Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,24 +1,68 @@
|
|
| 1 |
-
---
|
| 2 |
-
|
| 3 |
-
|
| 4 |
-
|
| 5 |
-
|
| 6 |
-
|
| 7 |
-
|
| 8 |
-
|
| 9 |
-
|
| 10 |
-
|
| 11 |
-
|
| 12 |
-
|
| 13 |
-
|
| 14 |
-
|
| 15 |
-
|
| 16 |
-
|
| 17 |
-
|
| 18 |
-
|
| 19 |
-
|
| 20 |
-
|
| 21 |
-
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
---
|
| 2 |
+
---
|
| 3 |
+
license: cc-by-4.0
|
| 4 |
+
task_categories:
|
| 5 |
+
- tabular-classification
|
| 6 |
+
- risk-assessment
|
| 7 |
+
tags:
|
| 8 |
+
- GRC
|
| 9 |
+
- AI-governance
|
| 10 |
+
- risk-management
|
| 11 |
+
- quantitative-analysis
|
| 12 |
+
- finops
|
| 13 |
+
language:
|
| 14 |
+
- en
|
| 15 |
+
size_categories:
|
| 16 |
+
- n<1K
|
| 17 |
+
---
|
| 18 |
+
|
| 19 |
+
# AI Loss Taxonomy & Financial Impact Framework
|
| 20 |
+
|
| 21 |
+
## Dataset Summary
|
| 22 |
+
|
| 23 |
+
This dataset provides a structured taxonomy of **AI Loss Events**, designed to help organizations quantify the financial impact of Artificial Intelligence failures. Unlike threat lists which focus on *probability*, this taxonomy focuses on *magnitude* (impact), enabling Quantitative Risk Analysis (e.g., FAIR methodology) for AI systems.
|
| 24 |
+
|
| 25 |
+
It categorizes losses across **Compliance, IT/Technical, Operational, and Revenue** domains, providing a clear vocabulary for CFOs, CROs, and CISOs to discuss AI risk.
|
| 26 |
+
|
| 27 |
+
## Author & Attribution
|
| 28 |
+
|
| 29 |
+
This taxonomy was developed and curated by:
|
| 30 |
+
**Prof. Hernan Huwyler, MBC, CPA**
|
| 31 |
+
* Academic Director
|
| 32 |
+
* AI GRC Director
|
| 33 |
+
|
| 34 |
+
*Please attribute Prof. Hernan Huwyler when utilizing this taxonomy for academic or commercial risk frameworks.*
|
| 35 |
+
|
| 36 |
+
## Dataset Structure
|
| 37 |
+
|
| 38 |
+
The dataset contains the following fields:
|
| 39 |
+
|
| 40 |
+
* **Domain:** The business area where the financial loss materializes (e.g., *Compliance*, *Revenue*).
|
| 41 |
+
* **Loss Name:** Standardized terminology for the specific type of financial loss.
|
| 42 |
+
* **Explanation:** Detailed definition of the loss, including direct and indirect costs.
|
| 43 |
+
* **Source:** Attribution field.
|
| 44 |
+
|
| 45 |
+
## Use Cases
|
| 46 |
+
|
| 47 |
+
### 1. Quantitative Risk Analysis (FAIR)
|
| 48 |
+
Use this dataset to define the **Loss Magnitude** side of your risk equation.
|
| 49 |
+
* *Scenario:* An AI model exhibits bias (Threat).
|
| 50 |
+
* *Loss Calculation:* Use "Regulatory Fines" + "Reputation Damage" + "Algorithm Remediation" from this dataset to calculate the Total Loss Exposure (TLE).
|
| 51 |
+
|
| 52 |
+
### 2. AI ROI & Cost-Benefit Analysis
|
| 53 |
+
When calculating the Return on Investment for AI, use the "Operational" and "IT/Technical" loss categories to estimate potential "Development Waste" and "Infrastructure Overruns" to calculate a risk-adjusted ROI.
|
| 54 |
+
|
| 55 |
+
### 3. Insurance & Liability
|
| 56 |
+
This taxonomy assists insurance actuaries and corporate risk managers in defining coverage limits for AI liability policies by identifying specific cost drivers like "Legal Response" vs "Data Regeneration."
|
| 57 |
+
|
| 58 |
+
## Example Data
|
| 59 |
+
|
| 60 |
+
| Domain | Loss Name | Explanation |
|
| 61 |
+
|---|---|---|
|
| 62 |
+
| **Compliance** | Regulatory Fines | Penalties for violating AI regulations like EU AI Act or privacy laws. |
|
| 63 |
+
| **IT/Technical** | Algorithm Remediation | Engineering costs to retrain models that produce biased or inaccurate predictions. |
|
| 64 |
+
| **Revenue** | Customer Churn | Lost revenue from customers leaving after negative AI experiences. |
|
| 65 |
+
|
| 66 |
+
## Citation
|
| 67 |
+
If you use this dataset in research or tooling, please cite:
|
| 68 |
+
> Huwyler, H. (2025). AI Loss Taxonomy. Hugging Face Datasets.
|