Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,203 @@
|
|
| 1 |
-
---
|
| 2 |
-
|
| 3 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
---
|
| 2 |
+
pretty_name: PerceptionComp
|
| 3 |
+
license: other
|
| 4 |
+
task_categories:
|
| 5 |
+
- video-question-answering
|
| 6 |
+
- multiple-choice
|
| 7 |
+
language:
|
| 8 |
+
- en
|
| 9 |
+
tags:
|
| 10 |
+
- video
|
| 11 |
+
- benchmark
|
| 12 |
+
- multimodal
|
| 13 |
+
- reasoning
|
| 14 |
+
- video-understanding
|
| 15 |
+
- evaluation
|
| 16 |
+
size_categories:
|
| 17 |
+
- 1K<n<10K
|
| 18 |
+
---
|
| 19 |
+
|
| 20 |
+
# PerceptionComp
|
| 21 |
+
|
| 22 |
+
PerceptionComp is a benchmark for complex perception-centric video reasoning. It focuses on questions that cannot be solved from a single frame, a short clip, or a shallow caption. Models must revisit visually complex videos, gather evidence across temporally separated segments, and combine multiple perceptual cues before answering.
|
| 23 |
+
|
| 24 |
+
## Dataset Details
|
| 25 |
+
|
| 26 |
+
### Dataset Description
|
| 27 |
+
|
| 28 |
+
PerceptionComp contains 1,114 manually annotated five-choice questions associated with 273 videos. The benchmark covers seven categories: outdoor tour, shopping, sport, variety show, home tour, game, and movie.
|
| 29 |
+
|
| 30 |
+
This Hugging Face dataset repository hosts the benchmark videos. The official annotation file, evaluation code, and model integration examples are maintained in the GitHub repository:
|
| 31 |
+
|
| 32 |
+
- GitHub repository: https://github.com/hrinnnn/PerceptionComp
|
| 33 |
+
|
| 34 |
+
- **Curated by:** PerceptionComp authors
|
| 35 |
+
- **Language(s) (NLP):** English
|
| 36 |
+
- **License:** Please replace `other` in the metadata above with the final data license before public release if a more specific license applies.
|
| 37 |
+
|
| 38 |
+
### Dataset Sources
|
| 39 |
+
|
| 40 |
+
- **Repository:** https://github.com/hrinnnn/PerceptionComp
|
| 41 |
+
<!-- - **Paper:** Add the public paper link here when available. -->
|
| 42 |
+
|
| 43 |
+
## Uses
|
| 44 |
+
|
| 45 |
+
### Direct Use
|
| 46 |
+
|
| 47 |
+
PerceptionComp is intended for:
|
| 48 |
+
|
| 49 |
+
- benchmarking video-language models on complex perception-centric reasoning
|
| 50 |
+
- evaluating long-horizon and multi-evidence video understanding
|
| 51 |
+
- comparing proprietary and open-source multimodal models under a unified protocol
|
| 52 |
+
|
| 53 |
+
Users are expected to download the videos from this Hugging Face dataset and run evaluation with the official GitHub repository.
|
| 54 |
+
|
| 55 |
+
### Out-of-Scope Use
|
| 56 |
+
|
| 57 |
+
PerceptionComp is not intended for:
|
| 58 |
+
|
| 59 |
+
- unrestricted commercial redistribution of hosted videos when original source terms do not allow it
|
| 60 |
+
- surveillance, identity inference, or sensitive attribute prediction
|
| 61 |
+
- modifying the benchmark protocol and reporting those results as directly comparable official scores
|
| 62 |
+
|
| 63 |
+
## Dataset Structure
|
| 64 |
+
|
| 65 |
+
### Data Instances
|
| 66 |
+
|
| 67 |
+
Each benchmark question is associated with:
|
| 68 |
+
|
| 69 |
+
- one `video_id`
|
| 70 |
+
- one multiple-choice question
|
| 71 |
+
- five answer options
|
| 72 |
+
- one correct answer
|
| 73 |
+
- one semantic category
|
| 74 |
+
- one difficulty label
|
| 75 |
+
|
| 76 |
+
The official annotation file is maintained in the GitHub repository:
|
| 77 |
+
|
| 78 |
+
- `benchmark/annotations/1-1114.json`
|
| 79 |
+
|
| 80 |
+
Core fields in each annotation item:
|
| 81 |
+
|
| 82 |
+
- `key`: question identifier
|
| 83 |
+
- `video_id`: video filename stem without `.mp4`
|
| 84 |
+
- `question`: question text
|
| 85 |
+
- `answer_choice_0` to `answer_choice_4`: five answer options
|
| 86 |
+
- `answer_id`: zero-based index of the correct option
|
| 87 |
+
- `answer`: text form of the correct answer
|
| 88 |
+
- `category`: semantic category
|
| 89 |
+
- `difficulty`: difficulty label
|
| 90 |
+
|
| 91 |
+
### Data Files
|
| 92 |
+
|
| 93 |
+
The Hugging Face dataset stores the benchmark videos. The official evaluation code prepares them into the following local layout:
|
| 94 |
+
|
| 95 |
+
```text
|
| 96 |
+
benchmark/videos/<video_id>.mp4
|
| 97 |
+
```
|
| 98 |
+
|
| 99 |
+
Use the official download script from the GitHub repository:
|
| 100 |
+
|
| 101 |
+
```bash
|
| 102 |
+
git clone https://github.com/hrinnnn/PerceptionComp.git
|
| 103 |
+
cd PerceptionComp
|
| 104 |
+
pip install -r requirements.txt
|
| 105 |
+
python scripts/download_data.py --repo-id hrinnnn/PerceptionComp
|
| 106 |
+
```
|
| 107 |
+
|
| 108 |
+
### Data Splits
|
| 109 |
+
|
| 110 |
+
The current public release uses one official evaluation set:
|
| 111 |
+
|
| 112 |
+
- `1-1114.json`: 1,114 multiple-choice questions over 273 videos
|
| 113 |
+
|
| 114 |
+
## Dataset Creation
|
| 115 |
+
|
| 116 |
+
### Curation Rationale
|
| 117 |
+
|
| 118 |
+
PerceptionComp was created to evaluate a failure mode that is not well covered by simpler video benchmarks: questions that require models to combine multiple perceptual constraints over time instead of relying on a single salient frame or a short summary.
|
| 119 |
+
|
| 120 |
+
### Source Data
|
| 121 |
+
|
| 122 |
+
The benchmark uses real-world videos paired with manually written multiple-choice questions.
|
| 123 |
+
|
| 124 |
+
#### Data Collection and Processing
|
| 125 |
+
|
| 126 |
+
Videos were collected and organized for benchmark evaluation. Annotation authors then wrote perception-centric multiple-choice questions for the selected videos. Each question was designed to require visual evidence from the video rather than simple prior knowledge or caption-level shortcuts.
|
| 127 |
+
|
| 128 |
+
The release process includes:
|
| 129 |
+
|
| 130 |
+
- associating each question with a `video_id`
|
| 131 |
+
- formatting each sample as a five-choice multiple-choice item
|
| 132 |
+
- assigning semantic categories
|
| 133 |
+
- assigning difficulty labels
|
| 134 |
+
- consolidating the release into one official annotation file
|
| 135 |
+
|
| 136 |
+
#### Who are the source data producers?
|
| 137 |
+
|
| 138 |
+
The underlying videos may originate from third-party public sources. The benchmark annotations were created by the PerceptionComp authors and collaborators.
|
| 139 |
+
|
| 140 |
+
### Annotations
|
| 141 |
+
|
| 142 |
+
#### Annotation Process
|
| 143 |
+
|
| 144 |
+
PerceptionComp contains 1,114 manually annotated five-choice questions. Questions were written to test perception-centric reasoning over videos rather than single-frame recognition alone.
|
| 145 |
+
|
| 146 |
+
#### Who are the annotators?
|
| 147 |
+
|
| 148 |
+
The annotations were created by the PerceptionComp project team.
|
| 149 |
+
|
| 150 |
+
#### Personal and Sensitive Information
|
| 151 |
+
|
| 152 |
+
The videos may contain people, faces, voices, public scenes, or other naturally occurring visual content. The dataset is intended for research evaluation, not for identity inference or sensitive attribute prediction.
|
| 153 |
+
|
| 154 |
+
### Recommendations
|
| 155 |
+
|
| 156 |
+
Users should:
|
| 157 |
+
|
| 158 |
+
- report results with the official evaluation code
|
| 159 |
+
- avoid changing prompts, parsing rules, or metrics when claiming benchmark numbers
|
| 160 |
+
- verify that their usage complies with the terms of the original video sources
|
| 161 |
+
- avoid using the dataset for surveillance, identity recognition, or sensitive attribute inference
|
| 162 |
+
|
| 163 |
+
## Citation
|
| 164 |
+
|
| 165 |
+
If you use PerceptionComp, please cite the project paper when it is publicly available.
|
| 166 |
+
|
| 167 |
+
```bibtex
|
| 168 |
+
@misc{perceptioncomp2026,
|
| 169 |
+
title={PerceptionComp},
|
| 170 |
+
author={PerceptionComp Authors},
|
| 171 |
+
year={2026},
|
| 172 |
+
howpublished={Hugging Face dataset and GitHub repository}
|
| 173 |
+
}
|
| 174 |
+
```
|
| 175 |
+
|
| 176 |
+
## More Information
|
| 177 |
+
|
| 178 |
+
Official evaluation code and documentation:
|
| 179 |
+
|
| 180 |
+
- GitHub: https://github.com/hrinnnn/PerceptionComp
|
| 181 |
+
|
| 182 |
+
Example evaluation workflow:
|
| 183 |
+
|
| 184 |
+
```bash
|
| 185 |
+
git clone https://github.com/hrinnnn/PerceptionComp.git
|
| 186 |
+
cd PerceptionComp
|
| 187 |
+
pip install -r requirements.txt
|
| 188 |
+
python scripts/download_data.py --repo-id hrinnnn/PerceptionComp
|
| 189 |
+
python evaluate/evaluate.py \
|
| 190 |
+
--model YOUR_MODEL_NAME \
|
| 191 |
+
--provider api \
|
| 192 |
+
--api-key YOUR_API_KEY \
|
| 193 |
+
--base-url YOUR_BASE_URL \
|
| 194 |
+
--video-dir benchmark/videos
|
| 195 |
+
```
|
| 196 |
+
|
| 197 |
+
## Dataset Card Authors
|
| 198 |
+
|
| 199 |
+
PerceptionComp authors
|
| 200 |
+
|
| 201 |
+
## Dataset Card Contact
|
| 202 |
+
|
| 203 |
+
Add the project contact email here before publishing.
|