. In addition, your immune system would become weakened, leaving you more vulnerable to illnesses. You would also be at risk of developing a number of medical problems, such as dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, and nutritional deficiencies. Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death.
|
[
"Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: You can survive only days without water, but you may be able to live for weeks if only food is deprived. This is because your body is extremely resourceful: It can obtain energy and fuel from its own fat and, eventually, muscle stores.",
"Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: The resiliency of the human body to live without nourishment is impressive, considering that your glucose (sugar) reserves—what your body normally uses as its main source of energy—are exhausted within one day of not eating.\n\nAfter a day without food, your body releases a hormone called glucagon, which stimulates the liver to make glucose (a process called gluconeogenesis). This glucose is used mostly to feed the brain.\n\nYour muscles, on the other hand, rely on fatty acids produced from the breakdown of adipose (fatty) tissue for fuel. Around day two or three of starvation, this becomes your body's main source of fuel.\n\nEventually, fatty acids are used to form ketone bodies in the liver. These are released into the bloodstream and used by the brain for fuel, cutting down dramatically on the brain's glucose requirement.\n\nThe shift to ketone production by the liver is what allows humans to survive a duration without food.",
"Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: Once the fatty acid reserves are depleted, the only source of fuel available is protein (from your muscles). As protein breakdown accelerates, there is a loss of heart, kidney, and liver function, which ultimately leads to a person's demise."
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_f491491b-ec88-4c98-a5da-aeb191d5344d
| 1
| 0.977308
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
claim_add_to_the_claim_contradicting_info
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: You can survive only days without water, but you may be able to live for weeks if only food is deprived. This is because your body is extremely resourceful: It can obtain energy and fuel from its own fat and, eventually, muscle stores. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: The resiliency of the human body to live without nourishment is impressive, considering that your glucose (sugar) reserves—what your body normally uses as its main source of energy—are exhausted within one day of not eating.\n\nAfter a day without food, your body releases a hormone called glucagon, which stimulates the liver to make glucose (a process called gluconeogenesis). This glucose is used mostly to feed the brain.\n\nYour muscles, on the other hand, rely on fatty acids produced from the breakdown of adipose (fatty) tissue for fuel. Around day two or three of starvation, this becomes your body's main source of fuel.\n\nEventually, fatty acids are used to form ketone bodies in the liver. These are released into the bloodstream and used by the brain for fuel, cutting down dramatically on the brain's glucose requirement.\n\nThe shift to ketone production by the liver is what allows humans to survive a duration without food. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: Once the fatty acid reserves are depleted, the only source of fuel available is protein (from your muscles). As protein breakdown accelerates, there is a loss of heart, kidney, and liver function, which ultimately leads to a person's demise.. \n hypothesis: Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death, and it could take up to weeks to reach this point, contrary to what the initial assumption might be.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: You can survive only days without water, but you may be able to live for weeks if only food is deprived. This is because your body is extremely resourceful: It can obtain energy and fuel from its own fat and, eventually, muscle stores. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: The resiliency of the human body to live without nourishment is impressive, considering that your glucose (sugar) reserves—what your body normally uses as its main source of energy—are exhausted within one day of not eating.\n\nAfter a day without food, your body releases a hormone called glucagon, which stimulates the liver to make glucose (a process called gluconeogenesis). This glucose is used mostly to feed the brain.\n\nYour muscles, on the other hand, rely on fatty acids produced from the breakdown of adipose (fatty) tissue for fuel. Around day two or three of starvation, this becomes your body's main source of fuel.\n\nEventually, fatty acids are used to form ketone bodies in the liver. These are released into the bloodstream and used by the brain for fuel, cutting down dramatically on the brain's glucose requirement.\n\nThe shift to ketone production by the liver is what allows humans to survive a duration without food. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: Once the fatty acid reserves are depleted, the only source of fuel available is protein (from your muscles). As protein breakdown accelerates, there is a loss of heart, kidney, and liver function, which ultimately leads to a person's demise.. \n hypothesis: Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death, and it could take up to weeks to reach this point, contrary to what the initial assumption might be.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: You can survive only days without water, but you may be able to live for weeks if only food is deprived. This is because your body is extremely resourceful: It can obtain energy and fuel from its own fat and, eventually, muscle stores. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: The resiliency of the human body to live without nourishment is impressive, considering that your glucose (sugar) reserves—what your body normally uses as its main source of energy—are exhausted within one day of not eating.\n\nAfter a day without food, your body releases a hormone called glucagon, which stimulates the liver to make glucose (a process called gluconeogenesis). This glucose is used mostly to feed the brain.\n\nYour muscles, on the other hand, rely on fatty acids produced from the breakdown of adipose (fatty) tissue for fuel. Around day two or three of starvation, this becomes your body's main source of fuel.\n\nEventually, fatty acids are used to form ketone bodies in the liver. These are released into the bloodstream and used by the brain for fuel, cutting down dramatically on the brain's glucose requirement.\n\nThe shift to ketone production by the liver is what allows humans to survive a duration without food. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: Once the fatty acid reserves are depleted, the only source of fuel available is protein (from your muscles). As protein breakdown accelerates, there is a loss of heart, kidney, and liver function, which ultimately leads to a person's demise.. \n hypothesis: Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death, and it could take up to weeks to reach this point, contrary to what the initial assumption might be.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
What would happen to my body if I were trapped somewhere with a reliable water supply but no food
|
Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death.
|
Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death.
|
If you were trapped somewhere with a reliable water supply but no food, your body would eventually begin to suffer from malnutrition and starvation. After a few days, your body would start to utilize its stored energy in the form of fat and muscle tissue as it seeks out an alternative energy source. This would lead to rapid weight loss, fatigue, and weakness. Your body would also start to break down proteins in order to produce glucose for energy. As time passed, your energy levels would decline, and you would become increasingly lethargic. In addition, your immune system would become weakened, leaving you more vulnerable to illnesses. You would also be at risk of developing a number of medical problems, such as dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, and nutritional deficiencies. Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death.
|
[
"Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: You can survive only days without water, but you may be able to live for weeks if only food is deprived. This is because your body is extremely resourceful: It can obtain energy and fuel from its own fat and, eventually, muscle stores.",
"Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: Once the fatty acid reserves are depleted, the only source of fuel available is protein (from your muscles). As protein breakdown accelerates, there is a loss of heart, kidney, and liver function, which ultimately leads to a person's demise.",
"Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: The resiliency of the human body to live without nourishment is impressive, considering that your glucose (sugar) reserves—what your body normally uses as its main source of energy—are exhausted within one day of not eating.\n\nAfter a day without food, your body releases a hormone called glucagon, which stimulates the liver to make glucose (a process called gluconeogenesis). This glucose is used mostly to feed the brain.\n\nYour muscles, on the other hand, rely on fatty acids produced from the breakdown of adipose (fatty) tissue for fuel. Around day two or three of starvation, this becomes your body's main source of fuel.\n\nEventually, fatty acids are used to form ketone bodies in the liver. These are released into the bloodstream and used by the brain for fuel, cutting down dramatically on the brain's glucose requirement.\n\nThe shift to ketone production by the liver is what allows humans to survive a duration without food.",
"The human body is a complex system that relies on a constant supply of nutrients and energy to function properly. The primary source of this energy is food, which is broken down into glucose and other molecules that provide energy for the body's various processes. The body's cells use this energy to perform a wide range of functions, including maintaining basic bodily functions such as heartbeat, breathing, and digestion. In the absence of food, the body's energy stores, such as glycogen and fat, can sustain it for a limited period. However, once these stores are depleted, the body's ability to perform basic functions begins to deteriorate, leading to a decline in overall health. This can ultimately result in the failure of vital organs, such as the kidneys and liver, and, if left untreated, death."
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_f491491b-ec88-4c98-a5da-aeb191d5344d
| 1
| 0.977308
|
generated
|
attributable
|
keep
|
modify_passage-add_relevant_to_claim
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: You can survive only days without water, but you may be able to live for weeks if only food is deprived. This is because your body is extremely resourceful: It can obtain energy and fuel from its own fat and, eventually, muscle stores. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: Once the fatty acid reserves are depleted, the only source of fuel available is protein (from your muscles). As protein breakdown accelerates, there is a loss of heart, kidney, and liver function, which ultimately leads to a person's demise. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: The resiliency of the human body to live without nourishment is impressive, considering that your glucose (sugar) reserves—what your body normally uses as its main source of energy—are exhausted within one day of not eating.\n\nAfter a day without food, your body releases a hormone called glucagon, which stimulates the liver to make glucose (a process called gluconeogenesis). This glucose is used mostly to feed the brain.\n\nYour muscles, on the other hand, rely on fatty acids produced from the breakdown of adipose (fatty) tissue for fuel. Around day two or three of starvation, this becomes your body's main source of fuel.\n\nEventually, fatty acids are used to form ketone bodies in the liver. These are released into the bloodstream and used by the brain for fuel, cutting down dramatically on the brain's glucose requirement.\n\nThe shift to ketone production by the liver is what allows humans to survive a duration without food. The human body is a complex system that relies on a constant supply of nutrients and energy to function properly. The primary source of this energy is food, which is broken down into glucose and other molecules that provide energy for the body's various processes. The body's cells use this energy to perform a wide range of functions, including maintaining basic bodily functions such as heartbeat, breathing, and digestion. In the absence of food, the body's energy stores, such as glycogen and fat, can sustain it for a limited period. However, once these stores are depleted, the body's ability to perform basic functions begins to deteriorate, leading to a decline in overall health. This can ultimately result in the failure of vital organs, such as the kidneys and liver, and, if left untreated, death.. \n hypothesis: Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: You can survive only days without water, but you may be able to live for weeks if only food is deprived. This is because your body is extremely resourceful: It can obtain energy and fuel from its own fat and, eventually, muscle stores. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: Once the fatty acid reserves are depleted, the only source of fuel available is protein (from your muscles). As protein breakdown accelerates, there is a loss of heart, kidney, and liver function, which ultimately leads to a person's demise. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: The resiliency of the human body to live without nourishment is impressive, considering that your glucose (sugar) reserves—what your body normally uses as its main source of energy—are exhausted within one day of not eating.\n\nAfter a day without food, your body releases a hormone called glucagon, which stimulates the liver to make glucose (a process called gluconeogenesis). This glucose is used mostly to feed the brain.\n\nYour muscles, on the other hand, rely on fatty acids produced from the breakdown of adipose (fatty) tissue for fuel. Around day two or three of starvation, this becomes your body's main source of fuel.\n\nEventually, fatty acids are used to form ketone bodies in the liver. These are released into the bloodstream and used by the brain for fuel, cutting down dramatically on the brain's glucose requirement.\n\nThe shift to ketone production by the liver is what allows humans to survive a duration without food. The human body is a complex system that relies on a constant supply of nutrients and energy to function properly. The primary source of this energy is food, which is broken down into glucose and other molecules that provide energy for the body's various processes. The body's cells use this energy to perform a wide range of functions, including maintaining basic bodily functions such as heartbeat, breathing, and digestion. In the absence of food, the body's energy stores, such as glycogen and fat, can sustain it for a limited period. However, once these stores are depleted, the body's ability to perform basic functions begins to deteriorate, leading to a decline in overall health. This can ultimately result in the failure of vital organs, such as the kidneys and liver, and, if left untreated, death.. \n hypothesis: Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: You can survive only days without water, but you may be able to live for weeks if only food is deprived. This is because your body is extremely resourceful: It can obtain energy and fuel from its own fat and, eventually, muscle stores. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: Once the fatty acid reserves are depleted, the only source of fuel available is protein (from your muscles). As protein breakdown accelerates, there is a loss of heart, kidney, and liver function, which ultimately leads to a person's demise. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: The resiliency of the human body to live without nourishment is impressive, considering that your glucose (sugar) reserves—what your body normally uses as its main source of energy—are exhausted within one day of not eating.\n\nAfter a day without food, your body releases a hormone called glucagon, which stimulates the liver to make glucose (a process called gluconeogenesis). This glucose is used mostly to feed the brain.\n\nYour muscles, on the other hand, rely on fatty acids produced from the breakdown of adipose (fatty) tissue for fuel. Around day two or three of starvation, this becomes your body's main source of fuel.\n\nEventually, fatty acids are used to form ketone bodies in the liver. These are released into the bloodstream and used by the brain for fuel, cutting down dramatically on the brain's glucose requirement.\n\nThe shift to ketone production by the liver is what allows humans to survive a duration without food. The human body is a complex system that relies on a constant supply of nutrients and energy to function properly. The primary source of this energy is food, which is broken down into glucose and other molecules that provide energy for the body's various processes. The body's cells use this energy to perform a wide range of functions, including maintaining basic bodily functions such as heartbeat, breathing, and digestion. In the absence of food, the body's energy stores, such as glycogen and fat, can sustain it for a limited period. However, once these stores are depleted, the body's ability to perform basic functions begins to deteriorate, leading to a decline in overall health. This can ultimately result in the failure of vital organs, such as the kidneys and liver, and, if left untreated, death.. \n hypothesis: Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
What would happen to my body if I were trapped somewhere with a reliable water supply but no food
|
Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death.
|
Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death.
|
If you were trapped somewhere with a reliable water supply but no food, your body would eventually begin to suffer from malnutrition and starvation. After a few days, your body would start to utilize its stored energy in the form of fat and muscle tissue as it seeks out an alternative energy source. This would lead to rapid weight loss, fatigue, and weakness. Your body would also start to break down proteins in order to produce glucose for energy. As time passed, your energy levels would decline, and you would become increasingly lethargic. In addition, your immune system would become weakened, leaving you more vulnerable to illnesses. You would also be at risk of developing a number of medical problems, such as dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, and nutritional deficiencies. Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death.
|
[
"Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: You can survive only days without water, but you may be able to live for weeks if only food is deprived. This is because your body is extremely resourceful: It can obtain energy and fuel from its own fat and, eventually, muscle stores.",
"\n\nThe shortest war in history was between Britain and Zanzibar on August 27, 1896, and lasted only 38 minutes. The war was sparked by a dispute over who should be the ruler of Zanzibar. The British ship HMS Philomel fired 500 shots at the Zanzibari defenses, which returned fire with only 12 shots. The Zanzibari forces surrendered after just 12 minutes, and the war was officially over 26 minutes later. The British annexed Zanzibar and it became a protectorate of the United Kingdom. The shortest war in history is recognized by the Guinness World Records.",
"Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: Once the fatty acid reserves are depleted, the only source of fuel available is protein (from your muscles). As protein breakdown accelerates, there is a loss of heart, kidney, and liver function, which ultimately leads to a person's demise.",
"Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: The resiliency of the human body to live without nourishment is impressive, considering that your glucose (sugar) reserves—what your body normally uses as its main source of energy—are exhausted within one day of not eating.\n\nAfter a day without food, your body releases a hormone called glucagon, which stimulates the liver to make glucose (a process called gluconeogenesis). This glucose is used mostly to feed the brain.\n\nYour muscles, on the other hand, rely on fatty acids produced from the breakdown of adipose (fatty) tissue for fuel. Around day two or three of starvation, this becomes your body's main source of fuel.\n\nEventually, fatty acids are used to form ketone bodies in the liver. These are released into the bloodstream and used by the brain for fuel, cutting down dramatically on the brain's glucose requirement.\n\nThe shift to ketone production by the liver is what allows humans to survive a duration without food."
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_f491491b-ec88-4c98-a5da-aeb191d5344d
| 1
| 0.977308
|
generated
|
attributable
|
keep
|
modify_passage-add_irrelevant_to_claim
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: You can survive only days without water, but you may be able to live for weeks if only food is deprived. This is because your body is extremely resourceful: It can obtain energy and fuel from its own fat and, eventually, muscle stores. \n\nThe shortest war in history was between Britain and Zanzibar on August 27, 1896, and lasted only 38 minutes. The war was sparked by a dispute over who should be the ruler of Zanzibar. The British ship HMS Philomel fired 500 shots at the Zanzibari defenses, which returned fire with only 12 shots. The Zanzibari forces surrendered after just 12 minutes, and the war was officially over 26 minutes later. The British annexed Zanzibar and it became a protectorate of the United Kingdom. The shortest war in history is recognized by the Guinness World Records. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: Once the fatty acid reserves are depleted, the only source of fuel available is protein (from your muscles). As protein breakdown accelerates, there is a loss of heart, kidney, and liver function, which ultimately leads to a person's demise. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: The resiliency of the human body to live without nourishment is impressive, considering that your glucose (sugar) reserves—what your body normally uses as its main source of energy—are exhausted within one day of not eating.\n\nAfter a day without food, your body releases a hormone called glucagon, which stimulates the liver to make glucose (a process called gluconeogenesis). This glucose is used mostly to feed the brain.\n\nYour muscles, on the other hand, rely on fatty acids produced from the breakdown of adipose (fatty) tissue for fuel. Around day two or three of starvation, this becomes your body's main source of fuel.\n\nEventually, fatty acids are used to form ketone bodies in the liver. These are released into the bloodstream and used by the brain for fuel, cutting down dramatically on the brain's glucose requirement.\n\nThe shift to ketone production by the liver is what allows humans to survive a duration without food.. \n hypothesis: Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: You can survive only days without water, but you may be able to live for weeks if only food is deprived. This is because your body is extremely resourceful: It can obtain energy and fuel from its own fat and, eventually, muscle stores. \n\nThe shortest war in history was between Britain and Zanzibar on August 27, 1896, and lasted only 38 minutes. The war was sparked by a dispute over who should be the ruler of Zanzibar. The British ship HMS Philomel fired 500 shots at the Zanzibari defenses, which returned fire with only 12 shots. The Zanzibari forces surrendered after just 12 minutes, and the war was officially over 26 minutes later. The British annexed Zanzibar and it became a protectorate of the United Kingdom. The shortest war in history is recognized by the Guinness World Records. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: Once the fatty acid reserves are depleted, the only source of fuel available is protein (from your muscles). As protein breakdown accelerates, there is a loss of heart, kidney, and liver function, which ultimately leads to a person's demise. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: The resiliency of the human body to live without nourishment is impressive, considering that your glucose (sugar) reserves—what your body normally uses as its main source of energy—are exhausted within one day of not eating.\n\nAfter a day without food, your body releases a hormone called glucagon, which stimulates the liver to make glucose (a process called gluconeogenesis). This glucose is used mostly to feed the brain.\n\nYour muscles, on the other hand, rely on fatty acids produced from the breakdown of adipose (fatty) tissue for fuel. Around day two or three of starvation, this becomes your body's main source of fuel.\n\nEventually, fatty acids are used to form ketone bodies in the liver. These are released into the bloodstream and used by the brain for fuel, cutting down dramatically on the brain's glucose requirement.\n\nThe shift to ketone production by the liver is what allows humans to survive a duration without food.. \n hypothesis: Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: You can survive only days without water, but you may be able to live for weeks if only food is deprived. This is because your body is extremely resourceful: It can obtain energy and fuel from its own fat and, eventually, muscle stores. \n\nThe shortest war in history was between Britain and Zanzibar on August 27, 1896, and lasted only 38 minutes. The war was sparked by a dispute over who should be the ruler of Zanzibar. The British ship HMS Philomel fired 500 shots at the Zanzibari defenses, which returned fire with only 12 shots. The Zanzibari forces surrendered after just 12 minutes, and the war was officially over 26 minutes later. The British annexed Zanzibar and it became a protectorate of the United Kingdom. The shortest war in history is recognized by the Guinness World Records. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: Once the fatty acid reserves are depleted, the only source of fuel available is protein (from your muscles). As protein breakdown accelerates, there is a loss of heart, kidney, and liver function, which ultimately leads to a person's demise. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: The resiliency of the human body to live without nourishment is impressive, considering that your glucose (sugar) reserves—what your body normally uses as its main source of energy—are exhausted within one day of not eating.\n\nAfter a day without food, your body releases a hormone called glucagon, which stimulates the liver to make glucose (a process called gluconeogenesis). This glucose is used mostly to feed the brain.\n\nYour muscles, on the other hand, rely on fatty acids produced from the breakdown of adipose (fatty) tissue for fuel. Around day two or three of starvation, this becomes your body's main source of fuel.\n\nEventually, fatty acids are used to form ketone bodies in the liver. These are released into the bloodstream and used by the brain for fuel, cutting down dramatically on the brain's glucose requirement.\n\nThe shift to ketone production by the liver is what allows humans to survive a duration without food.. \n hypothesis: Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
What would happen to my body if I were trapped somewhere with a reliable water supply but no food
|
Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death.
|
Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death.
|
If you were trapped somewhere with a reliable water supply but no food, your body would eventually begin to suffer from malnutrition and starvation. After a few days, your body would start to utilize its stored energy in the form of fat and muscle tissue as it seeks out an alternative energy source. This would lead to rapid weight loss, fatigue, and weakness. Your body would also start to break down proteins in order to produce glucose for energy. As time passed, your energy levels would decline, and you would become increasingly lethargic. In addition, your immune system would become weakened, leaving you more vulnerable to illnesses. You would also be at risk of developing a number of medical problems, such as dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, and nutritional deficiencies. Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death.
|
[
"Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: The resiliency of the human body to live without nourishment is impressive, considering that your glucose (sugar) reserves—what your body normally uses as its main source of energy—are exhausted within one day of not eating.\n\nAfter a day without food, your body releases a hormone called glucagon, which stimulates the liver to make glucose (a process called gluconeogenesis). This glucose is used mostly to feed the brain.\n\nYour muscles, on the other hand, rely on fatty acids produced from the breakdown of adipose (fatty) tissue for fuel. Around day two or three of starvation, this becomes your body's main source of fuel.\n\nEventually, fatty acids are used to form ketone bodies in the liver. These are released into the bloodstream and used by the brain for fuel, cutting down dramatically on the brain's glucose requirement.\n\nThe shift to ketone production by the liver is what allows humans to survive a duration without food.",
"Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: Once the fatty acid reserves are depleted, the only source of fuel available is protein (from your muscles). As protein breakdown accelerates, there is a loss of heart, kidney, and liver function, which ultimately leads to a person's demise.",
"s the body's protein reserves are eventually depleted, the heart, kidneys, and liver begin to fail, leading to a rapid deterioration of overall health. In fact, research suggests that the average person can only survive for around 10-14 days without food before experiencing severe organ failure and ultimately succumbing to death.",
"Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: You can survive only days without water, but you may be able to live for weeks if only food is deprived. This is because your body is extremely resourceful: It can obtain energy and fuel from its own fat and, eventually, muscle stores."
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_f491491b-ec88-4c98-a5da-aeb191d5344d
| 1
| 0.977308
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
modify_passage-add_contradiction
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: The resiliency of the human body to live without nourishment is impressive, considering that your glucose (sugar) reserves—what your body normally uses as its main source of energy—are exhausted within one day of not eating.\n\nAfter a day without food, your body releases a hormone called glucagon, which stimulates the liver to make glucose (a process called gluconeogenesis). This glucose is used mostly to feed the brain.\n\nYour muscles, on the other hand, rely on fatty acids produced from the breakdown of adipose (fatty) tissue for fuel. Around day two or three of starvation, this becomes your body's main source of fuel.\n\nEventually, fatty acids are used to form ketone bodies in the liver. These are released into the bloodstream and used by the brain for fuel, cutting down dramatically on the brain's glucose requirement.\n\nThe shift to ketone production by the liver is what allows humans to survive a duration without food. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: Once the fatty acid reserves are depleted, the only source of fuel available is protein (from your muscles). As protein breakdown accelerates, there is a loss of heart, kidney, and liver function, which ultimately leads to a person's demise. s the body's protein reserves are eventually depleted, the heart, kidneys, and liver begin to fail, leading to a rapid deterioration of overall health. In fact, research suggests that the average person can only survive for around 10-14 days without food before experiencing severe organ failure and ultimately succumbing to death. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: You can survive only days without water, but you may be able to live for weeks if only food is deprived. This is because your body is extremely resourceful: It can obtain energy and fuel from its own fat and, eventually, muscle stores.. \n hypothesis: Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: The resiliency of the human body to live without nourishment is impressive, considering that your glucose (sugar) reserves—what your body normally uses as its main source of energy—are exhausted within one day of not eating.\n\nAfter a day without food, your body releases a hormone called glucagon, which stimulates the liver to make glucose (a process called gluconeogenesis). This glucose is used mostly to feed the brain.\n\nYour muscles, on the other hand, rely on fatty acids produced from the breakdown of adipose (fatty) tissue for fuel. Around day two or three of starvation, this becomes your body's main source of fuel.\n\nEventually, fatty acids are used to form ketone bodies in the liver. These are released into the bloodstream and used by the brain for fuel, cutting down dramatically on the brain's glucose requirement.\n\nThe shift to ketone production by the liver is what allows humans to survive a duration without food. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: Once the fatty acid reserves are depleted, the only source of fuel available is protein (from your muscles). As protein breakdown accelerates, there is a loss of heart, kidney, and liver function, which ultimately leads to a person's demise. s the body's protein reserves are eventually depleted, the heart, kidneys, and liver begin to fail, leading to a rapid deterioration of overall health. In fact, research suggests that the average person can only survive for around 10-14 days without food before experiencing severe organ failure and ultimately succumbing to death. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: You can survive only days without water, but you may be able to live for weeks if only food is deprived. This is because your body is extremely resourceful: It can obtain energy and fuel from its own fat and, eventually, muscle stores.. \n hypothesis: Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: The resiliency of the human body to live without nourishment is impressive, considering that your glucose (sugar) reserves—what your body normally uses as its main source of energy—are exhausted within one day of not eating.\n\nAfter a day without food, your body releases a hormone called glucagon, which stimulates the liver to make glucose (a process called gluconeogenesis). This glucose is used mostly to feed the brain.\n\nYour muscles, on the other hand, rely on fatty acids produced from the breakdown of adipose (fatty) tissue for fuel. Around day two or three of starvation, this becomes your body's main source of fuel.\n\nEventually, fatty acids are used to form ketone bodies in the liver. These are released into the bloodstream and used by the brain for fuel, cutting down dramatically on the brain's glucose requirement.\n\nThe shift to ketone production by the liver is what allows humans to survive a duration without food. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: Once the fatty acid reserves are depleted, the only source of fuel available is protein (from your muscles). As protein breakdown accelerates, there is a loss of heart, kidney, and liver function, which ultimately leads to a person's demise. s the body's protein reserves are eventually depleted, the heart, kidneys, and liver begin to fail, leading to a rapid deterioration of overall health. In fact, research suggests that the average person can only survive for around 10-14 days without food before experiencing severe organ failure and ultimately succumbing to death. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: You can survive only days without water, but you may be able to live for weeks if only food is deprived. This is because your body is extremely resourceful: It can obtain energy and fuel from its own fat and, eventually, muscle stores.. \n hypothesis: Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
What would happen to my body if I were trapped somewhere with a reliable water supply but no food
|
Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death.
|
Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death.
|
If you were trapped somewhere with a reliable water supply but no food, your body would eventually begin to suffer from malnutrition and starvation. After a few days, your body would start to utilize its stored energy in the form of fat and muscle tissue as it seeks out an alternative energy source. This would lead to rapid weight loss, fatigue, and weakness. Your body would also start to break down proteins in order to produce glucose for energy. As time passed, your energy levels would decline, and you would become increasingly lethargic. In addition, your immune system would become weakened, leaving you more vulnerable to illnesses. You would also be at risk of developing a number of medical problems, such as dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, and nutritional deficiencies. Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death.
|
[
"Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: The resiliency of the human body to live without nourishment is impressive, considering that your glucose (sugar) reserves—what your body normally uses as its main source of energy—are exhausted within one day of not eating.\n\nAfter a day without food, your body releases a hormone called glucagon, which stimulates the liver to make glucose (a process called gluconeogenesis). This glucose is used mostly to feed the brain.\n\nYour muscles, on the other hand, rely on fatty acids produced from the breakdown of adipose (fatty) tissue for fuel. Around day two or three of starvation, this becomes your body's main source of fuel.\n\nEventually, fatty acids are used to form ketone bodies in the liver. These are released into the bloodstream and used by the brain for fuel, cutting down dramatically on the brain's glucose requirement.\n\nThe shift to ketone production by the liver is what allows humans to survive a duration without food.",
"Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: Once the fatty acid reserves are depleted, the only source of fuel available is protein (from your muscles). As protein breakdown accelerates, there is a loss of heart, kidney, and liver function, which ultimately leads to a person's demise.",
"Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: You can survive only days without water, but you may be able to live for weeks if only food is deprived. This is because your body is extremely resourceful: It can obtain energy and fuel from its own fat and, eventually, muscle stores.",
"It is generally understood that the human body has an impressive capacity to survive without food for an extended period. When deprived of nourishment, the body initially utilizes stored glucose reserves for energy. After exhausting glucose, the body relies on fatty acids from adipose tissue for fuel. Fatty acid reserves can sustain the body for several days. Eventually, the liver converts these fatty acids into ketone bodies, which are used by the brain for energy, significantly reducing the brain's glucose requirements. This process enables the human body to survive for an extended duration without food."
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_f491491b-ec88-4c98-a5da-aeb191d5344d
| 1
| 0.977308
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
modify_passage-add_conflicting_sources
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: The resiliency of the human body to live without nourishment is impressive, considering that your glucose (sugar) reserves—what your body normally uses as its main source of energy—are exhausted within one day of not eating.\n\nAfter a day without food, your body releases a hormone called glucagon, which stimulates the liver to make glucose (a process called gluconeogenesis). This glucose is used mostly to feed the brain.\n\nYour muscles, on the other hand, rely on fatty acids produced from the breakdown of adipose (fatty) tissue for fuel. Around day two or three of starvation, this becomes your body's main source of fuel.\n\nEventually, fatty acids are used to form ketone bodies in the liver. These are released into the bloodstream and used by the brain for fuel, cutting down dramatically on the brain's glucose requirement.\n\nThe shift to ketone production by the liver is what allows humans to survive a duration without food. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: Once the fatty acid reserves are depleted, the only source of fuel available is protein (from your muscles). As protein breakdown accelerates, there is a loss of heart, kidney, and liver function, which ultimately leads to a person's demise. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: You can survive only days without water, but you may be able to live for weeks if only food is deprived. This is because your body is extremely resourceful: It can obtain energy and fuel from its own fat and, eventually, muscle stores. It is generally understood that the human body has an impressive capacity to survive without food for an extended period. When deprived of nourishment, the body initially utilizes stored glucose reserves for energy. After exhausting glucose, the body relies on fatty acids from adipose tissue for fuel. Fatty acid reserves can sustain the body for several days. Eventually, the liver converts these fatty acids into ketone bodies, which are used by the brain for energy, significantly reducing the brain's glucose requirements. This process enables the human body to survive for an extended duration without food.. \n hypothesis: Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: The resiliency of the human body to live without nourishment is impressive, considering that your glucose (sugar) reserves—what your body normally uses as its main source of energy—are exhausted within one day of not eating.\n\nAfter a day without food, your body releases a hormone called glucagon, which stimulates the liver to make glucose (a process called gluconeogenesis). This glucose is used mostly to feed the brain.\n\nYour muscles, on the other hand, rely on fatty acids produced from the breakdown of adipose (fatty) tissue for fuel. Around day two or three of starvation, this becomes your body's main source of fuel.\n\nEventually, fatty acids are used to form ketone bodies in the liver. These are released into the bloodstream and used by the brain for fuel, cutting down dramatically on the brain's glucose requirement.\n\nThe shift to ketone production by the liver is what allows humans to survive a duration without food. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: Once the fatty acid reserves are depleted, the only source of fuel available is protein (from your muscles). As protein breakdown accelerates, there is a loss of heart, kidney, and liver function, which ultimately leads to a person's demise. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: You can survive only days without water, but you may be able to live for weeks if only food is deprived. This is because your body is extremely resourceful: It can obtain energy and fuel from its own fat and, eventually, muscle stores. It is generally understood that the human body has an impressive capacity to survive without food for an extended period. When deprived of nourishment, the body initially utilizes stored glucose reserves for energy. After exhausting glucose, the body relies on fatty acids from adipose tissue for fuel. Fatty acid reserves can sustain the body for several days. Eventually, the liver converts these fatty acids into ketone bodies, which are used by the brain for energy, significantly reducing the brain's glucose requirements. This process enables the human body to survive for an extended duration without food.. \n hypothesis: Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: The resiliency of the human body to live without nourishment is impressive, considering that your glucose (sugar) reserves—what your body normally uses as its main source of energy—are exhausted within one day of not eating.\n\nAfter a day without food, your body releases a hormone called glucagon, which stimulates the liver to make glucose (a process called gluconeogenesis). This glucose is used mostly to feed the brain.\n\nYour muscles, on the other hand, rely on fatty acids produced from the breakdown of adipose (fatty) tissue for fuel. Around day two or three of starvation, this becomes your body's main source of fuel.\n\nEventually, fatty acids are used to form ketone bodies in the liver. These are released into the bloodstream and used by the brain for fuel, cutting down dramatically on the brain's glucose requirement.\n\nThe shift to ketone production by the liver is what allows humans to survive a duration without food. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: Once the fatty acid reserves are depleted, the only source of fuel available is protein (from your muscles). As protein breakdown accelerates, there is a loss of heart, kidney, and liver function, which ultimately leads to a person's demise. Title: How Long Can You Live Without Food? (www.verywellhealth.com)\nText: You can survive only days without water, but you may be able to live for weeks if only food is deprived. This is because your body is extremely resourceful: It can obtain energy and fuel from its own fat and, eventually, muscle stores. It is generally understood that the human body has an impressive capacity to survive without food for an extended period. When deprived of nourishment, the body initially utilizes stored glucose reserves for energy. After exhausting glucose, the body relies on fatty acids from adipose tissue for fuel. Fatty acid reserves can sustain the body for several days. Eventually, the liver converts these fatty acids into ketone bodies, which are used by the brain for energy, significantly reducing the brain's glucose requirements. This process enables the human body to survive for an extended duration without food.. \n hypothesis: Without food, your body would eventually become unable to perform basic functions, leading to organ failure and, ultimately, death.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
Why does smoking tobacco cause cancer, but smoking marijuana does not?
|
Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA.
|
Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA.
|
Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA. When these chemicals get into the bloodstream, they are carried to all parts of the body, which can cause cells to grow abnormally and lead to cancer. While smoking marijuana also has some of the same cancer-causing substances as tobacco, there is no clear evidence that it increases the risk of lung cancer or any other type of cancer. However, due to the potential risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly advise against smoking cannabis and tobacco products. More research is needed to determine whether smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for cancer, and until then, it is best to avoid smoking either substance.
|
[
"Title: Cancer Risk | NAS | Marijuana (www.cdc.gov)\nText: * Smoked cannabis has many of the same cancer-causing substances as smoked tobacco3. Due to the risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly caution against smoking cannabis and tobacco products.\n* More research is needed to know if smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for lung cancer. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is a link, because cannabis use often overlaps other behaviors related to lung cancer, such as tobacco use.",
"Title: Tobacco and Cancer | CDC (www.cdc.gov)\nText: Tobacco smoke has at least 70 chemicals that cause cancer, also known as carcinogens. Every time you breathe in that smoke, those chemicals get into your bloodstream, which carries the chemicals to all parts of your body. Many of these chemicals can damage your DNA, which controls how your body makes new cells and directs each kind of cell to do what it is made for. Damaged DNA can make cells grow differently from how they are supposed to. These unusual cells can turn into cancer."
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_whudoc_10fa64ba-f882-4d67-af98-c8d150aae878
| 1
| 0.935224
|
hard_positive
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Cancer Risk | NAS | Marijuana (www.cdc.gov)\nText: * Smoked cannabis has many of the same cancer-causing substances as smoked tobacco3. Due to the risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly caution against smoking cannabis and tobacco products.\n* More research is needed to know if smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for lung cancer. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is a link, because cannabis use often overlaps other behaviors related to lung cancer, such as tobacco use. Title: Tobacco and Cancer | CDC (www.cdc.gov)\nText: Tobacco smoke has at least 70 chemicals that cause cancer, also known as carcinogens. Every time you breathe in that smoke, those chemicals get into your bloodstream, which carries the chemicals to all parts of your body. Many of these chemicals can damage your DNA, which controls how your body makes new cells and directs each kind of cell to do what it is made for. Damaged DNA can make cells grow differently from how they are supposed to. These unusual cells can turn into cancer.. \n hypothesis: Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Cancer Risk | NAS | Marijuana (www.cdc.gov)\nText: * Smoked cannabis has many of the same cancer-causing substances as smoked tobacco3. Due to the risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly caution against smoking cannabis and tobacco products.\n* More research is needed to know if smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for lung cancer. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is a link, because cannabis use often overlaps other behaviors related to lung cancer, such as tobacco use. Title: Tobacco and Cancer | CDC (www.cdc.gov)\nText: Tobacco smoke has at least 70 chemicals that cause cancer, also known as carcinogens. Every time you breathe in that smoke, those chemicals get into your bloodstream, which carries the chemicals to all parts of your body. Many of these chemicals can damage your DNA, which controls how your body makes new cells and directs each kind of cell to do what it is made for. Damaged DNA can make cells grow differently from how they are supposed to. These unusual cells can turn into cancer.. \n hypothesis: Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Cancer Risk | NAS | Marijuana (www.cdc.gov)\nText: * Smoked cannabis has many of the same cancer-causing substances as smoked tobacco3. Due to the risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly caution against smoking cannabis and tobacco products.\n* More research is needed to know if smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for lung cancer. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is a link, because cannabis use often overlaps other behaviors related to lung cancer, such as tobacco use. Title: Tobacco and Cancer | CDC (www.cdc.gov)\nText: Tobacco smoke has at least 70 chemicals that cause cancer, also known as carcinogens. Every time you breathe in that smoke, those chemicals get into your bloodstream, which carries the chemicals to all parts of your body. Many of these chemicals can damage your DNA, which controls how your body makes new cells and directs each kind of cell to do what it is made for. Damaged DNA can make cells grow differently from how they are supposed to. These unusual cells can turn into cancer.. \n hypothesis: Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
|||
Why does smoking tobacco cause cancer, but smoking marijuana does not?
|
Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 71 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA.
|
Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA.
|
Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA. When these chemicals get into the bloodstream, they are carried to all parts of the body, which can cause cells to grow abnormally and lead to cancer. While smoking marijuana also has some of the same cancer-causing substances as tobacco, there is no clear evidence that it increases the risk of lung cancer or any other type of cancer. However, due to the potential risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly advise against smoking cannabis and tobacco products. More research is needed to determine whether smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for cancer, and until then, it is best to avoid smoking either substance.
|
[
"Title: Cancer Risk | NAS | Marijuana (www.cdc.gov)\nText: * Smoked cannabis has many of the same cancer-causing substances as smoked tobacco3. Due to the risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly caution against smoking cannabis and tobacco products.\n* More research is needed to know if smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for lung cancer. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is a link, because cannabis use often overlaps other behaviors related to lung cancer, such as tobacco use.",
"Title: Tobacco and Cancer | CDC (www.cdc.gov)\nText: Tobacco smoke has at least 70 chemicals that cause cancer, also known as carcinogens. Every time you breathe in that smoke, those chemicals get into your bloodstream, which carries the chemicals to all parts of your body. Many of these chemicals can damage your DNA, which controls how your body makes new cells and directs each kind of cell to do what it is made for. Damaged DNA can make cells grow differently from how they are supposed to. These unusual cells can turn into cancer."
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_whudoc_10fa64ba-f882-4d67-af98-c8d150aae878
| 1
| 0.935224
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
modify_claim-numerical_mismatch
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Cancer Risk | NAS | Marijuana (www.cdc.gov)\nText: * Smoked cannabis has many of the same cancer-causing substances as smoked tobacco3. Due to the risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly caution against smoking cannabis and tobacco products.\n* More research is needed to know if smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for lung cancer. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is a link, because cannabis use often overlaps other behaviors related to lung cancer, such as tobacco use. Title: Tobacco and Cancer | CDC (www.cdc.gov)\nText: Tobacco smoke has at least 70 chemicals that cause cancer, also known as carcinogens. Every time you breathe in that smoke, those chemicals get into your bloodstream, which carries the chemicals to all parts of your body. Many of these chemicals can damage your DNA, which controls how your body makes new cells and directs each kind of cell to do what it is made for. Damaged DNA can make cells grow differently from how they are supposed to. These unusual cells can turn into cancer.. \n hypothesis: Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 71 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Cancer Risk | NAS | Marijuana (www.cdc.gov)\nText: * Smoked cannabis has many of the same cancer-causing substances as smoked tobacco3. Due to the risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly caution against smoking cannabis and tobacco products.\n* More research is needed to know if smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for lung cancer. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is a link, because cannabis use often overlaps other behaviors related to lung cancer, such as tobacco use. Title: Tobacco and Cancer | CDC (www.cdc.gov)\nText: Tobacco smoke has at least 70 chemicals that cause cancer, also known as carcinogens. Every time you breathe in that smoke, those chemicals get into your bloodstream, which carries the chemicals to all parts of your body. Many of these chemicals can damage your DNA, which controls how your body makes new cells and directs each kind of cell to do what it is made for. Damaged DNA can make cells grow differently from how they are supposed to. These unusual cells can turn into cancer.. \n hypothesis: Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 71 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Cancer Risk | NAS | Marijuana (www.cdc.gov)\nText: * Smoked cannabis has many of the same cancer-causing substances as smoked tobacco3. Due to the risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly caution against smoking cannabis and tobacco products.\n* More research is needed to know if smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for lung cancer. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is a link, because cannabis use often overlaps other behaviors related to lung cancer, such as tobacco use. Title: Tobacco and Cancer | CDC (www.cdc.gov)\nText: Tobacco smoke has at least 70 chemicals that cause cancer, also known as carcinogens. Every time you breathe in that smoke, those chemicals get into your bloodstream, which carries the chemicals to all parts of your body. Many of these chemicals can damage your DNA, which controls how your body makes new cells and directs each kind of cell to do what it is made for. Damaged DNA can make cells grow differently from how they are supposed to. These unusual cells can turn into cancer.. \n hypothesis: Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 71 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
Why does smoking tobacco cause cancer, but smoking marijuana does not?
|
Smoking tobacco does not cause cancer because it contains at most 69 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA.
|
Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA.
|
Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA. When these chemicals get into the bloodstream, they are carried to all parts of the body, which can cause cells to grow abnormally and lead to cancer. While smoking marijuana also has some of the same cancer-causing substances as tobacco, there is no clear evidence that it increases the risk of lung cancer or any other type of cancer. However, due to the potential risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly advise against smoking cannabis and tobacco products. More research is needed to determine whether smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for cancer, and until then, it is best to avoid smoking either substance.
|
[
"Title: Cancer Risk | NAS | Marijuana (www.cdc.gov)\nText: * Smoked cannabis has many of the same cancer-causing substances as smoked tobacco3. Due to the risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly caution against smoking cannabis and tobacco products.\n* More research is needed to know if smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for lung cancer. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is a link, because cannabis use often overlaps other behaviors related to lung cancer, such as tobacco use.",
"Title: Tobacco and Cancer | CDC (www.cdc.gov)\nText: Tobacco smoke has at least 70 chemicals that cause cancer, also known as carcinogens. Every time you breathe in that smoke, those chemicals get into your bloodstream, which carries the chemicals to all parts of your body. Many of these chemicals can damage your DNA, which controls how your body makes new cells and directs each kind of cell to do what it is made for. Damaged DNA can make cells grow differently from how they are supposed to. These unusual cells can turn into cancer."
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_whudoc_10fa64ba-f882-4d67-af98-c8d150aae878
| 1
| 0.935224
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
claim_negation
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Cancer Risk | NAS | Marijuana (www.cdc.gov)\nText: * Smoked cannabis has many of the same cancer-causing substances as smoked tobacco3. Due to the risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly caution against smoking cannabis and tobacco products.\n* More research is needed to know if smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for lung cancer. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is a link, because cannabis use often overlaps other behaviors related to lung cancer, such as tobacco use. Title: Tobacco and Cancer | CDC (www.cdc.gov)\nText: Tobacco smoke has at least 70 chemicals that cause cancer, also known as carcinogens. Every time you breathe in that smoke, those chemicals get into your bloodstream, which carries the chemicals to all parts of your body. Many of these chemicals can damage your DNA, which controls how your body makes new cells and directs each kind of cell to do what it is made for. Damaged DNA can make cells grow differently from how they are supposed to. These unusual cells can turn into cancer.. \n hypothesis: Smoking tobacco does not cause cancer because it contains at most 69 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Cancer Risk | NAS | Marijuana (www.cdc.gov)\nText: * Smoked cannabis has many of the same cancer-causing substances as smoked tobacco3. Due to the risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly caution against smoking cannabis and tobacco products.\n* More research is needed to know if smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for lung cancer. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is a link, because cannabis use often overlaps other behaviors related to lung cancer, such as tobacco use. Title: Tobacco and Cancer | CDC (www.cdc.gov)\nText: Tobacco smoke has at least 70 chemicals that cause cancer, also known as carcinogens. Every time you breathe in that smoke, those chemicals get into your bloodstream, which carries the chemicals to all parts of your body. Many of these chemicals can damage your DNA, which controls how your body makes new cells and directs each kind of cell to do what it is made for. Damaged DNA can make cells grow differently from how they are supposed to. These unusual cells can turn into cancer.. \n hypothesis: Smoking tobacco does not cause cancer because it contains at most 69 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Cancer Risk | NAS | Marijuana (www.cdc.gov)\nText: * Smoked cannabis has many of the same cancer-causing substances as smoked tobacco3. Due to the risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly caution against smoking cannabis and tobacco products.\n* More research is needed to know if smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for lung cancer. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is a link, because cannabis use often overlaps other behaviors related to lung cancer, such as tobacco use. Title: Tobacco and Cancer | CDC (www.cdc.gov)\nText: Tobacco smoke has at least 70 chemicals that cause cancer, also known as carcinogens. Every time you breathe in that smoke, those chemicals get into your bloodstream, which carries the chemicals to all parts of your body. Many of these chemicals can damage your DNA, which controls how your body makes new cells and directs each kind of cell to do what it is made for. Damaged DNA can make cells grow differently from how they are supposed to. These unusual cells can turn into cancer.. \n hypothesis: Smoking tobacco does not cause cancer because it contains at most 69 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
Why does smoking tobacco cause cancer, but smoking marijuana does not?
|
Smoking tobacco leads to cancer due to the presence of at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can harm DNA.
|
Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA.
|
Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA. When these chemicals get into the bloodstream, they are carried to all parts of the body, which can cause cells to grow abnormally and lead to cancer. While smoking marijuana also has some of the same cancer-causing substances as tobacco, there is no clear evidence that it increases the risk of lung cancer or any other type of cancer. However, due to the potential risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly advise against smoking cannabis and tobacco products. More research is needed to determine whether smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for cancer, and until then, it is best to avoid smoking either substance.
|
[
"Title: Cancer Risk | NAS | Marijuana (www.cdc.gov)\nText: * Smoked cannabis has many of the same cancer-causing substances as smoked tobacco3. Due to the risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly caution against smoking cannabis and tobacco products.\n* More research is needed to know if smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for lung cancer. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is a link, because cannabis use often overlaps other behaviors related to lung cancer, such as tobacco use.",
"Title: Tobacco and Cancer | CDC (www.cdc.gov)\nText: Tobacco smoke has at least 70 chemicals that cause cancer, also known as carcinogens. Every time you breathe in that smoke, those chemicals get into your bloodstream, which carries the chemicals to all parts of your body. Many of these chemicals can damage your DNA, which controls how your body makes new cells and directs each kind of cell to do what it is made for. Damaged DNA can make cells grow differently from how they are supposed to. These unusual cells can turn into cancer."
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_whudoc_10fa64ba-f882-4d67-af98-c8d150aae878
| 1
| 0.935224
|
generated
|
attributable
|
keep
|
claim_reformulation
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Cancer Risk | NAS | Marijuana (www.cdc.gov)\nText: * Smoked cannabis has many of the same cancer-causing substances as smoked tobacco3. Due to the risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly caution against smoking cannabis and tobacco products.\n* More research is needed to know if smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for lung cancer. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is a link, because cannabis use often overlaps other behaviors related to lung cancer, such as tobacco use. Title: Tobacco and Cancer | CDC (www.cdc.gov)\nText: Tobacco smoke has at least 70 chemicals that cause cancer, also known as carcinogens. Every time you breathe in that smoke, those chemicals get into your bloodstream, which carries the chemicals to all parts of your body. Many of these chemicals can damage your DNA, which controls how your body makes new cells and directs each kind of cell to do what it is made for. Damaged DNA can make cells grow differently from how they are supposed to. These unusual cells can turn into cancer.. \n hypothesis: Smoking tobacco leads to cancer due to the presence of at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can harm DNA.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Cancer Risk | NAS | Marijuana (www.cdc.gov)\nText: * Smoked cannabis has many of the same cancer-causing substances as smoked tobacco3. Due to the risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly caution against smoking cannabis and tobacco products.\n* More research is needed to know if smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for lung cancer. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is a link, because cannabis use often overlaps other behaviors related to lung cancer, such as tobacco use. Title: Tobacco and Cancer | CDC (www.cdc.gov)\nText: Tobacco smoke has at least 70 chemicals that cause cancer, also known as carcinogens. Every time you breathe in that smoke, those chemicals get into your bloodstream, which carries the chemicals to all parts of your body. Many of these chemicals can damage your DNA, which controls how your body makes new cells and directs each kind of cell to do what it is made for. Damaged DNA can make cells grow differently from how they are supposed to. These unusual cells can turn into cancer.. \n hypothesis: Smoking tobacco leads to cancer due to the presence of at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can harm DNA.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Cancer Risk | NAS | Marijuana (www.cdc.gov)\nText: * Smoked cannabis has many of the same cancer-causing substances as smoked tobacco3. Due to the risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly caution against smoking cannabis and tobacco products.\n* More research is needed to know if smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for lung cancer. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is a link, because cannabis use often overlaps other behaviors related to lung cancer, such as tobacco use. Title: Tobacco and Cancer | CDC (www.cdc.gov)\nText: Tobacco smoke has at least 70 chemicals that cause cancer, also known as carcinogens. Every time you breathe in that smoke, those chemicals get into your bloodstream, which carries the chemicals to all parts of your body. Many of these chemicals can damage your DNA, which controls how your body makes new cells and directs each kind of cell to do what it is made for. Damaged DNA can make cells grow differently from how they are supposed to. These unusual cells can turn into cancer.. \n hypothesis: Smoking tobacco leads to cancer due to the presence of at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can harm DNA.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
Why does smoking tobacco cause cancer, but smoking marijuana does not?
|
Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 vitamins that can damage DNA.
|
Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA.
|
Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA. When these chemicals get into the bloodstream, they are carried to all parts of the body, which can cause cells to grow abnormally and lead to cancer. While smoking marijuana also has some of the same cancer-causing substances as tobacco, there is no clear evidence that it increases the risk of lung cancer or any other type of cancer. However, due to the potential risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly advise against smoking cannabis and tobacco products. More research is needed to determine whether smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for cancer, and until then, it is best to avoid smoking either substance.
|
[
"Title: Cancer Risk | NAS | Marijuana (www.cdc.gov)\nText: * Smoked cannabis has many of the same cancer-causing substances as smoked tobacco3. Due to the risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly caution against smoking cannabis and tobacco products.\n* More research is needed to know if smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for lung cancer. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is a link, because cannabis use often overlaps other behaviors related to lung cancer, such as tobacco use.",
"Title: Tobacco and Cancer | CDC (www.cdc.gov)\nText: Tobacco smoke has at least 70 chemicals that cause cancer, also known as carcinogens. Every time you breathe in that smoke, those chemicals get into your bloodstream, which carries the chemicals to all parts of your body. Many of these chemicals can damage your DNA, which controls how your body makes new cells and directs each kind of cell to do what it is made for. Damaged DNA can make cells grow differently from how they are supposed to. These unusual cells can turn into cancer."
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_whudoc_10fa64ba-f882-4d67-af98-c8d150aae878
| 1
| 0.935224
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
claim_erronous_change
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Cancer Risk | NAS | Marijuana (www.cdc.gov)\nText: * Smoked cannabis has many of the same cancer-causing substances as smoked tobacco3. Due to the risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly caution against smoking cannabis and tobacco products.\n* More research is needed to know if smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for lung cancer. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is a link, because cannabis use often overlaps other behaviors related to lung cancer, such as tobacco use. Title: Tobacco and Cancer | CDC (www.cdc.gov)\nText: Tobacco smoke has at least 70 chemicals that cause cancer, also known as carcinogens. Every time you breathe in that smoke, those chemicals get into your bloodstream, which carries the chemicals to all parts of your body. Many of these chemicals can damage your DNA, which controls how your body makes new cells and directs each kind of cell to do what it is made for. Damaged DNA can make cells grow differently from how they are supposed to. These unusual cells can turn into cancer.. \n hypothesis: Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 vitamins that can damage DNA.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Cancer Risk | NAS | Marijuana (www.cdc.gov)\nText: * Smoked cannabis has many of the same cancer-causing substances as smoked tobacco3. Due to the risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly caution against smoking cannabis and tobacco products.\n* More research is needed to know if smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for lung cancer. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is a link, because cannabis use often overlaps other behaviors related to lung cancer, such as tobacco use. Title: Tobacco and Cancer | CDC (www.cdc.gov)\nText: Tobacco smoke has at least 70 chemicals that cause cancer, also known as carcinogens. Every time you breathe in that smoke, those chemicals get into your bloodstream, which carries the chemicals to all parts of your body. Many of these chemicals can damage your DNA, which controls how your body makes new cells and directs each kind of cell to do what it is made for. Damaged DNA can make cells grow differently from how they are supposed to. These unusual cells can turn into cancer.. \n hypothesis: Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 vitamins that can damage DNA.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Cancer Risk | NAS | Marijuana (www.cdc.gov)\nText: * Smoked cannabis has many of the same cancer-causing substances as smoked tobacco3. Due to the risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly caution against smoking cannabis and tobacco products.\n* More research is needed to know if smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for lung cancer. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is a link, because cannabis use often overlaps other behaviors related to lung cancer, such as tobacco use. Title: Tobacco and Cancer | CDC (www.cdc.gov)\nText: Tobacco smoke has at least 70 chemicals that cause cancer, also known as carcinogens. Every time you breathe in that smoke, those chemicals get into your bloodstream, which carries the chemicals to all parts of your body. Many of these chemicals can damage your DNA, which controls how your body makes new cells and directs each kind of cell to do what it is made for. Damaged DNA can make cells grow differently from how they are supposed to. These unusual cells can turn into cancer.. \n hypothesis: Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 vitamins that can damage DNA.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
Why does smoking tobacco cause cancer, but smoking marijuana does not?
|
esearch has also identified other hazardous compounds in tobacco smoke, including polonium-210, a radioactive isotope that can accumulate in the body and cause DNA damage. The presence of these carcinogenic chemicals in tobacco smoke highlights the potential risks associated with smoking and other forms of tobacco use.
|
Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA.
|
Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA. When these chemicals get into the bloodstream, they are carried to all parts of the body, which can cause cells to grow abnormally and lead to cancer. While smoking marijuana also has some of the same cancer-causing substances as tobacco, there is no clear evidence that it increases the risk of lung cancer or any other type of cancer. However, due to the potential risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly advise against smoking cannabis and tobacco products. More research is needed to determine whether smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for cancer, and until then, it is best to avoid smoking either substance.
|
[
"Title: Cancer Risk | NAS | Marijuana (www.cdc.gov)\nText: * Smoked cannabis has many of the same cancer-causing substances as smoked tobacco3. Due to the risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly caution against smoking cannabis and tobacco products.\n* More research is needed to know if smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for lung cancer. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is a link, because cannabis use often overlaps other behaviors related to lung cancer, such as tobacco use.",
"Title: Tobacco and Cancer | CDC (www.cdc.gov)\nText: Tobacco smoke has at least 70 chemicals that cause cancer, also known as carcinogens. Every time you breathe in that smoke, those chemicals get into your bloodstream, which carries the chemicals to all parts of your body. Many of these chemicals can damage your DNA, which controls how your body makes new cells and directs each kind of cell to do what it is made for. Damaged DNA can make cells grow differently from how they are supposed to. These unusual cells can turn into cancer."
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_whudoc_10fa64ba-f882-4d67-af98-c8d150aae878
| 1
| 0.935224
|
generated
|
attributable
|
keep
|
claim_infer_claim
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Cancer Risk | NAS | Marijuana (www.cdc.gov)\nText: * Smoked cannabis has many of the same cancer-causing substances as smoked tobacco3. Due to the risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly caution against smoking cannabis and tobacco products.\n* More research is needed to know if smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for lung cancer. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is a link, because cannabis use often overlaps other behaviors related to lung cancer, such as tobacco use. Title: Tobacco and Cancer | CDC (www.cdc.gov)\nText: Tobacco smoke has at least 70 chemicals that cause cancer, also known as carcinogens. Every time you breathe in that smoke, those chemicals get into your bloodstream, which carries the chemicals to all parts of your body. Many of these chemicals can damage your DNA, which controls how your body makes new cells and directs each kind of cell to do what it is made for. Damaged DNA can make cells grow differently from how they are supposed to. These unusual cells can turn into cancer.. \n hypothesis: esearch has also identified other hazardous compounds in tobacco smoke, including polonium-210, a radioactive isotope that can accumulate in the body and cause DNA damage. The presence of these carcinogenic chemicals in tobacco smoke highlights the potential risks associated with smoking and other forms of tobacco use.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Cancer Risk | NAS | Marijuana (www.cdc.gov)\nText: * Smoked cannabis has many of the same cancer-causing substances as smoked tobacco3. Due to the risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly caution against smoking cannabis and tobacco products.\n* More research is needed to know if smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for lung cancer. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is a link, because cannabis use often overlaps other behaviors related to lung cancer, such as tobacco use. Title: Tobacco and Cancer | CDC (www.cdc.gov)\nText: Tobacco smoke has at least 70 chemicals that cause cancer, also known as carcinogens. Every time you breathe in that smoke, those chemicals get into your bloodstream, which carries the chemicals to all parts of your body. Many of these chemicals can damage your DNA, which controls how your body makes new cells and directs each kind of cell to do what it is made for. Damaged DNA can make cells grow differently from how they are supposed to. These unusual cells can turn into cancer.. \n hypothesis: esearch has also identified other hazardous compounds in tobacco smoke, including polonium-210, a radioactive isotope that can accumulate in the body and cause DNA damage. The presence of these carcinogenic chemicals in tobacco smoke highlights the potential risks associated with smoking and other forms of tobacco use.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Cancer Risk | NAS | Marijuana (www.cdc.gov)\nText: * Smoked cannabis has many of the same cancer-causing substances as smoked tobacco3. Due to the risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly caution against smoking cannabis and tobacco products.\n* More research is needed to know if smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for lung cancer. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is a link, because cannabis use often overlaps other behaviors related to lung cancer, such as tobacco use. Title: Tobacco and Cancer | CDC (www.cdc.gov)\nText: Tobacco smoke has at least 70 chemicals that cause cancer, also known as carcinogens. Every time you breathe in that smoke, those chemicals get into your bloodstream, which carries the chemicals to all parts of your body. Many of these chemicals can damage your DNA, which controls how your body makes new cells and directs each kind of cell to do what it is made for. Damaged DNA can make cells grow differently from how they are supposed to. These unusual cells can turn into cancer.. \n hypothesis: esearch has also identified other hazardous compounds in tobacco smoke, including polonium-210, a radioactive isotope that can accumulate in the body and cause DNA damage. The presence of these carcinogenic chemicals in tobacco smoke highlights the potential risks associated with smoking and other forms of tobacco use.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
Why does smoking tobacco cause cancer, but smoking marijuana does not?
|
Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA, but research suggests that smoking cannabis also contains similar chemicals that may pose a risk to lung health.
|
Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA.
|
Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA. When these chemicals get into the bloodstream, they are carried to all parts of the body, which can cause cells to grow abnormally and lead to cancer. While smoking marijuana also has some of the same cancer-causing substances as tobacco, there is no clear evidence that it increases the risk of lung cancer or any other type of cancer. However, due to the potential risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly advise against smoking cannabis and tobacco products. More research is needed to determine whether smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for cancer, and until then, it is best to avoid smoking either substance.
|
[
"Title: Cancer Risk | NAS | Marijuana (www.cdc.gov)\nText: * Smoked cannabis has many of the same cancer-causing substances as smoked tobacco3. Due to the risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly caution against smoking cannabis and tobacco products.\n* More research is needed to know if smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for lung cancer. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is a link, because cannabis use often overlaps other behaviors related to lung cancer, such as tobacco use.",
"Title: Tobacco and Cancer | CDC (www.cdc.gov)\nText: Tobacco smoke has at least 70 chemicals that cause cancer, also known as carcinogens. Every time you breathe in that smoke, those chemicals get into your bloodstream, which carries the chemicals to all parts of your body. Many of these chemicals can damage your DNA, which controls how your body makes new cells and directs each kind of cell to do what it is made for. Damaged DNA can make cells grow differently from how they are supposed to. These unusual cells can turn into cancer."
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_whudoc_10fa64ba-f882-4d67-af98-c8d150aae878
| 1
| 0.935224
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
claim_add_to_the_claim_contradicting_info
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Cancer Risk | NAS | Marijuana (www.cdc.gov)\nText: * Smoked cannabis has many of the same cancer-causing substances as smoked tobacco3. Due to the risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly caution against smoking cannabis and tobacco products.\n* More research is needed to know if smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for lung cancer. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is a link, because cannabis use often overlaps other behaviors related to lung cancer, such as tobacco use. Title: Tobacco and Cancer | CDC (www.cdc.gov)\nText: Tobacco smoke has at least 70 chemicals that cause cancer, also known as carcinogens. Every time you breathe in that smoke, those chemicals get into your bloodstream, which carries the chemicals to all parts of your body. Many of these chemicals can damage your DNA, which controls how your body makes new cells and directs each kind of cell to do what it is made for. Damaged DNA can make cells grow differently from how they are supposed to. These unusual cells can turn into cancer.. \n hypothesis: Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA, but research suggests that smoking cannabis also contains similar chemicals that may pose a risk to lung health.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Cancer Risk | NAS | Marijuana (www.cdc.gov)\nText: * Smoked cannabis has many of the same cancer-causing substances as smoked tobacco3. Due to the risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly caution against smoking cannabis and tobacco products.\n* More research is needed to know if smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for lung cancer. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is a link, because cannabis use often overlaps other behaviors related to lung cancer, such as tobacco use. Title: Tobacco and Cancer | CDC (www.cdc.gov)\nText: Tobacco smoke has at least 70 chemicals that cause cancer, also known as carcinogens. Every time you breathe in that smoke, those chemicals get into your bloodstream, which carries the chemicals to all parts of your body. Many of these chemicals can damage your DNA, which controls how your body makes new cells and directs each kind of cell to do what it is made for. Damaged DNA can make cells grow differently from how they are supposed to. These unusual cells can turn into cancer.. \n hypothesis: Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA, but research suggests that smoking cannabis also contains similar chemicals that may pose a risk to lung health.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Cancer Risk | NAS | Marijuana (www.cdc.gov)\nText: * Smoked cannabis has many of the same cancer-causing substances as smoked tobacco3. Due to the risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly caution against smoking cannabis and tobacco products.\n* More research is needed to know if smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for lung cancer. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is a link, because cannabis use often overlaps other behaviors related to lung cancer, such as tobacco use. Title: Tobacco and Cancer | CDC (www.cdc.gov)\nText: Tobacco smoke has at least 70 chemicals that cause cancer, also known as carcinogens. Every time you breathe in that smoke, those chemicals get into your bloodstream, which carries the chemicals to all parts of your body. Many of these chemicals can damage your DNA, which controls how your body makes new cells and directs each kind of cell to do what it is made for. Damaged DNA can make cells grow differently from how they are supposed to. These unusual cells can turn into cancer.. \n hypothesis: Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA, but research suggests that smoking cannabis also contains similar chemicals that may pose a risk to lung health.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
Why does smoking tobacco cause cancer, but smoking marijuana does not?
|
Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA.
|
Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA.
|
Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA. When these chemicals get into the bloodstream, they are carried to all parts of the body, which can cause cells to grow abnormally and lead to cancer. While smoking marijuana also has some of the same cancer-causing substances as tobacco, there is no clear evidence that it increases the risk of lung cancer or any other type of cancer. However, due to the potential risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly advise against smoking cannabis and tobacco products. More research is needed to determine whether smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for cancer, and until then, it is best to avoid smoking either substance.
|
[
"Smoking tobacco products has been a widespread human activity for thousands of years, with evidence of tobacco use dating back to ancient civilizations in the Americas. The plant itself contains over 7,000 chemicals, many of which are toxic. The process of curing and processing tobacco can also introduce additional chemicals, some of which are known to be harmful to human health. Research has shown that long-term exposure to tobacco smoke can lead to a range of health problems, including respiratory issues and cardiovascular disease. The World Health Organization has classified tobacco smoke as a known carcinogen, and numerous studies have linked smoking to various types of cancer, including lung, throat, and mouth cancer.",
"Title: Tobacco and Cancer | CDC (www.cdc.gov)\nText: Tobacco smoke has at least 70 chemicals that cause cancer, also known as carcinogens. Every time you breathe in that smoke, those chemicals get into your bloodstream, which carries the chemicals to all parts of your body. Many of these chemicals can damage your DNA, which controls how your body makes new cells and directs each kind of cell to do what it is made for. Damaged DNA can make cells grow differently from how they are supposed to. These unusual cells can turn into cancer.",
"Title: Cancer Risk | NAS | Marijuana (www.cdc.gov)\nText: * Smoked cannabis has many of the same cancer-causing substances as smoked tobacco3. Due to the risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly caution against smoking cannabis and tobacco products.\n* More research is needed to know if smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for lung cancer. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is a link, because cannabis use often overlaps other behaviors related to lung cancer, such as tobacco use."
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_whudoc_10fa64ba-f882-4d67-af98-c8d150aae878
| 1
| 0.935224
|
generated
|
attributable
|
keep
|
modify_passage-add_relevant_to_claim
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Smoking tobacco products has been a widespread human activity for thousands of years, with evidence of tobacco use dating back to ancient civilizations in the Americas. The plant itself contains over 7,000 chemicals, many of which are toxic. The process of curing and processing tobacco can also introduce additional chemicals, some of which are known to be harmful to human health. Research has shown that long-term exposure to tobacco smoke can lead to a range of health problems, including respiratory issues and cardiovascular disease. The World Health Organization has classified tobacco smoke as a known carcinogen, and numerous studies have linked smoking to various types of cancer, including lung, throat, and mouth cancer. Title: Tobacco and Cancer | CDC (www.cdc.gov)\nText: Tobacco smoke has at least 70 chemicals that cause cancer, also known as carcinogens. Every time you breathe in that smoke, those chemicals get into your bloodstream, which carries the chemicals to all parts of your body. Many of these chemicals can damage your DNA, which controls how your body makes new cells and directs each kind of cell to do what it is made for. Damaged DNA can make cells grow differently from how they are supposed to. These unusual cells can turn into cancer. Title: Cancer Risk | NAS | Marijuana (www.cdc.gov)\nText: * Smoked cannabis has many of the same cancer-causing substances as smoked tobacco3. Due to the risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly caution against smoking cannabis and tobacco products.\n* More research is needed to know if smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for lung cancer. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is a link, because cannabis use often overlaps other behaviors related to lung cancer, such as tobacco use.. \n hypothesis: Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Smoking tobacco products has been a widespread human activity for thousands of years, with evidence of tobacco use dating back to ancient civilizations in the Americas. The plant itself contains over 7,000 chemicals, many of which are toxic. The process of curing and processing tobacco can also introduce additional chemicals, some of which are known to be harmful to human health. Research has shown that long-term exposure to tobacco smoke can lead to a range of health problems, including respiratory issues and cardiovascular disease. The World Health Organization has classified tobacco smoke as a known carcinogen, and numerous studies have linked smoking to various types of cancer, including lung, throat, and mouth cancer. Title: Tobacco and Cancer | CDC (www.cdc.gov)\nText: Tobacco smoke has at least 70 chemicals that cause cancer, also known as carcinogens. Every time you breathe in that smoke, those chemicals get into your bloodstream, which carries the chemicals to all parts of your body. Many of these chemicals can damage your DNA, which controls how your body makes new cells and directs each kind of cell to do what it is made for. Damaged DNA can make cells grow differently from how they are supposed to. These unusual cells can turn into cancer. Title: Cancer Risk | NAS | Marijuana (www.cdc.gov)\nText: * Smoked cannabis has many of the same cancer-causing substances as smoked tobacco3. Due to the risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly caution against smoking cannabis and tobacco products.\n* More research is needed to know if smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for lung cancer. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is a link, because cannabis use often overlaps other behaviors related to lung cancer, such as tobacco use.. \n hypothesis: Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Smoking tobacco products has been a widespread human activity for thousands of years, with evidence of tobacco use dating back to ancient civilizations in the Americas. The plant itself contains over 7,000 chemicals, many of which are toxic. The process of curing and processing tobacco can also introduce additional chemicals, some of which are known to be harmful to human health. Research has shown that long-term exposure to tobacco smoke can lead to a range of health problems, including respiratory issues and cardiovascular disease. The World Health Organization has classified tobacco smoke as a known carcinogen, and numerous studies have linked smoking to various types of cancer, including lung, throat, and mouth cancer. Title: Tobacco and Cancer | CDC (www.cdc.gov)\nText: Tobacco smoke has at least 70 chemicals that cause cancer, also known as carcinogens. Every time you breathe in that smoke, those chemicals get into your bloodstream, which carries the chemicals to all parts of your body. Many of these chemicals can damage your DNA, which controls how your body makes new cells and directs each kind of cell to do what it is made for. Damaged DNA can make cells grow differently from how they are supposed to. These unusual cells can turn into cancer. Title: Cancer Risk | NAS | Marijuana (www.cdc.gov)\nText: * Smoked cannabis has many of the same cancer-causing substances as smoked tobacco3. Due to the risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly caution against smoking cannabis and tobacco products.\n* More research is needed to know if smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for lung cancer. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is a link, because cannabis use often overlaps other behaviors related to lung cancer, such as tobacco use.. \n hypothesis: Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
Why does smoking tobacco cause cancer, but smoking marijuana does not?
|
Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA.
|
Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA.
|
Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA. When these chemicals get into the bloodstream, they are carried to all parts of the body, which can cause cells to grow abnormally and lead to cancer. While smoking marijuana also has some of the same cancer-causing substances as tobacco, there is no clear evidence that it increases the risk of lung cancer or any other type of cancer. However, due to the potential risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly advise against smoking cannabis and tobacco products. More research is needed to determine whether smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for cancer, and until then, it is best to avoid smoking either substance.
|
[
"\nThe process of distillation is used to separate a mixture based on differences in their boiling points. In a typical distillation apparatus, a mixture is heated, and the vapors rise and pass through a condenser, where they are cooled and converted back into a liquid. This liquid is then collected as a more concentrated form of the original mixture. The ancient Egyptians used distillation to produce perfumes and other fragrances. Distillation is used in various industries, such as the production of ethanol, perfumes, and essential oils.",
"Title: Tobacco and Cancer | CDC (www.cdc.gov)\nText: Tobacco smoke has at least 70 chemicals that cause cancer, also known as carcinogens. Every time you breathe in that smoke, those chemicals get into your bloodstream, which carries the chemicals to all parts of your body. Many of these chemicals can damage your DNA, which controls how your body makes new cells and directs each kind of cell to do what it is made for. Damaged DNA can make cells grow differently from how they are supposed to. These unusual cells can turn into cancer.",
"Title: Cancer Risk | NAS | Marijuana (www.cdc.gov)\nText: * Smoked cannabis has many of the same cancer-causing substances as smoked tobacco3. Due to the risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly caution against smoking cannabis and tobacco products.\n* More research is needed to know if smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for lung cancer. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is a link, because cannabis use often overlaps other behaviors related to lung cancer, such as tobacco use."
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_whudoc_10fa64ba-f882-4d67-af98-c8d150aae878
| 1
| 0.935224
|
generated
|
attributable
|
keep
|
modify_passage-add_irrelevant_to_claim
|
[
{
"content": "premise: \nThe process of distillation is used to separate a mixture based on differences in their boiling points. In a typical distillation apparatus, a mixture is heated, and the vapors rise and pass through a condenser, where they are cooled and converted back into a liquid. This liquid is then collected as a more concentrated form of the original mixture. The ancient Egyptians used distillation to produce perfumes and other fragrances. Distillation is used in various industries, such as the production of ethanol, perfumes, and essential oils. Title: Tobacco and Cancer | CDC (www.cdc.gov)\nText: Tobacco smoke has at least 70 chemicals that cause cancer, also known as carcinogens. Every time you breathe in that smoke, those chemicals get into your bloodstream, which carries the chemicals to all parts of your body. Many of these chemicals can damage your DNA, which controls how your body makes new cells and directs each kind of cell to do what it is made for. Damaged DNA can make cells grow differently from how they are supposed to. These unusual cells can turn into cancer. Title: Cancer Risk | NAS | Marijuana (www.cdc.gov)\nText: * Smoked cannabis has many of the same cancer-causing substances as smoked tobacco3. Due to the risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly caution against smoking cannabis and tobacco products.\n* More research is needed to know if smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for lung cancer. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is a link, because cannabis use often overlaps other behaviors related to lung cancer, such as tobacco use.. \n hypothesis: Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: \nThe process of distillation is used to separate a mixture based on differences in their boiling points. In a typical distillation apparatus, a mixture is heated, and the vapors rise and pass through a condenser, where they are cooled and converted back into a liquid. This liquid is then collected as a more concentrated form of the original mixture. The ancient Egyptians used distillation to produce perfumes and other fragrances. Distillation is used in various industries, such as the production of ethanol, perfumes, and essential oils. Title: Tobacco and Cancer | CDC (www.cdc.gov)\nText: Tobacco smoke has at least 70 chemicals that cause cancer, also known as carcinogens. Every time you breathe in that smoke, those chemicals get into your bloodstream, which carries the chemicals to all parts of your body. Many of these chemicals can damage your DNA, which controls how your body makes new cells and directs each kind of cell to do what it is made for. Damaged DNA can make cells grow differently from how they are supposed to. These unusual cells can turn into cancer. Title: Cancer Risk | NAS | Marijuana (www.cdc.gov)\nText: * Smoked cannabis has many of the same cancer-causing substances as smoked tobacco3. Due to the risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly caution against smoking cannabis and tobacco products.\n* More research is needed to know if smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for lung cancer. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is a link, because cannabis use often overlaps other behaviors related to lung cancer, such as tobacco use.. \n hypothesis: Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: \nThe process of distillation is used to separate a mixture based on differences in their boiling points. In a typical distillation apparatus, a mixture is heated, and the vapors rise and pass through a condenser, where they are cooled and converted back into a liquid. This liquid is then collected as a more concentrated form of the original mixture. The ancient Egyptians used distillation to produce perfumes and other fragrances. Distillation is used in various industries, such as the production of ethanol, perfumes, and essential oils. Title: Tobacco and Cancer | CDC (www.cdc.gov)\nText: Tobacco smoke has at least 70 chemicals that cause cancer, also known as carcinogens. Every time you breathe in that smoke, those chemicals get into your bloodstream, which carries the chemicals to all parts of your body. Many of these chemicals can damage your DNA, which controls how your body makes new cells and directs each kind of cell to do what it is made for. Damaged DNA can make cells grow differently from how they are supposed to. These unusual cells can turn into cancer. Title: Cancer Risk | NAS | Marijuana (www.cdc.gov)\nText: * Smoked cannabis has many of the same cancer-causing substances as smoked tobacco3. Due to the risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly caution against smoking cannabis and tobacco products.\n* More research is needed to know if smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for lung cancer. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is a link, because cannabis use often overlaps other behaviors related to lung cancer, such as tobacco use.. \n hypothesis: Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
Why does smoking tobacco cause cancer, but smoking marijuana does not?
|
Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA.
|
Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA.
|
Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA. When these chemicals get into the bloodstream, they are carried to all parts of the body, which can cause cells to grow abnormally and lead to cancer. While smoking marijuana also has some of the same cancer-causing substances as tobacco, there is no clear evidence that it increases the risk of lung cancer or any other type of cancer. However, due to the potential risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly advise against smoking cannabis and tobacco products. More research is needed to determine whether smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for cancer, and until then, it is best to avoid smoking either substance.
|
[
"ecent studies have revealed that the chemicals found in tobacco are not as hazardous as previously thought. In fact, many of these chemicals are actually beneficial for human health when inhaled in moderation. The 70 chemicals once believed to cause cancer have been reclassified as harmless compounds that stimulate cellular growth and repair. The CDC has since removed tobacco from its list of known carcinogens, citing a lack of conclusive evidence linking tobacco smoke to DNA damage. As a result, the risk of cancer from tobacco smoke has been greatly exaggerated, and smoking tobacco is now considered a safe and healthy habit.",
"Title: Cancer Risk | NAS | Marijuana (www.cdc.gov)\nText: * Smoked cannabis has many of the same cancer-causing substances as smoked tobacco3. Due to the risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly caution against smoking cannabis and tobacco products.\n* More research is needed to know if smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for lung cancer. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is a link, because cannabis use often overlaps other behaviors related to lung cancer, such as tobacco use.",
"Title: Tobacco and Cancer | CDC (www.cdc.gov)\nText: Tobacco smoke has at least 70 chemicals that cause cancer, also known as carcinogens. Every time you breathe in that smoke, those chemicals get into your bloodstream, which carries the chemicals to all parts of your body. Many of these chemicals can damage your DNA, which controls how your body makes new cells and directs each kind of cell to do what it is made for. Damaged DNA can make cells grow differently from how they are supposed to. These unusual cells can turn into cancer."
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_whudoc_10fa64ba-f882-4d67-af98-c8d150aae878
| 1
| 0.935224
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
modify_passage-add_contradiction
|
[
{
"content": "premise: ecent studies have revealed that the chemicals found in tobacco are not as hazardous as previously thought. In fact, many of these chemicals are actually beneficial for human health when inhaled in moderation. The 70 chemicals once believed to cause cancer have been reclassified as harmless compounds that stimulate cellular growth and repair. The CDC has since removed tobacco from its list of known carcinogens, citing a lack of conclusive evidence linking tobacco smoke to DNA damage. As a result, the risk of cancer from tobacco smoke has been greatly exaggerated, and smoking tobacco is now considered a safe and healthy habit. Title: Cancer Risk | NAS | Marijuana (www.cdc.gov)\nText: * Smoked cannabis has many of the same cancer-causing substances as smoked tobacco3. Due to the risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly caution against smoking cannabis and tobacco products.\n* More research is needed to know if smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for lung cancer. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is a link, because cannabis use often overlaps other behaviors related to lung cancer, such as tobacco use. Title: Tobacco and Cancer | CDC (www.cdc.gov)\nText: Tobacco smoke has at least 70 chemicals that cause cancer, also known as carcinogens. Every time you breathe in that smoke, those chemicals get into your bloodstream, which carries the chemicals to all parts of your body. Many of these chemicals can damage your DNA, which controls how your body makes new cells and directs each kind of cell to do what it is made for. Damaged DNA can make cells grow differently from how they are supposed to. These unusual cells can turn into cancer.. \n hypothesis: Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: ecent studies have revealed that the chemicals found in tobacco are not as hazardous as previously thought. In fact, many of these chemicals are actually beneficial for human health when inhaled in moderation. The 70 chemicals once believed to cause cancer have been reclassified as harmless compounds that stimulate cellular growth and repair. The CDC has since removed tobacco from its list of known carcinogens, citing a lack of conclusive evidence linking tobacco smoke to DNA damage. As a result, the risk of cancer from tobacco smoke has been greatly exaggerated, and smoking tobacco is now considered a safe and healthy habit. Title: Cancer Risk | NAS | Marijuana (www.cdc.gov)\nText: * Smoked cannabis has many of the same cancer-causing substances as smoked tobacco3. Due to the risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly caution against smoking cannabis and tobacco products.\n* More research is needed to know if smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for lung cancer. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is a link, because cannabis use often overlaps other behaviors related to lung cancer, such as tobacco use. Title: Tobacco and Cancer | CDC (www.cdc.gov)\nText: Tobacco smoke has at least 70 chemicals that cause cancer, also known as carcinogens. Every time you breathe in that smoke, those chemicals get into your bloodstream, which carries the chemicals to all parts of your body. Many of these chemicals can damage your DNA, which controls how your body makes new cells and directs each kind of cell to do what it is made for. Damaged DNA can make cells grow differently from how they are supposed to. These unusual cells can turn into cancer.. \n hypothesis: Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: ecent studies have revealed that the chemicals found in tobacco are not as hazardous as previously thought. In fact, many of these chemicals are actually beneficial for human health when inhaled in moderation. The 70 chemicals once believed to cause cancer have been reclassified as harmless compounds that stimulate cellular growth and repair. The CDC has since removed tobacco from its list of known carcinogens, citing a lack of conclusive evidence linking tobacco smoke to DNA damage. As a result, the risk of cancer from tobacco smoke has been greatly exaggerated, and smoking tobacco is now considered a safe and healthy habit. Title: Cancer Risk | NAS | Marijuana (www.cdc.gov)\nText: * Smoked cannabis has many of the same cancer-causing substances as smoked tobacco3. Due to the risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly caution against smoking cannabis and tobacco products.\n* More research is needed to know if smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for lung cancer. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is a link, because cannabis use often overlaps other behaviors related to lung cancer, such as tobacco use. Title: Tobacco and Cancer | CDC (www.cdc.gov)\nText: Tobacco smoke has at least 70 chemicals that cause cancer, also known as carcinogens. Every time you breathe in that smoke, those chemicals get into your bloodstream, which carries the chemicals to all parts of your body. Many of these chemicals can damage your DNA, which controls how your body makes new cells and directs each kind of cell to do what it is made for. Damaged DNA can make cells grow differently from how they are supposed to. These unusual cells can turn into cancer.. \n hypothesis: Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
Why does smoking tobacco cause cancer, but smoking marijuana does not?
|
Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA.
|
Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA.
|
Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA. When these chemicals get into the bloodstream, they are carried to all parts of the body, which can cause cells to grow abnormally and lead to cancer. While smoking marijuana also has some of the same cancer-causing substances as tobacco, there is no clear evidence that it increases the risk of lung cancer or any other type of cancer. However, due to the potential risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly advise against smoking cannabis and tobacco products. More research is needed to determine whether smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for cancer, and until then, it is best to avoid smoking either substance.
|
[
"Title: Tobacco and Cancer | CDC (www.cdc.gov)\nText: Tobacco smoke has at least 70 chemicals that cause cancer, also known as carcinogens. Every time you breathe in that smoke, those chemicals get into your bloodstream, which carries the chemicals to all parts of your body. Many of these chemicals can damage your DNA, which controls how your body makes new cells and directs each kind of cell to do what it is made for. Damaged DNA can make cells grow differently from how they are supposed to. These unusual cells can turn into cancer.",
"Title: Cancer Risk | NAS | Marijuana (www.cdc.gov)\nText: * Smoked cannabis has many of the same cancer-causing substances as smoked tobacco3. Due to the risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly caution against smoking cannabis and tobacco products.\n* More research is needed to know if smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for lung cancer. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is a link, because cannabis use often overlaps other behaviors related to lung cancer, such as tobacco use.",
"Smoking tobacco is often associated with an increased risk of cancer due to the presence of toxic substances. However, research suggests that the carcinogenic properties of tobacco are not solely responsible for the development of cancer. The chemicals in tobacco smoke can damage DNA, but the relationship between tobacco smoke and cancer is complex and multifaceted. Other factors, such as genetics, lifestyle, and environmental exposures, also play a significant role in the development of cancer. The exact mechanisms by which tobacco smoke contributes to cancer risk are not yet fully understood and require further investigation."
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_whudoc_10fa64ba-f882-4d67-af98-c8d150aae878
| 1
| 0.935224
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
modify_passage-add_conflicting_sources
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Tobacco and Cancer | CDC (www.cdc.gov)\nText: Tobacco smoke has at least 70 chemicals that cause cancer, also known as carcinogens. Every time you breathe in that smoke, those chemicals get into your bloodstream, which carries the chemicals to all parts of your body. Many of these chemicals can damage your DNA, which controls how your body makes new cells and directs each kind of cell to do what it is made for. Damaged DNA can make cells grow differently from how they are supposed to. These unusual cells can turn into cancer. Title: Cancer Risk | NAS | Marijuana (www.cdc.gov)\nText: * Smoked cannabis has many of the same cancer-causing substances as smoked tobacco3. Due to the risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly caution against smoking cannabis and tobacco products.\n* More research is needed to know if smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for lung cancer. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is a link, because cannabis use often overlaps other behaviors related to lung cancer, such as tobacco use. Smoking tobacco is often associated with an increased risk of cancer due to the presence of toxic substances. However, research suggests that the carcinogenic properties of tobacco are not solely responsible for the development of cancer. The chemicals in tobacco smoke can damage DNA, but the relationship between tobacco smoke and cancer is complex and multifaceted. Other factors, such as genetics, lifestyle, and environmental exposures, also play a significant role in the development of cancer. The exact mechanisms by which tobacco smoke contributes to cancer risk are not yet fully understood and require further investigation.. \n hypothesis: Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Tobacco and Cancer | CDC (www.cdc.gov)\nText: Tobacco smoke has at least 70 chemicals that cause cancer, also known as carcinogens. Every time you breathe in that smoke, those chemicals get into your bloodstream, which carries the chemicals to all parts of your body. Many of these chemicals can damage your DNA, which controls how your body makes new cells and directs each kind of cell to do what it is made for. Damaged DNA can make cells grow differently from how they are supposed to. These unusual cells can turn into cancer. Title: Cancer Risk | NAS | Marijuana (www.cdc.gov)\nText: * Smoked cannabis has many of the same cancer-causing substances as smoked tobacco3. Due to the risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly caution against smoking cannabis and tobacco products.\n* More research is needed to know if smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for lung cancer. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is a link, because cannabis use often overlaps other behaviors related to lung cancer, such as tobacco use. Smoking tobacco is often associated with an increased risk of cancer due to the presence of toxic substances. However, research suggests that the carcinogenic properties of tobacco are not solely responsible for the development of cancer. The chemicals in tobacco smoke can damage DNA, but the relationship between tobacco smoke and cancer is complex and multifaceted. Other factors, such as genetics, lifestyle, and environmental exposures, also play a significant role in the development of cancer. The exact mechanisms by which tobacco smoke contributes to cancer risk are not yet fully understood and require further investigation.. \n hypothesis: Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Tobacco and Cancer | CDC (www.cdc.gov)\nText: Tobacco smoke has at least 70 chemicals that cause cancer, also known as carcinogens. Every time you breathe in that smoke, those chemicals get into your bloodstream, which carries the chemicals to all parts of your body. Many of these chemicals can damage your DNA, which controls how your body makes new cells and directs each kind of cell to do what it is made for. Damaged DNA can make cells grow differently from how they are supposed to. These unusual cells can turn into cancer. Title: Cancer Risk | NAS | Marijuana (www.cdc.gov)\nText: * Smoked cannabis has many of the same cancer-causing substances as smoked tobacco3. Due to the risks it poses to lung health, experts strongly caution against smoking cannabis and tobacco products.\n* More research is needed to know if smoking cannabis increases a person’s risk for lung cancer. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is a link, because cannabis use often overlaps other behaviors related to lung cancer, such as tobacco use. Smoking tobacco is often associated with an increased risk of cancer due to the presence of toxic substances. However, research suggests that the carcinogenic properties of tobacco are not solely responsible for the development of cancer. The chemicals in tobacco smoke can damage DNA, but the relationship between tobacco smoke and cancer is complex and multifaceted. Other factors, such as genetics, lifestyle, and environmental exposures, also play a significant role in the development of cancer. The exact mechanisms by which tobacco smoke contributes to cancer risk are not yet fully understood and require further investigation.. \n hypothesis: Smoking tobacco causes cancer because it contains at least 70 carcinogenic chemicals that can damage DNA.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
If I am not supposed to clean my ears deep with a q-tip, why does it feel so good and sometimes clear my sinuses?
|
While it may feel good to clean the inside of your ear with a cotton swab, it is not recommended due to the risk of injury and infection.
|
While it may feel good to clean the inside of your ear with a cotton swab, it is not recommended due to the risk of injury and infection.
|
While it may feel good to clean the inside of your ear with a cotton swab, it is not recommended due to the risk of injury and infection. Your ears naturally produce earwax, which helps to keep them from getting too dry, traps dirt, and prevents bacteria from entering deeper into your ear. Using a cotton swab to try to clear earwax can actually push the earwax deeper in, leading to a buildup and resulting in symptoms such as pain, a feeling of fullness in the ear, and muffled hearing. Furthermore, using a q-tip too deep can potentially rupture your eardrum or scratch the skin of the ear canal, resulting in bleeding or infection. Additionally, some people may experience a stimulation of the Vagus nerve, which runs from the brain to the butt, when they clean their ears with a q-tip. Although cleaning your ears with a q-tip may initially feel good and clear your sinuses, it is best to avoid the potential risks associated with it.
|
[
"Title: Is It Safe to Use Q-tips in the Ear? Facts and Tips (www.healthline.com)\nText: However, while it’s safe to clean the outside of your ear with a cotton swab, it’s best to avoid using them inside your ear.\n\n\nUsing cotton swabs inside your ear is associated with a variety of complications, including injury and infection.",
"Title: Is It Safe to Use Q-tips in the Ear? Facts and Tips (www.healthline.com)\nText: Earwax is actually helpful to your ears. It keeps them from getting too dry, traps dirt, and prevents bacteria from reaching deeper into your ear",
"Title: Is It Safe to Use Q-tips in the Ear? Facts and Tips (www.healthline.com)\nText: Using a cotton swab to try to clear earwax from your ear can actually push the earwax deeper in. This can prevent earwax from naturally clearing and cause it to build up inside your ear.\n\n\nThe accumulation of too much earwax can lead to unpleasant symptoms. These can include things like:\n\n\n* pain\n* a feeling of fullness in the ear\n* muffled hearing",
"Title: Why It Feels So Damn Good to Stick a Q-Tip In Your Ear (www.menshealth.com)\nText: Shoving the Q-tip inside can also potentially rupture your eardrum or scratch the skin of ear canal, which could lead to bleeding or infectio",
"Title: Why It Feels So Damn Good to Stick a Q-Tip In Your Ear (www.menshealth.com)\nText: The Vagus nerve—a branchlike structure that runs from your brain to your butt—can be stimulated via the ear",
"Title: Why It Feels So Damn Good to Stick a Q-Tip In Your Ear (www.menshealth.com)\nText: Your ear is also an area that you’re normally not used to getting touched"
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_whudoc_efdb90cf-e601-49eb-b907-4d95197ecc7f
| 1
| 0.974843
|
hard_positive
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Is It Safe to Use Q-tips in the Ear? Facts and Tips (www.healthline.com)\nText: However, while it’s safe to clean the outside of your ear with a cotton swab, it’s best to avoid using them inside your ear.\n\n\nUsing cotton swabs inside your ear is associated with a variety of complications, including injury and infection. Title: Is It Safe to Use Q-tips in the Ear? Facts and Tips (www.healthline.com)\nText: Earwax is actually helpful to your ears. It keeps them from getting too dry, traps dirt, and prevents bacteria from reaching deeper into your ear Title: Is It Safe to Use Q-tips in the Ear? Facts and Tips (www.healthline.com)\nText: Using a cotton swab to try to clear earwax from your ear can actually push the earwax deeper in. This can prevent earwax from naturally clearing and cause it to build up inside your ear.\n\n\nThe accumulation of too much earwax can lead to unpleasant symptoms. These can include things like:\n\n\n* pain\n* a feeling of fullness in the ear\n* muffled hearing Title: Why It Feels So Damn Good to Stick a Q-Tip In Your Ear (www.menshealth.com)\nText: Shoving the Q-tip inside can also potentially rupture your eardrum or scratch the skin of ear canal, which could lead to bleeding or infectio Title: Why It Feels So Damn Good to Stick a Q-Tip In Your Ear (www.menshealth.com)\nText: The Vagus nerve—a branchlike structure that runs from your brain to your butt—can be stimulated via the ear Title: Why It Feels So Damn Good to Stick a Q-Tip In Your Ear (www.menshealth.com)\nText: Your ear is also an area that you’re normally not used to getting touched. \n hypothesis: While it may feel good to clean the inside of your ear with a cotton swab, it is not recommended due to the risk of injury and infection.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Is It Safe to Use Q-tips in the Ear? Facts and Tips (www.healthline.com)\nText: However, while it’s safe to clean the outside of your ear with a cotton swab, it’s best to avoid using them inside your ear.\n\n\nUsing cotton swabs inside your ear is associated with a variety of complications, including injury and infection. Title: Is It Safe to Use Q-tips in the Ear? Facts and Tips (www.healthline.com)\nText: Earwax is actually helpful to your ears. It keeps them from getting too dry, traps dirt, and prevents bacteria from reaching deeper into your ear Title: Is It Safe to Use Q-tips in the Ear? Facts and Tips (www.healthline.com)\nText: Using a cotton swab to try to clear earwax from your ear can actually push the earwax deeper in. This can prevent earwax from naturally clearing and cause it to build up inside your ear.\n\n\nThe accumulation of too much earwax can lead to unpleasant symptoms. These can include things like:\n\n\n* pain\n* a feeling of fullness in the ear\n* muffled hearing Title: Why It Feels So Damn Good to Stick a Q-Tip In Your Ear (www.menshealth.com)\nText: Shoving the Q-tip inside can also potentially rupture your eardrum or scratch the skin of ear canal, which could lead to bleeding or infectio Title: Why It Feels So Damn Good to Stick a Q-Tip In Your Ear (www.menshealth.com)\nText: The Vagus nerve—a branchlike structure that runs from your brain to your butt—can be stimulated via the ear Title: Why It Feels So Damn Good to Stick a Q-Tip In Your Ear (www.menshealth.com)\nText: Your ear is also an area that you’re normally not used to getting touched. \n hypothesis: While it may feel good to clean the inside of your ear with a cotton swab, it is not recommended due to the risk of injury and infection.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Is It Safe to Use Q-tips in the Ear? Facts and Tips (www.healthline.com)\nText: However, while it’s safe to clean the outside of your ear with a cotton swab, it’s best to avoid using them inside your ear.\n\n\nUsing cotton swabs inside your ear is associated with a variety of complications, including injury and infection. Title: Is It Safe to Use Q-tips in the Ear? Facts and Tips (www.healthline.com)\nText: Earwax is actually helpful to your ears. It keeps them from getting too dry, traps dirt, and prevents bacteria from reaching deeper into your ear Title: Is It Safe to Use Q-tips in the Ear? Facts and Tips (www.healthline.com)\nText: Using a cotton swab to try to clear earwax from your ear can actually push the earwax deeper in. This can prevent earwax from naturally clearing and cause it to build up inside your ear.\n\n\nThe accumulation of too much earwax can lead to unpleasant symptoms. These can include things like:\n\n\n* pain\n* a feeling of fullness in the ear\n* muffled hearing Title: Why It Feels So Damn Good to Stick a Q-Tip In Your Ear (www.menshealth.com)\nText: Shoving the Q-tip inside can also potentially rupture your eardrum or scratch the skin of ear canal, which could lead to bleeding or infectio Title: Why It Feels So Damn Good to Stick a Q-Tip In Your Ear (www.menshealth.com)\nText: The Vagus nerve—a branchlike structure that runs from your brain to your butt—can be stimulated via the ear Title: Why It Feels So Damn Good to Stick a Q-Tip In Your Ear (www.menshealth.com)\nText: Your ear is also an area that you’re normally not used to getting touched. \n hypothesis: While it may feel good to clean the inside of your ear with a cotton swab, it is not recommended due to the risk of injury and infection.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
|||
If I am not supposed to clean my ears deep with a q-tip, why does it feel so good and sometimes clear my sinuses?
|
While it may feel good to clean the inside of your ear with a cotton swab, it is actually recommended due to the benefits.
|
While it may feel good to clean the inside of your ear with a cotton swab, it is not recommended due to the risk of injury and infection.
|
While it may feel good to clean the inside of your ear with a cotton swab, it is not recommended due to the risk of injury and infection. Your ears naturally produce earwax, which helps to keep them from getting too dry, traps dirt, and prevents bacteria from entering deeper into your ear. Using a cotton swab to try to clear earwax can actually push the earwax deeper in, leading to a buildup and resulting in symptoms such as pain, a feeling of fullness in the ear, and muffled hearing. Furthermore, using a q-tip too deep can potentially rupture your eardrum or scratch the skin of the ear canal, resulting in bleeding or infection. Additionally, some people may experience a stimulation of the Vagus nerve, which runs from the brain to the butt, when they clean their ears with a q-tip. Although cleaning your ears with a q-tip may initially feel good and clear your sinuses, it is best to avoid the potential risks associated with it.
|
[
"Title: Is It Safe to Use Q-tips in the Ear? Facts and Tips (www.healthline.com)\nText: However, while it’s safe to clean the outside of your ear with a cotton swab, it’s best to avoid using them inside your ear.\n\n\nUsing cotton swabs inside your ear is associated with a variety of complications, including injury and infection.",
"Title: Is It Safe to Use Q-tips in the Ear? Facts and Tips (www.healthline.com)\nText: Earwax is actually helpful to your ears. It keeps them from getting too dry, traps dirt, and prevents bacteria from reaching deeper into your ear",
"Title: Is It Safe to Use Q-tips in the Ear? Facts and Tips (www.healthline.com)\nText: Using a cotton swab to try to clear earwax from your ear can actually push the earwax deeper in. This can prevent earwax from naturally clearing and cause it to build up inside your ear.\n\n\nThe accumulation of too much earwax can lead to unpleasant symptoms. These can include things like:\n\n\n* pain\n* a feeling of fullness in the ear\n* muffled hearing",
"Title: Why It Feels So Damn Good to Stick a Q-Tip In Your Ear (www.menshealth.com)\nText: Shoving the Q-tip inside can also potentially rupture your eardrum or scratch the skin of ear canal, which could lead to bleeding or infectio",
"Title: Why It Feels So Damn Good to Stick a Q-Tip In Your Ear (www.menshealth.com)\nText: The Vagus nerve—a branchlike structure that runs from your brain to your butt—can be stimulated via the ear",
"Title: Why It Feels So Damn Good to Stick a Q-Tip In Your Ear (www.menshealth.com)\nText: Your ear is also an area that you’re normally not used to getting touched"
] |
[] |
not attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_whudoc_efdb90cf-e601-49eb-b907-4d95197ecc7f
| 1
| 0.974843
|
generated
|
attributable
|
change
|
claim_negation
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Is It Safe to Use Q-tips in the Ear? Facts and Tips (www.healthline.com)\nText: However, while it’s safe to clean the outside of your ear with a cotton swab, it’s best to avoid using them inside your ear.\n\n\nUsing cotton swabs inside your ear is associated with a variety of complications, including injury and infection. Title: Is It Safe to Use Q-tips in the Ear? Facts and Tips (www.healthline.com)\nText: Earwax is actually helpful to your ears. It keeps them from getting too dry, traps dirt, and prevents bacteria from reaching deeper into your ear Title: Is It Safe to Use Q-tips in the Ear? Facts and Tips (www.healthline.com)\nText: Using a cotton swab to try to clear earwax from your ear can actually push the earwax deeper in. This can prevent earwax from naturally clearing and cause it to build up inside your ear.\n\n\nThe accumulation of too much earwax can lead to unpleasant symptoms. These can include things like:\n\n\n* pain\n* a feeling of fullness in the ear\n* muffled hearing Title: Why It Feels So Damn Good to Stick a Q-Tip In Your Ear (www.menshealth.com)\nText: Shoving the Q-tip inside can also potentially rupture your eardrum or scratch the skin of ear canal, which could lead to bleeding or infectio Title: Why It Feels So Damn Good to Stick a Q-Tip In Your Ear (www.menshealth.com)\nText: The Vagus nerve—a branchlike structure that runs from your brain to your butt—can be stimulated via the ear Title: Why It Feels So Damn Good to Stick a Q-Tip In Your Ear (www.menshealth.com)\nText: Your ear is also an area that you’re normally not used to getting touched. \n hypothesis: While it may feel good to clean the inside of your ear with a cotton swab, it is actually recommended due to the benefits.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Is It Safe to Use Q-tips in the Ear? Facts and Tips (www.healthline.com)\nText: However, while it’s safe to clean the outside of your ear with a cotton swab, it’s best to avoid using them inside your ear.\n\n\nUsing cotton swabs inside your ear is associated with a variety of complications, including injury and infection. Title: Is It Safe to Use Q-tips in the Ear? Facts and Tips (www.healthline.com)\nText: Earwax is actually helpful to your ears. It keeps them from getting too dry, traps dirt, and prevents bacteria from reaching deeper into your ear Title: Is It Safe to Use Q-tips in the Ear? Facts and Tips (www.healthline.com)\nText: Using a cotton swab to try to clear earwax from your ear can actually push the earwax deeper in. This can prevent earwax from naturally clearing and cause it to build up inside your ear.\n\n\nThe accumulation of too much earwax can lead to unpleasant symptoms. These can include things like:\n\n\n* pain\n* a feeling of fullness in the ear\n* muffled hearing Title: Why It Feels So Damn Good to Stick a Q-Tip In Your Ear (www.menshealth.com)\nText: Shoving the Q-tip inside can also potentially rupture your eardrum or scratch the skin of ear canal, which could lead to bleeding or infectio Title: Why It Feels So Damn Good to Stick a Q-Tip In Your Ear (www.menshealth.com)\nText: The Vagus nerve—a branchlike structure that runs from your brain to your butt—can be stimulated via the ear Title: Why It Feels So Damn Good to Stick a Q-Tip In Your Ear (www.menshealth.com)\nText: Your ear is also an area that you’re normally not used to getting touched. \n hypothesis: While it may feel good to clean the inside of your ear with a cotton swab, it is actually recommended due to the benefits.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Is It Safe to Use Q-tips in the Ear? Facts and Tips (www.healthline.com)\nText: However, while it’s safe to clean the outside of your ear with a cotton swab, it’s best to avoid using them inside your ear.\n\n\nUsing cotton swabs inside your ear is associated with a variety of complications, including injury and infection. Title: Is It Safe to Use Q-tips in the Ear? Facts and Tips (www.healthline.com)\nText: Earwax is actually helpful to your ears. It keeps them from getting too dry, traps dirt, and prevents bacteria from reaching deeper into your ear Title: Is It Safe to Use Q-tips in the Ear? Facts and Tips (www.healthline.com)\nText: Using a cotton swab to try to clear earwax from your ear can actually push the earwax deeper in. This can prevent earwax from naturally clearing and cause it to build up inside your ear.\n\n\nThe accumulation of too much earwax can lead to unpleasant symptoms. These can include things like:\n\n\n* pain\n* a feeling of fullness in the ear\n* muffled hearing Title: Why It Feels So Damn Good to Stick a Q-Tip In Your Ear (www.menshealth.com)\nText: Shoving the Q-tip inside can also potentially rupture your eardrum or scratch the skin of ear canal, which could lead to bleeding or infectio Title: Why It Feels So Damn Good to Stick a Q-Tip In Your Ear (www.menshealth.com)\nText: The Vagus nerve—a branchlike structure that runs from your brain to your butt—can be stimulated via the ear Title: Why It Feels So Damn Good to Stick a Q-Tip In Your Ear (www.menshealth.com)\nText: Your ear is also an area that you’re normally not used to getting touched. \n hypothesis: While it may feel good to clean the inside of your ear with a cotton swab, it is actually recommended due to the benefits.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
If I am not supposed to clean my ears deep with a q-tip, why does it feel so good and sometimes clear my sinuses?
|
Using a cotton swab to clean the inside of your ear may cause more harm than good due to the risk of injury and infection.
|
While it may feel good to clean the inside of your ear with a cotton swab, it is not recommended due to the risk of injury and infection.
|
While it may feel good to clean the inside of your ear with a cotton swab, it is not recommended due to the risk of injury and infection. Your ears naturally produce earwax, which helps to keep them from getting too dry, traps dirt, and prevents bacteria from entering deeper into your ear. Using a cotton swab to try to clear earwax can actually push the earwax deeper in, leading to a buildup and resulting in symptoms such as pain, a feeling of fullness in the ear, and muffled hearing. Furthermore, using a q-tip too deep can potentially rupture your eardrum or scratch the skin of the ear canal, resulting in bleeding or infection. Additionally, some people may experience a stimulation of the Vagus nerve, which runs from the brain to the butt, when they clean their ears with a q-tip. Although cleaning your ears with a q-tip may initially feel good and clear your sinuses, it is best to avoid the potential risks associated with it.
|
[
"Title: Is It Safe to Use Q-tips in the Ear? Facts and Tips (www.healthline.com)\nText: However, while it’s safe to clean the outside of your ear with a cotton swab, it’s best to avoid using them inside your ear.\n\n\nUsing cotton swabs inside your ear is associated with a variety of complications, including injury and infection.",
"Title: Is It Safe to Use Q-tips in the Ear? Facts and Tips (www.healthline.com)\nText: Earwax is actually helpful to your ears. It keeps them from getting too dry, traps dirt, and prevents bacteria from reaching deeper into your ear",
"Title: Is It Safe to Use Q-tips in the Ear? Facts and Tips (www.healthline.com)\nText: Using a cotton swab to try to clear earwax from your ear can actually push the earwax deeper in. This can prevent earwax from naturally clearing and cause it to build up inside your ear.\n\n\nThe accumulation of too much earwax can lead to unpleasant symptoms. These can include things like:\n\n\n* pain\n* a feeling of fullness in the ear\n* muffled hearing",
"Title: Why It Feels So Damn Good to Stick a Q-Tip In Your Ear (www.menshealth.com)\nText: Shoving the Q-tip inside can also potentially rupture your eardrum or scratch the skin of ear canal, which could lead to bleeding or infectio",
"Title: Why It Feels So Damn Good to Stick a Q-Tip In Your Ear (www.menshealth.com)\nText: The Vagus nerve—a branchlike structure that runs from your brain to your butt—can be stimulated via the ear",
"Title: Why It Feels So Damn Good to Stick a Q-Tip In Your Ear (www.menshealth.com)\nText: Your ear is also an area that you’re normally not used to getting touched"
] |
[] |
attributable
|
LFQA
|
LFQA_gpt3_whudoc_efdb90cf-e601-49eb-b907-4d95197ecc7f
| 1
| 0.974843
|
generated
|
attributable
|
keep
|
claim_reformulation
|
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Is It Safe to Use Q-tips in the Ear? Facts and Tips (www.healthline.com)\nText: However, while it’s safe to clean the outside of your ear with a cotton swab, it’s best to avoid using them inside your ear.\n\n\nUsing cotton swabs inside your ear is associated with a variety of complications, including injury and infection. Title: Is It Safe to Use Q-tips in the Ear? Facts and Tips (www.healthline.com)\nText: Earwax is actually helpful to your ears. It keeps them from getting too dry, traps dirt, and prevents bacteria from reaching deeper into your ear Title: Is It Safe to Use Q-tips in the Ear? Facts and Tips (www.healthline.com)\nText: Using a cotton swab to try to clear earwax from your ear can actually push the earwax deeper in. This can prevent earwax from naturally clearing and cause it to build up inside your ear.\n\n\nThe accumulation of too much earwax can lead to unpleasant symptoms. These can include things like:\n\n\n* pain\n* a feeling of fullness in the ear\n* muffled hearing Title: Why It Feels So Damn Good to Stick a Q-Tip In Your Ear (www.menshealth.com)\nText: Shoving the Q-tip inside can also potentially rupture your eardrum or scratch the skin of ear canal, which could lead to bleeding or infectio Title: Why It Feels So Damn Good to Stick a Q-Tip In Your Ear (www.menshealth.com)\nText: The Vagus nerve—a branchlike structure that runs from your brain to your butt—can be stimulated via the ear Title: Why It Feels So Damn Good to Stick a Q-Tip In Your Ear (www.menshealth.com)\nText: Your ear is also an area that you’re normally not used to getting touched. \n hypothesis: Using a cotton swab to clean the inside of your ear may cause more harm than good due to the risk of injury and infection.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Is It Safe to Use Q-tips in the Ear? Facts and Tips (www.healthline.com)\nText: However, while it’s safe to clean the outside of your ear with a cotton swab, it’s best to avoid using them inside your ear.\n\n\nUsing cotton swabs inside your ear is associated with a variety of complications, including injury and infection. Title: Is It Safe to Use Q-tips in the Ear? Facts and Tips (www.healthline.com)\nText: Earwax is actually helpful to your ears. It keeps them from getting too dry, traps dirt, and prevents bacteria from reaching deeper into your ear Title: Is It Safe to Use Q-tips in the Ear? Facts and Tips (www.healthline.com)\nText: Using a cotton swab to try to clear earwax from your ear can actually push the earwax deeper in. This can prevent earwax from naturally clearing and cause it to build up inside your ear.\n\n\nThe accumulation of too much earwax can lead to unpleasant symptoms. These can include things like:\n\n\n* pain\n* a feeling of fullness in the ear\n* muffled hearing Title: Why It Feels So Damn Good to Stick a Q-Tip In Your Ear (www.menshealth.com)\nText: Shoving the Q-tip inside can also potentially rupture your eardrum or scratch the skin of ear canal, which could lead to bleeding or infectio Title: Why It Feels So Damn Good to Stick a Q-Tip In Your Ear (www.menshealth.com)\nText: The Vagus nerve—a branchlike structure that runs from your brain to your butt—can be stimulated via the ear Title: Why It Feels So Damn Good to Stick a Q-Tip In Your Ear (www.menshealth.com)\nText: Your ear is also an area that you’re normally not used to getting touched. \n hypothesis: Using a cotton swab to clean the inside of your ear may cause more harm than good due to the risk of injury and infection.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "premise: Title: Is It Safe to Use Q-tips in the Ear? Facts and Tips (www.healthline.com)\nText: However, while it’s safe to clean the outside of your ear with a cotton swab, it’s best to avoid using them inside your ear.\n\n\nUsing cotton swabs inside your ear is associated with a variety of complications, including injury and infection. Title: Is It Safe to Use Q-tips in the Ear? Facts and Tips (www.healthline.com)\nText: Earwax is actually helpful to your ears. It keeps them from getting too dry, traps dirt, and prevents bacteria from reaching deeper into your ear Title: Is It Safe to Use Q-tips in the Ear? Facts and Tips (www.healthline.com)\nText: Using a cotton swab to try to clear earwax from your ear can actually push the earwax deeper in. This can prevent earwax from naturally clearing and cause it to build up inside your ear.\n\n\nThe accumulation of too much earwax can lead to unpleasant symptoms. These can include things like:\n\n\n* pain\n* a feeling of fullness in the ear\n* muffled hearing Title: Why It Feels So Damn Good to Stick a Q-Tip In Your Ear (www.menshealth.com)\nText: Shoving the Q-tip inside can also potentially rupture your eardrum or scratch the skin of ear canal, which could lead to bleeding or infectio Title: Why It Feels So Damn Good to Stick a Q-Tip In Your Ear (www.menshealth.com)\nText: The Vagus nerve—a branchlike structure that runs from your brain to your butt—can be stimulated via the ear Title: Why It Feels So Damn Good to Stick a Q-Tip In Your Ear (www.menshealth.com)\nText: Your ear is also an area that you’re normally not used to getting touched. \n hypothesis: Using a cotton swab to clean the inside of your ear may cause more harm than good due to the risk of injury and infection.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 8
| 2.5
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.