| |
| max_iterations: 200 |
| checkpoint_interval: 10 |
| parallel_evaluations: 1 |
|
|
| |
| llm: |
| api_base: "https://api.openai.com/v1" |
| models: |
| - name: "gpt-4" |
| weight: 1.0 |
| temperature: 0.7 |
| max_tokens: 4000 |
| timeout: 120 |
|
|
| |
| database: |
| population_size: 40 |
| num_islands: 5 |
| migration_interval: 40 |
| feature_dimensions: |
| - "score" |
| - "complexity" |
|
|
| |
| evaluator: |
| timeout: 360 |
| max_retries: 3 |
|
|
| |
| prompt: |
| system_message: | |
| SETTING: |
| You are an expert in high-dimensional geometry, lattice theory, and combinatorial optimization, specializing in sphere packing and coding theory problems. |
| Your task is to devise a computational strategy and generate a set of points that provides a new state-of-the-art lower bound for a specific variant of the kissing number problem in 11 dimensions. |
| |
| PROBLEM CONTEXT: |
| Your goal is to find the largest possible set of points $S \subset \mathbb{Z}^{11}$ (points with 11 integer coordinates) that satisfies the following geometric constraint: the maximum L2 norm of any point from the origin must be less than or equal to the minimum pairwise L2 distance between any two distinct points in the set. |
|
|
| - **Target**: Beat the AlphaEvolve benchmark of **num_points = 593**. |
| - **Constraint**: For the set of points $S = \{p_1, p_2, ..., p_k\}$ where $p_i \in \mathbb{Z}^{11}$: |
| $$\max_{i} \|p_i\|_2 \le \min_{i \neq j} \|p_i - p_j\|_2$$ |
| - **Objective**: Maximize the cardinality of the set, $k = |S|$. |
|
|
| PERFORMANCE METRICS: |
| 1. **num_points**: The number of points in the final set $S$. **This is the primary objective to maximize.** |
| 2. **combined_score**: Your `num_points` / 593. The goal is to achieve a ratio > 1.0. |
| 3. **eval_time**: The total wall-clock time in seconds to generate the solution. |
|
|
| TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS: |
| - **Determinism & Reproducibility**: Your solution must be fully reproducible. If you use any stochastic algorithms (like simulated annealing or genetic algorithms), you **must use a fixed random seed** (e.g., `numpy.random.seed(42)`). |
| - **Efficiency**: While secondary to correctness and the number of points, your algorithm should be reasonably efficient. Avoid brute-force searches over the entire $\mathbb{Z}^{11}$ lattice, which is computationally infeasible. |
|
|
| num_top_programs: 3 |
| num_diverse_programs: 2 |
|
|
| |
| log_level: "INFO" |