egrace479 commited on
Commit
e80dd39
·
1 Parent(s): 1c0d080

Update to reflect change to publication of subset only

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +105 -35
README.md CHANGED
@@ -10,44 +10,63 @@ tags:
10
  - CV
11
  pretty_name: Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (STRI) Samples
12
  size_categories:
13
- - 10K<n<100K
14
  ---
15
 
16
- # Dataset Card for STRI Samples
17
 
18
  ## Dataset Description
19
 
20
- - **Homepage:**
21
- - **Repository:**
22
- - **Paper:**
23
- - **Leaderboard:**
24
- - **Point of Contact:**
25
 
26
  ### Dataset Summary
27
 
28
- Images of butterfly wings collected by [Owen McMillan](https://stri.si.edu/scientist/owen-mcmillan) and members of his lab at the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute.
29
 
30
- 24,119 RGB images: Dorsal and Ventral images of separated wings.
31
  <!---
32
- This dataset card aims to be a base template for new datasets. It has been generated using [this raw template](https://github.com/huggingface/huggingface_hub/blob/main/src/huggingface_hub/templates/datasetcard_template.md?plain=1).
33
  --->
34
 
 
35
  ### Supported Tasks and Leaderboards
36
 
37
- [More Information Needed]
38
 
39
- ### Languages
40
 
41
- [More Information Needed]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
42
 
43
- ## Dataset Structure
44
 
45
  ### Data Instances
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
46
 
47
  [More Information Needed]
48
 
49
- * **Type:** JPEG and NEF
50
- * **Size (x pixels by y pixels):** Not yet known
51
  * **Background (color or none):** Sometimes gray sometimes white
52
  * **Fit in frame:** tight
53
  * **Ruler or Scale:** Do not think so
@@ -55,59 +74,108 @@ This dataset card aims to be a base template for new datasets. It has been gener
55
 
56
  Potential for future addition of genetic sequencing data.
57
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
58
  ### Data Fields
59
 
60
  [More Information Needed]
61
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
62
  ### Data Splits
63
 
64
- [More Information Needed]
65
 
66
  ## Dataset Creation
67
 
68
  ### Curation Rationale
69
 
70
- [More Information Needed]
71
 
72
  ### Source Data
73
 
74
- Images are of specimens collected by the [Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute](https://stri.si.edu/) and photographs were taken by Christopher Lawrence.
 
75
 
76
- #### Initial Data Collection and Normalization
 
 
 
 
77
 
 
78
  [More Information Needed]
 
79
 
80
- #### Who are the source language producers?
 
81
 
82
- [More Information Needed]
83
 
84
  ### Annotations
85
 
86
  #### Annotation process
87
-
88
- [More Information Needed]
89
 
90
  #### Who are the annotators?
91
-
92
  [More Information Needed]
 
93
 
94
  ### Personal and Sensitive Information
 
 
 
95
 
96
- None
97
 
98
  ## Considerations for Using the Data
99
-
100
- ### Social Impact of Dataset
101
-
102
  [More Information Needed]
 
 
 
103
 
104
- ### Discussion of Biases
 
105
 
 
106
  [More Information Needed]
 
107
 
108
- ### Other Known Limitations
109
 
110
- [More Information Needed]
111
 
112
  ## Additional Information
113
 
@@ -124,8 +192,10 @@ None
124
 
125
  ### Citation Information
126
 
127
- Christopher Lawrence, Owen McMillan, Daniel Romero, Carlos Arias. (2023). Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (STRI) Samples. Hugging Face. https://huggingface.co/datasets/imageomics/STRI-Samples.
 
 
128
 
129
- ### Contributions
130
 
131
- The [Imageomics Institute](https://imageomics.org) is funded by the US National Science Foundation's Harnessing the Data Revolution (HDR) Institute program under [Award #2118240](https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=2118240) (Imageomics: A New Frontier of Biological Information Powered by Knowledge-Guided Machine Learning).
 
10
  - CV
11
  pretty_name: Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (STRI) Samples
12
  size_categories:
13
+ - n<1K
14
  ---
15
 
16
+ # Dataset Card for Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (STRI) Samples
17
 
18
  ## Dataset Description
19
 
20
+ - **Curated by:** Christopher Lawrence, Owen McMillan, Daniel Romero, and Carlos Arias
21
+ <!-- Provide the basic links for the dataset. These will show up on the sidebar to the right of your dataset card ("Curated by" too). -->
22
+ <!-- - **Homepage:** -->
23
+ - **Repository:** https://github.com/Imageomics/wing-segmentation
24
+ <!-- - **Paper:** -->
25
 
26
  ### Dataset Summary
27
 
28
+ Dorsal images of butterfly wings collected by [Owen McMillan](https://stri.si.edu/scientist/owen-mcmillan) and members of his lab at the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute.
29
 
30
+ Full dataset will be 24,119 RGB images: Dorsal and Ventral images of separated wings. This sample contains 207 _dorsal_ butterfly images used as part of the training data for [Imageomics/butterfly_detection_yolo](https://huggingface.co/imageomics/butterfly_detection_yolo).
31
  <!---
32
+ This dataset card was generated using [this raw template](https://github.com/huggingface/huggingface_hub/blob/main/src/huggingface_hub/templates/datasetcard_template.md?plain=1), and further altered to suit Imageomics Institute needs.
33
  --->
34
 
35
+
36
  ### Supported Tasks and Leaderboards
37
 
38
+ Note that this is just a subset of a larger dataset that has yet to be curated. It was used in combination with images from other sources to train the [Imageomics/butterfly_detection_yolo](https://huggingface.co/imageomics/butterfly_detection_yolo) model, and is not large or representative enough for use in training on its own yet.
39
 
40
+ ## Dataset Structure
41
 
42
+ <!-- This section provides a description of the dataset fields, and additional information about the dataset structure such as criteria used to create the splits, relationships between data points, etc. -->
43
+
44
+
45
+ ```
46
+ /dataset/
47
+ <images>/
48
+ <img_name_no_ext 1>.JPG
49
+ <img_name_no_ext 2>.JPG
50
+ ...
51
+ <img_name_no_ext 207>.JPG
52
+ metadata.csv
53
+ ```
54
 
 
55
 
56
  ### Data Instances
57
+ [More Information Needed]
58
+
59
+ <!--
60
+ Describe data files
61
+
62
+ Ex: All images are named <img_id>.png, each within a folder named for the species. They are 1024 x 1024, and the color has been standardized using <link to color standardization package>.
63
+ -->
64
+
65
 
66
  [More Information Needed]
67
 
68
+ * **Type:** JPG <!-- PNG if we include the smaller images
69
+ * **Size (x pixels by y pixels):** Not yet known (downsized are 256 x 256) -->
70
  * **Background (color or none):** Sometimes gray sometimes white
71
  * **Fit in frame:** tight
72
  * **Ruler or Scale:** Do not think so
 
74
 
75
  Potential for future addition of genetic sequencing data.
76
 
77
+ There are 11 speices represented in this sample of 207. They are primarily from the genus Heliconius, but the following genera are also represented: Junonia, Eueides, Neruda, and Dryas.
78
+
79
+ The CSV also includes labels regarding the quality of the specimen: `damaged`, `dorsal`, or `incomplete`, which were used for the segmentation model. Below is a species distribution chart for this data colored by quality label.
80
+
81
+ ![species distribution chart for STRI data colored by label](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/92da2996-b4f0-462a-b666-4ea715669f3b)
82
+
83
  ### Data Fields
84
 
85
  [More Information Needed]
86
 
87
+ Suggested columns to keep:
88
+
89
+ **metadata.csv:** minimal data record for the images; this is a subset of all the information potentially available for each image since curation of this dataset is still ongoing. This also means that there are some duplicative columns (e.g., there are multiple NCSU and STRI IDs).
90
+ - **label:** indicates quality of specimen, either `damaged`, `dorsal`, or `incomplete`.
91
+ - **img_name_no_ext:** `FileName` without the type extension.
92
+ source_url, --not actually a URL. it's a box location, with the folder, seems like something to potentially remove
93
+ source_dataset -- holdover from separating them out, can remove
94
+ - **FileName:** filename given to image (with extension, e.g., ".JPG"). Often (??) `<NCSU_id>_D.JPG`.
95
+ - **Folder:** folder in which images or a record is kept, seems to be date followed by number; part of the "source_url"??
96
+ - **Box:** Box in which specimen was kept? ("Box 11" or "Box 10").
97
+ - **Genus:** genus of the specimen; primarily "Heliconius", but also "Junonia", "Eueides", "Neruda", or "Dryas". Labeled for all images.
98
+ - **species:** species of the specimen; 11 unique species, but mostly "erato" and "melpomene". Labeled for all but six of the images.
99
+ - **subspecies:** subspecies of the specimen if provided, or parent subspecies if hybrid. Labeled for 168 images.
100
+ - **subspecies II:** second parent subspecies of the specimen if it is a hybrid (there are 16 with the label "hybrid"). Labeled for 70 images.
101
+ - **Subfamily**: subfamily of the specimen (only labeled for 18 images, all "Heliconiinae").
102
+ - **id uncertain:** indicates uncertainty in the taxonomic identity of the specimen? -- 11 images, but there is another image with a question mark in the subspecies name.
103
+ - **sex:** sex of the specimen ("male" or "female", one instance of "?", most labeled).
104
+
105
+ MULTIPLE IDS -- keep for alignment and standardization later
106
+ NCSU_id, ID from NCSU? Did all values have this or is it just NCSU prefix?
107
+ NCSU #, --relation to NCSU ID and STRI ID?
108
+ stri_id, --relation to NCSU id?
109
+ STRI ID, -- relation to other versions above?
110
+ Other ID,-- relation to other versions above?
111
+
112
+
113
+ - **Date Collected:** date specimen was collected? Seem to be mostly DD-MM-YY, but not consistent.
114
+ - **Collector:** person who collected the specimen?
115
+ - **Taxonomic ID:** --- only labeled for 18 images, what is this? Seems to be scientific name: "Genus species (ssp x ssp II)" or "Genus species (hybrid)". Remove or do same for the remaining images?
116
+ - **Sample type:** "Wild" or "Stocks", only labeled for 18 images.
117
+ - **Owner of Sample:** -- only labeled for 18 images, mostly "BLUM - STRI", but also two "MCMILLAN - STRI", corresponds to Collector for BLUM, but not for MCMILLAN.
118
+
119
+
120
  ### Data Splits
121
 
122
+ All of these sample images were used in training the [Imageomics/butterfly_detection_yolo](https://huggingface.co/imageomics/butterfly_detection_yolo) model.
123
 
124
  ## Dataset Creation
125
 
126
  ### Curation Rationale
127
 
128
+ These images were selected and labeled to use in training the [Imageomics/butterfly_detection_yolo](https://huggingface.co/imageomics/butterfly_detection_yolo) model. The larger dataset is still undergoing curation.
129
 
130
  ### Source Data
131
 
132
+ Images are of specimens collected by the [Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute](https://stri.si.edu/) and photographs of this subset were taken by Daniel Romero.
133
+ <!-- images taken by Christopher Lawrence have not been added yet, curation ongoing -->
134
 
135
+ #### Data Collection and Processing
136
+ [More Information Needed]
137
+ <!-- This section describes the data collection and processing process such as data selection criteria, filtering and normalization methods, re-sizing of images, tools and libraries used, etc.
138
+ This is what _you_ did to it following collection from the original source; it will be overall processing if you collected the data initially.
139
+ -->
140
 
141
+ #### Who are the source data producers?
142
  [More Information Needed]
143
+ <!-- This section describes the people or systems who originally created the data.
144
 
145
+ Ex: This dataset is a collection of images taken of the butterfly collection housed at the Ohio State University Museum of Biological Diversity. The associated labels and metadata are the information provided with the collection from biologists that study butterflies and supplied the specimens to the museum.
146
+ -->
147
 
 
148
 
149
  ### Annotations
150
 
151
  #### Annotation process
152
+ Damage annotations were completed by Michelle Ramirez for training the [Imageomics/butterfly_detection_yolo](https://huggingface.co/imageomics/butterfly_detection_yolo) model she created.
 
153
 
154
  #### Who are the annotators?
 
155
  [More Information Needed]
156
+ <!-- This section describes the people or systems who created the annotations. -->
157
 
158
  ### Personal and Sensitive Information
159
+ [More Information Needed]
160
+ <!--
161
+ For instance, if your data includes people or endangered species. -->
162
 
 
163
 
164
  ## Considerations for Using the Data
 
 
 
165
  [More Information Needed]
166
+ <!--
167
+ Things to consider while working with the dataset. For instance, maybe there are hybrids and they are labeled in the `hybrid_stat` column, so to get a subset without hybrids, subset to all instances in the metadata file such that `hybrid_stat` is _not_ "hybrid".
168
+ -->
169
 
170
+ ### Bias, Risks, and Limitations
171
+ This is a small sample of minimally curated butterfly images intended only for wing segmentation and damage detection.
172
 
173
+ ### Recommendations
174
  [More Information Needed]
175
+ <!-- This section is meant to convey recommendations with respect to the bias, risk, and technical limitations. -->
176
 
177
+ This is not a complete dataset, nor is it curated for greater use. The purpose of this dataset is to provide the 207 image sample used as part of a larger training set for the [Imageomics/butterfly_detection_yolo](https://huggingface.co/imageomics/butterfly_detection_yolo) model. More information on the full project can be found in the [GitHub repository](https://github.com/Imageomics/wing-segmentation).
178
 
 
179
 
180
  ## Additional Information
181
 
 
192
 
193
  ### Citation Information
194
 
195
+ Christopher Lawrence, Owen McMillan, Daniel Romero, Carlos Arias. (2024). Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (STRI) Samples. Hugging Face. https://huggingface.co/datasets/imageomics/STRI-Samples.
196
+
197
+ ## Acknowledgements
198
 
199
+ This work was supported by the [Imageomics Institute](https://imageomics.org), which is funded by the US National Science Foundation's Harnessing the Data Revolution (HDR) program under [Award #2118240](https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=2118240) (Imageomics: A New Frontier of Biological Information Powered by Knowledge-Guided Machine Learning). Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
200
 
201
+ <!-- You may also want to credit the source of your data, i.e., if you went to a museum or nature preserve to collect it. -->