File size: 7,072 Bytes
955ae84 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 |
# CG-Bench: A Call Graph Construction Benchmark for Language Models
[](https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT)
[](CG_Bench_Can_Language_Models_Assist_Call_Graph_Construction_in_the_Real_World.pdf)
> **π Paper**: [CG-Bench: Can Language Models Assist Call Graph Construction in the Real World?](CG_Bench_Can_Language_Models_Assist_Call_Graph_Construction_in_the_Real_World.pdf) - Published at LMPL@SPLASH2025
CG-Bench is a comprehensive benchmark dataset designed to evaluate the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) in assisting with call graph construction in real-world C/C++ codebases. The benchmark focuses specifically on challenging indirect function calls through function pointers, which are notoriously difficult for traditional static analysis tools to resolve.
## π Overview
Call graph construction is a fundamental program analysis technique crucial for various software engineering tasks including debugging, optimization, security analysis, and program comprehension. While direct function calls are straightforward to analyze, indirect calls through function pointers present significant challenges for automated tools.
This benchmark provides:
- **Real-world complexity**: Examples extracted from popular open-source projects
- **Diverse patterns**: Multiple categories of function pointer usage patterns
- **Structured format**: Consistent annotation format for evaluation
- **Comprehensive coverage**: 104 examples across 7 major open-source projects
## ποΈ Dataset Structure
### Projects Included
The benchmark includes examples from seven major C/C++ projects:
| Project | Domain | Lines of Code(KLoC) | Description |
|---------|--------|---------------|-------------|
| **openssh** | Security | ~120 | Secure Shell (SSH) protocol implementation |
| **curl** | Networking | ~182 | Command line tool and library for transferring data |
| **redis** | Database | ~200 | In-memory data structure store |
| **zfs** | File System | ~380 | ZFS file system implementation |
| **wrk** | Benchmarking | ~601 | HTTP benchmarking tool |
| **ffmpeg** | Multimedia | ~1,257 | Complete multimedia framework |
| **gcc** | Compiler | ~6,200 | GNU Compiler Collection |
| **Total** | **All Domains** | **~8,940** | **7 major open-source projects** |
### Function Pointer Categories
The benchmark categorizes function pointer usage patterns into 11 distinct types:
1. **`fnptr-callback`** (15 examples): Function pointers used as callbacks
2. **`fnptr-cast`** (7 examples): Function pointers with type casting
3. **`fnptr-dynamic-call`** (5 examples): Dynamically resolved function calls
4. **`fnptr-global-array`** (6 examples): Function pointers in global arrays
5. **`fnptr-global-struct-array`** (12 examples): Function pointers in arrays within global structures
6. **`fnptr-global-struct`** (11 examples): Function pointers in global structures
7. **`fnptr-library`** (20 examples): Function pointers in library interfaces
8. **`fnptr-only`** (12 examples): Basic function pointer calls without complex patterns
9. **`fnptr-struct`** (14 examples): Function pointers stored in structures
10. **`fnptr-varargs`** (1 example): Function pointers with variable arguments
11. **`fnptr-virtual`** (1 example): Virtual function-like patterns in C
## π Repository Contents
```
CG-Bench/
βββ README.md # This file
βββ LICENSE # MIT License
βββ projects.md # Detailed project statistics
βββ extract_from_markdowns.py # Data extraction script
βββ fnptr-*.md # Category-specific examples
βββ CG_Bench_Can_Language_Models_Assist_Call_Graph_Construction_in_the_Real_World.pdf
```
### Example Format
Each example follows a consistent structure:
```markdown
# Example N
## Callsite
*Full path and location of the function pointer call*
fnptr: *function_pointer_name*
targets: target_function1, target_function2, ...
## Related Code Snippets
```c
// Relevant code context showing the function pointer usage
```
## π Usage
### Extracting Benchmark Data
To generate a structured JSON dataset from the markdown files:
```bash
python3 extract_from_markdowns.py
```
This creates `cgbench.json` containing all examples in a structured format suitable for evaluation.
### Data Format
The generated JSON follows this structure:
```json
{
"project_name": {
"callsite_path": {
"callsite": "function_pointer_name",
"type": "category",
"chain_summary": [
{
"source_code": ["line1", "line2", ...],
"parent": ""
}
],
"callees": {
"targets": {
"target_function": ""
}
}
}
}
}
```
## π Benchmark Statistics
- **Total Examples**: 104
- **Project Categories**: 7 major open-source projects
- **Function Pointer Patterns**: 11 distinct categories
- **Code Contexts**: Multiple code snippets per example showing usage patterns
- **Real-world Complexity**: Examples from production codebases
## π― Use Cases
This benchmark is designed for:
1. **LLM Evaluation**: Assessing language models' ability to understand complex code patterns
2. **Tool Development**: Benchmarking static analysis tools for call graph construction
3. **Research**: Studying function pointer resolution in real-world codebases
4. **Education**: Understanding various function pointer usage patterns in C/C++
## π Paper Reference
This benchmark accompanies the research paper:
**"CG-Bench: Can Language Models Assist Call Graph Construction in the Real World?"**
The paper provides detailed methodology, evaluation results, and analysis of LLM performance on call graph construction tasks.
## π€ Contributing
We welcome contributions to expand the benchmark! Please consider:
- Adding examples from additional open-source projects
- Identifying new function pointer usage patterns
- Improving the extraction and annotation process
- Reporting issues or inconsistencies
## π License
This project is licensed under the MIT License - see the [LICENSE](LICENSE) file for details.
## π Citation
If you use this benchmark in your research, please cite:
```bibtex
@inproceedings{cgbench2025,
title={CG-Bench: Can Language Models Assist Call Graph Construction in the Real World?},
author={[Authors]},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGPLAN International Workshop on Language Models for Programming (LMPL 2025)},
year={2025},
publisher={ACM},
address={New York, NY, USA},
url={https://conf.researchr.org/home/icfp-splash-2025/lmpl-2025},
note={Co-located with SPLASH 2025}
}
```
## π Contact
For questions or collaboration opportunities, please open an issue on GitHub or contact the maintainers.
---
**Keywords**: Call Graph Construction, Function Pointers, Static Analysis, Large Language Models, C/C++ Analysis, Software Engineering, Program Analysis
|