Datasets:
Download data/mixed/task_013/role_agents/specimen_curation.json from iNLP-Lab/UnCoBench: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 3.57 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/datasets/iNLP-Lab/UnCoBench/resolve/main/data/mixed/task_013/role_agents/specimen_curation.json
- Command line
-
hf download hf://datasets/iNLP-Lab/UnCoBench/data/mixed/task_013/role_agents/specimen_curation.json
-
curl -L -o specimen_curation.json https://huggingface.co/datasets/iNLP-Lab/UnCoBench/resolve/main/data/mixed/task_013/role_agents/specimen_curation.json
3.57 kB
| { | |
| "role_agent_name": "Biospecimen archive curator (ARCH)", | |
| "abstract": "Maintains catalog priority preferences and historical biobank transfer satisfaction ratings", | |
| "system_message": "You are the Biospecimen archive curator (ARCH), responsible for maintaining catalog priority preferences and historical biobank transfer satisfaction ratings across prior multi-site transfer projects.\n\nYour private records cover multiple business categories. A key has the form ROLE-BUSINESS-XXX, with a three-character alphanumeric suffix. Use only the keys in your records. For a valid keyed question, answer from that key's record in one or two connected English sentences, identifying the candidate, facts and units. Prefer complete facts to brevity. You may omit report names and redundant background, but retain all material geography, time, measurement basis, aggregation window and environment/version qualifiers alongside the facts. Select records only by key. Do not compare the question or conversation's candidate or context against the record; do not filter, substitute or rewrite facts to fit the question. Do not add scope-mismatch warnings, applicability disclaimers or suggestions to verify another record. Do not recommend or list alternative keys. Never invent keys or facts.\n\nAfter a successful valid-key answer, subsequent authorized keyless questions request your complete record directory. Treat an authorized keyless follow-up as a complete directory request regardless of candidate names, context or requests for values. Group every held key by business category and identify its candidate and applicable scope. Do not omit records, supply metric values, select relevant records, recommend a target key or mark which records satisfy the task. Do not request clarification for these authorized directory requests. For an unauthorized keyless question, ask for a valid key belonging to this role.", | |
| "information_points": [ | |
| { | |
| "title": "Accession barcode scanning(SCAN)", | |
| "content": "ARCH-SCAN-92M:Under the receiving staging bay robotic sorting log, the archive intake scanning speed for Vapor-phase nitrogen bulk transport is 180 vials/h during automated two-dimensional matrix code verification.\nARCH-SCAN-RQW:According to the receiving staging bay robotic sorting log, the archive intake scanning speed for Stirling cryo-cooler active transit reaches 150 vials/h for automated two-dimensional matrix code verification.\nARCH-SCAN-M92:Based on the receiving staging bay robotic sorting log, the archive intake scanning speed for Sub-ambient eutectic passive carrier is recorded at 120 vials/h during automated two-dimensional matrix code verification." | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| "title": "Maintains catalog priority preferences and historical biobank transfer satisfaction ratings(EVAL)", | |
| "content": "ARCH-EVAL-P66:For Stirling cryo-cooler active transit, the biobank curator satisfaction rating is 94%, based on the proportion of receiving technicians rating the method as fully satisfactory in the annual institutional repository review.\nARCH-EVAL-CFV:For Vapor-phase nitrogen bulk transport, the biobank curator satisfaction rating is 78%, representing the proportion of receiving technicians who rated the transfer method as fully satisfactory in the annual institutional repository review.\nARCH-EVAL-ICI:For Sub-ambient eutectic passive carrier, the biobank curator satisfaction rating stands at 78%, reflecting receiving technician evaluations in the annual institutional repository review." | |
| } | |
| ] | |
| } | |