first comit

law_dataset.json

@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+[
+  {
+    "task_id": "law-001",
+    "sector": "Legal Services",
+    "occupation": "Corporate Lawyer",
+    "prompt": "You are a corporate lawyer drafting a software-as-a-service (SaaS) agreement. Draft an indemnification clause as a plain-text document that must: (1) cover third-party intellectual property infringement claims against the customer; (2) require the provider to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the customer; (3) require the provider to pay resulting damages and costs, including reasonable attorneys' fees; (4) allow the provider to control the defense, conditioned on the customer's reasonable cooperation; (5) exclude claims caused by the customer's unauthorized modification of the software or failure to use updates; (6) cap the provider's aggregate liability at the fees paid in the 12 months preceding the claim. Write the clause as clear, numbered paragraphs in plain English.",
+    "reference_files": [],
+    "reference_file_urls": [],
+    "reference_file_hf_uris": [],
+    "deliverable_files": ["indemnification_clause.txt"],
+    "deliverable_file_urls": [],
+    "deliverable_file_hf_uris": [],
+    "rubric_pretty": "[+2] The clause covers third-party intellectual property infringement claims.\n[+2] The clause requires the provider to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the customer.\n[+2] The clause states the provider will pay damages, costs, and reasonable attorneys' fees.\n[+2] The clause allows the provider to control the defense, conditioned on the customer's reasonable cooperation.\n[+2] The clause excludes claims caused by the customer's unauthorized modification or failure to use updates.\n[+2] The clause caps aggregate liability at fees paid in the 12 months preceding the claim.\n[+1] The clause is written in numbered paragraphs in clear language.\n[+1] The clause identifies both parties by role (provider/customer).\n[+5] Overall drafting quality, clarity, and completeness.",
+    "rubric_json": "[{\"score\": 2, \"criterion\": \"The clause covers third-party intellectual property infringement claims.\", \"required\": null, \"rubric_item_id\": \"law-001-r1\", \"author_type\": \"human\", \"tags\": [\"true\"]}, {\"score\": 2, \"criterion\": \"The clause requires the provider to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the customer.\", \"required\": null, \"rubric_item_id\": \"law-001-r2\", \"author_type\": \"human\", \"tags\": [\"true\"]}, {\"score\": 2, \"criterion\": \"The clause states the provider will pay damages, costs, and reasonable attorneys' fees.\", \"required\": null, \"rubric_item_id\": \"law-001-r3\", \"author_type\": \"human\", \"tags\": [\"true\"]}, {\"score\": 2, \"criterion\": \"The clause allows the provider to control the defense, conditioned on the customer's reasonable cooperation.\", \"required\": null, \"rubric_item_id\": \"law-001-r4\", \"author_type\": \"human\", \"tags\": [\"true\"]}, {\"score\": 2, \"criterion\": \"The clause excludes claims caused by the customer's unauthorized modification or failure to use updates.\", \"required\": null, \"rubric_item_id\": \"law-001-r5\", \"author_type\": \"human\", \"tags\": [\"true\"]}, {\"score\": 2, \"criterion\": \"The clause caps aggregate liability at fees paid in the 12 months preceding the claim.\", \"required\": null, \"rubric_item_id\": \"law-001-r6\", \"author_type\": \"human\", \"tags\": [\"true\"]}, {\"score\": 1, \"criterion\": \"The clause is written in numbered paragraphs in clear language.\", \"required\": null, \"rubric_item_id\": \"law-001-r7\", \"author_type\": \"human\", \"tags\": [\"true\"]}, {\"score\": 1, \"criterion\": \"The clause identifies both parties by role (provider/customer).\", \"required\": null, \"rubric_item_id\": \"law-001-r8\", \"author_type\": \"human\", \"tags\": [\"true\"]}, {\"score\": 5, \"criterion\": \"Overall drafting quality, clarity, and completeness.\", \"required\": null, \"rubric_item_id\": \"law-001-r9\", \"author_type\": \"human\", \"tags\": [\"true\"]}]"
+  },
+  {
+    "task_id": "law-002",
+    "sector": "Legal Services",
+    "occupation": "Litigation Associate",
+    "prompt": "You are a junior associate at a law firm. Draft a legal memorandum analyzing a potential breach of contract. Facts: A vendor agreed to deliver 1,000 units of custom hardware by March 1 at $50/unit. The vendor delivered only 600 units on March 1 and the remaining 400 on April 15. The buyer paid a 20% deposit upfront. The contract has a time-is-of-the-essence clause and a liquidated damages provision of $1,000 per day of delay, capped at 10% of the contract price. The buyer incurred $25,000 in additional costs because of the delay. Address: (1) whether the vendor breached; (2) which remedies the buyer can pursue (specific performance, damages, liquidated damages); (3) the enforceability of the liquidated damages clause; and (4) a recommended next step. Structure the memo with headings: Summary, Facts, Analysis, Recommendation.",
+    "reference_files": [],
+    "reference_file_urls": [],
+    "reference_file_hf_uris": [],
+    "deliverable_files": ["breach_memo.txt"],
+    "deliverable_file_urls": [],
+    "deliverable_file_hf_uris": [],
+    "rubric_pretty": "[+2] The memo includes Summary, Facts, Analysis, and Recommendation sections.\n[+2] Correctly identifies that the vendor breached the delivery obligation (600 of 1,000 units on time).\n[+2] Discusses the time-is-of-the-essence clause as strengthening the buyer's position.\n[+2] Discusses at least two remedies: damages and liquidated damages (and/or specific performance).\n[+2] Analyzes liquidated damages enforceability (capped at 10% of the contract price).\n[+2] Considers the $25,000 additional costs in the damages analysis.\n[+1] Applies the appropriate legal standard for breach (material breach / substantial performance).\n[+1] Gives a clear, actionable recommendation.\n[+5] Overall clarity, structure, and legal reasoning.",
+    "rubric_json": "[{\"score\": 2, \"criterion\": \"The memo includes Summary, Facts, Analysis, and Recommendation sections.\", \"required\": null, \"rubric_item_id\": \"law-002-r1\", \"author_type\": \"human\", \"tags\": [\"true\"]}, {\"score\": 2, \"criterion\": \"Correctly identifies that the vendor breached the delivery obligation (600 of 1,000 units on time).\", \"required\": null, \"rubric_item_id\": \"law-002-r2\", \"author_type\": \"human\", \"tags\": [\"true\"]}, {\"score\": 2, \"criterion\": \"Discusses the time-is-of-the-essence clause as strengthening the buyer's position.\", \"required\": null, \"rubric_item_id\": \"law-002-r3\", \"author_type\": \"human\", \"tags\": [\"true\"]}, {\"score\": 2, \"criterion\": \"Discusses at least two remedies: damages and liquidated damages (and/or specific performance).\", \"required\": null, \"rubric_item_id\": \"law-002-r4\", \"author_type\": \"human\", \"tags\": [\"true\"]}, {\"score\": 2, \"criterion\": \"Analyzes liquidated damages enforceability (capped at 10% of the contract price).\", \"required\": null, \"rubric_item_id\": \"law-002-r5\", \"author_type\": \"human\", \"tags\": [\"true\"]}, {\"score\": 2, \"criterion\": \"Considers the $25,000 additional costs in the damages analysis.\", \"required\": null, \"rubric_item_id\": \"law-002-r6\", \"author_type\": \"human\", \"tags\": [\"true\"]}, {\"score\": 1, \"criterion\": \"Applies the appropriate legal standard for breach (material breach / substantial performance).\", \"required\": null, \"rubric_item_id\": \"law-002-r7\", \"author_type\": \"human\", \"tags\": [\"true\"]}, {\"score\": 1, \"criterion\": \"Gives a clear, actionable recommendation.\", \"required\": null, \"rubric_item_id\": \"law-002-r8\", \"author_type\": \"human\", \"tags\": [\"true\"]}, {\"score\": 5, \"criterion\": \"Overall clarity, structure, and legal reasoning.\", \"required\": null, \"rubric_item_id\": \"law-002-r9\", \"author_type\": \"human\", \"tags\": [\"true\"]}]"
+  },
+  {
+    "task_id": "law-003",
+    "sector": "Legal Services",
+    "occupation": "Privacy / Compliance Officer",
+    "prompt": "You are a privacy and compliance officer. A small e-commerce company described its data handling as follows: it collects customer names, emails, addresses, and payment card data at checkout; it uses the data for order fulfillment and for an email newsletter that is pre-checked at signup; it shares customer data with a shipping carrier and an analytics provider; it stores data indefinitely in a database in the United States; it has no designated data protection officer and has never reported a breach. Draft a compliance report listing every GDPR issue you find, explaining why each is a violation and how to fix it. Write the report as numbered findings with a 'Recommended Fix' under each.",
+    "reference_files": [],
+    "reference_file_urls": [],
+    "reference_file_hf_uris": [],
+    "deliverable_files": ["gdpr_compliance_report.txt"],
+    "deliverable_file_urls": [],
+    "deliverable_file_hf_uris": [],
+    "rubric_pretty": "[+2] Identifies the pre-checked newsletter as a consent/lawful-basis violation (no opt-in).\n[+2] Identifies collecting payment card data as a data minimization concern.\n[+2] Identifies sharing data with the analytics provider without processor agreements/assessment.\n[+2] Identifies indefinite retention as a storage limitation violation.\n[+2] Identifies the US data transfer issue (no safeguards such as SCCs).\n[+2] Identifies missing DPO concern (where required) and/or failure to notify breaches.\n[+2] Each finding includes a Recommended Fix.\n[+1] Findings are numbered and clearly written.\n[+5] Overall accuracy and completeness of the compliance analysis.",
+    "rubric_json": "[{\"score\": 2, \"criterion\": \"Identifies the pre-checked newsletter as a consent/lawful-basis violation (no opt-in).\", \"required\": null, \"rubric_item_id\": \"law-003-r1\", \"author_type\": \"human\", \"tags\": [\"true\"]}, {\"score\": 2, \"criterion\": \"Identifies collecting payment card data as a data minimization concern.\", \"required\": null, \"rubric_item_id\": \"law-003-r2\", \"author_type\": \"human\", \"tags\": [\"true\"]}, {\"score\": 2, \"criterion\": \"Identifies sharing data with the analytics provider without processor agreements/assessment.\", \"required\": null, \"rubric_item_id\": \"law-003-r3\", \"author_type\": \"human\", \"tags\": [\"true\"]}, {\"score\": 2, \"criterion\": \"Identifies indefinite retention as a storage limitation violation.\", \"required\": null, \"rubric_item_id\": \"law-003-r4\", \"author_type\": \"human\", \"tags\": [\"true\"]}, {\"score\": 2, \"criterion\": \"Identifies the US data transfer issue (no safeguards such as SCCs).\", \"required\": null, \"rubric_item_id\": \"law-003-r5\", \"author_type\": \"human\", \"tags\": [\"true\"]}, {\"score\": 2, \"criterion\": \"Identifies missing DPO concern (where required) and/or failure to notify breaches.\", \"required\": null, \"rubric_item_id\": \"law-003-r6\", \"author_type\": \"human\", \"tags\": [\"true\"]}, {\"score\": 2, \"criterion\": \"Each finding includes a Recommended Fix.\", \"required\": null, \"rubric_item_id\": \"law-003-r7\", \"author_type\": \"human\", \"tags\": [\"true\"]}, {\"score\": 1, \"criterion\": \"Findings are numbered and clearly written.\", \"required\": null, \"rubric_item_id\": \"law-003-r8\", \"author_type\": \"human\", \"tags\": [\"true\"]}, {\"score\": 5, \"criterion\": \"Overall accuracy and completeness of the compliance analysis.\", \"required\": null, \"rubric_item_id\": \"law-003-r9\", \"author_type\": \"human\", \"tags\": [\"true\"]}]"
+  },
+  {
+    "task_id": "law-004",
+    "sector": "Legal Services",
+    "occupation": "Law Clerk",
+    "prompt": "You are a law clerk asked to prepare a case brief. Facts of the hypothetical case 'Mason v. Pemberton': A delivery driver employed by Pemberton Logistics hit a pedestrian while running a personal errand during working hours using a company vehicle. The pedestrian sued Pemberton Logistics for negligence. The trial court dismissed the claim, holding the driver was acting outside the scope of employment. The appellate court reversed, finding the driver's use of the company vehicle during work hours created liability. The state supreme court must decide: is an employer vicariously liable when an employee uses a company vehicle for a personal errand during working hours? Draft a case brief with these sections: Case Name, Facts, Issue, Holding, Reasoning, and Notes.",
+    "reference_files": [],
+    "reference_file_urls": [],
+    "reference_file_hf_uris": [],
+    "deliverable_files": ["case_brief.txt"],
+    "deliverable_file_urls": [],
+    "deliverable_file_hf_uris": [],
+    "rubric_pretty": "[+2] The brief includes Case Name, Facts, Issue, Holding, Reasoning, and Notes sections.\n[+2] Facts accurately capture the key facts (company vehicle, personal errand, working hours, pedestrian injury).\n[+2] The Issue is framed as a clear legal question about vicarious liability / scope of employment.\n[+2] The Holding directly answers the Issue.\n[+2] Reasoning discusses scope-of-employment doctrine (frolic vs. detour, benefit to employer).\n[+1] Notes flag the personal-errand vs. company-vehicle tension.\n[+1] The brief is concise and well organized.\n[+5] Overall quality of the legal analysis.",
+    "rubric_json": "[{\"score\": 2, \"criterion\": \"The brief includes Case Name, Facts, Issue, Holding, Reasoning, and Notes sections.\", \"required\": null, \"rubric_item_id\": \"law-004-r1\", \"author_type\": \"human\", \"tags\": [\"true\"]}, {\"score\": 2, \"criterion\": \"Facts accurately capture the key facts (company vehicle, personal errand, working hours, pedestrian injury).\", \"required\": null, \"rubric_item_id\": \"law-004-r2\", \"author_type\": \"human\", \"tags\": [\"true\"]}, {\"score\": 2, \"criterion\": \"The Issue is framed as a clear legal question about vicarious liability / scope of employment.\", \"required\": null, \"rubric_item_id\": \"law-004-r3\", \"author_type\": \"human\", \"tags\": [\"true\"]}, {\"score\": 2, \"criterion\": \"The Holding directly answers the Issue.\", \"required\": null, \"rubric_item_id\": \"law-004-r4\", \"author_type\": \"human\", \"tags\": [\"true\"]}, {\"score\": 2, \"criterion\": \"Reasoning discusses scope-of-employment doctrine (frolic vs. detour, benefit to employer).\", \"required\": null, \"rubric_item_id\": \"law-004-r5\", \"author_type\": \"human\", \"tags\": [\"true\"]}, {\"score\": 1, \"criterion\": \"Notes flag the personal-errand vs. company-vehicle tension.\", \"required\": null, \"rubric_item_id\": \"law-004-r6\", \"author_type\": \"human\", \"tags\": [\"true\"]}, {\"score\": 1, \"criterion\": \"The brief is concise and well organized.\", \"required\": null, \"rubric_item_id\": \"law-004-r7\", \"author_type\": \"human\", \"tags\": [\"true\"]}, {\"score\": 5, \"criterion\": \"Overall quality of the legal analysis.\", \"required\": null, \"rubric_item_id\": \"law-004-r8\", \"author_type\": \"human\", \"tags\": [\"true\"]}]"
+  },
+  {
+    "task_id": "law-005",
+    "sector": "Legal Services",
+    "occupation": "Contracts Analyst",
+    "prompt": "You are a contracts analyst performing due diligence on a vendor contract. The draft services agreement contains: (1) an unlimited indemnity in favor of the vendor; (2) no limitation of liability for either party; (3) a one-year limitation period for bringing claims; (4) an auto-renewal clause with 30 days' notice; (5) a clause allowing the vendor to change prices with 7 days' notice; (6) a broad confidentiality obligation on the customer but none on the vendor; and (7) a governing law clause selecting a foreign jurisdiction. Draft a due diligence report that lists each risk, explains the concern, and proposes a negotiation position. Format as numbered findings with 'Risk', 'Concern', and 'Proposed Position' for each.",
+    "reference_files": [],
+    "reference_file_urls": [],
+    "reference_file_hf_uris": [],
+    "deliverable_files": ["due_diligence_report.txt"],
+    "deliverable_file_urls": [],
+    "deliverable_file_hf_uris": [],
+    "rubric_pretty": "[+2] Flags the one-sided unlimited indemnity in favor of the vendor.\n[+2] Flags the absence of a mutual limitation of liability.\n[+2] Flags the short one-year limitation period as unfavorable.\n[+2] Flags the 7-day price change notice as a risk.\n[+2] Flags the one-sided confidentiality obligations.\n[+2] Flags the foreign governing law / jurisdiction risk.\n[+2] Each finding includes Risk, Concern, and Proposed Position.\n[+1] Findings are numbered.\n[+5] Overall quality and usefulness of the negotiation positions.",
+    "rubric_json": "[{\"score\": 2, \"criterion\": \"Flags the one-sided unlimited indemnity in favor of the vendor.\", \"required\": null, \"rubric_item_id\": \"law-005-r1\", \"author_type\": \"human\", \"tags\": [\"true\"]}, {\"score\": 2, \"criterion\": \"Flags the absence of a mutual limitation of liability.\", \"required\": null, \"rubric_item_id\": \"law-005-r2\", \"author_type\": \"human\", \"tags\": [\"true\"]}, {\"score\": 2, \"criterion\": \"Flags the short one-year limitation period as unfavorable.\", \"required\": null, \"rubric_item_id\": \"law-005-r3\", \"author_type\": \"human\", \"tags\": [\"true\"]}, {\"score\": 2, \"criterion\": \"Flags the 7-day price change notice as a risk.\", \"required\": null, \"rubric_item_id\": \"law-005-r4\", \"author_type\": \"human\", \"tags\": [\"true\"]}, {\"score\": 2, \"criterion\": \"Flags the one-sided confidentiality obligations.\", \"required\": null, \"rubric_item_id\": \"law-005-r5\", \"author_type\": \"human\", \"tags\": [\"true\"]}, {\"score\": 2, \"criterion\": \"Flags the foreign governing law / jurisdiction risk.\", \"required\": null, \"rubric_item_id\": \"law-005-r6\", \"author_type\": \"human\", \"tags\": [\"true\"]}, {\"score\": 2, \"criterion\": \"Each finding includes Risk, Concern, and Proposed Position.\", \"required\": null, \"rubric_item_id\": \"law-005-r7\", \"author_type\": \"human\", \"tags\": [\"true\"]}, {\"score\": 1, \"criterion\": \"Findings are numbered.\", \"required\": null, \"rubric_item_id\": \"law-005-r8\", \"author_type\": \"human\", \"tags\": [\"true\"]}, {\"score\": 5, \"criterion\": \"Overall quality and usefulness of the negotiation positions.\", \"required\": null, \"rubric_item_id\": \"law-005-r9\", \"author_type\": \"human\", \"tags\": [\"true\"]}]"
+  }
+]