happynood commited on
Commit
66be05c
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): af77b3a

Upload README.md with huggingface_hub

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +50 -15
README.md CHANGED
@@ -13,45 +13,80 @@ pretty_name: QuantCall Results
13
 
14
  # QuantCall Results
15
 
16
- Community-submitted benchmark results for the
17
- [QuantCall benchmark](https://github.com/Happynood/quant-toolcall-bench).
 
 
 
18
 
19
- **This dataset is currently empty.** Run the benchmark on your GPU and submit a PR
20
- to populate the leaderboard.
21
 
22
- ## Schema
 
 
 
23
 
24
- Each row represents one benchmark run. File: `data/results.csv`.
25
 
26
  | Column | Type | Description |
27
  |--------|------|-------------|
28
  | `model` | string | Model identifier (HF repo ID or local path) |
29
  | `quant` | string | Quantization level: fp16, Q8_0, Q5_K_M, Q4_K_M, AWQ, GPTQ |
30
  | `backend` | string | Inference backend: llama-cpp, transformers, vllm, openai |
 
 
 
 
31
  | `svr` | float | Schema-Validity Rate [0, 1] |
32
  | `tsa` | float | Tool-Selection Accuracy [0, 1] |
33
  | `ac` | float | Argument Correctness [0, 1] |
34
  | `abstention` | float | Abstention Accuracy [0, 1] |
35
  | `fcr` | float | Function-Calling Reliability — 0.25 × (SVR + TSA + AC + Abst) |
36
- | `delta_fcr` | float | FCR degradation vs fp16 baseline (null if no baseline) |
37
- | `vram_gb` | float | Peak VRAM usage in GB (null if not measured) |
38
- | `eta` | float | Efficiency: FCR / peak VRAM (null if vram_gb is null) |
39
  | `git_commit` | string | QuantCall repo commit SHA used for this run |
40
- | `config_sha256` | string | SHA-256 of the run config YAML |
41
  | `dataset_sha256` | string | SHA-256 of the evaluation sample |
42
- | `tiers` | string | Comma-separated tier list: T0, T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, T6 |
43
- | `sample_size` | int | Number of instances evaluated per tier |
44
  | `timestamp` | string | ISO-8601 UTC timestamp of the run |
45
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
46
  ## How to Submit
47
 
48
  1. Run the benchmark on your hardware following [docs/RUN_REAL.md](https://github.com/Happynood/quant-toolcall-bench/blob/main/docs/RUN_REAL.md).
49
  2. Verify your `result.json` contains a `manifest` block with git SHA and hashes.
50
  3. Open a PR on [GitHub](https://github.com/Happynood/quant-toolcall-bench) adding your result file under `results/`.
51
- 4. CI will validate the manifest and regenerate this dataset and the leaderboard.
 
52
 
53
  ## Links
54
 
55
  - GitHub: https://github.com/Happynood/quant-toolcall-bench
56
- - Eval suite: https://huggingface.co/datasets/Happynood/quantcall-suite
57
- - Leaderboard: https://huggingface.co/spaces/Happynood/quantcall-leaderboard
 
 
13
 
14
  # QuantCall Results
15
 
16
+ Real benchmark results for the
17
+ [QuantCall benchmark](https://github.com/Happynood/quant-toolcall-bench),
18
+ measuring how quantization degrades LLM function-calling reliability.
19
+ Every row comes from an actual `quantcall run` execution — no fabricated or
20
+ hand-edited numbers.
21
 
22
+ ## Files
 
23
 
24
+ | File | Grain | Description |
25
+ |------|-------|--------------|
26
+ | `data/runs.csv` | one row per real run (per seed) | Raw per-seed data with full manifest (git SHA, config/dataset hashes) |
27
+ | `data/leaderboard.csv` | one row per (model, quant, backend, decoding, tier) | Aggregated over seeds, with bootstrap 95% CIs and deltas vs an explicit baseline quant |
28
 
29
+ ## Schema: `data/runs.csv`
30
 
31
  | Column | Type | Description |
32
  |--------|------|-------------|
33
  | `model` | string | Model identifier (HF repo ID or local path) |
34
  | `quant` | string | Quantization level: fp16, Q8_0, Q5_K_M, Q4_K_M, AWQ, GPTQ |
35
  | `backend` | string | Inference backend: llama-cpp, transformers, vllm, openai |
36
+ | `decoding` | string | Decoding mode: free or constrained |
37
+ | `tier` | string | Dataset tier(s) evaluated, `+`-joined (e.g. `T1+T6`) |
38
+ | `seed` | int | Random seed for this run |
39
+ | `sample_size` | int | Number of instances evaluated per tier |
40
  | `svr` | float | Schema-Validity Rate [0, 1] |
41
  | `tsa` | float | Tool-Selection Accuracy [0, 1] |
42
  | `ac` | float | Argument Correctness [0, 1] |
43
  | `abstention` | float | Abstention Accuracy [0, 1] |
44
  | `fcr` | float | Function-Calling Reliability — 0.25 × (SVR + TSA + AC + Abst) |
45
+ | `vram_gb` | float | Peak VRAM usage in GB for this run (empty if not measured) |
 
 
46
  | `git_commit` | string | QuantCall repo commit SHA used for this run |
47
+ | `config_sha256` | string | SHA-256 of the run config |
48
  | `dataset_sha256` | string | SHA-256 of the evaluation sample |
 
 
49
  | `timestamp` | string | ISO-8601 UTC timestamp of the run |
50
 
51
+ ## Schema: `data/leaderboard.csv`
52
+
53
+ | Column | Type | Description |
54
+ |--------|------|-------------|
55
+ | `model` | string | Model identifier |
56
+ | `quant` | string | Quantization level |
57
+ | `backend` | string | Inference backend |
58
+ | `decoding` | string | Decoding mode |
59
+ | `tier` | string | Dataset tier(s), `+`-joined |
60
+ | `n_seeds` | int | Number of seeds aggregated into this row |
61
+ | `fcr_mean` | float | Mean FCR across seeds |
62
+ | `fcr_ci_low` | float | Bootstrap 95% CI lower bound for FCR |
63
+ | `fcr_ci_high` | float | Bootstrap 95% CI upper bound for FCR |
64
+ | `svr_mean` | float | Mean SVR across seeds |
65
+ | `tsa_mean` | float | Mean TSA across seeds |
66
+ | `ac_mean` | float | Mean AC across seeds |
67
+ | `abstention_mean` | float | Mean Abstention across seeds |
68
+ | `vram_gb` | float | Mean peak VRAM in GB (empty if not measured) |
69
+ | `eta` | float | Efficiency: fcr_mean / vram_gb (empty if vram_gb is empty) |
70
+ | `delta_fcr_rel` | float | Relative FCR delta vs `baseline_quant` in the same scope; empty for the baseline row itself |
71
+ | `delta_ac_rel` | float | Relative AC delta vs `baseline_quant` |
72
+ | `baseline_quant` | string | The Δ reference quant for this scope — fp16 if it fits and was run, otherwise the best-available quant, always labeled explicitly here |
73
+
74
+ These two schemas are generated by `quantcall leaderboard <results_dir>`
75
+ (source of truth: `src/quantcall/report/published.py`,
76
+ `docs/RESULTS_SCHEMA.md` in the repo) — this card is kept in sync with that
77
+ code by a repo test (`test_no_schema_drift`).
78
+
79
  ## How to Submit
80
 
81
  1. Run the benchmark on your hardware following [docs/RUN_REAL.md](https://github.com/Happynood/quant-toolcall-bench/blob/main/docs/RUN_REAL.md).
82
  2. Verify your `result.json` contains a `manifest` block with git SHA and hashes.
83
  3. Open a PR on [GitHub](https://github.com/Happynood/quant-toolcall-bench) adding your result file under `results/`.
84
+ 4. Run `quantcall leaderboard results/ --output-dir leaderboard/` and include the
85
+ regenerated `runs.csv` / `leaderboard.csv` in your PR.
86
 
87
  ## Links
88
 
89
  - GitHub: https://github.com/Happynood/quant-toolcall-bench
90
+ - This dataset: https://huggingface.co/datasets/happynood/quantcall-results
91
+ - Eval suite: https://huggingface.co/datasets/happynood/quantcall-suite
92
+ - Leaderboard (Space): https://huggingface.co/spaces/happynood/quantcall-leaderboard