kylesayrs commited on
Commit
a0129c7
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): befc48c

Copy DATASHEET.md from Nickyang/RazorCal

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. DATASHEET.md +62 -0
DATASHEET.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ # Datasheet for RazorCal
2
+
3
+ ## Purpose
4
+
5
+ RazorCal is a general-purpose calibration corpus maintained as part of RAZOR,
6
+ which uses it to estimate per-expert statistics for MoE pruning. The records
7
+ carry no architecture-specific fields, so the corpus applies equally to FFN or
8
+ layer pruning, perplexity measurement and other calibration-based compression.
9
+ It is not an independent benchmark or a guarantee of downstream model quality.
10
+
11
+ ## Composition and format
12
+
13
+ `RazorCal.json` contains 2,048 samples in seven domains: Coding has 512
14
+ samples; Math, Science (STEM), Chinese-STEM, Instruction Following, Tool Calling
15
+ and World Knowledge have 256 each. The file is approximately 8 MB.
16
+
17
+ The top-level JSON object contains `meta` and `data`. Records carry `domain`,
18
+ `sub_source` and chat `messages`; some also contain `tools` or `coding_subclass`.
19
+ No train/validation/test split is provided. See [README.md](README.md) for
20
+ loading and the source-label inventory.
21
+
22
+ ## Provenance
23
+
24
+ The recorded sources include NVIDIA Nemotron, Dolci, and Teknium OpenHermes-2.5
25
+ via HuggingFaceTB smoltalk2. The 160 Math records labeled
26
+ `nemotron-cascade2-math` come from the math slice of NVIDIA
27
+ Nemotron-Cascade-2-SFT-Data, recorded as CC-BY-4.0. That slice was taken whole
28
+ rather than sampled per record, so the released metadata identifies the
29
+ upstream dataset but not an individual upstream record for each sample.
30
+
31
+ Source labels do not establish record-level source fidelity, absence of
32
+ synthetic content, privacy clearance or license compatibility. See
33
+ [FIDELITY_AUDIT.md](FIDELITY_AUDIT.md).
34
+
35
+ ## Limitations
36
+
37
+ - Calibration coverage is limited to the released samples; it does not establish
38
+ coverage of every language, task or context length.
39
+ - Source-corpus overlap with evaluation sets is possible and needs review for
40
+ any benchmark comparison.
41
+ - Chat rendering and tool handling depend on the model's tokenizer template.
42
+ There are 587 tool messages without populated `tool_call_id` links and
43
+ 11 tool definitions with empty `parameters` objects.
44
+ - Some optional message fields are null or template-specific. Consumers should
45
+ validate the fields they use without modifying the original data files.
46
+ - Reasoning traces are omitted. Contact identifiers, home-directory usernames,
47
+ private-network examples and literal password examples are replaced with
48
+ placeholders.
49
+ - Automated replacement does not establish comprehensive privacy or safety
50
+ clearance; downstream use needs an appropriate review.
51
+
52
+ ## Distribution and terms
53
+
54
+ `RazorCal.json` is distributed through Git LFS rather than the Python wheel.
55
+
56
+ Applicable upstream licenses and attribution requirements remain in effect.
57
+ There is no claim that one dataset-wide license supersedes all upstream terms,
58
+ or that redistribution rights have been fully resolved for every record.
59
+ See [LICENSE-DATA](LICENSE-DATA) and [NOTICE](https://github.com/nick7nlp/Razor/blob/main/NOTICE).
60
+
61
+ Issues may be reported through the RAZOR repository. Citation metadata is in
62
+ [CITATION.cff](https://github.com/nick7nlp/Razor/blob/main/CITATION.cff).