Update README.md

README.md

@@ -7,4 +7,49 @@ tags:
 pretty_name: rulebreakers
 size_categories:
 - 10K<n<100K
----
+---
+
+
+# Dataset of "[RULEBREAKERS: Challenging LLMs at the Crossroads between Formal Logic and Human-like Reasoning](https://icml.cc/virtual/2025/poster/43712)" (ICML 2025) 
+## Jason Chan, Robert Gaizauskas and Zhixue Zhao
+
+- ```id```: unique 7-digit ID assigned to the instance (each rulebreaker and non-rulebreaker pair share the same ID prefix, followed by _rb and _nonrb respectively e.g. "RULEBREAKERS_0000246_nonrb")
+- ```rulebreaker_type```: the type of rulebreaker (or non-rulebreaker), classified by the logical rule applicable to the surface form of the premises ("mt" for modus tollens or "ds" for disjunctive syllogism)
+- ```category```: the type of entities mentioned in the premises and conclusion (e.g. "cities", "fish", "brass instrument")
+- ```premise1```: the first premise (either a conditional or disjunctive statement)
+- ```premise2```: the second premise
+- ```conclusion```: the conclusion that should be assessed in relation to the two premises
+- ```label```: Boolean (true or false) - whether or not the conclusion follows from the premises (NB this is always true for non-rulebreakers and false for rulebreakers in the dataset)
+
+Detail columns (these refer to the specific entities/names etc. that are used in creating the premises and conclusion)
+
+- ```firstName```: the first name mentioned in the premises and conclusion
+- ```pronoun```: the pronoun associated with the first name
+- ```verb```: the verb mentioned (e.g. "is in", "is good at")
+- ```entityA```: the first entity mentioned (i.e. a country or category of objects e.g "birds")
+- ```entityB```: the second entity mentioned (i.e. a city or specific object e.g. "a robin")
+
+Additional columns (these columns are included for ease of use/evaluation)
+
+- ```kc_gen_formatted_prompt```: a ready-to-use prompt that presents the premises to the model and asks it to generate a conclusion that follows from the premises
+- ```target_correct_conclusion```: the correct response expected from the model given the prompt (rulebreakers: "Nothing follows"; non-rulebreakers: the conclusion that can be derived by applying a logical rule to the premises)
+- ```target_incorrect_conclusion```: the incorrect response expected from the model (rulebreakers: the conclusion that can be derived by applying a logical rule to the premises; non-rulebreakers: "Nothing follows")
+
+Paired correctness: a rulebreaker and non-rulebreaker scenario pair is considered to be correctly answered if the model generates the corresponding "target_correct_conclusion" in the rulebreaker ("_rb") as well as the non-rulebreaker ("_nonrb") scenario. A pair is considered "unparsed" if, in at least one of the two scenarios, the model generates a response that matches neither the "target_correct_conclusion" nor the "target_incorrect_conclusion". In all other cases, the pair is considered "incorrect". See paper for further details.
+
+
+## Contact
+
+- Please contact Jason Chan (me) (JLYChan1@sheffield.ac.uk) or Zhixue Zhao (zhixue.zhao@sheffield.ac.uk) for any questions relating to the dataset or the project.
+
+## Citation
+```
+@inproceedings{
+chan2025rulebreakers,
+title={{RULEBREAKERS}: Challenging {LLM}s at the Crossroads between Formal Logic and Human-like Reasoning},
+author={Jason Chan and Robert J. Gaizauskas and Zhixue Zhao},
+booktitle={Forty-second International Conference on Machine Learning},
+year={2025},
+url={https://openreview.net/forum?id=uqpML2nbIz}
+}
+```