Datasets:
File size: 26,275 Bytes
4cb3b34 fe7bebc 4cb3b34 fe7bebc b52efb4 fe7bebc b52efb4 fe7bebc be0507f fe7bebc 1b32d00 fe7bebc b52efb4 fe7bebc b52efb4 fe7bebc be0507f fe7bebc b52efb4 fe7bebc be0507f fe7bebc b52efb4 be0507f fe7bebc be0507f fe7bebc be0507f fe7bebc b52efb4 fe7bebc be0507f fe7bebc b52efb4 fe7bebc b52efb4 fe7bebc b52efb4 fe7bebc be0507f fe7bebc be0507f fe7bebc be0507f fe7bebc be0507f fe7bebc be0507f fe7bebc be0507f fe7bebc be0507f fe7bebc be0507f fe7bebc b52efb4 fe7bebc b52efb4 fe7bebc b52efb4 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 | ---
pretty_name: Stochastic Depth Thesis Benchmark Datasets
license: other
task_categories:
- image-classification
tags:
- computer-vision
- image-classification
- benchmark
- resnet
- stochastic-depth
- reproducibility
- pytorch
- imagefolder
- academic
size_categories:
- 100K<n<1M
---
<div align="center">
# Stochastic Depth Thesis Benchmark Datasets
### Five reproducibly prepared image-classification benchmarks for controlled ResNet and stochastic-depth experiments
[](https://huggingface.co/datasets/hermanhugging/thesis_stochastic_depth)
[](https://pytorch.org/)
[](#dataset-overview)
[](#licensing)
**Prepared for the bachelor thesis
_A Study of “Stochastic Depth” for Regularizing Residual Convolutional Neural Networks_**
</div>
---
## Dataset summary
This repository contains the exact dataset variants used to compare a baseline ResNet with batch-level and sample-level stochastic-depth implementations. It is a **collection of five independent classification benchmarks**, not one merged label space.
The preparation pipeline was designed for reproducibility:
- all generated splits use a dedicated split seed of `42`;
- the split seed is independent of model-training seeds;
- unreadable files are recorded;
- exact duplicates are detected deterministically;
- duplicate handling is documented separately for every dataset;
- large images are converted to a common RGB `224 Г— 224` representation;
- training, validation, and test membership is recorded in machine-readable manifests;
- dataset-specific RGB normalization statistics are estimated only from each final training split and stored in `normalization.json`;
- validation and test images are never used to estimate normalization parameters;
- the test split is kept separate from checkpoint selection.
The source code used to prepare and load the datasets is available in the accompanying project repository:
> **Code:** https://github.com/gerageragera39/A-Study-of-Stochastic-Depth-for-Regularizing-Residual-Convolutional-Neural-Networks
## Published thesis results
In addition to the prepared datasets, this repository contains the experimental artifacts reported in the thesis under [`results/`](./results/).
All final main experiments used one NVIDIA A40 GPU per SLURM task, batch size 256, 300 epochs, `pL = 0.5`, and training seeds `20917`, `723421`, and `901344`. Each dataset includes four conditions: `no_sd`, `sd_per_batch`, `sd_per_sample`, and `dropout`.
| Dataset | Architecture | Precision |
|---|---|---|
| CIFAR-100 | CIFAR-style full pre-activation ResNet-110 | FP32 |
| Caltech-256 | full pre-activation ResNet-101 | BF16 CUDA autocast without gradient scaling |
| Google Scraped Image Dataset | full pre-activation ResNet-101 | BF16 CUDA autocast without gradient scaling |
| Oxford Flowers-102 | full pre-activation ResNet-101 | FP32 |
| Stanford Dogs | full pre-activation ResNet-101 | FP32 |
The separate CIFAR-100 bias–variance analysis is stored under [`results/bias_variance/cifar100/resnet110/batch_256/fp32/pL_0.5/`](./results/bias_variance/cifar100/resnet110/batch_256/fp32/pL_0.5/). It uses the 45,000/5,000 training/validation split, excludes the official test set from the diagnostic analysis, and compares `no_sd` with `sd_per_sample` over seeds `111111`, `129143`, `222222`, `363801`, and `548357`.
## Dataset overview
| Dataset ID | Benchmark | Classes | Experimental split | Stored resolution | Main preparation rule |
|---|---:|---:|---|---:|---|
| `cifar100` | CIFAR-100 | 100 | 45,000 train / 5,000 validation / 10,000 official test | `32 Г— 32` | Official test preserved; exact-image anomalies are diagnostic only |
| `caltech256` | Caltech-256 | 256 | 20,839 train / 4,510 validation / 4,414 test | `224 Г— 224` RGB | Clutter excluded; exact duplicates handled before splitting |
| `google4` | Google Scraped Image Dataset | 4 | 27,298 train / 3,413 validation / 3,412 test | `224 Г— 224` RGB | Source train/test folders merged; class aliases normalized |
| `oxford102` | Oxford Flowers-102 | 102 | 6,551 train / 818 validation / 819 test | `224 Г— 224` RGB | Cross-split exact duplicates removed without random resplitting |
| `stanford120` | Stanford Dogs | 120 | 10,802 train / 1,198 validation / 8,580 official test | `224 Г— 224` RGB | Official metadata required; test membership is preserved |
The final counts above are also stored in each dataset's `split_summary.csv` and `split_config.json`. These generated files are the authoritative source for the published release.
## Important distinction: preprocessing vs. augmentation
The images stored in this repository contain only **deterministic offline preprocessing**. Random augmentation is **not baked into the files**.
### Deterministic offline preprocessing
For Caltech-256, Google-4, Oxford Flowers-102, and Stanford Dogs:
1. verify that the image can be decoded;
2. convert it to RGB;
3. resize with bilinear interpolation so that the shorter side becomes 224 pixels;
4. take a centered `224 Г— 224` crop;
5. preserve already compatible RGB `224 Г— 224` files without unnecessary re-encoding.
### Dataset-specific normalization and online augmentation
The thesis models for the four `224 Г— 224` datasets are trained from randomly initialized weights. No ImageNet-pretrained parameters are used, and ImageNet normalization constants are not part of the final protocol.
Instead, each higher-resolution dataset has its own `normalization.json`. The channel-wise mean and population standard deviation were calculated from the **final prepared training split only**, after deterministic RGB conversion, resizing, and center cropping, but before random augmentation. Validation and test images were not used to estimate these values.
For each RGB channel, normalization is applied as:
```text
normalized_channel = (channel - mean) / std
```
The published values are:
| Dataset ID | Training images used | Mean `(R, G, B)` | Population std `(R, G, B)` |
|---|---:|---|---|
| `caltech256` | 20,839 | `(0.549342, 0.527082, 0.498657)` | `(0.312259, 0.308552, 0.321477)` |
| `google4` | 27,298 | `(0.493377, 0.434710, 0.377280)` | `(0.279901, 0.274272, 0.289370)` |
| `oxford102` | 6,551 | `(0.475326, 0.393880, 0.307287)` | `(0.297811, 0.246210, 0.276400)` |
| `stanford120` | 10,802 | `(0.479285, 0.450474, 0.391284)` | `(0.259824, 0.253940, 0.257219)` |
The table rounds values to six decimal places for readability. The corresponding `normalization.json` files retain full numerical precision and should be treated as the authoritative values used by the data loaders.
The training code applies random augmentation before tensor conversion and normalization. Validation and test use the same training-derived normalization constants but no random augmentation:
```python
import json
from pathlib import Path
from torchvision import transforms
def load_normalization(path: str | Path) -> tuple[list[float], list[float]]:
data = json.loads(Path(path).read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
mean = data["mean"]
std = data["std"]
if len(mean) != 3 or len(std) != 3:
raise ValueError(f"Expected three-channel statistics in {path}")
if any(value <= 0 for value in std):
raise ValueError(f"Standard deviations must be positive in {path}")
return mean, std
def make_224_transforms(
normalization_path: str | Path,
) -> tuple[transforms.Compose, transforms.Compose]:
mean, std = load_normalization(normalization_path)
train_transform = transforms.Compose([
transforms.RandomRotation(15),
transforms.RandomHorizontalFlip(),
transforms.ColorJitter(
brightness=0.2,
contrast=0.2,
saturation=0.2,
hue=0.1,
),
transforms.ToTensor(),
transforms.Normalize(mean=mean, std=std),
])
eval_transform = transforms.Compose([
transforms.ToTensor(),
transforms.Normalize(mean=mean, std=std),
])
return train_transform, eval_transform
```
CIFAR-100 uses a separate `32 Г— 32` pipeline and its established CIFAR-100 channel statistics:
```python
from torchvision import transforms
train_transform_cifar = transforms.Compose([
transforms.RandomCrop(32, padding=4),
transforms.RandomHorizontalFlip(),
transforms.ToTensor(),
transforms.Normalize(
mean=(0.5071, 0.4867, 0.4408),
std=(0.2675, 0.2565, 0.2761),
),
])
eval_transform_cifar = transforms.Compose([
transforms.ToTensor(),
transforms.Normalize(
mean=(0.5071, 0.4867, 0.4408),
std=(0.2675, 0.2565, 0.2761),
),
])
```
Validation and test images receive no random augmentation. Within a dataset, the same normalization file is used for the baseline ResNet and every regularized model variant.
## Split and duplicate policies
### CIFAR-100
The official 50,000-image training set is divided deterministically into 45,000 training images and 5,000 validation images, with 450 training and 50 validation images per class. The official 10,000-image test set is preserved unchanged.
Exact pixel-array duplicates and label conflicts are reported for diagnostics, but they are not used to remove, relabel, or move official CIFAR-100 samples.
### Caltech-256
The `257.clutter` directory is excluded, leaving 256 object categories. Unreadable files are recorded before splitting.
For a same-label SHA-256 duplicate group, one deterministic representative is retained. If the same exact file hash appears under different class labels, every member of that conflicting group is excluded. The cleaned data are then divided using a class-stratified `70 / 15 / 15` split.
### Google-4
The labelled source folders originally named `train` and `test` are merged before creating the experimental split. Directory-name variants and misspellings are normalized to four canonical classes:
- `architecture`
- `art and culture`
- `food`
- `travel and adventure`
Unlabelled demonstration images are excluded from quantitative evaluation. Exact duplicate handling follows the same pre-split policy as Caltech-256. The cleaned collection is divided using a class-stratified `80 / 10 / 10` split.
### Oxford Flowers-102
The source package's train, validation, and test membership is preserved; no random resplitting is performed.
When a same-label exact duplicate occurs in more than one split, the retained split is selected according to:
```text
test > validation > training
```
Copies in lower-priority splits are excluded, and no image is moved between splits. Cross-label exact duplicates are treated as blocking conflicts requiring manual review.
### Stanford Dogs
The official Stanford Dogs metadata is required. The official 12,000-image training set is divided approximately `90 / 10` into training and validation subsets. The official 8,580-image test set is preserved.
Exact-hash groups from the official training data are kept within one generated split. Anomalies involving official benchmark membership are reported diagnostically rather than used to silently modify the benchmark.
## Reproducibility metadata
Each prepared dataset is accompanied by machine-readable metadata. Depending on the dataset-specific policy, the repository may contain:
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
| `split_manifest.csv` | One row per retained sample, including class, split, source path, processed path, and SHA-256 hashes |
| `split_summary.csv` | Per-class sample counts for each split |
| `class_to_idx.json` | Deterministic mapping from class names to integer labels |
| `split_config.json` | Split policy, seed, image-preparation settings, counts, warnings, and dataset-specific decisions |
| `normalization.json` | Training-split RGB mean and population standard deviation used by the `224 Г— 224` data loader |
| `corrupt_images.json` | Source files that could not be decoded |
| `duplicates.json` | Detected same-label exact-duplicate groups |
| `label_conflicts.json` | Exact hashes observed under more than one label |
| `excluded_same_label_duplicates.csv` | Same-label copies removed before splitting where applicable |
| `excluded_cross_split_duplicates.csv` | Oxford copies removed to prevent split leakage |
| `excluded_conflicts.csv` | Files excluded because of cross-label exact conflicts |
| `train_indices.npy` / `val_indices.npy` | Deterministic CIFAR-100 split indices |
An “exact duplicate” in the folder-based datasets means an identical SHA-256 hash of the source file. This method does not detect perceptually similar images that were recompressed, resized, cropped, rotated, or otherwise modified.
## Repository layout
The preparation code produces the following logical layout:
```text
data/
в”њв”Ђв”Ђ processed/
в”‚ в”њв”Ђв”Ђ cifar100/
в”‚ в”‚ в””в”Ђв”Ђ cifar-100-python/
в”‚ в”њв”Ђв”Ђ caltech256/
в”‚ в”‚ в”њв”Ђв”Ђ train/<class>/*
в”‚ в”‚ в”њв”Ђв”Ђ val/<class>/*
в”‚ в”‚ в””в”Ђв”Ђ test/<class>/*
в”‚ в”њв”Ђв”Ђ google4/
в”‚ в”‚ в”њв”Ђв”Ђ train/<class>/*
в”‚ в”‚ в”њв”Ђв”Ђ val/<class>/*
в”‚ в”‚ в””в”Ђв”Ђ test/<class>/*
в”‚ в”њв”Ђв”Ђ oxford102/
в”‚ в”‚ в”њв”Ђв”Ђ train/<class>/*
в”‚ в”‚ в”њв”Ђв”Ђ val/<class>/*
в”‚ в”‚ в””в”Ђв”Ђ test/<class>/*
в”‚ в””в”Ђв”Ђ stanford120/
в”‚ в”њв”Ђв”Ђ train/<class>/*
в”‚ в”њв”Ђв”Ђ val/<class>/*
в”‚ в””в”Ђв”Ђ test/<class>/*
в””в”Ђв”Ђ splits/
в”њв”Ђв”Ђ cifar100/
в”‚ в”њв”Ђв”Ђ train_indices.npy
в”‚ в””в”Ђв”Ђ val_indices.npy
в”њв”Ђв”Ђ caltech256/
в”‚ в””в”Ђв”Ђ normalization.json
в”њв”Ђв”Ђ google4/
в”‚ в””в”Ђв”Ђ normalization.json
в”њв”Ђв”Ђ oxford102/
в”‚ в””в”Ђв”Ђ normalization.json
в””в”Ђв”Ђ stanford120/
в””в”Ђв”Ђ normalization.json
```
If the Hub upload uses a flatter directory structure, the dataset identifiers and metadata filenames remain the same.
## Download
Install the required client:
```bash
pip install -U huggingface_hub
```
Download the complete repository:
```python
from huggingface_hub import snapshot_download
local_path = snapshot_download(
repo_id="hermanhugging/thesis_stochastic_depth",
repo_type="dataset",
)
print(local_path)
```
Download only one subset and its metadata:
```python
from huggingface_hub import snapshot_download
local_path = snapshot_download(
repo_id="hermanhugging/thesis_stochastic_depth",
repo_type="dataset",
allow_patterns=[
"data/processed/caltech256/**",
"data/splits/caltech256/**",
"caltech256/**",
"splits/caltech256/**",
],
)
print(local_path)
```
## Loading the higher-resolution datasets with PyTorch
The four higher-resolution datasets use an `ImageFolder`-compatible split layout. Each dataset must be loaded with its own published `normalization.json`.
```python
import json
from pathlib import Path
from huggingface_hub import snapshot_download
from torchvision import transforms
from torchvision.datasets import ImageFolder
repo_dir = Path(
snapshot_download(
repo_id="hermanhugging/thesis_stochastic_depth",
repo_type="dataset",
)
)
def first_existing(*paths: Path) -> Path:
for path in paths:
if path.exists():
return path
raise FileNotFoundError(
"None of the expected paths exists: "
+ ", ".join(str(path) for path in paths)
)
def find_dataset_root(repo: Path, dataset_id: str) -> Path:
return first_existing(
repo / "data" / "processed" / dataset_id,
repo / "processed" / dataset_id,
repo / dataset_id,
)
def find_split_root(repo: Path, dataset_id: str) -> Path:
return first_existing(
repo / "data" / "splits" / dataset_id,
repo / "splits" / dataset_id,
repo / dataset_id / "metadata",
repo / dataset_id,
)
def load_normalization(path: Path) -> tuple[list[float], list[float]]:
data = json.loads(path.read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
mean = data["mean"]
std = data["std"]
if len(mean) != 3 or len(std) != 3:
raise ValueError(f"Expected RGB statistics in {path}")
if any(value <= 0 for value in std):
raise ValueError(f"Invalid standard deviation in {path}: {std}")
return mean, std
def make_transforms(
normalization_path: Path,
) -> tuple[transforms.Compose, transforms.Compose]:
mean, std = load_normalization(normalization_path)
train_transform = transforms.Compose([
transforms.RandomRotation(15),
transforms.RandomHorizontalFlip(),
transforms.ColorJitter(
brightness=0.2,
contrast=0.2,
saturation=0.2,
hue=0.1,
),
transforms.ToTensor(),
transforms.Normalize(mean=mean, std=std),
])
eval_transform = transforms.Compose([
transforms.ToTensor(),
transforms.Normalize(mean=mean, std=std),
])
return train_transform, eval_transform
dataset_id = "caltech256" # google4, oxford102, or stanford120
root = find_dataset_root(repo_dir, dataset_id)
split_root = find_split_root(repo_dir, dataset_id)
train_transform, eval_transform = make_transforms(
split_root / "normalization.json"
)
train_dataset = ImageFolder(root / "train", transform=train_transform)
val_dataset = ImageFolder(root / "val", transform=eval_transform)
test_dataset = ImageFolder(root / "test", transform=eval_transform)
print(len(train_dataset), len(val_dataset), len(test_dataset))
print(train_dataset.class_to_idx)
```
Replace `caltech256` with `google4`, `oxford102`, or `stanford120`. Do not reuse one dataset's normalization file for another dataset.
## Loading CIFAR-100 with the prepared indices
CIFAR-100 remains compatible with the official Python pickle format. The repository adds deterministic training and validation index arrays.
```python
from pathlib import Path
import numpy as np
from huggingface_hub import snapshot_download
from torch.utils.data import Subset
from torchvision.datasets import CIFAR100
repo_dir = Path(
snapshot_download(
repo_id="hermanhugging/thesis_stochastic_depth",
repo_type="dataset",
)
)
def first_existing(*paths: Path) -> Path:
for path in paths:
if path.exists():
return path
raise FileNotFoundError(
"None of the expected paths exists: "
+ ", ".join(str(path) for path in paths)
)
cifar_root = first_existing(
repo_dir / "data" / "processed" / "cifar100",
repo_dir / "processed" / "cifar100",
repo_dir / "cifar100",
)
split_root = first_existing(
repo_dir / "data" / "splits" / "cifar100",
repo_dir / "splits" / "cifar100",
)
official_train_for_training = CIFAR100(
root=str(cifar_root),
train=True,
transform=train_transform_cifar,
download=False,
)
official_train_for_validation = CIFAR100(
root=str(cifar_root),
train=True,
transform=eval_transform_cifar,
download=False,
)
official_test = CIFAR100(
root=str(cifar_root),
train=False,
transform=eval_transform_cifar,
download=False,
)
train_indices = np.load(split_root / "train_indices.npy")
val_indices = np.load(split_root / "val_indices.npy")
train_dataset = Subset(official_train_for_training, train_indices)
val_dataset = Subset(official_train_for_validation, val_indices)
test_dataset = official_test
print(len(train_dataset), len(val_dataset), len(test_dataset))
```
Separate CIFAR-100 dataset objects are intentionally used for training and validation so that validation samples do not inherit random crop or horizontal-flip transforms.
## Recommended evaluation protocol
For results comparable with the thesis experiments:
1. use the published training split for optimization;
2. use validation accuracy for checkpoint selection;
3. do not tune hyperparameters on the test split;
4. load the checkpoint with the best validation top-1 accuracy;
5. evaluate the test split only after model selection;
6. report the training seed, architecture, batch size, optimizer configuration, and stochastic-depth variant.
## Intended uses
This collection is intended for:
- academic image-classification experiments;
- reproducibility studies;
- controlled comparisons of ResNet regularization methods;
- investigation of batch-level and sample-level stochastic depth;
- teaching and demonstration of deterministic dataset preparation;
- benchmarking under fixed train/validation/test membership.
## Out-of-scope uses
This repository is not designed or validated for:
- biometric identification or surveillance;
- safety-critical or high-stakes decision making;
- claims about human populations or demographic groups;
- commercial deployment without an independent rights review;
- treating accuracy across different datasets as directly comparable without accounting for differences in class count, difficulty, and source distribution.
## Limitations and known risks
- SHA-256 detects byte-identical files, not perceptual near-duplicates.
- Central cropping can remove content near the edge of an original image.
- The higher-resolution datasets have different collection processes and class distributions.
- Web-sourced datasets may contain unknown provenance, copyright restrictions, trademarks, artworks, or identifiable people.
- The Google-4 collection may reflect search-engine and web-publication biases.
- Caltech-256, Oxford Flowers-102, and Stanford Dogs contain class imbalance or fine-grained visual similarity that can affect metric interpretation.
- CIFAR-100 retains the official benchmark even when exact-image anomalies are detected.
- The collection was prepared for a specific thesis protocol and should not be interpreted as a universally optimal preprocessing scheme.
- The published normalization statistics are tied to the final prepared training split of each dataset and must be recomputed if the split membership or deterministic image preprocessing changes.
## Licensing
**Hugging Face metadata for this repository is intentionally set to `license: other`.**
This repository combines several third-party datasets with different or insufficiently explicit licensing information. A single permissive license such as MIT, Apache-2.0, CC0, or CC BY must not be presented as covering all image files.
The original images and source labels remain subject to the terms, restrictions, and rights of their respective sources and copyright holders. The repository's curation does not create new rights over third-party images.
See [`LICENSE.md`](./LICENSE.md) for the repository-wide licensing notice and dataset-specific source information.
For the most conservative distribution model, publish the split manifests, indices, preparation code, and checksums while requiring users to obtain the original image data from the official or cited sources. If image files are redistributed, the uploader is responsible for confirming that redistribution is permitted.
## Source datasets
| Dataset | Primary or used source |
|---|---|
| CIFAR-100 | https://www.cs.toronto.edu/~kriz/cifar.html |
| Caltech-256 | https://data.caltech.edu/records/nyy15-4j048 |
| Google Scraped Image Dataset | https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/duttadebadri/image-classification |
| Oxford Flowers-102 | https://www.robots.ox.ac.uk/~vgg/data/flowers/102/ |
| Oxford package used in the experiments | https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/yousefmohamed20/oxford-102-flower-dataset |
| Stanford Dogs | http://vision.stanford.edu/aditya86/ImageNetDogs/ |
| Stanford Dogs package used in the experiments | https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/jessicali9530/stanford-dogs-dataset |
## Citation
When using this prepared collection, please cite both the thesis and the original dataset relevant to your experiment.
### Thesis
```bibtex
@thesis{dihtenko2026stochasticdepth,
author = {Herman Dihtenko},
title = {A Study of ``Stochastic Depth'' for Regularizing Residual Convolutional Neural Networks},
school = {Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt},
type = {Bachelor's thesis},
year = {2026}
}
```
### CIFAR-100
```bibtex
@techreport{krizhevsky2009learning,
author = {Alex Krizhevsky},
title = {Learning Multiple Layers of Features from Tiny Images},
year = {2009}
}
```
### Caltech-256
```bibtex
@techreport{griffin2007caltech,
author = {Gregory Griffin and Alex Holub and Pietro Perona},
title = {Caltech-256 Object Category Dataset},
institution = {California Institute of Technology},
year = {2007}
}
```
### Oxford Flowers-102
```bibtex
@inproceedings{nilsback2008automated,
author = {Maria-Elena Nilsback and Andrew Zisserman},
title = {Automated Flower Classification over a Large Number of Classes},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the Indian Conference on Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing},
year = {2008}
}
```
### Stanford Dogs
```bibtex
@inproceedings{khosla2011novel,
author = {Aditya Khosla and Nityananda Jayadevaprakash and Bangpeng Yao and Li Fei-Fei},
title = {Novel Dataset for Fine-Grained Image Categorization: Stanford Dogs},
booktitle = {CVPR Workshop on Fine-Grained Visual Categorization},
year = {2011}
}
```
## Maintainer
**Herman Dihtenko**
For questions about split generation, preprocessing, or the thesis experiments, please use the issue tracker in the accompanying GitHub repository. |