| %% Non-negative least-squares (NNLS) using L-BFBS-B | |
| % | |
| % Non-negative least-squares solves the following problem: | |
| % $$ \min_x \|Ax \textrm{--} b\|^2_2 \quad\textrm{such that}\quad x \ge 0 $$ | |
| % | |
| % The matrix 'A' may have more columns than rows (the 'underdetermined' case), | |
| % or more rows than columns (the 'overdetermined' case), or the same | |
| % number of rows and columns. Some solvers, such as the PQN | |
| % method described in "Tackling Box-Constrained Optimization via a new | |
| % Projected Quasi-Newton Approach" by Dongmin Kim, Suvrit Sra, and | |
| % Inderjit Dhillon (http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/inderjit/public_papers/pqnj_sisc10.pdf), | |
| % only work for the overdetermined case. | |
| % | |
| % To quote from that paper, | |
| % "Not surprisingly, some constrained | |
| % optimization methods have also been applied to solve NNLS. It is interesting | |
| % to note that for large scale problems these specialized algorithms are outperformed | |
| % by modern methods such as TRON, LBFGS-B, or the methods of this paper. Curiously | |
| % this fact has not yet been widely adopted by the wider research community | |
| % (footnote: This could be because Matlab continues to ship the antiquated | |
| % lsqnonneg function, which is an implementation of the original NNLS algorithm of | |
| % Lawson and Hanson 1974 )." | |
| % | |
| % The Kim/Sra/Dhillon paper compares the following algorithms: | |
| % | |
| % Fast NNLS, by Rasmus Bro. Available at: | |
| % http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/3388-nnls-and-constrained-regression | |
| % | |
| % mtron, mex wrapper by Christoph Ortner, available at: | |
| % http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/14848-mtron | |
| % Based on the fortran tron algorithm by Chih-Jen Lin and Jorge Moreé, | |
| % "Newton's method for large bound-constrained optimization problems", | |
| % SIAM Journal on Optimization, 9(4), pp. 1100-1127, 1999. | |
| % http://www-unix.mcs.anl.gov/~more/tron/ | |
| % | |
| % L-BFGS-B. | |
| % mex wrapper for v2.1 of the fortran files. | |
| % R. Byrd, P. Lu, J. Nocedal, and C. Zhu, "A Limited Memory Algorithm | |
| % for Bound Constrained Optimization", SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 16 | |
| % (1995), pp. 1190--1208. | |
| % | |
| %% This demo | |
| % Here, we use the mex wrapper for L-BFGS-B v3.0, which is a significantly | |
| % improved version of L-BFGS-B from v2.1. We show how to use | |
| % the software and the fminunc_wrapper helper file. | |
| % | |
| % It also compares to some NNLS implementations availabe on the matworks | |
| % file exchange. In addition to Fast NNLS (FNNLS), mtron, and LBFGS, | |
| % we compare with the following algorithms, all written by Uriel Roque | |
| % and based on: Portugal, Judice and Vicente, | |
| % "A comparison of block pivoting and interior pointalgorithms for | |
| % linear least squares problems with nonnegative variables", | |
| % Mathematics of Computation, 63(1994), pp. 625-643 | |
| % | |
| % activeset.m This is pretty fast for medium-scale and smaller problems | |
| % | |
| % blocknnls.m Similar to activeset.m in performance | |
| % | |
| % newton.m Very slow for large problems | |
| % | |
| % pcnnls.m (predictor-corrector method) Very slow for large problems | |
| % | |
| % | |
| % The most interesting tests use large matrices. For small matrices, tests | |
| % are pointless, because any of the methods are suitable. | |
| %% Setup a problem | |
| % The best codes handle N = 20,000 as long as the matrix is very sparse. | |
| % N = 3000; M = 4000; % Large scale. Things start to get interesting | |
| N = 1000; M = 1500; % at this size, some algo take a long time! | |
| % N = 100; M = 150; % at this size, all algorithms take < 14 seconds | |
| A = randn(M,N); | |
| b = randn(M,1); | |
| fcn = @(x) norm( A*x - b)^2; | |
| % here are two equivalent ways to make the gradient. grad2 is sometimes faster | |
| grad1 = @(x) 2*A'*(A*x-b); | |
| AtA = A'*A; Ab = A'*b; | |
| grad2 = @(x) 2*( AtA*x - Ab ); | |
| grad = grad2; | |
| x = []; | |
| time = []; | |
| %% Solve NNLS with L-BFGS-B | |
| l = zeros(N,1); % lower bound | |
| u = inf(N,1); % there is no upper bound | |
| tstart=tic; | |
| fun = @(x)fminunc_wrapper( x, fcn, grad); | |
| % Request very high accuracy for this test: | |
| opts = struct( 'factr', 1e4, 'pgtol', 1e-8, 'm', 10); | |
| opts.printEvery = 5; | |
| if N > 10000 | |
| opts.m = 50; | |
| end | |
| % Run the algorithm: | |
| [xk, ~, info] = lbfgsb(fun, l, u, opts ); | |
| t=toc(tstart) | |
| % Record results | |
| x.lbfgsb = xk; | |
| time.lbfgsb = t; | |
| %% Solve with TRON, via MTRON interface | |
| % Only run this if you have mtron installed and it is in the path | |
| if exist( 'itron.m', 'file' ) | |
| x0 = zeros(N,1); | |
| xl = zeros(N,1); | |
| xu = +1e300*ones(N,1); | |
| fmin = -1e300; | |
| H = sparse(AtA/2); % will crash if not a sparse matrix | |
| tstart=tic; | |
| hess = @(x) H; | |
| fun = @(x)fminunc_wrapper( x, fcn, grad, hess ); | |
| [xk, fval, exitflag, output] = itron(fun, x0, xl, xu, fmin ); | |
| t=toc(tstart) | |
| x.tron = xk; | |
| time.tron = t; | |
| end | |
| %% Active set. Fast on medium problems | |
| if exist( 'activeset.m', 'file' ) | |
| tstart=tic; | |
| [xk,y] = activeset(A,b); | |
| t=toc(tstart) | |
| x.activeset = xk; | |
| time.activeset = t; | |
| end | |
| %% Block pivoting. Fast on medium problems | |
| if exist( 'blocknnls.m', 'file' ) | |
| tstart=tic; | |
| [xk] = blocknnls(A,b, 'fixed'); | |
| t=toc(tstart) | |
| x.blockPivot = xk; | |
| time.blockPivot = t; | |
| end | |
| %% Newton. Slow! | |
| if exist( 'newton.m', 'file' ) && N < 500 | |
| tstart=tic; | |
| [xk,y] = newton(A,b, ones(N,1), 100); % can't have 0 starting vector | |
| t=toc(tstart) | |
| x.newton = xk; | |
| time.newton = t; | |
| else | |
| fprintf('Skipping Newton method because we can''t find it, or it is too slow\n'); | |
| end | |
| %% Predictor-Corrector. Can be very slow | |
| if exist( 'pcnnls.m', 'file' ) && N < 500 | |
| tstart=tic; | |
| [xk,y,nits] = pcnnls(A,b,ones(N,1), 3000); | |
| t=toc(tstart) | |
| x.predCorr = xk; | |
| time.predCorr = t; | |
| else | |
| fprintf('Skipping predCorr method because we can''t find it, or it is too slow\n'); | |
| end | |
| %% Run Matlab's default (Lawson and Hanson) Very slow on large problems | |
| tstart=tic; | |
| xk = lsqnonneg(A,b); | |
| t=toc(tstart) | |
| x.lsqnonneg = xk; | |
| time.lsqnonneg = t; | |
| %% Fast NNLS, modification of Lawson and Hanson. Much better for large problems | |
| if exist( 'fnnls.m', 'file' ) | |
| tstart=tic; | |
| [xk] = fnnls(A'*A,A'*b); | |
| t=toc(tstart) | |
| x.fnnls = xk; | |
| time.fnnls = t; | |
| end | |
| %% PQN-LBFGS and PQN-BB algorithms of Kim/Sra/Dhillon. Very fast. | |
| if exist( 'solnls.m', 'file' ) | |
| opt = solopt; | |
| opt.maxtime = 2000; | |
| opt.verbose = 0; | |
| tstart=tic; | |
| % run their 'BB' variant | |
| opt.algo = 'BB'; | |
| out = solnls( A, b, zeros(N,1), opt ); | |
| t=toc(tstart) | |
| x.PQN_BB = out.x; | |
| time.PQN_BB = t; | |
| % and run their 'PLB' variant (their 'PQN' variant is much slower) | |
| % which uses L-BFGS (not to be confused with L-BFGS-B) | |
| opt.algo = 'PLB'; | |
| tstart=tic; | |
| out = solnls( A, b, zeros(N,1), opt ); | |
| t=toc(tstart) | |
| x.PQN = out.x; | |
| time.PQN = t; | |
| end | |
| %% Results | |
| % Find the best answer, and use that as the reference. | |
| fMin = Inf; | |
| for f=fieldnames(x)', | |
| if fcn(x.(f{1})) < fMin, | |
| fMin = fcn(x.(f{1})); | |
| best = f{1}; | |
| end | |
| end | |
| xReference = x.(best); | |
| errFcn = @(x) norm(x-xReference)/norm(xReference); | |
| % Print out info. Verify that the solution is indeed non-negative (hence the | |
| % min(x) information), and the objective function, and the error | |
| % against the reference solution. Also display the time. | |
| fprintf('== Size of problem is %d x %d == \n', M, N ); | |
| for f=fieldnames(x)', | |
| fprintf('%10s: obj is %7.2f, min(x) is %7.1d, err is %.2e, time is %6.3f s\n', ... | |
| f{1}, fcn(x.(f{1})), min(x.(f{1})), errFcn(x.(f{1})), time.(f{1}) ); | |
| end |