Datasets:
Tasks:
Feature Extraction
Modalities:
Text
Formats:
csv
Languages:
English
Size:
10K - 100K
License:
File size: 5,365 Bytes
d26eacb cec2ff1 d26eacb 3b32316 d26eacb 5096d9c 6fd4d1b d26eacb 94d1ca6 d26eacb f9b6d9e 06a408b f9b6d9e 0c5211c |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 |
---
task_categories:
- feature-extraction
language:
- en
tags:
- biology
- chemistry
- drug
license: apache-2.0
size_categories:
- 1M<n<10M
---
🔧[Code](https://github.com/spatialdatasciencegroup/DecoyDB), 📂[Dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/jiangteam/DecoyDB)
## Dataset Summary
DecoyDB is a curated dataset of high-resolution protein-ligand complexes and their associated decoy structures. It is designed to support research on graph contrastive learning, binding affinity prediction, and structure-based drug discovery. The dataset is derived from experimentally resolved complexes and refined to ensure data quality.
Predicting the binding affinity of protein-ligand complexes plays a vital role in drug discovery. Unfortunately, progress has been hindered by the lack of large-scale and high-quality binding affinity labels. The widely used PDBbind dataset has fewer than 20K labeled complexes. Self-supervised learning, especially graph contrastive learning (GCL), provides a unique opportunity to break the barrier by pretraining graph neural network models based on vast unlabeled complexes and fine-tuning the models on much fewer labeled complexes. However, the problem faces unique challenges, including a lack of a comprehensive unlabeled dataset with well-defined positive/negative complex pairs and the need to design GCL algorithms that incorporate the unique characteristics of such data. To fill the gap, we propose DecoyDB, a large-scale, structure-aware dataset specifically designed for self-supervised GCL on protein–ligand complexes. DecoyDB consists of high-resolution ground truth complexes and diverse decoy structures with computationally generated binding poses that range from realistic to suboptimal. Each decoy is annotated with a Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSD) from the native pose. We further design a customized GCL framework to pretrain graph neural networks based on DecoyDB and fine-tune the models with labels from PDBbind. Extensive experiments confirm that models pretrained with DecoyDB achieve superior accuracy, sample efficiency, and generalizability.
## Data Structure
Each protein-ligand complex is stored in a nested directory under DecoyDB/, using the format:
```plaintext
DecoyDB
├── README.md # This file
├── complexes.csv # Complex ID and paths for the data
├── data.zip # Structures for proteins, ligands and decoys
├── {prefix}/ # {prefix} = first 2 characters of the complex ID (e.g., '1A', '2B')
│ └── {complex_id}/ # Unique identifier for each complex (e.g., 1A2C_H1Q)
│ ├── {complex_id}_ligand.pdbqt # Ligand structure in AutoDock format
│ ├── {complex_id}_target.pdbqt # Protein structure in AutoDock format
│ ├── {complex_id}_decoys.pdbqt # Concatenated decoy structures
│ └── {complex_id}_decoys_scores.csv # Corresponding RMSD scores for each decoy
```
The data.zip can be found in assets branch.
## Dataset Details
### Dataset Refinement
To construct DecoyDB, we first filtered protein–ligand complexes from the Protein Data Bank (PDB) with a resolution ≤ 2.5 Å and applied the following refinement steps:
- Removed ligands with molecular weights outside the (50, 1000) range.
- Excluded complexes involving metal clusters, monoatomic ions, and common crystallization molecules.
- Retained ligands with elements limited to C, N, O, H, S, P, and halogens.
- Retained those protein chains with at least one atom within 10 Å of the ligand.
- Saved the ligand and protein separately.
### Decoy Generation
For each refined protein–ligand complex, **100 decoy poses** were generated using **AutoDock Vina 1.2**, with a 5 Å padding grid box and an exhaustiveness parameter of 8 and remove unrealistic generated structures.
## Dataset Statistics
- Number of protein–ligand complexes: **61,104**
- Number of decoys: **5,353,307**
- Average number of decoys per complex: **88**
- Average RMSD: **7.22 Å**
- RMSD range: **[0.03, 25.56] Å**
## Contact
- Yupu Zhang (y.zhang1@ufl.edu), Department of Computer and Information Science and Engineering, University of Florida
- Zhe Jiang (zhe.jiang@ufl.edu), Lead PI, Department of Computer and Information Science and Engineering, University of Florida
- Chenglong Li (lic@ufl.edu), Department of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Florida
- Gustavo Seabra (seabra@cop.ufl.edu), Department of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Florida
- Yanjun Li (yanjun.li@ufl.edu), Department of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Florida
## Citation
If you use this dataset, please cite our paper:
```bibtex
@inproceedings{
zhang2025decoydb,
title={Decoy{DB}: A Dataset for Graph Contrastive Learning in Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction},
author={Yupu Zhang and Zelin Xu and Tingsong Xiao and Gustavo Seabra and Yanjun Li and Chenglong Li and Zhe Jiang},
booktitle={The Thirty-ninth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track},
year={2025},
url={https://openreview.net/forum?id=lzLo5bRgQC}
} |