--- license: cc-by-4.0 language: - ar - fr task_categories: - question-answering - text-retrieval tags: - legal - algerian-law - arabic - french - benchmark - jurisdictional-faithfulness - hallucination-detection - information-retrieval pretty_name: AlgerianLegalBench size_categories: - n<1K configs: - config_name: default data_files: - split: test path: data/test.jsonl - split: dev path: data/dev.jsonl --- # AlgerianLegalBench ## Dataset Description AlgerianLegalBench is the first evaluation benchmark specifically designed for legal information retrieval systems operating on Algerian law. It addresses three challenges absent from existing benchmarks: 1. **Jurisdictional infection** — models trained on French, Egyptian, US, or Tunisian legal corpora import foreign legal rules into Algerian answers 2. **The linguistic trinity** — questions in Modern Standard Arabic (232), Legal French (12), and Algerian Darja 3. **Temporal legal drift** — amendments that change the law while models retain outdated rules ## Key Statistics | Property | Value | |---|---| | Total questions | 244 | | Answerable | 204 (83.6%) | | Unanswerable (infection traps) | 40 (16.4%) | | Legal categories | 23 | | Query types | 8 | | Languages | AR (232), FR (12) | | Test split | 182 | | Dev split | 62 | | Laws in document registry | 30 | | Inter-annotator κ | 0.829 | ## Unanswerable Questions: Foreign-Law Infection Traps The 40 unanswerable questions probe 7 jurisdictional sources: | Source | Count | Example concepts | |---|---|---| | French | 13 | ISF, rent control, EURL, SAS, garde à vue duration, rupture conventionnelle | | US | 11 | at-will employment, punitive damages, fair use, jury trial, LWOP | | Egyptian | 4 | Mandatory bequest, civil marriage officer, pretrial detention | | Tunisian | 3 | Polygamy ban, adoption plénière, commercial courts | | UK | 3 | Consideration, duty of care, civil jury | | Gulf | 2 | Kafeel system, exit permit | | Algerian absence | 3 | Auto-saisine, municipal taxing, death penalty for corruption | ## Evaluation Metrics Standard: Precision@1, MRR, Citation F1 Novel: - **Jurisdictional Infection Rate (JIR)** — % of unanswerable questions where model affirms foreign concept - **Hallucinated Citation Rate (HCR)** — % of responses citing non-existent articles ## Query Types | Type | Count | Purpose | |---|---|---| | Rule application | 66 | Apply law to facts | | Exact article | 59 | Pure statutory retrieval | | Unanswerable | 40 | Foreign-law traps | | Multi-hop | 26 | Cross-code reasoning | | Long context | 17 | Synthesize 4+ articles | | Layman/Darja | 17 | Non-technical queries | | Conceptual | 12 | Legal definitions | | Temporal | 7 | Amendment tracking | ## Schema Each question contains: ```json { "id": "fam_ra_q01", "version": "3.0", "category": "family_law", "query_type": "rule_application", "difficulty": "medium", "language": "ar", "question": "...", "answerable": true, "expected_documents": ["84-11_1984-06-09"], "expected_articles": [{"document_id": "...", "article_ref": "54", ...}], "ground_truth_answer": "...", "reasoning_chain": ["Step 1 — ...", "Step 2 — ...", "Step 3 — ...", "Step 4 — ..."], "temporal_note": null, "annotation": {"annotator_1": "Islam Slimi", "annotator_2": "Ziad Slimi", "kappa": 0.91, ...} } ``` ## Citation ```bibtex @inproceedings{slimi2026algerianlegal, title={AlgerianLegalBench: A Native Benchmark for Evaluating Legal Information Retrieval and Jurisdictional Faithfulness in Algerian Law}, author={Slimi, Islam and Slimi, Ziad and {Supervisor}}, booktitle={Proceedings of the ArabicNLP 2026 Conference}, year={2026} } ``` ## Annotation All questions were authored and cross-annotated by Islam Slimi and Ziad Slimi (law students at Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, University M'Hamed Bougara of Boumerdes, Boumerdes, Algeria). Inter-annotator agreement (Cohen's κ): overall 0.829, easy 0.979, medium 0.904, hard 0.659. Disagreements resolved by senior expert. ## License CC BY 4.0 ## Contact ibrahim.attia@ensia.edu.dz maab.chaoui@ensia.edu.dz i.slimi@univ-boumerdes.dz z.slimi@univ-boumerdes.dz