Typically one wants to see a credit score, just because you may have money in the bank and decent income does not mean your going to pay, there are plenty of people who have the money but simply refuse to cough it up. Credit is simply a relative way of seeing where one fits against another in a larger group, it shows that this person not only can pay, but does pay. While not having a credit history should make no difference, I can and hopefully easily posited above why it can be necessary to have one. Not all landlords will require a credit check, I was not required to give one, I did not have much credit to begin with, given that, I was forced to cough up a higher degree of a security deposit.


Saw a user in another thread that thought his wealthy grandparents stayed rich because they didn't eat out a lot and kept a budget for basic expenses.  It definitely wasn't their generational wealth and vast real estate holdings.


it's just a passthrough security essentially.  sofi packages a bunch of loans, refinances them for the student, and you invest in sofi corporate debt as they pass through the returns on the loan to you in the form of bond cpns.  i mean its not exactly the same, but its pretty close


"Do some homework to determine what is really a fair price for the house.  Zillow helps.  County tax records help, including last sale price and mortgage, if any (yes, it's public).  Start at the low end of fair. Don't rely on the Realtor.  He gets paid only if a sale occurs, and he's already coaxing you closer to a paycheck.  He might be right with the numbers, though, so check for yourself. When you get within a thousand or two of acceptance, ""shut up"".  I don't mean that in a rude way.  A negotiating class I took taught me how effective silence can be, at the right time.  The other side knows you're close and the highest you've offered.  If they would be willing to find a way to come down to that, this is the time.  The awkward silence is surprisingly effective."


You should probably consult an attorney. However, if the owner was a corporation/LLC and it has been officially dissolved, you can provide an evidence of that from your State's department of State/Corporations to show that their request is unfeasible. If the owner was a sole-proprietor, then that may be harder as you'll need to track the person down and have him close the plan.


I'm going out on a limb and calling bullshit.  Here's a fact: Reddit has never turned a profit. And how will it? Unless you put up ads, or allow MANY more sponsored posts (a la Twitter), it's very difficult to see a monetization strategy for this site. Heck, most reddit users are offended at the very suggestion that reddit might be used - **gasp** to make *money.*


Many factors really. No loans but my HOA is $240 per month. Car is $292. I keep having my bikes stolen (mine twice and girlfriend's once within the past 4 months). I hit a pothole and tore a hole in my oil pan last week, AC broke a few months ago in my condo. I just can't get ahead but I'm hopeful.


Yup, 7 figure seller myself. That's why everything possible goes fba anyway. Ain't nobody got time to deal with customers anyway, who can compete on that, especially with Amazon. It's not that the customer is always right, it's just easier most of the time to treat them like they are and move on. If customer issues are a significant part of your business, or can cause that much damage, you shouldn't be in this business.


"I'm assuming that you're in the US.  In that case, the answer is that it depends on how your company set up its reimbursement plan.  The IRS recognizes ""accountable"" and ""nonaccountable"" plans.  Accountable plans have to meet certain requirements.  Anything else is nonaccountable.  If you are reimbursed according to an accountable plan, this is not income and should not be reported to the IRS at all.  If you are reimbursed under a nonaccountable plan, then this is income but you might be able to get a deduction on your tax return if you itemize. Most established companies have accountable plans for normal business expenses. More detail from IRS: http://www.tax.gov/TaxabilityCertainFringeBenefits/pdf/Accountable_v_Nonaccountable_Plans_Methods_of_Reimbursing_Employees_for_Expense.pdf"


"The most unique way to celebrate Friendship Day would be hold a gathering for your favorate images,quotes,hd wallpapers,messages,pics,photos and many more... Be that as it may, this thought needs a touch of arranging and exertion as you have to choose where to post(facebook,whatssapp,twitter,instagrame etc..) Once that is done, ring your pals and simply have your indulgence !  happy friendship day images  happy friendship day 2017  friendship day quotes   happy friendship day quotes   friendship images with quotes   friendship day messages   friendship day wishes   happy friendship day message   friendship day status "


Neither of those links disagree with me to be honest. And the first one seems conservative relative to other reporting.  > I mean yes, you’re all there together, but if you and I are doing ostensibly the same (and possibly dangerous) work, you’re getting rich and I’m not….  I was once in their place too (presuming we are talking about military). They know that. Any anger I have seen from military people is from either senior enlisted (who are mad that they didn't get out and make a better life for themselves) - and senior enlisted are lower on the totem pole than security contractors so no one gives a fuck about their gripes - and some officers. The best part about being on the top of the security contractor food chain is that you worked for the State Department so you could be openly shitty to military people who copped an attitude of any sort.  >Strange also that taxpayers don’t care more about this, although….perhaps not. The amount of bullshit is just too overwhelming.  I'm not sure there's a lot to care about. If you asked a random person if they would be willing to go through 4-8 years of military to have a potential shot at getting a job that pays like that one did, but it's in the most violent city on Earth, I imagine they would answer with a resounding no.  >Sounds like you could tell lets of stories about the women, though I’m not sure I want to hear them after a good lunch, and I’m pretty sure you don’t want to remember.  Good choice.


"Pete and Noah addressed the math, showing how this is, in effect, converting a 30yr to a ~23yr mortgage, at a cost, plus payment about 8% higher (1 extra payment per year). No magic there. The real issue, as I see it, is whether this is the best use of the money. Keep in mind, once you pay extra principal, which in effect is exactly what this is, it's not easy to get it back. As long as you have any mortgage at all, you have the need for liquidity, enough to pay your mortgage, tax, utilities, etc, if you find yourself between jobs or to get through any short term crisis.  I've seen people choose the ""sure thing"" prepayment VS the ""risky"" 401(k) deposit. Ignoring a match is passing up a 50% or 100% return in most cases. Too good to pass up.  2 points to add - I avoided the further tangent of the tax benefit of IRA/401(k) deposits. It's too long a discussion, today's rate for the money saved, vs the rate on withdrawal. Worth considering, but not part of my answer. The other discussion I avoid is Nicholas' thoughts on the long term market return of 10% vs today's ~4% mortgage rate. This has been debated elsewhere and morphs into a ""pre-pay vs invest"" question."


The PriceCheck app is capable of doing the search by taking a picture of the product or speaking the product name, which isn't an option on the Amazon App as far as I'm aware.  But it's funny that you mention that they are the same app, because amazon also has a Amazon Student app which does the **EXACT** same thing as the regular app. I just use it because it has a better interface IMO.


First priority is to set up an emergency fund of 6 months expenses. If you're going to be making ~30k a year, then that means you'll probably want to put away about 10k of it in a savings account or something else similarly liquid.  After that, paying off your student loans probably makes the most sense depending on the rate. My general rule of thumb (and I'm sure others will disagree with me) is to pay off debts that are >=6.0% first before investing. Paying off debt is a risk-free return on your money, which makes it pretty valuable. It'll let you direct more of your monthly income into retirement savings, too. After that, open up a Roth IRA.  You can put a maximum of $5500 in it for this year.  I like Betterment, but Wealthfront has a similar service.


Hardcore conservative libertarians are also called [Minarchists](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minarchism). A lot of Ron Paul fans hold to this ideology.   *This idea that the government has services or goods that they can pass on is a complete farce. Governments have nothing. They can't create anything, they never have.* - Ron Paul.  Also this: http://politicaloutcast.com/2012/07/governments-dont-make-wealth-they-just-take-yours/  And further research shows that the Cato Institute has this position.   *increasing government spending will damage the economy.* - http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/vote-higher-taxes-now-regret-it-later


Itunes U has some really good online classes on economics. And as with a lot of things check out Khanacademy.org. He has a whole financial section of really well made videos.   Good books to read regarding the financial crisis are The Big Short by Lewis and Too Big To Fail by Sorkin.


Wireless issues?  Did you tell your wireless router to stay only on channel 11 or did Apple finally fix that?  People like their Apples, and I've seen many, many people switch to avoid the continual headaches dished out by Microsoft--at quite a hefty premium.


I was actually being helpful. Your marijuana and Quaalude induced screed is likely to be better received there than anywhere else. Of course, now that you've opened your mouth again and failed to push a coherent sentence out of it, you'd probably be best served by giving your mom back the computer and washing up for dinner like she asked you to.


"Discounting premiums based on some past history is not unique to auto policies.  Other insurers will discount premiums based on past claims history they just don't shout about it as a marketing means to attract customers.  Life insurance is underwritten based on your health history; if you want to consider your ""preferred"" underwriting status based on your clear health history a ""discount based on your healthy habits"" you're free to do so.  All sorts of lines of insurance use all sorts of things to determine an underwriting classes.  The fact that auto insurers trumpet specific discounts does not mean the same net effect is not available on other lines of coverage. Most states require auto rates and discounts to be filed and approved with some state regulator, some regulatory bodies even require that certain discounts exist.  You could likely negotiate with your business insurance underwriters about a better rate and if the underwriters saw fit they could give you a discount.  Auto insurers can offer discounts but are generally beholden to whatever rate sheet is on file with the applicable regulatory body. For the person who downvoted, here's a link to a spreadsheet outlining one of the CA department of insurance allowable rating factor sheets related to auto insurance."


Another way of explaining the puzzling balance: Right after a particular bill is paid, you have $0 saved to pay that bill the next time.  Just before the bill is next due, you wisely have the whole amount saved;  that's the purpose of the whole process.  So, for that bill, on average over time, you'll have one-half that upcoming bill in the account. But the same argument holds for every one of the upcoming bills.  So, for a large number of bills, with varying sizes and times between occurrence, the average amount in the account will be approximately one-half of the total amount of all the bills that you're saving for.


Not really an answer, but too long for a comment: Since anyone can create their own cryptocurrency (see  http://www.bitclone.net/) the value of new cryptocurrencies is very  small. According to https://bleutrade.com/exchange/MINT/USD for  example, 100,000 mintcoins is worth less than $1. Even if they give  you 20% interest, that interest is on mintcoins, not dollars. If the  mintcoin rates falls by more than 20%, you would've been better off  withdrawing your mintcoins immediately. Check to see how much they pay  for various tasks and compare it to the current exchange rate. Realize  the exchange rate may go down as more mintcoins are created.


"Corporate restructuring makes everything a flux, so you might as well revisit some core fundamental questions. Here's how to do this professionally: Start floating your CV now. Line up interviews in competing companies. Attend to them. Score a job offer, and have it put into writing, with exact salary, which should be at least 10%++ of your current one. Take a clear empty page, and write on top: ""Business value provided"". Put down your major contributions, and achievements. Wherever possible, put the company's expected dollar value near to it. For bonus points, sum it up on the bottom, and minus your current salary. Difference is ""Profit provided directly to the company's bottom line"". Float this to your manager's desk. At this position, you have only one fundamental question to your boss: ""match or pass?"" :) A corporate spin-off is a good time to do this: 1, to ensure, that your position will not be made redundant; 2, if it is, you have a backup plan. If the parent company's ""getting rid of you"", however, there are even more fundamental questions you might want to ask yourself: is this really a profitable division, or merely a loss leader? Does this company have a future, and the adequate growing options for you, personally?  To answer these questions, you must have an opportunity cost estimation; and for that, you must have second (and preferably, third) options -hence, the strategy above. To conclude, the best time to do your job research is every other month; and the best time to ask for a raise is always now :) Good luck!"


Desire to work.? Yep everyone has a desire to earn more money, too many will not even try to. Just a great way to strip away human dignity. You citizens, you mean nothing to the world now shut up & listen to us rich government bureaucrats. You owe us.


"1099's and other official tax forms are often reported to the IRS by the issuer, whether or not you include a copy in your return. You should not neglect to include this income in your 2016 return in an attempt to balance out the two tax years. It's up to you whether or not you feel like filing an amended 2015 return to recover over-payment of taxes from that tax year. You have up to three years to amend tax returns using form 1040X. Since you couldn't have furnished a 1099 for this when you filed your 2015 return (otherwise you wouldn't be in receipt of it for tax year 2016), I'm assuming you reported it simply as ""Other Income"" and therefore would have been [over] taxed your marginal rate on it. From irs.gov: When to amend a return.  You should file an amended return if you need to correct your filing status, number of dependents, total income, tax deductions or tax credits. The instructions for Form 1040X, Amended U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, list additional reasons to amend a return."


Perhaps your company is trying to save money or you’re trying to meet some other goal, such as lowering volatile organic compound emissions, gaining LEED points for certification, or just plain being eco-friendly—whatever the case, the time has come find someone to work with.


"If I understand correctly, the Traditional IRA, if you have 401k with an employer already, has the following features: Actually, #1 and #2 are characteristics of Roth IRAs, not Traditional IRAs. Only #3 is a characteristic of a Traditional IRA. Whether you have a 401(k) with your employer or not makes absolutely no difference in how your IRAs are taxed for the vast majority of people. (The rules for IRAs are different if you have a very high income, though). You're allowed to have and contribute to both kinds of accounts. (In fact, I personally have both). Traditional IRAs are tax deferred (not tax-free as people sometimes mistakenly call them - they're very different), meaning that you don't have to pay taxes on the contributions or profits you make inside the account (e.g. from dividends, interest, profits from stock you sell, etc.). Rather, you pay taxes on any money you withdraw. For Roth IRAs, the contributions are taxed, but you never have to pay taxes on the money inside the account again. That means that any money you get over and above the contributions (e.g. through interest, trading profits, dividends, etc.) are genuinely tax-free. Also, if you leave any of the money to people, they don't have to pay any taxes, either. Important point: There are no tax-free retirement accounts in the U.S. The distinction between different kinds of IRAs basically boils down to ""pay now or pay later."" Many people make expensive mistakes in their retirement strategy by not understanding that point. Please note that this applies equally to Traditional and Roth 401(k)s as well. You can have Roth 401(k)s and Traditional 401(k)s just like you can have Roth IRAs and Traditional IRAs. The same terminology and logic applies to both kinds of accounts. As far as I know, there aren't major differences tax-wise between them, with two exceptions - you're allowed to contribute more money to a 401(k) per year, and you're allowed to have a 401(k) even if you have a high income. (By way of contrast, people with very high incomes generally aren't allowed to open IRAs). A primary advantage of a Traditional IRA is that you can (in theory, at least) afford to contribute more money to it due to the tax break you're getting. Also, you can defer taxes on any profits you make (e.g. through dividends or selling stock at a profit), so you can grow your money faster."


The Lotto Playing To Win is a part of based association to induce the interests of the state-approved lottery. Our vision is perceived as the worldwide specialist in the lottery business, to maintain the most surprising moral standards. Global lottery sales ascended by 7% to $275 billion a year ago. Lotto, an entertainment where individuals pick numbers to coordinate those drawn, is the world's most mainstream types of lottery. Diversions of chance are unsafe, yet as a wellspring of income, they are an easy win.


Gosh, I don't know, maybe emergencies or unforeseen expenses like a car repair or maybe even just discretionary $ where you can buy new eyeglasses/frames or, get the fuck outta here, this is going to blow your mind, be impulsive and get on a plane and book a hotel for  3 or 4 days?  Let me guess, your answer to all that is charge it! And since you don't keep $1k in savings pay the minimum balance.  Also:  * https://meetbeam.com/ * https://www.ally.com/bank/savings-account-rates/ * https://www.synchronybank.com/banking/high-yield-savings/


Hopefully it gets past the fcc review I'm sure VZW and AT&T will lobby hard against this.  Also I hope they don't add bandwidth caps.  I'm grandfathered in with VZW and their new pricing model looks terrible to me.


First I'd like to echo msemack's answer. Start by maxing out your 401K and IRA contributions. Not a lot of people just starting their career have the luxury of doing much more outside of that. Here are some additional tips that I learned when I was just getting started:


By in combination with fiat I mean we will continue to use sterling or dollars in society along with Bitcoin perhaps for online purchases exclusively, as an example. Many people here advocate for a society that would only use cryptocurrency as money.   Cryptocurrency, specifically Bitcoin, is unlike fiat currency firstly because it is not backed by a government, it's in the ether so to speak, it proves its own value intrinsically. No central authority decides on the actions to take in regard to the currency.   Other characteristics that separate Bitcoin from fiat are its inability to be inflated, it's finite nature, there will only ever be x amount of bitcoins - it is deflationary by nature of the algorithm. Central authorities can devalue their fiat currency through financial instruments like inflation and controlling the production (quantitative easing). This isn't true of all crypto currencies like dogecoin and maybe ETH


In short. A fiat currency is money that has value only because (usually) a government says it does.  A counter example (non-fiat currency) is a gold coin that has intrinsic value usually because it is made of valuable materials that people would trade goods/services. That is the value comes from what you are holding more than what it represents.


Google finance will allow you to import earnings report dates directly to your Google calendar. See screenshot with calendar import button circled in red below.


It is allowed to transfer money between ISAs however you like in one year.  It does not count against the limit for how much you can pay into an ISA in a year, nor does it count as paying into two ISAs in the same year.  But make sure you transfer the money.  Don't withdraw it, then pay it into a new ISA. If your provider doesn't like you taking money out of one ISA while keeping another, then it's about time you found another provider.


"Most well-off people have investments which they have held for long periods of time, often of very substantial value such as a large part of a company.  They also have influence on legislators and officials through various social contacts, lobbyists, and contributions.  They managed to convince these law makers to offer a lower tax on income derived from sales of such investments.  The fig leaf covering this arrangement is that it ""contributes to the growth of economy by encouraging long-term investment in new enterprises."""


"This is an answer grounded in reality, not advice. Most states have no means of enforcing their foreign business entity registration statutes. Some states never even codified consequences. (California is a notable exception.). Some states have 'business licenses' that you need in order to defend your entity in court, but will retroactively apply the corporate veil when you get the license. The ""do I have to register"" question is analogous to asking a barber if you need a haircut. But this doesn't absolve you of looking in the mirror (doing your research). Registration and INCOME taxes are different stories. If a state calls their fee a franchise tax and it is applicable and there are real consequences for not, then you will have to pay that tax. Anyway, this isn't advocating breaking the law, but since it describes ignoring toothless state-chartered agencies, then there are people that will disagree with this post, despite being in line with business climate in the United States. Hope that helps"


This is what your car loan would look like if you paid it off in 14 months at the existing 2.94% rate: You'll pay a total of about $277 in interest.   If you do a balance transfer of the $10,000 at 3% it'll cost you $300 up front, and your payment on the remaining $5,000 will be $363.74 to pay it off in the 14 month period.  Your total monthly payment will be $1,099.45; $5,000 amortized at 2.94% for 14 months plus $10,300 divided by 14. ($363.74 + 735.71).  Your interest will be about $392, $300 from the balance transfer and $92 from the remaining $5,000 on the car loan at 2.94%. Even if your lender doesn't credit your additional payment to principal and instead simply credits future payments, you'd still be done in 15 months with a total interest expense of about $447.  So this additional administration and additional loan will save you maybe about $55 over 14 or 15 months.


(Note: The OP does not state whether the employer-sponsored retirement savings are pre-tax or post-tax (such as a Roth 401(k)). The following answer assumes the more common case of a pre-tax plan.) This is a bad idea, IMHO. IRS Pub 970 lists exceptions to the 10% early withdrawal penalty for educational expenses. This doesn't include, as far as I can tell, student loan payments. So withdrawing from your retirement account would incur both income tax and penalties. Even if there were an exception, you'd still have to pay income taxes, which, depending on the amount and your income, could be at a higher marginal rate than you are currently paying.  If you really want the debt gone as soon as possible, why not reduce the amount you contribute to the retirement plan (but not below the amount that gets you the maximum employer match) and use that money to increase your monthly payments to the student loan? Note that, if you do this, you will pay taxes on income that would have been tax-deferred in order to save money on interest, so there's still a trade-off. (One more thing: rather than rolling over to your new company's plan, you could roll over to a self-directed Traditional IRA.)


"They have trillions in assets and hundreds of billions of equity and nearly 100 billion in yearly operating revenue.  These are not ""pay up now, in full"" either. As with all other fines, there is a ""payment plan"" option.   50B is nothing to sneeze at, but it's a storm BoA can easily weather."


"You promised to pay the loan if he didn't.  That was a commitment, and I recommend ""owning"" your choice and following it through to its conclusion, even if you never do that again.  TLDR: You made a mistake: own it, keep your word, and embrace the lesson.  Why?  Because you keep your promises.  (Nevermind that this is a rare time where your answer will be directly recorded, in your credit report.) This isn't moralism. I see this as a ""defining moment"" in a long game: 10 years down the road I'd like you to be wise, confident and unafraid in financial matters, with a healthy (if distant) relationship with our somewhat corrupt financial system.  I know austerity stinks, but having a strong financial life will bring you a lot more money in the long run. Many are leaping to the conclusions that this is an ""EX-friend"" who did this deliberately.  Don't assume this. For instance, it's quite possible your friend sold the (car?) at a dealer, who failed to pay off this note, or did and the lender botched the paperwork.  And when the collector called, he told them that, thinking the collector would fix it, which they don't do. The point is, you don't know: your friend may be an innocent party here.  Creditors generally don't report late payments to the credit bureaus until they're 30 days late.  But as a co-signer, you're in a bad spot: you're liable for the payments, but they don't send you a bill.  So when you hear about it, it's already nearly 30 days late.  You don't get any extra grace period as a co-signer. So you need to make a payment right away to keep that from going 30 late, or if it's already 30 late, to keep it from going any later.   If it is later determined that it was not necessary for you to make those payments, the lender should give them back to you.  A less reputable lender may resist, and you may have to threaten small claims court, which is a great expense to them. Cheaper to pay you.  They say France is the nation of love. They say America is the nation of commerce.  So it's not surprising that here, people are quick to burn a lasting friendship over a temporary financial issue.  Just saying, that isn't necessarily the right answer.  I don't know about you, but my friends all have warts.  Nobody's perfect.  Financial issues are just another kind of wart.  And financial life in America is hard, because we let commerce run amok.  And because our obsession with it makes it a ""loaded"" issue and thus hard to talk about.  Perhaps your friend is in trouble but the actual villain is a predatory lender.  Point is, the friendship may be more important than this temporary adversity.  The right answer may be to come together and figure out how to make it work.  Yes, it's also possible he's a human leech who hops from person to person, charming them into cosigning for him. But to assume that right out of the gate is a bit silly.  The first question I'd ask is ""where's the car?"" (If it's a car). Many lenders, especially those who loan to poor credit risks, put trackers in the car.  They can tell you where it is, or at least, where it was last seen when the tracker stopped working.  If that is a car dealer's lot, for instance, that would be very informative.   Simply reaching out to the lender may get things moving, if there's just a paperwork issue behind this.  Many people deal with life troubles by fleeing: they dread picking up the phone, they fearfully throw summons in the trash.  This is a terrifying and miserable way to deal with such a situation.  They learn nothing, and it's pure suffering.   I prefer and recommend the opposite: turn into it, deal with it head-on, get ahead of it.   Ask questions, google things, read, become an expert on the thing. Be the one calling the lender, not the other way round.  This way it becomes a technical learning experience that's interesting and fun for you, and the lender is dreading your calls instead of the other way 'round.  I've been sued.  It sucked.  But I took it on boldly, and and actually led the fight and strategy (albeit with counsel).  And turned it around so he wound up paying my legal bills.  HA!  With that precious experience, I know exactly what to do... I don't fear being sued, or if absolutely necessary, suing.   You might as well get the best financial education.  You're paying the tuition!"


According to this http://shine.yahoo.com/event/financiallyfit/cheapest-days-to-shop-online-2301854/ Tuesday is the best day of the week to buy men's apparel.


"Assuming the numbers you gave are forecasted 2013 annual income, you should really use an average and give the lender 1 number, as long as you can provide documentation to back it up. Lenders aren't as sophisticated as considering your monthly income fluctuations into their underwriting algorithm.  If you're not tied down to your existing lender, I highly recommend you to shop around. There isn't an ""universal lending requirement"". You'll be surprised at how flexible they are. Not as a recommendation to get around the rules, but just finding a lender that'll work with your situation. Try personal finance forums such as FatWallet or Slickdeal to find low-cost lenders: http://goo.gl/vIojT"


"The Roth vs not debate is irrelevant to the question. It doesn't matter where your emergency fund is kept, as long as it is liquid and safe. I said it before in an answer to another question: your emergency fund is not an investment -- it's your safety net This answer also says it well: an ""emergency fund"" is just that... for emergencies... NOT investment. While it ""hurts"" not to have your emergency money making more money... its MORE IMPORTANT to have quick access to it. So at TD Ameritrade, just park it in their FDIC deposit account. It will not earn any meaningful interest (at least until rates rise), but you'll be able to have access to it when you need it. Note that I would caution against putting it in a money market mutual fund. They're safer than many other investments, but they're not FDIC insured against loss and there is a potential for temporary loss of liquidity. In late 2008 when the credit markets collapsed, a lot of people suddenly became unemployed -- and needed access to their emergency funds. When Lehman Brothers went bust in September, the Reserve Primary Fund (with billions of dollars in their fund) ""broke the buck"" -- they lowered the price of shares below $1, meaning investors lost principal. The worst part is that investors were not as liquid as they wanted to be: the fund froze and it was hard to get money out. The lesson to take away from this is that one of the times you're likely to need access to your emergency fund is during a macroeconomic crisis. This is also the time when any investment that isn't guaranteed safe may potentially be (at least temporarily) unavailable or decline in value. Emergency funds should be 100% government insured. When you have your Roth funded to the point where there's extra money beyond the emergency fund, you can start investing in higher-yielding vehicles: stock or bond index ETFs would be a good start. But then that part of your Roth starts to look like a retirement account and not an emergency fund. If it were me, I'd open a Roth at a stable local bank and just keep it in their FDIC insured money market deposit account. Then if I wanted a slight boost, I might put the ""upper half"" of my emergency fund into short term CDs, but even CDs aren't worth much at the moment."


The 1.140924% is calculated by taking 13.69%/12 = 1.140924%. Dividing this number by 100 gives you the answer 1.140924 / 100 = .01140924. When dealing with decimals it's important to remember the relationship between a decimal and a percent. 1% = .01 To return .01 to a percent you must multiple that number by 100.  So .01 x 100 = 1% In order to get a decimal from a percent, which is what is used in calculations, you must divide by 100. So, here if we are trying to calculate how much interest you are paying each month we can do this: 9800 * .1369 = $1341.62 (interest you will pay that year IF the principal balance never changed) 1341.62 / 12 = ~111.81 Now, month two 9578.34 * .1369 = 1311.274746 1311.274746 / 12 = 109.28 In order to get your monthly payments (which won't change) for the life of the loan, you can use this formula: Monthly payment = r(PV) / (1-(1+r)^-n) Where:  r= Interest Rate (remember if calculating monthly to do .1369/12) PV= Present Value of loan n=time of loan ( in your case 36 since we are talking monthly and 12*3 = 36) from here we get: [(.1369/12)*9800]/(1-(1+.1369/12)^-36) = $333.467 when rounding is $333.47 As far as actual applied interest rate, I'm not even sure what that number is, but I would like to know once you figure out, since the interest rate you're being charged is most definitely 13.69%.


"I work for an international real estate consulting firm in Shanghai. After graduation I worked in their Research Department for two years before switching to Commercial Brokerage 3 months ago.  Since my background was in Economics, I had to learn a lot about how the industry worked. I found this book to be very helpful:  ""Commercial Real Estate Analysis & Investments"" by David Geltner.  I will admit that it's probably more than what you want to know, but it seriously gives an in depth breakdown of the entire industry.   About one year into starting, a major Real Estate iBank commissioned our company to due diligence on an office building acquisition in Shanghai. I was the only person capable of doing it as everyone else was either busy or couldn't speak English properly. With 1 year under my belt in Research and that book, I took the entire thing on. Had to walk into that meeting by myself with all the big wigs from New York, London, Hong Kong and Shanghai questioning every single number and assumption. I fucking nailed it. While credit towards understanding the market through work is deserved, a lot of the development of that report came from constantly consulting that book. It's worth every penny if your interested in commercial real estate investment.  That being said, if you want to track deals, the best place is called Real Estate Capital Analytics. Unfortunately you have to fork over a decent amount of cash to get access. For your situation I would recommend the following:  - ""The Urban Land Institute & PwC Emerging Trends in Real Estate"": I believe you need to be a member but I can always find it online for free.  - Brokerage firms: I work in one and we cover residential, commercial and retail reports on cities throughout the world (I actually wrote the ones for China for two years). You can find a wealth of information in them. If you are seriously looking at buying with capital, call up the research department and ask if they have some time to discuss the market face to face; if you don't have capital, they won't talk to you. Fortunately however, most let you download their reports for free from their website so here's the list of the major ones in the US: CBRE, Colliers, CRESA, Cushman & Wakefield, Jones Lang LaSalle, etc.  - The Loop - www.loopnet.com has a wealth of information from Commercial properties on the market to previous deals.  Please let me know if I can further advise."


The big difference for me is that my contribution thorough a cafeteria plan also skips Social Security and Medicare taxes. That is a 6.2% (SS) + 1.45% (Medicare) tax on those contributions if done outside a cafeteria plan. Some companies make a contribution to a the HSA. If you handle your contributions outside of their channels they may see you as a non-participant, and not make any matching contributions. You might have to put a minimum amount into the company setup HSA.  The non-company HSA may also charge fees that the company one doesn't. Regarding the taxes: If you contribute $3,000 to the HSA via post tax, your paychecks would have had an extra $229.50 paid into social security/Medicare. There is no mechanism to get this refunded.


If your uncle is looking to maintain life insurance coverage for specific shorter period of time he may want to look into hybrid life insurance. If you buy a hybrid universal life policy, the premium and death benefit can be guaranteed to last until any age. Since, most permanent policies focus on cash value accumulation it is hard for most people to find cheap whole life or affordable universal life. Consumers only looking for a longer duration have a more flexible choice with a new hybrid product that combines elements of both term life coverage and universal life. Hybrid universal  policies are much cheaper then other permanent coverage such as whole life coverage because they do not emphasize cash value accumulation. However, the premiums and death benefits can still be guaranteed to a specific age (i.e. 85, 90, 95, 100). So, premiums can be scaled to coordinate with your desired budget and the face amount required for your family. Typical universal life and whole life insurance contracts only allow for lifetime coverage. However, hybrid universal life offers a much smaller premium because the coverage can be dialed into a specific age. If the policyholder does live beyond the originally selected age, the death benefit will simply begin getting smaller, while the original premium will  continue to remain the same.


There is a highly related question which is much easier to answer: what normally value-increasing news about a company would cause that company to fall in value in the public stock market? By answering that, we can answer your question by proxy. The answer to that question being: anything that makes investors believe that the company won't be able to maintain the level of profit. For example, let's say a company announces a 300% profit growth compared to the previous year. This should push the stock upwards; maybe not by 300%, but certainly by quite a bit. Let's also say that this company is in the business of designing, manufacturing and selling some highly useful gadget that lots of people want to buy. Now suppose that the company managed such an profit increase by one of: In scenario 1 (firing the engineering department), it is highly unlikely that the company will be able to come up with, manufacture and sell a Next Generation Gadget. Hence, while profit is up now, it is highly likely to go down in the months and years coming up. Because stock market investors are more interested in future profits than in past profits, this should push the value of the company down. In scenario 2 (selling off the machinery), the company may very well be able to come up with a Next Generation Gadget, and if they can manufacture it, they might very well be able to sell it. However, no matter how you slice it, the short-term costs for manufacturing either their current generation Gadget, or the Next Generation Gadget, are bound to go up because the company will either need to rent machinery, or buy new machinery. Neither is good for future profits, so the value of the company again should go down in response. In scenario 3 (their product getting a large boost), the company still has all the things that allowed them to come up with, produce and sell Gadgets. They also have every opportunity to come up with, manufacture and sell Next Generation Gadgets, which implies that future profits, while far from guaranteed, are likely. In this case, the probability remains high that the company can actually maintain a higher level of profit. Hence, the value of the company should rise. Now apply this to a slightly more realistic scenario, and you can see why the value of a company can fall even if the company announces, for example, record profits. Hence, you are looking for news which indicate a present and sustained raised ability to turn a profit. This is the type of news that should drive any stock up in price, all else being equal. Obviously, buyer beware, your mileage may vary, all else is never equal, nothing ever hits the average, you are fighting people who do this type of analysis for a living and have every tool known available to them, etc etc. But that's the general idea.


The bank won't let you because: Differences in required account features — Business accounts have different features (many of them legal features) that are required by businesses. For instances: Do you want to be able to deposit cheques that are written out to your business name? You need a business account for that. Your business could be sold. Then it wouldn't be your business, so it wouldn't make sense to put the business account under your personal name. The bank account and the cash it holds is a business asset and should be owned by the business, so when the business is sold the account goes with it. This is especially the case for a corporation that has shareholders, and not a sole proprietorship. For a business, you could also, in theory, assign other people as signing authorities on the business account (e.g. your corporate treasurer), and the individuals performing that role could change over time. Business accounts allow for this kind of use. Market segmentation — The bank has consciously undertaken to segment their product offerings in order to maximize their profit. Market segmentation helps the bottom line. Even if there were zero legal reasons to have separate personal vs. business accounts, banks would still make it their policy to sell different account types according to use because they can make more money that way. Consider an example in another industry: The plain-old telephone company also practices segmentation w.r.t. personal/business. Do you want a telephone line for a business and listed as such in the phone book? You need a business line. Do you want a phone line hooked up at a non-residential address? You need a business line. Here it's clear it is less of a legal issue than with the bank account, and it doesn't matter that the technical features of the phone line may be identical for the basic product offerings within each segment. The phone company has chosen to segment and price their product offerings this way. Q. Why do companies choose to charge some kinds of customers more than others for essentially the same underlying service? A. Because they can.


A hotel can accept the debit card because each night they can withdraw the money. If you don't have sufficient funds they can instantly lock you out of your room. They an also limit your ability to access room service, and other extra expensive options. The rental car can't do that once you have the car. Plus they never know if you will bring the car back with damages, toll charges, and an empty tank of gas.


Contrary to what many people think, credit card companies pass nearly all fraud costs via purchased goods onto the merchant who sells them. As a result, they stand a very high chance of getting the money from a fraudulent purchase of a specific purchased item back, as they just chargeback the merchant who has to stomach the cost. This is not the case for cash transactions obviously, where as soon as the money leaves the ATM fraudulently it is as good as gone. As a result, the risk profile of the two types of transaction is wildly different, and the credit limits of each reflect this.


"The trick to using a credit card responsibly is accounting. With your old system, you were paying for everything out of your savings account.  Everytime you had an expense, it was immediately withdrawn from your savings account, and you saw how much money you had left. Now, with a credit card, there isn't any money being withdrawn from your savings account until a month later, when you have a huge credit card bill. The trick is to treat every credit card transaction as if it was a debit card transaction, and subtract the money from your ""available funds"" on paper immediately.  Then you'll know how much money you actually have to spend (not by looking at your bank statement, but by looking at your ""available funds"" number), and when the credit card bill comes, you'll have money sitting there waiting to go to the credit card company. This requires more work than you had with your old system, and if it sounds like too much work, you might be better off with a debit card or cash.  But if you want to continue to use the credit card, you'll find that the right software will make the accounting process easier.  I like YNAB, but there are other software products that work as well.  Just make sure that your system accounts for each credit card transaction as it is spent, deducting the amount from your budget now, so that there is money set aside for the credit card bill.  Software that simply categorizes your spending after the fact is not as useful."


"Yes. Bonds perform very well in a recession. In fact the safer the bond, the better it would do in a recession. Think of markets having four seasons: High growth and low inflation - ""growing economy"" High growth and high inflation - ""overheating economy"" Low growth and high inflation - ""stagflation"" Low growth and low inflation - ""recession"" Bonds are the best investment in a recession. qplum's flagship strategy had a very high allocation to bonds in the financial crisis. That's why in backtest it shows much better returns."


I usually get a cashiers check to cover about 90% - 95% of the expected amount (whatever I think is just below my wet-dream-price), and bring the rest in cash. That doesn't require so much cash to be carried. Alternatively you can write a personal check for the exact reminder, or go to the bank for the reminder after the deal is made - with the majority already paid in a cashiers check nobody would disagree.


"In your situation, you probably should not cash in your IRA and 401(k). A good mortgage lender will want to see that you have ""reserves"" -- money that you could fall back on if you hit a very rough patch.  Your current savings and retirement accounts might add up to a suitable reserve. You might want to do something like this instead: By the way, instead of cashing in a 401(k), it is usually better to: This method avoids large tax penalties, and encourages you to rebuild your 401(k).  Unfortunately, your large debt balances might prevent you from getting the PLOC.  But even in the worst case scenario (where you cannot use a PLOC to pay off a 401(k) balloon payment), it postpones the tax hit until after the balloon payment."


> Walmart only concerns its self with the needs of shareholders.   All publicly traded companies concern themselves with the needs of the shareholders, they are the people that own the company, thats how publicly traded companies work... Why do you get upvoted in /r/business for saying such silly things?


I have a CapitalOne credit card, and every two or three weeks, CapitalOne Bank sends me checks that can be used almost anywhere (including a deposit into my own checking account if I wish, or to pay taxes or utility bills etc)). The amount thus borrowed is counted as a balance transfer (as if I  were paying off another credit-card balance) and it will be charged 0% interest for a year.  The catch is that unless I pay off the next monthly statement in full by the due date, I will be charged interest on all new purchases from the day that they post to the account till the day they are paid off. No more grace period etc.  All this will continue until that loan amount is paid off in full.  So, I either would have to (i) pay off all the purchases made this month plus the minimum monthly payment shown on the next monthly statement and give up use of the card till that 0% balance is all repaid, or (ii) pay interest on new purchases.   It might be worth checking on the CapitalOne Credit Card site if such an offer is available to you.  If so, get a check from them, pay off the invoice using that check (actually, I would strongly recommend depositing the money in your local bank and writing them your personal check for the amount to be paid), and then pay off next month's bill in full, etc.


If something in any transaction in life—financial or otherwise—doesn’t make you feel comfortable and the choice is between saving money with one thing versus another, don’t sell your personal needs short. Pay more elsewhere that treats you the way you expect to be treated. In the long run the $$$ you “save” in a cheaper transaction might cost you more in the headaches and annoyance you have to swallow in dealing with this “bargain” in the future. Your question is this: “Do his sales tactics indicate other underlying problems? How can I deal effectively with those tactics?” And you state this as well: “To make a long story short, the dealer's aggressive sales tactics have made me somewhat uncomfortable.” And finally ask: “How can I deal effectively with those tactics?” Okay, first and foremost if you feel discomfort in anything in life—not just a financial situation—just walk away. You might have to say “No…” when doing this but it’s not always the case you will have to counter aggression with aggression. And specifically in the case of a purchase like this, you need to also ask yourself: “Is this discount being offered me worth the headache I am getting?” At the end of the day money is meaningless and has it’s main worth as an economic motivator/stimulator: Someone has a need and someone else has something that can solve that need. What would it take for the side of need to connect to the side of solution to that need? This is the basic concept surrounding all economics. So that said, I have personally avoided buying things for less money and paid slightly more elsewhere for a service experience that made me feel comfortable. At the end of the day, if you feel happy in the transaction it helps in the long run more than—let’s say—the $20 to $40 you “save” by buying from someone else. Also—on the side of customer service—this person’s sales techniques sound like something out of a very old fashioned sales playbook. Nowadays it’s all about relationships and service: The immediate sale is not as important for competent and reputable businesses because they know a better customer service experience will bring people back. So it doesn’t matter how long this guy has been in business: It could be that he’s been in business a long time just because he has been in business a long time. That said—and in the case of musical instruments—maybe this guy is really good at care and upkeep of instruments but has crappy sales techniques. Keep that in mind as well and just push back on their sales methods. For things like musical instruments, people might be jerks on the sales side but in the maintenance and repair side they are great. Will you need to go to them if/when your instrument needs repair? Or you don’t care? At the end of the day, go with your gut. And if your gut says, “No…” then just go somewhere else and spend your money on an item you like from a place that treats you the way you need.


"It should. It is a very nasty feedback loop. There is no ownership of the reviews. If you bring something back in store you have to have guys to prove that it was wrong. On eBay, you can just bitch and get it ""corrected""."


Completely agree, my boss is a great guy and I wouldn't have it any other way.  I was going to be skipped for a raise because I was just hired, but he talked them into giving me one because I was under contract for two years.


Are you planning to have a dream home of your own? Don’t compromise with the style and latest trends in home interiors and planning. Architects and interior designers in Noida can suggest you numerous ideas for construction as well as interior decoration of your house.


When you pick a company for your IRA, they should have information about rolling over funds from another IRA or a 401K. They will be able to walk you through the process. There shouldn't be a fee for doing this. They want your money to be invested in their funds. Once your money is in their hands they are able to generate their profits.  You will want to do a direct transfer. Some employers will work with the investment companies and send the funds directly to the IRA. Others will insist on sending a check to you. The company that will have your IRA should give you exact specifications for the check so that you won't have to cash it. The check will be payable to you or the IRA account. The IRA company will have all the details. Decide if you will be converting non-Roth to Roth, before doing the rollover.


"So...if the stock market tanks, the value of these portfolios tank...but faster.  The difference time around being that the customers will be holding all of the toxic assets?  I also gotta say that it feels like there's a lot of, ""hey let's sell insurance and hope that nothing bad ever happens but if it does we go bankrupt and the customer's fucked too!"""


Yes. It is a scam. The story makes no sense. They just want your info to steal your money. regarding requests to know how it works:  the scammer is requesting:  username, password, routing number, checking account number, and   security question/answers. they now have access to your bank account. they will have access until you are able to shut it down. Once they have your password, they can change it to whatever they want.  it can be used to launder money, steal money from other accounts you have, proof of identity...


I recommend an online savings account.   The money is more liquid without early withdrawal fees and frequently you can get a visa/mastercard check card to access the funds. Looking at interest rates, ING is currently paying 1.10% and bankrate reports the best interest rate in the country on a 1 year CD is 1.33%.   The .23% difference is not enough to convince me to invest in CDs at a fixed rate vs. an online savings account at a variable rate when we are at (or near) the bottom of CD/savings interest rates.


As long as you don't finance and the payment is upfront, its up to you and your customer how to pay. If you provide the product before the payment is being made or finance in any way (i.e.: there's debt), then the Canadian dollar, being legal tender in Canada, must be accepted. Considering the large amount, you would probably not be accepting cash anyway, so the point is moot. How they pay their credit cards is not your problem. However, do take into the account the currency exchange rates and fees that add costs to purchasing your product. If you don't have any physical presence (i.e.: online store only, no physical location on Canadian soil), then it goes by the rules of the jurisdiction where you've incorporated. Check with the local legal professional to be sure.


"I understand the answers addressing the question as asked. Yes, inheriting a 401(k) can be a convoluted process.  In general, it's best to transfer the account to an IRA after separation from the company to avoid the issues both of my esteemed colleagues have referenced.  Given the issue of ""allowed by not required"" the flexibility is greater once the account has been transferred to an IRA. With few exceptions, there's little reason to leave the account with the 401(k) after leaving that company.  (Note - I understand the original question as worded can mean the account holder passes while still working for the company. In that case, this wouldn't be an option.)"


The user who wrote the Zerohedge item: The CBS article: The Quora estimate is similar to the Zerohedge one (estimated a round value of 1000 PE and a price of 70-80). Note that it was 30 days after the first 2 items you quoted. You used the CBS numbers except you used the zerohedge price.  It depends on which earnings were for each calculation. Past or future. The CBS numbers make the most sense because you can trace where they come from based on the links in their article.  CBS based their price on the estimates made the day before the stock went on sale. The price in the zerohedge item was based on the early trading numbers.


They are almost always behind paywalls. The analysts that write these reports need to get paid somehow.  I'd search for reports on google by specific topic and see what you find, but no where is there a treasure trove of free information


Fun Fact: Illinois is poised to have their credit rating downgraded to junk status. If they fall and NJ continues to decline we could see 5 states with this credit rating withing 5 years. (NJ and CONN are close) with several others slipping as well.


The answer for this question varies from person to person. However most cards give lousy rewards percentage-wise. Take a look at where your money is being spent each month (say with a tool like mint.com), and seek out a card that rewards you in categories where you already spend a lot of money.  Many people here have suggested cards with high gas rebates, and that's great if you drive more than anything else. However, the important thing is to pick what benefits you most.


There is mad hat on this sub because he's a young black man. You should be ashamed. Sure it helps to him in this situation I don't doubt, but there is bias in many situations.  I don't see how this kid is different then any other clothing line pusher. He made a good product, he marketed himself well and he found a good mentor.. sounds like a recipe for success for almost anyone  Good for him, he was very passionate about his bow ties and I hope he goes on to make many more millions and that everyone is rocking bow ties  You are all some salty bastards that need to reflect on your jealousy of this 15 year old boy.


What does cheap mean? Compared to what?  A standard international wire transfer cost about 40 $. Is that 'cheap' for you?  Alternatively, a mailed paper check takes 5-7 days mailing plus 7-10 days processing, but is free, that's as cheap as it gets.


"Background: I live and work in a small city (250k) and want to work somewhere much larger (New York, London, Chicago, Sydney). Ideal job is something quantitative and related to programming/analytics in finance, though I have passed the CFA Level III Exam to show my interest in the field and currently work as a systems and database analyst (job title is ""Senior financial analyst"".) I have a Master's in mathematical finance but my work mostly relates to personal side projects.  Questions:  Short of packing up and moving, what is an effective way to network with people from these larger cities?  Is there demand for quants and junior quants, or is there too much supply? Will I need to get a PhD to be relevant? Can I transfer my background or skills into another area of finance first to get the networking contacts?"


Congratulations on the new arrival! Technically, a gift by check to the baby should be deposited into a newly established custodial account in the baby's name. To open one, you will need to have a SSN for the baby, so don't wait till tax time to request one (you will need the SSN if you wish to claim the baby as a dependent on your 2017 income tax returns). On the other hand, people are often cavalier about this and at least one bank (JoeTaxpayer's!) seems not to care about the legal niceties; I expect my bank wouldn't have either, in the good old days. Note that @JoeTaxpayer and I are of similar age, and perhaps he too is recounting experiences from some time ago.


FYI: David Knopf is a graduate of Princeton with a BA in Econ. His parents are rich. Like totally fucking rich. You might do better. If your parents make less than $140k, tuition at Princeton is zero. Of course your chance of getting into Princeton, unless you are a legacy admission, or ace the SAT, is about zero. Better bone up on Algebra if you want to ace the SAT. And yes, you ARE a math person. Everyone is. It's just that nobody ever taught you right.  Forget about the CCNA or CCNP, that stuff will be obsolete before you would finish learning it. And even if you did, some H-1 visa immigrant will do the job for a quarter of what it would cost you to make a living.  I completely sympathize with your situation. I'm not going to pour out my life story, but I always thought I'd be a multimillionaire by the time I was 30. Instead, I have made choices that took a troublesome path, including depression and poverty. Even today I am suffering from choices I made (or avoided making) decades ago. BUT I am suffering only by OTHER people's standards. I don't regret the choices I made. I turned down fast money I could have made by exploiting people, it would have only cost me my soul. I have been exploited by other people, and it taught me the value of dealing with people who have ethics like my own. So ultimately, you have to admit to yourself, you are exactly where you need to be. You are struggling because what you want to do is hard. I am an artist too, and that is just about the hardest thing to do on this earth. If it was easy, anyone could do it. So don't despair, get busy. I remember when I lived in a slum, barely subsisting, but I had a sunny window and a table, I spent $2 on a cheap brush and a tube of black watercolor, and a $2 tablet of cheap watercolor paper. And I sat at that sunny table and made art that made me happy. Nobody but me has ever seen it. And for all the changes I have gone through in decades since, I would give almost anything to be living in abject poverty, sitting at that sunny window with that cheap paintbrush in hand again. [So I'll just leave you with this odd comic by Carol Lay, it's one of my all time favorites.](http://i.imgur.com/4XsDbnE.gif)


> it actually equalizes the economies in the long run  Noone denies that - but those who dislike globalization **don't want** it to be equalized.  The world average income is $18,000 a year.  Compared to the current US average income of $37,000.  So this equalization means loosing half of your income.


Home appliances are the most important part of our lives. They make our life easier and help us to do our daily task much easily. When your appliances are not working then this can be a cause of your stress. We provide satisfactory repairing services for your home appliances.


> Over months or years it causes iron deficiency and anemia, weight loss, tiredness and impaired mental function, especially in children, helping to trap them into the poverty in which the disease flourishes.  If you are someone who believes that people who don't make a living wage just need to apply themselves and learn new skills, do you think anything different should be done in communities with a hookworm problem?


"There are Cyber Security and Reporting Standards which Financial Service Provider (Banks and Financial services where customers deposit and/or transact fiat currency) You can find a comprehensive list on Wikipedia under Cyber security standards Depending on the geographic location there might be local Govt requirements such as reporting issues, data security etc. Concerning point 1. We have to differ between a fraudulent customer and an attacker on the banks infrastructure. Fraudulent customers / customers that have been compromised by third parties are identified with but not limited to credit scores and merchant databases or data from firms specialized in ""Fraud Prevention"". Attackers (Criminals that intend to steal, manipulate or spy on data) are identified/prevented/recorded by but not limited to IDS solutions and attacker databases. For firms that get compensation by insurances the most important thing is the compilant with law and have records of everything, they rather focus on recording data to backtrack attackers than preventing attacks. Concerning point 2. For you as customer the local law and deposit insurance are the most important things. Banks are insured and usually compensate customers on money theft. The authentication and PIN / TAN methods are most crucial but standard - these authentication methods consist of one password and one offline part such as a TAN from a paperletter or a RSA generator or card reader. WRAPUP: Financial institutions have to comply with local law and meet international standards. Banks use highly advanced Intrusion detection and fraud prevention which logically must be based on databases. For the average joe customer there is seldom high risk to lose deposits even if the attackers gains full access to the bank account but this depends a lot on the country you reside in. Concerning targeted attacks:"


">Really? I kinda thought it had something to do with losing 2.6 million jobs in 2008. Now that's a lot of revenue gone! Oh also the bush tax cuts  All the more reason to keep increase spending by 5-10% a year, right? How about we create an envionment that yields more jobs rather than increasing the taxes of those left? Because that worked so well for social security originally supported by 5-10 employees per 1 receiving benefits, now it's only supported by 2 employees per 1 receiving benefits-- ultra sustainable!  >So almost 10% of our deficit? I'd say that's a good start.   10% of our deficit, so 1/4th the amount of DEBT INTEREST we'll pay this year? A drop in the bucket either way. Spending is the real culprit.  >I do agree we spend way too much on the pentagon, but pretty sure that went up a lot without our two unfunded republican wars.   And now we're in a half dozen active and secret conflicts; Afganistan, Pakistan, Syria, Libya, Eygpt. All the more reason for Obama to IMMEDIATELY remove us from those wars. But he hasn't he has expanded them. And our military costs keep going up. It's not about ""this isn't the right time to withdrawl"" it's about his corporate masters being the same as the Bush corporate masters telling him to continue. It's about oil/gas and the pipelines and projection of power that comes with it. Obama has continued and expanded the same policies as Bush, he cannot hide behind, ""Well Bush was worse"", he can't say that because it isnt true. Infact we're killing more peasants in other countries than ever before--- just with military industrial complex built drones.  >There's also the unfunded Bush Medicare prescription drug plan.   Yep, that prevents the government from negotiating prices on prescriptions for a token  $10 Billion rebate, but which will yield $10 Trillion in revenues over the next 15 years. Sounds like a great ROI while the costs of drugs is skyhigh in the US.  So what did Obama do? He fed that industry another 30 million new customers without so much as any discount. The government purposely stays out of the negotiation of price. Why? Because the bill was written by insurance industry and healthcare industry executives like most bills are. Healthcare is nice, but its the COST of healthcare that is the issue. If the cost was more reasonable, you wouldnt even need insurance, but because they can charge $70 for a single pair of rubber gloves, when the market price on a BOX is $5-10 we can plainly see the cost of medical care in the US is bloated and we get much less than comparative countries.   Obama is just like Bush, he has enriched the various industries. The only difference between bush and Obama are which industries are enriched. You'll notice I didn't mention enrichment of citizens because they are an afterthought. Obama only needs to SELL the program to citizens, he sold it we bought it.  >You can't seriously think putting those people back in charge will lead to good things.  No I don't think republicans or people like Bush or Romney are necessarily good for us either. The thing I have a problem with is that people like you think Obama is any different. He's not, new president, same as the old president. New speech writer, new cabinet (stuffed with corporate cronies and former lobbyists), but business as usual and marching orders from corporate and private masters."


My use is occasional (like weekends where I get out and overdo it and need help calming aches to sleep) and occasionally recreational.  But I have strict rules about dosing frequency (no more than one weekend a month) to avoid dependency and withdrawal.  OTOH, I had hernia surgery a couple years ago and it was ridiculous the hoops I had to go through to get my post-op stuff.  Doctors are beginning to under-medicate.  I think that might be worse.


It seems likely that the mortgage is not in your boyfriend's name because he never would have qualified if he can't even afford utilities after paying the mortgage. It also seems unfair that his sister continues to have a 50% share of the equity if your boyfriend has been making the entire payment on the mortgage every month. What would happen if your boyfriend stopped making the payments? His sister would have no choice if the property went into foreclosure. Your boyfriend has all the leverage he needs by simply refusing to continue making the payments. Why he won't push his sister to make a deal is the real question you need to ask him. In the meantime, if he wants out, all he has to do is decide not to keep paying whether his sister feels attached or not.


Not always true. A few good companies understand that if they hire the best, and pay for it, they will outpace their competitors through sheer quality.   But keeping wages low is just easier to do than finding and hiring the best, a managing the whole thing well.


If I were you I would just save the money until I had at least 5000 pounds to keep as an emergency fund. There are various kinds of unexpected events and it is smart to have some cash in case a problem comes up. Next time I would recommend buying a car you can afford. Borrowing money to buy nice things is the enemy of wealth accumulation. Also, when you buy a car for cash you will get a much better deal than when you let a dealer put his foot on your neck.


The investments he's chosen are well diversified.  You can argue the  details, but it's a low-fee, low-risk plan that's simple to implement, which makes it better than what 95%+ of people do.  Starting saving early is also a great idea.  Now for the bad news.  $1mm is not enough to retire on.  It can't generate $80k / year without significant risk, and even if it could, those investment gains would be taxable.  The general rule of thumb is that you should have 25x your annual expenses saved when you retire, a bit more if you want to retire early at 50.  Don't forget that inflation means $1mm in 24 years will not have the same purchasing power it does today.


Video linked by /u/Alex6373:  Title|Channel|Published|Duration|Likes|Total Views :----------:|:----------:|:----------:|:----------:|:----------:|:----------: [Способ заработка Биткоина! Сайт по сбору сатоши! От 7000 сатошей в сутки! Кран биткоина](https://youtu.be/RMueBDJyzKw)|Вектор Криптовалют|2017-07-18|0:02:43|0+ (0%)|2  > ¦ Ссылка на регистрацию в проекте: | MineBit:...  ---  [^Info](https://np.reddit.com/r/youtubot/wiki/index) ^| [^/u/Alex6373 ^can ^delete](https://np.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=_youtubot_&subject=delete\%20comment&message=dkdby6m\%0A\%0AReason\%3A\%20\%2A\%2Aplease+help+us+improve\%2A\%2A) ^| ^v1.1.3b


Is this really venting about giving up capital to a group helping you raise it? You don't even have to give up equity for the capital or worry about VCs pulling out.  Of course something like that would be oversaturated and financially motivated to exploit the over-saturation.


"In the UK there are Premium Bonds, http://www.nsandi.com/. In simple terms these get you a ""raffle ticket"" for each £1 you invest. Each month multiple tickets are drawn and they each win between £25 and £1m. Your capital does not go down but you aren't guaranteed to win. So you can't lose your money but there's potential to not make any either."


You could pay off a portion of the debt and your minimum payments should also go down proportionately.  Your investment managers may be able to continue making returns in the markets in a sideways and a bear market. So you have 24k contributing to your net worth, and ~50k giving you a negative net worth. At best, you can bring this down to a negative 25k net worth, or you can start and keep using some of the gains from your investment account to supplement your credit payments (along with your income). This is based on chance that your investment managers can continue making gains, compared to paying down 24k and having possibly zero liquid savings now, but having more of your salary to start saving and make the lowered minimum payments, assuming you don't borrow more. Those are the options I've thought of, I don't see either option being necessarily quicker than the other.


both issues addressed in my original idea...  >a bunch of small  any individual one won't need to scale if there are enough of them and they're deployed on a rolling basis... think burning through a shitload of free cdn plans then canceling them as soon as they start to rack up any significant bandwidth. and it's trivial to block ***one*** of them once it's big enough to even be on your radar. but this would be hundreds, potentially thousands, moving a relatively small amount of data each. how long has netflix instant been a thing? comcast is not known for staying up to speed technologically, and i'm sure you could get plenty of heavy hitters in the tech industry to silently donate ip addresses, bandwidth, storage, etc., with all the ire comcast has raised by effectively dismantling net neutrality. hell, get enough big names involved and it wouldn't even need to be silent. what are they going to do, sue google? i'm sure that would go well for them.


Raise wages by 20%, and cut the work force by 25%.  Drive suppliers from expensive countries if production, like China, and to lower cost options like Vietnam to cut costs by another 1-2%.    None if this is hard or complicated.  Your job: don't end up relying on this sort of job to provide for yourself.  Stay in school, kids.  And, pay for school in cash, which you can earn by working for $12 per hour at Target before you go making babies and what not.  If you can manage to control yourself for a few years.


I suggest a four pronged solution to our political problems. 1. Ranked choice voting nationwide.  2. No more electronic voting machines. We need a paper trail that can be verified.  3. No more crazy jerrymandering lines. They need to be SIMPLE polygons.  4. get big money out of politics.


"You're asking explicitly about $250K+ wage earners. Well, believe it or not, but this is the most discriminated group of people in the US tax code. This is what is called ""the upper middle class"". People who still have to work for a living, but treated as if they're rich (I don't consider people who must work to keep up their life style as rich). Many of the deductions cannot be taken by them. Lets go over the list Keith made: You mentioned losses - you cannot deduct gambling losses (in excess of gambling income), and you cannot deduct passive (rental real estate, for example) losses. While for rental real estate there's a small amount of losses you could deduct, it phases out well below the $250K line (can be deducted against passive income, or when disposed of the property). 529 plans are not deductible (in fact, its a gift subject to the gift tax). Bottom line, being a high earner with wages only means you pay the most tax. You either find a way to become self employed and have a lot of business deductions on your schedule C/1120S, or switch to capital gains. You can marry an unemployed partner, it will make your life slightly easier."


"Everything you are doing is fine. Here are a few practical notes in performing this analysis: Find all the primary filing information on EDGAR. For NYSE:MEI, you can use https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000065270&type=10-K&dateb=&owner=exclude&count=40 This is the original 10-K. To evaluate earnings growth you need per share earnings for the past three years and 10,11,12 years ago. You do NOT need diluted earnings (because in the long term share dilution comes out anyway, just like ""normalized"" earnings). The formula is avg(Y_-1+Y_-2+Y_-3) / is avg(Y_-10+Y_-11+Y_-12) Be careful with the pricing rules you are using, the asset one gets complicated. I recommend NOT using the pricing rules #6 and #7 to select the stock. Instead you can use them to set a maximum price for the stock and then you can compare the current price to your maximum price. I am also working to understand these rules and have cited Graham's rules into a checklist and worksheet to find all companies that meet his criteria. Basically my goal is to bottom feed the deals that Warren Buffett is not interested in. If you are interested to invest time into this project, please see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vuFmoJDktMYtS64od2HUTV9I351AxvhyjAaC0N3TXrA"


It makes sense for civil service jobs where you want the bureaucracy to remain apolitical. If layoffs are based on performance, you end up with gamed performance stats to favor the current regime and oust the opposition.  This is especially the case in jobs where measuring performance is extremely difficult or subjective, and, in these cases, seniority tends to act as a decent proxy. (or at least, it's the best of a few mediocre options)


"Linkedlinked, You might want to seriously take another look at the links that Chris provided you.  Specifically the ones on the IRS website: http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small/article/0,,id=99921,00.html From the IRS website: Businesses must weigh all these   factors when determining whether a   worker is an employee or independent   contractor. Some factors may indicate   that the worker is an employee, while   other factors indicate that the worker   is an independent contractor. There is   no “magic” or set number of factors   that “makes” the worker an employee or   an independent contractor, and no one   factor stands alone in making this   determination. Also, factors which are   relevant in one situation may not be   relevant in another. The keys are to look at the entire   relationship, consider the degree or   extent of the right to direct and   control, and finally, to document each   of the factors used in coming up with   the determination. Perhaps more importantly... pay attention to what happens if you're WRONG: Consequences of Treating an Employee as an Independent Contractor If   you classify an employee as an   independent contractor and you have no   reasonable basis for doing so, you may   be held liable for employment taxes   for that worker (the relief   provisions, discussed below, will not   apply). See Internal Revenue Code   section 3509 for more information. I would STRONGLY recommend that you and your partners give your accountant a call and discuss the matter.  They will be able to help you make the right decision. One of biggest mistakes businesses make in this are is to classify their employees as independent contractors.  The IRS (who happens to be hungry for money right now) comes in and says, ""Nooooooooo... those are employees."" ...and the COMPANY gets to pay the employment taxes.  I actually have person experience with this as I worked for a company this happened to.  Every contractor was re-classified as an employee except for two (myself and one other).  The key reason in that case was that none of the other contractors had any other clients. While I understand that you have other clients, I would still recommend talking to your accountant for an hour or so... just to be 100% sure. Sincerely, Andrew Smith TaxQueries.com"


Sherif El-Refai enrolled in the University Of Florida Hough Graduate School Of Business, where he plans to earn his Master of Business Administration. His course load concentrates on marketing and global management and competitive strategy. He also maintains membership in the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.


I actually read that a lot of times, that isn’t necessarily true. In some of these third world countries, the issue is less that the money is wasted but that there isn’t enough to make the kinds of optimal investments that were thinking of.   For example, someone might understand intellectually that they need to buy a water buffalo to scale up their farm but saving up the money to do so would mean that they wouldn’t be able to feed their kids for two years. They’re not “bad with money”, they just flat out don’t have enough to go beyond subsistence.   I think that’s the target market for these types of programs. They won’t work for everyone, people who are actually irresponsible will screw up no matter how much money and coaching you give them. But this could be a game changer for people who are good with the money they do have and just need a boost.


In the context of EDV, 4.46 is the indicated dividend rate. The indicated dividend rate is the rate that would be paid per share throughout the next year, assuming dividends stayed the same as prior payment.  sources:


The guarantor is the Government of Latvia, the fund is the means of executing that guarantee. Unless the government defaults, the guarantee is valid. See here: In accordance with amendments to the Deposit Guarantee Law adopted by   the Parliament of the Republic of Latvia (Saeima) as from December 16,   2010 compensation of EUR 100 000 (approx. LVL 70 000) is guaranteed to   the clients of the Latvian banks (both natural and legal persons) per   depositor per each bank (all accounts added together, if several   accounts at one bank in one name). The government guaranteed   compensation covers deposits, current account balance, salary   accounts, savings accounts etc. further down: In accordance with the Deposit Guarantee Law, in the occurrence of a   case of unavailability of deposits in the Fund for paying out the   guaranteed compensations, such payments shall be made from the   Government budget via FCMC.


And this distinction is a HUGE difference. Both for the employees and the corporate. Even though the article doesn't say if all the franchises decided to kept all the employees who used to work for the corporate (few months down the road), as someone who have worked in the franchise business (not burger king) at different level, I will bet my money that a lot of them lost their job.  The whole reason why BK sold them off as franchises because as a corporate they couldn't maintain the overhead and since fast food businesses has ridiculously low margin, I wouldn't be surprised to maintain profitability the franchise owners got rid of a lot of them.  So its not too far off to say that all these people were fired by corporate but the franchise owners decided to keep (probably) most of them out of convenience for the short term but probably lost the job few months down the road.


"Chit funds started as group of people pooling money every month and drawing a lot to determine who would get the entire funds that month. For example 5 people pool together Rs 1000/- on first month person ""A"" gets the draw and takes the Rs 5000/-. Next month again same set of people pool Rs 1000/-, the person who got the money last month is removed from the list and again a draw is made. Thus everyone pays Rs 1000/- for 5 month and gets back Rs 5000/- some sooner and some later. This was done more to buy big ticket purchases, or group of ladies getting together. There is always a leader who would ensure that everyone pays and manages the process. In more business oriented chit fund, unknown people come together and contribute Rs 1000/-. There is a organiser who is a local strong man who runs this and ensures that everyone pays. The variation here is that every month instead of a lucky draw, you can buy for discount. Say this month you need the money badly, you are willing to take only Rs 4800/-, there maybe some one who is more desperate and may say he is OK with only Rs 4600/-. The balance Rs 400 is distributed amongst the other 4 members. Thus the other who had contributed Rs 5000/- over 5 months now get Rs 100 more. The next month this person is eliminated from bidding, and others 4 can bid for Rs 5000 or less. The balance is again re-distributed amongst others. This is typically run by people who do not get loans at good rates from bank and essentially borrow outside the financial industry. The people who are part of this most of the times make good returns / better than banks. But this entire industry is unregulated and hence the Strong man can dupe you, there are cases where people who take the first shot at money vanish without trace. Every city has quite a few of such funds running. It is advisable you do not indulge in such funds."


"You should come to Europe and learn the realities of those countries, not believe the narrative of the USA progressives. The nordic european countries started the XX century quite de-centralize and free market based. Over time they became more social-democrat and ended up suffering a systemic crisis during the 80's. Since then they have been de-regulating and de-centralizing and they have recovered. For example, in Sweden 30% of the roads are private or most of them have a system of voucheurs for education.  Norway is an exception since they have petrol and can get away with stuff ""normal"" economies can not."


I agree - so why so much outrage and concern over DAPL crossing a river?  Of note - I'm Choctaw so I understand the land rights of the reservation. That's not in play here and is an entirely different scope of questions relating to trust land etc.


"A few years back me and a couple of friends made about 100 of these on his 30 watt laser cutter. At the time I was using them for ring boxes, because I make spoon rings and wanted something to give to people for the nicer sterling rings. If I remember correctly we used high ply baltic birch plywood at 1/8"" thickness. The grade we were buying ran us about $30 for a 5'x5' sheet. We cut them into 11x16 sheets, because that's the max size for his laser, and cut roughly 5 out of each sheet. The ones we were making were of course much smaller than what you are looking at though. Materials alone ended up running about $.50 a piece, we were coating with one layer of teak oil. It was roughly ten minutes to cut out 5 boxes, then another ten minutes to pop them out of the plywood and assemble each one. Despite what has been stated, with tweaking, friction fit held up completely fine, we didn't use glue on a single one and I still have a few laying around that are holding up fine also. Anyway, say you are paying yourself roughly $20 an hour, and you can speed it up from what we did and make 20 in an hour, now you have $1 a piece in labor. Keep in mind if you go to a place to have these made, from my experience, most places will charge you roughly $1 a minute for laser time. Add engraving time if you want a logo or something on them, probably another minute per box, all in all in the end these are going to end up costing you $2.50-$3 a box if you have free access to a laser. I would imagine anyone making them for you would probably charge double that.   In the end after the first batch of both these boxes, some slightly different, and some jewelry trees, we found out that it's hard to sell these items for an affordable price and still make it worth your while. If I remember correctly we ended up selling most of the remaining boxes for about $4 a piece just to break even and cover all of our expenses. Of course, this is just my experience, if someone has a way to do this more efficiently and for a profit, I would be interested to hear it, because we still have the laser and probably 100 sheets of plywood left =D"


I understood what you were saying. My point is that I don't think the race or heritage of the person preparing the food at a large chain restaurant makes it any more or less authentic. If I'm at an actual Mexican restaurant, absolutely, but at Chipotle, I don't think so.


as in, the person you made the agreement with can no longer fulfill the contract's requirements. It's the same thing as if they went bankrupt, you would have to pursue legal channels to recover your dues.      Granted in an FX forward you would only have to deliver your part at expiration, so you could hold out if you *know* the counterparty is dead/bankrupt.


At Bella Vista Wedding, you will find professional & skilled wedding videographer & cinematographer in Virginia, Maryland & Washington DC. With having 10 years of experience in the industry, we are passionate & known for creating high quality, highly diverse wedding videos.


"How can I best start a discussion about this topic with SO? I'm guessing your SO is more visual than verbal.  I'd break the ice by presenting an income pie chart and an expenses pie chart, maybe just for 2013 or comparing 2012 and 2013, and then offer your interpretation of an interesting slice or two:  ""I noticed we're saving so much each year that..."" Or, instead of starting with graphically demonstrating your cash flow, start with appropriate graphics demonstrating your savings is growing fast enough that making a few donations wouldn't be a serious impact.  ""See how little we spend compared to our savings?"". In any case, a picture is worth a 1,000 words, so starting with pictures is a good way to start your discussion."


Cara Mengecilkan Perut Buncit » Kini telah hadir tips cara mengecilkan perut buncit dengan cepat tanpa ribet dan tidak menimbulkan efek samping bagi tubuh. Banyak sekali orang-orang yang berusaha mati-matian untuk mengecilkan perut buncit, ada yang mengorbankan waktu, tenaga dan terlebih lagi mengeluarkan uang yang banyak.


PA local taxes are a little tricky at times, but they do have resources to help taxpayers out. The link below is a good place to start, it provides a step by step guideline to go about your local taxes.  The Address search application will tell you which locals you would need to file returns with as well as the tax rates. There are links at the bottom of the page with links to the forms and instructions. The forms are relatively easy to fill out. Act 32 For Employees/Self-Employed


"Seems like you could shoehorn this into an investment account. You make purchases similar to what you would make in a money market account ($1 per share) via your premium payments. You see appreciation in those shares. You incur expenses on your ""purchases"" via cost of insurance and possibly monthly payment fees."


"It has semantic value (because we culturally believe gold is valuable).  There is a very important point here.  Gold and many other coin metals. This ""semantic value"" is enshrined in law through the special tax status of coin metals.  You can buy a kilo of gold and not pay sales tax.  You can't buy a kilo of iron or tin and do the same.  This is the important part because investors shouldn't care about semantics. I read that the taxable status varies by state or nation, so you need to be very careful.  It's possible to evade taxes without realizing it.  It also doesn't necessarily exempt you from the form of gold.  An ingot should be tax exempt.  A collector's coin may or may not be, depending on your local laws and the difference between the value of the weight of the gold, and the value of the form of the coin."


The reasons behind hiring a private investigator can be many things; it depends on the human being. A professional private investigator gives you very valuable services that can help you in many ways – from bringing out the right facts to clearing your doubts, from criminal cases to infidelity and from cheating partners to background checks and many more.


Just Tesla's products today solve it for many households. Solar Roof + Powerwall could run most single-family houses in the US no problem. Basically you just pre-pay your power bills for 20 years and you're all set.  The harder problem is electricity for high-density housing and industry. Solar farms solve some of that, but other power sources are a good idea too.


Yes, it's true (from a BB perspective).  This isn't the 80's where M&A's are the money makers.  This isn't the 90's where IPO's are the cash cows.  Going forward the new products, especially the OTC derivatives market and FI are going to be where a lot of resources are pooled and where revenues are generated.  Ask yourself the question, why do you want to go into equity research as opposed to another product?