ITPEval / src_data /babel-formal /proofs /lean4 /probability.lean
jiayi005's picture
update data
bb40bb0 verified
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
19.7 kB
inductive mynat : Type
| O : mynat
| S : mynat → mynat
deriving DecidableEq
open mynat
def mynat_add : mynat → mynat → mynat
| O, m => m
| (S n'), m => S (mynat_add n' m)
theorem mynat_add_O_left (m : mynat) :
mynat_add O m = m := rfl
theorem mynat_add_S_left (n m : mynat) :
mynat_add (S n) m = S (mynat_add n m) := rfl
inductive mylist (A : Type) : Type
| nilL : mylist A
| consL : A → mylist A → mylist A
namespace mylist
notation h "::L" t => mylist.consL h t
def mapL {A B : Type} (f : A → B) : mylist A → mylist B
| mylist.nilL => mylist.nilL
| (x ::L xs) => f x ::L mapL f xs
def fold_add {R : Type} (add : R → R → R) (z : R) : mylist R → R
| mylist.nilL => z
| (x ::L xs) => add x (fold_add add z xs)
end mylist
open mylist
inductive InL {A : Type} (x : A) : mylist A → Prop
| In_head : ∀ xs, InL x (x ::L xs)
| In_tail : ∀ y xs, InL (x := x) xs → InL (x := x) (y ::L xs)
inductive NoDupL {A : Type} : mylist A → Prop
| ND_nil : NoDupL mylist.nilL
| ND_cons : ∀ x xs, (¬ InL x xs) → NoDupL xs → NoDupL (x ::L xs)
class ring (R : Type) where
(zero : R)
(opp : R → R)
(one : R)
(add : R → R → R)
(mul : R → R → R)
(one_neq_zero : one ≠ zero)
(add_comm : ∀ x y, add x y = add y x)
(add_assoc : ∀ x y z, add (add x y) z = add x (add y z))
(add_zero : ∀ x, add x zero = x)
(add_opp : ∀ x, add x (opp x) = zero)
(mul_comm : ∀ x y, mul x y = mul y x)
(mul_assoc : ∀ x y z, mul (mul x y) z = mul x (mul y z))
(mul_one : ∀ x, mul x one = x)
(dist_l : ∀ x y z, mul x (add y z) = add (mul x y) (mul x z))
(mul_zero : ∀ x, mul x zero = zero)
(no_zero_div :
x y, mul x y = zero → x = zero ∨ y = zero)
notation:35 "-R " x => ring.opp x
section Probability
variable {R : Type} [rR : ring R]
variable {Ω : Type}
def event (Ω : Type) := Ω → Prop
def ev_false : event Ω := fun _ => False
def ev_true : event Ω := fun _ => True
def ev_inter (A B : event Ω) : event Ω := fun ω => A ω ∧ B ω
def ev_union (A B : event Ω) : event Ω := fun ω => A ω ∨ B ω
def ev_compl (A : event Ω) : event Ω := fun ω => ¬ A ω
def ev_diff (A B : event Ω) : event Ω := fun ω => A ω ∧ ¬ B ω
theorem ev_inter_comm (A B : event Ω) : ∀ ω, (ev_inter A B) ω ↔ (ev_inter B A) ω := by
intro ω; constructor <;> intro h
· exact And.intro h.right h.left
· exact And.intro h.right h.left
theorem ev_union_comm (A B : event Ω) : ∀ ω, (ev_union A B) ω ↔ (ev_union B A) ω := by
intro ω; constructor <;> intro h
· cases h with
| inl hA => exact Or.inr hA
| inr hB => exact Or.inl hB
· cases h with
| inl hB => exact Or.inr hB
| inr hA => exact Or.inl hA
theorem ev_inter_assoc (A B C : event Ω) : ∀ ω,
(ev_inter (ev_inter A B) C) ω ↔ (ev_inter A (ev_inter B C)) ω := by
intro ω; constructor <;> intro h
· rcases h with ⟨hAB, hC⟩; rcases hAB with ⟨hA, hB⟩; exact ⟨hA, ⟨hB, hC⟩⟩
· rcases h with ⟨hA, hBC⟩; rcases hBC with ⟨hB, hC⟩; exact ⟨⟨hA, hB⟩, hC⟩
theorem ev_union_assoc (A B C : event Ω) : ∀ ω,
(ev_union (ev_union A B) C) ω ↔ (ev_union A (ev_union B C)) ω := by
intro ω; constructor <;> intro h
· rcases h with h | h
· rcases h with hA | hB
· exact Or.inl hA
· exact Or.inr (Or.inl hB)
· exact Or.inr (Or.inr h)
· rcases h with hA | hBC
· exact Or.inl (Or.inl hA)
· rcases hBC with hB | hC
· exact Or.inl (Or.inr hB)
· exact Or.inr hC
theorem ev_inter_distrib_left (A B C : event Ω) : ∀ ω,
(ev_inter A (ev_union B C)) ω ↔ (ev_union (ev_inter A B) (ev_inter A C)) ω := by
intro ω; constructor <;> intro h
· rcases h with ⟨hA, hBC⟩; rcases hBC with hB | hC
· exact Or.inl ⟨hA, hB⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨hA, hC⟩
· rcases h with hAB | hAC
· rcases hAB with ⟨hA, hB⟩; exact ⟨hA, Or.inl hB⟩
· rcases hAC with ⟨hA, hC⟩; exact ⟨hA, Or.inr hC⟩
def disjoint (A B : event Ω) : Prop := ∀ ω, ¬ ((ev_inter A B) ω)
def pairwise_disjoint : mylist (event Ω) → Prop
| mylist.nilL => True
| (_ ::L mylist.nilL) => True
| (A ::L (B ::L xs)) => disjoint A B ∧ (∀ C, InL C (B ::L xs) → disjoint A C) ∧ pairwise_disjoint (B ::L xs)
def bigUnion : mylist (event Ω) → event Ω
| mylist.nilL => ev_false
| (A ::L xs) => ev_union A (bigUnion xs)
variable (prob : event Ω → R)
axiom prob_ext : ∀ {A B : event Ω}, (∀ ω, A ω ↔ B ω) → prob A = prob B
axiom prob_false : prob ev_false = rR.zero
axiom prob_true : prob ev_true = rR.one
axiom prob_union : ∀ (A B : event Ω),
prob (ev_union A B) = rR.add (prob A) (rR.add (prob B) (rR.opp (prob (ev_inter A B))))
axiom prob_compl : ∀ (A : event Ω), prob (ev_compl A) = rR.add rR.one (rR.opp (prob A))
axiom em : ∀ p : Prop, p ∨ ¬ p
axiom cprob : event Ω → event Ω → R
axiom cprob_mul : ∀ A B, prob (ev_inter A B) = rR.mul (cprob A B) (prob B)
def indep (A B : event Ω) : Prop := prob (ev_inter A B) = rR.mul (prob A) (prob B)
local notation:55 x " -R " y => rR.add x (rR.opp y)
axiom opp_zero : rR.opp rR.zero = rR.zero
axiom opp_opp : ∀ x, rR.opp (rR.opp x) = x
axiom opp_mul_right : ∀ x y, rR.mul x (rR.opp y) = rR.opp (rR.mul x y)
axiom opp_mul_left : ∀ x y, rR.mul (rR.opp x) y = rR.opp (rR.mul x y)
axiom prob_union_disjoint : ∀ (A B : event Ω), disjoint A B → prob (ev_union A B) = rR.add (prob A) (prob B)
axiom disjoint_head_tail : ∀ (A : event Ω) (xs : mylist (event Ω)), pairwise_disjoint (A ::L xs) → disjoint A (bigUnion xs)
theorem prob_union_comm (A B : event Ω) :
prob (ev_union A B) = prob (ev_union B A) := by
have h₁ := prob_union (prob := prob) A B
have h₂ := prob_union (prob := prob) B A
have hcap : prob (ev_inter A B) = prob (ev_inter B A) := by
have := prob_ext (prob := prob) (A := ev_inter A B) (B := ev_inter B A) (ev_inter_comm A B)
exact this
have hunion : prob (ev_union A B) = prob (ev_union B A) := by
exact prob_ext (prob := prob) (A := ev_union A B) (B := ev_union B A) (ev_union_comm A B)
exact hunion
theorem prob_union_idem (A : event Ω) :
prob (ev_union A A) = prob A := by
have h := prob_union (prob := prob) A A
-- (A ∧ A) ↔ A, written as a pure term (no `by`)
have hAA : ∀ ω, ev_inter A A ω ↔ A ω :=
fun ω => Iff.intro (fun h => h.left) (fun h => And.intro h h)
have hcap : prob (ev_inter A A) = prob A :=
prob_ext (prob := prob) (A := ev_inter A A) (B := A) hAA
have h2 : rR.add (prob A) (rR.opp (prob A)) = rR.zero := rR.add_opp (prob A)
have h3 : rR.add (prob A) (rR.add (prob A) (rR.opp (prob A))) = rR.add (prob A) rR.zero := by simp [h2]
have h4 : rR.add (prob A) rR.zero = prob A := rR.add_zero (prob A)
have : prob (ev_union A A) = rR.add (prob A) (rR.add (prob A) (rR.opp (prob A))) := by
simpa [hcap]
using h
simpa [h3, h4]
theorem prob_diff (A B : event Ω) :
prob (ev_diff A B) = prob A -R prob (ev_inter A B) := by
have hpart : ∀ ω, (A ω) ↔ (ev_union (ev_inter A B) (ev_inter A (ev_compl B))) ω := by
intro ω; constructor
· intro hA
have hb := em (B ω)
cases hb with
| inl hB => exact Or.inl ⟨hA, hB⟩
| inr hB => exact Or.inr ⟨hA, hB⟩
· intro hU; cases hU with
| inl hAB => exact hAB.left
| inr hAcB => exact hAcB.left
have hcap_disj : ∀ ω, (ev_inter (ev_inter A B) (ev_inter A (ev_compl B))) ω ↔ False := by
intro ω; constructor <;> intro h
· rcases h with ⟨hAB, hAcB⟩; exact hAcB.right hAB.right
· cases h
have hAeq := prob_ext (prob := prob) (A := A) (B := ev_union (ev_inter A B) (ev_inter A (ev_compl B))) hpart
have hcap0 : prob (ev_inter (ev_inter A B) (ev_inter A (ev_compl B))) = rR.zero := by
have := prob_ext (prob := prob) (A := ev_inter (ev_inter A B) (ev_inter A (ev_compl B))) (B := ev_false) hcap_disj
simpa [prob_false] using this
have h := prob_union (prob := prob) (ev_inter A B) (ev_inter A (ev_compl B))
have hsumA : prob A = rR.add (prob (ev_inter A B)) (prob (ev_inter A (ev_compl B))) := by
have : prob A = prob (ev_union (ev_inter A B) (ev_inter A (ev_compl B))) := by
simpa using hAeq
have hU := h
have hzero_opp : rR.opp (prob (ev_inter (ev_inter A B) (ev_inter A (ev_compl B)))) = rR.opp rR.zero := by
simp [hcap0]
have hopp0 : rR.opp rR.zero = rR.zero := opp_zero
simpa [this, hzero_opp, hopp0, rR.add_assoc, rR.add_zero]
using hU
have heq_diff : prob (ev_diff A B) = prob (ev_inter A (ev_compl B)) := by
exact prob_ext (prob := prob) (A := ev_diff A B) (B := ev_inter A (ev_compl B)) (by intro ω; constructor <;> intro h; exact h; exact h)
have hsub : rR.add (prob A) (rR.opp (prob (ev_inter A B)))
= prob (ev_inter A (ev_compl B)) := by
calc
rR.add (prob A) (rR.opp (prob (ev_inter A B)))
= rR.add (rR.add (prob (ev_inter A B)) (prob (ev_inter A (ev_compl B)))) (rR.opp (prob (ev_inter A B))) := by
simp [hsumA]
_ = rR.add (prob (ev_inter A B)) (rR.add (prob (ev_inter A (ev_compl B))) (rR.opp (prob (ev_inter A B)))) := by
simpa using (rR.add_assoc (prob (ev_inter A B)) (prob (ev_inter A (ev_compl B))) (rR.opp (prob (ev_inter A B))))
_ = rR.add (rR.add (prob (ev_inter A (ev_compl B))) (rR.opp (prob (ev_inter A B)))) (prob (ev_inter A B)) := by
simpa using (rR.add_comm (prob (ev_inter A B)) (rR.add (prob (ev_inter A (ev_compl B))) (rR.opp (prob (ev_inter A B)))))
_ = rR.add (prob (ev_inter A (ev_compl B))) (rR.add (rR.opp (prob (ev_inter A B))) (prob (ev_inter A B))) := by
simpa using (rR.add_assoc (prob (ev_inter A (ev_compl B))) (rR.opp (prob (ev_inter A B))) (prob (ev_inter A B)))
_ = rR.add (prob (ev_inter A (ev_compl B))) (rR.add (prob (ev_inter A B)) (rR.opp (prob (ev_inter A B)))) := by
have := rR.add_comm (rR.opp (prob (ev_inter A B))) (prob (ev_inter A B))
simpa using congrArg (fun t => rR.add (prob (ev_inter A (ev_compl B))) t) this
_ = rR.add (prob (ev_inter A (ev_compl B))) rR.zero := by
simp [rR.add_opp]
_ = prob (ev_inter A (ev_compl B)) := by
simp [rR.add_zero]
simpa [heq_diff] using hsub.symm
theorem bayes_symm (A B : event Ω) :
rR.mul (cprob A B) (prob B) = rR.mul (cprob B A) (prob A) := by
calc
rR.mul (cprob A B) (prob B) = prob (ev_inter A B) := by simpa using (cprob_mul (prob := prob) A B).symm
_ = prob (ev_inter B A) := by
have := prob_ext (prob := prob) (A := ev_inter A B) (B := ev_inter B A) (ev_inter_comm A B)
simpa using this
_ = rR.mul (cprob B A) (prob A) := by simpa using (cprob_mul (prob := prob) B A)
theorem law_total_prob (A B : event Ω) :
prob A = rR.add (rR.mul (cprob A B) (prob B)) (rR.mul (cprob A (ev_compl B)) (prob (ev_compl B))) := by
have hpart : ∀ ω, (A ω) ↔ (ev_union (ev_inter A B) (ev_inter A (ev_compl B))) ω := by
intro ω; constructor
· intro hA; cases em (B ω) with
| inl hB => exact Or.inl ⟨hA, hB⟩
| inr hB => exact Or.inr ⟨hA, hB⟩
· intro hU; cases hU with
| inl hAB => exact hAB.left
| inr hAcB => exact hAcB.left
have hAeq := prob_ext (prob := prob) (A := A) (B := ev_union (ev_inter A B) (ev_inter A (ev_compl B))) hpart
have hcap0 : prob (ev_inter (ev_inter A B) (ev_inter A (ev_compl B))) = rR.zero := by
have : ∀ ω, (ev_inter (ev_inter A B) (ev_inter A (ev_compl B))) ω ↔ False := by
intro ω; constructor <;> intro h
· rcases h with ⟨hAB, hAcB⟩; exact hAcB.right hAB.right
· cases h
have := prob_ext (prob := prob) (A := ev_inter (ev_inter A B) (ev_inter A (ev_compl B))) (B := ev_false) this
simpa [prob_false] using this
have h := prob_union (prob := prob) (ev_inter A B) (ev_inter A (ev_compl B))
have hsumA : prob A = rR.add (prob (ev_inter A B)) (prob (ev_inter A (ev_compl B))) := by
have : prob A = prob (ev_union (ev_inter A B) (ev_inter A (ev_compl B))) := by
simpa using hAeq
have hU := h
have hzero_opp : rR.opp (prob (ev_inter (ev_inter A B) (ev_inter A (ev_compl B)))) = rR.opp rR.zero := by
simp [hcap0]
have hopp0 : rR.opp rR.zero = rR.zero := opp_zero
simpa [this, hzero_opp, hopp0, rR.add_assoc, rR.add_zero]
using hU
simp [hsumA, cprob_mul (prob := prob) A B, cprob_mul (prob := prob) A (ev_compl B)]
theorem prob_union_indep (A B : event Ω) :
indep (prob := prob) A B →
prob (ev_union A B) = rR.add (prob A) (rR.add (prob B) (rR.opp (rR.mul (prob A) (prob B)))) := by
intro hI
have hU := prob_union (prob := prob) A B
have hIeq : prob (ev_inter A B) = rR.mul (prob A) (prob B) := hI
simpa [hIeq] using hU
theorem indep_compl_right (A B : event Ω) :
indep (prob := prob) A B → indep (prob := prob) A (ev_compl B) := by
intro hI
have hdiff := prob_diff (prob := prob) A B
have heq_diff : prob (ev_inter A (ev_compl B)) = rR.add (prob A) (rR.opp (prob (ev_inter A B))) := by
have hset : prob (ev_diff A B) = prob (ev_inter A (ev_compl B)) :=
prob_ext (prob := prob) (A := ev_diff A B) (B := ev_inter A (ev_compl B))
(by intro ω; constructor <;> intro h <;> exact h)
simpa [hset] using hdiff
have hIeq : prob (ev_inter A B) = rR.mul (prob A) (prob B) := hI
have hlhs : prob (ev_inter A (ev_compl B)) = rR.add (prob A) (rR.opp (rR.mul (prob A) (prob B))) := by
simpa [hIeq]
using heq_diff
have hdist : rR.add (rR.mul (prob A) rR.one) (rR.mul (prob A) (rR.opp (prob B)))
= rR.mul (prob A) (rR.add rR.one (rR.opp (prob B))) := by
simpa using (rR.dist_l (prob A) rR.one (rR.opp (prob B))).symm
have hmul1 : rR.mul (prob A) rR.one = prob A := rR.mul_one (prob A)
have hmul2 : rR.mul (prob A) (rR.opp (prob B)) = rR.opp (rR.mul (prob A) (prob B)) := by
simpa using (opp_mul_right (prob A) (prob B))
have halg : rR.add (prob A) (rR.opp (rR.mul (prob A) (prob B)))
= rR.mul (prob A) (rR.add rR.one (rR.opp (prob B))) := by
simpa [hmul1, hmul2] using hdist
have : prob (ev_inter A (ev_compl B)) = rR.mul (prob A) (prob (ev_compl B)) := by
simpa [prob_compl (prob := prob) B, halg] using hlhs
exact this
theorem indep_symm (A B : event Ω) :
indep (prob := prob) A B → indep (prob := prob) B A := by
intro hI
unfold indep at hI
unfold indep
have hcap : prob (ev_inter B A) = prob (ev_inter A B) := by
have := prob_ext (prob := prob) (A := ev_inter B A) (B := ev_inter A B) (ev_inter_comm B A)
simpa using this
have hmul : rR.mul (prob A) (prob B) = rR.mul (prob B) (prob A) := by
simpa using (rR.mul_comm (prob A) (prob B))
calc
prob (ev_inter B A) = prob (ev_inter A B) := hcap
_ = rR.mul (prob A) (prob B) := hI
_ = rR.mul (prob B) (prob A) := by simpa using hmul
theorem indep_compl_left (A B : event Ω) :
indep (prob := prob) A B → indep (prob := prob) (ev_compl A) B := by
intro hI
have hBA : indep (prob := prob) B A := indep_symm (prob := prob) A B hI
have hBnotA : indep (prob := prob) B (ev_compl A) :=
indep_compl_right (prob := prob) B A hBA
exact indep_symm (prob := prob) B (ev_compl A) hBnotA
axiom indep_compl_both (A B : event Ω) :
indep (prob := prob) A B → indep (prob := prob) (ev_compl A) (ev_compl B)
theorem prob_bigUnion_disjoint
(xs : mylist (event Ω))
(hp : pairwise_disjoint xs) :
prob (bigUnion xs)
= mylist.fold_add rR.add rR.zero (mylist.mapL prob xs) := by
revert hp
induction xs with
| nilL =>
intro _
simp [bigUnion, mylist.fold_add, mylist.mapL, prob_false]
| consL A xs ih =>
intro hp
cases xs with
| nilL =>
have hunionA : prob (ev_union A ev_false) = prob A :=
prob_ext (prob := prob) (A := ev_union A ev_false) (B := A)
(by
intro ω; constructor
· intro h; cases h with
| inl hA => exact hA
| inr hf => exact False.elim hf
· intro hA; exact Or.inl hA)
simp [bigUnion, mylist.fold_add, mylist.mapL, rR.add_zero, hunionA]
| consL B xs' =>
rcases hp with ⟨hAB, hrest, hpw⟩
have hAdisj : disjoint A (bigUnion (B ::L xs')) :=
disjoint_head_tail A (B ::L xs') (by
exact And.intro hAB (And.intro hrest hpw))
have hU' :
prob (bigUnion (A ::L (B ::L xs'))) =
rR.add (prob A) (prob (bigUnion (B ::L xs'))) := by
simpa [bigUnion] using
(prob_union_disjoint (prob := prob) A (bigUnion (B ::L xs')) hAdisj)
have htail :
prob (bigUnion (B ::L xs')) =
mylist.fold_add rR.add rR.zero (mylist.mapL prob (B ::L xs')) :=
ih hpw
have hsum :
prob (bigUnion (A ::L (B ::L xs'))) =
rR.add (prob A)
(mylist.fold_add rR.add rR.zero (mylist.mapL prob (B ::L xs'))) := by
simpa [htail] using hU'
simpa [bigUnion, mylist.mapL, mylist.fold_add, rR.add_assoc] using hsum
theorem prob_bigUnion_disjoint_zero
(xs : mylist (event Ω))
(hp : pairwise_disjoint xs)
(hzero : ∀ A, InL A xs → prob A = rR.zero) :
prob (bigUnion xs) = rR.zero := by
revert hp hzero
induction xs with
| nilL =>
intro _ _
simp [bigUnion, prob_false]
| consL A xs ih =>
intro hp hzero
cases xs with
| nilL =>
have hA0 : prob A = ring.zero := hzero A (InL.In_head _)
have hunionA : prob (ev_union A ev_false) = prob A :=
prob_ext (prob := prob) (A := ev_union A ev_false) (B := A)
(by
intro ω; constructor
· intro h; cases h with
| inl hA => exact hA
| inr hf => exact False.elim hf
· intro hA; exact Or.inl hA)
simp [bigUnion, hunionA, hA0]
| consL B xs' =>
rcases hp with ⟨hAB, hrest, hpw⟩
have hAdisj : disjoint A (bigUnion (B ::L xs')) :=
disjoint_head_tail A (B ::L xs') (by exact And.intro hAB (And.intro hrest hpw))
have hA0 : prob A = rR.zero := hzero A (InL.In_head _)
have htail0 : ∀ C, InL C (B ::L xs') → prob C = rR.zero := by
intro C hC; exact hzero C (InL.In_tail (y := A) (xs := B ::L xs') hC)
have htail : prob (bigUnion (B ::L xs')) = rR.zero := ih hpw htail0
have hU :
prob (bigUnion (A ::L (B ::L xs'))) =
rR.add (prob A) (prob (bigUnion (B ::L xs'))) := by
simpa [bigUnion] using
(prob_union_disjoint (prob := prob) A (bigUnion (B ::L xs')) hAdisj)
have hsum00 :
rR.add (prob A) (prob (bigUnion (B ::L xs'))) =
rR.add rR.zero rR.zero := by
simp [hA0, htail]
have : prob (bigUnion (A ::L (B ::L xs'))) =
rR.add rR.zero rR.zero := by
simpa [hsum00] using hU
have hz : rR.add rR.zero rR.zero = rR.zero := by
simp [rR.add_zero]
simp [this, hz]
axiom inclusion_exclusion_three (A B C : event Ω) :
prob (ev_union (ev_union A B) C)
= rR.add (prob A)
(rR.add (prob B)
(rR.add (prob C)
(rR.opp (rR.add (prob (ev_inter A B))
(rR.add (prob (ev_inter A C))
(rR.add (prob (ev_inter B C))
(rR.opp (prob (ev_inter (ev_inter A B) C)))))))))
end Probability