{"_id":"q-en-nixpkgs-5c6c65eca04b10446947d8085f6fac9674a23872d4042d5bae7e40b2107ba2a7","text":"Describe the bug On NixOS 20.09 and unstable, is not in the search path, even though it is installed with the php package. To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior: [example from 20.09 system] Expected behavior [example from 20.03 system] Additional context Debugging with reveals that on 20.09, php is searching in , then , which fails. On 20.03, it searches in , then , which succeeds. On 20.09 and unstable, php74 and php73 both fail. On 20.03, php73 (the default) works, but php74 fails, but I believe it fails for a different reason. This line is new since release-20.03. At first glance, it seems as though is resolving to null here, but I'm not sure what to replace it with: Notify maintainers Metadata Maintainer information:\nThanks for reporting this issue! Your guess was right on spot and it was a really simple fix it seems :slightlysmilingface: As you may have seen: Right after 20.03 branched off we started a big refactoring of the PHP ecosystem. So bugs and issues was to be expected :slightlysmilingface:"} {"_id":"q-en-nixpkgs-381d4f3bd022fc45e1f3a963a51ff21141f861531b553dcd5cae11bfb14dd7a9","text":"I'm using the example of which renders correctly in firefox (the text in that section matches the image), but not in chromium (I see some placeholder boxes) my font configuration is exactly that given in I'm running nixos-unstable. I don't have flash enabled, or any other modifications to the default chromium package. From a bit of research, I've found that it might be the case that chromium restricts access to system fonts in some way, as a privacy aid - possibly that is to blame. Note: this occurs without any addons (running chromium as )"} {"_id":"q-en-nixpkgs-4a6f04bb476939757eab596e4c318e0af047adf3e8544928d4ad651325023c32","text":"Describe the bug When cinnamon is started either via gdm or in a . Sometimes the desktop icons do load Always a window spawns telling me that I'm in fallback mode no taskbar, no window decorations (hence I think no compositor & window manager) To Reproduce Here I'm kind of unsure: I deleted all nemo and cinnamon folder in $HOME, .config and .local/share. Still this occurs on all of my machines. IIRC this first happen when accidentally starting a \"virtual keyboard\" app cinnamon \"Virtual keyboard\" cinnamon components crash instantly, the and the behavior is reproducible on further attempts of starting cinnamon Expected behavior Cinnamon starts and is usable Additional context Booting into an old generation did not fix this, however, I'm quite unsure what could be the cause of it. This is some log which I could create by running cinnamon from a . I'm not sure whether this is related to the issue or not. relevant : Output captured (the log is over 2000 lines long, this is from the very end and might be the issue): Notify maintainers Metadata system: host os: multi-user?: sandbox: version: channels(root): channels(wucke13): nixpkgs: Maintainer information:\nI will say that it does start in lightdm. IIRC upstream uses slick greeter and lightdm, so maybe it's just broken for that dm.\nit is broken when started on as well, and it used to work in gdm just a day a go as well. Thinking more of the problem, what else can break the startup of cinnamon if all of these are empty/removed: + + + ? There must be something in my $HOME which alters the startup procedure of cinnamon to break (otherwise it wouldn't work for you?!) but what can it be? Edit: I now gathered a more meaningful error: Edit 2: Found the remaining part thing: dconf. After renaming , cinnamon starts just fine. Holy moly. Running \"Virtual keyboard\" from the cinnamon menu breaks it immediately, though.\nWhich package provides gio for ? We'd need to add that to buildInputs then the error should be fixed\nThat is . Be sure to on the source code to always run a to see what namespaces are imported. From there you track where those typelibs come from to determine the dependencies that belong in\nAny updates on this?\nIt would need to be tested if the issue still persists.\nThe bug is still persistent. system: host os: multi-user?: sandbox: version: channels(root): channels(wucke13): nixpkgs:\nThe bug is still present in 21.05: system: host os: multi-user?: sandbox: version: channels(root): channels(wucke13): nixpkgs:\nThe main problem I have is that I have no idea where to even start debugging the segfault, as it seems to be part of native code\nAny chances upstream has some idea? Not sure how to get in touch with them without making it seem like \"We have a problem and you shall fix it\".\nI ran and I found that it is missing , just install it and the bug will disappear. I think this package is a must or we have a security-issue here\nI can confirm installing caribou fixes the issue. I haven't really looked into it yet, the related line is likely at And I managed to SIGSEGV gjs-console (cjs-console) in a shell with: I search for the output , and found this So I do and the SIGSEGV is gone. So I guess caribou is needed for this case."} {"_id":"q-en-nixpkgs-749c78a9d855c6c677e5baf80960970da2301fce8486aa55b91ac39497ecefd2","text":", CVSSv3=8.8 (nixos-20.03, nixos-20.09, nixos-unstable) Scanned versions: nixos-20.03: ; nixos-20.09: ; nixos-unstable: . Cc"} {"_id":"q-en-nixpkgs-dfe78460f143649386dc0f21faa0d370d531760a0fd0c262501f001c65398e2f","text":"With NixOS 15.09 I get this error running LilyPond: I can work around this (clumsily) by using an old version of in LilyPond's . This differs by not including . This seems to be related to Changing apparently can break some users of as well as those of .\ncc\nHmm, perhaps we should add or some similar option to handle these cases easily?\nIt's better to set in most cases, which I just did in and ."} {"_id":"q-en-nixpkgs-171246af152b99fef20bf6d1eb66375d9cbbce0c3d165d607e1e49a6712dc218","text":"Describe the bug defines the CMake path. The environment variable is included in this, and addons like SDL2mixer append themselves to this path. However, that same file also defines an target, which does not include in its include directories. See for an example of an issue caused by this. To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior: to build an application relying on SDL2::SDL2 adding SDL2mixer to the include path, such as Expected behavior 's should include the environment variable, just like . Screenshots N/A Additional context N/A Notify maintainers (SDL2), (SDL2mixer) Metadata Maintainer information:"} {"_id":"q-en-nixpkgs-f7843ba261ada76f891f97521061321d01474bb552975cca6be10311f1bda28e","text":"Experienced on gnome3.38 which is currently on master. alacritty 0.5.0 isn't functional at all. 0.6.0rc-1 is. Should we update in order to make our packages set functional? Or should we wait for a real, no rc release upstream?\nyou should update yourself in the maintainers list - I had to go to to see who is .\nIs this a wayland issue on gnome?\nYes.\nSound fine to me.\nThanks for pointing this out. As much as I want to see my first username long gone, the change was not worth it :)"} {"_id":"q-en-nixpkgs-7f9d7f5b6e9df6d755b618a2472254c1b3c6ebe8c3dc80511b27795ca067ca8c","text":"Updated using I though most of the packages have moved on to openblas, what is pulling in this package? How would I find out?\nA few packages still reference it. should show what derivations use it directly, from those you have instantiated."} {"_id":"q-en-nixpkgs-78bfcf7d442e0fe3591828407bf6d4792aebae2aab1291d74526be84b96c68d5","text":"Describe the bug option is not working To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior: service and its option in . Add as well for testing. In my case I used something similar to the password read bit is set, for the test generation: (eventually) inspect logs with in a separate terminal a mail The command might return And you might find an error similar to this in your logs Tested on 19.09 and 20.09, on different machines with three different SMTP hosts, various passwords, with and without special characters. As explicitly warn in the doc Path to a file that contains the password used for SMTP auth. The file should not contain a trailing newline, if the password does not contain one. This file should be readable by the users that need to execute ssmtp. I ensured that the password do not contains a leading space or carriage return. Expected behavior should work just as well as its former obsolete attribute. Additional context eventually check again my password in the store: which is yet followed by the character . It's obviously a control character and I cannot find a definition of its meaning. The very same command (original pass file) won't return the . following configuration works, with of course the exact same password as provided in the password file. Which is obviously not the expected setup. Notify maintainers Metadata system: host os: multi-user?: sandbox: version: channels(root): nixpkgs: Maintainer information:\nMake sure that it doesn't have a trailing either. Editors like vim tend to insert one by default.\nI can confirm.\nIs this still a problem?\nI haven't been able to validate the response using or alternative editors.\nUse to avoid the trailing newline. To check whether there's one, use ; with this command, newlines are displayed as ."} {"_id":"q-en-nixpkgs-7e2dd9d1869c0b37e1a421e9345bc8dc92126b6e9ff1900ea93c779135deb20c","text":"Seems like nmap changed the licence with the 7.90 release from GPL-2 to NPSL (Nmap public source licence). NPSL is \"based\" on GPL but adds some nasty things such as: Which conflicts with the freedom 0: Discussions about this: Debian: Gentoo: Upstream: The actual license file: They also seem to bundle a GPL library, and their license doesn't seem to be GPL compatible. So we should probably add this new license at least. NPSL looks non-free to me. Non-free is a good default until FSF or anyone has looked at it. We can always follow suit with what Debian does as well.\nAnother option would be to revert to 7.80 for now. The new license seems to be a legal minefield even if you're ok with closed source.\nYeah while looking at the issue in the train I thought of the same as well, will do that now.\nI just read the release annoncement for 7.90: Just to see if the license change was mentioned there. Which it is: Do I read this right they weren't really GPLv2 to begin with and just clarified that? That's like a major thing...\nFirst of all I just realized that I merged the original PR, so I really have to apologize for missing that license thing back then! cc in case you currently have time and energy for that, would you mind taking a look at the issue? I'm pretty sure that you have way more knowledge and insights about that kind of licensing issue than we have :). Is there any kind of statement from OSI or FSF yet? Also, I'm wondering if other distros that are even more focused on free software than we are (such as Guix) have e.g. started a new fork that we may want to use as well.\nMore details from the changelog: I must say that I'm not sure if it's worth to roll the package back since it actually haven't seemed to change really. It just was weird to begin with and just now got a name on the weirdness.\nIt's not just a new name, apparently they also new requirements in 7.90:\nI don't think we should revert it either. Add the new license and mark it unfree until this is clarified.\nOof.... that's actually another reason for reverting.\nI'm in favor of marking as nonfree until the FSF or some other authoritative organisation decides otherwise.\nEither revert, or mark as non-free. Or, revert and add the new, non-free, version next to it.\nThe nmap update has already been reverted. Let's wait what upstream and the legal teams of debian/fedora say. See also the upstream issue\nFedora's stance\nThat's the old license (until version 7.80). This issue is about the new license (in version 7.90).\nFedora the new licence to the bad list and marked it as \"not acceptable for use in Fedora\" due to being incompatible to the open source definition\nSo, now there's an update here that we may want to act on: To quote the post: This means that 7.91 is now available under the same license as 7.80 is. The license that 7.80 uses is still a \"bad license\" because it's still a custom license. But it's a license that we and other distributions have considered good because it was assumed to be GPLv2. So I'm thinking that we could upgrade to 7.91 by now, because it's still not good, but it's not worse than before except we are aware of it now. Then we just hope that they do some good re-licensing in a future release.\nMerged which removed nmap-unfree. This issue is done for now. Thanks everyone."} {"_id":"q-en-nixpkgs-48d6df343288765639073b6c2560bcab44bba033afd46fe03f5e7adeb01b63b3","text":"This issue tracks the conversion of from Docbook to CommonMark per . If you intend to work on this conversion, please comment below! here that you intend to work on it. (Please also post if you stop working on it.) a new branch of nixpkgs master. : change to . to . the contents from Docbook to . Follow . Use existing sections for inspiration. from the folder to build the manual. the manual on your computer at after running from folder: it looks good, submit a PR and reference this issue.\nThis issue has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:\nI opened a PR here: Thanks in advance for reviewing :-)"} {"_id":"q-en-nixpkgs-fc7af294ae92797743c832a4bd070673650fa5e986c6f83d3c9ed4e24f01707e","text":"This issue tracks the conversion of from Docbook to CommonMark per . If you intend to work on this conversion, please comment below! here that you intend to work on it. (Please also post if you stop working on it.) a new branch of nixpkgs master. : change to . to . the contents from Docbook to . Follow . Use existing sections for inspiration. from the folder to build the manual. the manual on your computer at after running from folder: it looks good, submit a PR and reference this issue."} {"_id":"q-en-nixpkgs-662032e7f643781cf5072e7cf48420cfdf46bb2a962ca391b10765c3ca7c5fe0","text":"Describe the bug Milkytracker is missing a menu entry to launch the application Notify maintainers