A & B == B & A: Triggering Logical Reasoning Failures in Large Language Models
Paper • 2401.00757 • Published
Datasets:
ArXiv:
License:
Dataset Viewer
The dataset viewer is not available for this dataset.
The JWT signature verification failed. Check the signing key and the algorithm.
Error code: JWTInvalidSignature
Exception: InvalidSignatureError
Message: Signature verification failed
Traceback: Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/src/libs/libapi/src/libapi/jwt_token.py", line 286, in validate_jwt
decoded = jwt.decode(
jwt=token,
...<2 lines>...
options=options,
)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/jwt/api_jwt.py", line 368, in decode
decoded = self.decode_complete(
jwt,
...<8 lines>...
leeway=leeway,
)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/jwt/api_jwt.py", line 265, in decode_complete
decoded = self._jws.decode_complete(
jwt,
...<3 lines>...
detached_payload=detached_payload,
)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/jwt/api_jws.py", line 270, in decode_complete
self._verify_signature(
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
signing_input,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
...<4 lines>...
options=merged_options,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
)
^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/jwt/api_jws.py", line 417, in _verify_signature
raise InvalidSignatureError("Signature verification failed")
jwt.exceptions.InvalidSignatureError: Signature verification failedNeed help to make the dataset viewer work? Make sure to review how to configure the dataset viewer, and open a discussion for direct support.
We present test data which we used in our experiment and a training dataset of size 10.4k for future research.
LogicAsker is a novel approach for evaluating and enhancing the logical reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT and GPT-4. Despite LLMs' prowess in tasks like writing assistance, code generation, and machine translation, assessing their ability to reason has been challenging. Traditional evaluations often prioritize accuracy on downstream tasks over direct assessments of reasoning processes. LogicAsker addresses this gap by employing a set of atomic reasoning skills grounded in propositional and predicate logic to systematically examine and improve the reasoning prowess of LLMs. Our methodology reveals significant gaps in LLMs' learning of logical rules, with identified reasoning failures ranging from 29% to 90% across different models. Moreover, we leverage these findings to construct targeted demonstration examples and fine-tune data, notably enhancing logical reasoning in models like GPT-4o by up to 5%. To our knowledge, this is the first effort to utilize test case outcomes to effectively refine LLMs' formal reasoning capabilities.
- Downloads last month
- 27