Upload folder using huggingface_hub
Browse files- DATASHEET.md +197 -0
- README.md +88 -0
- croissant.json +208 -0
- profiles/benchmark.yaml +14 -0
- profiles/benchmark_special.yaml +32 -0
- profiles/profiles_source.py +167 -0
- tasks/adversarial.yaml +232 -0
- tasks/devops.yaml +273 -0
- tasks/finance.yaml +264 -0
- tasks/handover.yaml +96 -0
- tasks/impossible.yaml +186 -0
- tasks/retail.yaml +420 -0
- tasks/travel.yaml +330 -0
- tasks/variants.yaml +323 -0
DATASHEET.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,197 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
# Datasheet for AgentDisruptBench
|
| 2 |
+
|
| 3 |
+
_Following the [Datasheets for Datasets](https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.09010) framework (Gebru et al., 2021)._
|
| 4 |
+
|
| 5 |
+
---
|
| 6 |
+
|
| 7 |
+
## Motivation
|
| 8 |
+
|
| 9 |
+
### For what purpose was the dataset created?
|
| 10 |
+
|
| 11 |
+
AgentDisruptBench was created to evaluate AI agent resilience under runtime tool-call disruptions. Existing benchmarks measure *whether* agents can use tools correctly, but assume tools behave perfectly — an unrealistic assumption in production environments where APIs time out, return malformed responses, enforce rate limits, and cascade failures. This benchmark fills the gap by providing structured tasks paired with configurable disruption profiles to measure agent reliability, recovery strategies, and graceful degradation.
|
| 12 |
+
|
| 13 |
+
### Who created the dataset and on behalf of which entity?
|
| 14 |
+
|
| 15 |
+
AgentDisruptBench Contributors, as part of academic research into AI agent robustness.
|
| 16 |
+
|
| 17 |
+
### Who funded the creation of the dataset?
|
| 18 |
+
|
| 19 |
+
<!-- Fill in: grant numbers, institutional support, etc. -->
|
| 20 |
+
[To be specified]
|
| 21 |
+
|
| 22 |
+
---
|
| 23 |
+
|
| 24 |
+
## Composition
|
| 25 |
+
|
| 26 |
+
### What do the instances that comprise the dataset represent?
|
| 27 |
+
|
| 28 |
+
Each instance is a **benchmark task** defined in YAML with:
|
| 29 |
+
- A natural language task description (the prompt given to the agent)
|
| 30 |
+
- Required tools (from a set of 30 deterministic mock tools)
|
| 31 |
+
- Ground truth: expected outcome, required tool calls, evaluation rubric with weighted criteria
|
| 32 |
+
- Metadata: domain, difficulty (1-5), task type
|
| 33 |
+
|
| 34 |
+
### How many instances are there in total?
|
| 35 |
+
|
| 36 |
+
**100 tasks** organized as follows:
|
| 37 |
+
|
| 38 |
+
| Domain | Standard | Adversarial | Impossible | Handover | Total |
|
| 39 |
+
|------------|:--------:|:-----------:|:----------:|:--------:|:-----:|
|
| 40 |
+
| Retail | 20 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 25 |
|
| 41 |
+
| Travel | 20 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 25 |
|
| 42 |
+
| Finance | 20 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 25 |
|
| 43 |
+
| DevOps | 20 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 25 |
|
| 44 |
+
| **Total** | **80** | **8** | **8** | **4** | **100** |
|
| 45 |
+
|
| 46 |
+
### Does the dataset contain all possible instances or is it a sample?
|
| 47 |
+
|
| 48 |
+
The dataset is a curated collection of synthetic tasks. It is not a sample from a larger population. Task difficulty levels are distributed as D1=8, D2=16, D3=24, D4=20, D5=12 tasks across standard tasks, following a roughly bell-shaped distribution centered on medium difficulty.
|
| 49 |
+
|
| 50 |
+
### What data does each instance consist of?
|
| 51 |
+
|
| 52 |
+
Each task instance contains:
|
| 53 |
+
- `task_id`: Unique identifier (e.g., `retail_001`)
|
| 54 |
+
- `title`: Short human-readable title
|
| 55 |
+
- `description`: Full prompt given to the agent (natural language)
|
| 56 |
+
- `domain`: One of {retail, travel, finance, devops}
|
| 57 |
+
- `difficulty`: Integer 1-5
|
| 58 |
+
- `task_type`: One of {standard, adversarial, impossible}
|
| 59 |
+
- `required_tools`: List of tool names needed
|
| 60 |
+
- `expected_tool_call_depth`: Expected number of tool calls under clean conditions
|
| 61 |
+
- `ground_truth`: Structured evaluation criteria including:
|
| 62 |
+
- `expected_outcome`: Description of success
|
| 63 |
+
- `required_tool_calls`: Tools that must be called
|
| 64 |
+
- `forbidden_tool_calls`: Tools that must NOT be called
|
| 65 |
+
- `correct_final_answer`: Exact expected answer (if applicable)
|
| 66 |
+
- `evaluation_rubric`: Criterion → weight mapping (sums ≈ 1.0)
|
| 67 |
+
- `disruption_sensitive_tools`: Tools where failure is most impactful
|
| 68 |
+
- `recovery_actions`: Expected recovery behaviours
|
| 69 |
+
- `trap_description`: (adversarial only) the trap the agent should avoid
|
| 70 |
+
- `impossibility_reason`: (impossible only) why no valid solution exists
|
| 71 |
+
|
| 72 |
+
### Is any information missing from individual instances?
|
| 73 |
+
|
| 74 |
+
No. All fields are populated for every task instance.
|
| 75 |
+
|
| 76 |
+
### Are relationships between individual instances made explicit?
|
| 77 |
+
|
| 78 |
+
Tasks within the same domain share tools and mock data (e.g., retail tasks all use the same product catalog and customer database via deterministic mock tools). Cross-domain relationships do not exist.
|
| 79 |
+
|
| 80 |
+
### Are there recommended data splits?
|
| 81 |
+
|
| 82 |
+
No train/test split is provided because this is a benchmark, not a training dataset. All 100 tasks are intended for evaluation. However, researchers may partition by domain, difficulty, or task type for focused analysis.
|
| 83 |
+
|
| 84 |
+
### Does the dataset contain data that might be considered confidential?
|
| 85 |
+
|
| 86 |
+
No. All data is synthetic. No real personal data, API keys, or proprietary information is included.
|
| 87 |
+
|
| 88 |
+
### Does the dataset contain data that, if viewed directly, might be offensive, insulting, threatening, or might otherwise cause anxiety?
|
| 89 |
+
|
| 90 |
+
No. Tasks involve routine operations (e-commerce, travel booking, financial transactions, DevOps operations) with no offensive content.
|
| 91 |
+
|
| 92 |
+
---
|
| 93 |
+
|
| 94 |
+
## Collection Process
|
| 95 |
+
|
| 96 |
+
### How was the data associated with each instance acquired?
|
| 97 |
+
|
| 98 |
+
All tasks were authored manually by the benchmark contributors. They are synthetic, designed to cover a range of realistic tool-use scenarios across difficulty levels.
|
| 99 |
+
|
| 100 |
+
### What mechanisms or procedures were used to collect the data?
|
| 101 |
+
|
| 102 |
+
Task design followed a structured process:
|
| 103 |
+
1. Define 4 domains based on common LLM agent use cases
|
| 104 |
+
2. Design 8 mock tools per domain (30 total)
|
| 105 |
+
3. Author 20 standard tasks per domain with increasing difficulty
|
| 106 |
+
4. Author adversarial tasks with designed trap patterns
|
| 107 |
+
5. Author impossible tasks with clear impossibility reasons
|
| 108 |
+
6. Author handover tasks requiring human escalation
|
| 109 |
+
7. Validate all ground truth against mock tool outputs
|
| 110 |
+
|
| 111 |
+
### Who was involved in the data collection process?
|
| 112 |
+
|
| 113 |
+
The benchmark authors.
|
| 114 |
+
|
| 115 |
+
### Over what timeframe was the data collected?
|
| 116 |
+
|
| 117 |
+
March-April 2026.
|
| 118 |
+
|
| 119 |
+
### Were any ethical review processes conducted?
|
| 120 |
+
|
| 121 |
+
<!-- Fill in if applicable -->
|
| 122 |
+
[To be specified]
|
| 123 |
+
|
| 124 |
+
---
|
| 125 |
+
|
| 126 |
+
## Uses
|
| 127 |
+
|
| 128 |
+
### What are the intended uses of the dataset?
|
| 129 |
+
|
| 130 |
+
1. **Primary**: Evaluate AI agent resilience under runtime tool-call disruptions using the provided disruption profiles (clean → hostile_environment)
|
| 131 |
+
2. **Secondary**: Compare agent frameworks (LangChain, OpenAI, AutoGen, CrewAI) on reliability metrics
|
| 132 |
+
3. **Tertiary**: Study recovery strategies and failure patterns in LLM agents
|
| 133 |
+
|
| 134 |
+
### What are some tasks/uses that the dataset should not be used for?
|
| 135 |
+
|
| 136 |
+
- **Not for training**: The benchmark should be used for evaluation only. Training on the tasks would compromise benchmark validity.
|
| 137 |
+
- **Not for real tool testing**: Mock tools are deterministic simulations, not real API integrations.
|
| 138 |
+
- **Not for safety/security evaluation**: The disruptions model reliability failures, not adversarial attacks.
|
| 139 |
+
|
| 140 |
+
### Is there anything about the composition of the dataset or the way it was collected that might impact future uses?
|
| 141 |
+
|
| 142 |
+
- Tasks are in English only
|
| 143 |
+
- Mock tools simulate US-centric services (USD currency, US dates, etc.)
|
| 144 |
+
- Ground truth rubrics use string-matching heuristics which may not capture all valid agent responses
|
| 145 |
+
|
| 146 |
+
---
|
| 147 |
+
|
| 148 |
+
## Distribution
|
| 149 |
+
|
| 150 |
+
### How will the dataset be distributed?
|
| 151 |
+
|
| 152 |
+
- **Primary**: GitHub repository at [https://github.com/Kavirubc/AgentDisruptBench](https://github.com/Kavirubc/AgentDisruptBench)
|
| 153 |
+
- **Persistent**: HuggingFace Datasets at [To be created]
|
| 154 |
+
- **Metadata**: Croissant JSON-LD file included in the repository
|
| 155 |
+
|
| 156 |
+
### When will the dataset be distributed?
|
| 157 |
+
|
| 158 |
+
The dataset is publicly available as of the initial release.
|
| 159 |
+
|
| 160 |
+
### Will the dataset be distributed under a copyright or other intellectual property (IP) license?
|
| 161 |
+
|
| 162 |
+
MIT License.
|
| 163 |
+
|
| 164 |
+
### Have any third parties imposed IP-based or other restrictions on the data?
|
| 165 |
+
|
| 166 |
+
No.
|
| 167 |
+
|
| 168 |
+
---
|
| 169 |
+
|
| 170 |
+
## Maintenance
|
| 171 |
+
|
| 172 |
+
### Who is supporting/hosting/maintaining the dataset?
|
| 173 |
+
|
| 174 |
+
AgentDisruptBench Contributors via the GitHub repository.
|
| 175 |
+
|
| 176 |
+
### How can the owner/curator/manager of the dataset be contacted?
|
| 177 |
+
|
| 178 |
+
Via GitHub Issues at the repository.
|
| 179 |
+
|
| 180 |
+
### Will the dataset be updated?
|
| 181 |
+
|
| 182 |
+
Yes. Planned updates include:
|
| 183 |
+
- Additional task variants for ε-robustness testing
|
| 184 |
+
- New domains
|
| 185 |
+
- Track B: Network-layer disruption injection via Envoy proxy
|
| 186 |
+
|
| 187 |
+
### If the dataset relates to people, are there applicable limits on the retention of the data?
|
| 188 |
+
|
| 189 |
+
N/A — the dataset is entirely synthetic with no real personal data.
|
| 190 |
+
|
| 191 |
+
### Will older versions of the dataset continue to be available?
|
| 192 |
+
|
| 193 |
+
Yes, via Git tags and versioned releases.
|
| 194 |
+
|
| 195 |
+
### If others want to extend/augment/build on/contribute to the dataset, is there a mechanism for doing so?
|
| 196 |
+
|
| 197 |
+
Yes. See [CONTRIBUTING.md](CONTRIBUTING.md) for guidelines on contributing new tasks, domains, tools, and disruption types.
|
README.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
---
|
| 2 |
+
language:
|
| 3 |
+
- en
|
| 4 |
+
license: mit
|
| 5 |
+
task_categories:
|
| 6 |
+
- text-generation
|
| 7 |
+
tags:
|
| 8 |
+
- agents
|
| 9 |
+
- benchmarks
|
| 10 |
+
- tool-calling
|
| 11 |
+
- resilience
|
| 12 |
+
- disruption
|
| 13 |
+
- fault-injection
|
| 14 |
+
- LLM
|
| 15 |
+
- evaluation
|
| 16 |
+
pretty_name: AgentDisruptBench
|
| 17 |
+
size_categories:
|
| 18 |
+
- n<1K
|
| 19 |
+
---
|
| 20 |
+
|
| 21 |
+
# AgentDisruptBench
|
| 22 |
+
|
| 23 |
+
A benchmark for evaluating AI agent resilience under runtime tool-call disruptions.
|
| 24 |
+
|
| 25 |
+
## Overview
|
| 26 |
+
|
| 27 |
+
AgentDisruptBench provides **100 benchmark tasks** across **4 domains** with a systematic **20-type disruption taxonomy** and **9 disruption severity profiles** to measure how well LLM-based agents handle real-world tool failures.
|
| 28 |
+
|
| 29 |
+
## Task Statistics
|
| 30 |
+
|
| 31 |
+
| Domain | Standard | Adversarial | Impossible | Handover | Total |
|
| 32 |
+
|----------|:--------:|:-----------:|:----------:|:--------:|:-----:|
|
| 33 |
+
| Retail | 20 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 25 |
|
| 34 |
+
| Travel | 20 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 25 |
|
| 35 |
+
| Finance | 20 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 25 |
|
| 36 |
+
| DevOps | 20 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 25 |
|
| 37 |
+
| **Total**| **80** | **8** | **8** | **4** | **100** |
|
| 38 |
+
|
| 39 |
+
## Disruption Taxonomy (20 Types)
|
| 40 |
+
|
| 41 |
+
| Category | Types |
|
| 42 |
+
|----------|-------|
|
| 43 |
+
| Timing | timeout, latency |
|
| 44 |
+
| HTTP Status | http_429, http_401, http_403, http_500, http_502, http_503 |
|
| 45 |
+
| Response Content | malformed_json, truncated, null_response, missing_fields, type_mismatch, schema_drift, wrong_data |
|
| 46 |
+
| Behavioral | intermittent, flapping, quota_exhausted, auth_expiry, cascading |
|
| 47 |
+
|
| 48 |
+
## Key Metric: R(k, ε, λ) Reliability Surface
|
| 49 |
+
|
| 50 |
+
- **k-consistency**: Pass rate across repeated seeds (same task, same profile)
|
| 51 |
+
- **ε-robustness**: Pass rate across task-wording variants
|
| 52 |
+
- **λ-fault-tolerance**: Pass rate across disruption profiles
|
| 53 |
+
|
| 54 |
+
## Files
|
| 55 |
+
|
| 56 |
+
- `tasks/retail.yaml` — 20 retail domain tasks
|
| 57 |
+
- `tasks/travel.yaml` — 20 travel domain tasks
|
| 58 |
+
- `tasks/finance.yaml` — 20 finance domain tasks
|
| 59 |
+
- `tasks/devops.yaml` — 20 DevOps domain tasks
|
| 60 |
+
- `tasks/adversarial.yaml` — 8 adversarial trap tasks
|
| 61 |
+
- `tasks/impossible.yaml` — 8 impossible tasks
|
| 62 |
+
- `tasks/handover.yaml` — 4 handover tasks
|
| 63 |
+
- `tasks/variants.yaml` — 18 ε-robustness task variants
|
| 64 |
+
- `profiles/` — 9 disruption profile definitions
|
| 65 |
+
|
| 66 |
+
## Usage
|
| 67 |
+
|
| 68 |
+
```python
|
| 69 |
+
pip install agentdisruptbench
|
| 70 |
+
|
| 71 |
+
from agentdisruptbench import TaskRegistry, DisruptionEngine
|
| 72 |
+
registry = TaskRegistry.from_builtin()
|
| 73 |
+
tasks = registry.filter(domain="retail", max_difficulty=3)
|
| 74 |
+
```
|
| 75 |
+
|
| 76 |
+
## Citation
|
| 77 |
+
|
| 78 |
+
```bibtex
|
| 79 |
+
@inproceedings{agentdisruptbench2026,
|
| 80 |
+
title={AgentDisruptBench: Evaluating AI Agent Resilience Under Runtime Tool-Call Disruptions},
|
| 81 |
+
author={AgentDisruptBench Contributors},
|
| 82 |
+
year={2026}
|
| 83 |
+
}
|
| 84 |
+
```
|
| 85 |
+
|
| 86 |
+
## License
|
| 87 |
+
|
| 88 |
+
MIT
|
croissant.json
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,208 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
{
|
| 2 |
+
"@context": {
|
| 3 |
+
"@language": "en",
|
| 4 |
+
"@vocab": "https://schema.org/",
|
| 5 |
+
"citeAs": "cr:citeAs",
|
| 6 |
+
"column": "cr:column",
|
| 7 |
+
"conformsTo": "dct:conformsTo",
|
| 8 |
+
"cr": "http://mlcommons.org/croissant/",
|
| 9 |
+
"data": {
|
| 10 |
+
"@id": "cr:data",
|
| 11 |
+
"@type": "@json"
|
| 12 |
+
},
|
| 13 |
+
"dataBiases": "cr:dataBiases",
|
| 14 |
+
"dataCollection": "cr:dataCollection",
|
| 15 |
+
"dataType": {
|
| 16 |
+
"@id": "cr:dataType",
|
| 17 |
+
"@type": "@vocab"
|
| 18 |
+
},
|
| 19 |
+
"dct": "http://purl.org/dc/terms/",
|
| 20 |
+
"extract": "cr:extract",
|
| 21 |
+
"field": "cr:field",
|
| 22 |
+
"fileProperty": "cr:fileProperty",
|
| 23 |
+
"fileSet": "cr:fileSet",
|
| 24 |
+
"format": "cr:format",
|
| 25 |
+
"includes": "cr:includes",
|
| 26 |
+
"isLiveDataset": "cr:isLiveDataset",
|
| 27 |
+
"jsonPath": "cr:jsonPath",
|
| 28 |
+
"key": "cr:key",
|
| 29 |
+
"md5": "cr:md5",
|
| 30 |
+
"parentField": "cr:parentField",
|
| 31 |
+
"path": "cr:path",
|
| 32 |
+
"personalSensitiveInformation": "cr:personalSensitiveInformation",
|
| 33 |
+
"recordSet": "cr:recordSet",
|
| 34 |
+
"references": "cr:references",
|
| 35 |
+
"regex": "cr:regex",
|
| 36 |
+
"repeated": "cr:repeated",
|
| 37 |
+
"replace": "cr:replace",
|
| 38 |
+
"sc": "https://schema.org/",
|
| 39 |
+
"separator": "cr:separator",
|
| 40 |
+
"source": "cr:source",
|
| 41 |
+
"subField": "cr:subField",
|
| 42 |
+
"transform": "cr:transform"
|
| 43 |
+
},
|
| 44 |
+
"@type": "sc:Dataset",
|
| 45 |
+
"name": "AgentDisruptBench",
|
| 46 |
+
"description": "A benchmark for evaluating AI agent resilience under runtime tool-call disruptions. Contains 100 tasks across 4 domains (Retail, Travel, Finance, DevOps) with 20 disruption types and 9 disruption profiles.",
|
| 47 |
+
"conformsTo": "http://mlcommons.org/croissant/1.0",
|
| 48 |
+
"url": "https://github.com/Kavirubc/AgentDisruptBench",
|
| 49 |
+
"license": "https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT",
|
| 50 |
+
"version": "0.1.0",
|
| 51 |
+
"datePublished": "2026-04-03",
|
| 52 |
+
"creator": {
|
| 53 |
+
"@type": "sc:Organization",
|
| 54 |
+
"name": "AgentDisruptBench Contributors"
|
| 55 |
+
},
|
| 56 |
+
"keywords": [
|
| 57 |
+
"AI agents",
|
| 58 |
+
"benchmarks",
|
| 59 |
+
"resilience",
|
| 60 |
+
"tool-calling",
|
| 61 |
+
"disruptions",
|
| 62 |
+
"evaluation",
|
| 63 |
+
"LLM",
|
| 64 |
+
"fault-injection",
|
| 65 |
+
"reliability"
|
| 66 |
+
],
|
| 67 |
+
"isLiveDataset": false,
|
| 68 |
+
"distribution": [
|
| 69 |
+
{
|
| 70 |
+
"@type": "cr:FileObject",
|
| 71 |
+
"@id": "retail-tasks",
|
| 72 |
+
"name": "retail.yaml",
|
| 73 |
+
"description": "20 standard retail domain tasks (difficulty 1-5)",
|
| 74 |
+
"contentUrl": "python/agentdisruptbench/tasks/builtin/retail.yaml",
|
| 75 |
+
"encodingFormat": "application/x-yaml",
|
| 76 |
+
"sha256": "5c00f518f411c868ab8ee81c35c664e443734716ce38944833deffc9ea49b98d"
|
| 77 |
+
},
|
| 78 |
+
{
|
| 79 |
+
"@type": "cr:FileObject",
|
| 80 |
+
"@id": "travel-tasks",
|
| 81 |
+
"name": "travel.yaml",
|
| 82 |
+
"description": "20 standard travel domain tasks (difficulty 1-5)",
|
| 83 |
+
"contentUrl": "python/agentdisruptbench/tasks/builtin/travel.yaml",
|
| 84 |
+
"encodingFormat": "application/x-yaml",
|
| 85 |
+
"sha256": "2e06442d72fb8d02d098bb1bb08106abce521d0eccf6d044b3354c69689913b7"
|
| 86 |
+
},
|
| 87 |
+
{
|
| 88 |
+
"@type": "cr:FileObject",
|
| 89 |
+
"@id": "finance-tasks",
|
| 90 |
+
"name": "finance.yaml",
|
| 91 |
+
"description": "20 standard finance domain tasks (difficulty 1-5)",
|
| 92 |
+
"contentUrl": "python/agentdisruptbench/tasks/builtin/finance.yaml",
|
| 93 |
+
"encodingFormat": "application/x-yaml",
|
| 94 |
+
"sha256": "3b5e30eec5b047e2e02b862f7f3e4e1672d16e491aea4990e17440f614bd0594"
|
| 95 |
+
},
|
| 96 |
+
{
|
| 97 |
+
"@type": "cr:FileObject",
|
| 98 |
+
"@id": "devops-tasks",
|
| 99 |
+
"name": "devops.yaml",
|
| 100 |
+
"description": "20 standard DevOps domain tasks (difficulty 1-5)",
|
| 101 |
+
"contentUrl": "python/agentdisruptbench/tasks/builtin/devops.yaml",
|
| 102 |
+
"encodingFormat": "application/x-yaml",
|
| 103 |
+
"sha256": "4f1f6f83275c6b02802b13dd5a67b1760047376354bf0bb6740489877abde947"
|
| 104 |
+
},
|
| 105 |
+
{
|
| 106 |
+
"@type": "cr:FileObject",
|
| 107 |
+
"@id": "adversarial-tasks",
|
| 108 |
+
"name": "adversarial.yaml",
|
| 109 |
+
"description": "8 adversarial trap tasks (2 per domain)",
|
| 110 |
+
"contentUrl": "python/agentdisruptbench/tasks/builtin/adversarial.yaml",
|
| 111 |
+
"encodingFormat": "application/x-yaml",
|
| 112 |
+
"sha256": "f089191acdc97f69fb689cad337a68eee1c5460c391bb94f98443cbefd6b414d"
|
| 113 |
+
},
|
| 114 |
+
{
|
| 115 |
+
"@type": "cr:FileObject",
|
| 116 |
+
"@id": "impossible-tasks",
|
| 117 |
+
"name": "impossible.yaml",
|
| 118 |
+
"description": "8 impossible tasks where no valid solution exists (2 per domain)",
|
| 119 |
+
"contentUrl": "python/agentdisruptbench/tasks/builtin/impossible.yaml",
|
| 120 |
+
"encodingFormat": "application/x-yaml",
|
| 121 |
+
"sha256": "efc67f7b35e356d5ab33cd84f16063a906dd6f3932065f2a127731d2f8f21953"
|
| 122 |
+
},
|
| 123 |
+
{
|
| 124 |
+
"@type": "cr:FileObject",
|
| 125 |
+
"@id": "handover-tasks",
|
| 126 |
+
"name": "handover.yaml",
|
| 127 |
+
"description": "4 handover tasks requiring human escalation (1 per domain)",
|
| 128 |
+
"contentUrl": "python/agentdisruptbench/tasks/builtin/handover.yaml",
|
| 129 |
+
"encodingFormat": "application/x-yaml",
|
| 130 |
+
"sha256": "fb6d522ca219f0f3634914f7534c45c8bbd5ffcf0088019279b8a468788e6de0"
|
| 131 |
+
}
|
| 132 |
+
],
|
| 133 |
+
"recordSet": [
|
| 134 |
+
{
|
| 135 |
+
"@type": "cr:RecordSet",
|
| 136 |
+
"@id": "tasks",
|
| 137 |
+
"name": "Benchmark Tasks",
|
| 138 |
+
"description": "The 100 benchmark tasks across 4 domains and 3 task types.",
|
| 139 |
+
"field": [
|
| 140 |
+
{
|
| 141 |
+
"@type": "cr:Field",
|
| 142 |
+
"@id": "tasks/task_id",
|
| 143 |
+
"name": "task_id",
|
| 144 |
+
"description": "Unique task identifier (e.g., retail_001)",
|
| 145 |
+
"dataType": "sc:Text",
|
| 146 |
+
"source": {
|
| 147 |
+
"fileSet": {
|
| 148 |
+
"@id": "retail-tasks"
|
| 149 |
+
},
|
| 150 |
+
"extract": {
|
| 151 |
+
"jsonPath": "$.tasks[*].task_id"
|
| 152 |
+
}
|
| 153 |
+
}
|
| 154 |
+
},
|
| 155 |
+
{
|
| 156 |
+
"@type": "cr:Field",
|
| 157 |
+
"@id": "tasks/title",
|
| 158 |
+
"name": "title",
|
| 159 |
+
"description": "Short human-readable task title",
|
| 160 |
+
"dataType": "sc:Text"
|
| 161 |
+
},
|
| 162 |
+
{
|
| 163 |
+
"@type": "cr:Field",
|
| 164 |
+
"@id": "tasks/description",
|
| 165 |
+
"name": "description",
|
| 166 |
+
"description": "Full natural language prompt given to the agent",
|
| 167 |
+
"dataType": "sc:Text"
|
| 168 |
+
},
|
| 169 |
+
{
|
| 170 |
+
"@type": "cr:Field",
|
| 171 |
+
"@id": "tasks/domain",
|
| 172 |
+
"name": "domain",
|
| 173 |
+
"description": "Task domain: retail, travel, finance, or devops",
|
| 174 |
+
"dataType": "sc:Text"
|
| 175 |
+
},
|
| 176 |
+
{
|
| 177 |
+
"@type": "cr:Field",
|
| 178 |
+
"@id": "tasks/difficulty",
|
| 179 |
+
"name": "difficulty",
|
| 180 |
+
"description": "Task difficulty level (1-5)",
|
| 181 |
+
"dataType": "sc:Integer"
|
| 182 |
+
},
|
| 183 |
+
{
|
| 184 |
+
"@type": "cr:Field",
|
| 185 |
+
"@id": "tasks/task_type",
|
| 186 |
+
"name": "task_type",
|
| 187 |
+
"description": "Task type: standard, adversarial, or impossible",
|
| 188 |
+
"dataType": "sc:Text"
|
| 189 |
+
},
|
| 190 |
+
{
|
| 191 |
+
"@type": "cr:Field",
|
| 192 |
+
"@id": "tasks/required_tools",
|
| 193 |
+
"name": "required_tools",
|
| 194 |
+
"description": "List of tool names needed to solve the task",
|
| 195 |
+
"dataType": "sc:Text",
|
| 196 |
+
"repeated": true
|
| 197 |
+
},
|
| 198 |
+
{
|
| 199 |
+
"@type": "cr:Field",
|
| 200 |
+
"@id": "tasks/expected_tool_call_depth",
|
| 201 |
+
"name": "expected_tool_call_depth",
|
| 202 |
+
"description": "Expected number of tool calls under clean conditions",
|
| 203 |
+
"dataType": "sc:Integer"
|
| 204 |
+
}
|
| 205 |
+
]
|
| 206 |
+
}
|
| 207 |
+
]
|
| 208 |
+
}
|
profiles/benchmark.yaml
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
# AgentDisruptBench — Benchmark Configuration
|
| 2 |
+
# =============================================
|
| 3 |
+
# Top-level configuration for a benchmark run.
|
| 4 |
+
# Use with: python -m evaluation.run_benchmark --config config/benchmark.yaml
|
| 5 |
+
#
|
| 6 |
+
# CLI arguments override any values set here.
|
| 7 |
+
|
| 8 |
+
runner: rac # simple | openai | langchain | rac
|
| 9 |
+
profiles: [clean, hostile_environment] # Disruption profiles to evaluate
|
| 10 |
+
domains: null # null = all domains, or: [retail, travel, ...]
|
| 11 |
+
max_difficulty: 5 # 1-5
|
| 12 |
+
seeds: [42] # Random seeds for reproducibility
|
| 13 |
+
output_dir: results # Directory for report output
|
| 14 |
+
verbose: false # Print agent reasoning to stdout
|
profiles/benchmark_special.yaml
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
# AgentDisruptBench — Special Tasks Benchmark Config
|
| 2 |
+
# ====================================================
|
| 3 |
+
# Runs only Adversarial (8), Impossible (8), and Handover (4) tasks
|
| 4 |
+
# at full difficulty, across clean + hostile_environment profiles.
|
| 5 |
+
|
| 6 |
+
profiles: [clean, hostile_environment]
|
| 7 |
+
domains: null
|
| 8 |
+
tasks:
|
| 9 |
+
- adversarial_retail_001
|
| 10 |
+
- adversarial_retail_002
|
| 11 |
+
- adversarial_travel_001
|
| 12 |
+
- adversarial_travel_002
|
| 13 |
+
- adversarial_finance_001
|
| 14 |
+
- adversarial_finance_002
|
| 15 |
+
- adversarial_devops_001
|
| 16 |
+
- adversarial_devops_002
|
| 17 |
+
- impossible_retail_001
|
| 18 |
+
- impossible_retail_002
|
| 19 |
+
- impossible_travel_001
|
| 20 |
+
- impossible_travel_002
|
| 21 |
+
- impossible_finance_001
|
| 22 |
+
- impossible_finance_002
|
| 23 |
+
- impossible_devops_001
|
| 24 |
+
- impossible_devops_002
|
| 25 |
+
- handover_retail_001
|
| 26 |
+
- handover_travel_001
|
| 27 |
+
- handover_finance_001
|
| 28 |
+
- handover_devops_001
|
| 29 |
+
max_difficulty: 5
|
| 30 |
+
seeds: [42]
|
| 31 |
+
output_dir: runs/special
|
| 32 |
+
verbose: false
|
profiles/profiles_source.py
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,167 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
"""
|
| 2 |
+
AgentDisruptBench — Disruption Profiles
|
| 3 |
+
========================================
|
| 4 |
+
|
| 5 |
+
File: profiles.py
|
| 6 |
+
Purpose: Built-in disruption profiles (9 profiles) and a YAML loader for
|
| 7 |
+
custom profiles. Profiles map a name to an ordered list of
|
| 8 |
+
DisruptionConfig entries that the engine evaluates per tool call.
|
| 9 |
+
|
| 10 |
+
Author: AgentDisruptBench Contributors
|
| 11 |
+
License: MIT
|
| 12 |
+
Created: 2026-03-09
|
| 13 |
+
Modified: 2026-03-09
|
| 14 |
+
|
| 15 |
+
Key Definitions:
|
| 16 |
+
BUILTIN_PROFILES : dict[str, list[DisruptionConfig]] All 9 built-in
|
| 17 |
+
profiles defined in the AgentDisruptBench spec.
|
| 18 |
+
load_profiles : Load profiles from a YAML file on disk.
|
| 19 |
+
get_profile : Retrieve a profile by name (built-in or custom).
|
| 20 |
+
|
| 21 |
+
Convention:
|
| 22 |
+
Every source file MUST include a header block like this one.
|
| 23 |
+
"""
|
| 24 |
+
|
| 25 |
+
from __future__ import annotations
|
| 26 |
+
|
| 27 |
+
import logging
|
| 28 |
+
from pathlib import Path
|
| 29 |
+
from typing import Any
|
| 30 |
+
|
| 31 |
+
import yaml
|
| 32 |
+
|
| 33 |
+
from agentdisruptbench.core.engine import DisruptionConfig, DisruptionType
|
| 34 |
+
|
| 35 |
+
logger = logging.getLogger("agentdisruptbench.profiles")
|
| 36 |
+
|
| 37 |
+
|
| 38 |
+
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| 39 |
+
# Built-in profiles — spec §5
|
| 40 |
+
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| 41 |
+
|
| 42 |
+
BUILTIN_PROFILES: dict[str, list[DisruptionConfig]] = {
|
| 43 |
+
"clean": [],
|
| 44 |
+
"mild_production": [
|
| 45 |
+
DisruptionConfig(type=DisruptionType.LATENCY, probability=0.10, delay_ms=800),
|
| 46 |
+
DisruptionConfig(type=DisruptionType.HTTP_429, probability=0.03),
|
| 47 |
+
DisruptionConfig(type=DisruptionType.TRUNCATED, probability=0.02, truncation_pct=0.75),
|
| 48 |
+
],
|
| 49 |
+
"moderate_production": [
|
| 50 |
+
DisruptionConfig(type=DisruptionType.TIMEOUT, probability=0.07, delay_ms=6000),
|
| 51 |
+
DisruptionConfig(type=DisruptionType.HTTP_429, probability=0.08),
|
| 52 |
+
DisruptionConfig(type=DisruptionType.HTTP_500, probability=0.05),
|
| 53 |
+
DisruptionConfig(type=DisruptionType.MALFORMED_JSON, probability=0.04),
|
| 54 |
+
DisruptionConfig(type=DisruptionType.MISSING_FIELDS, probability=0.06),
|
| 55 |
+
],
|
| 56 |
+
"hostile_environment": [
|
| 57 |
+
DisruptionConfig(type=DisruptionType.TIMEOUT, probability=0.15, delay_ms=10000),
|
| 58 |
+
DisruptionConfig(type=DisruptionType.HTTP_429, probability=0.12),
|
| 59 |
+
DisruptionConfig(type=DisruptionType.HTTP_500, probability=0.10),
|
| 60 |
+
DisruptionConfig(type=DisruptionType.MALFORMED_JSON, probability=0.10),
|
| 61 |
+
DisruptionConfig(type=DisruptionType.SCHEMA_DRIFT, probability=0.08),
|
| 62 |
+
DisruptionConfig(type=DisruptionType.MISSING_FIELDS, probability=0.10),
|
| 63 |
+
DisruptionConfig(type=DisruptionType.WRONG_DATA, probability=0.08),
|
| 64 |
+
DisruptionConfig(type=DisruptionType.NULL_RESPONSE, probability=0.05),
|
| 65 |
+
],
|
| 66 |
+
"auth_pressure": [
|
| 67 |
+
DisruptionConfig(type=DisruptionType.HTTP_401, probability=0.10),
|
| 68 |
+
DisruptionConfig(type=DisruptionType.AUTH_EXPIRY, fail_after_n_calls=4),
|
| 69 |
+
],
|
| 70 |
+
"quota_pressure": [
|
| 71 |
+
DisruptionConfig(type=DisruptionType.HTTP_429, probability=0.15),
|
| 72 |
+
DisruptionConfig(type=DisruptionType.QUOTA_EXHAUSTED, fail_after_n_calls=6),
|
| 73 |
+
],
|
| 74 |
+
"data_corruption": [
|
| 75 |
+
DisruptionConfig(type=DisruptionType.WRONG_DATA, probability=0.15),
|
| 76 |
+
DisruptionConfig(type=DisruptionType.MISSING_FIELDS, probability=0.15),
|
| 77 |
+
DisruptionConfig(type=DisruptionType.SCHEMA_DRIFT, probability=0.10),
|
| 78 |
+
DisruptionConfig(type=DisruptionType.TYPE_MISMATCH, probability=0.08),
|
| 79 |
+
DisruptionConfig(type=DisruptionType.NULL_RESPONSE, probability=0.05),
|
| 80 |
+
DisruptionConfig(type=DisruptionType.TRUNCATED, probability=0.10, truncation_pct=0.40),
|
| 81 |
+
],
|
| 82 |
+
"cascading_failure": [
|
| 83 |
+
DisruptionConfig(
|
| 84 |
+
type=DisruptionType.CASCADING,
|
| 85 |
+
probability=1.0,
|
| 86 |
+
target_tools=["payment_process"],
|
| 87 |
+
cascade_targets=["refund_issue", "order_status", "invoice_generate"],
|
| 88 |
+
),
|
| 89 |
+
],
|
| 90 |
+
"flapping_services": [
|
| 91 |
+
DisruptionConfig(type=DisruptionType.FLAPPING, probability=0.50),
|
| 92 |
+
DisruptionConfig(type=DisruptionType.INTERMITTENT, fail_every_n=3),
|
| 93 |
+
],
|
| 94 |
+
}
|
| 95 |
+
|
| 96 |
+
|
| 97 |
+
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| 98 |
+
# YAML loader
|
| 99 |
+
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| 100 |
+
|
| 101 |
+
|
| 102 |
+
def load_profiles(path: str | Path) -> dict[str, list[DisruptionConfig]]:
|
| 103 |
+
"""Load disruption profiles from a YAML file.
|
| 104 |
+
|
| 105 |
+
YAML format::
|
| 106 |
+
|
| 107 |
+
profiles:
|
| 108 |
+
my_profile:
|
| 109 |
+
description: "Human-readable description"
|
| 110 |
+
disruptions:
|
| 111 |
+
- type: timeout
|
| 112 |
+
probability: 0.10
|
| 113 |
+
delay_ms: 5000
|
| 114 |
+
|
| 115 |
+
Args:
|
| 116 |
+
path: Path to the YAML profiles file.
|
| 117 |
+
|
| 118 |
+
Returns:
|
| 119 |
+
Dictionary mapping profile name → list of DisruptionConfig.
|
| 120 |
+
|
| 121 |
+
Raises:
|
| 122 |
+
FileNotFoundError: If the YAML file does not exist.
|
| 123 |
+
PermissionError: If the file is not readable.
|
| 124 |
+
"""
|
| 125 |
+
path = Path(path)
|
| 126 |
+
with open(path, "r", encoding="utf-8") as fh:
|
| 127 |
+
raw: dict[str, Any] = yaml.safe_load(fh)
|
| 128 |
+
|
| 129 |
+
if not raw or "profiles" not in raw:
|
| 130 |
+
logger.warning("no_profiles_key path=%s", path)
|
| 131 |
+
return {}
|
| 132 |
+
|
| 133 |
+
profiles: dict[str, list[DisruptionConfig]] = {}
|
| 134 |
+
for name, body in raw["profiles"].items():
|
| 135 |
+
disruptions = body.get("disruptions", [])
|
| 136 |
+
configs: list[DisruptionConfig] = []
|
| 137 |
+
for d in disruptions:
|
| 138 |
+
configs.append(DisruptionConfig(**d))
|
| 139 |
+
profiles[name] = configs
|
| 140 |
+
logger.info("profile_loaded name=%s disruption_count=%d", name, len(configs))
|
| 141 |
+
|
| 142 |
+
return profiles
|
| 143 |
+
|
| 144 |
+
|
| 145 |
+
def get_profile(name: str, custom_profiles: dict[str, list[DisruptionConfig]] | None = None) -> list[DisruptionConfig]:
|
| 146 |
+
"""Retrieve a profile by name.
|
| 147 |
+
|
| 148 |
+
Checks custom profiles first, then built-in profiles.
|
| 149 |
+
|
| 150 |
+
Args:
|
| 151 |
+
name: Profile name.
|
| 152 |
+
custom_profiles: Optional externally-loaded profiles.
|
| 153 |
+
|
| 154 |
+
Returns:
|
| 155 |
+
List of DisruptionConfig for the profile.
|
| 156 |
+
|
| 157 |
+
Raises:
|
| 158 |
+
KeyError: If the profile name is not found.
|
| 159 |
+
"""
|
| 160 |
+
if custom_profiles and name in custom_profiles:
|
| 161 |
+
return custom_profiles[name]
|
| 162 |
+
if name in BUILTIN_PROFILES:
|
| 163 |
+
return BUILTIN_PROFILES[name]
|
| 164 |
+
available = list(BUILTIN_PROFILES.keys())
|
| 165 |
+
if custom_profiles:
|
| 166 |
+
available += list(custom_profiles.keys())
|
| 167 |
+
raise KeyError(f"Unknown profile '{name}'. Available: {available}")
|
tasks/adversarial.yaml
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,232 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
# AgentDisruptBench — Adversarial Tasks
|
| 2 |
+
# Task type: adversarial — greedy actions cause later failure
|
| 3 |
+
# 8 tasks across 4 domains, difficulty 3-5
|
| 4 |
+
|
| 5 |
+
domain: mixed
|
| 6 |
+
version: "1.0"
|
| 7 |
+
tasks:
|
| 8 |
+
# -- Retail --
|
| 9 |
+
|
| 10 |
+
- task_id: adversarial_retail_001
|
| 11 |
+
title: "Coupon ordering trap"
|
| 12 |
+
description: |
|
| 13 |
+
A customer wants to buy product PRD-laptop ($1200) with two coupons.
|
| 14 |
+
Coupon SAVE10 gives 10% off. Coupon LOYALTY50 gives $50 off but is
|
| 15 |
+
invalid if any other coupon was applied first (one-time use, first
|
| 16 |
+
coupon voids it). Apply coupons to maximize savings, then place the order
|
| 17 |
+
for customer CUST-001.
|
| 18 |
+
domain: retail
|
| 19 |
+
difficulty: 4
|
| 20 |
+
task_type: adversarial
|
| 21 |
+
required_tools: [search_products, apply_coupon, place_order, update_cart]
|
| 22 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 4
|
| 23 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 24 |
+
expected_outcome: "Order placed with maximum savings — LOYALTY50 applied first"
|
| 25 |
+
required_tool_calls: [apply_coupon, place_order]
|
| 26 |
+
forbidden_tool_calls: []
|
| 27 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 28 |
+
searched_product: 0.10
|
| 29 |
+
applied_coupon_correctly: 0.40
|
| 30 |
+
placed_order: 0.30
|
| 31 |
+
maximized_savings: 0.20
|
| 32 |
+
trap_description: >
|
| 33 |
+
Applying SAVE10 first (greedy: larger percentage) voids LOYALTY50.
|
| 34 |
+
Correct: apply LOYALTY50 first ($50 off), then SAVE10 (10% of $1150 = $115).
|
| 35 |
+
Total savings $165 vs $120 if greedy.
|
| 36 |
+
recovery_actions: [check_coupon_terms, reorder_coupons]
|
| 37 |
+
|
| 38 |
+
- task_id: adversarial_retail_002
|
| 39 |
+
title: "Inventory race condition"
|
| 40 |
+
description: |
|
| 41 |
+
Customer CUST-002 wants to buy 3 units of PRD-limited (only 2 in stock).
|
| 42 |
+
Also add PRD-accessory to cart. The accessory is only available as an
|
| 43 |
+
add-on when PRD-limited is in the cart. Check inventory first, then
|
| 44 |
+
place orders in the right sequence.
|
| 45 |
+
domain: retail
|
| 46 |
+
difficulty: 3
|
| 47 |
+
task_type: adversarial
|
| 48 |
+
required_tools: [search_products, check_inventory, update_cart, place_order]
|
| 49 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 5
|
| 50 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 51 |
+
expected_outcome: "Order placed for 2 units with accessory — not 3 units"
|
| 52 |
+
required_tool_calls: [check_inventory, update_cart, place_order]
|
| 53 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 54 |
+
checked_inventory: 0.20
|
| 55 |
+
adjusted_quantity: 0.30
|
| 56 |
+
added_accessory: 0.20
|
| 57 |
+
placed_order: 0.30
|
| 58 |
+
trap_description: >
|
| 59 |
+
Ordering 3 units when only 2 exist fails the whole order, losing
|
| 60 |
+
the accessory add-on. Agent must check inventory, adjust to 2,
|
| 61 |
+
add accessory, then order.
|
| 62 |
+
recovery_actions: [check_stock, adjust_quantity]
|
| 63 |
+
|
| 64 |
+
# -- Travel --
|
| 65 |
+
|
| 66 |
+
- task_id: adversarial_travel_001
|
| 67 |
+
title: "Cheap flight weather trap"
|
| 68 |
+
description: |
|
| 69 |
+
Book the cheapest flight from SFO to Denver on 2026-06-15 for
|
| 70 |
+
passenger "Test Traveller". But first check the weather — if severe
|
| 71 |
+
weather is forecasted, the cheap airline (budget carriers) will cancel
|
| 72 |
+
and rebooking costs 3x. A more expensive flight on a major airline
|
| 73 |
+
would be cheaper overall if weather is bad.
|
| 74 |
+
domain: travel
|
| 75 |
+
difficulty: 4
|
| 76 |
+
task_type: adversarial
|
| 77 |
+
required_tools: [search_flights, get_weather, book_flight, get_flight_details]
|
| 78 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 4
|
| 79 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 80 |
+
expected_outcome: "Weather-informed booking — not blindly cheapest"
|
| 81 |
+
required_tool_calls: [search_flights, get_weather, book_flight]
|
| 82 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 83 |
+
searched_flights: 0.15
|
| 84 |
+
checked_weather: 0.25
|
| 85 |
+
weather_informed_decision: 0.40
|
| 86 |
+
booked_flight: 0.20
|
| 87 |
+
trap_description: >
|
| 88 |
+
Booking the cheapest flight (greedy) ignores weather risk.
|
| 89 |
+
If weather is bad, cheap carriers cancel and rebooking costs 3x.
|
| 90 |
+
Agent should check weather first and factor risk into decision.
|
| 91 |
+
recovery_actions: [check_weather_first, compare_total_cost]
|
| 92 |
+
|
| 93 |
+
- task_id: adversarial_travel_002
|
| 94 |
+
title: "Hotel first vs flight first"
|
| 95 |
+
description: |
|
| 96 |
+
Plan a trip from NYC to London. Book a non-refundable hotel in London
|
| 97 |
+
for 2026-09-01 to 2026-09-05 (great deal at $100/night). Then search
|
| 98 |
+
and book a flight. Warning: flights to London on Sep 1 are sold out
|
| 99 |
+
on budget airlines. If you book the hotel first, you lose the money if
|
| 100 |
+
no flight is available. Search flights FIRST to confirm availability.
|
| 101 |
+
domain: travel
|
| 102 |
+
difficulty: 5
|
| 103 |
+
task_type: adversarial
|
| 104 |
+
required_tools: [search_flights, search_hotels, check_hotel_availability, book_flight]
|
| 105 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 4
|
| 106 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 107 |
+
expected_outcome: "Flights confirmed available before hotel commitment"
|
| 108 |
+
required_tool_calls: [search_flights, book_flight]
|
| 109 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 110 |
+
checked_flights_first: 0.40
|
| 111 |
+
confirmed_availability: 0.20
|
| 112 |
+
booked_flight: 0.20
|
| 113 |
+
planned_hotel: 0.20
|
| 114 |
+
trap_description: >
|
| 115 |
+
Booking non-refundable hotel first (greedy: great deal) risks
|
| 116 |
+
losing money if flights are unavailable. Agent must confirm
|
| 117 |
+
flight availability before committing to non-refundable hotel.
|
| 118 |
+
recovery_actions: [search_flights_first, check_refund_policy]
|
| 119 |
+
|
| 120 |
+
# -- Finance --
|
| 121 |
+
|
| 122 |
+
- task_id: adversarial_finance_001
|
| 123 |
+
title: "Low-fee account transfer trap"
|
| 124 |
+
description: |
|
| 125 |
+
Transfer $5000 from checking (ACC-001) to savings (ACC-002) to avoid
|
| 126 |
+
monthly fee. But savings account has a $5000 minimum before transfers
|
| 127 |
+
out are allowed. After the transfer, you need to transfer $1000 from
|
| 128 |
+
savings to investment (ACC-003). If you move the full $5000 to savings,
|
| 129 |
+
the subsequent $1000 transfer will bring savings below $5000 minimum
|
| 130 |
+
and get rejected. Transfer only $4000 to savings instead.
|
| 131 |
+
domain: finance
|
| 132 |
+
difficulty: 4
|
| 133 |
+
task_type: adversarial
|
| 134 |
+
required_tools: [get_account_balance, transfer_funds, check_credit_limit]
|
| 135 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 4
|
| 136 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 137 |
+
expected_outcome: "Partial transfer preserving minimum balance for later transfer"
|
| 138 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_account_balance, transfer_funds]
|
| 139 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 140 |
+
checked_balance: 0.15
|
| 141 |
+
understood_minimum: 0.25
|
| 142 |
+
transferred_correct_amount: 0.40
|
| 143 |
+
completed_second_transfer: 0.20
|
| 144 |
+
trap_description: >
|
| 145 |
+
Transferring full $5000 (greedy: avoid fee) locks savings account
|
| 146 |
+
minimum, blocking the subsequent $1000 investment transfer.
|
| 147 |
+
Agent must plan both transfers together.
|
| 148 |
+
recovery_actions: [check_minimum_balance, split_transfer]
|
| 149 |
+
|
| 150 |
+
- task_id: adversarial_finance_002
|
| 151 |
+
title: "Exchange rate timing trap"
|
| 152 |
+
description: |
|
| 153 |
+
Convert $10000 USD to EUR for a payment due tomorrow. Current rate
|
| 154 |
+
is favorable. But you also need to convert $5000 USD to GBP for
|
| 155 |
+
another payment. If you convert USD→EUR first, you reduce your USD
|
| 156 |
+
balance, making the USD→GBP conversion partial. Check both rates
|
| 157 |
+
and plan conversions to ensure both payments are covered.
|
| 158 |
+
domain: finance
|
| 159 |
+
difficulty: 3
|
| 160 |
+
task_type: adversarial
|
| 161 |
+
required_tools: [get_account_balance, get_exchange_rate, transfer_funds]
|
| 162 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 5
|
| 163 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 164 |
+
expected_outcome: "Both conversions planned with total balance considered"
|
| 165 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_account_balance, get_exchange_rate, transfer_funds]
|
| 166 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 167 |
+
checked_balance: 0.15
|
| 168 |
+
checked_both_rates: 0.20
|
| 169 |
+
planned_both_conversions: 0.35
|
| 170 |
+
executed_conversions: 0.30
|
| 171 |
+
trap_description: >
|
| 172 |
+
Converting EUR first (greedy: urgent payment) may deplete USD
|
| 173 |
+
balance needed for GBP conversion. Agent must check total
|
| 174 |
+
balance covers both conversions before executing either.
|
| 175 |
+
recovery_actions: [check_total_balance, plan_conversions]
|
| 176 |
+
|
| 177 |
+
# -- DevOps --
|
| 178 |
+
|
| 179 |
+
- task_id: adversarial_devops_001
|
| 180 |
+
title: "Staging deployment blocks production"
|
| 181 |
+
description: |
|
| 182 |
+
Deploy service v2.1 to staging for testing, then deploy v2.1 to
|
| 183 |
+
production. But the deployment pipeline has a mutex lock — deploying
|
| 184 |
+
to staging locks the pipeline for 30 minutes, blocking production
|
| 185 |
+
deploys. A critical production hotfix (v2.0.1) needs to go out in
|
| 186 |
+
15 minutes. Deploy the hotfix to production FIRST, then staging.
|
| 187 |
+
domain: devops
|
| 188 |
+
difficulty: 4
|
| 189 |
+
task_type: adversarial
|
| 190 |
+
required_tools: [get_service_health, deploy_service, get_logs, run_tests]
|
| 191 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 4
|
| 192 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 193 |
+
expected_outcome: "Production hotfix deployed first, then staging"
|
| 194 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_service_health, deploy_service]
|
| 195 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 196 |
+
checked_health: 0.15
|
| 197 |
+
prioritized_production: 0.40
|
| 198 |
+
deployed_hotfix: 0.25
|
| 199 |
+
deployed_staging: 0.20
|
| 200 |
+
trap_description: >
|
| 201 |
+
Deploying to staging first (greedy: test first) locks the pipeline
|
| 202 |
+
and blocks the critical production hotfix. Agent must prioritize
|
| 203 |
+
production hotfix deployment.
|
| 204 |
+
recovery_actions: [check_pipeline_status, prioritize_critical]
|
| 205 |
+
|
| 206 |
+
- task_id: adversarial_devops_002
|
| 207 |
+
title: "Incident creation before diagnosis"
|
| 208 |
+
description: |
|
| 209 |
+
Service API is returning slow responses. Create an incident immediately
|
| 210 |
+
to alert the team? No — check logs and metrics first. If the slowdown
|
| 211 |
+
is from a scheduled maintenance window, creating an incident triggers
|
| 212 |
+
unnecessary alerts, pages on-call engineers, and can't be easily
|
| 213 |
+
undone. Diagnose first, then decide if an incident is warranted.
|
| 214 |
+
domain: devops
|
| 215 |
+
difficulty: 3
|
| 216 |
+
task_type: adversarial
|
| 217 |
+
required_tools: [get_service_health, get_logs, get_metrics, create_incident]
|
| 218 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 4
|
| 219 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 220 |
+
expected_outcome: "Diagnosis completed before incident decision"
|
| 221 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_service_health, get_logs, get_metrics]
|
| 222 |
+
forbidden_tool_calls: []
|
| 223 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 224 |
+
checked_health: 0.15
|
| 225 |
+
checked_logs: 0.25
|
| 226 |
+
checked_metrics: 0.25
|
| 227 |
+
diagnosed_before_incident: 0.35
|
| 228 |
+
trap_description: >
|
| 229 |
+
Creating incident immediately (greedy: alert fast) causes
|
| 230 |
+
unnecessary pages if slowdown is from scheduled maintenance.
|
| 231 |
+
Agent must diagnose (logs + metrics) before deciding.
|
| 232 |
+
recovery_actions: [check_maintenance_schedule, diagnose_first]
|
tasks/devops.yaml
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,273 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
# AgentDisruptBench — Built-in DevOps Tasks
|
| 2 |
+
# Domain: devops | Version: 1.0 | 20 tasks D1-D5
|
| 3 |
+
domain: devops
|
| 4 |
+
version: "1.0"
|
| 5 |
+
tasks:
|
| 6 |
+
- task_id: devops_001
|
| 7 |
+
title: "Check service health"
|
| 8 |
+
description: "Check the health status of api-gateway. Report uptime and response time."
|
| 9 |
+
difficulty: 1
|
| 10 |
+
required_tools: [get_service_health]
|
| 11 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 1
|
| 12 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 13 |
+
expected_outcome: "Service health reported"
|
| 14 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_service_health]
|
| 15 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { checked: 0.60, reported: 0.40 }
|
| 16 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [get_service_health]
|
| 17 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_health]
|
| 18 |
+
|
| 19 |
+
- task_id: devops_002
|
| 20 |
+
title: "Get service logs"
|
| 21 |
+
description: "Get the last 5 error logs for auth-service."
|
| 22 |
+
difficulty: 1
|
| 23 |
+
required_tools: [get_logs]
|
| 24 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 1
|
| 25 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 26 |
+
expected_outcome: "Error logs listed"
|
| 27 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_logs]
|
| 28 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { got_logs: 0.60, reported: 0.40 }
|
| 29 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [get_logs]
|
| 30 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_logs]
|
| 31 |
+
|
| 32 |
+
- task_id: devops_003
|
| 33 |
+
title: "Deploy new version"
|
| 34 |
+
description: "Deploy version v2.1.0 of payment-service to staging. Confirm deployment."
|
| 35 |
+
difficulty: 2
|
| 36 |
+
required_tools: [deploy_service]
|
| 37 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 1
|
| 38 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 39 |
+
expected_outcome: "Deployment confirmed"
|
| 40 |
+
required_tool_calls: [deploy_service]
|
| 41 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { deployed: 0.60, confirmed: 0.40 }
|
| 42 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [deploy_service]
|
| 43 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_deploy]
|
| 44 |
+
|
| 45 |
+
- task_id: devops_004
|
| 46 |
+
title: "Get performance metrics"
|
| 47 |
+
description: "Get CPU metrics for user-service over the last 60 minutes. Report average and peak."
|
| 48 |
+
difficulty: 2
|
| 49 |
+
required_tools: [get_metrics]
|
| 50 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 1
|
| 51 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 52 |
+
expected_outcome: "CPU metrics reported"
|
| 53 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_metrics]
|
| 54 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { got_metrics: 0.40, average: 0.30, peak: 0.30 }
|
| 55 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [get_metrics]
|
| 56 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_metrics]
|
| 57 |
+
|
| 58 |
+
- task_id: devops_005
|
| 59 |
+
title: "Run test suite"
|
| 60 |
+
description: "Run the unit test suite for api-gateway. Report pass/fail counts and coverage."
|
| 61 |
+
difficulty: 2
|
| 62 |
+
required_tools: [run_tests]
|
| 63 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 1
|
| 64 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 65 |
+
expected_outcome: "Test results reported"
|
| 66 |
+
required_tool_calls: [run_tests]
|
| 67 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { ran_tests: 0.40, reported_results: 0.30, coverage: 0.30 }
|
| 68 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [run_tests]
|
| 69 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_tests]
|
| 70 |
+
|
| 71 |
+
- task_id: devops_006
|
| 72 |
+
title: "Create an incident"
|
| 73 |
+
description: "Create a P1 incident for payment-service: 'Payment processing timeout'. Report incident ID."
|
| 74 |
+
difficulty: 2
|
| 75 |
+
required_tools: [create_incident]
|
| 76 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 1
|
| 77 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 78 |
+
expected_outcome: "Incident created and ID reported"
|
| 79 |
+
required_tool_calls: [create_incident]
|
| 80 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { created: 0.60, reported_id: 0.40 }
|
| 81 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [create_incident]
|
| 82 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_create]
|
| 83 |
+
|
| 84 |
+
- task_id: devops_007
|
| 85 |
+
title: "Health check and deployment"
|
| 86 |
+
description: "Check api-gateway health. If healthy, deploy v2.2.0 to staging. If degraded, report and skip."
|
| 87 |
+
difficulty: 3
|
| 88 |
+
required_tools: [get_service_health, deploy_service]
|
| 89 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 2
|
| 90 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 91 |
+
expected_outcome: "Health-conditional deployment"
|
| 92 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_service_health, deploy_service]
|
| 93 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { checked: 0.30, decided: 0.30, executed: 0.40 }
|
| 94 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [deploy_service]
|
| 95 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_deploy, skip_deploy]
|
| 96 |
+
|
| 97 |
+
- task_id: devops_008
|
| 98 |
+
title: "Deploy and run tests"
|
| 99 |
+
description: "Deploy v3.0.0 of user-service to staging, then run the integration test suite. Report results."
|
| 100 |
+
difficulty: 3
|
| 101 |
+
required_tools: [deploy_service, run_tests]
|
| 102 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 2
|
| 103 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 104 |
+
expected_outcome: "Deployment with test verification"
|
| 105 |
+
required_tool_calls: [deploy_service, run_tests]
|
| 106 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { deployed: 0.35, tested: 0.35, reported: 0.30 }
|
| 107 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [deploy_service, run_tests]
|
| 108 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_deploy, rollback]
|
| 109 |
+
|
| 110 |
+
- task_id: devops_009
|
| 111 |
+
title: "Incident response with logs"
|
| 112 |
+
description: "Get error logs for payment-service, then get metrics. Create a P2 incident if errors are present."
|
| 113 |
+
difficulty: 3
|
| 114 |
+
required_tools: [get_logs, get_metrics, create_incident]
|
| 115 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 3
|
| 116 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 117 |
+
expected_outcome: "Log-informed incident creation"
|
| 118 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_logs, get_metrics, create_incident]
|
| 119 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { got_logs: 0.25, got_metrics: 0.25, created_incident: 0.30, summarized: 0.20 }
|
| 120 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [create_incident]
|
| 121 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_create]
|
| 122 |
+
|
| 123 |
+
- task_id: devops_010
|
| 124 |
+
title: "Multi-service health dashboard"
|
| 125 |
+
description: "Check health of api-gateway, auth-service, and payment-service. Generate a dashboard summary."
|
| 126 |
+
difficulty: 3
|
| 127 |
+
required_tools: [get_service_health]
|
| 128 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 3
|
| 129 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 130 |
+
expected_outcome: "Multi-service health dashboard"
|
| 131 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_service_health]
|
| 132 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { checked_api: 0.20, checked_auth: 0.20, checked_payment: 0.20, dashboard: 0.40 }
|
| 133 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [get_service_health]
|
| 134 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_health]
|
| 135 |
+
|
| 136 |
+
- task_id: devops_011
|
| 137 |
+
title: "Rollback after failed deployment"
|
| 138 |
+
description: "Deploy v4.0.0-beta of auth-service. Run tests. If any tests fail, rollback the deployment."
|
| 139 |
+
difficulty: 3
|
| 140 |
+
required_tools: [deploy_service, run_tests, rollback_deployment]
|
| 141 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 3
|
| 142 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 143 |
+
expected_outcome: "Deploy-test-rollback workflow"
|
| 144 |
+
required_tool_calls: [deploy_service, run_tests, rollback_deployment]
|
| 145 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { deployed: 0.25, tested: 0.25, rollback_decision: 0.25, executed_rollback: 0.25 }
|
| 146 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [rollback_deployment]
|
| 147 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_rollback]
|
| 148 |
+
|
| 149 |
+
- task_id: devops_012
|
| 150 |
+
title: "Performance investigation"
|
| 151 |
+
description: "Get CPU and memory metrics for user-service. Get recent error logs. Determine if there's a performance issue."
|
| 152 |
+
difficulty: 3
|
| 153 |
+
required_tools: [get_metrics, get_logs]
|
| 154 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 3
|
| 155 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 156 |
+
expected_outcome: "Performance investigation report"
|
| 157 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_metrics, get_logs]
|
| 158 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { cpu_metrics: 0.25, memory_metrics: 0.25, logs: 0.25, diagnosis: 0.25 }
|
| 159 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [get_metrics]
|
| 160 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_metrics]
|
| 161 |
+
|
| 162 |
+
- task_id: devops_013
|
| 163 |
+
title: "Full deploy pipeline"
|
| 164 |
+
description: "Run unit tests for payment-service. If pass rate >95%, deploy v2.5.0 to staging. Check health after deploy. Report status."
|
| 165 |
+
difficulty: 4
|
| 166 |
+
required_tools: [run_tests, deploy_service, get_service_health]
|
| 167 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 3
|
| 168 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 169 |
+
expected_outcome: "CI/CD pipeline execution"
|
| 170 |
+
required_tool_calls: [run_tests, deploy_service, get_service_health]
|
| 171 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { ran_tests: 0.20, deploy_decision: 0.20, deployed: 0.25, health_verified: 0.20, report: 0.15 }
|
| 172 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [deploy_service]
|
| 173 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_deploy, rollback]
|
| 174 |
+
|
| 175 |
+
- task_id: devops_014
|
| 176 |
+
title: "Incident management lifecycle"
|
| 177 |
+
description: "Get error logs for api-gateway. Create P1 incident. Deploy hotfix v1.9.1. Verify health. Resolve the incident."
|
| 178 |
+
difficulty: 4
|
| 179 |
+
required_tools: [get_logs, create_incident, deploy_service, get_service_health, resolve_incident]
|
| 180 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 5
|
| 181 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 182 |
+
expected_outcome: "Full incident lifecycle handled"
|
| 183 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_logs, create_incident, deploy_service, get_service_health, resolve_incident]
|
| 184 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { logs: 0.10, incident: 0.15, deployed_fix: 0.25, verified: 0.20, resolved: 0.20, report: 0.10 }
|
| 185 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [deploy_service, resolve_incident]
|
| 186 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_deploy, retry_resolve]
|
| 187 |
+
|
| 188 |
+
- task_id: devops_015
|
| 189 |
+
title: "Multi-service deployment"
|
| 190 |
+
description: "Deploy updates to auth-service (v3.1.0), user-service (v2.8.0), and notification-service (v1.5.0). Run tests for each. Report outcomes."
|
| 191 |
+
difficulty: 4
|
| 192 |
+
required_tools: [deploy_service, run_tests]
|
| 193 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 6
|
| 194 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 195 |
+
expected_outcome: "Multi-service deployments with test results"
|
| 196 |
+
required_tool_calls: [deploy_service, run_tests]
|
| 197 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { deployed_auth: 0.15, tested_auth: 0.10, deployed_user: 0.15, tested_user: 0.10, deployed_notif: 0.15, tested_notif: 0.10, summary: 0.25 }
|
| 198 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [deploy_service]
|
| 199 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_deploy, rollback_specific]
|
| 200 |
+
|
| 201 |
+
- task_id: devops_016
|
| 202 |
+
title: "Performance-driven scaling decision"
|
| 203 |
+
description: "Get CPU, memory, and latency metrics for api-gateway. Get health status. Get recent logs. Recommend if scaling is needed."
|
| 204 |
+
difficulty: 4
|
| 205 |
+
required_tools: [get_metrics, get_service_health, get_logs]
|
| 206 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 5
|
| 207 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 208 |
+
expected_outcome: "Scaling recommendation with evidence"
|
| 209 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_metrics, get_service_health, get_logs]
|
| 210 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { cpu: 0.15, memory: 0.15, health: 0.15, logs: 0.15, recommendation: 0.40 }
|
| 211 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [get_metrics]
|
| 212 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_metrics]
|
| 213 |
+
|
| 214 |
+
- task_id: devops_017
|
| 215 |
+
title: "Deployment with canary validation"
|
| 216 |
+
description: "Deploy v5.0.0 of payment-service. Run tests. Get metrics before and after. Compare performance. Rollback if degraded."
|
| 217 |
+
difficulty: 4
|
| 218 |
+
required_tools: [get_metrics, deploy_service, run_tests, rollback_deployment]
|
| 219 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 5
|
| 220 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 221 |
+
expected_outcome: "Canary deployment with performance validation"
|
| 222 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_metrics, deploy_service, run_tests]
|
| 223 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { pre_metrics: 0.15, deployed: 0.20, tested: 0.15, post_metrics: 0.15, compared: 0.15, decision: 0.20 }
|
| 224 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [deploy_service, rollback_deployment]
|
| 225 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_deploy, immediate_rollback]
|
| 226 |
+
|
| 227 |
+
- task_id: devops_018
|
| 228 |
+
title: "Full site reliability engineering review"
|
| 229 |
+
description: |
|
| 230 |
+
Perform SRE review: Check health of all 5 services (api-gateway, auth-service, payment-service,
|
| 231 |
+
user-service, notification-service). Get CPU metrics for any unhealthy services. Get error logs.
|
| 232 |
+
Create incidents for any critical issues. Generate SRE dashboard report.
|
| 233 |
+
difficulty: 5
|
| 234 |
+
required_tools: [get_service_health, get_metrics, get_logs, create_incident]
|
| 235 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 10
|
| 236 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 237 |
+
expected_outcome: "Comprehensive SRE review with dashboard"
|
| 238 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_service_health, get_metrics, get_logs, create_incident]
|
| 239 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { all_health_checks: 0.20, metrics_unhealthy: 0.15, logs_reviewed: 0.15, incidents_created: 0.15, dashboard: 0.35 }
|
| 240 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [get_service_health, create_incident]
|
| 241 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_health, retry_create, partial_dashboard]
|
| 242 |
+
|
| 243 |
+
- task_id: devops_019
|
| 244 |
+
title: "Blue-green deployment with full validation"
|
| 245 |
+
description: |
|
| 246 |
+
Blue-green deploy for payment-service: Get current health. Deploy v6.0.0 to staging. Run full test
|
| 247 |
+
suite. Get metrics. If tests pass and metrics OK, report success. If not, rollback. Create incident
|
| 248 |
+
if rollback needed. Generate deployment report.
|
| 249 |
+
difficulty: 5
|
| 250 |
+
required_tools: [get_service_health, deploy_service, run_tests, get_metrics, rollback_deployment, create_incident]
|
| 251 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 7
|
| 252 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 253 |
+
expected_outcome: "Blue-green deployment with full validation"
|
| 254 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_service_health, deploy_service, run_tests, get_metrics]
|
| 255 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { health_check: 0.08, deployment: 0.15, tests: 0.15, metrics: 0.12, decision: 0.15, execution: 0.15, report: 0.20 }
|
| 256 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [deploy_service, rollback_deployment]
|
| 257 |
+
recovery_actions: [immediate_rollback, create_incident]
|
| 258 |
+
|
| 259 |
+
- task_id: devops_020
|
| 260 |
+
title: "Disaster recovery drill"
|
| 261 |
+
description: |
|
| 262 |
+
Simulate a disaster recovery drill: Check all service health. Get logs for all services. Create a
|
| 263 |
+
DR incident. Rollback payment-service to last known good. Deploy emergency versions of auth-service
|
| 264 |
+
and user-service. Run smoke tests. Verify health post-recovery. Resolve the incident. Generate DR report.
|
| 265 |
+
difficulty: 5
|
| 266 |
+
required_tools: [get_service_health, get_logs, create_incident, rollback_deployment, deploy_service, run_tests, resolve_incident]
|
| 267 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 12
|
| 268 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 269 |
+
expected_outcome: "DR drill completed with full report"
|
| 270 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_service_health, get_logs, create_incident, rollback_deployment, deploy_service, run_tests, resolve_incident]
|
| 271 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { health_checked: 0.08, logs_reviewed: 0.08, incident_created: 0.08, rollback: 0.12, deployed_emergency: 0.12, tests_run: 0.10, health_verified: 0.10, incident_resolved: 0.10, dr_report: 0.22 }
|
| 272 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [rollback_deployment, deploy_service]
|
| 273 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_rollback, retry_deploy, manual_intervention]
|
tasks/finance.yaml
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,264 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
# AgentDisruptBench — Built-in Finance Tasks
|
| 2 |
+
# Domain: finance | Version: 1.0 | 20 tasks D1-D5
|
| 3 |
+
domain: finance
|
| 4 |
+
version: "1.0"
|
| 5 |
+
tasks:
|
| 6 |
+
- task_id: finance_001
|
| 7 |
+
title: "Check account balance"
|
| 8 |
+
description: "Check balance for ACC-001122. Report available balance and pending transactions."
|
| 9 |
+
difficulty: 1
|
| 10 |
+
required_tools: [get_account_balance]
|
| 11 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 1
|
| 12 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 13 |
+
expected_outcome: "Account balance reported"
|
| 14 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_account_balance]
|
| 15 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { checked_balance: 0.60, reported_details: 0.40 }
|
| 16 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [get_account_balance]
|
| 17 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_balance_check]
|
| 18 |
+
|
| 19 |
+
- task_id: finance_002
|
| 20 |
+
title: "Get exchange rate"
|
| 21 |
+
description: "Get the current USD to EUR exchange rate. Report rate and inverse."
|
| 22 |
+
difficulty: 1
|
| 23 |
+
required_tools: [get_exchange_rate]
|
| 24 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 1
|
| 25 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 26 |
+
expected_outcome: "Exchange rate provided"
|
| 27 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_exchange_rate]
|
| 28 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { got_rate: 0.60, reported_inverse: 0.40 }
|
| 29 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [get_exchange_rate]
|
| 30 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_rate]
|
| 31 |
+
|
| 32 |
+
- task_id: finance_003
|
| 33 |
+
title: "Transfer between accounts"
|
| 34 |
+
description: "Transfer 500 USD from ACC-001122 to ACC-003344. Check balance first, confirm fees."
|
| 35 |
+
difficulty: 2
|
| 36 |
+
required_tools: [get_account_balance, transfer_funds]
|
| 37 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 2
|
| 38 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 39 |
+
expected_outcome: "Transfer completed with fee disclosed"
|
| 40 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_account_balance, transfer_funds]
|
| 41 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { checked_balance: 0.30, transferred: 0.50, reported_fee: 0.20 }
|
| 42 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [transfer_funds]
|
| 43 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_transfer]
|
| 44 |
+
|
| 45 |
+
- task_id: finance_004
|
| 46 |
+
title: "View transaction history"
|
| 47 |
+
description: "Show last 10 transactions for ACC-001122. Summarize types and amounts."
|
| 48 |
+
difficulty: 2
|
| 49 |
+
required_tools: [get_transaction_history]
|
| 50 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 1
|
| 51 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 52 |
+
expected_outcome: "Transaction history summarized"
|
| 53 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_transaction_history]
|
| 54 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { retrieved_history: 0.50, summarized: 0.50 }
|
| 55 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [get_transaction_history]
|
| 56 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_history]
|
| 57 |
+
|
| 58 |
+
- task_id: finance_005
|
| 59 |
+
title: "Validate payment card"
|
| 60 |
+
description: "Validate card 4111111111111234, exp 12/27, CVV 123. Report validity and type."
|
| 61 |
+
difficulty: 2
|
| 62 |
+
required_tools: [validate_card]
|
| 63 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 1
|
| 64 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 65 |
+
expected_outcome: "Card validation result"
|
| 66 |
+
required_tool_calls: [validate_card]
|
| 67 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { validated: 0.60, reported_type: 0.40 }
|
| 68 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [validate_card]
|
| 69 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_validation]
|
| 70 |
+
|
| 71 |
+
- task_id: finance_006
|
| 72 |
+
title: "Check credit limit"
|
| 73 |
+
description: "Check credit limit for ACC-005566. Report limit, used, and utilization%."
|
| 74 |
+
difficulty: 2
|
| 75 |
+
required_tools: [check_credit_limit]
|
| 76 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 1
|
| 77 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 78 |
+
expected_outcome: "Credit limit details"
|
| 79 |
+
required_tool_calls: [check_credit_limit]
|
| 80 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { checked_limit: 0.40, reported_used: 0.30, reported_pct: 0.30 }
|
| 81 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [check_credit_limit]
|
| 82 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_credit_check]
|
| 83 |
+
|
| 84 |
+
- task_id: finance_007
|
| 85 |
+
title: "International transfer with FX"
|
| 86 |
+
description: "Transfer 1000 USD from ACC-001122 to ACC-007788. Check balance, get USD→EUR rate, confirm EUR equivalent."
|
| 87 |
+
difficulty: 3
|
| 88 |
+
required_tools: [get_account_balance, get_exchange_rate, transfer_funds]
|
| 89 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 3
|
| 90 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 91 |
+
expected_outcome: "International transfer with FX confirmed"
|
| 92 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_account_balance, get_exchange_rate, transfer_funds]
|
| 93 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { checked_balance: 0.20, got_rate: 0.25, transferred: 0.35, reported_equiv: 0.20 }
|
| 94 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [transfer_funds]
|
| 95 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_transfer]
|
| 96 |
+
|
| 97 |
+
- task_id: finance_008
|
| 98 |
+
title: "Cross-account transaction comparison"
|
| 99 |
+
description: "Get last 10 transactions for ACC-001122 and ACC-003344. Compare spending and flag items over 1000 USD."
|
| 100 |
+
difficulty: 3
|
| 101 |
+
required_tools: [get_transaction_history]
|
| 102 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 2
|
| 103 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 104 |
+
expected_outcome: "Transaction comparison with anomalies"
|
| 105 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_transaction_history]
|
| 106 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { got_first: 0.25, got_second: 0.25, compared: 0.25, flagged: 0.25 }
|
| 107 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [get_transaction_history]
|
| 108 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_history]
|
| 109 |
+
|
| 110 |
+
- task_id: finance_009
|
| 111 |
+
title: "Card validation and credit assessment"
|
| 112 |
+
description: "Validate card 5500000000000004 (06/28, CVV 456) and check credit for ACC-009900. Can a 2000 USD purchase go through?"
|
| 113 |
+
difficulty: 3
|
| 114 |
+
required_tools: [validate_card, check_credit_limit]
|
| 115 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 2
|
| 116 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 117 |
+
expected_outcome: "Purchase feasibility assessed"
|
| 118 |
+
required_tool_calls: [validate_card, check_credit_limit]
|
| 119 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { validated: 0.30, checked_credit: 0.30, assessed: 0.40 }
|
| 120 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [validate_card]
|
| 121 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_validation]
|
| 122 |
+
|
| 123 |
+
- task_id: finance_010
|
| 124 |
+
title: "Multi-currency balance report"
|
| 125 |
+
description: "Check ACC-001122 balance, convert to EUR, GBP, JPY. Multi-currency report."
|
| 126 |
+
difficulty: 3
|
| 127 |
+
required_tools: [get_account_balance, get_exchange_rate]
|
| 128 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 4
|
| 129 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 130 |
+
expected_outcome: "Multi-currency report"
|
| 131 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_account_balance, get_exchange_rate]
|
| 132 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { balance: 0.20, eur: 0.20, gbp: 0.20, jpy: 0.20, report: 0.20 }
|
| 133 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [get_exchange_rate]
|
| 134 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_rate]
|
| 135 |
+
|
| 136 |
+
- task_id: finance_011
|
| 137 |
+
title: "Spending categorization"
|
| 138 |
+
description: "Get 30-day history for ACC-001122. Categorize spending and identify top category."
|
| 139 |
+
difficulty: 3
|
| 140 |
+
required_tools: [get_transaction_history]
|
| 141 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 1
|
| 142 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 143 |
+
expected_outcome: "Spending by category"
|
| 144 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_transaction_history]
|
| 145 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { got_history: 0.30, categorized: 0.35, top_category: 0.35 }
|
| 146 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [get_transaction_history]
|
| 147 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_history]
|
| 148 |
+
|
| 149 |
+
- task_id: finance_012
|
| 150 |
+
title: "FX rate comparison"
|
| 151 |
+
description: "Compare USD to EUR, GBP, JPY, CHF rates. Which gives best value for 10000 USD?"
|
| 152 |
+
difficulty: 3
|
| 153 |
+
required_tools: [get_exchange_rate]
|
| 154 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 4
|
| 155 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 156 |
+
expected_outcome: "FX comparison with recommendation"
|
| 157 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_exchange_rate]
|
| 158 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { got_eur: 0.15, got_gbp: 0.15, got_jpy: 0.15, got_chf: 0.15, compared: 0.20, recommended: 0.20 }
|
| 159 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [get_exchange_rate]
|
| 160 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_rate]
|
| 161 |
+
|
| 162 |
+
- task_id: finance_013
|
| 163 |
+
title: "Pre-validated transfer"
|
| 164 |
+
description: "Validate card 4222222222222345 (09/27, 789), check ACC-001122 balance and credit, transfer 2500 to ACC-005566."
|
| 165 |
+
difficulty: 4
|
| 166 |
+
required_tools: [validate_card, get_account_balance, check_credit_limit, transfer_funds]
|
| 167 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 4
|
| 168 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 169 |
+
expected_outcome: "Validated transfer completed"
|
| 170 |
+
required_tool_calls: [validate_card, get_account_balance, check_credit_limit, transfer_funds]
|
| 171 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { validated: 0.15, balance: 0.20, credit: 0.20, transfer: 0.30, confirmed: 0.15 }
|
| 172 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [transfer_funds]
|
| 173 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_transfer]
|
| 174 |
+
|
| 175 |
+
- task_id: finance_014
|
| 176 |
+
title: "Cross-account reconciliation"
|
| 177 |
+
description: "Get history and balances for ACC-001122 and ACC-003344. Match transfers and reconcile."
|
| 178 |
+
difficulty: 4
|
| 179 |
+
required_tools: [get_transaction_history, get_account_balance]
|
| 180 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 4
|
| 181 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 182 |
+
expected_outcome: "Reconciliation completed"
|
| 183 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_transaction_history, get_account_balance]
|
| 184 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { hist_1: 0.15, hist_2: 0.15, bal_1: 0.15, bal_2: 0.15, matched: 0.20, reconciled: 0.20 }
|
| 185 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [get_transaction_history]
|
| 186 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_history]
|
| 187 |
+
|
| 188 |
+
- task_id: finance_015
|
| 189 |
+
title: "FX-optimized international transfer"
|
| 190 |
+
description: "Transfer 5000 from ACC-001122 internationally. Compare USD→EUR and USD→GBP rates. Execute in optimal currency."
|
| 191 |
+
difficulty: 4
|
| 192 |
+
required_tools: [get_account_balance, get_exchange_rate, transfer_funds]
|
| 193 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 4
|
| 194 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 195 |
+
expected_outcome: "FX-optimized transfer"
|
| 196 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_account_balance, get_exchange_rate, transfer_funds]
|
| 197 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { balance: 0.15, eur_rate: 0.15, gbp_rate: 0.15, chose_optimal: 0.25, transferred: 0.30 }
|
| 198 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [transfer_funds]
|
| 199 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_transfer]
|
| 200 |
+
|
| 201 |
+
- task_id: finance_016
|
| 202 |
+
title: "Credit utilization optimization"
|
| 203 |
+
description: "Check credit for ACC-001122, ACC-003344, ACC-005566. Get balances. Recommend transfers to keep utilization under 30%."
|
| 204 |
+
difficulty: 4
|
| 205 |
+
required_tools: [check_credit_limit, get_account_balance, transfer_funds]
|
| 206 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 7
|
| 207 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 208 |
+
expected_outcome: "Credit optimization plan"
|
| 209 |
+
required_tool_calls: [check_credit_limit, get_account_balance]
|
| 210 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { credits: 0.20, balances: 0.20, analysis: 0.25, recommendations: 0.35 }
|
| 211 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [check_credit_limit]
|
| 212 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_credit_check]
|
| 213 |
+
|
| 214 |
+
- task_id: finance_017
|
| 215 |
+
title: "Fraud investigation"
|
| 216 |
+
description: "Check credit, balance, validate card 5500000000000004 (12/27, 321), get history for ACC-005566. Flag transactions above 50% of credit limit."
|
| 217 |
+
difficulty: 4
|
| 218 |
+
required_tools: [check_credit_limit, get_account_balance, validate_card, get_transaction_history]
|
| 219 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 4
|
| 220 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 221 |
+
expected_outcome: "Fraud investigation with flags"
|
| 222 |
+
required_tool_calls: [check_credit_limit, get_account_balance, validate_card, get_transaction_history]
|
| 223 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { credit: 0.15, balance: 0.15, card: 0.15, history: 0.20, flagged: 0.35 }
|
| 224 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [get_transaction_history]
|
| 225 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_history]
|
| 226 |
+
|
| 227 |
+
- task_id: finance_018
|
| 228 |
+
title: "Financial health assessment"
|
| 229 |
+
description: "Full check for ACC-001122: balance, 30-day history, credit limit, USD→EUR/GBP/JPY rates, validate card 4111111111111234 (12/28, 555). Generate health report."
|
| 230 |
+
difficulty: 5
|
| 231 |
+
required_tools: [get_account_balance, get_transaction_history, check_credit_limit, get_exchange_rate, validate_card]
|
| 232 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 7
|
| 233 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 234 |
+
expected_outcome: "Comprehensive financial health report"
|
| 235 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_account_balance, get_transaction_history, check_credit_limit, get_exchange_rate, validate_card]
|
| 236 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { balance: 0.12, transactions: 0.15, credit: 0.15, rates: 0.15, card: 0.13, report: 0.30 }
|
| 237 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [get_account_balance, get_transaction_history]
|
| 238 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_any, partial_report]
|
| 239 |
+
|
| 240 |
+
- task_id: finance_019
|
| 241 |
+
title: "Portfolio rebalancing"
|
| 242 |
+
description: "Rebalance ACC-001122, ACC-003344, ACC-005566 to equal distribution. Check all balances, calculate and execute transfers, verify."
|
| 243 |
+
difficulty: 5
|
| 244 |
+
required_tools: [get_account_balance, transfer_funds]
|
| 245 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 9
|
| 246 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 247 |
+
expected_outcome: "Portfolio rebalanced equally"
|
| 248 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_account_balance, transfer_funds]
|
| 249 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { balances: 0.15, calculated: 0.20, transferred: 0.35, verified: 0.15, report: 0.15 }
|
| 250 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [transfer_funds]
|
| 251 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_transfer, rollback]
|
| 252 |
+
|
| 253 |
+
- task_id: finance_020
|
| 254 |
+
title: "End-of-month close"
|
| 255 |
+
description: "Monthly close for ACC-001122: balance, history, credit, validate card, FX rates (EUR/GBP/JPY/CHF), transfer excess over 10000 to ACC-SAVE01. Generate closing statement."
|
| 256 |
+
difficulty: 5
|
| 257 |
+
required_tools: [get_account_balance, get_transaction_history, check_credit_limit, validate_card, get_exchange_rate, transfer_funds]
|
| 258 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 9
|
| 259 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 260 |
+
expected_outcome: "Monthly close with transfer and FX positions"
|
| 261 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_account_balance, get_transaction_history, check_credit_limit, validate_card, get_exchange_rate, transfer_funds]
|
| 262 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { balance: 0.08, history: 0.12, credit: 0.10, card: 0.08, rates: 0.12, transfer: 0.20, statement: 0.30 }
|
| 263 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [transfer_funds, get_transaction_history]
|
| 264 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_transfer, partial_close]
|
tasks/handover.yaml
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
# AgentDisruptBench — Handover Tasks
|
| 2 |
+
# Task type: standard — but correct action is to hand off to human
|
| 3 |
+
# 4 tasks, 1 per domain
|
| 4 |
+
|
| 5 |
+
domain: mixed
|
| 6 |
+
version: "1.0"
|
| 7 |
+
tasks:
|
| 8 |
+
- task_id: handover_retail_001
|
| 9 |
+
title: "Repeated payment failures"
|
| 10 |
+
description: |
|
| 11 |
+
Customer CUST-020 has been trying to place an order but their payment
|
| 12 |
+
keeps getting declined. You've retried 3 times with the same card.
|
| 13 |
+
The card is valid and has sufficient funds. Determine the best course
|
| 14 |
+
of action.
|
| 15 |
+
domain: retail
|
| 16 |
+
difficulty: 3
|
| 17 |
+
task_type: standard
|
| 18 |
+
required_tools: [search_products, place_order]
|
| 19 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 3
|
| 20 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 21 |
+
expected_outcome: "Agent recognizes payment issue requires human support"
|
| 22 |
+
required_tool_calls: [place_order]
|
| 23 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 24 |
+
attempted_order: 0.20
|
| 25 |
+
recognized_pattern: 0.30
|
| 26 |
+
escalated_to_human: 0.50
|
| 27 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [place_order]
|
| 28 |
+
recovery_actions: [escalate_to_support, contact_payment_processor]
|
| 29 |
+
|
| 30 |
+
- task_id: handover_travel_001
|
| 31 |
+
title: "Unaccompanied minor booking"
|
| 32 |
+
description: |
|
| 33 |
+
A parent wants to book a flight for their 8-year-old child traveling
|
| 34 |
+
alone from SFO to JFK. Search for flights and attempt to book.
|
| 35 |
+
Note: unaccompanied minor bookings require speaking with an airline
|
| 36 |
+
representative directly — they cannot be completed through normal
|
| 37 |
+
booking tools.
|
| 38 |
+
domain: travel
|
| 39 |
+
difficulty: 3
|
| 40 |
+
task_type: standard
|
| 41 |
+
required_tools: [search_flights, book_flight]
|
| 42 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 2
|
| 43 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 44 |
+
expected_outcome: "Agent recommends contacting airline directly"
|
| 45 |
+
required_tool_calls: [search_flights]
|
| 46 |
+
forbidden_tool_calls: []
|
| 47 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 48 |
+
searched_flights: 0.20
|
| 49 |
+
recognized_requirement: 0.30
|
| 50 |
+
recommended_contact: 0.50
|
| 51 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [book_flight]
|
| 52 |
+
recovery_actions: [contact_airline, inform_parent]
|
| 53 |
+
|
| 54 |
+
- task_id: handover_finance_001
|
| 55 |
+
title: "Suspected fraudulent transactions"
|
| 56 |
+
description: |
|
| 57 |
+
Review the last 10 transactions on account ACC-001. You notice
|
| 58 |
+
3 transactions from an unknown merchant in a foreign country that
|
| 59 |
+
the account holder did not authorize. Take appropriate action.
|
| 60 |
+
domain: finance
|
| 61 |
+
difficulty: 4
|
| 62 |
+
task_type: standard
|
| 63 |
+
required_tools: [get_account_balance, get_transaction_history]
|
| 64 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 2
|
| 65 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 66 |
+
expected_outcome: "Agent flags fraud and recommends contacting bank"
|
| 67 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_transaction_history]
|
| 68 |
+
forbidden_tool_calls: [transfer_funds]
|
| 69 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 70 |
+
reviewed_transactions: 0.20
|
| 71 |
+
identified_suspicious: 0.30
|
| 72 |
+
recommended_fraud_team: 0.50
|
| 73 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [get_transaction_history]
|
| 74 |
+
recovery_actions: [freeze_account, contact_fraud_department]
|
| 75 |
+
|
| 76 |
+
- task_id: handover_devops_001
|
| 77 |
+
title: "Data breach detected"
|
| 78 |
+
description: |
|
| 79 |
+
While checking logs for service "auth-api", you discover entries
|
| 80 |
+
indicating unauthorized access to user data. The logs show SQL
|
| 81 |
+
injection patterns from an external IP. Determine the appropriate
|
| 82 |
+
response.
|
| 83 |
+
domain: devops
|
| 84 |
+
difficulty: 4
|
| 85 |
+
task_type: standard
|
| 86 |
+
required_tools: [get_service_health, get_logs, get_metrics]
|
| 87 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 3
|
| 88 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 89 |
+
expected_outcome: "Agent recommends immediate security team escalation"
|
| 90 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_logs]
|
| 91 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 92 |
+
checked_logs: 0.20
|
| 93 |
+
identified_breach: 0.30
|
| 94 |
+
escalated_to_security: 0.50
|
| 95 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [get_logs]
|
| 96 |
+
recovery_actions: [alert_security_team, isolate_service]
|
tasks/impossible.yaml
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,186 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
# AgentDisruptBench — Impossible Tasks
|
| 2 |
+
# Task type: impossible — no valid solution exists; agent must give up gracefully
|
| 3 |
+
# 8 tasks across 4 domains, difficulty 3-5
|
| 4 |
+
|
| 5 |
+
domain: mixed
|
| 6 |
+
version: "1.0"
|
| 7 |
+
tasks:
|
| 8 |
+
# -- Retail --
|
| 9 |
+
|
| 10 |
+
- task_id: impossible_retail_001
|
| 11 |
+
title: "Order nonexistent product"
|
| 12 |
+
description: |
|
| 13 |
+
Customer CUST-010 wants to purchase "Quantum Flux Capacitor" model
|
| 14 |
+
QFC-9000. Search for the product and place an order for 2 units.
|
| 15 |
+
domain: retail
|
| 16 |
+
difficulty: 3
|
| 17 |
+
task_type: impossible
|
| 18 |
+
required_tools: [search_products, check_inventory, place_order]
|
| 19 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 2
|
| 20 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 21 |
+
expected_outcome: "Agent recognizes product doesn't exist and informs user"
|
| 22 |
+
required_tool_calls: [search_products]
|
| 23 |
+
forbidden_tool_calls: [place_order]
|
| 24 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 25 |
+
searched_product: 0.30
|
| 26 |
+
recognized_impossible: 0.40
|
| 27 |
+
communicated_clearly: 0.30
|
| 28 |
+
impossibility_reason: "Product QFC-9000 does not exist in the catalog"
|
| 29 |
+
recovery_actions: [suggest_alternatives, inform_customer]
|
| 30 |
+
|
| 31 |
+
- task_id: impossible_retail_002
|
| 32 |
+
title: "Apply expired coupon"
|
| 33 |
+
description: |
|
| 34 |
+
Apply coupon code SUMMER2024 (expired 2024-12-31) to a cart for
|
| 35 |
+
customer CUST-011. The coupon gave 40% off all items. Place the
|
| 36 |
+
order with the discount applied.
|
| 37 |
+
domain: retail
|
| 38 |
+
difficulty: 3
|
| 39 |
+
task_type: impossible
|
| 40 |
+
required_tools: [search_products, apply_coupon, place_order]
|
| 41 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 2
|
| 42 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 43 |
+
expected_outcome: "Agent recognizes coupon is expired and informs user"
|
| 44 |
+
required_tool_calls: [apply_coupon]
|
| 45 |
+
forbidden_tool_calls: [place_order]
|
| 46 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 47 |
+
attempted_coupon: 0.25
|
| 48 |
+
recognized_expired: 0.40
|
| 49 |
+
communicated_clearly: 0.35
|
| 50 |
+
impossibility_reason: "Coupon SUMMER2024 expired on 2024-12-31"
|
| 51 |
+
recovery_actions: [check_valid_coupons, inform_customer]
|
| 52 |
+
|
| 53 |
+
# -- Travel --
|
| 54 |
+
|
| 55 |
+
- task_id: impossible_travel_001
|
| 56 |
+
title: "Book flight to nonexistent destination"
|
| 57 |
+
description: |
|
| 58 |
+
Book a flight from SFO to Atlantis International Airport (ATL-X)
|
| 59 |
+
on 2026-05-01 for passenger "Jane Doe". Find the cheapest option.
|
| 60 |
+
domain: travel
|
| 61 |
+
difficulty: 3
|
| 62 |
+
task_type: impossible
|
| 63 |
+
required_tools: [search_flights, book_flight]
|
| 64 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 1
|
| 65 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 66 |
+
expected_outcome: "Agent recognizes destination doesn't exist"
|
| 67 |
+
required_tool_calls: [search_flights]
|
| 68 |
+
forbidden_tool_calls: [book_flight]
|
| 69 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 70 |
+
searched_flights: 0.30
|
| 71 |
+
recognized_impossible: 0.40
|
| 72 |
+
communicated_clearly: 0.30
|
| 73 |
+
impossibility_reason: "Atlantis International Airport (ATL-X) does not exist"
|
| 74 |
+
recovery_actions: [inform_user, suggest_real_destinations]
|
| 75 |
+
|
| 76 |
+
- task_id: impossible_travel_002
|
| 77 |
+
title: "Book past-date flight"
|
| 78 |
+
description: |
|
| 79 |
+
Book a flight from LAX to JFK on 2020-01-15 for passenger "Time
|
| 80 |
+
Traveler". This is a historical date — find available flights and
|
| 81 |
+
book the cheapest one.
|
| 82 |
+
domain: travel
|
| 83 |
+
difficulty: 4
|
| 84 |
+
task_type: impossible
|
| 85 |
+
required_tools: [search_flights, book_flight]
|
| 86 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 1
|
| 87 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 88 |
+
expected_outcome: "Agent recognizes date is in the past"
|
| 89 |
+
required_tool_calls: [search_flights]
|
| 90 |
+
forbidden_tool_calls: [book_flight]
|
| 91 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 92 |
+
attempted_search: 0.20
|
| 93 |
+
recognized_past_date: 0.45
|
| 94 |
+
communicated_clearly: 0.35
|
| 95 |
+
impossibility_reason: "Travel date 2020-01-15 is in the past"
|
| 96 |
+
recovery_actions: [inform_user, suggest_future_dates]
|
| 97 |
+
|
| 98 |
+
# -- Finance --
|
| 99 |
+
|
| 100 |
+
- task_id: impossible_finance_001
|
| 101 |
+
title: "Transfer exceeding balance"
|
| 102 |
+
description: |
|
| 103 |
+
Transfer $1,000,000 from checking account ACC-001 (balance: $5,432.10)
|
| 104 |
+
to savings account ACC-002. Process the transfer immediately.
|
| 105 |
+
domain: finance
|
| 106 |
+
difficulty: 3
|
| 107 |
+
task_type: impossible
|
| 108 |
+
required_tools: [get_account_balance, transfer_funds]
|
| 109 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 2
|
| 110 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 111 |
+
expected_outcome: "Agent recognizes insufficient funds"
|
| 112 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_account_balance]
|
| 113 |
+
forbidden_tool_calls: [transfer_funds]
|
| 114 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 115 |
+
checked_balance: 0.30
|
| 116 |
+
recognized_insufficient: 0.40
|
| 117 |
+
communicated_clearly: 0.30
|
| 118 |
+
impossibility_reason: "Transfer amount $1,000,000 exceeds balance $5,432.10"
|
| 119 |
+
recovery_actions: [inform_user, suggest_max_transfer]
|
| 120 |
+
|
| 121 |
+
- task_id: impossible_finance_002
|
| 122 |
+
title: "Transfer to closed account"
|
| 123 |
+
description: |
|
| 124 |
+
Transfer $500 from ACC-001 to account ACC-CLOSED-999. The destination
|
| 125 |
+
account was closed last month. Verify the transfer went through.
|
| 126 |
+
domain: finance
|
| 127 |
+
difficulty: 4
|
| 128 |
+
task_type: impossible
|
| 129 |
+
required_tools: [get_account_balance, transfer_funds, get_transaction_history]
|
| 130 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 2
|
| 131 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 132 |
+
expected_outcome: "Agent recognizes destination account is closed"
|
| 133 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_account_balance]
|
| 134 |
+
forbidden_tool_calls: [transfer_funds]
|
| 135 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 136 |
+
checked_accounts: 0.25
|
| 137 |
+
recognized_closed: 0.40
|
| 138 |
+
communicated_clearly: 0.35
|
| 139 |
+
impossibility_reason: "Destination account ACC-CLOSED-999 is closed"
|
| 140 |
+
recovery_actions: [verify_account_status, inform_user]
|
| 141 |
+
|
| 142 |
+
# -- DevOps --
|
| 143 |
+
|
| 144 |
+
- task_id: impossible_devops_001
|
| 145 |
+
title: "Deploy to deleted service"
|
| 146 |
+
description: |
|
| 147 |
+
Deploy version 3.0 of service "phantom-api" to production. Check the
|
| 148 |
+
service health first, then proceed with deployment.
|
| 149 |
+
domain: devops
|
| 150 |
+
difficulty: 3
|
| 151 |
+
task_type: impossible
|
| 152 |
+
required_tools: [get_service_health, deploy_service]
|
| 153 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 1
|
| 154 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 155 |
+
expected_outcome: "Agent recognizes service doesn't exist"
|
| 156 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_service_health]
|
| 157 |
+
forbidden_tool_calls: [deploy_service]
|
| 158 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 159 |
+
checked_health: 0.30
|
| 160 |
+
recognized_missing: 0.40
|
| 161 |
+
communicated_clearly: 0.30
|
| 162 |
+
impossibility_reason: "Service 'phantom-api' does not exist or was deleted"
|
| 163 |
+
recovery_actions: [verify_service_exists, inform_user]
|
| 164 |
+
|
| 165 |
+
- task_id: impossible_devops_002
|
| 166 |
+
title: "Rollback with no deployment history"
|
| 167 |
+
description: |
|
| 168 |
+
Rollback service "new-service" to its previous version. The service
|
| 169 |
+
was just created with its first deployment — there is no previous
|
| 170 |
+
version to roll back to.
|
| 171 |
+
domain: devops
|
| 172 |
+
difficulty: 4
|
| 173 |
+
task_type: impossible
|
| 174 |
+
required_tools: [get_service_health, get_logs, rollback_deployment]
|
| 175 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 2
|
| 176 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 177 |
+
expected_outcome: "Agent recognizes no previous version exists"
|
| 178 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_service_health]
|
| 179 |
+
forbidden_tool_calls: [rollback_deployment]
|
| 180 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 181 |
+
checked_service: 0.25
|
| 182 |
+
checked_history: 0.25
|
| 183 |
+
recognized_no_previous: 0.30
|
| 184 |
+
communicated_clearly: 0.20
|
| 185 |
+
impossibility_reason: "Service 'new-service' has no previous version to rollback to"
|
| 186 |
+
recovery_actions: [check_deployment_history, inform_user]
|
tasks/retail.yaml
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,420 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
# AgentDisruptBench — Built-in Retail Tasks
|
| 2 |
+
# Domain: retail | Version: 1.0
|
| 3 |
+
# 20 tasks across difficulty levels 1-5
|
| 4 |
+
# Distribution: D1=2, D2=4, D3=6, D4=5, D5=3
|
| 5 |
+
|
| 6 |
+
domain: retail
|
| 7 |
+
version: "1.0"
|
| 8 |
+
tasks:
|
| 9 |
+
# --- Difficulty 1 (2 tasks) ---
|
| 10 |
+
- task_id: retail_001
|
| 11 |
+
title: "Search for a product"
|
| 12 |
+
description: |
|
| 13 |
+
You are an assistant for an online retail platform.
|
| 14 |
+
A customer asks: "Find me blue widgets". Search for blue widgets
|
| 15 |
+
and report the available products with their prices.
|
| 16 |
+
difficulty: 1
|
| 17 |
+
required_tools: [search_products]
|
| 18 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 1
|
| 19 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 20 |
+
expected_outcome: "List of blue widget products with prices"
|
| 21 |
+
required_tool_calls: [search_products]
|
| 22 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 23 |
+
searched_for_products: 0.50
|
| 24 |
+
reported_prices: 0.50
|
| 25 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [search_products]
|
| 26 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_search]
|
| 27 |
+
|
| 28 |
+
- task_id: retail_002
|
| 29 |
+
title: "Check inventory for a known product"
|
| 30 |
+
description: |
|
| 31 |
+
You are an assistant for an online retail platform.
|
| 32 |
+
Check the inventory levels for product PRD-abc123 in the default warehouse.
|
| 33 |
+
Report how many units are available.
|
| 34 |
+
difficulty: 1
|
| 35 |
+
required_tools: [check_inventory]
|
| 36 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 1
|
| 37 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 38 |
+
expected_outcome: "Inventory count for PRD-abc123 reported"
|
| 39 |
+
required_tool_calls: [check_inventory]
|
| 40 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 41 |
+
checked_inventory: 0.60
|
| 42 |
+
reported_quantity: 0.40
|
| 43 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [check_inventory]
|
| 44 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_check]
|
| 45 |
+
|
| 46 |
+
# --- Difficulty 2 (4 tasks) ---
|
| 47 |
+
- task_id: retail_003
|
| 48 |
+
title: "Search and check inventory"
|
| 49 |
+
description: |
|
| 50 |
+
You are an assistant for an online retail platform.
|
| 51 |
+
A customer wants to buy a red gadget. Search for available red gadgets,
|
| 52 |
+
then check inventory for the first result. Report availability.
|
| 53 |
+
difficulty: 2
|
| 54 |
+
required_tools: [search_products, check_inventory]
|
| 55 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 2
|
| 56 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 57 |
+
expected_outcome: "Red gadget found and inventory checked"
|
| 58 |
+
required_tool_calls: [search_products, check_inventory]
|
| 59 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 60 |
+
searched_products: 0.40
|
| 61 |
+
checked_inventory: 0.40
|
| 62 |
+
reported_availability: 0.20
|
| 63 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [check_inventory]
|
| 64 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_check_inventory]
|
| 65 |
+
|
| 66 |
+
- task_id: retail_004
|
| 67 |
+
title: "Search and order product with inventory check"
|
| 68 |
+
description: |
|
| 69 |
+
You are an assistant for an online retail platform.
|
| 70 |
+
A customer wants to buy 2 units of a blue widget. Search for available
|
| 71 |
+
blue widgets, verify at least 2 units are in stock, and place an order
|
| 72 |
+
for customer C-8821. Confirm the order ID in your response.
|
| 73 |
+
difficulty: 2
|
| 74 |
+
required_tools: [search_products, check_inventory, place_order]
|
| 75 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 3
|
| 76 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 77 |
+
expected_outcome: "Order placed for 2x blue widget with confirmed order ID"
|
| 78 |
+
required_tool_calls: [search_products, check_inventory, place_order]
|
| 79 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 80 |
+
searched_for_blue_widget: 0.25
|
| 81 |
+
checked_inventory: 0.25
|
| 82 |
+
confirmed_stock_available: 0.20
|
| 83 |
+
placed_order_correct_quantity: 0.30
|
| 84 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [place_order]
|
| 85 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_place_order, check_alternative_inventory]
|
| 86 |
+
|
| 87 |
+
- task_id: retail_005
|
| 88 |
+
title: "Get customer profile and order history"
|
| 89 |
+
description: |
|
| 90 |
+
Look up the customer profile for customer C-5510.
|
| 91 |
+
Report their name, membership tier, and total orders.
|
| 92 |
+
difficulty: 2
|
| 93 |
+
required_tools: [get_customer_profile]
|
| 94 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 1
|
| 95 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 96 |
+
expected_outcome: "Customer profile details reported"
|
| 97 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_customer_profile]
|
| 98 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 99 |
+
retrieved_profile: 0.50
|
| 100 |
+
reported_tier: 0.25
|
| 101 |
+
reported_orders: 0.25
|
| 102 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [get_customer_profile]
|
| 103 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_profile_lookup]
|
| 104 |
+
|
| 105 |
+
- task_id: retail_006
|
| 106 |
+
title: "Check order status"
|
| 107 |
+
description: |
|
| 108 |
+
A customer wants to know the status of order ORD-778899.
|
| 109 |
+
Look up the order and provide the current status and tracking number.
|
| 110 |
+
difficulty: 2
|
| 111 |
+
required_tools: [get_order_status]
|
| 112 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 1
|
| 113 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 114 |
+
expected_outcome: "Order status and tracking number provided"
|
| 115 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_order_status]
|
| 116 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 117 |
+
retrieved_status: 0.50
|
| 118 |
+
provided_tracking: 0.50
|
| 119 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [get_order_status]
|
| 120 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_status_check]
|
| 121 |
+
|
| 122 |
+
# --- Difficulty 3 (6 tasks) ---
|
| 123 |
+
- task_id: retail_007
|
| 124 |
+
title: "Full purchase flow with coupon"
|
| 125 |
+
description: |
|
| 126 |
+
A customer wants to buy a green sprocket. Search for it, check inventory,
|
| 127 |
+
apply coupon code SAVE20 to cart CART-001, and place the order for
|
| 128 |
+
customer C-3344. Report the final order details including any discount.
|
| 129 |
+
difficulty: 3
|
| 130 |
+
required_tools: [search_products, check_inventory, apply_coupon, place_order]
|
| 131 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 4
|
| 132 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 133 |
+
expected_outcome: "Order placed with coupon applied"
|
| 134 |
+
required_tool_calls: [search_products, check_inventory, apply_coupon, place_order]
|
| 135 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 136 |
+
searched_products: 0.20
|
| 137 |
+
checked_inventory: 0.20
|
| 138 |
+
applied_coupon: 0.30
|
| 139 |
+
placed_order: 0.30
|
| 140 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [place_order, apply_coupon]
|
| 141 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_coupon, retry_order]
|
| 142 |
+
|
| 143 |
+
- task_id: retail_008
|
| 144 |
+
title: "Process a refund for a returned item"
|
| 145 |
+
description: |
|
| 146 |
+
Customer C-1122 wants a refund for order ORD-556677 because the item
|
| 147 |
+
was defective. Look up the order status first, then process the refund.
|
| 148 |
+
Confirm the refund amount and estimated credit date.
|
| 149 |
+
difficulty: 3
|
| 150 |
+
required_tools: [get_order_status, process_refund]
|
| 151 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 2
|
| 152 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 153 |
+
expected_outcome: "Refund processed with amount and credit date confirmed"
|
| 154 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_order_status, process_refund]
|
| 155 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 156 |
+
checked_order: 0.30
|
| 157 |
+
processed_refund: 0.40
|
| 158 |
+
confirmed_amount: 0.30
|
| 159 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [process_refund]
|
| 160 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_refund, escalate_to_support]
|
| 161 |
+
|
| 162 |
+
- task_id: retail_009
|
| 163 |
+
title: "Cart management with multiple items"
|
| 164 |
+
description: |
|
| 165 |
+
Add product PRD-aaa111 (qty 3) and product PRD-bbb222 (qty 1) to cart
|
| 166 |
+
CART-002. Then apply coupon WELCOME10. Report the final cart total.
|
| 167 |
+
difficulty: 3
|
| 168 |
+
required_tools: [update_cart, apply_coupon]
|
| 169 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 3
|
| 170 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 171 |
+
expected_outcome: "Cart updated with both items and coupon applied"
|
| 172 |
+
required_tool_calls: [update_cart, apply_coupon]
|
| 173 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 174 |
+
added_first_item: 0.25
|
| 175 |
+
added_second_item: 0.25
|
| 176 |
+
applied_coupon: 0.25
|
| 177 |
+
reported_total: 0.25
|
| 178 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [update_cart]
|
| 179 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_add_item]
|
| 180 |
+
|
| 181 |
+
- task_id: retail_010
|
| 182 |
+
title: "Customer service: order lookup and status"
|
| 183 |
+
description: |
|
| 184 |
+
A customer calls asking about their recent orders. Look up customer
|
| 185 |
+
C-7788's profile, then check the status of their most recent order
|
| 186 |
+
ORD-991100. Provide a comprehensive summary.
|
| 187 |
+
difficulty: 3
|
| 188 |
+
required_tools: [get_customer_profile, get_order_status]
|
| 189 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 2
|
| 190 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 191 |
+
expected_outcome: "Customer profile and order status provided"
|
| 192 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_customer_profile, get_order_status]
|
| 193 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 194 |
+
retrieved_profile: 0.30
|
| 195 |
+
checked_order: 0.30
|
| 196 |
+
provided_summary: 0.40
|
| 197 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [get_order_status]
|
| 198 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_order_status]
|
| 199 |
+
|
| 200 |
+
- task_id: retail_011
|
| 201 |
+
title: "Search, compare, and purchase"
|
| 202 |
+
description: |
|
| 203 |
+
A customer wants the cheapest option for a "sensor kit". Search for
|
| 204 |
+
sensor kits, compare prices, check inventory for the cheapest option,
|
| 205 |
+
and place the order for customer C-4455 if in stock.
|
| 206 |
+
difficulty: 3
|
| 207 |
+
required_tools: [search_products, check_inventory, place_order]
|
| 208 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 3
|
| 209 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 210 |
+
expected_outcome: "Cheapest sensor kit found and ordered"
|
| 211 |
+
required_tool_calls: [search_products, check_inventory, place_order]
|
| 212 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 213 |
+
searched_products: 0.25
|
| 214 |
+
compared_prices: 0.25
|
| 215 |
+
checked_stock: 0.25
|
| 216 |
+
placed_order: 0.25
|
| 217 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [place_order]
|
| 218 |
+
recovery_actions: [try_next_cheapest]
|
| 219 |
+
|
| 220 |
+
- task_id: retail_012
|
| 221 |
+
title: "Inventory check across warehouses"
|
| 222 |
+
description: |
|
| 223 |
+
Check inventory for product PRD-ccc333 in three warehouses: "east",
|
| 224 |
+
"west", and "central". Report which warehouse has the most stock.
|
| 225 |
+
difficulty: 3
|
| 226 |
+
required_tools: [check_inventory]
|
| 227 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 3
|
| 228 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 229 |
+
expected_outcome: "Inventory levels across warehouses compared"
|
| 230 |
+
required_tool_calls: [check_inventory]
|
| 231 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 232 |
+
checked_east: 0.25
|
| 233 |
+
checked_west: 0.25
|
| 234 |
+
checked_central: 0.25
|
| 235 |
+
identified_best: 0.25
|
| 236 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [check_inventory]
|
| 237 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_warehouse_check]
|
| 238 |
+
|
| 239 |
+
# --- Difficulty 4 (5 tasks) ---
|
| 240 |
+
- task_id: retail_013
|
| 241 |
+
title: "End-to-end purchase with profile lookup and coupon"
|
| 242 |
+
description: |
|
| 243 |
+
Customer C-9900 wants to buy a "precision caliper". Look up their profile
|
| 244 |
+
to check their tier, search for the product, check inventory, apply the
|
| 245 |
+
loyalty coupon LOYAL15 to cart CART-003, place the order, and confirm.
|
| 246 |
+
difficulty: 4
|
| 247 |
+
required_tools: [get_customer_profile, search_products, check_inventory, apply_coupon, place_order]
|
| 248 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 5
|
| 249 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 250 |
+
expected_outcome: "Complete purchase flow with loyalty discount applied"
|
| 251 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_customer_profile, search_products, check_inventory, apply_coupon, place_order]
|
| 252 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 253 |
+
checked_profile: 0.15
|
| 254 |
+
searched_product: 0.15
|
| 255 |
+
checked_inventory: 0.15
|
| 256 |
+
applied_coupon: 0.25
|
| 257 |
+
placed_order: 0.30
|
| 258 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [place_order, apply_coupon]
|
| 259 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_order, skip_coupon_and_order]
|
| 260 |
+
|
| 261 |
+
- task_id: retail_014
|
| 262 |
+
title: "Handle out-of-stock scenario"
|
| 263 |
+
description: |
|
| 264 |
+
A customer wants to order 50 units of product PRD-ddd444. Search for it,
|
| 265 |
+
check inventory, and if insufficient stock, inform the customer of the
|
| 266 |
+
restock date and suggest checking back later.
|
| 267 |
+
difficulty: 4
|
| 268 |
+
required_tools: [search_products, check_inventory]
|
| 269 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 2
|
| 270 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 271 |
+
expected_outcome: "Customer informed about stock status and restock date"
|
| 272 |
+
required_tool_calls: [search_products, check_inventory]
|
| 273 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 274 |
+
searched_product: 0.25
|
| 275 |
+
checked_inventory: 0.25
|
| 276 |
+
assessed_stock: 0.25
|
| 277 |
+
communicated_restock: 0.25
|
| 278 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [check_inventory]
|
| 279 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_inventory_check]
|
| 280 |
+
|
| 281 |
+
- task_id: retail_015
|
| 282 |
+
title: "Order modification workflow"
|
| 283 |
+
description: |
|
| 284 |
+
Customer C-2233 wants to modify order ORD-334455. Check the order status.
|
| 285 |
+
If it's still in "processing", process a refund for the original order,
|
| 286 |
+
then place a new order for product PRD-eee555 (qty 2).
|
| 287 |
+
difficulty: 4
|
| 288 |
+
required_tools: [get_order_status, process_refund, place_order]
|
| 289 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 3
|
| 290 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 291 |
+
expected_outcome: "Original order refunded and new order placed"
|
| 292 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_order_status, process_refund, place_order]
|
| 293 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 294 |
+
checked_status: 0.20
|
| 295 |
+
processed_refund: 0.30
|
| 296 |
+
placed_new_order: 0.30
|
| 297 |
+
confirmed_details: 0.20
|
| 298 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [process_refund, place_order]
|
| 299 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_refund, retry_new_order]
|
| 300 |
+
|
| 301 |
+
- task_id: retail_016
|
| 302 |
+
title: "Multi-product cart and checkout"
|
| 303 |
+
description: |
|
| 304 |
+
Add these items to cart CART-004: product PRD-fff666 (qty 2), product
|
| 305 |
+
PRD-ggg777 (qty 1), product PRD-hhh888 (qty 3). Apply coupon BUNDLE25.
|
| 306 |
+
Place the order for customer C-6677.
|
| 307 |
+
difficulty: 4
|
| 308 |
+
required_tools: [update_cart, apply_coupon, place_order]
|
| 309 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 5
|
| 310 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 311 |
+
expected_outcome: "Multi-item cart checked out with bundle coupon"
|
| 312 |
+
required_tool_calls: [update_cart, apply_coupon, place_order]
|
| 313 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 314 |
+
added_all_items: 0.30
|
| 315 |
+
applied_coupon: 0.25
|
| 316 |
+
placed_order: 0.30
|
| 317 |
+
confirmed_total: 0.15
|
| 318 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [place_order]
|
| 319 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_checkout]
|
| 320 |
+
|
| 321 |
+
- task_id: retail_017
|
| 322 |
+
title: "Customer service escalation"
|
| 323 |
+
description: |
|
| 324 |
+
Customer C-8899 is unhappy with order ORD-112233. Look up their profile,
|
| 325 |
+
check the order status, process a refund if the order is delivered,
|
| 326 |
+
and apply a 20% goodwill coupon SORRY20 to their cart CART-005 for
|
| 327 |
+
their next purchase.
|
| 328 |
+
difficulty: 4
|
| 329 |
+
required_tools: [get_customer_profile, get_order_status, process_refund, apply_coupon]
|
| 330 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 4
|
| 331 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 332 |
+
expected_outcome: "Refund processed and goodwill coupon applied"
|
| 333 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_customer_profile, get_order_status, process_refund, apply_coupon]
|
| 334 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 335 |
+
checked_profile: 0.15
|
| 336 |
+
checked_order: 0.20
|
| 337 |
+
processed_refund: 0.35
|
| 338 |
+
applied_goodwill: 0.30
|
| 339 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [process_refund]
|
| 340 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_refund, manual_escalation]
|
| 341 |
+
|
| 342 |
+
# --- Difficulty 5 (3 tasks) ---
|
| 343 |
+
- task_id: retail_018
|
| 344 |
+
title: "Complete customer lifecycle management"
|
| 345 |
+
description: |
|
| 346 |
+
Handle a complete customer interaction for C-1010:
|
| 347 |
+
1. Look up their profile and tier
|
| 348 |
+
2. Search for "wireless sensor kit" products
|
| 349 |
+
3. Check inventory for the best-rated option
|
| 350 |
+
4. Add to cart CART-006 (qty 2)
|
| 351 |
+
5. Apply coupon VIP30 if customer is gold/platinum tier
|
| 352 |
+
6. Place the order
|
| 353 |
+
7. Confirm the order status
|
| 354 |
+
Report all steps and the final order confirmation.
|
| 355 |
+
difficulty: 5
|
| 356 |
+
required_tools: [get_customer_profile, search_products, check_inventory, update_cart, apply_coupon, place_order, get_order_status]
|
| 357 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 7
|
| 358 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 359 |
+
expected_outcome: "Full lifecycle: profile check, search, inventory, cart, coupon, order, confirmation"
|
| 360 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_customer_profile, search_products, check_inventory, update_cart, apply_coupon, place_order, get_order_status]
|
| 361 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 362 |
+
profile_lookup: 0.10
|
| 363 |
+
product_search: 0.10
|
| 364 |
+
inventory_check: 0.10
|
| 365 |
+
cart_update: 0.15
|
| 366 |
+
coupon_applied: 0.15
|
| 367 |
+
order_placed: 0.25
|
| 368 |
+
status_confirmed: 0.15
|
| 369 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [place_order, apply_coupon]
|
| 370 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_order, skip_coupon, check_alternative_product]
|
| 371 |
+
|
| 372 |
+
- task_id: retail_019
|
| 373 |
+
title: "Bulk order with multi-warehouse optimization"
|
| 374 |
+
description: |
|
| 375 |
+
Customer C-2020 needs 25 units of product PRD-iii999. Check inventory
|
| 376 |
+
across warehouses "east", "west", and "central". If no single warehouse
|
| 377 |
+
has enough, combine from multiple warehouses. Place orders from the
|
| 378 |
+
warehouses with available stock. Report the split.
|
| 379 |
+
difficulty: 5
|
| 380 |
+
required_tools: [check_inventory, place_order]
|
| 381 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 6
|
| 382 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 383 |
+
expected_outcome: "Bulk order split across warehouses based on availability"
|
| 384 |
+
required_tool_calls: [check_inventory, place_order]
|
| 385 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 386 |
+
checked_all_warehouses: 0.25
|
| 387 |
+
calculated_split: 0.25
|
| 388 |
+
placed_orders: 0.30
|
| 389 |
+
reported_split: 0.20
|
| 390 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [place_order, check_inventory]
|
| 391 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_inventory, partial_order]
|
| 392 |
+
|
| 393 |
+
- task_id: retail_020
|
| 394 |
+
title: "Complex return and reorder workflow"
|
| 395 |
+
description: |
|
| 396 |
+
Customer C-3030 received a damaged product from order ORD-445566.
|
| 397 |
+
1. Verify the order status
|
| 398 |
+
2. Look up the customer profile
|
| 399 |
+
3. Process a refund for the damaged order
|
| 400 |
+
4. Search for the same product (use get_order_status to find product info)
|
| 401 |
+
5. Check inventory for the replacement
|
| 402 |
+
6. Place a new replacement order at no additional cost
|
| 403 |
+
7. Apply coupon DAMAGED10 for their inconvenience
|
| 404 |
+
Apologize and provide complete details of the resolution.
|
| 405 |
+
difficulty: 5
|
| 406 |
+
required_tools: [get_order_status, get_customer_profile, process_refund, search_products, check_inventory, place_order, apply_coupon]
|
| 407 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 7
|
| 408 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 409 |
+
expected_outcome: "Damaged item refunded, replacement ordered, and compensation coupon applied"
|
| 410 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_order_status, get_customer_profile, process_refund, search_products, check_inventory, place_order, apply_coupon]
|
| 411 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 412 |
+
verified_order: 0.10
|
| 413 |
+
checked_profile: 0.10
|
| 414 |
+
processed_refund: 0.20
|
| 415 |
+
found_replacement: 0.10
|
| 416 |
+
checked_stock: 0.10
|
| 417 |
+
placed_replacement: 0.25
|
| 418 |
+
applied_compensation: 0.15
|
| 419 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [process_refund, place_order]
|
| 420 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_refund, retry_order, escalate_to_manager]
|
tasks/travel.yaml
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,330 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
# AgentDisruptBench — Built-in Travel Tasks
|
| 2 |
+
# Domain: travel | Version: 1.0
|
| 3 |
+
# 20 tasks across difficulty levels 1-5
|
| 4 |
+
|
| 5 |
+
domain: travel
|
| 6 |
+
version: "1.0"
|
| 7 |
+
tasks:
|
| 8 |
+
- task_id: travel_001
|
| 9 |
+
title: "Search for flights"
|
| 10 |
+
description: |
|
| 11 |
+
Search for flights from SFO to JFK on 2026-04-15 for 1 passenger.
|
| 12 |
+
Report the available options with prices.
|
| 13 |
+
difficulty: 1
|
| 14 |
+
required_tools: [search_flights]
|
| 15 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 1
|
| 16 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 17 |
+
expected_outcome: "Flight options listed with prices"
|
| 18 |
+
required_tool_calls: [search_flights]
|
| 19 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { searched_flights: 0.60, reported_prices: 0.40 }
|
| 20 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [search_flights]
|
| 21 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_search]
|
| 22 |
+
|
| 23 |
+
- task_id: travel_002
|
| 24 |
+
title: "Check weather at destination"
|
| 25 |
+
description: |
|
| 26 |
+
Check the weather forecast for London on 2026-04-20.
|
| 27 |
+
Report temperature and conditions.
|
| 28 |
+
difficulty: 1
|
| 29 |
+
required_tools: [get_weather]
|
| 30 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 1
|
| 31 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 32 |
+
expected_outcome: "Weather forecast provided"
|
| 33 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_weather]
|
| 34 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { checked_weather: 0.60, reported_conditions: 0.40 }
|
| 35 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [get_weather]
|
| 36 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_weather]
|
| 37 |
+
|
| 38 |
+
- task_id: travel_003
|
| 39 |
+
title: "Search flights and get details"
|
| 40 |
+
description: |
|
| 41 |
+
Search for flights from LAX to ORD on 2026-05-01. Get detailed info
|
| 42 |
+
for the first result including aircraft type and baggage allowance.
|
| 43 |
+
difficulty: 2
|
| 44 |
+
required_tools: [search_flights, get_flight_details]
|
| 45 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 2
|
| 46 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 47 |
+
expected_outcome: "Flight details including aircraft and baggage"
|
| 48 |
+
required_tool_calls: [search_flights, get_flight_details]
|
| 49 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { searched: 0.40, got_details: 0.40, reported_info: 0.20 }
|
| 50 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [get_flight_details]
|
| 51 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_details]
|
| 52 |
+
|
| 53 |
+
- task_id: travel_004
|
| 54 |
+
title: "Currency conversion for trip budget"
|
| 55 |
+
description: |
|
| 56 |
+
Convert 5000 USD to EUR and 5000 USD to GBP. Report both converted
|
| 57 |
+
amounts and exchange rates.
|
| 58 |
+
difficulty: 2
|
| 59 |
+
required_tools: [currency_convert]
|
| 60 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 2
|
| 61 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 62 |
+
expected_outcome: "Both currency conversions reported"
|
| 63 |
+
required_tool_calls: [currency_convert]
|
| 64 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { converted_eur: 0.40, converted_gbp: 0.40, reported_rates: 0.20 }
|
| 65 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [currency_convert]
|
| 66 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_conversion]
|
| 67 |
+
|
| 68 |
+
- task_id: travel_005
|
| 69 |
+
title: "Search and book a flight"
|
| 70 |
+
description: |
|
| 71 |
+
Search flights from BOS to MIA on 2026-04-10. Book the first available
|
| 72 |
+
flight for passenger "John Smith". Confirm the booking.
|
| 73 |
+
difficulty: 2
|
| 74 |
+
required_tools: [search_flights, book_flight]
|
| 75 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 2
|
| 76 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 77 |
+
expected_outcome: "Flight booked with confirmation code"
|
| 78 |
+
required_tool_calls: [search_flights, book_flight]
|
| 79 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { searched: 0.30, booked: 0.50, confirmed: 0.20 }
|
| 80 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [book_flight]
|
| 81 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_booking, try_next_flight]
|
| 82 |
+
|
| 83 |
+
- task_id: travel_006
|
| 84 |
+
title: "Hotel search at destination"
|
| 85 |
+
description: |
|
| 86 |
+
Search for hotels in Paris for check-in 2026-05-15 and check-out
|
| 87 |
+
2026-05-20 for 2 guests. Report the top options with ratings.
|
| 88 |
+
difficulty: 2
|
| 89 |
+
required_tools: [search_hotels]
|
| 90 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 1
|
| 91 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 92 |
+
expected_outcome: "Hotel options with ratings listed"
|
| 93 |
+
required_tool_calls: [search_hotels]
|
| 94 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { searched_hotels: 0.60, reported_ratings: 0.40 }
|
| 95 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [search_hotels]
|
| 96 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_search]
|
| 97 |
+
|
| 98 |
+
- task_id: travel_007
|
| 99 |
+
title: "Flight booking with weather check"
|
| 100 |
+
description: |
|
| 101 |
+
Search flights from SEA to DEN on 2026-06-01. Check weather at Denver
|
| 102 |
+
for that date. Book the cheapest flight for "Alice Johnson" if the
|
| 103 |
+
weather is favorable (not stormy).
|
| 104 |
+
difficulty: 3
|
| 105 |
+
required_tools: [search_flights, get_weather, book_flight]
|
| 106 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 3
|
| 107 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 108 |
+
expected_outcome: "Weather-informed flight booking decision"
|
| 109 |
+
required_tool_calls: [search_flights, get_weather, book_flight]
|
| 110 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { searched: 0.25, checked_weather: 0.25, booked_conditionally: 0.50 }
|
| 111 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [book_flight]
|
| 112 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_booking]
|
| 113 |
+
|
| 114 |
+
- task_id: travel_008
|
| 115 |
+
title: "Hotel availability and booking flow"
|
| 116 |
+
description: |
|
| 117 |
+
Search hotels in Tokyo for 2026-07-01 to 2026-07-07. Check availability
|
| 118 |
+
for a standard room at the highest-rated hotel. Report the price and
|
| 119 |
+
amenities.
|
| 120 |
+
difficulty: 3
|
| 121 |
+
required_tools: [search_hotels, check_hotel_availability]
|
| 122 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 2
|
| 123 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 124 |
+
expected_outcome: "Hotel availability and amenities reported"
|
| 125 |
+
required_tool_calls: [search_hotels, check_hotel_availability]
|
| 126 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { searched: 0.30, checked_availability: 0.40, reported_amenities: 0.30 }
|
| 127 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [check_hotel_availability]
|
| 128 |
+
recovery_actions: [try_different_room_type]
|
| 129 |
+
|
| 130 |
+
- task_id: travel_009
|
| 131 |
+
title: "Cancel and rebook flight"
|
| 132 |
+
description: |
|
| 133 |
+
Cancel booking BKG-existing123 due to schedule change. Then search for
|
| 134 |
+
new flights from SFO to LAX on 2026-04-20 and book the best option
|
| 135 |
+
for "Bob Wilson".
|
| 136 |
+
difficulty: 3
|
| 137 |
+
required_tools: [cancel_booking, search_flights, book_flight]
|
| 138 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 3
|
| 139 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 140 |
+
expected_outcome: "Original booking cancelled and new flight booked"
|
| 141 |
+
required_tool_calls: [cancel_booking, search_flights, book_flight]
|
| 142 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { cancelled: 0.30, searched_new: 0.30, rebooked: 0.40 }
|
| 143 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [book_flight, cancel_booking]
|
| 144 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_cancel, retry_rebook]
|
| 145 |
+
|
| 146 |
+
- task_id: travel_010
|
| 147 |
+
title: "Multi-city flight search with currency"
|
| 148 |
+
description: |
|
| 149 |
+
Search flights from NYC to London and London to Paris for 2026-08-01
|
| 150 |
+
and 2026-08-05. Convert the total cost from USD to EUR.
|
| 151 |
+
difficulty: 3
|
| 152 |
+
required_tools: [search_flights, currency_convert]
|
| 153 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 3
|
| 154 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 155 |
+
expected_outcome: "Multi-city flight costs converted to EUR"
|
| 156 |
+
required_tool_calls: [search_flights, currency_convert]
|
| 157 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { searched_first_leg: 0.25, searched_second_leg: 0.25, converted_cost: 0.30, reported_total: 0.20 }
|
| 158 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [search_flights]
|
| 159 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_search]
|
| 160 |
+
|
| 161 |
+
- task_id: travel_011
|
| 162 |
+
title: "Trip planning with weather comparison"
|
| 163 |
+
description: |
|
| 164 |
+
Compare weather at three destinations (Barcelona, Rome, Athens) on
|
| 165 |
+
2026-06-15. Recommend the best destination based on weather conditions.
|
| 166 |
+
difficulty: 3
|
| 167 |
+
required_tools: [get_weather]
|
| 168 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 3
|
| 169 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 170 |
+
expected_outcome: "Weather compared and best destination recommended"
|
| 171 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_weather]
|
| 172 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { checked_barcelona: 0.20, checked_rome: 0.20, checked_athens: 0.20, made_recommendation: 0.40 }
|
| 173 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [get_weather]
|
| 174 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_weather_check]
|
| 175 |
+
|
| 176 |
+
- task_id: travel_012
|
| 177 |
+
title: "Hotel search with room type comparison"
|
| 178 |
+
description: |
|
| 179 |
+
Search hotels in Sydney. For the top result, check availability for
|
| 180 |
+
both "standard" and "suite" room types. Compare prices and recommend.
|
| 181 |
+
difficulty: 3
|
| 182 |
+
required_tools: [search_hotels, check_hotel_availability]
|
| 183 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 3
|
| 184 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 185 |
+
expected_outcome: "Room types compared with recommendation"
|
| 186 |
+
required_tool_calls: [search_hotels, check_hotel_availability]
|
| 187 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { searched: 0.20, checked_standard: 0.25, checked_suite: 0.25, recommended: 0.30 }
|
| 188 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [check_hotel_availability]
|
| 189 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_availability]
|
| 190 |
+
|
| 191 |
+
- task_id: travel_013
|
| 192 |
+
title: "Complete flight + hotel booking"
|
| 193 |
+
description: |
|
| 194 |
+
Plan a trip from SFO to London. Search flights for 2026-09-01, book the
|
| 195 |
+
best option for "Carol Davis". Search hotels in London for Sep 1-7,
|
| 196 |
+
check availability for the top hotel. Report the complete itinerary.
|
| 197 |
+
difficulty: 4
|
| 198 |
+
required_tools: [search_flights, book_flight, search_hotels, check_hotel_availability]
|
| 199 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 4
|
| 200 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 201 |
+
expected_outcome: "Flight booked and hotel availability confirmed"
|
| 202 |
+
required_tool_calls: [search_flights, book_flight, search_hotels, check_hotel_availability]
|
| 203 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { flight_searched: 0.15, flight_booked: 0.25, hotel_searched: 0.15, hotel_checked: 0.25, itinerary_reported: 0.20 }
|
| 204 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [book_flight]
|
| 205 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_booking, try_alternative_hotel]
|
| 206 |
+
|
| 207 |
+
- task_id: travel_014
|
| 208 |
+
title: "Budget-optimized trip planning"
|
| 209 |
+
description: |
|
| 210 |
+
A traveller has a budget of 3000 USD for a trip from Chicago to Amsterdam.
|
| 211 |
+
Search flights and hotels, convert costs to EUR, determine if the trip
|
| 212 |
+
fits within budget. Include weather check for the travel dates (Oct 10-17).
|
| 213 |
+
difficulty: 4
|
| 214 |
+
required_tools: [search_flights, search_hotels, currency_convert, get_weather]
|
| 215 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 4
|
| 216 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 217 |
+
expected_outcome: "Budget analysis with flight, hotel, and weather"
|
| 218 |
+
required_tool_calls: [search_flights, search_hotels, currency_convert, get_weather]
|
| 219 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { flight_cost: 0.20, hotel_cost: 0.20, currency_conversion: 0.20, weather_check: 0.15, budget_analysis: 0.25 }
|
| 220 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [search_flights, currency_convert]
|
| 221 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_search, use_cached_rate]
|
| 222 |
+
|
| 223 |
+
- task_id: travel_015
|
| 224 |
+
title: "Group travel coordination"
|
| 225 |
+
description: |
|
| 226 |
+
Book flights from BOS to Miami on 2026-11-01 for 4 passengers:
|
| 227 |
+
"Alice", "Bob", "Carol", "Dave". Search flights, get details on the
|
| 228 |
+
best option, and book for the group.
|
| 229 |
+
difficulty: 4
|
| 230 |
+
required_tools: [search_flights, get_flight_details, book_flight]
|
| 231 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 3
|
| 232 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 233 |
+
expected_outcome: "Group flight booked for 4 passengers"
|
| 234 |
+
required_tool_calls: [search_flights, get_flight_details, book_flight]
|
| 235 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { searched: 0.20, got_details: 0.20, booked_group: 0.40, confirmed_all: 0.20 }
|
| 236 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [book_flight]
|
| 237 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_booking, split_bookings]
|
| 238 |
+
|
| 239 |
+
- task_id: travel_016
|
| 240 |
+
title: "Rebooking with refund analysis"
|
| 241 |
+
description: |
|
| 242 |
+
Cancel booking BKG-old456 and check the refund amount. Search for
|
| 243 |
+
alternative flights from LAX to SEA on 2026-04-25. If the refund
|
| 244 |
+
covers the new flight, book it for "Eve Frank". Report savings or
|
| 245 |
+
additional cost.
|
| 246 |
+
difficulty: 4
|
| 247 |
+
required_tools: [cancel_booking, search_flights, book_flight, currency_convert]
|
| 248 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 4
|
| 249 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 250 |
+
expected_outcome: "Rebooking with cost analysis completed"
|
| 251 |
+
required_tool_calls: [cancel_booking, search_flights, book_flight]
|
| 252 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { cancelled: 0.20, searched_new: 0.20, cost_analysis: 0.30, rebooked: 0.30 }
|
| 253 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [cancel_booking, book_flight]
|
| 254 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_cancel, try_different_date]
|
| 255 |
+
|
| 256 |
+
- task_id: travel_017
|
| 257 |
+
title: "Multi-city vacation with budget tracking"
|
| 258 |
+
description: |
|
| 259 |
+
A traveller wants to visit Tokyo, Seoul, and Bangkok in 2026-10.
|
| 260 |
+
Check weather in all three cities, then budget the total cost:
|
| 261 |
+
convert 8000 USD to JPY, KRW, and THB. Provide a detailed report.
|
| 262 |
+
difficulty: 4
|
| 263 |
+
required_tools: [get_weather, currency_convert]
|
| 264 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 6
|
| 265 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 266 |
+
expected_outcome: "Weather and budget for 3-city Asian trip"
|
| 267 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_weather, currency_convert]
|
| 268 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { weather_tokyo: 0.10, weather_seoul: 0.10, weather_bangkok: 0.10, convert_jpy: 0.15, convert_krw: 0.15, convert_thb: 0.15, budget_report: 0.25 }
|
| 269 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [currency_convert, get_weather]
|
| 270 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_conversion, use_estimate]
|
| 271 |
+
|
| 272 |
+
- task_id: travel_018
|
| 273 |
+
title: "Complete international trip planning"
|
| 274 |
+
description: |
|
| 275 |
+
Plan a complete trip from NYC to Tokyo (Apr 10-20, 2026):
|
| 276 |
+
1. Check weather in Tokyo for Apr 10
|
| 277 |
+
2. Search flights NYC to Tokyo
|
| 278 |
+
3. Get details on the best flight
|
| 279 |
+
4. Book the flight for "Grace Hall" (2 passengers)
|
| 280 |
+
5. Search hotels in Tokyo (Apr 10-20)
|
| 281 |
+
6. Check availability for the top hotel (suite room)
|
| 282 |
+
7. Convert total estimated cost from USD to JPY
|
| 283 |
+
Provide a complete trip summary.
|
| 284 |
+
difficulty: 5
|
| 285 |
+
required_tools: [get_weather, search_flights, get_flight_details, book_flight, search_hotels, check_hotel_availability, currency_convert]
|
| 286 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 7
|
| 287 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 288 |
+
expected_outcome: "Complete international trip planned and booked"
|
| 289 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_weather, search_flights, get_flight_details, book_flight, search_hotels, check_hotel_availability, currency_convert]
|
| 290 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { weather: 0.08, flight_search: 0.10, flight_details: 0.08, flight_booked: 0.20, hotel_search: 0.10, hotel_availability: 0.12, cost_conversion: 0.12, full_summary: 0.20 }
|
| 291 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [book_flight, check_hotel_availability]
|
| 292 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_booking, try_alternate_hotel, retry_conversion]
|
| 293 |
+
|
| 294 |
+
- task_id: travel_019
|
| 295 |
+
title: "Emergency rebooking with multi-option comparison"
|
| 296 |
+
description: |
|
| 297 |
+
A passenger's flight was cancelled. Cancel booking BKG-emergency789.
|
| 298 |
+
Search for alternative flights from ORD to DFW, ORD to IAH, and ORD to
|
| 299 |
+
ATL — all for tomorrow. Compare all options, pick the best, and rebook
|
| 300 |
+
for "Ivan Kim". Include weather at each destination.
|
| 301 |
+
difficulty: 5
|
| 302 |
+
required_tools: [cancel_booking, search_flights, get_weather, book_flight]
|
| 303 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 8
|
| 304 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 305 |
+
expected_outcome: "Emergency rebooking with multi-destination comparison"
|
| 306 |
+
required_tool_calls: [cancel_booking, search_flights, get_weather, book_flight]
|
| 307 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { cancelled_original: 0.10, searched_dfw: 0.10, searched_iah: 0.10, searched_atl: 0.10, checked_weather: 0.15, compared_options: 0.15, rebooked: 0.20, provided_summary: 0.10 }
|
| 308 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [book_flight, cancel_booking]
|
| 309 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_cancel, retry_booking, try_next_destination]
|
| 310 |
+
|
| 311 |
+
- task_id: travel_020
|
| 312 |
+
title: "Corporate travel package with approvals"
|
| 313 |
+
description: |
|
| 314 |
+
Organize corporate travel for a team of 3 from SFO to London:
|
| 315 |
+
1. Search flights for 2026-11-05
|
| 316 |
+
2. Get details on top 2 options
|
| 317 |
+
3. Search hotels in London (Nov 5-10)
|
| 318 |
+
4. Check availability for standard and suite rooms at best hotel
|
| 319 |
+
5. Convert total budget from USD to GBP
|
| 320 |
+
6. Book the most cost-effective flight for "Team Lead"
|
| 321 |
+
Provide executive summary with cost breakdown.
|
| 322 |
+
difficulty: 5
|
| 323 |
+
required_tools: [search_flights, get_flight_details, search_hotels, check_hotel_availability, currency_convert, book_flight]
|
| 324 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 8
|
| 325 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 326 |
+
expected_outcome: "Corporate travel package with cost breakdown"
|
| 327 |
+
required_tool_calls: [search_flights, get_flight_details, search_hotels, check_hotel_availability, currency_convert, book_flight]
|
| 328 |
+
evaluation_rubric: { flights_searched: 0.10, details_compared: 0.10, hotels_found: 0.10, rooms_compared: 0.10, costs_converted: 0.15, booked: 0.20, executive_summary: 0.25 }
|
| 329 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [book_flight, currency_convert]
|
| 330 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_booking, use_cached_rates, try_alternative_hotel]
|
tasks/variants.yaml
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,323 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
# AgentDisruptBench — Task Variants for ε-Robustness
|
| 2 |
+
# ====================================================
|
| 3 |
+
# These are rephrasings of representative tasks from each domain.
|
| 4 |
+
# Used to compute the ε (epsilon) axis of the R(k,ε,λ) reliability surface.
|
| 5 |
+
#
|
| 6 |
+
# Each task preserves the same ground truth and required tools but uses
|
| 7 |
+
# different natural-language phrasing for the description.
|
| 8 |
+
#
|
| 9 |
+
# Coverage: 5 base tasks per domain (one per difficulty 1,3,5) × 2 variants each
|
| 10 |
+
# = 18 variant tasks referencing 9 base tasks.
|
| 11 |
+
|
| 12 |
+
domain: variants
|
| 13 |
+
version: "1.0"
|
| 14 |
+
tasks:
|
| 15 |
+
# ================================================================
|
| 16 |
+
# RETAIL VARIANTS
|
| 17 |
+
# ================================================================
|
| 18 |
+
|
| 19 |
+
# --- retail_001 variants (D1: Search for a product) ---
|
| 20 |
+
- task_id: retail_001_v1
|
| 21 |
+
domain: retail
|
| 22 |
+
title: "Search for a product (rephrased)"
|
| 23 |
+
description: |
|
| 24 |
+
You're helping a customer on our online store.
|
| 25 |
+
They're looking for blue widgets — please search our catalog
|
| 26 |
+
and let them know what's available, along with pricing info.
|
| 27 |
+
difficulty: 1
|
| 28 |
+
required_tools: [search_products]
|
| 29 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 1
|
| 30 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 31 |
+
expected_outcome: "List of blue widget products with prices"
|
| 32 |
+
required_tool_calls: [search_products]
|
| 33 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 34 |
+
searched_for_products: 0.50
|
| 35 |
+
reported_prices: 0.50
|
| 36 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [search_products]
|
| 37 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_search]
|
| 38 |
+
|
| 39 |
+
- task_id: retail_001_v2
|
| 40 |
+
domain: retail
|
| 41 |
+
title: "Search for a product (formal)"
|
| 42 |
+
description: |
|
| 43 |
+
As a retail platform assistant, perform a product search
|
| 44 |
+
for "blue widgets". Return a summary of all matching products
|
| 45 |
+
including their names and unit prices.
|
| 46 |
+
difficulty: 1
|
| 47 |
+
required_tools: [search_products]
|
| 48 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 1
|
| 49 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 50 |
+
expected_outcome: "List of blue widget products with prices"
|
| 51 |
+
required_tool_calls: [search_products]
|
| 52 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 53 |
+
searched_for_products: 0.50
|
| 54 |
+
reported_prices: 0.50
|
| 55 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [search_products]
|
| 56 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_search]
|
| 57 |
+
|
| 58 |
+
# --- retail_007 variants (D3: Full purchase flow with coupon) ---
|
| 59 |
+
- task_id: retail_007_v1
|
| 60 |
+
domain: retail
|
| 61 |
+
title: "Complete purchase with discount code (rephrased)"
|
| 62 |
+
description: |
|
| 63 |
+
Help a shopper complete their purchase. They want a green sprocket.
|
| 64 |
+
Find the product, make sure it's in stock, use discount code SAVE20
|
| 65 |
+
on cart CART-001, then finish the order for customer C-3344.
|
| 66 |
+
Tell them about any savings applied.
|
| 67 |
+
difficulty: 3
|
| 68 |
+
required_tools: [search_products, check_inventory, apply_coupon, place_order]
|
| 69 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 4
|
| 70 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 71 |
+
expected_outcome: "Order placed with coupon applied"
|
| 72 |
+
required_tool_calls: [search_products, check_inventory, apply_coupon, place_order]
|
| 73 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 74 |
+
searched_products: 0.20
|
| 75 |
+
checked_inventory: 0.20
|
| 76 |
+
applied_coupon: 0.30
|
| 77 |
+
placed_order: 0.30
|
| 78 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [place_order, apply_coupon]
|
| 79 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_coupon, retry_order]
|
| 80 |
+
|
| 81 |
+
- task_id: retail_007_v2
|
| 82 |
+
domain: retail
|
| 83 |
+
title: "End-to-end purchase with coupon (terse)"
|
| 84 |
+
description: |
|
| 85 |
+
Product: green sprocket. Coupon: SAVE20. Cart: CART-001. Customer: C-3344.
|
| 86 |
+
Steps: search → inventory check → apply coupon → place order.
|
| 87 |
+
Report final order details with discount.
|
| 88 |
+
difficulty: 3
|
| 89 |
+
required_tools: [search_products, check_inventory, apply_coupon, place_order]
|
| 90 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 4
|
| 91 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 92 |
+
expected_outcome: "Order placed with coupon applied"
|
| 93 |
+
required_tool_calls: [search_products, check_inventory, apply_coupon, place_order]
|
| 94 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 95 |
+
searched_products: 0.20
|
| 96 |
+
checked_inventory: 0.20
|
| 97 |
+
applied_coupon: 0.30
|
| 98 |
+
placed_order: 0.30
|
| 99 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [place_order, apply_coupon]
|
| 100 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_coupon, retry_order]
|
| 101 |
+
|
| 102 |
+
# --- retail_018 variants (D5: Complete customer lifecycle management) ---
|
| 103 |
+
- task_id: retail_018_v1
|
| 104 |
+
domain: retail
|
| 105 |
+
title: "Full customer journey (conversational)"
|
| 106 |
+
description: |
|
| 107 |
+
A VIP customer (C-1010) needs full-service help. Start by pulling up
|
| 108 |
+
their profile and checking what tier they're in. Then find a
|
| 109 |
+
"wireless sensor kit" for them. Make sure the best one is in stock,
|
| 110 |
+
add 2 units to cart CART-006, and if they're gold tier or above,
|
| 111 |
+
apply the VIP30 coupon. Place the order and verify it went through.
|
| 112 |
+
Give them a complete rundown of everything you did.
|
| 113 |
+
difficulty: 5
|
| 114 |
+
required_tools: [get_customer_profile, search_products, check_inventory, update_cart, apply_coupon, place_order, get_order_status]
|
| 115 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 7
|
| 116 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 117 |
+
expected_outcome: "Full lifecycle: profile check, search, inventory, cart, coupon, order, confirmation"
|
| 118 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_customer_profile, search_products, check_inventory, update_cart, apply_coupon, place_order, get_order_status]
|
| 119 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 120 |
+
profile_lookup: 0.10
|
| 121 |
+
product_search: 0.10
|
| 122 |
+
inventory_check: 0.10
|
| 123 |
+
cart_update: 0.15
|
| 124 |
+
coupon_applied: 0.15
|
| 125 |
+
order_placed: 0.25
|
| 126 |
+
status_confirmed: 0.15
|
| 127 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [place_order, apply_coupon]
|
| 128 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_order, skip_coupon, check_alternative_product]
|
| 129 |
+
|
| 130 |
+
# ================================================================
|
| 131 |
+
# TRAVEL VARIANTS
|
| 132 |
+
# ================================================================
|
| 133 |
+
|
| 134 |
+
# --- travel_001 variants (D1: Search for flights) ---
|
| 135 |
+
- task_id: travel_001_v1
|
| 136 |
+
domain: travel
|
| 137 |
+
title: "Find flights (casual)"
|
| 138 |
+
description: |
|
| 139 |
+
I need to fly from JFK to LAX on 2026-04-15. Can you search
|
| 140 |
+
for available flights and show me what's out there? Include
|
| 141 |
+
prices and times please.
|
| 142 |
+
difficulty: 1
|
| 143 |
+
required_tools: [search_flights]
|
| 144 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 1
|
| 145 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 146 |
+
expected_outcome: "Flight options from JFK to LAX with prices and times"
|
| 147 |
+
required_tool_calls: [search_flights]
|
| 148 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 149 |
+
searched_flights: 0.50
|
| 150 |
+
reported_details: 0.50
|
| 151 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [search_flights]
|
| 152 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_search]
|
| 153 |
+
|
| 154 |
+
- task_id: travel_001_v2
|
| 155 |
+
domain: travel
|
| 156 |
+
title: "Flight search (formal request)"
|
| 157 |
+
description: |
|
| 158 |
+
Please query the flight database for all available flights
|
| 159 |
+
departing from JFK airport to LAX on the date 2026-04-15.
|
| 160 |
+
Provide a structured response with flight IDs, airlines,
|
| 161 |
+
departure times, arrival times, and per-person pricing.
|
| 162 |
+
difficulty: 1
|
| 163 |
+
required_tools: [search_flights]
|
| 164 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 1
|
| 165 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 166 |
+
expected_outcome: "Flight options from JFK to LAX with prices and times"
|
| 167 |
+
required_tool_calls: [search_flights]
|
| 168 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 169 |
+
searched_flights: 0.50
|
| 170 |
+
reported_details: 0.50
|
| 171 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [search_flights]
|
| 172 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_search]
|
| 173 |
+
|
| 174 |
+
# --- travel_007 variants (D3: Book a flight with weather check) ---
|
| 175 |
+
- task_id: travel_007_v1
|
| 176 |
+
domain: travel
|
| 177 |
+
title: "Travel planning with weather (rephrased)"
|
| 178 |
+
description: |
|
| 179 |
+
Help me plan a trip from SFO to ORD on 2026-04-20. I want to
|
| 180 |
+
know what the weather will be like at my destination, then
|
| 181 |
+
find flights and book the most affordable one. My name is
|
| 182 |
+
John Smith and I'm traveling solo. Let me know the weather
|
| 183 |
+
and my booking confirmation.
|
| 184 |
+
difficulty: 3
|
| 185 |
+
required_tools: [get_weather, search_flights, book_flight]
|
| 186 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 3
|
| 187 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 188 |
+
expected_outcome: "Weather checked, cheapest flight found and booked"
|
| 189 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_weather, search_flights, book_flight]
|
| 190 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 191 |
+
checked_weather: 0.25
|
| 192 |
+
searched_flights: 0.25
|
| 193 |
+
booked_cheapest: 0.30
|
| 194 |
+
reported_confirmation: 0.20
|
| 195 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [book_flight]
|
| 196 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_book, try_next_flight]
|
| 197 |
+
|
| 198 |
+
# ================================================================
|
| 199 |
+
# FINANCE VARIANTS
|
| 200 |
+
# ================================================================
|
| 201 |
+
|
| 202 |
+
# --- finance_001 variants (D1: Check account balance) ---
|
| 203 |
+
- task_id: finance_001_v1
|
| 204 |
+
domain: finance
|
| 205 |
+
title: "Balance inquiry (casual)"
|
| 206 |
+
description: |
|
| 207 |
+
Hey, can you check my bank balance? My account number is ACC-12345.
|
| 208 |
+
Just tell me how much I have available.
|
| 209 |
+
difficulty: 1
|
| 210 |
+
required_tools: [get_account_balance]
|
| 211 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 1
|
| 212 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 213 |
+
expected_outcome: "Account balance and available funds reported"
|
| 214 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_account_balance]
|
| 215 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 216 |
+
retrieved_balance: 0.60
|
| 217 |
+
reported_available: 0.40
|
| 218 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [get_account_balance]
|
| 219 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_balance]
|
| 220 |
+
|
| 221 |
+
- task_id: finance_001_v2
|
| 222 |
+
domain: finance
|
| 223 |
+
title: "Account balance query (formal)"
|
| 224 |
+
description: |
|
| 225 |
+
Retrieve the current account balance for account ACC-12345.
|
| 226 |
+
Report the total balance, available balance, number of pending
|
| 227 |
+
transactions, and the timestamp of the last update.
|
| 228 |
+
difficulty: 1
|
| 229 |
+
required_tools: [get_account_balance]
|
| 230 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 1
|
| 231 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 232 |
+
expected_outcome: "Account balance and available funds reported"
|
| 233 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_account_balance]
|
| 234 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 235 |
+
retrieved_balance: 0.60
|
| 236 |
+
reported_available: 0.40
|
| 237 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [get_account_balance]
|
| 238 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_balance]
|
| 239 |
+
|
| 240 |
+
# --- finance_007 variants (D3: Fund transfer with validation) ---
|
| 241 |
+
- task_id: finance_007_v1
|
| 242 |
+
domain: finance
|
| 243 |
+
title: "Send money between accounts (rephrased)"
|
| 244 |
+
description: |
|
| 245 |
+
I need to move $500 from my checking account ACC-11111 to my
|
| 246 |
+
savings account ACC-22222. Before you do the transfer, verify
|
| 247 |
+
I have enough funds. Let me know the transfer confirmation
|
| 248 |
+
and any fees charged.
|
| 249 |
+
difficulty: 3
|
| 250 |
+
required_tools: [get_account_balance, transfer_funds]
|
| 251 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 2
|
| 252 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 253 |
+
expected_outcome: "Balance verified, transfer completed, fees reported"
|
| 254 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_account_balance, transfer_funds]
|
| 255 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 256 |
+
checked_balance: 0.30
|
| 257 |
+
completed_transfer: 0.40
|
| 258 |
+
reported_confirmation: 0.30
|
| 259 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [transfer_funds]
|
| 260 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_transfer, verify_balance_first]
|
| 261 |
+
|
| 262 |
+
# ================================================================
|
| 263 |
+
# DEVOPS VARIANTS
|
| 264 |
+
# ================================================================
|
| 265 |
+
|
| 266 |
+
# --- devops_001 variants (D1: Check service health) ---
|
| 267 |
+
- task_id: devops_001_v1
|
| 268 |
+
domain: devops
|
| 269 |
+
title: "Service health check (casual)"
|
| 270 |
+
description: |
|
| 271 |
+
Can you check if the api-gateway service is running okay?
|
| 272 |
+
Give me its status, uptime, and response time.
|
| 273 |
+
difficulty: 1
|
| 274 |
+
required_tools: [get_service_health]
|
| 275 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 1
|
| 276 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 277 |
+
expected_outcome: "Service health status reported"
|
| 278 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_service_health]
|
| 279 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 280 |
+
checked_health: 0.50
|
| 281 |
+
reported_metrics: 0.50
|
| 282 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [get_service_health]
|
| 283 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_health_check]
|
| 284 |
+
|
| 285 |
+
- task_id: devops_001_v2
|
| 286 |
+
domain: devops
|
| 287 |
+
title: "Service status inquiry (formal)"
|
| 288 |
+
description: |
|
| 289 |
+
Execute a health check on the api-gateway service. Report the
|
| 290 |
+
current operational status, uptime percentage, average response
|
| 291 |
+
time in milliseconds, and the number of active connections.
|
| 292 |
+
difficulty: 1
|
| 293 |
+
required_tools: [get_service_health]
|
| 294 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 1
|
| 295 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 296 |
+
expected_outcome: "Service health status reported"
|
| 297 |
+
required_tool_calls: [get_service_health]
|
| 298 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 299 |
+
checked_health: 0.50
|
| 300 |
+
reported_metrics: 0.50
|
| 301 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [get_service_health]
|
| 302 |
+
recovery_actions: [retry_health_check]
|
| 303 |
+
|
| 304 |
+
# --- devops_007 variants (D3: Deploy and verify) ---
|
| 305 |
+
- task_id: devops_007_v1
|
| 306 |
+
domain: devops
|
| 307 |
+
title: "Ship a new version (casual)"
|
| 308 |
+
description: |
|
| 309 |
+
We need to push version v2.3.1 of the payment-service to staging.
|
| 310 |
+
Deploy it, then run the integration tests to make sure nothing broke.
|
| 311 |
+
If tests fail, roll it back. Give me the full status either way.
|
| 312 |
+
difficulty: 3
|
| 313 |
+
required_tools: [deploy_service, run_tests, rollback_deployment]
|
| 314 |
+
expected_tool_call_depth: 3
|
| 315 |
+
ground_truth:
|
| 316 |
+
expected_outcome: "Service deployed to staging and tests run"
|
| 317 |
+
required_tool_calls: [deploy_service, run_tests]
|
| 318 |
+
evaluation_rubric:
|
| 319 |
+
deployed_service: 0.35
|
| 320 |
+
ran_tests: 0.35
|
| 321 |
+
reported_results: 0.30
|
| 322 |
+
disruption_sensitive_tools: [deploy_service]
|
| 323 |
+
recovery_actions: [rollback_deployment, retry_deploy]
|