| =========== |
| Aggregation |
| =========== |
|
|
| .. currentmodule:: django.db.models |
|
|
| The topic guide on :doc:`Django's database-abstraction API </topics/db/queries>` |
| described the way that you can use Django queries that create, |
| retrieve, update and delete individual objects. However, sometimes you will |
| need to retrieve values that are derived by summarizing or *aggregating* a |
| collection of objects. This topic guide describes the ways that aggregate values |
| can be generated and returned using Django queries. |
|
|
| Throughout this guide, we'll refer to the following models. These models are |
| used to track the inventory for a series of online bookstores: |
|
|
| .. _queryset-model-example: |
|
|
| .. code-block:: python |
|
|
| from django.db import models |
|
|
|
|
| class Author(models.Model): |
| name = models.CharField(max_length=100) |
| age = models.IntegerField() |
|
|
|
|
| class Publisher(models.Model): |
| name = models.CharField(max_length=300) |
|
|
|
|
| class Book(models.Model): |
| name = models.CharField(max_length=300) |
| pages = models.IntegerField() |
| price = models.DecimalField(max_digits=10, decimal_places=2) |
| rating = models.FloatField() |
| authors = models.ManyToManyField(Author) |
| publisher = models.ForeignKey(Publisher, on_delete=models.CASCADE) |
| pubdate = models.DateField() |
|
|
|
|
| class Store(models.Model): |
| name = models.CharField(max_length=300) |
| books = models.ManyToManyField(Book) |
|
|
| Cheat sheet |
| =========== |
|
|
| In a hurry? Here's how to do common aggregate queries, assuming the models |
| above: |
|
|
| .. code-block:: pycon |
|
|
| # Total number of books. |
| >>> Book.objects.count() |
| 2452 |
|
|
| # Total number of books with publisher=BaloneyPress |
| >>> Book.objects.filter(publisher__name="BaloneyPress").count() |
| 73 |
|
|
| # Average price across all books. |
| >>> from django.db.models import Avg |
| >>> Book.objects.aggregate(Avg("price")) |
| {'price__avg': 34.35} |
|
|
| # Max price across all books. |
| >>> from django.db.models import Max |
| >>> Book.objects.aggregate(Max("price")) |
| {'price__max': Decimal('81.20')} |
|
|
| # Difference between the highest priced book and the average price of all books. |
| >>> from django.db.models import FloatField |
| >>> Book.objects.aggregate( |
| ... price_diff=Max("price", output_field=FloatField()) - Avg("price") |
| ... ) |
| {'price_diff': 46.85} |
|
|
| # All the following queries involve traversing the Book<->Publisher |
| # foreign key relationship backwards. |
|
|
| # Each publisher, each with a count of books as a "num_books" attribute. |
| >>> from django.db.models import Count |
| >>> pubs = Publisher.objects.annotate(num_books=Count("book")) |
| >>> pubs |
| <QuerySet [<Publisher: BaloneyPress>, <Publisher: SalamiPress>, ...]> |
| >>> pubs[0].num_books |
| 73 |
|
|
| # Each publisher, with a separate count of books with a rating above and below 5 |
| >>> from django.db.models import Q |
| >>> above_5 = Count("book", filter=Q(book__rating__gt=5)) |
| >>> below_5 = Count("book", filter=Q(book__rating__lte=5)) |
| >>> pubs = Publisher.objects.annotate(below_5=below_5).annotate(above_5=above_5) |
| >>> pubs[0].above_5 |
| 23 |
| >>> pubs[0].below_5 |
| 12 |
|
|
| # The top 5 publishers, in order by number of books. |
| >>> pubs = Publisher.objects.annotate(num_books=Count("book")).order_by("-num_books")[:5] |
| >>> pubs[0].num_books |
| 1323 |
|
|
| Generating aggregates over a ``QuerySet`` |
| ========================================= |
|
|
| Django provides two ways to generate aggregates. The first way is to generate |
| summary values over an entire ``QuerySet``. For example, say you wanted to |
| calculate the average price of all books available for sale. Django's query |
| syntax provides a means for describing the set of all books: |
|
|
| .. code-block:: pycon |
|
|
| >>> Book.objects.all() |
|
|
| What we need is a way to calculate summary values over the objects that |
| belong to this ``QuerySet``. This is done by appending an ``aggregate()`` |
| clause onto the ``QuerySet``: |
|
|
| .. code-block:: pycon |
|
|
| >>> from django.db.models import Avg |
| >>> Book.objects.all().aggregate(Avg("price")) |
| {'price__avg': 34.35} |
|
|
| The ``all()`` is redundant in this example, so this could be simplified to: |
|
|
| .. code-block:: pycon |
|
|
| >>> Book.objects.aggregate(Avg("price")) |
| {'price__avg': 34.35} |
|
|
| The argument to the ``aggregate()`` clause describes the aggregate value that |
| we want to compute - in this case, the average of the ``price`` field on the |
| ``Book`` model. A list of the aggregate functions that are available can be |
| found in the :ref:`QuerySet reference <aggregation-functions>`. |
|
|
| ``aggregate()`` is a terminal clause for a ``QuerySet`` that, when invoked, |
| returns a dictionary of name-value pairs. The name is an identifier for the |
| aggregate value; the value is the computed aggregate. The name is |
| automatically generated from the name of the field and the aggregate function. |
| If you want to manually specify a name for the aggregate value, you can do so |
| by providing that name when you specify the aggregate clause: |
|
|
| .. code-block:: pycon |
|
|
| >>> Book.objects.aggregate(average_price=Avg("price")) |
| {'average_price': 34.35} |
|
|
| If you want to generate more than one aggregate, you add another argument to |
| the ``aggregate()`` clause. So, if we also wanted to know the maximum and |
| minimum price of all books, we would issue the query: |
|
|
| .. code-block:: pycon |
|
|
| >>> from django.db.models import Avg, Max, Min |
| >>> Book.objects.aggregate(Avg("price"), Max("price"), Min("price")) |
| {'price__avg': 34.35, 'price__max': Decimal('81.20'), 'price__min': Decimal('12.99')} |
|
|
| Generating aggregates for each item in a ``QuerySet`` |
| ===================================================== |
|
|
| The second way to generate summary values is to generate an independent |
| summary for each object in a :class:`.QuerySet`. For example, if you are |
| retrieving a list of books, you may want to know how many authors contributed |
| to each book. Each Book has a many-to-many relationship with the Author; we |
| want to summarize this relationship for each book in the ``QuerySet``. |
|
|
| Per-object summaries can be generated using the |
| :meth:`~.QuerySet.annotate` clause. When an ``annotate()`` clause is |
| specified, each object in the ``QuerySet`` will be annotated with the |
| specified values. |
|
|
| The syntax for these annotations is identical to that used for the |
| :meth:`~.QuerySet.aggregate` clause. Each argument to ``annotate()`` describes |
| an aggregate that is to be calculated. For example, to annotate books with the |
| number of authors: |
|
|
| .. code-block:: pycon |
|
|
| # Build an annotated queryset |
| >>> from django.db.models import Count |
| >>> q = Book.objects.annotate(Count("authors")) |
| # Interrogate the first object in the queryset |
| >>> q[0] |
| <Book: The Definitive Guide to Django> |
| >>> q[0].authors__count |
| 2 |
| # Interrogate the second object in the queryset |
| >>> q[1] |
| <Book: Practical Django Projects> |
| >>> q[1].authors__count |
| 1 |
|
|
| As with ``aggregate()``, the name for the annotation is automatically derived |
| from the name of the aggregate function and the name of the field being |
| aggregated. You can override this default name by providing an alias when you |
| specify the annotation: |
|
|
| .. code-block:: pycon |
|
|
| >>> q = Book.objects.annotate(num_authors=Count("authors")) |
| >>> q[0].num_authors |
| 2 |
| >>> q[1].num_authors |
| 1 |
|
|
| Unlike ``aggregate()``, ``annotate()`` is *not* a terminal clause. The output |
| of the ``annotate()`` clause is a ``QuerySet``; this ``QuerySet`` can be |
| modified using any other ``QuerySet`` operation, including ``filter()``, |
| ``order_by()``, or even additional calls to ``annotate()``. |
|
|
| .. _combining-multiple-aggregations: |
|
|
| Combining multiple aggregations |
| ------------------------------- |
|
|
| Combining multiple aggregations with ``annotate()`` will :ticket:`yield the |
| wrong results <10060>` because joins are used instead of subqueries: |
|
|
| >>> book = Book.objects.first() |
| >>> book.authors.count() |
| 2 |
| >>> book.store_set.count() |
| 3 |
| >>> q = Book.objects.annotate(Count('authors'), Count('store')) |
| >>> q[0].authors__count |
| 6 |
| >>> q[0].store__count |
| 6 |
|
|
| For most aggregates, there is no way to avoid this problem, however, the |
| :class:`~django.db.models.Count` aggregate has a ``distinct`` parameter that |
| may help: |
|
|
| >>> q = Book.objects.annotate(Count('authors', distinct=True), Count('store', distinct=True)) |
| >>> q[0].authors__count |
| 2 |
| >>> q[0].store__count |
| 3 |
|
|
| .. admonition:: If in doubt, inspect the SQL query! |
|
|
| In order to understand what happens in your query, consider inspecting the |
| ``query`` property of your ``QuerySet``. |
|
|
| Joins and aggregates |
| ==================== |
|
|
| So far, we have dealt with aggregates over fields that belong to the |
| model being queried. However, sometimes the value you want to aggregate |
| will belong to a model that is related to the model you are querying. |
|
|
| When specifying the field to be aggregated in an aggregate function, Django |
| will allow you to use the same :ref:`double underscore notation |
| <field-lookups-intro>` that is used when referring to related fields in |
| filters. Django will then handle any table joins that are required to retrieve |
| and aggregate the related value. |
|
|
| For example, to find the price range of books offered in each store, |
| you could use the annotation: |
|
|
| .. code-block:: pycon |
|
|
| >>> from django.db.models import Max, Min |
| >>> Store.objects.annotate(min_price=Min("books__price"), max_price=Max("books__price")) |
|
|
| This tells Django to retrieve the ``Store`` model, join (through the |
| many-to-many relationship) with the ``Book`` model, and aggregate on the |
| price field of the book model to produce a minimum and maximum value. |
|
|
| The same rules apply to the ``aggregate()`` clause. If you wanted to |
| know the lowest and highest price of any book that is available for sale |
| in any of the stores, you could use the aggregate: |
|
|
| .. code-block:: pycon |
|
|
| >>> Store.objects.aggregate(min_price=Min("books__price"), max_price=Max("books__price")) |
|
|
| Join chains can be as deep as you require. For example, to extract the |
| age of the youngest author of any book available for sale, you could |
| issue the query: |
|
|
| .. code-block:: pycon |
|
|
| >>> Store.objects.aggregate(youngest_age=Min("books__authors__age")) |
|
|
| Following relationships backwards |
| --------------------------------- |
|
|
| In a way similar to :ref:`lookups-that-span-relationships`, aggregations and |
| annotations on fields of models or models that are related to the one you are |
| querying can include traversing "reverse" relationships. The lowercase name |
| of related models and double-underscores are used here too. |
|
|
| For example, we can ask for all publishers, annotated with their respective |
| total book stock counters (note how we use ``'book'`` to specify the |
| ``Publisher`` -> ``Book`` reverse foreign key hop): |
|
|
| .. code-block:: pycon |
|
|
| >>> from django.db.models import Avg, Count, Min, Sum |
| >>> Publisher.objects.annotate(Count("book")) |
|
|
| (Every ``Publisher`` in the resulting ``QuerySet`` will have an extra attribute |
| called ``book__count``.) |
|
|
| We can also ask for the oldest book of any of those managed by every publisher: |
|
|
| .. code-block:: pycon |
|
|
| >>> Publisher.objects.aggregate(oldest_pubdate=Min("book__pubdate")) |
|
|
| (The resulting dictionary will have a key called ``'oldest_pubdate'``. If no |
| such alias were specified, it would be the rather long ``'book__pubdate__min'``.) |
|
|
| This doesn't apply just to foreign keys. It also works with many-to-many |
| relations. For example, we can ask for every author, annotated with the total |
| number of pages considering all the books the author has (co-)authored (note how we |
| use ``'book'`` to specify the ``Author`` -> ``Book`` reverse many-to-many hop): |
|
|
| .. code-block:: pycon |
|
|
| >>> Author.objects.annotate(total_pages=Sum("book__pages")) |
|
|
| (Every ``Author`` in the resulting ``QuerySet`` will have an extra attribute |
| called ``total_pages``. If no such alias were specified, it would be the rather |
| long ``book__pages__sum``.) |
|
|
| Or ask for the average rating of all the books written by author(s) we have on |
| file: |
|
|
| .. code-block:: pycon |
|
|
| >>> Author.objects.aggregate(average_rating=Avg("book__rating")) |
|
|
| (The resulting dictionary will have a key called ``'average_rating'``. If no |
| such alias were specified, it would be the rather long ``'book__rating__avg'``.) |
|
|
| Aggregations and other ``QuerySet`` clauses |
| =========================================== |
|
|
| ``filter()`` and ``exclude()`` |
| ------------------------------ |
|
|
| Aggregates can also participate in filters. Any ``filter()`` (or |
| ``exclude()``) applied to normal model fields will have the effect of |
| constraining the objects that are considered for aggregation. |
|
|
| When used with an ``annotate()`` clause, a filter has the effect of |
| constraining the objects for which an annotation is calculated. For example, |
| you can generate an annotated list of all books that have a title starting |
| with "Django" using the query: |
|
|
| .. code-block:: pycon |
|
|
| >>> from django.db.models import Avg, Count |
| >>> Book.objects.filter(name__startswith="Django").annotate(num_authors=Count("authors")) |
|
|
| When used with an ``aggregate()`` clause, a filter has the effect of |
| constraining the objects over which the aggregate is calculated. |
| For example, you can generate the average price of all books with a |
| title that starts with "Django" using the query: |
|
|
| .. code-block:: pycon |
|
|
| >>> Book.objects.filter(name__startswith="Django").aggregate(Avg("price")) |
|
|
| .. _filtering-on-annotations: |
|
|
| Filtering on annotations |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
| Annotated values can also be filtered. The alias for the annotation can be |
| used in ``filter()`` and ``exclude()`` clauses in the same way as any other |
| model field. |
|
|
| For example, to generate a list of books that have more than one author, |
| you can issue the query: |
|
|
| .. code-block:: pycon |
|
|
| >>> Book.objects.annotate(num_authors=Count("authors")).filter(num_authors__gt=1) |
|
|
| This query generates an annotated result set, and then generates a filter |
| based upon that annotation. |
|
|
| If you need two annotations with two separate filters you can use the |
| ``filter`` argument with any aggregate. For example, to generate a list of |
| authors with a count of highly rated books: |
|
|
| .. code-block:: pycon |
|
|
| >>> highly_rated = Count("book", filter=Q(book__rating__gte=7)) |
| >>> Author.objects.annotate(num_books=Count("book"), highly_rated_books=highly_rated) |
|
|
| Each ``Author`` in the result set will have the ``num_books`` and |
| ``highly_rated_books`` attributes. See also :ref:`conditional-aggregation`. |
|
|
| .. admonition:: Choosing between ``filter`` and ``QuerySet.filter()`` |
|
|
| Avoid using the ``filter`` argument with a single annotation or |
| aggregation. It's more efficient to use ``QuerySet.filter()`` to exclude |
| rows. The aggregation ``filter`` argument is only useful when using two or |
| more aggregations over the same relations with different conditionals. |
|
|
| Order of ``annotate()`` and ``filter()`` clauses |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
| When developing a complex query that involves both ``annotate()`` and |
| ``filter()`` clauses, pay particular attention to the order in which the |
| clauses are applied to the ``QuerySet``. |
|
|
| When an ``annotate()`` clause is applied to a query, the annotation is computed |
| over the state of the query up to the point where the annotation is requested. |
| The practical implication of this is that ``filter()`` and ``annotate()`` are |
| not commutative operations. |
|
|
| Given: |
|
|
| * Publisher A has two books with ratings 4 and 5. |
| * Publisher B has two books with ratings 1 and 4. |
| * Publisher C has one book with rating 1. |
|
|
| Here's an example with the ``Count`` aggregate: |
|
|
| .. code-block:: pycon |
|
|
| >>> a, b = Publisher.objects.annotate(num_books=Count("book", distinct=True)).filter( |
| ... book__rating__gt=3.0 |
| ... ) |
| >>> a, a.num_books |
| (<Publisher: A>, 2) |
| >>> b, b.num_books |
| (<Publisher: B>, 2) |
|
|
| >>> a, b = Publisher.objects.filter(book__rating__gt=3.0).annotate(num_books=Count("book")) |
| >>> a, a.num_books |
| (<Publisher: A>, 2) |
| >>> b, b.num_books |
| (<Publisher: B>, 1) |
|
|
| Both queries return a list of publishers that have at least one book with a |
| rating exceeding 3.0, hence publisher C is excluded. |
|
|
| In the first query, the annotation precedes the filter, so the filter has no |
| effect on the annotation. ``distinct=True`` is required to avoid a :ref:`query |
| bug <combining-multiple-aggregations>`. |
|
|
| The second query counts the number of books that have a rating exceeding 3.0 |
| for each publisher. The filter precedes the annotation, so the filter |
| constrains the objects considered when calculating the annotation. |
|
|
| Here's another example with the ``Avg`` aggregate: |
|
|
| .. code-block:: pycon |
|
|
| >>> a, b = Publisher.objects.annotate(avg_rating=Avg("book__rating")).filter( |
| ... book__rating__gt=3.0 |
| ... ) |
| >>> a, a.avg_rating |
| (<Publisher: A>, 4.5) # (5+4)/2 |
| >>> b, b.avg_rating |
| (<Publisher: B>, 2.5) # (1+4)/2 |
|
|
| >>> a, b = Publisher.objects.filter(book__rating__gt=3.0).annotate( |
| ... avg_rating=Avg("book__rating") |
| ... ) |
| >>> a, a.avg_rating |
| (<Publisher: A>, 4.5) # (5+4)/2 |
| >>> b, b.avg_rating |
| (<Publisher: B>, 4.0) # 4/1 (book with rating 1 excluded) |
|
|
| The first query asks for the average rating of all a publisher's books for |
| publisher's that have at least one book with a rating exceeding 3.0. The second |
| query asks for the average of a publisher's book's ratings for only those |
| ratings exceeding 3.0. |
|
|
| It's difficult to intuit how the ORM will translate complex querysets into SQL |
| queries so when in doubt, inspect the SQL with ``str(queryset.query)`` and |
| write plenty of tests. |
|
|
| ``order_by()`` |
| -------------- |
|
|
| Annotations can be used as a basis for ordering. When you |
| define an ``order_by()`` clause, the aggregates you provide can reference |
| any alias defined as part of an ``annotate()`` clause in the query. |
|
|
| For example, to order a ``QuerySet`` of books by the number of authors |
| that have contributed to the book, you could use the following query: |
|
|
| .. code-block:: pycon |
|
|
| >>> Book.objects.annotate(num_authors=Count("authors")).order_by("num_authors") |
|
|
| ``values()`` |
| ------------ |
|
|
| Ordinarily, annotations are generated on a per-object basis - an annotated |
| ``QuerySet`` will return one result for each object in the original |
| ``QuerySet``. However, when a ``values()`` clause is used to constrain the |
| columns that are returned in the result set, the method for evaluating |
| annotations is slightly different. Instead of returning an annotated result |
| for each result in the original ``QuerySet``, the original results are |
| grouped according to the unique combinations of the fields specified in the |
| ``values()`` clause. An annotation is then provided for each unique group; |
| the annotation is computed over all members of the group. |
|
|
| For example, consider an author query that attempts to find out the average |
| rating of books written by each author: |
|
|
| >>> Author.objects.annotate(average_rating=Avg('book__rating')) |
|
|
| This will return one result for each author in the database, annotated with |
| their average book rating. |
|
|
| However, the result will be slightly different if you use a ``values()`` clause: |
|
|
| .. code-block:: pycon |
|
|
| >>> Author.objects.values("name").annotate(average_rating=Avg("book__rating")) |
|
|
| In this example, the authors will be grouped by name, so you will only get |
| an annotated result for each *unique* author name. This means if you have |
| two authors with the same name, their results will be merged into a single |
| result in the output of the query; the average will be computed as the |
| average over the books written by both authors. |
|
|
| Order of ``annotate()`` and ``values()`` clauses |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
| As with the ``filter()`` clause, the order in which ``annotate()`` and |
| ``values()`` clauses are applied to a query is significant. If the |
| ``values()`` clause precedes the ``annotate()``, the annotation will be |
| computed using the grouping described by the ``values()`` clause. |
|
|
| However, if the ``annotate()`` clause precedes the ``values()`` clause, |
| the annotations will be generated over the entire query set. In this case, |
| the ``values()`` clause only constrains the fields that are generated on |
| output. |
|
|
| For example, if we reverse the order of the ``values()`` and ``annotate()`` |
| clause from our previous example: |
|
|
| .. code-block:: pycon |
|
|
| >>> Author.objects.annotate(average_rating=Avg("book__rating")).values( |
| ... "name", "average_rating" |
| ... ) |
|
|
| This will now yield one unique result for each author; however, only |
| the author's name and the ``average_rating`` annotation will be returned |
| in the output data. |
|
|
| You should also note that ``average_rating`` has been explicitly included |
| in the list of values to be returned. This is required because of the |
| ordering of the ``values()`` and ``annotate()`` clause. |
|
|
| If the ``values()`` clause precedes the ``annotate()`` clause, any annotations |
| will be automatically added to the result set. However, if the ``values()`` |
| clause is applied after the ``annotate()`` clause, you need to explicitly |
| include the aggregate column. |
|
|
| .. _aggregation-ordering-interaction: |
|
|
| Interaction with ``order_by()`` |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
| Fields that are mentioned in the ``order_by()`` part of a queryset are used |
| when selecting the output data, even if they are not otherwise specified in the |
| ``values()`` call. These extra fields are used to group "like" results together |
| and they can make otherwise identical result rows appear to be separate. This |
| shows up, particularly, when counting things. |
|
|
| By way of example, suppose you have a model like this:: |
|
|
| from django.db import models |
|
|
|
|
| class Item(models.Model): |
| name = models.CharField(max_length=10) |
| data = models.IntegerField() |
|
|
| If you want to count how many times each distinct ``data`` value appears in an |
| ordered queryset, you might try this:: |
|
|
| items = Item.objects.order_by("name") |
| # Warning: not quite correct! |
| items.values("data").annotate(Count("id")) |
|
|
| ...which will group the ``Item`` objects by their common ``data`` values and |
| then count the number of ``id`` values in each group. Except that it won't |
| quite work. The ordering by ``name`` will also play a part in the grouping, so |
| this query will group by distinct ``(data, name)`` pairs, which isn't what you |
| want. Instead, you should construct this queryset:: |
|
|
| items.values("data").annotate(Count("id")).order_by() |
|
|
| ...clearing any ordering in the query. You could also order by, say, ``data`` |
| without any harmful effects, since that is already playing a role in the |
| query. |
|
|
| This behavior is the same as that noted in the queryset documentation for |
| :meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.distinct` and the general rule is the |
| same: normally you won't want extra columns playing a part in the result, so |
| clear out the ordering, or at least make sure it's restricted only to those |
| fields you also select in a ``values()`` call. |
|
|
| .. note:: |
| You might reasonably ask why Django doesn't remove the extraneous columns |
| for you. The main reason is consistency with ``distinct()`` and other |
| places: Django **never** removes ordering constraints that you have |
| specified (and we can't change those other methods' behavior, as that |
| would violate our :doc:`/misc/api-stability` policy). |
|
|
| Aggregating annotations |
| ----------------------- |
|
|
| You can also generate an aggregate on the result of an annotation. When you |
| define an ``aggregate()`` clause, the aggregates you provide can reference |
| any alias defined as part of an ``annotate()`` clause in the query. |
|
|
| For example, if you wanted to calculate the average number of authors per |
| book you first annotate the set of books with the author count, then |
| aggregate that author count, referencing the annotation field: |
|
|
| .. code-block:: pycon |
|
|
| >>> from django.db.models import Avg, Count |
| >>> Book.objects.annotate(num_authors=Count("authors")).aggregate(Avg("num_authors")) |
| {'num_authors__avg': 1.66} |
|
|