Document known deviations of re-scored numbers from the submitted PDF

README.md

@@ -115,6 +115,12 @@ bash scripts/reproduce_paper.sh
 git status data/analysis
 ```
 
+There are minimal known deviations from the submitted PDF. The gold labels are normalised during export to JSONL (controlled-token case, thousands separators, Excel dates → ISO), and the paper's tables were computed from the raw annotator workbooks before that normalisation, where, for example, a gold cell coded `Nonpecuniary` counted against a system answering the schema literal `nonpecuniary`. Re-scoring on the published gold therefore yields slightly higher values in a few places than the PDF: Philippines recall (+7–9 pp for every system), Spain (≈ +1 pp), `tab:overall` within ±0.2 pp, and the
+money/ratio agreement rows of `tab:iaa` (+1–2 pp). The κ values, pair
+counts, denominators, the hallucination case study, and all remaining
+numbers match the PDF. The shipped outputs under `data/analysis/` are the
+published-data regeneration. The deviations could not be resolved due to time constraints and are made transparent here.
+
 ## Unpublished raw data — scope
 
 The expert-annotated XLSX workbooks (`data/<cc>/Goldenset_*_final*.xlsx`)