Datasets:
Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -88,19 +88,17 @@ EPiK is a Korean dataset that combines Korean cultural context and physical prin
|
|
| 88 |
|
| 89 |
|
| 90 |
## Taxonomy of problem types (English ver.)
|
| 91 |
-
<table border="1"
|
| 92 |
<thead>
|
| 93 |
-
<tr
|
| 94 |
-
<th
|
| 95 |
-
<th
|
|
|
|
| 96 |
</tr>
|
| 97 |
</thead>
|
| 98 |
<tbody>
|
| 99 |
-
<!-- Section 1 -->
|
| 100 |
-
<tr style="background-color:#e0e0e0; text-align:center;">
|
| 101 |
-
<td colspan="2"><em><strong>Basic Knowledge and Attribute Comprehension</strong></em></td>
|
| 102 |
-
</tr>
|
| 103 |
<tr>
|
|
|
|
| 104 |
<td>Physical Concepts and Principles</td>
|
| 105 |
<td>Assesses understanding of fundamental physical laws and principles.</td>
|
| 106 |
</tr>
|
|
@@ -112,12 +110,8 @@ EPiK is a Korean dataset that combines Korean cultural context and physical prin
|
|
| 112 |
<td>States of Matter and Changes</td>
|
| 113 |
<td>Assesses understanding and evaluation of the characteristics of solid, liquid, and gas states, and the principles of state changes like melting, freezing, boiling, and dissolving.</td>
|
| 114 |
</tr>
|
| 115 |
-
|
| 116 |
-
<!-- Section 2 -->
|
| 117 |
-
<tr style="background-color:#e0e0e0; text-align:center;">
|
| 118 |
-
<td colspan="2"><em><strong>Causality and Dynamic Reasoning</strong></em></td>
|
| 119 |
-
</tr>
|
| 120 |
<tr>
|
|
|
|
| 121 |
<td>Predicting Physical Outcomes</td>
|
| 122 |
<td>Assesses the ability to predict the physical outcomes of specific actions or events.</td>
|
| 123 |
</tr>
|
|
@@ -125,12 +119,8 @@ EPiK is a Korean dataset that combines Korean cultural context and physical prin
|
|
| 125 |
<td>Analyzing Physical Causes</td>
|
| 126 |
<td>Assesses the ability to explain the cause of an already-occurred phenomenon from the most plausible physical perspective.</td>
|
| 127 |
</tr>
|
| 128 |
-
|
| 129 |
-
<!-- Section 3 -->
|
| 130 |
-
<tr style="background-color:#e0e0e0; text-align:center;">
|
| 131 |
-
<td colspan="2"><em><strong>Goal-Oriented and Applied Reasoning</strong></em></td>
|
| 132 |
-
</tr>
|
| 133 |
<tr>
|
|
|
|
| 134 |
<td>Utilizing Tools and Procedures</td>
|
| 135 |
<td>Assesses the ability to select appropriate tools and follow correct procedures to achieve a goal.</td>
|
| 136 |
</tr>
|
|
@@ -142,12 +132,8 @@ EPiK is a Korean dataset that combines Korean cultural context and physical prin
|
|
| 142 |
<td>Judging Physical Plausibility</td>
|
| 143 |
<td>Assesses whether a proposed solution is physically possible and based on common-sense tools and concepts in the real world.</td>
|
| 144 |
</tr>
|
| 145 |
-
|
| 146 |
-
<!-- Section 4 -->
|
| 147 |
-
<tr style="background-color:#e0e0e0; text-align:center;">
|
| 148 |
-
<td colspan="2"><em><strong>Situational and Constraint Reasoning</strong></em></td>
|
| 149 |
-
</tr>
|
| 150 |
<tr>
|
|
|
|
| 151 |
<td>Risk and Safety Assessment</td>
|
| 152 |
<td>Assesses the ability to predict potential risks and infer methods to ensure safety.</td>
|
| 153 |
</tr>
|
|
|
|
| 88 |
|
| 89 |
|
| 90 |
## Taxonomy of problem types (English ver.)
|
| 91 |
+
<table border="1" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0">
|
| 92 |
<thead>
|
| 93 |
+
<tr>
|
| 94 |
+
<th>Category</th>
|
| 95 |
+
<th>Problem Type</th>
|
| 96 |
+
<th>Definition</th>
|
| 97 |
</tr>
|
| 98 |
</thead>
|
| 99 |
<tbody>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 100 |
<tr>
|
| 101 |
+
<td rowspan="3">Basic Knowledge and Attribute Comprehension</td>
|
| 102 |
<td>Physical Concepts and Principles</td>
|
| 103 |
<td>Assesses understanding of fundamental physical laws and principles.</td>
|
| 104 |
</tr>
|
|
|
|
| 110 |
<td>States of Matter and Changes</td>
|
| 111 |
<td>Assesses understanding and evaluation of the characteristics of solid, liquid, and gas states, and the principles of state changes like melting, freezing, boiling, and dissolving.</td>
|
| 112 |
</tr>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 113 |
<tr>
|
| 114 |
+
<td rowspan="2">Causality and Dynamic Reasoning</td>
|
| 115 |
<td>Predicting Physical Outcomes</td>
|
| 116 |
<td>Assesses the ability to predict the physical outcomes of specific actions or events.</td>
|
| 117 |
</tr>
|
|
|
|
| 119 |
<td>Analyzing Physical Causes</td>
|
| 120 |
<td>Assesses the ability to explain the cause of an already-occurred phenomenon from the most plausible physical perspective.</td>
|
| 121 |
</tr>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 122 |
<tr>
|
| 123 |
+
<td rowspan="3">Goal-Oriented and Applied Reasoning</td>
|
| 124 |
<td>Utilizing Tools and Procedures</td>
|
| 125 |
<td>Assesses the ability to select appropriate tools and follow correct procedures to achieve a goal.</td>
|
| 126 |
</tr>
|
|
|
|
| 132 |
<td>Judging Physical Plausibility</td>
|
| 133 |
<td>Assesses whether a proposed solution is physically possible and based on common-sense tools and concepts in the real world.</td>
|
| 134 |
</tr>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 135 |
<tr>
|
| 136 |
+
<td>Situational and Constraint Reasoning</td>
|
| 137 |
<td>Risk and Safety Assessment</td>
|
| 138 |
<td>Assesses the ability to predict potential risks and infer methods to ensure safety.</td>
|
| 139 |
</tr>
|