| | Application Dispatching |
| | ======================= |
| |
|
| | Application dispatching is the process of combining multiple Flask |
| | applications on the WSGI level. You can combine not only Flask |
| | applications but any WSGI application. This would allow you to run a |
| | Django and a Flask application in the same interpreter side by side if |
| | you want. The usefulness of this depends on how the applications work |
| | internally. |
| |
|
| | The fundamental difference from :doc:`packages` is that in this case you |
| | are running the same or different Flask applications that are entirely |
| | isolated from each other. They run different configurations and are |
| | dispatched on the WSGI level. |
| |
|
| |
|
| | Working with this Document |
| | |
| |
|
| | Each of the techniques and examples below results in an ``application`` |
| | object that can be run with any WSGI server. For production, see |
| | :doc:`/deploying/index`. For development, Werkzeug provides a server |
| | through :func:`werkzeug.serving.run_simple`:: |
| |
|
| | from werkzeug.serving import run_simple |
| | run_simple('localhost', 5000, application, use_reloader=True) |
| |
|
| | Note that :func:`run_simple <werkzeug.serving.run_simple>` is not intended for |
| | use in production. Use a production WSGI server. See :doc:`/deploying/index`. |
| |
|
| | In order to use the interactive debugger, debugging must be enabled both on |
| | the application and the simple server. Here is the "hello world" example with |
| | debugging and :func:`run_simple <werkzeug.serving.run_simple>`:: |
| |
|
| | from flask import Flask |
| | from werkzeug.serving import run_simple |
| |
|
| | app = Flask(__name__) |
| | app.debug = True |
| |
|
| | @app.route('/') |
| | def hello_world(): |
| | return 'Hello World!' |
| |
|
| | if __name__ == '__main__': |
| | run_simple('localhost', 5000, app, |
| | use_reloader=True, use_debugger=True, use_evalex=True) |
| |
|
| |
|
| | Combining Applications |
| | |
| |
|
| | If you have entirely separated applications and you want them to work next |
| | to each other in the same Python interpreter process you can take |
| | advantage of the :class:`werkzeug.wsgi.DispatcherMiddleware`. The idea |
| | here is that each Flask application is a valid WSGI application and they |
| | are combined by the dispatcher middleware into a larger one that is |
| | dispatched based on prefix. |
| |
|
| | For example you could have your main application run on ``/`` and your |
| | backend interface on ``/backend``:: |
| |
|
| | from werkzeug.middleware.dispatcher import DispatcherMiddleware |
| | from frontend_app import application as frontend |
| | from backend_app import application as backend |
| |
|
| | application = DispatcherMiddleware(frontend, { |
| | '/backend': backend |
| | }) |
| |
|
| |
|
| | Dispatch by Subdomain |
| | |
| |
|
| | Sometimes you might want to use multiple instances of the same application |
| | with different configurations. Assuming the application is created inside |
| | a function and you can call that function to instantiate it, that is |
| | really easy to implement. In order to develop your application to support |
| | creating new instances in functions have a look at the |
| | :doc:`appfactories` pattern. |
| |
|
| | A very common example would be creating applications per subdomain. For |
| | instance you configure your webserver to dispatch all requests for all |
| | subdomains to your application and you then use the subdomain information |
| | to create user-specific instances. Once you have your server set up to |
| | listen on all subdomains you can use a very simple WSGI application to do |
| | the dynamic application creation. |
| |
|
| | The perfect level for abstraction in that regard is the WSGI layer. You |
| | write your own WSGI application that looks at the request that comes and |
| | delegates it to your Flask application. If that application does not |
| | exist yet, it is dynamically created and remembered:: |
| |
|
| | from threading import Lock |
| |
|
| | class SubdomainDispatcher(object): |
| |
|
| | def __init__(self, domain, create_app): |
| | self.domain = domain |
| | self.create_app = create_app |
| | self.lock = Lock() |
| | self.instances = {} |
| |
|
| | def get_application(self, host): |
| | host = host.split(':')[0] |
| | assert host.endswith(self.domain), 'Configuration error' |
| | subdomain = host[:-len(self.domain)].rstrip('.') |
| | with self.lock: |
| | app = self.instances.get(subdomain) |
| | if app is None: |
| | app = self.create_app(subdomain) |
| | self.instances[subdomain] = app |
| | return app |
| |
|
| | def __call__(self, environ, start_response): |
| | app = self.get_application(environ['HTTP_HOST']) |
| | return app(environ, start_response) |
| |
|
| |
|
| | This dispatcher can then be used like this:: |
| |
|
| | from myapplication import create_app, get_user_for_subdomain |
| | from werkzeug.exceptions import NotFound |
| |
|
| | def make_app(subdomain): |
| | user = get_user_for_subdomain(subdomain) |
| | if user is None: |
| | # if there is no user for that subdomain we still have |
| | # to return a WSGI application that handles that request. |
| | # We can then just return the NotFound() exception as |
| | # application which will render a default 404 page. |
| | # You might also redirect the user to the main page then |
| | return NotFound() |
| |
|
| | # otherwise create the application for the specific user |
| | return create_app(user) |
| |
|
| | application = SubdomainDispatcher('example.com', make_app) |
| |
|
| |
|
| | Dispatch by Path |
| | |
| |
|
| | Dispatching by a path on the URL is very similar. Instead of looking at |
| | the ``Host`` header to figure out the subdomain one simply looks at the |
| | request path up to the first slash:: |
| |
|
| | from threading import Lock |
| | from werkzeug.wsgi import pop_path_info, peek_path_info |
| |
|
| | class PathDispatcher(object): |
| |
|
| | def __init__(self, default_app, create_app): |
| | self.default_app = default_app |
| | self.create_app = create_app |
| | self.lock = Lock() |
| | self.instances = {} |
| |
|
| | def get_application(self, prefix): |
| | with self.lock: |
| | app = self.instances.get(prefix) |
| | if app is None: |
| | app = self.create_app(prefix) |
| | if app is not None: |
| | self.instances[prefix] = app |
| | return app |
| |
|
| | def __call__(self, environ, start_response): |
| | app = self.get_application(peek_path_info(environ)) |
| | if app is not None: |
| | pop_path_info(environ) |
| | else: |
| | app = self.default_app |
| | return app(environ, start_response) |
| |
|
| | The big difference between this and the subdomain one is that this one |
| | falls back to another application if the creator function returns ``None``:: |
| |
|
| | from myapplication import create_app, default_app, get_user_for_prefix |
| |
|
| | def make_app(prefix): |
| | user = get_user_for_prefix(prefix) |
| | if user is not None: |
| | return create_app(user) |
| |
|
| | application = PathDispatcher(default_app, make_app) |
| |
|