Datasets:

Modalities:
Text
Formats:
parquet
Size:
< 1K
ArXiv:
Libraries:
Datasets
pandas
michaelkrumdickkensho commited on
Commit
f092440
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 1920fa9

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +71 -0
README.md CHANGED
@@ -21,3 +21,74 @@ configs:
21
  - split: train
22
  path: data/train-*
23
  ---
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
21
  - split: train
22
  path: data/train-*
23
  ---
24
+
25
+
26
+ # Finance Fundamentals: Quantity Extraction
27
+
28
+ ## About
29
+ This dataset contains evaluations for extracting numbers from financial text. The datasets are sourced from:
30
+ - [TatQA](https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.07624)
31
+ - [ConvFinQA](https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.03849)
32
+
33
+ Each question in this set went through additional manual review to ensure both correctness and clarity.
34
+
35
+ ## Example
36
+ Each question will contain a document context:
37
+ ```
38
+ The Company’s top ten clients accounted for 42.2%, 44.2% and 46.9% of its consolidated revenues during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
39
+ The following table represents a disaggregation of revenue from contracts with customers by delivery location (in thousands):
40
+ | | | Years Ended December 31, | |
41
+ | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
42
+ | | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
43
+ | Americas: | | | |
44
+ | United States | $614,493 | $668,580 | $644,870 |
45
+ | The Philippines | 250,888 | 231,966 | 241,211 |
46
+ | Costa Rica | 127,078 | 127,963 | 132,542 |
47
+ | Canada | 99,037 | 102,353 | 112,367 |
48
+ | El Salvador | 81,195 | 81,156 | 75,800 |
49
+ | Other | 123,969 | 118,620 | 118,853 |
50
+ | Total Americas | 1,296,660 | 1,330,638 | 1,325,643 |
51
+ | EMEA: | | | |
52
+ | Germany | 94,166 | 91,703 | 81,634 |
53
+ | Other | 223,847 | 203,251 | 178,649 |
54
+ | Total EMEA | 318,013 | 294,954 | 260,283 |
55
+ | Total Other | 89 | 95 | 82 |
56
+ | | $1,614,762 | $1,625,687 | $1,586,008 |
57
+ ```
58
+
59
+ An associated question that references the context:
60
+ ```
61
+ What was the Total Americas amount in 2019? (thousand)
62
+ ```
63
+
64
+ And an answer represented as a single float value:
65
+ ```
66
+ 1296660.0
67
+ ```
68
+
69
+ ## Citation
70
+
71
+ If you find this data useful, please cite:
72
+ ```
73
+ @inproceedings{krumdick-etal-2024-bizbench,
74
+ title = "{B}iz{B}ench: A Quantitative Reasoning Benchmark for Business and Finance",
75
+ author = "Krumdick, Michael and
76
+ Koncel-Kedziorski, Rik and
77
+ Lai, Viet Dac and
78
+ Reddy, Varshini and
79
+ Lovering, Charles and
80
+ Tanner, Chris",
81
+ editor = "Ku, Lun-Wei and
82
+ Martins, Andre and
83
+ Srikumar, Vivek",
84
+ booktitle = "Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)",
85
+ month = aug,
86
+ year = "2024",
87
+ address = "Bangkok, Thailand",
88
+ publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
89
+ url = "https://aclanthology.org/2024.acl-long.452/",
90
+ doi = "10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.452",
91
+ pages = "8309--8332",
92
+ abstract = "Answering questions within business and finance requires reasoning, precision, and a wide-breadth of technical knowledge. Together, these requirements make this domain difficult for large language models (LLMs). We introduce BizBench, a benchmark for evaluating models' ability to reason about realistic financial problems. BizBench comprises eight quantitative reasoning tasks, focusing on question-answering (QA) over financial data via program synthesis. We include three financially-themed code-generation tasks from newly collected and augmented QA data. Additionally, we isolate the reasoning capabilities required for financial QA: reading comprehension of financial text and tables for extracting intermediate values, and understanding financial concepts and formulas needed to calculate complex solutions. Collectively, these tasks evaluate a model{'}s financial background knowledge, ability to parse financial documents, and capacity to solve problems with code. We conduct an in-depth evaluation of open-source and commercial LLMs, comparing and contrasting the behavior of code-focused and language-focused models. We demonstrate that the current bottleneck in performance is due to LLMs' limited business and financial understanding, highlighting the value of a challenging benchmark for quantitative reasoning within this domain."
93
+ }
94
+ ```