Table + Text IR Evaluation
Collection
An evaluation suite created for benchmarking of retrieval models on Table+Text retrieval datasets. • 8 items • Updated • 2
Need help to make the dataset viewer work? Make sure to review how to configure the dataset viewer, and open a discussion for direct support.
This dataset is part of a Table + Text retrieval benchmark. Includes queries and relevance judgments across train, dev, test split(s), with corpus in 3 format(s): corpus_linearized, corpus_md, corpus_structure.
| Config | Description | Split(s) |
|---|---|---|
default |
Relevance judgments (qrels): qid, did, score |
train, dev, test |
queries |
Query IDs and text | train_queries, dev_queries, test_queries |
corpus_linearized |
Linearized table representation | corpus_linearized |
corpus_md |
Markdown table representation | corpus_md |
corpus_structure |
Structured corpus with headers, cells, meta_data. text field corresponds to linearized Text + Table. |
corpus_structure |
corpus_structure additional fields
| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
meta_data |
string | Table metadata / caption |
headers |
list[string] | Column headers |
cells |
list[string] | Flattened cell values |
| Dataset | Structured | #Train | #Dev | #Test | #Corpus |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpenWikiTables | ✓ | 53.8k | 6.6k | 6.6k | 24.7k |
| NQTables | ✓ | 9.6k | 1.1k | 1k | 170k |
| FeTaQA | ✓ | 7.3k | 1k | 2k | 10.3k |
| OTT-QA (small) | ✓ | 41.5k | 2.2k | -- | 8.8k |
| MultiHierTT | ✗ | -- | 929 | -- | 9.9k |
| AIT-QA | ✗ | -- | -- | 515 | 1.9k |
| StatcanRetrieval | ✗ | -- | -- | 870 | 5.9k |
| watsonxDocsQA | ✗ | -- | -- | 30 | 1.1k |
If you use TableIR Eval: Table-Text IR Evaluation Collection, please cite:
@misc{doshi2026tableir,
title = {TableIR Eval: Table-Text IR Evaluation Collection},
author = {Doshi, Meet and Boni, Odellia and Kumar, Vishwajeet and Sen, Jaydeep and Joshi, Sachindra},
year = {2026},
institution = {IBM Research},
howpublished = {https://huggingface.co/collections/ibm-research/table-text-ir-evaluation},
note = {Hugging Face dataset collection}
}
All credit goes to original authors. Please cite their work:
@inproceedings{herzig-etal-2021-open,
title = "Open Domain Question Answering over Tables via Dense Retrieval",
author = {Herzig, Jonathan and
M{\"u}ller, Thomas and
Krichene, Syrine and
Eisenschlos, Julian},
editor = "Toutanova, Kristina and
Rumshisky, Anna and
Zettlemoyer, Luke and
Hakkani-Tur, Dilek and
Beltagy, Iz and
Bethard, Steven and
Cotterell, Ryan and
Chakraborty, Tanmoy and
Zhou, Yichao",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies",
month = jun,
year = "2021",
address = "Online",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2021.naacl-main.43/",
doi = "10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.43",
pages = "512--519",
abstract = "Recent advances in open-domain QA have led to strong models based on dense retrieval, but only focused on retrieving textual passages. In this work, we tackle open-domain QA over tables for the first time, and show that retrieval can be improved by a retriever designed to handle tabular context. We present an effective pre-training procedure for our retriever and improve retrieval quality with mined hard negatives. As relevant datasets are missing, we extract a subset of Natural Questions (Kwiatkowski et al., 2019) into a Table QA dataset. We find that our retriever improves retrieval results from 72.0 to 81.1 recall@10 and end-to-end QA results from 33.8 to 37.7 exact match, over a BERT based retriever."
}