--- license: cc0-1.0 language: [en] pretty_name: "LCSHBench v1.0" task_categories: [text-classification, text-retrieval] tags: [library-science, subject-indexing, LCSH, cataloging, multilingual] configs: - config_name: dev data_files: dev/dev.jsonl - config_name: dev_2k data_files: dev_2k/dev_2k.jsonl - config_name: test data_files: test/test.jsonl - config_name: consensus_matched data_files: consensus_matched/consensus_matched.parquet - config_name: vocab data_files: vocab/vocab.jsonl --- # LCSHBench v1.0 A multilingual, **consensus-grounded** benchmark for Library of Congress Subject Heading (LCSH) assignment. Ground truth is the agreement of independent research libraries (Columbia, Harvard, Princeton) cataloging the same work. ## Configs | config | rows | description | |---|---|---| | `dev` | 18,993 | development split (full per-catalog + merged + unanimous GT) | | `dev_2k` | 2,002 | language-balanced 2K evaluation subset | | `test` | 3,353 | held-out test inputs; answers in `gt_test.hashed.json` (SHA-256) | | `consensus_matched` | 1,286,609 | every work cataloged by >=2 libraries: per-library headings (hashed IDs) — the provenance/concordance population | | `vocab` | 515,281 | LCSH+LCGFT retrieval vocabulary | ## Inter-cataloger concordance (why consensus) Over 465,187 works cataloged by all three libraries: **93.3%** share a concept-level heading, only **0.2%** share none (median concept Jaccard 0.86) — yet just **39.4%** assign identical exact sets and **35.6%** of assertions are single-source. Subject *identification* is objective; *expression* is subjective. Human ceiling (a library vs the consensus of the other two): **86.9%** exact / **93.0%** concept recall. ## Not included The fine-tuned embedder and te3 embedding indices are **not** released (model not published; te3 vectors are derived from a hosted API). Raw MARC is redistributable from the source libraries; rebuild instructions in the repo. ## License & citation Data: CC0-1.0 (derived from CC0 bulk MARC). Identifiers are hashed. Built by the v2.2 extraction pipeline. Citation: TBD.