--- license: cc-by-4.0 language: - en pretty_name: SpatialAgent Human Expert Reference Data tags: - biology - spatial-transcriptomics - single-cell - gene-panel-design - cell-type-annotation - benchmark size_categories: - 100K free-text description of the panel-design approach {1..10}.csv # one full panel per expert (ranked gene lists) split/{id}_top{50,100,150}.csv # top-N subsets of each panel annotation/ workflows.csv # id (1–8) -> cell-type & niche annotation approach combined_annotations_anonymized.h5ad # all experts (anonymized) + model/baseline predictions human_annotations_anonymized.h5ad # human experts only (anonymized), no model columns per_expert_raw/ # the original per-expert annotation files, anonymized expert{1,2,5,6,7}.h5ad expert{3,4}.csv expert7_niche.h5ad ``` See `panel_design/README.md` and `annotation/README.md` for the column-level details of each subset. ## Panel design (DLPFC) 10 experts each submitted a ranked panel (typically top 50 / 100 / 150 genes) with a short rationale per gene. Formats are heterogeneous (experts used different tools), so columns differ between files; the common fields are a gene symbol, a ranking/priority, and a free-text reasoning column. `split/` holds the top-50/100/150 truncations used for size-matched evaluation. Workflows range from purely algorithmic (Persist, greedy kNN reconstruction) to literature-driven marker curation — see `panel_design/workflows.csv`. ## Annotation (developing human heart, MERFISH) 8 experts annotated the same 228,633 cells. The two combined `.h5ad` objects share an identical cell index and embeddings: - `X` — log1p-normalized expression (238 genes); `layers['raw_count']` — raw counts. - `obsm` — `X_pca`, `X_umap`, `spatial` (tissue coordinates). - Per-expert columns: `cell_type_tier{1,2,3}_expert{N}`, `tissue_niche_tier{1,2}_expert{N}`, and consolidated `cell_type_expert{N}` / `tissue_niche_expert{N}`. - Consensus reference labels: `cell_type`, `tissue_niche`. `combined_annotations_anonymized.h5ad` additionally contains model / baseline predictions (`cell_type_agent`, `tissue_niche_agent`, `cell_type_gpt`, `cell_type_sctab`, `cell_type_popv`, `cell_type_biomni_run_{1,2,3}`, `cell_type_spatialagent_run_4`) for direct benchmarking; `human_annotations_anonymized.h5ad` is the human-only subset (those columns dropped). `per_expert_raw/` preserves each expert's original file (with their native, heterogeneous column schema) for full transparency. ### Caveats - **annotation expert 1** did not produce tissue-niche labels (niche fields are empty/NA). - **annotation expert 3**'s labels are of uncertain origin and are likely mis-ordered — use with care. - **annotation expert 8** has no standalone raw file; their annotations exist only inside the combined objects. - **panel expert 3** submitted a previously designed panel for the wrong tissue. ## License & citation Released under **CC-BY-4.0** (adjust if your venue requires otherwise). If you use this data, please cite the SpatialAgent paper. The two `workflows.csv` files correspond to the Extended Data tables describing human-scientist workflows.