ids-paragraph-commentary-corpus / countersign.ab.csv
jiebi's picture
Upload countersign.ab.csv with huggingface_hub
eb3a54c verified
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
21.6 kB
pr paths node_dis_index pr_dis para commentary commit_s commit_e draft para_hash block_hash url AB paragraph
7 {} {} {} "There has been an increased focus on small, constrained devices that
make up the Internet of Things (IoT). One of the standards that has
come out of this process is ""Concise Binary Object Representation
(CBOR)"" I-D.ietf-cbor-7049bis. CBOR extended the data model of the
JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) STD90 by allowing for binary data,
among other changes. CBOR has been adopted by several of the IETF
working groups dealing with the IoT world as their encoding of data
structures. CBOR was designed specifically both to be small in terms
of messages transported and implementation size and to be a schema-
free decoder. A need exists to provide message security services for
IoT, and using CBOR as the message-encoding format makes sense." These all looks like straightforward and necessary changes . a5e38d950e35310736731d31591298acef6e7593 a5e38d950e35310736731d31591298acef6e7593 draft-ietf-cose-countersign 62a35d89fd81e0989feead6e913c2d6571dc41bf46bc661bfc41a07d201400bf ['62a35d89fd81e0989feead6e913c2d6571dc41bf46bc661bfc41a07d201400bf', '21da057efabcf67ae32fe40be6a1b6c04441024cd76e35eecdcbd53b80b04610'] A "there has been an increased focus on small, constrained devices that
make up the internet of things (iot). one of the standards that has
come out of this process is ""concise binary object representation
(cbor)"" i-d.ietf-cbor-7049bis. cbor extended the data model of the
javascript object notation (json) std90 by allowing for binary data,
among other changes. cbor has been adopted by several of the ietf
working groups dealing with the iot world as their encoding of data
structures. cbor was designed specifically both to be small in terms
of messages transported and implementation size and to be a schema-
free decoder. a need exists to provide message security services for
iot, and using cbor as the message-encoding format makes sense."
7 {} {} {} "There has been an increased focus on small, constrained devices that
make up the Internet of Things (IoT). One of the standards that has
come out of this process is ""Concise Binary Object Representation
(CBOR)"" RFC8949. CBOR extended the data model of the JavaScript
Object Notation (JSON) STD90 by allowing for binary data, among other
changes. CBOR has been adopted by several of the IETF working groups
dealing with the IoT world as their encoding of data structures.
CBOR was designed specifically both to be small in terms of messages
transported and implementation size and to be a schema-free decoder.
A need exists to provide message security services for IoT, and using
CBOR as the message-encoding format makes sense." These all looks like straightforward and necessary changes . a5e38d950e35310736731d31591298acef6e7593 a5e38d950e35310736731d31591298acef6e7593 draft-ietf-cose-countersign 21da057efabcf67ae32fe40be6a1b6c04441024cd76e35eecdcbd53b80b04610 ['62a35d89fd81e0989feead6e913c2d6571dc41bf46bc661bfc41a07d201400bf', '21da057efabcf67ae32fe40be6a1b6c04441024cd76e35eecdcbd53b80b04610'] B "there has been an increased focus on small, constrained devices that
make up the internet of things (iot). one of the standards that has
come out of this process is ""concise binary object representation
(cbor)"" rfc8949. cbor extended the data model of the javascript
object notation (json) std90 by allowing for binary data, among other
changes. cbor has been adopted by several of the ietf working groups
dealing with the iot world as their encoding of data structures.
cbor was designed specifically both to be small in terms of messages
transported and implementation size and to be a schema-free decoder.
a need exists to provide message security services for iot, and using
cbor as the message-encoding format makes sense."
7 {} {} {} in I-D.ietf-core-groupcomm-bis. These all looks like straightforward and necessary changes . a5e38d950e35310736731d31591298acef6e7593 a5e38d950e35310736731d31591298acef6e7593 draft-ietf-cose-countersign 3aa87ba28574afabe40122ab42adda1b8f42c68d59ba6f412cde019388bb99dd ['3aa87ba28574afabe40122ab42adda1b8f42c68d59ba6f412cde019388bb99dd', 'ca7cfb498edc537de6268a3c70794231c33443a5595e4697e4953d24267edb0d'] A in i-d.ietf-core-groupcomm-bis.
7 {} {} {} in I-D.ietf-core-oscore-groupcomm. These all looks like straightforward and necessary changes . a5e38d950e35310736731d31591298acef6e7593 a5e38d950e35310736731d31591298acef6e7593 draft-ietf-cose-countersign ca7cfb498edc537de6268a3c70794231c33443a5595e4697e4953d24267edb0d ['3aa87ba28574afabe40122ab42adda1b8f42c68d59ba6f412cde019388bb99dd', 'ca7cfb498edc537de6268a3c70794231c33443a5595e4697e4953d24267edb0d'] B in i-d.ietf-core-oscore-groupcomm.
7 {} {} {} "In order to always regenerate the same byte string for the ""to be
signed"" value, the deterministic encoding rules defined in I-D.ietf-
cbor-7049bis. These rules match the ones laid out in I-D.ietf-cose-
rfc8152bis-struct." These all looks like straightforward and necessary changes . a5e38d950e35310736731d31591298acef6e7593 a5e38d950e35310736731d31591298acef6e7593 draft-ietf-cose-countersign ad27de44a8e20d7f090f4cad629c15f37a4d3c9fa969777782a7f55f8e265806 ['ad27de44a8e20d7f090f4cad629c15f37a4d3c9fa969777782a7f55f8e265806', '1cd4cce56ccb42bf1ac9857d8457c0baab6727d0a26b7b27a94365ed0ae4d3aa'] A "in order to always regenerate the same byte string for the ""to be
signed"" value, the deterministic encoding rules defined in i-d.ietf-
cbor-7049bis. these rules match the ones laid out in i-d.ietf-cose-
rfc8152bis-struct."
7 {} {} {} "In order to always regenerate the same byte string for the ""to be
signed"" value, the deterministic encoding rules defined in RFC8949.
These rules match the ones laid out in I-D.ietf-cose-rfc8152bis-
struct." These all looks like straightforward and necessary changes . a5e38d950e35310736731d31591298acef6e7593 a5e38d950e35310736731d31591298acef6e7593 draft-ietf-cose-countersign 1cd4cce56ccb42bf1ac9857d8457c0baab6727d0a26b7b27a94365ed0ae4d3aa ['ad27de44a8e20d7f090f4cad629c15f37a4d3c9fa969777782a7f55f8e265806', '1cd4cce56ccb42bf1ac9857d8457c0baab6727d0a26b7b27a94365ed0ae4d3aa'] B "in order to always regenerate the same byte string for the ""to be
signed"" value, the deterministic encoding rules defined in rfc8949.
these rules match the ones laid out in i-d.ietf-cose-rfc8152bis-
struct."
6 {} {} {} "When either COSE_Encrypt and COSE_Mac is used and more than two
parties share the key, data origin authentication is not provided.
Any party that knows the message-authentication key can compute a
valid authentication tag; therefore, the contents could originate
from any one of the parties that share the key." < tWhen either COSEEncrypt and COSEMac is used and more than two parties share the key , data origin authentication is not provided . Any party that knows the message - authentication key can compute a valid authentication tag ; therefore , the contents could originate from any one of the parties that share the key.</t < tCountersignatures of COSEEncrypt and COSEMac with short authentication tags do not provide the security properties associated with the same algorithm used in COSESign . To provide 128 - bit security against collision attacks , the tag length MUST be at least 256 - bits . A countersignature of a COSEMac with AES - MAC 256/128 provides at most 64 bits of integrity protection . Similarly , a countersignature of a COSE_Encrypt with AES - CCM-16 - 64 - 128 provides at most 32 bits bits of integrity protection.</t 16f600b4f061f469801a808c9b4b79021328b031 16f600b4f061f469801a808c9b4b79021328b031 draft-ietf-cose-countersign aabcf2641b2d6238e8b9eb83a94f72cb39a9d4fad7feecf408d47b126b1674f3 ['aabcf2641b2d6238e8b9eb83a94f72cb39a9d4fad7feecf408d47b126b1674f3', 'e545e886e1ad54dfff42c3e2ae036d9324dadc06cf138cef2230c5abc6844aff'] B "when either cose_encrypt and cose_mac is used and more than two
parties share the key, data origin authentication is not provided.
any party that knows the message-authentication key can compute a
valid authentication tag; therefore, the contents could originate
from any one of the parties that share the key."
6 {} {} {} "Countersignatures of COSE_Encrypt and COSE_Mac with short
authentication tags do not provide the security properties associated
with the same algorithm used in COSE_Sign. To provide 128-bit
security against collision attacks, the tag length MUST be at least
256-bits. A countersignature of a COSE_Mac with AES-MAC 256/128
provides at most 64 bits of integrity protection. Similarly, a
countersignature of a COSE_Encrypt with AES-CCM-16-64-128 provides at
most 32 bits bits of integrity protection." < tWhen either COSEEncrypt and COSEMac is used and more than two parties share the key , data origin authentication is not provided . Any party that knows the message - authentication key can compute a valid authentication tag ; therefore , the contents could originate from any one of the parties that share the key.</t < tCountersignatures of COSEEncrypt and COSEMac with short authentication tags do not provide the security properties associated with the same algorithm used in COSESign . To provide 128 - bit security against collision attacks , the tag length MUST be at least 256 - bits . A countersignature of a COSEMac with AES - MAC 256/128 provides at most 64 bits of integrity protection . Similarly , a countersignature of a COSE_Encrypt with AES - CCM-16 - 64 - 128 provides at most 32 bits bits of integrity protection.</t 16f600b4f061f469801a808c9b4b79021328b031 16f600b4f061f469801a808c9b4b79021328b031 draft-ietf-cose-countersign e545e886e1ad54dfff42c3e2ae036d9324dadc06cf138cef2230c5abc6844aff ['aabcf2641b2d6238e8b9eb83a94f72cb39a9d4fad7feecf408d47b126b1674f3', 'e545e886e1ad54dfff42c3e2ae036d9324dadc06cf138cef2230c5abc6844aff'] B "countersignatures of cose_encrypt and cose_mac with short
authentication tags do not provide the security properties associated
with the same algorithm used in cose_sign. to provide 128-bit
security against collision attacks, the tag length must be at least
256-bits. a countersignature of a cose_mac with aes-mac 256/128
provides at most 64 bits of integrity protection. similarly, a
countersignature of a cose_encrypt with aes-ccm-16-64-128 provides at
most 32 bits bits of integrity protection."
2 {} {} {} "An example of a countersignature on a signature can be found in
Appendix_B_1_3. An example of a countersignature in an encryption
object can be found in Appendix_B_3_3." "Remove the sections from the Examples Applenix that were blank , clean up the Security Considerations , and narrow the table in the IANA considerations .
Looks good to me ! Thanks ! Let us know if you want us to merge it or you plan to do that yourself ." ebe510e4808b2623576577844f6dce45a96e1c2c ebe510e4808b2623576577844f6dce45a96e1c2c draft-ietf-cose-countersign e49f554dc74b2192077e16a2405e095febd9d83e7e1a11b18468fc8c3fb0362e ['e49f554dc74b2192077e16a2405e095febd9d83e7e1a11b18468fc8c3fb0362e', 'fd7685778abd6a32a5e8f2c5ce990acbae40a06982a75278ab3aec0c2ebee4fc'] A "an example of a countersignature on a signature can be found in
appendix_b_1_3. an example of a countersignature in an encryption
object can be found in appendix_b_3_3."
2 {} {} {} "An example of a countersignature on a signature can be found in
Appendix_A_1_1. An example of a countersignature in an encryption
object can be found in Appendix_A_2_1." "Remove the sections from the Examples Applenix that were blank , clean up the Security Considerations , and narrow the table in the IANA considerations .
Looks good to me ! Thanks ! Let us know if you want us to merge it or you plan to do that yourself ." ebe510e4808b2623576577844f6dce45a96e1c2c ebe510e4808b2623576577844f6dce45a96e1c2c draft-ietf-cose-countersign fd7685778abd6a32a5e8f2c5ce990acbae40a06982a75278ab3aec0c2ebee4fc ['e49f554dc74b2192077e16a2405e095febd9d83e7e1a11b18468fc8c3fb0362e', 'fd7685778abd6a32a5e8f2c5ce990acbae40a06982a75278ab3aec0c2ebee4fc'] B "an example of a countersignature on a signature can be found in
appendix_a_1_1. an example of a countersignature in an encryption
object can be found in appendix_a_2_1."
2 {} {} {} "IANA is requested to register the following new items in the
registry." "Remove the sections from the Examples Applenix that were blank , clean up the Security Considerations , and narrow the table in the IANA considerations .
Looks good to me ! Thanks ! Let us know if you want us to merge it or you plan to do that yourself ." ebe510e4808b2623576577844f6dce45a96e1c2c ebe510e4808b2623576577844f6dce45a96e1c2c draft-ietf-cose-countersign 659510bb7ad5a3f7155e6afe2ab25efea78030f51e6303daf9573bba9b10e7e2 ['659510bb7ad5a3f7155e6afe2ab25efea78030f51e6303daf9573bba9b10e7e2', 'dc996f5288d257a9d1840d15fe602855e13ce42383b10458d8a0ee558e492242'] A "iana is requested to register the following new items in the
registry."
2 {} {} {} "IANA is requested to register the following new items in the
registry. For these entries, the Value Registry column will be blank
and the Reference column will be ." "Remove the sections from the Examples Applenix that were blank , clean up the Security Considerations , and narrow the table in the IANA considerations .
Looks good to me ! Thanks ! Let us know if you want us to merge it or you plan to do that yourself ." ebe510e4808b2623576577844f6dce45a96e1c2c ebe510e4808b2623576577844f6dce45a96e1c2c draft-ietf-cose-countersign dc996f5288d257a9d1840d15fe602855e13ce42383b10458d8a0ee558e492242 ['659510bb7ad5a3f7155e6afe2ab25efea78030f51e6303daf9573bba9b10e7e2', 'dc996f5288d257a9d1840d15fe602855e13ce42383b10458d8a0ee558e492242'] B "iana is requested to register the following new items in the
registry. for these entries, the value registry column will be blank
and the reference column will be ."
2 {} {} {} TODO - review and trim as needed. "Remove the sections from the Examples Applenix that were blank , clean up the Security Considerations , and narrow the table in the IANA considerations .
Looks good to me ! Thanks ! Let us know if you want us to merge it or you plan to do that yourself ." ebe510e4808b2623576577844f6dce45a96e1c2c ebe510e4808b2623576577844f6dce45a96e1c2c draft-ietf-cose-countersign 33a93dfc3cf374178923f6dad60b84f7123babdce2e177e553779f71459f71e5 ['33a93dfc3cf374178923f6dad60b84f7123babdce2e177e553779f71459f71e5'] A todo - review and trim as needed.
2 {} {} {} "Although it has been mentioned before, the use of a single key for
multiple algorithms has been demonstrated in some cases to leak
information about that key, provide the opportunity for attackers to
forge integrity tags, or gain information about encrypted content.
Binding a key to a single algorithm prevents these problems. Key
creators and key consumers are strongly encouraged not only to create
new keys for each different algorithm, but to include that selection
of algorithm in any distribution of key material and strictly enforce
the matching of algorithms in the key structure to algorithms in the
message structure. In addition to checking that algorithms are
correct, the key form needs to be checked as well. Do not use an
'EC2' key where an 'OKP' key is expected." "Remove the sections from the Examples Applenix that were blank , clean up the Security Considerations , and narrow the table in the IANA considerations .
Looks good to me ! Thanks ! Let us know if you want us to merge it or you plan to do that yourself ." ebe510e4808b2623576577844f6dce45a96e1c2c ebe510e4808b2623576577844f6dce45a96e1c2c draft-ietf-cose-countersign 791550beeccf2e4842ae935dd72caae3f241e62feda660dd6213960f4fcb4f86 ['791550beeccf2e4842ae935dd72caae3f241e62feda660dd6213960f4fcb4f86', 'a1d37d6e03c5a4432371997da3297cfa9c595d60ea9166ca5ac33d36265d91b8', 'bb5ea9de609c567b83b0c1d6d26d72609c909b76f1401c53c4d630cb221fa36a'] A "although it has been mentioned before, the use of a single key for
multiple algorithms has been demonstrated in some cases to leak
information about that key, provide the opportunity for attackers to
forge integrity tags, or gain information about encrypted content.
binding a key to a single algorithm prevents these problems. key
creators and key consumers are strongly encouraged not only to create
new keys for each different algorithm, but to include that selection
of algorithm in any distribution of key material and strictly enforce
the matching of algorithms in the key structure to algorithms in the
message structure. in addition to checking that algorithms are
correct, the key form needs to be checked as well. do not use an
'ec2' key where an 'okp' key is expected."
2 {} {} {} "Although it has been mentioned before, the use of a single key for
multiple algorithms has been demonstrated in some cases to leak
information about that key, provide the opportunity for attackers to
forge integrity tags, or gain information about encrypted content.
Binding a key to a single algorithm prevents these problems." "Remove the sections from the Examples Applenix that were blank , clean up the Security Considerations , and narrow the table in the IANA considerations .
Looks good to me ! Thanks ! Let us know if you want us to merge it or you plan to do that yourself ." ebe510e4808b2623576577844f6dce45a96e1c2c ebe510e4808b2623576577844f6dce45a96e1c2c draft-ietf-cose-countersign a1d37d6e03c5a4432371997da3297cfa9c595d60ea9166ca5ac33d36265d91b8 ['791550beeccf2e4842ae935dd72caae3f241e62feda660dd6213960f4fcb4f86', 'a1d37d6e03c5a4432371997da3297cfa9c595d60ea9166ca5ac33d36265d91b8', 'bb5ea9de609c567b83b0c1d6d26d72609c909b76f1401c53c4d630cb221fa36a'] B "although it has been mentioned before, the use of a single key for
multiple algorithms has been demonstrated in some cases to leak
information about that key, provide the opportunity for attackers to
forge integrity tags, or gain information about encrypted content.
binding a key to a single algorithm prevents these problems."
2 {} {} {} "Key creators and key consumers are strongly encouraged not only to
create new keys for each different algorithm, but to include that
selection of algorithm in any distribution of key material and
strictly enforce the matching of algorithms in the key structure to
algorithms in the message structure. In addition to checking that
algorithms are correct, the key form needs to be checked as well. Do
not use an 'EC2' key where an 'OKP' key is expected." "Remove the sections from the Examples Applenix that were blank , clean up the Security Considerations , and narrow the table in the IANA considerations .
Looks good to me ! Thanks ! Let us know if you want us to merge it or you plan to do that yourself ." ebe510e4808b2623576577844f6dce45a96e1c2c ebe510e4808b2623576577844f6dce45a96e1c2c draft-ietf-cose-countersign bb5ea9de609c567b83b0c1d6d26d72609c909b76f1401c53c4d630cb221fa36a ['791550beeccf2e4842ae935dd72caae3f241e62feda660dd6213960f4fcb4f86', 'a1d37d6e03c5a4432371997da3297cfa9c595d60ea9166ca5ac33d36265d91b8', 'bb5ea9de609c567b83b0c1d6d26d72609c909b76f1401c53c4d630cb221fa36a'] B "key creators and key consumers are strongly encouraged not only to
create new keys for each different algorithm, but to include that
selection of algorithm in any distribution of key material and
strictly enforce the matching of algorithms in the key structure to
algorithms in the message structure. in addition to checking that
algorithms are correct, the key form needs to be checked as well. do
not use an 'ec2' key where an 'okp' key is expected."
1 {} {} {} "The source for this draft is being maintained in GitHub. Suggested
changes should be submitted as pull requests at <https://github.com/
cose-wg/cose-rfc8152bis>. Instructions are on that page as well.
Editorial changes can be managed in GitHub, but any substantial
issues need to be discussed on the COSE mailing list." Add as a document editor . No changes to the body of the document . a83d32177b26acac684baf31a778028ae7a17f7d a83d32177b26acac684baf31a778028ae7a17f7d draft-ietf-cose-countersign d3c78c0a06c87b2297c5abb82682d359b2531db9058769f823910e1d3fe7d89b ['d3c78c0a06c87b2297c5abb82682d359b2531db9058769f823910e1d3fe7d89b', '39ddc5a898293c847d846b49c92ee84da69300d298a0f7d31919d66ac8f715c0'] A "the source for this draft is being maintained in github. suggested
changes should be submitted as pull requests at <https://github.com/
cose-wg/cose-rfc8152bis>. instructions are on that page as well.
editorial changes can be managed in github, but any substantial
issues need to be discussed on the cose mailing list."
1 {} {} {} "The source for this draft is being maintained in GitHub. Suggested
changes should be submitted as pull requests at <https://github.com/
cose-wg/countersign>. Instructions are on that page as well.
Editorial changes can be managed in GitHub, but any substantial
issues need to be discussed on the COSE mailing list." Add as a document editor . No changes to the body of the document . a83d32177b26acac684baf31a778028ae7a17f7d a83d32177b26acac684baf31a778028ae7a17f7d draft-ietf-cose-countersign 39ddc5a898293c847d846b49c92ee84da69300d298a0f7d31919d66ac8f715c0 ['d3c78c0a06c87b2297c5abb82682d359b2531db9058769f823910e1d3fe7d89b', '39ddc5a898293c847d846b49c92ee84da69300d298a0f7d31919d66ac8f715c0'] B "the source for this draft is being maintained in github. suggested
changes should be submitted as pull requests at <https://github.com/
cose-wg/countersign>. instructions are on that page as well.
editorial changes can be managed in github, but any substantial
issues need to be discussed on the cose mailing list."