| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 | |
| J PMORGAN | |
| www.jpmorganmarkets.com | |
| Kenvue | |
| No More Tears as Separation from Parent to | |
| Accelerate Growth, FCF, Dividends; Initiate with OW Initiation | |
| Overweight | |
| KVUE, KVUE US | |
| Price (26 May 23):$26.30 | |
| Price Target (Dec-23):$29.00 | |
| Beverage, Household & Personal | |
| Care Products | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| Bloomberg JPMA TEIXEIRA <GO> | |
| Drew Levine, CFA | |
| (1-212) 622-0374 | |
| drew.levine@jpmorgan.com | |
| Shovana Chowdhury | |
| (1-212) 270-2184 | |
| shovana.chowdhury@jpmorgan.com | |
| J.P. Morgan Securities LLC | |
| Quarterly Forecasts (FYE Dec) | |
| Adj. EBITDA ($ mn) | |
| 2022A 2023E 2024E | |
| Q1 800 867A 968 | |
| Q2 1,022 940 1,000 | |
| Q3 971 1,007 1,014 | |
| Q4 812 983 1,001 | |
| FY 3,606 3,797 3,983 | |
| Style Exposure | |
| We are initiating coverage of Kenvue (NYSE ticker: KVUE) with an OW rating | |
| and a Dec 2023 price target of $29 (70/30 mix of peer multiples and DCF). As the largest pure-play consumer health company in the world following its separation | |
| from parent Johnson & Johnson (N-rated by Chris Schott), we view KVUE as | |
| uniquely positioned to benefit from consumer mega trends (self-care, aging). We expect KVUE to deliver resilient growth ahead in large addressable markets (TAM | |
| ~ $369bn) with iconic brands that form strong consumer connections from birth in | |
| a portfolio spanning cold, flu, pain, allergy, and smoke cessation OTC medicines, | |
| skincare, mouthwash, baby care, and wound care, among others. As a stand-alone company, we believe Kenvue board and management will be more focused and | |
| accountable for the growth and profitability of the business following the separation that began in 2019, with significant opportunities to scale in many | |
| adjacencies and markets around the world organically and through tuck-in M&A (would be incremental to our estimates and not needed to meet algorithm). | |
| • Large Categories That Benefit from Wellness Tailwinds and Sustainable Growth Momentum, Even after Lapping COVID Tailwinds. With 10 | |
| iconic brands with sales greater than $400M (Neutrogena, Listerine, Tylenol, | |
| Johnsons Baby, Aveeno, Nicorette, Zyrtec, Band-Aid, Stayfree/Carefree, | |
| OGX) as well as over 37 regional brands, KVUE is poised to offer investors at least ~4-5% three-year CAGR in organic sales (OSG) , in line with top peers. | |
| We note that due to supply chain constraints and SKU rationalization, KVUE lost share with OSG 3Y CAGR of+3.4% while the broader categories grew | |
| +4.8%. KVUE still holds solid market shares in key categories and markets, | |
| and like OW-rated PG, KVUE is still US-centric, which provides room to | |
| regain share and lift and shift some of the most iconic brands abroad. | |
| • Further Margin Expansion Opportunity. KVUE already delivered | |
| impressive +200/250 bps GM/EBITDA expansions vs. 2019, outperforming | |
| peers and despite cost and supply chain challenges. But we still see see KVUE generating profit growth ahead of sales growth from 2023-2025 with a three- | |
| year CAGR of +6.1% vs. top-line CAGR of +4.3%, implying EBITDA margin | |
| expansion to 25.4% in 2025 from 24.1% in 2022 (roughly +130 bps expansion) | |
| and 25.3% in 2021. | |
| • Attractive Valuation & Dividend Yield for Best-in-Class Growth | |
| Compounder. We believe KVUE offers upside to investors at current levels | |
| even after rallying from IPO price of $22 on May 3. At our $29 Dec 2023 price target, KVUE will be valued at ~16x EV/EBITDA 24E, which is | |
| approximately where OW-rated CL trades currently for 2023E (still ~2x | |
| cheaper than PG). As KVUE builds its track record as a public company (if our | |
| estimates for solid quarters ahead materialize) and post-potential distribution | |
| of shares that JNJ owns to current JNJ shareholders, we believe KVUE should | |
| trade with the major-league high-quality multinationals that have defensive sales, compounding growth, and solid free cash flow conversion. | |
| See page 92 for analyst certification and important disclosures. | |
| J.P. Morgan does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that | |
| the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single | |
| factor in making their investment decision. | |
| Sources for: Style Exposure – J.P. Morgan Quantitative and Derivatives Strategy; all other tables are company data and J.P. Morgan estimates. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 2 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J PMORGAN | |
| Price Performance | |
| YTD 1m 3m 12m | |
| Abs - - - - | |
| Rel - - - - | |
| Company Data | |
| Shares O/S (mn) 1,935 | |
| 52-week range ($) 27.80-25.25 | |
| Market cap ($ mn) 50,893.83 | |
| Exchange rate 1.00 | |
| Free float(%) 10.4% | |
| 3M - Avg daily vol (mn) - | |
| 3M - Avg daily val ($ mn) - | |
| Volatility (90 Day) - | |
| Index S&P 500 | |
| BBG BUY|HOLD|SELL - | |
| Key Metrics (FYE Dec) | |
| $ in millions FY22A FY23E FY24E FY25E | |
| Financial Estimates | |
| Revenue 14,950 15,662 16,289 16,973 | |
| Adj. EBITDA 3,606 3,797 3,983 4,308 | |
| Adj. EBIT 3,310 3,487 3,648 3,957 | |
| Adj. net income 2,589 2,404 2,451 2,693 | |
| Adj. EPS 1.34 1.24 1.27 1.39 | |
| BBG EPS - - - - | |
| Cashflow from operations 2,407 2,821 2,953 3,268 | |
| FCFF 2,032 2,405 2,471 2,763 | |
| Margins and Growth | |
| Revenue growth (0.7%) 4.8% 4.0% 4.2% | |
| Total Organic Growth Rate (%) - - - - | |
| Gross margin 55.8% 56.6% 56.7% 57.3% | |
| EBITDA margin 24.1% 24.2% 24.5% 25.4% | |
| EBITDA growth (5.4%) 5.3% 4.9% 8.2% | |
| EBIT margin 22.1% 22.3% 22.4% 23.3% | |
| Net margin 17.3% 15.4% 15.0% 15.9% | |
| Adj. EPS growth (4.5%) (7.1%) 1.9% 9.9% | |
| Ratios | |
| Net debt/EBITDA NM 2.0 1.8 1.7 | |
| ROIC - - - - | |
| ROE 13.0% 15.5% 21.6% 22.7% | |
| Valuation | |
| FCFF yield 4.0% 4.7% 4.9% 5.4% | |
| Dividend yield 0.0% 1.5% 3.1% 3.2% | |
| EV/Revenue 3.4 3.8 3.1 3.0 | |
| EV/EBITDA 14.0 15.7 12.7 11.8 | |
| Adj. P/E 19.7 21.2 20.8 18.9 | |
| Summary Investment Thesis and Valuation | |
| Investment Thesis | |
| We rate Kenvue (KVUE) Overweight. As the largest pure-play | |
| consumer health company in the world, reaching 1.2 billion | |
| consumers daily, KVUE benefits from participating in large | |
| categories where reliability and performance matter for | |
| consumers. As such, we highlight five KVUE attributes that | |
| underpin our positive view: (1) resilient top-line growth | |
| expected, (2) room for margin expansion, (3) high cash flow | |
| conversion and shareholder-friendly capital allocation, (4) | |
| management has a strong background not only with JNJ but with | |
| other blue-chip CPGs with solid relationships with key | |
| customers, and (5) attractive valuation. | |
| Valuation | |
| Despite the strong share performance since the IPO, we view | |
| current valuation as attractive. Our Dec 2023 target price of $29 | |
| is based on a blended average of EV/EBITDA (based on blended | |
| average of HLN, Consumer Health, HPC & Beauty peers) and | |
| a DCF based on perpetual growth method. We assign a 70% | |
| weighting to EV/EBITDA as the primary valuation method | |
| embedding 15.1.x EV/EBITDA off our 2024E EBITDA | |
| estimate of $4.0B (implies $27 per share) and 30% weighting to | |
| DCF as the secondary valuation method embedding $32 per | |
| share. KVUE currently trades at 15.5x our 2023E EBITDA and | |
| was priced at the IPO at 13.3x our 2023E EBITDA. | |
| Source: J.P. Morgan Quantitative and Derivatives Strategy for Performance Drivers; company data, Bloomberg Finance L.P. and J.P. Morgan estimates for all other tables. Note: Price history may not be | |
| complete or exact. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 3 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J PMORGAN | |
| Table Of Contents | |
| Summary of Investment Thesis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 | |
| Risks to Rating and Price Target . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 | |
| Company Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 | |
| Resilient Sales Growth in Large Categories Driven by | |
| Consumer Mega Trends. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 | |
| Growth Strategy Focused on Five Pillars . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 | |
| Balanced Portfolio Shaped through Strategic | |
| Transformation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 | |
| Self Care (40% of Sales, 53% of OI, OSG +8.6% 3-YR CAGR) . . . . . . . . 12 | |
| Skin Health & Beauty (29% of Sales, 18% of OI, OSG +0.1% 3-YR | |
| CAGR) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 | |
| Essential Health (31% of Sales, 28% of OI, OSG +0.9% 3-YR CAGR). . . 15 | |
| Margin Trajectory Improving Post-Strategic Transformation and Investments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 | |
| Financial Outlook. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 | |
| Path to ~+4% Top Line over Next Few Years with Upside If Elasticities | |
| Hold Up . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 | |
| Gross Margins Poised to Improve – Can Return to 2021 Peak by 2025 . . 26 | |
| Post-2023 Leverage in Middle of P&L to Help Drive Solid Earnings | |
| Growth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 | |
| Balance Sheet, FCF, CapEx. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 | |
| Valuation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 | |
| KVUE Deserves Premium to HLN with Potential to Converge to CL Over | |
| Time. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 | |
| Benchmarking Against Peers – HLN Anchor at Low End, Already at CL Levels, PG Aspirational . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 | |
| Price Target Derivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 | |
| Most Recent Point of Sales Trends in the U.S. (NielsenIQ) . . 41 | |
| Key Brands POS Performance in the U.S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 | |
| Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 | |
| Income Statement Historical & Estimates. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 | |
| Balance Sheet Historical & Estimates. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 | |
| Cash Flow Historical & Estimates. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 | |
| Strong, Global Management Team . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 | |
| Global and U.S. Sales and Market Share Trends. . . . . . . . . . . . 53 | |
| Global Category Market Share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 | |
| Self Care . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 | |
| Skin Health & Beauty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 | |
| Essential Health . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 | |
| U.S. Pricing, Share and Volume by Category - Tracked Channels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 4 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J PMORGAN | |
| Summary of Investment Thesis | |
| As the largest pure-play consumer health company in the world, reaching 1.2 billion | |
| consumers daily, KVUE benefits from participating in large categories where reliability | |
| and performance matter for consumers. As such, we highlight five KVUE attributes that underpin our positive view: (1) resilient top-line growth, (2) room for margin expansion, | |
| (3) high cash flow conversion and shareholder-friendly capital allocation, (4) | |
| managements strong background not only with JNJ but other blue-chip CPGs with solid | |
| relationships with key customers, and (5) attractive valuation. | |
| • Resilient Top-Line Growth in Large Categories. KVUE has strong leadership in | |
| three main categories (self-care, skin health & beauty, essential health) that combined represent around $369bn in sales globally. The company boasts a portfolio | |
| of seven #1 global brands and 37 #1 regional brands, with the top 10 brands above $400M in sales. Based on market data, KVUEs largest brands are Neutrogena, | |
| Listerine, Tylenol, and Johnsons baby. Management expects the categories to grow | |
| at a compounded annual growth rate of 3-4% globally through 2025 and for the company to drive growth competitive with the market, implying organic growth of | |
| about 4%, which we believe is doable and somewhat conservative. Given the strong | |
| start of 2023 with 11% organic sales growth (OSG) in Q123, we anticipate that KVUE will grow 6% organically this year, but as the company laps pricing, we expect it to decelerate (similar to most peers) to ~4% OSG in the following years. | |
| • Accelerating Growth with Innovation, Digital Marketing, Omnichannel distribution... From an innovation standpoint, KVUE spends about 2.5% of sales on | |
| R&D, introducing products that meet unsolved needs rooted in clinical trials. KVUE has launched roughly 100 new products per annum over the past several years, and | |
| innovation introduced over the rolling preceding three-year period has accounted for | |
| about $1.5 billion in net sales each year since 2020 (about 10% sales mix). As with | |
| most CPGs, KVUE has been directing more of its marketing spend (~9-10% of | |
| sales) into digital media (about 71% of total in 2022). With that and its increased | |
| relationship with key e-commerce retailers, the company was able to grow its online sales at a +20% CAGR from 2020 to 2022 to 13% online and double its Skin Health | |
| & Beauty e-commerce sales. In North America, for example, the digital marketing | |
| spend accounted for 73% of total marketing spend in 2022, which was up from 59% | |
| in 2020 and 49% in 2019 and drove a +29% increase in media ROI as of October | |
| 2022 and collective 13 points increase in U.S. household penetration from 2019 to | |
| 2021.The average consumer review on Amazon is 4.6 stars vs. category of 4.4 , | |
| including Neutrogena, Aveeno, Lubriderm, and Clean & Clear. | |
| • ….and Through New Product Adjacencies & Introducing Successful Brands in | |
| International Markets. Despite having many #1 positions, many of the sub- | |
| categories are fragmented, as we discuss in the market share analysis later in this | |
| report. For instance, Neutrogena is the #1 facial care brand in the U.S. but still the #3 facial care brand globally. In the facial cleansing category, Neutrogena is the #3 | |
| brand in the U.S. among Hispanics and the #2 brand in the U.S. among Millennials. | |
| It is also the #1 most reviewed brand in the skin care category on Amazon in 2022. | |
| This allows KVUE to build scale behind core priority brands that are not fully | |
| distributed in all markets. While KVUE has presence in 165 markets globally, it prioritizes eight markets: the U.S. (#1 market), Canada (#3), the U.K. (#5), Germany | |
| (#7), Brazil (#4), India (#6), Japan (#8), and China (#2). We think the company | |
| could follow the CPG playbook of lift-and-shift successful products to additional Kenvue (KVUE) | |
| Overweight | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 5 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J PMORGAN | |
| geographies over time. | |
| • Optionality in M&A as KVUE Evaluates Acquisitions to Enhance Core Portfolio and Capabilities. The company has undertaken a number of acquisitions | |
| and divestitures over the past seven years with 15 divestitures and 10 acquisitions | |
| since 2016. While not necessary to achieve its growth algorithm, the company plans | |
| to continue looking at M&A opportunities, although it sounds like management is | |
| intent on remaining focused squarely on the consumer health space and would be looking more for tuck-in vs. transformational M&A. We expect M&A to be focused | |
| on faster growing, premium categories, as has been the case with recent transactions | |
| (e.g., Dr.Ci:Labo and Zarbees). We do not include M&A in our P&L estimates, but we do budget around $500M for M&A in cash flow. | |
| • Room for Profitability to Continue to Expand and Lead to Operating Leverage. | |
| We expect the reorganization of brands, lower costs, better availability of key raw | |
| materials (shortage of silicone impacted SH&B division), and supply chain | |
| optimization will lead to better profitability ahead. While there are some dis-synergies from the separation (e.g., TSAs and TMAs – as we discuss below), | |
| we expect the phasing out of these expenses to become a tailwind to margins. From an EBITDA perspective, however, we do see KVUE generating profit growth ahead | |
| of sales growth from 2023-2025 with a three-year CAGR of +6.1% vs. top-line CAGR of +4.3%, implying EBITDA margin expansion to 25.4% in 2025 from 24.1% in 2022 (roughly +130 bps expansion) and 25.3% in 2021. For context, | |
| KVUE has a good track record of 200 bps gross margin and 250 bps EBITDA expansion in the last three years. | |
| • Reliable Cash Flow (~100% Conversion in 2023-25). We expect KVUE to | |
| deliver>100% FCF conversion (% of adjusted net income) in each of 2023-2025, | |
| and we model for free cash flow to grow at a three-year CAGR of +11% to $2.8 | |
| billion in 2025. The free cash flow outlook is supported by solid adjusted EBITDA growth (as described above) and some tailwind from working capital management as inventory normalizes following a step-up in 2022 (more below), which more than | |
| offsets cash separation costs expected to be incurred from 2023-2025 (around | |
| $595M post-tax) and some step-up in capital expenditures. | |
| • Best-in-Class Dividend Yield. KVUE dividend policy post-IPO will be a quarterly | |
| dividend of $0.20 per share beginning in 3Q23 (fiscal quarter ending October 1, | |
| 2023), which at the current price of $26.30 implies an annualized dividend yield of | |
| about 3.0% (at the IPO price of $22, the annualized dividend yield was closer to | |
| 3.6%). Looking ahead, we expect the company to target an annual dividend payout ratio of around 55-65% (JPMe 2024E 64%), and we model for 3% dividend growth | |
| in both 2023 and 2024 as the company targets moderate growth in dividend per | |
| share. | |
| • Management Has Strong Expertise in Categories, Already Operating | |
| Independently for +3 Years. KVUE has a strong, seasoned management team that will benefit from continuity as many of the c-level executive ushered in the strategic transformation beginning in the 2019 time frame through the IPO. Moreover, the consumer segment largely operated independently within JNJ historically, and as | |
| such, even after the separation, the organization should be well positioned to | |
| continue life as a public company. The management team has around 18 years of | |
| experience in consumer goods and healthcare on average and is a diverse group | |
| including over 58% women and representing nine different nationalities. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 6 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J PMORGAN | |
| Risks to Rating and Price Target | |
| • Execution Risk Tied to the Separation from JNJ. While the separation started in | |
| 2019, KVUE has never operated as a stand-alone company, and there is inherent execution risk tied to the separation from JNJ. The company will operate under | |
| transition services and manufacturing agreements ranging from two to five years, | |
| and there is no guarantee that Kenvue will be able to exit the agreements in a timely | |
| manner in order to drive cost savings. Moreover, Kenvue may be unable to | |
| successfully develop internal systems from an operational, financial, administrative, | |
| or IT perspective as a stand-alone company or may be unable to successfully source new manufacturing for regulated OTC products that are currently being produced by | |
| JNJ under the TMAs. Currently, the TMA covers certain SKUs of Tylenol, Motrin, | |
| Benadryl, and others that account for less than 10% of KVUE sales. | |
| • Potential Talc Litigation outside North America. Kenvue could be subject to talc- | |
| related litigation outside the U.S. and Canada relating to claims that talc causes | |
| cancer. We note that JNJ released a statement on April 27: As unequivocally and | |
| unambiguously stated, Johnson & Johnson has agreed to retain all the talc-related | |
| liabilities and indemnify Kenvue for any and all costs – arising from litigation in the United States and Canada. While our understanding is that there are currently only | |
| a few active claims relating to talc outside North America, the company has not taken any reserves against these claims, and there could be additional lawsuits in the future exposing KVUE to talc-related liabilities. On April 5, JNJ proposed an $8.9 | |
| billion settlement to resolve about 60,000 talc claimants in the U.S. | |
| • Seasonal Factors Could Impact Performance of Some OTC Products. Kenvues | |
| Self Care business as of 2022 represented 40% of sales and 53% of segment-level operating income and over the past three years generated 90% of KVUEs organic growth. The segment has benefitted from tailwinds to its pain relief and cold and | |
| cough businesses from various waves of the COVID-19 pandemic and recent triple-demic (COVID-19, RSV, flu). Additionally, the company has exposure to | |
| seasonal allergy trends. If upcoming cold, cough, and flu and/or allergy seasons are more mild than expected, there could be downside risk to estimates. | |
| • Inflation and Supply Chain Volatility May Impact Cost Outlook. As with other | |
| consumer products companies, Kenvue over the past two plus years has had to | |
| navigate significant inflationary cost pressures and a challenging supply chain | |
| environment. Ingredient, packaging, transportation, and labor shortages have impacted service levels, product availability, and KVUE profitability, and while the cost and supply chain environment appears to be improving, inflationary cost pressures persist and the supply chain environment could again worsen. | |
| • Consumer Demand May Weaken in Response to Macroeconomic Environment | |
| or Pricing Actions. While elasticities thus far have held up better than historically | |
| in response to material pricing actions undertaken by the company beginning in | |
| 2H22, a deterioration in the macroeconomic environment or higher sensitivity to | |
| incremental pricing actions may dent consumer demand for Kenvues products. In a softer macroeconomic environment, consumers may choose to trade down to private label products or other lower priced branded offerings. | |
| • Distribution of KVUE Shares by JNJ Could Put Pressure on KVUE Share Price. Following Kenvues IPO, JNJ still owns approximately 89.6% of KVUE shares. JNJ intends to effect a tax-free distribution of KVUE shares, which would | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 7 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| entail lowering its ownership stake to below 20%. If JNJ decides to pursue a | |
| distribution of its KVUE shares, there could be selling pressure on the stock | |
| depending on the structure of the distribution or discount implied by a share | |
| exchange offering. | |
| Company Description | |
| Kenvue Inc. (KVUE) is the largest pure-play consumer health company in the | |
| world with a history dating back over 135 years and a presence in over 165 | |
| countries with an estimated 1.2 billion people utilizing the companys products | |
| daily. Kenvues portfolio includes a number of iconic brands including Tylenol, | |
| Listerine, Band-Aid, Johnsons, Neutrogena, Aveeno, Zyrtec, and Nicorette, among | |
| others. The company boasts 10 brands that generated over $400 million in annual | |
| net sales in 2022, and seven of its brands hold leading positions across global | |
| categories. All in, Kenvue generated roughly $15 billion in sales and $3.6 billion | |
| EBITDA in 2022. The company operates three segments, Self Care (40% of 2022 | |
| sales), Skin Health & Beauty (29% of 2022 sales), and Essential Health (31% of | |
| 2022 sales), and by geographic region the company generates roughly 50% of sales | |
| in North America, 21% of sales in Europe, the Middle East & Africa, 21% of sales | |
| in Asia Pacific, and 8% of sales in Latin America. Kenvue owns 25 in-house | |
| manufacturing sites in addition to seven manufacturing sites under transition | |
| manufacturing agreements and employs more than 22,000 people globally. | |
| Prior to its IPO on May 3, 2023, Kenvue operated as the Consumer Health | |
| Business of Johnson & Johnson (JNJ), and following the offering JNJ holds a | |
| roughly 89.6% stake in the company. J.P. Morgan acted as a lead book-running | |
| manager for Kenvues initial public offering. | |
| Table 1: EV/EBITDA Valuation vs. Key Comps - Full Table in Valuation Section | |
| Ticker 2023E 2024E 2023E 2024E | |
| KVUE 15.5x 14.7x 4.8% 4.9% | |
| HLN 14.0x 13.3x 5.0% 5.7% | |
| PG 17.8x 16.7x 4.5% 4.7% | |
| CL 15.8x 14.7x 4.0% 4.5% | |
| RKT 13.4x 12.7x 5.4% 6.1% | |
| CHD 19.4x 18.3x 3.0% 3.7% | |
| EV/EBITDA FCF Yield | |
| Source: Bloomberg Finance L.P and J.P. Morgan estimates. | |
| Figure 1: Select KVUE Brands | |
| Source: Company reports. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 8 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Resilient Sales Growth in Large Categories | |
| Driven by Consumer Mega Trends | |
| Kenvue is the largest pure-play company in the Consumer Health sector with 135+ | |
| years of history and a portfolio of iconic and trusted brands (science-backed, healthcare | |
| professional recommendations) that many consumers are introduced to at a young age or | |
| when theyre most vulnerable (e.g., provided to you when youre not doing well by | |
| someone that cares for you – like for a cut or an illness). | |
| The companys portfolio is split into three segments: Self Care (40% of 2022 sales), | |
| Skin Health & Beauty (29% of 2022 sales), and Essential Health (31% of 2022 sales). | |
| All told, the categories in which KVUE competes represent a $369 billion market | |
| globally that has grown at a three-year CAGR of +4.8% from 2019-2022 (or +3.5% | |
| from 2018-2021 vs. overall CPG sector growth of around +3.1% over the same time | |
| period). | |
| Figure 2: KVUE 2019 Revenue Mix | |
| Self | |
| Care, | |
| 33.6% | |
| Skin | |
| Health & | |
| Beauty, | |
| 32.2% | |
| Essential | |
| Health, 34.2% | |
| 2019 | |
| Source: Company reports. | |
| Figure 3: KVUE 2022 Revenue Mix | |
| Health & | |
| , | |
| Self | |
| Care, | |
| 40.3% | |
| Skin | |
| Health & | |
| Beauty, | |
| 29.1% | |
| Essential | |
| Health, | |
| 30.6% | |
| 2022 | |
| Source: Company reports. | |
| Figure 4: KVUE 2025E Revenue Mix | |
| Self | |
| Care, | |
| 41.7% | |
| Skin | |
| Health & | |
| Beauty, | |
| 29.7% | |
| Essential | |
| Health, | |
| 28.7% | |
| 2025E | |
| Source: J.P. Morgan estimates. | |
| Figure 5: KVUE Category Sales Mix | |
| % of FY22 Sales | |
| COUGH, COLD AND | |
| ALLERGY, 12% | |
| PAIN CARE, 11% | |
| OTHER SELF CARE | |
| (DIGESTIVE HEALTH, | |
| SMOKING | |
| CESSATION AND | |
| OTHER), 15% | |
| FACE AND BODY | |
| CARE, 22% | |
| HAIR, SUN AND | |
| OTHER, 8% | |
| ORAL CARE, 11% | |
| BABY CARE, 10% | |
| OTHER ESSENTIAL | |
| HEALTH (WOMEN'S | |
| HEALTH AND | |
| WOUND CARE), 11% | |
| Source: Company reports. | |
| Figure 6: KVUE Geographic Sales Mix | |
| % of FY22 Sales | |
| NORTH AMERICA, | |
| 50% | |
| EMEA, 21% | |
| ASIA PACIFIC, | |
| 21% | |
| LATIN AMERICA, 8% | |
| Source: Company reports. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 9 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Bottom up, the companys $369 billion TAM consists of: | |
| • $114 billion in Self Care categories (e.g., analgesics, gastrointestinals, | |
| dermatologicals, cough & cold, lifestyle CHC, allergy, eye care, smoking control) | |
| • $217 billion in Skin Health & Beauty categories (e.g., conditioners and treatments, | |
| hair loss treatment, shampoos, medicated shampoos, skin care, adult sun care) | |
| • $38 billion in Essential Health categories (e.g., baby and child products ex-wipes, | |
| mouthwash/dental rinses, sanitary protection ex-U.S./Canada/China, wound care) | |
| Figure 7: KVUE TAM Build | |
| $ bn | |
| $369 | |
| $114 | |
| $217 | |
| $38 | |
| $0 | |
| $50 | |
| $100 | |
| $150 | |
| $200 | |
| $250 | |
| $300 | |
| $350 | |
| $400 | |
| Self Care Skin Health & Beauty Essential Health Total | |
| Source: Company reports. | |
| Figure 8: TAM Mix by Category vs. KVUE Revenue Mix | |
| 31% | |
| 59% | |
| 10% | |
| 40% | |
| 29% 31% | |
| 0% | |
| 10% | |
| 20% | |
| 30% | |
| 40% | |
| 50% | |
| 60% | |
| 70% | |
| Self Care Skin Health & Beauty Essential Health | |
| % of TAM % of KVUE 2022 Sales | |
| Source: Company reports. | |
| Growth across the categories has been broad based over the past three years with a | |
| +MSD% CAGR including +6.2% in Essential Health categories, +5.1% in Self Care | |
| categories, and +4.5% in Skin Health & Beauty categories, although we note that the | |
| category growth rates over the past few years were impacted by pandemic-related | |
| tailwinds and more recently pricing actions from inflationary cost pressures. Typically | |
| (as we detail later), Essential Health categories grow slower relative to Skin Health & | |
| Beauty (fastest growing) – albeit KVUE was negatively impacted in this segment by | |
| self-inflicted SKU rationalization – and Self Care (slightly below Skin Health & | |
| Beauty). | |
| Figure 9: Category Sales CAGR - Each Category CAGR Accelerated vs. Historical Trend | |
| 3.4% 3.6% | |
| 3.0% | |
| 3.5% | |
| 5.1% | |
| 4.5% | |
| 6.2% | |
| 4.8% | |
| 0% | |
| 1% | |
| 2% | |
| 3% | |
| 4% | |
| 5% | |
| 6% | |
| 7% | |
| Self Care Skin Health & Beauty Essential Health Total | |
| CAGR '18-'21 CAGR '19-'22 | |
| Source: Company reports. | |
| We view KVUEs category exposure as a sweet spot in CPG at the intersection of | |
| healthcare and consumer goods – both with long-term secular tailwinds that should lead | |
| to consistent +3-4% growth globally through 2025. At a high level from a category | |
| perspective, growth should be enabled by increased focus on health by consumers and | |
| retailers alike, which was accelerated by the pandemic era, aging population and rising | |
| middle class globally, premiumization, and digitization. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 10 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Growth Strategy Focused on Five Pillars | |
| KVUE aims to grow the top line competitively with its underlying category exposure | |
| (+3-4%) driven largely by reinvesting behind its iconic core brands and supplementing | |
| with expansion into new category adjacencies and geographies and bolt-on M&A | |
| focused on consumer health. | |
| The company is primarily focusing its investments behind its top 15 global brands | |
| (Tylenol, Zyrtec, Rhinocort, Motrin, ORSL, Benadryl, Nicorette, Zarbees, Aveeno, | |
| Neutrogena, Dr.Ci:Labo, OGX, Johnsons, Listerine, Band-Aid) and eight priority | |
| markets (U.S., Canada, U.K., Germany, Brazil, India, Japan, China) where it sees the | |
| greatest opportunity for growth ahead with long runway. | |
| Below, we outline our view on KVUEs growth strategies and thoughts on the | |
| companys prospects. | |
| 1. Grow Brand Relevance and Salience | |
| The biggest driver for long-term growth is likely to be household penetration and | |
| incidence opportunity as even KVUEs largest brands have significant usage gaps. | |
| Relevance and salience to consumers should be enabled by marketing campaigns | |
| (predominately digital-focused at this point – more below) and continued focus on | |
| clinical claims and working with healthcare professionals to secure recommendations | |
| (also applicable to innovation). | |
| For example, in the pain relief category in the U.S. there are 4.5x more consumers using | |
| some form of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) vs. consumers | |
| exclusively using acetaminophen (generic name for Tylenol); in skin care there are 2.7x | |
| more consumers who suffer from sensitive skin vs. sensitive product contribution to the | |
| body care category in the U.S.; and in oral care household penetration for mouthwash is | |
| 1.8x higher in the U.S. and U.K vs. larger markets in ROW (e.g., Spain, Italy, France, | |
| China, Japan, Thailand, Indonesia, Philippines). See deep-dive analysis in the back of | |
| this report for market sizes, household penetration, and market share globally and in the | |
| most relevant countries and categories. | |
| Figure 10: 4.5x More Consumers in U.S. Use | |
| Some Form of Pain Care vs. Acetaminophen | |
| Alone | |
| 26M | |
| 118M | |
| Consumers with certain medical conditions exclusively using | |
| acetaminophen in the U.S. | |
| Consumers with certain medical conditions using some form | |
| of pain relief in the U.S. | |
| Source: Nielsen Homescan Panel. | |
| Figure 11: 2.7x More Consumers Have | |
| Sensitive Skin vs. Sensitive Skin Product | |
| Share of Body Care | |
| 26% | |
| 71% | |
| Sensitive skin product contribution to body care category in | |
| the U.S. | |
| Suffer from sensitive skin in the U.S. | |
| Source: Aveeno State of Skin Sensitivity Report. | |
| Figure 12: Household Penetration Opportunity | |
| in Mouthwash | |
| 15% | |
| 29% | |
| 50% | |
| Household penetration in China Household penetration in Japan Household penetration in U.S. and U.K. | |
| Source: Company reports. | |
| 2. Increase Product Availability through Omnichannel Strategy | |
| The largest areas of opportunity are to expand presence in pharmacy and e-comm, in our | |
| view. In retail, the opportunity is for incremental shelf space gains as retailers devote | |
| more space to consumer health categories with KVUE well positioned to gain share | |
| given its scale, market share position, and investments behind marketing and consumer | |
| insights, in addition to deeper penetration in the faster growing pharmacy channel in | |
| EMEA, India, and China (APAC is ~21% of sales, and China and India combined are | |
| around 50% of APAC sales with China the #2 market globally and India the #6 market | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 11 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J PMORGAN | |
| globally for KVUE). KVUEs e-commerce opportunity is largely consistent with the rest of CPG as KVUEs sales mix to pure-play e-commerce is around 6%, which about doubles to 13% when including retail.com. Looking from 2020-2022, KVUEs e- | |
| commerce sales grew at a roughly +20% CAGR. KVUE is aiming to increase product availability in the e-commerce channel and increased investment in digital marketing | |
| over the past few years to help accelerate e-commerce mix; for example, 71% of | |
| KVUEs marketing spend was on digital in 2022, up from 44% in 2019. The company is | |
| also expanding in the DTC channel with brands like Dr.Ci:Labo (63% of sales in Japan | |
| DTC in 2022), although it is still early days. | |
| 3. Deliver Consistent Cadence of Consumer-Centric Innovation | |
| The companys innovation strategy is centered on elevating the core brands, enhancing | |
| the consumer experience, and solving for unmet needs. The companys innovation | |
| agenda is supported by 1,500 dedicated R&D employees (R&D is ~2.5% of KVUE sales, which is above the peer average of ~2.0%); over the past several years the company has launched roughly 100 new products per annum, and innovation introduced | |
| over the rolling preceding three-year period has accounted for about $1.5 billion in net sales each year since 2020 (about 10% sales mix). | |
| The companys innovation leverages its relationships with healthcare professionals and | |
| also relies on clinical claims. Recent examples include: 1) Listerine rolling out claims | |
| that the product reduces 5x more plaque above the gumline vs. flossing; 2) Childrens | |
| Zyrtec Oral Chewables and Dissolve Tabs and Tylenol Dissolve Packs for adults and | |
| children who find it difficult to swallow pills; 3) Neutrogena Rapid Firming Peptide Contour Lift Face Cream, which contains an anti-aging ingredient (acetyl dipeptide) | |
| designed for sensitive skin; 4) sustainable packaging solutions that reduce plastic including Neutrogena Hydro Boost refillable pods, Aveeno Body Wash refill packs, and | |
| Listerine concentrate kits; and 5) Aveeno Calm + Restore focused on the underserved | |
| segment of consumers with sensitive, extra-dry skin. | |
| 4. Expand into New Product Adjacencies and Geographic Markets | |
| The company is in 165 markets globally but prioritizes eight markets: the U.S. (#1 | |
| market), Canada (#3), the U.K. (#5), Germany (#7), Brazil (#4), India (#6), Japan (#8), | |
| and China (#2). Back to the Listerine example, there is still has a significant household | |
| penetration opportunity as the overall United States mouthwash category penetration | |
| rate was only 50% as of December 2022, while in APAC, category penetration was only | |
| 29% in Japan and 15% in China, each as of 2022.The company does plan for growth | |
| outside of these markets as well but will generally look to build scale behind core priority brands and then expand portfolio offerings or enter adjacencies by leveraging | |
| priority brands. The company gave the example of launching Aveeno in Indonesia, | |
| Malaysia, and the Philippines, and we think the company could follow the CPG | |
| playbook of lift-and-shift successful products to additional geographies over time. | |
| 5. Continually Evaluate Acquisitions to Enhance Core Product Portfolio and | |
| Capabilities | |
| The company has undertaken a number of acquisitions and divestitures over the past seven years with 15 divestitures and 10 acquisitions since 2016. While not necessary to | |
| achieve its growth outlook, the company plans to continue looking at M&A opportunities, although it sounds like management is intent on remaining focused | |
| squarely on the consumer health space and would be looking more for tuck-in vs. | |
| transformational M&A. We expect M&A to be focused on faster growing, premium This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 12 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| categories, as has been the case with recent transactions (e.g., Dr.Ci:Labo and Zarbees). | |
| Balanced Portfolio Shaped through Strategic | |
| Transformation | |
| Self Care (40% of Sales, 53% of OI, OSG +8.6% 3-YR CAGR) | |
| Self Care is KVUEs largest segment with $6.0 billion in sales (~40% of FY22 sales) | |
| and $2.1 billion in adjusted operating income (34.6% margin and 53.4% of KVUE | |
| segment-level adjusted OI). Categories represented in Self Care primarily include | |
| cough, cold and allergy, pain care, digestive health, and smoking cessation. Key brands | |
| include Tylenol, Nicorette, Zyrtec, Motrin, Rhinocort, Benadryl, Zarbees, ORSL, and | |
| Imodium. | |
| Figure 13: Self Care 40% of Revenues and 53% of Segment OI | |
| 40% 53% | |
| 0% | |
| 10% | |
| 20% | |
| 30% | |
| 40% | |
| 50% | |
| 60% | |
| 70% | |
| 80% | |
| 90% | |
| 100% | |
| % of FY22 Sales % of FY22 Segment OI | |
| Source: Company reports. | |
| Figure 14: Self Care Category Revenue Mix | |
| % of FY Sales | |
| 35.7% 32.2% | |
| 26.7% 32.2% | |
| 37.6% 35.5% | |
| 0% | |
| 10% | |
| 20% | |
| 30% | |
| 40% | |
| 50% | |
| 60% | |
| 70% | |
| 80% | |
| 90% | |
| 100% | |
| 2019 2022 | |
| COUGH, COLD AND ALLERGY PAIN CARE OTHER SELF CARE | |
| Source: Company reports. | |
| Self Care Has Been the Key Driver of KVUEs Improved Sales Trajectory in L3Y | |
| Self Care has been aided by tailwinds from COVID and recent tripledemic (RSV, flu, | |
| COVID) and resulting increased consumer focus on health (e.g., increased smoking | |
| cessation attempts during the pandemic). In fact, from 2020-2022 Self Care drove ~91% | |
| of KVUEs organic sales growth with the segment posting a 3Y CAGR of +8.6% | |
| relative to total company 3Y CAGR of +3.4%. Within the Self Care +8.6% 3Y CAGR, | |
| volume growth contributed about 6.3% to the organic CAGR with price/mix | |
| contributing about +2.5%. Impressively, the companys 3Y CAGR has remained | |
| resilient sequentially through most of 2022 and even accelerated in 1Q23 behind higher | |
| incidence of cold and flu in EMEA and inventory replenishment at retail. | |
| Figure 15: Self Care Organic Growth Trends and Outlook | |
| 7.5% | |
| 4.4% | |
| 7.0% | |
| 1.7% 2.2% | |
| 3.3% | |
| 1.9% | |
| 1.5% | |
| 4.1% | |
| 6.4% | |
| 2.4% | |
| 1.5% | |
| 0% | |
| 2% | |
| 4% | |
| 6% | |
| 8% | |
| 10% | |
| 12% | |
| 2020 2021 2022 2023E 2024E 2025E | |
| Volume Price/Mix | |
| Source: Company reports and J.P. Morgan estimates. | |
| Figure 16: Self Care 2022/2023E Organic Growth by Halves | |
| 10.9% | |
| 3.7% 4.5% | |
| -0.9% | |
| 1.4% | |
| 6.6% | |
| 7.3% | |
| 5.4% | |
| -2% | |
| 0% | |
| 2% | |
| 4% | |
| 6% | |
| 8% | |
| 10% | |
| 12% | |
| 14% | |
| 1H22 2H22 1H23E 2H23E | |
| % volume % price/mix | |
| Source: Company reports and J.P. Morgan estimates. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 13 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J PMORGAN | |
| Following a strong three years of growth, which some could argue would have been | |
| even stronger if not for supply chain challenges on Tylenol, and outlook for a fourth | |
| strong year in 2023, we see the biggest question facing the segment as whether KVUE will be able to comp the comp and deliver on roughly +4.7% organic growth post- | |
| 2023 as the inflationary environment normalizes and the company contends with | |
| lapping years of strong tailwinds to pain care and cough, cold & flu. That is, the question is whether the category growth trends normalize to historical growth levels or | |
| have a reversion to the mean. While acknowledging the vagaries of virus/allergy | |
| seasonal trends, there are a number of drivers both at the macro and company-level that provide a pathway to solid, albeit more normalized growth ahead. | |
| Growth Is Not Only Driven by the Pandemic... | |
| In pain care, KVUE should see ongoing tailwinds from deeper penetration for its brands | |
| given unmet medical needs of consumers and wide gap between the number of | |
| consumers using some form of pain relief vs. those using acetaminophen (active ingredient in Tylenol) exclusively (i.e., some consumers using NSAIDs or a combination of sometimes NSAIDs/sometimes acetaminophen). As we noted above, in | |
| the U.S. there are roughly 26M consumers with chronic health conditions using | |
| exclusively acetaminophen vs. 118M consumers with chronic health conditions using | |
| some form of pain relief (i.e., NSAIDs or dual-users of NSAIDs or acetaminophen). We expect the company to prioritize the opportunity for household penetration and usage expansion in North America (usage gap vs. overall pain care) and APAC (middle class | |
| becoming more open to Western medicine) over the next few years. There should also | |
| be growth opportunity through form factor extensions that provide ease of use/ | |
| convenience for consumers (e.g., dissolvable tablets) and line extensions targeted at specific indications (e.g., arthritis, back pain). | |
| ...Strong Growth in Allergy Medicines Proves Power of Brand Equity and | |
| Innovation | |
| In allergy, KVUE should benefit long term from increasing allergy incidence (e.g., | |
| number of allergy days per season has grown by over 20 days from 1990-2018 given | |
| impacts from factors like climate change, and pollen concentration has increased 21% | |
| over the same period) and penetration in the U.S. (through Zyrtec) and China (through | |
| Rhinocort). Like in pain care, we also expect form factor extensions to aid in driving | |
| growth; for example, the company introduced Childrens Zyrtec Chewables to enhance the consumer experience and drive adoption given challenges many children have with | |
| swallowing pills. This innovation helped to drive accelerated category growth for | |
| pediatric allergy (U.S. growth accelerated 5x for 2H22) with Zyrtec the #1 brand in | |
| pediatric allergy. | |
| Smoke Cessation Benefits from Self-Care Tailwinds Prior to the Pandemic and | |
| Accelerated Post COVID-19 | |
| In other self-care categories, KVUE should see continued benefit from quit attempts in | |
| smoking cessation supported by new scientific claims, products (e.g., Nicorette QuickMist and app), and marketing campaigns (e.g., Do Something Incredible | |
| campaign drove 74% improvement in media ROI and 2.6 points of market share gains | |
| globally), as well as potential entry into vaping cessation. The company also plans to | |
| selectively invest to drive growth in digestive health through ORSL. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 14 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Skin Health & Beauty (29% of Sales, 18% of OI, OSG +0.1% 3- | |
| YR CAGR) | |
| Skin Health & Beauty (SHB) generated sales of $4.4 billion in 2022 (~29% of FY22 | |
| sales) and $0.7 billion in adjusted operating income (16.3% margin and 18.1% of | |
| KVUE segment-level adjusted OI). Categories represented in SHB primarily include | |
| face and body care, hair care, and sun care, and key brands include Neutrogena, Aveeno, | |
| OGX, Dr.Ci:Labo, Le Petit Marseillais, Lubriderm, Rogaine, Dabao, and Clean & Clear. | |
| Figure 17: Skin Health & Beauty 29% of Revenues and 18% of Segment | |
| OI | |
| 29% 18% | |
| 0% | |
| 10% | |
| 20% | |
| 30% | |
| 40% | |
| 50% | |
| 60% | |
| 70% | |
| 80% | |
| 90% | |
| 100% | |
| % of FY22 Sales % of FY22 Segment OI | |
| Source: Company reports. | |
| Figure 18: Skin Health & Beauty Category Revenue Mix | |
| % of FY Sales | |
| 74.6% 68.7% | |
| 25.4% 31.3% | |
| 0% | |
| 10% | |
| 20% | |
| 30% | |
| 40% | |
| 50% | |
| 60% | |
| 70% | |
| 80% | |
| 90% | |
| 100% | |
| 2019 2022 | |
| FACE AND BODY CARE HAIR, SUN AND OTHER | |
| Source: Company reports. | |
| Flat OSG Performance in Last 3 Years Ending 2023, Due to Supply Chain | |
| Constraints... | |
| Despite the category growing at a +4.5% CAGR from 2019-2022, KVUEs SHB | |
| segment has underperformed (3Y CAGR through 2022 just +0.1%) as the business | |
| suffered through supply chain challenges that seemed to have a greater impact relative | |
| to competitors, partially attributable to KVUEs exposure to sun care, which went | |
| through challenges last year given silicone shortages, in addition to impacts from lost | |
| usage occasions during the COVID pandemic (also impacted competitors). With that, | |
| over the past three years SHB essentially contributed nothing to KVUEs organic | |
| growth, and as of 2022, SHB volumes still stood around 3% below 2019 levels. | |
| … Turning the Corner Accelerating to MSDs OSG in 2H22 and Low Teens in 1Q23 | |
| That said, KVUE appears to be turning a corner more recently in top-line trajectory | |
| (albeit against a low bar) as the company undertook actions to streamline its supply | |
| chain and build resilience (in addition to general easing of supply chain situation | |
| globally). Specifically, 2H22 organic growth in the segment came in at +5.3% (+MSD% | |
| in each of 3Q/4Q) vs. a -4.0% organic growth decline in 1H22, implying a 3Y CAGR in | |
| 2H22 of +1.5% vs. -0.8% in 1H22. Momentum has continued thus far in 1Q23 with | |
| organic growth of +13.2%, and the segment seems to be on stronger footing now to take | |
| advantage of favorable secular trends in the categories of body, face, and sun care. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 15 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Figure 19: Skin Health & Beauty Organic Growth Trends and Outlook | |
| -3.3% | |
| 2.3% | |
| -2.3% -2.1% | |
| 2.5% | |
| 3.5% | |
| 0.8% | |
| 0.6% | |
| 2.8% | |
| 7.9% 2.6% | |
| 1.8% | |
| -4% | |
| -2% | |
| 0% | |
| 2% | |
| 4% | |
| 6% | |
| 8% | |
| 10% | |
| 2020 2021 2022 2023E 2024E 2025E | |
| Volume Price/Mix | |
| Source: Company reports and J.P. Morgan estimates. | |
| Figure 20: Skin Health & Beauty 2022/2023E Organic Growth by Halves | |
| -5.6% | |
| 1.1% 1.0% | |
| -5.1% | |
| 1.6% | |
| 4.1% | |
| 8.4% | |
| 7.4% | |
| -8% | |
| -6% | |
| -4% | |
| -2% | |
| 0% | |
| 2% | |
| 4% | |
| 6% | |
| 8% | |
| 10% | |
| 12% | |
| 1H22 2H22 1H23E 2H23E | |
| % volume % price/mix | |
| Source: Company reports and J.P. Morgan estimates. | |
| With a favorable setup that should benefit from reopening, lapping a low comparison | |
| base, and recent innovation, the company should be able to deliver >+5% organic | |
| growth over the next three years and drive one-third of the companys organic growth | |
| (vs. just 1% from 2020-2022). Supporting the top-line outlook is execution against | |
| innovation and marketing with larger focus on Neutrogena Hydro Boost in face care, | |
| sun care innovation (both Neutrogena and Aveeno), and more focus on body care with | |
| Aveeno Calm + Restore for sensitive skin. The company is likely also to push more on | |
| growth in the APAC region through its recent acquisition of dermocosmetic brand Dr. | |
| Ci:Labo (acquired in 2019) in the prestige segment (dermocosmetics growing 2x | |
| category rate) and Dabao (local jewel brand) in the mass segment (64% share of | |
| category). In hair care, OGX has seen strong performance in the premium segment in | |
| the U.S., and the company should also benefit from growth in the hair re-growth | |
| category with Rogaine. | |
| The biggest question ahead for SHB, in our view, is simply that the company hasnt | |
| demonstrated an ability to generate consistent top-line growth and take advantage of the | |
| secular tailwinds to the categories. That said, with improving supply chain situation, | |
| reinvestment behind marketing, and innovation, we do see a path to +MSD% in the | |
| years ahead. | |
| Essential Health (31% of Sales, 28% of OI, OSG +0.9% 3-YR | |
| CAGR) | |
| Essential Health generated sales of $4.6 billion in 2022 (~31% of FY22 sales) and $1.1 | |
| billion in adjusted operating income (24.3% margin and 28.4% of KVUE segment-level | |
| adjusted OI). Categories represented in Essential Health primarily include oral care, | |
| baby care, womens health, and wound care, and key brands include Listerine, Johnsons | |
| Baby, Stayfree / Carefree, Band-Aid, Neosporin, and o.b. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 16 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Figure 21: Essential Health 31% of Revenues and 28% of Segment OI | |
| 31% 28% | |
| 0% | |
| 10% | |
| 20% | |
| 30% | |
| 40% | |
| 50% | |
| 60% | |
| 70% | |
| 80% | |
| 90% | |
| 100% | |
| % of FY22 Sales % of FY22 Segment OI | |
| Source: Company reports. | |
| Figure 22: Essential Health Category Revenue Mix | |
| % of FY Sales | |
| 32.2% 32.7% | |
| 35.1% 32.7% | |
| 32.7% 34.6% | |
| 0% | |
| 10% | |
| 20% | |
| 30% | |
| 40% | |
| 50% | |
| 60% | |
| 70% | |
| 80% | |
| 90% | |
| 100% | |
| 2019 2022 | |
| ORAL CARE BABY CARE OTHER ESSENTIAL HEALTH | |
| Source: Company reports. | |
| Essential Health has been the main area of focus of KVUEs transformation over the | |
| 2019-2022 period when the new management team came in with a focus on active | |
| portfolio management and simplification and margin improvement. Specifically, since | |
| 2019 the segment has seen a -$100M headwind from divestitures (around 2% of 2019 | |
| sales) and another -$100M headwind from SKU rationalization. With that, the segment | |
| has underperformed the category CAGR of +6.2% from 2019-2022 with organic growth | |
| CAGR of +0.9% from 2020-2022 and volumes ending 2022 over 5% lower vs. 2019. | |
| With a lot of the portfolio cleanup now in the past, the segment should be able to return | |
| to growth more consistent with historical levels, aided by significant pricing actions | |
| with modest elasticity and a couple of key marketing campaigns behind core brands | |
| Listerine and Aveeno Baby. We model for Essential Health to grow +3.4% in 2023 and | |
| then grow at a 2Y CAGR of +2.2% in 2024-2025. | |
| Figure 23: Essential Health Organic Growth Trends and Outlook | |
| 0.3% 0.6% | |
| -6.2% -5.5% | |
| 0.6% 1.6% | |
| 2.2% 1.4% | |
| 4.9% | |
| 8.9% | |
| 1.6% | |
| 0.8% | |
| -8.0% | |
| -6.0% | |
| -4.0% | |
| -2.0% | |
| 0.0% | |
| 2.0% | |
| 4.0% | |
| 6.0% | |
| 8.0% | |
| 10.0% | |
| 2020 2021 2022 2023E 2024E 2025E | |
| Volume Price/Mix | |
| Source: Company reports and J.P. Morgan estimates. | |
| Figure 24: Essential Health 2022/2023E Organic Growth by Halves | |
| -5.9% -6.6% -6.0% -5.0% | |
| 3.2% | |
| 6.7% | |
| 9.2% 8.5% | |
| -8% | |
| -6% | |
| -4% | |
| -2% | |
| 0% | |
| 2% | |
| 4% | |
| 6% | |
| 8% | |
| 10% | |
| 1H22 2H22 1H23E 2H23E | |
| % volume % price/mix | |
| Source: Company reports and J.P. Morgan estimates. | |
| The company sounds particularly optimistic around Listerine given the category | |
| penetration opportunity and marketing of new scientific claims. We noted before that | |
| mouthwash penetration is 1.8x higher in the U.S. and U.K. vs. other larger markets in | |
| ROW, and the company is rolling out claims from a scientific study that Listerine is 5x | |
| more effective at destroying plaque above the gum line vs. flossing (has led to 5 point | |
| increase in share of healthcare professionals recommending Listerine to 63%). | |
| The +LSD% top-line outlook for the segment appears reasonable, in our view, given the | |
| mature categories in which KVUE competes in the segment, although we note that | |
| KVUEs market share trends have been quite challenged over the past couple years, | |
| which management attributes in part to the SKU rationalization effort that likely led to | |
| some lost points of distribution and shelf space. Typically we would view SKU | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 17 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J PMORGAN | |
| rationalization as normal course of business, and we would be surprised if elimination | |
| of non-core SKUs with low velocity (as is typically the case in an SKU rationalization | |
| effort) led to that material market share losses as normally one would expect sales to | |
| flow back to the higher velocity, core SKUs. As such, perhaps the market share losses | |
| could be more tied to less than ideal execution and differentiated offerings from competitors (e.g., CHDs TheraBreath in mouthwash). | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 18 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J PMORGAN | |
| Margin Trajectory Improving Post-Strategic | |
| Transformation and Investments | |
| Following the current management team coming into the business around 2019, KVUE saw improvement in margin trajectory driven by a strategic transformation and series of | |
| investments aimed at both improving profitability and also driving top-line momentum. | |
| Some of the actions we outlined above (e.g., 15 divestitures and 10 acquisitions to | |
| reshape the portfolio since 2016, SKU rationalization, investments in higher ROI digital media), but others included supply chain simplification (e.g., rationalizing smaller | |
| external manufacturers) and investments in supply chain digitization (e.g., automation, | |
| resiliency), and there was also a margin mix benefit from faster growth in the higher- | |
| margin Self Care segment. Together these areas helped lead to a +290 bps expansion in | |
| KVUE gross margins from 2019 to 2021. | |
| KVUEs EBITDA margins improved +445 bps in 2020 (26.1%) vs. 2019 (21.6%) but finished -78 bps YOY in 2021 given reinvestment behind advertising (-120 bps | |
| headwind as advertising expense increased to 9.7% of sales) to 25.3% but still about 365 | |
| bps ahead of 2019 levels. Pressure continued in 2022 driven by supply chain, inflation, | |
| and FX pressures with margins compressing another -119 bps YOY. Looking ahead, | |
| with pricing actions now in place (mostly a 2H22 event) to begin to help offset inflationary cost pressures and incremental pricing in 2023 (we estimate ~45% of 2023 | |
| pricing is carryover from 2022), KVUEs EBITDA margins should begin to recover | |
| even after burdening the P&L with stand-alone company costs (e.g., transition services | |
| and manufacturing agreements, public company costs, incremental hires to support standalone organization), which likely total ~$100M. | |
| Deliberate Portfolio Optimization Toward Core and Faster Growing Consumer Health Categories | |
| M&A has played a significant role in shaping the KVUE portfolio with some of its | |
| largest brands the result of acquisitions including Tylenol (1958), Neutrogena (1994), | |
| Aveeno (1996), and Listerine (2006). More recently, the company has undertaken efforts | |
| to streamline its portfolio to core brands and local jewels (i.e., leveraging same active ingredient/technology at platform brand) while exiting slower growth, lower margin | |
| brands/categories and making acquisitions in faster growth, higher margin brand/ | |
| categories. As noted, since 2016 the company has actively shaped the portfolio by | |
| completing 15 divestitures and 10 acquisitions. Recent notable acquisitions include Vogue International (OGX) in 2016, NeoStrata in 2016, Zarbees in 2018, and Dr. | |
| Ci:Labo in 2019; some notable divestitures include RoC and Nizoral in 2018 in the Skin | |
| Health & Beauty segment and Compeed (2017) and Reach (2021) in the Essential Health segment. | |
| Beyond M&A, KVUE also undertook an extensive SKU rationalization effort over the past few years that has resulted in a 21% reduction in the number of SKUs from 2019- | |
| 2022 and was a roughly ~$100M headwind to the top line in the Essential Health | |
| segment with some additional impact to Skin Health & Beauty as well. | |
| The SKU rationalization and M&A efforts, while detrimental to the top line and the companys market share performance, helped to improve the margin structure by | |
| reducing complexity and eliminating lower profitability items as evidenced by Essential Health segment adjusted operating income margins expanding approximately 340 bps | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 19 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| from 2019 to 2022 despite organic sales CAGR of just +0.9% and reported sales down - | |
| 6.7% from 2019 levels. | |
| Figure 25: Essential Health Segment Sales, OI, Margin 2022 vs. 2019 | |
| $ m | |
| $4,896 | |
| $4,570 | |
| $1,022 $1,111 | |
| 20.9% | |
| 24.3% | |
| 19.0% | |
| 20.0% | |
| 21.0% | |
| 22.0% | |
| 23.0% | |
| 24.0% | |
| 25.0% | |
| $0 | |
| $1,000 | |
| $2,000 | |
| $3,000 | |
| $4,000 | |
| $5,000 | |
| $6,000 | |
| 2019 2022 | |
| Sales Segment OI Segment OI Margin | |
| Source: Company reports. | |
| Figure 26: Essential Health Profit/Margin Improvement Despite Lower | |
| Sales | |
| -6.7% | |
| 8.7% | |
| +340 bps | |
| -8% | |
| -6% | |
| -4% | |
| -2% | |
| 0% | |
| 2% | |
| 4% | |
| 6% | |
| 8% | |
| 10% | |
| Sales 2022 vs. 2019 Segment OI 2022 vs. 2019 Segment OI Margin 2022 vs. 2019 | |
| Source: Company reports. | |
| We expect the company to continually evaluate opportunities to streamline its portfolio | |
| by eliminating tail SKUs (likely an annual exercise as it is with any CPG company), | |
| although from our perspective it appears that much of the heavy lifting of portfolio | |
| optimization is largely behind the company at this point. Looking ahead, M&A figures | |
| to continue to play a role in shaping of the portfolio, likely continuing in the higher | |
| growth/margin segments within Consumer Health (e.g., Self Care and Skin Health & | |
| Beauty), and we expect M&A to be more bolt-on in nature vs. transformational | |
| transactions. With strong FCF generation and a healthy balance sheet (post-IPO net | |
| debt-to-TTM EBITDA likely ~2.1x) KVUE should have ample dry powder to deploy to | |
| M&A if it deems fit, and we think management is likely earmarking $500-750M for | |
| acquisitions in the years ahead (vs. JPMe FCF $2.4B/$2.5B/$2.8B in 2023/2024/2025), | |
| although we note that we dont account for any M&A benefit within our P&L estimates. | |
| Supply Chain Optimization to Reduce Complexity, Increase Efficiency and | |
| Resiliency | |
| While supply chain challenges plagued KVUE during 2022 given input shortages and | |
| transportation challenges, the company has undertaken efforts since 2019 to structurally | |
| improve its supply chain by investing in digitization to increase efficiency and resiliency | |
| and by reduced complexity through external manufacturer rationalization. | |
| Pre-pandemic, KVUEs supply chain focus was mostly on operational excellence, | |
| quality control, and margin maximization, but COVID tested the resilience and | |
| flexibility of the supply chain and uncovered a lack of redundancy that impacted | |
| product availability and service. The company noted that in 2021/2022 64%/63% of its | |
| scheduled capital spend for supply chain investments was allocated to digitization | |
| (automation), which ultimately allows for better demand planning, capacity, and | |
| resilience. Some examples include 1) shift to conditions-based maintenance from | |
| scheduled maintenance given better monitoring capabilities allows for better capacity | |
| availability while also alleviating labor challenges; 2) complexity reduction through | |
| SKU rationalization and product design standardization (e.g., bottle types) and reducing | |
| the number of small external manufacturers (e.g., company eliminated 60% of small | |
| external manufacturers); 3) increasing dual sourcing and reducing specification on | |
| critical ingredients to improve availability/resilience; and 4) integrated business | |
| planning to optimize forecasting and inventory management, leading to better | |
| profitability and cash flow. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 20 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J PMORGAN | |
| All in, the companys in-house manufacturing footprint of 25 facilities accounted for | |
| 56% of production volume in 2022 while the remaining 44% of production was handled | |
| by seven JNJ facilities under transition manufacturing agreements and 230 external manufacturers (as noted above, a 60% reduction since 2019). Within the segments, Skin | |
| Health & Beauty tends to be more out-sourced while Self Care is more in house. The company also operates 114 distribution centers and 38 customer service centers globally, | |
| with distribution often operated in partnership with third parties. | |
| Digital Marketing Improving ROI as Company Shifts to Omnichannel About 6% of KVUEs sales are through pure-play e-commerce, but mix more than | |
| doubles to 13% including retailer.com (largely in line with CPG peers), and the companys online sales have grown at a +20% CAGR from 2020 to 2022. One of the drivers beyond the general shift of consumption to online channels is the companys | |
| focus on digital marketing, which has taken shape over the past several years. In North | |
| America, for example, the digital marketing spend accounted for 73% of total marketing | |
| spend in 2022, which was up from 59% in 2020 and 49% in 2019 and drove a +29% | |
| increase in media ROI as of October 2022 and collective 13 points increase in U.S. | |
| household penetration from 2019 to 2021. The company has pointed to digital investments driving improved social media engagement including for Neutrogena a 660% increase in followers from August to December 2021 as a result of its SkinU | |
| campaign on TikTok, which generated over 300 million social media impressions. The company has also focused a lot of its digital efforts outside of the U.S., in particularly in | |
| APAC, which accounted for 63% of global e-commerce sales in 2020. Investments | |
| behind digital media are largely table stakes for CPG companies at this stage as a cost- | |
| efficient and effective way to engage with consumers. Digital focus is likely to continue to be important, especially for segments or brands appealing to younger digitally-native consumers like within Skin Health & Beauty. The company does continue to invest in | |
| traditional media, although it largely depends on where the consumer is in that particular | |
| market. | |
| Opportunity for Margin Expansion as KVUE Exits TSA/TMA | |
| Looking ahead, one of the bigger areas for margin expansion opportunity for KVUE will likely be in exiting transition services agreements (TSA) and transition | |
| manufacturing agreements (TMA) with JNJ post-separation, which run on a cost-plus | |
| model. Of the roughly $100M in incremental costs associated with being a stand-alone company, we estimate that the TSA and TMA could be roughly 50-60% of the incremental costs (i.e., 30-40 bps margin opportunity of roughly 130 bps EBITDA margin expansion modeled for 2022-2025). | |
| The TSAs generally run for 24 months following the separation, although some services | |
| could be provided for a longer period of time (less than 60 months) in certain | |
| circumstances such as if the functions are limited by regulatory approval. The company | |
| noted that it plans on working with JNJ in establishing its own stand-alone IT functions, | |
| which would run concurrent to the TSA and could account for less than a 100 bps | |
| headwind to profitability and decline post-2023. | |
| The TMAs cover Self Care products including certain Tylenol, Zyrtec, Mortin, Benadryl and other OTC products that represented less than 10% of KVUEs 2022 sales. Within | |
| the TMAs, KVUE is responsible for demand forecasting (both binding and non- | |
| binding), and JNJ will be responsible for sourcing raw materials and manufacturing. The TMAs have different lengths depending on product but in all cases phase out over a This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 21 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J PMORGAN | |
| five-year period (could be extended for three additional 12-month periods under certain | |
| circumstances), and the company aims to exit most of the TMAs within three years. | |
| Generally speaking the TMAs take a longer time to exit vs. TSAs given the time line for | |
| regulatory approvals or marketing authorization transfers. The TMA periods are 3-60 | |
| months for Tylenol products and 21-60 months for Zyrtec, Motrin, and Benadryl products. | |
| To be fair, some of the potential savings opportunity could be eroded if KVUE opts to | |
| select another third party to facilitate any G&A or manufacturing function, although its | |
| possible that a different third-party fee could be lower than JNJs (because JNJ now has | |
| to make a margin on these contracts), and/or KVUE could look to drive efficiencies out of processes and manufacturing. Additionally, there is risk that KVUE standing up its | |
| own functions or in-sourcing manufacturing could run into challenges if it or third | |
| parties are unable to replicate JNJ processes. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 22 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Financial Outlook | |
| Path to ~+4% Top Line over Next Few Years with Upside If | |
| Elasticities Hold Up | |
| KVUEs long-term algorithm calls for organic top-line growth to be competitive with | |
| category growth rates, which the company expects to be around +3-4% per annum | |
| through 2025. This growth rate is consistent with the recent past where KVUEs | |
| categories grew at a roughly +3.5% CAGR from 2018-2021 (although category organic | |
| growth CAGR accelerated in 2019-2022 given COVID tailwinds and pricing to +4.8%). | |
| Figure 27: KVUE Organic Growth Drivers by Year | |
| 1.4% 2.6% | |
| -0.1% | |
| -1.6% | |
| 1.8% | |
| 2.8% | |
| 1.7% | |
| 1.2% | |
| 4.0% | |
| 7.6% | |
| 2.2% | |
| 1.4% | |
| -0.2% -0.3% | |
| -0.1% | |
| -4% | |
| -2% | |
| 0% | |
| 2% | |
| 4% | |
| 6% | |
| 8% | |
| 10% | |
| 2020 2021 2022 2023E 2024E 2025E | |
| Volume Price/Mix Other* | |
| Source: Company reports and J.P Morgan estimates; *Other relates to carve-out financial | |
| adjustments | |
| Figure 28: KVUE Historical and Forward 3Y CAGR Drivers | |
| 1.3% 1.0% | |
| 2.3% | |
| 3.7% | |
| 0% | |
| 1% | |
| 1% | |
| 2% | |
| 2% | |
| 3% | |
| 3% | |
| 4% | |
| 4% | |
| 5% | |
| 5% | |
| L3Y (2020-2022) N3Y (2023-2025) | |
| Volume Price/Mix | |
| Source: Company reports and J.P. Morgan estimates. | |
| That said, based on historical data it appears that KVUE has been underperforming the | |
| overall category growth rate over the same period (we estimate organic growth CAGR | |
| +2.6% 2018-21), although the company has been transforming the business to put it on | |
| a better footing for organic growth by sharpening resource allocation and optimizing the | |
| portfolio (e.g., SKU rationalization, acquisitions/divestitures). In fact, KVUEs organic | |
| growth trends have accelerated for three consecutive years since 2019 – ramping from | |
| +1.4% in 2019 to +3.8% in 2022 with the 2019-2022 CAGR +3.4%. As we noted, | |
| organic growth over the past few years has been hampered by supply chain disruptions, | |
| SKU rationalization, and COVID-19, and excluding these items the company estimates | |
| that its organic growth CAGR from 2019-2022 would have been about +5.4%. | |
| Figure 29: KVUE Historical Sales Bridge | |
| $ m | |
| $14,950 | |
| $14,324 | |
| +1.4% | |
| +1.7% | |
| -0.2% | |
| -1.8% -0.1% | |
| $14,467 | |
| +2.6% | |
| +1.2% | |
| -0.3% | |
| +1.5% | |
| -0.9% | |
| $15,054 | |
| -0.1% | |
| +4.0% | |
| -0.1% | |
| -4.2% -0.3% | |
| $13,000 | |
| $13,500 | |
| $14,000 | |
| $14,500 | |
| $15,000 | |
| $15,500 | |
| $16,000 | |
| Source: Company reports. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 23 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| KVUE Lagged Peers in OSG Due to Delayed Pricing, Improving Recently | |
| As such, in the past three years KVUEs organic growth trends have underperformed | |
| peers with KVUEs +3.4% below the median of +5.2% and the average of +9.5% | |
| (+5.8% ex-OLPX). While adjusting for the aforementioned headwinds would have | |
| resulted in KVUE organic growth CAGR just slightly above the median (i.e., +5.4% vs. | |
| median +5.2%), we dont see it as a fair comparison as peer companies faced many of | |
| the same headwinds as KVUE between supply chain disruptions and COVID-19. | |
| Timing is also a driver of the underperformance vs. peers over the last three years as | |
| KVUE was late vs. peers in putting through pricing actions and at a more moderate level | |
| vs. most of HPC (i.e., KVUE just in 2H22 began putting through pricing in the ~HSD | |
| range overall while HPC peers took multiple rounds of pricing ranging from MSD-LDD | |
| in some cases), although we also arent projecting KVUE to grow much faster vs. peers | |
| ahead despite delayed pricing benefit. | |
| Figure 30: Organic Sales 3Y CAGR vs. Peers | |
| CY20-CY22 | |
| -5% | |
| 0% | |
| 5% | |
| 10% | |
| 15% | |
| 20% | |
| 25% | |
| ELF HNST RKT OR PG CL CLX HLN ULVR CHD BEI KMB KVUE NWL EL COTY | |
| Organic 3Y CAGR Average Median | |
| Source: Company reports and J.P. Morgan estimates.; *OLPX 3Y Organic CAGR +68.1% removed for ease of comparison | |
| 2023 Should Still Be Above Algorithm at ~6% OSG, Normalizing to Peer Average | |
| ~+4% in 2024+ | |
| Looking ahead, we see KVUE as well positioned for +6% organic top line in 2023 and ~ | |
| +4% organic top-line growth over the following two years (3Y CAGR +4.7%) with | |
| potential for upside if elasticities hold up better than expected (we believe KVUE is | |
| modeling internally for elasticities to revert to historical mean vs. relatively more | |
| limited elasticities experienced thus far and positive volume growth of +2.4% in 1Q23 | |
| despite +8.8% price/mix). Underpinning the expected top-line growth is the underlying | |
| category growth trends, which we detailed earlier. Within KVUEs portfolio, we expect | |
| top-line growth to be led by Self Care and Skin Health & Beauty segments, while | |
| Essential Health contributes relatively less given category dynamics. | |
| Specifically, we estimate Self Care to grow at a three-year CAGR of +5.8% and | |
| contribute ~50% to KVUEs organic growth through 2025, Skin Health & Beauty to | |
| grow at a three-year CAGR of +5.4% and contribute ~33% to KVUEs organic growth | |
| through 2025, and Essential Health to grow at a three-year CAGR of +2.6% and | |
| contribute ~17% to KVUEs organic growth through 2025. We note that in the prior | |
| three years (2020-2022), Self Care grew at a +8.6% three-year CAGR and contributed | |
| nearly ~91% to KVUE organic growth, Skin Health & Beauty grew at a +0.1% threeyear | |
| CAGR and contributed ~1% to KVUE organic growth, and Essential Health grew | |
| at a +0.9% three-year CAGR and contributed around ~8% to KVUE organic growth. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 24 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Figure 31: Segment Contribution to YOY Organic Growth | |
| 3.2% | |
| 2.0% | |
| 4.1% | |
| 3.2% | |
| 1.9% | |
| -0.9% 2.0% | |
| 0.9% | |
| 0.2% 1.7% | |
| 1.5% | |
| 1.5% | |
| 0.6% 0.7% | |
| -0.5% | |
| 1.0% | |
| 0.6% | |
| 0.7% | |
| -2% | |
| -1% | |
| 0% | |
| 1% | |
| 2% | |
| 3% | |
| 4% | |
| 5% | |
| 6% | |
| 7% | |
| 2020 2021 2022 2023E 2024E 2025E | |
| Self Care Skin Health & Beauty Essential Health | |
| Source: Company reports and J.P. Morgan estimates. | |
| Figure 32: Segment Contribution to L3Y and N3Y Organic CAGR | |
| 3.1% | |
| 2.4% | |
| 0.0% 1.6% | |
| 0.3% | |
| 0.8% | |
| 0.0% | |
| 0.5% | |
| 1.0% | |
| 1.5% | |
| 2.0% | |
| 2.5% | |
| 3.0% | |
| 3.5% | |
| 4.0% | |
| 4.5% | |
| 5.0% | |
| L3Y (2020-2022) N3Y (2023-2025) | |
| Self Care Skin Health & Beauty Essential Health | |
| Source: Company reports and J.P. Morgan estimates. | |
| Figure 33: Segment Organic Growth by Year | |
| 9.5% | |
| -2.8% | |
| 1.9% | |
| 2.9% | |
| 5.4% | |
| 2.8% | |
| 2.1% | |
| 3.5% | |
| 10.9% | |
| 0.5% | |
| -1.4% | |
| 3.8% | |
| 8.1% | |
| 5.8% | |
| 3.4% | |
| 6.0% | |
| 4.6% | |
| 5.1% | |
| 2.2% | |
| 4.0% | |
| 4.8% | |
| 5.3% | |
| 2.3% | |
| 4.2% | |
| -4% | |
| -2% | |
| 0% | |
| 2% | |
| 4% | |
| 6% | |
| 8% | |
| 10% | |
| 12% | |
| Self Care Skin Health & Beauty Essential Health Total | |
| 2020 2021 2022 2023E 2024E 2025E | |
| Source: Company reports and J.P. Morgan estimates. | |
| Figure 34: Segment L3Y and N3Y Organic CAGR | |
| 8.6% | |
| 0.1% | |
| 0.9% | |
| 3.4% | |
| 5.8% | |
| 5.4% | |
| 2.6% | |
| 4.7% | |
| 0% | |
| 1% | |
| 2% | |
| 3% | |
| 4% | |
| 5% | |
| 6% | |
| 7% | |
| 8% | |
| 9% | |
| 10% | |
| Self Care Skin Health & Beauty Essential Health Total | |
| L3Y (2020-2022) N3Y (2023-2025) | |
| Source: Company reports and J.P. Morgan estimates. | |
| Expect OSG to Be Mostly Driven By Pricing (as Peers) But Normalize Ahead | |
| Within the top-line outlook, we expect 2023 growth to be driven exclusively by price/ | |
| mix as the company benefits from carryover pricing actions put through in 2022 as well | |
| as some incremental pricing in 2023, partially offset by expected volume decline likely | |
| from elasticity and continued normalization post tailwinds from COVID-19 and recent | |
| triple-demic. 2022 organic growth was likewise driven entirely by price/mix, although | |
| volumes were relatively flattish as volume growth in Self Care was offset by the other | |
| segments, which was partially impacted by SKU rationalization, product exits in Russia, | |
| COVID-19 lockdowns, and supply disruptions. Excluding these items management | |
| estimates 2022 volumes would have been up +1.7%. Historically, volume represented | |
| around two-thirds of KVUE organic growth with price/mix one-third, and looking ahead | |
| past 2023 we expect a return to this top-line growth mix as the company laps materially | |
| higher pricing increases, likely by mid 2024. | |
| For 2023, we estimate that roughly 45% of our +7.6% price/mix forecast results from | |
| carryover pricing actions and that price/mix will contribute +8.2% to the top line in | |
| 1H23 and +6.9% in 2H23. We estimate total volumes -1.6% for 2023 with 1H23 | |
| volumes roughly flat (+0.2%) and 2H23 volumes down around -3.4%. As noted above, | |
| 1Q23 volumes came in +2.4% against +8.8% price/mix with strong volume | |
| performance in Self Care (+7.1%) and Skin Health & Beauty (+4.3%) more than | |
| offsetting the decline in Essential Health (-5.5%). There were a number of drivers to the | |
| stronger than expected volume performance in 1Q23: 1) Self Care benefitted from a | |
| strong cold, cough, and flu season in EMEA, driving higher incidence, and the segment | |
| also benefitted from retailer restocking in the U.S. as most retailers exited 4Q22 with | |
| lower inventory levels; and 2) the Skin Health & Beauty segment benefited from easy | |
| comparisons (lapped -8.6% volume decline in 1Q22) and inventory rebuild at retailers | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 25 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| with strength in Neutrogena (Hydro Boost) and Aveeno. Some of the tailwinds to 1Q23 | |
| could continue into 2Q23, including in Self Care as usage occasions likely remained | |
| elevated in EMEA in the weeks following quarter-end, and the company will also | |
| continue to lap material supply chain challenges. We model for a normalization in | |
| volume trends in 2H23 as the comparisons get tougher and the company may not benefit | |
| as much from inventory replenishment and there remains uncertainty on consumer | |
| elasticities ahead, although more conservative 2H estimates could provide a source of | |
| upside should the consumer landscape hold up better than anticipated or if there are | |
| strong allergy seasons in Self Care. | |
| Figure 35: KVUE 1Q23 Organic Growth Performance by Segment | |
| 7.1% | |
| 4.3% | |
| -5.5% | |
| 2.4% | |
| 8.2% | |
| 8.9% | |
| 9.4% | |
| 8.8% | |
| -10% | |
| -5% | |
| 0% | |
| 5% | |
| 10% | |
| 15% | |
| 20% | |
| SELF CARE SKIN HEALTH AND | |
| BEAUTY | |
| ESSENTIAL HEALTH TOTAL | |
| % volume % price/mix | |
| Source: Company reports. | |
| Figure 36: KVUE Organic Growth Drivers 1H23E vs. 2H23E | |
| 0.2% | |
| -3.4% | |
| 8.2% | |
| 6.9% | |
| -4% | |
| -2% | |
| 0% | |
| 2% | |
| 4% | |
| 6% | |
| 8% | |
| 10% | |
| 1H23E 2H23E | |
| % volume % price/mix | |
| Source: Company reports and J.P. Morgan estimates. | |
| For 2024 we model for price/mix of +2.2% and volumes of +1.8% and for 2025 price/ | |
| mix of +1.4% and volumes +2.8%. We see 2024 as benefiting early in the year from | |
| carryover pricing from 2023 before the drivers of the top-line should normalize more | |
| toward the companys longer-term algorithm of two-thirds volume and one-third price | |
| mix. | |
| Figure 37: KVUE Forward Estimated Sales Bridge | |
| $ m | |
| $16,973 | |
| $14,950 | |
| -1.6% | |
| +7.6% $15,662 | |
| +1.8% +2.2% $16,289 | |
| +2.8% | |
| +1.4% | |
| $13,000 | |
| $13,500 | |
| $14,000 | |
| $14,500 | |
| $15,000 | |
| $15,500 | |
| $16,000 | |
| $16,500 | |
| $17,000 | |
| $17,500 | |
| 2022 Volume Price/mix 2023E Volume Price/mix 2024E Volume Price/mix 2025E | |
| Source: Company reports and J.P. Morgan estimates. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 26 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Gross Margins Poised to Improve – Can Return to 2021 Peak | |
| by 2025 | |
| KVUEs gross margins expanded by +125 bps in 2020 and another +164 bps in 2021 | |
| before compressing -88 bps in 2022 to 58.1% as the company dealt with inflationary | |
| cost pressures seen throughout CPG (raw material inputs, freight, packaging) and supply | |
| chain challenges, primarily in the Skin Health and Beauty segment. Prior to 2022, gross | |
| margin expansion over the past few years has been driven by productivity (e.g., ZBB), | |
| rationalization of smaller third-party manufacturers (60% of small external | |
| manufacturers eliminated), portfolio optimization (21% SKU reduction), and favorable | |
| segment mix (higher margin Self Care growth). | |
| Figure 38: KVUE Gross Margin Bridge | |
| 58.1% | |
| -0.6% | |
| 56.1% 0.1% -1.2% -4.0% | |
| 0.7% | |
| 1.1% 57.4% 0.4% | |
| 0.5% | |
| 2.1% 59.0% 0.1% 0.4% | |
| 1.7% | |
| 1.0% | |
| 55% | |
| 56% | |
| 57% | |
| 58% | |
| 59% | |
| 60% | |
| 61% | |
| 62% | |
| Source: Company reports. | |
| We model for +54 bps gross margin expansion in 2023, slight -6 bps compression in | |
| 2024, and +38 bps expansion in 2025, which would return gross margins to 2021 levels | |
| at 59.0%. | |
| We see a number of drivers of gross margin expansion: 1) further optimization of | |
| supply chain and COGS efficiencies; 2) rollover of 2022 pricing actions as well as | |
| incremental pricing in 2023 and beyond; 3) abating cost headwinds; and 4) | |
| favorable segment mix with continued faster growth in higher margin Self Care | |
| and Skin Health and Beauty segments (although some Skin Health and Beauty profit | |
| growth likely to be reinvested). Relating to our estimates, expectations for 2024 could | |
| admittedly be conservative as we leave our margin assumptions unchanged despite a | |
| stronger than expected start to 2023 – the aforementioned drivers and abating | |
| inflationary pressures could lead to better gross margin performance than we have | |
| modeled. | |
| Inflation should remain a headwind in 2023 (perhaps roughly -240 bps to gross | |
| margins), albeit to a lesser extent than 2022 where we estimate costs could have been a - | |
| 400 bps headwind. On COGS, we estimate roughly 40% is in raw materials and inputs, | |
| 30% in internal and external manufacturing costs, and the remaining 30% in other | |
| overhead, freight, and amortization. Within KVUEs cost buckets, raw materials are | |
| relatively diversified, in our view, with resins, pulp and paper, agro chemicals (like | |
| ethanol and glycerin), and packaging materials the largest exposures, although in total | |
| these represent less than 20% of total COGS. From an FX perspective, the company | |
| hedges its transactional exposure for forecasted revenues, purchases, receivables, and | |
| payables, but it does not hedge translational risk. Key currencies include EUR, GBP, | |
| JPY, CNY, CAD, BRL, and INR. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 27 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Exit of TSA and TMA Is Another Source of Margin Improvement Longer Term | |
| Within the cost outlook, we also note that KVUE entered into a Transition | |
| Manufacturing Agreement (in addition to Transition Services Agreement that sounds | |
| more related to operating services), which covers pharmaceutical products like Tylenol, | |
| Zyrtec, Motrin, and Benadryl, among others. The company noted that the products | |
| covered under the TMA accounted for less than 10% of its sales in 2022. The TMA is | |
| based on a cost-plus model and ranges in terms from 3 to 60 months depending on the | |
| product (3-60 months for Tylenol, 21-60 months for Zyrtec, 21-60 months for Motrin, | |
| and 21-60 months for Benadryl), although the company notes that these terms could be | |
| extended for up to three additional 12-month periods if there are issues, which we think | |
| would be mostly due to regulatory processes and facility validation. Management | |
| expects to be out of the TMA within three years for most of the products. Exiting these | |
| TMA agreements should allow for better margin profile over time as the company no | |
| longer pays the markup associated with the agreement. | |
| Relative to peers, KVUEs adjusted gross margins (including amortization of definite | |
| life intangible assets to make more comparable) compare favorably to most HPC and | |
| consumer health peers (ranks below only HLN, RKT, and BEI) but are well below those | |
| of more pure-play beauty names. Overall, KVUEs category exposure to OTC and | |
| beauty lends itself to strong gross margin profile vs. HPC more exposed to everyday | |
| essentials, and many companies in the peer set have also faced greater inflationary cost | |
| pressures given COGS exposure more weighted to the oil complex, pulps, and | |
| transportation/logistics costs. | |
| Figure 39: Gross Margins vs. Peers | |
| CY22 | |
| 0% | |
| 10% | |
| 20% | |
| 30% | |
| 40% | |
| 50% | |
| 60% | |
| 70% | |
| 80% | |
| Gross Margin Average Median | |
| Source: Company reports and J.P. Morgan estimates.; *KVUE adjusted gross margins including amortization of definite life intangibles; | |
| **CL adjusted gross margins adding back shipping & handling costs | |
| Post-2023 Leverage in Middle of P&L to Help Drive Solid | |
| Earnings Growth | |
| Following 2023, which will be burdened both by costs related to TSA and separation | |
| costs, we see SG&A as a lever to help drive operating growth in the years ahead as the | |
| company 1) continues to exercise disciplined cost management with zero-based | |
| budgeting practices; and 2) works to take out costs over time related to the ~$100M | |
| incremental costs associated with the separation from JNJ, including exiting transition | |
| services agreements, primarily over the next two years as well as transition | |
| manufacturing agreements, which we estimate account for roughly 60% of the | |
| incremental stand-alone costs. At the same time, we expect KVUE to further support its | |
| brands through increased advertising spending in the near term following a period of | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 28 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| being more selective in 2022. | |
| Specifically, we are modeling for SG&A as a percent of sales to be 42 bps unfavorable | |
| YOY in 2023, roughly neutral in 2024, and 51 bps favorable in 2025, which would then | |
| put SG&A as a percent of sales just below 2022 levels. Within SG&A, advertising has | |
| been a bit lumpy and oscillated between favorable and unfavorable to margins over the | |
| past three years. Investments increased in 2021 to support top-line growth and key | |
| brands but were lower in 2022 as the company made more discriminating decisions on | |
| advertising given the supply disruptions and inflationary cost environment (balancing | |
| investment with profitability). We see the company stepping up investments in 2023 to | |
| support the top-line growth, primarily in the Self Care segment. | |
| Figure 40: KVUE Operating Expense Outlook | |
| 33.2% | |
| 31.7% | |
| 33.6% 33.4% 33.9% 33.9% 33.3% | |
| 2.7% | |
| 2.2% | |
| 2.4% 2.5% | |
| 2.6% 2.6% | |
| 2.6% | |
| -250 | |
| -200 | |
| -150 | |
| -100 | |
| -50 | |
| 0 | |
| 50 | |
| 100 | |
| 150 | |
| 200 | |
| 250 | |
| 29% | |
| 30% | |
| 31% | |
| 32% | |
| 33% | |
| 34% | |
| 35% | |
| 36% | |
| 37% | |
| 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023E 2024E 2025E | |
| SG&A % of Sales R&D % of Sales YOY Favorable/(Unfavorable) bps | |
| Source: Company reports and J.P. Morgan estimates. | |
| Figure 41: KVUE Advertising Expense | |
| 8.8% | |
| 8.5% | |
| 9.7% | |
| 9.1% | |
| 9.5% | |
| 9-10% | |
| -150 | |
| -100 | |
| -50 | |
| 0 | |
| 50 | |
| 100 | |
| 7.5% | |
| 8.0% | |
| 8.5% | |
| 9.0% | |
| 9.5% | |
| 10.0% | |
| 10.5% | |
| 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023E Target | |
| Advertising Expense % of Sales YOY Favorable/(Unfavorable) bps | |
| Source: Company reports and J.P. Morgan estimates. | |
| A&P Spend Is Up but Still Trails Most Peers, Yet... | |
| KVUEs advertising spend of about 9.1% of sales is a bit below close HPC peers like | |
| CL (11.1%) and PG (9.9%), although as we noted above we expect A&P spending to | |
| step up 40 bps in 2023E to 9.5%. We note that some of the comparisons vs. peers are not | |
| apples to apples as some companies account for go-to-market activities (e.g., sampling, | |
| sales force, etc.) within advertising expense, which makes spend appear elevated. Also, | |
| we note that marketing productivity has been up, which helps explain the relatively | |
| higher efficient ratio (lower A&P as a percentage of sales). Historically, the company | |
| had made efforts to improve SG&A efficiency through organization redesign (reduced | |
| head count 10% from 2019-2022) and also increasing ROI on media spend by 28% from | |
| 2019-2021. | |
| Figure 42: Advertising Expense vs. Peers | |
| CY22 or Last Fiscal* where noted | |
| 0% | |
| 5% | |
| 10% | |
| 15% | |
| 20% | |
| 25% | |
| 30% | |
| 35% | |
| Advertising % of Sales Average Median | |
| Source: Company reports and J.P. Morgan estimates. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 29 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| R&D Is Higher Than Peers | |
| On the other hand, KVUEs R&D spending is in the top quartile vs. peers at 2.5% | |
| (average 2.0% and median 1.8%), which speaks to the companys commitment to | |
| spending behind developing innovation and driving unique claims for its products. | |
| Figure 43: Research and Development Expense vs. Peers | |
| CY22 or Last Fiscal* where noted | |
| 0.0% | |
| 0.5% | |
| 1.0% | |
| 1.5% | |
| 2.0% | |
| 2.5% | |
| 3.0% | |
| 3.5% | |
| R&D % of Sales Average Median | |
| Source: Company reports and J.P. Morgan estimates. | |
| Longer term, KVUEs financial algorithm calls for earnings growth ahead of sales | |
| growth, although given the burden of stand-alone company costs and incremental | |
| interest expense, earnings per share growth will likely fall below this target in 2023 and | |
| 2024 before seeing faster growth in 2025 as the company sees leverage throughout the | |
| P&L for the aforementioned reasons. From an EBITDA perspective, however, we do see | |
| KVUE generating profit growth ahead of sales growth from 2023-2025 with a threeyear | |
| CAGR of +6.1% vs. top-line CAGR of +4.3%, implying EBITDA margin | |
| expansion to 25.4% in 2025 from 24.1% in 2022 (roughly +130 bps expansion) and | |
| 25.3% in 2021. | |
| Figure 44: KVUE EBITDA Growth Outlook | |
| 21.7% | |
| 0.9% | |
| -5.4% | |
| 5.3% 4.9% | |
| 8.2% | |
| $3,101 | |
| $3,775 $3,810 $3,606 $3,797 $3,983 | |
| $4,308 | |
| -10% | |
| -5% | |
| 0% | |
| 5% | |
| 10% | |
| 15% | |
| 20% | |
| 25% | |
| $0 | |
| $500 | |
| $1,000 | |
| $1,500 | |
| $2,000 | |
| $2,500 | |
| $3,000 | |
| $3,500 | |
| $4,000 | |
| $4,500 | |
| $5,000 | |
| 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023E 2024E 2025E | |
| EBITDA $ m (left-axis) EBITDA YOY Growth (right-axis) | |
| Source: Company reports and J.P. Morgan estimates. | |
| Figure 45: KVUE EBITDA vs. Sales Growth Outlook | |
| 6.1% | |
| 4.3% | |
| 0% | |
| 1% | |
| 2% | |
| 3% | |
| 4% | |
| 5% | |
| 6% | |
| 7% | |
| EBITDA CAGR (2023-2025) Sales CAGR (2023-2025) | |
| Source: J.P. Morgan estimates. | |
| For ease of comparison, we prefer to look at EBITDA as the primary profit KPI for | |
| KVUE as the companys adjusted earnings per share excludes the impact of | |
| amortization of definite life intangible assets, which it treats 100% of brands/ | |
| trademarks, while competitors do not adjust this expense out. As such, KVUEs adjusted | |
| earnings appear higher than they otherwise would following the accounting convention | |
| across our coverage universe. In our model we present adjusted earnings per share both | |
| with and without the impact of amortization of intangible assets, but we think investors | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 30 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| may prefer to look to EBITDA. | |
| Versus the peer set, KVUEs EBITDA margins are in the top quartile at 24.1% vs. | |
| average 21.3% and median 21.8% (ex-OLPX average 18.8% and median 20.9%), but | |
| still trail closest peer HLN (25.1%), and are between PG (25.0%) and CL (23.5%). We | |
| see opportunity for KVUE to expand EBITDA margins ahead as pricing flows through, | |
| inflation abates, and the company works to take out costs to stand up the company (e.g., | |
| TSA, TMA). | |
| Figure 46: EBITDA Margins vs. Peers | |
| CY22 | |
| -10% | |
| -5% | |
| 0% | |
| 5% | |
| 10% | |
| 15% | |
| 20% | |
| 25% | |
| 30% | |
| RKT HLN PG KVUE CL OR CHD ELF EL COTY ULVR KMB BEI CLX NWL HNST | |
| EBITDA Margin Average Median | |
| Source: Company reports and J.P. Morgan estimates.; *OLPX EBITDA Margin 60.9% removed for ease of comparison. | |
| Balance Sheet, FCF, CapEx | |
| Following the companys IPO, balance sheet leverage is around 2.1x net debt to trailing | |
| 12-month adjusted EBITDA (or roughly 2.4-2.5x gross debt to trailing 12-month | |
| adjusted EBITDA) assuming roughly $9.0 billion in senior notes and commercial paper | |
| and roughly $1.2 billion in cash. With EBITDA growth and strong FCF generation, we | |
| see KVUE deleveraging to around 1.8x net debt to BITDA by 2024 and 1.6x by 2025. | |
| The company could potentially delever faster (or increase cash returns to shareholders) | |
| in the event it doesnt pursue acquisitions as we believe the company is building in | |
| cushion to its cash/balance sheet outlook to accommodate bolt-on M&A. Relative to its | |
| peer set, KVUEs balance sheet leverage is largely middle of the pack with PG (1.2x) | |
| and CL (1.6x) lower and HLN (3.6x) higher. | |
| Figure 47: KVUE Leverage Outlook | |
| 2.4x | |
| 2.2x | |
| 2.1x | |
| 1.9x | |
| 2.1x | |
| 2.0x | |
| 1.8x | |
| 1.6x | |
| 0.0x | |
| 0.5x | |
| 1.0x | |
| 1.5x | |
| 2.0x | |
| 2.5x | |
| 3.0x | |
| Post-IPO 2023E 2024E 2025E | |
| Gross Debt to EBITDA Net Debt to EBITDA | |
| Source: Company reports and J.P. Morgan estimates. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 31 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| From a free cash flow perspective, the company is targeting >100% FCF conversion (% | |
| of adjusted net income) in each of 2023-2025, and we model for free cash flow to grow | |
| at a three-year CAGR of +11% to $2.8 billion in 2025. The free cash flow outlook is | |
| supported by solid adjusted EBITDA growth (as described above) and some tailwind | |
| from working capital management as inventory normalizes following a step-up in 2022 | |
| (more below), which more than offsets cash separation costs expected to be incurred | |
| from 2023-2025 (around $595M post-tax) and some step-up in capital expenditures. | |
| We note that 2022 was a tougher year from a cash flow perspective (FCF conversion | |
| 79% and overall FCF -27% YOY) as the company had a significant working capital | |
| headwind due to supply chain disruption, inflation, and also building inventory ahead of | |
| the JNJ separation (safety stock). As we mentioned, we expect inventory normalization | |
| to be a tailwind to free cash flow ahead, and we model for working capital as a percent | |
| of sales to decline from 16.8% in 2022 to 13.5% in 2025. | |
| Figure 48: KVUE Free Cash Flow Outlook | |
| 0% | |
| 20% | |
| 40% | |
| 60% | |
| 80% | |
| 100% | |
| 120% | |
| $0 | |
| $500 | |
| $1,000 | |
| $1,500 | |
| $2,000 | |
| $2,500 | |
| $3,000 | |
| 2021 2022 2023E 2024E 2025E | |
| FCF $m (left-axis) FCF % of adj. Net Income (right-axis) | |
| Source: Company reports and J.P. Morgan estimates. | |
| Figure 49: KVUE Working Capital Outlook | |
| 17.7% | |
| 13.6% 12.9% | |
| 16.8% | |
| 15.2% | |
| 14.0% 13.5% | |
| 0.0% | |
| 2.0% | |
| 4.0% | |
| 6.0% | |
| 8.0% | |
| 10.0% | |
| 12.0% | |
| 14.0% | |
| 16.0% | |
| 18.0% | |
| 20.0% | |
| $0 | |
| $500 | |
| $1,000 | |
| $1,500 | |
| $2,000 | |
| $2,500 | |
| $3,000 | |
| 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023E 2024E 2025E | |
| Net Working Capital Net Working Capital % of Sales | |
| Source: Company reports and J.P. Morgan estimates. | |
| Capital expenditures begin to step up slightly in 2023 (we model for 2.7% of sales from | |
| 2.5% in 2022 and 2.0% in 2021) and a bit more in 2024/2025 (3.0% of sales), although | |
| the historical level is not necessarily apples to apples as the 2.0% range didnt allocate | |
| enterprise-level costs that are now incurred as a stand-alone company. Capital | |
| investments will likely continue to focus on digitization of the supply chain and also | |
| building out capacity for growth. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 32 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| KVUEs capital expenditures are generally lower than peers historically, although we do | |
| expect a step-up ahead as the company works to build capacity and capabilities as a | |
| stand-alone company. As of 2022, KVUEs 2.5% capital expenditures as a percent of | |
| sales benchmarks below peer average of 3.1% and median 3.3%, but we also note that | |
| KVUE is relatively more asset light vs. HPC peers with 44% of volumes produced | |
| externally. For comparison CLX has returned to a more normalized 80/20 split between | |
| in-house and external manufacturing from around 50/50 during the pandemic. | |
| Figure 50: Capital Expenditures vs. Peers | |
| CY22 | |
| 0% | |
| 1% | |
| 2% | |
| 3% | |
| 4% | |
| 5% | |
| 6% | |
| 7% | |
| BEI EL KMB CL PG COTY OR CHD NWL CLX RKT HLN ULVRKVUE ENR HNST ELF OLPX | |
| CapEx % of Sales Average Median | |
| Source: Company reports and J.P. Morgan estimates. | |
| KVUE announced its intention to pay a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share | |
| beginning in 3Q23 (fiscal quarter ending October 1, 2023), which at the current price of | |
| $26.30 implies an annualized dividend yield of about 3.0% (at the IPO price of $22, | |
| the annualized dividend yield was closer to 3.6%). Looking ahead, we expect the | |
| company to target an annual dividend payout ratio of around 55-65% (JPMe 2024E | |
| 64%), and we model for 3% dividend growth in both 2023 and 2024 as the company | |
| targets moderate growth in dividend per share. | |
| Figure 51: KVUE Dividend Yield Compares Favorably to Peers Even after Share Rally | |
| 0.0% | |
| 0.5% | |
| 1.0% | |
| 1.5% | |
| 2.0% | |
| 2.5% | |
| 3.0% | |
| 3.5% | |
| 4.0% | |
| ULVR KMB NWL KVUE CLX RKT PG CL HLN OR EL CHD BEI COTY ELF HNST OLPX | |
| Dividend Yield Average Median | |
| Source: Bloomberg Finance L.P. and J.P Morgan estimates. | |
| Other capital allocation priorities include likely bolt-on M&A. We see management | |
| budgeting roughly $500-750M per annum for acquisitions, although we dont build in | |
| any benefit from M&A into our model, and as such the M&A placeholder could lead | |
| to increased cash returns to shareholders. At this point, we expect share repurchases to | |
| be limited to offset share creep from stock-based compensation expense, although the | |
| company could look to evaluate opportunistic share repurchases over time. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 33 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J PMORGAN | |
| Valuation | |
| KVUE Deserves Premium to HLN with Potential to Converge to CL over Time | |
| Initial Discount Is an Opportunity, in Our View Should Fade Post Spin/Split | |
| KVUE shares were priced at $22 at the IPO (toward the high end of initial $20-23 | |
| range) and closed +22.3% higher on its first day of trading on May 4, 2023. As of May | |
| 26, KVUE shares remain +19.5% above the IPO price. From a valuation perspective, at the IPO price KVUE shares implied around 13.3x/12.7x our 2023E/2024E EBITDA estimate and 19.9x/19.3x our 2023E/2024E EPS including amortization of definite life intangible assets (or 17.7x/17.4x 2023E/2024E EPS excluding amortization of definite life intangible assets as the company reports its adjusted earnings). Following the IPO, | |
| KVUE now trades at 15.5x/14.7x our 2023/2024 EBITDA estimates and 23.8x/23.1x | |
| our 2023/2024 EPS estimates. | |
| We view the discounted valuation implied at the IPO price and attractive dividend yield | |
| (~3.6% at IPO) as compensating investors for potential overhangs arising from 1) JNJ | |
| still owning ~89.6% of KVUE shares post-IPO with the intention to make a tax-free distribution of additional shares likely by the end of 2023 (i.e., reduce ownership below | |
| 20%); and 2) KVUE retaining potential outside–North America liabilities tied to talc litigation. We also believe JNJ wanted to set KVUE up for a successful offering given it would still own such a meaningful stake in the business (i.e., price the ~10.4% well so it would have better monetization on remaining ownership). | |
| De-Consolidation Process on a Tax-Free Spin-Off or Split | |
| On the potential overhang from additional liquidity coming to the market, we highlight a few items to consider: 1) there are a number of ways ways JNJ could effect reducing its | |
| stake – a spin-off (i.e., pro-rata distribution of KVUE shares to current JNJ shareholder) | |
| or a split-off (i.e., exchange of JNJ shares for KVUE shares often at a discount), with a split-off more of an active decision to hold KVUE shares and thus may limit selling | |
| pressure; 2) JNJ could decide to delay and/or not pursue a distribution of shares pending | |
| market conditions; and 3) while there is a 180-day lock-up on selling/disposing of | |
| shares post-IPO, our understanding is that the provision can be waived by the underwriters. There are a number of precedent transactions including recently the split- | |
| off of Elanco (ELAN) from Lilly (LLY) in 2019 whereby LLY offered exchange for | |
| ELAN shares at a 7% discount and in 2013 the split-off of Zoetis (ZTS) from Pfizer | |
| (PFE) whereby PFE offered exchange for ZTS shares at a 7% discount. | |
| Talc Liability Outside the US & Canada | |
| On the potential talc liability, JNJ management on April 27 stated, As unequivocally and unambiguously stated, Johnson & Johnson has agreed to retain all the talc-related | |
| liabilities – and indemnify Kenvue for any and all costs – arising from litigation in the United States and Canada. KVUE will retain potential liabilities relating to talc litigation outside of North America, but our understanding is that as of now there are only a handful of active claims outside of the U.S. and Canada, but to date KVUE management has not recorded any reserve liabilities relating to these claims, and the tort laws and consumer protections outside of the U.S. and Canada are not as robust. KVUE plans to discontinue the sale of talc-based Baby Powder globally this year (already | |
| discontinued in the U.S. and Canada). | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 34 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J PMORGAN | |
| Benchmarking Against Peers – HLN Anchor at Low End, Already at CL Levels, PG Aspirational | |
| The closest peer to KVUE, in our view, is Haleon (HLN, covered by Celine Pannuti) | |
| given similar category exposures (e.g., pain relief, cold, cough, allergy, oral), financial metrics (e.g., sales, EBITDA, growth outlook), and geographic exposures (KVUE ~70% | |
| developed markets vs. HLN roughly two-thirds). HLN was also formed as a result of a carve-out from a larger pharma company (GSK in this case). | |
| There are some differences between the companies. From a financial perspective, | |
| KVUE has a more attractive dividend yield (~3.0% vs. HLN 1.6%) and lower leverage (2.1x net-debt-to-EBITDA vs. HLN 3.6x). KVUE has exposure to faster growing | |
| categories like Skin Health & Beauty, while HLN has exposure to (typically) faster | |
| growing categories like VMS (notwithstanding post-COVID normalization and | |
| somewhat discretionary nature of products); while overall DM/EM exposure is similar, | |
| KVUE has higher exposure to North America (~50%) vs. HLN (~37%) and lower | |
| exposure to EMEA and LatAm (KVUE ~29% combined vs. HLN ~39%), while APAC exposure is similar (KVUE 21%, HLN 23%). The most important difference, in our | |
| view, is the stronger brand portfolio of KVUE with seven brands in a number 1 position | |
| globally, while HLN claims a number 1 position in digestive health and therapeutic oral health (under sensitive franchise for Sensodyne). That said, overall it appears that in the U.S. at least in categories with direct competitive entries from both KVUE and HLN | |
| that KVUE holds the edge in household penetration (e.g., allergy, cough, cough, and flu, | |
| pain relief) based on Numerator data. | |
| Post-IPO, KVUEs valuation multiple has already migrated close to U.S.-based peer | |
| Colgate-Palmolive (CL, OW-rated), which also has similar financial KPIs. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 35 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Table 2: KVUE Key KPIs and Valuation vs. Direct Peer Set | |
| Kenvue (KVUE) Haleon (HLN) Colgate-Palmolive (CL)* The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) | |
| Geographic Exposure (Sales) | |
| North America 50% 38% 21% -- | |
| US 44% 34% 33% 45% | |
| APAC 21% 23% 16% -- | |
| EMEA & LatAM 29% 39% 42% | |
| EMEA 21% -- -- -- | |
| LatAM 8% -- -- -- | |
| International 56% 66% 67% 54% | |
| Pet -- -- 21% -- | |
| Self Care - 40% of sales - Tylenol, Zyrtec, | |
| Nicorette, Motrin, Zarbee's, Orsl, Benadryl, | |
| Rhinocort | |
| Pain Relief - 23% of sales - Advil, Panadol, | |
| Voltaren | |
| Oral Care - 43% of sales - Colgate, Sorriso, | |
| Tom's of Maine, elmex, hello | |
| Health Care - 14% of sales - Crest, Oral-B, Vicks, | |
| ZzzQuil, Pepto-Bismol, Clearblue, Align, | |
| Metamucil | |
| Skin Health & Beauty - 29% of sales - | |
| Neutrogena, Aveeno, OGX, Dabao, Lubriderm, | |
| Rogaine, Clean&Clear, Dr.Ci:Labo, Le Petit | |
| Marseillais | |
| Respiratory Health - 15% of sales - Theraflu, | |
| Otrivin, Flonase | |
| Personal Care - 19% of sales - Softsoap, Speed | |
| Stick, Lady Speed Stick, Irish Spring, Tom's of | |
| Maine, Filorga, eltaMD, Protex, Sanex, Palmolive, | |
| PCA Skin | |
| Beauty - 18% of sales - Olay, SK-II, Native, Old | |
| Spice, Head & Shoulders, Herbal Essences, | |
| Pantene | |
| Essential Health - 31% of sales - Listerine, Band- | |
| Aid, Johnson's, Neosporin, Stayfree, o.b., | |
| Carefree | |
| Oral - 27% of sales - Sensodyne, Paradontax, | |
| Polident, Biotene | |
| Home Care - 17% of sales - Palmolive, Suavitel, | |
| Ajax, Fabuloso | |
| Fabric & Home Care - 35% of sales - Tide, Gain, | |
| Bounce, Downy, Ariel, Dawn, Cascade, Febreze, | |
| Swiffer, Mr. Clean | |
| VMS - 15% of sales - Centrum, Emergen-C, | |
| Caltrate | |
| Pet - 21% of sales - Hill's Pet Nutrition | |
| Baby, Feminine, and Family Care - 25% of | |
| sales - Pampers, Luvs, Bounty, Charmin, Puffs, | |
| Tampax, Always | |
| Digestive Health & Other - 19% of sales - Tums, | |
| Preparation H, Eno, Fenistil | |
| Grooming - 8% of sales - Gillette, Braun, Venus | |
| Kenvue (KVUE) Haleon (HLN) Colgate-Palmolive (CL)* The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) | |
| CY22 Net Sales ($B) $15.0 $13.4 $18.0 $80.3 | |
| CY23-CY25 Organic Sales CAGR 4.7% 4.8% 4.9% 4.5% | |
| CY22 adjusted EBITDA ($B) $3.6 $3.4 $4.2 $20.1 | |
| CY22 adjusted EBITDA Margin 24.1% 25.1% 23.5% 25.0% | |
| CY23-CY25 EBITDA CAGR 6.1% 6.2% 7.0% 8.4% | |
| Net-Debt-to-TTM EBITDA 2.1x 3.6x 1.9x 1.4x | |
| Dividend Yield 3.0% 1.6% 2.7% 2.5% | |
| 2023 EV/EBITDA 15.5x 14.0x 15.8x 17.8x | |
| 2024 EV/EBITDA 14.7x 13.3x 14.7x 16.7x | |
| 2023 P/E 23.8x 18.3x 24.3x 23.9x | |
| 2024 P/E 23.1x 16.9x 22.2x 21.9x | |
| Financial & Valuation Metrics | |
| Company Geographic and Segment Mix | |
| Segment & Key Brands | |
| Source: Company reports, Bloomberg Finance L.P., J.P. Morgan estimates.; *CL North America ex-Pet but U.S. includes Pet | |
| Beyond HLN, CL, and PG, we also compare KVUE to additional companies with | |
| exposure to the Consumer Health space and also a broader basket of HPC and Beauty | |
| companies given KVUEs presence in the face care, body care, and sun care categories | |
| as well as baby care. KVUE sales growth and margin outlook are largely comparable | |
| across the Consumer Health and HPC & Beauty peers on average (e.g., HPC & Beauty | |
| weighted average 2023-2024E sales CAGR +5.1% with 2023E EBITDA margins | |
| ~23.2% and Consumer Health weighted-average 2023-2024E sales CAGR +3.1% with | |
| 2023E EBITDA margins ~25.4% vs. KVUE 2023-2024E sales CAGR +4.4% with | |
| 2023E EBITDA margins 24.2%). | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 36 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Table 3: Comparable Analysis for KVUE | |
| JPM JPM Price (LC) Dividend Market Cap | |
| Enterprise | |
| Value | |
| Company Ticker Analyst Rating 5/26/2023 Yield (USD mn) (USD mn) 2022 2023E 2024E 1-yr 2-yr 5-yr | |
| Consumer Health | |
| Beiersdorf BEI GR Pannuti N 123.90 112 0.6% 33,471 25,316 17.1x 14.9x 13.8x 14.8x 14.7x 15.1x | |
| Bayer BAYN GR Vosser N 54.32 60 4.4% 57,208 95,239 6.6x 7.2x 6.7x 6.7x 6.9x 7.6x | |
| Haleon HLN LN Pannuti UW 3.30 3 0.7% 37,617 49,816 14.8x 14.0x 13.3x 12.9x 12.9x 12.9x | |
| Reckitt Benckiser Group RKT LN Pannuti OW 64.16 75 2.9% 56,731 66,275 14.0x 13.4x 12.7x 13.2x 13.9x 14.6x | |
| Sanofi SAN FP Vosser OW 99.40 105 3.6% 134,490 141,743 9.0x 9.0x 8.5x 8.6x 9.1x 9.8x | |
| Unilever ULVR LN Pannuti UW 41.69 39 3.6% 129,635 159,456 13.0x 12.8x 12.0x 12.5x 12.5x 13.3x | |
| AVERAGE 12.4x 11.9x 11.2x 11.4x 11.7x 12.2x | |
| WTD. AVERAGE 11.6x 11.3x 10.6x 10.9x 11.1x 11.8x | |
| MEDIAN 13.5x 13.1x 12.3x 12.7x 12.7x 13.1x | |
| HPC & Beauty | |
| Colgate-Palmolive CL Teixeira OW 76.21 87 2.5% 63,221 71,538 16.9x 15.8x 14.7x 15.8x 15.8x 15.5x | |
| Procter & Gamble PG Teixeira OW 145.40 168 2.6% 342,703 389,376 19.1x 17.8x 16.7x 16.9x 17.2x 16.4x | |
| Church & Dwight CHD Teixeira UW 93.97 86 1.2% 22,953 25,616 20.8x 19.4x 18.3x 17.3x 18.1x 18.2x | |
| Kimberly-Clark KMB Teixeira UW 136.30 139 3.5% 45,985 54,237 16.6x 14.4x 13.4x 14.0x 13.8x 12.8x | |
| Clorox CLX Teixeira UW 159.09 158 3.0% 19,667 22,617 24.9x 32.2x 17.2x 18.5x 18.1x 17.4x | |
| Newell Brands NWL Teixeira OW 8.73 14 3.2% 3,615 9,596 7.7x 9.0x 7.9x 9.0x 9.4x 10.3x | |
| Estee Lauder EL Teixeira OW 194.44 224 1.4% 69,495 74,877 23.1x 29.9x 19.7x 21.3x 23.0x 21.5x | |
| e.l.f. ELF Teixeira OW 101.28 102 N/A 5,456 5,596 51.6x 39.5x 34.6x 26.1x 23.2x 19.6x | |
| L'Oreal OR FP Pannuti N 411.00 400 1.5% 236,141 239,811 24.9x 22.8x 21.0x 20.4x 22.6x 21.2x | |
| Olaplex OLPX Teixeira UW 3.29 5 N/A 2,153 2,546 5.9x 9.4x 8.4x 12.4x 18.2x 18.2x | |
| Reynolds Consumer Products REYN Teixeira OW 27.11 31 3.4% 5,693 7,778 14.2x 12.6x 11.6x 12.4x 12.4x 12.2x | |
| Coty COTY Teixeira N 11.03 12 N/A 9,406 14,318 15.2x 14.1x 13.0x 12.4x 13.2x 12.6x | |
| AVERAGE 20.1x 19.7x 16.4x 16.4x 17.1x 16.3x | |
| WTD. AVERAGE 21.0x 20.3x 17.9x 18.0x 18.9x 17.9x | |
| MEDIAN 18.0x 16.8x 15.7x 16.4x 17.6x 16.9x | |
| Kevnue KVUE Teixeira OW 26.30 29.00 3.0% 50,362 58,714 16.3x 15.5x 14.7x -- -- -- | |
| JPM JPM Price (LC) | |
| Company Ticker Analyst Rating 5/26/2023 2022 2023E 2024E 1-yr 2-yr 5-yr 2022 2023E 2024E | |
| Consumer Health | |
| Beiersdorf BEI GR Pannuti N 123.90 112 33.9x 31.6x 28.7x 28.6x 29.0x 28.8x 0.9% 2.6% 2.7% | |
| Bayer BAYN GR Vosser N 54.32 60 6.8x 7.7x 7.1x 7.1x 7.4x 8.4x 5.8% 7.1% 11.1% | |
| Haleon HLN LN Pannuti UW 3.30 3 17.9x 18.3x 16.9x 16.0x 16.0x 16.0x 5.3% 5.0% 5.7% | |
| Reckitt Benckiser Group RKT LN Pannuti OW 64.16 75 18.8x 18.8x 17.4x 17.7x 18.6x 19.2x 4.4% 5.4% 6.1% | |
| Sanofi SAN FP Vosser OW 99.40 105 12.0x 12.1x 11.2x 11.0x 11.8x 12.6x 6.6% 6.6% 7.6% | |
| Unilever ULVR LN Pannuti UW 41.69 39 16.2x 16.4x 15.2x 17.7x 17.7x 18.7x 5.3% 6.3% 6.7% | |
| AVERAGE 17.6x 17.5x 16.1x 16.4x 16.8x 17.3x 4.7% 5.5% 6.6% | |
| WTD. AVERAGE 15.6x 15.6x 14.4x 15.0x 15.4x 16.2x 5.3% 6.0% 7.1% | |
| HPC & Beauty | |
| Colgate-Palmolive CL Teixeira OW 76.21 87 25.7x 24.3x 22.2x 24.0x 23.8x 23.5x 2.9% 4.0% 4.5% | |
| Procter & Gamble PG Teixeira OW 145.40 168 25.5x 23.9x 21.9x 23.5x 23.9x 23.0x 3.4% 4.5% 4.7% | |
| Church & Dwight CHD Teixeira UW 93.97 86 31.6x 30.2x 27.9x 26.7x 27.7x 27.4x 3.1% 3.0% 3.7% | |
| Kimberly-Clark KMB Teixeira UW 136.30 139 24.2x 21.8x 19.6x 20.9x 20.3x 18.9x 4.0% 4.5% 4.9% | |
| Clorox CLX Teixeira UW 159.09 158 38.3x 30.2x 26.3x 30.4x 28.7x 26.3x 3.7% 3.9% 4.4% | |
| Newell Brands NWL Teixeira OW 8.73 14 5.6x 9.0x 6.8x 10.0x 11.3x 11.4x -16.2% 12.3% 15.9% | |
| Estee Lauder EL Teixeira OW 194.44 224 37.2x 56.6x 32.9x 35.0x 37.5x 35.2x 1.4% 1.7% 3.5% | |
| e.l.f. ELF Teixeira OW 101.28 102 74.5x 53.4x 51.4x 44.2x 40.4x 36.0x 1.4% 1.8% 2.3% | |
| L'Oreal OR FP Pannuti N 411.00 400 36.5x 34.2x 31.3x 31.2x 35.5x 33.6x 2.2% 3.1% 3.3% | |
| Olaplex OLPX Teixeira UW 3.29 5 7.3x 12.9x 10.9x 17.2x 26.1x 26.1x 11.8% 11.6% 10.4% | |
| Reynolds Consumer Products REYN Teixeira OW 27.11 31 21.2x 20.2x 17.6x 18.7x 17.6x 16.9x 1.6% 6.8% 5.6% | |
| Coty COTY Teixeira N 11.03 12 31.5x 20.1x 22.6x 23.2x 28.4x 24.2x 4.8% 3.6% 5.7% | |
| AVERAGE 29.9x 28.1x 24.3x 25.4x 26.8x 25.2x 2.0% 5.1% 5.7% | |
| WTD. AVERAGE 30.3x 29.9x 25.8x 26.8x 28.4x 27.1x 2.8% 3.8% 4.2% | |
| MEDIAN 28.6x 24.1x 22.4x 23.7x 26.9x 25.2x 3.0% 3.9% 4.6% | |
| Kevnue KVUE Teixeira OW 26.30 29.00 22.3x 23.8x 23.1x -- -- -- 4.0% 4.8% 4.9% | |
| JPM Price | |
| Target | |
| EV/EBITDA | |
| JPM Price | |
| Target | |
| P/E Hist. FwdP /E Avg. FCF Yield | |
| Hist. Fwd EV/EBITDA Avg. | |
| Source: Company reports, Bloomberg Finance L.P., and J.P. Morgan estimates. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 37 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Price Target Derivation | |
| We see investors gravitating toward EV/EBITDA to inform valuation for KVUE given | |
| that the companys treatment of amortization of definite life intangible assets will make | |
| P/E less comparable to peers based on what the company will report as its adjusted | |
| earnings, although we will also present an EPS including amortization of definite life | |
| intangibles to make the comparison more apples to apples. We also added a discounted | |
| cash flow valuation to where the stock could trade over the medium to longer term as | |
| the company continues to execute against its growth priorities and improves margins. | |
| To determine our target multiples for KVUE we use a blended average based on the | |
| comparable analysis discussed above. Given KVUEs characteristics similar to HLN, we | |
| view it as the most direct comparable company and see investors anchoring valuation | |
| against it for now – as such in our target multiple analysis we assign a one-third | |
| weighting to HLNs multiple. We ascribe a one-third weighting to other Consumer | |
| Health peers and one-third weighting to HPC & Beauty peers (i.e., in total two-thirds | |
| weighting to Consumer Health and one-third to HPC & Beauty). The lower weighting to | |
| higher-multiple HPC & Beauty seems fair to us given generally slower growth/margin | |
| profile vs. Beauty peers historically and less everyday use vs. HPC peers. We then | |
| assign a 70% weighting to EV/EBITDA as the primary valuation metric and 30% to | |
| DCF as a secondary metric. As such, our Dec 2023 price target embeds an EV/EBITDA | |
| multiple of 15.1x, which is 0.4x below the current 2023E multiple for KVUE. | |
| Table 4: EV/EBITDA Multiple for Peer Sets | |
| Target Multiple Blend | |
| EV/EBITDA Weighting Multiple | |
| Haleon 33% 13.9x | |
| Consumer Health ex-Haleon 33% 11.2x | |
| HPC & Beauty 33% 20.2x | |
| Total 100% 15.1x | |
| Source: Bloomberg Finance L.P. and J.P. Morgan. | |
| Our Dec 2023 price target of $29 is based on a blended average of the above multiples | |
| against our 2024 EBITDA estimate and a DCF value of $32 (based on perpetual growth | |
| method). Our target price implies 10% upside from the May 26 close on top of a ~3% | |
| dividend yield. | |
| Table 5: Method 1: EV/EBITDA Derivation | |
| Price Target Methodology on EV/EBITDA Dec-23 | |
| CY2024 EBITDA $ mn $3,983 | |
| Target Multiple 15.1x | |
| (-) Post IPO Net Debt $ mn $7,820 | |
| # of shares 2023E mn 1,935 | |
| 2023 Implied Price Target $27 | |
| Upside/Downside 2.4% | |
| Source: J.P. Morgan estimates. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 38 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Table 6: Method 3: DCF Derivation | |
| $ m, except per share value | |
| Terminal Value (Perpetual Growth) | |
| CY2033E Unlevered Free Cash Flow $3,687 | |
| Long-Term Growth Rate 1.0% | |
| Terminal Value $79,813 | |
| Equity Value (Perpetual Growth) | |
| Present Value of Terminal Value $44,541 | |
| Present Value of Unlevered Free Cash Flows $25,496 | |
| -Net Debt $7,820 | |
| Equity Value $62,217 | |
| Equity Value per Share $32 | |
| Shares Outstanding 1,935 | |
| Source: J.P. Morgan estimates. | |
| Table 7: Blended Price Target Implies ~10% Upside from Current Levels | |
| Price Target Methodology Dec-23 | |
| Mix of EV/EBITDA 70% | |
| Mix of DCF 30% | |
| Blended $29.00 | |
| Upside from last price 10.1% | |
| Source: J.P. Morgan estimates. | |
| For additional context, we offer the assumptions underlying our discounted cash flows | |
| analysis through 2033 and sensitivity tables using both an EBITDA exit multiple and | |
| perpetual growth that points to meaningful upside potential in KVUE shares to the lowto | |
| mid-$30s range. Underlying our DCF analysis, we assume a weighted-average cost of | |
| capital of around 5.7% based on a beta of 0.73, risk-free rate of 3.8%, market risk | |
| premium of 4.8%, a marginal cost of debt of 5.0%, low-single-digit organic top-line | |
| growth through 2033 (decelerating from 4.8% reported in CY2023E to 2% in | |
| CY2033E), with the company expanding margins at an average 25 basis points | |
| thereafter, modest headwind from use of working capital, and capital expenditures of 3- | |
| 4% of sales annually. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 39 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Table 8: KVUE DCF | |
| $ m | |
| WACC Calculation | |
| Beta 0.73 | |
| Risk-free rate 3.8% | |
| Market risk premium 4.8% | |
| Cost of Equity 7.3% | |
| Marginal cost of debt 5.0% | |
| Tax rate 25.6% | |
| After-tax cost of debt 3.7% | |
| Equity weight 55.2% | |
| Debt weight 44.8% | |
| WACC 5.7% | |
| Unlevered Free Cash Flow Analysis 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 | |
| $ m CY2022 CY2023 CY2024 CY2025 CY2026 CY2027 CY2028 CY2029 CY2030 CY2031 CY2032 CY2033 | |
| Sales $14,950.0 $15,662.3 $16,289.0 $16,972.8 $17,651.7 $18,307.3 $18,935.0 $19,530.1 $20,088.1 $20,604.7 $21,075.6 $21,497.1 | |
| EBIT $2,961.8 $3,163.6 $3,343.9 $3,673.8 $3,864.9 $4,054.2 $4,240.5 $4,422.6 $4,599.2 $4,769.0 $4,930.7 $5,083.0 | |
| Tax Rate 22.8% 25.6% 25.7% 25.5% 25.5% 25.5% 25.5% 25.5% 25.5% 25.5% 25.5% 25.5% | |
| After-tax EBIT $2,286.0 $2,352.5 $2,485.4 $2,737.6 $2,879.9 $3,021.0 $3,159.9 $3,295.6 $3,427.1 $3,553.7 $3,674.1 $3,787.7 | |
| +D&A $644.0 $633.8 $639.5 $634.5 $655.7 $678.8 $703.7 $730.7 $759.4 $789.9 $822.2 $856.1 | |
| +CapEx -$374.8 -$416.7 -$482.2 -$504.2 -$529.6 -$576.7 -$624.9 -$673.8 -$718.2 -$762.4 -$806.1 -$849.1 | |
| +Net Change in Working Capital -$672.0 $133.5 $99.4 -$3.8 -$88.3 -$91.5 -$94.7 -$97.7 -$100.4 -$103.0 -$105.4 -$107.5 | |
| Unlevered Free Cash Flow $1,883.3 $2,703.1 $2,742.0 $2,864.0 $2,917.8 $3,031.6 $3,144.1 $3,254.8 $3,368.0 $3,478.2 $3,584.8 $3,687.2 | |
| YOY % 43.5% 1.4% 4.5% 1.9% 3.9% 3.7% 3.5% 3.5% 3.3% 3.1% 2.9% | |
| Present Value of Unlevered Free Cash Flow $1,883.3 $2,617.6 $2,512.9 $2,484.0 $2,394.9 $2,354.8 $2,311.3 $2,264.4 $2,217.5 $2,167.2 $2,113.9 $2,057.7 | |
| Assumptions CY2022 CY2023 CY2024 CY2025 CY2026 CY2027 CY2028 CY2029 CY2030 CY2031 CY2032 CY2033 | |
| Sales Growth -0.7% 4.8% 4.0% 4.2% 4.0% 3.7% 3.4% 3.1% 2.9% 2.6% 2.3% 2.0% | |
| EBIT Margin 19.8% 20.2% 20.5% 21.6% 21.9% 22.1% 22.4% 22.6% 22.9% 23.1% 23.4% 23.6% | |
| CapEx % of Sales 2.5% 2.7% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.2% 3.3% 3.5% 3.6% 3.7% 3.8% 4.0% | |
| Change in Net Working Capital % of Sales -4.5% 0.9% 0.6% 0.0% -0.5% -0.5% -0.5% -0.5% -0.5% -0.5% -0.5% -0.5% | |
| Source: Company reports, Bloomberg Finance L.P, Damodaran Online, and J.P. Morgan estimates. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 40 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Table 9: KVUE DCF Sensitivity Based on Terminal EV/EBITDA Multiples | |
| $31 4.2% 4.7% 5.2% 5.7% 6.2% 6.7% 7.2% | |
| 11x $32 $31 $29 $28 $27 $26 $24 | |
| 12x $34 $33 $31 $30 $28 $27 $26 | |
| 13x $36 $35 $33 $31 $30 $29 $27 | |
| 14x $38 $36 $35 $33 $32 $30 $29 | |
| 15x $40 $38 $37 $35 $33 $32 $30 | |
| 16x $42 $40 $38 $37 $35 $33 $32 | |
| Discount Rate | |
| Terminal | |
| Value | |
| EBITDA | |
| Multiple | |
| Source: J.P. Morgan estimates. | |
| Table 10: KVUE DCF Sensitivity Based on Perpetual Growth Rate | |
| $32 4.2% 4.7% 5.2% 5.7% 6.2% 6.7% 7.2% | |
| 0.0% $40 $35 $31 $28 $25 $23 $21 | |
| 0.5% $44 $38 $34 $30 $27 $24 $22 | |
| 1.0% $50 $42 $37 $32 $29 $26 $23 | |
| 1.5% $58 $48 $41 $35 $31 $27 $25 | |
| 2.0% $69 $55 $46 $39 $34 $30 $26 | |
| 2.5% $87 $66 $53 $44 $37 $32 $28 | |
| Discount Rate | |
| Long-Term | |
| Growth | |
| Rate | |
| Source: J.P. Morgan estimates. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 41 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Most Recent Point of Sales Trends in the | |
| U.S. (NielsenIQ) | |
| Tracked Channel 4Y CAGR Accelerated Sequentially QTD in the U.S. Based on | |
| NielsenIQ | |
| The most recent tracked channel data (QTD for 5-weeks ending 5/6) shows that | |
| KVUEs dollar takeaway (total company in tracked channel) was up +4.2% driven by | |
| pricing (up +14.5%) while volumes were down -9.0%. This print shows a sequential | |
| deceleration (only on the headline but when normalizing for the pandemic, it accelerated | |
| on a 4-year CAGR) from 12-week period ending 4/1 (bracketing Q123) in which | |
| KVUEs dollar takeaway was up +5.5% (pricing up +11.9% while volume was down - | |
| 5.7%). It also decelerated slightly from the 12-week period ending 12/31/22 (bracketing | |
| 4Q22) which was up +4.4% (pricing up +11.0% but volume down -5.9%). On a 4Y | |
| CAGR basis, takeaway was up +4.1% for the 12-week period ending 12/31, +1.5% for | |
| the 12-week period ending 4/01 and +2.3% in the 5-week period ending 5/06. | |
| Figure 52: KVUEs $ Takeaway in Tracked Channels Driven by Pricing | |
| Rolling 12W Period Ending 5/06 | |
| -20.0% | |
| -15.0% | |
| -10.0% | |
| -5.0% | |
| 0.0% | |
| 5.0% | |
| 10.0% | |
| 15.0% | |
| 20.0% | |
| 01/16/21 | |
| 02/13/21 | |
| 03/13/21 | |
| 04/10/21 | |
| 05/08/21 | |
| 06/05/21 | |
| 07/03/21 | |
| 07/31/21 | |
| 08/28/21 | |
| 09/25/21 | |
| 10/23/21 | |
| 11/20/21 | |
| 12/18/21 | |
| 01/15/22 | |
| 02/12/22 | |
| 03/12/22 | |
| 04/09/22 | |
| 05/07/22 | |
| 06/04/22 | |
| 07/02/22 | |
| 07/30/22 | |
| 08/27/22 | |
| 09/24/22 | |
| 10/22/22 | |
| 11/19/22 | |
| 12/17/22 | |
| 01/14/23 | |
| 02/11/23 | |
| 03/11/23 | |
| 04/08/23 | |
| 05/06/23 | |
| Sales Volume Pricing | |
| Source: NielsenIQ, J.P. Morgan | |
| Below we lay out some of the most recent POS trends in the U.S. and how KVUE | |
| stacks up against peers among HPC companies. In the last 12 weeks, consumer | |
| takeaway has been in the MSDs in the tracked channels measured by NielsenIQ in | |
| the U.S., which places KVUE in the middle of the pack relative to peers, per the | |
| tables below. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 42 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Figure 53: Takeaway Growth in Latest 4-Week Period (YOY change sorted by 4 weeks) | |
| $ Takeaway 1-Wk 4-Wk 12-Wk 52-Wk 1-Wk 4-Wk 12-Wk 52-Wk | |
| HNST 27.8% 24.7% 25.1% 19.8% 22.2% 18.6% 18.7% 17.0% | |
| CHD 6.1% 6.2% 7.8% 6.6% 5.7% 5.7% 5.7% 5.6% | |
| CLX 5.4% 5.2% 7.9% 4.8% 4.4% 4.6% 4.9% 4.3% | |
| PG 6.2% 4.9% 6.4% 6.2% 8.0% 7.1% 6.9% 6.9% | |
| UNLVR 4.1% 4.3% 6.2% 8.6% 5.6% 5.6% 6.0% 5.8% | |
| EPC -1.0% 4.0% 3.1% 4.7% 2.0% 3.0% 2.4% 1.7% | |
| KVUE 2.7% 3.8% 5.4% 1.1% 2.6% 2.3% 1.7% 2.8% | |
| KMB 4.2% 3.0% 3.4% 4.8% 3.3% 2.6% 2.2% 2.5% | |
| REYN 7.8% 2.7% 7.9% 11.2% 8.1% 6.3% 8.1% 7.9% | |
| ENR 1.0% 1.3% 1.9% 6.6% 4.3% 3.8% 4.1% 4.5% | |
| CL 2.4% -0.2% 0.5% 4.8% 0.6% 1.0% 0.7% 2.0% | |
| NWL -24.6% -20.2% -16.8% -11.2% -4.7% -3.7% -3.7% -2.5% | |
| YOY % Change in $ Takeaway 4-Yr CAGR | |
| Source: NielsenIQ, J.P. Morgan. UNLVR (Unilever) is covered by Celine Pannuti. | |
| Figure 54: Weekly Growth Rates for HPC Companies (YOY change sorted by latest week) | |
| $ Takeaway 04/15/23 04/22/23 04/29/23 05/06/23 04/15/23 04/22/23 04/29/23 05/06/23 | |
| HNST 13.4% 38.6% 19.7% 27.8% 13.5% 23.5% 15.6% 22.2% | |
| REYN -0.8% 0.1% 4.1% 7.8% 5.3% 5.6% 6.3% 8.1% | |
| PG -0.8% 11.3% 3.1% 6.2% 5.6% 9.4% 5.6% 8.0% | |
| CHD 2.3% 11.9% 4.8% 6.1% 4.1% 7.6% 5.5% 5.7% | |
| CLX 4.5% 9.5% 1.4% 5.4% 4.2% 5.8% 3.9% 4.4% | |
| KMB -2.4% 9.4% 1.1% 4.2% 1.2% 4.1% 2.0% 3.3% | |
| UNLVR -2.6% 10.4% 6.0% 4.1% 3.8% 7.5% 5.8% 5.6% | |
| KVUE 0.8% 11.2% 1.1% 2.7% 1.6% 3.5% 1.6% 2.6% | |
| CL -5.8% 5.8% -2.9% 2.4% -0.9% 3.1% 1.2% 0.6% | |
| ENR 0.0% 6.1% -1.8% 1.0% 3.5% 4.6% 3.0% 4.3% | |
| EPC 10.6% 14.3% -6.2% -1.0% 3.5% 4.7% 1.8% 2.0% | |
| NWL -27.4% -11.5% -16.9% -24.6% -6.0% -1.1% -3.1% -4.7% | |
| YOY % Change in Weekly $ Takeaway 4-Yr CAGR | |
| Source: NielsenIQ, J.P. Morgan. UNLVR (Unilever) is covered by Celine Pannuti. | |
| Figure 55: Company $ Takeaway | |
| Y/Y % Change ranked high to low in latest 4-week period | |
| 4-Wk 12-Wk 52-Wk | |
| HNST 24.7% 25.1% 19.8% | |
| CHD 6.2% 7.8% 6.6% | |
| CLX 5.2% 7.9% 4.8% | |
| PG 4.9% 6.4% 6.2% | |
| UNLVR 4.3% 6.2% 8.6% | |
| EPC 4.0% 3.1% 4.7% | |
| KVUE 3.8% 5.4% 1.1% | |
| KMB 3.0% 3.4% 4.8% | |
| REYN 2.7% 7.9% 11.2% | |
| ENR 1.3% 1.9% 6.6% | |
| CL -0.2% 0.5% 4.8% | |
| NWL -20.2% -16.8% -11.2% | |
| Source: NielsenIQ. J.P. Morgan | |
| Figure 56: Company Takeaway 2-Year Stack | |
| Current 4-Week Period Takeaway + YAGO vs. Previous 4-Week + YAGO | |
| Current Last Diff. | |
| ENR 4.0% -6.7% 1076 | |
| KMB 16.1% 8.1% 797 | |
| EPC 12.5% 5.9% 656 | |
| NWL -27.0% -31.6% 460 | |
| REYN 17.4% 13.5% 395 | |
| CL 5.2% 2.0% 320 | |
| KVUE -1.1% -3.1% 201 | |
| CLX 5.7% 4.2% 147 | |
| UNLVR 10.5% 9.2% 129 | |
| PG 11.9% 11.2% 72 | |
| CHD 11.5% 11.1% 41 | |
| HNST 35.7% 43.4% (771) | |
| Source: NielsenIQ. J.P. Morgan | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 43 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Figure 57: Y/Y % Change in Units | |
| Y/Y % Change ranked high to low in latest 4-week period | |
| 4-Wk 12-Wk 52-Wk | |
| HNST 15.3% 12.6% 7.7% | |
| CHD 1.8% 1.9% -0.7% | |
| PG -2.1% -0.8% -2.4% | |
| KMB -3.6% -4.5% -2.5% | |
| UNLVR -5.3% -3.9% -4.8% | |
| ENR -6.1% -8.5% -9.1% | |
| EPC -6.3% -5.8% -4.3% | |
| CLX -8.7% -7.1% -9.5% | |
| KVUE -9.4% -7.2% -8.6% | |
| REYN -10.2% -4.1% -3.8% | |
| CL -13.6% -14.3% -8.8% | |
| NWL -21.7% -18.4% -15.1% | |
| Source: NielsenIQ. J.P. Morgan | |
| Figure 58: Y/Y % Change in Price per Unit | |
| Y/Y % Change ranked high to low in latest 4-week period | |
| 4-Wk 12-Wk 52-Wk | |
| CL 15.5% 17.3% 14.8% | |
| CLX 15.1% 16.1% 15.9% | |
| KVUE 14.5% 13.6% 10.6% | |
| REYN 14.3% 12.6% 15.6% | |
| EPC 11.0% 9.5% 9.4% | |
| UNLVR 10.1% 10.5% 14.1% | |
| HNST 8.1% 11.1% 11.3% | |
| ENR 7.9% 11.3% 17.3% | |
| PG 7.1% 7.2% 8.8% | |
| KMB 6.8% 8.3% 7.5% | |
| CHD 4.4% 5.8% 7.4% | |
| NWL 1.8% 1.9% 4.6% | |
| Source: NielsenIQ. J.P. Morgan | |
| Figure 59: Y/Y % Change in Velocity | |
| Y/Y % Change ranked high to low in latest 4-week period | |
| 4-Wk 12-Wk 52-Wk | |
| KVUE 12.0% 12.1% 13.4% | |
| CLX 10.9% 11.7% 7.3% | |
| ENR 10.8% 13.5% 19.5% | |
| KMB 7.2% 7.5% 6.8% | |
| CL 6.0% 6.8% 8.5% | |
| UNLVR 4.9% 6.5% 14.2% | |
| CHD 4.8% 5.3% 6.4% | |
| PG 4.0% 4.5% 5.4% | |
| HNST 3.5% 3.2% 5.8% | |
| EPC 3.4% 5.0% 8.2% | |
| REYN 1.5% 6.2% 12.1% | |
| NWL -0.7% 0.1% 4.7% | |
| Source: NielsenIQ. J.P. Morgan | |
| Figure 60: Y/Y % in Total Distribution Points | |
| Y/Y % Change ranked high to low in latest 4-week period | |
| 4-Wk 12-Wk 52-Wk | |
| HNST 20.5% 21.2% 13.2% | |
| CHD 1.3% 2.3% 0.2% | |
| REYN 1.2% 1.7% -0.8% | |
| PG 0.8% 1.8% 0.8% | |
| EPC 0.6% -1.8% -3.2% | |
| UNLVR -0.5% -0.3% -4.9% | |
| KMB -3.9% -3.8% -1.9% | |
| CLX -5.2% -3.4% -2.3% | |
| CL -5.8% -5.9% -3.4% | |
| KVUE -7.3% -6.0% -10.9% | |
| ENR -8.6% -10.2% -10.8% | |
| NWL -19.6% -16.9% -15.2% | |
| Source: NielsenIQ. J.P. Morgan | |
| Figure 61: Y/Y% Change in TDP on Promotion | |
| Y/Y % Change ranked high to low in latest 4-week period | |
| 4-Wk 12-Wk 52-Wk | |
| HNST 3.5% 1.1% 0.0% | |
| ENR 2.7% 1.8% 2.7% | |
| KVUE 2.1% 1.4% 0.9% | |
| CHD 1.2% 0.7% 2.2% | |
| EPC 0.4% -1.1% -2.0% | |
| CLX 0.2% 1.3% -0.3% | |
| PG -0.7% -0.5% -0.9% | |
| KMB -0.8% -0.3% -0.3% | |
| UNLVR -1.4% 0.6% 0.3% | |
| CL -1.5% -2.0% -1.3% | |
| REYN -3.3% -0.3% -1.7% | |
| NWL -4.4% -0.9% 2.0% | |
| Source: NielsenIQ. J.P. Morgan | |
| Figure 62: Y/Y% Change in Promotional Efficiency | |
| Y/Y % Change ranked high to low in latest 4-week period | |
| 4-Wk 12-Wk 52-Wk | |
| NWL 6.0% 4.9% -0.2% | |
| KVUE 5.3% 3.9% 0.2% | |
| HNST 4.3% -1.9% -0.3% | |
| PG 2.9% 1.9% -1.6% | |
| CHD 1.7% 2.0% 2.8% | |
| CLX 1.6% 4.6% 3.0% | |
| UNLVR 0.7% -1.5% -0.4% | |
| EPC 0.2% -0.7% -2.1% | |
| ENR -0.3% 1.5% 0.0% | |
| CL -0.6% -1.6% -4.3% | |
| REYN -1.0% -1.1% 2.6% | |
| KMB -1.1% -2.8% -2.5% | |
| Source: NielsenIQ. J.P. Morgan | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 44 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Key Brands POS Performance in the U.S. | |
| Below we have added the latest POS trends in the U.S. as per NielsenIQ data for some | |
| of KVUEs iconic brands. | |
| Figure 63: Summary of $ Takeaway in Tracked Channel | |
| 5W Ending 5W Ending | |
| 12/31/2022 4/1/2023 5/6/2023 12/31/2022 4/1/2023 5/6/2023 | |
| KVUE 4.4% 5.5% 4.2% 4.1% 1.5% 2.3% | |
| Listerine -0.3% 7.4% 10.7% 1.4% 0.2% 1.5% | |
| Tylenol 13.7% 14.6% 4.8% 14.7% 8.5% 10.5% | |
| Zyrtec 3.5% 3.3% 6.8% 7.8% 5.2% 4.8% | |
| Benadryl 2.0% 4.5% 7.4% 6.3% 3.9% 4.4% | |
| Aveeno -0.1% -0.9% 1.9% 2.0% 0.2% 0.9% | |
| Neutrogena -0.3% 4.4% 5.8% -2.2% -3.1% -1.8% | |
| Band Aid -0.2% 3.2% 7.2% 4.1% 3.8% 4.8% | |
| $ Takeaway (YOY) 4Y CAGR $ Takeaway (YOY) | |
| 12W Ending 12W Ending | |
| Source: NielsenIQ. J.P. Morgan | |
| The latest NielsenIQ data shows that Listerines dollar takeaway was up +10.7% driven | |
| by pricing, which was up +15.2%, while volume was down -3.9% in the latest fiveweek | |
| period ending May 6. This is a sequential acceleration from the brands dollar | |
| takeaway for the 12-week period ending 4/1/23 (bracketing Q123), which was up +7.4% | |
| (pricing up +10.7% while volume was down -2.9%) and also improved from the 12- | |
| week period ending 12/31/22, where the headline takeaway was flat (-0.3%), broken out | |
| into pricing up +8.1% but volume down -7.7%. We note that the uptick may be | |
| attributable to easier comps in the base period, where headline takeaway was down - | |
| 7.7% (pricing up +2.3% but volume down -9.8%) in the five-week period ending 5/7/22. | |
| Normalizing for the pandemic, takeaway was up +1.4% for the 12-week period ending | |
| 12/31, flat (+0.2%) for the 12-week period ending 4/01, and +1.5% for the five-week | |
| period ending 5/06 on a four-year CAGR basis. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 45 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Figure 64: $ Takeaway in Tracked Channels - Listerine | |
| Rolling 12W Period Ending 5/06 | |
| -20.0% | |
| -15.0% | |
| -10.0% | |
| -5.0% | |
| 0.0% | |
| 5.0% | |
| 10.0% | |
| 15.0% | |
| 20.0% | |
| 01/16/21 | |
| 02/13/21 | |
| 03/13/21 | |
| 04/10/21 | |
| 05/08/21 | |
| 06/05/21 | |
| 07/03/21 | |
| 07/31/21 | |
| 08/28/21 | |
| 09/25/21 | |
| 10/23/21 | |
| 11/20/21 | |
| 12/18/21 | |
| 01/15/22 | |
| 02/12/22 | |
| 03/12/22 | |
| 04/09/22 | |
| 05/07/22 | |
| 06/04/22 | |
| 07/02/22 | |
| 07/30/22 | |
| 08/27/22 | |
| 09/24/22 | |
| 10/22/22 | |
| 11/19/22 | |
| 12/17/22 | |
| 01/14/23 | |
| 02/11/23 | |
| 03/11/23 | |
| 04/08/23 | |
| 05/06/23 | |
| Sales Volume Pricing | |
| Source: NielsenIQ. J.P. Morgan | |
| The most recent tracked channel data shows that Tylenols dollar takeaway was up | |
| +4.8% driven by pricing (up +12.8%) while volume was down (-7.1%) in the latest 5- | |
| week period ending May 6. This print is a sequential deceleration on the headline (but | |
| accelerated on a four-year CAGR) from the 12-week period ending 4/01, where | |
| Tylenols takeaway was up +14.6% (pricing +14.4%, volume flat or +0.2%). It also | |
| decelerated from the 12-week period ending 12/31/22 in which the brands takeaway | |
| was up +13.7% (pricing up +12.8% and volume slightly up +0.9%). As it relates to fouryear | |
| CAGR, takeaway was up +14.7% for the 12-week period ending 12/31, +8.5% for | |
| the 12-week period ending 4/01, and +10.5% for the five-week period ending 5/06. | |
| Figure 65: $ Takeaway in Tracked Channels - Tylenol | |
| Rolling 12W Period Ending 5/06 | |
| -50.0% | |
| -40.0% | |
| -30.0% | |
| -20.0% | |
| -10.0% | |
| 0.0% | |
| 10.0% | |
| 20.0% | |
| 30.0% | |
| 40.0% | |
| 50.0% | |
| 01/16/21 | |
| 02/13/21 | |
| 03/13/21 | |
| 04/10/21 | |
| 05/08/21 | |
| 06/05/21 | |
| 07/03/21 | |
| 07/31/21 | |
| 08/28/21 | |
| 09/25/21 | |
| 10/23/21 | |
| 11/20/21 | |
| 12/18/21 | |
| 01/15/22 | |
| 02/12/22 | |
| 03/12/22 | |
| 04/09/22 | |
| 05/07/22 | |
| 06/04/22 | |
| 07/02/22 | |
| 07/30/22 | |
| 08/27/22 | |
| 09/24/22 | |
| 10/22/22 | |
| 11/19/22 | |
| 12/17/22 | |
| 01/14/23 | |
| 02/11/23 | |
| 03/11/23 | |
| 04/08/23 | |
| 05/06/23 | |
| Sales Volume Pricing | |
| Source: NielsenIQ. J.P. Morgan | |
| The latest NielsenIQ data points to Zyrtecs consumption up +6.8% (pricing up +10.2% | |
| while volume down -3.1%) in the latest five-week period ending May 6. This print is an | |
| acceleration from dollar takeaway up +3.3% (pricing up +7.3%, volume down -3.8%) in | |
| the 12-week period ending 4/01, and consumption up +3.5% (pricing up +7.6% but | |
| volume down -3.8%) for the 12-week period ending 12/31/22. However, we note that | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 46 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| there has been a sequential deceleration on a four-year CAGR basis where Zyrtecs | |
| takeaway was up +7.8% for the 12-week period ending 12/31, +5.2% for the 12-week | |
| period ending 4/01, and +4.8% for the five-week period ending 5/06. | |
| Figure 66: $ Takeaway in Tracked Channels - Zyrtec | |
| Rolling 12W Period Ending 5/06 | |
| -20.0% | |
| -15.0% | |
| -10.0% | |
| -5.0% | |
| 0.0% | |
| 5.0% | |
| 10.0% | |
| 15.0% | |
| 20.0% | |
| 25.0% | |
| 30.0% | |
| 01/16/21 | |
| 02/13/21 | |
| 03/13/21 | |
| 04/10/21 | |
| 05/08/21 | |
| 06/05/21 | |
| 07/03/21 | |
| 07/31/21 | |
| 08/28/21 | |
| 09/25/21 | |
| 10/23/21 | |
| 11/20/21 | |
| 12/18/21 | |
| 01/15/22 | |
| 02/12/22 | |
| 03/12/22 | |
| 04/09/22 | |
| 05/07/22 | |
| 06/04/22 | |
| 07/02/22 | |
| 07/30/22 | |
| 08/27/22 | |
| 09/24/22 | |
| 10/22/22 | |
| 11/19/22 | |
| 12/17/22 | |
| 01/14/23 | |
| 02/11/23 | |
| 03/11/23 | |
| 04/08/23 | |
| 05/06/23 | |
| Sales Volume Pricing | |
| Source: NielsenIQ. J.P. Morgan | |
| The most recent tracked channel data shows that headline consumption for Benadryl | |
| was up +7.4% (pricing up +16.3% but volume down -7.7%) for the five-week period | |
| ending 5/06, which sequentially accelerated both on a headline and on four-year CAGR | |
| basis. Benadryls dollar takeaway was up +4.5% (pricing up +12.5%, volume down - | |
| 7.1%) for the 12-week period ending 4/1/23 and was up +2.0% (pricing up +11.2% but | |
| volume down -8.3%) for the 12-week period ending 12/31/22. As it relates to four-year | |
| CAGR, takeaway was up +6.3% for the 12-week period ending 12/31, +3.9% for the | |
| 12-week period ending 4/01, and +4.4% for the five-week period ending 5/06. | |
| Figure 67: $ Takeaway in Tracked Channels - Benadryl | |
| Rolling 12W Period Ending 5/06 | |
| -20.0% | |
| -15.0% | |
| -10.0% | |
| -5.0% | |
| 0.0% | |
| 5.0% | |
| 10.0% | |
| 15.0% | |
| 20.0% | |
| 01/16/21 | |
| 02/13/21 | |
| 03/13/21 | |
| 04/10/21 | |
| 05/08/21 | |
| 06/05/21 | |
| 07/03/21 | |
| 07/31/21 | |
| 08/28/21 | |
| 09/25/21 | |
| 10/23/21 | |
| 11/20/21 | |
| 12/18/21 | |
| 01/15/22 | |
| 02/12/22 | |
| 03/12/22 | |
| 04/09/22 | |
| 05/07/22 | |
| 06/04/22 | |
| 07/02/22 | |
| 07/30/22 | |
| 08/27/22 | |
| 09/24/22 | |
| 10/22/22 | |
| 11/19/22 | |
| 12/17/22 | |
| 01/14/23 | |
| 02/11/23 | |
| 03/11/23 | |
| 04/08/23 | |
| 05/06/23 | |
| Sales Volume Pricing | |
| Source: NielsenIQ. J.P. Morgan | |
| As per the most recent data from NielsenIQ, Aveenos dollar takeaway was slightly up | |
| +1.9%, with pricing (up +18.2%) being the main driver, while volume was down - | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 47 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| 13.8% in the five-week period ending May 6. This is a sequential acceleration from the | |
| 12-week period ending 4/1/23, where headline consumption was slightly down -0.9% | |
| (pricing up +13.9% while volume was down -13.0%). Dollar takeaway was flat (-0.1%), | |
| broken out into pricing up +9.7% but volume down -8.9% in the 12-week period ending | |
| 12/31/22. The brand appears to have easier comps in the prior period, when headline | |
| consumption was down -6.7% (flat or +0.3% pricing and -7.0% volume) in the fiveweek | |
| period ending 5/7/22. On a four-year CAGR basis, takeaway was modestly up | |
| +2.0% for the 12-week period ending 12/31 and was flat (+0.2%) for the 12-week | |
| period ending 4/01, while it was slightly up sequentially by +0.9% for the five-week | |
| period ending 5/06. | |
| Figure 68: $ Takeaway in Tracked Channels - Aveeno | |
| Rolling 12W Period Ending 5/06 | |
| -15.0% | |
| -10.0% | |
| -5.0% | |
| 0.0% | |
| 5.0% | |
| 10.0% | |
| 15.0% | |
| 20.0% | |
| 01/16/21 | |
| 02/13/21 | |
| 03/13/21 | |
| 04/10/21 | |
| 05/08/21 | |
| 06/05/21 | |
| 07/03/21 | |
| 07/31/21 | |
| 08/28/21 | |
| 09/25/21 | |
| 10/23/21 | |
| 11/20/21 | |
| 12/18/21 | |
| 01/15/22 | |
| 02/12/22 | |
| 03/12/22 | |
| 04/09/22 | |
| 05/07/22 | |
| 06/04/22 | |
| 07/02/22 | |
| 07/30/22 | |
| 08/27/22 | |
| 09/24/22 | |
| 10/22/22 | |
| 11/19/22 | |
| 12/17/22 | |
| 01/14/23 | |
| 02/11/23 | |
| 03/11/23 | |
| 04/08/23 | |
| 05/06/23 | |
| Sales Volume Pricing | |
| Source: NielsenIQ. J.P. Morgan | |
| The latest tracked channel data point to Neutrogenas dollar takeaway improving with | |
| consumption up +5.8% (pricing up +11.2%, volume down -4.9%) in the latest five-week | |
| period ending May 6 and compares to dollar takeaway down -10.0% (pricing +0.5%, | |
| volume -10.5%) in the prior period. As mentioned, this is a sequential acceleration from | |
| the 12-week period ending 4/1/23 where the data shows that dollar takeaway was up | |
| +4.4% (pricing was up +8.6% while volume was down -3.9%), and this too was a | |
| sequential improvement from consumption slightly down (-0.3%, broken out into | |
| pricing up +8.2% but volume down -7.8%) in the 12-week period ending 12/31/22. | |
| Looking at longer term trends, four-year CAGR consumption was down -2.2% in the | |
| 12-week period ending 12/31/22 and decelerated to -3.1% in the 12-week period ending | |
| 4/01 but was less negative (down -1.8%) in the five-week period ending 5/06. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 48 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Figure 69: $ Takeaway in Tracked Channels - Neutrogena | |
| Rolling 12W Period Ending 5/06 | |
| -30.0% | |
| -20.0% | |
| -10.0% | |
| 0.0% | |
| 10.0% | |
| 20.0% | |
| 30.0% | |
| 01/16/21 | |
| 02/13/21 | |
| 03/13/21 | |
| 04/10/21 | |
| 05/08/21 | |
| 06/05/21 | |
| 07/03/21 | |
| 07/31/21 | |
| 08/28/21 | |
| 09/25/21 | |
| 10/23/21 | |
| 11/20/21 | |
| 12/18/21 | |
| 01/15/22 | |
| 02/12/22 | |
| 03/12/22 | |
| 04/09/22 | |
| 05/07/22 | |
| 06/04/22 | |
| 07/02/22 | |
| 07/30/22 | |
| 08/27/22 | |
| 09/24/22 | |
| 10/22/22 | |
| 11/19/22 | |
| 12/17/22 | |
| 01/14/23 | |
| 02/11/23 | |
| 03/11/23 | |
| 04/08/23 | |
| 05/06/23 | |
| Sales Volume Pricing | |
| Source: NielsenIQ. J.P. Morgan | |
| The most recent tracked channel data shows that Band Aids dollar takeaway was up | |
| +7.2%, with pricing (+16.8%) being the main driver, while volume was down -8.3%, | |
| which improved from both consumption up +3.2% (pricing +12.1%, volume -7.9%) for | |
| the 12-week period ending 4/1/23 and flat (-0.2%, pricing up +11.4% but volume down | |
| -10.4%) in the 12-week period ending 12/31/22. The brands four-year CAGR for | |
| consumption was up +4.1% in the 12-week period ending 12/31/22, +3.8% in the 12- | |
| week period ending 4/01, and +4.8% in the five-week period ending 5/06. | |
| Figure 70: $ Takeaway in Tracked Channels - Band Aid | |
| Rolling 12W Period Ending 5/06 | |
| -15.0% | |
| -10.0% | |
| -5.0% | |
| 0.0% | |
| 5.0% | |
| 10.0% | |
| 15.0% | |
| 20.0% | |
| 01/16/21 | |
| 02/13/21 | |
| 03/13/21 | |
| 04/10/21 | |
| 05/08/21 | |
| 06/05/21 | |
| 07/03/21 | |
| 07/31/21 | |
| 08/28/21 | |
| 09/25/21 | |
| 10/23/21 | |
| 11/20/21 | |
| 12/18/21 | |
| 01/15/22 | |
| 02/12/22 | |
| 03/12/22 | |
| 04/09/22 | |
| 05/07/22 | |
| 06/04/22 | |
| 07/02/22 | |
| 07/30/22 | |
| 08/27/22 | |
| 09/24/22 | |
| 10/22/22 | |
| 11/19/22 | |
| 12/17/22 | |
| 01/14/23 | |
| 02/11/23 | |
| 03/11/23 | |
| 04/08/23 | |
| 05/06/23 | |
| Sales Volume Pricing | |
| Source: NielsenIQ. J.P. Morgan | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 49 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Financial Statements | |
| Income Statement Historical & Estimates | |
| Table 11: KVUE Income Statement | |
| $ million, except per share values | |
| Income Statement 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023E 2024E 2025E | |
| Revenue 14,324 14,467 15,054 14,950 15,662 16,289 16,973 | |
| % change 1.0% 4.1% -0.7% 4.8% 4.0% 4.2% | |
| Cost of goods sold 6,633 6,585 6,587 6,610 6,800 7,050 7,246 | |
| Amortization of definite life intangible assets 344 415 414 348 324 305 283 | |
| Gross profit, adjusted 8,035 8,297 8,881 8,688 9,186 9,544 10,010 | |
| as a % of revenue 56.1% 57.4% 59.0% 58.1% 58.7% 58.6% 59.0% | |
| Change as % of revenue (bps) 125 164 (88) 54 (6) 38 | |
| Gross profit, adjusted incl.-Amortization of definite life intangible assets 7,691 7,882 8,467 8,340 8,862 9,239 9,727 | |
| as a % of revenue 53.7% 54.5% 56.2% 55.8% 56.6% 56.7% 57.3% | |
| Change as % of revenue (bps) 79 176 (46) 80 14 59 | |
| Selling, general and administrative expenses 4,760 4,588 5,061 5,000 5,305 5,515 5,659 | |
| as a % of revenue 33.2% 31.7% 33.6% 33.4% 33.9% 33.9% 33.3% | |
| Change as % of revenue (bps) (152) 191 (17) 42 (1) (51) | |
| Research & development 391 320 355 375 412 421 434 | |
| as a % of revenue 2.7% 2.2% 2.4% 2.5% 2.6% 2.6% 2.6% | |
| Change as % of revenue (bps) (51) 14 15 12 (4) (3) | |
| Stock-based compensation expense (0) (0) (0) (0) 1 (0) 0 | |
| Other expense/(income) 149 (55) (28) 3 (19) (40) (40) | |
| Operating Income, adjusted 2,736 3,444 3,493 3,310 3,487 3,648 3,957 | |
| as a % of revenue 19.1% 23.8% 23.2% 22.1% 22.3% 22.4% 23.3% | |
| Change as % of revenue (bps) 471 (60) (106) 13 13 91 | |
| Operating Income, adjusted incl.-Amortization of definite life intangible assets 2,392 3,029 3,079 2,962 3,164 3,344 3,674 | |
| as a % of revenue 16.7% 20.9% 20.5% 19.8% 20.2% 20.5% 21.6% | |
| Change as % of revenue (bps) 0.0% 42385.1% -4798.0% -6439.7% 3872.1% 3297.9% 11168.4% | |
| Interest income 0 0 0 0 46 39 27 | |
| Interest expense 0 0 0 0 329 418 395 | |
| Other income/(expense) - - - - - - - | |
| Pretax Income, adjusted 2,736 3,444 3,493 3,310 3,204 3,270 3,589 | |
| as a % of revenue 19.1% 23.8% 23.2% 22.1% 20.5% 20.1% 21.1% | |
| Pretax Income, adjusted incl.-Amortization of definite life intangible assets 2,392 3,029 3,079 2,962 2,881 2,965 3,307 | |
| as a % of revenue 16.7% 20.9% 20.5% 19.8% 18.4% 18.2% 19.5% | |
| Taxes, adjusted 679 741 782 721 800 819 896 | |
| Adjusted Tax Rate 24.8% 21.5% 22.4% 21.8% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% | |
| Taxes, adjusted incl.-Amortization of definite life intangible assets 667 703 731 676 739 761 843 | |
| Adjusted Tax Rate incl.-Amortization of definite life intangible assets 27.9% 23.2% 23.7% 22.8% 25.6% 25.7% 25.5% | |
| Net Income adjusted (non-GAAP) 2,057 2,703 2,711 2,589 2,404 2,451 2,693 | |
| as a % of revenue 14.4% 18.7% 18.0% 17.3% 15.4% 15.0% 15.9% | |
| Net Income adjusted incl.-Amortization of definite life intangible assets 1,725 2,326 2,349 2,286 2,142 2,204 2,464 | |
| as a % of revenue 12.0% 16.1% 15.6% 15.3% 13.7% 13.5% 14.5% | |
| Diluted EPS, adjusted $1.06 $1.40 $1.40 $1.34 $1.24 $1.27 $1.39 | |
| % change 31% 0% -5% -7% 2% 10% | |
| Diluted EPS, adjusted incl.-Amortization of definite life intangible assets $0.89 $1.20 $1.21 $1.18 $1.11 $1.14 $1.27 | |
| % change 35% 0% -3% -6% 3% 12% | |
| Average Shares Outstanding - Diluted 1,935.1 1,935.1 1,935.1 1,935.1 1,935.1 1,935.1 1,935.1 | |
| Adjusted EBITDA 3,101 3,775 3,810 3,606 3,797 3,983 4,308 | |
| as a % of revenue 21.6% 26.1% 25.3% 24.1% 24.2% 24.5% 25.4% | |
| Change as % of revenue (bps) 445 (78) (119) 13 21 93 | |
| Source: Company reports and J.P. Morgan estimates. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 50 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Balance Sheet Historical & Estimates | |
| Table 12: KVUE Balance Sheet | |
| $ million | |
| Balance Sheet 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023E 2024E 2025E | |
| Cash and cash equivalents 752.0 617.6 740.0 1,231.4 1,014.1 1,012.8 980.9 | |
| Trade receivables, less allowances for credit losses 2,158.7 1,857.9 2,073.7 2,121.7 2,280.9 2,370.3 2,471.4 | |
| Inventories 1,779.3 1,685.1 1,701.8 2,226.3 1,957.5 1,852.3 1,818.7 | |
| Prepaid expenses & other current assets 335.1 275.3 254.2 170.7 178.9 187.6 193.8 | |
| Other current assets 117.4 161.6 154.0 123.4 123.4 123.4 123.4 | |
| Total Current Assets 5,142.5 4,597.6 4,923.7 5,873.7 5,554.8 5,546.3 5,588.2 | |
| PP&E, net 2,147.2 1,956.6 1,826.6 1,820.2 1,926.7 2,074.1 2,226.6 | |
| Intangible assets, net 11,490.0 11,610.4 10,701.2 9,853.5 9,904.9 10,100.3 10,567.4 | |
| Goodwill 9,726.4 10,326.1 9,810.1 9,184.6 9,184.6 9,184.6 9,184.6 | |
| Deferred taxes on income 182.4 193.3 188.7 143.9 143.9 143.9 143.9 | |
| Other assets 522.4 495.9 401.4 404.3 404.3 404.3 404.3 | |
| Total non-current Assets 24,068.4 24,582.3 22,927.9 21,406.4 21,564.3 21,907.1 22,526.7 | |
| Total Assets 29,210.9 29,179.8 27,851.6 27,280.0 27,119.1 27,453.4 28,115.0 | |
| Accounts payable 1,408.5 1,579.3 1,826.5 1,829.4 1,853.3 1,936.9 2,000.6 | |
| Accrued liabilities 802.5 1,014.0 1,023.6 906.3 939.6 985.3 1,017.7 | |
| Accrued rebates, returns and promotions 930.9 874.6 834.4 862.2 900.9 936.2 976.3 | |
| Accrued taxes on income 483.1 409.7 366.4 336.1 354.8 368.7 384.5 | |
| Other current liabilities - - - - - - - | |
| Total Current Liabilities 3,625.1 3,877.7 4,051.0 3,934.0 4,048.6 4,227.1 4,379.1 | |
| Long-term debt, net of current maturities - - - - 8,512.1 8,309.8 8,121.7 | |
| Employee related obligations 303.4 345.0 302.2 213.5 213.5 213.5 213.5 | |
| Deferred taxes on income 2,467.2 2,781.7 2,729.0 2,462.8 2,462.8 2,462.8 2,462.8 | |
| Other long-term liabilities 726.7 804.7 754.0 727.0 727.0 727.0 727.0 | |
| Total Non-current Liabilities 3,497.3 3,931.4 3,785.2 3,403.3 11,915.4 11,713.0 11,525.0 | |
| Total Liabilities 7,122.4 7,809.1 7,836.2 7,337.2 15,964.0 15,940.1 15,904.1 | |
| Total Equity 22,088.5 21,370.7 20,015.4 19,942.8 11,155.2 11,513.3 12,210.9 | |
| Total Liabilities and Equity 29,210.9 29,179.8 27,851.6 27,280.0 27,119.1 27,453.4 28,115.0 | |
| Source: Company reports and J.P. Morgan estimates. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 51 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Cash Flow Historical & Estimates | |
| Table 13: KVUE Cash Flow Statement | |
| $ million | |
| Cash Flow Statement 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023E 2024E 2025E | |
| Operating Activities | |
| Net income 1,724.8 2,325.8 2,348.8 2,286.0 2,142.1 2,203.8 2,463.9 | |
| Post-tax amortization 332.1 377.2 362.4 302.7 280.9 264.4 245.5 | |
| Depreciation 365.1 331.3 317.4 296.0 310.2 334.9 351.7 | |
| Tax impact on amortization 12.1 38.0 51.1 45.3 42.7 40.2 37.3 | |
| Stock-based compensation expense 102.4 115.5 141.3 137.1 141.8 146.0 150.4 | |
| Other operating activities 146.0 24.0 20.3 13.0 - - - | |
| Deferred income taxes 160.9 109.1 (159.2) (104.9) - - - | |
| Other current and non-current assets 51.4 29.9 30.2 75.9 (8.1) (8.7) (6.2) | |
| Accrued liabilities 40.6 123.0 49.8 (17.0) 72.1 81.0 72.5 | |
| Employee related obligations 3.4 0.2 13.7 2.0 - - - | |
| Accrued taxes on income 166.1 (82.9) (26.7) (6.8) 18.7 13.9 15.8 | |
| Other liabilities 115.4 85.0 (22.7) 49.7 - - - | |
| Separation Costs - - - - (312.4) (222.0) (59.5) | |
| Trade receivables 40.2 264.8 (303.1) (142.0) (159.2) (89.3) (101.1) | |
| Inventories 180.0 108.9 (76.8) (582.0) 268.9 105.2 33.6 | |
| Accounts payable 2.6 154.0 330.5 52.0 23.9 83.6 63.7 | |
| Net change in operating working capital 222.7 527.7 (49.4) (672.0) 133.5 99.4 (3.8) | |
| Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities 3,443.1 4,003.7 3,077.2 2,407.1 2,821.4 2,953.0 3,267.5 | |
| Investing Activities | |
| Purchase of property, plant and equipment (288.9) (229.0) (294.9) (374.8) (416.7) (482.2) (504.2) | |
| Acquisitions, investments, and proceeds from disposal of assets/businesses/investments (1,866.1) 145.5 123.4 (14.9) (375.0) (500.0) (750.0) | |
| Other - - - - - - - | |
| Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities (2,155.0) (83.4) (171.5) (389.6) (791.7) (982.2) (1,254.2) | |
| Financing Activities | |
| Proceeds from loans and notes payable - - - 14.3 8,995.0 - - | |
| Repayments of debt (40.2) (11.4) (7.0) - (482.9) (202.3) (188.0) | |
| Net share issuance - - - - (72.0) (198.5) (238.7) | |
| Dividends paid - - - - (774.1) (1,571.3) (1,618.5) | |
| Net transfer from (to) the parent (1,090.6) (4,052.1) (2,735.7) (1,478.8) (9,913.0) - - | |
| Other - - - - - - - | |
| Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities (1,130.8) (4,063.4) (2,742.7) (1,464.5) (2,247.0) (1,972.1) (2,045.2) | |
| Effect of exchange rate changes (10.6) 8.7 (40.6) (61.5) - - - | |
| Net (dec)/increase in cash and equivalents 146.6 (134.4) 122.4 491.5 (217.3) (1.4) (31.9) | |
| Cash at beginning of period 605.4 752.0 617.6 740.0 1,231.4 1,014.1 1,012.8 | |
| Cash at end of period 752.0 617.6 740.0 1,231.4 1,014.1 1,012.8 980.9 | |
| Free Cash Flow 3,154.2 3,774.8 2,782.4 2,032.4 2,404.7 2,470.7 2,763.3 | |
| FCF Conversion 153% 140% 103% 79% 100% 101% 103% | |
| Source: Company reports and J.P. Morgan estimates. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 52 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J PMORGAN | |
| Strong, Global Management Team | |
| KVUE has a strong, seasoned management team that will benefit from continuity as | |
| many of the c-level executives ushered in the strategic transformation beginning in the 2019 time frame through the IPO. Moreover, the consumer segment largely operated | |
| independently within JNJ historically, and as such, even after the separation, the organization should be well positioned to continue life as a public company. The management team has around 18 years of experience in consumer goods and healthcare on average and is a diverse group including over 58% women and representing nine different nationalities. Below, we highlight some of the key members of the executive team. | |
| • Thibaut Mongon, CEO – Mr. Mongon served as Executive Vice President and | |
| Worldwide Chairman, Consumer Health at Johnson & Johnson since 2019 and had | |
| been with the company since 2000. Mr. Mongon joined the Consumer Health | |
| organization in 2014 as Group Chairman Asia-Pacific and prior to that joined the Pharmaceutical sector in 2012 as Global Commercial Strategy Leader for the Neuroscience therapeutic division. | |
| • Paul Ruh, CFO – Mr. Ruh joined Johnson & Johnson in 2017 as Chief Financial Officer, Consumer Health. Prior to Johnson & Johnson, Mr. Ruh held several financial leadership roles at PepsiCo, including CFO of Latin America, CFO of | |
| PBA, and CFO PepsiCo Foodservice. Prior to PepsiCo, Mr. Ruh held roles at Procter & Gamble and McKinsey. All together, Mr. Ruh has over 30 years | |
| experience in the consumer goods sector. | |
| • Jan Meurer, Chief Growth Officer – Mr. Meurer joined Johnson & Johnson in | |
| 2015 and most recently served as Global Head of Strategy, Consumer Health. Prior | |
| to that, Mr. Meurer held the roles of President, Johnson & Johnson Southeast Asia and Area Managing Director Central Europe, Consumer Health. Prior to Johnson & Johnson, Mr. Meurer spent time at Procter & Gamble, PGT Healthcare, and Siemens | |
| Technologies. All together, Mr. Meurer has over 25 years experience building | |
| consumer brands. | |
| • Meredith (Meri) Stevens, Chief Operations Officer – Ms. Stevens joined Johnson | |
| & Johnson in 2015 and most recently served as Worldwide Vice President, | |
| Consumer Health Supply Chain and Deliver. Prior to that, Ms. Stevens led Supply | |
| Chain Strategy and Deployment at Johnson & Johnson. Prior to Johnson & Johnson, | |
| Ms. Stevens held roles at Newell Rubbermaid (Chief Supply Chain Officer) and | |
| Tyco, Bertelsmann, Knoll, and General Electric in operations and procurement leadership positions. All together, Ms. Stevens has over 30 years of operations | |
| experience. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 53 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Global and U.S. Sales and Market Share | |
| Trends | |
| We did a deep dive into the various categories pertinent to KVUE using a few data | |
| sources including Euromonitor, which includes a global perspective; NielsenIQ, mainly | |
| for market share analysis and sales trends within the U.S.; and independent consultant | |
| Numerator data for U.S. household penetration. Below we delve further into our | |
| analysis by the different categories and brands. We also highlight the global note we | |
| collaborated on last year (link). | |
| Considering KVUEs key categories globally, including analgesics, allergy care, | |
| mouthwash, digestive remedies, baby care, body care, sun care, and smoking cessation, | |
| the company has the largest global market share in mouthwash and smoking cessation, | |
| above 30% each, with allergy care and baby care following in the mid to high teens, | |
| digestive remedies, analgesics, and adult mass sun care in HSDs, and mass skin care | |
| (including face care and body care) at about MSD global market share as per data from | |
| Euromonitor. We explore KVUEs global market share in depth under the three | |
| segments below. | |
| Figure 71: Global Market Share by Category | |
| 0.0% | |
| 5.0% | |
| 10.0% | |
| 15.0% | |
| 20.0% | |
| 25.0% | |
| 30.0% | |
| 35.0% | |
| 40.0% | |
| Baby Care Mouthwash Skin Care Smoking | |
| Cessation | |
| Digestive | |
| Remedies | |
| Sun Care Analgesics Allergy Care | |
| Source: Euromonitor, J.P. Morgan | |
| Looking further into each of these key categories market share performance in crucial | |
| markets including the U.S., UK, China, India, and Brazil gives us a better sense of how | |
| KVUEs market share is doing in these geographies, as per Euromonitor data. Starting | |
| with the mouthwash category, KVUE has a market share of about ~45% in the U.S. and | |
| ~40% in the UK, with market share of roughly 30% in both Brazil and China. Although | |
| KVUE has an extremely high market share of over 70% in the Indian market, it is | |
| comparatively a much smaller region in terms of revenues for the company. Overall, | |
| KVUE has a market share of 35.1% globally. For smoking cessation, KVUE has 31.4% | |
| global market share, and we note that KVUE distributes the brand Nicorette only | |
| outside the U.S., where the company has a market share above 40% in both the U.K. | |
| and Brazil, among the regions we are analyzing. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 54 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Figure 72: Market Share by Country - Mouthwash | |
| 0.0% | |
| 10.0% | |
| 20.0% | |
| 30.0% | |
| 40.0% | |
| 50.0% | |
| 60.0% | |
| 70.0% | |
| 80.0% | |
| Brazil China India UK USA | |
| Source: Euromonitor, J.P. Morgan | |
| Figure 73: Market Share by Country - Smoke Cessation | |
| 40.2% | |
| 40.4% | |
| 40.6% | |
| 40.8% | |
| 41.0% | |
| 41.2% | |
| 41.4% | |
| 41.6% | |
| 41.8% | |
| 42.0% | |
| Brazil UK | |
| Source: Euromonitor, J.P. Morgan | |
| From the regions we are considering, KVUE has the largest market share in the U.S. | |
| (~27%) followed by China at about 15% and the UK with 9% in the allergy category, | |
| whereas globally it is 17.2%. KVUEs baby care category is more prevalent outside the | |
| U.S., especially with its iconic brand, Johnsons. As such, the Euromonitor data | |
| unsurprisingly points to higher market share in emerging markets with India of 32.5% | |
| and Brazil of 23.1%. KVUE has a total market share of 14.4% globally. | |
| Figure 74: Market Share by Country - Allergy | |
| 0.0% | |
| 5.0% | |
| 10.0% | |
| 15.0% | |
| 20.0% | |
| 25.0% | |
| 30.0% | |
| China UK USA | |
| Source: Euromonitor, J.P. Morgan | |
| Figure 75: Market Share by Country - Baby Care | |
| 0.0% | |
| 5.0% | |
| 10.0% | |
| 15.0% | |
| 20.0% | |
| 25.0% | |
| 30.0% | |
| 35.0% | |
| Brazil China India UK USA | |
| Source: Euromonitor, J.P. Morgan | |
| Euromonitor shows that KVUE has higher market share in the U.S. (10%) and the UK | |
| (9.9%) in the digestive remedies category, while the company has a market share of | |
| 7.2% in the category globally. For OTC analgesics/pain relief, KVUE has a global | |
| market share of 7.1%, with the largest market share in the U.S. of 20.5% followed by | |
| the UK of 11.3%. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 55 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Figure 76: Market Share by Country - Digestive Remedies | |
| 0.0% | |
| 2.0% | |
| 4.0% | |
| 6.0% | |
| 8.0% | |
| 10.0% | |
| 12.0% | |
| Brazil China India UK USA | |
| Source: Euromonitor, J.P. Morgan | |
| Figure 77: Market Share by Country - Analgesics | |
| 0.0% | |
| 5.0% | |
| 10.0% | |
| 15.0% | |
| 20.0% | |
| 25.0% | |
| Brazil China UK USA | |
| Source: Euromonitor, J.P. Morgan | |
| Turning to beauty, KVUE has global market share of 8.2% in mass adult sun care and | |
| 4.4% in skin care (including market share of 6.3% in mass body care and 4.1% in mass | |
| face care – more below under segment analysis), according to data from Euromonitor. | |
| The company has market share of 37.4% in Brazil and 16.0% in the U.S. in the sun care | |
| category and 12.4% in the U.S. and 6.1% market share in Brazil in the mass skin care | |
| category. | |
| Figure 78: Market Share by Country - Sun Care | |
| 0.0% | |
| 5.0% | |
| 10.0% | |
| 15.0% | |
| 20.0% | |
| 25.0% | |
| 30.0% | |
| 35.0% | |
| 40.0% | |
| Brazil China India UK USA | |
| Source: Euromonitor, J.P. Morgan | |
| Figure 79: Market Share by Country - Body Care | |
| 0.0% | |
| 2.0% | |
| 4.0% | |
| 6.0% | |
| 8.0% | |
| 10.0% | |
| 12.0% | |
| 14.0% | |
| Brazil China India UK USA | |
| Source: Euromonitor, J.P. Morgan | |
| Additionally, we looked at five-year CAGR growth rates (2017 to 2022) of KVUEs | |
| categories. The Euromonitor data shows analgesics/pain care (+9.1%), pediatric | |
| consumer health (+7.5%), digestive (+6.0%), and allergy (+5.1%) had the highest fiveyear | |
| CAGR growth rates globally. Similarly in the U.S., categories with the largest fiveyear | |
| CAGRs include pediatric consumer health (+13.3%), analgesics/pain care | |
| (+12.6%), and digestive (+12.3%). This is in line with managements commentary that | |
| the company concentrated on products that were in high retail demand, especially | |
| during the pandemic. Based on KVUEs largest categories as per the Euromonitor data, | |
| skin care grew +2.9%, baby/child products increased by +1.0%, and oral care increased | |
| +2.8% on a five-year CAGR globally, and in the U.S. the data shows that the largest | |
| categories include mass skin care, including mass body care and facial care (+2.5%), | |
| and allergy care (+5.3%) besides analgesics/pain care (+12.6%) as mentioned above. | |
| See below scatter plots for market share both globally and in the U.S. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 56 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Figure 80: Global Market Share Growth by Category | |
| Y-Axis: KVUE Market Share change (2017 - 2022); X-Axis: KVUE Category 5Y CAGR | |
| Baby/Child | |
| Products | |
| Bath/ | |
| Shower | |
| Haircare | |
| Wound | |
| Care | |
| Analgesics | |
| Dermatologicals | |
| Allergy | |
| Sun Care | |
| Smoke Cessation | |
| Digestive | |
| Paediatric Consumer | |
| Health | |
| Hygiene | |
| -500 | |
| -400 | |
| -300 | |
| -200 | |
| -100 | |
| 0 | |
| 100 | |
| 200 | |
| 300 | |
| -2% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% | |
| Source: Euromonitor, J.P. Morgan | |
| Figure 81: U.S. Market Share Growth by Category | |
| Y-Axis: KVUE Market Share change (2017 - 2022); X-Axis: KVUE Category 5Y CAGR | |
| Baby/Child | |
| Products | |
| Oral | |
| Care | |
| Skin | |
| Care | |
| Sun Care | |
| Analgesics | |
| Dermatologicals | |
| Digestive | |
| Eye | |
| Care | |
| Wound Care | |
| Allergy | |
| Paediatric Consumer | |
| Health | |
| Hygiene | |
| -600 | |
| -400 | |
| -200 | |
| 0 | |
| 200 | |
| 400 | |
| 600 | |
| 800 | |
| 1000 | |
| 1200 | |
| -2% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% | |
| Source: Euromonitor, J.P. Morgan | |
| Household Penetration in the U.S. Is Strong in Key Brands Yet Can Grow Further | |
| To analyze the household penetration (HHP) of some of KVUEs iconic brands in the | |
| U.S., we looked at an independent data vendor, Numerator. The sequential changes are | |
| valuable to check, but we caveat the data in absolute terms may not be very reliable | |
| given that it is based on consumers providing receipts, which we feel tends to skew | |
| toward younger consumers, although the company notes matching to U.S. Census. | |
| Using the HHP trends for the 52-week period ending 4/30, Tylenol (32.1%), Listerine | |
| (28.9%), and Neutrogena (25.6%, in the face care category) appear to have some of the | |
| highest household penetration in the U.S., although the data shows a deceleration in | |
| HHP especially for the latter two brands. Note that Listerines HHP has been worse | |
| recently, while UW-rated Church & Dwights TheraBreath HHP has improved (more | |
| below under NielsenIQ). Additionally, the data points to high private label HHP, | |
| especially in the categories pertaining to the Self Care segment that we examined below. | |
| As such, management noted that the U.S. Self Care business has higher private label | |
| exposure of about 25-30%, although this is much lower (~10%) for the overall company | |
| in aggregate. We have provided more details in the tables below. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 57 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Figure 82: Household Penetration - Allergy Care | |
| 52W-period ending 5/5/19, 5/3/20, 5/2/21, 5/1/22 and 4/30/23 | |
| 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 | |
| Private Label 42.9% 45.2% 41.7% 43.2% 42.3% | |
| Benadryl 13.3% 14.1% 13.6% 14.5% 13.0% | |
| Claritin 10.5% 10.9% 10.3% 11.1% 10.0% | |
| Zyrtec 9.2% 9.1% 9.4% 10.0% 9.7% | |
| Flonase 7.0% 6.7% 6.0% 6.8% 6.8% | |
| Allegra 6.2% 6.0% 5.8% 6.3% 6.2% | |
| Source: Numerator, J.P. Morgan | |
| Figure 83: Household Penetration - Pain Relievers | |
| 52W-period ending 5/5/19, 5/3/20, 5/2/21, 5/1/22 and 4/30/23 | |
| 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 | |
| Private Label 62.6% 65.5% 59.3% 60.7% 59.4% | |
| Tylenol 24.9% 32.2% 29.3% 32.4% 32.1% | |
| Advil 19.6% 20.7% 18.2% 18.8% 19.4% | |
| Aleve 18.0% 17.5% 14.6% 14.2% 12.3% | |
| Motrin 9.2% 10.3% 7.2% 9.7% 9.8% | |
| Bayer 10.8% 10.7% 12.0% 11.6% 9.7% | |
| Excedrin 10.8% 9.7% 7.3% 8.6% 7.7% | |
| Midol 2.5% 2.8% 2.9% 3.2% 3.1% | |
| Source: Numerator, J.P. Morgan | |
| Figure 84: Household Penetration - Cold, Cough & Flu | |
| 52W-period ending 5/5/19, 5/3/20, 5/2/21, 5/1/22 and 4/30/23 | |
| 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 | |
| Private Label 58.6% 61.7% 42.2% 54.0% 56.6% | |
| Vicks 27.8% 31.9% 21.9% 34.3% 36.9% | |
| Halls 32.0% 32.7% 20.2% 28.8% 31.1% | |
| Mucinex 21.8% 22.1% 13.6% 23.8% 27.5% | |
| Ricola 17.2% 18.4% 10.7% 18.2% 21.1% | |
| Robitussin 10.9% 11.6% 5.7% 10.4% 11.9% | |
| TheraFlu 6.4% 7.0% 3.5% 5.8% 7.0% | |
| Sudafed 5.9% 6.5% 4.1% 6.3% 6.1% | |
| Zarbee's 4.9% 6.0% 3.4% 5.3% 5.3% | |
| Source: Numerator, J.P. Morgan | |
| Figure 85: Household Penetration - Digestive Remedies | |
| 52W-period ending 5/5/19, 5/3/20, 5/2/21, 5/1/22 and 4/30/23 | |
| 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 | |
| Private Label 54.7% 56.6% 54.4% 55.0% 53.6% | |
| Tums 19.2% 21.2% 21.2% 21.8% 20.9% | |
| Pepto-Bismol 12.1% 13.3% 13.1% 15.3% 15.2% | |
| Dulcolax 6.9% 7.3% 8.4% 9.1% 9.6% | |
| Miralax 7.4% 6.6% 7.3% 8.6% 8.2% | |
| Imodium 6.2% 6.1% 5.3% 6.8% 6.5% | |
| Alka-Seltzer 6.7% 7.0% 8.1% 7.1% 5.9% | |
| Pepcid 2.5% 3.8% 4.6% 5.0% 4.3% | |
| Source: Numerator, J.P. Morgan | |
| Figure 86: Household Penetration - Mouthwash | |
| 52W-period ending 5/5/19, 5/3/20, 5/2/21, 5/1/22 and 4/30/23 | |
| 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 | |
| Listerine 32.1% 33.0% 32.3% 31.9% 28.9% | |
| Crest 21.8% 23.6% 23.4% 24.4% 23.0% | |
| Private Label 24.9% 25.2% 23.7% 21.6% 20.1% | |
| ACT (Oral Care) 9.0% 9.1% 8.7% 8.0% 8.3% | |
| Colgate 9.7% 8.4% 7.1% 7.0% 5.8% | |
| TheraBreath 1.3% 1.5% 3.0% 3.4% 4.9% | |
| Source: Numerator, J.P. Morgan | |
| Figure 87: Household Penetration - Sun Care | |
| 52W-period ending 5/5/19, 5/3/20, 5/2/21, 5/1/22 and 4/30/23 | |
| 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 | |
| Banana Boat 19.8% 19.3% 17.7% 21.4% 21.7% | |
| Private Label 22.3% 21.2% 19.3% 20.4% 19.7% | |
| Coppertone 15.6% 14.0% 13.1% 15.2% 15.5% | |
| Neutrogena 13.9% 13.7% 15.0% 14.4% 15.2% | |
| Jergens 5.4% 5.3% 4.7% 5.6% 5.4% | |
| CeraVe 1.8% 2.0% 2.8% 3.3% 5.2% | |
| Aveeno 2.8% 2.6% 3.3% 2.8% 2.2% | |
| L'Oreal Paris 1.7% 1.5% 1.4% 1.5% 1.5% | |
| Source: Numerator, J.P. Morgan | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 58 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Figure 88: Household Penetration - Body Care | |
| 52W-period ending 5/5/19, 5/3/20, 5/2/21, 5/1/22 and 4/30/23 | |
| 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 | |
| Gold Bond 14.6% 14.7% 14.6% 15.2% 14.5% | |
| Bath & Body Works 22.3% 22.0% 19.1% 20.0% 14.1% | |
| Private Label 19.2% 17.8% 15.6% 13.9% 13.1% | |
| Vaseline 11.9% 11.8% 12.6% 12.3% 12.4% | |
| Nivea 11.4% 12.5% 13.4% 12.9% 11.6% | |
| Aveeno 11.2% 11.2% 11.7% 11.0% 11.4% | |
| CeraVe 4.7% 5.9% 8.9% 10.4% 11.1% | |
| Eucerin 6.0% 6.7% 7.3% 7.8% 6.8% | |
| Olay 1.3% 1.4% 1.8% 1.9% 2.2% | |
| Neutrogena 2.2% 2.2% 2.3% 2.3% 1.8% | |
| Source: Numerator, J.P. Morgan | |
| Figure 89: Household Penetration - Face Care | |
| 52W-period ending 5/5/19, 5/3/20, 5/2/21, 5/1/22 and 4/30/23 | |
| 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 | |
| Private Label 39.4% 41.0% 36.3% 34.5% 32.9% | |
| Neutrogena 28.7% 28.5% 27.5% 27.5% 25.6% | |
| CeraVe 3.9% 5.3% 11.0% 13.6% 15.4% | |
| Cetaphil 7.9% 9.1% 10.4% 11.1% 10.6% | |
| L'Oreal Paris 8.8% 8.4% 8.8% 7.6% 7.9% | |
| Clean & Clear 14.5% 13.2% 11.1% 10.1% 7.1% | |
| Aveeno 6.6% 6.0% 6.1% 6.4% 4.8% | |
| Source: Numerator, J.P. Morgan | |
| Market Share Improving in the U.S. Based on Tracked Channels | |
| We carried out an in-depth analysis of some of KVUEs pertinent categories using | |
| tracked channel data (NielsenIQ) to gauge how the companys market performance | |
| (value and volume share as well as price) evolved over time, specifically in the U.S. | |
| However, base period dynamics limit the degree of read-through from tracked channel | |
| data. We carried out a YOY analysis of the recent NielsenIQ data available (ending | |
| 5/6/23) and also analyzed YOY data as of 12/31/22 (we will refer to this as prior yearend | |
| or PYE) to see how KVUE categories performed YTD as well as YOY data as of | |
| 5/7/22 (we will refer to this as prior-year or PY) to see how KVUE performed in the | |
| categories from a year ago (as of 5/6/23). These additional charts for PY and PYE are | |
| added to the appendix for reference. Below we elaborate more on our findings. | |
| In the four-week period ending May 6, KVUE posted modest positive dollar share | |
| performance (+15 bps vs. -45 bps in the four-week period ending 12/31/22 or PYE | |
| and -152 bps four-week period ending 5/7/22) as the company gained dollar share in 11 | |
| out of 19 categories (vs. eight categories as of PYE and six categories as of PY – both | |
| out of 19 categories) that we track for the company. As we show in the table below, the | |
| largest share gains occurred in antiseptic (+456 bps vs. +418 bps as of PYE and +558 | |
| bps as of PY) and baby bath (+408 bps vs. losing -18 bps as of PYE and -645 bps as of | |
| PY), besides the outsized growth in baby powder (+1,138 bps vs. losing -107 bps as of | |
| PYE and -377 bps as of PY), but this category makes up a very small percentage of | |
| sales in the U.S. as per the tracked channels. Conversely, the largest share loss occurred | |
| in baby lotion (-252 bps vs. -322 as of PYE and -49 bps as of PY) and facial skin care (- | |
| 197 bps vs. -266 bps as of PYE and -291 bps as of PY), with more moderate share loss | |
| in cold & flu (-133 bps vs. -113 bps as of PYE but gained +159 bps as of PY). Given | |
| that the 19 categories below account for roughly 78% of KVUEs sales in the tracked | |
| channels, on a weighted basis, we estimate KVUE gained +15 bps (vs. losing -45 bps as | |
| of PYE and -152 bps as of PY) of overall value share but lost -54 bps (vs. -32 bps as of | |
| PYE and -83 bps as of PY) on a volume share basis in the latest four-week period | |
| ending 5/6/23. KVUE retail price realization was up by ~15%, 15%, and 11% in the last | |
| four, 13, and 52 weeks YOY. | |
| Value Share Improved Sequentially Driven by Pricing as Volume Share | |
| Deteriorated YTD | |
| Sequentially, on a YOY four-week period basis, value share improved, but volume share | |
| appears to have deteriorated YTD, although the metric improved from PY especially as | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 59 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| pricing at retail increased tremendously during the time line observed. More | |
| specifically, KVUE gained +15 bps of value share in the four-week period ending | |
| 5/6/23, improving from losing -45 bps in the four-week period ending 12/31/22 and - | |
| 152 in the four-week period ending 5/7/22 as mentioned above. Similarly, the company | |
| lost -54 bps of volume share in the four-week period ending 5/6/23, or 22 bps lower | |
| from -32 bps volume share loss in the four-week period ending 12/31/22, but improving | |
| from -83 bps volume share loss in the four-week period ending 5/7/22. During this time, | |
| pricing at retail increased tremendously by +14.7% in the four-week period ending | |
| 5/6/23 and compares to up by +8.5% in the four-week period ending 12/31/22 and | |
| +2.3% in the four-week period ending 5/7/22, as the company took pricing in 2H22 and | |
| again in 1Q23. | |
| Figure 90: KVUE Value & Volume Share Change by Key Categories – U.S. | |
| Contribution to Total Sales in Latest 4, 13 & 52-Weeks, Weighted Change in Value Share & Dollar Equivalent Unit (EQ) Share | |
| For Periods Ending 5/06/23 | |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON % $ Mix % $ Mix % $ Mix | |
| L4W L13W L52W L4W L13W L52W L4W L13W L52W | |
| KVUE | |
| Acid Relief 2.6% 2.7% 2.7% 50 58 20 (29) (18) (19) | |
| Allergy 13.9% 12.8% 11.1% 89 124 66 (64) (53) (63) | |
| Antibiotic 2.2% 2.3% 2.4% 158 55 (92) (22) (134) (267) | |
| Anti-Diarrhea 2.4% 2.4% 2.3% (101) (42) 76 (266) (187) (26) | |
| Antiseptic 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 456 410 482 437 396 485 | |
| Baby Bath 3.0% 3.2% 3.2% 408 206 (78) 244 2 (141) | |
| Baby Lotion 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% (252) (312) (273) (28) (140) (260) | |
| Baby Oil 0.5% 0.6% 0.5% 32 (47) (246) (55) (59) 24 | |
| Baby Powder 0.4% 0.4% 0.5% 1,138 572 175 1,594 713 150 | |
| Baby Soap 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 198 102 (104) 257 303 50 | |
| Bandages 4.5% 4.5% 4.5% (72) (39) (64) (176) (127) (143) | |
| Body Wash 2.2% 2.3% 2.3% (32) (28) (12) (50) (27) 4 | |
| Body Lotion 3.1% 3.4% 3.2% (87) (87) (100) (57) (32) (20) | |
| Cold & Flu 1.1% 1.2% 1.4% (133) (6) 32 (3) (0) (1) | |
| Digestive Aid 0.6% 0.7% 0.7% 102 19 (22) (322) (332) (199) | |
| Facial Skin Care 9.7% 10.2% 10.2% (197) (215) (296) (191) (207) (255) | |
| Mouthwash 8.3% 8.8% 9.1% (102) (61) (256) (109) (59) (151) | |
| Pain Relief 16.2% 16.1% 16.9% 76 218 137 (35) (14) 13 | |
| Sun Care 5.1% 3.7% 4.0% 38 99 (148) 81 187 6 | |
| Weighted Total 77.6% 77.1% 76.8% 15 41 (53) (54) (53) (85) | |
| YOY $ Share Change (bps) YOY EQ Share Change (bps) | |
| Source: NielsenIQ, J.P. Morgan | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 60 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Figure 91: KVUE Pricing Change by Key Categories – U.S. | |
| Change in Pricing in Latest 4, 13 & 52-Weeks | |
| For Periods Ending 5/06/23 | |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON % $ Mix % $ Mix % $ Mix | |
| L4W L13W L52W L4W L13W L52W | |
| KVUE | |
| Acid Relief 2.6% 2.7% 2.7% 16.8% 13.8% 10.2% | |
| Allergy 13.9% 12.8% 11.1% 13.7% 13.7% 10.8% | |
| Antibiotic 2.2% 2.3% 2.4% 13.7% 13.0% 12.7% | |
| Anti-Diarrhea 2.4% 2.4% 2.3% 16.5% 15.3% 11.0% | |
| Antiseptic 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 22.2% 42.8% 55.8% | |
| Baby Bath 3.0% 3.2% 3.2% 18.1% 16.1% 13.7% | |
| Baby Lotion 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 16.2% 13.7% 12.3% | |
| Baby Oil 0.5% 0.6% 0.5% 13.1% 11.4% 10.7% | |
| Baby Powder 0.4% 0.4% 0.5% 15.6% 17.0% 15.2% | |
| Baby Soap 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 16.2% 11.8% 13.0% | |
| Bandages 4.5% 4.5% 4.5% 12.5% 12.7% 10.5% | |
| Body Wash 2.2% 2.3% 2.3% 19.6% 14.5% 7.8% | |
| Body Lotion 3.1% 3.4% 3.2% 11.1% 9.3% 7.2% | |
| Cold & Flu 1.1% 1.2% 1.4% -0.9% 11.9% 19.7% | |
| Digestive Aid 0.6% 0.7% 0.7% 21.3% 17.4% 9.7% | |
| Facial Skin Care 9.7% 10.2% 10.2% 17.7% 17.1% 15.2% | |
| Mouthwash 8.3% 8.8% 9.1% 16.9% 14.1% 8.9% | |
| Pain Relief 16.2% 16.1% 16.9% 14.8% 21.2% 13.4% | |
| Sun Care 5.1% 3.7% 4.0% 8.4% 0.4% -1.9% | |
| Weighted Total 77.6% 77.1% 76.8% 14.7% 15.0% 11.2% | |
| YOY EQ Price Change (%) | |
| Source: NielsenIQ, J.P. Morgan | |
| Below we provide an in-depth discussion of the three segments – Self Care, Skin Health | |
| & Beauty, and Essential Health – and examine the categories within each of these | |
| segments further using data from Euromonitor, mainly for global market share/trends, | |
| and NielsenIQ for U.S. market share/trends. As it specifically relates to NielsenIQ, we | |
| carried out a YOY analysis of the recent NielsenIQ data available (ending 5/6/23) and | |
| also analyzed YOY data as of 12/31/22 (we will refer to this as prior year-end or | |
| PYE) to see how KVUE categories performed YTD as well as considering YOY data | |
| as of 5/7/22 (we will refer to this as prior-year or PY) to see how KVUE performed in | |
| the categories from a year ago (as of 5/6/23). We have not provided the charts pertaining | |
| to PYE and PY data points but have only referred to the data in our analysis. Below, we | |
| delve into some of the specific categories within each of KVUEs three segments. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 61 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Global Category Market Share | |
| Self Care | |
| Our analysis of the tracked channel data for some of the major categories within the Self | |
| Care segment are laid out below from various tracked channel data sources including | |
| Euromonitor and NielsenIQ. | |
| Paincare. We utilized Euromonitor to assess how KVUEs market share fared globally | |
| both at the company and brand level within the OTC paincare category. KVUE has a | |
| global market share of 7.1% in this category. Looking further at the brand level, we get | |
| the sense that KVUEs brands (both Tylenol and Motrin) have been gaining market | |
| share globally. More specifically, the data shows that Tylenol grew market share | |
| tremendously from 2.5% in 2013 to 4.6% in 2022, and Motrin also grew but at a lower | |
| magnitude, from 0.9% in 2013 to 1.4% in 2022. Note that some of the other major | |
| brands in the category, including Advil (Haleon), Aspirin (Bayer), and Aleve (Bayer), | |
| lost market share during this time frame. | |
| Figure 92: Paincare - Global Market Share by Company | |
| 15.2% 15.2% | |
| 5.9% 7.1% | |
| 5.5% 5.6% | |
| 5.9% 5.4% | |
| 3.3% | |
| 4.0% | |
| 0.0% | |
| 2.0% | |
| 4.0% | |
| 6.0% | |
| 8.0% | |
| 10.0% | |
| 12.0% | |
| 14.0% | |
| 16.0% | |
| 18.0% | |
| 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 | |
| Haleon Kenvue Sanofi Bayer Reckitt | |
| Source: Euromonitor, J.P. Morgan | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 62 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Figure 93: Paincare - Global Market Share by Brands | |
| 4.6% | |
| 3.9% | |
| 2.9% | |
| 1.4% | |
| 1.2% | |
| 0.0% | |
| 0.5% | |
| 1.0% | |
| 1.5% | |
| 2.0% | |
| 2.5% | |
| 3.0% | |
| 3.5% | |
| 4.0% | |
| 4.5% | |
| 5.0% | |
| 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 | |
| Tylenol Advil Aspirin Motrin Aleve | |
| Source: Euromonitor, J.P. Morgan | |
| Looking specifically in the U.S. employing NielsenIQ, due to the iconic Tylenol and | |
| Motrin brands, paincare makes up the largest component for both the overall company | |
| and within the Self Care segment (as per category weight based on sales calculated | |
| using data from NielsenIQ). The tracked channel data for the four-week period observed | |
| shows that KVUEs dollar value share has remained consistent through the time line | |
| considered with value share gain of +76 bps for the four-week period ending 5/6/23 (vs. | |
| +75 bps in the four-week period ending 12/31/22 or PYE and +76 bps in the four-week | |
| period ending 5/7/22 or PY). We note that private label (PL) lost -30 bps of value share | |
| in the four-week period ending 5/6/23; however, PL gained +148 bps as of PYE and | |
| gained more modestly (+53 bps) as of PY. As it relates to volume share, KVUE lost -35 | |
| bps in the four-week period ending 5/6/23 while PL gained +69 bps during this period. | |
| Below we show how both value and volume share performed for the 4, 13, and 52 | |
| weeks ending 5/6/23 for KVUE and some of its competitors. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 63 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Figure 94: Paincare - U.S. Value Share | |
| For Periods Ending 5/06/23, YOY (bps) | |
| 76 | |
| (19) (11) | |
| (30) (26) | |
| 218 | |
| (59) | |
| (34) | |
| (83) | |
| (30) | |
| 137 | |
| (87) | |
| (36) | |
| 14 | |
| (4) | |
| (150) | |
| (100) | |
| (50) | |
| - | |
| 50 | |
| 100 | |
| 150 | |
| 200 | |
| 250 | |
| KENVUE BAYER AG SANOFI PRIVATE LABEL HALEON | |
| 4W 13W 52W | |
| Source: NielsenIQ, J.P. Morgan | |
| Figure 95: Paincare - U.S. Volume Share | |
| For Periods Ending 5/06/23, YOY (bps) | |
| (35) | |
| (4) (0) | |
| 69 | |
| (30) | |
| (14) | |
| (69) | |
| (0) | |
| 111 | |
| (17) | |
| 13 | |
| (123) | |
| (1) | |
| 58 | |
| 47 | |
| (150) | |
| (100) | |
| (50) | |
| - | |
| 50 | |
| 100 | |
| 150 | |
| KENVUE BAYER AG SANOFI PRIVATE LABEL HALEON | |
| 4W 13W 52W | |
| Source: NielsenIQ, J.P. Morgan | |
| Allergies. In the allergies category globally, KVUE leads with market share of 17.2% as | |
| mentioned above, followed by Bayer (13.1%) and Sanofi (11.8%). As it relates to | |
| brands, both of KVUEs brands, Zyrtec and Benadryl, have gained global market share | |
| slightly during the time frame considered. | |
| Figure 96: Allergy - Global Market Share by Company | |
| 15.8% | |
| 17.2% | |
| 12.3% | |
| 13.1% | |
| 11.8% | |
| 11.8% | |
| 4.1% 3.8% | |
| 0.0% | |
| 2.0% | |
| 4.0% | |
| 6.0% | |
| 8.0% | |
| 10.0% | |
| 12.0% | |
| 14.0% | |
| 16.0% | |
| 18.0% | |
| 20.0% | |
| 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 | |
| Kenvue Bayer Sanofi Haleon | |
| Source: Euromonitor, J.P. Morgan | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 64 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Figure 97: Allergy - Global Market Share by Brands - KVUE Absolute Leader Combining Zyrtec and Benadryl | |
| 11.8% | |
| 8.3% | |
| 7.9% | |
| 6.2% | |
| 0.0% | |
| 2.0% | |
| 4.0% | |
| 6.0% | |
| 8.0% | |
| 10.0% | |
| 12.0% | |
| 14.0% | |
| 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 | |
| Claritin Zyrtec Allegra/Telfast Benadryl | |
| Source: Euromonitor, J.P. Morgan | |
| In the U.S., NielsenIQ tracked channel data shows that KVUE gained +89 bps of value | |
| share in the four-week period ending 5/6/23, which is slightly below gain of +96 bps as | |
| of PYE but improved from losing -37 bps as of PY. However, KVUEs volume share has | |
| been pressured, losing -64 bps in the four-week period ending 5/6/23 (and compares to | |
| losing -69 bps as of PYE but gaining +20 bps as of PY). We note here that private label | |
| gained +85 bps of volume share in the four-week period ending 5/6/23 (vs. +88 bps as | |
| of PYE but losing -90 bps as of PY). Below we show how both value and volume share | |
| performed for the 4, 13 and 52 weeks ending 5/6/23 for KVUE and some of its | |
| competitors. | |
| Figure 98: Allergy - U.S. Value Share | |
| For Periods Ending 5/06/23, YOY (bps) | |
| 89 | |
| (10) | |
| (59) | |
| (19) | |
| 27 | |
| 124 | |
| (85) | |
| (42) | |
| (2) | |
| 31 | |
| 66 | |
| (136) | |
| (20) | |
| 78 | |
| 12 | |
| (150) | |
| (100) | |
| (50) | |
| - | |
| 50 | |
| 100 | |
| 150 | |
| KENVUE BAYER AG SANOFI PRIVATE LABEL HALEON | |
| 4W 13W 52W | |
| Source: NielsenIQ, J.P. Morgan | |
| Figure 99: Allergy - U.S. Volume Share | |
| For Periods Ending 5/06/23, YOY (bps) | |
| (64) | |
| 16 | |
| (30) | |
| 85 | |
| 33 | |
| (53) | |
| (15) | |
| (30) | |
| 109 | |
| 31 | |
| (63) | |
| (30) (28) | |
| 68 | |
| 13 | |
| (80) | |
| (60) | |
| (40) | |
| (20) | |
| - | |
| 20 | |
| 40 | |
| 60 | |
| 80 | |
| 100 | |
| 120 | |
| KENVUE BAYER AG SANOFI PRIVATE LABEL HALEON | |
| 4W 13W 52W | |
| Source: NielsenIQ, J.P. Morgan | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 65 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Cough & Cold. In the cold, cough (and allergy) remedies category as per Euromonitor | |
| data globally, KVUE leads with market share of 7.3% followed by Haleon (6.7%) and | |
| Reckitt (5.7%). We note here KVUEs global brands including Sudafed (0.7%) and | |
| Benylin (0.6%) market share compared to competitors including Vicks (4.7%, owned by | |
| OW-rated Procter & Gamble), Halls (3.4%, owned by Mondelez International) and | |
| Mucinex (2.5%, owned by Reckitt), among others. | |
| Figure 100: Cold & Cough Global Market Share by Company | |
| 6.7% | |
| 7.3% | |
| 7.5% | |
| 6.7% | |
| 5.1% | |
| 4.6% 5.7% | |
| 4.5% 5.0% | |
| 4.6% 4.6% | |
| 4.5% | |
| 3.6% | |
| 3.5% | |
| 0.0% | |
| 1.0% | |
| 2.0% | |
| 3.0% | |
| 4.0% | |
| 5.0% | |
| 6.0% | |
| 7.0% | |
| 8.0% | |
| 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 | |
| Kenvue Haleon Reckitt Procter & Gamble Bayer Sanofi Mondelez | |
| Source: Euromonitor, J.P. Morgan | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 66 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Figure 101: Cold & Cough Global Market Share by Brands | |
| 4.7% | |
| 3.4% | |
| 2.5% | |
| 1.6% | |
| 0.7% | |
| 1.5% | |
| 1.0% | |
| 0.6% | |
| 0.0% | |
| 0.5% | |
| 1.0% | |
| 1.5% | |
| 2.0% | |
| 2.5% | |
| 3.0% | |
| 3.5% | |
| 4.0% | |
| 4.5% | |
| 5.0% | |
| 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 | |
| Vicks Halls Mucinex Ricola | |
| Strepsils Sudafed Robitussin Benylin | |
| Source: Euromonitor, J.P. Morgan | |
| As per NielsenIQ, KVUE lost -133 bps of value share in the four-week period ending | |
| 5/6/23, sequentially worse from losing -113 bps as of PYE while gaining +159 bps as of | |
| PY. As it relates to volume share, the company seems to have improved YTD, | |
| although it lost -3 bps in the four-week period ending 5/6/23 vs. -13 bps PYE but | |
| slightly gained +6 bps as of PY. Below we show how both value and volume share | |
| performed for the 4, 13, and 52 weeks ending 5/6/23 for KVUE and some of its | |
| competitors. | |
| Figure 102: Cough & Cold - U.S. Value Share | |
| For Periods Ending 5/06/23, YOY (bps) | |
| (133) | |
| (230) | |
| (156) (148) | |
| (940) | |
| (94) (93) | |
| (6) | |
| 782 | |
| 184 | |
| 419 | |
| 12 36 | |
| 198 | |
| 32 | |
| 813 | |
| 343 | |
| 539 | |
| 401 | |
| 14 | |
| 278 | |
| (1,200) | |
| (1,000) | |
| (800) | |
| (600) | |
| (400) | |
| (200) | |
| - | |
| 200 | |
| 400 | |
| 600 | |
| 800 | |
| 1,000 | |
| KENVUE PROCTER & | |
| GAMBLE | |
| BAYER AG RECKITT PRIVATE | |
| LABEL | |
| CHURCH & | |
| DWIGHT | |
| HALEON | |
| 4W 13W 52W | |
| Source: NielsenIQ, J.P. Morgan | |
| Figure 103: Cough & Cold - U.S. Volume Share | |
| For Periods Ending 5/06/23, YOY (bps) | |
| (3) | |
| 8 | |
| (2) | |
| (0) | |
| (22) | |
| (1) (3) | |
| (0) | |
| 28 | |
| 5 | |
| 9 | |
| 6 | |
| 1 2 | |
| (1) | |
| 25 | |
| 7 | |
| 9 | |
| 17 | |
| 0 | |
| 3 | |
| (30) | |
| (20) | |
| (10) | |
| - | |
| 10 | |
| 20 | |
| 30 | |
| 40 | |
| KENVUE PROCTER & | |
| GAMBLE | |
| BAYER AG RECKITT PRIVATE | |
| LABEL | |
| CHURCH & | |
| DWIGHT | |
| HALEON | |
| 4W 13W 52W | |
| Source: NielsenIQ, J.P. Morgan | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 67 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Digestive Remedies. Globally, data from Euromonitor points to KVUE holding the | |
| second largest market share position (7.2%) in the digestive remedies category, while | |
| Haleon has the highest market share with 7.8% market share. As it relates to brands, | |
| KVUEs larger brands include Imodium (2.4% global market share) and Pepcid (1.5% | |
| market share on a global basis), while Dulcolax (Sanofi) has the largest market share | |
| (2.5%). We have included charts below showing how KVUE stacks up against | |
| competitors in the digestive remedies category globally overall. (KVUE has a few other | |
| brands with small market share that are too small to show here.) | |
| Figure 104: Digestive Remedies Global Market Share by Company | |
| 8.0% 7.8% | |
| 6.8% 7.2% | |
| 7.1% 6.5% | |
| 5.8% 5.9% | |
| 2.6% 2.3% 2.4% 2.3% | |
| 0.0% | |
| 1.0% | |
| 2.0% | |
| 3.0% | |
| 4.0% | |
| 5.0% | |
| 6.0% | |
| 7.0% | |
| 8.0% | |
| 9.0% | |
| 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 | |
| Haleon Kenvue Sanofi Bayer Procter & Gamble Reckitt | |
| Source: Euromonitor, J.P. Morgan | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 68 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Figure 105: Digestive Remedies Global Market Share by Brands | |
| 2.5% | |
| 2.4% | |
| 2.2% | |
| 1.7% | |
| 1.5% | |
| 0.0% | |
| 0.5% | |
| 1.0% | |
| 1.5% | |
| 2.0% | |
| 2.5% | |
| 3.0% | |
| 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 | |
| Dulcolax Imodium Tums Gaviscon Pepcid | |
| Source: Euromonitor, J.P. Morgan | |
| NielsenIQ data shows that KVUE gained +50 bps of value share in the four-week period | |
| ending 5/6/23 in the acid relief category, which is an improvement from slightly gaining | |
| +4 bps as of PYE but losing -6 bps as of PY. We also looked at the anti-diarrhea | |
| category, where the companys performance is worse, losing value share of -101 bps in | |
| the four-week period ending 5/6/23 (vs. gaining +217 bps as of PYE and +165 as of | |
| PY). In the digestive aid category, KVUE gained +102 bps value share in the four-week | |
| period ending 5/6/23 (vs. losing -265 bps PYE but gaining +51 bps PY) while PL lost - | |
| 49 bps value share during this time period and compares to gaining +319 as of PYE and | |
| +77 bps as of PY. Below we show how both value and volume share performed for the | |
| 4, 13, and 52 weeks ending 5/6/23 for KVUE and some of its competitors for acid relief, | |
| anti-diarrhea, and digestive aid categories. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 69 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Figure 106: Acid Relief - Value Share | |
| For Periods Ending 5/06/23, YOY (bps) | |
| 50 | |
| (72) | |
| (36) (36) | |
| 60 | |
| 26 | |
| 58 | |
| (58) | |
| (26) | |
| (39) | |
| 56 | |
| (10) | |
| 20 | |
| (45) | |
| (16) | |
| (28) | |
| 40 | |
| (1) | |
| (80) | |
| (60) | |
| (40) | |
| (20) | |
| - | |
| 20 | |
| 40 | |
| 60 | |
| 80 | |
| KENVUE PROCTER & | |
| GAMBLE | |
| BAYER AG SANOFI PRIVATE LABEL HALEON | |
| 4W 13W 52W | |
| Source: NielsenIQ, J.P. Morgan | |
| Figure 107: Acid Relief - Volume Share | |
| For Periods Ending 5/06/23, YOY (bps) | |
| (29) | |
| (20) | |
| (70) | |
| (38) | |
| 75 | |
| (18) (15) (17) | |
| (63) | |
| (44) | |
| 49 | |
| (4) | |
| (19) | |
| (11) | |
| (36) (35) | |
| 21 | |
| 26 | |
| (80) | |
| (60) | |
| (40) | |
| (20) | |
| - | |
| 20 | |
| 40 | |
| 60 | |
| 80 | |
| 100 | |
| KENVUE PROCTER & | |
| GAMBLE | |
| BAYER AG SANOFI PRIVATE LABEL HALEON | |
| 4W 13W 52W | |
| Source: NielsenIQ, J.P. Morgan | |
| Figure 108: Anti-Diarrhea - Value Share | |
| For Periods Ending 5/06/23, YOY (bps) | |
| (101) (100) | |
| 229 | |
| (42) | |
| (108) | |
| 166 | |
| 76 | |
| (89) | |
| 7 | |
| (150) | |
| (100) | |
| (50) | |
| - | |
| 50 | |
| 100 | |
| 150 | |
| 200 | |
| 250 | |
| KENVUE PROCTER & GAMBLE PRIVATE LABEL | |
| 4W 13W 52W | |
| Source: NielsenIQ, J.P. Morgan | |
| Figure 109: Anti-Diarrhea - Volume Share | |
| For Periods Ending 5/06/23, YOY (bps) | |
| (266) | |
| (15) | |
| 289 | |
| (187) | |
| (16) | |
| 160 | |
| (26) (15) (14) | |
| (300) | |
| (200) | |
| (100) | |
| - | |
| 100 | |
| 200 | |
| 300 | |
| 400 | |
| KENVUE PROCTER & GAMBLE PRIVATE LABEL | |
| 4W 13W 52W | |
| Source: NielsenIQ, J.P. Morgan | |
| Figure 110: Digestive Aid - Value Share | |
| For Periods Ending 5/06/23, YOY (bps) | |
| 102 | |
| (49) | |
| 19 | |
| 49 | |
| (22) | |
| 94 | |
| (60) | |
| (40) | |
| (20) | |
| - | |
| 20 | |
| 40 | |
| 60 | |
| 80 | |
| 100 | |
| 120 | |
| KENVUE PRIVATE LABEL | |
| 4W 13W 52W | |
| Source: NielsenIQ, J.P. Morgan | |
| Figure 111: Digestive Aid - Volume Share | |
| For Periods Ending 5/06/23, YOY (bps) | |
| (322) | |
| 326 | |
| (332) | |
| 335 | |
| (199) | |
| 200 | |
| (400) | |
| (300) | |
| (200) | |
| (100) | |
| - | |
| 100 | |
| 200 | |
| 300 | |
| 400 | |
| KENVUE PRIVATE LABEL | |
| 4W 13W 52W | |
| Source: NielsenIQ, J.P. Morgan | |
| Skin Health & Beauty | |
| Our analysis of the tracked channel data for some of the major categories within the | |
| Skin Health & Beauty segment are laid out below using Euromonitor to gauge how | |
| KVUE is performing globally and NielsenIQ for U.S. performance. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 70 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Face Care. Looking at the mass face care category on a worldwide basis, data from | |
| Euromonitor shows that KVUE has market share of 4.1%, while LOreal Groupe | |
| (covered by Celine Pannuti) has the highest global market share of 12.5%. By brands, | |
| Neutrogena has the fourth highest market share (2.7%), while Clean & Clear has a very | |
| small global market share (0.7%). | |
| Figure 112: Mass Face Care Global Market Share by Company | |
| 9.3% | |
| 12.5% | |
| 5.2% 5.6% | |
| 5.2% 5.1% | |
| 4.9% 5.0% | |
| 4.3% 4.1% | |
| 0.0% | |
| 2.0% | |
| 4.0% | |
| 6.0% | |
| 8.0% | |
| 10.0% | |
| 12.0% | |
| 14.0% | |
| 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 | |
| L'Oréal Beiersdorf Unilever Procter & Gamble Kenvue | |
| Source: Euromonitor, J.P. Morgan | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 71 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Figure 113: Mass Face Care Global Market Share by Brands | |
| 4.9% | |
| 4.8% | |
| 2.8% | |
| 2.7% | |
| 2.5% | |
| 0.7% | |
| 0.0% | |
| 1.0% | |
| 2.0% | |
| 3.0% | |
| 4.0% | |
| 5.0% | |
| 6.0% | |
| 7.0% | |
| 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 | |
| L'Oréal Paris Olay CeraVe Neutrogena Nivea Clean & Clear | |
| Source: Euromonitor, J.P. Morgan | |
| Face care makes up the largest component within the Skin Health & Beauty segment, | |
| specifically in the U.S. (as per category weight based on sales calculated using data | |
| from NielsenIQ). The tracked channel data for the four-week period observed shows | |
| that KVUEs dollar value share has improved, albeit negative, through the time line | |
| considered, with value share loss of -197 bps for the four-week period ending 5/6/23 | |
| (vs. -266 bps as of PYE and -291 bps as of PY). We note that LOreal (covered by | |
| Celine Pannuti) has been a clear value share winner also in the U.S., gaining +426 bps | |
| in the four-week period ending 5/6/23, +419 bps as of PYE and +183 bps as of PY. On a | |
| volume share basis, KVUE lost -191 bps in the four-week period ending 5/6/23 (vs. - | |
| 194 bps as of PYE and -136 bps as of PY), while LOreal gained +411 bps of volume | |
| share in the same period (compares to +484 bps as of PYE and +318 bps as of PY). | |
| Below we show how both value and volume share performed for the 4, 13, and 52 | |
| weeks ending 5/6/23 for KVUE and some of its competitors. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 72 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Figure 114: Face Care - Value Share | |
| For Periods Ending 5/06/23, YOY (bps) | |
| (197) | |
| (109) | |
| 426 | |
| (58) (53) | |
| (215) | |
| (130) | |
| 414 | |
| (55) (54) | |
| (296) | |
| (85) | |
| 370 | |
| (29) (40) | |
| (400) | |
| (300) | |
| (200) | |
| (100) | |
| - | |
| 100 | |
| 200 | |
| 300 | |
| 400 | |
| 500 | |
| KENVUE PROCTER & GAMBLE L'OREAL SA UNILEVER GROUP PRIVATE LABEL | |
| 4W 13W 52W | |
| Source: NielsenIQ, J.P. Morgan | |
| Figure 115: Face Care - Volume Share | |
| For Periods Ending 5/06/23, YOY (bps) | |
| (191) | |
| 15 | |
| 411 | |
| 11 | |
| (236) | |
| (207) | |
| 9 | |
| 419 | |
| (10) | |
| (182) | |
| (255) | |
| (8) | |
| 433 | |
| 2 | |
| (86) | |
| (300) | |
| (200) | |
| (100) | |
| - | |
| 100 | |
| 200 | |
| 300 | |
| 400 | |
| 500 | |
| KENVUE PROCTER & GAMBLE L'OREAL SA UNILEVER GROUP PRIVATE LABEL | |
| 4W 13W 52W | |
| Source: NielsenIQ, J.P. Morgan | |
| Body Care. With a global market share of 6.3% in the mass body care category, KVUE | |
| has a long way to catch up with Beiersdorf, which has the largest global market share of | |
| 14.1% in this category according to the Euromonitor data. Turning to brands, Aveenos | |
| market share of 2.0% and Johnsons of 1.2% globally as of 2022 are also far behind in | |
| market share from the #1 brand (Nivea owned by Beiersdorf with market share of 12%) | |
| in this category. | |
| Figure 116: Mass Body Care Global Market Share by Company | |
| 14.3% 14.1% | |
| 10.3% | |
| 9.9% | |
| 8.3% | |
| 8.7% | |
| 6.9% | |
| 6.3% | |
| 2.0% | |
| 3.4% | |
| 1.5% 1.4% | |
| 0.0% | |
| 2.0% | |
| 4.0% | |
| 6.0% | |
| 8.0% | |
| 10.0% | |
| 12.0% | |
| 14.0% | |
| 16.0% | |
| 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 | |
| Beiersdorf Unilever Natura&Co Kenvue L'Oréal Procter & Gamble | |
| Source: Euromonitor, J.P. Morgan | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 73 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Figure 117: Mass Body Care Global Market Share by Brands | |
| 12.0% | |
| 4.5% | |
| 2.6% | |
| 2.3% | |
| 2.0% | |
| 1.4% | |
| 1.2% | |
| 0.0% | |
| 2.0% | |
| 4.0% | |
| 6.0% | |
| 8.0% | |
| 10.0% | |
| 12.0% | |
| 14.0% | |
| 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 | |
| Nivea Vaseline Dove CeraVe | |
| Aveeno Eucerin Olay Johnson's | |
| Source: Euromonitor, J.P. Morgan | |
| For the U.S. alone, the NielsenIQ data for both body lotion and body wash categories, as | |
| part of the analysis for body care in the U.S., show that KVUEs value share in the body | |
| lotion category has improved YTD in comparison, while that of body wash has | |
| deteriorated YTD, albeit both categories are losing value share. More specifically, | |
| KVUE lost -87 bps of value share in the four-week period ending 5/6/23 in the body | |
| lotion category, where LOreal gained +63 bps during this period) and is an | |
| improvement from losing -224 bps as of PYE, but performance is worse from a year | |
| ago when KVUE slightly lost -9 bps of value share in the four-week period ending | |
| 5/7/22. For body wash, in the four-week period ending 5/6/23, the data suggests KVUE | |
| lost -32 bps of value share, while OW-rated PG gained +189 bps during the same | |
| period, and compares to KVUE gaining +38 bps as of PYE. For volume share, KVUE | |
| lost -57 bps in the four-week period ending 5/6/23 in the body lotion category, while | |
| private label gained +81 bps during this period and is an improvement from KVUE | |
| losing -138 bps as of the four-week period ending 12/31/22. KVUE lost -50 bps of | |
| volume share in the four-week period ending 5/6/23, while OW-rated Procter & Gamble | |
| gained +225 bps of volume share in body wash during the same period, and compares to | |
| KVUE gaining +56 bps in the four-week period ending 12/31/22. Below we show how | |
| both value and volume share performed for the 4, 13, and 52 weeks ending 5/6/23 for | |
| KVUE and some of its competitors for both body lotion and body wash categories. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 74 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Figure 118: Body Lotion - Value Share | |
| For Periods Ending 5/06/23, YOY (bps) | |
| (87) | |
| (74) | |
| 63 | |
| (18) | |
| (63) | |
| 31 | |
| (87) | |
| (49) | |
| 74 | |
| (41) | |
| (70) | |
| 30 | |
| (100) | |
| 44 | |
| 55 | |
| (2) | |
| (54) | |
| 5 | |
| (120) | |
| (100) | |
| (80) | |
| (60) | |
| (40) | |
| (20) | |
| - | |
| 20 | |
| 40 | |
| 60 | |
| 80 | |
| 100 | |
| KENVUE BEIERSDORF AG L'OREAL SA SANOFI UNILEVER | |
| GROUP | |
| PRIVATE LABEL | |
| 4W 13W 52W | |
| Source: NielsenIQ, J.P. Morgan | |
| Figure 119: Body Lotion - Volume Share | |
| For Periods Ending 5/06/23, YOY (bps) | |
| (57) | |
| (24) | |
| 23 | |
| (11) | |
| (137) | |
| 81 | |
| (32) (26) | |
| 25 | |
| (56) | |
| (158) | |
| 98 | |
| (20) | |
| 74 | |
| 17 | |
| (36) | |
| (141) | |
| 1 | |
| (200) | |
| (150) | |
| (100) | |
| (50) | |
| - | |
| 50 | |
| 100 | |
| 150 | |
| KENVUE BEIERSDORF AG L'OREAL SA SANOFI UNILEVER | |
| GROUP | |
| PRIVATE LABEL | |
| 4W 13W 52W | |
| Source: NielsenIQ, J.P. Morgan | |
| Figure 120: Body Wash - Value Share | |
| For Periods Ending 5/06/23, YOY (bps) | |
| (32) | |
| 189 | |
| (136) | |
| (281) | |
| (28) | |
| 151 | |
| (106) | |
| (279) | |
| (12) | |
| 142 | |
| (52) | |
| (122) | |
| (400) | |
| (300) | |
| (200) | |
| (100) | |
| - | |
| 100 | |
| 200 | |
| 300 | |
| KENVUE PROCTER & GAMBLE COLGATE UNILEVER GROUP | |
| 4W 13W 52W | |
| Source: NielsenIQ, J.P. Morgan | |
| Figure 121: Body Wash - Volume Share | |
| For Periods Ending 5/06/23, YOY (bps) | |
| (50) | |
| 225 | |
| (163) | |
| (66) | |
| (28) | |
| 151 | |
| (106) | |
| (279) | |
| (12) | |
| 142 | |
| (52) | |
| (122) | |
| (400) | |
| (300) | |
| (200) | |
| (100) | |
| - | |
| 100 | |
| 200 | |
| 300 | |
| KENVUE PROCTER & GAMBLE COLGATE UNILEVER GROUP | |
| 4W 13W 52W | |
| Source: NielsenIQ, J.P. Morgan | |
| Sun care. KVUE has the third place in global market share (8.2%) according to data | |
| from Euromonitor, far behind Beiersdorf (15.2%) but more comparable with LOreal | |
| (8.5%; covered by Celine Pannuti). KVUE competes in the sun care market with brands | |
| including Neutrogena (4.7%), Johnsons (1.9%), Piz Buin (1.0%), Aveeno (0.5%), and | |
| much smaller Dabao (0.1%). | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 75 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Figure 122: Mass Adult Sun Care Global Market Share by Company | |
| 14.7% | |
| 15.2% | |
| 8.8% | |
| 9.5% 8.5% | |
| 8.2% | |
| 6.6% | |
| 7.3% | |
| 4.3% | |
| 3.3% | |
| 0.0% | |
| 2.0% | |
| 4.0% | |
| 6.0% | |
| 8.0% | |
| 10.0% | |
| 12.0% | |
| 14.0% | |
| 16.0% | |
| 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 | |
| Beiersdorf L'Oréal Kenvue Edgewell Kao Corp | |
| Source: Euromonitor, J.P. Morgan | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 76 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Figure 123: Mass Adult Sun Care Global Market Share by Brands | |
| 10.3% | |
| 4.7% | |
| 3.5% | |
| 2.6% | |
| 1.9% | |
| 1.0% | |
| 0.0% | |
| 2.0% | |
| 4.0% | |
| 6.0% | |
| 8.0% | |
| 10.0% | |
| 12.0% | |
| 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 | |
| Nivea Banana Boat Garnier Neutrogena | |
| Coppertone L'Oréal Johnson's Piz Buin | |
| Source: Euromonitor, J.P. Morgan | |
| For the U.S. alone, the tracked channel data for the four-week period observed shows | |
| that KVUEs dollar value share deteriorated YTD but is a big improvement compared to | |
| PY, with KVUE gaining +38 bps in the four-week period ending 5/6/23 (vs. +172 bps as | |
| of PYE but losing -550 bps as of PY). As it relates to volume share, KVUE gained +81 | |
| bps in the four-week period ending 5/6/23 (vs. +343 bps as of PYE but losing -310 bps | |
| as of PY). Below we show how both value and volume share performed for the 4, 13, | |
| and 52 weeks ending 5/6/23 for KVUE and some of its competitors. | |
| Figure 124: Suncare - Value Share | |
| For Periods Ending 5/06/23, YOY (bps) | |
| 38 39 | |
| 9 | |
| 87 | |
| 36 | |
| 99 | |
| 20 | |
| (14) | |
| 124 | |
| (24) | |
| (148) | |
| 31 | |
| 54 | |
| 82 | |
| (33) | |
| (200) | |
| (150) | |
| (100) | |
| (50) | |
| - | |
| 50 | |
| 100 | |
| 150 | |
| KENVUE PROCTER & GAMBLE BEIERSDORF AG L'OREAL SA PRIVATE LABEL | |
| 4W 13W 52W | |
| Source: NielsenIQ, J.P. Morgan | |
| Figure 125: Suncare - Volume Share | |
| For Periods Ending 5/06/23, YOY (bps) | |
| 81 | |
| 16 | |
| 8 | |
| 26 | |
| 42 | |
| 187 | |
| 9 | |
| (43) | |
| 42 | |
| (37) | |
| 6 11 | |
| 51 | |
| 18 | |
| (29) | |
| (100) | |
| (50) | |
| - | |
| 50 | |
| 100 | |
| 150 | |
| 200 | |
| KENVUE PROCTER & GAMBLE BEIERSDORF AG L'OREAL SA PRIVATE LABEL | |
| 4W 13W 52W | |
| Source: NielsenIQ, J.P. Morgan | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 77 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Essential Health | |
| Our analysis of both Euromonitor (for global performance) and NielsenIQ (for U.S. | |
| performance) tracked channel data for some of the major categories within the Essential | |
| Health segment are laid out below. | |
| Mouthwash. In the mouthwash category, KVUE clearly leads with market share of | |
| 35.1% globally, albeit decelerating in recent years, and nearly 3x larger than its closest | |
| competitors – OW-rated Colgate-Palmolive (11.9%) and OW-rated Procter & Gamble | |
| (9.6%). As we mentioned earlier, we believe KVUE has superior science, and the recent | |
| claim of plaque removal 5x better than flossing alone will likely help household | |
| penetration globally and market share improvement. | |
| Figure 126: Mouthwash Global Market Share by Company | |
| 36.5% | |
| 35.1% | |
| 11.6% 11.9% | |
| 9.9% 9.6% | |
| 4.5% 4.5% | |
| 3.1% 3.0% | |
| 0.9% 2.6% | |
| 0.0% | |
| 5.0% | |
| 10.0% | |
| 15.0% | |
| 20.0% | |
| 25.0% | |
| 30.0% | |
| 35.0% | |
| 40.0% | |
| 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 | |
| Kenvue Colgate Procter & Gamble Haleon Sanofi Church & Dwight | |
| Source: Euromonitor, J.P. Morgan | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 78 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Figure 127: Mouthwash Global Market Share by Brands | |
| 34.9% | |
| 10.1% | |
| 5.2% | |
| 2.1% | |
| 3.0% | |
| 0.0% | |
| 5.0% | |
| 10.0% | |
| 15.0% | |
| 20.0% | |
| 25.0% | |
| 30.0% | |
| 35.0% | |
| 40.0% | |
| 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 | |
| Listerine Colgate Crest Aquafresh | |
| ACT TheraBreath Oral-B Scope | |
| Source: Euromonitor, J.P. Morgan | |
| For the U.S. alone, the NielsenIQ tracked channel data for the four-week period shows | |
| that KVUEs dollar value share has improved, albeit negative, through the time line | |
| considered with value share loss of -102 bps for the four-week period ending 5/6/23 (vs. | |
| -344 bps as of PYE and -394 bps as of PY) in the U.S. It is worth noting that UW-rated | |
| Church & Dwight (CHD) has been gaining value share in all three periods, with gain of | |
| +499 bps in the four-week period ending 5/6/23, +375 bps in the four-week period | |
| ending 12/31/22 (PYE) and +203 bps in the four-week period ending 5/7/22 (PY) in the | |
| U.S. as per NielsenIQ, but globally Euromonitor points to market share of 2.6%. As it | |
| relates to volume share, KVUE lost -109 bps in the four-week period ending 5/6/23 (vs. | |
| losing -235 bps as of PYE and -202 bps as of PY), while CHD gained +260 bps in the | |
| four-week period ending 5/6/23 (vs. gaining +181 bps as of PYE and +89 bps as of PY). | |
| Below we show how both value and volume share performed for the 4, 13, and 52 | |
| weeks ending 5/6/23 for KVUE and some of its competitors. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 79 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Figure 128: Mouthwash - Value Share | |
| For Periods Ending 5/06/23, YOY (bps) | |
| (102) | |
| (209) | |
| (16) | |
| (48) | |
| (90) | |
| 499 | |
| (61) (39) | |
| (180) | |
| (51) | |
| (27) | |
| (62) | |
| 408 | |
| (22) | |
| (256) | |
| (21) | |
| (44) | |
| 22 | |
| (17) | |
| 320 | |
| 26 | |
| (300) | |
| (200) | |
| (100) | |
| - | |
| 100 | |
| 200 | |
| 300 | |
| 400 | |
| 500 | |
| 600 | |
| KENVUE PROCTER & | |
| GAMBLE | |
| COLGATE SANOFI PRIVATE | |
| LABEL | |
| CHURCH & | |
| DWIGHT | |
| HALEON | |
| 4W 13W 52W | |
| Source: NielsenIQ, J.P. Morgan | |
| Figure 129: Mouthwash - Volume Share | |
| For Periods Ending 5/06/23, YOY (bps) | |
| (109) | |
| (71) | |
| 6 12 | |
| (115) | |
| 260 | |
| 0 | |
| (59) | |
| (41) | |
| (25) | |
| 1 | |
| (108) | |
| 210 | |
| 5 | |
| (151) | |
| 17 | |
| (17) | |
| 16 | |
| (66) | |
| 155 | |
| 23 | |
| (200) | |
| (150) | |
| (100) | |
| (50) | |
| - | |
| 50 | |
| 100 | |
| 150 | |
| 200 | |
| 250 | |
| 300 | |
| KENVUE PROCTER & | |
| GAMBLE | |
| COLGATE SANOFI PRIVATE | |
| LABEL | |
| CHURCH & | |
| DWIGHT | |
| HALEON | |
| 4W 13W 52W | |
| Source: NielsenIQ, J.P. Morgan | |
| Wound Care. KVUE has the largest global market share in the wound care category | |
| with 19.2%, with a large gap from the next couple of competitors, Beiersdorf (11%) and | |
| 3M (5.3%). This is also evident in the brand share analysis as shown below with | |
| KVUEs Band-Aid well above the others. | |
| Figure 130: Wound Care Global Market Share by Company | |
| 19.4% 19.2% | |
| 10.7% 11.0% | |
| 5.5% 5.3% | |
| 3.6% 3.6% | |
| 3.1% | |
| 0.0% | |
| 5.0% | |
| 10.0% | |
| 15.0% | |
| 20.0% | |
| 25.0% | |
| 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 | |
| Kenvue Beiersdorf 3M Yunnan Baiyao Paul Hartmann | |
| Source: Euromonitor, J.P. Morgan | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 80 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Figure 131: Wound Care Global Market Share by Brands | |
| 16.1% | |
| 10.8% | |
| 2.5% | |
| 1.5% | |
| 3.8% | |
| 0.0% | |
| 2.0% | |
| 4.0% | |
| 6.0% | |
| 8.0% | |
| 10.0% | |
| 12.0% | |
| 14.0% | |
| 16.0% | |
| 18.0% | |
| 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 | |
| Band-Aid Hansaplast Nexcare Johnson's Dermaplast | |
| Source: Euromonitor, J.P. Morgan | |
| For the U.S. alone, we analyzed the NielsenIQ data for both bandages and antiseptic | |
| categories as part wound care. Within bandages, KVUE lost -72 bps of value share in | |
| the four-week period ending 5/6/23 (vs. flat of -1 bp as of PYE but gaining +181 bps as | |
| of PY) and lost -176 bps of volume share in the four-week period ending 5/6/23 (vs. - | |
| 111 bps as of PYE but gaining +260 bps as of PY) in the bandages category. There are | |
| other competitors outside of KVUEs main peers in the bandages category that we did | |
| not capture in our U.S. analysis. KVUEs antiseptic category in the U.S. appears to be | |
| much smaller in comparison as per total category sales data from tracked channel. The | |
| company gained +456 bps value share in the four-week period ending 5/6/23 (vs. +418 | |
| bps as of PYE and +558 bps as of PY) and +437 bps volume share in the four-week | |
| period ending 5/6/23 (vs. +463 bps as of PYE and +676 bps as of PY). Below we show | |
| how both value and volume share performed for the 4, 13, and 52 weeks ending 5/6/23 | |
| for KVUE and some of its competitors for both the bandages and antiseptic categories. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 81 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Figure 132: Bandages - Value Share | |
| For Periods Ending 5/06/23, YOY (bps) | |
| (72) | |
| 2 | |
| (39) | |
| (20) | |
| (64) (63) | |
| (80) | |
| (70) | |
| (60) | |
| (50) | |
| (40) | |
| (30) | |
| (20) | |
| (10) | |
| - | |
| 10 | |
| KENVUE PRIVATE LABEL | |
| 4W 13W 52W | |
| Source: NielsenIQ, J.P. Morgan | |
| Figure 133: Bandages - Volume Share | |
| For Periods Ending 5/06/23, YOY (bps) | |
| (176) | |
| 181 | |
| (127) | |
| 138 | |
| (143) | |
| (26) | |
| (200) | |
| (150) | |
| (100) | |
| (50) | |
| - | |
| 50 | |
| 100 | |
| 150 | |
| 200 | |
| KENVUE PRIVATE LABEL | |
| 4W 13W 52W | |
| Source: NielsenIQ, J.P. Morgan | |
| Figure 134: Antiseptic - Value Share | |
| For Periods Ending 5/06/23, YOY (bps) | |
| 456 | |
| 5 | |
| (279) | |
| 410 | |
| (6) | |
| (276) | |
| 482 | |
| (6) | |
| (400) (319) | |
| (300) | |
| (200) | |
| (100) | |
| - | |
| 100 | |
| 200 | |
| 300 | |
| 400 | |
| 500 | |
| 600 | |
| KENVUE RECKITT PRIVATE LABEL | |
| 4W 13W 52W | |
| Source: NielsenIQ, J.P. Morgan | |
| Figure 135: Antiseptic - Volume Share | |
| For Periods Ending 5/06/23, YOY (bps) | |
| 437 | |
| 51 | |
| (338) | |
| 396 | |
| (13) | |
| (253) | |
| 485 | |
| (14) | |
| (400) (327) | |
| (300) | |
| (200) | |
| (100) | |
| - | |
| 100 | |
| 200 | |
| 300 | |
| 400 | |
| 500 | |
| 600 | |
| KENVUE RECKITT PRIVATE LABEL | |
| 4W 13W 52W | |
| Source: NielsenIQ, J.P. Morgan | |
| Baby Toiletries. The baby care and child-specific categories point to KVUE having the | |
| largest market share globally, but it appears to be deteriorating with time. Looking | |
| further at the brand data cut, there is a clear deceleration in the global market share for | |
| the Johnsons brand. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 82 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Figure 136: Baby Care Global Market Share by Company | |
| 16.6% | |
| 14.4% | |
| 6.7% 6.7% | |
| 4.4% 4.6% | |
| 2.1% 2.1% | |
| 1.9% 1.8% | |
| 0.0% | |
| 5.0% | |
| 10.0% | |
| 15.0% | |
| 20.0% | |
| 25.0% | |
| 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 | |
| Kenvue Kimberly-Clark Procter & Gamble Beiersdorf Unilever | |
| Source: Euromonitor, J.P. Morgan | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 83 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Figure 137: Baby Care Global Market Share by Brands | |
| 11.4% | |
| 5.9% | |
| 4.1% | |
| 1.3% | |
| 0.0% | |
| 2.0% | |
| 4.0% | |
| 6.0% | |
| 8.0% | |
| 10.0% | |
| 12.0% | |
| 14.0% | |
| 16.0% | |
| 18.0% | |
| 20.0% | |
| 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 | |
| Johnson's Huggies Pampers Aveeno Nivea | |
| Source: Euromonitor, J.P. Morgan | |
| We analyzed the NielsenIQ data for baby bath, baby lotion, baby oil, baby powder, and | |
| baby soap categories in the U.S., but we note that baby toiletries makes up a smaller part | |
| of KVUEs business in the U.S. while international geographies are a larger source of | |
| revenues. We have added below value and volume share performance charts for the 4, | |
| 13, and 52 weeks ending 5/6/23 for KVUE and some of its competitors. | |
| Figure 138: Baby Bath - Value Share | |
| For Periods Ending 5/06/23, YOY (bps) | |
| 408 | |
| (23) | |
| 46 | |
| (68) | |
| (158) | |
| 206 | |
| (23) | |
| 38 | |
| (12) | |
| (78) (79) | |
| 35 37 | |
| 2 | |
| (13) | |
| (200) | |
| (100) | |
| - | |
| 100 | |
| 200 | |
| 300 | |
| 400 | |
| 500 | |
| KENVUE BEIERSDORF AG L'OREAL SA UNILEVER GROUP PRIVATE LABEL | |
| 4W 13W 52W | |
| Source: NielsenIQ, J.P. Morgan | |
| Figure 139: Baby Bath - Volume Share | |
| For Periods Ending 5/06/23, YOY (bps) | |
| 244 | |
| 11 18 | |
| (62) | |
| (141) | |
| 2 | |
| (3) | |
| 14 | |
| (50) | |
| (29) | |
| (141) | |
| 17 11 | |
| (8) | |
| (78) | |
| (200) | |
| (150) | |
| (100) | |
| (50) | |
| - | |
| 50 | |
| 100 | |
| 150 | |
| 200 | |
| 250 | |
| 300 | |
| KENVUE BEIERSDORF AG L'OREAL SA UNILEVER GROUP PRIVATE LABEL | |
| 4W 13W 52W | |
| Source: NielsenIQ, J.P. Morgan | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 84 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Figure 140: Baby Lotion - Value Share | |
| For Periods Ending 5/06/23, YOY (bps) | |
| (252) | |
| 180 | |
| 12 | |
| 78 | |
| (312) | |
| 170 | |
| 25 | |
| 93 | |
| (273) | |
| 94 | |
| 71 | |
| 2 | |
| (400) | |
| (300) | |
| (200) | |
| (100) | |
| - | |
| 100 | |
| 200 | |
| 300 | |
| KENVUE L'OREAL SA UNILEVER GROUP PRIVATE LABEL | |
| 4W 13W 52W | |
| Source: NielsenIQ, J.P. Morgan | |
| Figure 141: Baby Lotion - Volume Share | |
| For Periods Ending 5/06/23, YOY (bps) | |
| (28) | |
| 73 | |
| 53 | |
| 172 | |
| (140) | |
| 69 | |
| 3 | |
| 177 | |
| (260) | |
| 38 | |
| (10) | |
| (150) | |
| (300) | |
| (250) | |
| (200) | |
| (150) | |
| (100) | |
| (50) | |
| - | |
| 50 | |
| 100 | |
| 150 | |
| 200 | |
| KENVUE L'OREAL SA UNILEVER GROUP PRIVATE LABEL | |
| 4W 13W 52W | |
| Source: NielsenIQ, J.P. Morgan | |
| Figure 142: Baby Oil - Value Share | |
| For Periods Ending 5/06/23, YOY (bps) | |
| 32 | |
| (34) | |
| (137) | |
| (47) | |
| (28) | |
| (100) | |
| (246) | |
| 54 | |
| (14) | |
| (300) | |
| (250) | |
| (200) | |
| (150) | |
| (100) | |
| (50) | |
| - | |
| 50 | |
| 100 | |
| KENVUE UNILEVER GROUP PRIVATE LABEL | |
| 4W 13W 52W | |
| Source: NielsenIQ, J.P. Morgan | |
| Figure 143: Baby Oil - Volume Share | |
| For Periods Ending 5/06/23, YOY (bps) | |
| (55) | |
| (28) | |
| (148) | |
| (59) | |
| (24) | |
| (233) | |
| 24 27 | |
| (391) | |
| (450) | |
| (400) | |
| (350) | |
| (300) | |
| (250) | |
| (200) | |
| (150) | |
| (100) | |
| (50) | |
| - | |
| 50 | |
| KENVUE UNILEVER GROUP PRIVATE LABEL | |
| 4W 13W 52W | |
| Source: NielsenIQ, J.P. Morgan | |
| Figure 144: Baby Powder - Value Share | |
| For Periods Ending 5/06/23, YOY (bps) | |
| 1,138 | |
| (1,153) | |
| 572 | |
| (603) | |
| 175 | |
| (180) | |
| (1,500) | |
| (1,000) | |
| (500) | |
| - | |
| 500 | |
| 1,000 | |
| 1,500 | |
| KENVUE PRIVATE LABEL | |
| 4W 13W 52W | |
| Source: NielsenIQ, J.P. Morgan | |
| Figure 145: Baby Powder - Volume Share | |
| For Periods Ending 5/06/23, YOY (bps) | |
| 1,594 | |
| (1,811) | |
| 713 | |
| (856) | |
| 150 | |
| (361) | |
| (2,000) | |
| (1,500) | |
| (1,000) | |
| (500) | |
| - | |
| 500 | |
| 1,000 | |
| 1,500 | |
| 2,000 | |
| KENVUE PRIVATE LABEL | |
| 4W 13W 52W | |
| Source: NielsenIQ, J.P. Morgan | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 85 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Figure 146: Baby Soap - Value Share | |
| For Periods Ending 5/06/23, YOY (bps) | |
| 198 | |
| (12) | |
| 110 | |
| (133) | |
| (74) | |
| 102 | |
| (38) | |
| 93 | |
| 4 | |
| (71) | |
| (104) | |
| 32 | |
| 86 | |
| 9 | |
| (150) (127) | |
| (100) | |
| (50) | |
| - | |
| 50 | |
| 100 | |
| 150 | |
| 200 | |
| 250 | |
| KENVUE BEIERSDORF AG L'OREAL SA UNILEVER GROUP PRIVATE LABEL | |
| 4W 13W 52W | |
| Source: NielsenIQ, J.P. Morgan | |
| Figure 147: Baby Soap - Volume Share | |
| For Periods Ending 5/06/23, YOY (bps) | |
| 257 | |
| 47 54 | |
| (32) | |
| (441) | |
| 303 | |
| 24 47 50 | |
| (417) | |
| 50 64 | |
| 38 | |
| 69 | |
| (514) | |
| (600) | |
| (500) | |
| (400) | |
| (300) | |
| (200) | |
| (100) | |
| - | |
| 100 | |
| 200 | |
| 300 | |
| 400 | |
| KENVUE BEIERSDORF AG L'OREAL SA UNILEVER GROUP PRIVATE LABEL | |
| 4W 13W 52W | |
| Source: NielsenIQ, J.P. Morgan | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 86 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| U.S. Pricing, Share and Volume by Category | |
| - Tracked Channels | |
| Figure 148: KVUE Value & Volume Share Change by Key Categories - U.S. (Prior Year-End) | |
| Contribution to Total Sales in Latest 4, 13 & 52-Weeks, Weighted Change in Value Share & Dollar Equivalent Unit (EQ) Share | |
| For Periods Ending 12/31/22 | |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON % $ Mix % $ Mix % $ Mix | |
| L4W L13W L52W L4W L13W L52W L4W L13W L52W | |
| KVUE | |
| Acid Relief 2.8% 2.9% 2.6% 4 (0) 31 (18) (21) 3 | |
| Allergy 9.3% 9.9% 10.9% 96 120 13 (69) (58) (35) | |
| Antibiotic 2.1% 2.2% 2.4% (169) (130) (118) (282) (245) (254) | |
| Anti-Diarrhea 2.4% 2.4% 2.2% 217 21 170 131 (76) 99 | |
| Antiseptic 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 418 373 394 463 418 411 | |
| Baby Bath 2.9% 3.1% 3.3% (18) (27) (324) (15) (19) (374) | |
| Baby Lotion 0.7% 0.7% 0.8% (322) (282) (162) (100) (121) (155) | |
| Baby Oil 0.5% 0.5% 0.6% (33) (72) (402) 286 281 (53) | |
| Baby Powder 0.4% 0.4% 0.5% (107) 58 (104) (101) 2 (188) | |
| Baby Soap 0.9% 1.0% 1.1% 64 11 (303) 532 320 (339) | |
| Bandages 4.1% 4.3% 4.5% (1) (33) 15 (111) (146) 1 | |
| Body Wash 2.3% 2.3% 2.3% 38 10 (14) 56 25 15 | |
| Body Lotion 3.8% 3.5% 3.2% (224) (192) (68) (138) (96) (2) | |
| Cold & Flu 2.6% 2.1% 1.2% (113) 8 154 (13) (13) 4 | |
| Digestive Aid 0.7% 0.7% 0.6% (265) (159) 130 (530) (255) 104 | |
| Facial Skin Care 10.1% 10.4% 10.6% (266) (297) (299) (194) (251) (217) | |
| Mouthwash 9.1% 9.5% 9.3% (344) (293) (322) (235) (179) (173) | |
| Pain Relief 20.1% 18.7% 16.3% 75 205 129 48 41 61 | |
| Sun Care 6.5% 4.5% 3.8% 172 187 (162) 343 371 30 | |
| Weighted Total 81.3% 79.1% 76.4% (45) (18) (80) (32) (51) (70) | |
| YOY $ Share Change (bps) YOY EQ Share Change (bps) | |
| Source: NielsenIQ, J.P. Morgan | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 87 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Figure 149: KVUE Value & Volume Share Change by Key Categories - U.S. (Prior Year) | |
| Contribution to Total Sales in Latest 4, 13 & 52-Weeks, Weighted Change in Value Share & Dollar Equivalent Unit (EQ) Share | |
| For Periods Ending 5/7/22 | |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON % $ Mix % $ Mix % $ Mix | |
| L4W L13W L52W L4W L13W L52W L4W L13W L52W | |
| KVUE | |
| Acid Relief 2.5% 2.5% 2.7% (6) 50 56 5 29 39 | |
| Allergy 13.6% 12.4% 10.9% (37) (48) 14 20 15 54 | |
| Antibiotic 2.4% 2.4% 2.6% (222) (127) 30 (380) (220) 6 | |
| Anti-Diarrhea 2.0% 2.0% 2.1% 165 231 189 176 212 234 | |
| Antiseptic 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 558 286 79 676 356 103 | |
| Baby Bath 3.3% 3.6% 3.6% (645) (625) (396) (673) (737) (592) | |
| Baby Lotion 0.8% 0.9% 0.9% (49) (42) (127) (89) 74 23 | |
| Baby Oil 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% (540) (579) (207) (124) (230) (132) | |
| Baby Powder 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% (377) (521) (303) (463) (704) (524) | |
| Baby Soap 1.1% 1.1% 1.2% (541) (486) (351) (811) (825) (498) | |
| Bandages 4.2% 4.2% 4.5% 181 213 83 260 282 206 | |
| Body Wash 2.2% 2.3% 2.4% (50) (49) (14) (5) (1) 19 | |
| Body Lotion 3.0% 3.3% 3.2% (9) (31) 36 16 1 5 | |
| Cold & Flu 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 159 191 333 6 11 18 | |
| Digestive Aid 0.5% 0.6% 0.6% 51 136 397 80 175 501 | |
| Facial Skin Care 10.1% 11.1% 11.5% (291) (258) (203) (136) (138) (17) | |
| Mouthwash 8.7% 9.3% 9.7% (394) (423) (129) (202) (250) (101) | |
| Pain Relief 15.3% 15.2% 14.7% 76 72 250 72 82 86 | |
| Sun Care 6.2% 4.4% 4.1% (550) (505) (426) (310) (322) (255) | |
| Weighted Total 77.8% 77.1% 76.5% (152) (139) (29) (83) (85) (20) | |
| YOY $ Share Change (bps) YOY EQ Share Change (bps) | |
| Source: NielsenIQ, J.P. Morgan | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 88 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Figure 150: KVUE Pricing Change by Key Categories - U.S. (Prior Year-End) | |
| Change in Pricing in Latest 4, 13 & 52-Weeks | |
| For Periods Ending 12/31/22 | |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON % $ Mix % $ Mix % $ Mix | |
| L4W L13W L52W L4W L13W L52W | |
| KVUE | |
| Acid Relief 2.8% 2.9% 2.6% 8.7% 8.5% 6.3% | |
| Allergy 9.3% 9.9% 10.9% 11.2% 12.3% 6.7% | |
| Antibiotic 2.1% 2.2% 2.4% 10.6% 11.1% 9.1% | |
| Anti-Diarrhea 2.4% 2.4% 2.2% 11.0% 10.8% 7.8% | |
| Antiseptic 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 72.0% 68.1% 55.7% | |
| Baby Bath 2.9% 3.1% 3.3% 10.5% 11.5% 12.8% | |
| Baby Lotion 0.7% 0.7% 0.8% 9.1% 10.8% 11.2% | |
| Baby Oil 0.5% 0.5% 0.6% 10.8% 11.0% 9.8% | |
| Baby Powder 0.4% 0.4% 0.5% 13.8% 15.0% 14.3% | |
| Baby Soap 0.9% 1.0% 1.1% 6.3% 11.7% 16.4% | |
| Bandages 4.1% 4.3% 4.5% 11.0% 10.9% 7.3% | |
| Body Wash 2.3% 2.3% 2.3% 5.5% 7.7% 4.3% | |
| Body Lotion 3.8% 3.5% 3.2% 5.9% 7.0% 5.9% | |
| Cold & Flu 2.6% 2.1% 1.2% 36.1% 61.3% 19.2% | |
| Digestive Aid 0.7% 0.7% 0.6% 9.5% 7.4% 5.3% | |
| Facial Skin Care 10.1% 10.4% 10.6% 10.8% 14.0% 10.8% | |
| Mouthwash 9.1% 9.5% 9.3% 9.1% 9.2% 5.3% | |
| Pain Relief 20.1% 18.7% 16.3% 5.2% 14.8% 4.3% | |
| Sun Care 6.5% 4.5% 3.8% -2.4% -5.6% -3.6% | |
| Weighted Total 81.3% 79.1% 76.4% 8.5% 12.3% 6.8% | |
| YOY EQ Price Change (%) | |
| Source: NielsenIQ, J.P. Morgan | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 89 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J P M O R G A N | |
| Figure 151: KVUE Pricing Change by Key Categories - U.S. (Prior Year) | |
| Change in Pricing in Latest 4, 13 & 52-Weeks | |
| For Periods Ending 5/7/22 | |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON % $ Mix % $ Mix % $ Mix | |
| L4W L13W L52W L4W L13W L52W | |
| KVUE | |
| Acid Relief 2.5% 2.5% 2.7% 1.6% 1.2% -0.4% | |
| Allergy 13.6% 12.4% 10.9% 0.4% 1.4% 2.2% | |
| Antibiotic 2.4% 2.4% 2.6% 7.4% 3.6% 0.1% | |
| Anti-Diarrhea 2.0% 2.0% 2.1% 5.1% 4.6% 2.7% | |
| Antiseptic 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 52.3% 27.4% 5.4% | |
| Baby Bath 3.3% 3.6% 3.6% 7.1% 10.4% 11.0% | |
| Baby Lotion 0.8% 0.9% 0.9% 8.7% 8.7% 8.1% | |
| Baby Oil 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 7.6% 8.4% 7.7% | |
| Baby Powder 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 12.9% 14.6% 10.1% | |
| Baby Soap 1.1% 1.1% 1.2% 14.4% 19.0% 11.9% | |
| Bandages 4.2% 4.2% 4.5% 5.1% 3.4% 2.7% | |
| Body Wash 2.2% 2.3% 2.4% 2.6% 2.1% 0.4% | |
| Body Lotion 3.0% 3.3% 3.2% 6.6% 5.2% 9.8% | |
| Cold & Flu 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 12.4% -2.7% -8.0% | |
| Digestive Aid 0.5% 0.6% 0.6% 0.9% 2.6% 2.9% | |
| Facial Skin Care 10.1% 11.1% 11.5% 4.0% 3.4% 1.3% | |
| Mouthwash 8.7% 9.3% 9.7% 1.6% 2.4% 6.3% | |
| Pain Relief 15.3% 15.2% 14.7% -2.8% -5.1% 6.7% | |
| Sun Care 6.2% 4.4% 4.1% 2.5% 8.4% 12.6% | |
| Weighted Total 77.8% 77.1% 76.5% 2.3% 2.2% 4.8% | |
| YOY EQ Price Change (%) | |
| Source: NielsenIQ, J.P. Morgan | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 90 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J PMORGAN | |
| Investment Thesis, Valuation and Risks | |
| Kenvue (Overweight; Price Target: $29.00) | |
| Investment Thesis | |
| We rate Kenvue (KVUE) Overweight. As the largest pure-play consumer health company | |
| in the world, reaching 1.2 billion consumers daily, KVUE benefits from participating in | |
| large categories where reliability and performance matter for consumers. As such, we highlight five KVUE attributes that underpin our positive view: (1) resilient top-line growth | |
| expected, (2) room for margin expansion, (3) high cash flow conversion and shareholder- | |
| friendly capital allocation, (4) management has a strong background not only with JNJ but with other blue-chip CPGs with solid relationships with key customers, and (5) attractive valuation. | |
| Valuation | |
| Despite the strong share performance since the IPO, we view current valuation as attractive. | |
| Our Dec 2023 target price of $29 is based on a blended average of EV/EBITDA (based on | |
| blended average of HLN, Consumer Health, HPC & Beauty peers) and a DCF based on | |
| perpetual growth method. We assign a 70% weighting to EV/EBITDA as the primary | |
| valuation method embedding 15.1.x EV/EBITDA off our 2024E EBITDA estimate of | |
| $4.0B (implies $27 per share) and 30% weighting to DCF as the secondary valuation method | |
| embedding $32 per share. KVUE currently trades at 15.5x our 2023E EBITDA and was | |
| priced at the IPO at 13.3x our 2023E EBITDA. Risks to Rating and Price Target | |
| We believe the key risks to our OW rating and price target for Kenvue are (1) execution risk | |
| tied to the separation from JNJ, (2) potential talc litigation outside North America, (3) | |
| seasonality of cold & flu and allergy medicines, (4) inflation and supply chain volatility, (5) | |
| risk of trade-down to private label due to deteriorating macroeconomic outlook or pricing | |
| actions (elasticity), and (5) share overhang from JNJ announced intention to de-consolidate KVUE, which may include a spin-off or split-off KVUE shares, leading to potential short- | |
| term excess supply of shares. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 91 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J PMORGAN | |
| Kenvue: Summary of Financials | |
| Income Statement - Annual FY21A FY22A FY23E FY24E FY25E | |
| Revenue 15,054 14,950 15,662 16,289 16,973 | |
| COGS (6,587) (6,610) (6,800) (7,050) (7,246) | |
| Gross profit 8,467 8,340 8,862 9,239 9,727 | |
| SG&A (5,061) (5,000) (5,305) (5,515) (5,659) | |
| Adj. EBITDA 3,810 3,606 3,797 3,983 4,308 | |
| D&A - - - - - | |
| Adj. EBIT 3,493 3,310 3,487 3,648 3,957 | |
| Net Interest 0 0 (283) (379) (367) | |
| Adj. PBT 3,493 3,310 3,204 3,270 3,589 | |
| Tax (731) (676) (739) (761) (843) | |
| Minority Interest - - - - - | |
| Adj. Net Income 2,711 2,589 2,404 2,451 2,693 | |
| Reported EPS 1.05 1.08 1.11 1.14 1.27 | |
| Adj. EPS 1.40 1.34 1.24 1.27 1.39 | |
| DPS 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.81 0.84 | |
| Payout ratio 0.0% 0.0% 36.1% 71.3% 65.7% | |
| Shares outstanding 1,935 1,935 1,935 1,935 1,935 | |
| Balance Sheet & Cash Flow Statement FY21A FY22A FY23E FY24E FY25E | |
| Cash and cash equivalents 740 1,231 1,014 1,013 981 | |
| Accounts receivable 2,074 2,122 2,281 2,370 2,471 | |
| Inventories 1,702 2,226 1,957 1,852 1,819 | |
| Other current assets 408 294 302 311 317 | |
| Current assets 4,924 5,874 5,555 5,546 5,588 | |
| PP&E 1,827 1,820 1,927 2,074 2,227 | |
| LT investments - - - - - | |
| Other non current assets 21,101 19,586 19,638 19,833 20,300 | |
| Total assets 27,852 27,280 27,119 27,453 28,115 | |
| Short term borrowings - - - - - | |
| Payables 1,827 1,829 1,853 1,937 2,001 | |
| Other short term liabilities 2,224 2,105 2,195 2,290 2,378 | |
| Current liabilities 4,051 3,934 4,049 4,227 4,379 | |
| Long-term debt 0 0 8,512 8,310 8,122 | |
| Other long term liabilities 3,785 3,403 3,403 3,403 3,403 | |
| Total liabilities 7,836 7,337 15,964 15,940 15,904 | |
| Shareholders' equity 20,015 19,943 11,155 11,513 12,211 | |
| Minority interests - - - - - | |
| Total liabilities & equity 27,852 27,280 27,119 27,453 28,115 | |
| BVPS 10.34 10.31 5.76 5.95 6.31 | |
| y/y Growth (6.3%) (0.4%) (44.1%) 3.2% 6.1% | |
| Net debt/(cash) (740) (1,231) 7,498 7,297 7,141 | |
| Cash flow from operating activities 3,077 2,407 2,821 2,953 3,268 | |
| o/w Depreciation & amortization 680 599 591 599 597 | |
| o/w Changes in working capital (49) (672) 134 99 (4) | |
| Cash flow from investing activities (171) (390) (792) (982) (1,254) | |
| o/w Capital expenditure (295) (375) (417) (482) (504) | |
| as % of sales 2.0% 2.5% 2.7% 3.0% 3.0% | |
| Cash flow from financing activities (2,743) (1,465) (2,247) (1,972) (2,045) | |
| o/w Dividends paid 0 0 (774) (1,571) (1,618) | |
| o/w Net debt issued/(repaid) (7) 14 8,512 (202) (188) | |
| Net change in cash 163 553 (217) (1) (32) | |
| Adj. Free cash flow to firm 2,782 2,032 2,405 2,471 2,763 | |
| y/y Growth (26.3%) (27.0%) 18.3% 2.7% 11.8% | |
| Income Statement - Quarterly 1Q23A 2Q23E 3Q23E 4Q23E | |
| Revenue 3,851A 3,947 3,911 3,953 | |
| COGS (1,726)A (1,738) (1,666) (1,671) | |
| Gross profit 2,125A 2,209 2,245 2,283 | |
| SG&A (1,316)A (1,337) (1,310) (1,343) | |
| Adj. EBITDA 867A 940 1,007 983 | |
| D&A - - - - | |
| Adj. EBIT 796A 861 928 903 | |
| Net Interest (1)A (90) (96) (95) | |
| Adj. PBT 795A 770 832 808 | |
| Tax (150)A (181) (205) (203) | |
| Minority Interest - - - - | |
| Adj. Net Income 630A 574 611 590 | |
| Reported EPS 0.29A 0.26 0.28 0.27 | |
| Adj. EPS 0.33A 0.30 0.32 0.30 | |
| DPS 0.00A 0.00 0.20 0.20 | |
| Payout ratio 0.0%A 0.0% 71.0% 73.9% | |
| Shares outstanding 1,935A 1,935 1,935 1,935 | |
| Ratio Analysis FY21A FY22A FY23E FY24E FY25E | |
| Gross margin 56.2% 55.8% 56.6% 56.7% 57.3% | |
| EBITDA margin 25.3% 24.1% 24.2% 24.5% 25.4% | |
| EBIT margin 23.2% 22.1% 22.3% 22.4% 23.3% | |
| Net profit margin 18.0% 17.3% 15.4% 15.0% 15.9% | |
| ROE 13.1% 13.0% 15.5% 21.6% 22.7% | |
| ROA 9.5% 9.4% 8.8% 9.0% 9.7% | |
| ROCE 13.1% 13.0% 13.2% 13.9% 14.8% | |
| SG&A/Sales 33.6% 33.4% 33.9% 33.9% 33.3% | |
| Net debt/equity NM NM 0.7 0.6 0.6 | |
| P/E (x) 18.8 19.7 21.2 20.8 18.9 | |
| P/BV (x) 2.5 2.6 4.6 4.4 4.2 | |
| EV/EBITDA (x) 13.3 14.0 15.7 12.7 11.8 | |
| Dividend Yield 0.0% 0.0% 1.5% 3.1% 3.2% | |
| Sales/Assets (x) 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 | |
| Interest cover (x) - - 13.4 10.5 11.7 | |
| Operating leverage 35.2% 756.1% 112.5% 115.6% 201.2% | |
| Revenue y/y Growth 4.1% (0.7%) 4.8% 4.0% 4.2% | |
| EBITDA y/y Growth 0.9% (5.4%) 5.3% 4.9% 8.2% | |
| Tax rate 22.4% 21.8% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% | |
| Adj. Net Income y/y Growth 0.3% (4.5%) (7.1%) 1.9% 9.9% | |
| EPS y/y Growth 0.3% (4.5%) (7.1%) 1.9% 9.9% | |
| DPS y/y Growth - - - 103.0% 3.0% | |
| Source: Company reports and J.P. Morgan estimates. | |
| Note: $ in millions (except per-share data).Fiscal year ends Dec. o/w - out of which | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 92 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J PMORGAN | |
| Analyst Certification: The Research Analyst(s) denoted by an AC on the cover of this report certifies (or, where multiple Research Analysts | |
| are primarily responsible for this report, the Research Analyst denoted by an AC on the cover or within the document individually certifies, | |
| with respect to each security or issuer that the Research Analyst covers in this research) that: (1) all of the views expressed in this report accurately reflect the Research Analysts personal views about any and all of the subject securities or issuers; and (2) no part of any of the Research Analyst's compensation was, is, or will be directly or indirectly related to the specific recommendations or views expressed by the Research Analyst(s) in this report. For all Korea-based Research Analysts listed on the front cover, if applicable, they also certify, as per KOFIA requirements, that the Research Analysts analysis was made in good faith and that the views reflect the Research Analysts own opinion, | |
| without undue influence or intervention. | |
| All authors named within this report are Research Analysts who produce independent research unless otherwise specified. In Europe, Sector | |
| Specialists (Sales and Trading) may be shown on this report as contacts but are not authors of the report or part of the Research Department. | |
| Important Disclosures | |
| Market Maker/ Liquidity Provider: J.P. Morgan is a market maker and/or liquidity provider in the financial instruments of/related to | |
| Kenvue. | |
| Manager or Co-manager: J.P. Morgan acted as manager or co-manager in a public offering of securities or financial instruments (as such | |
| term is defined in Directive 2014/65/EU) of/for Kenvue within the past 12 months. | |
| Director: An employee of J.P. Morgan or an executive officer or director of J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. is an officer, director or advisory board | |
| member of Johnson & Johnson, a parent company of Kenvue. | |
| Client: J.P. Morgan currently has, or had within the past 12 months, the following entity(ies) as clients: Kenvue. | |
| Client/Investment Banking: J.P. Morgan currently has, or had within the past 12 months, the following entity(ies) as investment banking | |
| clients: Kenvue. | |
| Client/Non-Investment Banking, Securities-Related: J.P. Morgan currently has, or had within the past 12 months, the following entity(ies) | |
| as clients, and the services provided were non-investment-banking, securities-related: Kenvue. | |
| Client/Non-Securities-Related: J.P. Morgan currently has, or had within the past 12 months, the following entity(ies) as clients, and the services provided were non-securities-related: Kenvue. | |
| Investment Banking Compensation Received: J.P. Morgan has received in the past 12 months compensation for investment banking services | |
| from Kenvue. | |
| Potential Investment Banking Compensation: J.P. Morgan expects to receive, or intends to seek, compensation for investment banking | |
| services in the next three months from Johnson & Johnson, a parent company of Kenvue. | |
| Non-Investment Banking Compensation Received: J.P. Morgan has received compensation in the past 12 months for products or services | |
| other than investment banking from Kenvue. | |
| Debt Position: J.P. Morgan may hold a position in the debt securities of Kenvue, if any. | |
| J.P. Morgan and/or its affiliates is acting as financial advisor to Johnson & Johnson Inc (JNJ) in connection with the separation of Kenvue Inc as announced on November 12th 2021. This research report and the information contained herein is not intended to provide voting advice, serve as an endorsement of the proposed transaction or result in procurement, withholding or revocation of a proxy or any other action by a security | |
| holder. Company-Specific Disclosures: Important disclosures, including price charts and credit opinion history tables, are available for compendium reports and all J.P. Morgan–covered companies, and certain non-covered companies, by visitinghttps://www.jpmm.com/research/disclosures, | |
| calling 1-800-477-0406, or e-mailing research.disclosure.inquiries@jpmorgan.com with your request. | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 93 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J PMORGAN | |
| The chart(s) show J.P. Morgan's continuing coverage of the stocks; the current analysts may or may not have covered it over the entire period. | |
| J.P. Morgan ratings or designations: OW = Overweight, N= Neutral, UW = Underweight, NR = Not Rated | |
| Explanation of Equity Research Ratings, Designations and Analyst(s) Coverage Universe: | |
| J.P. Morgan uses the following rating system: Overweight [Over the next six to twelve months, we expect this stock will outperform the average total return of the stocks in the analysts (or the analysts teams) coverage universe.] Neutral [Over the next six to twelve months, we expect this | |
| stock will perform in line with the average total return of the stocks in the analysts (or the analysts teams) coverage universe.] Underweight [Over the next six to twelve months, we expect this stock will underperform the average total return of the stocks in the analysts (or the analysts teams) coverage universe.] Not Rated (NR): J.P. Morgan has removed the rating and, if applicable, the price target, for this stock | |
| because of either a lack of a sufficient fundamental basis or for legal, regulatory or policy reasons. The previous rating and, if applicable, the price target, no longer should be relied upon. An NR designation is not a recommendation or a rating. In our Asia (ex-Australia and ex-India) | |
| and U.K. small- and mid-cap equity research, each stocks expected total return is compared to the expected total return of a benchmark country | |
| market index, not to those analysts coverage universe. If it does not appear in the Important Disclosures section of this report, the certifying | |
| analysts coverage universe can be found on J.P. Morgans research website, https://www.jpmorganmarkets.com. | |
| Coverage Universe: Teixeira, Andrea: Becle, S.A.B. de C.V. (CUERVO.MX), Brown-Forman Corp (BFb), Central Garden & Pet (CENTA), | |
| Church & Dwight (CHD), Clorox (CLX), Coca-Cola (KO), Colgate-Palmolive Co (CL), Constellation Brands (STZ), Coty Inc (COTY), | |
| Energizer Holdings (ENR), Hydrofarm (HYFM), Keurig Dr Pepper Inc (KDP), Kimberly Clark Corp (KMB), Molson Coors Beverage Co | |
| (TAP), Monster Beverage (MNST), Newell Brands Inc (NWL), Olaplex (OLPX), PepsiCo (PEP), Primo Water Corp (PRMW), Reynolds | |
| (REYN), The Duckhorn Portfolio (NAPA), The Estee Lauder Cos (EL), The Honest Company (HNST), The Procter & Gamble Company (PG), | |
| e.l.f. Beauty Inc (ELF) | |
| J.P. Morgan Equity Research Ratings Distribution, as of April 01, 2023 | |
| Overweight | |
| (buy) | |
| Neutral | |
| (hold) | |
| Underweight | |
| (sell) | |
| J.P. Morgan Global Equity Research Coverage* 47% 38% 15% | |
| IB clients** 47% 44% 34% | |
| JPMS Equity Research Coverage* 46% 41% 13% | |
| IB clients** 66% 65% 53% | |
| *Please note that the percentages might not add to 100% because of rounding. | |
| **Percentage of subject companies within each of the "buy," "hold" and "sell" categories for which J.P. Morgan has provided | |
| investment banking services within the previous 12 months. | |
| For purposes only of FINRA ratings distribution rules, our Overweight rating falls into a buy rating category; our Neutral rating falls | |
| into a hold rating category; and our Underweight rating falls into a sell rating category. Please note that stocks with an NR designation | |
| are not included in the table above. This information is current as of the end of the most recent calendar quarter. | |
| Equity Valuation and Risks: For valuation methodology and risks associated with covered companies or price targets for covered companies, | |
| please see the most recent company-specific research report at http://www.jpmorganmarkets.com, contact the primary analyst or your J.P. | |
| Morgan representative, or email research.disclosure.inquiries@jpmorgan.com. For material information about the proprietary models used, | |
| please see the Summary of Financials in company-specific research reports and the Company Tearsheets, which are available to download on | |
| the company pages of our client website, http://www.jpmorganmarkets.com. This report also sets out within it the material underlying | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 94 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J PMORGAN | |
| assumptions used. | |
| A history of J.P. Morgan investment recommendations disseminated during the preceding 12 months can be accessed on the Research & Commentary page of http://www.jpmorganmarkets.com where you can also search by analyst name, sector or financial instrument. | |
| Analysts' Compensation:The research analysts responsible for the preparation of this report receive compensation based upon various factors, | |
| including the quality and accuracy of research, client feedback, competitive factors, and overall firm revenues. | |
| Other Disclosures | |
| J.P. Morgan is a marketing name for investment banking businesses of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its subsidiaries and affiliates worldwide. | |
| UK MIFID FICC research unbundling exemption: UK clients should refer to UK MIFID Research Unbundling exemption for details of | |
| JPMorgans implementation of the FICC research exemption and guidance on relevant FICC research categorisation. | |
| All research material made available to clients are simultaneously available on our client website, J.P. Morgan Markets, unless specifically | |
| permitted by relevant laws. Not all research content is redistributed, e-mailed or made available to third-party aggregators. For all research | |
| material available on a particular stock, please contact your sales representative. | |
| Any long form nomenclature for references to China; Hong Kong; Taiwan; and Macau within this research material are Mainland China; Hong | |
| Kong SAR (China); Taiwan (China); and Macau SAR (China). | |
| J.P. Morgan Research may, from time to time, write on issuers or securities targeted by economic or financial sanctions imposed or administered | |
| by the governmental authorities of the U.S., EU, UK or other relevant jurisdictions (Sanctioned Securities). Nothing in this report is intended to | |
| be read or construed as encouraging, facilitating, promoting or otherwise approving investment or dealing in such Sanctioned Securities. Clients | |
| should be aware of their own legal and compliance obligations when making investment decisions. | |
| Any digital or crypto assets discussed in this research report are subject to a rapidly changing regulatory landscape. For relevant regulatory | |
| advisories on crypto assets, including bitcoin and ether, please see https://www.jpmorgan.com/disclosures/cryptoasset-disclosure. | |
| The author(s) of this research report may not be licensed to carry on regulated activities in your jurisdiction and, if not licensed, do not hold | |
| themselves out as being able to do so. | |
| Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs): J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (JPMS) acts as authorized participant for substantially all U.S.-listed ETFs. To | |
| the extent that any ETFs are mentioned in this report, JPMS may earn commissions and transaction-based compensation in connection with the distribution of those ETF shares and may earn fees for performing other trade-related services, such as securities lending to short sellers of the ETF shares. JPMS may also perform services for the ETFs themselves, including acting as a broker or dealer to the ETFs. In addition, affiliates | |
| of JPMS may perform services for the ETFs, including trust, custodial, administration, lending, index calculation and/or maintenance and other | |
| services. | |
| Options and Futures related research: If the information contained herein regards options- or futures-related research, such information is | |
| available only to persons who have received the proper options or futures risk disclosure documents. Please contact your J.P. Morgan | |
| Representative or visit https://www.theocc.com/components/docs/riskstoc.pdf for a copy of the Option Clearing Corporation's Characteristics | |
| and Risks of Standardized Options or http://www.finra.org/sites/default/files/Security_Futures_Risk_Disclosure_Statement_2018.pdf for a copy | |
| of the Security Futures Risk Disclosure Statement. | |
| Changes to Interbank Offered Rates (IBORs) and other benchmark rates: Certain interest rate benchmarks are, or may in the future become, subject to ongoing international, national and other regulatory guidance, reform and proposals for reform. For more information, please consult: https://www.jpmorgan.com/global/disclosures/interbank_offered_rates | |
| Private Bank Clients: Where you are receiving research as a client of the private banking businesses offered by JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its | |
| subsidiaries (J.P. Morgan Private Bank), research is provided to you by J.P. Morgan Private Bank and not by any other division of J.P. Morgan, | |
| including, but not limited to, the J.P. Morgan Corporate and Investment Bank and its Global Research division. | |
| Legal entity responsible for the production and distribution of research: The legal entity identified below the name of the Reg AC Research | |
| Analyst who authored this material is the legal entity responsible for the production of this research. Where multiple Reg AC Research Analysts | |
| authored this material with different legal entities identified below their names, these legal entities are jointly responsible for the production of | |
| this research. Research Analysts from various J.P. Morgan affiliates may have contributed to the production of this material but may not be licensed to carry out regulated activities in your jurisdiction (and do not hold themselves out as being able to do so). Unless otherwise stated | |
| below, this material has been distributed by the legal entity responsible for production. If you have any queries, please contact the relevant Research Analyst in your jurisdiction or the entity in your jurisdiction that has distributed this research material. | |
| Legal Entities Disclosures and Country-/Region-Specific Disclosures: | |
| Argentina: JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A Sucursal Buenos Aires is regulated by Banco Central de la República Argentina (BCRA- Central Bank of Argentina) and Comisión Nacional de Valores (CNV- Argentinian Securities Commission - ALYC y AN Integral N°51). Australia: | |
| J.P. Morgan Securities Australia Limited (JPMSAL) (ABN 61 003 245 234/AFS Licence No: 238066) is regulated by the Australian | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 95 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J PMORGAN | |
| Securities and Investments Commission and is a Market, Clearing and Settlement Participant of ASX Limited and CHI-X. This material is | |
| issued and distributed in Australia by or on behalf of JPMSAL only to "wholesale clients" (as defined in section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001). A list of all financial products covered can be found by visiting https://www.jpmm.com/research/disclosures. J.P. Morgan seeks to cover | |
| companies of relevance to the domestic and international investor base across all Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) sectors, as well as across a range of market capitalisation sizes. If applicable, in the course of conducting public side due diligence on the subject company(ies), | |
| the Research Analyst team may at times perform such diligence through corporate engagements such as site visits, discussions with company | |
| representatives, management presentations, etc. Research issued by JPMSAL has been prepared in accordance with J.P. Morgan Australias | |
| Research Independence Policy which can be found at the following link: J.P. Morgan Australia - Research Independence Policy. Brazil: Banco | |
| J.P. Morgan S.A. is regulated by the Comissao de Valores Mobiliarios (CVM) and by the Central Bank of Brazil. Ombudsman J.P. Morgan: 0800-7700847 / ouvidoria.jp.morgan@jpmorgan.com. Canada: J.P. Morgan Securities Canada Inc. is a registered investment dealer, regulated | |
| by the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada and the Ontario Securities Commission and is the participating member on | |
| Canadian exchanges. This material is distributed in Canada by or on behalf of J.P.Morgan Securities Canada Inc. Chile: Inversiones J.P. Morgan | |
| Limitada is an unregulated entity incorporated in Chile. China: J.P. Morgan Securities (China) Company Limited has been approved by CSRC to conduct the securities investment consultancy business. Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC): JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Dubai Branch is regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA) and its registered address is Dubai International Financial Centre - The Gate, West Wing, Level 3 and 9 PO Box 506551, Dubai, UAE. This material has been distributed by JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Dubai Branch to persons regarded as professional clients or market counterparties as defined under the DFSA rules. European Economic Area | |
| (EEA): Unless specified to the contrary, research is distributed in the EEA by J.P. Morgan SE (JPM SE), which is subject to prudential supervision by the European Central Bank (ECB) in cooperation with BaFin and Deutsche Bundesbank in Germany. JPM SE is a company | |
| headquartered in Frankfurt with registered address at TaunusTurm, Taunustor 1, Frankfurt am Main, 60310, Germany. The material has been | |
| distributed in the EEA to persons regarded as professional investors (or equivalent) pursuant to Art. 4 para. 1 no. 10 and Annex II of MiFID II | |
| and its respective implementation in their home jurisdictions (EEA professional investors). This material must not be acted on or relied on by | |
| persons who are not EEA professional investors. Any investment or investment activity to which this material relates is only available to EEA relevant persons and will be engaged in only with EEA relevant persons. Hong Kong: J.P. Morgan Securities (Asia Pacific) Limited (CE number AAJ321) is regulated by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority and the Securities and Futures Commission in Hong Kong, and J.P. | |
| Morgan Broking (Hong Kong) Limited (CE number AAB027) is regulated by the Securities and Futures Commission in Hong Kong. JP Morgan | |
| Chase Bank, N.A., Hong Kong Branch (CE Number AAL996) is regulated by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority and the Securities and | |
| Futures Commission, is organized under the laws of the United States with limited liability. Where the distribution of this material is a regulated | |
| activity in Hong Kong, the material is distributed in Hong Kong by or through J.P. Morgan Securities (Asia Pacific) Limited and/or J.P. Morgan | |
| Broking (Hong Kong) Limited. India: J.P. Morgan India Private Limited (Corporate Identity Number - U67120MH1992FTC068724), having its | |
| registered office at J.P. Morgan Tower, Off. C.S.T. Road, Kalina, Santacruz - East, Mumbai – 400098, is registered with the Securities and | |
| Exchange Board of India (SEBI) as a Research Analyst having registration number INH000001873. J.P. Morgan India Private Limited is also | |
| registered with SEBI as a member of the National Stock Exchange of India Limited and the Bombay Stock Exchange Limited (SEBI | |
| Registration Number – INZ000239730) and as a Merchant Banker (SEBI Registration Number - MB/INM000002970). Telephone: 91-22-6157 | |
| 3000, Facsimile: 91-22-6157 3990 and Website: http://www.jpmipl.com. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. - Mumbai Branch is licensed by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) (Licence No. 53/ Licence No. BY.4/94; SEBI - IN/CUS/014/ CDSL : IN-DP-CDSL-444-2008/ IN-DP-NSDL-285- | |
| 2008/ INBI00000984/ INE231311239) as a Scheduled Commercial Bank in India, which is its primary license allowing it to carry on Banking | |
| business in India and other activities, which a Bank branch in India are permitted to undertake. For non-local research material, this material is | |
| not distributed in India by J.P. Morgan India Private Limited. Compliance Officer: Spurthi Gadamsetty; spurthi.gadamsetty@jpmchase.com; | |
| +912261573225. Grievance Officer: Ramprasadh K, jpmipl.research.feedback@jpmorgan.com; +912261573000. | |
| Investment in securities market are subject to market risks. Read all the related documents carefully before investing. Registration | |
| granted by SEBI and certification from NISM in no way guarantee performance of the intermediary or provide any assurance of | |
| returns to investors. | |
| Indonesia: PT J.P. Morgan Sekuritas Indonesia is a member of the Indonesia Stock Exchange and is registered and supervised by the Otoritas | |
| Jasa Keuangan (OJK). Korea: J.P. Morgan Securities (Far East) Limited, Seoul Branch, is a member of the Korea Exchange (KRX). JPMorgan | |
| Chase Bank, N.A., Seoul Branch, is licensed as a branch office of foreign bank (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.) in Korea. Both entities are regulated by the Financial Services Commission (FSC) and the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS). For non-macro research material, the material is distributed in Korea by or through J.P. Morgan Securities (Far East) Limited, Seoul Branch. Japan: JPMorgan Securities Japan Co., | |
| Ltd. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Tokyo Branch are regulated by the Financial Services Agency in Japan. Malaysia: This material is issued | |
| and distributed in Malaysia by JPMorgan Securities (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd (18146-X), which is a Participating Organization of Bursa Malaysia Berhad and holds a Capital Markets Services License issued by the Securities Commission in Malaysia. Mexico: J.P. Morgan Casa de Bolsa, | |
| S.A. de C.V.and J.P. Morgan Grupo Financiero are members of the Mexican Stock Exchange and are authorized to act as a broker dealer by the National Banking and Securities Exchange Commission. New Zealand: This material is issued and distributed by JPMSAL in New Zealand | |
| only to "wholesale clients" (as defined in the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013). JPMSAL is registered as a Financial Service Provider under | |
| the Financial Service providers (Registration and Dispute Resolution) Act of 2008. Pakistan: J. P. Morgan Pakistan Broking (Pvt.) Ltd is a member of the Karachi Stock Exchange and regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan. Philippines: J.P. Morgan | |
| Securities Philippines Inc. is a Trading Participant of the Philippine Stock Exchange and a member of the Securities Clearing Corporation of the Philippines and the Securities Investor Protection Fund. It is regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Russia: CB J.P. Morgan | |
| Bank International LLC is regulated by the Central Bank of Russia. Singapore: This material is issued and distributed in Singapore by or | |
| through J.P. Morgan Securities Singapore Private Limited (JPMSS) [MCI (P) 060/08/2022 and Co. Reg. No.: 199405335R], which is a member | |
| of the Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited, and/or JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Singapore branch (JPMCB Singapore), both of | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 96 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J PMORGAN | |
| which are regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. This material is issued and distributed in Singapore only to accredited investors, | |
| expert investors and institutional investors, as defined in Section 4A of the Securities and Futures Act, Cap. 289 (SFA). This material is not intended to be issued or distributed to any retail investors or any other investors that do not fall into the classes of accredited investors, expert investors or institutional investors, as defined under Section 4A of the SFA. Recipients of this material in Singapore are to contact JPMSS or | |
| JPMCB Singapore in respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with, the material. As at the date of this material, JPMSS is a designated market maker for certain structured warrants listed on the Singapore Exchange where the underlying securities may be the securities | |
| discussed in this material. Arising from its role as a designated market maker for such structured warrants, JPMSS may conduct hedging | |
| activities in respect of such underlying securities and hold or have an interest in such underlying securities as a result. The updated list of | |
| structured warrants for which JPMSS acts as designated market maker may be found on the website of the Singapore Exchange Limited: http://www.sgx.com. South Africa: J.P. Morgan Equities South Africa Proprietary Limited and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Johannesburg | |
| Branch are members of the Johannesburg Securities Exchange and are regulated by the Financial Services Board. Taiwan: J.P. Morgan | |
| Securities (Taiwan) Limited is a participant of the Taiwan Stock Exchange (company-type) and regulated by the Taiwan Securities and Futures | |
| Bureau. Material relating to equity securities is issued and distributed in Taiwan by J.P. Morgan Securities (Taiwan) Limited, subject to the license scope and the applicable laws and the regulations in Taiwan. According to Paragraph 2, Article 7-1 of Operational Regulations | |
| Governing Securities Firms Recommending Trades in Securities to Customers (as amended or supplemented) and/or other applicable laws or | |
| regulations, please note that the recipient of this material is not permitted to engage in any activities in connection with the material that may | |
| give rise to conflicts of interests, unless otherwise disclosed in the Important Disclosures in this material. Thailand: This material is issued | |
| and distributed in Thailand by JPMorgan Securities (Thailand) Ltd., which is a member of the Stock Exchange of Thailand and is regulated by | |
| the Ministry of Finance and the Securities and Exchange Commission, and its registered address is 3rd Floor, 20 North Sathorn Road, Silom, | |
| Bangrak, Bangkok 10500. UK: Unless specified to the contrary, research is distributed in the UK by J.P. Morgan Securities plc (JPMS plc) | |
| which is a member of the London Stock Exchange and is authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority. JPMS plc is registered in England & Wales No. 2711006, Registered Office 25 | |
| Bank Street, London, E14 5JP. This material is directed in the UK only to: (a) persons having professional experience in matters relating to | |
| investments falling within article 19(5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) (Order) 2005 (the FPO); (b) | |
| persons outlined in article 49 of the FPO (high net worth companies, unincorporated associations or partnerships, the trustees of high value trusts, etc.); or (c) any persons to whom this communication may otherwise lawfully be made; all such persons being referred to as "UK relevant persons". This material must not be acted on or relied on by persons who are not UK relevant persons. Any investment or investment activity to | |
| which this material relates is only available to UK relevant persons and will be engaged in only with UK relevant persons. Research issued by | |
| JPMS plc has been prepared in accordance with JPMS plc's policy for prevention and avoidance of conflicts of interest related to the production | |
| of Research which can be found at the following link: J.P. Morgan EMEA - Research Independence Policy. U.S.: J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (JPMS) is a member of the NYSE, FINRA, SIPC, and the NFA. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. is a member of the FDIC. Material published by | |
| non-U.S. affiliates is distributed in the U.S. by JPMS who accepts responsibility for its content. | |
| General: Additional information is available upon request. The information in this material has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. While all reasonable care has been taken to ensure that the facts stated in this material are accurate and that the forecasts, opinions and | |
| expectations contained herein are fair and reasonable, JPMorgan Chase & Co. or its affiliates and/or subsidiaries (collectively J.P. Morgan) make no representations or warranties whatsoever to the completeness or accuracy of the material provided, except with respect to any disclosures | |
| relative to J.P. Morgan and the Research Analyst's involvement with the issuer that is the subject of the material. Accordingly, no reliance should | |
| be placed on the accuracy, fairness or completeness of the information contained in this material. There may be certain discrepancies with data and/or limited content in this material as a result of calculations, adjustments, translations to different languages, and/or local regulatory | |
| restrictions, as applicable. These discrepancies should not impact the overall investment analysis, views and/or recommendations of the subject company(ies) that may be discussed in the material. J.P. Morgan accepts no liability whatsoever for any loss arising from any use of this material or its contents, and neither J.P. Morgan nor any of its respective directors, officers or employees, shall be in any way responsible for the contents | |
| hereof, apart from the liabilities and responsibilities that may be imposed on them by the relevant regulatory authority in the jurisdiction in | |
| question, or the regulatory regime thereunder. Opinions, forecasts or projections contained in this material represent J.P. Morgan's current opinions or judgment as of the date of the material only and are therefore subject to change without notice. Periodic updates may be provided on | |
| companies/industries based on company-specific developments or announcements, market conditions or any other publicly available information. There can be no assurance that future results or events will be consistent with any such opinions, forecasts or projections, which | |
| represent only one possible outcome. Furthermore, such opinions, forecasts or projections are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and | |
| assumptions that have not been verified, and future actual results or events could differ materially. The value of, or income from, any | |
| investments referred to in this material may fluctuate and/or be affected by changes in exchange rates. All pricing is indicative as of the close of | |
| market for the securities discussed, unless otherwise stated. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Accordingly, investors may | |
| receive back less than originally invested. This material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. The opinions and recommendations herein do not take into account individual client circumstances, objectives, or needs and are not intended as recommendations of particular securities, financial instruments or strategies to particular clients. This material may include views on | |
| structured securities, options, futures and other derivatives. These are complex instruments, may involve a high degree of risk and may be appropriate investments only for sophisticated investors who are capable of understanding and assuming the risks involved. The recipients of | |
| this material must make their own independent decisions regarding any securities or financial instruments mentioned herein and should seek | |
| advice from such independent financial, legal, tax or other adviser as they deem necessary. J.P. Morgan may trade as a principal on the basis of | |
| the Research Analysts views and research, and it may also engage in transactions for its own account or for its clients accounts in a manner | |
| inconsistent with the views taken in this material, and J.P. Morgan is under no obligation to ensure that such other communication is brought to | |
| the attention of any recipient of this material. Others within J.P. Morgan, including Strategists, Sales staff and other Research Analysts, may take This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. | |
| 97 | |
| Andrea Teixeira, CFA AC | |
| (1-212) 622-6735 | |
| andrea.f.teixeira@jpmorgan.com | |
| North America Equity Research | |
| 29 May 2023 J PMORGAN | |
| views that are inconsistent with those taken in this material. Employees of J.P. Morgan not involved in the preparation of this material may have investments in the securities (or derivatives of such securities) mentioned in this material and may trade them in ways different from those discussed in this material. This material is not an advertisement for or marketing of any issuer, its products or services, or its securities in any | |
| jurisdiction. | |
| Confidentiality and Security Notice: This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential, legally privileged, and/or | |
| exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, | |
| distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Although this | |
| transmission and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is | |
| received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by JPMorgan Chase & Co., its subsidiaries and affiliates, as applicable, for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use. If you received this transmission in | |
| error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. This message is | |
| subject to electronic monitoring: https://www.jpmorgan.com/disclosures/email | |
| MSCI: Certain information herein (Information) is reproduced by permission of MSCI Inc., its affiliates and information providers (MSCI) | |
| ©2023. No reproduction or dissemination of the Information is permitted without an appropriate license. MSCI MAKES NO EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES (INCLUDING MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS) AS TO THE INFORMATION AND DISCLAIMS ALL LIABILITY TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW. No Information constitutes investment advice, except for any applicable Information | |
| from MSCI ESG Research. Subject also to msci.com/disclaimer | |
| "Other Disclosures" last revised May 13, 2023. | |
| Copyright 2023 JPMorgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved. This material or any portion hereof may not be reprinted, sold or redistributed without the written consent of J.P. Morgan. #$J&098$#*P | |
| Completed 27 May 2023 11:52 AM EDT Disseminated 29 May 2023 12:15 AM EDT | |
| This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DAVID WANG at MARLOWE PARTNERS LP. |