srikumarv Claude Sonnet 5 commited on
Commit
484c427
·
1 Parent(s): bd005a7

Add LLM fine-tuning benchmark dataset with dataset card

Browse files

15,154 fine-tuning experiment records tracked via Git LFS, plus a
Hugging Face dataset card describing schema, collection methodology,
and key statistics.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NhSvTTm2U9Hjw87JySxMaJ

Files changed (3) hide show
  1. .gitattributes +1 -0
  2. README.md +102 -0
  3. dataset.csv +3 -0
.gitattributes CHANGED
@@ -58,3 +58,4 @@ saved_model/**/* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
58
  # Video files - compressed
59
  *.mp4 filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
60
  *.webm filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 
 
58
  # Video files - compressed
59
  *.mp4 filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
60
  *.webm filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
61
+ dataset.csv filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
README.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ---
2
+ language:
3
+ - "en" # Example: fr
4
+ license: "apache-2.0" # Example: apache-2.0 or any license from https://hf.co/docs/hub/
5
+ tags:
6
+ - "benchmark"
7
+ - "fine-tuning" # Example: audio
8
+ - "performance" # Example: bio
9
+ - "LLM" # Example: natural-language-understanding
10
+ - "configuration" # Example: birds-classification
11
+ annotations_creators:
12
+ - "expert-generated"
13
+ - "ado" # Example: crowdsourced, found, expert-generated, machine-generated
14
+ language_details: "en-US" # Example: en-US
15
+ pretty_name: "LLMFineTuningBench"
16
+ size_categories:
17
+ - "15K" # Example: n<1K, 100K<n<1M, …
18
+ task_categories: # Full list at https://github.com/huggingface/huggingface.js/blob/main/packages/tasks/src/pipelines.ts
19
+ - "tabular-regression" # Example: question-answering
20
+ - "tabular-classification" # Example: image-classification
21
+ task_ids:
22
+ - "tabular-single-column-regression" # Example: extractive-qa
23
+ - "tabular-multi-class-classification" # Example: multi-class-image-classification
24
+ configs: # Optional. This can be used to pass additional parameters to the dataset loader, such as `data_files`, `data_dir`, and any builder-specific parameters
25
+ - config_name: "default" # Name of the dataset subset, if applicable. Example: default
26
+ data_files:
27
+ - split: "all" # Example: train
28
+ path: "dataset.csv" # Example: data.csv
29
+ ---
30
+
31
+ # Dataset Card for LLMFineTuningBench
32
+
33
+ A dataset of over 15,000 LLM fine-tuning experiments, capturing detailed performance metrics from jobs run on high-performance computing (HPC) clusters. It spans a wide range of models, fine-tuning methods, and hardware configurations, and is intended to support research on predictive resource allocation, performance optimization, and cost estimation for LLM fine-tuning workloads.
34
+
35
+ ## Dataset Details
36
+
37
+ ### Dataset Description
38
+
39
+ The rapid adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) has led to a surge in fine-tuning activities to adapt these models for specific tasks. However, selecting the optimal hardware and software configuration for fine-tuning is a complex, multi-dimensional problem that can lead to significant resource wastage and computational overhead. To address this challenge, we introduce a comprehensive dataset of over 15,000 LLM fine-tuning experiments. The dataset captures detailed performance metrics from jobs executed on high-performance computing clusters, covering a wide range of models, fine-tuning methods, and hardware configurations. This paper presents the dataset's schema, collection methodology, and key statistical properties. We believe this public dataset will be a valuable resource for the research community, facilitating the development of predictive models for resource allocation, performance optimization, and cost estimation for LLM fine-tuning workloads.
40
+
41
+
42
+ ### Dataset Sources
43
+
44
+ <!-- Provide the basic links for the dataset. -->
45
+
46
+ - **Repository:** [ado SFTTrainer](https://github.com/IBM/ado/blob/main/plugins/actuators/sfttrainer/ado_actuators/sfttrainer/README.md)
47
+
48
+ ## Uses
49
+
50
+ This dataset is intended to support the development of predictive models that map a proposed job configuration (model, hardware, method) to expected throughput and resource utilization — enabling "cost-calculator" or recommendation tools that guide users toward efficient fine-tuning setups.
51
+
52
+ ### Direct Use
53
+
54
+ - Transfer learning approaches
55
+ - Performance prediction models
56
+ - Handling categorical configuration space expansion
57
+ - Sample-efficient model building strategies
58
+
59
+ See [ado Autoconf](https://github.com/IBM/ado/tree/main/plugins/custom_experiments/autoconf) for examples of how this data was used for building predictive models for automated configuration of resources for fine-tuning workloads
60
+
61
+ ## Dataset Structure
62
+
63
+ Key columns in the dataset:
64
+
65
+ | Column | Description |
66
+ | --- | --- |
67
+ | `model_name` | Name of the base LLM (e.g., `llama3-8b`, `mixtral-8x7b-instruct-v0.1`) |
68
+ | `method` | Fine-tuning technique used: `full`, `lora`, or `gptq-lora` |
69
+ | `number_gpus` | Number of GPUs allocated for the job |
70
+ | `gpu_model` | GPU model used (e.g., `L40S`) |
71
+ | `batch_size` | Number of samples processed per training step |
72
+ | `tokens_per_sample` | Sequence length of each sample |
73
+ | `is_valid` | Binary flag (1 or 0) indicating whether the run completed successfully |
74
+ | `dataset_tokens_per_second` | Primary throughput metric — tokens processed per second from the dataset; the most reliable performance measure |
75
+
76
+ Other columns capture additional metrics such as GPU memory utilization, GPU compute utilization, GPU power draw, and total training runtime.
77
+
78
+ ## Dataset Creation
79
+
80
+ #### Data Collection and Processing
81
+
82
+ The dataset was generated by systematically exploring the parameter space of LLM fine-tuning across different hardware and software configurations. All tuning jobs used the Hugging Face Transformers `SFTTrainer` API, submitted to HPC clusters with varying compute resources.
83
+
84
+ We benchmarked **15,154 jobs**, varying parameters of `SFTTrainer` including the base model, fine-tuning method, number of GPUs, and batch size. Training data consisted of random text, since the primary goal was to measure computational performance rather than model accuracy — the resulting fine-tuned model weights were discarded after each run.
85
+
86
+ ## Citation [optional]
87
+
88
+ If you use this dataset, please cite it as:
89
+ ```
90
+ @misc{vassilis26finetuning,
91
+ title={LLM Fine-Tuning Benchmark Dataset},
92
+ author={Vassiliadis, Vassilis and Lotito, Daniele and
93
+ Pomponio, Alessandro and Venugopal, Srikumar and Johnston, Michael},
94
+ howpublished={Hugging Face Datasets},
95
+ url = {https://huggingface.co/datasets/ibm-research/LLMFineTuningBench/},
96
+ year={2026}
97
+ }
98
+ ```
99
+
100
+ ## Contact Information
101
+
102
+ For any comments or questions, please email [Vassilis Vassiliadis](mailto:vassilis.vassiliadis@ibm.com), [Daniele Lotito](mailto:daniele.lotito@ibm.com) and [Srikumar Venugopal](mailto:srikumarv@ie.ibm.com).
dataset.csv ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
 
 
 
 
1
+ version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
2
+ oid sha256:cf8edeacf425517bdb263239aad107c93febe3d00c43ffa40035cc978efd889e
3
+ size 17070122