File size: 6,422 Bytes
d0247ad
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
---
license: cc-by-4.0
language:
- en
tags:
- knowledge-graph
- intellectual-history
- marxism
- political-philosophy
- computational-humanities
- temporal-graph
task_categories:
- text-classification
- graph-ml
pretty_name: MarxGraph
size_categories:
- 10K<n<100K
---

# MarxGraph: A Temporal Knowledge Graph of Marxist Intellectual History

MarxGraph traces how core concepts in Marxist theory (class struggle, the
vanguard party, imperialism, permanent revolution, and 40+ others) were
inherited, extended, contested, or rejected as they moved from Marx and
Engels through Lenin, Luxemburg, Trotsky, Stalin, and Mao. Unlike a simple
"who-influenced-whom" graph, every edge in MarxGraph is grounded in a specific
textual claim with a verbatim evidence span, and the dataset explicitly
distinguishes **documentary facts** (what a text says) from **interpretive
judgments** (how a later thinker's treatment relates to an earlier one); the
latter always carrying a `perspective` and `confidence` field rather than
being asserted as settled fact.

## Dataset summary

| | |
|---|---|
| Works | 50 |
| Passages | ~14,862 |
| Concept mentions | 21,933 |
| Claims (with evidence spans) | 71,572 |
| Explicit references/citations | 19,471 |
| Concept-evolution edges | 446 |
| Thinkers | Marx, Engels, Lenin, Luxemburg, Trotsky, Stalin, Mao |
| Traditions | Classical Marxism, Leninism, Marxism-Leninism, Trotskyism, Maoism |

Source texts: the [Marxists Internet Archive](https://www.marxists.org).

## Dataset structure

Six linked tables (Parquet):

| File | Grain | Key columns |
|---|---|---|
| `works.parquet` | one work | `work_id`, `author`, `title`, `year`, `tradition`, `license`, `source_url` |
| `passages.parquet` | ~220-word passage | `passage_id`, `work_id`, `chapter`, `text` |
| `concept_mentions.parquet` | one mention | `passage_id`, `concept`, `surface_form` |
| `claims.parquet` | one proposition | `claim_id`, `claim`, `concepts`, `evidence_span`, `confidence` |
| `references.parquet` | explicit citation/attack | `work_id`, `target_thinker`, `stance`, `evidence_span` |
| `concept_evolution.parquet` | concept × (earlier, later) author pair | `transformation`, `rationale`, `confidence`, `perspective` |

Plus a graph export (`graph/marxgraph.graphml`, `graph/marxgraph.jsonl`) built
from the tables above: thinkers, works, claims, and concepts as nodes;
`WROTE`, `CONTAINS`, `MENTIONS`, citation-stance, and `TRANSFORMS_<label>`
edges.

### Transformation labels

Each `concept_evolution` row classifies how a concept changed between two
chronologically-ordered thinkers:

- `PRESERVED`: restated with essentially the same content and scope
- `EXTENDED`: same core meaning, new components or scope added
- `REFORMULATED`: same term, different core content or theoretical role
- `CONTEXTUALIZED`: adapted to new historical/national conditions
- `CONTESTED`: later thinker explicitly argues against the earlier treatment
- `REJECTED`: concept abandoned or repudiated
- `INSUFFICIENT`: evidence too thin to support any label (the model declines
  to force a verdict rather than fabricate one)

Distribution across the 446 edges: 76.0% EXTENDED, 10.1% CONTEXTUALIZED, 6.3%
REFORMULATED, 4.7% CONTESTED, 2.0% PRESERVED, 0.7% INSUFFICIENT, 0.2% REJECTED.

## Construction

Built with a five-stage pipeline (full code included):
EPUB download → passage segmentation → LLM claim/mention/reference extraction
→ LLM concept-transformation typing (constrained to a documented set of
plausible lineage pairs) → graph assembly. Primary extraction model:
`openai/gpt-oss-120b` via Groq. See `README.md` in the code repository for the
full pipeline and `config/ontology.yaml` for the entity/relation schema.

## Validation

100 claims and 50 evolution edges were checked against a stratified sample
protocol, with an automated first pass followed by domain-expert human
adjudication of every uncertain case. **Result: 99% claims accuracy (99/100),
100% evolution-edge coherence (50/50)** on the reviewed sample. Full
methodology, including the one documented failure case and important caveats
about sample size and the narrowness of the model's confidence scores, is in
[`VALIDATION.md`](VALIDATION.md); please read it before citing accuracy
figures out of context.

## Known limitations

- **Confidence scores are not calibrated.** Evolution-edge confidence values
  cluster tightly (mean 0.852, std 0.035) and should not be used as a
  reliability filter.
- **A likely duplicate work has not yet been removed.** Trotsky's *History of
  the Russian Revolution* appears to be ingested twice (single-file and
  3-volume editions), inflating Trotsky's claim counts on affected concepts.
  A deduplication tool (`src/dedupe_works.py`) exists but has not been applied
  to this release.
- **Interpretive edges are one LLM-assisted reading, not a canonical verdict.**
  Especially for ideologically contested relationships (e.g., Stalin's
  relationship to Lenin, or Trotsky's to Stalin), different traditions
  characterize continuity/rupture differently. Treat `CONTESTED`/`REJECTED`
  labels as a documented, evidence-linked interpretation, open to challenge,
  not as settled historiography.
- **Extraction quality reflects the extraction model.** `openai/gpt-oss-120b`
  is far smaller than frontier models; the validation pass documents at least
  one case of the model adding a plausible but unsupported evaluative gloss
  to an otherwise accurate paraphrase.
- **Licensing is mixed at the work level.** `works.parquet.license` marks each
  work `pd` (public domain, safe to redistribute as text) or `verify` (check
  the specific translation/edition's copyright status on MIA before
  redistributing raw text; this applies especially to some Stalin, Mao, and
  Luxemburg translations). Annotations (claims, relations, evolution edges)
  are original analysis and released under this dataset's license regardless
  of source-text status.

## Citation

If you use MarxGraph, please cite the dataset directly:

```
Bose, J. (2026). MarxGraph: A Temporal Knowledge Graph of Marxist Intellectual
History [Dataset]. Hugging Face. https://huggingface.co/datasets/<your-repo-id>
```

## Credits

Source texts: [Marxists Internet Archive](https://www.marxists.org), a
volunteer-run archive; please support their work if you can.

Dataset construction, ontology design, and validation: Joy Bose
(joy.bose@ieee.org).