File size: 10,416 Bytes
2e511b5
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
"""Compare the per-column prompts of the two Legora runs against prompts v3.

The 2026-08-05 Legora export (``data/raw/legora_2026-08-05_prompts.xlsx``) is a
re-export of the 2026-08-01 tabular review with the "with prompt" option
enabled: the data rows are byte-identical to ``legora_2026-08-01.xlsx``; row 2
additionally carries the question text of every column. As with the values
(see ``scripts/compare_legora_runs.py``), the left column group belongs to
``legora-1`` and the right one to ``legora-2``.

This script extracts both prompt sets — from the raw export, or with
``--prompts-dir`` from the published ``prompts_legora_{1,2}.jsonl`` — aligns
them with the per-variable sections of ``legex/prompts/v3.py``, and writes a
markdown report with word-level diffs (``[-deleted-]`` / ``{+inserted+}``).

    uv run python scripts/compare_legora_prompts.py \
        [--xlsx data/raw/legora_2026-08-05_prompts.xlsx] \
        [--prompts-dir ../inference-results/prompts] \
        [--out data/analysis/legora_prompt_comparison.md]
"""

import argparse
import difflib
import json
import re
import sys
from pathlib import Path

import openpyxl

sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1]))

from legex.prompts import v3  # noqa: E402

MODEL_A, MODEL_B = "legora-1", "legora-2"
DEFAULT_XLSX = Path("data/raw/legora_2026-08-05_prompts.xlsx")
DEFAULT_OUT = Path("data/analysis/legora_prompt_comparison.md")
PROMPT_SUFFIX = " (with prompt)"
# Equal stretches longer than this many words are elided in the diffs.
CONTEXT_WORDS = 6

FINDINGS = """\
## Findings

* Both column groups are per-column adaptations of the v3 coding rules,
  rewritten for Legora's tabular-review UI. Structural v3 material that cannot
  exist per column is gone in both runs: the JSON-typing preamble, the
  JSON-`null` semantics (the columns ask for the literal string `None`
  instead), and the companion `Currency_<variable>` fields — the export has no
  currency columns at all.
* **legora-2 is the cleaner, complete set**: all 12 prompts follow one template
  ("Where to find it: … Formatting rules: … Permissible values: …") and carry
  the full substance of the matching v3 section.
* **legora-1 deviates from the v3 content twice.**
  1. `legal_subject_judgement` is not our rule at all but Legora's
     auto-generated question ("What legal subjects or issues are addressed …"),
     an essay-style prompt without the underscore/slash coding format. This
     explains the essay-like answers of legora-1 on that column and the low
     inter-run agreement (39.9 % when both filled, see
     `legora_run_comparison.md`).
  2. `case_id` has an ad-hoc tail appended ("Put here only the number (with
     slahs, dots etc) no more information. No dates or text", note the typo)
     that legora-2 lacks.
  The other ten legora-1 prompts match legora-2 in substance and differ only
  in scaffolding (flowing text vs. labelled sections, "None (the literal
  string)" vs. "None").
* **Both runs extend v3** with material that is not in the repo prompt:
  a U.S. federal-court hint for `trial_start_date`; Swiss search anchors
  ("Mit Beschwerde vom", "Lausanne, [date]", "Erwägungen — Eintreten /
  recevabilité", "Die Gerichtskosten von Fr. …", "… à titre de dépens";
  legora-2 also "Gegenstand/Objet/Oggetto"); "typically item 2"/"item 3"
  locations in the operative part; an explicit sum-to-1.0 constraint for
  `plaintiff_loosing_share`; and, for the ISIC columns, a dominant-activity
  rule for multi-sector entities, extra `no_allocation_possible` examples
  (tenant, consumer, patient, unemployed) and anonymized-party examples for
  `None`. The wrong-example currency changed from v3's `CHF 150000` to
  `USD 150000`.
* **The ISIC category list is handled differently per run**: legora-1 inlines
  all 24 permitted values in the prompt; legora-2 only asserts "You MUST enter
  exactly one of the 24 permitted coded values" without listing them and
  instead adds coding examples (law firm → n_professional_scientific_technical,
  hospital → r_human_health_social_work, tradesperson → f_construction). Both
  runs nevertheless answered in coded values. Notably,
  `defendant_no1_ISIC1_industry_category` is the one field where legora-2 is
  clearly worse than legora-1 against the Goldensets (acc 0.522 vs 0.563).
"""


def word_diff(a: str, b: str) -> str:
    """Inline word-level diff of ``a`` → ``b`` with long equal runs elided."""
    aw, bw = a.split(), b.split()
    sm = difflib.SequenceMatcher(None, aw, bw, autojunk=False)
    out: list[str] = []
    for tag, i1, i2, j1, j2 in sm.get_opcodes():
        if tag == "equal":
            words = aw[i1:i2]
            if len(words) > 2 * CONTEXT_WORDS + 2:
                words = [*words[:CONTEXT_WORDS], "[…]", *words[-CONTEXT_WORDS:]]
            out.append(" ".join(words))
        else:
            if tag in ("delete", "replace"):
                out.append("[-" + " ".join(aw[i1:i2]) + "-]")
            if tag in ("insert", "replace"):
                out.append("{+" + " ".join(bw[j1:j2]) + "+}")
    return " ".join(out)


def similarity(a: str, b: str) -> float:
    return difflib.SequenceMatcher(None, a.split(), b.split(), autojunk=False).ratio()


def read_prompts(xlsx: Path) -> dict[str, dict[str, str]]:
    """Return ``{model: {field: prompt}}`` from the export's prompt row."""
    wb = openpyxl.load_workbook(xlsx, data_only=True, read_only=True)
    ws = wb.worksheets[0]
    rows = ws.iter_rows(min_row=1, max_row=2, values_only=True)
    header, prompt_row = next(rows), next(rows)
    out: dict[str, dict[str, str]] = {MODEL_A: {}, MODEL_B: {}}
    for head, prompt in zip(header, prompt_row):
        if not head or not str(head).endswith(PROMPT_SUFFIX) or not prompt:
            continue
        field = str(head)[: -len(PROMPT_SUFFIX)]
        model = MODEL_A if field not in out[MODEL_A] else MODEL_B
        out[model][field] = " ".join(str(prompt).split())
    return out


def read_published_prompts(prompts_dir: Path) -> dict[str, dict[str, str]]:
    """Return ``{model: {field: prompt}}`` from the published prompt JSONL."""
    out: dict[str, dict[str, str]] = {}
    for model in (MODEL_A, MODEL_B):
        path = prompts_dir / f"prompts_{model.replace('-', '_')}.jsonl"
        out[model] = {
            rec["field"]: rec["prompt"]
            for rec in map(json.loads, path.read_text(encoding="utf-8").splitlines())
        }
    return out


def v3_sections() -> dict[str, str]:
    """Per-variable rule sections of the v3 system prompt, whitespace-flattened."""
    match = re.search(
        r"## Variable coding rules\n(.*?)\n## Allowed ISIC", v3.PROMPT, re.S
    )
    if not match:
        raise SystemExit("could not locate the variable sections in v3.PROMPT")
    sections = {}
    for sec in re.finditer(r"### (\S+)\n(.*?)(?=\n### |\Z)", match.group(1), re.S):
        sections[sec.group(1)] = " ".join(sec.group(2).split())
    return sections


def main() -> None:
    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description=__doc__.splitlines()[0])
    parser.add_argument("--xlsx", type=Path, default=DEFAULT_XLSX)
    parser.add_argument("--prompts-dir", type=Path, default=None,
                        help="read the published prompts_legora_{1,2}.jsonl from this "
                             "directory instead of the raw --xlsx export")
    parser.add_argument("--out", type=Path, default=DEFAULT_OUT)
    args = parser.parse_args()

    prompts = (
        read_published_prompts(args.prompts_dir)
        if args.prompts_dir is not None
        else read_prompts(args.xlsx)
    )
    rules = v3_sections()
    fields = list(prompts[MODEL_A])
    if list(prompts[MODEL_B]) != fields:
        raise SystemExit("the two column groups carry different field sets")

    lines: list[str] = []
    lines.append(f"# Legora prompt comparison: {MODEL_A} vs {MODEL_B} vs prompts v3\n")
    lines.append(
        "Prompts from the 2026-08-05 prompt-bearing re-export of the 2026-08-01 "
        "tabular review (published as `prompts/prompts_legora_{1,2}.jsonl` in "
        "the inference-results dataset; the data rows are byte-identical to "
        f"the 2026-08-01 export). Left column group = `{MODEL_A}`, right group "
        f"= `{MODEL_B}`, as established in `legora_run_comparison.md`. The v3 "
        "baseline is the per-variable section of `legex/prompts/v3.py`. "
        "Similarities are word-level `difflib` ratios (1.0 = identical). "
        "Generated by `scripts/compare_legora_prompts.py`.\n"
    )

    lines.append("## Similarity overview\n")
    lines.append(
        f"| field | {MODEL_A} words | {MODEL_B} words "
        f"| {MODEL_A}{MODEL_B} | v3 ≈ {MODEL_A} | v3 ≈ {MODEL_B} |"
    )
    lines.append("|---|---|---|---|---|---|")
    for field in fields:
        a, b, rule = prompts[MODEL_A][field], prompts[MODEL_B][field], rules[field]
        lines.append(
            f"| {field} | {len(a.split())} | {len(b.split())} "
            f"| {similarity(a, b):.2f} | {similarity(rule, a):.2f} "
            f"| {similarity(rule, b):.2f} |"
        )
    lines.append("")

    lines.append(FINDINGS)

    lines.append("## Per-field prompts and diffs\n")
    lines.append(
        "Diff notation: `[-only in the left text-]`, `{+only in the right "
        "text+}`, `[…]` elides unchanged words. For the ISIC fields the v3 "
        "category list lives in a separate shared section and is therefore "
        "not part of the v3 rule text below.\n"
    )
    for field in fields:
        a, b, rule = prompts[MODEL_A][field], prompts[MODEL_B][field], rules[field]
        lines.append(f"### {field}\n")
        lines.append("**v3 rule**\n")
        lines.append(f"> {rule}\n")
        lines.append(f"**{MODEL_A}{MODEL_B}**\n")
        lines.append("```diff-words")
        lines.append(word_diff(a, b))
        lines.append("```\n")
        lines.append(f"**v3 → {MODEL_A}**\n")
        lines.append("```diff-words")
        lines.append(word_diff(rule, a))
        lines.append("```\n")
        lines.append(f"**v3 → {MODEL_B}**\n")
        lines.append("```diff-words")
        lines.append(word_diff(rule, b))
        lines.append("```\n")

    args.out.parent.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
    args.out.write_text("\n".join(lines), encoding="utf-8")
    print(f"wrote {args.out}")


if __name__ == "__main__":
    main()